DOCSLIB.ORG

Using the Facial Grimace Scale to Evaluate Rabbit Wellness in Post

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Using the Facial Grimace Scale to Evaluate Rabbit Wellness in Post CLINICAL TECHNIQUES Victoria Hampshire, VMD, Column Editor Using the facial grimace scale to evaluate rabbit wellness in post-procedural monitoring Victoria Hampshire, VMD1 & Sheilah Robertson, BVMS (Hons), PhD, DACVAA, DECVAA, DACAW, DECAWBM (WSEL), Specialist in Welfare Science, Ethics and Law, MRCVS2 Rabbits are commonly used in biomedical research and might undergo potentially painful procedures during the course of a study. This column discusses the rabbit facial grimace scale as a tool for monitoring post- procedural pain and explains how it can be incorporated into a worksheet for evaluating rabbit wellness. Among species whose use in research is regulated by the US Department of Agriculture (USDA), rabbits are the second most common, with more than 169,000 rabbits included in the USDA annual report of animal usage in research facili- ties for 2013 (ref. 1), the most recent report available. Some of these animals undergo procedures that have the potential to cause pain or distress. Therefore, post-procedural monitoring to detect pain or distress in rab- Nature America, Inc. All rights reserved. America, Inc. Nature bits is important to protect animal welfare. 5 Most assessments of pain and distress © 201 rely on single or composite pain-scoring tools. One or more attributes associated with pain or distress are evaluated, and the npg level of pain or distress that each reflects is ranked using a numerical scale on which low numbers represent low levels of pain or distress and high numbers represent FIGURE 1 | Rabbit FGS. Illustrations by Aleks Byrd. Normal (0). Ears are alert; eyes are wide. Whiskers high levels of pain or distress. Scores from have a gentle downward curve. Cheeks are puffy, not contracted or flattened. Nose appears relaxed, multiple attributes can be compiled into and nares form a U shape. Moderate (1). Ears are droopy in frontal view and oriented caudally at a 60º a composite score. Single or composite angle in profile view. Eyes are slightly narrowed (orbital tightening). Whiskers are flattened against scores may be used alone or combined the cheeks or oriented caudally. Cheeks are slightly flattened and there is less definition between the with quantitative or qualitative measure- cheeks and nose. Nares form a V shape. Severe (2). Ears are flattened in both frontal and profile views. Eyes are overtly tightened or closed. Whiskers and cheeks are markedly flat. Nose is drawn down toward ments to estimate the overall intensity of the chin; head is tucked against the chest. pain or distress that an animal is experienc- ing. Veterinarians or other observers can consider these estimates when prescribing facial expressions were believed to correlate towards observers or other external stimuli analgesic drugs2–6. with emotions. Driven by a desire to bet- within their primary or secondary enclo- Well-known animal pain experts have ter understand species-typical manifesta- sures during cage-side observations. This recently described a complex set of facial tions of pain or distress, animal researchers propensity to face an observer enables him expressions as attributes that may be use- have recently revisited this topic7–10. Facial or her to detect and document changes ful in augmenting existing pain-scoring expressions are relatively easy to observe in an animal’s status more frequently or tools. As early as Darwin’s era, animals’ because animals often orient themselves when first approaching the cage. Early and 1Capital Preclinical Scientific Research Consultants, LLC, Bethesda, MD. 2College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI. Correspondence should be addressed to V.H. ([email protected]). LAB ANIMAL Volume 44, No. 7 | JULY 2015 259 CLINICAL TECHNIQUES TABLE 1 | Daily rabbit wellness evaluation and date of last check) as well as notes on any incisions and on diet) should also be Attribute Observations Score* recorded, along with an overall veterinary FGS Normal, moderate, severe assessment and recommendation. Finally, Posture Reared, sitting, crouched, sprawled Ears Alert, neutral, droopy we recommend that a recheck interval be Exploration Playful, curious, ambulatory, shaking unambiguously stated at the end of the