USDA Resource Guide for Rural Workforce Development

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

USDA Resource Guide for Rural Workforce Development USDA Resource Guide for Rural Workforce Development Together, America Prospers Contents How Your Rural Community can use USDA Programs to Build a Stronger Workforce . 2 Workforce Development Planning . .2 Infrastructure and Equipment Financing . .4 Industry and Employer Engagement, Entrepreneurship and Local Business Development . 6 Education, Training and Apprenticeship . .8 Rural Workforce Resource Guide Matrix . 10 Other Federal Agency Programs . 16 Additional Resources Available at USDA . 17 USDA Contact Information . 17 Created by the USDA Rural Development Innovation Center America’s rural workforce provides a vital foundation for the nation’s economy . Rural America supplies the nation’s food and energy resources, and the fiber necessary for goods and manufacturing . As USDA continues to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic and help restore the economy, we remain committed to supporting rural employers and job seekers to rebuild rural America’s workforce better, stronger and more equitably than ever before . For these reasons, USDA is prioritizing collaborations with its federal partners to help start and grow thousands of businesses and give individuals the educational and financial tools to succeed in rural America . This guide was created for community leaders and other local entities to help them access resources to create jobs, train talent, expand educational opportunities and provide technical assistance . The guide outlines programs and services available at USDA and other federal departments and agencies that support workforce development in rural communities . The guide highlights four key assistance types necessary to building a stronger rural workforce: 1. Workforce development planning 2. Infrastructure and equipment financing 3. Industry and employer engagement, entrepreneurship and local business development 4. Education, training and apprenticeship Examples on page 2 illustrate how customers have used USDA programs to support each assistance type . A resource matrix on page 10 organizes USDA funding opportunities by customer and assistance type . A list of additional federal resources that complement USDA funding opportunities is provided on page 16 . Additional USDA resource guides are available on page 17 . How Your Rural Community can use USDA Programs to Build a Stronger Workforce 1. Workforce Development Planning Recommended Practices Ideally, workforce development planning is supported by • Invite your local workforce development board to various organizations in your community, such as your participate and monitor priorities in your region to leverage Chamber of Commerce, local workforce development its funding resources for your community. Contact your board, and government leaders. Good planning ensures state government agency to find your local board. communities and businesses are equipped with skills, • Use key data – such as employment rates and experiences and competencies that meet the present demand for services in your rural area – to and future needs of a given workforce. A network of understand workforce gaps and opportunities, make stakeholders – including state and local government, strategic investments, identify and nurture strategic education and training institutions, employers, partnerships, and track impact. entrepreneurs, and social and infrastructure service • Identify and understand the unique characteristics, providers – must be at the table in order to build a opportunities and workforce development needs of comprehensive plan. various population groups (for example: youth, adults, rural communities, or veterans). • Integrate the needs of employers and workers. • Align workforce development planning and economic development planning activities at an early stage in the plan. • Develop cross-sector strategies and governance. • Periodically revise your plan. 2 Success Story and economic development projects in rural areas. The Regional Plan Sets Solid Foundation funds can be used to develop strategic plans, access for Workforce Development in alternative funding sources, support board training, organize fundraisers, develop childcare facilities and Rural Tennessee create training tools. (Rural Community Development TBR used the grant to increase technical career Initiative Grants) awareness among K-12 students and improve dual enrollment opportunities for high school students to earn The Tennessee Board of Regents (TBR) partnered with college credit and technical career certifications at the the National Rural Education Association (NREA) to Tennessee Colleges of Applied Technology. The grant develop a regional approach to workforce development financed a regional digital portal to help students, staff planning for four rural counties in Tennessee. and parents access resources, toolkits and courses. In 2019, Chester, Decatur, Henderson and Perry Funding also helped implement more effective uses