DOCSLIB.ORG

CHAPTER 3 Existing Condition and Environmental Consequences

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CHAPTER 3 Existing Condition and Environmental Consequences CHAPTER 3 Existing Condition and Environmental Consequences Introduction This chapter summarizes the affected physical, biological, social, and economic environments of the project area and the effects of implementing each alternative. The scientific and analytic basis is presented for the comparison of alternatives listed in Chapter 2. The effects disclosed are based on the effectiveness of the mitigation measure outlined in Chapter 2. Each resource identified indicators and measures for the analysis, based on management direction, research, or field practice. The effects resulting from each action are described in terms of their context and intensity. Other activities occurring in the same area over time, under certain circumstances, may have incremental effects that contribute to cumulative effects. Each resource identified the spatial and temporal boundaries appropriate for the analysis. The analyses disclose the direct, indirect and cumulative effects of each alternative. Past, present and reasonably foreseeable future projects that may contribute to cumulative effects are identified. Many of the effects discussed in this chapter are not easily quantified. It should be kept in mind that many of the values presented are modeled or estimated predictions of effects, and that the actual effects may not occur exactly to the degree presented. In some cases, the value of the analysis is in the comparison of the estimated effects between alternatives, rather than in the absolute values of the effects shown. Each environmental component is discussed in terms of the consequences of implementing each of the alternatives listed in Chapter 2. This allows the reader interested in specific resources to find the effects related to that resource in one place. The following format is used for each environmental component: Existing Condition describes the environment of the area to be affected by the alternatives, that is, the baseline environment, thus including past actions. It provides background for understanding the discussion that follows. Environmental Consequences of implementing each alternative are discussed. There are three types of effects considered: • Direct Effects are caused by the action and occur at the same time and place [40 CFR 1508.8(a)]. • Indirect Effects are caused by the action but occur later in time or further removed in distance, but are still reasonably foreseeable [40 CFR 1508.8(b)]. • Cumulative Effects result from the incremental impacts of the action when added to other past, present, and reasonable foreseeable actions [40 CFR 1508.7]. Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest Travel Management Draft EA 3-1 June 2016 Consistency Finding is a statement for each resource area that demonstrates how the action alternatives are consistent with the amended Forest Plan. The Chapter begins with a discussion of past, present, and reasonably foreseeable actions that may affect the project area. Environmental components are detailed as above. This EA hereby incorporates by reference the Recreation, Hydrology/Fish, Wildlife, Botany, Invasive Species, Heritage, and SocioEconomics specialist reports in the Analysis file [40 CFR 1502.21] all of which are summarized in this chapter. The referenced reports are located in the corresponding resource section of the Analysis file. All specialist reports contain the detailed data, methodologies, analyses, conclusions, maps, references and technical documentation (best available science) that the resource specialists relied on to reach conclusions. Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions The project interdisciplinary team (IDT) identified past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions, that might have cumulative impacts with the proposed action. Those actions in and adjacent to the project area are listed below. Each resource specialist considered different mixes of these actions, depending on the cumulative effects boundary for the resource area and the resource affected. Only those past, present and reasonably foreseeable future actions that overlap the geographic analysis area boundary for each particular resource are considered, and only if those other actions have or are expected to have overlapping effects (spatially and temporally) with Travel Management. Some past projects may still be having effects on one resource, but not another. Past Actions In order to understand the contribution of past actions to the cumulative effects of the proposed action and alternatives, this analysis relies on current environmental conditions as a proxy for the impacts of past actions. This is because existing conditions reflect the aggregate impact of all prior human actions and natural events that have affected the environment and might contribute to cumulative effects. The Council on Environmental Quality issued an interpretive memorandum on June 24, 2005 regarding analysis of past