DOCSLIB.ORG

Equity Valuation – Understanding What's Important

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Equity Valuation – Understanding What's Important The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. Equity Valuation – Understanding what’s important November 2009 Helen Jewell, CFA 44-20-7552-9454 [email protected] Introduction • We are going to consider three of the most popular and effective valuation tools • Returns based analysis • Multiple Analysis • DCF • For each of them we are going to look at: • How they work • Why some work better than others, and…. • Why they are all simply different ways of looking at the same thing Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 2 Returns Based Analysis Key Idea It’s all about the value-added Excess value Actual Return CROCI created by a versus company Required Return WACC Versus Excess value Actual Value Total EV attributed by versus Gross Cash the market Invested Value Invested If these are out of For Director’s line, the stock is Cut, but can misvalued adjust Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 4 Why Does it Work? You invest $100m in some assets Your required return is 10% The actual The actual The actual return is 10% return is 20% return is 5% The investment The investment The investment should be worth should be worth should be worth $100m $200m $50m EV CROCI EV CROCI EV CROCI GCI WACC GCI WACC GCI WACC Value Creating Value Destroying Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 5 Calculating CROCI Operating cash flow Non-cash items and the company’s (ignoring Working Capital) financial structure have no impact, making plus after-tax interest and comparisons more meaningful lease expense Interest and Lease x (1 – Tax Rate) CROCI = Debt-Adjusted Cash Flow Gross Cash Invested Pre-depreciation and write off value of tangible and intangible assets Gross Assets plus Operating Depreciation policies do not impact this working capital plus capitalised figure leases plus investments Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 6 Companies are compared with the sector 1:1 line 2.0 Overvalued Line representing average valuation for the 1.5 sector Question: Why are these different? 1.0 DC score > 1 EV EV / GCI DC score < 1 0.5 Undervalued 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 CROCI/WACC Quartile 4 Quartile 3 Quartile 2 Quartile 1 Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 7 Why are these different? • Capex • Valuable assets which are not revalued (eg. Intangibles) • Growth….. Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 8 What about growth? • Absolute growth is not the driver of value • Why? • Growth isn’t always good • Returns, not growth, have historically been shown to drive valuations • Returns are more stable and consistent than growth Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 9 Growth isn’t always good! • If management are generating lower returns than required returns, then value will be destroyed • If management are generating higher returns than required returns, then value will be added Pri ce Down Price Stable Pri ce UP Value Destroyer Value Neutral Value Adding Return < Required return Return = Required return Return > Required return h G wt o ro od G Gr ad ow B th Growth Growth High Low Low High Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 10 Cash return spreads, not growth, drive valuation and performance Director’s Cut shows the highest correlation with market valuation over time in AEJ… …as well as in Japan 70% 70% 60% 60% 50% 50% 40% 40% 30% 30% 20% 20% R^2 across sectors 2000-2008 average 2000-2008 sectors R^2 across R^2 across sectors 2000-2008 average 2000-2008 sectors R^2 across 10% 10% 0% 0% EV/EBITDA vs. Div Yield vs. PE vs. EV/GCI vs. Div Yield vs. PE vs. EV/EBITDA vs. EV/GCI vs. Next year EBITDA growth Next year DPS growth Next year EPS growth CROCI/WACC Next year DPS growth Next year EPS growth Next year EBITDA growth CROCI/WACC Source: Goldman Sachs Research estimates, Gao Hua Securities Research estimates. The market values companies on returns : The correlation between capitalization of cash invested (EV vs. GCI) and economic return spread (CROCI vs. WACC) is significantly higher than between multiples and growth Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 11 Superior returns are more sustainable than superior growth Top-quartile returns more sustainable than growth in AEJ… …as well as in Japan 80% 90% Average years first quartile position is sustained: Average years first quartile position is sustained: CROCI: 2.4 years CROCI: 2.8 years Growth: 1.3 years 70% 80% Growth: 1.2 years op-quartile) op-quartile) 70% 60% More than 95% of companies display first About 95% of companies display first quartile quartile growth for 2 years or less. Approx. 85% growth for 2 years or less. Approx. 80% do not do not make it past 1 year make it past 1 year 60% 50% 50% 40% 40% 30% CROCI is much more sustainable, with approx. 30% of 30% companies that ever returned a top quartile CROCI, holding the CROCI is much more sustainable, with more than 35% of position for longer than 3 consecutive years companies that ever returned a top quartile CROCI, holding the 20% position for 3 consecutive years and longer 20% 10% 10% Percentage of companies (at least one inyear the t Percentage of companies (atinyear of least one Percentage companies the t 0% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Number of consecutive years in first quartile Number of consecutive years in first quartile First quartile CROCI First quartile Growth First quartile CROCI First quartile Growth Source: Company data, Goldman Sachs Research estimates, Gao Hua Securities Research estimates. And understanding the sustainability of returns is critical for valuation…… Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 12 Taking the methodology one step further – understanding the