Analysing Restrictive and Liberal Approaches Towards Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Analysing Restrictive and Liberal Approaches Towards Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia Analysing Restrictive and Liberal Approaches towards Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia By Prema S Matker A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of MPhil (Laws) Queen Mary University of London 2010 1 Abstract The ‘end of life’ issue in relation to assisted suicide and euthanasia is one of our prime concerns and a most widely discussed phenomenon not only in academic and official literature, but also in day-to-day life. Some people, who are terminally ill or suffer from degenerative diseases, choose to end their life while they are competent to do so especially when the hope of recovery fades, suffering escalates and the quality of life diminishes. My thesis examines the practice of assisted suicide and euthanasia in: (a) England and Wales where the practice has been strictly prohibited, but is now in a process of liberalisation. The recent guidelines issued by the Director of the public prosecutions pertaining to section 2 (4) of the Suicide Act 19611, may permit people assisting suicide to disobey the law on assisted suicide.2 (b) The Netherlands, the State of Oregon in the U.S. and Switzerland where the practice is already liberalised under special circumstances. In conclusion, the thesis will discuss liberal regimes to observe which regime would best suit England and Wales position. 1 S. 2 (4) provide: “[N]o proceedings shall be instituted for an offence under this section except by or with the consent of the Director of Public Prosecutions.” See ‘The Suicide Act 1961’. http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk 2 This view was put forth by Prof. David Schiff and Prof. Richard Nobles in the conference held on ‘Purdy and Director of the public prosecutions’ Guidelines’ on 6th November 2009. 2 Table of Contents Title of the Thesis ……………………………………………………………..... 1 Abstract ................................................................................................................. 2 Table of Contents ………………………………………………………………. 3 Acknowledgements ...………………………………………………………….. 5 Introduction …………………………………………………………………….. 6 Chapter 1 The Law of England and Wales on Assisted Suicide ……………………….. 10 1.1. The Statutory Law on Assisted Suicide: The Suicide Act 1961 ..……... 11 a) Outline of the Act’s Provisions .………………………………………. 11 b) Negative and Positive Right to Die: The Limited Effect of Section 1 in the Light of Section 2 of the Act .…………………………………….. 18 c) The Role of the DPP under Section 2 (4) of the Act ....………………. 27 i) A Possible Rational for Inclusion of Subsection (4) of the Act …... 27 ii) The Practice of the DPP .………………………………………….. 36 iii) Immunity .……………………………………………………......... 38 iv) The Moves towards Greater Clarity through Guidance …………... 43 v) Likely Future Developments arising from the case of Debbie Purdy …………………………………………………………………….. 56 Chapter 2 The Law of England and Wales on Euthanasia ……………………………. 64 2.1. The Law on Euthanasia ……………………………………………......... 64 a) Acts that Kill ...……………………………………………………..........66 i) Double Effect Doctrine ………………………………………......... 66 ii) The Doctrine of Double Effect and the case of Dr Bodkin Adams and the case of Dr David Moor ..………………………………………. 73 iii) The Position of doctors who cannot claim Double Effect ………… 78 iv) Exploring the difficulties faced by laypersons in relying on the Double Effect Doctrine . .………………………………………… 83 3 v) Exploring the Doctrine of Double Effect and the Criminal Law …………………………………………………………..…………. 89 b) Omissions that Kill .………………………………………………… ….94 i) Understanding the Duties which make Omissions into Acts ……… 94 ii) The Ability of doctors to cancel those Duties …………………….. 96 iii) Examining the difficulties faced by laypersons in cancelling their Duties to provide care ………………………………………....... 104 iv) Examining the Implications that can be drawn from the Acts that Kill and the Omissions that Kill: Should doctors be permitted to kill either by act or by omission in the best interest of the patient? ………... 107 v) Conclusion …………………………………………………….... 110 Chapter 3 Exploring the Legal and Extra-Legal Regimes adopted by the Netherlands, the State of Oregon and Switzerland in relation to Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia ……………………………………………………………..…….. 112 3.1 The Legal Structure of the Regime of the Netherlands on Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia …………………………………………………………….... 113 a) The Extra-Legal Procedure in cases of the Termination of Life on Request and Assisted Suicide ………………………………………………………............. 