Congressional Record—Senate S10971

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

December 12, 2008 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S10971 TARP SPECIAL INSPECTOR to be able to assure ourselves that delay restoring the Justice Department GENERAL these recommendations are taken seri- and the confidence the American peo- ∑ Mrs. MCCASKILL. Mr. President, ously and are being considered. We ple have in our justice system. We this week, the Senate passed an impor- should know the reason if these rec- must promptly consider and confirm tant piece of legislation sponsored by ommendations are not implemented. Eric H. Holder Jr., and other nominees Senator GRASSLEY and myself, that Finally, Senator SNOWE suggested of the new President. was needed to assure the new Special that we should make sure that the Spe- I was encouraged by the initial reac- Inspector General for the $700 billion fi- cial Inspector General has the re- tion in mid-November when Mr. Hold- nancial rescue program could staff up sources he needs by imposing a time er’s name was reported as the likely quickly and have the ability to do his limit on providing him with the money nominee, and when he was designated job. S. 3731’s other cosponsors—Sen- allocated to his office in the original by the President-elect on December 1. ators COLLINS, LIEBERMAN, SNOWE, bill. The relationship between an agen- Democrats and Republicans alike ac- DODD, BUNNING, SCHUMER, LEVIN, CAR- cy and an office charged with over- knowledged his qualifications and PER, COLEMAN and CANTWELL—were seeing them is a delicate one. Tensions praised the choice. I appreciate the also key to securing unanimous sup- sometimes arise due to the fact that willingness of Larry Thompson, who port for this bill in the Senate. Finally, IGs must rely on the agency they audit was confirmed early in 2001 as Presi- I want to give special thanks to Sen- and investigate for their resources. dent Bush’s first Deputy Attorney Gen- ators BAUCUS and SHELBY for working While I have no reason to think that eral; Louis Freeh, the former Director closely with us to craft a strong bipar- the Treasury Department would deny of the FBI; and Fran Townsend, Presi- tisan bill. Mr. Barofsky the funds needed to per- dent Bush’s former Homeland Security This legislation, the Special Inspec- form his duties, this provision would advisor, to speak out in support of Mr. tor General for the Troubled Asset Re- eliminate that tension. Holder’s designation. lief Program, SIGTARP, would specifi- Unfortunately, we were not able to As early as November 19, the ranking cally grant the Special IG created secure passage of this legislation in the Republican member of the Judiciary under TARP earlier this fall to have House before we adjourned this week. I Committee said that he would not hold full oversight over all activities under will do everything I can to bring it up the matter, but ‘‘would be prepared the TARP program. The bill would back first thing in the 111th Congress to move ahead very promptly with have also granted the IG the temporary to secure its quick passage in both hearings.’’ I appreciated and shared his hiring authority needed to quickly hire chambers and signed into law to assure desire to proceed ‘‘as fast as we can the dozens of auditors required to con- we have strong oversight on the $700 move’’ and his commitment that he duct this critical oversight. billion financial rescue program.∑ ‘‘wouldn’t hold it up.’’ He said that he As the original Inspector General ∑ Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, the elec- hoped Mr. Holder would ‘‘re-profes- language is written under current law, tion of Barack Obama and JOE BIDEN, sionalize’’ the Justice Department. I Mr. Barofsky, who was confirmed as and the President-elect’s selection of hope so, too. the Special Inspector General this Eric Holder to be Attorney General of I agree with Senator SPECTER that week, must hire his entire staff using the United States, provide an historic we need to strengthen the Justice De- normal civil service channels. I am a opportunity for the country to move partment. He and I coauthored an arti- big proponent of using the normal hir- past the partisanship of the past dec- cle in the Politico before the election. ing process whenever possible. But that ades, and work together to solve the In a sentence Senator SPECTER quoted process is time consuming and can Nation’s problems, protect against se- recently on the Senate floor, we wrote: take weeks, sometimes months, to hire rious threats, and meet some of the ‘‘The Attorney General must be some- one person. Meanwhile, this money is greatest challenges of our time. We all one who deeply appreciates and re- flying out the door. TARP has given know these men. They have long and spects the work and commitment of out nearly all of the first $350 billion, distinguished records of service and ac- the thousands of men and women who and they have already told us they complishments. They can make a real work in the branches and divisions of want the second half soon. Yet, Mr. difference if we join with them, not as the Justice Department, day in and Barofsky has no staff, and he won’t Democrats or Republicans, but as day out, without regard to politics or have staff for some time. We need to Americans. ideology, doing their best to enforce fix this—right now. The need for new leadership at the the law and promote justice.’’ I have Our bill would also make clear that Department of Justice is as critical every confidence that Eric Holder is the Special Inspector General has over- today as it has ever been. The Judici- such a person, and I said so in this sight authority over the entire relief ary Committee, both Democrats and chamber on November 20. Indeed, in his program. As written right now, Republicans, spent a good deal of time brief remarks on the morning he was SIGTARP has oversight authority over and effort during this Congress uncov- designated, Mr. Holder expressed just only two sections of the relief program. ering scandals at the Department. such appreciation. Why would we want to limit the In- Former Attorney General Gonzales, I know that the professionals at the spector General to only certain sec- Karl Rove, Mr. Rove’s White House Department of Justice reacted with de- tions of this program? Our legislation deputies, and virtually the entire lead- light when he was named because they would make clear that SIGTARP has ership at the Department resigned in know him well. They know him from oversight duties over all of TARP. This the wake of congressional investiga- his 12 years at the Public Integrity would include sections related specifi- tion. Since then, the Inspector General Section, from his time as the U.S. At- cally to assistance to homeowners and at the Department has confirmed many torney for the District of Columbia, promulgation of conflict of interest of our findings and fears, and there are from his tenure on the bench, and from rules by the Secretary of the Treasury. still more reports to come. An ongoing his years as the Deputy Attorney Gen- Senator SNOWE added some provi- criminal investigation is being con- eral, the second-highest ranking offi- sions to assure that the IG would pro- ducted by a specially appointed pros- cial of the Department. His prompt vide Congress and the public a thor- ecutor. The crisis at the Department of confirmation will do a great deal to re- ough analysis of TARP’s spending, as Justice is not resolved, but ongoing. store morale throughout the Justice well as a requirement for Treasury offi- I want to continue the work we began Department. cials to report to Congress an expla- last year when I scheduled prompt I have called Mr. Holder a prosecu- nation if they did not implement the hearings and the Senate proceeded to tor’s prosecutor. He participated in a IG’s recommendations. confirm Michael Mukasey, Mark Filip number of prosecutions and appeals in- As a former auditor, nothing is more and Kevin O’Connor to serve as Attor- volving such defendants as the State frustrating than seeing your rec- ney General, Deputy Attorney General Treasurer of Florida, a former Ambas- ommendations completely ignored. I and Associate Attorney General after sador to the Dominican Republic, a would never claim that all audit rec- the Rove-Gonzales resignations, even local judge in Philadelphia, an Assist- ommendations can, or should, be im- though we were on the eve of the elec- ant United States Attorney in New mediately implemented. But we need tion of a new President. We cannot now York City, an FBI agent, a ‘‘capo’’ in VerDate Aug 31 2005 01:41 Dec 13, 2008 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4637 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A12DE6.022 S12DEPT1 jbell on PROD1PC69 with SENATE S10972 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE December 12, 2008 an organized crime family, and a pow- nomination in 30 days. I did not curb everyone and that we are working with erful Democratic chairman of the the rights of Committee members to local and state as well as Federal offi- House Ways and Means Committee. pose questions to then-nominee cials constantly to improve our crimi- After he served for a dozen years as a Mukasey during his confirmation proc- nal justice system. Public confidence prosecutor, President Reagan nomi- ess; I do not intend to do so with Eric and faith in that system has been shak- nated Mr. Holder to be a judge, and he Holder.
Recommended publications
  • Did William Barr Refuse a Subpoena

