DOCSLIB.ORG

University of Virginia Law School Annual Report 2017–2018 University of Virginia Law School Annual Report 2017–2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
University of Virginia Law School Annual Report 2017–2018 University of Virginia Law School Annual Report 2017–2018 UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA LAW SCHOOL ANNUAL REPORT 2017–2018 UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA LAW SCHOOL ANNUAL REPORT 2017–2018 3 Dean’s Message 4 Leadership Report 6 Statement of Accounts 11 Summary of Contributions & Expenditures 13 Dean’s Council 13 Life Members 14 Associate Members 16 Highest % Participation: Regions and Classes 17 Largest Gift: Regions and Classes 18 100% Participation Program 22 Regional Summary 24 Reunion Gifts 27 53RD Giving Campaign 28 Annual Giving 2009–2018 29 Unrestricted Operating 2009–2018 29 Alumni With Consecutive Years of Giving 30 Class Participation Percentages 32 Class Participation 99 Estate Gifts 100 Deferred Legacy Gifts 103 Non-Alumni Contributors 103 Friends, Faculty, and Staff 107 Firms, Foundations, Corporations, and Organizations 109 Matching Gifts 111 In Memoriam 112 Gifts-in-Kind to the Arthur J. Morris Law Library 113 Law School Foundation Board of Trustees 114 Law School Alumni Council 115 Law School Foundation 2017–2018 ANNUAL REPORT 1 2 UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA SCHOOL OF LAW DEAN’S MESSAGE AST YEAR, FOR A 13TH YEAR IN A ROW, more than 50 percent of alumni participated in annual giving. That participation rate Ltranslates into over 8,900 alumni donors. We view each gift as a signal of your affection to this institution and your continuing connection to it. It says to us that you still cherish the professor who changed your life or your mind, the course you still rely on for your work, the friends you still text with each week. That is why every single gift counts. The more alumni who give, the more we know that you believe in our stewardship of this wonderful school. Our students are our raison d’etre, and you, our alumni, are our lifeblood. Your gifts to our endowment secure permanent funding for recurring needs like financial aid for our talented students and financial support for our renowned faculty. Your unrestricted gifts allow us to provide an unparalleled education and the premier student experience in legal education by allocating dollars where and as needed. Our students benefit from your generosity in the classroom, in the huge variety of events, activities, and publications that make the Law School a vibrant intellectual and professional community, and in the opportunities we are able to offer for service and experiential learning through clinics, pro bono projects, externships, and fellowships. That we succeed wildly in combining academic rigor and collegiality is not simply a matter of my (admittedly biased) opinion: Princeton Review this year ranked us #1 for best professors and #1 for best quality of life. Your commitment to annual giving makes that possible. This annual report showcases your support and our shared values and mission as we begin to celebrate two hundred years of UVA Law in 2019. You are our past, present, and future. You are the reason that a third century of excellence awaits us, and we thank you. Risa L. Goluboff, Dean Arnold H. Lean Professor of Law Professor of History 2017–2018 ANNUAL REPORT 3 LEADERSHIP REPORT We are pleased to report that the 2017–2018 Annual Giving Campaign finished with 8,926 alumni donors and a 51.4% participation rate. This was the thirteenth consecutive year alumni participation surpassed 50%. Alumni from the classes of 1934 to 2021 contributed, with the classes of 1950, 1957, 1968, and 2017 surpassing 70% participation. Thirty-nine classes met or exceeded a 50% participation rate. In regional results, alumni in nine geographic regions finished with a participation rate of at least 60%, while Birmingham/Huntsville/Montgomery achieved 70%. This year’s graduation gift campaign finished with 90% of the Class of 2018 making a pledge of future support. The following is a summary of the Foundation’s financial position and a report of the Alumni Association for the year ending June 30, 2018: LAW SCHOOL ENDOWMENT AND TOTAL ASSETS The Foundation holds more than $490 million in endowed and $22 million in non-endowed funds for the ben- efit of the Law School. In addition, the University holds $61 million and the Jefferson Scholars Foundation holds $4 million in endowed funds designated for the Law School. The combined value of these assets at June 30 exceeds $577 million. 