behaviour of Q1 and Q4 CROCI companies • Companies who have Q1 CROCI and who can sustain this level of CROCI will be ascribed a premium by the market (they may appear to be overvalued but they are not). The size of the premium depends on how long they will stay as a Q1 CROCI stock • Companies who move into Q1 CROCI but for who the market does not believe this to be sustainable will not re-rate (they may appear to be undervalued but they are not) • Companies which are Q4 have a floor valuation and so trade at a premium to the line. The size of the premium depends on whether they are a sustained loser or not Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 13 The adjusted Director’s Cut methodology – looking at the duration of value addition/destruction Sustainable leaders: Valuation premium increases over time, up to c.10% premium Unsustainable leaders: Trade at a c.10% valuation EV/GCI EV/GCI Unsustained disadvantage: discount Trade at a c.20% premium Sustained Quartile 4 Quartile 1 disadvantage: Trade at a c.5% CROCI/WACC premium Source: Goldman Sachs Research estimates Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 14 Industry Leaders: Sustained advantage greater than four years is reflected in the valuation premium Average premium/(discount) ascribed to stocks sustaining top-quartile CROCI for 1-6 years 20% Similar to our analysis in Europe, we find 15% that 4 years of return sustainability is the key. There is a valuation premium for 39 24 companies sustaining top-quartile CROCI for 4 years or more and a valuation CROCI/WACC 10% discount for companies sustaining top 56 quartile CROCI for 3 years or less 5% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 82 -5% -10% 141 Number of companies -15% 260 Valuation Premium/Discount to sector avg vs. avg EV/GCI to sector Premium/Discount Valuation -20% Number of consecutive years in first quartile Source: Goldman Sachs Research. Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 15 Industry Laggards: Sustained disadvantage leads to a lower valuation premium, which disappears after 4 years Average premium/(discount) ascribed to stocks sustaining bottom-quartile CROCI for 1-6 years 25% 20% 504 209 WHY? Number of companies CROCI/WACC 15% 10% 101 5% 56 0% 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 -5% 15 -10% Valuation Premium/Discount to sector avg EV/GCI vs. EV/GCI to avg sector Valuation Premium/Discount -15% Number of consecutive years in fourth quartile Source: Goldman Sachs Research. Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 16 Sustained laggards tend to revert to an asset- based valuation Continuous fourth-quartile CROCI companies find a floor at about 0.34X sector relative EV/GCI in AEJ… …and 0.27X in Japan 0.60x 0.60x 0.55x 0.55x 0.50x 0.50x 0.45x 0.45x 0.40x 0.40x 0.35x Sector Relative EV/GCI Sector Relative 0.35x Sector EV/GCI Sector Relative 0.30x 0.30x 0.25x 0.25x 0.20x 0.20x 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Number of years in fourth quartile Number of years in fourth quartile Source: Goldman Sachs Research. While CROCI may trend towards zero (or negative), enterprise values are unlikely to converge towards zero due to potential for sale or break-up, hence sustained laggards find a floor Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 17 Sustainable returns…..GS SUSTAIN GS SUSTAIN identifies companies which stand out for their superior performance in each of the drivers of corporate performance: • Return on capital Identified by looking at CROCI quartile • Industry positioning Identified in collaboration with teams Using our ESG Management quality with respect to ESG issues • framework GS SUSTAIN focus list performance YTD Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 18 Backtesting shows consistent alpha generated 75% The Director’s Cut basic methodology generated 47% long/short performance in Asia on average (2000-200 60% 45% 30% 15% 0% 2000 Source: Goldman Sachs Research.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CFA Level 1 Financial Ratios Sheet
    CFA Level 1 Financial Ratios Sheet Activity Ratios Solvency ratios Ratio calculation Activity ratios measure how efficiently a company performs Total debt Debt-to-assets day-to-day tasks, such as the collection of receivables and Total assets management of inventory. The table below clarifies how to Total debt Dept-to-capital calculate most of the activity ratios. Total debt + Total shareholders’ equity Total debt Dept-to-equity Total shareholders’ equity Activity Ratios Ratio calculation Average total assets Financial leverage Cost of goods sold Total shareholders’ equity Inventory turnover Average inventory Number of days in period Days of inventory on hands (DOH) Coverage Ratios Ratio calculation Inventory turnover EBIT Revenue or Revenue from credit sales Interest coverage Receivables turnover Interest payements Average receivables EBIT + Lease payements Number of days Fixed charge coverage Days of sales outstanding (DSO) Interest payements + Lease payements Receivable turnover Purchases Payable Turnover Average payables Profitability Ratios Number of days in a period Number of days of payables Payable turnover Profitability ratios measure the company’s ability to Revenue generate profits from its resources (assets). The table below Working capital turnover Average working capital shows the calculations of these ratios. Revenue Fixed assets turnover Average fixed assets Return on sales ratios Ratio calculation Revenue Total assets turnover Average total assets Gross profit Gross profit margin Revenue Operating profit Operating margin Liquidity Ratios Revenue EBT (Earnings Before Taxes) Pretax margin Liquidity ratios measure the company’s ability to meet its Revenue short-term obligations and how quickly assets are converted Net income Net profit margin into cash. The following table explains how to calculate the Revenue major liquidity ratios.