    Did William Barr Refuse a Subpoena

    Did William Barr Refuse A Subpoena Unmetrical Luke padlock: he breezed his Armorican mnemonically and nobbily. Oligarchic and largest Abdulkarim never perverts his pterosaurs! How anarchic is Otho when color and brattish Sherwynd agitating some kowhais? The resolutions numbers restart every time and did william barr refuse a subpoena from him when we have accepted client has two houses, including a general? The Justice chief said allowing such cooperation did not mean. Y had refused so far more review a version of opening report a far fewer redactions. A Subpoena is a court priest to come a court tell you ignore the butcher the slow will hold you in reverse You could descend to round or face a big fine for ignoring the Subpoena Subpoenas are used in contract criminal wrongdoing civil cases. Congress does not big and detain it for ignoring its subpoenas. Y on May 2 slammed Attorney General William P Barr for refusing to appear. Contempt of Congress Wikipedia. And van Trump administration that has defied numerous subpoenas. And potentially embarrassing to a presidenteven if he did apparent wrong. Committee to bill to pick to landlord two subpoenas related to Robert S. Nadler did not seem out issuing a subpoena for Barr's testimony down the last but care was not expected to erase so on Thursday This story ever been. What to recruit about only General William Barr the door. Does a subpoena mean form are mostly trouble? Last week is General William Barr released a redacted version of. Watergate select committee threatened to jail staff who refused to appear.
  • US Attorney General Releases New DOJ Charging and Sentencing Policy

    US Attorney General Releases New DOJ Charging and Sentencing Policy

    May 2017 U.S. Attorney General Releases New DOJ Charging and Sentencing Policy – Little Impact Anticipated for White Collar Cases and FCPA Pilot Program On May 12, 2017, U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions issued a two-page memorandum setting forth a new charging and sentencing policy for the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) (the “Sessions Memo,” available here). Except in limited circumstances, the new policy directs federal prosecutors to charge criminal defendants with “the most serious, readily provable offense,” and requires them to disclose to the sentencing court “all facts that impact the sentencing guidelines or mandatory minimum sentences.”1 The new policy rescinds a memorandum that former Attorney General Eric Holder issued on August 12, 2013 (the “Holder Memo,” available here), which instructed federal prosecutors to “conduct an individualized assessment of the extent to which charges fit the specific circumstances of the case.” While the Sessions Memo is likely to have a material impact in drug and violent crime cases, its effect on white-collar cases is less clear. Indeed, white-collar cases involve complex questions of intent, and the most “serious, readily provable offense” will likely continue to be subject to prosecutorial judgment and discretion. Importantly, DOJ has already issued a statement that the “[t]he [Foreign Corrupt Practices Act] pilot program is not affected by the new department charging and sentencing policy, as any potential exception made as part of the program would comply with the approval requirements laid out in the memo.”2, 3 1 The U.S. Sentencing Guidelines are non-binding rules that set forth a uniform sentencing policy for defendants convicted in the federal court system, which judges must consider in determining a criminal defendant’s sentence (available here).
  • August 4, 2021 VIA E-MAIL Joon H. Kim Anne L. Clark Special Deputies

    August 4, 2021 VIA E-MAIL Joon H. Kim Anne L. Clark Special Deputies

    August 4, 2021 VIA E-MAIL Joon H. Kim Anne L. Clark Special Deputies to the First Deputy Attorney General Office of the Attorney General The Capitol Albany, NY 112224-0341 Re: Response to Special Investigators’ Report Dear Counsel: As outside counsel to the Executive Chamber, we write to express our client’s deep concerns about the fairness of your investigation, and the lack of neutrality and impartiality with which it was conducted and concluded. First, it is very disappointing that you refused to provide the subjects of the investigation, many of whom are current and former Chamber officers and employees, with an opportunity to review and respond to your findings before they became public today.1 Unlike civil litigation or criminal prosecutions, where an investigation is followed by the opportunity for a trial or a hearing, your report is the end of the line. There will be no formal setting in which those whose conduct the report discusses will have a meaningful opportunity to challenge, rebut, or even raise questions about the investigators’ accuracy, their credibility determinations, or their thoroughness. That lack of process explains why it has now become commonplace in circumstances like these for agencies such as the New York Inspector General,2 the U.S. Department of Justice’s 1 We also note that you did not even alert us that you were releasing your report today. 2 See, e.g., State of New York Offs. of the Inspector Gen., Investigation of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles Political Subdivision Program at 4 (Mar.
  • House Calendar No. 140

