DOCSLIB.ORG

Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria Version 12 (February 2016) Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Subcommittee of the IUCN Species Survival Commission. Citation: IUCN Standards and Petitions Subcommittee. 2016. Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 12. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Subcommittee. Downloadable from http://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines.pdf. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 4 2. AN OUTLINE OF THE RED LIST CATEGORIES AND CRITERIA............................................... 4 2.1 TAXONOMIC LEVEL AND SCOPE OF THE CATEGORIZATION PROCESS ........................................................ 4 2.1.1 Taxonomic scale of categorization ................................................................................................ 4 2.1.2 Geographical scale of categorization ........................................................................................... 6 2.1.3 Introduced taxa and subpopulations ............................................................................................. 7 2.1.4 Managed subpopulations .............................................................................................................. 8 2.2 NATURE OF THE CATEGORIES .................................................................................................................. 8 2.2.1 Transfer between categories ....................................................................................................... 11 2.3 NATURE OF THE CRITERIA...................................................................................................................... 13 2.4 CONSERVATION PRIORITIES AND ACTIONS ............................................................................................. 16 2.5 DOCUMENTATION .................................................................................................................................. 16 3. DATA QUALITY .................................................................................................................................... 17 3.1 DATA AVAILABILITY, INFERENCE, SUSPICION AND PROJECTION............................................................. 17 3.2 UNCERTAINTY ....................................................................................................................................... 18 3.2.1 Types of uncertainty .................................................................................................................... 18 3.2.2 Representing uncertainty ............................................................................................................ 18 3.2.3 Dispute tolerance and risk tolerance .......................................................................................... 19 3.2.4 Dealing with uncertainty ............................................................................................................. 19 3.2.5 Documenting uncertainty and interpreting listings ..................................................................... 20 3.2.6 Uncertainty and the application of the categories Data Deficient and Near Threatened ........... 20 4. DEFINITIONS OF TERMS USED IN THE CRITERIA AND THEIR CALCULATION .............. 20 4.1 POPULATION AND POPULATION SIZE (CRITERIA A, C AND D) ................................................................ 20 4.2 SUBPOPULATIONS (CRITERIA B AND C) ................................................................................................. 21 4.3 MATURE INDIVIDUALS (CRITERIA A, B, C AND D) ................................................................................. 21 4.3.1 Notes on defining mature individuals .......................................................................................... 22 4.3.2 Clonal colonial organisms, such as most corals, algae, bryophytes, fungi and some vascular plants ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….23 4.3.3 Fishes .......................................................................................................................................... 24 4.3.4 Sex-changing organisms ............................................................................................................. 24 4.3.5 Trees ............................................................................................................................................ 24 4.4 GENERATION (CRITERIA A, C1 AND E) .................................................................................................. 24 4.5 REDUCTION (CRITERION A) ................................................................................................................... 27 4.5.1 Calculating population reduction using statistical methods ....................................................... 27 4.5.2 Calculating population reduction using population models ....................................................... 32 4.5.3 Taxa with widely distributed or multiple subpopulations ........................................................... 32 Estimating overall reduction ..................................................................................................................... 33 Dealing with uncertainty ........................................................................................................................... 