DOCSLIB.ORG

R R R R R R Iii R

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
R R R R R R Iii R r r r ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE DIABLO RANGE: r INVESTIGATIONS AT THE ARROYO BLANCO RANCHERIA (CA-FRE-1331) r FRESNO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA r r r by r. ERIK C. ZABORSKY r r A thesis submitted to the Master of Arts Graduate Program in Anthropology at California r State University, Bakersfield, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of r. MASTER OF ARTS In r. ANTHROPOLOGY r r. r. Bakersfield, California 2006 r. r_ TO THE OFFICE OF MASTER OF ARTS GRADUATE PROGRAM IN ANTHROPOLOGY: The members of the committee examining the thesis of Erik C. Zaborsky find it satisfactory and recommend that it be accepted. Cali fo rnia State Uni versi ty. Bakersfi eld Frontispiece: Overview. of Arroyo Blanco Rancheria (CA-FRE-1331 ), looking southeast. The tlat, oak-studded area in the approximate center of the photograph IS interpreted as the primary occupation area of the site (see Chapter 5). '- 11 r ~ r r r r r Copyright «} Erik C. Zaborsky All Rights Reserved r 2006 r r ~ r f; r r r r r r iii r r ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS r Thank you to everyone at California State University, Bakersfield, the Bureau of r Land Management, Santa Rosa Rancheria, and my family and friends who supported me though this process. r This thesis has been an effort that spans centuries, nay millennia. Without the support r of lots of people this research in Fresno County, California would not have transpired. I will do my best to recognize all of you that have helped me but if I forget a name or individual r effort, please forgive me and know that you can take some credit in this archaeological r endeavor. r First a big thank you to the California State University, Bakersfield, archaeological field schools of Spring Quarter 2001 and Spring Quarter 2002 who did the lion's share of r initial excavation and mapping. The field school role call from 200 I is the following: Bruno r Huerta, Derek Hurt, Blendan Walker, Dr. Mark Q. Sutton, Amy Girado, Dr. Jill K. Gardner, Jeremy Kroger, Fran Rogers, Ryan Stahl, Becky Orfila, Amanda DesLauriers, Sandy Rogers, r Citla Vazquez, Susan Lewis, and Julie Minor. Bruno, Derek, and Citla were nice enough to r come back later that spring, too. In spring 2002, the list of participants was: Tim Kelly, Bruno Huerta, Derek Hurt, Blendan Walker, Justin Gamble, Dr. Mark Q. Sutton, Darron r Nilsson, Shannon Hurst, Rebecca Ragsdale, Juan Pinzon, Audrey Williams, and Dr. Jill K. ·r Gardner. A very special thank you goes to Alex DeGeorgey and Joann Mellon from northern r California who volunteered their time, expertise, and good character to come down and assist r with the documentation of the housepit and burial features ... sometimes things happen to r work out perfectly. r iv r r Without the contributions of ·the following individuals and companies, the special r studies section would be lacking: Erin Dwyer of Paradise who completed the floral analysis; Robert Parr of the Center for Archaeological Research in Bakersfield who did the protein r residue tests; Darden Hood, Lethia Cerda, and David Miller from BetaAnalytic, Inc., in r Miami, Florida, who completed the radiocarbon testing; and finally Craig E. Skinner and Jennifer Thatcher of the Northwest Obsidian Research Laboratory in Corvallis, Oregon, who r did all the obsidian hydration and sourcing studies. Thank you to Julie Anne Hamon r (Delgado) from the Bureau of Land Management for providing a plant list of the White Creek study area. Also, thank you to Dr. Roger LaJeunesse on behalf of the Fresno County r Coroner's Office and Dr. Robert M. Yohe II of California State University, Bakersfield, for r their analyses and impressions on the recovered human remains. Gary Breschini of Archaeological Consulting, Inc., in Salinas was very helpful in r getting reference material and allowing me to pick his brain about local excavations. r California archaeologists Bob Gibson and Bill Olsen were both helpful to me early on during my research, especially in formulating questions about the Salinan, Yokuts, and r Costanoan/Ohlone ethnic boundaries. Thanks to fellow graduate student Rubie Switalski in r developing a set of maps that are coherent and do everything a set of maps should do. Jim Snyder, librarian at Yosemite National Park, also deserves a big thank you for allowing me to r get into Frank F. Latta's notes and manuscripts, and for sending me a copy of the document r which helped to give a real place name to archaeological site CA-FRE-1331. r A special thank you goes to Marilyn Hilton, the University's Department of Sociology/Anthropology Secretary and so much more. She was instrumental in helping me r achieve thesis completion and navigating those eternal administrative procedures. Another r r v r r thank you goes to Marisa Marquez, my graduate student evaluator at Admissions and r Records. Although I didn't get to bother him as much as I should have, thanks to Dr. Robert Negrini of the University's Geology