2017–2018 CONTRIBUTIONS The 53rd Annual Giving Campaign raised $8.71 million. Gifts received by the Law School Foundation in fiscal year 2018, including annual giving, bequests, and special gifts, totaled $13.5 million. A total $4.8 million was for unrestricted current use. ALUMNI ASSOCIATION Last year Dean Risa Goluboff visited alumni at events in Atlanta, Birmingham, Boston, Charlotte, Charlottesville, Los Angeles, New York City, New Hampshire, Norfolk, Northern Virginia, Palo Alto, Richmond, Roanoke, San Francisco, and Washington, D.C. 4 UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA SCHOOL OF LAW This fall the Dean will meet alumni and friends in Charlottesville, Dallas, Houston, and Northern Virginia. The Law School will also host alumni receptions in Nashville, New York City, St. Louis, and Washington, D.C. The 2018 reunions were a great success, with a record 1,470 alumni and guests attending reunion weekend. The 2019 reunion weekend is scheduled for May 10–12 for the Classes of 1969, 1974, 1979, 1984, 1989, 1994, 1999, 2004, 2009, and 2014, and for the Lile Law Society (all alumni who have celebrated their 50th reunions). As always, all alumni are welcome to attend reunion weekend events regardless of their class year. As we reflect on the past year, we think it is important to take a collective moment to recognize not only our alumni and friends who have made a gift, but some of the reasons each of us has made the choice to support the Law School. Thank you for all you do to create and sustain our wonderful community. Best wishes, F. Blair Wimbush ’80 Virginia Beach, Virginia Chair, Law School Foundation Board of Trustees Harry A. Shannon III ’82 Rockbridge Baths, Virginia President, Law School Alumni Association Arthur D. Robinson ’88 New York, New York Chair, National Appeals Committee 2017–2018 ANNUAL REPORT 5 STATEMENT OF ACCOUNTS JULY 1, 2017 – JUNE 30, 2018 2017–2018 June 30, 2018 2017–2018 June 30, 2018 CONTRIBUTIONS MARKET VALUE CONTRIBUTIONS MARKET VALUE I. UNRESTRICTED FUNDS Warner Family $ – $ 410,789 Non-Endowed Unrestricted Funds Leigh D. Williams – 910,867 Current Use $ 4,109,447 $ 11,505,248 George A. and Elisabeth Dent Wilson – 19,861,612 Ernest L. Folk III 1,000 2,750 Stephen Clark Woodroe – 1,559,388 General Academic Programs – 3,515,611 Total Unrestricted Funds $ 4,892,609 $ 101,234,829 Jeff Horner Memorial – 12,700 Thatcher A. Stone 37,500 209,141 II. UNRESTRICTED REUNION FUNDS Class of 1968 Reunion $ 231,586 $ – Endowed Unrestricted Funds Class of 1978 Reunion 127,758 – Arnold R. Boyd $ – $ 1,029,878 Class of 1993 Reunion 145,698 – Andre W. Brewster ’48 Memorial – 295,724 Class of 2003 Reunion 57,834 – E. Fontaine Broun – 1,631,467 Class of 2008 Reunion 39,651 – David C. Burke ’93 100,000 100,000 Class of 2013 Reunion 15,413 – Andrew D. Christian – 41,252 Total Unrestricted Reunion Funds $ 617,940 $ – Class of 1929 – 352,092 Class of 1957 14,797 320,159 III. PROFESSORSHIPS Class of 1961 31,619 1,779,729 John S. Battle $ – $ 481,251 Class of 1973 159,255 166,810 Thomas F. Bergin Teaching 1,550 1,155,836 Lammot duPont Copeland – 7,474,819 Barron F. Black Research – 903,566 Richard N. Crockett – 145,149 Perre Bowen Fund – 4,267,403 Hardy Cross Dillard – 361,650 T. Munford Boyd 200 1,206,853 Henry L. Doherty Memorial – 2,990,938 Brokaw Professorship in Corporate Law 1,000 1,898,850 Doherty Foundation – 1,566,101 Percy Brown, Jr. – 711,997 Doherty-Lassen Memorial – 2,270,291 Walter L. Brown – 4,486,640 Dana Drake – 921,265 The Honorable Albert V. Bryan, Jr. ’50 General Endowment 403,991 20,919,707 Research 68,650 1,066,815 Colonel Joseph M. Hartfield Memorial – 237,600 Caddell & Chapman Research 10,000 701,774 Joseph M. Hartfield – 4,524,592 Mortimer M. Caplin – 1,483,243 Judge Robert E. Hayes – 1,399,705 Joseph C. Carter, Jr. Research 1,200 1,286,550 D. Peck Hill – 389,386 Nicholas E. Chimicles Research in J. Wilton Hope – 241,626 Business Law & Regulation – 935,389 Wallace Howland – 1,284,820 Class of 1941 Research – 739,928 Lawrence W. I’Anson – 89,383 Class of 1948 Scholarly Research 1,700 1,281,100 Henry C. Little – 1,109,409 Class of 1957 Research – 2,290,095 Ernest E. Monrad – 458,219 Class of 1962 – 2,333,796 David and Noreen Mulliken 25,000 1,931,389 Class of 1963 Research in Honor of Donald Richberg – 352,912 Graham C. Lilly & Peter W. Low 8,508 1,560,850 William H.D. Rossiter – 6,333,215 Class of 1966 Research – 1,205,006 Rutherfurd Family 