Vocalization Normal, moderate, severe worksheet. Tooth grinding Normal, moderate, severe Eating Normal, reduced, absent 1. US Department of Agriculture. Animals Used in Drinking Normal, reduced, absent Research 2013. http://www.aphis.usda.gov/ animal_welfare/downloads/7023/Animals%20 Defecation Normal, reduced, absent Used%20In%20Research%202013.pdf Urination Normal, reduced, absent 2. Weaver, L.A., Blaze, C.A., Linder, D.E., Grooming Normal, reduced, absent Andrutis, K.A. & Karas, A.Z. A model for clinical evaluation of perioperative analgesia in rabbits *0, normal; 1, moderate or reduced; 2, severe or absent. (Oryctolagus cuniculus). J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci. 49, 845–851 (2010). 3. Lipman, N.S., Marini, R.P. & Flecknell, P.A. Anesthesia and analgesia in rabbits. in frequent observation may enable detection pain-associated behaviors identified in any Anesthesia and Analgesia in Laboratory Animals of subtle changes that might indicate the treatment group. Serum corticosterone (eds. Kohn, D.F., Wixson, S.K., White, W.J. & need for analgesic intervention. concentrations (used as a marker of stress) Benson, G.J.) 205–232 (Academic, Boston, Various postural and behavioral attri- were no different between sham or tattoo 1997). 4. Lipman, N.S., Marini, R.P. & Flecknell, P.A. butes that may be useful for assessing treatments. Keating et al. concluded that Anesthesia and analgesia in rabbits. in 2,11 pain in rabbits have been described . the rabbit FGS was a reliable and accurate Anesthesia and Analgesia in Laboratory Keating et al. described facial expression tool for assessing pain in rabbits. We agree Animals 2nd edn. (eds. Fish, R.E., Brown, M.J., Danneman, P.J. & Karas, A.Z.) (Academic, responses to pain in rabbits, namely ear, and recommend that it be incorporated Boston, 2008). eye, whisker, cheek and nose positions, into post-procedural monitoring of well- 5. Parga, M.L. Assessment of the efficacy of and categorized them into a rabbit facial ness in laboratory rabbits. meloxicam and development of a pain scoring grimace scale (FGS)12 based largely on the We encourage technologists and oth- system based on behavior in rabbits undergoing elective surgery. BSAVA Congress 2003 Scientific coding methods used by Langford and col- ers tasked with routine pain assessment of Proceedings. (Birmingham, UK, 2003). leagues to characterize pain responses in rabbits to develop a protocol to guide their 6. Roughan, J.V., Flecknell, P.A. & Orr, H.E. Nature America, Inc. All rights reserved. America, Inc. Nature mice10. Keating et al. utilized a prospec- evaluation and intervention approach. We Behavioral assessment of postoperative pain 5 and analgesic effects of carprofen in the tive, blinded, crossover study in which the suggest that this protocol should include domestic rabbit. in Proceedings of the Eighth © 201 same investigator carried out ear tattoo- use of the FGS. We recommend that tech- World Congress of Veterinary Anaesthesia ing or a sham procedure on rabbits with nologists first become familiar with the (University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 2003). 7. Gross, D.M. Defending the humanities with or without prior application of a topical facial gestures and expressions that charac- Charles Darwin’s The Expression of the Emotions npg anesthetic cream containing lidocaine and terize each ranking on the FGS (Fig. 1). We in Man and Animals (1872). in The Secret History prilocaine. Treatment-blinded observ- find that illustrations are more helpful than of Emotion: from Aristotle’s Rhetoric to Modern Brain Science 34–59 (University of Chicago, ers watched video footage of each rabbit’s photographs both for training technologists Chicago, IL, 2007). facial expressions and assigned each rabbit and for regular use in assigning FGS scores 8. Gleerup, K.B., Forkman, B., Lindegaard, C. & a score on the FGS. Serum corticosterone because they can enhance the facial features Andersen, P.H. An equine pain face. Vet. concentrations were measured in blood to capture more detail. Anaesth. Analg. 42, 103–114 (2015). 9. Holden, E. et al. Evaluation of facial expression samples obtained from a catheter placed in When assessing a rabbit, technologists in acute pain in cats. J. Small Anim. Pract. 