    [Show full text]
  • Mortgage-Equity and 9 Residual Valuation Techniques
    MORTGAGE-EQUITY AND 9 RESIDUAL VALUATION TECHNIQUES Introduction In this chapter we move from the stable income, all-cash world depicted in the previous chapter, to the reality that property is typically purchased with financing, creating debt leverage. Our focus is the mortgage- equity or M-E technique. This valuation technique is founded on the premise that the overall rate should reflect the importance of separate yields attributable to the equity position and to the debt position. The M-E technique is not as commonly used as capitalization or discounted cash flow in everyday real estate practice. However, the M-E technique is helpful in certain situations to: $ determine overall rates; $ derive building and land capitalization rates for residual techniques; $ analyze the capitalization rates derived through other techniques; $ test separately determined value estimates; or $ graphically analyze financial components of an overall rate.1 This chapter begins with some history on the evolution of the M-E method. Early valuation methods did not consider the impact of mortgage financing. To explore this impact, economists in the 1950s developed new valuation techniques, the first of which was Band of Investment or BOI. Roughly speaking, BOI can be considered a forerunner to the mortgage-equity method, so in order to better understand M-E, it is useful to have a quick primer on its BOI predecessor. The goal of BOI is to determine an overall capitalization rate by building up the rate from the key factors that investors consider when making an investment decision. These factors include: • The initial loan-to-value ratio; • Interest rate on the loan; • The entrepreneur’s equity investment; and • The rate of return on investment expected.
    [Show full text]
  • Return on Assets and Its Decomposition Into Operating and Non- Operating Segments
    International Journal of Latest Engineering and Management Research (IJLEMR) ISSN: 2455-4847 www.ijlemr.com || Volume 02 - Issue 09 || September 2017 || PP. 22-31 Return on Assets and Its Decomposition into Operating and Non- Operating Segments C.A. (Dr.) Pramod Kumar Pandey Associate Professor, National Institute of Financial Management, Faridabad Abstract: Return on total assets (ROA) is a significant indicator of growth of business operations of an entity. It is broader concept than Return on equity (ROE) and Return on investment (ROI). Increase in Return on total assets (ROA) creates wealth for all stakeholders as against Return on Equity (ROE) which creates returns only for Equity Shareholders. This paper has analyzed Return on total assets (ROA), Return on equity (ROE) and Earnings per share (EPS) after decomposition of each into operating and non-operating segments. This paper concludes that for better financial analysis both operating and non-operating segments of return on total assets (ROA), Return on investment (ROE) and Earnings per share (EPS) should be analyzed. Keywords: ROA, ROI, ROE, Operating and Non-operating JEL CLASSIFICATION: M41, G32, G33 and G34 I. Introduction Return on total assets (ROA) is a significant indicator of growth of business operations of an entity. It is broader concept than return on equity (ROE) and return on investment (ROI). Increase in Return on total assets (ROA) creates wealth for all stakeholders as against Return on Equity (ROE) which creates returns only for Equity Shareholders. Further, Return on investment (ROI) takes into consideration only shareholders and lenders but ignores current liabilities. It tells how much return has been generated by investing Rupee one of the capital employed.
