Arxiv:2007.00660V1 [Physics.Space-Ph] 1 Jul 2020 BBELF Heating Was Thought to Occur Well Above the Iono- Will Be Trapped in an Eﬀective Potential Well

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. ???, XXXX, DOI:10.1002/?DRAFT,

On O+ ion heating by BBELF waves at low altitude: Test particle simulations Yangyang Shen1, 2, David J. Knudsen1

Abstract. We investigate mechanisms of wave-particle heating of ionospheric O+ ions resulting from broadband extremely low frequency (BBELF) waves using numerical test particle simulations that take into account ion-neutral collisions, in order to explain observations from the Enhanced Polar Outflow Probe (e-POP) satellite at low altitudes (∼400 km) [Shen et al., 2018]. We argue that in order to reproduce ion temperatures observed at e-POP altitudes, the most effective ion heating mechanism is through cyclotron acceleration by short-scale electrostatic ion cyclotron (EIC) waves with perpendicular wavelengths λ⊥≤200 m. The interplay between finite perpendicular wavelengths, wave amplitudes, and ion-neutral collision frequencies collectively determine the ionospheric ion heating limit, which begins to decrease sharply with decreasing altitude below approx- νc −3 imately 500 km, where the ratio becomes larger than 10 , νc and fci denoting the fci O+–O collision frequency and ion cyclotron frequency. We derive, both numerically and analytically, the ion gyroradius limit from heating by an EIC wave at half the cyclotron frequency. The limit is 0.28λ⊥. The ion gyroradius limit from an EIC wave can be surpassed either through adding waves with different λ⊥, or through stochastic “breakout”, meaning ions diffuse in energy beyond the gyroradius limit due to stochastic heating from large-amplitude waves. Our two-dimensional simulations indicate that small-scale (<1 km) Alfvénwaves cannot account for the observed ion heating through trapping or stochastic heating.

1. Introduction observations call for a more comprehensive and realistic ion heating model in the BBELF wave environment, including The importance of broadband extremely low-frequency the effects of both ionospheric ion-neutral collisions and fi- (BBELF) waves for transverse ionospheric ion heating and nite perpendicular wavelengths. There has been no such ion outflow in the high-latitude auroral region has been well model in the literature yet. established [Kintner et al., 1996; Bonnell et al., 1996; Knud- Previous studies have suggested different mechanisms of sen et al., 1998; Lynch et al., 2002]. Based on observa- ion heating from auroral plasma waves. Ions can be res- tions from sounding rockets and satellites, a number of wave onantly accelerated by lower-hybrid waves when the per- modes may exist in the broadband emission from several Hz pendicular wave phase velocity is comparable with the ion up to several kHz, including Alfvénwaves below the ion cy- velocity, leading to a heated tail [Lynch et al., 1996; Tsuru- clotron frequency [Stasiewicz et al., 2000a; Chaston et al., tani and Lakhina, 1997]. On the other hand, particles in the 2004], ion acoustic waves [Wahlund et al., 1998], electrostatic bulk of the ion population can be accelerated simultaneously waves near the ion cyclotron frequency (EIC waves) [Kint- by long-wavelength (much larger than the ion gyroradius ρi) ner et al., 1996; Bonnell et al., 1996], and electromagnetic ion cyclotron waves through quasi-linear cyclotron resonance ion cyclotron (EMIC) waves [Erlandson et al., 1994]. [Chang et al., 1986]. Ball and André [1991] used test parti- Although it is agreed upon that perpendicular electric cle simulations to study ion heating by BBELF waves and fields, either left-hand circularly polarized or linearly polar- found that the heating rate increases as the wave frequency ized, are essential for ion acceleration [Lysak et al., 1980; approaches the ion cyclotron frequency. Chang et al., 1986; Chaston et al., 2004], the ion heat- A similar, but nonlinear, acceleration mechanism is the ing mechanism, dominant wave modes, and perpendicular coherent ion trapping by electrostatic ion cyclotron waves wavelengths that are responsible for ion heating are still [Lysak et al., 1980; Ram et al., 1998]. Lysak et al. [1980] not well known [Paschmann et al., 2003]. Until recently, found that, in a single electrostatic ion cyclotron wave, ions arXiv:2007.00660v1 [physics.space-ph] 1 Jul 2020 BBELF heating was thought to occur well above the iono- will be trapped in an effective potential well. The energy, or sphere where collisional effects are negligible [e.g. Wu et al., equivalently the gyroradius, of the ion is limited by the first 1999; Zeng et al., 2006]. Shen et al. [2018] reported multi- zeros of the Bessel function of the first kind, governed by the ple examples of BBELF-induced heating at altitudes as low parameter k ρ , where k is the perpendicular wavenumber. as 350 km and at spatial scales as narrow as 2 km. These ⊥ i ⊥ Lysak et al. [1980] also showed that the presence of additional waves with different wavenumbers can detrap the ion, and the gyroradius barrier can be surpassed. Lysak [1986] 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of extended this theory to harmonics of EIC waves, in which Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. case the upper limits of the ion gyroradius are specified by 2Now at Department of Earth, Planetary, and Space the first zeros of Jn(k⊥ρi), where n is the harmonic inte- Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California, ger order. In this paper, we extend these previous results USA ωc of gyroradius limits to EIC waves with the frequency of 2 , which has not been reported yet. We shall provide consis- Copyright 2020 by the American Geophysical Union. tent analytical and numerical calculations for the gyroradius 0148-0227/20/$9.00 limits. 1 X - 2 SHEN ET AL.: ION HEATING BY BBELF WAVES