55, the contralateral ear vein, and blood pres- should use a worksheet to record their 615–621 (2014). sure, heart rate and behavioral responses findings. The date of the evaluation and 10. Langford, D.J. et al. Coding of facial expressions of pain in the laboratory mouse. Nat. Methods such as vocalization were all recorded. the number of days that have passed since 7, 447–449 (2010). Compared with other treatments, tattoo- the potentially painful procedure should 11. American College of Laboratory Animal ing without anesthetic cream resulted in be recorded. Next, each attribute of inter- Medicine. Guidelines for the Assessment and Management of Pain in Rodents and Rabbits higher FGS scores as well as more strug- est (Table 1), including the FGS, should be (American College of Laboratory Animal gling and vocalization, higher peak heart evaluated and scored. A table can be used Medicine, 2006). rate and higher blood pressure, which are to compile these scores (Table 1). Objective 12. Keating, S.C., Thomas, A.A., Flecknell, P.A. & Leach, M.C. Evaluation of EMLA cream for known physiologic and behavioral indi- findings (temperature, respiratory rate, preventing pain during tattooing of rabbits: cators of pain. Behavioral changes 1 hour heart rate and body weight (including changes in physiological, behavioral, and facial after treatment were minimal, with no change in body weight since last check expression responses. PLoS ONE 7, e44437 (2012). 260 Volume 44, No. 7 | JULY 2015 www.labanimal.com.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Guidelines for Pain and Distress in Laboratory Animals: Responsibilities, Recognition, and Intervention
    Guidelines for Pain and Distress in Laboratory Animals: Responsibilities, Recognition, and Intervention Introduction Animals can experience pain and distress. It is the ethical and legal obligation of all personnel involved with the use of animals in research to reduce or eliminate pain and distress in research animals whenever such actions do not interfere with the research objectives. The Institute/Center Animal Care and Use Committee (IC ACUC) has the delegated responsibility and accountability for ensuring that all animals under their oversight are used humanely and in accordance with a number of Federal Regulations and policies.2,21,29,30,32 Key to fulfilling the responsibilities for both the Principal Investigator (PI) and the IC ACUC are to: • understand the legal requirements, • be able to distinguish pain and distress in animals from their normal state, • relieve or minimize the pain and distress appropriately; and • establish humane endpoints. Regulatory Requirements and IC ACUC Responsibilities The IC ACUC must ensure that all aspects of the animal study proposal (ASP) that may cause more than transient pain and/or distress are addressed; alternatives6 to painful or distressful procedures are considered; that methods, anesthetics, and analgesics to minimize or eliminate pain and distress are included when these methods do not interfere with the research objectives; and that humane endpoints have been established for all situations where more than transient pain and distress can not be avoided or eliminated. Whenever possible, death or severe pain and distress should be avoided as endpoints. A written scientific justification is required to be included in the ASP for any more than transient painful or distressful procedure that cannot be relieved or minimized.
    [Show full text]
  • Do “Prey Species” Hide Their Pain? Implications for Ethical Care and Use of Laboratory Animals
    Journal of Applied Animal Ethics Research 2 (2020) 216–236 brill.com/jaae Do “Prey Species” Hide Their Pain? Implications for Ethical Care and Use of Laboratory Animals Larry Carbone Independent scholar; 351 Buena Vista Ave #703E, San Francisco, CA 94117, USA [email protected] Abstract Accurate pain evaluation is essential for ethical review of laboratory animal use. Warnings that “prey species hide their pain,” encourage careful accurate pain assess- ment. In this article, I review relevant literature on prey species’ pain manifestation through the lens of the applied ethics of animal welfare oversight. If dogs are the spe- cies whose pain is most reliably diagnosed, I argue that it is not their diet as predator or prey but rather because dogs and humans can develop trusting relationships and because people invest time and effort in canine pain diagnosis. Pain diagnosis for all animals may improve when humans foster a trusting relationship with animals and invest