DOCSLIB.ORG

Maryland: the Likelihood of Shore Protection

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Maryland: the Likelihood of Shore Protection The following document can be cited as: Nuckols, W.H., P. Johnston, D. Hudgens, and J.G. Titus. 2010. “Maryland.” In James G. Titus and Daniel Hudgens (editors). The Likelihood of Shore Protection along the Atlantic Coast of the United States. Volume 1: Mid-Atlantic. Report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. This report has undergone peer review as required by the Peer Review Handbook of the US Environmental Protection Agency for influential scientific information under the direction of Karen Scott, peer review leader for all products associated with Climate Change Science Program Synthesis and Assessment Product 4.1. The opinions expressed herein are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official opinion of the Environmental Protection Agency. The primary referring page for this report is http://risingsea.net/ERL/MD.html CHAPTER 6 MARYLAND Prepared by: William H. Nuckols IIIi Peter Johnstonii Daniel Hudgensiii and James G. Titusiv i W.H. Nuckols Consulting, Annapolis, Maryland ii Redman/Johnston Associates, Ltd., Easton, Maryland iii Industrial Economics, Incorporated, Cambridge, Massachusetts iv U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation, Washington, D.C. [ 512 TH E L I K E L I H O O D O F S H O R E P R O T E C T I O N I N M AR Y L A N D ] CONTENTS Summary ……………………………………………………………………………………...…516 Introduction..................................................................................................................... 523 Purpose of this Study ................................................................................................................................ 523 Caveat……................................................................................................................................................ 527 How to Read this Report…….................................................................................................................... 528 Methods ......................................................................................................................................................................529 Study Area................................................................................................................................................ 529 Draft Maps................................................................................................................................................. 530 County Stakeholder Review...................................................................................................................... 532 Map Scale ................................................................................................................................................ 533 Use of Experts .......................................................................................................................................... 533 Maryland Coastal Policies and Regulations................................................................. 535 Overview of Generalized State-wide Response to Sea Level Rise............................. 540 County Policies and Anticipated Response to Sea Level Rise .................................. 545 Western Shore Counties................................................................................................ 547 Harford County.......................................................................................................................................... 547 Baltimore County....................................................................................................................................... 551 Baltimore City............................................................................................................................................ 557 Anne Arundel County................................................................................................................................ 559 Calvert County .......................................................................................................................................... 564 St. Mary’s County...................................................................................................................................... 570 Charles County......................................................................................................................................... 574 Prince George’s County............................................................................................................................ 579 [ CONTENTS 513 ] Eastern Shore Counties..................................................................................................583 Cecil County..............................................................................................................................................583 Kent County...............................................................................................................................................588 Queen Anne’s County ...............................................................................................................................591 Talbot County ............................................................................................................................................596 Caroline County.........................................................................................................................................600 Dorchester County.....................................................................................................................................603 Wicomico County.......................................................................................................................................611 