Hypersensitivity.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Early-Phase GVHD Gene Expression Profile in Target Versus Non
Bone Marrow Transplantation (2013) 48, 284–293 & 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0268-3369/13 www.nature.com/bmt ORIGINAL ARTICLE Early-phase GVHD gene expression profile in target versus non-target tissues: kidney, a possible target? B Sadeghi1, H Al-Chaqmaqchi1, S Al-Hashmi1, D Brodin2, Z Hassan1,3, M Abedi-Valugerdi4, A Moshfegh5 and M Hassan1,3 GVHD is a major complication after allo-SCT. In GVHD, some tissues like liver, intestine and skin are infiltrated by donor T cells while others like muscle are not. The mechanism underlying targeted tropism of donor T cells is not fully understood. In the present study, we aim to explore differences in gene expression profile among target versus non-target tissues in a mouse model of GVHD based on chemotherapy conditioning. Expression levels of JAK–signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT), CXCL1, ICAM1 and STAT3 were increased in the liver and remained unchanged (or decreased) in the muscle and kidney after conditioning. At the start of GVHD the expression levels of CXCL9, ITGb2, SAA3, MARCO, TLR and VCAM1 were significantly higher in the liver or kidney compared with the muscle of GVHD animals. Moreover, biological processes of inflammatory reactions, leukocyte migration, response to bacterium and chemotaxis followed the same pattern. Our data show that both chemotherapy and allogenicity exclusively induce expression of inflammatory genes in target tissues. Moreover, gene expression profile and histopathological findings in the kidney are similar to those observed in the liver of GVHD mice. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2013) 48, 284–293; doi:10.1038/bmt.2012.120; published online 23 July 2012 Keywords: gene expression; GVHD; kidney; target tissues; mouse model INTRODUCTION none of these reports describe any changes in gene expression Allo-SCT is the treatment of choice for a variety of malignant and profile of non-target tissues like muscle. -
Allergic Reactions After Vaccination: Translating Guidelines Into Clinical Practice
R E V I E W EUR ANN ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL VOL 51, N 2, 51-61, 2019 A. RADICE1, G. CARLI2, D. MACCHIA1, A. FARSI2 Allergic reactions after vaccination: translating guidelines into clinical practice 1SOS Allergologia e Immunologia, Firenze, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Italy 2SOS Allergologia e Immunologia, Prato, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Italy KEYWORDS Summary vaccine; vaccination; allergic reactions; Vaccination represents one of the most powerful medical interventions on global health. anaphylaxis; vaccine hesitancy; vaccine Despite being safe, sustainable, and effective against infectious and in some cases also components; desensitization non-infectious diseases, it’s nowadays facing general opinion’s hesitancy because of a false perceived risk of adverse events. Adverse reactions to vaccines are relatively rare, instead, and those recognizing a hypersensitivity mechanism are even rarer. Corresponding author The purpose of this review is to offer a practical approach to adverse events after vaccina- Anna Radice Ospedale San Giovanni di Dio tion, focusing on immune-mediated reactions with particular regard to their recognition, Via Torregalli 3, 50143 Firenze diagnosis and management. Phone: +39 055 6932304 According to clinical features, we propose an algorythm for allergologic work-up, which E-mail: [email protected] helps in confirming hypersensitivity to vaccine, nonetheless ensuring access to vaccination. Finally, a screening questionnaire is included, providing criteria for immunisation in spe- Doi cialized care settings. 10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.86 Introduction The gain from vaccination is not just about human health, but it is also a matter of financial resources for health systems. “Smallpox is dead” stated the magazine of the World Health It has been calculated that for every dollar spent in vaccines, Organisation (WHO) in 1980. -
Difference Between Hypersensitivity and Autoimmunity Key Difference – Hypersensitivity Vs Autoimmunity
