DOCSLIB.ORG

Harpeth River Franklin, Tennessee

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Harpeth River Franklin, Tennessee Harpeth River Franklin, Tennessee Floodproofing Project Guide Section 205, Flood Risk Management April 2021 (This page intentionally left blank for two-sided printing) Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 3 2.0 Message to Homeowner .................................................................................................................... 4 3.0 Message to Contractor ...................................................................................................................... 9 Attachment 1 – Application Attachment 2 – List of Contractors Attachment 3 – Contractor Proposal Worksheet Attachment 4 – Floodproofing Agreement Attachment 5 – Floodproofing Covenant 1 (This page intentionally left blank for two-sided printing) 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION Under a joint U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and City of Franklin, TN program, 35 homes have been identified eligible for voluntary elevation (Table 1). It is noteworthy that Williamson County building codes now require first floor elevations to be 3 feet above the 100- year floodplain, thus the requirement for raised first floor elevations to exceed the 100-year floodplain by 3 feet for the purposes of this project. All elevations will be verified prior to actual floodproofing. Table 1 - Eligible Structures Current First Base Flood Amount of Structure Floor Elevation, Elevation Raising Square Strc_ID Address Feet (100-year) (Feet) Footage 2680 101 Monticello Road 625.93 627.86 4.93 3,192 2762 914 Rebel Circle 625.33 626.39 4.06 2,190 2771 514 Crafton Avenue 625.36 626.40 4.04 2,586 2783 513 Crafton Avenue 625.34 626.52 4.18 2,283 3056 150 Lancaster Drive 632.65 635.17 5.52 3,468 3064 154 Lancaster Drive 630.09 635.17 8.08 1,994 3110 147 Lancaster Drive 632.01 635.17 6.16 2,661 3111 151 Lancaster Drive 631.94 635.17 6.23 2,702 3135 174 Lancaster Drive 633.45 635.63 5.18 3,580 3148 182 Lancaster Drive 633.68 635.91 5.23 2,947 3154 178 Lancaster Drive 634.27 635.72 4.45 3,555 3185 169 Lancaster Drive 635.44 636.86 4.42 5,269 3216 173 Lancaster Drive 634.61 636.87 5.26 2,684 3221 177 Lancaster Drive 634.89 636.72 4.83 2,360 3427 109 Daniels Drive 635.69 639.79 7.10 1,727 3428 111 Daniels Drive 635.59 639.79 7.20 1,500 3429 107 Daniels Drive 635.35 639.79 7.44 1,249 3449 221 North Margin Street 632.43 636.94 7.51 860 3768 717 Fair Street 633.68 636.28 5.60 1,322 3799 406 Eddy Lane 634.72 642.50 10.78 1,158 4190 413 Murfreesboro Road 637.72 643.04 8.32 1,920 4342 101 Ewingville Drive 638.16 643.59 8.43 2,060 4362 159 Ewingville Drive 638.77 643.59 7.42 2,991 4449 135 Ewingville Drive 641.56 644.39 5.83 3,713 4462 134 Ewingville Drive 638.49 644.42 8.93 2,540 4476 133 Ewingville Drive 639.38 644.40 8.02 1,968 4484 132 Ewingville Drive 639.47 644.44 7.97 3,359 4503 112 Ewingville Drive 639.68 644.50 7.82 4,236 4508 131 Ewingville Drive 639.43 644.43 8.00 2,590 4520 130 Ewingville Driver 640.16 644.47 7.31 3,525 4531 114 Ewingville Drive 637.55 644.54 9.99 2,523 4538 129 Ewingville Drive 639.73 644.45 7.72 2,704 4551 115 Ewingville Drive 638.05 644.61 9.56 3,359 4553 126 Ewingville Drive 640.65 642.46 4.81 2,336 4593 125 Ewingville Drive 640.74 644.56 6.82 1,848 3 2.0 MESSAGE TO HOMEOWNER As you are probably aware, the costs for implementing the Harpeth River project must be shared by a local sponsor. For this project, the City of Franklin is acting as that cost sharing sponsor. USACE is responsible for 65% of total project costs and the sponsor’s share is 35%. The City of Franklin Board of Mayor and Aldermen has voted to split the 35% of project costs with the homeowners. What this means to you as a participant in the project, is that you will be responsible for 17.5% percent of costs associated with the floodproofing of your home. Any additional work you may request the contractor to perform will be your responsibility. If you have additional questions, you may contact the following persons associated with the project: Ramune Matuliauskaite William Banks USACE Project Manager City of Franklin Project Manager 615-736-7853 615-550-6677 [email protected] [email protected] This program is voluntary. The following paragraphs outline the steps on how to participate. 