Geology of Reef Ridge Coalinga District California

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Geology of Reef Ridge Coalinga District California If 70U no loncer need thlo publication write to the Geolo&lcal Surve7 in Washln&ton for an omcial mailln& label to use In returnin& it UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGY OF REEF RIDGE COALINGA DISTRICT CALIFORNIA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 205-C UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR J. A. Krug, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director Professional Paper 205-C GEOLOGY OF REEF RIDGE COALINGA DISTRICT CALIFORNIA BY RALPH STEWART Shorter contributions to general geology, 1943-45 (Pages 81-115) ' UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1946 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington 25,D. C. CONTENTS Page Abstract_ ____________________________________________ _ 81 Descriptive geology-Continued. Introduction __________________________________________ _ 81 Tertiary system-Continued. Location and topography ___________________________ _ 81 Miocene series-Continued. Previous,vork ____________________________________ _ 81 Temblor sandstone-Continued. Acknowledgments _________________________________ _ 84 Fossils and correlation _________________ _ 98 Descriptive geology ____________________________________ _ 85 General features ___________________ _ 98 General features ___________________________________ _ 85 Vertebrate fossils __________________ _ 99 Jurassic (?) system ________________________________ _ Faunal relations within the Temblor sand- 85 stone ______________________________ _ Franciscan formation __________________________ _ 85 99 Cretaceous system _________________________________ _ Lower zone _______________________ _ 99 85 Upper zone _______________________ _ Upper Cretaceous series ________________________ _ 85 100 Tertiary system ___________________________________ _ 89 Significance of zones _______________ _ 100 Eocene series _________________________________ _ 89 Comparison with other faunas __________ _ 100 Avenal sandstone __________________________ _ 89 McLure shale member of Monterey shale and Reef Ridge shale _________ ~ _____ ---- -- --- - 103 Definition __ -- _________________________ _ 89 Distribution __________________________ _ McLure shale member of Monterey shale __ 103 89 Reef Ridge shale ______________________ _ 104 Character____________________________ _ 89 Pliocene series ____________ - __ ------------------ 104 Stratigraphic relations _________________ _ 90 Fossils _______________________________ _ J acalitos formation _______________________ - _ 104 90 Etchegoin and San Joaquin formations _______ _ 105 Relation of A venal fauna to similar faunas 92 Tulare formation __________________________ _ 105 Kreyenhagen shale _________________________ _ 94 Quaternary system ____________ ---- - --- - --- - ------- ~ 106 Character and distribution ______________ _ 94 Alluvium _____________________________________ _ Stratigraphic relations _________________ _ 106 94 Structure _________________________________________ _ 106 Fossils and correlation _________________ _ 95 Miocene series ________________________________ _ Major features and age of folding ________________ _ 106 97 Minor faults __________________ --_-_------------ 107 Temblor sandstone ________________________ _ 97 Economic geology ____________________ -_- __ ------------- 108. Definition ____________________________ _ 97 Distribution __________________________ _ Fossil localities _____________________ -----_-------------- 111 97 Index _______________________________________________ _ 115 Character _____________ ~--------------- 97 Stratigraphic relations _________________ _ 97 I'LLUSTRATION,S Page PLATE 9. Geologic map and sections of Reef Ridge and PLATE 16. A., Reef Ridge looking eastward from the second parts of adjoining regions, Coalinga district, ridge east of Zapato Canyon; B, Contact of California---------------------------- In pocket McLure and Temblor in Zapata Canyon; C, 10. Sections of A venal sandstone in Reef Ridge area Contact of McLure and Temblor, Big Tar Canyon _________________________________ _ 114 ------------------------------------- In pocket 11. Eocene mollusks from the Avenal sandstone____ 114 17. Miocene mollusks from the Temblor and McLure 114 12. Eocene and Miocene fossils from Reef Ridge____ 114 FIGURE 10. Index map of part of California showing areas 13. Sections of Kreyenhag;en shale on Garza Creek described in oil reports published by the Geo- and east of Garza Peak _________________ In pocket logical Survey ____________ - ____ ------------ 82 14. Sections of upper member of Temblor sandstone 11. Map showing relation of Reef Ridge to nearby exposed along Reef Ridge______________ In pocket geographic features ______________ -- __ ------ 83 15. A, Reef Ridge looking eastward across Arroyo 12. Generalized section of rocks exposed on and near Reef Ridge _______________________________ _ Pinoso; B, Reef Ridge looking eastward from 86 Garza Peak; C, Reef Ridge looking westward 13. Names and age assignments of formations as across Beltran Canyon_ __ __ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ __ __ _ __ _ 114 given by authors of reports on Reef Ridge_--_ 87 TABLES Page TABLE 1. Eocene fossils from the Avenal sandstone of Reef Ridge ___________________________________________________ In pocket 2. Miocene fossils from Reef Ridge ________________________________________________________________________ In pocket III GEOLOGY OF REEF RIDGE, COALINGA DISTRICT, CALIFORNIA BY RALPH STEWART ABSTRACT inga district and may thus provide information use­ Reef Ridge lies along the east flank of the Diablo Range ful in interpreting conditions at depth in the nearby on the west side of the San Joaquin Valley south of Coalinga oil fields. During field work of the present investiga­ and west of the Kettleman Hills. The geologic section consists tion in 1936 and 1937 the early Tertiary rocks that of Cretaceous and Tertiary fossiliferous sedimentary rocks contain the oil s.eeps were mapped; the older and with some volcanic ash. Some metamorphic rocks, possibly Jurassic (Franciscan), are in apparent fault contact with the younger rocks in the immediately adjoining areas Cretaceous near the west end of the area. On Reef Ridge are were examined and mapped to some extent, but their exposed the upturned edges of the buried strata of North distribution and other features as shown on plate 9 Dome of the Kettleman Hills, including some of the oil sands. were taken for the most part from an earlier The general sections of the two areas are quite similar, but 1 most of the producing sands of North Dome appear to be geologic map of this region. missing from Reef Ridge, evidently because of overlap. The Location and topography.-Reef Ridge is a promi­ Tertiary strata, which are unconformable upon the Cretaceous nent narrow serrated ridge 18 miles in length that Panoche formation, include two prominent sandstones, the forms the easternmost escarpment of the Diablo Eocene A venal sandstone, 400 feet or less in thickness, and the Range and joins the west edge of the San Joaquin Miocene Temblor sandstone, 1,000 feet or less. Indurated fos­ siliferous ledges of the Temblor sandstone form the crest of Valley (fig. 10) south of Coalinga and west of the Reef Ridge, and the sandstone is separated from the A venal Kettleman Hills. (See fig. 11.) The ridge extends in a sandstone by the Kreyenhagen shale, 1,200 feet or less in southeasterly direction from Zapato Canyon to the thickness. Siliceous and clay shales, 1,200 feet or less in thick­ Pyramid Hills, which may be regarded as represent­ ness, overlie the Temblor. They correspond to the Monterey shale, and the two units into which they have been subdivided ing a southeastern extension of the ridge. On the are locally designated the McLure shale member of the Mon­ northeast the low Kreyenhagen Hills lie between the terey and Reef Ridge shale. They are overlain by 10,000 feet ridge· and the Kettleman Plain and the Kettleman of Pliocene and Pleistocene sand, silt, and conglomerate Hills beyond; to the southwest of its south end lies constituting the J acalitos, Etchegoin, San Joaquin, and Tulare the McLure Valley. From. northwest to southeast (Pliocene and Pleistocene) formations, which have been dis­ tinguished chiefly on the basis of their molluscan and echinoid the ridge is crossed by Arroyo Pinoso, Beltran Creek, faunas. Reese Canyon, Canoas Creek, Garza Creek, Baby All the formations of Reef Ridge except the Tulare contain King Canyon, and Big Tar Canyon. The ridge is marine fossils. The molluscan fauna of the Panoche formation 1,100 feet above sea level at its southeast end and is of Upper Cretaceous age. The molluscan fauna of the A venal sandstone consists of more than 140 species and is rises to more than 2,575 feet at Roundtop, its highest closely related to the Domengine fauna (Eocene) of the area point. Near the northwest end of the ridge the high­ north of Coalinga. The Miocene Temblor sandstone has two est point, 2,529 feet, is east of Arroyo Pinoso. Be­ faunal zones, the lower or Vertipecten zone containing a tween this locality and Roundtop are numerous sum­ gastropod fauna, and the upper or Aequipecten zone that has a smaller percentage of gastropod species. These two zones, mits ranging from 2,100 to 2,400 feet in altitude. whose differences are chiefly ecologic, correspond approxi­ Arroyo Pinoso and Big Tar Canyon are 1,000 feet mately to the lower and upper members of the formation as below adjacent summits on the ridge. In the Diablo mapped. The lower zone has a fauna that is more nearly Range south of the ridge many of
Recommended publications
  • Stratigraphy of the Southern Coast Ranges Near the San Andreas Fault from Cholame to Maricopa, California