Difference Between Hypersensitivity and Autoimmunity www.differencebetwee.com Key Difference – Hypersensitivity vs Autoimmunity Autoimmunity is an adaptive immune response mounted against self-antigens. In simple terms, when your body is acting against its own cells and tissues, this is called an autoimmune reaction. An exaggerated and inappropriate immune response to an antigenic stimulus is defined as a hypersensitivity reaction. Unlike autoimmune reactions that are triggered only by the endogenous antigens, hypersensitivity reactions are triggered by both endogenous and exogenous antigens. This is the key difference between hypersensitivity and autoimmunity. What is Hypersensitivity? An exaggerated and inappropriate immune response to an antigenic stimulus is defined as a hypersensitivity reaction. The first exposure to a particular antigen activates the immune system and, antibodies are produced as a result. This is called sensitization. Subsequent exposures to the same antigen give rise to hypersensitivity. Few important facts regarding the hypersensitivity reactions are given below They can be elicited by both exogenous and endogenous agents. They are a result of an imbalance between the effector mechanisms and the countermeasures that are there to control any inappropriate execution of an immune response. The presence of a genetic susceptibility increases the likelihood of hypersensitivity reactions. The manner in which hypersensitivity reactions harm our body is similar to the way that the pathogens are destroyed by immune reactions. Figure 01: Allergy According to the Coombs and Gell classification, there are four main types of hypersensitivity reactions. Type I- Immediate Type/ Anaphylactic Mechanism Vasodilation, edema, and contraction of smooth muscles are the pathological changes that take place during the immediate phase of the reaction. -
Ii Vasclitides
ا يمون وپات وژنز واسکوليتھااکلتا Vascliiitides: The Immunopa tho genes is دکتر محمدمھدی محمدی LMD, PhD, MPH ([email protected]) The 7th International 12th National Congress on Quality Improvement in Clinical Laboratories 28 Farvardin 1393 / 17April 2014 , Tehran, Iran A small spoonful of Terminology (in Farsi بيماريزايی) – .path·o·gen·e·sis, n • – the ppp(roduction and development of disease (events and reactions and other pathologic mechanisms) . Also, pa·thog·e·ny !?! (in Farsi بيماريزايی) _ .path·o·ge·nic·i·ty, n • – the disease-producing capacity of a pathogen. [PATHOGENIC + -ITY] • vir·u·lence, n. – the relative ability of a microorganism to cause disease; degree of pathogenicity. • Vasculitis, n. (vasculitides, plural) – a general term for vessel wall inflammation, systemic or localized, immune-mediated or directly invaded by microbes. • Infections may indirectly generate vasculitis, e.g. through IC formation or by X_reaction. Note that immunosuppressive therapy is only appropriate for --?– type! • WHAT R the IMMUNE MECHANISMS in VASCULITIS? افراط تعادل تفريط Immunodeficiency Allergy (& Infection) Defence Immunodeficiency Surveillance Autoimmunity (& Malignancy) Homostasis ?! Some Inter-related Concepts Immunological Vasculitis Hypersensitivity Auoimmunity Tolerance EDUCATION? Tolerance in different classic Txtbks of Immunology (Abbas, Benjamini, Janeway, Kuby, Roitt, Stites …) • Tolerance (by C&M Immunology): – Unresponsiveness of the adaptive immune system to antigens, as a result of inactivation or death of antigen-specific lymphocytes, induced by exposure to the antigens. – (()Active) Unresponsiveness of the (()HEALTHY) adappytive immune system to (selected) antigens, as a result of (i.e. MECHANISMS:) inactivation or death of antigen-specific lymphocytes, induced by exposure to those antigens. • Tolerance to self antigens is a normal feature of the adaptive immune system, but tolerance to foreign antigens may be induced undtiditiftider certain conditions of antigen exposure. -
Food Fact Sheet: Food Allergy and Food Intolerance