122 3.2 The Legal Structure of the Regime of the State of Oregon applied in cases of Physician-assisted Suicide ………………………………………………... 131 a) The Extra-Legal Procedure to be followed in compliance with the Death with Dignity Act ………………………………………………………………….. 134 3.3 The Law on Assisted Suicide in Switzerland …………………………... 140 a) The Extra-Legal Procedure: Switzerland and ‘Right to Die’ Societies ……..143 Conclusion ………………………………………………………………........ 152 Appendix A …………………………………………………………………... 158 Bibliography …………………………………………………………………. 169 4 Acknowledgements I am grateful to my supervisors, Professor William Wilson and Professor Richard Nobles for their guidance, support and fruitful comments on drafts of my thesis. I also wish to thank the School of Law, Queen Mary University of London, for providing me financial support (Graduate Teaching Award and Department of Law Award) to complete my studies. My greatest depth is to my mother and rest of my family members who provided me constant moral support to continue my research. The thesis is dedicated to them. I also offer sincere thanks to my colleagues and friends who always encouraged me to work hard. 5 Introduction Issues surrounding ‘end of life’ are widely discussed at today, not only in the academic and official literature, but also in day-to-day newspapers, television programmes and general conversation. The most controversial issues concern the areas of assisted suicide and euthanasia. These issues arose with the Greeks and eventually gained prominence in the medical context. Medical and scientific progress has lead to a change in the place and the time of death.3 For example, prior to the 20th century people generally died at home.4 It was rare for people to have any medical intervention in the last moments of their lives. Today many people die in hospitals or in hospices under medical supervision.5 As a result, there is now a progressive movement that consists of dying patients, as well as their families and physicians. This movement poses the question of whether the artificial extension of the lives of people who are dying is really in their best interest in all cases.6 For instance, ‘right to die’ societies and other such organisations have begun to lobby for change in the law of assisted suicide. These ‘right to die’ societies and organisations argue that the patient, or the family representative, should have control over the dying process. They aim to ensure patient autonomy in the last moments of his or her life and further to this, they are in favour of allowing the patient to choose the time and the place of his or her death. In other words, as argued by Battin,7 death has formed a part of the conception of personal autonomy and self-determination. 3 Ziegler S. J. (2009) ‘Collaborated Death: An Exploration of the Swiss Model of Assisted Suicide for its Potential to Enhance Oversight and Demedicalize the Dying Process’. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, Vol. 37, p. 318. 4 For example, owing either to old age or due to illness or natural calamity. 5 Ziegler S. J. (2009) ‘Collaborated Death: An Exploration of the Swiss Model of Assisted Suicide for its Potential to Enhance Oversight and Demedicalize the Dying Process’. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, Vol. 37, p. 318. 6 Ibid. 7 Battin M.P. (2008) ‘Safe, Legal Rare? Physician-Assisted Suicide and Cultural Change in the Future’ in Birnbacher Dieter and Dahl Edgar (eds) Giving Death a Helping Hand: Physician- Assisted Suicide, Terminal Sedation and Public Policy. An International Perspective. The Netherlands: Springer, Vol. 36. 6 This thesis examines the law of England and Wales on assisted suicide and euthanasia. As a comparison, the thesis examines the legal and extra-legal regimes of three different jurisdictions where assisted suicide or euthanasia, or both practices, are legalised or permitted officially. These jurisdictions are the Netherlands, the State of Oregon in the U.S. and finally, Switzerland. In the Netherlands, both euthanasia and assisted suicide are permitted under special provisions. In the State of Oregon, only physician-assisted suicide (PAS) is permitted. In Switzerland, assisted suicide is legal as long as the motive of the assistant is altruistic.8 The main difference between Switzerland and the other two jurisdictions is that in Switzerland anybody either a physician or non-physician may assist in an act of suicide. On the other hand, in the Netherlands and the State of Oregon only physicians can provide assistance. In Switzerland and the Netherlands in particular, these practices have long been recognised and are now deeply embedded in the culture of these countries. In fact, Switzerland has started to cater for foreigners with this service, resulting in a phenomenon known as ‘suicide tourism’. People from other countries, especially Germany, France, Austria and England, travel to Switzerland in order to die.9 As of now, it is the only place in Europe for ‘death refugees’ i.e. travellers who have the aim of ending their lives in a humane and dignified manner through the assistance of ‘right to die’ societies such as Dignitas.10 8 It is relevant
