DOCSLIB.ORG

Panel Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Panel Report WORLD TRADE WT/DS334/R 21 September 2007 ORGANIZATION (07-3877) Original: English TURKEY – MEASURES AFFECTING THE IMPORTATION OF RICE Report of the Panel WT/DS334/R Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................1 II. FACTUAL ASPECTS ..............................................................................................................2 A. PRODUCT DESCRIPTION...............................................................................................................2 B. TURKEY'S RICE MARKET .............................................................................................................3 1. Turkey's rice production..........................................................................................................3 2. Rice consumption in Turkey....................................................................................................5 3. Turkey's imports of rice ...........................................................................................................5 4. Domestic rice producers.........................................................................................................12 C. GENERAL IMPORT REGIME ........................................................................................................13 1. Tariff rates...............................................................................................................................13 2. Preferential agreements for the importation of rice ............................................................13 3. General procedure for the importation of rice.....................................................................13 D. CERTIFICATES OF CONTROL ......................................................................................................14 1. Legal basis ...............................................................................................................................14 (a) Situation at the time of the establishment of this Panel ............................................................14 (b) New legislation after the establishment of this Panel ...............................................................17 2. Approved Certificates of Control ..........................................................................................17 (a) Statement by Turkey.................................................................................................................17 (b) Request for evidence from Turkey............................................................................................17 (c) New request for evidence from Turkey ....................................................................................17 3. Rejection of Certificates of Control.......................................................................................19 (a) Rejection of Certificates of Control..........................................................................................19 (b) Request for evidence from Turkey............................................................................................20 (c) New request for evidence from Turkey ....................................................................................20 4. Procedures in Turkish administrative courts.......................................................................21 (a) Arguments by MARA before an administrative court..............................................................21 5. Decision by a Turkish administrative court .........................................................................22 E. THE TARIFF RATE QUOTA SYSTEM ............................................................................................22 1. Situation at the time of the establishment of this Panel.......................................................22 (a) Decree No. 95/6814 of 30 April 1995.......................................................................................22 (b) Decree No. 2004/7333 of 10 May 2004....................................................................................23 (c) Decree 2005/9315 of September 2005......................................................................................23 (d) Communiqué No. 25,943 of the FTU .......................................................................................24 2. Earlier tariff quota regimes ...................................................................................................25 WT/DS334/R Page ii (a) Decree 2004/7135 of 20 April 2004 (from 20 April 2004 to 31 August 2004) ........................25 (b) Decree 2004/7756 of August 2004 (from 1 November 2004 to 31 July 2005) ........................27 3. Import licences ........................................................................................................................28 F. THE TURKISH GRAIN BOARD....................................................................................................29 G. LETTERS OF ACCEPTANCE.........................................................................................................32 1. The so-called "letters of acceptance"....................................................................................32 2. Evidence of letters of acceptance ...........................................................................................33 3. Content of letters of acceptance.............................................................................................33 4. Nature of letters of acceptance...............................................................................................34 H. LETTER FROM THE MINISTER OF STATE OF TURKEY................................................................35 III. PARTIES' REQUESTS FOR FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.......................35 IV. ARGUMENTS OF THE PARTIES AND THIRD PARTIES ............................................38 V. INTERIM REVIEW...............................................................................................................38 A. REQUESTS FOR REVIEW OF PRECISE ASPECTS OF THE INTERIM REPORT ...................................38 B. REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ECONOMY ...........................................................................................38 C. BURDEN OF PROOF ....................................................................................................................39 D. PARTIES' DUTY TO COLLABORATE ............................................................................................40 E. APPROPRIATE INFERENCES .......................................................................................................41 F. PANEL'S RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................................................41 G. ADDITIONAL REVISIONS AND CORRECTIONS ............................................................................43 VI. PRELIMINARY RULING BY THE PANEL ON THIRD PARTY RIGHTS..................43 VII. FINDINGS...............................................................................................................................45 A. BURDEN OF PROOF ....................................................................................................................45 B. THE DENIAL OR FAILURE TO GRANT LICENCES TO IMPORT RICE AT OR BELOW THE BOUND RATE OF DUTY...............................................................................................................48 1. The United States' claims .......................................................................................................48 2. Turkey's response ...................................................................................................................49 3. The challenged measure .........................................................................................................50 (a) The so-called "blanket prohibition" ..........................................................................................50 (b) The measure at issue .................................................................................................................51 (c) Conclusion ................................................................................................................................51 4. Order of analysis.....................................................................................................................52 5. Claim under Article 4.2 of the Agreement on Agriculture..................................................56 (a) Arguments of the parties...........................................................................................................56 (b) Article 4.2 of the Agreement on Agriculture ............................................................................57 (c) The Panel's analysis ..................................................................................................................57 WT/DS334/R Page iii (i) Importance of Article 4.2 of the Agreement on Agriculture......................................................57 (ii) Issues for the Panel's consideration..........................................................................................58 (iii) Has the United States produced evidence of the challenged measure?....................................59 (iv) Has Turkey produced evidence to rebut the presumption?.......................................................65 (v) Is
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Al-Jedda-Preliminary-Issue-Judgment
    Appeal No: SC/66/2008 Hearing Dates: 2nd – 4th and 7th July 2014 Date of Judgment: 18th July 2014 SPECIAL IMMIGRATION APPEALS COMMISSION Before: THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE FLAUX UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE WARR SIR STEWART ELDON Hilal Abdul Razzaq Ali AL-JEDDA APPELLANT and SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT RESPONDENT For the Appellant: Mr Tom Hickman and Ms Samantha Knights Instructed by: Public Interest Lawyers For the Respondent: Mr Jonathan Swift QC, Ms Karen Steyn QC and Mr Rupert Jones Instructed by: The Treasury Solicitor JUDGMENT Page 1 The Honourable Mr Justice Flaux: Introduction 1. On 1 November 2013, the Respondent (referred to hereafter as “the Secretary of State” made an order in exercise of the power under section 40(2) of the British Nationality Act 1981 as amended (“the 1981 Act”) depriving the appellant (referred to hereafter as “Mr Al-Jedda”) of his British citizenship. Mr Al-Jedda appeals against that order to the Commission pursuant to section 2B of the Special Immigration Appeals Commission Act 1997 (“the 1997 Act”). 2. By Order of Irwin J dated 13 February 2014, the Commission ordered the determination of the following preliminary issues: (1) Did the deprivation order made by the Secretary of State on 1 November 2013 render Mr Al-Jedda stateless contrary to section 40(4) of the 1981 Act (including the sub-issues of issue estoppel and abuse of process which are referred to in the Scott Schedule and the Grounds of Appeal)? (2) Is the Secretary of State required to provide a minimum level of disclosure and information about the case against Mr Al-Jedda pursuant to the requirements of the European Convention on Human Rights and/or European Union law? (3) Was the deprivation of citizenship unfair by failing to provide Mr Al- Jedda with an adequate opportunity to make representations to the Secretary of State before it was made? 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Background Check Procedures
    Shaping the future of international education New Edition Criminal Background Check Procedures CIS in collaboration with other agencies has formed an International Task Force on Child Protection chaired by CIS Executive Director, Jane Larsson, in order to apply our collective resources, expertise, and partnerships to help international school communities address child protection challenges. Member Organisations of the Task Force: • Council of International Schools • Council of British International Schools • Academy of International School Heads • U.S. Department of State, Office of Overseas Schools • Association for the Advancement of International Education • International Schools Services • ECIS CIS is the leader in requiring police background check documentation for Educator and Leadership Candidates as part of the overall effort to ensure effective screening. Please obtain a current police background check from your current country of employment/residence as well as appropriate documentation from any previous country/countries in which you have worked. It is ultimately a school’s responsibility to ensure that they have appropriate police background documentation for their Educators and CIS is committed to supporting them in this endeavour. It is important to demonstrate a willingness and effort to meet the requirement and obtain all of the paperwork that is realistically possible. This document is the result of extensive research into governmental, law enforcement and embassy websites. We have tried to ensure where possible that the information has been obtained from official channels and to provide links to these sources. CIS requests your help in maintaining an accurate and useful resource; if you find any information to be incorrect or out of date, please contact us at: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Binding the Almancı to the “Homeland” – Notes from Turkey
    Binding the Almancı to the “Homeland” – Notes from Turkey Barbara PUSCH* and Julia SPLITT* Abstract The Turkish- German migration movement particular, the last group- the young and highly did not start with the recruitment agreement educated- cannot be called returnees as such in 1961. However, with this agreement, as they were born in the country where their migration from Turkey became a new dynamic. forebears settled. However, this group of young As migration is usually accompanied by return and educated migrants is often lucky in the migration, we may also say that the Turkish- sense that their professional skills correspond to German migration movements have not been the needs of the Turkish labour market. While only characterised by the migration of Turkish previous returnees often drove taxis or delivery citizens to Germany, but also by their return. trucks, built rental houses or set up small Consequently, we can observe different types businesses and became part of the service sector, of return migration parallel to the changing they now work in many different sectors ranging nature of migration movements to Germany from arts and culture to telecommunications, in the last 50 years. Today, more than 50 years engineering, banking and are often involved in after the recruitment agreement, the population the global economy. In this article, we will first with Turkish migration background has give an overview of the return migration from significantly changed. For immigrants with the 1960s onwards. Then we will refer to the Turkish background in Germany, we can return and reintegration policies of the Turkish identify several aspects, such as rising age, state.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey 2011 Progress Report
