DOCSLIB.ORG

Assize Indictments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Assize Indictments Elizabeth I (from Calendar of Assize Records: Surrey Indictments, Elizabeth I) Assizes of July 1564 177. Parker (or Coye), Thomas, and Yonge, Robert, labourers of Southwark, indicted for grand larceny. On 5 May 1564 they broke by night into the close of William Saunder, esq., at Ewell and stole 9 sheets (£2) and a tablecloth (6s 8d). Parker found guilty; allowed clergy and delivered to Mr. Fynche, rector of Croydon. Yonge found not guilty. Assizes of December 1564 202. Worsley, Eden, of Ewell, spinster, indicted for murder by witchcraft. On 4 July 1564 at Ewell she bewitched to death Elizabeth Bybye, daughter of Robert Bybye. Tried at the next assizes and found guilty; to hang. Assizes of July 1568 364. Hall, Stephen, of Epsom, labourer, indicted for grand larceny. On 10 June 1568 he broke into the close of John Tegge at Epsom and stole 4 lambs (10s). Not guilty. Assizes of February 1569 390. Tyckner, Thomas, of Ewell, labourer, indicted for grand larceny. On 25 Sept. 1568 he broke into the close of William Saunders, esq., at Epsom and stole a grey horse (26s 8d). Guilty; to hang. Assizes of February 1573 630. Robinson, Thomas, of Epsom, tailor, indicted for barratry. On 16 Dec. 1572 and other occasions at Epsom he was a common barrator, stirring up discord among his neighbours, etc. Endorsed ‘Billa vera: That he is troblesome amonge his neighbours. Ignoramus: That he is a comen barrator’. Verdict unknown. Assizes of July 1574 705. Dyngeley, Henry, butcher, Dyngeley, Joan, spinster, and Trye, Dorothy, spinster, of Ewell, and Rogers, Robert, of Malden, husbandman, indicted for disseisin. On 19 May 1574 they broke into ‘Heydons’, a messuage and 3 acres at Ewell,and disseised Francis Saunder, gent., of the freehold. Verdict unknown. Assizes of March 1576 819. Turner, John, of Leatherhead, glover, indicted for petty larceny. At Kingston sessions, 4 Oct. 1575, before William Fleetwood, recorder of London, Thomas Brown, Thomas Lyfield, Gregory Lovell, Edmund Slyfield, John Skinner, Richard Pelsted, John Lee, John Cooper, Edward Bellingham, J.P.s, a grand jury – Edward Sare, Henry Pyke, John Huntley, Robert Gyles, James Kinge, Edward Atlee, John Tyrrell, Christopher Mellershe, William Tycknor, John Astone, John Slyfeild, John Chenell, William Osborne, Thomas Bowtell, Anthony Cowper, John Worsham, George Miller, Martin Collyns, James Norman, Edmund Sutton, William Arnold – presented that on 28 June 1575 he broke into the close of William Buryman at Epsom and stole 13 young geese (11d). At large. Assizes of March 1578 958. Cole, Robert, vicar of Epsom, and Cole, Elizabeth, his wife, indicted for barratry at Epsom on 7 Jan. 1578 and other occasions. The indictment is inadequate. Tried in July 1578. Assizes of July 1578 970. Leather, Edmund, of Epsom, husbandman, indicted for grand larceny. At Guildford sessions, 1 July 1578, before Sir William Moor, Sir Thomas Brown, Edmund Slyfield, John Cooper, Lawrence Stoughton, J.P.s, a grand jury – John Tirrell, Richard Kynge, Robert Girlington, Thomas Cole, Thomas Hiller, Thomas Gawen, James Kinge, Richard Haywarde, John Woodden, John Woodman, Christopher Mellershe, William Ticknor, John Astone, Henry Whaler, Richard Cox, John Skeate, Arthur Cowper, Robert Bridger, Thomas Hall, John Holmeden, William Bignoll, Thomas Creswell, William Playstowe, James Corneford, Edmund Sutton, John Richardson – presented that on 4 June 1578 at Epsom he stole a sheep (5s) from William Richbell. Not guilty. 