actions, which states, “agencies can conduct an adequate cumulative effects analysis by focusing on the current aggregate effects of past actions without delving into the historical details of individual past actions.” The cumulative effects analysis in this EA is also consistent with Forest Service National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Regulations (36 CFR 220.4(f)) (July 24, 2008), which state, in part: Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest Travel Management Draft EA 3-2 June 2016 CEQ regulations do not require the consideration of the individual effects of all past actions to determine the present effects of past actions. Once the agency has identified those present effects of past actions that warrant consideration, the agency assesses the extent that the effects of the proposal for agency action or its alternatives will add to, modify, or mitigate those effects. The final analysis documents an agency assessment of the cumulative effects of the actions considered (including past, present, and reasonable foreseeable future actions) on the affected environment. With respect to past actions, during the scoping process and subsequent preparation of the analysis, the agency must determine what information regarding past actions is useful and relevant to the required analysis of cumulative effects. Cataloging past actions and specific information about the direct and indirect effects of their design and implementation could in some contexts be useful to predict the cumulative effects of the proposal. The CEQ regulations, however, do not require agencies to catalogue or exhaustively list and analyze all individual past actions. Simply because information about past actions may be available or obtained with reasonable effort does not mean that it is relevant and necessary to inform decision making.” (40 CFR 1508.7) For these reasons, the analysis of past actions in this section is based on current environmental conditions although the effects of past actions will be aggregated with present and reasonably foreseeable future actions in determining whether the effects from the outfitter-guide activities included in this document are significant. Present Actions Present and ongoing actions were considered in the cumulative effects analysis. There are many actions occurring at any given time on National Forest System land. Those that have a cumulative effect with the alternatives are discussed in the individual resource sections. The main routine present and ongoing actions are listed below. • Road Maintenance • Trail Maintenance • Developed Campground Maintenance • Respect the River (Improved Site) Maintenance • Firewood and other Special Forest Products Gathering • Livestock Grazing on Grazing Allotments • Noxious Weed/Invasive Species Control • Mining Operations • Recreation and Non-Recreation Special Use Permits • Fire Suppression Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest Travel Management Draft EA 3-3 June 2016 Ongoing and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions Reasonably foreseeable future actions are defined as: Those Federal of non-Federal activities not yet undertaken, for which there are existing decisions, funding, or identified proposals. Identified proposals for Forest Service actions are…[proposals for which the] Forest Service has a goal and is actively preparing to make a decision on one or more alternative means of accomplishing that goal and the effects can be meaningfully evaluated. 36 CFR §220.3 and 36 CFR §220.4(a)(1) The list of the actions the Forest Service or other landowners are currently implementing that could potentially interact with the effects of the Motorized Travel Management Project is included in Table A- 1 in Appendix A. Also included are those actions for which the Forest Service has decisions that have not been implemented, or an identified proposal, in addition to proposals by other landowners, that could potentially interact with the effects of the Motorized Travel Management Project. The following table includes the categories of these actions and key assumptions used in the cumulative effects analysis. A general assumption for all projects is that they will comply with all applicable laws and forest plan standards and guidelines. Table 3.0-1. Ongoing and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions Type of Project Agency Key Assumptions Restoration and Fuels Forest Service The Forest will complete Forest Restoration and Fuels Reduction Reduction on approximately 140,347 acres and close or decommission 218.5 miles of road. Projects will improve forest health, and reduce fuel loading. Projects will comply with all Forest Plan standards and guidelines, and all laws,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Climbing the Sea Annual Report