1. Application and Site Visit Submit an application and right-of-entry form (see Attachment 1) along with a copy of your property deed to the address below to get started. This enables USACE to verify the ownership and title and visit the property to gather information to aid in developing an independent government estimate (IGE). During the initial visit to the property we will discuss with you the work to be performed and what items would be included as part of the floodproofing, such as foundation, exterior features, gutter extensions, porches, steps, ramps, HVAC, landscaping, etc. After the visit we will provide you with a scope of work and technical criteria to assist you with soliciting proposals. Submit the application and right-of-entry form along with a copy of your property deed to: By email (preferred) to: [email protected] By mail to: Attn: Ramune Matuliauskaite Planning Branch (Harpeth River Project) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 110 9th Avenue South, Room A405 Nashville, TN 37203 If sending by mail, please call 615-736-7853 to let us know to expect your application arrival. 2. Estimates Once your application is cleared, you are responsible to solicit at least 3 estimates for floodproofing your home. Contractors should forward proposals to you for your review, and it is recommended that you send in the proposals from contractors that you are satisfied with, however, it is not necessary to send in proposals from contractors that you do not desire to use. You may solicit proposal(s) from your choice of contractors, provided that 4 they meet all the requirements of the State for doing business in the project area. A list of contractors who have expressed an interest in participating in the floodproofing program is attached (see Attachment 2). This list is only for your convenience and does not represent an endorsement or recommendation by the Corps of Engineers of any contractor. You are not required to select a contractor from this list. Each contractor's proposal must include all floodproofing construction costs, overhead, and profit. The Contractor Proposal Worksheet for use by the contractors is included in Attachment 3. In addition to construction costs, the contractor's proposal should include any temporary housing costs to cover the expenses that you and your family would incur (over and above those normal monthly expenses that you would pay if you stayed in your home) during the floodproofing construction work period. The temporary housing needs to be estimated based on the family size and the average hotel pricing of the area. Reimbursement of your reasonable temporary housing expenses will be made to you by your contractor according to the construction agreement executed between you and your contractor. Ask the contractor to put their estimates on the worksheet provided (Attachment 3). Furnish all the bids to the project manager via email: [email protected]. If you cannot do so, please mail the bids to: Attn: Ramune Matuliauskaite Planning Branch (Harpeth River Project) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 110 9th Avenue South, Room A405 Nashville, TN 37203 Following the Corps' review of your contractor's proposal(s) and comparison with the Corps' estimate of the floodproofing work, we will provide you with a written "Government Estimate" (lump sum dollar amount) for having your home floodproofed. Also, we will provide you with technical information relative to the proposal(s) submitted that will assist you in negotiating with your selected contractor(s), if further negotiations become necessary. It will be your responsibility to negotiate with your selected contractor a "fair- and-reasonable" price for having your home floodproofed. The "Government Estimate" will be the basis for your negotiations. Any costs negotiated with your selected contractor for floodproofing your home that are in excess of the "Government Estimate" are your (the homeowner's) financial responsibility and must be approved by the Corps before executing the construction contract. 3. Floodproofing Agreement and Contracts Once you have agreed upon a price with your contractor, including any temporary housing expenses, you and the Corps and the City will execute the FLOODPROOFING AGREEMENT (see Attachment 4). This agreement authorizes you to initiate the floodproofing construction, for which the Corps and the City will provide payment based on the "Government Estimate". The City of Franklin will have a separate agreement with 5 you regarding the cost-sharing of floodproofing contract costs. You and your contractor will then execute a CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT. The content and negotiation of the construction contract is entirely between you and your contractor. The only requirements that the Corps has are that the contract include specific language allowing the Corps to conduct "post construction audits" and that the contractor perform all floodproofing work in compliance with the technical criteria provided by the Corps. In order to comply with these requirements the contract must contain the following specific language: (1) "The Contractor agrees that all floodproofing work will be accomplished in accordance with the technical criteria previously provided by the Nashville District U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TDEC’S Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) for  the Stream’S Status Changes