36 4.6 CONTINUING DECLINE (CRITERIA B AND C) ........................................................................................... 38 4.7 EXTREME FLUCTUATIONS (CRITERIA B AND C2) ................................................................................... 40 4.8 SEVERELY FRAGMENTED (CRITERION B) ............................................................................................... 42 4.9 EXTENT OF OCCURRENCE (CRITERIA A AND B) ...................................................................................... 43 4.10 AREA OF OCCUPANCY (CRITERIA A, B AND D) ...................................................................................... 46 4.10.1 Problems of scale ........................................................................................................................ 47 4.10.2 Methods for estimating AOO....................................................................................................... 47 4.10.3 The appropriate scale ................................................................................................................. 48 4.10.4 Scale-area relationships .............................................................................................................. 48 4.10.5 Scale correction factors .............................................................................................................. 49 4.10.6 "Linear" habitat .......................................................................................................................... 51 4.10.7 AOO and EOO based on habitat maps and models .................................................................... 52 4.11 LOCATION (CRITERIA B AND D) ............................................................................................................. 53 4.12 QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS (CRITERION E) .............................................................................................. 54 5. GUIDELINES FOR APPLYING CRITERION A ............................................................................... 54 5.1 THE BASIS OF REDUCTIONS .................................................................................................................... 56 5.2 THE USE OF TIME CAPS IN CRITERION A ................................................................................................. 58 5.3 HOW TO APPLY CRITERION A4 ............................................................................................................... 58 5.4 REDUCTION FOLLOWED BY SHORT-TERM STABILIZATION OR INCREASE: THE 'SKI-JUMP' EFFECT ........... 59 Red List Guidelines 3 5.5 HISTORICAL REDUCTION FOLLOWED BY LONG-TERM STABILIZATION: SEVERELY DEPLETED POPULATIONS .................................................................................................................................................. 59 5.6 FISHERIES .............................................................................................................................................. 60 5.6.1 Fisheries management and extinction risk .................................................................................. 60 5.6.2 Technical aspects of using criterion A for fisheries .................................................................... 61 5.7 LONG-LIVED TAXA ................................................................................................................................ 61 5.8 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOSS OF HABITAT AND POPULATION REDUCTION ........................................... 61 6. GUIDELINES FOR APPLYING CRITERION B ............................................................................... 62 7. GUIDELINES FOR APPLYING CRITERION C ............................................................................... 63 8. GUIDELINES FOR APPLYING CRITERION D ............................................................................... 64 8.1 TAXA KNOWN ONLY FROM THE TYPE LOCALITY ...................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SDG Indicator Metadata (Harmonized Metadata Template - Format Version 1.0)
    Last updated: 4 January 2021 SDG indicator metadata (Harmonized metadata template - format version 1.0) 0. Indicator information 0.a. Goal Goal 15: Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss 0.b. Target Target 15.5: Take urgent and significant action to reduce the degradation of natural habitats, halt the loss of biodiversity and, by 2020, protect and prevent the extinction of threatened species 0.c. Indicator Indicator 15.5.1: Red List Index 0.d. Series 0.e. Metadata update 4 January 2021 0.f. Related indicators Disaggregations of the Red List Index are also of particular relevance as indicators towards the following SDG targets (Brooks et al. 2015): SDG 2.4 Red List Index (species used for food and medicine); SDG 2.5 Red List Index (wild relatives and local breeds); SDG 12.2 Red List Index (impacts of utilisation) (Butchart 2008); SDG 12.4 Red List Index (impacts of pollution); SDG 13.1 Red List Index (impacts of climate change); SDG 14.1 Red List Index (impacts of pollution on marine species); SDG 14.2 Red List Index (marine species); SDG 14.3 Red List Index (reef-building coral species) (Carpenter et al. 2008); SDG 14.4 Red List Index (impacts of utilisation on marine species); SDG 15.1 Red List Index (terrestrial & freshwater species); SDG 15.2 Red List Index (forest-specialist species); SDG 15.4 Red List Index (mountain species); SDG 15.7 Red List Index (impacts of utilisation) (Butchart 2008); and SDG 15.8 Red List Index (impacts of invasive alien species) (Butchart 2008, McGeoch et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Critically Endangered - Wikipedia
