The Nuclear Cap-Binding Complex As Choreographer of Gene Transcription and Pre-Mrna Processing
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 25, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press REVIEW The nuclear cap-binding complex as choreographer of gene transcription and pre-mRNA processing Xavier Rambout1,2 and Lynne E. Maquat1,2 1Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14642, USA; 2Center for RNA Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14642, USA The largely nuclear cap-binding complex (CBC) binds to tributed to elucidating the role of the CBC in the the 5′ caps of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII)-synthesized cytoplasm during the pioneer round of translation and transcripts and serves as a dynamic interaction platform nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) (for review, see for a myriad of RNA processing factors that regulate Maquat et al. 2010; Ryu and Kim 2017; Kurosaki et al. gene expression. While influence of the CBC can extend 2019), our current research focuses on the role of the into the cytoplasm, here we review the roles of the CBC CBC during gene transcription by RNAPII (Cho et al. in the nucleus, with a focus on protein-coding genes. We 2018). Here, we review known roles of the CBC in the nu- discuss differences between CBC function in yeast and cleus during the transcription of genes that encode pro- mammals, covering the steps of transcription initiation, teins, stitching together past studies from diverse groups release of RNAPII from pausing, transcription elongation, to describe the continuum of CBC-mediated checks and cotranscriptional pre-mRNA splicing, transcription ter- balances in eukaryotic cells. mination, and consequences of spurious transcription. We describe parameters known to control the binding of generic or gene-specific cofactors that regulate CBC activ- ities depending on the process(es) targeted, illustrating Chromatin-associated steps in the synthesis how the CBC is an ever-changing choreographer of gene and processing of protein-coding transcripts expression. The transcription of eukaryotic protein-coding genes is a stepwise process that can be divided into fundamental stages, all of which are regulated by the CBC: preinitiation complex assembly, transcription initiation, promoter- The nuclear cap-binding complex (CBC), which is a het- proximal pausing, processive transcription elongation, erodimer conserved from Saccharomyces cerevisiae to and transcription termination coupled to pre-mRNA Homo sapiens, is composed of two cap-binding proteins 3′ end processing. The process of pre-mRNA splicing, be- 7 ′ (CBPs). CBP20 directly binds the m G cap at the 5 end ing largely cotranscriptional, is also presented in this of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII)-synthesized transcripts, review. while CBP80 stabilizes the binding of CBP20 to the cap and serves as an interaction platform for numerous factors that control virtually every step of gene expression (Gona- topoulos-Pournatzis and Cowling 2014; Müller-McNicoll Preinitiation complex assembly and Neugebauer 2014). RNAPII-synthesized transcripts The first step of gene transcription is assembly at the core bound by the CBC include precursor and processed promoter of a preinitiation complex (PIC) composed of mRNAs, long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), promoter up- RNAPII and general transcription factors (GTFs). PIC as- stream transcripts (PROMPTs), enhancer RNAs (eRNAs), sembly is positively and negatively controlled by a pleth- immature small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs), small nucleolar ora of transcription factors and cofactors as well as RNAs (snoRNAs) of intergenic origin, and primary-micro- chromatin remodelers that regulate promoter accessibili- RNAs (pri-miRNAs). Whereas our lab discovered and con- ty (Eychenne et al. 2017; Nogales et al. 2017). [Keywords: CBP80; CBP20; CBC; transcription preinitiation complex; transcription initiation; promoter-proximal pausing; transcription © 2020 Rambout and Maquat This article is distributed exclusively by elongation; RNA 3′ end formation; transcription termination; pre-mRNA Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the first six months after the splicing; alternative splicing] full-issue publication date (see http://genesdev.cshlp.org/site/misc/ Corresponding author: [email protected] terms.xhtml). After six months, it is available under a Creative Commons Article is online at http://www.genesdev.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gad.339986. License (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International), as described at 120. