Riparian Zone Associations Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region Deschutes, Ochoco, Fremont, and R6 ECOLTP-279-87 Winema National Forests

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Riparian Zone Associations Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region Deschutes, Ochoco, Fremont, and R6 ECOLTP-279-87 Winema National Forests United States Depart merit of Agriculture Riparian Zone Associations Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region Deschutes, Ochoco, Fremont, and R6 ECOLTP-279-87 Winema National Forests 4'4, w,, ) Ii 4. p k ') *..- I .IuuIw . -,-. -4 ,M.'' ;-- u&-_ ,' r'/ By Bernard L. Kovaichik United States Department of Agriculture Riparian Zone Associations Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region Deschutes, Ochoco, Fremont, and Region 6 Ecology Technical Paper 279-87 Winema National Forests September 1987 By Bernard L. Kovaichik, Associate Ecologist Those who participate in management of National Forests whether they are foresters, engineers, landscape architects, biologists, hydrologists, fuels managers, geologists, or any other specialists, must in reality WHY WE CLASSIFY function as applied ecologists a large part of the time. PLANT ASSOCIATIONS The reason is that all parts of the ecosystems we manage are linked, and any decisions or recommendation made about one part produces impacts in the other parts when implemented. Thus, an understanding of the interre- lationships between all the ecosystem components is essential to making good choices about land management. One way to index the nature of ecosystem components is through vegetation. Over time, a relatively stable group of plants, or plant association, comes into equilibrium with the physical, chemical and biological environment on a given site (Daubeninire 1968). By know- something about the habitat requirements of these plants, we can often infer a great deal about a site's characteristics, just by looking at the vegetation. William and Lillybridge (1983) highlight three areas where plant associations are most useful: In planning management strategies - evaluating productivity, resource condition and response to disturbance. In communicating about our management exper- iences - both successes and failures - by providing a common framework for describing forest stands. In application of research - providing a direct link between research results and practical land management. The goal of the Area Ecology Program is to help those who manage National Forests understand what the presence of different groups of plants, or plant associations, implies. We do this by classifying and naming the assoc- iations, by collecting data on their productivity and response to disturbance, by publishing this information and by providing ongoing training to those who use it. Comments and inquiries may be addressed to: Area 4 Ecologist Deschutes National Forest 1645 Highway 20 East Bend, Oregon 97701 CONTENTS Page Willow/Kentucky bluegrass 74 Introduction 1 Willow/woolly sedge 76 Scope 1 Willow/widefruit sedge 78 Objectives 2 Willow/aquatic sedge 80 Methods 2 Willow/Sitka sedge 82 Field Methods 2 Willow/beaked sedge 84 Office Methods 2 Bog blueberry/Sitka sedge 86 Taxonomic Considerations 3 Bog blueberry/ Classification Concepts and Terminology 3 few-flowered spikerush 88 Community Type versus Association Concept. 3 Graminoid Dominated Associations 90 Nomenclature 3 Cusick bluegrass 90 Climate 4 Kentucky bluegrass 92 Soils 4 Tufted hairgrass 95 Geomorphology and Riparian Classification 5 Woolly sedge 98 Ochoco Mountains Physiographic Area 6 Nebraska sedge 100 Grasslands Physiographic Area 6 Widefruit sedge 102 Deschutes Cascades Physiographic Area 6 Aquatic sedge 104 LaPine Basin Physiographic Area 6 Short-beaked sedge 106 Low Flanks Cascades Physiographic Area 8 Slender sedge 108 Pumice-mantled Cascades Few-flowered spikerush 110 Physiographic Area 8 Small-fruit bulrush (bigleaf sedge) 1l2 Winema Cascades Physiographic Area 8 Sitka sedge 114 Pumice-mantled Basin and Range Inflated sedge 116 Physiographic Area 8 Beaked sedge 118 Basin and Range Physiographic Area 9 Creeping spikerush 120 The Ripariari Classification 9 Forb Dominated Associations 122 Association and Community Description Queencup beadlily (mountain alder). 122 Criteria 12 Arrowleaf groundsel 124 Vegetative Key to Dominance Groups, High Elevation Associations 126 Associations, and Community Types... .13 Brewer sedge 126 Key to Riparian Zone Associations on the Black alpine sedge 128 Ochoco and Fremont National Forests Holms sedge-black alpine Using Landforms and Fluvial Surfaees.21 sedge-tufted hairgrass 130 Coniferous Forest Dominated Associations. .27 Holm's sedge 132 Ponderosa pine/common Red mountainheath 134 snowberry-floodplain 27 Miscellaneous Associations Lodgepole pine/Kentucky bluegrass. 