FLAGSTAFF METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION CITY OF FLAGSTAFF  COCONINO COUNTY  ARIZONA DOT 211 West Aspen Avenue  Flagstaff, Arizona 86001 Phone: (928) 213-2651 www.flagstaffmpo.org  [email protected]

Amended AGENDA Executive Board 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, September 25, 2013 ______County Supervisors Offices, 2nd Floor Conference Room 219 E. Cherry Avenue, Flagstaff, AZ 86001 Regular meetings and work sessions are open to the public. Persons with a disability may request a reasonable accommodation by contacting the City of Flagstaff City Clerk’s Office at 928-779-7607. The FMPO complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to involve and assist underrepresented and underserved populations (age, gender, color, income status, race, national origin and LEP – Limited English Proficiency.) Requests should be made by contacting the FMPO at 928-213-2651 as early as possible to allow time to arrange the accommodation. A quorum of the TAC may be present.

CALL TO ORDER EXECUTIVE BOARD MEMBERS Matt Ryan, Chair Hank Rogers Coral Evans, Vice Chair Mark Woodson Mandy Metzger Jeff Oravits Art Babbott

FMPO STAFF David Wessel, FMPO Manager Martin Ince, Multimodal Planner Francis, Administrative Specialist

I. PRELIMINARY GENERAL BUSINESS A. PUBLIC COMMENT (At this time, any member of the public may address the Board on any subject within their jurisdiction that is not scheduled before the Board on that day. Due to Open Meeting Laws, the Board cannot discuss or act on items presented during this portion of the agenda. To address the Board on an item that is on the agenda, please wait for the Chair to call for Public Comment at the time the item is heard.)

B. ANNOUNCEMENTS (Reconsiderations, Changes to the Agenda, and other Preliminary Announcements)

C. APPROVAL of MINUTES. (pages 4-9) Special Meeting June 12, 2013 Meeting July 3, 2013

D. ROTATION OF OFFICERS The State will assume the chairmanship and the City the Vice Chair. RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Discussion and Possible Action

II. OLD BUSINESS (Continued, postponed, and tabled items.)

1. Legislative and Regulatory Update and Review (pages 11 & 44-45) FMPO Staff: David Wessel, FMPO Manager REQUESTED ACTION: Discussion and possible action Staff seeks Board direction as needed. Board may wish to discuss positions of federal reauthorization issues with a set policy and/or to support indexing in the short term. Staff will report on state legislation with an update from RTAC. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Discussion and Possible Action

2. I-11 Feasibility Study Update (page 12) FMPO Staff: David Wessel, FMPO Manager REQUESTED ACTION: Discussion Only Staff will continue to seek more specific information on impacts to the Flagstaff region. RECOMMENDED ACTION: table this item

III. NEW BUSINESS (Continued, postponed, and tabled items.)

3. Transportation Improvement Program Amendments (pages 13-15) FMPO Staff: David Wessel, Manager REQUESTED ACTION: Discussion and Possible Action Staff will present several amendments related to the Surface Transportation, Highway Safety and Transit programs submitted by staff to ADOT to address apportionment and obligation authority balances, project loans, changes in project cost estimates, and review fees. The projects themselves are unchanged. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt the amendments & ratification

4. FY 2014 Unified Planning Work Program Amendments (page 16) FMPO Staff: David Wessel, Manager REQUESTED ACTION: Discussion and Possible Action Staff will present changes to the funding sources within the UPWP to reflect unspent balances in the FTA 5303 program and unfunded projects identified in the work program. More specifically, staff recommends funding the bulk of the $100,000 Milton Road study with the 5303 funds ($78,000) and shifting the STP funds to the Access Management Policy ($25,000) effort and the Regional Freight effort ($35,000). RECOMMENDED ACTION: Recommend the amended work program

5. Appointment of FMPO Multimodal Planner as designated alternate to NAIPTA Transit Advisory Committee (page 17) FMPO Staff: David Wessel, Manager REQUESTED ACTION: Discussion and Possible Action The FMPO Manager now serves on the NAIPTA TAC. NAIPTA requests that all TAC members have an alternate designated by the governing body. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Designate NAIPTA TAC alternate

6. Fall Retreat Planning (page 18) FMPO Staff: David Wessel, Manager REQUESTED ACTION: Discussion and Possible Action The FMPO Fall Retreat is tentatively planned for the morning of October 30, 2013 at the Ft. Tuthill Mess Hall Meeting Room. Possible topics: Regional Transportation Plan content. Long Range Funding. MAP-21 Reauthorization. Strategic Planning. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff Direction

7. Resolution: Border Zone (pages 19-20 & 22-38) FMPO Staff: David Wessel, Manager REQUESTED ACTION: Discussion and Possible Action Staff will present a resolution in support of expanding the Border Zone in Arizona from the current 75 miles to cover the entire state. The resolution is being considered by all Councils of Government and Metropolitan Planning Organizations in the state. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt the Board Zone resolution

8. FMPO Working Calendar (page 21) FMPO Staff: David Wessel, FMPO Manager REQUESTED ACTION: Discussion only The agenda on the next meeting will include the work program, transportation improvement program process and legislative update. If possible, updates on I-11 and freight will be made. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Discussion only

IV. CONCLUDING GENERAL BUSINESS A. REPORTS 1) Technical Advisory Committee (pages 39-41) 2) Staff Report (pages 42-43)

B. ANNOUNCEMENTS (Informal Announcements, Future Agenda Items, and Next Meeting Date) TAC October 3, 2013 Coconino County Human Resources Bldg

Executive Board Retreat, October 30, 2013, 8 am to 12 pm Coconino County Supervisors Offices

ADJOURNMENT

CERTIFICATION OF POSTING OF NOTICE The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing notice was duly posted at Flagstaff City Hall on ,at a.m./p.m. in accordance with the statement filed by the Recording Secretary with the City Clerk.

Dated this day of , 2013. FLAGSTAFF METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION CITY OF FLAGSTAFF  COCONINO COUNTY  ARIZONA DOT 211 West Aspen Avenue  Flagstaff, Arizona 86001 Phone: (928) 213-2651 www.flagstaffmpo.org  [email protected]

Draft Minutes Executive Board 5:00 p.m. to 5:30 p.m., Wednesday, June 12, 2013 ______County Supervisors Offices, 2nd Floor Conference Room 219 E. Cherry Avenue, Flagstaff, AZ 86001 Regular meetings and work sessions are open to the public. Persons with a disability may request a reasonable accommodation by contacting the City of Flagstaff City Clerk’s Office at 928-779-7607. The FMPO complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to involve and assist underrepresented and underserved populations (age, gender, color, income status, race, national origin and LEP – Limited English Proficiency.) Requests should be made by contacting the FMPO at 928-213-2651 as early as possible to allow time to arrange the accommodation. A quorum of the TAC may be present..