10,000 25,435 Edwin S. Cohen Distinguished JER Fund – 117,159 in Law and Taxation – 2,399,470 J. Edward Smith – 510,672 Hardy Cross Dillard / Class of 1969 – 3,081,330 H.C. Kinsey Spotswood – 139,027 Armistead M. Dobie – 406,811 William L. Standish ’56 Memorial – 226,818 Henry L. and Grace Doherty Randall S. Strange – 209,655 Charitable Foundation – 812,436 Trustees’ Academic Initiative – 675,031 Joseph W. Dorn Research – 1,270,471 Albert R. Turnbull – 24,713 John A. Ewald Jr. Distinguished – 2,814,764 Royall Victor Memorial – 55,281 Horace W. Goldsmith Research – 1,918,642 John William Waltz – 543,645 6 UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA SCHOOL OF LAW 2017–2018 June 30, 2018 2017–2018 June 30, 2018 CONTRIBUTIONS MARKET VALUE CONTRIBUTIONS MARKET VALUE Holcombe T.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Autism Europe
    N o 5265 June 2016 English Edition Autism - Europe Our campaign: Respect, Acceptance, Inclusion “On the High Seas”: A film to promote the inclusion of children with autism Jon Spiers, Chief Executive of Autistica, on the report denouncing early death among autistic people Adam Bradford, self-advocate and Queen’s Young Leader 2016: “I hope this recognition inspires other young autistic people to reach their goals” Autism-Europe’s 11th International Congress: Keynote speakers announced Published by Autism-Europe Afgiftekantoor - Bureau de dépôt : Brussels - Ed. responsable : Z. Szilvasy For Diversity Autism-Europe aisbl Rue Montoyer, 39 • B - 1000 Brussels, Belgium Tel.:+32-2-675 75 05 - Fax:+32-2-675 72 70 Against Discrimination E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.autismeurope.org SUMMARY Activities - World Autism Awareness Day campaign 2016 ................... 3 - Autism-Europe’s Annual General Assembly 2016 in Cagliari, Italy .............................................................. 7 News & FeAtures - The “On the High Seas” project ....................................... 8 - Premature mortality among persons with autism. Interview with Jon Spiers, Chief Executive of Autistica .................. 10 - App “Oral Health – SOHDEV” improving oral health Dear friends, for people with autism ................................................... 12 It is with great pleasure that we present this latest edition - Interview with Adam Bradford, self-advocate of our LINK magazine, which offers an overview of Autism- and Queen’s Young Leader 2016 ................................... 13 Europe’s recent activities as well as news from a range - Keynotes speakers announced for Autism-Europe’s th of different stakeholders in the world of autism. In this 11 International Congress ........................................... 14 issue, you will be able to get to know our new member - The “Eight Points” project ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • New York Law School Reporter, Vol 11, No. 3, November 1995 New York Law School
    digitalcommons.nyls.edu NYLS Publications Student Newspapers 11-1995 New York Law School Reporter, vol 11, no. 3, November 1995 New York Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/newspapers Recommended Citation New York Law School, "New York Law School Reporter, vol 11, no. 3, November 1995" (1995). Student Newspapers. 126. https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/newspapers/126 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the NYLS Publications at DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Newspapers by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@NYLS. 9\(ew 'Yorfc.£aw Sclwo[ '£,PO 'T'E, ¥01/UM'E 11, 9{_'ll9,{'1J'£1( 3 Media Law Project Enters The WEB By John Clark and most importantly, links to other Want to know what media events For thoseofyou who may be won­ informationand pages. Thisis what are going on in the city? Want to net­ dering what exactly a web page is, this makes the web so attractive to those work with media experts? Exchange E­ may give you a pretty good idea. The of us who learned to use a computer mail with Media Law Project members? World Wide Web can be thought of as by pointing at an icon with a Circulateyourresume?Doajobsearch? an extensive interconnected frame that 'mouse'. You simply click on the Locate a Torts outline? All these things sits on top of the enormous network of highlighted text (hypertext) and you will be accessible through the Media networks that we know as the Internet. are suddenly surfing to the next Law Project's new web page, available This frame is the most graphically page.