time into multimodal pain evaluations. Where this is not practical, as with large cohorts of laboratory mice, committees must regard with skepticism assurances that animals “appear” pain-free on experiments, requiring thorough literature searches and sophisticated pain assessments during pilot work. Keywords laboratory animal ‒ pain ‒ animal welfare ‒ ethics ‒ animal behavior 1 Introduction As a veterinarian with an interest in laboratory animal pain management, I have read articles and reviewed manuscripts on how to diagnose a mouse in pain. The challenge, some authors warn, is that mice and other “prey species” © LARRY CARBONE, 2020 | doi:10.1163/25889567-bja10001 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0Downloaded license.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Advances in the Study of Animal Welfare
    Scientific advances in the study of animal welfare How we can more effectively Why Pain? assess pain… Matt Leach To recognise it, you need to define it… ‘Pain is an unpleasant sensory & emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage’ IASP 1979 As it is the emotional component that is critical for our welfare, the same will be true for animals Therefore we need indices that reflect this component! Q. How do we assess experience? • As it is subjective, direct assessment is difficult.. • Unlike in humans we do not have a gold standard – i.e. Self-report – Animals cannot meaningfully communicate with us… • So we traditionally use proxy indices Derived from inferential reasoning Infer presence of pain in animals from behavioural, anatomical, physiological & biochemical similarity to humans In humans, if pain induces a change & that change is prevented by pain relief, then it is used to assess pain If the same occurs in animals, then we assume that they can be used to assess pain Quantitative sensory testing • Application of standardised noxious stimuli to induce a reflex response – Mechanical, thermal or electrical… – Used to measure nociceptive (i.e. sensory) thresholds • Wide range of methods used – Choice depends on type of pain (acute / chronic) modeled • Elicits specific behavioural response (e.g. withdrawal) – Latency & frequency of response routinely measured – Intensity of stimulus required to elicit a response • Easy to use, but difficult to master… Value? • What do these tests tell us: – Fundamental nociceptive mechanisms & central processing – It measures evoked pain, not spontaneous pain • Tests of hypersensitivity not pain per se (Different mechanisms) • What don’t these tests tell us: – Much about the emotional component of pain • Measures nociceptive (sensory) thresholds based on autonomic responses (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Research and Teaching
    Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Research and Teaching Fourth edition © 2020. Published by the American Dairy Science Association®, the American Society of Animal Science, and the Poultry Science Association. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). American Dairy Science Association® American Society of Animal Science Poultry Science Association 1800 South Oak Street, Suite 100 PO Box 7410 4114C Fieldstone Road Champaign, IL 61820 Champaign, IL 61826 Champaign, IL 61822 www.adsa.org www.asas.org www.poultryscience.org ISBN: 978-0-9634491-5-3 (PDF) ISBN: 978-1-7362930-0-3 (PDF) ISBN: 978-0-9649811-2-6 (PDF) 978-0-9634491-4-6 (ePub) 978-1-7362930-1-0 (ePub) 978-0-9649811-3-3 (ePub) Committees to revise the Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Research and Teaching, 4th edition (2020) Senior Editorial Committee Cassandra B. Tucker, University of California Davis (representing the American Dairy Science Association®) Michael D. MacNeil, Delta G (representing the American Society of Animal Science) A. Bruce Webster, University of Georgia (representing the Poultry Science Association) Ag Guide 4th edition authors Chapter 1: Institutional Policies Chapter 7: Dairy Cattle Ken Anderson, North Carolina State University, Chair Cassandra Tucker, University of California Davis, Chair Deana Jones, ARS USDA Nigel Cook, University of Wisconsin–Madison Gretchen Hill, Michigan State University Marina von Keyserlingk, University of British Columbia James Murray, University of California Davis Peter Krawczel, University of Tennessee Chapter 2: Agricultural Animal Health Care Chapter 8: Horses Frank F.