Recommended publications
  • Davince Tools Generated PDF File
    oRAGNET ·THE DAILY ··NEWS MOZART 1,.\NUARY • 21, 22, available al 23. 24, 25, 26 ~~· Vol. 64. No. 18 ST. JOHN'S, NEWFOUNDLAND, TUESDAY, JANUARY 22/1957 (Price .5 cents) Charles Hutton & Sons. - ~----------------·--~--------·----------~---------------------------------·----------------------------~----~~~~~---------- Of larva .. Debate On ·oristructio·n roup irited .' .. • eechl From Throne' oustn , , ;· - r::crtion-hrr·llhc Conscrvatil"es around theil· : assistance for rcdcl"eloping !bCU" 0 osts 1 1 I ' .. ·.' . · , .'·Jf,rll m the motion's claim that tb~ govcJ\i·! won1out areas. · i• ·• · ... I ment has lost the confidcuc~ I REDEVELOP SLUliiS ' -----------~--..._,.;---------.....:....----------- ··:·. ;,, ·:\- ;, c bunched a of Parliament and the conntr1· 'I The National Housing Act pro- .::";,· . f •nnrt· CC'Frr, through its "incliffercncc, inerli:t, ·vidcd that the federal SOI'~rn- - ·. ,. ,, Hn11 tiryin;: i and lack of leadership." 1 ment, through its Central :llort- Help' Lower . · .... , ·' :1 he tr:·in~ i The ''cxtr:wr1iinary" t h i •i r: · gng~ and Housing Corporation, . _ '· , · p.,rty mal·~·· , about this "is that in fact tb~ I would share costs of sturlying • :1 ..~ 1 .. , . :. 111 !he next i only group lu this House to whicll 1 municipal areas for redevelop. _- , .·., , · ,:,llHiay .•Tun~ tho<c words Ci\n be properly as· , mcnt. It also would split costs · . .• ,, dwt:.~nt:r'i I crihcd is the official OJ1position: ol acquiring R\111 clearing such Income Groups .. ' 1: • , · 1;.miin~r 10 , Thi~ had been particularly nJl· 1areas, either on a fcdcrnl-prov- • 1!w ~o1·crn· ' parent when Opposition Leaer . ineial-munlcipnl basis or, with TORONTO (CP) - The Canadian Construction .1;:riculture ! Dtrfcnh:~k·~r. in re;:nril to the rcc· 1 prol'incial approval, directly with r.i\ CPR firemen's strike, said I the munlcipa!lly.
    [Show full text]
  • The Persecution of Doctor Bodkin Adams
    THE PHYSICIAN FALSELY ACCUSED: The Persecution Of Doctor Bodkin Adams When the Harold Shipman case broke in 1998, press coverage although fairly extensive was distinctly muted. Shipman was charged with the murder of Mrs Kathleen Grundy on September 7, and with three more murders the following month, but even then and with further exhumations in the pipeline, the often scurrilous tabloids kept up the veneer of respectability, and there was none of the lurid and sensationalist reporting that was to accompany the Soham inquiry four years later. It could be that the apparent abduction and subsequent gruesome discovery of the remains of two ten year old girls has more ghoul appeal than that of a nondescript GP who had taken to poisoning mostly elderly women, or it could be that some tabloid hacks have long memories and were reluctant to jump the gun just in case Shipman turned out to be another much maligned, benevolent small town doctor, for in 1956, a GP in the seaside town of Eastbourne was suspected and at times accused of being an even more prolific serial killer than Harold Shipman. Dr Bodkin Adams would eventually stand trial for the murder of just one of his female patients; and was cleared by a jury in less than three quarters of an hour. How did this come about? As the distinguished pathologist Keith Simpson pointed out, the investigation into Dr Adams started as idle gossip, “a mere whisper on the seafront deck chairs of Eastbourne” which first saw publication in the French magazine Paris Match - outside the jurisdiction of Britain’s libel laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Southampton Student Law Review 2014 Volume 4, Issue 1