Chair Ryan called the Meeting to Order: 5:04 pm

Present: EXECUTIVE BOARD MEMBERS Matt Ryan, Chair, Coconino County Supervisor Mark Woodson, Flagstaff City Councilmember Art Babbott, Coconino County Supervisor (designated alternate for Mandy Metzger) Floyd Roehrich, ADOT (designated alternate for Hank Rogers)-- telephonic

FMPO STAFF David Wessel, FMPO Manager Sydney Francis, FMPO Administrative Specialist

I. PRELIMINARY GENERAL BUSINESS A. PUBLIC COMMENT None

B. ANNOUNCEMENTS None

C. APPROVAL of MINUTES. Not applicable

II. OLD BUSINESS (Continued, postponed, and tabled items.)

None

4

III. NEW BUSINESS 2. FY 2013-2017 Transportation Improvement Program Amendments Mr. Wessel presented a brief discussion on projects and studies in which to place approximately $71,000 to address a late-breaking correction to funding estimates by ADOT for the FY 13-17 TIP. The TAC recommended $51,000 of additional funding to the NAIPTA bus stops and $20,000 to the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) update to assist with model improvements. A secondary amendment was needed to address HSIP funding corrections, as the apportioned amount is $816,000, but $779,000 is what can actually be spent (obligational authority).

Mr. Woodson asked about other options for the use of the $71,000 for FY13. Mr. Wessel replied that for FY13 the additional funds could go to studies, such as the RTP and the Operations and Maintenance study, because these funds need to be obligated very quickly due to the fiscal year. Another alternative includes the reinstatement of Adaptive Control Signal Technology (ACST) project, because it can be built easily. However, the City is taking on the ACST project.

Mr. Woodson moved to approve the following amendments to the FY13-17 TIP: flexing $51,000 to NAIPTA to build bus shelters in FY13; allocate $20,000 to the Regional Transportation Plan for a model update in FY13; and modify the HSIP figures to reflect current and correct obligation authority for FY13. Mr. Babbott seconded the motion. All were in favor of the amendments to the FY13-17 TIP.

IV. CONCLUDING GENERAL BUSINESS 1. REPORTS 1) Staff Report None

2. ANNOUNCEMENTS None

ADJOURNMENT

Chair Ryan adjourned meeting at 5:14 pm.

5 FLAGSTAFF METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION CITY OF FLAGSTAFF  COCONINO COUNTY  ARIZONA DOT 211 West Aspen Avenue  Flagstaff, Arizona 86001 Phone: (928) 213-2651 www.flagstaffmpo.org  [email protected]

Draft Minutes Executive Board 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, July 3, 2013 ______County Supervisors Offices, 2nd Floor Conference Room 219 E. Cherry Avenue, Flagstaff, AZ 86001 Regular meetings and work sessions are open to the public. Persons with a disability may request a reasonable accommodation by contacting the City of Flagstaff City Clerk’s Office at 928-779-7607. The FMPO complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to involve and assist underrepresented and underserved populations (age, gender, color, income status, race, national origin and LEP – Limited English Proficiency.) Requests should be made by contacting the FMPO at 928-213-2651 as early as possible to allow time to arrange the accommodation. A quorum of the TAC may be present.

Chair Woodson called the meeting to order at 8:07 a.m.

Roll Call Present: EXECUTIVE BOARD MEMBERS Mark Woodson, Councilmember City of Flagstaff, Designated Chair Floyd Roehrich, ADOT (designated alternate for Hank Rogers) Audra Merrick, ADOT (designated alternate for Hank Rogers) Jeff Oravits, Councilmember City of Flagstaff Art Babbott, Coconino County Supervisor (telephonic) Jim Cronk, City of Flagstaff Planning Director

FMPO STAFF David Wessel, FMPO Manager Sydney Francis, Administrative Specialist

I. PRELIMINARY GENERAL BUSINESS A. PUBLIC COMMENT None B. ANNOUNCEMENTS Mr. Wessel noted that the meeting will convene into Executive Session.

C. APPROVAL of MINUTES. Mr. Roehrich moved to approve the minutes from Meeting May 29, 2013. Mr. Babbott seconded the motion. All were in favor of approving the May 29, 2013 meeting minutes.

Chair Woodson convened the meeting members for Executive Session at 8:13 a.m. The Executive Board meeting was closed to the public for Executive Session.

II. EXECUTIVE SESSION 1. FMPO Manager Annual Personnel Review

6

Chair Woodson ended the Executive Session and called the Executive Board meeting back to order 8:23 a.m.

III. OLD BUSINESS (Continued, postponed, and tabled items.)

1. Legislative and Regulatory Update and Review Mr. Wessel stated that there was little additional information on the Legislative Update or HURF funding to report. Mr. Roehrich gave a brief update on the adoption of ADOT’s 5-year transportation plan. ADOT’s 5-year transportation plan is awaiting Governor Brewer’s final approval. HURF revenues remain flat and, therefore, the 5 year transportation program has shrunk in size to reflect HURF funding. Mr. Roehrich added that with Federal Authorization on transportation funding due to expire in October of 2014, the future of transportation funding is currently unclear. There was discussion only.

2. I-11 Feasibility Study Update Mr. Wessel gave a brief update on I-11. ADOT is currently completing their business case for I-11. Mr. Wessel suggested this would be a good topic of discussion for the August 28th, 2013 Executive Board meeting. Mr. Roehrich added that ADOT is wrapping up their transportation business case, but that the Arizona Commerce Authority is conducting a comprehensive business case on I-11 to see the business effects in the State and regionally. Mr. Roehrich offered to give an update on the I-11 and the comprehensive business case in August to the Executive Board. It was suggested that Mr. Roehrich present the I-11 update to City Council at the end of August or present to a joint meeting between City and County elected officials in September. There was discussion only.

IV. NEW BUSINESS (Continued, postponed, and tabled items.)

3. FY 14-18 Transportation Improvement Program Adoption Mr. Wessel presented on the adoption of the FY14-18 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The FMPO Technical Advisory Committee recommended the FY 14-18 TIP for adoption. Mr. Wessel handed out a table, regarding the FY14-18 TIP. The numbers on the table reflect the latest dollar figures from ADOT and the differences or changes to the TIP from June to July. No projects have changed, just the funding. For the related maps, the years and dollar figures will be updated.

Mr. Wessel summarized the table and the key changes. The reduction in funding for the projects reflects the difference between apportionment dollars and obligation authority. The practical impact on the HSIP program is to move the Switzer/Turquoise intersection project from FY16 to 17, phase-in the sign replacement and guardrail programs, and as a result have no balance in FY17 and little balance in FY18 for HSIP.