    Critically endangered - Wikipedia Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history Critically endangered From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Main page Contents This article is about the conservation designation itself. For lists of critically endangered species, see Lists of IUCN Red List Critically Endangered Featured content species. Current events A critically endangered (CR) species is one which has been categorized by the International Union for Random article Conservation status Conservation of Nature (IUCN) as facing an extremely high risk of extinction in the wild.[1] Donate to Wikipedia by IUCN Red List category Wikipedia store As of 2014, there are 2464 animal and 2104 plant species with this assessment, compared with 1998 levels of 854 and 909, respectively.[2] Interaction Help As the IUCN Red List does not consider a species extinct until extensive, targeted surveys have been About Wikipedia conducted, species which are possibly extinct are still listed as critically endangered. IUCN maintains a list[3] Community portal of "possibly extinct" CR(PE) and "possibly extinct in the wild" CR(PEW) species, modelled on categories used Recent changes by BirdLife International to categorize these taxa. Contact page Contents Tools Extinct 1 International Union for Conservation of Nature definition What links here Extinct (EX) (list) 2 See also Related changes Extinct in the Wild (EW) (list) 3 Notes Upload file Threatened Special pages 4 References Critically Endangered (CR) (list) Permanent
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Goal C: to Improve the Status of Biodiversity by Safeguarding Ecosystems, Species and Genetic Diversity
    BIPTPM 2012 Strategic Goal C: To improve the status of biodiversity by safeguarding ecosystems, species and genetic diversity Target 11 - Protected areas Indicator Name Indicator Partners Last Next Description CBD Operational Indicator(s) Update Update Protected Area Management University of 2010 2013 Trends in extent of marine protected areas, coverage of Effectiveness (PAME) Queensland, IUCN, KPAs and management effectiveness (A) WCPA, University of Trends in protected area condition and/or management Oxford, UNEP- effectiveness including more equitable management WCMC Trends in the delivery of ecosystem services and equitable benefits from PAs Protected area status of inland McGill University, New 2013? Trends in coverage of protected waters WWF, UNEP-WCMC areas Arctic Protected Areas indicator CBMP, UNEP- 2010 2015? Trends in representative coverage WCMC, Protected of PAs areas agencies Trends in PA condition and across Arctic management effectiveness countries Living Planet Index WWF, ZSL 2012 2014 Trends in species populations inside (and outside) protected areas Arctic Species Trend Index CBMP, ZSL, WWF 2012 2014 Trends in PA condition and management effectiveness Important Bird Area state, Birdlife Trends in PA condition and measure and response values management effectiveness Protected area coverage of Birdlife, IUCN etc Trends in representative coverage important sites for biodiversity of Pas and sites of particular (IBAs, KBA etc) importance for biodiversity Red List Index for Species with Birdlife, IUCN etc N/A Protected /
    [Show full text]
  • Table 5: Threatened Species in Each Country (Totals by Taxonomic Group)
    IUCN Red List version 2020-1: Table 5 Last updated: 19 March 2020 Table 5: Threatened species in each country (totals by taxonomic group) * Reptiles, fishes, molluscs, other invertebrates, plants, fungi & protists: please note that for these groups, there are still many species that have not yet been assessed for the IUCN Red List and therefore their status is not known (i.e., these groups have not yet been completely assessed). Therefore the figures presented below for these groups should be interpreted as the number of species known to be threatened within those species that have been assessed to date, and not as the overall total number of threatened species for each group. AFRICA Other Fungi & North Africa Mammals Birds Reptiles* Amphibians Fishes* Molluscs* Plants* Total* Inverts* Protists* Algeria 14 15 8 3 45 12 30 26 2 155 Egypt 18 14 13 0 62 1 56 8 0 172 Libya 10 8 6 0 38 1 4 8 0 75 Morocco 18 18 13 2 55 38 33 56 5 238 Tunisia 14 11 6 1 42 8 13 10 2 107 Western Sahara 10 5 1 0 39 2 1 0 0 58 Other Fungi & Sub-Saharan Africa Mammals Birds Reptiles* Amphibians Fishes* Molluscs* Plants* Total* Inverts* Protists* Angola 22 33 7 0 55 7 4 43 0 171 Benin 16 12 7 1 46 2 1 21 0 106 Botswana 11 16 1 0 2 0 0 3 0 33 Burkina Faso 11 12 3 0 4 1 0 5 0 36 Burundi 16 14 0 1 17 3 3 134 0 188 Cabo Verde 4 7 6 0 38 13 0 51 0 119 Cameroon 47 29 13 57 126 13 13 592 0 890 Central African Republic 19 16 5 0 4 0 0 29 0 73 Chad 16 16 5 0 1 4 0 6 0 48 Comoros 5 14 5 0 17 0 77 9 0 127 Congo 18 7 6 1 60 7 0 56 0 155 Congo, The Democratic Republic of the 42
    [Show full text]
  • Madagascar, 1998
