DOCSLIB.ORG

Congressional Record—House H3189

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

April 10, 2014 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE H3189 but it does show you that there were dents who pay $12,000 per person, the they can’t answer questions, and so Members then and I believe people now highest per capita federal taxes in the they make personal attacks. who recognize the unfairness of the un- country, to support the United States Then our Attorney General makes a equal status of D.C. residents I have of America; in the name of millions speech yesterday in which, because he discussed today and earlier this week. ever since 1801, when the District of Co- was busy helping, perhaps, terrorists or It became more difficult to make lumbia became the Capital, who have Marc Rich or things like that he didn’t progress as the years went by, because died in our wars without seeing the notice, because I am sure he wouldn’t most of my service in the Congress has benefits of voting representation in the be untruthful or tell a lie, but he been in the minority. Yet we are mak- House and Senate and without the full doesn’t even know how bad it gets in ing progress. and equal rights of other Americans Washington if you are a conservative, We were able to get the first statue who died alongside them, I ask this if you are George W. Bush, if you are representing the District of Columbia House to grant the residents of their John Ashcroft, if you are Alberto in the Capitol last year. The reason Nation’s Capital statehood. And if you Gonzales. that is important is that a statue, like fall short of statehood, at the very It got pretty brutal here, a lot worse those of the states, was denied us be- least, our residents are entitled to than anything our current Attorney cause we are not yet a State. We have equal representation and to equal rec- General has seen, and that is even now been able to break through that ognition, to equality under law with without having to go back and recall with what is surely a symbol of state- every other American citizen. the treatment that John Mitchell got. hood. f I would say, deservedly so, John Mitch- And at the ceremony with majority ell got the treatment he got. But for and minority leadership, unveiling the WAR ON BRATS any Attorney General to be so ignorant Douglass statue, Majority Leader REID (Mr. PETRI asked and was given per- of what has happened in very recent used the occasion, with great enthu- mission to address the House for 1 years of the maltreatment and siasm, to indicate that he was cospon- minute and to revise and extend his re- malignment and basically slander of soring the D.C. statehood bill. marks.) Republicans and a Republican Presi- The reason that is important, Mr. Mr. PETRI. Mr. Speaker, I rise today dent and Republican Attorneys General Speaker, is that the Majority Leader, to express my concern that protec- is a bit breathtaking. like the Speaker of this House, cospon- tionism could one day lead to a ‘‘war There is a Web site that is Boycott sors very few bills. It says something on brats.’’ Liberalism. It has a lot of quotes from about the importance of correcting un- Bratwursts are delicious. They are people. Senator HARRY REID said: fairness to the District of Columbia enjoyed around the world. In Wis- President Bush is a liar. that Majority Leader REID not only has consin, we take our brats seriously. I don’t recall anyone saying that at become a cosponsor of our D.C. state- But nowhere more so than in the Sixth our hearings with our current Attorney hood bill, one of 17 Senators, but that District, which includes the Bratwurst General. he did so with great enthusiasm and in Capital of the World, Sheboygan, Wis- The Speaker of the U.S. House of a prominent public announcement. consin. Representatives, NANCY PELOSI, said: I am pleased that virtually the entire In 1970, the city of Sheboygan battled Bush is an incompetent leader. In fact, he’s Democratic Senate leadership has Bucyrus, Ohio, for the title and won. not a leader. sponsored our statehood bill. The battle was ended on August 14, I don’t recall anyone saying anything Mr. Speaker, Congress continues to 1970, when Judge John Bolgert issued of that magnitude of our current At- deny the American citizens who live in an official decision bestowing the title torney General or President, not in any its Nation’s Capital their most basic upon Sheboygan and barring all other of our hearings. rights. Today we have discussed how claimants from using it. Hillary Clinton, former Secretary of that is a violation of every American Unfortunately, this title could soon State and U.S. Senator, said: principle, and that it is even a viola- be under attack. There is growing con- We have a culture of corruption. We have tion of international law. cern that the European Union could cronyism. We have incompetence. Congress has failed to give D.C. resi- consider more geographic name restric- This actually raises a question about dents even some of the rights associ- tions on products including ‘‘kielbasa’’ pots and kettles calling each other ated with statehood, rights that they and Wisconsin’s own ‘‘bratwurst.’’ names. could give today or tomorrow even if This is, frankly, getting ridiculous. If Other quotes. John Edwards, a they were not prepared to grant us anything, we should be trademarking former U.S. Senator and Democratic statehood, the right to control our own the name ‘‘bratwurst,’’ not them. Vice Presidential nominee: local funds, funds we raise, funds we I am currently circulating a letter I would say if you live in the United States then turn over, at a cost of $12,000 per urging the U.S. trade representatives of America and you vote for George Bush, person, to support the government of to reject any attempt to include these you’ve lost your mind. the United States. provisions in further trade negotia- Senator AL FRANKEN said: Congress tyrannically overturns lo- tions. I strongly urge my colleagues to I think the President highjacked 9/11 and cally passed laws and keeps our local consider signing this letter. used it to go to war with Iraq in a way that laws from going into existence until f was very divisive. they have had an opportunity to look The late Ted Kennedy, as Senator, WAR ON CONSERVATIVES at them, except they don’t. They just said: leave this costly, delay-ridden require- The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under No President in American history has done ment in place. the Speaker’s announced policy of Jan- more damage to our country and our secu- Congress continues to command our uary 3, 2013, the gentleman from Texas rity than George W. Bush. taxes to support the national govern- (Mr. GOHMERT) is recognized for 60 min- Amazingly, I am not aware of any ment at a higher per capita rate than utes as the designee of the majority U.S. President in one party reaching the rate paid by any other Americans leader. out more to a Senator in the other while denying D.C. residents voting Mr. GOHMERT. It is amazing some of party than did George W. Bush with representation when Congress passes the efforts made to rewrite history and Senator Ted Kennedy, and these are laws concerning those taxes or con- cast things in a light that doesn’t the kind of comments he got in re- cerning any other matter affecting our exist. So as some people in the admin- sponse. country. istration step up the continued Senator Hillary Clinton, former Sec- Therefore, Mr. Speaker, in the name trashing of conservatives in America— retary of State, said: of those who have died in the Nation’s we have already seen the assault on I predict to you that this administration wars; in the name of the living vet- conservative groups by the IRS, that will go down in history as one of the worst erans of our wars who are among the does need a special prosecutor, clear- that has ever governed our country. 650,000 residents of the District of Co- ly—the assault on people with whom We are just talking about there has lumbia today; in the name of D.C. resi- some in the administration disagree, never been an Attorney General or VerDate Mar 15 2010 02:31 Apr 11, 2014 Jkt 039060 PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\K10AP7.048 H10APPT1 tjames on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with HOUSE H3190 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE April 10, 2014 President treated as have been the cur- tice Department to terrorists, con- People were coerced into selling rent ones. victed terrorists. weapons to people that should not have Senator Hillary Clinton, former Sec- People who financed terrorism, which had them, morally or legally, because retary of State, said: made them a part of the terrorist act, the Justice Department wanted to get There has never been an administration, I convicted of over 100 counts, they were them to drug cartels in Mexico, where don’t believe, in our history more intent on given, their lawyers were given thou- they did, and we know, we have heard consolidating and abusing power to further sands and thousands and thousands of that at least a couple of hundred or so their own agenda. pages of documents. Lawyers were Mexicans, each one of them a life She also said: given 9,600 or so transcripts or sum- worth saving, those lives were taken by I have been absolutely amazed, even maries of transcripts.
Recommended publications
  • James Rosen Eric Holder Warrant