    Draft Version YEAR 2016 303(d) LIST July, 2016 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION Planning and Standards Unit Division of Water Resources William R. Snodgrass Tennessee Tower 312 Rosa L. Parks Ave Nashville, TN 37243 Table of Contents Page Guidance for Understanding and Interpreting the Draft 303(d) List ……………………………………………………………………....... 1 2016 Public Meeting Schedule ……………………………………………………………. 8 Key to the 303(d) List ………………………………………………………………………. 9 TMDL Priorities ……………………………………………………………………………... 10 Draft 2016 303(d) List ……………………………………………………………………… 11 Barren River Watershed (TN05110002)…………………………………………. 11 Upper Cumberland Basin (TN05130101 & TN05130104)…………………….. 12 Obey River Watershed (TN05130105)…………………………………………... 14 Cordell Hull Watershed (TN05130106)………………………………………….. 16 Collins River Watershed (TN05130107)…………………………………………. 16 Caney Fork River Watershed (TN05130108)…………………………………… 18 Old Hickory Watershed (TN05130201)………………………………………….. 22 Cheatham Reservoir Watershed (TN05130202)……………………………….. 24 Stones River Watershed (TN05130203)………………………………………… 30 Harpeth River Watershed (TN05130204)……………………………………….. 35 Barkley Reservoir Watershed (TN05130205)…………………………………… 41 Red River Watershed (TN05130206)……………………………………………. 42 North Fork Holston River Watershed (TN06010101)…………………………... 45 South Fork Holston River Watershed (TN06010102)………………………….. 45 Watauga River Watershed (TN06010103)………………………………………. 53 Holston River Basin (TN06010104)………………………………………………. 56 Upper French Broad River Basin (TN06010105 & TN06010106)…………….
    [Show full text]
  • National Register Off Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form 1
    NFS Form 10-900 (342) OHB No. 1024-0018 Expires 10-31-87 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service For NPS UM only National Register off Historic Places received MAR 3 (988 Inventory Nomination Form date entered See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries complete applicable sections 1. Name historic Historic Resources of Wllllamson County (Partial Inventory of Historic and Architectural i-roperties) and or common N/A 2. Location street & number See continuation sheets N/A not for publication city, town N/A vicinity of state Tennessee code DA 7 county Williamson code 187 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district public X occupied agriculture museum building(s) private X unoccupied X commercial nark structure * both X work in progress educational X private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment x religious __. object N/A in process X yes: restricted __ government __ scientific MRA N/A being considered X_ yes: unrestricted industrial transportation X "no military X other: Vacant 4. Owner of Property name Multiple Ownership - See individual forms street & number N/A city, town N/A vicinity of state N/A courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Williamson County Courthouse street & number Public Square city, town Franklin state TN 37064 6. Representation in Existing Surveys title Williamson County Survey has this property been determined eligible? yes _X.no date 1973 - 1986 federal X state county local Tennessee Historical Commission depository for survey records city,town 701 Broadway, Nashville state TN 37203 Condition Check one Check one *_ excellent X deteriorated unaltered original siite" -4- good __X_ ruins X altered moved date A fair unexposed Describe the present and original (iff known) physical appearance Williainson County is located in the central section of Middle Tennessee.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to TN Watersheds