29 and Community Types 136 Lodgepole pine/bearberry 31 References 139 Lodgepole pine/Douglas spiraea/forb. 33 Lodgepole pine/Douglas spiraea/widefruit sedge 35 Appendices: Lodgepole pine/bog blueberry/forb.. .37 Lodgepole pine/bog Number of Sample Plots by Association or blueberry/widefruit sedge 39 Community Type and Vicinity in Central Lodgepole pine/widefruit sedge 41 Oregon 142 Lodgepole pine/aquatic sedge 43 Constancy and Average Cover of Important Lodgepole pine - Engelmann Riparian Zone Plants in Central Oregon. .144 spruce/few-flowered spikerush. .45 Common Riparian Zone Vegetation on Central White fir/queencup beadlily 47 Oregon National Forests 160 Engelmann spruce/queencup beadlily. .49 Basal Area and 100-Year Site Index for Engelmann spruce/bog blueberry/forb. 51 Forested Riparian Zone Associations and Engelmann spruce/bog Community Types 165 blueberry/widefruit sedge 53 Glossary 166 Engelmann spruce/widefruit sedge 55 Engelmann spruce/common List of Figures: horsetail-twistedstalk 57 Deciduous Forest Dominated Community Area covered by this classification 1 Types. 59 Physiographic Areas of central Oregon 7 Quaking aspen/common Ochoco Creek Riparian Landform 27 snowberry/blue wildrye 59 Lake Creek Riparian Landform 27 Quaking aspen/blue wildrye 61 Jack Creek Riparian Landform 29 Quaking aspen-lodgepole pine/ Williamson River Riparian Landform 30 Douglas spiraea/widefruit sedge 63 Jack Creek Riparian Landform 31 Shrub Dominated Associations 65 Jackies Thicket Riparian Landform 31 Sagebrush/Cusick bluegrass 65 Coyote Creek Riparian Landform 33 Mountain alder 67 Miller Creek Riparian Landform 34 Mountain alder-common snowberry 69 Spruce Creek Riparian Landform 35 Mountain alder-Douglas spiraea 71 Unnamed drainage between Highway 97 and Mountain alder springs 73 Williamson River Riparian Landform 35 Jackie's Thicket Riparian Landform 37 Unnamed meadow near Lake of the Woods Riparian Landform 39 Long Prairie Riparian Landform 90 Jackies Thicket Riparian Landform 40 Chocktoot Creek Riparian Landform 91 Jack Creek Riparian Landform 41 Williamson River Riparian Landforin 92 Unnamed drainage near Davis Flat 41 Jack Creek Riparian Landform 93 Cougar Creek Riparian Landform 43 O'Connor Meadow Riparian Landform 95 Cottonwood Lake Riparian Landform 43 Heavenly Lakes Meadow Riparian Landform. .95 Cascade Lakes Highway Water Tower Meadow Riparian Landform 96 Bog Riparian Landform 45 Biggs Spring Headwaters Jack Creek Riparian Landform.. 46 Aspen Exciosure Riparian Landform 98 Trout Creek Riparian Landform 47 Boone Prairie Riparian Landform 100 Cougar Creek Riparian Landform 47 O'Connor Meadow Riparian Landform 102 Severunile Creek Riparian L.andform 49 Jack Creek Riparian Landforin 103 Little Cultus Marsh Riparian Landform 50 Sycan River Meadow Riparian Landform 104 Heavenly Lakes Meadow Riparian Landform. .51 Cougar Creek Riparian Landform 104 Many Lakes Bog Riparian Landform 53 Squaw Creek Marsh Riparian Landform 106 Upper Desehutes River Stimson Meadow Riparian Landform 106 Bog Riparian Landform 55 Big Marsh Riparian Landform 108 Squaw Creek Marsh Riparian Landform 55 Lake of the Woods Riparian Landform 108 Sevenmile Creek Riparian Landform 57 Little Cultus Marsh Riparian Landforin.. .110 Indian Ford Creek Cascade Lakes Highway Bog Riparian Campground Riparian Landform 59 Landform ill Dudley Creek Riparian Landform 61 Sevenmile Creek Riparian Landforni 112 Unnamed drainage near Highway 97 and Lake Creek Riparian Landform 112 Williamson River Riparian Landform 63 Deschutes River Riparian Landforin 114 Silver Creek Riparian Landform 65 Indian Ford Creek Riparian Landform 114 Boone Prairie Riparian Landform 65 Fivemile Creek Riparian Landform 116 Ochoco Creek Riparian Landform 67 Lake of the Woods Riparian Landform 116 Sevenmile Creek Riparian Landform 67 Santiam Pass Marsh Riparian Landform 118 Ochoco Creek Riparian Landform 69 Deschutes River Riparian Landform 118 Lake Creek Riparian Landform 70 Pond near Odell Creek Riparian Landform 71 Campbell Lake Riparian Landform 120 Metolius River Riparian Landfornt 71 Chocktoot Creek Riparian Landform 120 Chocktoot Creek Riparian Landform 74 Trout Creek Riparian Landform 122 Silver Creek Riparlan Landform 76 Todd Creek Riparian Landform 124 Crescent Creek Riparian Landform 78 Unnamed drainage near Spruce Creek Riparian Landform 78 Round Meadow Riparian Landform 126 Upper Sycan River Broken Top Meadow Riparian Landform 128 Meadow Riparian Landform 80 Broken Top Meadow Riparian Landforin 130 Sycan River Riparian Landform 80 Water Tower Meadow Riparian Landform 132 Deschutes River Riparian Landform 82 Broken Top Meadow Riparian Landform 132 Little Cultus Marsh Riparian Landform 82 Crater Creek Riparian Landform 134 Allison Creek Marsh Riparian Landform 84 Little Cultus Marsh Riparian Landform 86 Big Marsh Creek Riparian Landform 86 Table: Cascade Lakes Highway Bog Riparian Landform 88 Riparian zone associations and community types Upper Deschutes River of the Deschutes, Fremont, Ochoco, and Winema Bog Riparian Landform 88 National Forests 10 INTRODUCTION RIPARIAN ZONE ASSOCIATIONS OF THE DESCHUTES, OCHOCO,