    James Rosen Eric Holder Warrant

    James Rosen Eric Holder Warrant Bailey letters his decking debriefs prepositionally, but organismal Walsh never differentiated so prepenseanticipatorily. Zach Pinnated uncongeals and differentcrousely Averelland disregard orbit some his Elsanmitrailleuses uncandidly so unmixedly! and methodologically. Wanner and Load iframes as soon as his window. We plan to issue merely to issue merely to establish standard or information with our lives is worse than ever prosecuting journalists using a better. President Donald Trump and line look to doing worse. Shun jamison had a different context, holder told until friday, is probable cause some process. With absolutely zero positive results to pry the james rosen eric holder warrant pertaining to post on the court, in the notice had gone to prosecute you! Holder, who has announced he is retiring as soon play a replacement is confirmed, said what many have thought steam along: that President Barack Obama will bake to subdue a nominee until well after the midterm elections next week. Ultimately, the public gets protection from government secrecy and overreach. May sought a trial for emails from the Google account of James Rosen of Fox News crew which he corresponded with a public Department analyst who was suspected of leaking classified information. March for Our Lives Is mere a commercial Demand of Biden. Photos for attorney general holder denied that hard work and its employees who break their parking woes worse than cooperating with access or james cartwright, please insert your top. Please observe a valid email address. Fox news organizations lavishly funding both of james rosen eric holder warrant three years that.
  • The Civilian Impact of Drone Strikes