Somerset County.......................................................................................................................................614 Worcester County......................................................................................................................................619 Appendix A: Length of Shorelines by Likelihood of Shore Protection ......................624 Appendix B: Area of Land by Likelihood of Shore Protection ....................................638 Appendix C: Elevation Uncertainty................................................................................650 Appendix D: Summary of Data Sources........................................................................657 Credits and Acknowledgements ...................................................................................662 MAPS Map 6-1. Maryland: Likelihood of Shore Protection.........................................................................................520 Map 6-2. Harford County: Likelihood of Shore Protection ...............................................................................550 Map 6-3. Baltimore County: Likelihood of Shore Protection............................................................................556 Map 6-4. Baltimore City: Likelihood of Shore Protection .................................................................................558 Map 6-5. Anne Arundel County: Likelihood of Shore Protection .....................................................................563 Map 6-6. Calvert County: Likelihood of Shore Protection................................................................................569 Map 6-7. St. Mary’s County: Likelihood of Shore Protection ...........................................................................573 Map 6-8. Charles County: Likelihood of Shore Protection...............................................................................578 Map 6-9. Prince George’s County: Likelihood of Shore Protection .................................................................582 Map 6-10. Cecil County: Likelihood of Shore Protection .................................................................................587 Map 6-11. Kent County: Likelihood of Shore Protection..................................................................................591 Map 6-12. Queen Anne’s County: Likelihood of Shore Protection ..................................................................595 Map 6-13. Talbot County: Likelihood of Shore Protection ...............................................................................599 Map 6-14. Caroline County: Likelihood of Shore Protection............................................................................602 Map 6-15. Dorchester County: Likelihood of Shore Protection........................................................................610 Map 6-16. Wicomico County: Likelihood of Shore Protection..........................................................................613 Map 6-17. Somerset County: Likelihood of Shore Protection..........................................................................617 Map 6-18. Worcester County: Likelihood of Shore Protection.........................................................................623 [ 514 TH E L I K E L I H O O D O F S H O R E P R O T E C T I O N I N M AR Y L A N D ] FIGURES Figure 6-1. Lands Vulnerable to Sea Level Rise............................................................................................. 527 Figure 6-2. Locations of Counties in Maryland................................................................................................ 546 TABLES Table 6-1. Area of Land within 3.3 feet
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lower Susquehanna Heritage Greenway Makes an Impact December 2020 About Lower Susquehanna Heritage Greenway
    Lower Susquehanna Heritage Greenway Makes an Impact December 2020 About Lower Susquehanna Heritage Greenway $110.7 MILLION in economic impact 1,579 JOBS supported and sustained 14.9 MILLION in state and local tax revenue BIRTHPLACE OF THE BAY HISTORIC RIVERFRONT TOWNS HAVRE DE GRACE, PERRYVILLE, AND PORT DEPOSIT NATIONAL TRAILS CONVERGE CAPTAIN JOHN SMITH CHESAPEAKE NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL, WASHINGTONROCHAMBEAU REVOLUTIONARY ROUTE, AND STARSPANGLED BANNER NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL IMPORTANT WAR STORIES REVOLUTIONARY, 1812, AND CIVIL TRANSPORTATION STORIES WATER, RAIL, AND HIGHWAY FAMOUS AMERICANS HOME TO JOHN RODGERS, JACOB TOME, AND JOHN O’NEILL TRAIL NETWORKS HIKING, BIKING, AND WATER SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES SUSQUEHANNA RIVER, SUSQUEHANNA FLATS, AND PORT DEPOSIT GRANITE HISTORIC VISITORS CAPTAIN JOHN SMITH, WASHINGTONROCHAMBEAU, AND LAFAYETTE MAJOR ROADWAY CORRIDORS ROUTE 1, I95, AND ROUTE 40 RIVER CROSSINGS CONOWINGO DAM, I95, AND ROUTE 40 HISTORIC SCHOOLS TOME, HOSANNA, AND HAVRE DE GRACE COLORED SCHOOL HISTORIC MILLS ROCK RUN MILL, WILSON'S MILL, AND STAFFORD MILL VISITOR CENTERS CONOWINGO, HAVRE DE GRACE, AND PORT DEPOSIT RAIL SERVICES AMTRAK, MARC, AND CSX 1 About Lower Susquehanna Heritage Greenway THE MISSION OF LOWER SUSQUEHANNA HERITAGE GREENWAY The Lower Susquehanna Heritage Greenway (LSHG) is a non-prot organization whose mission is to stimulate local economic activity by developing a linkage between the area’s natural, historical, and cultural resources. This linkage is a series of land and water recreational trails that weave the past into the future while promoting an understanding and appreciation for the character of this region. Envisioned by government and private agencies in 1992 as an opportunity to encourage heritage tourism, the Lower Susquehanna Heritage Greenway (LSHG) tells the story of an area rich in historical and cultural resources, set in an unspoiled natural environment with unique scenic beauty.