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 12.10.2011 SEC(2011) 1201 COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER TURKEY 2011 PROGRESS REPORT Accompanying the document COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2011-2012 {COM(2011) 666} EN EN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction.................................................................................................................. 3 1.1. Preface.......................................................................................................................... 3 1.2. Context ......................................................................................................................... 3 1.3. Relations between the EU and Turkey......................................................................... 3 2. Political criteria and enhanced Political dialogue ........................................................ 5 2.1. Democracy and the rule of law .................................................................................... 5 2.2. Human rights and the protection of minorities ............................................................ 5 2.3. Regional issues and international obligations............................................................ 20 3. Economic criteria....................................................................................................... 43 3.1. The existence of a functioning market economy ....................................................... 45 3.2. The capacity to cope with
    [Show full text]
  • Ayça Tunç Cox
    Chapter 12 HypHenated IdentItIes: tHe ReceptIon of tuRkIsH GeRman cInema In tHe tuRkIsH daIly pRess Ayça Tunç Cox The success of Turkish German filmmaker Fatih Akın initiated new debates on the identity of Turkish diasporic filmmakers in Germany. While star director Akın and other Turkish German filmmakers have been celebrated in the German media with the slogan “the new German cinema is Turkish,” the Turkish media seems to downplay the German side of their hyphenated identity.1 Instead, the Turkish press uses the achievements of these Turkish filmmakers in Germany to bolster a positive image for Turkey in an international context. In this essay, I am particularly concerned with how hyphenated identities, which allow for “simultaneous denial and acceptance of their cultural and ethnic specificities,” are reconstructed in Turkey in the context of wider Turkish politics (Mani 2007: 124). Investigating the reception of these filmmakers in the Turkish press sheds light on a number of pertinent issues. First, the Turkish press utilizes the success of the filmmakers in order to make a case about Turkey’s accession to the EU. The emotionally charged controversies surrounding Turkish German filmmakers suggest that more is at stake than just the reputations of individual filmmakers. Second, it also endeavors to establish a national sentiment about Turkish identity by making them appear more or even exclusively Turkish. Celebrating the international success of these hyphenated filmmakers seems to be intended to revive Turkish national pride. Particularly prominent in the press are nationalist discourses, which challenge the filmmakers’ ambiguous sense of belonging (for a comparative perspective, see Karolin Machtans in this volume).
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey: Minorities, Othering and Discrimination, Citizenship Claims
    Turkey: Minorities, Othering and Discrimination, Citizenship Claims Document Identifier D4.9 Report on 'Turkey: How to manage a sizable citezenry outside the country across the EU'. Version 1.0 Date Due 31.08.2016 Submission date 27.09.2016 WorkPackage WP4 Rivalling citizenship claims elsewhere Lead Beneficiary 23 BU Dissemination Level PU Change log Version Date amended by changes 1.0 26.09.2016 Hakan Yilmaz Final deliverable sent to coordinator after implementing review comments. Partners involved number partner name People involved 23 Boğaziçi University Prof. dr. Hakan Yilmaz and Çağdan Erdoğan Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................... 4 PART I) MINORITIES IN TURKEY: HISTORICAL EVOLUTION AND CONTEMPORARY SITUATION ...................... 5 1) A Brief History of Minority Groups in Turkey .................................................................................... 5 2) The End of the Ottoman Millet System ............................................................................................ 5 3) Defining the Minority Groups in the Newly Emerging Nation- State ................................................ 6 4) What Happened to the Non-Muslim Population of Turkey? ............................................................. 7 5) What Happened to the Unrecognized Minorities in Turkey? .......................................................... 10 PART II) THE KURDISH QUESTION: THE PINNACLE OF THE
    [Show full text]
  • 'To Stay with a Family Member' (Foreign National)
    Application for admission and residence 'to stay with a family member’ (foreign national) To be filled in by the Dutch embassy or consulate Application submitted Passport photo at embassy/consulate: size 35 x 45 mm (width x height) Date Day Month Year Name and initials embassy employee File password (if applicable) Please note! If you have received a printed version of this information form, please check out the digital version, including direct links, on www.ind.nl. With this form, you apply for admission and residence in the Netherlands to stay with a family member. This family member is your sponsor. Your sponsor has the Dutch nationality, a Dutch residence permit and lives in the Netherlands or applies for admission and residence at the same time as you. You can only use this form if you are a foreign national staying outside the Netherlands. You can submit the application yourself if you are 12 years or older. If you want to submit an application for your minor child, you must have parental authority over your child. You submit the application to the Dutch embassy or consulate in the country of origin or the country of continuous residence.* Please check www.netherlandsworldwide.nl to find out whether and how you can make an appointment for this. * In case there is no Dutch consulate or embassy in your country of origin or permanent residence, please turn to the nearest Dutch representation. You can use this form in the following situations: • You are married to the sponsor or you have a registered partnership with the sponsor.