Department for the identification of some lithic r mysteries and answers to general geomorphological questions. One person that definitely r deserves a special thank you is Dr. Jill K. Gardner. Jill is a friend and colleague who introduced me to Cal. State Bakersfield, supported me during my time there, and was the one r who helped me to truly realize what the editing process is all about. r Thank you to Tim Moore, Bureau of Land Management geologist from the Hollister Field Office, who answered my numerous questions on lithic material identification, r formation, and structure. He was also able to provide the Niton portable x-ray fluorescence r (XRF) machine to examine the iron oxide content of a sandstone sample from CA-FRE- 1331. Other people to thank from the Bureau of Land Management are: Russ Kaldenberg for r offering some suggestions to the original research design; Bob Beehler, George Hill, and r Rick Cooper for being very understanding and supportive bosses while I was working on my field work, lab work, and writing; archaeologists Ken Wilson, Kirk Halford, and Duane r Christian for their program support; engineer technician John Wrobel; administrative help r from Sandy Borges, Carol Bustos, Lenore Avila-Pino and Teresa Alberts; technical support r and land use history from Bruce Cotterill, Dan Byrne, and Sam Fitton; and moral support came from anthropologist Yolanda Chavez and archaeologists Cheryl Foster-Curley, Jack r Scott, and Margaret Hangan. The Bureau of Land Management archaeologists who got their r hands dirty at CA-FRE-1331 were: my program and life mentor and Rick Hanks (thanks for the great frontispiece photo); the esteemed Dr. Eric Ritter from the Redding Field Office; r Julie Burcell from the Ukiah Field Office; James Barnes from the Folsom Field Office; and r r vi r r Kim Cuevas from the Bakersfield Field Office. Their combined expertise in and out of the r field is without equal. My peers Julie, James, and Kim worked at the site repeatedly and Julie was extra helpful with profile illustrations. I will always appreciate their efforts and r their different perspectives on cultural resources management, and I will always treasure r their friendship. Finally, a special thanks to John Skibinski - because of "Ski's" personal and professional commitment, I began my journey as an archaeologist with the Bureau of r Land Management in California. r Thank you to all of the other students and colleagues who helped me during my tenure at California State University, Bakersfield, including Audrey Williams, Vickie r Harvey, Deanna Heikken, Gale Grasse-S prague, Robin Tidmore, Susan Wolfe, Matt r DesLauriers, Jay Hinshaw, Nelson Siefken, Dr. Gerrit L. Fenenga, and Dr. Jean Hudson. Two special people on the campus made life bearable during the work grind: Bob Parr of the r Center for Archaeological Research made the hours spent in the laboratory seem less tedious r and much more· humane, and Adele Baldwin of the Southern San Joaquin Archaeological Information Center who showed me that life can be complicated but is too short to lose your r perspective (or your mind over) the little things. Another thank you at Cal. State is deserved r to Becky Orfila, M.A., for illustrating some of the groundstone artifacts and providing moral r support with a dose of friendship. A quick thank you goes to the Kern County Archaeological Society for allowing me r to present some of the preliminary data and findings to a riveted audience several years ago. r Needless to say this research would not have succeeded without the participation and consultation of Native Californian people. Early in the research design, consultation with r Ann Marie Sayers from Indian Canyon in Hollister provided some good input. A special r r Vll r r thanks to Lalo Franco of the Santa Rosa Rancheria of Tachi Yokuts from Lemoore for his r personal and professional insights, as well as his assistance in the legal handling and proper disposition of the human burial discovery. r Thanks to Ray Iddings, Jr., for his continual support and willingness to help backfill r some test units at CA-FRE-1331. Also thanks to: archaeologist Gabriel Roark of Jones & Stokes, Inc., in Sacramento; archaeologist Linda Hylkema of Santa Clara University; soil r scientist Kerry Arroues of the Natural Resource Conservation Service in Fresno; geologist r Fred Fisher of the United States Geological Survey at the University of Arizona; archaeologists Dan Foster and Linda Sandelin of the California Department of Forestry and r Fire Protection; archaeologist Rob Edwards, Director of the Archaeological Technology r Program at Cabrillo College in Aptos, who gave me a solid foundation in California archaeology I will always draw upon - thanks Rob; artist Joseph Demaree of San Jose; Joe r Deford of Bakersfield; archaeologist Mary Barger of the Western Area Power Administration r in Denver; archaeologist Mark Hylkema of California Department of Parks and Recreation in Santa Cruz; and paleontologist Dr.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stratigraphy of the Southern Coast Ranges Near the San Andreas Fault from Cholame to Maricopa, California