    WWW.MOUNTAINEERS.ORG MARCH/APRIL 2015 • VOLUME 109 • NO. 2 MountaineerEXPLORE • LEARN • CONSERVE Annual Report 2014 PAGE 3 Climbing the Sea sailing PAGE 23 tableofcontents Mar/Apr 2015 » Volume 109 » Number 2 The Mountaineers enriches lives and communities by helping people explore, conserve, learn about and enjoy the lands and waters of the Pacific Northwest and beyond. Features 3 Breakthrough The Mountaineers Annual Report 2014 23 Climbing the Sea a sailing experience 28 Sea Kayaking 23 a sport for everyone 30 National Trails Day celebrating the trails we love Columns 22 SUMMIT Savvy Guess that peak 29 MEMbER HIGHLIGHT Masako Nair 32 Nature’S WAy Western Bluebirds 34 RETRO REWIND Fred Beckey 36 PEAK FITNESS 30 Back-to-Backs Discover The Mountaineers Mountaineer magazine would like to thank The Mountaineers If you are thinking of joining — or have joined and aren’t sure where Foundation for its financial assistance. The Foundation operates to start — why not set a date to Meet The Mountaineers? Check the as a separate organization from The Mountaineers, which has received about one-third of the Foundation’s gifts to various Branching Out section of the magazine for times and locations of nonprofit organizations. informational meetings at each of our seven branches. Mountaineer uses: CLEAR on the cover: Lori Stamper learning to sail. Sailing story on page 23. photographer: Alan Vogt AREA 2 the mountaineer magazine mar/apr 2015 THE MOUNTAINEERS ANNUAL REPORT 2014 FROM THE BOARD PRESIDENT Without individuals who appreciate the natural world and actively champion its preservation, we wouldn’t have the nearly 110 million acres of wilderness areas that we enjoy today.
    [Show full text]
  • CODE of COLORADO REGULATIONS 2 CCR 406-9 Colorado Parks and Wildlife
    DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Colorado Parks and Wildlife CHAPTER W-9 - WILDLIFE PROPERTIES 2 CCR 406-9 [Editor’s Notes follow the text of the rules at the end of this CCR Document.] _________________________________________________________________________ ARTICLE I GENERAL PROVISIONS #900 REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL WILDLIFE PROPERTIES, EXCEPT STATE TRUST LANDS A. DEFINITIONS 1. “Aircraft” means any machine or device capable of atmospheric flight, including, but not limited to, airplanes, helicopters, gliders, dirigibles, balloons, rockets, hang gliders and parachutes, and any models thereof. 2. “Water contact activities” means swimming, wading (except for the purpose of fishing), waterskiing, sail surfboarding, scuba diving, and other water related activities which put a person in contact with the water (without regard to the clothing or equipment worn). 3. “Youth mentor hunting” means hunting by youths under 18 years of age. Youth hunters under 16 years of age shall at all times be accompanied by a mentor when hunting on youth mentor properties. A mentor must be 18 years of age or older and hold a valid hunter education certificate or be born before January 1, 1949. B. Public Access to State Wildlife Areas 1. Only properties listed in this chapter are open for public access. The Director may open newly acquired properties for public access for a period not to exceed nine (9) months pending adoption of permanent regulations. In addition, the Director may establish and post restrictions based upon consideration of the following criteria: a. The location and size of the area. b. The location, type and condition of roads, vehicle parking areas and the number and type of sanitary facilities available.
    [Show full text]
  • The Buffer Handbook Plant List
    THE BUFFER HANDBOOK PLANT LIST Originally Developed by: Cynthia Kuhns, Lake & Watershed Resource Management Associates With funding provided by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Maine Department of Environmental Protection,1998. Revised 2001 and 2009. Publication #DEPLW0094-B2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Acknowledgements 1 Introductory Information Selection of Plants for This List 1 Plant List Organization & Information 3 Terms & Abbreviations 4 Plant Hardiness Zone Map 5 General Tree & Shrub Planting Guidelines 5 Tips for Planting Perennials 7 Invasive Plants to Avoid 7 Plant Lists TREES 8 (30 to 100 ft.) SHRUBS 14 Small Trees/Large Shrubs 15 (12 to 30 ft.) Medium Shrubs 19 (6 to 12 ft.) Small Shrubs 24 (Less than 6 ft.) GROUNDLAYERS 29 Perennial Herbs & Flowers 30 Ferns 45 Grasses 45 Vines 45 References 49 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Original Publication: This plant list was published with the help of Clean Water Act, Section 319 funds, under a grant awarded to the Androscoggin Valley Soil and Water Conservation District and with help from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Graphics and ‘clip-art’ used in this document came from the University of Wisconsin-Extension and from Microsoft Office 97(Small Business Edition) and ClickArt 97 (Broderbund Software, Inc). This publication was originally developed by Cynthia Kuhns of Lake & Watershed Resource Management Associates. Substantial assistance was received from Phoebe Hardesty of the Androscoggin Valley Soil and Water Conservation District. Valuable review and advice was given by Karen Hahnel and Kathy Hoppe of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection. Elizabeth T. Muir provided free and cheerful editing and botanical advice.