Table 3. Surface Transportation Funds FY 13 June July O&M study $225,000 $215,000 RTP update $120,000 $110,000 Bus Stops $124,000 $92,000

FY14 LED lights $363,000 $300,000

FY15 Bus Stops $38,000 $32,000 LED lights $260,000 $200,000 7

FY16 F40 $1,266,000 $1,215,000 Pavement Traffic $35,000 $25,000 Counts

FY17 Kachina $1,366,000 $1,300,000 Trail

FY18 LED lights $439,000 $373,000

Table 6. Safety Projects (HSIP funding) – note that the tan shading on the spreadsheets indicate tentative costs FY13 June July No changes, pending guidance on whether $600,000 is subject to obligation authority or not and implication for loans

FY14 Bike lanes $200,000 $198,000 Loan $100,000 $0

FY15 Guardrails $600,000 $498,000

FY16 Loan $600,000 $498,000

FY17 Switzer/Turq $1,619,000 $1,417,000 with City $200,000 Loan repay $1,369,000 $1,269,000 from ADOT

FY18 Guardrail $0 $198,000

Ms. Merrick recommended that the FY14-18 TIP be aligned with projects in ADOT’s 5-year program.

Mr. Woodson commented that J.W. Powell boulevard is a priority for the City of Flagstaff and future developments in that area. Mr. Woodson would like J.W. Powell boulevard to continue to be a priority in the TIP. Mr. Babbott asked for clarification on the cost to design and construct J.W. Powell boulevard, estimated at $80 million in the I-40 DCR. Mr. Wessel added that after the recent flooding on Milton a parallel route would make transportation more accessible. Mr. Roerich recommended starting with a design concept report and refine and adjust the cost further. The I-40 DCR is a baseline and Ms. Merrick’s team has spent several years working on the data. Mr. Oravits added that 8 the flooding on Milton has to do with issues regarding Rio De Flag. Ms. Merrick suggested a prioritization of projects from the FMPO and its partners. Mr. Wessel stated the updated Regional Transportation Plan will include a prioritization of projects and the Benefit Cost Analysis tool will be used to help analyze the projects.

Mr. Woodson asked for clarification on page 31 of the TIP, regarding 180 North from Columbus to Bader. Ms. Merrick confirmed that the pavement preservation for this project is in ADOT’s 5-year plan; she recommended that the FY14-18 TIP match ADOT’s 5 year plan. Mr. Babbott added that he appreciated the 180 North pavement preservation project and supported keeping it on track. Mr. Woodson also noted that the $17 million overlay from Walnut Canyon to Twin Arrows was appreciated.

Ms. Merrick suggested regarding the Lone Tree project that parentheses be added with a note that the project is not funded at this time. Mr. Wessel commented that the Lone Tree project is in the TIP as a placeholder.

Mr. Oravits motioned to adopt FY14-18 TIP. Mr. Roehrich seconded the motion. All members were in favor of adopting the FY14-18 TIP.

4. FMPO Working Calendar Mr. Wessel stated that the TAC and EB meetings will not happen in July due to the respective summer breaks. Long Range Transportation Funding may be a topic for the Executive Board retreat. The joint City and County meeting on September 11, 2013 will cover needed agenda items, such as an update on I-11. The agenda on the next meeting will include the work program, transportation improvement program process and legislative update. If possible, updates on I-11 and freight will be made. Mr. Woodson requested that J.W. Powell corridor and the Lone Tree T.I. be added as agenda items on a subsequent Executive Board meeting agenda. There was discussion only.

V. CONCLUDING GENERAL BUSINESS Mr. Roehrich commented that the district engineer, Audra Merrick for the FMPO region, is the key to keeping projects in ADOT’s program; he suggested keeping Ms. Merrick involved in local projects.

A. REPORTS 1) Technical Advisory Committee 2) Staff Report

B. ANNOUNCEMENTS Mr. Oravits announced a research study being conducted at NAU regarding the use of Kevlar in asphalt. Kevlar is not much more expensive than the rubberized element already added to asphalt, but could prove to be more durable. Mr. Oravits said he would get this information out to the Board.

TAC July break - August 1, 2013 Coconino County Human Resources Bldg

Executive Board July break – August 28, 2013 Coconino County Supervisors Offices

ADJOURNMENT

Chair Woodson adjourned the meeting at 9:02 a.m.

9 FMPO Executive Board

September 25, 2013

10 II.1 Legislative Review

• FEDERAL LEGISLATION – Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21): RULE MAKING – MAP-21 Reauthorization • New legislation unlikely. Continuing Resolution probable. • Federal funding levels sustainable for one to two more years. • STATE LEGISLATION/FUND TRENDS/5-Year PROGRAM – Final budget maintained same level of HURF raids – Final 5-year program is middle-ground option C, mostly maintenance, some major projects – Several states indexing gas tax for inflation and/or raising gas tax and/or introducing sales tax

11 II.2. I-11Feasibility Study Status

• Review: Interstate 11 is a proposed corridor, now codified in federal legislation, that connects Phoenix to Las Vegas • Significant portions of US 93 and segments within Nevada have been improved or are programmed for improvement • Staff reminded ADOT of request for information on funding, I-17 projected traffic, travel times between Arizona communities, economic sectors affected • Next steps: Alternative alignment evaluation through FY 14-15

12 3

III.3 TIP Amendments

Requested Action: Amend the TIP to address recent changes in available funding Background/History: • The TIP is a federally mandated document • Updated ADOT ledgers showing balances in appropriations and obligation authority, clarifications of loans and loan amounts, and changes in projects costs required staff to take action in order to secure funding and keep projects moving forward. Key Considerations: • STP changes – The bus stop program is re-established at $124,000. • TIP amendment: Change f31305-1 from $92,000 to $124,000 • A loan of $9,500 in apportionment from ADOT was needed to support this. Note that we overspent obligation authority in the STP program but have a surplus in the HSIP program of the same amount. This is an example of new flexibility that ADOT and FHWA are enabling regions to exercise. • Related Transit Program Change – TIP amendment: Change STP Local Flex from $92,000 to $124,000

13 4 III.3. TIP Amendments

• STP Changes – Milton Road Study • TIP Amendment: Reduce from $100,000 to $22,000 – Access Management Policy • TIP Amendment: Add to program for $25,000 – Regional Freight Policy • TIP Amendment: Add to program for $35,000