    [Show full text]
  • Area's #1 Fishing & Hunting Outfitter
    Dear Angler: Here in Maryland, we need only look to our State Seal — depicting the fisherman and the ploughman — for proof that fishing really is part of our heritage. It’s a fun, affordable and accessible activity for all ages, and a great excuse to get our children away from video and computer games and into the great outdoors! Approximately 700,000 adults and thousands of young people fish each year in Maryland, with an estimated annual impact of $1 billion on our economy. Gov. Martin O’Malley and Sec. John R. Griffin More than a third of our anglers visit from out of state, testimony to the value and quality of our great fishing resources. We are very fortunate to have expert biologists and managers – working to- gether with our Sport Fisheries, Tidal Fisheries and Oyster Advisory Commissions, and our Coastal Fisheries Advisory Committee, to guide fisheries management across our State. We are also very fortunate to have you -- committed conserva- tionists and advocates – working with us. Your license revenues support protection and enhancement of Maryland’s fishery resources, research and management activities, expanded public access and enhanced law enforcement. And we look forward to strengthening our partnership with you as we work toward our goals for a restored Chesapeake Bay, thriving freshwater streams, and healthy abundant fish populations. Thank you for being a part of a great cultural tradition, and here’s wishing you a terrific year of fishing in Maryland. Martin O’Malley John R. Griffin Governor Secretary About the Cover: This edition of the Maryland Fishing Guide is dedicated to Frances McFaden, who retired from public service after 43 years as a steadfast, ever-helpful, and resourceful Maryland state worker.
    [Show full text]
  • Elk Neck, Cecil County
    Important Bird Areas Program Bird Blitz 2010-2011: Elk Neck, Cecil County Elk Neck Peninsula is located in central Cecil County and is bordered on the west by the Chesapeake Bay and North East River and on the east by the Elk River. Elk Neck Peninsula is well-known as a migration corridor for both raptors and songbirds. Its cone shape especially concentrates southbound birds in the autumn before they continue across the Chesapeake Bay. The Peninsula is mostly forested with substantial portions protected as Elk Neck State Park and State Forest. Surveys focused on the Peninsula’s forest core in Elk Neck State Forest. The State Forest consists of four separate tracts comprising about 1,335 ha (3,300 acres) of primarily oak- gum-cypress forest with smaller areas of loblolly-shortleaf pine and oak-hickory forest as well. Given that Elk Neck is heavily forested, 2010-2011 Bird Blitz surveys targeted birds of the Forest Interior Dwelling Species (FIDS) assemblage, or species listed by Maryland DNR as requiring large areas of intact forest to breed successfully, and particularly those FIDS considered at-risk in the state. All totaled, 10 surveys, including a nightjar survey, were conducted by 8 volunteers covering a distance of nearly 29 km of transects during more than 21 survey hours (Table 1). The results of these surveys are summarized below in Table 2, with highlighted species representing those which matched or exceeded their state-level IBA thresholds. It is important to note that Bird Blitz survey totals represent minimum population estimates of breeding pairs.
    [Show full text]
  • John Smith 2Nd Voyage
    Title: John Smith’s 2nd Voyage Exploring the Chesapeake Bay Developed by: Sari J. Bennett and Patricia King Robeson (Maryland Geographic Alliance) Grade Level: 4/5 Duration: 2 class periods VSC: Geography Grade 4: 3.A.1 Use geographic tools to locate places and describe the human and physical characteristics of those places c. Use photographs, maps, charts, graphs and atlases to describe geographic characteristics of Maryland and the United States Geography Grade 5: 3.A.1 Use geographic tools to locate places and describe human and physical characteristics in colo- nial America c.. Use photographs, maps, and drawings to describe geographic characteristics Social Studies Skills and Processes 6.D.1 Identify primary and secondary sources of information that relate to the topic/situation/problem being studied c. Locate and gather data and information from appropriate non-print sources, such as music, artifacts, charts, maps, graphs, photographs, video clips, illustrations, paintings, political car- toons, interviews, and oral histories Objectives: Students will be able to: • interpret a primary source, John Smith’s map and excerpts from his journal. • identify places on a map that show John Smith’s route. • identify geographic characteristics seen by John Smith on his second voyage of the Chesapeake Bay Vocabulary: Names on the left are taken from Smith’s map. Modern names are on the right. flu river Powhatan flu James River Bolus flu Patapsco River Poynt comfort Point Comfort Patawomeck flu Potomac River Pawtuxunt flu Patuxent River Tockwogh flu Sasfrass River Sasquesahanough flu Susquehanna River Rickards cliffes Calvert Cliffs Symths fales Conowingo Dam Gunters Harbour North East River 1 Materials: Teacher: “A Powhatan Village” make a transparency Students: “Virginia” John Smith’s Map - 1 for each group of four students.