979. Evans, Richard, of Ewell, labourer, indicted for grand larceny. On 20 May 1578 at Ewell he stole 2 geldings (£20) from Sir George Norton. Guilty; to hang. Assizes of March 1579 1056. Saunders, Nicholas, esq., of Epsom, indicted for recusancy. Not guilty Assizes of February 1585 1543. Denman, Henry, of Southwark, petty chapman, indicted for grand larceny. On 22 Nov. 1584 at Ewell he stole 10 sheep (£2) from John Woodwarde, 7 sheep (30s) from John Kerrell and 32 sheep (£7) from George Kinge. (Denman had also been tried for breaking into a house at Limpsfield and stealing goods in 1581). Raynolls, William, of Southwark, butcher, is indicted as an accessory. (Raynolls had also been tried for stealing sheep from Southwark and Horsleydown in 1585 and for acting as accessory to the theft of clothes from Westminster in 1586). Denman found guilty; remanded because he is said to have had the book before. Raynolls found not guilty; bailed because he is a man of ill behaviour. Assizes of February 1586 1625. Mathew, Elizabeth, of Epsom, spinster, indicted for grand larceny. On 27 Sept. 1585 she broke into the house of Robert Byne of Epsom, labourer, and stole 3 pieces of money (3s), a silver ring (20d) and a shirt (6d). Not guilty. 1656. Born, Robert, of Epsom, indicted for petty larceny. At a view of frank-pledge held by [...] Kedermister, gent., seneschal, a jury – Roger Lambert, George Gouldsmith, Thomas Burde, Thomas […], […] Woodman, Emery Tailor, Ralph Paris, Henry Charlewood, William Rogers, Henry Parker, William Richbell, Alan Tailor, Robert Michell – presented that on 8 June 1585 at Epsom he stole a sheep (10d) from […] Dawborne of Leatherhead, yeoman. [damaged]. The indictment has no value. Assizes of July 1586 1681. Clenche, Richard, of Ewell, labourer, indicted for petty larceny. On 9 May 1586 at Ewell he stole a sheet (11d) from Thomas Blundell. Guilty; whipped. 1716. Browne, Elizabeth, wife of Cuthbert Browne, gent., Horde, Anne, spinster, Horde, Alan, gent., and Horde, Barbara, his wife, of Ewell, indicted for recusancy for one month. Verdict unknown. Assizes of February 1587 1745. Turpyn, Priscilla, of Southwark, spinster, indicted for grand larceny. On 28 Oct. 15 86 at Ewell she stole a kirtle (4s), a hat (2s), a pair of knitted stockings (2s), a pair of garters (3d), a pair of shoes (1s), a smock (2s) and several pieces of linen (7s) from Owen Aphue. Guilty; remanded on plea of pregnancy. Assizes of July 1587 1813. Gest, Lionel, gent., Maundy (or Percyvall or Wale), William, yeoman, and Saunders, Edward, yeoman, of London, indicted for highway robbery. On 28 Sept. 1586 they assaulted George Shelley, gent., in the highway at Coulsdon and stole from him £34 in money. On 28 Sept. 1586 they assaulted John Turner in the highway at Ewell and stole from him a gold chain (£29 10s), £34 in money, 4 shirts (£2) 13 bands and 6 pairs of handruffs (£4), a pair of linen boothose (10s), 6 socks, 2 kerchiefs and a pillow-bar (30s), a pair of worsted stockings (10s), a pair of garters, a comb and a ‘benche’ (6s), a pistolet (£1), a sword (26s 8d) and a gold ring (26s). Maundy found guilty; to hang. Gest and Saunders are at large. 1821. Payne, William, of Southwark, yeoman, indicted for grand larceny. On 31 July 1585 at Nonsuch he stole a sword (26s) from John Roberts. At large. Pardoned by general pardon. Assizes of February 1588 1886. Ricatts, John, constable of Ewell, indicted for a voluntary escape. On 2 Nov. 1587 Ricatts arrested Alan Cox of Ewell, innholder, by virtue of a warrant issued by Richard Burton, J.P., but on the same day voluntarily allowed him to escape. Confessed to a negligent escape and submitted to his fine. 1888. Gray, William, of Woking, gent., Baker, —, of St Mary Magdalen, Bermondsey, clerk, Peckham, Sir George, Taylor, Margaret, wife of Robert Taylor, yeoman, and Bezant, Elizabeth, spinster, of St Saviour, Southwark, York, Joan, spinster, and Dorrington, John, yeoman, of Richmond, Whitney, Anne, gentlewoman, Russell, Edward, gent., Russell, —, his wife, Rutland, Dorothy, widow, Rutland, Joan, gentlewoman, and Rutland, —, wife of William Rutland, gent., of Mitcham, and Browne, Elizabeth, wife of Cuthbert Browne of Ewell, gent., indicted for recusancy. Proclaimed according to statute. 