    [Show full text]
  • MOTHER's MILK Barn 28 Hip No. 2416
    Consigned by Hunter Valley Farm, Agent Barn Hip No. 28 MOTHER'S MILK 2416 Bay Mare; foaled 2007 Vice Regent Deputy Minister ................ Mint Copy Silver Deputy .................... Mr. Prospector Silver Valley...................... Seven Valleys MOTHER'S MILK Seattle Slew A.P. Indy............................ Weekend Surprise Caught in the Act.............. (2001) Night Shift Creaking Board (GB)......... Happy Landing By SILVER DEPUTY (1985). Black-type winner of $41,820, Swynford S. [L] (WO, $32,100(CAN)). Among the leading sires, sire of 20 crops of racing age, 1072 foals, 865 starters, 87 black-type winners, 7 champions, 691 winners of 2770 races and earning $87,717,397. Sire of dams of 79 black- type winners, including champions Wake At Noon, Groupie Doll, Silvery Prospect, Ketal, and of Oken Bruce Lee, Ganges, Roman Ruler, Mirac- ulous Miss, Penny Whistle, Preachinatthebar, Wiseman's Ferry. 1st dam CAUGHT IN THE ACT, by A.P. Indy. Sister to CROWD PLEASER. Dam of 3 other registered foals, 3 of racing age, including a 2-year-old of 2013, 2 to race, 1 winner-- Elusive Act (f. by Elusive Quality). 3 wins at 3, 2013, $66,901. 2nd dam CREAKING BOARD (GB), by Night Shift. Winner at 2, €45,735, in France, 2nd Prix Robert Papin [G2], Prix La Fleche; 2 wins in 4 starts at 2, $278,- 750, in N.A./U.S., Hollywood Starlet S. [G1], Miesque S. [L] (HOL, $137,- 500). (Total: $335,244). Sister to DYHIM DIAMOND (IRE) [G3] (Total: $298,823, hwt. older horse at 4 on German Hand., 5 - 7 fur.), DAKHLA OASIS [G2] (Total: 480,682), half-sister to SANTENAY, Three Greens (GB), Mary The Best.
    [Show full text]
  • Jamestown, Rhode Island
    Historic andArchitectural Resources ofJamestown, Rhode Island 1 Li *fl U fl It - .-*-,. -.- - - . ---... -S - Historic and Architectural Resources of Jamestown, Rhode Island Rhode Island Historical Preservation & Heritage Commission 1995 Historic and Architectural Resources ofJamestown, Rhode Island, is published by the Rhode Island Historical Preservation & Heritage Commission, which is the state historic preservation office, in cooperation with the Jamestown Historical Society. Preparation of this publication has been funded in part by the National Park Service, United States Department of the Interior. The contents and opinions herein, however, do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior. The Rhode Island Historical Preservation & Heritage Commission receives federal funds from the National Park Service. Regulations of the United States Department of the Interior strictly prohibit discrimination in departmental federally assisted programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, or handicap. Any person who believes that he or she has been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility operated by a recipient of federal assistance should write to: Director, Equal Opportunity Program, United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, P.O. Box 37127, Washington, D.C. 20013-7127. Cover East Fern’. Photograph c. 1890. Couriecy of Janiestown Historical Society. This view, looking north along tile shore, shows the steam feriy Conanicut leaving tile slip. From left to rig/It are tile Thorndike Hotel, Gardner house, Riverside, Bay View Hotel and tile Bay Voyage Inn. Only tile Bay Voyage Iiii suivives. Title Page: Beavertail Lighthouse, 1856, Beavertail Road. Tile light/louse tower at the southern tip of the island, the tallest offive buildings at this site, is a 52-foot-high stone structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Years of Winter: the Cold Decade and Environmental