14 5 III.3 TIP Amendments • HSIP changes: – Transverse Pavement Markings (crosswalks): Ratify added construction administration fees in the amount of $59,273. • TIP amendment: Add FY 13 funds of $89,297.76 to project f61103 – $59,297.76 Local HSIP funds and $30,000 in ADOT HSIP funds – Obligation authority correction for the additional FY 13 HSIP funds appropriated. • TIP amendment: Modify the total loan amount in FY 13 to $643,000. The amount of “new” HSIP funds is reduced from $179,000+/- to $152,482.89. Raises the total dollars then reduces for Pavement Markings • Potential future changes to the HSIP program not for consideration today: The TAC may at a future date wish to eliminate the Regional Safety Project Scan and shift those funds to the Switzer-Turquoise project. They may also wish to defer the 2017 sign replacement phase and shift those dollars to the Switzer project, too. – County Guardrail Project (f61108) is cancelled for lack of design. • TIP amendment: Eliminate f61108 for $42,000 obligation authority – Beulah Bike Lane Project: Design-based cost estimate now available. • TIP Amendment: Reduce from $198,000 to $175,000 – New County Safety Project: Sign replacement (f61402). • TIP amendment: Add County Sign Replacement at $65,000

• $42,000 from guardrail project 15and $23,000 from Beulah project 6

III.4. UPWP Amendments

• Requested Action: Amend the FY14 Work Program • Background: – ADOT is now applying obligation authority limitations to federal highways planning funds, effectively reducing earlier estimates by 4.5%. – ADOT provided FTA 5303 planning fund estimates for FY 13 and FY 14 effectively raising them by $5,000 per year – An ADOT review of accounts revealed failure to invoice against one funding source: FTA 5303 funds. Accounting practices developed to avoid in future. – A review of TIP Amendments revealed an inadvertent elimination of funding for two projects: Access Management Policy ($25,000) and Regional Freight Planning ($35,000). Both projects were still referenced in the work program. • Key Considerations – No projects change in size or scope, only funding levels and sources – 5303 funds effectively spent down – UPWP Amendments: Reflect actual funding levels. Shift $78,000 of the $100,000 Milton Road study to 5303 funds ($78,000). Shift STP funds to the Access Management Policy ($25,000) and Regional Freight Study ($35,000)

16 7 III.5. NAIPTA TAC Alternate

• Requested Action: Appoint FMPO Multimodal Planner as NAIPTA Transit Advisory Committee alternate • Background: NAIPTA recently revised their operating procedures to include the FMPO Manager on its TAC. This enhances communications, coordination and accountability between the organizations. NAIPTA’s preference is to have an alternate for each agency to assist in meeting quorum.

17 8 III.6 – Fall Retreat Planning

• Requested Action: Provide staff direction on Retreat topic or topics • Background: FMPO holds an annual retreat with Executive Board, Technical Advisory Committee members and others to address priority activities and/or set strategic action for the following year. • Key Considerations – – Retreat discussion options: – Regional Transportation Plan update: FMPO will be preparing data and tools in anticipation of FY 2015 update effort. Board may wish to plan for RTP content; measures and targets; role as master plan(s) – Long Range Funding: City and County elected officials have discussed potential sales tax initiatives independent of each other. A retreat offers opportunity to exchange ideas and opportunities, relation to other transportation funding such as HURF, and information needed from staff for final decision-making – MAP-21 Reauthorization: Review of process and implications for positions such as MPO Opt out provisions for new, small MPOs, population threshold concerns, construction and planning funding levels, new planning requirements – Retreat logistics: location, time, invitees, facilitation

18 9 III.7 – Border Zone Resolution

• Requested Action: Authorize the Board Chair and FMPO Manager to sign the resolution • Background: – See Draft Resolution – See Fact sheet. General information regarding relative inefficiency of Arizona crossings compared to other states, compartive level of economic relationships with Mexico, etc. • Key considerations: – Joint resolution will be presented to Department of Homeland Security – Economic policy more than transportation • Tourism and shopping dollars from Mexico – Balance of security versus commerce • Economic competitiveness – international and intra-national – Earlier resolution in support of border staff and infrastructure • July 2012 resolution adopted by FMPO Executive Board

19 10

III.7 Border Zone Resolution Yuma article YUMASUN.com YMPO supports expansion of border crossing zone August 26, 2013 10:33 PM BY MARA KNAUB @YSMaraKnaub

The Yuma Metropolitan Planning Organization is supporting expansion of the border crossing card zone, although it might send shoppers out of the region.

Some board members expressed concern that expanding the border zone from the current 25 miles would be detrimental to Yuma County, but they still voted in favor of the resolution as a show of support for the state.

With the resolution, the state’s regional planning agencies are asking the Arizona congressional delegation and the Department of Homeland Security to extend the state’s border zone for border crossing card holders to include the entire state. The proposed extension would allow BCC holders to travel to the entire state for leisure, shopping, business and visiting family.

Read more: http://www.yumasun.com/articles/border-89354-zone-resolution.html#ixzz2fAlW0zde

20 11 III.6 – Working Calendar

• EB/TAC October 2013 – Preliminary FY15 work program and TIP discussions – BCA Calibration review (TAC) – Retreat (see agenda item on topic discussion)

• EB/TAC November/December 2013 – Preliminary FY 15 work program and TIP discussions – Coordinated Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan – Long Range Funding discussions – Regional Transportation Performance Report

21 12 Expanding Border Zones Statewide

Mayor Marie Lopez Rogers, City of Avondale Chair, MAG Economic Development22 Committee 2012 Arizona Travel Impact Summary $19.3 Billion In direct spending generated: ƒ 161,300 direct jobs ƒ $5.4 billion direct earnings ƒ $2.6 billion in local, state, and federal tax revenues

Source: Dean Runyan Associates and Arizona Office of Tourism23 Annual Earnings, Selected AZ Export-Oriented Industries

24 Source: Dean Runyan Associates and Arizona Office of Tourism MEXICO’S IMPORTANCE TO AZ Top Origin Markets for International Travelers to the U.S. (2010 vs. 2009 & 2008)

Mexican visitors spent $2.65 billion in AZ from July’07 to June’08.

Arizona Tourism Economic Impact by County*

* Data for 2012

Source: Office of Travel and Tourism Industries 25 Source: University of Arizona , Mexican – US Department of Commerce Visitors to Arizona: Visitor Characteristics and Economic Impacts, 2007-08 Tourism: Key industry

Mexicans to AZ (2007‐08): • 24 million crossings • 3.8 million Tourists

$2.7 billion spent AZ

26 5 In 2012: • Mexico was the fastest ‐ growing economy among NAFTA partners. • $13 Billion Trade Between Arizona –Mexico. • 75% of Arizona exports destined for Sonora.