Another important type of acceleration mechanism is 2. Stochastic ion acceleration by a monochromatic stochastic ion heating, in which ion energy increases due electrostatic wave to random kicks in phase space, increasing temperature. Stochastic ion heating has been studied in detail for EIC We assume a coherent monochromatic electrostatic wave waves and lower-hybrid waves [Karney, 1978; Papadopou- in a uniform background magnetic field B~ = B0zˆ: los et al., 1980; Lysak, 1986]. The onset condition is: 1 ~ E⊥ 1 Ωi 3 ω E = E0cos(kx − ωt)ˆx (1) ' , where E⊥ is the amplitude of perpen- B0 4 ω k⊥ dicular wave electric field, B0 the magnitude of magnetic field, Ω the ion cyclotron frequency, and ω the wave angu- where B0 is the magnitude of magnetic field, E0 the ampli- i tude of the electrostatic wave, k the wavenumber, and ω the lar frequency. wave angular frequency. Stochastic ion heating due to large-amplitude Alfvén We use the Hamiltonian method to describe the charged waves has also been investigated by several subsequent stud- particle’s motion perpendicular to the background magnetic ies [McChesney et al., 1987; Bailey et al., 1995; Stasiewicz field. The Hamiltonian reads: et al., 2000b; Chen et al., 2001; Johnson and Cheng, 2001; Chaston et al., 2004]. Chaston et al. [2004] found that, for 1 2 2 qE0 E⊥ Ωi transverse wave amplitude E⊥ satisfying < , ion mo- H = Tkinetic+Vpotential = [(Py+qB0x) +Px ]− sin(kx−ωt) B0 k⊥ 2m k tion in the wave field is coherent and the ion may become (2) trapped by Alfvénwaves in a manner similar to that pro- where Px = mvx and Py = mvy are the ion momentum posed for EIC waves. The ion may be accelerated up to a terms. Following previous similar studies [Karney, 1978; gyrodiameter roughly equivalent to the perpendicular wave- Bailey et al., 1995], we can normalize the physical quanti- E⊥ Ωi 0 0 0 k 0 k length of the wave. When B > k , the ion can be stochasti- ties as t = Ωit, x = kx, Py = Py , Px = Px , 0 ⊥ mΩi mΩi cally accelerated, and the gyroradius limit can be surpassed. α = E0 k , and ν = ω , where the primed variables indi- In addition, in the presence of a large spatial gradient of elec- B0 Ωi Ωi cate normalized quantities. Ω = qB0 is the ion cyclotron tric fields, significant ion acceleration and orbit chaotization i m may take place [Cole, 1976; Stasiewicz et al., 2000b]. How- frequency, α the normalized wave potential, and ν the nor- ever, amplitudes of Alfvénor EIC waves observed in the malized wave frequency. The Hamiltonian takes this new form: low-altitude ionosphere are generally insufficient to initiate 1 1 H = (P + x)2 + P 2 − αsin(x − νt) (3) stochastic ion heating, according to the onset condition of 2 y 2 x the stochastic behavior [Karney, 1978; Bonnell et al., 1996; where we have dropped the prime symbol. The equations of Chaston et al., 2004]. motion for the particle can be found as: Ion-neutral collisions, due to large DC electric fields in + the ionosphere, may generate a significant amount of O ∂H x˙ = = P (4) ion heating and sometimes lead to anisotropic and toroidal ∂P x ion distributions [St-Maurice and Schunk, 1979; Loranc and x St. Maurice, 1994; Wilson, 1994]. However, collisions can ∂H P˙ = − = −P − x + αcos(x − νt) (5) also put a limit on the ion heating in the ionosphere by x ∂x y restricting the achievable speed relative to neutral gases ∂H [Schunk and Nagy, 2009]. Few models of ionospheric ion y˙ = = Py + x (6) ∂P heating by plasma waves take into account both the ef- y fects of finite perpendicular wavelengths and ion-neutral col- ∂H P˙y = − = 0 (7) lisions. Using a multispecies particle simulation, Providakes ∂y and Seyler [1990] showed that collisional current-driven elec- where we can identify that Py is a constant of motion; there- trostatic ion cyclotron waves may be unstable in the bottom- fore, the dynamics in terms of x and Px are exclusively side ionosphere (<300 km) and that they are able to gener- determined by each other. The symmetric equations can ate transverse bulk acceleration of the heavy ions to energies be conveniently integrated numerically using the 4th-order of more than a few keV in this region. However, the required symplectic integrator [Forest and Ruth, 1990]. Such an in- critical field-aligned current for the cyclotron instabilities is tegrator is phase-space area conserving and more suitable at least 50 µA/m2, which is seen rarely at best, and is sig- for long-term integration. It also takes less computing time nificantly higher than values reported by Shen et al. [2018]. than the classic Runge-Kutta scheme. The orbit of a parti- Burleigh [2018] used an anisotropic fluid model to study ion cle in phase space is often represented by a Poincarésurface upflows in the ionosphere from drivers of both quasilinear of section plot, constructed by marking the particle’s tra- wave-ion heating and collisions. But this fluid model sim- jectory when it passes a constant plane in phase space, e.g., plifies wave-ion heating processes and does not incorporate when the wave phase equals 2π in our case. We use 30 test finite wavelength effects. particles that are uniformly distributed in velocity space to In this paper, we shall explore, using test particle sim- explore their trajectories under the influence of the wave ulations, whether and how cyclotron and stochastic ion electric field. The accuracy of the 4th order symplectic in- heating from Alfvén(planar or non-planar) or EIC waves tegrator has been tested on a simple harmonic oscillator so with different perpendicular wavelengths, along with ion- that the relative trajectory error is less than 0.01% for 10 neutral collisions, might contribute to ionospheric O+ ion million integration steps. A stepsize of 0.01 (equivalent to 1 −1 heating to observed levels, as exemplified by those found 100 Ωi ) is chosen as we numerically calculate the particle’s from the Enhanced Polar Outflow Probe (e-POP) at 410 motion over two million steps and construct the Poincaré km altitude [Shen et al., 2018]. The test particle simula- plots. tions we use are admittedly simple but allow us to under- In the following, we define the off-resonance case when stand the microphysical (kinetic) processes in some detail. ν = 0.1 and the on-resonance case when ν = 1. Linearly In the following, we shall first examine two different ion polarized waves having a frequency much less than the ion heating mechanisms—stochastic acceleration and coherent cyclotron frequency (ν = 0.1) may represent Alfvénwaves trapping—and then investigate the role of BBELF waves in the sheet-like current structures in the auroral region. In along with ion-neutral collisions in explaining O+ ion heat- the case described here, when the perpendicular wave elec- ing under the constraints of e-POP observations. tric field and wave vector are approximately parallel, Alfvén SHEN ET AL.: ION HEATING BY BBELF WAVES X - 3 waves are in the shear mode. Throughout the paper, the to all the available phase space region, or equivalently, ions term “Alfvénwave” therefore refers to a linearly polarized can be accelerated to any energy level accessible. wave with a frequency much lower than the ion cyclotron An ion trajectory that follows a circle in phase space frequency. We ignore the magnetic perturbation, which is means that its energy does not increase. However, for EIC justifiable because magnetic perturbations at low altitudes waves, the ion’s energy increases and returns back to its (∼400 km) are insignificant compared with the background original level cyclically (Figure 1c) if the ion stays in the magnetic field. The on-resonance case corresponds to an EIC wave. Both cases are investigated for different wave system for a sufficiently long time. In this case, the ion is potentials or amplitudes α, in order to understand the ion trapped within wave potential wells. The energy limit is de- stochastic motion in the Alfvénicand ion cyclotron regimes. termined by harmonic potential structures of the EIC wave, which can be represented by expansion of the wave potential in terms of the Bessel function Jn(kρi) of the first kind [Lysak et al., 1980; Gibelli et al., 2010]. Similar to Figure 1b, when α gradually increases from 0.05 to 2.0, we observe that stochastic ion motion emerges from the inner circle and expands into outer circles. The largest circle is specified by J1(kρi) = 0 [Lysak et al., 1980]. The stochastic onset condition for EIC waves was numerically determined by Karney 1 [1978] as E⊥ ' 0.25 Ωi 3 ω . The numerical constant we B0 ω k⊥ found instead is 0.4, which is similar to 0.25 found earlier using different scenarios and parameters. The formula derived from Karney [1978] concerns electrostatic waves with frequencies much larger than the ion cyclotron frequency.

3. Coherent ion cyclotron acceleration by EIC waves To understand ion cyclotron acceleration from EIC waves with different frequencies and perpendicular wavelengths, we perform another numerical simulation using the classic Runge-Kutta integrator to resolve ions dynamics. This is because we aim later to investigate how different frequency and wavenumber spectra may affect ion bulk heating, as applicable to the BBELF-heating scenario. The symplectic integrator has no advantage in this situation since the prob- lem is not symmetric. We shall report two phenomena of ion acceleration in the single wave case, i.e., the ion gyroradius limit and the stochastic “breakout”, where at a certain critical point an ion’s energy can diffuse beyond the gyroradius limit through stochastic acceleration. The ion dynamics perpendicular to the background magnetic field are determined by the Lorentz equation:

∂~v m = q(E~ (x, t) + ~v × B~ ) (8) Figure 1. Poincarésurface of section plots for both ∂t Alfvénicoff-resonance (Figure 1a, 1b) and electrostatic ~ ~ ion cyclotron (EIC) wave on-resonance (Figure 1c, 1d, where B only has az ˆ component and E(x, t) is the wave 1e, 1f) cases for different values of wave amplitude α. For electric field in thex ˆ direction. For a single wave case, 2π E~ (x, t) = E0cos( x − ωt)ˆx. The equations of motion in Alfvénwaves, there is no net ion energy increase when the λ⊥ wave amplitude is small (α = 0.1) (Figure 1a). However, the perpendicular directions are: when α approaches 0.8, the ions can undergo stochastic q acceleration as shown in Figure 1b. For the on-resonance v˙x = E~ (x, t) + Ωivy (9) cases, when α gradually increases from 0.05 to 2.0, we m observe that stochastic motion emerges from the inner v˙ = −Ω v (10) circle and expands into outer circles. The largest circle y i x is specified by J1(kρi) = 0. where Ωi is the ion gyrofrequency. The equation can be numerically integrated using the 4th-order Runge-Kutta integrator. The accuracy of the integrator has been tested by Figure 1 shows Poincarésurface of section plots for both comparing numerical results with the analytical solution of off- (Figure 1a, 1b) and on-resonance (Figure 1c, 1d, 1e, 1f) the E×B drift. A stepsize of 0.01T is chosen to limit cases when the wave amplitude α is set to different values. gyro the relative E×B trajectory error to be within 10−6 over 10 In Alfvénwaves, there is no net ion energy increase when the wave amplitude is small (α = 0.1). However, when α million integration steps. approaches 0.8, or equivalently, E0 k ' 0.8, the ion can In the presence of a single cyclotron wave, an ion is ac- B0 Ωi celerated over the entire gyroorbit; the ion’s velocity has a undergo stochastic acceleration. Figure 1b shows such a phonomenon, where ions start to randomly occupy the ve- component in the same direction of the wave electric field. locity space within a specific circle, which represents the Figure 2a, 2b, and 2c show the gyroradius evolution for Ωi ρi ω = ,Ωi, and 2Ωi. The limits are approximately energy limit that ions can gain. The stochastic onset condi- 2 λ⊥ tion for Alfvénwave ion heating is consistent with Chaston 0.27, 0.6 and 0.83 for the half, fundamental, and double cy- et al. [2004]. Within the stochastic region, ions have access clotron frequency wave respectively. By comparing these X - 4 SHEN ET AL.: ION HEATING BY BBELF WAVES