    What Is a Watershed? A watershed is all the land area that drains into a given body of water. Small watersheds combine to become big watersheds, sometimes called basins. When water from a few acres drains into a little stream, those few acres are its watershed. When that stream flows into a larger stream, and that larger stream flows into a bigger river, then the initial small watershed is now part of that river’s watershed. Watersheds are a logical way to think about the connection between the land and the quality of water we enjoy. How we manage and treat the land has a direct impact on the ability of water to support a number of im- portant public uses like swimming, fishing, aquatic species habitat and drinking water supply. We all live downstream from someone, and what happens in a watershed does not just stay in that watershed. Managing Programs by Watershed Tennessee’s water-protection program focuses on watersheds because it’s the Advisory Groups best way to evaluate, protect and improve the quality of all the waters in the state. Watershedof Arkansas Diagram WatershedCourtesy When pollutants threaten or prevent our waters from meeting clean-water goals, we can look at all of the pollution sources in the affected watershed and develop Water from rainfall that doesn’t evaporate runs more comprehensive control strategies. into ditches, streams, creeks, rivers, wetlands Tennessee recognizes 55 watersheds, and TDEC has developed a watershed or lakes. A watershed is the land area from management plan for each of them. Visit www.tn.gov/environment/watersheds which water drains into a river, stream or lake.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report IMPACTS of TROPHIC STATE on the COMPOSITION OF
    Final Report IMPACTS OF TROPHIC STATE ON THE COMPOSITION OF ALGAE ASSEMBLAGES OF THE HARPETH RIVER IN MIDDLE TENNESSEE Jefferson G. Lebkuecher Biology Department Austin Peay State University Clarksville, TN [email protected] Submitted to the Harpeth Conservancy Daniel B. Fitzgerald, Ph.D. Director of Watershed Science and Restoration The Harpeth Conservancy 215 Jamestown Park First Floor Brentwood, TN 37027 [email protected] 615.790.9767 www.harpethriver.org ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract .……………………………………….………..…………………………………………………………………….…....….. 1 Introduction …..…………………………………………………………………………………………………….…….…….…….. 2 Bioassessments using algae ………………………………………………………………………………..…….…………….. 2 Bioassessments using diatoms ……………………………………………………………………………….……………..... 3 Bioassessments using soft algae ……………………………………………………………………………………….…….. 4 Methods and Materials ……………………………………………………………….……………………………………….... 5 The study area: Harpeth River Watershed ……………………………………………………………………….……... 5 Sampling site locations and dates …..……………………………………………………………………………………….. 6 Sampling cobbles to determine periphyton characteristics …………………………..…….…….…..……….. 6 Periphyton pigment concentrations and ash-free dry mass ………………………………………………….…. 7 Composition of soft-algae assemblages ………………………….…….…………….….………………….…….…….. 8 Composition of diatom assemblages …………………………..………………..……………………..……..….….….. 9 Metrics and indices …………………………………………………………………………………………….……….………… 10 Concentrations of total phosphorus and total nitrogen of water samples …………………………….. 11 Reach
    [Show full text]
  • Canoeing the Harpeth
    Canoeing the Harpeth Activity A Day Spent Canoeing with the family Goal Spend quality time while engaging in an activity that doesn’t involve passively sitting in front of some sort of electronic device or standing over your kids while they do chores. Secret Objectives Create a “time apart” with your kids Benefit from time spent communing with Nature without all the discomfort of camping or walking Change the pace (and place) of your normal family interactions See each other in a different way Time together but without it being so burdensome that one or another (or all of you) get mad and frustrated Surprise (something memorable will almost certainly happen) Total Time Commitment Travel to the river: Approx. 40 minutes, one way from Williamson County Canoe time on the water: Anywhere from 2 to 5 hours Scenic Harpeth River The 115 mile long Harpeth River flows from Rutherford County through Williamson County where it joins the Cumberland River in Cheatham County. The south Harpeth is a peaceful, gently flowing 11 mile stretch of scenic river that meanders past tree lined banks, grassy fields and under rocky bluffs. The river twists and turns through occasional Class 1 (the lowest level) rapids and is studded with wide sand bars that are ideal for spontaneous picnics or catching some sun. There are wide, deep, slow moving sections of the river just made for swimming. Wildlife abounds on the Harpeth where deer, beaver, blue herons, ducks and turtles can be spied along the banks while cliff swallows put on amazing aerobatic displays overhead.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 901 Glencastle Way Raleigh, NC 27606 7 December 2016 Mr. James