Arizona’s largest exports to Mexico include: Computers and electronic components, minerals and ore, and electrical equipment. 27 Arizona Losing Share in Trade with Mexico’s Fast‐Growing Economy

Crossings at Arizona/Mexico POEs Imports From Mexico in U.S. Dollars: 2004‐2012 450,000 400,000 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 ‐ 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 28

Trucks Rail Containers Arizona– Sonora: One Connected Region

Mexico 112 million population

29 Nogales has the longest wait time and uncertainty: Range of Wait Time and Average Wait Time at Select Border Crossings 70 60 50 Minutes

in 40 30 29.4 30.4 Time 25.3 23.8 20 Wait 14.6 10 11.0 10.1 7.4 5.3 3.5 4.6 0 2.3

30 Source: USC CREATE Report “The Impact on the US Economy of Changes in Wait Times at Ports of Entry” (April 2013) 31 It’s time to circle the wagons!

32 For More Information Contact: Dennis Smith MAG Executive Director (602) 254‐6300 www.azmag.gov 33 DRAFT RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR EXTENDING THE BORDER ZONE IN ARIZONA

WHEREAS, the regional planning agencies throughout Arizona, including the Central Arizona Governments (CAG), Central Yavapai Metropolitan Planning Organization (CYMPO), Flagstaff Metropolitan Planning Organization (FMPO), Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG), Northern Arizona Council of Governments (NACOG), Pima Association of Governments (PAG), SouthEastern Arizona Governments Organization (SEAGO), Western Arizona Council of Governments (WACOG), and Yuma Metropolitan Planning Organization (YMPO), and other regional planning agencies and Native American Communities that may wish to join in this effort, hereafter referred to as the Regional Planning Agencies, desire to advocate for the extension of the authorized border zone for Border Crossing Cards (BCC) to include all of Arizona, and for the streamlining of the Mexican Visa process; and

WHEREAS, Mexican visitors traveling into the United States through the land border ports of entry use the Border Crossing Card, which allows for frequent, low-risk Mexican citizens to visit border communities for a period of up to 30 days, and remain within the “border zone,” which is no more than 25 miles beyond the border, and 75 miles if entering through selected ports in Arizona, limiting the opportunity for tourism and economic development throughout our state; and

WHEREAS, the proposed border zone extension would allow BCC holders to travel to world-class destinations such as the Grand Canyon – one of the Seven Natural Wonders of the World – and other state and federal parks, stimulating tourism throughout Arizona, and expanding the travel zone to include these tourist destinations will translate into greater economic benefits from residents from Mexico traveling to Arizona for leisure, shopping, conducting business, and visiting family; and

WHEREAS, it is estimated that $7.3 million is spent each day in Arizona by Mexican visitors, and more than 65,000 Mexican residents travel to Arizona each day for business, leisure and recreation; and

WHEREAS, Mexico is the 14th largest economy according to the International Monetary Fund, a member of the G-20 economies, and the 11th most populous country, with 17 percent of Mexico's population of 112 million inhabitants joining the middle class in the last decade, representing market opportunities for U.S. exports-oriented industries; and

WHEREAS, at the peak of the economy in 2007-08, 24 million Mexican visitors came to Arizona and spent $2.7 billion, creating 23,400 direct jobs and an additional 7,000 indirect jobs in Arizona. In 2011, 157,700 jobs were related directly to domestic and international tourism in Arizona, and when combined with indirect employment generated by tourism, the figure almost doubles to 300,000 jobs; and

WHEREAS, in the spirit of the 2012 Executive Order, the proposed extension of the border zone in Arizona will provide significant economic benefits to many communities, especially in rural Arizona, while maintaining ample safeguards to prevent undocumented entry into the United States, and

WHEREAS, due to the necessity to act immediately, the Regional Planning Agencies noted in this resolution have signed with the understanding that other governmental and nonprofit economic development organizations will be joining in supporting this resolution:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCIES as follows:

That it is the intent of the respective Regional Planning Agencies to work cooperatively to jointly advocate to the Arizona Congressional Delegation and the Department of Homeland Security for the extension of Arizona’s border zone, authorized for holders of Border Crossing Cards, to include the entire state of Arizona, and to jointly support the streamlining of the Mexican visa process to be more effective in enabling both business travelers and tourists to cross the border.

34

PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED BY THE REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCIES OF CENTRAL ARIZONA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS, CENTRAL YAVAPAI METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION, FLAGSTAFF METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION, MARICOPA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS, NORTHERN ARIZONA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS, PIMA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS, SOUTHEASTERN ARIZONA GOVERNMENTS ORGANIZATION, WESTERN ARIZONA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS, AND YUMA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION, ON THE DATES PROVIDED BELOW.

ATTEST:

______Tom Rankin, Chair Kenneth Hall CAG Regional Council CAG Executive Director Mayor, Town of Florence

______Date

______Darryl Croft, Chair Christopher Bridges CYMPO Executive Board CYMPO Administrator Vice Mayor, Town of Chino Valley

______Date

______Matt Ryan, Chair David Wessel FMPO Executive Board FMPO Manager Board of Supervisor, Coconino

______Date

______Scott Smith, Chair Dennis Smith MAG Regional Council MAG Executive Director Mayor, City of Mesa

______Date

35

______Wade Carlisle, Chair Chris Fetzer NACOG Regional Council NACOG Executive Director Councilman, City of Holbrook

______Date

______Jonathan Rothschild, Chair Cherie Campbell PAG Regional Council PAG Acting Executive Director Mayor, City of Tucson

______Date

______Rudy Molera, Chair Randy Heiss SEAGO Executive Board SEAGO Executive Director County Supervisor, Santa Cruz

______Date

______Janice Shelton, Chair Brian H. Babiars WACOG Executive Board of Directors WACOG Executive Director Superintendent, La Paz County Schools

______Date

______Greg Ferguson, Chair Charlene FitzGerald YMPO Executive Board YMPO Executive Director Supervisor, Yuma County

______Date

36 MEXICAN VISITORS - FACT SHEET

• Visa holders who wish to use the Border Crossing Card as a B1/B2 visa to travel outside the “border zone,” and/or who are staying longer than 30 days in the United States, must complete a Form I-94 and then be processed through the Office of Biometric Identity Management (OBIM) utilizing biometric procedures in secondary inspection areas at the land border ports of entry at the time of their crossing, and according to the Department of Homeland Security the OBIM is “an interim solution for the land border while the Department explores a long-term solution to record the entry and exit of visitors crossing our land border ports of entry.”

• The elimination of the requirement of an I-94 form, or the streamlining of the entire Mexican visa process to eliminate the need for the OBIM biometric procedures in secondary inspection areas for BCC holders traveling anywhere in Arizona would also decrease the administrative workload for Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers at the Arizona ports of entry, allowing CBP to focus resources on those who may pose a higher risk, improving security, reducing border wait times, and increasing efficiency at land border crossings.