1890. Inquisition held at Epsom, 31 Jan. 1588, before John Derrick, coroner, on the body of Edward Dewdney, aged 14 years, servant of Robert Arnolde of Leatherhead, yeoman. A jury – William Parker, Nicholas Humfrey, John […], John Stynte, Thomas Mathey, William Sewell, Edmund Byby, John Comber, John Richebell, George Vergyn, […] Thornecombe – found that on 22 Jan. Dewdney was returning from London to Leatherhead on a horse belonging to his master loaded with a ‘pannell’ and 2 panniers. At Mapleton Bush near Epsom the horse stumbled and fell into the ditch, killing Dewdney. [damaged]. Assizes of March 1589 1961. Jones, Ralph, of Westminster, Midd, labourer, indicted for grand larceny. On 18 Dec. 1588 at Ewell he stole a sheep (3s 4d) from an unknown man. Guilty; allowed clergy. 1977. York, Joan, spinster, and Dorrington, John, yeoman, of Richmond, Mollenax, Jane, wife of Thomas Mollenax of Nutfield, gent., Whittney, Anne, of Mitcham, gentlewoman, Beazant, Elizabeth, spinster, Chaplyn, Joan, wife of Thomas Chaplyn, waterman, Vaughan, Joan, spinster, Sutton, Ralph., yeoman, and Sutton, Elizabeth, his wife, of St Saviour, Southwark, Browne, Elizabeth, of Ewell, gentlewoman, Cooke, John., of Kennington in Lambeth, yeoman, and Glascock, Anne, of St Saviour, Southwark, widow, indicted for recusancy. Proclaimed according to statute. Assizes of June 1589 2000. Preston, Sibyl, of Effingham, spinster, indicted for witchcraft. At Guildford sessions, I July 1589, before Sir Henry Weston, Sir William Moor, Sir Thomas Brown, Anthony Mason, Thomas Lyfield, Edmund Slyfield, William Morgan, George Moor, Lawrence Stoughton, J.P.s, a grand jury – George Kynge of Banstead, Edmund Munter of Ewell, Richard Blundell of Ewell, William Wrenche of Epsom, Ambrose Taylor of Epsom, Austin Cuddington of Ashtead, Francis Styles of Ashtead, William Syms of Ashtead, Edward Ruminge of Fetcham, John Wilkins of Great Bookham, Robert Chippinge of Little Bookham, John Burges of Little Bookham, John Bramson of Leatherhead – presented that on 31 Aug. 1587 at Effingham she bewitched to death a mare (£2) belonging to Bartholomew Humphrey of Effingham and a horse (50s) belonging to Richard Atlee of Effingham. Not guilty. Assizes of March 1590 2041.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Warwickshire County Record Office
    WARWICKSHIRE COUNTY RECORD OFFICE Priory Park Cape Road Warwick CV34 4JS Tel: (01926) 738959 Email: [email protected] Website: http://heritage.warwickshire.gov.uk/warwickshire-county-record-office Please note we are closed to the public during the first full week of every calendar month to enable staff to catalogue collections. A full list of these collection weeks is available on request and also on our website. The reduction in our core funding means we can no longer produce documents between 12.00 and 14.15 although the searchroom will remain open during this time. There is no need to book an appointment, but entry is by CARN ticket so please bring proof of name, address and signature (e.g. driving licence or a combination of other documents) if you do not already have a ticket. There is a small car park with a dropping off zone and disabled spaces. Please telephone us if you would like to reserve a space or discuss your needs in any detail. Last orders: Documents/Photocopies 30 minutes before closing. Transportation to Australia and Tasmania Transportation to Australia began in 1787 with the sailing of the “First Fleet” of convicts and their arrival at Botany Bay in January 1788. The practice continued in New South Wales until 1840, in Van Dieman’s Land (Tasmania) until 1853 and in Western Australia until 1868. Most of the convicts were tried at the Assizes, The Court of the Assize The Assizes dealt with all cases where the defendant was liable to be sentenced to death (nearly always commuted to transportation for life.