    [Show full text]
  • MDE Urban QAPP 1-3-17 (2).Pdf
    Table of Contents 1.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT .......................................................................................................... 3 1.1 - Title and Approval Page – See page i. ................................................................................. 3 1.2 - Table of Contents – See page ii. ......................................................................................... 3 1.3 - Distribution List ................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 - Project Organization ........................................................................................................... 3 1.5 - Problem Definition/Background ......................................................................................... 7 1.6 - Project/Task Description and Schedule ............................................................................ 10 1.7 - Quality Objectives and Criteria for Acceptance of Data ................................................... 10 1.8 - Special Training Requirements/Certification .................................................................... 11 1.9 - Documents and Records ................................................................................................... 12 2.0 DATA SOURCES AND ACQUISITION ....................................................................................... 12 2.1 - Data Acquisition ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Crystal Beach
    Attractions ATTRACTIONS Crystal Beach Fair Hill Nature Center Public sandy beach on the Elk River Part of Fair Hill Natural Resource Calvert Regional Park with a wonderful view of Turkey Point; Management Area. Programs for stu- concession stand, picnic tables, admis- dents and community events. Classes One mile walking trail, synthetic turf sion; End of Rt. 282 West, Earleville; and reinforce science and environmen- multi-purpose field, basketball court, 410-275-1183 tal education. 630 Tawes Drive, Elkton; 7 natural grass multi-purpose fields, 410-398-4909 & concession stand. Located between Day Basket Factory MD Route 272 and MD Route 273, 304 Our craftsmen carefully select and split Fair Hill Natural Resource Brick Meetinghouse Road, North East. each piece of oak used by our skilled Management Area 410-996-8101 weavers, who produce our baskets using 5600 acres of countryside and 80 miles Cecil Bird Club techniques passed down by generations of trails for hiking, biking, horseback of basket makers. Demos by appoint- riding, and fresh water stream fish- Founded in 1994, the club sponsors ment. 1885 Old Elk Neck Rd, Elkton; ing. The property also hosts events recreational & social events, educa- 410-398-5150 including the Scottish Games, Fair tional programs, information exchange Earleville Hill Races, Cecil County Fair, Fair Hill DIRECTORY & research on bird populations. International, and more. Office at 300 Wildlife Management Area Cecilton – (see pages 18-19) Tawes Drive; 410-398-1246 Attractions .....................................2 A 195-acre home to beavers, wood Cecil County Dragway ducks, deer, and a host of bird species. Fair Hill Stables Boat Rentals ....................................4 Drag racing excitement March to Also has unmarked trails to invite You’ll be surrounded by scenic Fair Hill Civil War Trail Markers .................4 December.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Stewardship Lake Summaries
    Of ADIRONDACK WATERSHED INSTITUTE TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM Table of Contents Location Use Data Summaries ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Black Lake (St. Lawrence County) ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Brantingham Lake ......................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Chateaugay Lake ............................................................................................................................................................................ 8 Chazy Lake ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Cranberry Lake............................................................................................................................................................................. 14 Fish Creek Ponds ......................................................................................................................................................................... 17 Forked Lake ..................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Guide To