three cases, we observe that ion acceleration by higher- to 0.493Vphase (E0=120 mV/m), where Vphase is the phase E0 order cyclotron harmonics is generally much less eﬀective speed of the EIC wave. When approaches 0.43Vphase B0 than by the wave in the fundamental mode, as it takes a (E0=105 mV/m) of the wave as depicted in Figure 3c, ions longer time for ions to reach the gyroradius limit in the for- start to obtain gyroradii larger than 0.6λ⊥. This is a repeat- mer cases. The numerically calculated gyroradius limits for able threshold valid for the EIC wave in the fundamental integer-harmonic cyclotron waves are consistent with those mode. Such a threshold has not been reported yet. Al- predicted by Lysak [1986]. The limits are determined by the though stochastic “breakout” only increases the ion energy ﬁrst zeros of Jn(kρi) for cyclotron harmonics. However, no marginally, resultant detrapping of the ion from the wave po- calculation has been reported in the literature for the case tential may contribute to ion loss from a spatially-restricted Ωi of ω = 2 . In Appendix A, we show an analytical derivation heating system or a travelling wave. of the ion gyroradius limit with the emphasis on this half cyclotron frequency. The analytical predictions are consistent with the numerical results presented.

Figure 3. Stochastic “breakout”—ions diﬀusing beyond the gyroradius limit due to stochastic ion heating— initiates when the EIC wave amplitude increases from 10 E0 mV/m to 120 mV/m, corresponding to = 0.041Vphase B0 to 0.493Vphase. When E0=105 mV/m, as shown in Fig- E0 ure 3c, or equivalently when approaches 0.43Vphase of B0 the wave, the ion gyroradius can be larger than 0.6λ⊥. The magnitude of B0 in the simulation is 40,000 nT.

Figure 2. Time evolution of the ratio ρi for EIC waves λ⊥ Ωi with ω = 2 ,Ωi, and 2Ωi, and for the cases with two dif- 4. e-POP observations ferent wavelengths and two frequencies. The ratio limits are approximately 0.27, 0.6, and 0.83 in Figure 2a, 2b One of the major objectives of this paper is to investi- and 2c. Figure 2d shows a moderate ion radius limit gate essential wave properties, effective perpendicular wave- (∼0.3) for waves with two frequencies whose difference is lengths, as well as microscopic heating mechanisms that the cyclotron frequency. In Figure 2e, the ion gyroradius are responsible for BBELF wave-ion heating as observed exceeds the limits set by both perpendicular wavelengths. from the Enhanced Polar Outflow Probe (e-POP) satellite. The e-POP scientific payload is part of the multipurpose CASSIOPE satellite [Yau and James, 2015], launched on Figure 2d shows the result for waves with two frequencies 29 September 2013 into a polar elliptical orbit plane with ◦ whose difference is the cyclotron frequency. The ion gyrora- an inclination of 81 , a perigee of 325 km, and an apogee dius limit still holds for waves with multiple frequencies but of 1,500 km. In this section, we show the magnetic field, with a single wavelength. For Figure 2e, there are two waves electric field, and ion observations from the wave-ion heat- having different λ⊥, each with half of the original wave am- ing event on 18 May 2015. Further details on this event plitude. As a result, the ion gyroradius exceeds the limits set can be found in Shen et al. [2018]. Relevant instruments by both perpendicular wavelengths. The ion can be acceler- onboard e-POP are described separately in Knudsen et al. ated to a gyroradius more than 2.5 times of the maximum [2015], Wallis et al. [2015], and James et al. [2015]. The λ⊥. This is the detrapping effect discussed in Lysak et al. field and particle observations put important constraints on [1980]. Note that waves with multiple frequencies that add wave electric field amplitudes and ion heating scales, which up to the cyclotron frequency can also accelerate ions (not serve as baselines for the numerical test particle simulations shown here), which is consistent with previous studies [e.g. in the next sections. Temerin and Roth, 1986]. Figure 4 presents a summary of the field observations One way to break the ion gyroradius limit is to have multi- from e-POP at 410 km altitude between 22:29:47.4 and ple perpendicular wavelengths in the system as shown in Fig- 22:30:28.4 UT. Figure 4a and 4b show the magnetic pertur- ure 2e. The other way, which we found through test particle bations Bx and By in the spacecraft frame, corresponding simulations, is to increase the amplitude of the wave electric to the along-track (+x, to the south) and cross-track (+y, field to a degree that ions eventually diffuse out of the per- to the west) component, respectively. Magnetic fields are pendicular wavelength limit due to stochastic ion heating. measured at 160 samples per second (sps) and bandpass- Figure 3 shows how the stochastic “breakout” initiates when filtered to be within the frequency range of 3-80 Hz. Fig- E0 the ratio of increases from 0.041Vphase (E0 =10 mV/m) ure 4c shows wave electric fields measured from the Radio B0 SHEN ET AL.: ION HEATING BY BBELF WAVES X - 5

22:30:08.8 UT. The maximum O+ ion temperature, represented by the width of the distribution at 55◦ pitch angle (the white dashed line), is determined to be approximately 4.3 eV, which has been validated through a Monte-Carlo charged particle ray tracing simulation [Burchill et al., 2010]. The noteworthy feature in the image is that most of the ion signal lies within the energy of approximately 100 eV, as