    [Show full text]
  • Equity Valuation Using Multiples: an Empirical Investigation
    Equity Valuation Using Multiples: An Empirical Investigation DISSERTATION of the University of St.Gallen Graduate School of Business Administration, Economics, Law and Social Sciences (HSG) to obtain the title of Doctor of Business Administration submitted by Andreas Schreiner from Austria Approved on the application of Prof. Dr. Klaus Spremann and Prof. Dr. Thomas Berndt Dissertation no. 3313 Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, Wiesbaden 2007 The University of St. Gallen, Graduate School of Business Administration, Eco- nomics, Law and Social Sciences (HSG) hereby consents to the printing of the pre- sent dissertation, without hereby expressing any opinion on the views herein ex- pressed. St. Gallen, January 22, 2007 The President: Prof. Ernst Mohr, Ph.D. Foreword Accounting-based market multiples are the most common technique in equity valuation. Multiples are used in research reports and stock recommendations of both buy-side and sell-side analysts, in fairness opinions and pitch books of investment bankers, or at road shows of firms seeking an IPO. Even in cases where the value of a corporation is primarily determined with discounted cash flow, multiples such as P/E or market-to-book play the important role of providing a second opinion. Mul- tiples thus form an important basis of investment and transaction decisions of vari- ous types of investors including corporate executives, hedge funds, institutional in- vestors, private equity firms, and also private investors. In spite of their prevalent usage in practice, not so much theoretical back- ground is provided to guide the practical application of multiples. The literature on corporate valuation gives only sparse evidence on how to apply multiples or on why individual multiples or comparable firms should be selected in a particular context.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Changes in Return on Assets, Return on Equity, and Economic Value Added to the Stock Price Changes and Its Impact on Earnings Per Share
    Research Journal of Finance and Accounting www.iiste.org ISSN 2222-1697 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2847 (Online) Vol.6, No.6, 2015 The Effect of Changes in Return on Assets, Return on Equity, and Economic Value Added to the Stock Price Changes and Its Impact on Earnings Per Share Dyah Purnamasari Lecturer of Widyatama University Bandung & Doctoral Students of Management Department, Faculty of Economics and Business, Pansudan University, Bandung, Indonesia 1. Introduction Along with the development of economic globalization are experiencing rapid change and development, the reality show that will affect the development of the business world. Competition between firms regional, national, and international heavier. Companies are required to be able to withstand competition in the continuity of the wheels of business. Companies are not only to be able to compete in the trade market, but also in the capital markets. The capital market is a means to make investments that allow investors to diversify investments, forming a portfolio according to the risk they were willing to bear the expected profit rate. Investments in securities are also liquid (easily changed), therefore it is important for the company always pay attention to the interests of the owners of capital by way of maximizing the value of the company, because the value of the company is a measure of the success of the operations are financial functions. Capital markets and securities industry is one of the indicators to assess a country's economy going well or not. This is due to the company in the stock market are large companies and credible in the country concerned, so if there is a decrease in the performance of the stock market can be said to have occurred also a decline in the performance of the real sector (Sutrisno, 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Deutsche Bank Securities Complaint
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 450 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20549-0801, Plain tiff, COMPLAINT - against - DEUTSCHE BANK SECURITIES INC., 31 West 52nd Street New York, New York 10019, Defendant. Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission" or "SEC") alleges: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. The Commission brings this action against defendant Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. ("Deutsche Bank" or "Defendant") to redress Deutsche Bank's violations of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act"), the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act"), and rules of NASD Inc. ("NASD") and the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. ("NYSE"). 2. From July 1999 through June 2001 (the "relevant period"), Deutsche Bank engaged in acts and practices that created and/or maintained inappropriate.influence by investment banking over research analysts, thereby creating conflicts of interest for its research analysts. Deutsche Bank failed to manage these conflicts in an adequate manner. During this time period, Deutsche Bank offered research coverage in order to gain investment banking business and receive investment banking fees. It also received over $1 million from other investment banks to provide research coverage of their investment banking clients, and made payments of approxiniately $10 million to other securities finns primarily for research coverage for its investment banking clients. In addition, Deutsche Bank compensated its research analysts based in part upon their contributions to Deutsche Bank's investment banking business. These relationships and activities constituted substantial conflicts of interest for Deutsche Bank's research analysts. 3. Deutsche Bank failed to establish and maintain adequate policies and procedures reasonably designed to manage these conflicts of interest.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Earning Per Share and Return on Equity on Stock Price