    [Show full text]
  • Springleaf Acquisition of Onemain: Creating the “New” Onemain Financial
    “New” OneMain Overview January 2016 Important Information This presentation contains summarized information concerning OneMain Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) and the Company’s business, operations, financial performance and trends. No representation is made that the information in this presentation is complete. For additional financial, statistical and business related information, as well as information regarding business and segment trends, see the Company's most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Form 10-K”) and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q (“Form 10-Qs”) filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), as well as the Company’s other reports filed with the SEC from time to time. Such reports are or will be available in the Investor Relations section of the Company's website (www.springleaf.com) and the SEC's website (www.sec.gov). Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements This presentation contains “forward‐looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are not statements of historical fact but instead represent only management’s current beliefs regarding future events. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve inherent risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by such forward‐looking statements. We caution you not to place undue reliance on these forward‐looking statements that speak only as of the date they were made. We do not undertake any obligation to publicly release any revisions to these forward‐looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this presentation or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events or the non-occurrence of anticipated events.
    [Show full text]
  • • Making the Bar Review Fun
    • Making the Bar Review Fun Charles H. Whitebread ou want to take another bar modern bar review course. Before the 1970s, exam? Ask that question of any at- each state tested on its own law exclusively torney and watch their face blanch and had its own set of bar examiners. The with fear. In fact, I have one friend who prevalent type of bar review course prior Yclaims he could not sleep a wink for two to the 1970s was therefore local in its focus nights during the exam, wondering if he had and its ownership. Very often in these pre- answered the procedure essay correctly. The Multistate review courses, all subjects were bar exam is hard and dreary, but there’s no taught by a single person who specialized reason why the bar review, at least, can’t be in knowing the foibles and preferences of a little bit fun. local examiners. Substantive legal knowl- The bar examination in most jurisdic- edge took a back seat to insider knowledge tions is given twice a year: the last week about the local examiners. So, for example, of February and the last week of July. The the instructor might advise the students in exam usually is either two or three days long. the course that, in commercial paper, the ex- States vary but the usual pattern is one or aminer always used fact situations derived two days of essay and short answer ques- from recent Court of Appeals cases. So the tions and/or performance tests and one day student could review the past year’s five or – the Wednesday – for the national Multi- six commercial paper cases in the Court of state Bar Exam, made up of 300 multiple Appeals and feel sure they had seen the fact choice questions in six subjects: torts, con- patterns they would be asked to discuss on tracts, criminal law and procedure, property, the bar.
    [Show full text]
  • Fleming-The-Book-Of-Armagh.Pdf
    THE BOOK OF ARMAGH BY THE REV. CANON W.E.C. FLEMING, M.A. SOMETIME INCUMBENT OF TARTARAGHAN AND DIAMOND AND CHANCELLOR OF ARMAGH CATHEDRAL 2013 The eighth and ninth centuries A.D. were an unsettled period in Irish history, the situation being exacerbated by the arrival of the Vikings1 on these shores in 795, only to return again in increasing numbers to plunder and wreak havoc upon many of the church settlements, carrying off and destroying their treasured possessions. Prior to these incursions the country had been subject to a long series of disputes and battles, involving local kings and chieftains, as a result of which they were weakened and unable to present a united front against the foreigners. According to The Annals of the Four Masters2, under the year 800 we find, “Ard-Macha was plundered thrice in one month by the foreigners, and it had never been plundered by strangers before.” Further raids took place on at least seven occasions, and in 941 they record, “Ard-Macha was plundered by the same foreigners ...” It is, therefore, rather surprising that in spite of so much disruption in various parts of the country, there remained for many people a degree of normality and resilience in daily life, which enabled 1 The Vikings, also referred to as Norsemen or Danes, were Scandinavian seafarers who travelled overseas in their distinctive longships, earning for themselves the reputation of being fierce warriors. In Ireland their main targets were the rich monasteries, to which they returned and plundered again and again, carrying off church treasures and other items of value.