    House Calendar No. 140

    1 House Calendar No. 140 112TH CONGRESS " ! REPORT 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 112–546 RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING THAT THE HOUSE OF REPRESENT- ATIVES FIND ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, IN CONTEMPT OF CONGRESS FOR REFUSAL TO COMPLY WITH A SUBPOENA DULY ISSUED BY THE COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES together with ADDITIONAL AND MINORITY VIEWS JUNE 22, 2012.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 19–006 WASHINGTON : 2012 VerDate Mar 15 2010 09:03 Jun 23, 2012 Jkt 019006 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4012 Sfmt 4012 E:\HR\OC\HR546.XXX HR546 pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with HEARING congress.#13 VerDate Mar 15 2010 09:03 Jun 23, 2012 Jkt 019006 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4012 Sfmt 4012 E:\HR\OC\HR546.XXX HR546 pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with HEARING C O N T E N T S Page I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................. 2 II. AUTHORITY AND PURPOSE ..................................... 2 III. BACKGROUND ON THE COMMITTEE’S INVES- TIGATION .................................................................... 3 IV. OPERATION FAST AND FURIOUS: BREAK- DOWNS AT ALL LEVELS OF THE DEPART- MENT OF JUSTICE ................................................... 4 A. The ATF Phoenix Field Division ............................ 5 B. The United States Attorney’s Office for the Dis- trict of Arizona ....................................................... 6 C. ATF Headquarters ................................................... 7 D. THE Criminal Division ........................................... 8 1. Coordination with ATF ..................................... 8 2. Wiretaps ............................................................. 10 E. The Office of the Deputy Attorney General ........... 11 V. THE COMMITTEE’S OCTOBER 12, 2011, SUB- POENA TO ATTORNEY GENERAL HOLDER .......
  • Eric Holder Jr

    Eric Holder Jr

    THE REVEREND Cleveland A. Thompson MACM MINISTRY GUIDE Senior Pastor For More Information, Visit Us Online PASTORAL STAFF www.godiswithus.org/ministries First Assistant to the Pastor Reverend Willie Davis All eMail addresses are @godiswithus.org EXT 146 635-4865 [email protected] ADMINISTRY Mrs. Kim Fly-Finch adMinistry@ YOUTH PASTOR EXT 149 635-4865 [email protected] BEREAVEMENT Rev. S Jackson bereavement@ Director of Music BOY & CUB SCOUTS Mr. Felton Crawley scouting@ EXT 115 635-4865 [email protected] CHURCH SCHOOL Ms. Kathy Elzie edu@ CONSECRATED WOMEN LEADERSHIP Lady Bernice Thompson consecrated@ Chairman, Deacons Ministry Deac M. Jemison CULINARY ARTS Mrs. Karen Robinson culinary@ [email protected] DÉCOR Mrs. Kim Fly-Finch decor@ Director of Operations Deac Kervin Mack e911 MINISTRY Ms. Patricia Bauman e911@ [email protected] FINE ARTS Ms. Mildred Galbreath arts@ Chairman, Finance Ministry Deac Walter GIRL SCOUTS Ms. Alecia Mathis scouting@ Campbell [email protected] HELPING HANDS Ms. Melonie.Reed hands@ERIC HOLDER JR. HIV/AIDS MINISTRY Ms. Robin KoonceEric aids@ HolderADMINISTRATION Director of Staff Ms. Shawndell Thompson LITURGICAL DANCE Shawndell Thompson, (born January 21, 1951) is an American attorney who served as the 82nd Attorney Dee Samuel dance@ Ext 110 635-4865 [email protected] General of the United States from 2009 to 2015.Financial Holder, servingAssistant in theMrs. administration Kim Fly-Finch MEDIA MINISTRY Rev. William Smith media@ of President Barack Obama, was the first AfricanExt American 121 635-4865 to hold [email protected] position of U.S. MEN Rev. Solomon Moore men@ Attorney General (in both a confirmed and acting position).
  • Rhode Island Bar Journal, 115 Cedar Street, Providence, RI 02903, (401) 421-5740