    [Show full text]
  • PDFHS CD/Download Overview 100 Local War Memorials the CD Has Photographs of Almost 90% of the Memorials Plus Information on Their Current Location
    PDFHS CD/Download Overview 100 Local War Memorials The CD has photographs of almost 90% of the memorials plus information on their current location. The Memorials - listed in their pre-1970 counties: Cambridgeshire: Benwick; Coates; Stanground –Church & Lampass Lodge of Oddfellows; Thorney, Turves; Whittlesey; 1st/2nd Battalions. Cambridgeshire Regiment Huntingdonshire: Elton; Farcet; Fletton-Church, Ex-Servicemen Club, Phorpres Club, (New F) Baptist Chapel, (Old F) United Methodist Chapel; Gt Stukeley; Huntingdon-All Saints & County Police Force, Kings Ripton, Lt Stukeley, Orton Longueville, Orton Waterville, Stilton, Upwood with Gt Ravely, Waternewton, Woodston, Yaxley Lincolnshire: Barholm; Baston; Braceborough; Crowland (x2); Deeping St James; Greatford; Langtoft; Market Deeping; Tallington; Uffington; West Deeping: Wilsthorpe; Northamptonshire: Barnwell; Collyweston; Easton on the Hill; Fotheringhay; Lutton; Tansor; Yarwell City of Peterborough: Albert Place Boys School; All Saints; Baker Perkins, Broadway Cemetery; Boer War; Book of Remembrance; Boy Scouts; Central Park (Our Jimmy); Co-op; Deacon School; Eastfield Cemetery; General Post Office; Hand & Heart Public House; Jedburghs; King’s School: Longthorpe; Memorial Hospital (Roll of Honour); Museum; Newark; Park Rd Chapel; Paston; St Barnabas; St John the Baptist (Church & Boys School); St Mark’s; St Mary’s; St Paul’s; St Peter’s College; Salvation Army; Special Constabulary; Wentworth St Chapel; Werrington; Westgate Chapel Soke of Peterborough: Bainton with Ashton; Barnack; Castor; Etton; Eye; Glinton; Helpston; Marholm; Maxey with Deeping Gate; Newborough with Borough Fen; Northborough; Peakirk; Thornhaugh; Ufford; Wittering. Pearl Assurance National Memorial (relocated from London to Lynch Wood, Peterborough) Broadway Cemetery, Peterborough (£10) This CD contains a record and index of all the readable gravestones in the Broadway Cemetery, Peterborough.
    [Show full text]
  • Court Reform in England
    Comments COURT REFORM IN ENGLAND A reading of the Beeching report' suggests that the English court reform which entered into force on 1 January 1972 was the result of purely domestic considerations. The members of the Commission make no reference to the civil law countries which Great Britain will join in an important economic and political regional arrangement. Yet even a cursory examination of the effects of the reform on the administration of justice in England and Wales suggests that English courts now resemble more closely their counterparts in Western Eu- rope. It should be stated at the outset that the new organization of Eng- lish courts is by no means the result of the 1971 Act alone. The Act crowned the work of various legislative measures which have brought gradual change for a period of well over a century, including the Judicature Acts 1873-75, the Interpretation Act 1889, the Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act 1925, the Administration of Justice Act 1933, the County Courts Act 1934, the Criminal Appeal Act 1966 and the Criminal Law Act 1967. The reform culminates a prolonged process of response to social change affecting the legal structure in England. Its effect was to divorce the organization of the courts from tradition and history in order to achieve efficiency and to adapt the courts to new tasks and duties which they must meet in new social and economic conditions. While the earlier acts, including the 1966 Criminal Appeal Act, modernized the structure of the Supreme Court of Judicature, the 1971 Act extended modern court structure to the intermediate level, creating the new Crown Court, and provided for the regular admin- istration of justice in civil matters by the High Court in England and Wales, outside the Royal Courts in London.