of counties each were designated as economically regional labor market data to better align individuals with distressed, at-risk, or transitional. To help spur long-term careers that will have the greatest economic impact. growth in community and economic development, the TBR campuses are actively working with county, two organizations devised a plan to leverage community business and industry leaders to prepare students for funding, resources and subject matter experts to help life beyond high school. Funding also supports college improve workforce readiness. curriculum and career plan development for students to USDA Rural Development awarded TBR a $250,000 help meet the region’s workforce needs. Rural Community Development Initiative (RCDI) grant This project is an example of USDA’s commitment to to support this project. The RCDI program helps support new and creative ways to collaborate with local community development organizations, low-income organizations to spur community development, grow rural communities and federally-recognized Tribes businesses, and give individuals the financial tools to finance housing, community facilities and community succeed in rural America. The College System of Tennessee, governed by the Tennessee Board of Regents (TBR), is Tennessee’s largest higher education system, governing 40 post-secondary educational institutions with over 200 teaching locations . The TBR system includes 13 community colleges, 27 colleges of applied technology, and TN eCampus, providing programs to students across the state, country, and world . 3 2. Infrastructure and Recommended Practices Equipment Financing • Identify gaps and opportunities to make strategic Infrastructure and social services are driving factors in infrastructure investments supporting workforce attracting and retaining industries and employees. High- development goals. speed internet, transportation facilities, and water and • Design social service programs that meet waste facilities all are critical for industry growth. Access demographic needs (for example: veterans, single to health care, education, nutrition and community parents, age or disability status). spaces help improve quality of life. • Invest in infrastructure that enables access to technology and expands training and employment opportunities for communities with physical transportation barriers. Broadband connectivity is a vital infrastructure obstacle for rural economic development right now . 4 Success Story director of the Candler County Industrial Authority. Rural Telephone Cooperative “Broadband connectivity is a vital infrastructure obstacle Takes Networking to New Level for rural economic development right now, but it is the strongest advantage we have in Metter. (Telecommunication Direct Loan Program) For that, I am thankful, and happy to partner with Pineland Telephone Cooperative to be able to Built on speculation and hope, a 42,000-square-foot help companies flourish financially in this amazing facility in rural Metter, Georgia stood empty for nearly small town.” 30 years, awaiting the perfect occupant. In fact, it was the oldest “spec” building in the state until 2014, when Pineland Co-op General Manager Dustin Durden Australian entrepreneur Sebastian Falzon spotted it cautions that the mere presence of broadband doesn’t as a diamond-in-the-rough. Within a year, Falzon – the necessarily mean businesses will come. But, while president of Australia-based Concrete Pump Engineering foundational infrastructure such as electricity, water, and (CPE) – moved its North American headquarters to Metter. wastewater treatment may be considered prerequisites for telecommunications, Durden says in modern times, Globally partnered with Korea-based Everdigm – an “Not having broadband is an eliminating factor.” international leader in concrete pumps, hydraulic attachments, and tower cranes – CPE America is the In a small town where public-private cooperation is key North American distributor of Everdigm concrete pumps to sustaining a strong local economy, Pineland Co-op is used in commercial, housing, and industrial construction. doing its part to ensure its communities have access to Why would a multinational, multimillion dollar company leading-edge broadband connectivity. A USDA partner choose to land in such a small American town? As the old since the 1950s, Pineland has steadily developed its real estate mantra goes, “Location, location, location!” network capacity, offering increasingly diverse services and now, fiber technology. In the last 10 years, Pineland Flanking Interstate 16, Metter offers easy access to has received two awards
Recommended publications
  • Midwest Drought Early Warning System Kickoff Meeting 1