    Southampton Student Law Review 2014 volume 4, issue 1 1 Southampton Student Law Review Southampton Law School Published in the United Kingdom By the Southampton Student Law Review Southampton Law School University of Southampton SO17 1BJ In affiliation with the University of Southampton, Southampton Law School All rights reserved. Copyright© 2014 University of Southampton. No part of this publication may be reproduced, transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, recording or otherwise, or stored in any retrieval system of any nature, without the prior, express written permission of the Southampton Student Law Review and the author, to whom all requests to reproduce copyright material should be directed, in writing. The views expressed by the contributors are not necessarily those of the Editors of the Southampton Student Law Review. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure that the information contained in this journal is correct, the Editors do not accept any responsibility for any errors or omissions, or for any resulting consequences. © 2014 Southampton Student Law Review www.southampton.ac.uk/law/lawreview ISSN 2047 - 1017 This volume should be cited (2014) 4(1) S.S.L.R. Editorial Board 2014 Editors-in-Chief Elizabeth Herbert Ida Petretta Editorial Board Neil Brown Louise Cheung Dingjing (James) Huang Ebenezer Laryea Henry Pearce Viktor Weber Acknowledgements The Editors wish to thank our academic advisor Professor Oren Ben-Dor for his advice, commitment and support The Editors also wish to thank all members
    [Show full text]
  • The Queen on the Application of Mrs Dianne Pretty (Appellant) V Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent) and Secretary of State for the Home Department
    House of Lords Judgments - The Queen on the Application of Mrs Dianne Pretty (Appellant) v Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent) and Secretary of State for the Home Department (Interested Party) HOUSE OF LORDS Lord Bingham of Cornhill Lord Steyn Lord Hope of Craighead Lord Hobhouse of Wood-borough Lord Scott of Foscote OPINIONS OF THE LORDS OF APPEAL FOR JUDGMENT IN THE CAUSE THE QUEEN ON THE APPLICATION OF MRS DIANNE PRETTY (APPELLANT) v. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (RESPONDENT) AND SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT (INTERESTED PARTY) ON 29 NOVEMBER 2001 [2001] UKHL 61 LORD BINGHAM OF CORNHILL My Lords, 1. No one of ordinary sensitivity could be unmoved by the frightening ordeal which faces Mrs Dianne Pretty, the appellant. She suffers from motor neurone disease, a progressive degenerative illness from which she has no hope of recovery. She has only a short time to live and faces the prospect of a humiliating and distressing death. She is mentally alert and would like to be able to take steps to bring her life to a peaceful end at a time of her choosing. But her physical incapacity is now such that she can no longer, without help, take her own life. With the support of her family, she wishes to enlist the help of her husband to that end. He himself is willing to give such help, but only if he can be sure that he will not be prosecuted under section 2(1) of the Suicide Act 1961 for aiding and abetting her suicide. Asked to undertake that he would not under section 2(4) of the Act consent to the prosecution of Mr Pretty under section 2(1) if Mr Pretty were to assist his wife to commit suicide, the Director of Public Prosecutions has refused to give such an undertaking.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Homicide Act for England and Wales?
    The Law Commission Consultation Paper No 177 (Overview) A NEW HOMICIDE ACT FOR ENGLAND AND WALES? An Overview The Law Commission was set up by section 1 of the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Law Commissioners are: The Honourable Mr Justice Toulson, Chairman Professor Hugh Beale QC, FBA Mr Stuart Bridge Dr Jeremy Horder Professor Martin Partington CBE The Chief Executive of the Law Commission is Steve Humphreys and its offices are at Conquest House, 37-38 John Street, Theobalds Road, London WC1N 2BQ. This overview, completed on 28 November 2005, is circulated for comment and criticism only. It does not represent the final views of the Law Commission. For those who are interested in a fuller discussion of the law and the Law Commission's proposals, our formal consultation paper is accessible from http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/murder.htm, or you can order a hard copy from TSO (www.tso.co.uk). The Law Commission would be grateful for comments on its proposals before 13 April 2006. Comments may be sent either – By post to: David Hughes Law Commission Conquest House 37-38 John Street Theobalds Road London WC1N 2BQ Tel: 020-7453-1212 Fax: 020-7453-1297 By email to: [email protected] It would be helpful if, where possible, comments sent by post could also be sent on disk, or by email to the above address, in any commonly used format. All responses will be treated as public documents in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act 2000, and may be made available to third parties.