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. GENES & DEVELOPMENT 34:1113–1127 Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; ISSN 0890-9369/20; www.genesdev.org 1113 Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 25, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Rambout and Maquat Transcription initiation Transcription elongation can be interrupted by addi- tional pausing events. As one important example, RNAPII Transcription cofactors subsequently convey activating can pause at stable first nucleosomes (i.e., +1 nucleo- cues leading to phosphorylation of the RNAPII carboxy- somes) in mammals (Barski et al. 2007; Chiu et al. 2018; terminal domain (CTD) at serine 5 (S5) and S7 by the cy- Aoi et al. 2020), in fruit fly (Mavrich et al. 2008; Weber clin-dependent kinase 7 (CDK7) subunit of the GTF TFIIH et al. 2014), and in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces (Haberle and Stark 2018). CTD phosphorylation enables pombe (Booth et al. 2016). Like promoter-proximal paus- RNAPII to escape the promoter and begin pre-mRNA syn- ing, release from +1 nucleosome pausing relies on thesis; i.e., to initiate transcription. Despite being essen- P-TEFb (Booth et al. 2018; Chiu et al. 2018). However, tial to the process of gene transcription in both lower pausing at +1 nucleosomes is more transient (t <15 and higher eukaryotes (Schier and Taatjes 2020), PIC as- 1/2 sec) than pausing at promoter-proximal regions (t =2– sembly and transcription initiation are preferentially tar- 1/2 30 min) (Core and Adelman 2019). At least in mammals, geted for regulating gene expression in lower eukaryotes, +1 nucleosomes feedback to promoter-proximal pausing such as the budding yeast S. cerevisiae (Hahn and Young (Jimeno-González et al. 2015) as well as pre-mRNA splic- 2011), while promoter-proximal pausing has emerged as ing and early transcription termination (Chiu et al. 2018). the early step that largely regulates gene expression in On one hand, stable +1 nucleosomes enhance promoter- metazoans (Adelman and Lis 2012). proximal pausing by augmenting NELF recruitment (Jimeno-González et al. 2015). On the other hand, RNAPII Promoter-proximal pausing and pre-mRNA capping pausing at +1 nucleosomes located downstream from CpG islands has been proposed to cause premature transcrip- – In higher eukaryotes, RNAPII often pauses 25 50 bp tion termination in cases where the U1 small nuclear ribo- downstream from the transcription start site (TSS), await- nucleoprotein (snRNP) fails to recognize the 5′ splice site ing additional signals to engage in processive transcrip- of the first intron (Chiu et al. 2018). tion (Core and Adelman 2019). As the nascent transcript emerges from the exit channel of RNAPII, RNAPII stall- ing is induced by recruitment of (1) the two-subunit Pre-mRNA splicing β DSIF (dichloro-1- -D-ribofuranosylbenzimidazole [DRB] Consistent with extensive physical interactions between sensitivity-inducing factor) complex composed of SPT4 the transcription machinery and splicing factors, more and SPT5, and (2) the four-subunit NELF (negative elonga- than 75% of splicing events occur cotranscriptionally tion factor) complex composed of NELF-A, NELF-B, either (Neugebauer 2019). Posttranscriptional events are more the NELF-C or NELF-D isoform of the NELFCD gene, and likely to characterize constitutive splicing of 3′-terminal NELF-E. Particularly relevant to this review, promoter- ′ introns and alternative splicing (Neugebauer 2019). proximal pausing and accessibility of the 5 end of pre- Whereas cotranscriptional splicing kinetics may vary mRNA as it emerges from the RNAPII exit channel coin- ′ greatly between species (Neugebauer 2019), the core splic- cide to allow pre-mRNA 5 end capping (Rasmussen and ing machinery is globally well-conserved (Will and Lühr- Lis 1993; Martinez-Rucobo et al. 2015) and CBC recruit- ′ ′ mann 2011). First, 5 splice site recognition by U1 ment to the 5 cap (Visa et al. 1996; Listerman et al. snRNP, SF1 (BBP in yeast) binding to the branchpoint se- 2006; Glover-Cutter et al. 2008). Genome-wide recruit- ′ quence, and U2AF (Mud2p in yeast) binding to the poly- ment of the CBC to 5 caps is facilitated by NELF (Aoi pyrimidine tract and 3′ splice site result in formation of et al. 2020), which directly binds the CBC via the NELF- the early (E) complex (commitment complex in yeast). E subunit (Narita et al. 2007). Second, U2 snRNP replaces SF1/BBP to form the A com- Even though promoter-proximal pausing is less preva- plex. Third, recruitment of the U4/U6•U5 tri-snRNP lent in lower eukaryotes, in S. cerevisiae, promoter-prox- forms the B complex, which is subsequently extensively imal accumulation of RNAPII can be observed following remodeled to form the B∗ complex that catalyzes the first genetic inhibition of the first catalytic step of pre- splicing reaction. The C complex subsequently finalizes mRNA capping (Lahudkar et al. 2014). Nonetheless, splicing, releasing the lariat intron. such pausing does not coincide with CBC recruitment, which occurs more than ∼110 bp downstream from the ′ TSS