DOCSLIB.ORG

The Countess of Derby and Her Three Daughters, 1560-1647

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE "Such Daughters and Such a Mother": The Countess of Derby and her Three Daughters, 1560-1647 A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History by Vanessa Jean Wilkie August 2009 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Thomas Cogswell, Chairperson Dr. Randolph Head Dr. Dale Kent Copyright by Vanessa Jean Wilkie 2009 The Dissertation of Vanessa Jean Wilkie is approved: __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside Acknowledgements Many students pursue graduate school because they know exactly what they want to study. I was not that student. I meandered through public history, nineteenth century continental Europe, economic history, gender history, and had a brief affair with heavy postmodern theory until I finally settled down in early modern England. I have been so fortunate to work with a number of faculty members in History, English, and Women's Studies. I thank all of them for the patience they showed me while I tried to find my place in academia. Cliff Trafzer gave me sage advise my first two years of graduate school. Roger Ransom, Kiril Tomoff, and Georg Michels "went to bat" for me on several occasions. They made it impossible for me to blame any obstacles to my progress on a lack of funding and support. Ken Barkin patiently guided me through many materials courses. Ann Goldberg not only introduced me to Women's History, but she challenged me in ways I never thought possible. She helped me break through the glass ceiling of my own mind and graciously pointed out the tropes I brought to my writing. Christine Ward Gailey showed me how to bring the past into the present. I am truly grateful for her guidance and friendship. I doubt anyone could be more fortunate with a dissertation committee than I have been. Randy Head's fine-editing-eye is only surpassed by his passion for talking about the craft of history. Dale Kent brings brilliance, humor, and perspective to every conversation, both inside the classroom and out. They both have the remarkable ability to treat you like a peer and still mentor you at the same time. Their support, criticisms, expertise, and advice continue to make me a better historian. iv This dissertation could never have been written if it were not for Tom Cogswell, who introduced me to the Stanley women. At one of our first meetings, when I was rambling about what I wanted to write, Tom took a quick look under the table and then looked up at me. "What are you doing?" I asked. I will always remember his response: "I'm looking to see if your feet are on the ground because your head is in the clouds." Since then Tom has molded me into an early modern scholar that I never knew I could be. He taught me how to balance my analysis with narrative, how to follow footnotes, and how to survive lunches at the Huntington. I suspect I will spend the rest of my career thanking him for the impact he has had on me. I owe a great many thanks to the remarkable women in the UCR History Department office, namely, Susan Kumora, Deisy Escobedo, Rosie Mamaril, Connie Young, Christina Cuellar, and Wendy Mello. Without them I would undoubtedly be missing numerous graduation requirements and would still be trying to figure out how to submit travel expense reports. The outstanding librarians in the Tomas Rivera Inter- Library Loan Office brought the world to me and I am indebted to them. I also owe a huge debt to the History Department, the Graduate Division, and the Chancellor's Office at UCR for their generous financial support. The staff at the Huntington Library helped me put these funds to good use by making the Ahmanson Reading Room my home away from home. Mary Robertson and Sue Hodson's paleography seminar made the materials there far less intimidating. There were also a host of librarians and archivists who helped me on my whirl-wind trip through England. I also thank the many individuals at the PCCBS, WCBS, and NECBS for their thoughtful comments about my work. I am v honored to be associated with the network of British scholars on both sides of the Atlantic. Reading, researching and writing is a lonely road. I would have given up ages ago if it were not for so many friends who forced me out of the solitude of my head. My grad-school friends created a place where jokes about Foucault, the Simpsons, and the Reformation were funny and welcomed. Work and fun regularly collided on the fourth floor of the history tower and I doubt any of us could have survived without it. I would be lost if it were not for ABD Ladies Lunches and countless emails sent in moments of panic that were met with compassion and sympathy. I would specifically like to thank Kathleen McGuire, Anne Longanbach, Isaac Stephens, Michael Drake, Owen Jones, and John Bawden. I look forward to the lifetime of scholarship, coffee, drinks, and friendly meals I know we will continue