    [Show full text]
  • Integration Policies, Practices and Experiences; Turkey Country Report
    Working Papers Global Migration: Consequences and Responses Paper 2020/50, June 2020 Integration Policies, Practices and Experiences Turkey Country Report Susan Beth Rottmann Özyeğin University © Susan Beth Rottmann This research was conducted under the Horizon 2020 project ‘RESPOND Multilevel Governance of Migration and Beyond’ (770564). This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Commission. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the RESPOND Project consortium and author and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. The European Union is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to: [email protected] Suggested Citation: Rottmann, Susan Beth. (2020). “Integration: Policies, Practices and Experiences – Turkey Country Report,” RESPOND - Multilevel Governance of Mass Migration in Europe and Beyond Project (#770564, Horizon2020) Working Paper Series, Available at <https://www.respondmigration.com/>. This document is available for download at: https://www.respondmigration.com/ RESPOND: Multilevel Governance of Migration in Europe and Beyond (770564) RESPOND – 770564 Contents List of figures 5 List of tables 6 Acknowledgements 7 List of abbreviations 8 About the project 9 Executive summary 10 1. Introduction 12 1.1 Conceptualizing Integration 12 1.2 from Reception to Integration? 13 2. Methodology 15 2.1. Sampling and Data Gathering 15 2.2. Data Analysis and Limitations 16 3. Integration Policies: Legal, Political and Institutional Framework 18 3.1. Brief Background of Migration Policy Development 18 3.2 Introducing (non-)Integration Policy Discourses 18 3.3 Over Before it Started? Political Polarization and Return Discourses 20 3.4 The Partial and Tenuous Governance of Integration 21 3.5 Integration Governance Actors, Programmes and Differential Inclusion 23 State Actors 23 Local Municipalities 24 IOs and NGOs 26 Integration in Local Communities 29 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Application for the Purpose of Residence of 'Family Members And
    Application for the purpose of residence of ‘family members and relatives’ (sponsor) Read the explanation before you start to fill out the form. For whom is this form intended? You can use this form if you are a sponsor. A sponsor is someone who lives in the Netherlands and wants to bring a family member to the Netherlands, for example. A sponsor has Dutch nationality or a Dutch residence permit. A sponsor can use this form to submit an application for the foreign national. If you are a foreign national and you want to submit an application for yourself, you can use the form ‘Application form for a residence permit with the purpose of residence being ‘family members and relatives’ for the foreign national’. You are a sponsor. You can use this form to submit an application for the foreign national who wants to reside in the Netherlands on grounds of one of the following purposes of residence: • stay with spouse or (registered) partner; • stay with a parent; • stay as foreign adoptive child or foster child; • stay with a minor who holds an asylum permit; • stay with the holder of a medical residence permit; • stay with a family member who holds a residence permit on ‘temporary humanitarian grounds’ because he is in the terminal phase of an illness; or • stay in order to carry out family life on grounds of Article 8 of the ECHR; • stay with an under-age foreign national who holds a residence permit due to a family supervision order by the juvenile court. If you want to submit an application for your child you have to be the legal representative of your child.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkish Citizenship by Investment
    TURKISH CITIZENSHIP BY INVESTMENT CAPITAL LANGUAGES Ankara Turkish LARGEST CITY CURRENCY Istanbul Turkish Lira TIME ZONE POPULATION Eastern European Time Zone 81 Million (UTC+03:00) TOTAL AREA CLIMATE 783.562 km² Mediterranean, Balkan, Continental NEIGHBOURS VISA FREE COUNTRIES Greece, Bulgaria, Georgia, 148 Visa Free Destinations Armenia, Iran, Iraq, Syria www.ketencilaw.com TURKEY * Safe and happy environment for the family * One of the largest and strongest economies in * Regional Powerhouse the World * Muslim Country offering Democratic, Secular * G20, NATO Member and Western lifestyle * EU Candidate Country * Very hospitable and welcoming manner to * Prospective Visa free travel for all Turkish foreigners Citizens to EU (Schengen zone) soon * Perfectly located between Europe, Asia and * High GDP per capita the Middle East * Easy to do Business * Excellent