    SA ymTsuHltRifaeEcvetePIdMhreavirePwmjoA2ur0nCa2l Ti0n;t1hOe1fi(eF6ld)o:Ef1ph2Aa8rmR5a-cNy12I8N9 G PER SHARE AND RETURN ON EQUITY ON STOCK PRICE a JaDajeapnagrtBmaednrtuozfaAmcacnounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Siliwangi University of Tasikmalaya [email protected] ABSTRACT Research conducted to determine the effect of Earning Per Share and Return on Equity on Stock Prices, a survey on the Nikkei 225 Index of issuers in 2018 on the Japan Stock Exchange. the number of issuers in this study was 57 issuers. The data taken is the 2018 financial report data. Based on the results of data processing with the SPSS version 25 program shows that Earning Per Share and Return on Equity affect the Stock Price of 67.3% and partially Earning Per Share has a positive effect on Stock Prices. Furthermore, Return on Equity has a negative effect on Stock Prices. If compared to these two variables, EPS has the biggest and significant influence on stock prices, however, Return on Equity has a negative effect on stock prices Keywords: Earning Per Share, Return on Equity and Stock Price INTRODUCTION Investors will be sure that the investment can have a People who invest their money in business are interested positive impact on investors. Thus, eps is very important in the return the business is earning on that capital, for investors in measuring the success of management in therefore an important decision faced by management in managing a company. EPS can reflect the profits obtained relation to company operations is the decision on the use by the company in utilizing existing assets in the of financial resources as a source of financing for the company.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Growth Rate, Optimal Growth Rate, and Optimal Payout Ratio: a Joint Optimization Approach
    Sustainable Growth Rate, Optimal Growth Rate, and Optimal Payout Ratio: A Joint Optimization Approach Hong-Yi Chen Rutgers University E-mail: [email protected] Manak C. Gupta Temple University E-mail: [email protected] Alice C. Lee* State Street Corp., Boston, MA, USA E-mail: [email protected] Cheng-Few Lee Rutgers University E-mail: [email protected] March 2011 * Disclaimer: Views and opinions presented in this publication are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of State Street Corporation, which is not associated in any way with this publication and accepts no liability for its contents. Sustainable Growth Rate, Optimal Growth Rate, and Optimal Payout Ratio: A Joint Optimization Approach Abstract Based upon flexibility dividend hypothesis DeAngelo and DeAngelo (2006), Blua Fuller (2008), and Lee et al. (2011) have reexamined issues of dividend policy. However, they do not investigate the joint determination of growth rate and payout ratio. The main purposes of this paper are (1) to extend Higgins’ (1977, 1981, and 2008) sustainable growth by allowing new equity issue, and (2) to derive a dynamic model which jointly optimizes growth rate and payout ratio. By allowing growth rate and number of shares outstanding simultaneously change over time, we optimize the firm value to obtain the optimal growth rate and the steady state growth rate in terms of a logistic equation. We show that the steady state growth rate can be used as the bench mark for mean reverting process of the optimal growth rate. Using comparative statics analysis, we analyze how the optimal growth rate can be affected by the time horizon, the degree of market perfection, the rate of return on equity, and the initial growth rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Credit Rating - Role in Modern Financial System
    IRJC International Journal of Marketing, Financial Services & Management Research Vol.1 Issue 8, August 2012, ISSN 2277 3622 CREDIT RATING - ROLE IN MODERN FINANCIAL SYSTEM K.S.VENKATESWARA KUMAR*; S. HANUMANTHA RAO** *Assistant Professor, KLU Business School, K L University, Greenfields, Vaddeswaram, Guntur – 522502. **Assistant Professor, MBA Department, Vignan University, Vadlamudi, Guntur – 522213. ABSTRACT Credit rating business is a niche segment in the financial services arena. In the post-reforms era, with increased activity in the Indian Financial sector both existing and new companies are opting for finance from the capital market. The competition among firms for a slice of the savings cake has increased. Credit rating business in India is a sweet spot as it is on the cusp of robust growth potential, driven by three triggers: Strong capex cycle in Indian economy, lower penetration of corporate bond market and regulatory push due to implementation of Basel II norms. Credit rating helps in the development of financial markets. Credit rating is an investor service and a rating agency is expected to maintain the highest possible level of analytical competence and integrity. The analytical framework of rating deals with evaluation of both the business and financial risks associated with that entity. Besides qualitative aspects like management capabilities also play a considerable role in determining a rating. Credit ratings establish a link between risk & return. They thus provide a yardstick against which to measure the risk inherent in any instrument. Analytical framework of rating deals with evaluation of both the business & financial risks associated with that entity. The Reserve Bank of India liaises with SEBI, on the issue of rating agencies’ adherence to IOSCO Code of Conduct Fundamentals.
