2019-20 SUHSD Bus Routes
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2012 Traffic Volumes on California State Highways
2012 Traffic Volumes on California State Highways 2012 TRAFFIC VOLUMES ON THE CALIFORNIA STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE TRANSPORTATION AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF TRAFFIC OPERATIONS Sacramento, CA 95814 916-654-4578 Prepared in Cooperation with the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Highway Administration To Purchase This Book Price $15.00 Phone: 916-263-0822 PREFACE Traffic Trend A comparison of the 2012 over 2011 annual traffic volume data shows that state highway travel increased in 2012. This year’s increase in vehicle miles of travel on California highways compares with prior years as follows: *2012 over 2011………………………………………………………………….+ 0.24% *2011 over 2010…………………………………………………………………..- 1.1% 2010 over 2009…………………………………………………………………..- 0.2% 2009 over 2008…………………………………………………………………..- 0.6% 2008 over 2007…………………………………………………………………..+3.5% Traffic Profile This booklet lists 2012 traffic volumes for all count locations on the California state highway system. Peak hours, peak month ADTs and annual ADTs are shown at each count location. Significant volume changes (breakpoints) in the traffic profile along each route are counted and identified by name and milepost value. In addition to the profile breakpoints, the booklet lists county lines and landmarks to aid in orientation. The numbers shown in this booklet apply to the highway immediately back and ahead of the locations. Therefore, between any two successive breakpoints along the route it may be assumed that traffic volumes will vary from one breakpoint to the next at a reasonably uniform rate of increase or decrease. Where only a single set of figures appears between two breakpoints, a constant volume of traffic may be assumed for the intervening section of highway. -
Traffic Volumes on California State Highways
1988 traffic volumes on california state highways •lbllmn, I ' ,,_l :s~ 1988 TRAFFIC VOLUMES ON THE CALIFORNIA STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM STATE OF CALIFORNIA BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Sacramento, CA 94274 916-445-5163 Prepared in Cooperation with the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Highway Administration Price $6.00 LACMTA i.iBAARY HE 371 .c2 T72 1988 PREFACE Traffic Trend A comparison of the 1988 and 1987 annual traffic volume data shows that state highway travel increased 5.4% in 1988. This year's increase in vehicle-miles of travel on California highways compares with prior years as follows: 1988 over 1987 .................................................................. + 5.4%' 1987 over 1986 .................................................................. + 8.3%' 1986 over 1985 .................................................................. + 5.2% 1985 over 1984 .................................................................. + 4.5% 1984 over 1983 .................................................................. + 5.7% Annual Average Rate. 1983-1988 .................................. + 5.8% ' = Preliminary. The percent change is based on 22 control stations which indicate the statewide trend. " = Revised. The percent change is based on 7.000 ± profile points. Traffic Profile This booklet lists 1988 traffic volumes for all count locations on the California state highway system. Peak hours. peak month ADTs and annual ADTs are shown at each count location. Significant volume changes (breakpoints) in the traffic profile along each route are counted and identified by name and milepost value. In addition to the profile breakpoints. the booklet lists county lines and well-known landmarks to aid in orientation. The figures shown in the booklet above each profile breakpoint apply to the highway immediately back of the breakpoint and the figures shown below apply immediately ahead of the breakpoint. -
Sam Atsro/4 International Civil Aviation Organization
SAM ATSRO/4 INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION South American Regional Office Regional Project RLA/06/901 FINAL REPORT FOURTH SAM WORKSHOP/MEETING ON ATS ROUTES NETWORK OPTIMISATION (SAM ATSRO/4) (Lima, Peru, 2 to 6 July 2012) The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of ICAO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. SAM ATSRO/4 i - Index i-1 INDEX i - Index ........................................................................................................................................ i-1 ii - History of the Meeting........................................................................................................... ii-1 Place and duration of the Meeting ......................................................................................... ii-1 Opening ceremony and other matters .................................................................................... ii-1 Schedule, Organization, Working Methods, Officers and Secretariat .................................. ii-1 Working languages ................................................................................................................ ii-1 Agenda ................................................................................................................................... ii-1 Attendance ............................................................................................................................ -
2020-Title-VI-Program-Update-Final
FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION FY 2020 TITLE VI PROGRAM UPDATE CENTRAL FLORIDA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 455 N. Garland Avenue Orlando, Florida 32801 (407) 841-2279 www.golynx.com April 2020 FY 2020 TITLE VI PROGRAM PLAN UPDATE ® TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................1 1.1 Title VI Program Policy Statement .........................................................................................1 1.2 Major Accomplishments since the FY 2017 Title VI Plan Submittal ..........................................2 1.3 Pending Financial Awards for FY 2020 ...................................................................................2 1.4 Checklists ............................................................................................................................2 2.0 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS & GUIDELINES.................................................................................5 2.1 Providing Title VI Assurances ................................................................................................5 2.2 Promoting Inclusive Public Participation ................................................................................6 2.3 Providing Meaningful Access to LEP Persons ........................................................................ 11 2.4 Minority Representation .................................................................................................... 14 2.5 Providing Assistance -
Historical Significance - Local Agency Bridges March 2019 District 01 Del Norte County Bridge Bridge Name Location Historical Significance Year Number Built
Structure Maintenance & SM&I Investigations Historical Significance - Local Agency Bridges March 2019 District 01 Del Norte County Bridge Bridge Name Location Historical Significance Year Number Built 01C0001 HOPPOW CREEK 500' E OF RT 101/169 SEP 5. Bridge not eligible for NRHP 1965 01C0002 HOPPOW CREEK WEST OF ROUTE 101/169 SEP 5. Bridge not eligible for NRHP 1965 01C0006 MIDDLE FORK SMITH RIVER 0.05 MI SE JCT SR199 5. Bridge not eligible for NRHP 1956 01C0008 GILBERT CREEK 0.8 MI S OF RT 101 5. Bridge not eligible for NRHP 1947 01C0009 ROWDY CREEK 1.75 MI E OF RTE 101 5. Bridge not eligible for NRHP 1962 01C0010 MIDDLE FORK SMITH RIVER 0.1 MILE N/O RTE 199 5. Bridge not eligible for NRHP 1960 01C0011 HUNTER CREEK 0.1 MI WEST OF RT101 5. Bridge not eligible for NRHP 1949 01C0012 SALT CREEK 0.4 MI WEST OF RTE 101 5. Bridge not eligible for NRHP 1958 01C0015 ROWDY CREEK 1/2 MI S OF RTE 101 5. Bridge not eligible for NRHP 1989 01C0017 JORDAN CREEK 3.7 MI N OF RTE 101 5. Bridge not eligible for NRHP 1954 01C0018 ELK CREEK 0.1 MILE NE/O RTE 199 5. Bridge not eligible for NRHP 1925 01C0020 SALT CREEK 0.1 MI N/O REQUA RD 5. Bridge not eligible for NRHP 1975 01C0022 SHEEP PEN CREEK 0.74 MI S/O SOUTH FORK RD 5. Bridge not eligible for NRHP 1975 01C0032 EIGHTEEN MILE CREEK 5 MI FROM ROUTE 199 5. -
Organización De Aviación Civil Internacional / International Civil
SAM ATSRO/7 INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION South American Regional Office RLA/06/901 Regional Project SEVENTH SAM MEETING ON ATS ROUTES NETWORK OPTIMISATION (SAM ATSRO/7) FINAL REPORT Lima, Peru, 12 to 16 October 2015 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of ICAO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. i-1 i – Index SAM ATSRO/7 INDEX i - Index .............................................................................................................................................. i-1 ii - History of the Meeting .................................................................................................................. ii-1 Place and duration of the Meeting ................................................................................................ ii-1 Opening ceremony and other matters ........................................................................................... ii-1 Schedule, organization, working methods, Officers and Secretariat ............................................ ii-1 Working languagues ..................................................................................................................... ii-1 Agenda .......................................................................................................................................... ii-1 Attendance -
Inventory No. 164 K V 4" UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT of AGRICULTURE Washington, D.C., April 1966
Inventory No. 164 k V 4" UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Washington, D.C., April 1966 t PLANT MATERIAL INTRODUCED JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 1956 (NOS. 230877 TO 236142) CONTENTS Page Inventory 3 Index of common and scientific names 227 This inventory, No. 164, lists the plant material (Nos. 230877 to :236142) received by the New Crops Research Branch, Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, during the period from Jan- uary 1 to December 31, 1956. From 1954 to 1957, the branch was known as the Plant Introduction Section, Horticultural Crops Re- search Branch, Agricultural Research Service, United States Depart- ment of Agriculture. The inventory is a historical record of plant material introduced for Department and other specialists and is not to be considered as a list of plant material for distribution. EUGENE GRIFFITH and HOWARD L. HTLAND, Botanists. Plant Industry Station, Beltsville, Md. INVENTORY 230877. CITRUS SINENSIS (L.) Osbeck Rutaceae. Sweet orange. From Spain. Presented by J. R. Jurr, Almeria. Received Jan. 3, 1956. 'Castellana'. Fruits round, early. 230878 to 230924. From the United States. Plants growing at the United States Plant Introduc- tion Station, Coconut Grove, Florida. Numbered Jan. 3, 1956. 230878. ALPHONSEA LUTEA Hook. f. & Thorn. Annonaceae. No. 14171. Grown from seeds presented by R. J. Godbey, Kendall, Fla. 230879. AMOORA ROHITUKA (Roxb.) Wight & Am. Miliaceae. No. 14249. From the Atkins Garden, Cienfuegos, Cuba. 230880. ANISOMELES SALVIAEFOLIA R. Br. Menthaceae. No. 14228. From E. A. Menninger, Stuart, Fla. 230881. BILLBERGIA PORTEANA Brongn. Bromeliaceae. No. 14185. 230882. BUTEA MONOSPERMA (Lam.) Taub. Fabaceae. Bengal kino. No. 14275. From the Atkins Garden, Cienfuegos, Cuba.