    Rhode Island Bar Journal, 115 Cedar Street, Providence, RI 02903, (401) 421-5740

    Rhod e Isl and Bar Journal Rhode Island Bar Association Volume 62. Number 3. November/December 2 013 Domestic Use of Drones Estate Planning for Florida Snowbirds Economic Stewardship Book Review: Zoning the Oceans RHODE I SLAND Bar Association 1898 14 14 Editor In Chief , David N. Bazar Editor , Frederick D. Massie Assistant Editor , Kathleen M. Bridge Articles Editorial Board Jenna R. Algee, Esq. Matthew R. Plain, Esq. Victoria M. Almeida, Esq. Steven M. Richard, Esq. 5 Coming Home to Roost – Domestic Use of Unmanned aerial Steven J. Boyajian, Esq. Adam D. Riser, Esq. Vehicles Peter A. Carvelli, Esq. Miriam A. Ross, Esq. Hon. Brian Stern and Matthias Rubekeil Jerry Cohen, Esq. Julie Ann Sacks, Esq. Patrick T. Conley, Esq. Hon. Brian P. Stern 11 estate Planning for Florida snowbirds Eric D. Correira, Esq. Stephen J. Sypole, Esq. David J. Correira, Esq. and Eric D. Correira, Esq. William J. Delaney, Esq. Christopher Wildenhain, Esq. Amy H. Goins, Esq. 17 BOOK REVIEW – Zoning the oceans: the Next Big step in Adi Goldstein, Esq. Coastal Zone Management by John M. Boehnert, esq. Jay S. Goodman, Esq. Michael Rubin, Esq. Jenna Wims Hashway, Esq. Christina A. Hoefsmit, Esq. 21 lunch with legends: trailblazers, trendsetters and Marcia McGair Ippolito, Esq. treasures of the Rhode Island Bar Thomas A. Lynch, Esq. Ernest G. Mayo, Esq. Matthew R. Plain, Esq. and Elizabeth R. Merritt, Esq. John R. McDermott, Esq. 25 the Rhode Island Constitution on economic stewardship Elizabeth R. Merritt, Esq. Seth Handy, Esq. RHoDe IslaND BaR assoCIatIoN 31 In the City by the Bay – american Bar association Delegate lawyeR’s PleDge As a member of the Rhode Island Bar Association, I pledge Report: aBa annual Meeting to conduct myself in a manner that will reflect honor upon Robert D.
  • House Resolution Recommending That Attorney General Eric Holder

    House Resolution Recommending That Attorney General Eric Holder

    1 House Calendar No. 140 112TH CONGRESS " ! REPORT 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 112–546 RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING THAT THE HOUSE OF REPRESENT- ATIVES FIND ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, IN CONTEMPT OF CONGRESS FOR REFUSAL TO COMPLY WITH A SUBPOENA DULY ISSUED BY THE COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES together with ADDITIONAL AND MINORITY VIEWS JUNE 22, 2012.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 19–006 WASHINGTON : 2012 VerDate Mar 15 2010 09:03 Jun 23, 2012 Jkt 019006 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4012 Sfmt 4012 E:\HR\OC\HR546.XXX HR546 pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with HEARING congress.#13 VerDate Mar 15 2010 09:03 Jun 23, 2012 Jkt 019006 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4012 Sfmt 4012 E:\HR\OC\HR546.XXX HR546 pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with HEARING C O N T E N T S Page I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................. 2 II. AUTHORITY AND PURPOSE ..................................... 2 III. BACKGROUND ON THE COMMITTEE’S INVES- TIGATION .................................................................... 3 IV. OPERATION FAST AND FURIOUS: BREAK- DOWNS AT ALL LEVELS OF THE DEPART- MENT OF JUSTICE ................................................... 4 A. The ATF Phoenix Field Division ............................ 5 B. The United States Attorney’s Office for the Dis- trict of Arizona ....................................................... 6 C. ATF Headquarters ................................................... 7 D. THE Criminal Division ........................................... 8 1. Coordination with ATF ..................................... 8 2. Wiretaps ............................................................. 10 E. The Office of the Deputy Attorney General ........... 11 V. THE COMMITTEE’S OCTOBER 12, 2011, SUB- POENA TO ATTORNEY GENERAL HOLDER .......
  • Reported to the OIG That They Followed the Holder Memorandum but Did Not Specifically Revise Their District Policies to Reflect Smart on Crime Policy Changes