Figure 4. Summary of the field observations from e-POP at 410 km altitude between 22:29:47.4 and 22:30:28.4 UT on 18 May 2015. Figure 4a and 4b show magnetic perturbations Bx and By in the spacecraft frame. The magnetic field time series are sampled at 160 per second and bandpass filtered to be within the 3-80 Hz range. Figure 4c shows wave electric fields from the Radio Receiver Instrument (RRI) in the cross-track (y) direction. Ey electric fields has been lowpass filtered with a cutoff of 80 Hz. Time-series electric fields are under- estimated at frequencies below 7 Hz due to limitation of the instrument dynamic range. Note that magnetic fluc- Figure 5. Zoomed-in view of the microstructure of ion tuations do not always accompany wave electric fields, heating within 1.7 s, along with the BBELF wave spec- meaning the waves are sometimes electrostatic. Figure trum and short-time-scale electric fields recovered in the 4d displays the calculated AC Poynting flux from Bx frequency range of 3–150 Hz, for the event shown in Fig- and Ey. Alfvénicmagnetic fluctuations up to 300 nT, ure 4. Figure 5a shows a heated two-dimensional ion dis- perpendicular electric fields up to 8 mV/m, and Poynt- 2 tribution measured from the Suprathermal Electron/Ion ing uxes up to 0.8 mW/m are observed at near 22:30:08 Imager (SEI) instrument at 22:30:08.75 UT. This plot is UT. These field fluctuations are colocated with strong + adapted from Shen et al. [2018] in their Figure 4c. The O ion heating, indicated within the red-shaded region. projection of the magnetic field direction onto the de- tector is indicated by the black dashed line. Ion energy increases outward from the centroid of the distribution, Receiver Instrument (RRI) in the y direction. Electric fields which is indicated by the white dot in the image center. are sampled at 62,500 sps and bandpass-filtered from 7 Hz to 80 Hz in the very low-frequency (VLF) mode. Note that The ion energy detectable from SEI goes up to approx- magnetic fluctuations do not always accompany wave elec- imately 230 eV at the periphery. Figure 5b shows the tric fields, meaning the waves are sometimes electrostatic. Ey and Bx amplitude-frequency spectra averaged over In fact, Shen et al. [2018] showed that electric fields within a 0.4-second measurement period inside an ion heating BBELF waves measured by e-POP in this region are mostly region. The black solid curve shows the corrected Ey. linearly polarized perpendicular to the magnetic field with The black dashed curve displays the fitted function form 1.14 frequencies up to 1 kHz (in their Figure 6). One clear sig- 5 of Ey = 4.95 f . The magnetic perturbation spec- nature of O+ ion cyclotron waves is present at the exact trum is shown in the red line. Figure 5c compares the location of observed ion heating in this case, which will be measurements of E and B within 1.7 s of ion heating. shown in detail later. Figure 4d displays the calculated AC y x The magnetic field fluctuations are bandpass filtered in Poynting flux from B and E . We observe Alfvénicmag- x y 3–30 Hz. Note that the time-series E in Figure 5c have netic fluctuations up to 300 nT, perpendicular electric fields y up to 8 mV/m, and Poynting fluxes up to 0.8 mW/m2 at not been corrected in amplitude as we have done for the spectrum plot in Figure 5b. In Figure 5c, at the time near 22:30:08 UT. These field fluctuations, embedded within + BBELF waves, are also colocated with strong O+ ion heat- location of O ion heating (dark-red dotted grid line), ing up to a temperature of 4.3 eV as indicated within the Ey shows fluctuations with a frequency of approximately 100 Hz. These waves are linearly polarized perpendicu- red-shaded region [Shen et al., 2018]. + To demonstrate microstructures of ion heating, BBELF lar to the magnetic field and are consistent with O ion wave spectra, Alfvénwave and cyclotron wave characteris- cyclotron waves with a perpendicular wavelength of ap- tics, we present a 1.7-second zoomed-in view of the mea- proximately 150 m. A zoomed-in view of these cyclotron surements in Figure 5. Figure 5a shows a heated two- waves is shown in Figure 5d. It is worth mentioning that dimensional ion enery-angle distribution measured from another ion heating event with a temperature of near 2 the Suprathermal Electron/Ion Imager (SEI) instrument at eV was observed at +1.5 s in Figure 5c, which is not discussed here. X - 6 SHEN ET AL.: ION HEATING BY BBELF WAVES indicated by the red pixels (not saturated). This is one of poral or spatial structures. This is especially true as the the observables we use to compare simulations with obser- e-POP satellite moves at a speed of 7.8 km/s, which trans- vations. In addition, statistical observations from e-POP lates to 7.8 Hz for static structures with a perpendicular have shown that ion heating by BBELF waves is associated with ion downflows in the low-altitude (325-730 km) wavelength of 1 km. In this section, we examine wave-ion auroral downward current region [Shen et al., 2018]. Shen heating from BBELF waves, which are either Alfvénwaves et al. [2018] applied the“pressure cooker” ion heating model (ν =0.01, different from the earlier simulations to be consis- with down-pointing electric fields in the return current re- tent with common observations in the ionosphere) or EIC gion [Gorney et al., 1985] to explain the low-altitude e-POP waves (ν =1) with varying wavenumber spectra. BBELF observations. Based on these results, we conclude that O+ ions can be forced to remain within BBELF heating regions waves contain many wave modes, including EIC waves that long enough for their energies to saturate.. are slightly above the ion gyrofrequency and ion acoustic Figure 5b presents the Ey and Bx amplitude-frequency waves that are below the ion gyrofrequency [Kintner et al., spectra calculated within a 0.4-second measurement period 1996; Bonnell et al., 1996; Wahlund et al., 1998]. Here we inside an ion heating region. We can correct the magni- term any electrostatic wave as EIC wave so far as it has a fre- tude measurement of Ey below 10 Hz to account for the instrument filter response. This is plotted as the black quency near the ion gyrofrequency. We only consider wave- solid line in Figure 5b. This frequency spectrum up to ion heating in the two-dimensional plane perpendicular to approximately 120 Hz is fitted with a power-law function the background magnetic field. Our objective is to find the 1.14 5 asymptotic limit of perpendicular ion heating from plasma Ey = 4.95 f . After taking into account the other component of perpendicular electric field that we do not waves, which justifies our neglecting the effects of parallel measure, we assume much larger total electric fields as transport, including the mirror force and others, that tend 1.14 5 to remove hot ions from the heating region. Potential paral- E = 8 f . This is another important baseline setting lel electric fields in Alfvén waves, when their perpendicular for simulations. The O+ cyclotron frequency is about 38 Hz as indicated by the vertical orange line. In Figure 5b, the wavelengths are comparable to the electron inertial length ratios of the corrected Ey/Bx in the frequency range of 3–10 [e.g. Goertz and Boswell, 1979; Lysak and Lotko, 1996], are Hz suggest that the electromagnetic fluctuations have phase ignored in our simulations because ion parallel velocities (on + speeds of 400–700 km/s. Assuming O dominated plasma the order of 1 km/s) are much less than the Alfvénwave with an electron density of 1011 m−3 near 400 km altitude, the expected Alfvénspeed is approximately 700 km/s, which parallel phase velocity (on the order of 1000 km/s) so that is consistent with the observations. ions cannot be resonantly accelerated, and their perpendicu- Figure 5c compares the measurements of Ey and Bx lar temperature is insignificantly affected by parallel electric within 1.7 s of the ion heating period. In this case, the fields [Chaston et al., 2004]. electric field fluctuations are lowpass filtered with a cutoff In the simulation, there are in total 20000 particles, hav- of 150 Hz. Although time-series electric field measurements deteriorate at frequencies lower than 10 Hz, we can see in- ing an initial two-dimensional Maxwellian distribution in ve- phase oscillations of electric field and magnetic field pertur- locity space with a temperature of 0.2 eV, and exhibiting a bations, with an oscillation period of approximately 0.2s, uniformly distribution in the spatial domain x = [0, 2000] which is identifiable near +0.5 s and +1.5 s UT on the time m and y = [−100, 100] m. We use the 4th-order Runge- axis. The fairly detailed correlation between Ey and Bx, in- Kutta integrator, as discussed earlier, with a stepsize of ferred Alfvénspeeds, along with the macroscopic Poynting fluxes as shown in Figure 4d, strongly suggest that Alfvén 0.01Tgyro, to evolve the 20000-particle system numerically. waves are present within the measured BBELF wave spec- Note that there exists no spatial boundary for an ion’s tra- trum. Most interestingly, right at the time location of O+ jectory to evolve in the simulation. The ion temperature ion heating (indicated by the dark-red dotted grid line), Ey is calculated for the whole ion population and is expressed shows fluctuations with a frequency of approximately 100 mi 2 2 as T⊥ = < (vx− < vx >) + (vy− < vy >) ) >. Hz. These waves are not observed outside the ion heat- 2kB ing time intervals (within 0.2 s centered around +0.5 s UT Ion temperatures are recorded every 500 steps, correspond- on the time axis). The waves are linearly polarized per- ing to every 5Tgyro. This ensures that we investigate ion pendicular to the background magnetic field based on two- dynamics at a constant ion gyro-phase, indicating secu- component electric field (Ey and Ez) hodogram analysis lar variations. The wave electric field is generally in the (provided in Supporting Information). These features are P consistent with electrostatic O+ ion cyclotron waves with form Ex = E0cos(kxx − ωt + φrand), where 40 different amplitudes of up to 5 mV/m and a perpendicular wave- 40k k modes are utilized with random phases φrand. The wave length of approximately 150 m. Such a wave scale is in 1.14 + 5 accord with the gyroradius (180 m) of 100 eV O ions. A amplitudes are E0 = 8 f . zoomed-in view of these cyclotron waves is shown in Fig- In addition, many previous studies suggest that Alfvén ure 5d. Therefore, our observations show that both Alfvén waves become increasingly non-planar and display two- waves and EIC waves are present within the BBELF wave spectrum and are associated with ion heating observed by dimensional (2D) field variations with decreasing scale sizes, e-POP. especially when λ⊥ approaches 1 km or less [Volwerk et al., Based on previous studies, ion cyclotron waves may 1996; Chaston et al., 2004]. To account for this field be generated by velocity-shear driven instabilities [Ganguli topology, we perform additional test runs with both kx et al., 1994], current-driven instabilities [Kindel and Kennel, and ky for Alfvénwaves, with electric fields specified as 1971], ion-beam-driven instabilities [Hendel et al., 1976], or P nonlinear breaking of Alfvénwaves [Seyler et al., 1998]. The Ex = −kxΦ(ωt + φrand)cos(kxx)cos(kyy) and Ey = exact nature of how these kinetic processes produce EIC kx,ky P waves is beyond the scope of this study. kyΦ(ωt + φrand)sin(kxx)sin(kyy)[Chaston et al., 2004], kx,ky 5. Test particle simulation: Ion heating where kx and ky are equal to bring out the maximum heating rate and kΦ is the field amplitude specified according from BBELF waves to e-POP observations (the same as E0). Note that the 2D Wave frequency measurements from a single spacecraft perpendicular electric field in this equation is curl-free and can be complicated to interpret as to whether they are tem- therefore the ion flow is incompressible. This is similar to SHEN ET AL.: ION HEATING BY BBELF WAVES X - 7 that used in Chaston et al. [2004] but excludes variations in has been assigned a number indicated in the first column. the field line (z) direction. Broadband emission can be interpreted either as temporal Since observations of ion heating from e-POP are in the or Doppler-shifted spatial signals in the spacecraft frame, ionosphere, we have to take into account ion-neutral colli- and both contributions will affect the spectrum we observe sional effects, which play an important role in limiting ion [Stasiewicz et al., 2000a; Chaston et al., 2004]. We assume heating from BBELF waves. Atomic oxygen O+ ions in the that much of the broadband frequency spectrum is due to + ionosphere will primarily experience O –O resonant charge Doppler shift (k~⊥·V~ ) from a satellite passing through waves exchange (RCE) collisions and polarization collisions, where with finite λ⊥ at a relative speed of 7.8 km/s. The only ex- the ion interacts with the electric dipole it induces in the ception is Run-1 (temporal limit k = 0), where broadband neutral particle. At altitudes of about 400 km, chemical emissions from 0.1Ωi to 4Ωi are all temporal variations with + reactions between O ions and N2 and O2 neutral gases an infinitely long wavelength. Run-2 (spatial limit ω = 0) are of secondary significance. We only include O+–O RCE treats all fluctuations as stationary spatial structures with- collisions in the simulations, since long-range polarization out time oscillations. No heating is observed for these two collisions only deflect O+ ions that have low relative speeds cases. The movies showing phase space evolution of all the with neutral particles, and they are less important when test runs are in Supporting Information (SI). Figure 6 shows snapshots of the ion distributions (Fig- TO+ >400 K [Barakat et al., 1983; Wilson, 1994]. Details on how we simulate O+–O collisions are discussed in Ap- ure 6a, 6c, 6e, and 6g) and temperature evolution (Fig- pendix B. ure 6b, 6d, 6f, and 6h) for the test runs of Run-3, Run-4, Table 1 lists the wave modes, Doppler-shifted frequen- Run-5, and Run-8. In the case of short-scale shear Alfvén cies, perpendicular wavelengths, durations of numerical in- waves, we observe no ion acceleration or heating as demon- tegration, and ion heating features in the eight test runs we strated in Figure 6a and 6b. On the other hand, large-scale performed (see the end of the document). Each test run Alfvénwaves give rise to only a 0.2 eV ion temperature increase through coherent trapping. The periodic oscillation in the ion temperature is due to time oscillation of 0.5 Hz Alfvénwaves. Short-scale planar shear Alfvénwaves only generate a small amount of stochastic ion heating up to less than 0.6 eV (Figure 6e and 6f) even as we increase the wave amplitudes tenfold. Ion heating is still insignificant, as shown in Figure 6g and 6h, when we adopt a different field topology with equal kx and ky and with wave amplitudes increased tenfold (approximately 20 mV/m, 10 mV/m, and 5 mV/m for the three wavelengths included). Our result of 2D Alfvénwave ion heating differs from Chaston et al. [2004], who suggested that non-planarity of small-scale Alfvénwaves can facilitate ion energization up to several keV through coherent trapping at low-altitudes and stochastic ion heating at higher altitudes. The difference can be explained by the fact that electric field amplitudes of Alfvénwaves with a perpendicular wavelength of 800 m observed from e-POP (Doppler-shifted to 10 Hz in the satellite frame) are approximately 2 mV/m, which is two orders