    The Civilian Impact of Drone Strikes

    THE CIVILIAN IMPACT OF DRONES: UNEXAMINED COSTS, UNANSWERED QUESTIONS Acknowledgements This report is the product of a collaboration between the Human Rights Clinic at Columbia Law School and the Center for Civilians in Conflict. At the Columbia Human Rights Clinic, research and authorship includes: Naureen Shah, Acting Director of the Human Rights Clinic and Associate Director of the Counterterrorism and Human Rights Project, Human Rights Institute at Columbia Law School, Rashmi Chopra, J.D. ‘13, Janine Morna, J.D. ‘12, Chantal Grut, L.L.M. ‘12, Emily Howie, L.L.M. ‘12, Daniel Mule, J.D. ‘13, Zoe Hutchinson, L.L.M. ‘12, Max Abbott, J.D. ‘12. Sarah Holewinski, Executive Director of Center for Civilians in Conflict, led staff from the Center in conceptualization of the report, and additional research and writing, including with Golzar Kheiltash, Erin Osterhaus and Lara Berlin. The report was designed by Marla Keenan of Center for Civilians in Conflict. Liz Lucas of Center for Civilians in Conflict led media outreach with Greta Moseson, pro- gram coordinator at the Human Rights Institute at Columbia Law School. The Columbia Human Rights Clinic and the Columbia Human Rights Institute are grateful to the Open Society Foundations and Bullitt Foundation for their financial support of the Institute’s Counterterrorism and Human Rights Project, and to Columbia Law School for its ongoing support. Copyright © 2012 Center for Civilians in Conflict (formerly CIVIC) and Human Rights Clinic at Columbia Law School All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America. Copies of this report are available for download at: www.civiliansinconflict.org Cover: Shakeel Khan lost his home and members of his family to a drone missile in 2010.
  • Case 1:13-Cv-03994-WHP Document 42-1 Filed 09/04/13 Page 1 of 15

    Case 1:13-Cv-03994-WHP Document 42-1 Filed 09/04/13 Page 1 of 15

    Case 1:13-cv-03994-WHP Document 42-1 Filed 09/04/13 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION; AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION; NEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION; and NEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION, Plaintiffs, v. No. 13-cv-03994 (WHP) JAMES R. CLAPPER, in his official capacity as Director of National Intelligence; KEITH B. ALEXANDER, in his ECF CASE official capacity as Director of the National Security Agency and Chief of the Central Security Service; CHARLES T. HAGEL, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense; ERIC H. HOLDER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States; and ROBERT S. MUELLER III, in his official capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Defendants. BRIEF AMICI CURIAE OF THE REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS AND 18 NEWS MEDIA ORGANIZATIONS IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Of counsel: Michael D. Steger Bruce D. Brown Counsel of Record Gregg P. Leslie Steger Krane LLP Rob Tricchinelli 1601 Broadway, 12th Floor The Reporters Committee New York, NY 10019 for Freedom of the Press (212) 736-6800 1101 Wilson Blvd., Suite 1100 [email protected] Arlington, VA 22209 (703) 807-2100 Case 1:13-cv-03994-WHP Document 42-1 Filed 09/04/13 Page 2 of 15 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .......................................................................................................... ii STATEMENT OF INTEREST ....................................................................................................... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT…………………………………………………………………1 ARGUMENT……………………………………………………………………………………2 I. The integrity of a confidential reporter-source relationship is critical to producing good journalism, and mass telephone call tracking compromises that relationship to the detriment of the public interest……………………………………….2 A There is a long history of journalists breaking significant stories by relying on information from confidential sources…………………………….4 B.
  • Did William Barr Refuse a Subpoena