to share. Kim, Kendra, Bree, Maggie, Shannon, Pete, Alisha, Kevin, Jennie, Josh, Jules, State Street Pilates, and all my other "home-friends" offered unending support, dinners, weekend getaways, phone calls, and laughs while never once making me feel bad for not having a "real job." I wrote in my dissertation that success for the Stanley women began at home; the same thing applies to my own life. I thank my parents, and John and Jenn, for their infinite support. More importantly, I thank them for always demonstrating through their own actions just how far you can get with dedication and commitment. They made it impossible for me to think that this was out of my reach. Unlike some of the Stanley women, I have been so fortunate in my relationship with my in-laws. I thank the Osmond family for always asking about my work with enthusiasm and genuine interest. My vi largest debt is to Matt, who married the Stanley women when he married me. It takes a remarkable man to live with a moody graduate student and four ghosts but he met the challenge with encouragement, never-ending patience, and a sense of humor. Thank you Matt, for all of this, and so much more. vii To Mom and Dad viii ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION "Such Daughters and Such a Mother": The Countess of Derby and Her Three Daughters, 1560-1647 by Vanessa Jean Wilkie Doctor of Philosophy, Graduate Program in History University of California, Riverside, August 2009 Dr. Thomas Cogswell, Chairperson This dissertation focuses on the lives of Alice Spencer Stanley Egerton, the dowager countess of Derby (1559-1637), and her three daughters: Anne Stanley Brydges Touchet, Lady Chandos and then dowager countess of Castlehaven (1581-1647), Frances Stanley Egerton, countess of Bridgewater (1583-1636), and Elizabeth Stanley Hastings, countess of Huntingdon (1587-1634). This work contributes to the fields of early modern English history, gender history, women's history, and family history. My primary sources include, correspondence, household accounts, legal records, contracts, leases, literary dedications, masques, literature, personal prayer books, tombs, almshouses, household inventories, wills, personal papers, and cheap print. The remarkable quantity and quality of sources by and about the Stanley women make it possible to re-examine their various life experiences by melding empirical research and gender theory. In 1631, the countess of Castlehaven accused her husband and one of her servants of raping her. Scholars of early modern English history and literature are quite familiar with this trial. This dissertation examines the relationship between the countess of ix Castlehaven and her mother and sisters to better understand this infamous trial in light of their familial experiences. The chapters are organized thematically rather than chronologically, in order to flesh out the major themes in the lives of the Stanley women. These themes include discussions of how they used marriage to build kinship networks, the various ways they maintained these networks, their religious lives, the literary and political patronage, their family culture of commissioning masques, their numerous legal battles, and their individual deaths and legacies. All of these larger issues are examined against their trials with the Castlehaven scandal to understand how the Stanley women experienced and influenced this critical moment in their lives. In the end, this dissertation presents a rich micro-history and a collective biography of the Stanley women. It argues that scholars must remain open to the complex and fluid identities of early modern women in order to understand fully the complicated nuances of early modern relationships. The Stanley women serve as ideal case studies and the Castlehaven affair is an interesting backdrop for this endeavor. x Table of Contents List of Abbreviations xii List of Charts xiii Introduction 1 Prologue: The Family, Women, and Gender in Early Modern England 13 1 The Marriages of the Stanley Women: Building Kinship Networks 48 2 "Resting Assurance to Find Your Friendship Firm Toward Me": The Stanley Women and Maintaining Kinship Networks 79 3 Piety in Practice: The Religious Lives of the Stanley Women 108 4 "To the Right Honourable...": Print, Literary, and Local Political Patronage of the Stanley Women 139 5 The Theatrical Patronage and Masque Culture of the Stanley Women 164 6 Inheritance, the Law, and the Stanley Women 196 7 "Besmear'd With a Sensual Life": The Stanley Women and the Castlehaven Scandal 236 8 "Until the Joyful Resurrection": The Deaths and Legacies of the Stanley Women 287 Conclusion 333 Bibliography 339 Appendix 361 xi List of Abbreviations Add MS Additional MSS Collection, British Library, London BL The British Library, London DNB Dictionary of National Biography CP The Complete Peerage EL Ellesmere MSS, Henry E.
Recommended publications
  • Chronicles of the Family Baker"

    Chronicles of the Family Baker"