Recommended publications
  • Sea Level Driven Marsh Expansion in a Coupled Model of Marsh Erosion and Migration
    W&M ScholarWorks VIMS Articles Virginia Institute of Marine Science 5-14-2016 Sea level driven marsh expansion in a coupled model of marsh erosion and migration Matthew L. Kirwan Virginia Institute of Marine Science DC Walters W. G. Reay Virginia Institute of Marine Science JA Carr Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/vimsarticles Part of the Earth Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Kirwan, Matthew L.; Walters, DC; Reay, W. G.; and Carr, JA, "Sea level driven marsh expansion in a coupled model of marsh erosion and migration" (2016). VIMS Articles. 1418. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/vimsarticles/1418 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Virginia Institute of Marine Science at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in VIMS Articles by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PUBLICATIONS Geophysical Research Letters RESEARCH LETTER Sea level driven marsh expansion in a coupled 10.1002/2016GL068507 model of marsh erosion and migration Key Points: Matthew L. Kirwan1, David C. Walters1, William G. Reay1, and Joel A. Carr2 • Accelerated sea level rise leads to marsh expansion along gently 1Department of Physical Sciences, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary, Gloucester Point, sloping, unhardened coasts 2 • Loss of marsh and natural flood Virginia, USA, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Laurel, Maryland, USA protection is inevitable where barriers limit migration into uplands • Fluxes of organisms and sediment Abstract Coastal wetlands are among the most valuable ecosystems on Earth, where ecosystem services across adjacent ecosystems lead to such as flood protection depend nonlinearly on wetland size and are threatened by sea level rise and coastal increase in system resilience development.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Holocene Wetland Succession at Lake Flixton (UK) and Its Implications for Mesolithic Settlement
    Vegetation History and Archaeobotany https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-019-00714-9 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Early Holocene wetland succession at Lake Flixton (UK) and its implications for Mesolithic settlement Barry Taylor1 Received: 29 May 2018 / Accepted: 23 January 2019 © The Author(s) 2019 Abstract This paper reports on new research into the timing and nature of post-glacial environmental change at Lake Flixton (North Yorkshire, UK). Previous investigations indicate a succession of wetland environments during the early Holocene, ultimately infilling the basin by ca 7,000 cal BP. The expansion of wetland environments, along with early Holocene woodland devel- opment, has been linked to changes in the human occupation of this landscape during the Mesolithic (ca 11,300–6,000 cal BP). However, our understanding of the timing and nature of environmental change within the palaeolake is poor, making it difficult to correlate to known patterns of Mesolithic activity. This paper provides a new record for both the chronology and character of environmental change within Lake Flixton, and discusses the implications for the Mesolithic occupation of the surrounding landscape. Keywords Mesolithic · Early Holocene · Plant macrofossils · Environmental change · Lake Flixton · Star Carr Introduction to the final Palaeolithic, terminal Palaeolithic and the early and late Mesolithic have also been recorded (Fig. 2) (Con- Since the late 1940s evidence for intensive phases of early neller and Schadla-Hall 2003). Early Mesolithic activity (ca prehistoric activity has been recorded around Lake Flix- 11,300–9,500 cal BP) was particularly intensive. Recent work ton in the eastern Vale of Pickering (North Yorkshire, UK) at Star Carr has shown that the site was occupied for ca (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Sycan Watershed Analysis