    901 Glencastle Way Raleigh, NC 27606 7 December 2016 Mr. James M. Redwine Director, Water Quality Protection and Sustainability Program Harpeth River Watershed Association PO Box 1127 Franklin, Tennessee 37065 Dear Mr. Redwine, As you know, I submitted an assessment of the draft permit for the City of Franklin water reclamation facility (Franklin WRF) on the 21st of November. The assessment addressed three basic points: (i) the nitrogen and phosphorus pollutant levels allowed in the draft permit, which were not developed from technology-based effluent limitations or from water quality-based effluent limitations (WQBELs); (ii) the need to develop WQBELs for nitrogen (specifically for nitrate+nitrite, hereafter referred to as nitrate or NOx since nitrite is generally negligible in comparison to nitrate) and total phosphorus (TP) for the discharge from this WRF, considering both the pollutant concentrations and the pollutant (nitrogen-to-phosphorus) supply ratios; and (iii) the technology that is already available at the WRF, or could be installed with minimal modifications, which could significantly reduce the NOx and TP in the treated effluent to levels that met the WQBELs. Although I was asked by the Harpeth River Watershed Association to focus on the N and P levels in the draft permit as indicated above, I wanted to bring another issue of concern to your attention, namely, the impacts from the draft permit for the Franklin WRF on downstream Scenic River waters. Only 13 rivers or river segments are included in the Tennessee Scenic Rivers Program, directed by the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC) in cooperation with the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency (TWRA).
    [Show full text]
  • HARPETH RIVER WATERSHED SEDIMENT STUDY Comprehensive Technical Report
    HARPETH RIVER WATERSHED SEDIMENT STUDY Comprehensive Technical Report David J. Wilson and Richard E. Lockwood A Project of the Harpeth River Watershed Association and the Cumberland River Compact HARPETH RIVER WATERSHED SEDIMENT STUDY COMPREHENSIVE TECHNICAL REPORT David J. Wilson and Richard E. Lockwood A Project of the Harpeth River Watershed Association and the Cumberland River Compact TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 2 Figures 3 Tables 3 1.0 Introduction 4 1.1 Objectives 4 2.0 Locations of sampling sites and scheduling of sampling events 4 2.1 Rainfall information 5 2.2 Baseline sampling sites 5 2.3 Other sampling sites 5 3.0 Data collected 7 3.1 Measurements (estimates) of sediment 8 3.2 Stream stage (river depth) 8 3.3 Rain gauge readings 9 3.4 Photographs 9 4.0 Summary of results and statistical interpretations 9 4.1 Summary and comparisons of turbidity data 9 4.2 Correlations between turbidity (T) and Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 11 4.2.1 Linear correlations 11 4.2.2 Log-log correlations 12 4.2.3 Discussion of the relationship between T and TSS 15 4.2.4 Relationships between T, TSS, and NTUs 17 5.0 Land use patterns in the Harpeth River watershed 19 6.0 Estimation of the mass of sediment discharged from the Harpeth River 19 6.1 Methodology 19 6.2 Results, total sediment 20 7.0 Unfinished Business 23 8.0 References 25 9.0 Acknowledgments 26 Appendix A: Survey and sampling procedures and protocols 27 Appendix B: Safety considerations 32 Appendix C: The mathematical physics of muddy water.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORIC BRIDGES Cordell Hull Bridge: This Historic Postcard Shows an Elevation View of the National Register Eligible Cordell Hull Bridge (#139, 80-SR025-11.32)
    6 HISTORIC BRIDGES Cordell Hull Bridge: This historic postcard shows an elevation view of the National Register eligible Cordell Hull Bridge (#139, 80-SR025-11.32). Spanning the Cumberland River in Carthage in Smith County, the state built the bridge with New Deal money and named it in honor of Carthage native and Nobel Peace Prize winner Cordell Hull (Author’s Collection). 