Food Fact Sheet: Food Allergy and Food Intolerance Having to avoid certain foods in your diet can be difficult. But there are a few simple things you can do to help you manage your food allergies - allowing you to stay safe, continue to participate in fun activities and enjoy your food. What is the difference between food allergy and food intolerance? For some people, eating certain foods can lead to an unpleasant and sometimes dangerous physical reaction. The term used to describe all types of reactions to foods is ‘food hypersensitivity’. A 'food allergy' is a reaction involving the immune system (the body’s defence against foreign bodies). Those that do not involve the immune system are often called a ‘food intolerance’. It is important to identify and manage foods that trigger any symptoms in an appropriate way. Food allergy Proteins within foods can trigger immediate (within two hours) or delayed symptoms (up to several days later). Immediate food allergy (IgE mediated food allergy) Immediate reactions to foods occur when your immune system reacts to a normally harmless protein in food, due to the creation of Immunoglobulin E (IgE). This results in the release of chemicals (e.g. histamine) which trigger allergic symptoms. These symptoms are usually in the skin (itching/swelling), or gut (vomiting, diarrhoea). Other symptoms can include breathing problems and in rare cases an extreme allergic reaction called anaphylaxis. Delayed food allergy (non IgE mediated food allergy) Delayed reactions to foods still involve your immune system, but there is a different type of immune reaction involved. Symptoms typically occur in the gut (vomiting, diarrhoea, constipation) and/or the skin (atopic eczema). -
Allergy, Hypersensitivity, Angioedema, and Anaphylaxis Episode Overview
CrackCast Show Notes –Allergy and Anaphylaxis – October 2017 www.canadiem.org/crackcast Chapter 109 – Allergy, Hypersensitivity, Angioedema, and Anaphylaxis Episode Overview Key Points: 1. A history of sudden urticarial rash accompanied by respiratory difficulty, abdominal pain, or hypotension, strongly favors the diagnosis of anaphylaxis. 2. Epinephrine is the first-line treatment in patients with anaphylaxis: give it immediately. 3. There are no absolute contraindications to the use of epinephrine in the setting of anaphylaxis. 4. Antihistamines and corticosteroids are second- and third-line agents in the management of anaphylaxis and should not replace or precede epinephrine. 5. Consider prolonged observation or admission for patients who: a. Experience protracted anaphylaxis, hypotension, or airway involvement; b. Receive IV epinephrine or more than two doses of IM epinephrine; c. Or have poor outpatient social support. 6. Patients discharged after an anaphylactic event should be prescribed an EpiPen and instructed on its use. 7. Patients with refractory hypotension may require glucagon (receiving beta-blockage) or a continuous IV epinephrine infusion. 8. Non-histaminergic angioedema (non-allergic angioedema) does not typically respond to epinephrine and antihistamines. New drugs, including berinert, icatibant, ecallantide, and Ruconest have been approved for use in HAE. FFP has been used with varying success in HAE, ACID, and ACE inhibitor–induced angioedema. NOTE: ACID: acquired C1 esterase deficiency (ACED) Core Questions: 1. List the four types of Gell and Coombs classifications of immune reaction and give examples of each 2. List four etiologic agents causing anaphylaxis by immunologic mechanisms 3. List six mediators of anaphylaxis and their physiologic actions and clinical manifestations 4. -
Hypersensitivity Reactions (Types I, II, III, IV)
Hypersensitivity Reactions (Types I, II, III, IV) April 15, 2009 Inflammatory response - local, eliminates antigen without extensively damaging the host’s tissue. Hypersensitivity - immune & inflammatory responses that are harmful to the host (von Pirquet, 1906) - Type I Produce effector molecules Capable of ingesting foreign Particles Association with parasite infection Modified from Abbas, Lichtman & Pillai, Table 19-1 Type I hypersensitivity response IgE VH V L Cε1 CL Binds to mast cell Normal serum level = 0.0003 mg/ml Binds Fc region of IgE Link Intracellular signal trans. Initiation of degranulation Larche et al. Nat. Rev. Immunol 6:761-771, 2006 Abbas, Lichtman & Pillai,19-8 Factors in the development of allergic diseases • Geographical distribution • Environmental factors - climate, air pollution, socioeconomic status • Genetic risk factors • “Hygiene hypothesis” – Older siblings, day care – Exposure to certain foods, farm animals – Exposure to antibiotics during infancy • Cytokine milieu Adapted from Bach, JF. N Engl J Med 347:911, 2002. Upham & Holt. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 5:167, 2005 Also: Papadopoulos and Kalobatsou. Curr Op Allergy Clin Immunol 7:91-95, 2007 IgE-mediated diseases in humans • Systemic (anaphylactic shock) •Asthma – Classification by immunopathological phenotype can be used to determine management strategies • Hay fever (allergic rhinitis) • Allergic conjunctivitis • Skin reactions • Food allergies Diseases in Humans (I) • Systemic anaphylaxis - potentially fatal - due to food ingestion (eggs, shellfish, -