    Lower Sycan Watershed Analysis Fremont-Winema National Forest 2005 Lower Sycan River T33S,R12E,S23 Lower Sycan Watershed Analysis Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................... 1 General Watershed Area.....................................................................................................................................2 Geology and Soils.................................................................................................................................................5 Climate..................................................................................................................................................................6 STEP 1. CHARACTERIZATION OF THE WATERSHED ................................................................... 7 I. Watershed and Aquatics.................................................................................................................................7 Soils And Geomorphology...............................................................................................................................................10 Aquatic Habitat ................................................................................................................................................................10 II. Vegetation.....................................................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Field Nats News No. 301 Newsletter of the Field Naturalists Club of Victoria Inc
    Field Nats News 301 Page 1 Field Nats News No. 301 Newsletter of the Field Naturalists Club of Victoria Inc. 1 Gardenia Street, Blackburn Vic 3130 Editor: Joan Broadberry 03 9846 1218 Telephone 03 9877 9860 Founding editor: Dr Noel Schleiger P.O. Box 13, Blackburn 3130 www.fncv.org.au Understanding Reg. No. A0033611X Our Natural World Newsletter email: [email protected] (Office email: [email protected]) Patron: The Honourable Linda Dessau, AC Governor of Victoria Office Hours: Monday and Tuesday 9.30 am - 4 pm. October 2019 NOTE EARLIER DEADLINE From the President It is nice to see some Spring sunshine although I have yet to see many invertebrates The deadline for FNN 302 will be moving about the garden. On the other hand there have been many small protoctists 10 am on Monday 30th September as to observe. Wendy Gare recently provided me with moss and water samples from the editor is hoping to go to Annuello. her garden pond in Blackburn and once again I have been delighted to see the ex- FNN will go to the printers on the 8th traordinary biodiversity of “infusoria” in a small urban pond. Microscopical exami- with collation on Tuesday 15th October nation revealed numerous amoeboids, ciliates, flagellates and a host of small arthro- pods and annelids including mites, copepods, fly larvae and tiny freshwater oligo- chaetes. Gastrotrichs, nematodes, rotifers, tardigrades and diatoms were also well Contents represented. Some of the protozoan organisms from Wendy’s pond are pictured be- low. There were also many spirochaete bacteria swimming about.
    [Show full text]
  • Carr Slough Preservation and Tidal Wetland Restoration
    Carr Slough Preservation and Tidal Wetland Restoration Carr Slough is a 103-acre privately owned tidal freshwater wetland connected to the Lower Columbia River near Prescott, Oregon in Columbia County (Figure 1). It is located at approximately River Mile 73 just upstream of Cottonwood Island and is situated between Highway 30 and the railway (Table 1). It has approximately 1.8 miles of channels, of which approximately one mile is comprised of straight channel drainage ditch with the remaining portions as an apparent natural channel with meanders and woody riparian vegetation. The site is mapped as entirely Rafton-Sauvie-Moag Complex soil type, a floodplain silty-clay alluvium derived of mixed sources and having extremely poor drainage. There is an opportunity to protect Carr Slough and its natural resource values for fish and wildlife habitat in perpetuity via the Natural Resources Conservation Service’s Wetland Reserve Program (WRP). The site has excellent value for a variety of species and important habitat types in the Lower Columbia, as detailed below, and would be an important site to preserve. There is also potential to undertake habitat improvement actions to increase the existing natural resource values of the site after the site has been preserved. Table 1. Site Location Information for Carr Slough Project Fourth Field Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): Lower Columbia/Clatskanie 17080003 Project Fifth Field Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): Beaver Creek/Columbia River 1708000302 Project T/R/S Location: T7N, R3W, Section 26 SE, 35 NE Project Latitude/Longitude: 46.0524381N, 122.8950261W USGS Quadrangle Map Name: Rainier County: Columbia Potential Resource Benefits & Preservation Value of Carr Slough There are multiple habitat types of value at Carr Slough, including freshwater tidal emergent wetland, shrub-scrub wetland, slough and freshwater tidal channel.