    MIDWEST DROUGHT EARLY WARNING SYSTEM KICKOFF MEETING 1 Include logos of all partners that contributed to meeting on bottom here? MIDWEST DROUGHT EARLY WARNING SYSTEM KICKOFF MEETING 1 Table of Contents Introduction to the Midwest DEWS ......................................................................................... 2 Background..........................................................................................................................................................................2 Midwest DEWS Kick-off Meeting and Planning Process ..................................................................................4 Keynote Speaker Highlights...................................................................................................... 6 Mayor Francis G. Slay, Mayor of the City of St. Louis.........................................................................................6 Colleen Callahan, USDA Rural Development Illinois Director .......................................................................6 Todd Sampsell, Deputy Director of the Missouri DNR......................................................................................7 Highlights of the Presentations and Panel Discussions ...................................................... 7 Day 1 Theme: Laying the Foundation for a Midwest DEWS ..........................................................................7 Day 2 Theme: Current Climate Outlook and Forecasting, Drought Impacts & Vulnerabilities, and Drought Preparedness Resource Needs ........................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • The Oppressive Pressures of Globalization and Neoliberalism on Mexican Maquiladora Garment Workers
    Pursuit - The Journal of Undergraduate Research at The University of Tennessee Volume 9 Issue 1 Article 7 July 2019 The Oppressive Pressures of Globalization and Neoliberalism on Mexican Maquiladora Garment Workers Jenna Demeter The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/pursuit Part of the Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons, Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics Commons, Economic History Commons, Gender and Sexuality Commons, Growth and Development Commons, Income Distribution Commons, Industrial Organization Commons, Inequality and Stratification Commons, International and Comparative Labor Relations Commons, International Economics Commons, International Relations Commons, International Trade Law Commons, Labor and Employment Law Commons, Labor Economics Commons, Latin American Studies Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Macroeconomics Commons, Political Economy Commons, Politics and Social Change Commons, Public Economics Commons, Regional Economics Commons, Rural Sociology Commons, Unions Commons, and the Work, Economy and Organizations Commons Recommended Citation Demeter, Jenna (2019) "The Oppressive Pressures of Globalization and Neoliberalism on Mexican Maquiladora Garment Workers," Pursuit - The Journal of Undergraduate Research at The University of Tennessee: Vol. 9 : Iss. 1 , Article 7. Available at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/pursuit/vol9/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by
    [Show full text]
  • Inclusive Capitalism for the American Workforce Reaping the Rewards of Economic Growth Through Broad-Based Employee Ownership and Profit Sharing
    AP PHOTO/STEVE PHOTO/STEVE AP H ELBER Inclusive Capitalism for the American Workforce Reaping the Rewards of Economic Growth through Broad-based Employee Ownership and Profit Sharing Richard B. Freeman, Joseph R. Blasi, and Douglas L. Kruse March 2011 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Inclusive Capitalism for the American Workforce Reaping the Rewards of Economic Growth through Broad-based Employee Ownership and Profit Sharing Richard B. Freeman, Joseph R. Blasi, and Douglas L. Kruse March 2011 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 5 The problem and the reform 5 The problem 7 The reform 11 The tax consequences 15 The consequences of our reform 15 Broad-based incentive systems work 18 Narrow incentive pay systems don’t work 22 The implications of reform 22 Taxes 23 Company responses 26 Worker responses and risk 28 Conclusion 29 Endnotes 32 About the authors and acknowledgements Introduction and summary The American model of capitalism needs major institutional reforms to regain its economic health and do what it has failed to do for the past three to four decades—ensure that the benefits of economic progress reach the bulk of our citizens. Well before the recent housing and financial crises, the Great Recession of 2007-2009, and the ensuing jobless recovery, the U.S. economy was not deliv- ering the benefits of sustained economic growth to the vast bulk of workers. From the mid-1970s through the 2000s the earnings of most American workers increased more slowly than the rate of productivity growth. Real median earnings barely rose even as gross domestic product per employed worker grew substan- tially.1 This contrasts with the nearly equal rates of real earnings growth and pro- ductivity growth from the turn of the 20th century through the early 1970s, which created a large prosperous middle class.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Marketing Service
    AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE 2018 President’s Budget Agricultural Marketing Service Contents Page Purpose Statement ....................................................................................................................... 21-1 Statement of Available Funds and Staff Years ............................................................................ 21-9 Permanent Positions by Grade and Staff Year Summary ............................................................ 21-10 Motor Vehicle Fleet Data ............................................................................................................ 21-11 Marketing Services Appropriations Language ........................................................................................................ 21-12 Lead-off Tabular Statement ..................................................................................................... 21-12 Summary of Increases and Decreases ...................................................................................... 21-12 Project Statements .................................................................................................................... 21-13 Justifications ............................................................................................................................ 21-15 Summary of Proposed Legislation ........................................................................................... 21-24 Geographic Breakdown of Obligations and Staff Years .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Workforce Composition, Productivity and Pay: the Role of Firms in Wage Inequality
    DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 13212 Workforce Composition, Productivity and Pay: The Role of Firms in Wage Inequality Chiara Criscuolo Ryo Kambayashi Alexander Hijzen Timo Leidecker Cyrille Schwellnus Oskar Nordström Skans Erling Barth Capucine Riom Wen-Hao Chen Duncan Roth Richard Fabling Balazs Stadler Priscilla Fialho Richard Upward Katarzyna Grabska Wouter Zwysen MAY 2020 DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 13212 Workforce Composition, Productivity and Pay: The Role of Firms in Wage Inequality Chiara Criscuolo Ryo Kambayashi OECD Hitotsubashi University Alexander Hijzen Timo Leidecker OECD and IZA OECD Cyrille Schwellnus Oskar Nordström Skans OECD Uppsala University and IZA Erling Barth Capucine Riom Institute for Social Research Oslo and IZA LSE Wen-Hao Chen Duncan Roth Statcan IAB Richard Fabling Balazs Stadler MOTU OECD Priscilla Fialho Richard Upward OECD University of Nottingham Katarzyna Grabska Wouter Zwysen Maastricht University OECD MAY 2020 Any opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but IZA takes no institutional policy positions. The IZA research network is committed to the IZA Guiding Principles of Research Integrity. The IZA Institute of Labor Economics is an independent economic research institute that conducts research in labor economics and offers evidence-based policy advice on labor market issues. Supported by the Deutsche Post Foundation, IZA runs the world’s largest network of economists, whose research aims to provide answers to the global labor market challenges of our time. Our key objective is to build bridges between academic research, policymakers and society.
    [Show full text]
  • The Neoliberal Rhetoric of Workforce Readiness
    The Neoliberal Rhetoric of Workforce Readiness Richard D. Lakes Georgia State University, Atlanta, USA Abstract In this essay I review an important report on school reform, published in 2007 by the National Center on Education and the Economy, and written by a group of twenty-five panelists in the USA from industry, government, academia, education, and non-profit organizations, led by specialists in labor market economics, named the New Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce. These neoliberal commissioners desire a broad overhaul of public schooling, ending what is now a twelve-year high school curriculum after the tenth-grade with a series of state board qualifying exit examinations. In this plan vocational education (also known as career and technical education) has been eliminated altogether in the secondary-level schools as curricular tracks are consolidated into one, signifying a national trend of ratcheting-up prescribed academic competencies for students. I argue that college-for-all neoliberals valorize the middle-class values of individualism and self-reliance, entrepreneurship, and employment in the professions. Working-class students are expected to reinvent themselves in order to succeed in the new capitalist order. Imperatives in workforce readiness Elected officials in state and national legislatures and executive offices share a neoliberal perspective that public school students are academically deficient and under-prepared as future global workers. Their rhetoric has been used to re-establish the role of evidence-based measurement notably through report cards of student's grade-point-averages and test-taking results. Thus, states are tightening their diploma offerings and consolidating curricular track assignments.