    dnr.maryland.gov MARYLAND GUIDE TO 2017 – FISHING 2018 & CRABBING WHAT’S NEW See page 6 Also inside... • License Information • Seasons, Sizes & Limits •Fish Identification • Public Lakes & Ponds • T idal/Non tidal dividing lines •Oysters & Clams NONTIDAL | CHESAPEAKE BAY | COASTAL BAYS | ATLANTIC OCEAN You Are Here So Are We NOT EVERY TOWING SERVICE HAS A FLEET STANDING BY TO BACK UP THEIR PROMISES. We do. TowBoatU.S. has over 600 red boats from coast to coast, so you’re never far from help when you need it. Our Captains are licensed professionals that will get you and your boat underway and where you need to go in no time. CALL OR GO ONLINE NOW TO JOIN FOR JUST $149 ALL YEAR. 1-800-395-2628 BoatUS.com/towing Towing details can be found online at BoatUS.com/towing or by calling. dnr.maryland.gov Photo courtesy Dee Kolobow 38 Courtesy of Sherry Bishop 40 Photo courtesy of Steve Peperak page 24 43 CONTENTS 44 What’s New���������������������������������������������� 6 Put-and-Take Sport Fish State Records Rules Trout Fishing Areas������������������������22–23 & Procedures�����������������������������������������39 DNR Addresses & Phone Numbers���������������������������������� 8 Special Management Areas Blue Crabs���������������������������������������40–41 Trout������������������������������������������24–25 Natural Resource Police Artificial Reefs��������������������������������������42 Information���������������������������������������������� 8 AllSpecies��������������������������������������26 Oyster & Clams�������������������������������������43
    [Show full text]
  • Original Bridge Papers 1705-1958
    Original Bridge Papers 1705-1958 Township Stream/Creek Branch Year Location Identifier Road Located On Townships Draft Comments Volume Page Road Docket Page Bridge # Chichester 1739 1 9-10 Lower 1763 Repaired 1 33-36 Chichester Chichester 1765 Repaired 1 33-36 Chichester 1765 Repaired 1 33-36 Tinicum 1783 On Tinicum Island 1 43 Coventry [Small Stream] 1803 Schuylkill Road (new) 1 86-93 C 234 East Bradford [Small Stream] 1812 Near the Black Horse Tavern Strasburg Road Small stream that turns 1 173- D 277 Taylor's mill 175 Honey Brook [Small Stream] 1899 Near Edward's mill Public highway from Honey Brook to Cambridge 13 2 M 253 Lower Oxford Allen's Run 1877 Public road from Oxford to Pleasant Garden Papers mistakenly 8 116- [Pine Grove] identify the road's 121 destination as Pleasant Garden, should be Pine East Caln Beaver Creek 1819 Near Joseph M. Downing's mill Public highway from Waggontown to 2 113- E 93 Downington, Ephrata, Harrisburg Turnpike, at 118 Gate 1 Brandywine Beaver Creek 1832 Road to Joseph M. Downing's mills and lime 3 76-78 stone quarries Monday, January 07, 2019 Chester County Archives and Record Services, West Chester, PA 193 Original Bridge Papers 1705-1958 Township Stream/Creek Branch Year Location Identifier Road Located On Townships Draft Comments Volume Page Road Docket Page Bridge # East Caln Beaver Creek 1832 At Joseph Downing's mill Public road at Joseph Downing's mill 3 91-93 G 243 East Beaver Creek 1892 Near Bondsville Road from Guthrieville to Caln Meetinghouse 11 15 M 102, Brandywine 182 Downingtown Beaver Creek 1901 Manor Ave 13 20 M 289 East Beaver Creek 1912 Near lands of P.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Historical Magazine, 1930, Volume 25, Issue No. 4
    /v\sA sc 58^f-1 -\co Edited by J. HALL PLEASANTS, M. D. Ip-ublished by authority of the State VOLUME XLVI (Assembly Series, Volume 22) PEOOEEMNGS AND ACTS OF THE ASSEMBLY, 1748-51. 'IMS volume of the arduves is now ready for distribution. The attention of members of the Society who do not now receive the Archives is called to the liberal provision made by the Legislature, which permits the Society to furnish to its own members copies of the volumes, as they are published from year to year, at the mere cost of paper, presswork, and binding. This cost is at present fixed at one dollar, at which price members of the Society may obtain one copy of each volume published. For additional copies, a price of three dollars is charged. The European background upon which American affairs were projected when the Assembly met in session in 1748, found Great Britain still engaged with Prance in what in the colonies was called King George's War, but when the Assembly met in 1749, Governor Ogle was able to congratulate the province upon the restoration of peace, which had been effected by the recently signed treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle. Samuel Ogle, who had entered upon his third term as Governor in 1746, continued to serve in that capacity during the period covered by this volume, and died in office. May 3rd, 1752. He was an excellent governor, and the controversies which took place between him and the members of the Lower House, who were of the Country, or anti-Proprietary party, at the time usually in a slight majority in this body, were due rather to the rising spirit of independence then developing in the colonies, than to any feeling of ill will towards the Governor himself, who was tactful and personally popular.