    [Show full text]
  • A Veritable Revolution: the Court of Criminal Appeal in English
    A VERITABLE REVOLUTION: THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL IN ENGLISH CRIMINAL HISTORY 1908-1958 A THESIS IN History Presented to the Faculty of the University of Missouri-Kansas City in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF ARTS by CECILE ARDEN PHILLIPS B.A. University of Missouri-Kansas City, 1986 Kansas City, Missouri 2012 © 2012 CECILE ARDEN PHILLIPS ALL RIGHTS RESERVED A VERITABLE REVOLUTION: THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL IN ENGLISH CRIMINAL HISTORY 1908-1958 Cecile Arden Phillips, Candidate for the Masters of Arts Degree University of Missouri-Kansas City, 2012 ABSTRACT In a historic speech to the House of Commons on April 17, 1907, British Attorney General, John Lawson Walton, proposed the formation of what was to be the first court of criminal appeal in English history. Such a court had been debated, but ultimately rejected, by successive governments for over half a century. In each debate, members of the judiciary declared that a court for appeals in criminal cases held the potential of destroying the world-respected English judicial system. The 1907 debates were no less contentious, but the newly elected Liberal government saw social reform, including judicial reform, as their highest priority. After much compromise and some of the most overwrought speeches in the history of Parliament, the Court of Criminal Appeal was created in August 1907 and began hearing cases in May 1908. A Veritable Revolution is a social history of the Court’s first fifty years. There is no doubt, that John Walton and the other founders of the Court of Criminal Appeal intended it to provide protection from the miscarriage of justice for English citizens convicted of criminal offenses.
    [Show full text]
  • Framing Youth Suicide in a Multi-Mediated World: the Construction of the Bridgend Problem in the British National Press
    City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Akrivos, Dimitrios (2015). Framing youth suicide in a multi-mediated world: the construction of the Bridgend problem in the British national press. (Unpublished Doctoral thesis, City University London) This is the accepted version of the paper. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/13648/ Link to published version: Copyright: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to. Reuse: Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. City Research Online: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/ [email protected] FRAMING YOUTH SUICIDE IN A MULTI-MEDIATED WORLD THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BRIDGEND PROBLEM IN THE BRITISH NATIONAL PRESS DIMITRIOS AKRIVOS PhD Thesis CITY UNIVERSITY LONDON DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES 2015 THE FOLLOWING PARTS OF THIS THESIS HAVE BEEN REDACTED FOR COPYRIGHT REASONS: p15, Fig 1.1 p214, Fig 8.8 p16, Fig 1.2 p216, Fig 8.9 p17, Fig
    [Show full text]
  • FOI 18/228 8Th November 2018 James Smith
    Our Ref: FOI 18/228 8th November 2018 James Smith [email protected] Dear James Smith, Re: Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) Thank you for your Freedom of Information request received on 15th October 2018. Request I would like to request, under the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act, a list of dissertation titles submitted for the universities LLB program for the academic years: 14/15, 15/16 and 16/17. 2014/15 Is organised crime a growing problem not only in the UK but throughout the world? If so, how much do the public know about organised crime and what is being done to effectively eradicate powerful organised crime groups across the world, and are those methods working? Is withdrawal of treatment merely a legal form of euthanasia? Combating national security in the UK/EU; assessing progress made, current fight and plan of action. Has the European Court of Justice’s focus on the principle of effectiveness and the ‘architecture’ of the union, left the founding humanitarian and philosophical ideals of the union merely an abstract notion of virtues. Do legal aid cuts threaten to deny justice? And should we be worried? Should the UK adopt the death sentence? The dissertation will aim to consider the relationship between law and religion in the European Union and critically discuss the views of scholars that Christian values should be implemented with regards to politics, law and individuals. “One man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter”- Gerald Seymour. In light of this statement,
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette J3ublfs!)Tti
    41171 . 5287. The London Gazette J3ublfs!)tti Registered as a Newspaper For Table of Contents see last page TUESDAY, 10 SEPTEMBER, 1957 Treasury Chambers, S.W.I. LONDON HACKNEY CARRIAGE ACT, 1&50. The Lords Commissioners of Her Majesty's CAB STANDINGS. Treasury 'hereby give notice ithat They have made Notice is hereby given that in pursuance of sec- an Order under section 119 of the Import Duties Act, tion 4 of the London Hackney Carriage Act, 18'50, 1932, section 7 of 'the Finance Act, 1934 and section 1 the Commissioner of 'Police of the Metropolis has of .the Import Duties (Emergency Provisions) Act, issued 'Orders appointing the following caib 1939, viz.:— standings:— The Import Duties (Drawback) <iNo. 15) Order Orders dated 3\lst May, 1957. 1957, which revokes certain obsolete provisions . A standing for two hackney carriages at Sloane allowing drawback of Customs duty. Avenue (Fulham Road), S.W. The Order comes into operation on the 14tih A standing for three hackney carriages at Aber- September, 1957 and has been published as Statutory conway Road, Morden, Surrey. Instruments 1957, No. 1588. A standing for eleven hackney carriages at Copies may be purchased (price 3d. net) direct from Victoria Road. South Ruislip, Middlesex. Her Majesty's Stationery Office at the addresses shown on the last page >of this Gazette or through Orders dated l!Tth June, 1957. any bookseller. A standing for thirteen hackney carriages at Piccadilly (Down Street), W., in two portions. A standing for three hackney carriages at Arling- ton Street (iBennet Street), Westminster, S.W. Whitehall, l&th September, 1957.