Arthus Reaction
The Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 56, No. 4, pp. 450–451, 2019 Ó 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 0736-4679/$ - see front matter https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.12.047 Visual Diagnosis in Emergency Medicine ARTHUS REACTION Mei-Hua Wang, RN,* Alvin Hu,† Yei-Soon Lee, MD,* and Chih-Cheng Lai, MD‡ *Department of Emergency Department, Chi Mei Medical Center, Liouying, Taiwan, †Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland, and ‡Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Chi Mei Medical Center, Liouying, Taiwan Reprint Address: Chih-Cheng Lai, MD, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Chi Mei Medical Center, Liouying, Tainan, Taiwan CASE REPORT 0–4%), respectively, and a C-reactive protein level of 9.1 mg/L. Blood culture was collected but showed no bac- A 6-year-old boy presented to the emergency department terial growth. Physical examination showed an erythem- (ED) with fever and skin rash (Figure 1) over his left atous skin rash with swelling and severe pain over the thigh. He had just received a combination vaccine with vaccination site. Acetaminophen was given for pain relief diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, and poliomyelitis (DTaP- and fever. Steroid (methylprednisolone 20 mg every 8 h) IPV) on his left thigh 12 h prior to his visit to the ED. and an antihistamine (cyproheptadine 2 mg three times a His vital signs were body temperature of 36.6C, respira- day) were prescribed for suspected allergic reaction. Af- tory rate of 20 breaths/min, blood pressure of 104/83 mm ter treatment, the fever subsided and the painful swelling Hg, and heart rate of 100 beats/min. -
Immune Pathology Immune System Functions Reactivity to Tolerance Nonshared Ag to Self-Ag
Immune Pathology Immune system functions reactivity to tolerance nonshared Ag to self-Ag reduction pErVeRsIoN malfunction immunodeficiency hypersensitivity autoimmune diseases Hypersensitivity Hypersensitivity - excessive or inadequate manifestation adaptive immune of reactions Can manifest as local and systemic reactions Hypersensitivity Type Synonym Immunological mechanisms I IgE-mediated, anaphylactic, IgE-mediated degranulation of mast reaginic, HIS (blood cells dyscrasia) II antibody-dependent Cytotoxic antibodies activate cytotoxicity complement, which leads to cell lysis III immune complex Immune complexes activate leukocytes IV cell-mediated, delayed-type Cytokine production by hypersensitivity macrophages and lymphocytes V antibody-dependent Antibodies alter functional state of functional changes cells by interacting with its receptor Type I hypersensitivity • Speed of reaction - seconds or minutes • IgE-mediated • Chemical mediators of damage - vasoactive products of mast cells / basophils (histamine, arachidonic acid derivatives) • Mechanism - accumulation of of neutrophils, unstriated muscle spasm Type I hypersensitivity • bronchial asthma (some forms) • anaphylactic shock • Urticaria • Quincke's edema • dietary allergy • nasal allergy • allergic conjunctivitis Mast cell Аг Synthesis and secretion: leukotrienes (LTC4, LTB4), prostaglandins (PGD2), degranulation: IL-3, 4,5,6 histamine Platelet-activating factor serotonin (PAF) eotoxin Type I hypersensitivity Morphological manifestations IHS: • exudative alterative inflammation -
Hypersensitivity Reactions