    A mammal, bird, reptile, orchid and people-watching trip to - Madagascar (and a very short stay in Mauritius) 18-10-98 to 21-11-98 Dave Siems and Steve Anyon-Smith “weird (verb) – Madagascar” ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ When our first guide, Patrice Rabearisoa, asked us what we wanted to see, he went white (not easy) at our reply – “we want to see all the birds, mammals, reptiles, orchids and everything else of interest in the forest, in no particular order.” He showed us all these things and more in the paradise that was, and still is, in parts, Madagascar. Outline of Trip “Madagascar” I said to Dave, and his eyes lit up. Five weeks later we were looking at lemurs. Our advice was that there was no safe or even practical way to visit a country populated by thieves, thugs and other human detritus of the worst order. There was said to be no usable public transport and if the food or the locals didn’t kill you, the insects most definitely would. So Dave and I set out to test these propositions. Madagascar is renowned for its wildlife, political instability and not much else. Our mission was to see as much of the native fauna and flora as possible during a five-week stay. We used public transport at all times and hired local guides at every location (this is generally compulsory anyway). We scattered ourselves widely throughout the country as the habitats are extremely varied, boasting rainforest, semi-desert, the so-called spiny forest and anything in between. Our expectations for the trip were not high given that we had little prior information and fully expected to be roasted slowly over a kitchen fire somewhere if we had managed to avoid perishing in a traffic accident.
    [Show full text]
  • Download-Report-2
    Gao et al. BMC Plant Biology (2020) 20:430 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-020-02646-3 REVIEW Open Access Plant extinction excels plant speciation in the Anthropocene Jian-Guo Gao1* , Hui Liu2, Ning Wang3, Jing Yang4 and Xiao-Ling Zhang5 Abstract Background: In the past several millenniums, we have domesticated several crop species that are crucial for human civilization, which is a symbol of significant human influence on plant evolution. A pressing question to address is if plant diversity will increase or decrease in this warming world since contradictory pieces of evidence exit of accelerating plant speciation and plant extinction in the Anthropocene. Results: Comparison may be made of the Anthropocene with the past geological times characterised by a warming climate, e.g., the Palaeocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM) 55.8 million years ago (Mya)—a period of “crocodiles in the Arctic”, during which plants saw accelerated speciation through autopolyploid speciation. Three accelerators of plant speciation were reasonably identified in the Anthropocene, including cities, polar regions and botanical gardens where new plant species might be accelerating formed through autopolyploid speciation and hybridization. Conclusions: However, this kind of positive effect of climate warming on new plant species formation would be thoroughly offset by direct and indirect intensive human exploitation and human disturbances that cause habitat loss, deforestation, land use change, climate change, and pollution, thus leading to higher extinction risk than speciation in the Anthropocene. At last, four research directions are proposed to deepen our understanding of how plant traits affect speciation and extinction, why we need to make good use of polar regions to study the mechanisms of dispersion and invasion, how to maximize the conservation of plant genetics, species, and diverse landscapes and ecosystems and a holistic perspective on plant speciation and extinction is needed to integrate spatiotemporally.
    [Show full text]
  • Improvements to the Red List Index Stuart H
    Improvements to the Red List Index Stuart H. M. Butchart1*, H. Resit Akc¸akaya2, Janice Chanson3, Jonathan E. M. Baillie4, Ben Collen4, Suhel Quader5,8, Will R. Turner6, Rajan Amin4, Simon N. Stuart3, Craig Hilton-Taylor7 1 BirdLife International, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2 Applied Biomathematics, Setauket, New York, United States of America, 3 Conservation International/Center for Applied Biodiversity Science-World Conservation Union (IUCN)/Species Survival Commission Biodiversity Assessment Unit, IUCN Species Programme, Center for Applied Biodiversity Science, Conservation International, Washington, D. C., United States of America, 4 Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, United Kingdom, 5 Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 6 Center for Applied Biodiversity Science, Conservation International, Washington, D. C., United States of America, 7 World Conservation Union (IUCN) Species Programme, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 8 Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Sandy, United Kingdom The Red List Index uses information from the IUCN Red List to track trends in the projected overall extinction risk of sets of species. It has been widely recognised as an important component of the suite of indicators needed to measure progress towards the international target of significantly reducing the rate of biodiversity loss by 2010. However, further application of the RLI (to non-avian taxa in particular) has revealed some shortcomings in the original formula and approach: It performs inappropriately when a value of zero is reached; RLI values are affected by the frequency of assessments; and newly evaluated species may introduce bias. Here we propose a revision to the formula, and recommend how it should be applied in order to overcome these shortcomings.