• Tourism is one of the largest industries in Arizona and tourists from Mexico are critically important to the Arizona economy, according to the Arizona Lodging and Tourism Association.

• According to the municipality of Cajeme, Obregon, Sonora, tourism is one of the top developing engines in Sonora and is expected to have a potential market of 4.3 million Mexican tourists by 2030.

• The Regional Planning Agencies jointly recognize the economic power of the tourism industry due to its positive influence for every resident and business in Arizona.

• Tourism is an export-related activity bringing new monies to the region spent in tourism-sensitive sectors and on retail- exports. Tourism and export promotion have become a national focus through the National Export Initiative and the Travel Promotion Act signed into law in 2010 to enhance economic growth and job creation through the promotion of exports and inbound tourism.

• Mexico represented an impressive 21 percent of all inbound international arrivals to the United States with over 12.7 million arrivals in 2012 and was the second largest tourist-generating country after Canada, according to data from the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Office of Travel and Tourism Industries.

• Legal entry of Mexican residents and goods is an essential element of Arizona’s economy, with Mexico being the largest bilateral trading partner with Arizona, and the second largest in the U.S., accounting for an estimated $30 million in two- way trade between Arizona and Mexico each day, and reaching a record high of $1.3 billion per day in two-way trade between the U.S. and Mexico.

• According to the Greater Phoenix Convention and Visitors Bureau, the Mexico driving market represents the number one method of visiting Arizona and the most important market, with most of the visitors being from the middle class who spend weekends in Arizona with their families shopping and dining.

• The economic contribution of spending by Mexican visitors in Arizona has continued to grow over the decades. The economic impact of Mexican visitors increased from $688.3 million in spending and 12,407 total jobs in 1991, to $962.9 million in spending and 35,179 total jobs in 2001.

• The 2012 Executive Order signed by President Obama “Establishing Visa and Foreign Visitor Processing Goals and the Task Force on Travel and Competitiveness,” was ordered to “enable us [United States] to better capitalize on the economic opportunities presented by a dynamic 21st century travel and tourism industry” (Executive Order January 2012).

37 Visa Requirements for Temporary Visitors to the U.S. from Mexico, Canada, and countries under the Visa Waiver Program (VWP) Country Visitor Visa Type(s) Access/Extent Costs Additional Information

Mexico Border Crossing Card (BCC) BCC holders who are $160 (ages 15+) BCC and Visitor Visa applicants must apply using the authorized to enter to the $15 (under age 15) normal procedures set by consular sections in United States can remain Mexico, as follows: up to 30 days and travel no 1) Complete DS-160 application; more than 75 miles 2) schedule appointment and pay fees; beyond the border in 3) complete and submit biometrics per Arizona, 55 miles beyond US-VISIT/OBIM requirements; the border in New Mexico, 4) appear at interview; and 25 miles along the 5) pick up Visa/BCC (if approved). border in Texas and California. Currently, if a Mexican citizen chooses to use the BCC as a B1/B2 visa (traveling outside the “border zone” and/or staying longer than 30 days in the United States), he or she must complete a Form I-94 and Visitor Visas If allowed to enter the U.S. $160 then be processed through Office of Biometric (B-1, B-2, or B-1/B-2) , a Customs and Border Identity Management (OBIM) in secondary Protection (CBP) official inspection areas at the land border ports of entry at determines length of visit. that time.

Canada No Visa required n/a Citizens of Canada traveling to the United States do (passport or NEXUS* card) not require a nonimmigrant visa, with a few exceptions.** must present a machine-readable passport or NEXUS card at the U.S. port of entry to enter the U.S. without a visa; otherwise a U.S. visa is required.

Visa Waiver Program (VWP) countries: The Visa Waiver Program 90 days or less $14 which consists of: In order to travel without a visa on the VWP, you Andorra Hungary (VWP) allows citizens of must have authorization through the Electronic Iceland Norway participating countries to $4 processing fee plus System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) prior to Austria Ireland Portugal travel to the United States $10 Authorization boarding a U.S. bound air or sea carrier. ESTA is the Belgium Italy San Marino without obtaining a visa, for Charge Department of Homeland Security, Customs and Brunei Singapore stays of 90 days or less for Border Protection's (CBP) automated web-based Czech Republic Latvia Slovakia business, tourism, visiting or system to determine eligibility to travel without a visa Denmark Liechtenstein pleasure. Transitioning or to the United States for tourism or business. All Visa Estonia South Korea traveling through the United Waiver Program travelers must present a machine- Finland Luxembourg Spain States to Canada or Mexico is readable passport at the U.S. port of entry to enter Malta Sweden generally permitted for VWP the U.S. without a visa; otherwise a U.S. visa is Monaco travelers. required. Greece the Netherlands Taiwan*** ****

* Under the Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative, the NEXUS card has been approved as an alternative to the passport for air, land, and sea travel into the United States for US and Canadian citizens. http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/travel/trusted_traveler/nexus_prog/nexus.xml ** Canadians require nonimmigrant visas for temporary travel to the United States for these purposes: http://travel.state.gov/visa/temp/without/without_1260.html *** With respect to all references to “country” or “countries” in this document, it should be noted that the Taiwan Relations Act of 1979, Pub. L. No. 96-8, Section 4(b)(1), provides that “[w]henever the laws of the United States refer or relate to foreign countries, nations, states, governments, or similar entities, such terms shall include and such laws shall apply with respect to Taiwan.” 22 U.S.C. § 3303(b)(1). Accordingly, all references to “country” or “countries” in the Visa Waiver Program authorizing legislation, Section 217 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1187, are read to include Taiwan. This is consistent with the United States’ one- policy, under which the United States has maintained unofficial relations with Taiwan since 1979.

**** British citizens only with the unrestricted right of permanent abode in England, Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland, the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man. 38 FLAGSTAFF METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION CITY OF FLAGSTAFF  COCONINO COUNTY  ARIZONA DOT Office: 211 West Aspen Avenue  Flagstaff, Arizona 86001 Phone: (928) 213-2651 www.flagstaffmpo.org  [email protected]

Action Summary Technical Advisory Committee 1:30 p.m. – 3:30 p.m. – Thursday, September 5, 2013 ______Coconino County Human Resources Building – Weatherford Room 420 N. San Francisco Street, Flagstaff, AZ 86001 Regular meetings and work sessions are open to the public. Persons with a disability may request a reasonable accommodation by contacting the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Office at 928-779-6693. The FMPO complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to involve and assist underrepresented and underserved populations (age, gender, color, income status, race, national origin and LEP – Limited English Proficiency.) Requests should be made by contacting the FMPO at 928-213-2651 as early as possible to allow time to arrange the accommodation. A quorum of the FMPO Executive Board may be present.