    [Show full text]
  • A Geographical Description of the States of Maryland and Delaware : Also of the Counties, Towns, Rivers, Bays and Islands, With
    ffitbrarg ItttwrHtta of 3Pttt0b«rgI| Darlington Memorial Library look f BALTIMORE, SATURDAY, SEl'T. 8, 1966! Ar>'U •iq. Miles. f ; BALTIMORE, SATUfiDAY, SErT.S, 1866. A School Geogbaphy op Maryland. We have from the publishers, D. Appleton & Co., of Kew York, per Cuehings & Bailey, of this city, a Geography of the State of Maryland, designed for schools, and intended to accompany Corneire Grammar School Geography, which contains a new map of the State that can hardly fail to meet fally the ends for which it is designed. The general questions on the map of Marvland are such as will imi^rees on the minds of the pupil the exact location, as well as the general ctaracter^ of Burface, etc. On the last page is •given, in' convenient tabular form, the urigin of the camee of the counties, with date of forma- tion, area, etc., from which, on ac':ount of their interest, we take the following: Area Population CoWiiies. rcrmed. Sq. Miles. in 1880. St. Mary's It334 300 15,213 Anne Arundel 1«50 360 :i3,900 Kent 1650 SIO 13,267 Calvert 1(.«4 S50 10,447 Charles ItcS 4o0 16,517 1059 COO * Baltimore -) ''^fifi Talbot 1C60 280 14,7i« Dorchester 1066 600 20,461 Somerset 1666 50<J 24,993 Cecil, 1673 S.50 23,862 P.ince George's 1695 -100 23,327 Qi-.ecn Anne 9 1706 4'» 15.901 Worceeter 1 742 5G0 ^'0,061 Frederick 1748 580 40,o91 Montgomejv 1766 425 18,322 Caroline...'. 1773 270 11,129 l'«rfor4 1773 400 23,415 W.isl.in^fcou 1776 525 31,417 ^lieganv 1789 1,100 28.;347 Carroll 1836 425 '^^,533 Howard 1850 240 13,388 ^Baltimore citv.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Humanities Council History Matters!
    Maryland Humanities Council History Matters! Interpretive Plan for the Lower Susquehanna Heritage Greenway History Matters! A History of Maryland’s Lower Susquehanna Region The Lower Susquehanna region is the bold termination of the wide, powerful Susquehanna River and the gentle beginning of the great Chesapeake Bay. Water dominates and shapes the lives of the humans along the shores just as it dominates and shapes the contours of its land.1 The commanding river pulls people together; and at the same time, it divides them. Maryland’s Harford County to the south and Cecil County to the north, separated by the river, are pulled away from one another toward competing economic centers. Harford County easily connects with urban Baltimore, and Cecil County is lured away from Maryland’s influence by Philadelphia and Wilmington. The Lower Susquehanna is a borderland connected by the mighty waters that dominate its existence. When we began reviewing the history of the Lower Susquehanna region of Maryland, we read the existing volumes on Harford and Cecil Counties; and we talked to our heritage area partners in the region. What did they need? Excellent histories focusing on the important men and events of the region already exist.2 What could we add? We gathered together experts on Maryland’s history and culture to discuss how we might fill in what was missing in our existing knowledge of the state. We visited local historians in the Lower Susquehanna to learn what information they needed to better interpret their region. Most agreed that we needed to explore the lives of the everyday people who lived and worked and died near these great waters.
    [Show full text]