Figure 6. Snapshots of ion distribution and temperature evolution for four test runs: (Run-3) 0.5 Hz planar short- scale shear Alfvénwaves (Figure 6a and 6b), (Run-4) 0.5 Hz planar large-scale Alfvénwaves (Figure 6c and 6d); (Run-5) 0.5 Hz planar short-scale Alfvénwaves with in- Figure 7. Ion velocity distribution and temperature evo- creased amplitudes to initiate stochastic heating (Fig- lution for the test runs (Run-6 and Run-7) of short-scale ure 6e and 6f); (Run-8) 0.5 Hz two-dimensional Alfvén (λ⊥ ∼70–200 m) cyclotron waves without (Figure 7a waves with equal kx and ky and with increased ampli- and 7b) and with (Figure 7b and 7c) ion-neutral colli- tudes (Figure 6g and 6h), respectively. Snapshots of the sions. The format is similar to Figure 6, except that velocity distribution are taken at the end of 1000 gyrope- overall averaged ion temperatures are calculated in the riods of integration. Snapshots of temperature are taken simulation. In Figure 7d, when O+–O collisions collisions every 5 gyroperiods. The red contour (100 eV) in the ve- are included, ion temperature increases rapidly (within locity plots represents the observed O+ ion energy limit 50 gyroperods, corresponding to near 1 s) to a steady from e-POP. state of 26 eV. X - 8 SHEN ET AL.: ION HEATING BY BBELF WAVES of magnitude smaller than 200 mV/m electric fields used by is calculated from the MSIS00 model [Hedin, 1991] at 410 km Chaston et al. [2004] for the same wavelength. It is gener- altitude, to half and tenth of this value, calculated at an alti- ally not likely to observe a 200 mV/m electric field at 10 Hz tude of 450 km and 540 km respectively. A linearly polarized from low-altitude (<1000 km) satellites [Basu et al., 1988; wave can be decomposed into right-handed and left-handed Ball and André, 1991; Wu et al., 2020]. As we artificially circularly polarized waves with equal amplitudes and only increase the wave amplitudes of non-planar 2D Alfvénwaves left-handed polarized waves can interact with left-handedly in our simulation to 200 mV/m (λ⊥ ∼500 m), we observe rotating ions in the magnetic field through cyclotron res- significant ion heating up to 20 eV (not shown here), con- onance. Thus, only the left-handed polarized power of cy- sistent with the O+ ion temperature obtained by Chaston clotron waves are taken into account for comparison with the et al. [2004]. The temperature increase will drop to 1 eV model of quasilinear cyclotron heating according to Chang with an electric field amplitude of 100 mV/m. Therefore, et al. [1986], who suggested that the ion heating rate from the relatively weak electric fields at low altitudes limit the cyclotron waves with an infinite wavelength can be expressed role of either planar or 2D Alfvénwaves in explaining the as: dW q2E2 ion heating we observed through either coherent trapping or = (11) stochastic ion heating. dt 2mi The insignificant amount of ion heating from small-scale where E2 is the power spectral density of the left-hand com- Alfvénwaves from our simulations is also in contrast to ponent of electric fields. The cases of cyclotron heating with the study of Stasiewicz et al. [2000b], who suggested that an infinite wavelength are termed “temporal” in the follow- stochastic ion heating from small-scale (of the order of 100 ing. m perpendicular wavelength) Alfvénwaves can explain the Figure 8 presents the simulation results comparing the bulk ion heating observed at Freja and FAST altitudes magnitude of, and the integration time to, a steady-state (>1700 km). Similarly, that study used large wave am- ion temperature from cyclotron heating with varying wave- plitudes of 100 mV/m within tens-of-meter spatial struc- lengths, wave powers, and collisional frequencies at altitudes tures to initiate stochastic ion heating. Again, the field from 410 km to 540 km. Figure 8a, 8b and 8c show increas- amplitudes observed from e-POP and used in the simula- ing steady-state temperatures, from several eV to tens of tions in our paper are an order of magnitude smaller, thus eV for E2 = 0.5 (mV/m)2, with decreasing collision fre- not enough to create significant stochastic ion heating as quencies by tenfold for a 100-km change in altitude. Ion Stasiewicz et al. [2000b] does. Alfvénwaves may play an heating limited by the finite wavelength effect (the black indirect role in ion heating cases at low altitudes, which dots and lines) has a steady-state temperature smaller than needs to be investigated in the future. In addition to the that of temporal cyclotron heating (red triangles and lines) test runs described here, we also run cases that take into ac- from wave electric fields with the same power. The finite count waves with multiple frequencies below the cyclotron wavelength effect is not discernible when collision frequen- frequency. No significant difference is observed compared cies are relatively high and wave powers are relatively weak, with the single-frequency Alfvéniccases. but dramatic when collision frequencies are small and wave Figure 7 presents results of the other test runs (Run-6 powers strong, as shown in Figure 8a and 8c. For tem- and Run-7) for short-scale (λ⊥ ∼ 70m – 200 m) cyclotron poral cyclotron ion heating, the temperature limits rise by wave ion heating with (Figure 7a and 7b) and without (Fig- more than ten times, from 4.3 eV to 49 eV when E2 = 0.5 ure 7c and 7d) ion-neutral collisions. In the absence of col- (mV/m)2, as the collision frequency is lowered by a factor lisions, small-scale cyclotron waves with wavelengths of less than 200 m effectively heat ions to temperatures of larger than 50 eV within 200 gyroperiods (Figure 7b), corresponding to approximately 5 seconds. Figure 7a illustrates that accelerated ions obtain energies well above the 100 eV observed limit (the red contour line) due to cyclotron heating. However, many ions are trapped at energies less than 100 eV, which can be attributed to the finite wavelength effect. When collisions are present, ions are isotropically restricted within the 100 eV limit and the temperature surges to a steady state of 26 eV within 50 gyroperiods (near 1 second). Figure 7c and 7d demonstrate that the effect of collisions is to limit as well as to heat the system to a steady-state ion temperature. Compared with the other test runs, small- scale cyclotron wave ion heating regulated by ion-neutral collisions can be most effective in heating O+ ions at ionospheric altitudes where e-POP operates.