    Reported to the OIG That They Followed the Holder Memorandum but Did Not Specifically Revise Their District Policies to Reflect Smart on Crime Policy Changes

    Office of the Inspector General U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General U.S. Department of Justice Review of the Department’s Implementation of Prosecution and Sentencing Reform Principles under the Smart on Crime Initiative Evaluation and Inspections Division 17-04 June 2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction In August 2013, the U.S. Department of Justice (Department) and then Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr., announced the Smart on Crime initiative, which highlighted five principles to reform the federal criminal justice system. Smart on Crime encouraged federal prosecutors to focus on the most serious cases that implicate clear, substantial federal interests. In the first principle, the Department required, for the first time, the development of district-specific prosecution guidelines for determining when federal prosecutions should be brought, with the intent of focusing resources on fewer but the most significant cases. The second principle of Smart on Crime announced a change in Department charging policies so that certain defendants who prosecutors determined had committed low-level, non-violent drug offenses, and who had no ties to large-scale organizations, gangs, or cartels, generally would not be charged with offenses that imposed a mandatory minimum prison sentence. The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) initiated this review to evaluate the Department’s implementation of the first two principles of Smart on Crime, as well as the impact of those changes to federal charging policies and practices. We assessed the 94 U.S. Attorney’s Office districts’ implementation and the impact of the Smart on Crime policy on not charging drug quantities implicating mandatory minimum sentences in circumstances where the defendants were low-level, non-violent offenders with limited criminal histories.
  • Response to the Submission from the United States In

    Response to the Submission from the United States In

    RESPONSE TO THE SUBMISSION FROM THE UNITED STATES IN RELATION TO THE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT PENDING AGAINST DAVID ADDINGTON, JAY BYBEE, DOUGLAS FEITH, ALBERTO GONZALES, WILLIAM HAYNES AND JOHN YOO IN THE AUDIENCIA NACIONAL, MADRID SPAIN CASE N˚ 134/2009 April 2011 I. Background On 17 March 2009, a complaint was filed by the Association for the Dignity of Male and Female Prisoners of Spain against six former officials of the United States government, namely David Addington, former Counsel to, and Chief of Staff for, former Vice President Cheney; Jay S. Bybee, former Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel (OLC), U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ); Douglas Feith, former Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, Department of Defense (DOD); Alberto R. Gonzales, former Counsel to former President George W. Bush, and former Attorney General of the United States; William J. Haynes, former General Counsel, DOD; and John Yoo, former Deputy Assistant Attorney General, OLC, DOJ, in the Spanish high court, the Audiencia Nacional.1 The defendants are alleged to have materially contributed to a systematic plan of torture and cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment of persons detained by the United Sates in the context of the so-called “War on Terror.” The complaint contains charges that include torture and violations of the 1949 Geneva Conventions. This case was assigned to Judge Eloy Velasco. On 4 May 2009, Judge Velasco issued Letters Rogatory to the United States, in accordance with the 1990 US-Spain Treaty on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters, asking it “whether the acts referred to in this complaint are or are not being investigated or prosecuted,” and if so, to identify the prosecuting authority and to inform the Court of the specific procedure by which to refer the complaints for joinder.
  • Unity Task Force Recommendations