    Stratigraphy of the Southern Coast Ranges near the San Andreas Fault from Cholame to Maricopa, California GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 764 Stratigraphy of the Southern Coast Ranges near the San Andreas Fault from Gholame to Maricopa, California By T. W. DIBBLEE, JR. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 764 A discussion of the regional stratigraphy of the McLure Valley area, Temblor Range, Carrizo Plain, Cuyama Valley, Caliente Range, La Panza Range, and Sierra Madre Mountains UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1973 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 72-600327 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 Price: Paper cover-80 cents, domestic postpaid; 55 cents, GPO Bookstore. Stock No. 2401-00300 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract _ _ __________________________ 1 Middle Tertiary sedimentary sequence Continued Introduction _____________________________________ 1 Vaqueros and Temblor Formations Continued Scope and purpose ___________________________ 1 Temblor Formation Continued Problems of stratigraphic terminology _________ 3 Buttonbed Sandstone Member ______ 23 Chronology used _____________________________ 3 Monterey Shale ____________________ 24 Tectonic areas ____________________________ 5 Review of nomenclature _____ _ 24 Crystalline plutonic and metamorphic rocks ________ 5 Stratigraphic units southwest of the San Eugeosynclinal sedimentary
    [Show full text]
  • BIRDS of the KETTLEMAN HILLS AREA, CALIFORNIA by IDA DEMAY WILSON
    July, 1945 149 BIRDS OF THE KETTLEMAN HILLS AREA, CALIFORNIA By IDA DEMAY WILSON It is always interesting to find out what sort of wild creatures manage to live in un- favorable regions which have little water or vegetation to make them habitable.,Such a region is the southwestern part of the San Joaquin Valley in California. Here, at about the half-way point on a straight line between Los Angeles and San Francisco, the Kettle- man Hills rise out of the dry, barren-looking flats. They extend northwestward from Kern County, through Kings County, into Fresno County, on the eastern edge of the Coast Range. The Kreyenhagen Hills and the Diablo Range, less than five miles away to the west across the Kettleman Plain, support more vegetation than the Kettleman Hills and provide suitable habitats for more kinds of animals. So also does the Coalinga area to the northwest (Arnold, Condor, 39, 1937 :31-35), about seventeen miles from the town of Avenal, which is situated on the Kettleman Plain just west of the north dome of the Kettleman Hills. The canals and low farm lands around Tulare Lake, about five miles east of the Hills, attract a wide variety of ducks, herons, and shore birds, but few of these stray to the Kettleman Hills. The highest point in the Kettleman Hills rises about 900 feet above the edge of the San Joaquin Valley and about 600 feet above the Kettleman Plain. It has an altitude of 1366 feet (Woodring, Stewart, and Richards, U.S. Dept. Int., Geol. Surv.
    [Show full text]
  • General Plan 2005 - 2025
    JUNE 2009 CITY OF COALINGA GENERAL PLAN 2005 - 2025 CITY OF COALINGA GENERAL PLAN 2005-2025 JUNE 2009 BILL SKINNER CITY MANAGER CITY OF COALINGA CITY HALL 155 WEST DURIAN COALINGA, CA 93210 PHONE (559) 935-1531 PMC 585 CANNERY ROW, SUITE 304 MONTEREY, CA 93940 PHONE: (831) 644-9174 FAX: (831) 644-7696 TTAABBLLEE OOFF CCOONNTTEENNTTSS CHAPTER 1 GENERAL PLAN OVERVIEW Coalinga’s History...................................................................................................................... 1-1 2025 General Plan Update......................................................................................................... 1-4 Guiding Principles................................................................................................................ 1-4 Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan ............................................................................................ 1-7 Community Involvement ...................................................................................................... 1-7 General Plan Requirements .................................................................................................. 1-8 Organization of The 2025 Coalinga General Plan ................................................................ 1-9 Related Planning Considerations ........................................................................................ 1-12 CHAPTER 2 LAND USE ELEMENT Introduction ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Draft SEIR Section C.5 Geology, Soils, and Minerals