    [Show full text]
  • CEDARBURG BOG WETLAND TYPES Kate Redmond Coniferous Bog, Coniferous Swamp, Fen, Lowland Hardwood Swamp, Marsh, Shrub Carr, Ephemeral Pond, Patterned Peatland
    SOUTHEAST - 2 CEDARBURG BOG WETLAND TYPES Kate Redmond Coniferous bog, coniferous swamp, fen, lowland hardwood swamp, marsh, shrub carr, ephemeral pond, patterned peatland ECOLOGY & SIGNIFICANCE low strips of open sedge mat alternating with peat ridges of bog birch, leatherleaf, white cedar and tamarack. Plants Cedarburg Bog is the least disturbed large bog remaining common at the site include cranberry, bog birch, narrow- in southern Wisconsin. This wetland complex was once leaved sedge, bogbean, water horsetail, arrowgrass and part of a large glacial lake; today six lakes of varying size orchids as well as insectivorous plants like round-leaved and depth, all with high water quality, remain. The site’s • sundew, purple pitcher plant and bladderwort. More than OZAUKEE COUNTY 2500 acres support a number of different wetland plant 35 plant species at Cedarburg Bog are at or near the southern community types and an associated diversity of plants, extent of their range in Wisconsin. including many species that are regionally rare and are at the southern limits of their range here. This Wetland Gem Cedarburg Bog provides excellent habitat for both breeding also supports significant wildlife diversity including many and migrating birds. Nearly 300 species of birds have been amphibians, mammals and hundreds of birds. documented in the area, including 19 species that are near the southern extent of their range in Wisconsin. Breeding FLORA & FAUNA birds include Acadian Flycatcher, willow flycatcher, hooded This diverse wetland complex consists of extensive warbler, golden-crowned kinglet, Canada warbler, northern coniferous bog with a canopy of tamarack and black spruce waterthrush and white-throated sparrow.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Action Plan
    Stream Stability and Water Quality 2018-2020 Schoharie Watershed Stream Management Program 2018 – 2020 Action Plan Photo of Batavia Kill Streambank Stabilization at Kastanis courtesy of Chris Langworthy (GCSWCD) NYCDEP Stream Management Program Greene County Soil & Water Conservation District 71 Smith Ave 907 County Office Building Kingston, NY 12401 Cairo, NY 12413 Dave Burns, ProjectGreene Manager County Soil & Water ConservationJeff Flack, Executive District Director 845.340.7850 907 County Office Building, Cairo518.622.6320 NY 12413 [email protected] [email protected] Stream Stability and Water Quality 2018-2020 Greene County Soil & Water Conservation District 907 County Office Building, Cairo NY 12413 Phone (518) 622-3620 Fax (518) 622-0344 To: David Burns, Project Manager, NYCDEP From: Jeff Flack, Executive Director, GCSWCD Date: May 15, 2018 Re: Schoharie Watershed Stream Management Program 2018-2020 Action Plan The Greene County Soil and Water Conservation District (GCSWCD) and the NYC Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) have collaborated with the Schoharie Watershed Advisory Committee (SWAC) to develop the 2018 – 2020 Action Plan. The Action Plan provides the Schoharie Watershed Stream Management Program’s activities, projects and programs that are planned for 2018-2020 as well as program accomplishments. The Action Plan is divided into key programmatic areas: A. Protecting and Enhancing Stream Stability and Water Quality B. Floodplain Management and Planning C. Highway and Infrastructure Management in Conjunction with Streams D. Assisting Streamside Landowners (Public and Private) E. Protecting and Enhancing Aquatic and Riparian Habitat F. Enhancing Public Access to Streams The Action Plan is updated and revised annually. This plan will be implemented from May 2018 – May 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • CHEROKEE MARSH WETLAND TYPES Mario Quintano Marsh, Fen, Sedge Meadow, Low Prairie, Shrub Carr