    [Show full text]
  • FSA Guaranteed Farm Loan Programs
    FSA Guaranteed Farm Loan Programs TIDBITS/HELPFUL HINTS November 2015 Lender Meetings State Office Staff Dan Gieseke Farm Loan Chief Email = [email protected] Sandra Waibel State Farm Loan Specialist Email = [email protected] Janet Bollinger State Farm Loan Specialist Email = Lorna Plowman State Farm Loan Program Technician Email = 601 Business Loop 70 W Parkade Center, Suite 225 Columbia, MO 65203 Telephone (573) 876-0980 Fax (855) 830-0682 INDEX Subject 0BPage # 1. Why Should USDA’s Farm Service Agency Be Your Lender of First Opportunity? …………………….. 1-2 2. MO State Fact Sheet – FSA Guaranteed Farm Loan Programs …………………………………………… 3-4 3. Direct Loan Information Sheet ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 5 4. Missouri Agricultural and Small Business Development Authority (MASBDA) Fact Sheet …………………… 6 5. MO FSA Guaranteed Lender Website ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 7 6. Average County Farm Acreage – Missouri ……………………………………………………………………………………………. 8 7. Weekly Funds Report ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 9 8. Email or Faxed Applications ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 10 Appeal Rights – Guaranteed Loans Lender Conflict of Interest Guaranteed Forms 9. FSA-2211: CLP & SEL Guaranteed Application …………………………………………….…………………………………. 11-15 10. FSA-2212: PLP Guaranteed Application ………………………………………………………………………………………….. 16-17 11. 2-FLP Exhibit 5 Electronic Access ………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 18-20 12. Guar Loan vs. Direct Loan Comparison …………………………………………………………………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL FARMWORKER JOBS PROGRAM Program Guide
    NATIONAL FARMWORKER JOBS PROGRAM Program Guide Table of Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................... v 1 – Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 2 – What is the National Farmworker Jobs Program? ............................................................. 3 3 – What is the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act? ................................................. 7 3.1 What is the Purpose of WIOA? ..................................................................................................7 3.2 What are Workforce Development Boards? ...............................................................................8 3.2.1 State Workforce Development Boards ........................................................................................ 9 3.2.2 Local Workforce Development Boards ...................................................................................... 11 3.3 What are American Job Centers? ............................................................................................. 14 3.3.1 Overview of the AJC Network .................................................................................................... 14 3.3.2 AJC Required Partners ................................................................................................................ 14 3.3.3 Memorandum of Understanding ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • USDA Rural Development Financing for Food Hubs
    USDA Potential USDA Programs to Support Regional Food Hub Development This is not a comprehensive list, but an edited selection of USDA programs that have previously supported regional food hubs, with examples of funded projects. Many other USDA programs support various activities of regional food hubs. Page 4 has a longer list of funding resources, divided by agency. State and local USDA offices offer a wealth of resources in researching and preparing applications for support. Rural Development agency: The following programs are administered by WKHVWDWHVRIILFHVRI86'$¶V5XUDO'HYHORSPHQW)LQG\RXUVWDWH office here: http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/recd_map.html 1. The Rural Business Enterprise G rant (RB E G) supports the development of physical infrastructure and facilities, including food processing, marketing, and distribution business ventures for locally-grown agricultural products. It is administered by the Rural Business Cooperative Service, and can support everything from planning, plant upgrades, equipment purchases, and technical assistance. Grants range from $10,000 up to $500,000, although smaller projects are given higher priority. Rural public entities, Indian tribes, and rural non-SURILWRUJDQL]DWLRQVDUHHOLJLEOHWRDSSO\³5XUDO´LQWKLVFDVHLVGHILQHGDV any area other than a city or town that has a population of greater than 50,000 and the urbanized area contiguous and adjacent to such a city or town according to the latest decennial census. Information and grants are disbursed on the state level. For more information go to: http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/busp/rbeg.htm RBEG Example: Coast Grown in San Luis Obispo received an $88,000 RBEG grant in 2007 to form the Coast *URZQ&RRSHUDWLYHRILQGHSHQGHQWIDUPVDQGUDQFKHVDORQJ&DOLIRUQLD¶V&HQWUDO&RDVWDQGWREXLOGWKH first Mobile Harvest Unit in California.