324 HISTORIC BRIDGES HISTORIC BRIDGES IN TENNESSEE This chapter contains a discussion of each National Register listed or eligible bridge identified in this survey. The staff considered several ways to sequentially arrange these bridges such as chronologically, geographically, or construction method. The staff ultimately decided to arrange the bridges chronologically, beginning with the state’s earliest masonry arch bridges dating from about 1830-1850 and ending with truss bridges built in the 1940s, as enumerated in Table VI-01. The advantages of such an arrangement included an overview of construction periods and trends that provided a comparative engineering context. It also reflected the overlapping nature of bridge construction in that there are no definitive beginning and ending dates for construction types but rather parallel and concurrent movements that evolved within the bridge building industry. To facilitate finding bridges geographically, a chart (Table VI-02) enumerates the bridges by county locations. Chapters Four and Five contain a discussion of bridges by construction method. Due to time limitations, TDOT historians have conducted this survey sporadically over a period of several years. In the interim, replacement projects have resulted in the demolition SURVEY REPORT FOR HISTORIC HIGHWAY BRIDGES HIGHWAY FOR HISTORIC REPORT SURVEY of some of these bridges.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissolved Oxygen in the Harpeth River August-September 2006
    Dissolved Oxygen in the Harpeth River August-September 2006 Harpeth River During Low Flow Season downstream from Franklin Sewage Treatment Plant February 2007 Contributing Authors: Dorene Bolze Michael Cain John McFadden Harpeth River Watershed Association PO Box 1127 Franklin, TN 37065 www.harpethriver.org [email protected] Work funded, in part, by World Wildlife Fund and Patagonia. Table of Contents Introduction p.3-5 Methods and Materials p.5-6 Table 1: DO Site Numbers, Locations and Volunteers p.6 Results p.7-8 Figure 1: DO Levels in the Harpeth River p.8 Table 2: HRWA DO Summary p.9-11 Discussion p.13-15 Figure 2: Franklin Low-head Dam p.14 Acknowledgements p.15 References p.16-17 Appendix A: Site Maps Overview Map: HRWA, TDEC DO Sampling Sites p.19 Map 1: Eagleville Area p.20 Map 2: Franklin Area p.21 Map 3: North Williamson County p.22 Map 4: Bellevue Area p.23 Map 5: Kingston Springs Area p.24 Appendix B: USGS Flow Data Figure 3: USGS 03432350 p.25 Figure 4: USGS 03432400 p.25 Figure 5: USGS 03433500 p.25 Figure 6: USGS 03434500 p.25 Appendix C: TDEC 2006 Diurnal Graphs Graph 1: Eagleville, Route 41A and Webb Rd. Crossing p.27 Graph 2: Newsom Mill, Bellevue p.28 Graph 3: Narrows of the Harpeth downstream canoe take-out p.29 Harpeth River Discrete Sampling 2006 p.30 Appendix D: HRWA DO Raw Data 2006 p.32-37 Appendix E: TDEC Diurnal Data 2002, 2003 p.39-41 Appendix F: HRWA DO Study 2002 p.43-48 2 Dissolved Oxygen in the Harpeth River August-September 2006 Introduction The Harpeth River Watershed Association (HRWA) is a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit conservation organization whose mission is to protect and restore the Harpeth River Watershed and provide expertise in statewide conservation policy.
    [Show full text]
  • TENNESSEE, 2005 Vii OHIO RIVER BASIN Ohio River
    WATER RESOURCES DATA - TENNESSEE, 2005 vii OHIO RIVER BASIN Ohio River: GREEN RIVER BASIN Barren River: Salt Lick Creek Below Red Boiling Springs (d) . 03312259 . 48 OHIO RIVER BASIN Ohio River: CUMBERLAND RIVER BASIN Cumberland River: New River (head of South Fork Cumberland River): New River at New River (d) . 03408500 . 50 Clear Fork near Robbins (d) . 03409500 . 52 South Fork Cumberland River at Leatherwood Ford (d) . 03410210 . 54 East Fork Obey River near Jamestown (d) . 03414500 . 56 West Fork Obey River near Alpine (d) . 03415000 . 60 Roaring River above Gainesboro (d) . 03418070 . 62 Calfkiller River at Hwy 111 below Sparta (d) . 03419800 . 64 Caney Fork: Collins River near McMinnville (d) . 03421000 . 70 Smith Fork at Temperance Hall (d) . 03424730 . 72 Cumberland River at Old Hickory Dam (Tailwater) (d,c,t) . 03426310 . 74 Stones River: Mansker Creek above Goodlettsville (d) . 03426385 . 76 Dry Creek near Edenwold (d) . 03426470 . 80 East Fork Stones River near Lascassas (d,c,t) . 03427500. 82 West Fork Stones River at Murfreesboro (d,c,t) . 03428200. 84 Stones River at US Hwy 70 near Donelson (c,t) . 03430200 . 94 Mill Creek at Thompson Lane near Woodbine (d) . 03431060 . 102 Cumberland River at Omohundro Water Plant at Nashville (c,t). 03431091. 104 Browns Creek at State Fairgrounds at Nashville (d) . 03431300. 112 Cumberland River at Woodland Street at Nashville (d) . 034315005. 114 Cumberland River near Bordeaux (c,t) . 03431514. 116 Whites Creek: Whites Creek near Bordeaux (d) . 03431599. 124 Richland Creek at Charlotte Avenue at Nashville (d) . 03431700. 126 Harpeth River at Franklin (d) . 03432350. 128 Harpeth River Tributary at Mack Hatcher Parkway near Franklin (d) 034323531.