    [Show full text]
  • BRISTOL's COURTS of LAW Hon
    BRISTOL BRANCH OF THE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION BRISTOL'S Price £3.00 2006 COURTS OF LAW ISSN 1362 7759 No. 117 JOHNLYES THE BRISTOL BRANCH OF THE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION LOCAL HISTORY PAMPHLETS BRISTOL'S COURTS OF LAW Hon. General Editor: PETER HARRIS Assistant General Editor: NORMA KNIGHT In 1373 Bristol became a county, separate from Gloucestershire and Editorial Advisor: JOSEPH BETTEY Somerset. The charter granting this change in status acknowledged that in the petition that preceded it the townspeople had asserted: the same town to be situate partly in the County of Gloucester and partly in the County Bristol's Courts of Law is the one hundred and seventeenth pamphlet in this of Somerset; and although the town aforesaid from the towns of Gloucester and series. Ilchester, where the county courts, assizes, juries and inquisitions are taken before our Justices and other Ministers in the Counties aforesaid, is distant by thirty leagues of a John Lyes is the author of 'A Strong Smell of Brimstone': The Solicitors way deep in winter time especially and perilous to travellers, the burgesses, and Attorneys of Bristol 1740-1840 and other pamphlets in this series. nevertheless, of the said town of Bristol are on many occasions bound to be present at The publication of a pamphlet by the Bristol Branch of the Historical the holding of the county courts, assizes, juries and inquisitions aforesaid, by which Association does not necessarily imply the Branch's approval of the they are sometimes prevented from paying attention to the management of their shipping and merchandise, to the lowering of their estate and the manifest opinions expressed in it.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Abolition of the English Grand Jury Nathan T
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 29 Article 2 Issue 1 May-June Summer 1938 Notes on the Abolition of the English Grand Jury Nathan T. Elliff Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Nathan T. Elliff, Notes on the Abolition of the English Grand Jury, 29 Am. Inst. Crim. L. & Criminology 3 (1938-1939) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. NOTES ON THE ABOLITION OF THE ENGLISH GRAND JURY 1 NATHAN T. ELLIFF INTRODUCTION The obituary of the English grand jury might well read: "Born in 1166 to increase accusations of crime, lived to be termed the palladium of justice, and died in 1933 of inutility on a wave of economy." Today, in the words of a London K. C., nobody mentions it, nobody regrets it, nobody is any the worse off. Yet Blackstone *considered it an essential safeguard of liberty and wrote that no one would ever be so hardy as to attack it. The reason for this change is found in the history of English criminal law and procedure. Henry II crieated the grand jury in 1166 by the Assize of Clar- endon as a prosecuting rather than a protecting body. It merely supplemented private accusation (appeals).
    [Show full text]
  • 1577 1 1577 at HAMPTON COURT, Middlesex. Jan 1,Tues New Year
    1577 1577 At HAMPTON COURT, Middlesex. Jan 1,Tues New Year gifts. play: The History of Error, by the Children of Paul’s. Among 197 gifts to the Queen: by Sir Gilbert Dethick, Garter King of Arms: ‘A Book of the Arms of the Garter since the time of the Queen’s Majesty’; by Mr Alfonsus [Alfonso Ferrabosco, musician]: ‘An Italian book written’; by Henry Gyrtens: ‘An English book in verse being a story translated’; by Petruccio Ubaldini: ‘A book written in Italian fair’.NYG Roger 2nd Lord North’s payments: ‘The Queen’s New Year’s gift, £10; given in court at New Year’s tide, £16.10s; lost at play to the Queen, £70’.A George Talbot 6th Earl of Shrewsbury had sent Thomas Baldwin £100 to purchase New Year gifts for the Queen and others. [Talbot P.755]. Shrewsbury gave the Queen £20 in gold; the Countess of Shrewsbury gave ‘a gown of tawny satin...lined with yellow sarcenet’; Lord North gave £10 in gold.NYG Jan 1, Petruccio Ubaldini dedicated to the Queen a description in Italian of the Lives and Fortunes of six illustrious ladies. 14ff. [BL Royal MS 14 A.XIX]. Jan 1: George Gascoigne dedicated to the Queen: ‘The Grief of Joy. Certain Elegies wherein the doubtful delights of man’s life are displayed. Written to the Queen’s most excellent Majesty...1576’. Dedication: ‘To the high and mighty’ Queen. ‘The life of Man...is beset with sundry enemies, and subjected to many perils. Neither have we in this world any joy that may be accounted sure and stable, nor yet any such stability as may yield us sufficient cause of perfect Joy and contentation...Our age seemeth (unto me) a flying chase, continually hunted with Calamities’..