    Stratigraphy of the Southern Coast Ranges near the San Andreas Fault from Cholame to Maricopa, California GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 764 Stratigraphy of the Southern Coast Ranges near the San Andreas Fault from Gholame to Maricopa, California By T. W. DIBBLEE, JR. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 764 A discussion of the regional stratigraphy of the McLure Valley area, Temblor Range, Carrizo Plain, Cuyama Valley, Caliente Range, La Panza Range, and Sierra Madre Mountains UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1973 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 72-600327 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 Price: Paper cover-80 cents, domestic postpaid; 55 cents, GPO Bookstore. Stock No. 2401-00300 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract _ _ __________________________ 1 Middle Tertiary sedimentary sequence Continued Introduction _____________________________________ 1 Vaqueros and Temblor Formations Continued Scope and purpose ___________________________ 1 Temblor Formation Continued Problems of stratigraphic terminology _________ 3 Buttonbed Sandstone Member ______ 23 Chronology used _____________________________ 3 Monterey Shale ____________________ 24 Tectonic areas ____________________________ 5 Review of nomenclature _____ _ 24 Crystalline plutonic and metamorphic rocks ________ 5 Stratigraphic units southwest of the San Eugeosynclinal sedimentary
    [Show full text]
  • BIRDS of the KETTLEMAN HILLS AREA, CALIFORNIA by IDA DEMAY WILSON
    July, 1945 149 BIRDS OF THE KETTLEMAN HILLS AREA, CALIFORNIA By IDA DEMAY WILSON It is always interesting to find out what sort of wild creatures manage to live in un- favorable regions which have little water or vegetation to make them habitable.,Such a region is the southwestern part of the San Joaquin Valley in California. Here, at about the half-way point on a straight line between Los Angeles and San Francisco, the Kettle- man Hills rise out of the dry, barren-looking flats. They extend northwestward from Kern County, through Kings County, into Fresno County, on the eastern edge of the Coast Range. The Kreyenhagen Hills and the Diablo Range, less than five miles away to the west across the Kettleman Plain, support more vegetation than the Kettleman Hills and provide suitable habitats for more kinds of animals. So also does the Coalinga area to the northwest (Arnold, Condor, 39, 1937 :31-35), about seventeen miles from the town of Avenal, which is situated on the Kettleman Plain just west of the north dome of the Kettleman Hills. The canals and low farm lands around Tulare Lake, about five miles east of the Hills, attract a wide variety of ducks, herons, and shore birds, but few of these stray to the Kettleman Hills. The highest point in the Kettleman Hills rises about 900 feet above the edge of the San Joaquin Valley and about 600 feet above the Kettleman Plain. It has an altitude of 1366 feet (Woodring, Stewart, and Richards, U.S. Dept. Int., Geol. Surv.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Reef Ridge Coalinga District California
    If 70U no loncer need thlo publication write to the Geolo&lcal Surve7 in Washln&ton for an omcial mailln& label to use In returnin& it UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGY OF REEF RIDGE COALINGA DISTRICT CALIFORNIA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 205-C UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR J. A. Krug, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director Professional Paper 205-C GEOLOGY OF REEF RIDGE COALINGA DISTRICT CALIFORNIA BY RALPH STEWART Shorter contributions to general geology, 1943-45 (Pages 81-115) ' UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1946 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington 25,D. C. CONTENTS Page Abstract_ ____________________________________________ _ 81 Descriptive geology-Continued. Introduction __________________________________________ _ 81 Tertiary system-Continued. Location and topography ___________________________ _ 81 Miocene series-Continued. Previous,vork ____________________________________ _ 81 Temblor sandstone-Continued. Acknowledgments _________________________________ _ 84 Fossils and correlation _________________ _ 98 Descriptive geology ____________________________________ _ 85 General features ___________________ _ 98 General features ___________________________________ _ 85 Vertebrate fossils __________________ _ 99 Jurassic (?) system ________________________________ _ Faunal relations within the Temblor sand- 85 stone ______________________________ _ Franciscan formation __________________________ _ 85 99 Cretaceous
    [Show full text]
  • General Plan 2005 - 2025