    [Show full text]
  • PAIN SCORING in DOGS: an OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT PAIN SCORING in CATS: an OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT (Combined)
    PAIN SCORING IN DOGS: AN OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT PAIN SCORING IN CATS: AN OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT (Combined) Kirk Munoz, DVM (Hons), PgCert BA, MRCVS, cVMA, DACVAA Board Certified Specialist in Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia Assistant Professor, Anesthesia Fear Free Certified Professional College of Veterinary Medicine- Michigan State University 784 Wilson Rd, East Lansing, MI 48824 [email protected] Maggie (Pratt) Bodiya BS, LVT, VTS- AVTAA Veterinary Technician Specialist (Anesthesia/Analgesia) Veterinary Nurse III (Anesthesia Dept.) Academic Instructor (MSU Veterinary Nursing Program) Fear Free Certified Professional College of Veterinary Medicine- Michigan State University 784 Wilson Rd, East Lansing, MI 48824 [email protected] Pain is a multifactorial experience involving both sensory and emotional components. There have been many definitions of pain but the most recent and accepted one has been stated by The International Association for the Study of Pain which states that, “Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage.” Cats tend to display many of the signs associated with pain in dogs, but they may vary from dogs in the sense that they can also appear very grumpy and remain in a quiet crouched position. In some cases, cats will purr when they are happy and also in pain, so this cannot be relied on to determine if a cat is painful or not. This goes to prove the point that no one sign can be used to determine if an animal is painful and the extent of the pain that animal is experiencing. Animals that are painful may become very reserved and quiet, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • October 2019
    ANIMAL WELFARE SCIENCE UPDATE ISSUE 66 – OCTOBER 2019 The aim of the animal welfare science update is to keep you informed of developments in animal welfare science relating to the work of the RSPCA. The update provides summaries of the most relevant scientific papers and reports received by the RSPCA Australia office in the past quarter. Email [email protected] to subscribe. ANIMALS USED FOR SPORT, ENTERTAINMENT, RECREATION AND WORK Observations on human safety and horse emotional state during grooming sessions Grooming is a basic aspect of horse care, and when During grooming, only 5% of the horses expressed performed correctly can be a pleasant experience for mutual grooming, approach or relaxed behaviour, the horse. However, when performed incorrectly it whereas avoidance and threatening behaviour were can lead to negative emotions in horses and these expressed by four times more horses. This behaviour may lead to handling difficulties and potential safety was independent of the horse’s gender or breed, issues. In fact, one quarter of injuries caused by horses suggesting that these behaviours are less related to the that require hospital treatment occur while the rider characteristics of the horses, and more related to the is on foot, and children are substantially more likely way they are groomed. During the observations there to be seriously injured when they are on foot near a were 9 potentially dangerous incidents where a horse’s horse compared to when they are riding. This study teeth or hoof passed within 10cm of the rider’s body, examined the behaviours of both horse and rider and the riders were often unaware of this behaviour in during a grooming session to determine whether their horse.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Pain Assessment in Pigs Ison, SH; Clutton, RE; Di Giminiani, P; Rutherford, KMD
    Scotland's Rural College A review of pain assessment in pigs Ison, SH; Clutton, RE; Di Giminiani, P; Rutherford, KMD Published in: Frontiers in Veterinary Science DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2016.00108 First published: 28/11/2016 Document Version Peer reviewed version Link to publication Citation for pulished version (APA): Ison, SH., Clutton, RE., Di Giminiani, P., & Rutherford, KMD. (2016). A review of pain assessment in pigs. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 3, 8 - 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2016.00108 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 29. Sep. 2021 REVIEW published: 28 November 2016 doi: 10.3389/fvets.2016.00108 A Review of Pain Assessment in Pigs Sarah H. Ison1,2*†, R. Eddie Clutton2, Pierpaolo Di Giminiani3 and Kenneth M. D. Rutherford1 1 Animal Behaviour and Welfare, Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Scotland’s Rural College (SRUC), Edinburgh, UK, 2 Easter Bush Veterinary Centre, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK, 3 Food and Rural Development, School of Agriculture, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK There is a moral obligation to minimize pain in pigs used for human benefit.