    [Show full text]
  • Bucks Prisoners
    Centre for Buckinghamshire Studies Bucks Prisoners The courts of Buckinghamshire have seen charges brought for all sorts of illicit activities. Between them the Court of Quarter Sessions and Court of Assize have punished the people of the county for a range of offences from the trivial to the capital. As laws have changed the character of the cases brought have altered with them. Some look slightly peculiar by 21st Century standards—few today would feel that Peter Horton of Iver’s offence of keeping a bowling alley (for which he was fined £2 in 1690, worth around £175 today) is something that should be occupying the court’s attention. Later convictions can bear the mark of desperation as much as deliquency; James Roads’s conviction for the theft of bread and mutton in 1842 has the look of a man trying to feed his family more than a criminal mastermind at work. Standards of justice have also changed; it wasn’t until the judicial reforms of the 19th Century (notably the Jervis Acts of 1848) that anything like modern standards were implemented. As late as 1746, justices were still being advised by judicial manuals to commit the accused for trial, even where it was apparent that the evidence exonerated them. Those tried and imprisoned could therefore be anywhere from debtor to hardened criminal to starving to entirely innocent. Exploring the records of the criminal courts are therefore potentially relevant to all family historians. This guide will provide a brief introduction to crime and punishment in the county, and takes you through some of the sources at the Centre for Buckinghamshire Studies (CBS) you can use to discover more details about your family’s criminal past.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Quarter Sessions Records
    Introduction to Quarter Sessions Records: England’s County Court System Dan Poffenberger, AG® Senior British and Irish Research Specialist Family History Library 23 April 2021 Introduction Basic civil, criminal and even ecclesiastical justice began at the parish level. The parish constable often dealt with petty disputes and crimes. Parish officers could report parishioners and even the minister to the archdeacon or bishop in the form of Churchwarden’s Presentments. Lords of the manor might also be able to adjudicate civil and criminal issues. County officers could deal with petty to major offenses. National courts dealt with offences deemed major. One should remember that what is considered a misdemeanor today may have once been considered major. For ancestors who may have broken the law, who were the victims of criminal acts, or who served as jurors, witnesses, or Justices of the Peace, there can be confusion as to where to begin finding these kinds of records. Quarter sessions records are undoubtedly the place to start. Court of Quarter Sessions From 1388 to 1972, Justices of the Peace were empowered by the King to meet four times a year, or quarterly, to hold Courts of Quarter Sessions. These sessions were to be held around the time of well-known feast days of that time: Easter (spring), Trinity (midsummer), Michaelmas (late September) and Epiphany (January). Quarter Session Courts exist in every county in England except Middlesex. Middlesex and London took place in the Old Bailey Sessions which were held monthly. County Quarter Sessions could be held in a different town for each of the quarterly sessions.