    JUNE 2009 CITY OF COALINGA GENERAL PLAN 2005 - 2025 CITY OF COALINGA GENERAL PLAN 2005-2025 JUNE 2009 BILL SKINNER CITY MANAGER CITY OF COALINGA CITY HALL 155 WEST DURIAN COALINGA, CA 93210 PHONE (559) 935-1531 PMC 585 CANNERY ROW, SUITE 304 MONTEREY, CA 93940 PHONE: (831) 644-9174 FAX: (831) 644-7696 TTAABBLLEE OOFF CCOONNTTEENNTTSS CHAPTER 1 GENERAL PLAN OVERVIEW Coalinga’s History...................................................................................................................... 1-1 2025 General Plan Update......................................................................................................... 1-4 Guiding Principles................................................................................................................ 1-4 Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan ............................................................................................ 1-7 Community Involvement ...................................................................................................... 1-7 General Plan Requirements .................................................................................................. 1-8 Organization of The 2025 Coalinga General Plan ................................................................ 1-9 Related Planning Considerations ........................................................................................ 1-12 CHAPTER 2 LAND USE ELEMENT Introduction ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Draft SEIR Section C.5 Geology, Soils, and Minerals
    C.5 GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND MINERALS This chapter provides an update on geology, soils, and minerals from that presented in the Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (FEIS/EIR) for the California-Oregon Transmission Project and the Los Banos-Gates Transmission Project (TANC/WAPA, 1988). The environmental setting of the Proposed Project area has not significantly changed since the publication of the FEIS/EIR with respect to the geology, soils, mineral and paleontologic resources of the region; however, the general understanding of the processes underlying the observed conditions have advanced and seismic standards have changed. This chapter includes a general description of the geology and associated geologic hazards of the Project area; a revision of the seismic hazard analysis reflecting changes in the governing regulations and an improved understanding of the faulting in the Project area; a description of the soil conditions; and a revised description of the paleontologic resources of the Project area. A revised discussion of potential impacts is presented, as well as five revised mitigation measures for the Proposed Project. In general, the methodology used for this analysis did not differ substantially from that used in the FEIS/EIR, except for access to recent studies and publications. The impacts identified in this chapter differ from the FEIS/EIR only in the inclusion of a mitigation measure for identification and avoidance of paleontologic resources within the Moreno Formation of the Panoche and Tumey Hills, which has recently been, designated an Area of Critical Environmental Concern. The mitigation measures from the FEIS/EIR have been incorporated into new mitigation measures because those from the previous document were generally vague and lacked enforcement procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Coast Oil and Gas Facilities Leasing and Development, Draft
    Central Coast Oil and Gas Facilities Leasing and Development 3.1 Introduction 3. Affected Environment 3.1 Introduction This chapter describes existing conditions for Bureau of Land Management (BLM) resource programs, resource uses, special designations, and the social and economic environment in the Central Coast Field Office (CCFO) Planning Area. The description of the affected environment uses the best and most recent data available. In addition to describing existing conditions, where appropriate, this chapter identifies management chal- lenges for oil and gas development within the Planning Area. The BLM reviewed current management and reviewed the scoping comments to revise the 2007 Hollister Field Office Resource Management Plan for the Southern Diablo Mountain Range and Central Coast of California. By describing existing condi- tions for resource programs in the Planning Area, this chapter serves as the baseline against which Chapter 4 analyzes potential impacts of the alternatives. The CCFO Planning Area encompasses about 6.8 million acres of land throughout San Francisco, Contra Costa, San Mateo, Alameda, San Joaquin, Santa Cruz, Santa Clara, Stanislaus, Monterey, San Benito, Merced, and Fresno Counties. Most of the acres are in private, State, or local ownership. Bounded by the Pacific Ocean to the west and the San Joaquin Valley to the east, elevations range from sea level to over 5,000 feet. This is a region of diverse topography and landscapes and extraordinary biodiversity. Major landforms include the Diablo Mountain Range, Salinas Valley, and San Joaquin Valley. Public lands are dis- tributed across the Planning Area in numerous small parcels. The BLM CCFO is directly responsible for the management of approximately 284,000 acres of public land (less than 1% of the total) and 793,000 acres of Federal mineral estate (approximately 1.2% of the total).