6. Test particle simulation: Cyclotron ion Figure 8. Simulation results comparing the magnitude 2 of (Figure 8a, 8b and 8c), and the integration time to heating regulated by E , λ⊥ and collisions (Figure 8d, 8e and 8f), a steady-state ion temperature from cyclotron heating with varying wavelengths, wave In this section, we use test particle simulations to ex- powers, and collision frequencies at altitudes from 410 plore how ion-neutral collisions, together with λ and wave ⊥ km to 540 km. Steady-state ion temperatures from the amplitudes, affect ion heating from cyclotron waves in the cyclotron wave with a perpendicular wavelength of 200 ionosphere. For multiple test particle simulations, we spec- m, and with an infinite wavelength, are indicated by the ify a single cyclotron wave with either an infinite wavelength black dots and lines, and red triangles and lines, respec- or a wavelength of 200 m, and with varying amplitudes of 1, 2, 4, or 6 mV/m. Note that the 200 m wavelength is cho- tively. Simulations have been run for 1,000 gyroperiods in sen to represent the finite wavelength effect of cyclotron ion all cases. The theoretically calculated steady-state tem- heating. We vary the collisional frequency by changing the peratures from Equation 12 are displayed as the cyan atomic oxygen O neutral density from 5.7×107cm−3, which triangles for left-hand polarized cyclotron waves in the temporal cyclotron heating model. SHEN ET AL.: ION HEATING BY BBELF WAVES X - 9 of ten from 410 km to 540 km. In this case, the parame- 7. Summary and Conclusions νc −2 −3 ter decreases from about 10 to 10 , where νc is the fci collision frequency between neutral O and heated O+ ions In this paper, we have examined the physics of ion heating in the steady state and fci is the ion cyclotron frequency in from Alfvénwaves (ωΩi) and cyclotron waves (ω = Ωi) Hz. Overall, collisions play a critical role in regulating ion using test particle simulations, with an objective to explain heating limits in the ionosphere. We observe drastic varia- how BBELF waves heat ionospheric ions as observed from tions in the ion heating limit with even a 100-km change in the e-POP satellite in the low-altitude (∼400 km) iono- altitude for the same wave electric fields. sphere. We have investigated the effects of finite perpen- The ion heating limit from temporal cyclotron heating dicular wavelengths, wave amplitudes, and ion neutral col- with collisions can be theoretically calculated by solving the lisions, on ionospheric ion heating. The results of our test energy equation: particle simulations in this paper show the following:

2 2 1. The numerical onset thresholds of stochastic ion heat- dW q E 1 2 = − νc miv¯ = 0 (12) ing from the EIC wave and Alfvénwave, as illustrated by dt 2mi 2 the Poincarésurface of section plots, are consistent with previous studies [Karney, 1978; Lysak, 1986; Bailey et al., wherev ¯ is the two-dimensional root-mean-square speed in 1995; Chaston et al., 2004]. One important characteristic of the steady state. Note that νc is constant and can be ap- proximated by n(O)Q(¯v)¯v in a steady-state, where Q(¯v) is stochastic ion heating is that ions undergoing stochastic ac- the total collision cross-section. This equation implies that celeration can still be limited by the large potential structure for each effective resonant O+–O collision taking place, the of the wave, or similarly by the perpendicular wavelength. momenta of the two colliding particles exchange completely. 2. The ion gyroradius limit for the EIC wave with half The loss of energy due to collisions is balanced by the addi- of the cyclotron frequency is 0.28λ⊥, which has been both tion of energy due to ion heating. After we obtain a steady- numerically and analytically derived. The ion gyrora- state root-mean-square speedv ¯ based on Equation 12, we dius limit from a single EIC wave can be surpassed either derive the steady-state ion temperature of a two-dimensional through adding waves with different λ⊥, or through stochas- Maxwellian distribution based on the assumed relation: tic “breakout”, when the wave electric field amplitude satis- E0 r fies ≥ 0.43Vphase, where Vphase is the wave phase velocity. 2kT B0 v¯ = i (13) 3. In contrast to previous studies focusing on higher al- mi titudes [Stasiewicz et al., 2000b; Chaston et al., 2004], our We display the theoretically calculated steady-state temper- simulations indicate that both planar and non-planar small- atures for cyclotron waves with different powers as the cyan scale (<1 km) Alfvénwaves cannot explain ion heating in triangles in Figure 8a. The simulated (red) and theoret- our case. In order to reproduce ion distributions observed at ically calculated (cyan) temporal cyclotron heating limits e-POP altitudes, the most effective ion heating mechanism agree well when E2 is below 2 (mV/m)2. When the wave from BBELF waves is through collisional cyclotron heating power becomes larger, the calculated Maxwellian tempera- by short-scale EIC waves with λ⊥ ≤ 200 m. tures become much greater than, and deviate from, the sim- 4. The interplay between finite perpendicular wave- ulated limits. This is because the simulated ion distribution lengths, wave amplitudes, and ion-neutral collision frequen- becomes increasingly non-Maxwellian and more flat-shaped cies collectively determine the ionospheric ion heating limit, due to larger electric fields, rendering Equation 13 incorrect. which begins to decrease sharply with decreasing altitude Figure 8d, 8e and 8f display integration times to reach below approximately 500 km altitude, where the ratio νc fci a steady-state temperature as the collision frequency de- −3 clines. As E2 and the collision frequency increase, ions reach becomes significant (>10 ) with decreasing altitude. a steady-state temperature more rapidly, generally in tens Our model of ion heating by Alfvénwaves is limited to of to hundreds of cyclotron periods, corresponding to ap- the perpendicular plane. Ion dynamics in the direction par- proximately 1 s to 10 s. Finite wavelength effects heat ions allel to the magnetic field is not included; as a result, the to a steady state temperature more efficiently when colli- magnetic mirror force and parallel electric fields are not in- sion frequencies are small (Figure 8e and 8f). In Figure 8d, cluded. While effects of parallel dynamics on ion heating temporal cyclotron heating accelerates ions more effectively are not included, they are expected to be small in the low- than with a wave having a finite wavelength, and collisions altitude (410 km) ionosphere as discussed above. prevail over finite wavelengths in limiting the system to a steady state. Comparing Figure 8d with Figure 8e, as the collision frequency decreases by half, we observe a cross-over between collisional and finite wavelength effects in heating ions to a steady-state temperature. In general, the effects of λ⊥, wave power and collision collectively determine the magnitude and efficiency (time to reach a steady-state temperature) of ion heating in the ionosphere. Note that our neglecting of the magnetic mirror force may overestimate the ion heating limits only slightly, since within the period of 10 s, cold ionospheric ions cannot travel far along the field line and transfer of energy from perpendicular to parallel via the mirror force is quite limited. For example, ionospheric O+ ions with a parallel temperature of 1 eV have parallel speeds of the order of 3 km/s. On a time scale of 10 s, an O+ ion flowing upward due to the magnetic mirror force will travel a vertical distance of 30 km. The perpendicular energy of the ion with an initial value of 10 eV will decrease by only 0.1 eV. In addition, in light of evidence of a low-altitude “pressure cooker” effect [Shen et al., 2018], ions may well be trapped in the heating region long enough to reach the heating limits derived here under the assumption of negligible field-aligned transport. X - 10 SHEN ET AL.: ION HEATING BY BBELF WAVES