    Did William Barr Refuse a Subpoena

    Did William Barr Refuse A Subpoena Unmetrical Luke padlock: he breezed his Armorican mnemonically and nobbily. Oligarchic and largest Abdulkarim never perverts his pterosaurs! How anarchic is Otho when color and brattish Sherwynd agitating some kowhais? The resolutions numbers restart every time and did william barr refuse a subpoena from him when we have accepted client has two houses, including a general? The Justice chief said allowing such cooperation did not mean. Y had refused so far more review a version of opening report a far fewer redactions. A Subpoena is a court priest to come a court tell you ignore the butcher the slow will hold you in reverse You could descend to round or face a big fine for ignoring the Subpoena Subpoenas are used in contract criminal wrongdoing civil cases. Congress does not big and detain it for ignoring its subpoenas. Y on May 2 slammed Attorney General William P Barr for refusing to appear. Contempt of Congress Wikipedia. And van Trump administration that has defied numerous subpoenas. And potentially embarrassing to a presidenteven if he did apparent wrong. Committee to bill to pick to landlord two subpoenas related to Robert S. Nadler did not seem out issuing a subpoena for Barr's testimony down the last but care was not expected to erase so on Thursday This story ever been. What to recruit about only General William Barr the door. Does a subpoena mean form are mostly trouble? Last week is General William Barr released a redacted version of. Watergate select committee threatened to jail staff who refused to appear.
  • A List of the Records That Petitioners Seek Is Attached to the Petition, Filed Concurrently Herewith

    A List of the Records That Petitioners Seek Is Attached to the Petition, Filed Concurrently Herewith

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE PETITION OF STANLEY KUTLER, ) AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION, ) AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR LEGAL HISTORY, ) Miscellaneous Action No. ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN HISTORIANS, ) and SOCIETY OF AMERICAN ARCHIVISTS. ) ) MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR ORDER DIRECTING RELEASE OF TRANSCRIPT OF RICHARD M. NIXON’S GRAND JURY TESTIMONY OF JUNE 23-24, 1975, AND ASSOCIATED MATERIALS OF THE WATERGATE SPECIAL PROSECUTION FORCE Professor Stanley Kutler, the American Historical Association, the American Society for Legal History, the Organization of American Historians, and the Society of American Archivists petition this Court for an order directing the release of President Richard M. Nixon’s thirty-five-year- old grand jury testimony and associated materials of the Watergate Special Prosecution Force.1 On June 23-24, 1975, President Nixon testified before two members of a federal grand jury who had traveled from Washington, DC, to San Clemente, California. The testimony was then presented in Washington, DC, to the full grand jury that had been convened to investigate political espionage, illegal campaign contributions, and other wrongdoing falling under the umbrella term Watergate. Watergate was the defining event of Richard Nixon’s presidency. In the early 1970s, as the Vietnam War raged and the civil rights movement in the United States continued its momentum, the Watergate scandal ignited a crisis of confidence in government leadership and a constitutional crisis that tested the limits of executive power and the mettle of the democratic process. “Watergate” was 1A list of the records that petitioners seek is attached to the Petition, filed concurrently herewith.
  • US Attorney General Releases New DOJ Charging and Sentencing Policy

    US Attorney General Releases New DOJ Charging and Sentencing Policy

    May 2017 U.S. Attorney General Releases New DOJ Charging and Sentencing Policy – Little Impact Anticipated for White Collar Cases and FCPA Pilot Program On May 12, 2017, U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions issued a two-page memorandum setting forth a new charging and sentencing policy for the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) (the “Sessions Memo,” available here). Except in limited circumstances, the new policy directs federal prosecutors to charge criminal defendants with “the most serious, readily provable offense,” and requires them to disclose to the sentencing court “all facts that impact the sentencing guidelines or mandatory minimum sentences.”1 The new policy rescinds a memorandum that former Attorney General Eric Holder issued on August 12, 2013 (the “Holder Memo,” available here), which instructed federal prosecutors to “conduct an individualized assessment of the extent to which charges fit the specific circumstances of the case.” While the Sessions Memo is likely to have a material impact in drug and violent crime cases, its effect on white-collar cases is less clear. Indeed, white-collar cases involve complex questions of intent, and the most “serious, readily provable offense” will likely continue to be subject to prosecutorial judgment and discretion. Importantly, DOJ has already issued a statement that the “[t]he [Foreign Corrupt Practices Act] pilot program is not affected by the new department charging and sentencing policy, as any potential exception made as part of the program would comply with the approval requirements laid out in the memo.”2, 3 1 The U.S. Sentencing Guidelines are non-binding rules that set forth a uniform sentencing policy for defendants convicted in the federal court system, which judges must consider in determining a criminal defendant’s sentence (available here).
  • John Mitchell and the Crimes of Watergate Reconsidered Gerald Caplan Pacific Cgem Orge School of Law

    John Mitchell and the Crimes of Watergate Reconsidered Gerald Caplan Pacific Cgem Orge School of Law