    SOUTHEAST - 3 CHEROKEE MARSH WETLAND TYPES Mario Quintano Marsh, fen, sedge meadow, low prairie, shrub carr ECOLOGY & SIGNIFICANCE areas of marsh habitat extend out into the river channel. Common herbaceous plants at the site include cattails, This urban Wetland Gem is the largest remaining wetland common bur-reed, river bulrush, softstem bulrush, in Dane County and a highly significant wetland within hardstem bulrush, sago pondweed, coontail, pickerel the Yahara River watershed. More than 2000 acres at weed and a variety of sedges and rushes. The site supports Cherokee Marsh, along both the east and west sides of DANE COUNTY some relic tamarack trees and several rare plant species, • the river, are protected by city, county and state agency including tufted bulrush, small yellow ladyslipper, white property owners. This extensive wetland complex is ladyslipper and glade mallow. characterized by steep side slopes and large flat expanses hosting marsh, fen, shrub carr, sedge meadow, and one of Many mammals, amphibians, reptiles and birds use the largest low prairies in the region. Cherokee Marsh not Cherokee Marsh. A wide diversity of birds nest in or only serves as excellent wildlife habitat, but also provides migrate through the area, including northern harrier, services like water quality protection and flood attenuation short-eared owl, great horned owl, American egret, great to the City of Madison downstream. The City has intensive blue heron, green heron, sandhill crane, marsh wren, and ongoing marsh restoration efforts that are helping to sedge wren, swamp sparrow, belted kingfisher, and bring back hundreds of lost acres. The site also provides many species of ducks.
    [Show full text]
  • Botanical and Ecological Inventory of Peatland Sites on the Medicine Bow National Forest
    Botanical and Ecological Inventory of Peatland Sites on the Medicine Bow National Forest Prepared for Medicine Bow National Forest By Bonnie Heidel and Scott Laursen Wyoming Natural Diversity Database University of Wyoming P.O. Box 3381 Laramie, WY 82071 FS Agreement No. 02-CS-11021400-012 June 2003 ABSTRACT Peatlands are specialized wetland habitats that harbor high concentrations of Wyoming plant species of special concern. Intensive botanical and ecological inventories were conducted at five select peatland sites on Medicine Bow National Forest to further document the vascular flora, update information on plant species of special concern, initiate documentation of the bryophyte flora composition, and to document the vegetation associations. This provides a preliminary summary of peatland botanical and ecological resources on Medicine Bow National Forest, data for comparison between sites, and both floristic and vegetation plot datasets for comparison between Medicine Bow National Forest and Shoshone National Forest where parallel studies were undertaken. It might be used for more more extensive systematic inventories of peatlands and their associated botanical and ecological attributes across the Forest, or related efforts to evaluate watershed, wildlife, and other values associated with peatlands. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS John Proctor (USFS Medicine Bow NF) contributed to fieldwork and provided Forest Service coordination that made this project a reality. Judy Harpel (USFS) made the moss species identifications for a segment of moss specimens, and provided encouragement in bryophyte research. George Jones (WYNDD) and Kathy Roche (USFS Medicine Bow NF) provided literature and comments on site selection and study aspects. Gary Beauvais provided administrative support. Chris Hiemstra and Mark Lyford (UW) provided study site data.