    Chronicles of the Family by Lee C.Baker i ii Table of Contents 1 THE MEDIEVAL BAKERS........................................................................................1 2 THE BAKERS OF SISSINGHURST.........................................................................20 3 THE BAKERS OF LONDON AND OXFORD ............................................................49 4 THE BAKERS AT HOTHFIELD ..............................................................................58 5 COMING OUT OF ENGLAND.................................................................................70 6 THE DAYS AT MILFORD .......................................................................................85 7 EAST HAMPTON, L. I. ...........................................................................................96 8 AMAGANSETT BY THE SEA ................................................................................114 9 STATEN ISLAND AND NEW AMSTERDAM ..........................................................127 10 THE ELIZABETH TOWN PIONEERS ....................................................................138 11 THE BAKERS OF ELIZABETH TOWN AND WESTFIELD ......................................171 12 THE NEIGHBORS AT NEWARK...........................................................................198 13 THE NEIGHBORS AT RAHWAY ...........................................................................208 14 WHO IS JONATHAN BAKER?..............................................................................219 15 THE JONATHAN I. BAKER CONFUSION
  • Thomas, Lord Stanley by Michael Iliffe

    Thomas, Lord Stanley by Michael Iliffe

    Thomas, Lord Stanley by Michael Iliffe Thomas Lord Stanley was the son of Thomas, 1st Baron Stanley. The 1st baron was a younger son of Cheshire gentry who had been elevated to the peerage. Thomas, his son, became the 2nd Baron Stanley at his father’s death in 1459, and in 1461 became Chief Justice of Cheshire. In 1472 he married Eleanor, the sister of Richard Neville (“the kingmaker”). They had four sons that we know of; George, Edward, Edmund and James. George was to become Lord Strange, James joined the Church, Edward and Edmund played no part in the politics of the time. Lord Stanley’s brother, William, later became Sir William Stanley. After the death of his wife, Eleanor, he married Margaret Beaufort in 1482, and became the step-father of Henry Tudor, son of Edmund Tudor, the Duke of Richmond, who died in 1458. Margaret was the daughter of John, 1st Duke of Somerset; she brought him great wealth, and a wife of breeding and accomplishment. Thomas and Margaret had no children together. During the personal rule of Henry VI, Lord Stanley became Controller of the Royal Household, and in times of crisis the court looked to him to provide troops in the North-West. Stanley’s greatest danger came in 1459, when Queen Margaret made a bid to recruit him directly in Cheshire, when the Yorkists were mobilising and sought assistance from the Stanleys. To add to his dilemma, his father died that year, leaving the 24 year old Thomas to weather the storm. At the Battle of Blore Heath that year, young Stanley played a game of brinkmanship and held his retinue and levies some miles from the encounter.
  • TIES of the TUDORS the Influence of Margaret Beaufort and Her Web of Relations on the Formation and Preservation of Tudor Rulership

    TIES of the TUDORS the Influence of Margaret Beaufort and Her Web of Relations on the Formation and Preservation of Tudor Rulership

    TIES OF THE TUDORS The Influence of Margaret Beaufort and her Web of Relations on the Formation and Preservation of Tudor Rulership P.V. Smolders Student Number: 1607022 Research Master Thesis, August 2016 Supervisor: Dr. Liesbeth Geevers Leiden University, Institute for History Ties of the Tudors The Influence of Margaret Beaufort and her Web of Relations on the Formation and Preservation of Tudor Rulership. Pauline Vera Smolders Student number 1607022 Breestraat 7 / 2311 CG Leiden Tel: 06 50846696 E-mail: [email protected] Research Master Thesis: Europe, 1000-1800 August 2016 Supervisor: Dr. E.M. Geevers Second reader: Prof. Dr. R. Stein Leiden University, Institute for History Cover: Signature of Margaret Beaufort, taken from her first will, 1472. St John’s Archive D56.195, Cambridge University. 1 Table of Contents List of Abbreviations 3 Introduction 4 1 Kinship Networks 11 1.1 The Beaufort Family 14 1.2 Marital Families 18 1.3 The Impact of Widowhood 26 1.4 Conclusion 30 2 Patronage Networks 32 2.1 Margaret’s Household 35 2.2 The Court 39 2.3 The Cambridge Network 45 2.4 Margaret’s Wills 51 2.5 Conclusion 58 3 The Formation and Preservation of Tudor Rulership 61 3.1 Margaret’s Reputation and the Role of Women 62 3.2 Mother and Son 68 3.3 Preserving Tudor Rulership 73 3.4 Conclusion 76 Conclusion 78 Bibliography 82 Appendixes 88 2 Abbreviations BL British Library CUL Cambridge University Library PRO Public Record Office RP Rotuli Parliamentorum SJC St John’s College Archives 3 Introduction A wife, mother of a king, landowner, and heiress, Margaret of Beaufort was nothing if not a versatile women that has interested historians for centuries.
  • M a K in G a N D U N M a K in Gin Early Modern English Drama