    University of the Pacific Scholarly Commons McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles McGeorge School of Law Faculty Scholarship 2010 The akM ing of the Attorney General: John Mitchell and the Crimes of Watergate Reconsidered Gerald Caplan Pacific cGeM orge School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/facultyarticles Part of the Legal Biography Commons, and the President/Executive Department Commons Recommended Citation 41 McGeorge L. Rev. 311 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the McGeorge School of Law Faculty Scholarship at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Book Review Essay The Making of the Attorney General: John Mitchell and the Crimes of Watergate Reconsidered Gerald Caplan* I. INTRODUCTION Shortly after I resigned my position as General Counsel of the District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department in 1971, I was startled to receive a two-page letter from Attorney General John Mitchell. I was not a Department of Justice employee, and Mitchell's acquaintance with me was largely second-hand. The contents were surprising. Mitchell generously lauded my rather modest role "in developing an effective and professional law enforcement program for the District of Columbia." Beyond this, he added, "Your thoughtful suggestions have been of considerable help to me and my colleagues at the Department of Justice." The salutation was, "Dear Jerry," and the signature, "John." I was elated. I framed the letter and hung it in my office.
  • Anddominatethe Coming

    Anddominatethe Coming

    AUGUST 2016 | THETRUMPET.COM What really caused the Orlando attack America’s real enemy China’s 100-year strategy The Arab Spring—five years later “Germany is the Diabetes: Are you at risk? economic and military heart of Europe. Probably Germany will lead and dominate the coming United States of Europe. But Britain will be no part of it.” — HERBERT W. ARMSTRONG 1956 COVER Herbert W. Armstrong prophesied 60 years ago that AUGUST 2016 | VOL. 27, NO. 7 | CIRC. 278,357 Britain would not remain united with Europe. (TRUMPET ILLUSTRATION) FEATURES 1 FROM THE EDITOR What Really Caused the Orlando Terrorist Attack 2 COVER STORY What’s Next for Britain? The Bible prophesied Brexit. What does this source of advance news say will follow? 5 What’s Next for Europe? Why Europe will emerge stronger than ever 8 America’s Real Enemy The real source of the nation’s problems is being overlooked. 11 Diabetes: Are You at Risk? 12 China’s Hundred-Year Strategy 14 One Man to Rule a Billion 16 Three Men Who Saved Millions 18 INFOGRAPHIC The Arab Spring Five Years On 20 Scientist, Astronomer, Mathematician—and Father of Nations 22 Lessons From a Broken Land DEPARTMENTS 28 WORLDWATCH 31 SOCIETYWATCH 33 PRINCIPLES OF LIVING Stuff Breaks—Deal With It 34 DISCUSSION BOARD 35 COMMENTARY Orlando Massacre: The Wrong Lesson BREXIT The votes have been counted— Britain is out of the European Union. 36 THE KEY OF DAVID TELEVISION LOG (MELISSA BARREIRO/TRUMPET) Trumpet editor in chief Gerald Trumpet executive editor Stephen News and analysis A weekly digest Flurry’s weekly television program Flurry’s television program updated daily of important news theTrumpet.com/keyofdavid theTrumpet.com/trumpet_daily theTrumpet.com theTrumpet.com/trumpetweekly FROM THE EDITOR What Really Caused the Orlando Terrorist Attack n Islamic State-supporting gunman massacred 49 he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out people at a homosexual nightclub in Orlando, Florida, with him” (Revelation 12:7-9).
  • The Case Study of Crossfire Hurricane

    The Case Study of Crossfire Hurricane

    TIMELINE: Congressional Oversight in the Face of Executive Branch and Media Suppression: The Case Study of Crossfire Hurricane 2009 FBI opens a counterintelligence investigation of the individual who would become Christopher Steele’s primary sub-source because of his ties to Russian intelligence officers.1 June 2009: FBI New York Field Office (NYFO) interviews Carter Page, who “immediately advised [them] that due to his work and overseas experiences, he has been questioned by and provides information to representatives of [another U.S. government agency] on an ongoing basis.”2 2011 February 2011: CBS News investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson begins reporting on “Operation Fast and Furious.” Later in the year, Attkisson notices “anomalies” with several of her work and personal electronic devices that persist into 2012.3 2012 September 11, 2012: Attack on U.S. installations in Benghazi, Libya.4 2013 March 2013: The existence of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email server becomes publicly known.5 May 2013: o News reports reveal Obama’s Justice Department investigating leaks of classified information and targeting reporters, including secretly seizing “two months of phone records for reporters and editors of The Associated Press,”6 labeling Fox News reporter James Rosen as a “co-conspirator,” and obtaining a search warrant for Rosen’s personal emails.7 May 10, 2013: Reports reveal that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) targeted and unfairly scrutinized conservative organizations seeking tax-exempt status.8
  • The Obama Administration and the Press Leak Investigations and Surveillance in Post-9/11 America