    [Show full text]
  • Onemain Financial 2019 Investor Day
    OneMain Financial 2019 Investor Day November 20, 2019 Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-looking Statements This presentation contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are not statements of historical fact but instead represent only management’s current beliefs regarding future events. By their nature, forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other important factors that may cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by such forward-looking statements. We caution you not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements that speak only as of the date on which they were made. We do not undertake any obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this presentation or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events or the non-occurrence of anticipated events, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as required by law. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements concerning future plans, objectives, goals, projections, strategies, events or performance, including certain projected financial results for full-year 2019, and underlying assumptions and other statements related thereto. The only financial projections we are disclosing relate to the full-year 2019 period. Past performance is not necessarily indicative, or a guarantee, of future results, and there can be no assurance that our strategies will be successful or that we will realize any of our projected financial results for 2019 or other business goals.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Manuscript and Printed Sources Current Marks and Abreviations
    1 1 LIST OF MANUSCRIPT AND PRINTED SOURCES CURRENT MARKS AND ABREVIATIONS * * surrounds insertions by me * * variant forms of the lemmata for finding ** (trailing at end of article) wholly new article inserted by me + + surrounds insertion from the addenda ++ (trailing at end of article) wholly new article inserted from addenda † † marks what is (I believe) certainly wrong !? marks an unidentified source reference [ro] Hogan’s Ro [=reference omitted] {1} etc. different places but within a single entry are thus marked Identical lemmata are numbered. This is merely to separate the lemmata for reference and cross- reference. It does not imply that the lemmata always refer to separate names SOURCES Unidentified sources are listed here and marked in the text (!?). Most are not important but they are nuisance. Identifications please. 23 N 10 Dublin, RIA, 967 olim 23 N 10, antea Betham, 145; vellum and paper; s. xvi (AD 1575); see now R. I. Best (ed), MS. 23 N 10 (formerly Betham 145) in the Library of the RIA, Facsimiles in Collotype of Irish Manuscript, 6 (Dublin 1954) 23 P 3 Dublin, RIA, 1242 olim 23 P 3; s. xv [little excerption] AASS Acta Sanctorum … a Sociis Bollandianis (Antwerp, Paris, & Brussels, 1643—) [Onomasticon volume numbers belong uniquely to the binding of the Jesuits’ copy of AASS in their house in Leeson St, Dublin, and do not appear in the series]; see introduction Ac. unidentified source Acallam (ed. Stokes) Whitley Stokes (ed. & tr.), Acallam na senórach, in Whitley Stokes & Ernst Windisch (ed), Irische Texte, 4th ser., 1 (Leipzig, 1900) [index]; see also Standish H.