    [Show full text]
  • Madagascar Highlights I 11 Th to 25 Th July 2011 (15 Days)
    Madagascar Highlights I 11 th to 25 th July 2011 (15 days) Trip Report Trip report compiled by tour leader: Rainer Summers Tour Summary Sometimes referred to as the “laboratory of evolution”, Madagascar, the huge Indian Ocean island situated 500km off the coast of east Africa, has long attracted the attention of naturalists and travelling birders alike. Our winter tour, although a departure from the standard summer tours to the “Red Isle”, was very successful, and we managed to see a fantastic proportion of the amazing creatures that call Madagascar home. Trip Report RBT Madagascar Highlights I 2011 2 We began our first day with a visit to the Tsimbazaza Zoo, where despite the overcast weather we managed to find Eleonora’s Falcon, Mascarene Martin and the first of many Madagascar Buzzards, while our afternoon at Lake Alarobia proved to be most enjoyable, with large numbers of waterfowl including Knob-billed Duck and Red-billed Teal, Black and Dimorphic Egret, Malagasy Kingfisher and Madagascar Swamp Warbler, before enjoying a sumptuous dinner at our comfortable accommodations. The eastern rainforests of Madagascar harbour a rich assemblage of sought-after mammals and birds, and for this reason the forested zone in the vicinity of Perinet village formed the basis of our explorations for four days. Our time was divided between visits to the reserve at Perinet and the more distant Mantadia National Park, both offering good rainforest birding. Despite the less than optimal weather during our time in Perinet- Mantadia, our hard work and time in the field paid off, and we were rewarded with a mouth-watering selection of eastern rainforest endemics.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species
    Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history Endangered species From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Main page Contents For other uses, see Endangered species (disambiguation). Featured content "Endangered" redirects here. For other uses, see Endangered (disambiguation). Current events An endangered species is a species which has been categorized as likely to become Random article Conservation status extinct . Endangered (EN), as categorized by the International Union for Conservation of Donate to Wikipedia by IUCN Red List category Wikipedia store Nature (IUCN) Red List, is the second most severe conservation status for wild populations in the IUCN's schema after Critically Endangered (CR). Interaction In 2012, the IUCN Red List featured 3079 animal and 2655 plant species as endangered (EN) Help worldwide.[1] The figures for 1998 were, respectively, 1102 and 1197. About Wikipedia Community portal Many nations have laws that protect conservation-reliant species: for example, forbidding Recent changes hunting , restricting land development or creating preserves. Population numbers, trends and Contact page species' conservation status can be found in the lists of organisms by population. Tools Extinct Contents [hide] What links here Extinct (EX) (list) 1 Conservation status Related changes Extinct in the Wild (EW) (list) 2 IUCN Red List Upload file [7] Threatened Special pages 2.1 Criteria for 'Endangered (EN)' Critically Endangered (CR) (list) Permanent link 3 Endangered species in the United
    [Show full text]
  • IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ to Identify the Level of Threat to Plants
    Ex-Situ Conservation at Scott Arboretum Public gardens and arboreta are more than just pretty places. They serve as an insurance policy for the future through their well managed ex situ collections. Ex situ conservation focuses on safeguarding species by keeping them in places such as seed banks or living collections. In situ means "on site", so in situ conservation is the conservation of species diversity within normal and natural habitats and ecosystems. The Scott Arboretum is a member of Botanical Gardens Conservation International (BGCI), which works with botanic gardens around the world and other conservation partners to secure plant diversity for the benefit of people and the planet. The aim of BGCI is to ensure that threatened species are secure in botanic garden collections as an insurance policy against loss in the wild. Their work encompasses supporting botanic garden development where this is needed and addressing capacity building needs. They support ex situ conservation for priority species, with a focus on linking ex situ conservation with species conservation in natural habitats and they work with botanic gardens on the development and implementation of habitat restoration and education projects. BGCI uses the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ to identify the level of threat to plants. In-depth analyses of the data contained in the IUCN, the International Union for Conservation of Nature, Red List are published periodically (usually at least once every four years). The results from the analysis of the data contained in the 2008 update of the IUCN Red List are published in The 2008 Review of the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species; see www.iucn.org/redlist for further details.