    [Show full text]
  • National Farmworker Jobs Program
    OFFICE OF WORKFORCE INVESTMENT National Farmworker Jobs Program About NFJP The National Farmworker Jobs Program (NFJP) provides grants to community-based organizations and public agencies that assist migrant and seasonal farmworkers (MSFWs) and their families attain greater economic stability. The program helps farmworkers acquire the skills they need to retain agricultural jobs or start new careers. Target Population NFJP serves eligible MSFWs and their dependents. Eligible farmworkers are those individuals who primarily depend on employment in agricultural labor that is characterized by chronic unemployment and underemployment. Services - The services provided by NFJP grantees to MSFWs are: • Career Services - including outreach, skills assessment, labor market information, job search, program eligibility determination and placement assistance, individual employment plans developed through a case management-based service strategy, group and individual counseling, and short term prevocational services, such as workplace readiness training. MSFWs can also access the other services of the American Job Center. • Training Services - including occupational skills and job training, on-the-job training opportunities, programs that combine workplace training with related instruction, skills upgrading and retraining, entrepreneurial training, and other training activities. • Youth Services – including tutoring, dropout prevention, paid and unpaid work experiences, occupational skills training, certain education, leadership development opportunities, mentoring, comprehensive guidance and counseling, financial literacy training, and entrepreneurial skills training. • Related Assistance Services - including short-term direct assistance that helps farmworkers and their family members to retain their agricultural employment or to participate in intensive or training services. • Housing Assistance - helps to meet a critical need for the availability and quality of farmworker housing, and supports better economic outcomes for MSFWs and their families.
    [Show full text]
  • OKLAHOMA WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT ISSUANCE #02-2019, Change 2
    900 N. Stiles Avenue Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA 405-815-5251 | Toll Free 800-588-5959 OKCOMMERCE.GOV OKLAHOMA WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT ISSUANCE #02-2019, Change 2 TO: Chief Local Elected Officials Workforce Development Board Chairs Workforce Development Board Staff FROM: Don Morris, Executive Director DATE: May 25, 2021 SUBJECT: Data Validation and Documentation Requirements PURPOSE: The Oklahoma Office of Workforce Development (OOWD) as the Governor’s Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) administrative entity, provides this issuance as guidance to the workforce system on the State of Oklahoma’s Data Validation and Source Documentation Requirements for the WIOA Title I Programs and the Wagner- Peyser Employment Services as amended by Title III. REFERENCES: The Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) of 2014 (Public Law (Pub. L. 113- 128)) Title I and III Federal Register/Vol. 81. No.161 U.S. Department of Labor/Employment and Training Administration (TEGL) No. 7-18 U.S. Department of Labor/Employment and Training Administration (TEGL) No. 18-16 U.S. Department of Labor/Employment and Training Administration (TEGL) No. 19-16 U.S. Department of Labor/Employment and Training Administration (TEGL) No. 21-16 U.S. Department of Labor/Employment and Training Administration (TEGL) No. 22-15 U.S. Department of Labor/Employment and Training Administration (TEGL) No. 23-19 MESSAGE: This Oklahoma Workforce Development Issuance (OWDI) is intended to clarify procedures that support documenting eligibility, service provision, and outcomes while to ensure data integrity and report accurate information to the United States Department of Labor (USDOL). The revision updates the program elements for data validation information collection described in U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Agency Financial Report
    2020 AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT United States Department of Agriculture Page Intentionally Blank USDA’s Non-Discrimination Statement In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, USDA, its Mission Areas, agencies, staff offices, employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Program information may be made available in languages other than English. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication to obtain program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or American Sign Language) should contact the responsible Mission Area, agency, or staff office; the USDA TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY); or the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. To file a program discrimination complaint, a complainant should complete a Form AD 3027, USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, which can be obtained online, from any USDA office, by calling (866) 632-9992, or by writing a letter addressed to USDA. The letter must contain the complainant’s name, address, telephone number, and a written description of the alleged discriminatory action in sufficient detail to inform the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights (ASCR) about the nature and date of an alleged civil rights violation.
    [Show full text]