Chair Feek called the meeting to order at 1:35 pm Present TAC COMMITTEE MEMBERS Justin Feek, ADOT Senior Transportation Planner, Chair Erika Mazza, NAIPTA Transit Planner (for Jeff Meilbeck, NAIPTA General Manager) Jeff Bauman, City of Flagstaff Transportation Manager Tim Dalegowski, (for Andy Bertelsen, Coconino County Public Works Director) Chuck Gillick (designated alternate for Walter K. Link, ADOT)

FMPO STAFF David Wessel, FMPO Manager Martin Ince, Multimodal Planner Sydney Francis, FMPO Administrative Specialist

OTHERS PRESENT Dejan Dudich, FMPO intern Anson Gock, ADOT

I. PRELIMINARY GENERAL BUSINESS A. PUBLIC COMMENT None

B. ANNOUNCEMENTS Mr. Wessel asked the TAC to table Item II.2, BCA Tool, in order to complete a thorough run through of the tool.

C. APPROVAL of MINUTES. Mr. Dalegowski moved to approve the minutes from the Meeting of August 1, 2013. Ms. Mazza seconded the motion. All were in favor of approving the minutes from August 1, 2013. 39

II. OLD BUSINESS (Continued, postponed, and tabled items.)

1. Highway Safety Improvement Program & Projects Project sponsors provided a progress update on their respective projects. There was discussion only.

2. Benefit Cost Analysis Tool Template / Calibration This item was tabled for future discussion.

III. NEW BUSINESS

3. Transportation Improvement Program amendments and ratification Mr. Wessel presented on several amendments related to the Surface Transportation, Highway Safety and Transit programs submitted by staff to ADOT to address apportionment and obligation authority balances, project loans, changes in project cost estimates, and review fees. The projects themselves remain unchanged. Mr. Bauman made a motion to recommend to the Executive Board the amendments and ratification of the TIP based on FMPO recommendations outlined in the Staff Summary Report. Ms. Mazza seconded the motion. All were in favor of recommending to the Executive Board the amendments and ratification of the TIP to reflect the changes outlined in the Staff Summary Report.

4. FY 2014 Unified Planning Work Program Amendments Mr. Wessel presented on changes to the funding sources within the UPWP to reflect unspent balances in the FTA 5303 program and unfunded projects identified in the work program. Mr. Wessel recommended funding the bulk of the $100,000 Milton Road study with the 5303 funds ($78,000) and shifting the STP funds to the Access Management Policy ($25,000) effort and the Regional Freight effort ($35,000). Ms. Mazza motioned to recommend to the Executive Board the amended work program, reflecting the above funding changes. Mr. Bauman seconded the motion. All were in favor.

5. Section 5310 Grant Application Process Acceptance Mr. Ince presented information on Section 5310 grant applications received in the FMPO region for 2013 and the process to score them prior to forwarding them to ADOT. Mr. Bauman motion to accept the 5310 application process. Mr. Dalegowski seconded the motion. Ms. Mazza abstained due to her participation in the 5310 application process. All were in favor.

6. Coordination Plan Update Mr. Ince introduced the annual update to the FMPO Coordinated Public Transit - Human Services Transportation Plan, which will be fully presented to the TAC in October. There was discussion only.

7. Performance Report Presentation Mr. Dudich presented an update on the FMPO Performance Repot. Mr. Wessel sought TAC input on conclusions and recommendations for improving the report content and presentation. There was discussion only.

8. FMPO Working Calendar Mr. Wessel gave an overview of the FMPO working calendar. The Executive Board retreat is scheduled for Wednesday, October 30th at Fort Tuthill. The next meeting will include the current work program and a presentation on the BCA tool.

IV. CONCLUDING GENERAL BUSINESS

40 1. REPORTS Mr. Wessel gave a brief overview of the Planning to Programming process.

2. ANNOUNCEMENTS TAC October 3, 2013 Coconino County Human Resources (420 N. San Francisco) Management Committee TBD as needed Executive Board August 28, 2013 cancel October 30, 2013 (retreat) Coconino County Administration (219 Cherry Ave.)

ADJOURNMENT

Mr. Feek adjourned the meeting at 3:24 pm.

CERTIFICATION OF POSTING OF NOTICE The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing notice was duly posted at Flagstaff City Hall on ,at a.m./p.m. in accordance with the statement filed by the Recording Secretary with the City Clerk.

Dated this day of , 2013.

41

Memorandum – Staff Reports

Date: September 17, 2013 To: FMPO Executive Board From: Martin Ince, Multi-Modal Planner David Wessel, FMPO Manager

Re: Ongoing Transportation Projects

Enhancement Grants: No update

Federal Reauthorization – Many guidance documents for MAP-21 are still pending. Congressional hearings on reauthorization have commenced.

I-40 Design Concept Report – No updates

I-17 Design Concept Report. Now complete.

US 89A/J.W. Powell Boulevard Intersection – right-of-way purchase underway. Utility relocation related to power lines may create delays. Moved to FY14 in ADOT’s program.

ADOT Planning to Programming (P2P) – Final report being drafted.

Fourth Street North – No update

FHWA Initiative - Every Day Counts – no update

Traffic Counts/ADOT Traffic Data Management System –Award has been made to Traffic Research & Analysis. Working with City staff to coordinate counts with traffic impact analysis requirements

Beulah Boulevard Extension/P3 – ADOT remains in negotiations with the preferred P3 developer. City Community Development staff is actively engaged. Schedule is lengthening due to the several land transactions and relocations necessary.

Sidewalk Inventory and Improvement Program  GIS geodatabase is near complete. FMPO interns and staff are working with Public Works and GIS staff to develop a conditions rating form for a handheld device. FMPO purchased such a device. Legal issues regarding constructive knowledge of trip hazards need to be resolved.