    [Show full text]
  • Earnings Yield As a Predictor of Return on Assets, Return on Equity, Economic Value Added and the Equity Multiplier
    Modern Economy, 2017, 8, 10-24 http://www.scirp.org/journal/me ISSN Online: 2152-7261 ISSN Print: 2152-7245 Earnings Yield as a Predictor of Return on Assets, Return on Equity, Economic Value Added and the Equity Multiplier Rebecca Abraham, Judith Harris, Joel Auerbach Huizenga College of Business, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA How to cite this paper: Abraham, R., Abstract Harris, J. and Auerbach, J. (2017) Earnings Yield as a Predictor of Return on Assets, This study identifies earnings yield as a measure of financial performance that Return on Equity, Economic Value Added is based on a firm’s ability to sell profitable goods. It excludes the irrationality and the Equity Multiplier. Modern Econo- that can confound market-based measures of financial performance by em- my, 8, 10-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/me.2017.81002 phasizing a firm’s ability to earn profits as the indicator of superior perfor- mance. For the full sample, the differential effects of earnings yield on return Received: December 5, 2016 on assets, return on equity, stock returns, economic value added and the eq- Accepted: January 6, 2017 uity multiplier are determined for firms of different size and volatility. The Published: January 9, 2017 analysis is conducted both across industries and within the oil and gas, com- Copyright © 2017 by authors and puter software, biotechnology and retail industries. For the full sample of Scientific Research Publishing Inc. NASDAQ stocks from 2010-2014, earnings yield significantly explained re- This work is licensed under the Creative turn on assets, return on equity, stock returns, economic value added and the Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0).
    [Show full text]
  • S Ecurities Research Analyst
    JOHN G. ULLMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. – SECURITIES RESEARCH ANALYST John G. Ullman & Associates, Inc. has an incredible opportunity for entry level and experienced Securities Research Analysts to join our growing firm. We are a Registered Investment Advisor, Fee Only Wealth Management Firm. Our team is fully committed to serving clients as a unique, single source, for their financial needs. The firm is positioned to expand tremendously and these essential positions will plan a significant role in our strategic plans for growth. Role: Working from our Headquarters in Corning, NY, our Securities Research Analysts are part of a Securities Research Team now managing over $1 billion in stocks and bonds. Securities Research Analysts will develop, research, and present to the Investment Committee, new equity ideas that align with the firm’s balanced investment management philosophy. As a member of the Investment Committee, actively participate in buy, sell and hold discussions, including price points and size of the buy/sell recommendation. The research process includes relative and intrinsic analysis, as well as speaking with company representatives and others within the industry. Provide expertise to the Investment Committee on numerous areas of investment research, including macroeconomics effects and sector trends that may affect stocks, bonds, currencies, commodities and any other area in which a client may have a concern. Participate with asset allocation decisions, including cash levels, equity and bond exposure and any unique bond strategies. Assist the Trading Department with bond research as needed, especially the U.S. municipal market. Develop and maintain relationships to support and assist the firm’s financial advisors and client relationship managers with client investment needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on the Enterprise Sustainable Growth and the Leverage Mechanism
    Vol. 4, No. 3 International Journal of Business and Management Study on the Enterprise Sustainable Growth and the Leverage Mechanism Rui Huang & Guiying Liu College of Industry and Commerce Administration Tianjin Polytechnic University Tianjin 300387, China E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The sustainable growth is the necessary condition for the survival and the development of the enterprise, and it is thought as the scale to measure the strength of the enterprise. In this article, we first compared the James·C·VanHorne sustainable growth model and the Robert·C·Higgins sustainable growth model, and analyzed the main mechanism of two sorts of leverage, i.e. the influencing degree of different intervals to the profits, and established the sustainable growth model based on the leverage effect, and simply validated the data. The sustainable growth model based on the leverage effect could make the investors consider the functions of two sorts of leverage, design various financial indexes suiting for the survival and development of the enterprise, reasonably invest and finance to realize the sustainable growth of the enterprise before they grasp the investment and financing situation of the enterprise. Keywords: Enterprise sustainable growth, Degree of Operating Leverage (DOL), Degree of Financial Leverage (DFL) 1. Introduction The financial idea of the sustainable growth means the actual growth of the enterprise must harmonized with its resources. The quicker growth will induce the shortage of the corporate resources and even the financial crisis or bankruptcy. And slower growth will make the corporate resources can not be effective utilized, which will also induce the survival crisis of the enterprise.
    [Show full text]