    C.5 GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND MINERALS This chapter provides an update on geology, soils, and minerals from that presented in the Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (FEIS/EIR) for the California-Oregon Transmission Project and the Los Banos-Gates Transmission Project (TANC/WAPA, 1988). The environmental setting of the Proposed Project area has not significantly changed since the publication of the FEIS/EIR with respect to the geology, soils, mineral and paleontologic resources of the region; however, the general understanding of the processes underlying the observed conditions have advanced and seismic standards have changed. This chapter includes a general description of the geology and associated geologic hazards of the Project area; a revision of the seismic hazard analysis reflecting changes in the governing regulations and an improved understanding of the faulting in the Project area; a description of the soil conditions; and a revised description of the paleontologic resources of the Project area. A revised discussion of potential impacts is presented, as well as five revised mitigation measures for the Proposed Project. In general, the methodology used for this analysis did not differ substantially from that used in the FEIS/EIR, except for access to recent studies and publications. The impacts identified in this chapter differ from the FEIS/EIR only in the inclusion of a mitigation measure for identification and avoidance of paleontologic resources within the Moreno Formation of the Panoche and Tumey Hills, which has recently been, designated an Area of Critical Environmental Concern. The mitigation measures from the FEIS/EIR have been incorporated into new mitigation measures because those from the previous document were generally vague and lacked enforcement procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Coast Oil and Gas Facilities Leasing and Development, Draft
    Central Coast Oil and Gas Facilities Leasing and Development 3.1 Introduction 3. Affected Environment 3.1 Introduction This chapter describes existing conditions for Bureau of Land Management (BLM) resource programs, resource uses, special designations, and the social and economic environment in the Central Coast Field Office (CCFO) Planning Area. The description of the affected environment uses the best and most recent data available. In addition to describing existing conditions, where appropriate, this chapter identifies management chal- lenges for oil and gas development within the Planning Area. The BLM reviewed current management and reviewed the scoping comments to revise the 2007 Hollister Field Office Resource Management Plan for the Southern Diablo Mountain Range and Central Coast of California. By describing existing condi- tions for resource programs in the Planning Area, this chapter serves as the baseline against which Chapter 4 analyzes potential impacts of the alternatives. The CCFO Planning Area encompasses about 6.8 million acres of land throughout San Francisco, Contra Costa, San Mateo, Alameda, San Joaquin, Santa Cruz, Santa Clara, Stanislaus, Monterey, San Benito, Merced, and Fresno Counties. Most of the acres are in private, State, or local ownership. Bounded by the Pacific Ocean to the west and the San Joaquin Valley to the east, elevations range from sea level to over 5,000 feet. This is a region of diverse topography and landscapes and extraordinary biodiversity. Major landforms include the Diablo Mountain Range, Salinas Valley, and San Joaquin Valley. Public lands are dis- tributed across the Planning Area in numerous small parcels. The BLM CCFO is directly responsible for the management of approximately 284,000 acres of public land (less than 1% of the total) and 793,000 acres of Federal mineral estate (approximately 1.2% of the total).
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 4.7-B – Paleontological Resources Technical Report
    PEA Paleontological Resources Technical Report - Appendices Appendix 4.7-B – Paleontological Resources Technical Report LS Power Grid California (LSPGC) February 2021 Gates 500 kV Dynamic Reactive Support Project Paleontological Resources Technical Report LS Power Grid California (LSPGC) Gates 500 kV Dynamic Reactive Support Fresno County, California August 10, 2020 Prepared for: LS Power Development, LLC Chesterfield, Missouri Under contract to: kp environmental 1038 Dewitt Avenue Encinitas, California 92024 Prepared by: Department of PaleoServices San Diego Natural History Museum P.O. Box 121390 San Diego, California 92112-1390 Katie M. McComas, M.S., Paleontological Report Writer & GIS Specialist Thomas A. Deméré, Ph.D., Principal Paleontologist Executive Summary This Paleontological Resources Technical Report was prepared for the proposed LS Power Grid California (LSPGC)’s Gates 500 kV Dynamic Reactive Support project (Proposed Project), located in southwestern Fresno County, California. The purpose of this report is to identify and summarize paleontological resources that potentially occur within the Proposed Project area, identify individual Proposed Project construction elements that may negatively impact paleontological resources, and provide recommendations to minimize any potential negative impacts. The goal of the Proposed Project is to ensure the reliability of this portion of the California Independent System Operator Corporation (CAISO) controlled grid, and to accommodate maintenance and contingencies of the reactive device.