ρi Appendix A: Ion gyroradius limit from a The first zeros of Jn(k⊥ρi) correspond to = λ⊥ single EIC wave 0.61, 0.82, 1.0, 1.2 for n = 1, 2, 3 , 4. This result is in agreement with Lysak [1986]. Lysak [1986] has given the derivation of the ion gyroradius limit for EIC waves with ω = nωc. Here we present an + analytical derivation of the ion gyroradius limit using the Appendix B: Simulating O–O collisions gyro-orbit-averaging method for EIC waves with half of the cyclotron frequency, since this has not been reported else- We use an approximate method of O+–O collisions, which where in the literature. is essentially that used by Barakat et al. [1983] and Wil- Following the main text, we assume a single coherent EIC son [1994]. The probability that a particle suffers no col- Ωi wave with a form E = E0cos(k⊥x − 2 t) in a background lision in the time interval t overall follows Poisson statis- −νct magnetic field B~ in thez ˆ direction. Since the wave is electro- tics Pnc(t) = e . The probability of collision is therefore −νct static in nature, the wave scalar potential may be expressed Pc(t) = 1 − e . νc depends on the neutral O density E0 Ωi as Φ = − sin(k⊥x − t). The ion can be viewed as being n(O), RCE collisional cross section, and the relative speed k⊥ 2 trapped by the wave potential, therefore the total energy of g between O+ and O. Ideally, the overall probability of col- the wave-ion system is conserved. The maximum of the ion’s lision during the time dt can be written in a general form as −dtn(O) R σ(g)gf(g)dg kinetic energy corresponds to the minimum of the wave po- Pc(t) = 1 − e , where σ(g) is the differen- tential energy, which translates to finding zeros of the wave tial cross-section of RCE collisions and f(g) is normalized electric field. Considering secular increase of the ion’s gyro- so that R f(g)dg = 1. We adopt the same approximate radius, we shall obtain a wave electric field that is averaged method as that used by Wilson [1994], where the integral over one ion gyro-orbit. The electric field is first rewritten in the exponential is replaced by n(O)Q(g)g (Q(g) is the in the reference frame of the guiding center: total cross section) and g is found at each time step. We assume the background neutral O gas is near stationary so Ωi + E = E0cos(k⊥x0 + k⊥ρicos(Ωit) − t) (A1) that for each RCE collision the O velocity is set to 0 with 2 a probability of 0.5. The neutral O density is obtained from where x0 is guiding center coordinate, ρi is the ion gyrora- MSIS00 model [Hedin, 1991] using geophysical parameters dius. From trigonometric identities, this can be expressed relevant to the ion heating event reported by Shen et al. as: [2018]. If νc is a constant, the relationship between succes- sive collisional time interval dt and Pc(t) can be simplified as 1 Ωi dt = − ln(1 − P (dt)). To take into account speed E = E {cos(k x )cos( t)cos(k ρ cos(Ω t)) n(O)Q(g)g c 0 ⊥ 0 2 ⊥ i i dependence of the collision time dt, we use the “null colli- Ω sion” method [Lin and Bardsley, 1977; Winkler et al., 1992]. + cos(k x )sin( i t)sin(k ρ cos(Ω t)) ⊥ 0 2 ⊥ i i The simulation steps are: Ωi 1. Specify a very small constant dt, which represents the − sin(k⊥x0)cos( t)sin(k⊥ρicos(Ωit)) 2 maximum νc possible to occur. We use a dt of about 0.03 s Ωi in this paper compared with 0.05 s used by Wilson [1994]. + sin(k⊥x0)sin( t)cos(k⊥ρicos(Ωit))} (A2) 2 2. Assume collisions occur at this constantq dt. Calculate the impact parameter b based on b = − ln(1−r) , where r This form can be further expanded using the Bessel function πn(O)gdt ∞ is a psudorandom number between 0 and 1 representing the P n identities equations cos(zcosθ) = J0(z) + 2 (−1) J2n(z)cos(2collisionnθ), probability within time dt. n=1 ∞ 3. Calculate a critical impact parameter b , which is de- P n cr sin(zcosθ) = −2 (−1) J2n−1(z)cos((2n − 1)θ). After in- termined by the experimental Q(g) measured for RCE colli- n=1 serting these Bessel identities into the equation and inte- sions. We use the same phenomenological RCE model as grate the electric field within one ion gyro-orbit < E >= in Wilson [1994]. bcr is calculated for each g such that 1 R 2π E d(Ωit), we have the wave electric field in the final the total cross section for RCE satisfies Q(g) = (10.995 − 2π 0 2 −16 2 form: 0.95 log10 g) × 10 cm . The probability of charge exchange to occur during each collision is 0.5.

4 4. Compare b with bcr. If b ≤ bcr, a real charge exchange < E >= E0cos(k x0){− J1(k ρi) ⊥ 3π ⊥ collision occurs during this time interval dt and the O+ ion 4 4 + J (k ρ ) − J (k ρ ) + ···} velocity is set to 0; if b > bcr, the assumed collision is “null” 35π 3 ⊥ i 99π 5 ⊥ i and the O+ ion velocity is not changed. 2 4 5. Proceed to the next dt and repeat the above process. + E0sin(k⊥x0){ J0(k⊥ρi) + J2(k⊥ρi) π 15π Using this approach, we find that each test particle within 4 − J (k ρ ) + ···} (A3) a heated (4 eV for example) ion population experiences ap- 63π 4 ⊥ i proximately 10 collisions within the integration time of 1000 gyroperiods. This magnitude of O+–O collision frequency The maximum magnitude of the averaged electric√ field is 2 is comparable with values estimated by Schunk and Nagy found when setting sin(k⊥x0) = cos(k⊥x0) = 2 , in which [2009] assuming a reduced temperature of approximately 2 case the wave potential magnitude is at its largest. The eV. maximum ion kinetic energy, or equivalently the ion gyroradius limit, is obtained from the first zero of < E >. Since the terms after J5(k⊥ρi) are negligibly small, we can trun- cate the series and find the solution to be k⊥ρi = 1.8, which translates to the ratio ρi = 0.28. This analytical solution λ⊥ is consistent with the numerical result shown in Figure 2a. Using the same procedure and change the wave frequency to ω = Ωi, 2Ωi, 3Ωi and 4Ωi, the resulting averaged wave electric fields are, respectively, −E0sin(k⊥x0)J1(k⊥ρi), −E0cos(k⊥x0)J2(k⊥ρi), E0sin(k⊥x0)J3(k⊥ρi), and E0cos(k⊥x0)J4(k⊥ρi). SHEN ET AL.: ION HEATING BY BBELF WAVES X - 11