    M a K in G a N D U N M a K in Gin Early Modern English Drama

    Porter MAKING AND Chloe Porter UNMAKING IN EARLY MODERN ENGLISH DRAMA Why are early modern English dramatists preoccupied with unfinished processes of ‘making’ and ‘unmaking’? And what did ‘finished’ or ‘incomplete’ mean for spectators of plays and visual works in this period? Making and unmaking in early IN EARLY MODERN ENGLISH DRAMA IN EARLY UNMAKING AND MAKING modern English drama is about the prevalence and significance of visual things that are ‘under construction’ in early modern plays. Contributing to challenges to the well-worn narrative of ‘iconophobic’ early modern English culture, it explores the drama as a part of a lively post-Reformation visual world. Interrogating the centrality of concepts of ‘fragmentation’ and ‘wholeness’ in critical approaches to this period, it opens up new interpretations of the place of aesthetic form in early modern culture. An interdisciplinary study, this book argues that the idea of ‘finish’ had transgressive associations in the early modern imagination. It centres on the depiction of incomplete visual practices in works by playwrights including Shakespeare, John Lyly, and Robert Greene. The first book of its kind to connect dramatists’ attitudes to the visual with questions of materiality, Making and Unmaking in Early Modern English Drama draws on a rich range of illustrated examples. Plays are discussed alongside contexts and themes, including iconoclasm, painting, sculpture, clothing and jewellery, automata, and invisibility. Asking what it meant for Shakespeare and his contemporaries to ‘begin’ or ‘end’ a literary or visual work, this book is invaluable for scholars and students of early modern English literature, drama, visual culture, material culture, theatre history, history and aesthetics.
  • POLITICS, SOCIETY and CIVIL WAR in WARWICKSHIRE, 162.0-1660 Cambridge Studies in Early Modern British History

    POLITICS, SOCIETY and CIVIL WAR in WARWICKSHIRE, 162.0-1660 Cambridge Studies in Early Modern British History

    Cambridge Studies in Early Modern British History POLITICS, SOCIETY AND CIVIL WAR IN WARWICKSHIRE, 162.0-1660 Cambridge Studies in Early Modern British History Series editors ANTHONY FLETCHER Professor of History, University of Durham JOHN GUY Reader in British History, University of Bristol and JOHN MORRILL Lecturer in History, University of Cambridge, and Fellow and Tutor of Selwyn College This is a new series of monographs and studies covering many aspects of the history of the British Isles between the late fifteenth century and the early eighteenth century. It will include the work of established scholars and pioneering work by a new generation of scholars. It will include both reviews and revisions of major topics and books which open up new historical terrain or which reveal startling new perspectives on familiar subjects. It is envisaged that all the volumes will set detailed research into broader perspectives and the books are intended for the use of students as well as of their teachers. Titles in the series The Common Peace: Participation and the Criminal Law in Seventeenth-Century England CYNTHIA B. HERRUP Politics, Society and Civil War in Warwickshire, 1620—1660 ANN HUGHES London Crowds in the Reign of Charles II: Propaganda and Politics from the Restoration to the Exclusion Crisis TIM HARRIS Criticism and Compliment: The Politics of Literature in the Reign of Charles I KEVIN SHARPE Central Government and the Localities: Hampshire 1649-1689 ANDREW COLEBY POLITICS, SOCIETY AND CIVIL WAR IN WARWICKSHIRE, i620-1660 ANN HUGHES Lecturer in History, University of Manchester The right of the University of Cambridge to print and sell all manner of books was granted by Henry VIII in 1534.
  • I 'A MAN MOSTE MEETE': a NATIONWIDE SURVEY OF