    [Show full text]
  • R R R R R R Iii R
    r r r ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE DIABLO RANGE: r INVESTIGATIONS AT THE ARROYO BLANCO RANCHERIA (CA-FRE-1331) r FRESNO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA r r r by r. ERIK C. ZABORSKY r r A thesis submitted to the Master of Arts Graduate Program in Anthropology at California r State University, Bakersfield, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of r. MASTER OF ARTS In r. ANTHROPOLOGY r r. r. Bakersfield, California 2006 r. r_ TO THE OFFICE OF MASTER OF ARTS GRADUATE PROGRAM IN ANTHROPOLOGY: The members of the committee examining the thesis of Erik C. Zaborsky find it satisfactory and recommend that it be accepted. Cali fo rnia State Uni versi ty. Bakersfi eld Frontispiece: Overview. of Arroyo Blanco Rancheria (CA-FRE-1331 ), looking southeast. The tlat, oak-studded area in the approximate center of the photograph IS interpreted as the primary occupation area of the site (see Chapter 5). '- 11 r ~ r r r r r Copyright «} Erik C. Zaborsky All Rights Reserved r 2006 r r ~ r f; r r r r r r iii r r ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS r Thank you to everyone at California State University, Bakersfield, the Bureau of r Land Management, Santa Rosa Rancheria, and my family and friends who supported me though this process. r This thesis has been an effort that spans centuries, nay millennia. Without the support r of lots of people this research in Fresno County, California would not have transpired. I will do my best to recognize all of you that have helped me but if I forget a name or individual r effort, please forgive me and know that you can take some credit in this archaeological r endeavor.
    [Show full text]
  • Coalinga Oil District
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLP ^AL SURVEY GEORGE OT.IS SMITH, DIRECTOR BULLET IK 351 PRELIMINARY REPORT ON THH: COALINGA OIL DISTRICT ERESNO AND KINGS COUNTIES CALIFORNIA BY RALPH ARNOLD AND ROBERT ANDERSON WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1908 CONTENTS. Introduction.............................................................. 7 General features of the district......................................... 7 Plan of the present report..................................... '.......... 7 Acknowledgments....................................................... 9 Advantage of cooperation among operators............................... 10 Geography, and topography.................................................. 11 Location.............................................................. 11 Definitions of place names^ ...........;.................'................ 12 General topographic features........................................... 16 ' Geology.................................................................. 19 General statement...................................................... 19 Stratigraphy.......................................................... 20 Franciscan formation.............................................. 20 Knoxville-Chico rocks.............................................. 21 Tejon formation................................................... 23 The post-Eocene formations........................................ 29 Vaqueros sandstone................................................. 31 Santa Margarita formation..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Cenozoic Evolution of the San Joaquin Valley, California
    The Cenozoic Evolution of the San ,*~*Toaquin JL \Mle\v/ California ,S. OEOLQ01CAL SURVEY PR0FE£SKWAL PAPER 1501 The Cenozoic Evolution of the San Joaquin Valley, California By J. ALAN BARTOW U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1501 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1991 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, JR., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Bartow, J. Alan. The Cenozoic evolution of the San Joaquin Valley, California / by J. Alan Bartow. p. cm. (U.S. Geological Survey professional paper ; 1501) Includes bibliographical references. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.16:1501 1. Geology, Stratigraphic Cenozoic. 2. Geology California San Joaquin River Valley. 3. Sedimentation and depo­ sition California San Joaquin River Valley. I. Title. II. Series. QE690.B341991 551.7'8'097948-dc20 89-600313 CIP For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section, U.S. Geological Survey, Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract 1 The sedimentary record Continued Introduction 2 Paleogene Continued Setting 2 Upper Paleocene and lower Eocene sequence 17 Previous work 2 Eocene sequence 18 Purpose and approach 3 Lower Oligocene sequence 19 Geology 3 Upper Oligocene sequence 19 Northern Sierran block 3 Neogene and Quaternary 20 Southern Sierran block 6 Lower and middle Miocene sequence 20 Northern
    [Show full text]
  • Geol<)Gy of the Compacting Deposits in the Los Banos- Kettleman City
    Geol<)gy of the Compacting Deposits in the Los Banos­ Kettleman City Subsidence Area, California GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 497-E Geology of the Compacting Deposits in the Los Banos­ Kettleman City Subsidence Area, California By R. E. MILLER, J. H. GREEN, and G. H. DAVIS MECHANICS OF AQUIFER SYSTEMS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 497-E Geology of the deposits undergoing compaction due to head decline, including source, type, physical character, and ?node of deposition, and the hydrologic framework so developed UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTO~ : 1971 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 7o-610408 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Geology-Continued Abstract __________________________________________ _ E1 Geology of the tributary drainage area, etc.-Con. Page Introducuon ______________________________________ _ 1 Upper Tertiary and Quaternary deposits undif- Previous investigations ________________________ _ 4 ferentiated ______________________________ _ E13 Purpose of investigation and scope of report _______ _ 4 Stratigraphy of the water-bearing deposits ________ _ 13 Electric-log interpretation _______________________ _ 5 Jacalitos Formation (Pliocene) ______________ _ 14 Acknowledgments ______________________________ _ 8 Etchegoin Formation (Pliocene) _____________ _ 16 Well-numbering system _________________________
    [Show full text]