Avian Ecological Succession in the Amazon: a Long-Term Case Study Following Experimental Deforestation
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons Faculty Publications School of Renewable Natural Resources 11-1-2019 Avian ecological succession in the Amazon: A long-term case study following experimental deforestation Cameron L. Rutt Louisiana State Univ, AgCtr, [email protected] Vitek Jirinec Louisiana State Univ, AgCtr Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/agrnr_pubs Part of the Agriculture Commons Recommended Citation Rutt, Cameron L. and Jirinec, Vitek, "Avian ecological succession in the Amazon: A long-term case study following experimental deforestation" (2019). Faculty Publications. 2. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/agrnr_pubs/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Renewable Natural Resources at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Received: 6 June 2019 | Revised: 14 September 2019 | Accepted: 14 October 2019 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5822 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Avian ecological succession in the Amazon: A long‐term case study following experimental deforestation Cameron L. Rutt1,2 | Vitek Jirinec1,2 | Mario Cohn‐Haft1,3 | William F. Laurance1,4 | Philip C Stouffer1,2 1Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Abstract Amazônia (INPA), Manaus, Brazil 1. Approximately 20% of the Brazilian Amazon has now been deforested, and the 2 School of Renewable Natural Amazon is currently experiencing the highest rates of deforestation in a decade, Resources, Louisiana State University and Louisiana State University AgCenter, Baton leading to large‐scale land‐use changes. Roads have consistently been implicated Rouge, LA, USA as drivers of ongoing Amazon deforestation and may act as corridors to facilitate 3Coleções Zoológicas – INPA, Manaus, Brazil species invasions. Long‐term data, however, are necessary to determine how eco‐ 4Centre for Tropical Environmental and Sustainability Science, College of Science logical succession alters avian communities following deforestation and whether and Engineering, James Cook University, established roads lead to a constant influx of new species. Cairns, Qld, Australia 2. We used data across nearly 40 years from a large‐scale deforestation experi‐ Correspondence ment in the central Amazon to examine the avian colonization process in a spatial Cameron L. Rutt, School of Renewable Natural Resources, Louisiana State and temporal framework, considering the role that roads may play in facilitating University, RNR 227, Baton Rouge, LA colonization. 70803, USA. Email: [email protected] 3. Since 1979, 139 species that are not part of the original forest avifauna have been recorded, including more secondary forest species than expected based on the Funding information US National Science Foundation, Grant/ regional species pool. Among the 35 species considered to have colonized and be‐ Award Number: LTREB 0545491 and come established, a disproportionate number were secondary forest birds (63%), 1257340; Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation; National Geographic Society; almost all of which first appeared during the 1980s. These new residents comprise National Institute of Food and Agriculture; about 13% of the current community of permanent residents. US Department of Agriculture; McIntire Stennis, Grant/Award Number: 94098 and 4. Widespread generalists associated with secondary forest colonized quickly fol‐ 94327 lowing deforestation, with few new species added after the first decade, despite a stable road connection. Few species associated with riverine forest or special‐ ized habitats colonized, despite road connection to their preferred source habitat. Colonizing species remained restricted to anthropogenic habitats and did not in‐ filtrate old‐growth forests nor displace forest birds. 5. Deforestation and expansion of road networks into terra firme rainforest will con‐ tinue to create degraded anthropogenic habitat. Even so, the initial pulse of colo‐ nization by nonprimary forest bird species was not the beginning of a protracted series of invasions in this study, and the process appears to be reversible by forest succession. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. © 2019 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Ecology and Evolution. 