    [Show full text]
  • Abert and Summer Lakes, South-Central Oregon
    ... ( t.• CE'...,.. ~ - ~'>01..1.4_... ~ Dl - . ,, c E: 70. I V F' O I 12 "7.'t: I z Solute Balance at 'i.'] .J Abert and Summer Lakes, South-Central Oregon GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 502-C Solute Balance at Abert and Summer Lakes, South-Central Oregon By A. S. VAN DENBURGH CLOSED- BASIN INVESTIGATIONS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 502-C A description of the quantity and chemical character of incoming, outgoing, and stored solutes and the mechanisms of solute accumulation and depletion in a saline environment UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON 1975 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data VanDenburgh, A. S. Solute balance at Abert and Summer Lakes, south-central Oregon. (Closed-basin investigations) (Geological Survey Professional Paper 502-C) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs. No.: I 19.16:502-C 1. Saline waters-Oregon-Abert Lake. 2. Saline waters-Oregon-Summer Lake. I. Title. II. Series. III. Series: United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 502-C. QE75.P9 No. 502-C fGB1625.07) 557.3'08s f553'.72'0979593) 75-619062 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 024-001-02689-9 CONTENTS P.1ge Page Abstract ... ..... ........ ....... .. .... ..... .. ....... ........ ........ ... .. ... ... ... ... ... .. C1 Solute bala!H"e ................................................................................... C10 Introduction ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wms92 Southern Basin Wet Meadow/Carr Factsheet
    WET MEADOW/CARR SYSTEM WMs92 Southern Floristic Region Southern Basin Wet Meadow/Carr Open wetlands dominated by dense cover of broad-leaved sedges. Typically present in small, closed, shallow basins isolated from groundwater inputs. Vegetation Structure & Composition Description is based on summary of vegetation data from 28 plots (relevés). • Mosses are typically absent or sparse, although the weedy and shade-tolerant spe- cies Drepanocladus aduncus is commonly present beneath dense sedge tussocks • Graminoid cover is continuous (75–100%); typically dominated by slough sedge (Carex atherodes), sometimes with whitetop (Scolo- chloa festucacea), bluejoint (Calamagrostis canadensis), prairie cordgrass (Spartina pectinata), red-stalked spikerush (Eleocharis palustris), or lake sedge (Carex lacustris). • Forb cover is variable, ranging from absent to sparse (< 25%); common species include water smartweed (Polygonum amphibium), cattails (Typha spp.), common mint (Men- tha arvensis), rough bugleweed (Lycopus asper), water parsnip (Sium suave), and swamp milkweed (Asclepias incarnata). • Shrub cover is sparse; pussy willow (Salix discolor), slender willow (S. petiolaris), and red-osier dogwood (Cornus sericea) may be present. • Note: WMs92 has become uncommon across much of its range as a result of invasion by non-native species, especially reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea), following alterations in wetland hydrology. Landscape Setting & Soils WMs92 occurs primarily in shallow wetland basins and rarely along shores of lakes and rivers. Surface water is derived from rainfall and surface flow; in general, sites are isolated from lateral groundwater flow. Water chemistry is basic (pH > 7) because of influence of calcareous soils. Relatively low precipitation in the prairie region and high rates of evaporation result in higher salinity in this community compared with other Wet Meadow/Carr communities in Minnesota.
    [Show full text]
  • Designated Trout Lakes and Streams
    DESIGNATED TROUT LAKES FO - 200.02 Following is a listing of designated Type A lakes. Type A lakes are managed strictly for trout and, as such, are DESIGNATED TROUT LAKES. County Lake Name Alcona O' Brien Lake Alger Addis Lakes (T46N, R20W, S33) Alger Cole Creek Pond (T46N, R20W, S24) Alger Grand Marais Lake Alger Hike Lake Alger Irwin Lake Alger Rock Lake Alger Rock River Pond Alger Sullivan Lake (T49N, R15W, S21) Alger Trueman Lake Baraga Alberta Pond Baraga Roland Lake Chippewa Dukes Lake Chippewa Highbanks Lake Chippewa Naomikong Lake Chippewa Naomikong Pond Chippewa Roxbury Pond, East Chippewa Roxbury Pond, West Chippewa Trout Brook Pond Crawford Bright Lake Crawford Glory Lake Crawford Kneff Lake Crawford Shupac Lake 1 of 86 DESIGNATED TROUT LAKES County Lake Name Delta Bear Lake Delta Carr Lake (T43N, R18W, S36) Delta Carr Ponds (T43N, R18W, S26) Delta Kilpecker Pond (T43N, R18W, S11) Delta Norway Lake Delta Section 1 Pond Delta Square Lake Delta Wintergreen Lake (T43N, R18W, S36) Delta Zigmaul Pond Gogebic Castle Lake Gogebic Cornelia Lake Gogebic Mishike Lake Gogebic Plymouth Lake Houghton Penegor Lake Iron Deadman’s Lk (T41N, R32W, S5 & 8) Iron Fortune Pond (T43N, R33W, S25) Iron Hannah-Webb Lake Iron Killdeer Lake Iron Madelyn Lake Iron Skyline Lake Iron Spree Lake Isabella Blanchard Pond Keweenaw Manganese Lake Keweenaw No Name Pond (T57N, R31W, S8) Luce Bennett Springs Lake Luce Brockies Pond (T46N, R11W, S1) 2 of 86 DESIGNATED TROUT LAKES County Lake Name Luce Buckies Pond (T46N, R11W, S1) Luce Dairy Lake Luce Dillingham
    [Show full text]