    TEN YEARS OF WINTER: THE COLD DECADE AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSCIOUSNESS IN THE EARLY 19 TH CENTURY by MICHAEL SEAN MUNGER A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of History and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 2017 DISSERTATION APPROVAL PAGE Student: Michael Sean Munger Title: Ten Years of Winter: The Cold Decade and Environmental Consciousness in the Early 19 th Century This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in the Department of History by: Matthew Dennis Chair Lindsay Braun Core Member Marsha Weisiger Core Member Mark Carey Institutional Representative and Scott L. Pratt Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded June 2017 ii © 2017 Michael Sean Munger iii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT Michael Sean Munger Doctor of Philosophy Department of History June 2017 Title: Ten Years of Winter: The Cold Decade and Environmental Consciousness in the Early 19 th Century Two volcanic eruptions in 1809 and 1815 shrouded the earth in sulfur dioxide and triggered a series of weather and climate anomalies manifesting themselves between 1810 and 1819, a period that scientists have termed the “Cold Decade.” People who lived during the Cold Decade appreciated its anomalies through direct experience, and they employed a number of cognitive and analytical tools to try to construct the environmental worlds in which they lived. Environmental consciousness in the early 19 th century commonly operated on two interrelated layers.
    [Show full text]
  • Tdn Europe • Page 2 of 8 • Thetdn.Com Saturday • 17 April 2021
    SATURDAY, 17 APRIL 2021 GREENLANDS GOAL FOR GLEN SHIEL MENUISIER FOCUSED Glen Shiel (GB) (Pivotal {GB}), who claimed a first Group 1 win ON ARC WITH at age six last season when upsetting the G1 British Champions Sprint S. at 16-1, could make his seasonal debut in the G3 WONDERFUL TONIGHT Greenlands S. at The Curragh on May 22. The Archie Watson- trained gelding also has an option in the G2 Duke Of York S. at York on May 12. Cosmo Charlton, Head Racing Manager for owner Hambleton Racing, said, AGlen Shiel is in fantastic form. Everyone is very happy with him. He=s stepped up into faster work now, and Archie is really pleased. AWe=re weighing up possible starting point options, but it might be the Greenlands S. over in Ireland, a Group 2 at the end of May. The Duke of York is still under consideration as well, but I think the likelihood is he=ll go to the Greenlands and then on to Royal Ascot for the [G1] Diamond Jubilee.@ Cont. p2 Wonderful Tonight | Scoop Dyga IN TDN AMERICA TODAY ALL IN THE FAMILY WITH STONESTREET’S OAKS FILLIES Three of the leading contender’s for the GI Kentucky Oaks were Christopher Wright=s dual Group 1-winning mare Wonderful born and raised at Stonestreet Farm. Click or tap here to go Tonight (Fr) (Le Havre {Ire}) is likely to have a later start to her straight to TDN America. 4-year-old campaign, with all roads leading to the G1 Prix de l=Arc de Triomphe, according to trainer David Menuisier.