    I 'A MAN MOSTE MEETE': a NATIONWIDE SURVEY OF

    'A MAN MOSTE MEETE': A NATIONWIDE SURVEY OF JUSTICES OF THE PEACE IN MID-TUDOR ENGLAND, 1547-1582 _____________ A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History University of Houston _____________ In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy _____________ By Clarissa Elisabeth Hinojosa May 2014 i 'A MAN MOSTE MEETE': A NATIONWIDE SURVEY OF JUSTICES OF THE PEACE IN MID-TUDOR ENGLAND, 1547-1582 _____________ An Abstract of a Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History University of Houston _____________ In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy _____________ By Clarissa Elisabeth Hinojosa May 2014 ii ABSTRACT This dissertation is a national study of English justices of the peace (JPs) in the mid- Tudor era. It incorporates comparable data from the reigns of Edward VI, Mary I, and the Elizabeth I. Much of the analysis is quantitative in nature: chapters compare the appointments of justices of the peace during the reigns of Edward VI, Mary I, and Elizabeth I, and reveal that purges of the commissions of the peace were far more common than is generally believed. Furthermore, purges appear to have been religiously- based, especially during the reign of Elizabeth I. There is a gap in the quantitative data beginning in 1569, only eleven years into Elizabeth I’s reign, which continues until 1584. In an effort to compensate for the loss of quantitative data, this dissertation analyzes a different primary source, William Lambarde’s guidebook for JPs, Eirenarcha. The fourth chapter makes particular use of Eirenarcha, exploring required duties both in and out of session, what technical and personal qualities were expected of JPs, and how well they lived up to them.
  • Speakers of the House of Commons

    Speakers of the House of Commons

    Parliamentary Information List BRIEFING PAPER 04637a 21 August 2015 Speakers of the House of Commons Speaker Date Constituency Notes Peter de Montfort 1258 − William Trussell 1327 − Appeared as joint spokesman of Lords and Commons. Styled 'Procurator' Henry Beaumont 1332 (Mar) − Appeared as joint spokesman of Lords and Commons. Sir Geoffrey Le Scrope 1332 (Sep) − Appeared as joint spokesman of Lords and Commons. Probably Chief Justice. William Trussell 1340 − William Trussell 1343 − Appeared for the Commons alone. William de Thorpe 1347-1348 − Probably Chief Justice. Baron of the Exchequer, 1352. William de Shareshull 1351-1352 − Probably Chief Justice. Sir Henry Green 1361-1363¹ − Doubtful if he acted as Speaker. All of the above were Presiding Officers rather than Speakers Sir Peter de la Mare 1376 − Sir Thomas Hungerford 1377 (Jan-Mar) Wiltshire The first to be designated Speaker. Sir Peter de la Mare 1377 (Oct-Nov) Herefordshire Sir James Pickering 1378 (Oct-Nov) Westmorland Sir John Guildesborough 1380 Essex Sir Richard Waldegrave 1381-1382 Suffolk Sir James Pickering 1383-1390 Yorkshire During these years the records are defective and this Speaker's service might not have been unbroken. Sir John Bussy 1394-1398 Lincolnshire Beheaded 1399 Sir John Cheyne 1399 (Oct) Gloucestershire Resigned after only two days in office. John Dorewood 1399 (Oct-Nov) Essex Possibly the first lawyer to become Speaker. Sir Arnold Savage 1401(Jan-Mar) Kent Sir Henry Redford 1402 (Oct-Nov) Lincolnshire Sir Arnold Savage 1404 (Jan-Apr) Kent Sir William Sturmy 1404 (Oct-Nov) Devonshire Or Esturmy Sir John Tiptoft 1406 Huntingdonshire Created Baron Tiptoft, 1426.
  • Part 1), September 2019 Historic Environment Associates

