Fuller's Theological Indebtedness to Religious
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
CHAPTER FIVE FULLER’S THEOLOGICAL INDEBTEDNESS TO RELIGIOUS AFFECTIONS I think I am by the ministry, as I was by my life as a Christian before I read Edwards on the Aff ections. I had never entered into the spirit of a great many important things. O for some such penetrating, edifying writer on this subject! Or rather, O that the Holy Spirit would open my eyes, and let me into the things that I have never seen!1 Andrew Fuller 5.1 Historical Background of Sandemanians What should a secretary of a newly formed missionary organization do when one of their largest fi nancial supporters accuses him of abandoning the Reformation dogma of sola fi de? Th is was the touchy predicament in which Andrew Fuller found himself when he visited his trusted Scotch Baptist denomination. As Fuller was based in England, he was quite familiar with Sandemanianism, yet he did not have either the time or, indeed, cause to engage it until he faced a strand of Sandemanianism within the Scotch Baptist churches. Prior to plunging into this dispute, a historical background of Sandemanianism may be helpful. 5.1.1 Sandemanianism in Scotland As mentioned in chapter 2, the religious climate in an ‘Age of Reason’ may be one of the main factors in explaining the presence of Hyper- Calvinists and Unitarians among the Baptists in England. Yet, in Scotland, one way the Enlightenment developed was through Sandema- nianism. Th e eighteenth century Presbyterian intolerance in Scotland gave birth to the dissection of that church, and from that disconnec- tion, there were those who saw the New Testament as the only rule of faith and practice. Th e founder of this camp was John Glas (1696–1773) 1 “Extracts from his Diary on February 3, 1781,” WAF, 1:25. fuller’s theological indebtedness to religious affections111 who was born in Auchtermuchty, and raised in Perthshire where he became profi cient in Greek and Latin. He studied at the University of St. Andrews and Edinburgh, and was the fi ft h generation of successive ministers in his family.2 Glas and Glasites formed a new church based upon what they saw as a literal interpretation of the New Testament, insisting on weekly com- munion, foot washing, love feasts and holy kissing. Perhaps the most signifi cant contribution of Glas was the concept of local congregational autonomy based on what he considered to be the authority of the scrip- ture. For this reason he is sometimes known as the “Father of Scottish Congregationalism.”3 However, with his fi erce Calvinistic background, Glas believed that human eff ort had no part in acquiring salvation, thus rendering the concept of faith one of total objectivity. According to Th omas South, “Glas spoke only of the subjection of the mind to the testimony of the Gospel. He made no reference to the subjection of the will.”4 Even though the origin of Sandemanianism can be traced to Glas, the name of the sect is derived from his son-in-law, Robert Sandeman (1718–1771) who was born in Perth and educated at the University of Edinburgh in preparation for the ministry. Sandeman met Glas at the university and was converted to Glas’s persuasions within a few weeks.5 Th rough Sandeman’s infl uential writings, most notably Letters on Th eron and Aspasio, he was able to disseminate the teachings of Glas. Sandemanianism fi rst gained popularity in Dundee and Edinburgh and unlike Glas, who avoided contentious issues, Sandeman thrived on controversial debates. In stressing what he saw as the Reformation principle of sola fi de, Sandeman elaborated on Glas’s concept of ‘bare faith.’ Sandeman argued that “justifi cation comes by bare faith.”6 He proclaimed that keeping “the bare truth, and to live by it alone,”7 and to 2 See, D.B. Murray, “Glas, John” in Dictionary of Scottish Church History and Th eology ed., Nigel M. de. S. Cameron (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1993), 364. 3 Harry Escott, A History of Scottish Congregationalism (Glasgow: Congregational Union of Scotland, 1960), 17, n.1. For more information on Glas, Sandeman, and Mclean, see, Brian Talbot, Th e Search for a Common Identity: Th e Origins of the Baptist Union of Scotland 1800–1870, SBHT, vol. 9 (Carlisle: Paternoster, 2003), 29–45. 4 Th omas South, “Th e Response of Andrew Fuller to the Sandemanian View of Saving Faith” (Th .D. thesis, Mid-America Baptist Th eological Seminary, 1993), 55–56. 5 South, “Th e Response,”58. 6 Robert Sandeman, Letters on Th eron and Aspasio (Edinburgh: Sands, Donaldson, Murray, and Cochran, 1759), 2:330, Eighteenth Century Collections Online. 7 Ibid., 338..