    [Show full text]
  • Pasayten Rim Wilderness Evaluation
    May-June 2009 Pasayten Rim Wilderness Evaluation WILDERNESS EVALUATION PASAYTEN RIM - 608025 41,349 acres OVERVIEW History The area was originally inventoried as two separate roadless areas totaling approximately 15,400 acres during RARE I. The areas were Sherman Peak (12,000 acres) and Last Chance (3,400 acres). The RARE II process combined the two areas and did not recommend the area for wilderness designation. Due to nonconforming uses such as road construction and logging, 160 acres were removed from previous inventory; 10,839 acres were added to the previous inventory as they met the criteria for a potential wilderness area (PWA) as described in Forest Service Handbook (FSH) 1909.12, Chapter 70. The following chart depicts the 1989 Okanogan Forest Land and Resource Management Plan direction for the 2006 potential wilderness area. Table 1--Management area percentages (rounded) Okanogan National Forest MA32 MA37 MA45 MA46 Recreation/ Mtn. Mineral Timber/ Scenery Goat Exploration Range Habitat 45% 11% 32% 13% Location and Access The area is located northwest of Winthrop in the northern portion of the Okanogan- Wenatchee National Forest, and consists of a long, narrow band of land along the south edge of the Pasayten Wilderness. All lands are located in Okanogan County. From Winthrop, access is provided over State Highway 20, and county and national forest roads in the Chewuch River, Eightmile Creek, Lost River, and Harts Pass areas. Geography and Topography The western portion of the area consists of a long, half mile-wide band of southwest facing slope between the Harts Pass road and the Pasayten Wilderness.
    [Show full text]
  • WDFW Washington State Recovery Plan for the Lynx
    STATE OF WASHINGTON March 2001 LynxLynx RecoveryRecovery PlanPlan by Derek Stinson Washington Department of FISH AND WILDLIFE Wildlife Program Wildlife Diversity Division WDFW 735 In 1990, the Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission adopted procedures for listing and delisting species as endangered, threatened, or sensitive and for writing recovery and management plans for listed species (WAC 232-12-297, Appendix C). The lynx was classified by the Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission as a threatened species in 1993 (Washington Administrative Code 232-12-011). The procedures, developed by a group of citizens, interest groups, and state and federal agencies, require that recovery plans be developed for species listed as threatened or endangered. Recovery, as defined by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, is “the process by which the decline of an endangered or threatened species is arrested or reversed, and threats to its survival are neutralized, so that its long-term survival in nature can be ensured.” This document summarizes the historic and current distribution and abundance of the lynx in Washington, describes factors affecting the population and its habitat, and prescribes strategies to recover the species in Washington. The draft state recovery plan for the lynx was reviewed by researchers and state and federal agencies. This review was followed by a 90 day public comment period. All comments received were considered in preparation of this final recovery plan. For additional information about lynx or other state listed species, contact: Manager, Endangered Species Section Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 600 Capitol Way N Olympia WA 98501-1091 This report should be cited as: Stinson, D.
    [Show full text]
  • National Morgan Horse Show July ?6, 27
    he ULY 9 8 MORGAN HORSE NATIONAL MORGAN HORSE SHOW JULY ?6, 27 THE MORGAN HORSE Oldest and Most Highly Esteemed of American Horses MORGAN HORSES are owned the nation over and used in every kind of service where good saddle horses are a must. Each year finds many new owners of Morgans — each owner a great booster who won- ders why he didn't get wise to the best all-purpose saddle horse sooner. Keystone, the champion Morgan stallion owned by the Keystone Ranch, Entiat, Washington, was winner of the stock horse class at Wash- ington State Horse Show. Mabel Owen of Merrylegs Farm wanted to breed and raise hunters and jumpers. She planned on thoroughbreds until she discovered the Morgan could do everything the thoroughbred could do and the Morgan is calmer and more manageable. So the Morgan is her choice. The excellent Morgan stallion, Mickey Finn, owned by the Mar-La •antt Farms, Northville, Michigan, is another consistent winner in Western LITTLE FLY classes. A Morgan Horse on Western Range. Spring Hope, the young Morgan mare owned by Caven-Glo Farm Westmont, Illinois, competed and won many western classes throughout the middle-west shows the past couple of years, leaving the popular Quar- ter horse behind in many instances. The several Morgan horses owned by Frances and Wilma Reichow of Lenore, Idaho, usually win the western classes wherever they show. J. C. Jackson & Sons operate Pleasant View Ranch, Harrison, Mon- tana. Their Morgan stallion, Fleetfield, is a many-times champion in western stock horse classes. They raise and sell many fine Morgan horses each year.