    The Obama Administration and the Press Leak Investigations and Surveillance in Post-9/11 America

    The Obama Administration and the Press Leak investigations and surveillance in post-9/11 America By Leonard Downie Jr. with reporting by Sara Rafsky A special report of the Committee to Protect Journalists Leak investigations and surveillance in post-9/11 America U.S. President Barack Obama came into office pledging open government, but he has fallen short of his promise. Journalists and transparency advocates say the White House curbs routine disclosure of information and deploys its own media to evade scrutiny by the press. Aggressive prosecution of leakers of classified information and broad electronic surveillance programs deter government sources from speaking to journalists. A CPJ special report by Leonard Downie Jr. with reporting by Sara Rafsky Barack Obama leaves a press conference in the East Room of the White House August 9. (AFP/Saul Loeb) Published October 10, 2013 WASHINGTON, D.C. In the Obama administration’s Washington, government officials are increasingly afraid to talk to the press. Those suspected of discussing with reporters anything that the government has classified as secret are subject to investigation, including lie-detector tests and scrutiny of their telephone and e-mail records. An “Insider Threat Program” being implemented in every government department requires all federal employees to help prevent unauthorized disclosures of information by monitoring the behavior of their colleagues. Six government employees, plus two contractors including Edward Snowden, have been subjects of felony criminal prosecutions since 2009 under the 1917 Espionage Act, accused of leaking classified information to the press— compared with a total of three such prosecutions in all previous U.S.
  • In the Brief

    In the Brief

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN THE MATTER OF THE SEARCH OF INFORMATION ASSOCIATED WITH Case No. 18-MJ-723 (PK) SPECIFIED E-MAIL ACCOUNTS UNOPPOSED BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, AND 21 MEDIA ORGANIZATIONS* IN SUPPORT OF MICROSOFT’S OBJECTIONS TO ORDER DENYING MOTION TO MODIFY SECRECY ORDER * A full list of the amici can be found in Appendix A. CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press is an unincorporated association of reporters and editors with no parent corporation and no stock. ALM Media, LLC is privately owned, and no publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of its stock. The American Society of Magazine Editors is a trade association with no parent corporation and no stock. Association of Alternative Newsmedia has no parent corporation and does not issue any stock. First Look Media Works, Inc. is a nonprofit non-stock corporation organized under the laws of Delaware. No publicly-held corporation holds an interest of 10% or more in First Look Media Works, Inc. Gannett Co., Inc. is a publicly traded company and has no affiliates or subsidiaries that are publicly owned. BlackRock, Inc., a publicly traded company, owns 10 percent or more of Gannett’s stock. The International Documentary Association is a not-for-profit organization with no parent corporation and no stock. Investigative Studios, Inc. is a nonprofit corporation formally affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley. It has no statutory members and no stock. The McClatchy Company is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange American under the ticker symbol MNI.
  • August 4, 2021 VIA E-MAIL Joon H. Kim Anne L. Clark Special Deputies

    August 4, 2021 VIA E-MAIL Joon H. Kim Anne L. Clark Special Deputies

    August 4, 2021 VIA E-MAIL Joon H. Kim Anne L. Clark Special Deputies to the First Deputy Attorney General Office of the Attorney General The Capitol Albany, NY 112224-0341 Re: Response to Special Investigators’ Report Dear Counsel: As outside counsel to the Executive Chamber, we write to express our client’s deep concerns about the fairness of your investigation, and the lack of neutrality and impartiality with which it was conducted and concluded. First, it is very disappointing that you refused to provide the subjects of the investigation, many of whom are current and former Chamber officers and employees, with an opportunity to review and respond to your findings before they became public today.1 Unlike civil litigation or criminal prosecutions, where an investigation is followed by the opportunity for a trial or a hearing, your report is the end of the line. There will be no formal setting in which those whose conduct the report discusses will have a meaningful opportunity to challenge, rebut, or even raise questions about the investigators’ accuracy, their credibility determinations, or their thoroughness. That lack of process explains why it has now become commonplace in circumstances like these for agencies such as the New York Inspector General,2 the U.S. Department of Justice’s 1 We also note that you did not even alert us that you were releasing your report today. 2 See, e.g., State of New York Offs. of the Inspector Gen., Investigation of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles Political Subdivision Program at 4 (Mar.