    [Show full text]
  • MADAGASCAR: the Wonders of the “8Th Continent” a Tropical Birding Set Departure
    MADAGASCAR: The Wonders of the “8th Continent” A Tropical Birding Set Departure November 3—28, 2013 Guide: Ken Behrens All photos taken during this trip. All photos by Ken Behrens unless noted otherwise. TOUR SUMMARY Madagascar has long been a core destination for Tropical Birding, and with last year’s opening of a satellite office in the country, we have further solidified our expertise in the “Eighth Continent.” This was another highly successful set-departure tour to this special island. It included both the Northwestern Endemics Pre-Trip at the start and the Helmet Vanga extension to the Masoala Peninsula at the end. Although Madagascar poses some logistical challenges, especially in the form of the national airline Air Madagascar, we had no problems on this tour, not even a single delayed flight! The birding was great, with 196 species recorded, including almost all of the island’s endemic birds. As usual, the highlight was seeing all five of the incredible ground-rollers, from the roadrunner-like Long-tailed of the spiny forest to the wonderful rainforest-dwelling Scaly. There was a strong cast of vangas, including Helmet, Bernier’s, and Sickle-billed. In fact, we saw every member of the family save the mysterious Red-tailed Newtonia which is only regularly seen in the far south. As normal, the couas were also a favorite. From the shy and beautiful Red-breasted of Madagascar Set Departure Tour Nov. 3-28, 2013 the eastern rainforest to the huge Giant Coua of the dry western forest, we were looking for and at couas virtually every day! The bizarre mesites form a Malagasy endemic family, and we had superb extended views of all three members of the family.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Appropriate Uses of Iucn Red List Data
    GUIDELINES FOR APPROPRIATE USES OF IUCN RED LIST DATA Incorporating, as Annexes, the 1) Guidelines for Reporting on Proportion Threatened (ver. 1.1); 2) Guidelines on Scientific Collecting of Threatened Species (ver. 1.0); and 3) Guidelines for the Appropriate Use of the IUCN Red List by Business (ver. 1.0) Version 3.0 (October 2016) Citation: IUCN. 2016. Guidelines for appropriate uses of IUCN Red List Data. Incorporating, as Annexes, the 1) Guidelines for Reporting on Proportion Threatened (ver. 1.1); 2) Guidelines on Scientific Collecting of Threatened Species (ver. 1.0); and 3) Guidelines for the Appropriate Use of the IUCN Red List by Business (ver. 1.0). Version 3.0. Adopted by the IUCN Red List Committee. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ GUIDELINES FOR APPROPRIATE USES OF RED LIST DATA The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ is the world’s most comprehensive data resource on the status of species, containing information and status assessments on over 80,000 species of animals, plants and fungi. As well as measuring the extinction risk faced by each species, the IUCN Red List includes detailed species-specific information on distribution, threats, conservation measures, and other relevant factors. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ is increasingly used by scientists, governments, NGOs, businesses, and civil society for a wide variety of purposes. These Guidelines are designed to encourage and facilitate the use of IUCN Red List data and information to tackle a broad range of important conservation issues. These Guidelines give a brief introduction to The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ (hereafter called the IUCN Red List), the Red List Categories and Criteria, and the Red List Assessment process, followed by some key facts that all Red List users need to know to maximally take advantage of this resource.
    [Show full text]