    [Show full text]
  • Hiking Withdogs
    www.wta.org April 2008 » Washington Trails On Trail « Hiking withDogs Photo by “Sadie’s Driver” Dogs make some of the finest hiking companions. Sadie hikes with her “driver” on the Yellow Aster Butte Trail. Hiking with Your Best Buddy The Northwest is blessed with so many but sometimes that pushed her to the limits. places to venture in the outdoors—no matter Like the time I decided to do a trail run to the what your skill level. And, for some, it’s so top of Mount Dickerman in August. Not real much more enjoyable when you have a four- smart. She collapsed about a mile from the car legged companion to join you. The dogs I have on our way down. The combination of heat and seen on the trail seem so happy to be out roam- insufficient water took its toll. We made it back ing with their humans. fine, but I learned a lesson. Having hiked for a number of years all Some dogs are comfortable rock hopping around Washington and areas in British Colum- and scrambling, but many are not. Sadie could bia, my greatest enjoyment has been with my climb higher and faster than I could, but I al- Sadie’s buddy Sadie. This was a she-devil golden re- ways worried about what would happen when triever who, as a puppy, was a terror! But from she got to the top. Fortunately Sadie was quite Driver Sadie’s Driver lives her very first trip, being on the trail brought out confident on her feet and was cautious enough her best.
    [Show full text]
  • Byword(USA) Chestnut, 2006 • Height 16Hh
    Byword(USA) chestnut, 2006 • height 16hh Nearctic - Nearco NORTHERN DANCER Natalma - Native DANCER RACE RECORD Nureyev 1977 Forli - Aristophanes In France, UK, USA and Hong Kong, 7 wins, Special 1600-2000m (from 16 starts; 15 races in Graded and Thong - Nantallah Listed races, for earnings of £699.385). Peintre Celebre Champion Older Horse France 2010 (USA)1994 RAISE A Native - Native DANCER Alydar Timeform 126 – “effective on firm ground as well as soft; Sweet Tooth - On-And-On very best efforts at around 1¼m” Peintre Bleue At 3 WON Prix Pelleas-(L) (2000m) 1987 Habitat - Sir Gaylord 4th Gr2 Prix Guillaume d’Ornano (200m) Petroleuse 4th Gr3 Prix du Prince d’Orange (2000m) Plencia - Le Haar At 4 WON Gr1 Prince Of Wales S. (2000m) RAISE A Native - Native DANCER WON Gr2 Prix du Muguet (1600m) Mr Prospector WON Prix Jacques Laffitte-(L) (1800m) Woodman Gold Digger - Nashua 2nd Gr1 Prix d’Ispahan (1850m) 1983 Buckpasser - Tom Fool 3rd Gr1 Juddmonte Int. S. (2050m) Playmate 4th Gr2 Prix Foy (2400m) Binche (USA) Intriguing - Swaps At 5 WON Gr2 Prix Dollar (1950m) 1999 Blushing Groom - Red God WON Gr3 Prix du Chemin de Fer du Nord (1600m) Rainbow Quest 2nd Gr2 Prix du Muguet (1600m) Binary I Will Follow - Herbager 1993 Nijinsky - NORTHERN DANCER SIRE LINE Balabina PEINTRE CELEBRE – European Horse Of The Year 1997. Peace - Klairon European Champion 3yo, won 5 of 7 starts incl Gr1 GP de Paris, Gr1 Prix du Jockey Club, Gr1 Prix de l’Arc de SALES ANALYSIS 4th dam Triomphe (TFR 137). Sire of sires & broodmare sire of Gr1 BORN colt avg sold SI filly avg sold SI PEACE (66f Klairon): won Blue Seal S.-(L) (only start at 2; TFR winners worldwide.
    [Show full text]