    [Show full text]
  • Citigroup - Quarterly Financial Data Supplement 1Q16
    CITIGROUP - QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA SUPPLEMENT 1Q16 Page Citigroup Consolidated Financial Summary 1 Consolidated Statement of Income 2 Consolidated Balance Sheet 3 Segment Detail Net Revenues 4 Income & Citicorp Regional Average Assets and ROA 5 Citicorp Income Statement and Balance Sheet Data 6 Global Consumer Banking (GCB) 7 - 8 North America 9 - 11 Latin America 12 - 13 Asia (1) 14 - 15 Institutional Clients Group (ICG) 16 Revenues by Business 17 Corporate / Other 18 Citi Holdings Income Statement and Balance Sheet Data 19 Consumer Key Indicators 20 - 21 Citigroup Supplemental Detail Average Balances and Interest Rates 22 Deposits 23 Loans Citicorp 24 Citi Holdings / Total Citigroup 25 Consumer Loan Delinquency Amounts and Ratios 90+ Days 26 30-89 Days 27 Allowance for Credit Losses Total Citigroup 28 Consumer and Corporate 29 - 30 Components of Provision for Loan Losses Citicorp 31 Citi Holdings / Total Citigroup 32 Non-Accrual Assets Total Citigroup 33 Citicorp 34 Citi Holdings 35 Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures 36 (1) For reporting purposes, Asia GCB includes the results of operations of EMEA GCB for all periods presented. CITIGROUP -- FINANCIAL SUMMARY (In millions of dollars, except per share amounts, and as otherwise noted) 1Q16 Increase/ 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q (Decrease) from 2015 2015 2015 2015 2016 4Q15 1Q15 Total Revenues, Net of Interest Expense$ 19,736 $ 19,470 $ 18,692 $ 18,456 $ 17,555 (5%) (11%) Total Operating Expenses 10,884 10,928 10,669 11,134 10,523 (5%) (3%) Net Credit Losses (NCLs) 1,957 1,920 1,663 1,762
    [Show full text]
  • Iau American University Blr Business Law Rview
    AMERICAN UNIVERSITY BUSINESS LAW REVIEW VOLUME6 • 2016 • ISSUE I ALEXANDRA MCLEOD Editor-in-Chief GABRIEL RASKAS CATRIONA COPPLER Managing Editor Executive Editor TIANA CHERRY Associate ManagingEditor BENJAMIN MCCARTY GINA COLARUSSO PATRICK KAIN Senior Note & Comment Senior Articles Editor JOANNA SCLEIDOROVICH Business & Marketing Editor Editors STEPHANIE COSTA Symposium Editor Articles Editors Note & Comment Editors KRISTINE LITTLE ALEXANDRA CAIN CHAUNA PERVIS MARJORIE CASTILLO CHELSEA RECKELL MEGAN DOYLE NINA RODRIGUEZ KIKi MCARTHUR Senior Staff JOSHUA ADRIAN PAOLA HENRY SUZANNE RIOPEL RALPH BERNARD STEPHANIE LIAO SARA SASS PETER BROSTOWIN SHAWN MARCUM JULIE SHURSKY JULIANA PEREZ CALLE BETTY MCNEIL MAEGEN SINCLEAIR NICHOLAS ENNS DAVID NAJERA BRIAN TAN SANDRA FADEL MONISHA RAO WILLIAM WARMKE ALEXANDRA FOSTER KALLI WELLS BRIAN GAUTHIER EMILY WOLFFORD Junior Staff NANA AMOO ZACHARY JOHNSTON HILARY ROSENTHAL STEFANIE ANDREWS JAMES KIM NATHAN ROY JOSHUA ARONS INDIA MCGEE BRIANNA SCHACTER CONOR ARPEY MORGAN McKINLAY DANIEL PATRICK SHAFFER JOHN COSCULLUELA VANESSA MICHAUD RONALDA SMITH NATALIE CUADROS JOSHUA MORRIS DALISHA STURDIVANT ELI DANIELS ELIZABETH NWABUEZE LUKE TROMPETER JAMES DUFFY MOFETOLUWA OBADINA STEPHANIE VILELLA ALYSSA DUNBAR JACOB PEEPLES SETH WEINTRAUB VICTORIA GARCIA PRITIKA RAMESH COLIN WOOD CARL GAUL SAREESH RAWAT CHRIS WHITE Law Review Coordinator SHARON E. WOLFE C -~ - N IAU AMERICAN UNIVERSITY BLR BUSINESS LAW RVIEW The AMERICAN UNIVERSITY BUSINESS LAW REVIEW is published three times a year by students of the Washington College of Law, American University, 4300 Nebraska Avenue, NW, Suite CT08 Washington, D.C. 20016. Manuscripts should be sent to the Executive Editor at the above listed address or electronically at [email protected]. The opinions expressed in articles herein are those of the signed authors and do not reflect the views of the Washington College of Law or the American University Business Law Review.