    Part 1), September 2019 Historic Environment Associates

    Appendix 22: A conservation management plan for the central area of the Ashridge Estate (part 1), September 2019 Historic Environment Associates Ashridge Estate A Conservation Management Plan for the Central Area of the Ashridge Estate Part 1 Report Final September 2019 Contents Contents 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 Background to the study ............................................................................................................ 2 National Trust Policy .................................................................................................................. 2 Spirit of the Place ....................................................................................................................... 4 Methodology .............................................................................................................................. 4 Authorship ................................................................................................................................. 5 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................... 5 2 Baseline Information ......................................................................................................... 9 Ownership and Land Management ............................................................................................ 9 Covenants and Legal Restrictions on Management
  • DORSET AS a LOCAL MAGNATE, 1624-1642. in the Previous Chapter

    DORSET AS a LOCAL MAGNATE, 1624-1642. in the Previous Chapter

    CHAPTER FIVE: DORSET AS A LOCAL MAGNATE, 1624-1642. In the previous chapter, I argued that Dorset's ecclesiastical patronage is best understood as one dimension of his local influence: most of the benefices in his gift lay near his Sussex estates, and he nearly always chose local men to serve them. 1 I now want to explore more fully Dorset's career as a provincial magnate from his inheritance of the earldom to the outbreak of civil war. I will suggest that muscle in local politics and government depended on three things above all: first, the tenure of specific offices, such as the Lord Lieutenancy of a county, or the High Stewardship of a borough; second, residence in a particular district, and the local knowledge which this yielded; and third, the location of landed estates. The first three sections of this chapter analyse how these variables interacted in Sussex, where Dorset was Lord Lieutenant from 1624, and where his territorial base was concentrated. We will see that Dorset's extensive selling of land to payoff his elder brother's debts did not per se reduce his local clout, and that the office of Lord Lieutenant retained considerable power, especially in military and fiscal matters. However, the Lord Lieutenancy did not necessarily confer electoral patronage, and it seems that Dorset's ------------------------- 1. See Chapter Four, above, pp. 242-3. -260- parliamentary candidates were most consistently successful where they had a local background. In the fourth section, I will strengthen these conclusions with evidence from outside Sussex, and suggest that recent discussion of the early Stuart electorate has tended to neglect the central conflict of interest between noblemen sponsoring their men-of-business and corporations seeking representatives with local knowledge.
  • Heritage Impact Assessment

    Heritage Impact Assessment

    Heritage Impact Assessment Birchall Garden Suburb Draft Site Allocation JulyOctober 2017 2017 All Ordnance Survey Plans are © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. Licence Number: 100007624 © Copyright 2017. All worldwide rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retreval system or transmitted in any form by any other means whatsoever: i.e. photocopy, electronic, mechanical recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. Any enquiries should be directed to: Montagu Evans LLP 5 Bolton Street London W1J 8BA. Tel: +44 (0)20 7439 4002 Fax: +44 (0)20 7312 7548 CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 6 APPENDICIES The Proposed Allocation Site 01: HERITAGE ASSET PLAN FROM NATIONAL HERITAGE LIST 37 Purpose of this Report 02: LIST DESCRIPTIONS 39 2.0 STATUTORY PROVISION AND POLICY CONSIDERATIONS 12 03: EXTRACTS FROM HISTORIC ENGLAND REPRESENTATION 53 Statutory Provision, Case Law, and National Guidance Development Plans Material Considerations Regional Assessments 3.0 HISTORIC EVOLUTION OF THE DRAFT ALLOCATION SITE AND SURROUNDING LANDSCAPE 16 Historic Landscape Context Hatfield Estate Panshanger Estate Other Identified Heritage Assets within the Surrounding Landscape 4.0 WELWYN GARDEN CITY AND THE SALISBURY LINE 26 5.0 ASSESSMENT OF THE PROPOSED ALLOCATION SITE 32 Impact on Historic Relationships within the Landscape Impacts on Individual Heritage Assets Impact on Cultural Heritage Legacy Represented by the Salisbury Line 6.0 CONCLUSION 36 iv IntroduCTION © Montagu Evans LLP 2017 | Birchall Garden Suburb - Draft Site Allocation 1.0 // Birchall GARDEN SuBuRB - DRAfT SITE Allocation Introduction 6 IntroduCTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Montagu Evans has been instructed by Gascoyne Cecil Estates (‘the Estate’) to undertake the following heritage impact assessment in relation to the proposed allocation of land at Cole Green and Birchall Farm, Hertfordshire (‘the site’).
  • The Breretons of Cheshire, England