    Unity Task Force Recommendations

    BIDEN-SANDERS UNITY TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS COMBATING THE CLIMATE CRISIS AND PURSUING ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE Climate change is a global emergency. We have no time to waste in taking action to protect Americans’ lives and futures. From Houston, Texas, to Paradise, California; from San Juan, Puerto Rico, to Davenport, Iowa, the last four years have seen record-breaking storms, devastating wildfires, and historic floods. Urban and rural communities alike have suffered tens of billions of dollars in economic losses. Dams have failed catastrophically in Michigan. Neighborhoods have been all but wiped off the map in Florida. Farmers’ crops have been drowned in their fields across the Midwest. Thousands of Americans have died. And President Trump still callously and willfully denies the science that explains why so many are suffering. Like so many crises facing the United States, the impacts of climate change are not evenly distributed in our society or our economy. Communities of color, low-income families, and indigenous communities have long suffered disproportionate and cumulative harm from air pollution, water pollution, and toxic sites. Highways have been built to enforce racial segregation in our cities, with federal dollars and federal policy support. Coal companies have been allowed to reduce or ignore their obligations to fund retirees’ promised health care benefits and pensions. From Flint, Michigan, to the Navajo Nation, to Lowndes County, Alabama, millions of Americans have been denied access to clean, safe drinking water and even the most basic wastewater infrastructure. And although the youngest generations of Americans have contributed the least to this calamity, they stand to lose the most as they suffer from the impacts of runaway carbon pollution for decades to come.
  • Congressional Record—House H3189

    Congressional Record—House H3189

    April 10, 2014 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE H3189 but it does show you that there were dents who pay $12,000 per person, the they can’t answer questions, and so Members then and I believe people now highest per capita federal taxes in the they make personal attacks. who recognize the unfairness of the un- country, to support the United States Then our Attorney General makes a equal status of D.C. residents I have of America; in the name of millions speech yesterday in which, because he discussed today and earlier this week. ever since 1801, when the District of Co- was busy helping, perhaps, terrorists or It became more difficult to make lumbia became the Capital, who have Marc Rich or things like that he didn’t progress as the years went by, because died in our wars without seeing the notice, because I am sure he wouldn’t most of my service in the Congress has benefits of voting representation in the be untruthful or tell a lie, but he been in the minority. Yet we are mak- House and Senate and without the full doesn’t even know how bad it gets in ing progress. and equal rights of other Americans Washington if you are a conservative, We were able to get the first statue who died alongside them, I ask this if you are George W. Bush, if you are representing the District of Columbia House to grant the residents of their John Ashcroft, if you are Alberto in the Capitol last year. The reason Nation’s Capital statehood.
  • The Obama Administration's Decision to Defend Constitutional Equality

    The Obama Administration's Decision to Defend Constitutional Equality

    Fordham Law Review Volume 81 Issue 2 Article 5 2012 The Obama Administration’s Decision to Defend Constitutional Equality Rather Than the Defense of Marriage Act Dawn Johnsen Indiana Maurer School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Dawn Johnsen, The Obama Administration’s Decision to Defend Constitutional Equality Rather Than the Defense of Marriage Act, 81 Fordham L. Rev. 599 (2013). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol81/iss2/5 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION’S DECISION TO DEFEND CONSTITUTIONAL EQUALITY RATHER THAN THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT Dawn Johnsen* When President Barack Obama announced his view that the Defense of Marriage Act1 (DOMA) violated the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection,2 he joined a storied line of Presidents who have acted upon their own constitutional determinations in the absence of, and on rare occasion contrary to, those of the U.S. Supreme Court. How best to proceed in the face of a federal statute the President considers unconstitutional can involve complex judgments, as was true of the difficult decision to enforce but not defend DOMA. Ordinarily the Department of Justice should adhere to its tradition of defending statutes against constitutional challenge, but I believe that DOMA constituted a rare exception.