    [Show full text]
  • A Redefinition of Facial Communication in Non-Human Animals
    Central Journal of Behavior Review Article *Corresponding author Claude Tomberg, Faculty of Medecine, Université libre de Bruxelles, Belgium, 808, route de Lennick, CP 630, Brussels, Belgium, Tel: +32-02-555.64.05; Email: ctomberg@ A Redefinition of Facial ulb.ac.be Submitted: 22 October 2020 Communication in Non-Human Accepted: 17 November 2020 Published: 21 November 2020 Animals ISSN: 2576-0076 Copyright Sophie Pellon, Margaux Hallegot, Julian Lapique and Claude © 2020 Pellon S, et al. Tomberg* OPEN ACCESS Faculty of Medecine, Université libre de Bruxelles, Belgium Keywords Abstract • Facial expressions • Facial behaviors In humans, social communication is mostly conveyed by facial expressions, which • Facial movements are widely shared among Mammals. Based on current knowledge, we explore the • Social communication concept of facial communication from an evolutionary point of view and examine • Amniotes how far it might not only be performed by Mammals, but more broadly by Amniotes. • Cutaneous muscles As we investigate facial communication in various species, we find out that facial • Cranial nerve expressions are restrained to Mammals. However, even if non-mammals lack of cutaneous facial muscles responsible of facial expressions, they display facial signals bearing a communicative value. Thus, facial communication is not clustered to Mammals. Moreover, some facial displays are shared by almost every Amniotes, as the eye- blink which has been suggested to be related to social factors aside its physiological role. Yet, to understand the terminology of this research field, definitions should be unified. Thus, based on current data on Amniotes’ facial communication, we proposed extended definitions of facial movements, behaviours and expressions: movements are visible displacements of body segments or tissues.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Opinion Concerning the Killing of Rabbits for Purposes Other Than Slaughter
    SCIENTIFIC OPINION ADOPTED: 10 December 2019 doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5943 Scientific opinion concerning the killing of rabbits for purposes other than slaughter EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW), Søren Saxmose Nielsen, Julio Alvarez, Dominique Joseph Bicout, Paolo Calistri, Klaus Depner, Julian Ashley Drewe, Bruno Garin-Bastuji, Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas, Christian Gortazar Schmidt, Virginie Michel, Miguel Angel Miranda Chueca, Helen Clare Roberts, Liisa Helena Sihvonen, Karl Stahl, Antonio Velarde Calvo, Arvo Viltrop, Christoph Winckler, Denise Candiani, Chiara Fabris, Olaf Mosbach-Schulz, Yves Van der Stede and Hans Spoolder Abstract Rabbits of different ages may have to be killed on-farm for purposes other than slaughter (where slaughter is defined as killing for human consumption) either individually or on a large scale (e.g. for production reasons or for disease control). The purpose of this opinion was to assess the risks associated to the on-farm killing of rabbits. The processes during on-farm killing that were assessed included handling, stunning and/or killing methods (including restraint). The latter were grouped into four categories: electrical methods, mechanical methods, controlled atmosphere method and lethal injection. In total, 14 hazards were identified and characterised, most of these related to stunning and/or killing. The staff was identified as the origin for all hazards, either due to lack of the appropriate skill sets needed to perform tasks or due to fatigue. Possible corrective and preventive measures were assessed: measures to correct hazards were identified for five hazards and the staff was shown to have a crucial role in prevention.
    [Show full text]
  • By Aylia Mohammadi a Thesis Submitted in Conformity with the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Depart
    QUANTITATIVE BEHAVIORAL ANALYSIS OF THERMAL NOCICEPTION IN Caenorhabditis elegans: INVESTIGATION OF NEURAL SUBSTRATES SPATIALLY MEDIATING THE NOXIOUS RESPONSE, AND THE EFFECTS OF PHARMACOLOGICAL PERTURBATIONS. by Aylia Mohammadi A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Physics University of Toronto © Copyright 2013 by Aylia Mohammadi Abstract Quantitative behavioral analysis of thermal nociception in Caenorhabditis elegans: investigation of neural substrates spatially mediating the noxious response, and the effects of pharmacological perturbations. Aylia Mohammadi Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Physics University of Toronto 2013 The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans possesses a relatively simple nervous system of only 302 neurons, but is able to perform an impressive range of complex behaviors. This dissertation aims to understand the neurobiology of behavior by quantifying, at the systems-level, the sen- sorimotor response to carefully controlled stimuli. Through neuronal or genetic perturbations to the system, we can begin to uncouple the behavior from the underlying circuitry. The be- havior studied here is thermal nociception, an escape response designed to protect an organism from potential tissue damage or harm from noxious heat. Vertebrates and invertebrates alike possess sensory neurons called nociceptors that detect noxious stimuli and relay the stimulus information to elicit an appropriate escape response. C. elegans is known to perform a reversal or forward response when presented with noxious stimuli at the head or tail, respectively. In this work, we develop a novel thermal stimulus assay with precise spatiotemporal control of an infrared pulse that targets small regions along the worm to spatially dissect the noxious re- sponse.