    [Show full text]
  • Onemain Financial Issuance Trust 2021-1
    Presale: OneMain Financial Issuance Trust 2021-1 May 13, 2021 PRIMARY CREDIT ANALYST Preliminary Ratings Trang Luu Austin Preliminary amount (mil. Legal maturity + 1 (214) 765 5887 Class Preliminary rating Type Interest rate $)(i) date trang.luu A-1 AAA (sf) Senior Fixed 235.990 June 16, 2036 @spglobal.com A-2(ii) AAA (sf) Senior Floating 118.000 June 16, 2036 SECONDARY CONTACTS B AA (sf) Subordinate Fixed 54.790 June 16, 2036 Romil Chouhan, CFA New York C A (sf) Subordinate Fixed 33.510 June 16, 2036 + 1 (212) 438 3512 D BBB- (sf) Subordinate Fixed 57.710 June 16, 2036 romil.chouhan @spglobal.com Note: This presale report is based on information as of May 13, 2021. The ratings shown are preliminary. Subsequent information may result in the assignment of final ratings that differ from the preliminary ratings. Accordingly, the preliminary ratings should not be construed as Mayan Abraham evidence of final ratings. This report does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell securities. (i)The actual size of these tranches New York will be determined on the pricing date. (ii)The class A notes aggregate initial balance will be equal to $353.99 million, of which the class A-2 + 2124381905 notes will not exceed one-third of the total amount of class A notes. The class A-2 interest rate will be a floating rate indexed to SOFR plus a margin (to be determined). SOFR--Secured Overnight Financing Rate. mayan.abraham @spglobal.com Profile Expected closing date May 26, 2021. Collateral Personal consumer loan receivables.
    [Show full text]
  • Smythe-Wood Series B
    Mainly Ulster families – “B” series – Smythe-Wood Newspaper Index Irish Genealogical Research Society Dr P Smythe-Wood’s Irish Newspaper Index Selected families, mainly from Ulster ‘SERIES B’ The late Dr Patrick Smythe-Wood presented a large collection of card indexes to the IGRS Library, reflecting his various interests, - the Irish in Canada, Ulster families, various professions etc. These include abstracts from various Irish Newspapers, including the Belfast Newsletter, which are printed below. Abstracts are included for all papers up to 1864, but excluding any entries in the Belfast Newsletter prior to 1801, as they are fully available online. Dr Smythe-Wood often found entries in several newspapers for the one event, & these will be shown as one entry below. Entries dealing with RIC Officers, Customs & Excise Officers, Coastguards, Prison Officers, & Irish families in Canada will be dealt with in separate files. In most cases, Dr Smythe-Wood has recorded the exact entry, but in some, marked thus *, the entries were adjusted into a database, so should be treated with more caution. There are further large card indexes of Miscellaneous notes on families which are not at present being digitised, but which often deal with the same families treated below. ACR: Acadian Recorder LON The London Magazine ANC: Anglo-Celt LSL Londonderry Sentinel ARG Armagh Guardian LST Londonderry Standard BAA Ballina Advertiser LUR Lurgan Times BAI Ballina Impartial MAC Mayo Constitution BAU Banner of Ulster NAT The Nation BCC Belfast Commercial Chronicle NCT
    [Show full text]
  • Why Liberals Should Chuck the Exclusionary Rule Christopher Slobogin
    Vanderbilt University Law School Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 1999 Why Liberals Should Chuck the Exclusionary Rule Christopher Slobogin Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/faculty-publications Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Christopher Slobogin, Why Liberals Should Chuck the Exclusionary Rule, 1999 University of Illinois Law Review. 363 (1999) Available at: http://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/faculty-publications/298 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WHY LIBERALS SHOULD CHUCK THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE Christopher Slobogin* In this article, Professor Christopher Slobogin makes a com- pelling new case against the exclusionary rule, from a "liberal"per- spective. Moving beyond the inconclusive empirical data on the efficacy of the rule, he uses behavioraland motivational theory to demonstrate why the rule is structurally unable to deter individual police officers from performing most unconstitutionalsearches and seizures. He also argues, contrary to liberal dogma, that the rule is poor at promoting Fourth Amendment values at the systemic, de- partmental level. Finally, ProfessorSlobogin contends that the rule stultifies liberal interpretation of the Fourth Amendment, in large part because of judicial heuristics that grow out of constant expo- sure to litigants with dirty hands. He also explains why noninstru- mental justificationsfor the rule, even when viewed from a liberal bias, fail to support a broad policy of exclusion.
    [Show full text]