Color code: Important in red Extra in blue Hypersensitivity Reactions For team error adjustments, click here Objectives ➤ To know that hypersensitivity reactions are over and excessive immune responses that can be harmful to the body in four different ways ➤ To be familiar with inflammatory processes in Type I hypersensitivity reaction that mediate allergic inflammation ➤ To recognize that Type II hypersensitivity deals with immune responses against antigens that are integral parts of the cell membrane and are usually associated with autoimmune disorders ➤ To know that Type III hypersensitivity reactions are mediated by immune complexes and cause vasculitis ➤ To describe Type IV hypersensitivity is a purely cell mediated immune response associated with chronic inflammation What is hypersensitivity? Hypersensitivity: is an undesirable Protective immunity: desirable reaction by the immune system. reaction. Gell—Coombs Classification of Hypersensitivity Reactions Type I: Type IV: IgE mediated Type II: Type III: IgG mediated IgG mediated T cell (most (destruction (immune mediated allergic of cells) complex) immunity reactions) Type I Hypersensitivity ● Known as immediate hypersensitivity (mins-hrs) or an allergic reaction that may develop into an anaphylactic* reaction (a severe and life-threatening form). Antibody - Allergic (atopic): IgE - Non Allergic: IgG Features Cells Involved - Mast cells - Eosinophils - Basophils Antigen - Allergen (low molecular weight & high solubility) Ex: Pollens, Dust mites, Injected allergen (sting venom from -
Reaction by Staphylococcal Protein a Cell Superantigen: Elicitation of An
In Vivo Inflammatory Response to a Prototypic B Cell Superantigen: Elicitation of an Arthus Reaction by Staphylococcal Protein A This information is current as Lisa M. Kozlowski, Weiping Li, Michael Goldschmidt and Arnold of October 1, 2021. I. Levinson J Immunol 1998; 160:5246-5252; ; http://www.jimmunol.org/content/160/11/5246 Downloaded from References This article cites 50 articles, 28 of which you can access for free at: http://www.jimmunol.org/content/160/11/5246.full#ref-list-1 Why The JI? Submit online. http://www.jimmunol.org/ • Rapid Reviews! 30 days* from submission to initial decision • No Triage! Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists • Fast Publication! 4 weeks from acceptance to publication *average by guest on October 1, 2021 Subscription Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at: http://jimmunol.org/subscription Permissions Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 1998 by The American Association of Immunologists All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. In Vivo Inflammatory Response to a Prototypic B Cell Superantigen: Elicitation of an Arthus Reaction by Staphylococcal Protein A1 Lisa M. Kozlowski,2* Weiping Li,* Michael Goldschmidt,† and Arnold I. Levinson3* Staphylococcal protein A (SpA) is representative of a new class of Ags, the B cell superantigens (SAgs). -
Delayed-Type Hypersensitivity Reaction to Measure Cellular Immune Responses in RNA-SARS-Cov-2 Vaccinated Individuals
Communication The Beauty of Simplicity: Delayed-Type Hypersensitivity Reaction to Measure Cellular Immune Responses in RNA-SARS-Cov-2 Vaccinated Individuals Yvelise Barrios 1, Andres Franco 1, Inmaculada Sánchez-Machín 2, Paloma Poza-Guedes 2, Ruperto González-Pérez 2 and Victor Matheu 2,* 1 Department of Immunology, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, 38320 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain; [email protected] (Y.B.); [email protected] (A.F.) 2 Department of Allergy, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, 38320 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain; [email protected] (I.S.-M.); [email protected] (P.P.-G.); [email protected] (R.G.-P.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Background: Monitoring cellular immune responses elicited in vaccinated individuals is highly complicated. Methods: 28 individuals participated during the vaccination process with 12 BNT162b2 mRNA (Pfizer) vaccine. Specific anti-RBD IgG using a classic ELISA was performed in days 10 and 20 (after one dose of the vaccine) and on day 35 (after two vaccine doses) in serum samples of all participants. In parallel, DTH (delayed-type hypersensitivity) Skin Test using S protein was performed before (11/28) and after two doses (28/28) of the vaccine. Results: 6/28 individuals Citation: Barrios, Y.; Franco, A.; were considered positive for the specific anti-RBD IgG positive at day 10, whereas all 28 individuals Sánchez-Machín, I.; Poza-Guedes, P.; were positive at day 20. Moreover, 28/28 individuals increased the OD ratios at day 36 (2 doses). González-Pérez, R.; Matheu, V. The DTH cutaneous test was performed on 11/28 participants at day 20 (1 dose) showing 8/11 a positive Beauty of Simplicity: Delayed-Type Hypersensitivity Reaction to Measure reaction at 12 h.