    [Show full text]
  • Pain Management for Animals Used in Science: Views of Scientists and Veterinarians in Canada
    Animals 2014, 4, 494-514; doi:10.3390/ani4030494 OPEN ACCESS animals ISSN 2076-2615 www.mdpi.com/journal/animals Article Pain Management for Animals Used in Science: Views of Scientists and Veterinarians in Canada Nicole Fenwick, Shannon E. G. Duffus and Gilly Griffin * Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC), 190 O’Connor St., Suite 800, Ottawa, ON, K2P 2R3, Canada; E-Mails: [email protected] (N.F.); [email protected] (S.E.G.D.) * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-613-238-4031; Fax: +1-613-238-2837. Received: 21 March 2014; in revised form: 22 July 2014 / Accepted: 28 July 2014 / Published: 4 August 2014 Simple Summary: Veterinarians, veterinarian-scientists and scientists (all engaged in animal-based studies in Canada) were interviewed to explore the challenges and opportunities for laboratory animal pain management. Our broader aim was to contribute to further discussion of how pain can be minimized for animals used in science. Recognizing when animals are in pain continues to present a challenge, and there does not seem to be consensus on the signs of pain. Clarification of the interactions between scientific objectives and pain management are needed, as well as a stronger evidence base for pain management approaches. Detailed examination of pain management for individual invasive animal models in order to develop model-specific pain management protocols may be useful. Abstract: To explore the challenges and opportunities for pain management for animals used in research an interview study with 9 veterinarians, 3 veterinarian-scientists and 9 scientists, all engaged in animal-based studies in Canada, was carried out.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of an RSPCA/AHVLA Meeting on the Welfare of Agricultural Animals in Research: Cattle, Goats, Pigs and Sheep
    April 2014 Animal Technology and Welfare Report of an RSPCA/AHVLA meeting on the welfare of agricultural animals in research: cattle, goats, pigs and sheep *PENNY HAWKINS 1, R. EDDIE CLUTTON 2, NGAIRE DENNISON 3, MIRJAM GUESGEN 4, MATT LEACH 5, FINULA SHARPE 6, HUGH SIMMONS 7, ADRIAN J. SMITH 8, JOHN WEBSTER 9 and UTE WEYER 7 1 Research Animals Department, RSPCA, Wilberforce Way, Southwater, West Sussex RH13 9RS 2 Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian EH25 9RG 3 Home Office Animals in Science Regulation Unit, PO Box 6779, Dundee DD1 9WW 4 Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand 5 Pain & Animal Welfare Science (PAWS) Group, School of Agriculture, Food & Rural Development, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU 6 HLS, Woolley Road, Alconbury, Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire PE28 4HS 7 AHVLA, Animal Sciences Unit, AHVLA Weybridge, Addlestone, Surrey KT15 3NB 8 Norecopa, c/o Norwegian Veterinary Institute, P.O. Box 750 Sentrum, 0106 Oslo, Norway 9 Old Sock Cottage, Mudford Sock, Yeovil, Somerset BA22 8EA *Corresponding author: [email protected] Introduction Sciences in Bologna the same year, a European organisation was established with the purpose of The Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to bringing together all four stakeholders interested in Animals (RSPCA) and the Animal Health and Veterinary animal research: regulators, academia, industry and Laboratories Agency (AHVLA) jointly convened a animal welfare organisations. This organisation, known meeting to bring together animal technologists, as ecopa (European Consensus-Platform for researchers, veterinarians and students with an Alternatives, www.ecopa.eu ), offers membership and interest in the welfare of cattle, goats, pig and sheep support to national platforms which follow the same used in research and testing, for a programme of talks principles.
    [Show full text]