    [Show full text]
  • A Road Guide to the Harpeth River and Stones River Fault Zones on the Northwest fl Ank of the Nashville Dome, Central Tennessee
    Downloaded from fieldguides.gsapubs.org on March 13, 2015 The Geological Society of America Field Guide 39 2015 A road guide to the Harpeth River and Stones River fault zones on the northwest fl ank of the Nashville dome, central Tennessee Mark Abolins* Department of Geosciences, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, Tennessee 37132, USA Shaunna Young Geology Department, Radford University, Radford, Virginia 24141, USA Joe Camacho† Environmental Science and Management, Humboldt State University, Arcata, California 95521, USA Mark Trexler# Alex Ward** Matt Cooley†† Albert Ogden Department of Geosciences, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, Tennessee 37132, USA ABSTRACT The authors use mesoscale structures and existing 1:24,000 scale geologic maps to infer the locations of four macroscale NNW-striking blind normal faults on the northwest fl ank of the Nashville dome ~30 km south of downtown Nashville. The Harpeth River fault zone has an across-strike width of ~6 km, and, from west to east, includes the Peytonsville, Arno, McClory Creek, and McDaniel fault zones. All of the fault zones are east-side-down except for the west-side-down Peytonsville fault zone. Mesoscale structures are exposed within each fault zone and are observed at three stops along Tennessee State Route (S.R.)-840 and at an additional stop 1.8 km south of the highway. These structures include minor normal faults (maximum dip separa- tion 3.8 m), non-vertical joints, and mesoscale folds. No faults are depicted on existing geologic maps of the zone, but these maps reveal macroscale folding of the contact between the Ordovician Carters Formation and the overlying Hermitage Formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Williamson County Historic Property Survey, 1976-1982
    Williamson County Historic Property Survey, 1976-1982 Williamson County Archives 611 West Main Street Franklin, TN 37064 Telephone: 615-790-5462 Email: [email protected] Mail: P.O. Box 1006, Franklin, TN 37065 Published 2018 Finding Aid to the Williamson County Historic Property Survey 1976-1982 Williamson County Archives Page 1 of 31 Collection Overview Title: Williamson County Historic Property Survey Date Range: 1976-1982 Creator: Tennessee Historical Commission Extent: 9 letter size document boxes Abstract: The Williamson County Historic Property Survey contains a series of reports, generated by the Tennessee Historical Commission, identifying and describing structures with historical value across Williamson County, TN. Language: English Repository: Williamson County Archives, Franklin, TN Collection Number: WCA 0001 Scope and Content The buildings identified in the Williamson County Historic Property Survey were originally assigned a property number as survey reports were generated. The properties were then arranged and indexed in ascending numerical order by the record creator. Each property report in the survey has its own number and corresponding folder in the collection. Most of the folders contain a simple one or two page report on the property of interest. The original reports generated in this survey range from numbers 37 to 1127. Each number represents a unique property. The Williamson County Historic Property Survey is available in the Williamson County Archives Reading Room in the form of paper reports. These reports are also available on microfilm in the reading room. It is important to note that the microfilmed reports contain photos of the inventoried properties that were generated as a part of the original reports.
    [Show full text]