Planning to Programming (P2P): ADOT’s effort to move to a performance-based programming system starting with the Investment Choice set up in What Moves You Arizona the state long range transportation plan. Key features:  Investment Choices: Preservation, Modernization, Expansion  10-year TIP. 1-5 year delivery. 6-10 year development

42  Set measures and targets for each category o MAP-21 measures in 6 months o ADOT measures 12 months after FHWA o Development of analysis and methodologies over 1-2 years . Objectives, Measures and Targets  Potential concerns: o Modernization and Expansion projects may rely heavily on delay measures o Risk assessment will be based on Tiers of projects and Strategic Corridors o Both may favor large metro areas  Next steps – September 2013 o Final Report o Implementation Process o Procedures Manual o Risk Assessment

FY 14 Work Program Update  FY 14 UPWP: Adopted, and approved, amended  Data Collection: Fall 13 counts pending award. Data will include driveway counts on Milton to support that study.  TIP: FY 14 approved and amended.  Long Range Planning o Flagstaff Regional Plan 2030 -Hearings have started. o Benefit Cost Analysis – Prototype template near complete. Calibrated tests forthcoming. Completion in September/October. o RTP Update Preparation – Scope near complete. DBE goals received from ADOT. RFP released with pre-bid meeting on 9/23.  Special Projects o Adaptive Control Signal Technology – Now a city-led effort. Staff will provide some technical and research support. o Milton Road Microsimulation Study – Scope near complete. DBE goals request submitted to ADOT. Obligation pending. Release of RFP in September/October. o Operations and Maintenance Study – Staff has conferred with City and County public works staff and has drafted a scope of work for their consideration. Timing of release will be coordinated with any potential election. o Access Management Policy- not initiated o Freight Study – not initiated  Regional Planning o Traffic Impact Analysis Procedures Manual – staff continues to work with the City to update this manual. A first draft is near complete. o Juniper Point: A new TIA effort will commence shortly. o Fourth Street – North Corridor – see earlier comments. o Little America – TIA under review o Canyon del Rio – TIA under development  Public Transportation o NAIPTA Coordination Meetings continue o 5310 application program and plan are underway and on schedule  Public Participation Website is being maintained

43

Central Arizona Governments Central Yavapai Metro. Planning Org. Flagstaff Metropolitan Planning Org. Northern Arizona Council of Gov’ts Southeastern Arizona Governments Org. Western Arizona Council of Gov’ts Yuma Metropolitan Planning Org.

RTAC TRANSPORTATION UPDATE

July 23, 2013 2013 Update #15

LEGISLATIVE SESSION WRAP- UP: With much of the transportation agenda focused on license plates, the Legislature adjourned with relatively little action impacting the infrastructure other than the budget and the revenues distributed to ADOT and local governments for highway and road systems. A final bill matrix for the session is attached with the final disposition of the transportation-related regular session bills.

The budget and revenue trends for transportation remain disturbing. Highway and road revenue collections remain flat at approximately 2004 levels. Like Arizona, the federal government and other states rely heavily on the gas tax to fund transportation infrastructure which has become increasingly inadequate due to a number of factors including better vehicle fuel efficiencies and the greater use of alternative-fuels. Also, Arizona and the federal government have not adjusted the gas tax for inflation in over 20 years.

While Arizona’s transportation funding woes are not unique, many other states have been far more proactive in remedying their shortfalls. This month, states increased their gas tax and another two are on the verge of passing an increase. Sixteen have implemented automatic adjustments based on gas prices and inflation. Others have passed or are considering alternative funding measures such as dedicated sales taxes or a shift to a vehicle miles travelled fee structure. While reforms have been discussed but not yet passed at the national level, in the interim, federal lawmakers have made up for transportation revenue losses with transfers from the general fund which has at least kept federal transportation spending relatively constant.

In contrast, Arizona has done the opposite by transferring much of its limited transportation revenues to the state general fund. These continual raids greatly compound the impacts of the declining revenue collections. Next year’s state budget transfers $127 million in transportation revenues to DPS which is $107 million above the $20 million statutory cap for such transfers. It should also be noted that these raids are continuing despite the constant positive growth in state general fund revenue streams.

Due to the adjusted revenue outlook, the State Transportation Board updated the State’s 5-year highway construction program last month by cutting $350 million from the previous program and adding very bleak investment levels for the new end year (2018). New construction in greater Arizona is now limited to five major projects, some of which may also be removed if current trends continue and more program cuts are required in upcoming years. The program also provides roughly $150 million for maintenance every year, far short of the $260 million estimated by ADOT to meet the system’s needs.

______(602) 258-3719 1820 W.. Washiing44ton ~ Phoeniix,, AZ 85007 www..rtac..net

WORK CONTINUES ON FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDING: The short-term outlook for federal transportation funding appears more predictable than the long-term. Forecasts indicate that the Highway Trust Fund can sustain current spending levels for federal fiscal year 2014. Also, the House and Senate Appropriations Committees have passed spending bills for next year that consistently fund most highway and transit programs at current levels. While there are no guarantees, it would appear that much of the status quo is likely for the upcoming year.

The House and Senate appropriations bills do differ greatly on the transportation-related discretionary programs that are not funded by the Highway Trust Fund. Most of these involve aviation and rail. For Arizona, the two non-Highway Trust Fund programs with the greatest potential impact would be the New Starts program which provides capital assistance for transit systems and the TIGER program which provides competitive funding grants for a wide array of transportation projects. The Tucson Street Car system and Interstate 15 bridge repairs in northwestern Arizona received significant grant amounts from previous rounds of TIGER. This year, the TIGER program was funded at roughly $500 million. The Senate appropriations bill increases that level to $550 million next year while the House provides no funding.

While both the House and Senate are prepared to consider and pass their differing versions relatively soon, the outlook for enacting a final bill is far less likely as all indications are that the Republican-controlled House and Democrat-controlled Senate will fail to reach a budget agreement by the start of the fiscal year on October 1st necessitating continuing resolutions. In addition to the differences on discretionary funding, transportation programs are in the same appropriations bill as housing programs which are a major point of contention between the House and Senate and further diminish the odds of reaching an agreement.

While not providing any long-term guarantees, continuing resolutions would at least likely entail transportation funding remaining at current levels. In the unlikely event that a budget is passed, based on the work already completed by House and Senate appropriators, it appears that there is already a bipartisan consensus on maintaining the MAP-21 non-discretionary funding levels. Either way, it appears that the bulk of the transportation funding, including highway and transit formula funding will remain relatively constant for next year.

Federal fiscal year 2015 and beyond are far more unpredictable. MAP-21 expires at the end of next year necessitating the passage of continued highway and transit program authority. Likely more important, the Highway Trust Fund will not be able to sustain current spending levels. Next year’s solvency is based largely on $20 billion worth of one-time funding that was deposited into the Highway Trust Fund by MAP-21. Once that is depleted, Trust Fund revenue streams can only sustain roughly two-thirds of the current spending levels. Without an agreement on increased funding, massive cuts are unavoidable. For Arizona, the federal aid highway program provides roughly $700 million a year. A one-third cut would amount to roughly a $230 million loss to Arizona every year.

For roughly the last half-decade, lawmakers have addressed Highway Trust Fund shortfalls with one-time deposits of additional funding. On the positive side, this has prevented any significant cuts in federal highway and transit spending. However, the lack of longer-term funding assurances has greatly impacted infrastructure planning and programming which by law is often confined to future guaranteed funding availability. While maintaining funding levels is important, doing so in a manner that provides longer-term funding assurances is an increasing priority.

45 2