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 4.7-B – Paleontological Resources Technical Report
    PEA Paleontological Resources Technical Report - Appendices Appendix 4.7-B – Paleontological Resources Technical Report LS Power Grid California (LSPGC) February 2021 Gates 500 kV Dynamic Reactive Support Project Paleontological Resources Technical Report LS Power Grid California (LSPGC) Gates 500 kV Dynamic Reactive Support Fresno County, California August 10, 2020 Prepared for: LS Power Development, LLC Chesterfield, Missouri Under contract to: kp environmental 1038 Dewitt Avenue Encinitas, California 92024 Prepared by: Department of PaleoServices San Diego Natural History Museum P.O. Box 121390 San Diego, California 92112-1390 Katie M. McComas, M.S., Paleontological Report Writer & GIS Specialist Thomas A. Deméré, Ph.D., Principal Paleontologist Executive Summary This Paleontological Resources Technical Report was prepared for the proposed LS Power Grid California (LSPGC)’s Gates 500 kV Dynamic Reactive Support project (Proposed Project), located in southwestern Fresno County, California. The purpose of this report is to identify and summarize paleontological resources that potentially occur within the Proposed Project area, identify individual Proposed Project construction elements that may negatively impact paleontological resources, and provide recommendations to minimize any potential negative impacts. The goal of the Proposed Project is to ensure the reliability of this portion of the California Independent System Operator Corporation (CAISO) controlled grid, and to accommodate maintenance and contingencies of the reactive device.
    [Show full text]
  • Coalinga Oil District
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLP ^AL SURVEY GEORGE OT.IS SMITH, DIRECTOR BULLET IK 351 PRELIMINARY REPORT ON THH: COALINGA OIL DISTRICT ERESNO AND KINGS COUNTIES CALIFORNIA BY RALPH ARNOLD AND ROBERT ANDERSON WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1908 CONTENTS. Introduction.............................................................. 7 General features of the district......................................... 7 Plan of the present report..................................... '.......... 7 Acknowledgments....................................................... 9 Advantage of cooperation among operators............................... 10 Geography, and topography.................................................. 11 Location.............................................................. 11 Definitions of place names^ ...........;.................'................ 12 General topographic features........................................... 16 ' Geology.................................................................. 19 General statement...................................................... 19 Stratigraphy.......................................................... 20 Franciscan formation.............................................. 20 Knoxville-Chico rocks.............................................. 21 Tejon formation................................................... 23 The post-Eocene formations........................................ 29 Vaqueros sandstone................................................. 31 Santa Margarita formation..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Cenozoic Evolution of the San Joaquin Valley, California
    The Cenozoic Evolution of the San ,*~*Toaquin JL \Mle\v/ California ,S. OEOLQ01CAL SURVEY PR0FE£SKWAL PAPER 1501 The Cenozoic Evolution of the San Joaquin Valley, California By J. ALAN BARTOW U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1501 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1991 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, JR., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Bartow, J. Alan. The Cenozoic evolution of the San Joaquin Valley, California / by J. Alan Bartow. p. cm. (U.S. Geological Survey professional paper ; 1501) Includes bibliographical references. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.16:1501 1. Geology, Stratigraphic Cenozoic. 2. Geology California San Joaquin River Valley. 3. Sedimentation and depo­ sition California San Joaquin River Valley. I. Title. II. Series. QE690.B341991 551.7'8'097948-dc20 89-600313 CIP For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section, U.S. Geological Survey, Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract 1 The sedimentary record Continued Introduction 2 Paleogene Continued Setting 2 Upper Paleocene and lower Eocene sequence 17 Previous work 2 Eocene sequence 18 Purpose and approach 3 Lower Oligocene sequence 19 Geology 3 Upper Oligocene sequence 19 Northern Sierran block 3 Neogene and Quaternary 20 Southern Sierran block 6 Lower and middle Miocene sequence 20 Northern
    [Show full text]
  • Geol<)Gy of the Compacting Deposits in the Los Banos- Kettleman City
    Geol<)gy of the Compacting Deposits in the Los Banos­ Kettleman City Subsidence Area, California GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 497-E Geology of the Compacting Deposits in the Los Banos­ Kettleman City Subsidence Area, California By R. E. MILLER, J. H. GREEN, and G. H. DAVIS MECHANICS OF AQUIFER SYSTEMS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 497-E Geology of the deposits undergoing compaction due to head decline, including source, type, physical character, and ?node of deposition, and the hydrologic framework so developed UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTO~ : 1971 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 7o-610408 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Geology-Continued Abstract __________________________________________ _ E1 Geology of the tributary drainage area, etc.-Con. Page Introducuon ______________________________________ _ 1 Upper Tertiary and Quaternary deposits undif- Previous investigations ________________________ _ 4 ferentiated ______________________________ _ E13 Purpose of investigation and scope of report _______ _ 4 Stratigraphy of the water-bearing deposits ________ _ 13 Electric-log interpretation _______________________ _ 5 Jacalitos Formation (Pliocene) ______________ _ 14 Acknowledgments ______________________________ _ 8 Etchegoin Formation (Pliocene) _____________ _ 16 Well-numbering system _________________________
    [Show full text]