    The Breretons of Cheshire, England

    The Breretons of Cheshire Page 1 of 68 The Breretons of Cheshire, England Researched and Written by Faye Brereton-Goodwin, Ontario, Canada [email protected] Copyright © Faye Brereton-Goodwin 2001 (February 2018 revision) The Breretons of Cheshire Page 2 of 68 This history is part of a larger 2002 document, titled ‘In Search of My Ancestors” which I dedicated to my father Albert Lionel (Bert) Brereton who served in the Navy, during the First World War and as a Sergeant in the 3rd Canadian Infantry, Princess Patricia's Regiment, during the Second World War. He returned to Canada in 1945, on a hospital ship and died when I was eight years of age. Unable to learn about my Brereton ancestors from my father or his parents over the years I searched for links to the past; at times travelling to Brereton sites. My journey has been both fun and rewarding. On our first trip to England, in 1993, my husband Bob and I visited Royal Leamington Spa in England and saw the home of my Great Aunt Ina Glass at 2 Clarendon Crescent (my Grandmother Brereton- Smallwood also resided there until her death at the age of 101 years). We also visited Brereton Hall in Cheshire, England and met with the owners of the property Mary and Derrick Creigh. For many years, under their ownership Brereton Hall had functioned as a private girl’s school. However, by the 1990’s much updating was needed to continue as a school and the decision was made to return the hall to its original function, as a private residence.
  • Milton's Comus, Being the Bridgewater Manuscript

    Milton's Comus, Being the Bridgewater Manuscript

    MILTON'S COMUS All Rights Resei-'ed 0^ye/i-^Zm /f MILTON'S COMUS BEING THE BRIDGEWATER MANUSCRIPT WITH NOTES AND A SHORT FAMILY MEMOIR BY THE LADY ALIX EGERTON LONDON J. M. DENT ^ SONS LIMITED I9IO Printed by Ballantyne, Hanson 6* Co. At the Ballantyne Press, Edinburgh / am indebted to Mr. Strachan Holme, Curator of the Bridgewater Library^ for much valuable advice^ and also for assistance in correcting the proofs of the Maske. ALIX EGERTON. October igog. O^146571 ^. LIST OF PORTRAITS IN TINTED PHOTOGRAVURE John, ist Earl of Bridgewater .... Frontispiece (From the Portrait at Bridgewater House) John Egerton, Lord Brackley, afterwards 2nd Earl of Bridgewater Facing page 8 {From the Portrait at Bridgewater House) Frances, ist Countess of Bridgewater . ,, 12 (From the Portrait at Bridgewater House) Lady Alice Egerton, Youngest Daughter of ist of Bridgewater John, Earl ... ,, 18 (From the Portrait at IVorsley Hall) John Egerton, Lord Brackley, afterwards 2nd Earl of Bridgewater ..... ,,20 (From the Portrait at Worsley Hall) Thomas Egerton, Youngest Son of John, ist Earl OF Bridgewater ,,26 (From the Portrait at IVorsley Hall) Lady Alice Egerton, Youngest Daughter of John, ist Earl of Bridgewater, afterwards Countess of Carbery ,, 30 (From the Portrait at Golden Grove, belonging to the Earl of Cawdor) viii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Thomas Egerton, Youngest Son of John, ist Earl of Bridgewater ..... Facing page 32 {From the Portrait at Worsky Hall) THE BRIDGEWATER MS. ^ Facsimile of Title-Page Facing page 34 First Page of Bridgewater MS .,36 Last Page of Bridgewater MS. .... „ 82 COMUS ITS AUTHOR AND ITS PLAYERS With the recollection of Masson, the greatest of Milton^s biographers, and of all those greater and lesser men who have described the poet and his works, it seems superfluous, if not presumptuous^ to contribute anything to the subject.