food and rich Turkish cuisine * Strong, Independent Legal System and Courts * Superb Educational Facilities * Fair Tax System * Superb Health Facilities * Easy to obtain long-term, multiple visa entry * High Quality of Life to EU, US, Canada, UK and Australia for * Fantastic natural environment Turkish citizens * Wonderful climate throughout the year * Opportunity to relocate and live in Istanbul, one of the most beautiful and developed towns in the World or any other part of Turkey BENEFITS OF TURKEY CITIZENSHIP BY INVESTMENT Citizenship in 6 Spouse and Children Immediate Residency Valid for Life Citizenship Months only Below 18 Included Permit issued after Transferrable to investment Descendents TURKISH CITIZENSHIP BY INVESTMENT * Safe and happy environment for the family LEGAL BASIS * Regional Powerhouse * Muslim Country offering Democratic, Secular Turkish Citizenship by Investment (TCBI) programme has been introduced by the Turkish Government and Western lifestyle with the amendment of Turkish Citizenship Law numbered 5901 on 19th September 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Security RS&RM Contents
    Physical Security RS&RM Contents 1 Security 1 1.1 Perceived security compared to real security ............................... 1 1.2 Categorizing security ........................................... 2 1.3 Security concepts ............................................. 2 1.4 Security at home .............................................. 2 1.5 Security management in organizations ................................... 2 1.6 See also .................................................. 3 1.7 References ................................................ 3 1.8 External links ............................................... 3 2 Physical security 4 2.1 Overview ................................................. 4 2.2 Elements and design ............................................ 4 2.2.1 Deterrence methods ....................................... 4 2.2.2 Intrusion detection and electronic surveillance .......................... 5 2.2.3 Access control .......................................... 6 2.2.4 Security personnel ........................................ 7 2.3 See also .................................................. 7 2.4 References ................................................. 7 3 Closed-circuit television 9 3.1 History .................................................. 9 3.1.1 Technology ............................................ 10 3.1.2 Application ............................................ 10 3.2 Uses .................................................... 10 3.2.1 Crime prevention ......................................... 10 3.2.2
    [Show full text]
  • Young Minds Rethinking the Mediterranean Young Minds Rethinking the Mediterranean
    YOUNG MINDS RETHINKING THE MEDITERRANEAN MINDS RETHINKING YOUNG This book is a compilation of the best papers presented by participants of the first “Euro-Mediterranean Forum for Young Researchers” in the following two categories: “Intercultural and Interreligious Dialogue” and “Euro-Mediterranean Relations”. YOUNG MINDS The event, which took place in Istanbul between April 13-15, 2011 was jointly organized by Global Political Trends Center (GPoT Center) of Istanbul Kültur University, Chios Institute for Mediterranean Affairs (CIMA), Center for International and European Studies (CIES) of the Kadir Has University and the Euro-Mediterranean Observatory RETHINKING of the Hellenic Centre for European Studies (EKEM). THE MEDITERRANEAN Authors: Nihan Akıncılar, Anna Alexieva, Jennifer Brindisi, Evinç Doğan, Amanda E. Rogers, Beatrice Schimmang Edited By: Mensur Akgün, Lenka Petková ISBN: 978-605-4233-66-3 YOUNG MINDS RETHINKING THE MEDITERRANEAN YOUNG MINDS RETHINKING THE MEDITERRANEAN Istanbul Kültür University Publication No. 159 ISBN: 978-605-4233-66-3 Edited by: Mensur Akgün & Lenka Peťková Proofreading: Onur Bayramoğlu & Natalie R. Chambers Prepared for publication by: Lenka Peťková Book Design and Cover: Myra Page Layout: Myra Printed by: İmak Ofset Basım Yayın San. Ve Tic. Ltd. Şti. Atatürk Cad. Göl Sok. No : 1, Yenibosna, Bahçelievler/İstanbul-Türkiye First Published: December 2011 Global Political Trends Center Istanbul Kültür University Atakoy Campus, Bakirkoy 34 156 Istanbul, Turkey I. Uluslararası İlişkiler II. Akdeniz Bölgesi Istanbul Kültür University Publisher Certificate No. 14505 Phone: +90 212 498 44 65 Fax: +90 212 498 44 05 www.gpotcenter.org Library Catalogue Details: Young Minds Rethinking The Mediterranean / ed. Mensur Akgün, Lenka Peťková. – Copyright© IKU, 2011 All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]