    [Show full text]
  • Death by Appointment
    Death by Appointment Death by Appointment: A Rational Guide to the Assisted Dying Debate By Ilora Finlay and Robert Preston Death by Appointment: A Rational Guide to the Assisted Dying Debate By Ilora Finlay and Robert Preston This book first published 2020 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2020 by Ilora Finlay and Robert Preston All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-5978-5 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-5978-3 CONTENTS Introduction ...................................................................................... 1 Chapter One ..................................................................................... 5 Assisted Dying and The Law By Robert Preston Chapter Two ................................................................................... 25 The Doctor's Dilemma By Ilora Finlay Chapter Three ................................................................................. 41 A Matter for Society By Robert Preston Chapter Four ................................................................................... 57 As Life Draws to a Close By Ilora Finlay Chapter Five ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Harmful Online Communications: the Criminal Offences a Consultation
    Harmful Online Communications: The Criminal Offences A Consultation paper Consultation Paper 248 Law Commission Consultation Paper 248 Harmful Online Communications: The Criminal Offences A Consultation Paper 11 September 2020 I © Crown copyright 2020 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/reform-of-the- communications-offences/ II The Law Commission – How we consult About the Law Commission: The Law Commission was set up by section 1 of the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Law Commissioners are: The Rt Hon Lord Justice Green, Chair, Professor Sarah Green, Professor Nicholas Hopkins, Professor Penney Lewis, and Nicholas Paines QC. The Chief Executive is Phillip Golding. Topic of this consultation: We are consulting on reform of the communications offences (Malicious Communications Act 1988 and Communications Act 2003) in light of developments in online communication. We are also consulting on specific behaviours such as cyberflashing, pile-on harassment, and the glorification of both self-harm and violent crime. Geographical scope: This consultation applies to the law of England and Wales. Duration of the consultation: We invite responses from 11 September 2020 to 18 December 2020. Responses to the consultation may be sent: By email to [email protected] OR By post to Online Communications Team, Law Commission, 1st Floor, Tower, 52 Queen Anne’s Gate, London, SW1H 9AG.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislation Title
    FALKLAND ISLANDS _____________ Crimes Ordinance 2014 (No: 13 of 2014) ARRANGEMENT OF PROVISIONS CHAPTER 1 – PRELIMINARY PART 1 – PRELIMINARY AND INTERPRETATION Section 1. Title and commencement 2. Interpretation PART 2 – GENERAL PRINCIPLES Criminal liability 3. Age of criminal responsibility 4. Inferences as to intent 5. Automatism Offences committed outside the Falkland Islands 6. Offences committed partly outside the Falkland Islands 7. Offences to which sections 8 to 13 apply 8. Jurisdiction in respect of Group A offences 9. Questions immaterial to jurisdiction in the case of certain offences 10. Rules relating to the location of events 11. Conspiracy and encouraging 12. Extended jurisdiction in relation to certain attempts 13. Relevance of external law Alternative verdicts 14. Conviction of offence other than that charged 1 15. Person tried for offence may be convicted of ancillary offence Miscellaneous 16. Proceedings by and against spouses 17. Application of Ordinance to corporations 18. No requirement for corroboration PART 3 – ANCILLARY OFFENCES Attempts 19. Attempts generally 20. Application of procedural and other provisions to offences of attempt 21. Procedural rules 22. Effect of sections 19 to 21 on common law Conspiracy 23. Conspiracy 24. Conspiracy to commit offences outside the Falkland Islands 25. Exemptions from liability 26. Penalties 27. Restrictions on the commencement of proceedings 28. Conspiracy under other enactments 29. Effect of acquittal of other defendant 30. Abolitions, savings, transitional provisions Encouragement of offences 31. Offence of encouragement 32. Proving an offence under section 31 33. Supplemental provisions 34. Defences 35. Jurisdiction 36. Extended jurisdiction in certain cases 37. Commencement of proceedings, etc. for an offence 38.
    [Show full text]