    [Show full text]
  • This Work Has Been Submitted to NECTAR, the Northampton
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by NECTAR This work has been submitted to NECTAR, the Northampton Electronic Collection of Theses and Research . http://nectar.northampton.ac.uk/1983/ Creator(s): Zoe Dyndor Title: Death recorded: capital punishment and the press in Northampton, 1780-1834 Date: Autumn 2008 Originally published in : Midland History Official URL: http://www.maney.co.uk/journals/mdh http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/maney/mdh Example citation: Dyndor, Z. (2008) Death recorded: capital punishment and the press in Northampton, 1780-1834. Midland History. 33 (2), pp. 179-195. Version of item: publisher’s PDF midland history, Vol. 33 No. 2, Autumn 2008, 179–195 Death Recorded: Capital Punishment and the Press in Northampton, 1780–1834 Midland History Prize Proxime Accessit 2007 Zoe Dyndor University of Northampton This article focuses on execution reports in the Northampton Mercury and Northamptonshire execution broadsides from 1780–1834 to determine how capital punishment was represented in the media. Although there has been an increase in literature discussing the reporting of crime in the press, there has been no study of execution reports in the late eighteenth and early nine- teenth centuries. The use of a variety of media suggests reports in different mediums refl ected their readership. Through a typical case study this article hopes to address how the criminal justice system was portrayed as its reform was imminent. In particular it will highlight how the formulaic style of reports gave messages about the reformative nature and effi cacy of the execution process, and created an acceptable image of justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Circuit in Upper Canada a Century Ago William Renwick Riddell
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 12 | Issue 1 Article 9 1921 Criminal Circuit in Upper Canada a Century Ago William Renwick Riddell Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation William Renwick Riddell, Criminal Circuit in Upper Canada a Century Ago, 12 J. Am. Inst. Crim. L. & Criminology 91 (May 1921 to February 1922) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. A CRIMINAL CIRCUIT IN UPPER CANADA A CENTURY AGO 1 WILLIAm RENWICic RiDDELL Mfore than a century ago the province of Upper Canada was divided by the judges of the Court of King's Bench into three circuits, each of a number of district towns; and the three judges of that court took each one circuit twice a year by an arrangement made by them- selves and publicly announced. The Court of King's Bench was the only Superior Court in the province, but it very seldom tried a criminal case; most of the charges of crime were tried before a Court of Oyer and Terminer and General Gaol Delivery, presided over by one of the judges of the Court of King's Bench who received a commission for that purpose-and the same judge received a comnission of assize and nisi prius empowering him to try civil cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Finding in the English Court of Chancery: a Rebuttal
    Fact Finding in the English Court of Chancery: A Rebuttal John H. Langbeint In a recent article in this Journal Harold Chesnin and Geoffrey Hazard presented a breathtaking thesis: The English Court of Chan- cery lacked the power to "decide fact issues itself... until some time after 1800, at least a decade after the effective date of the Seventh Amendment."1 By "fact issues" the authors mean "contested issues of fact."12 "The authors hypothesize that the office of the Lord Chan- cellor was not originally endowed with the power to decide questions of fact, though it assumed that power by the nineteenth century."3 This might mean that the Seventh Amendment requires a federal court sitting in equity to submit disputed questions of fact to a jury.4 Because their thesis is couched as an interpretation of the right to jury trial under the American Constitution, it has a potential for mischief in our courts and requires a swift rebuttal. Section I of this article shows that the historical sources contradict the authors' con- tentions. First, the Court of Chancery did indeed have and exercise fact finding power. Second, when the court delegated factual disputes for trial at law, the verdict was advisory and nonbinding. Section II points to the larger context of the relations between equity and law for an understanding of the Chancery's practice of referring issues of fact to common law trial. I Chesnin and Hazard report that their research has disclosed but one case instancing Chancery fact finding before the 19th century. In Bennet v.
    [Show full text]
  • History 3851F/G – Capitalism and the Law – P. Ryan – Glossary of Terms
    History 3851F/G – Capitalism and the Law – P. Ryan – Glossary of Terms Action of Assumpsit – In one sense the term refers to a contractual obligation that is ‘assumed’ within the exchange. Actions of Assumpsit were invented in the 16C to allow parties to seek justice in cases were there no act of trespass – especially where the loss was incurred by deceit. They also could be pursued without a deed, so long as there was a of quid pro quo (or consideration) given for the promise. Baker tells us this was a rare action in the medieval period. Action of Assumpsit in Lieu of Debt – Failure to pay debt does not fit well into a category like trespass, because it is neither an act, nor directly destructive. It is also the absence of ‘consideration’ – which is part of what forms an agreement. This fact combined with other factors (Christian prohibition on usury, the entailment of real property, and rules of inheritance), made debt collection difficult in medieval and early modern law. The ‘action of assumpsit in lieu of debt’ was invented when the Kings Bench began allowing plaintiffs (M16C) to separate the existence of the debt (debt on contract) from the deceit inherent in the failure to pay a debt that was assumed in its existence (assumpsit). The former action (writ of debt) could be defended against by wager or law (e.g. the debtor could purchase oath helpers). Assumpsit went to the jury. Therefore, it was a more viable way to enforce debt payment. The Kings Bench used assumpsit in lieu of debt to instruct juries to examine evidence of the existence of the debt as binding the debtor.
    [Show full text]