2019;00:1–12. www.ecolevol.org | 1 2 | RUTT ET AL. KEYWORDS Amazonia, colonization, deforestation, ecological species invasions, land‐use change, Neotropics, rain forest 1 | INTRODUCTION Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project (BDFFP). We employed three historical avian inventories, spread across four decades (1979–2017), Deforestation rates in the Amazon increased dramatically in the to make inferences about the long‐term colonization and accumu‐ early 1970s, rose during the late 1990s to the highest absolute rates lation of species that were not part of the original forest avifauna in the world, and accelerated once again during the early 2000s, (Cohn‐Haft, Whittaker, & Stouffer, 1997; Rutt et al., 2017; Stotz & before diminishing to the lowest rates in three decades (2012: Bierregaard, 1989). More specifically, we were interested in how Fearnside, 2005; INPE, 2019; Laurance, Albernaz, & Da Costa, 2001; patterns of avian arrivals relate to deforestation locally and along Laurance, Cochrane, et al., 2001). In the past 4 years, however, that two roads leading north from the Manaus metropolitan area, a po‐ trend has reversed itself, with Amazon deforestation again growing tential source for colonizing birds. Prior to the late 1970s, the region to the highest rates in a decade (8,000 km2 in 2018; Artaxo, 2019; was continuous forest, but today the BDFFP represents a mosaic of INPE, 2019). Roads have consistently been implicated as direct and regenerating second‐growth, small forest fragments, and continu‐ indirect drivers of Amazon deforestation (Barber, Cochrane, Souza, ous forest (Cohn‐Haft et al., 1997). Here, we (a) use the regional spe‐ & Laurance, 2014; Barni, Fearnside, & Graca, 2015; Fearnside, 2015; cies pool to identify possible colonists to the BDFFP and estimate Fearnside & Graca, 2006; Laurance, Albernaz, et al., 2001; Laurance the expected proportion of arrivals by habitat type, (b) describe the et al., 2002; Nepstad et al., 2001; Soares‐Filho et al., 2006). When chronosequence and source habitat of all birds added to the core both highways and secondary roads are taken into account, 94% of avifauna (sensu Cohn‐Haft et al., 1997), (c) plot the location and hab‐ regional deforestation occurred within 5.5 km of a road; together, itat of all first detections since 1995, and (d) assess the contribu‐ this network and buffer covers nearly a third (31.7%) of the Brazilian tion of landscape change, both locally and along two road corridors, Amazon (Barber et al., 2014). Among the diverse array of deleterious to the process of colonization. We predict that new arrivals at the effects that roads exert on the flora and fauna of tropical forests (re‐ BDFFP are disproportionately represented by species from separate viewed in Laurance, Goosem, & Laurance, 2009), road networks may early‐successional habitats (e.g., second‐growth and riverine vegeta‐ act as corridors to facilitate species invasions (Gascon et al., 1999; tion) and that these additions reflect changes in regional access via Laurance et al., 2018). However, we are not aware of any long‐term roads and not local landscape changes. studies in Amazonia that have examined vertebrate species inva‐ sions in the context of roads and land‐use change. 2 | METHODS For Amazonian birds, a considerable body of research has shown the toll that deforestation (including partial deforestation charac‐ 2.1 | Study area terized by forest fragments) and existing roads take on the forest bird community (e.g., Ahmed et al., 2014; Develey & Stouffer, 2001; The BDFFP (2°20′S, 60°W) is located ~80 km north of Manaus, Ferraz et al., 2003; Laurance, 2004; Laurance, Stouffer, & Laurance, Amazonas, Brazil (Figure 1). Before the project was initiated in 1979, 2004; Lees & Peres, 2006, 2009; Mahood, Lees, & Peres, 2012; the entire site and much of the surrounding region consisted of con‐ Stouffer, Johnson, Bierregaard, & Lovejoy, 2011). However, little at‐ tinuous primary terra firme forest. Development on three ~15,000 ha tention has focused on these deforested landscapes and how eco‐ cattle ranches at the BDFFP began in the late 1970s, and forest clear‐ logical succession alters avian communities following anthropogenic ing was largely complete by the mid‐1980s (Cohn‐Haft et al., 1997; change. After deforestation, early‐successional habitats could be Stotz & Bierregaard, 1989). These cattle ranches, however, were populated by either local, preexisting forest species or colonized by gradually abandoned or operated at low production levels, providing foreign species from disjunct habitats, which could eventually infil‐ a mosaic of open pastures, second growth of various ages (from 3 to trate primary forest. Furthermore, the timing of arrival, persistence >30 years), and forest fragments embedded in a region that continues (temporary or permanent), and eventual turnover of these colonists to be dominated by primary forest. To this day, regional disturbance remain poorly understood. Unfortunately, to date, most previous