Acknowledgments. This work was supported by an Eyes Gibelli, L., B. Shizgal, and A. Yau (2010), Ion energization by High Doctoral Recruitment Scholarship from the University of wave-particle interactions: Comparison of spectral and par- Calgary, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council ticle simulation solutions of the Vlasov equation, Computers of Canada (NSERC), and the Canadian Space Agency (CSA). & Mathematics with Applications, 59 (8), 2566 – 2581, doi: e-POP was funded with support from CSA and MDA Cor- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2010.01.016. poration. In 2017 e-POP has been incorporated as one part Goertz, C. K., and R. W. Boswell (1979), Magnetosphere- (Swarm Echo) of the Swarm constellation funded by the Eu- ionosphere coupling, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space ropean Space Agency. e-POP data are accessible through Physics, 84 (A12), 7239–7246, doi:10.1029/JA084iA12p07239. http://epop-data.phys.ucalgary.ca/. Simulation data and codes Gorney, D. J., Y. T. Chiu, and D. R. Croley (1985), Trapping necessary to reproduce the results are available from PRISM of ion conics by downward parallel electric fields, J. Geophys. Dataverse at University of Calgary’s Data Repository through Res., 90 (A5), 4205–4210, doi:10.1029/JA090iA05p04205. https://doi.org/10.5683/SP2/PWYYZQ. Hedin, A. E. (1991), Extension of the MSIS Thermosphere Model into the middle and lower atmosphere, Journal of Geo- physical Research: Space Physics, 96 (A2), 1159–1172, doi: References 10.1029/90JA02125. Hendel, H. W., M. Yamada, S. W. Seiler, and H. Ikezi (1976), Ion- Bailey, A. D., P. M. Bellan, and R. A. Stern (1995), Poincaré Beam-Driven Resonant Ion-Cyclotron Instability, Phys. Rev. maps define topography of Vlasov distribution functions con- Lett., 36, 319–322, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.36.319. sistent with stochastic dynamics, Physics of Plasmas, 2 (8), James, H. G., E. P. King, A. White, R. H. Hum, W. H. H. L. Lun- 2963–2969, doi:10.1063/1.871194. scher, and C. L. Siefring (2015), The e-POP Radio Receiver Ball, L., and M. André(1991), What parts of broadband spec- Instrument on CASSIOPE, Space Science Reviews, 189 (1), tra are responsible for ion conic production?, Geophysical Re- 79–105, doi:10.1007/s11214-014-0130-y. search Letters, 18 (9), 1683–1686, doi:10.1029/91GL00169. Johnson, J. R., and C. Z. Cheng (2001), Stochastic ion Barakat, A. R., R. W. Schunk, and J. P. St.-Maurice (1983), heating at the magnetopause due to kinetic alfvén waves, Monte Carlo calculations of the O+ velocity distribution in the Geophysical Research Letters, 28 (23), 4421–4424, doi: auroral ionosphere, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space 10.1029/2001GL013509. Physics, 88 (A4), 3237–3241, doi:10.1029/JA088iA04p03237. Karney, C. F. F. (1978), Stochastic ion heating by a lower hy- Basu, S., S. Basu, E. MacKenzie, P. F. Fougere, W. R. Coley, brid wave, The Physics of Fluids, 21 (9), 1584–1599, doi: N. C. Maynard, J. D. Winningham, M. Sugiura, W. B. Han- 10.1063/1.862406. son, and W. R. Hoegy (1988), Simultaneous density and electric field fluctuation spectra associated with velocity shears Kindel, J. M., and C. F. Kennel (1971), Topside current in the auroral oval, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space instabilities, J. Geophys. Res., 76 (13), 3055–3078, doi: Physics, 93 (A1), 115–136, doi:10.1029/JA093iA01p00115. 10.1029/JA076i013p03055. Bonnell, J., P. Kintner, J.-E. Wahlund, K. Lynch, and R. Arnoldy Kintner, P. M., J. Bonnell, R. Arnoldy, K. Lynch, C. Pollock, (1996), Interferometric determination of broadband ELF wave and T. Moore (1996), SCIFER-Transverse ion acceleration and phase velocity within a region of transverse auroral ion plasma waves, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23 (14), 1873–1876, doi: acceleration, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23 (23), 3297–3300, doi: 10.1029/96GL01863. 10.1029/96GL03238. Knudsen, D., J. Burchill, T. Cameron, G. Enno, A. Howarth, and Burchill, J. K., D. J. Knudsen, J. H. Clemmons, K. Oksavik, R. F. A. Yau (2015), The CASSIOPE/e-POP suprathermal electron Pfaff, C. T. Steigies, A. W. Yau, and T. K. Yeoman (2010), imager (SEI), Space Science Reviews, 189 (1-4), 65–78, doi: Thermal ion upflow in the cusp ionosphere and its dependence 10.1007/s11214-015-0151-1. on soft electron energy flux, Journal of Geophysical Research: Knudsen, D. J., J. H. Clemmons, and J.-E. Wahlund (1998), Space Physics, 115 (A5), doi:10.1029/2009JA015006. Correlation between core ion energization, suprathermal elec- Burleigh, M. (2018), Impacts of Anisotropy, Wave Heating, tron bursts, and broadband elf plasma waves, Journal of Geo- and Neutral Winds on High-Latitude Ionospheric Dynam- physical Research: Space Physics, 103 (A3), 4171–4186, doi: ics, Ph.D. thesis, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, 10.1029/97JA00696. https://commons.erau.edu/edt/408. Lin, S. L., and J. N. Bardsley (1977), Monte Carlo simulation of Chang, T., G. B. Crew, N. Hershkowitz, J. R. Jasperse, J. M. Ret- ion motion in drift tubes, The Journal of Chemical Physics, terer, and J. D. Winningham (1986), Transverse acceleration of 66 (2), 435–445, doi:10.1063/1.433988. oxygen ions by electromagnetic ion cyclotron resonance with broad band left-hand polarized waves, Geophysical Research Loranc, M., and J. P. St. Maurice (1994), A time-dependent Letters, 13 (7), 636–639, doi:10.1029/GL013i007p00636. gyro-kinetic model of thermal ion upflows in the high-latitude Chaston, C. C., J. W. Bonnell, C. W. Carlson, J. P. McFad- f region, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, den, R. E. Ergun, R. J. Strangeway, and E. J. Lund (2004), 99 (A9), 17,429–17,451, doi:10.1029/93JA01852. Auroral ion acceleration in dispersive Alfvén waves, Jour- Lynch, K. A., R. L. Arnoldy, P. M. Kintner, and J. Bonnell nal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 109 (A4), doi: (1996), The AMICIST auroral sounding rocket: A compar- 10.1029/2003JA010053. ison of transverse ion acceleration mechanisms, Geophysical Chen, L., Z. Lin, and R. White (2001), On resonant heating be- Research Letters, 23 (23), 3293–3296, doi:10.1029/96GL02688. low the cyclotron frequency, Physics of Plasmas, 8 (11), 4713– Lynch, K. A., J. W. Bonnell, C. W. Carlson, and W. J. Peria 4716, doi:10.1063/1.1406939. (2002), Return current region aurora: Ek, jz, particle ener- Cole, K. (1976), Effects of crossed magnetic and (spa- gization, and broadband ELF wave activity, Journal of Geo- tially dependent) electric fields on charged particle mo- physical Research: Space Physics, 107 (A7), SMP 16–1–SMP tion, Planetary and Space Science, 24 (5), 515 – 518, doi: 16–19, doi:10.1029/2001JA900134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(76)90096-9. Lysak, R., M. Hudson, and M. Temerin (1980), Ion heating Erlandson, R. E., L. J. Zanetti, M. H. Acuna, A. I. Eriks- by strong electrostatic ion cyclotron turbulence, Journal of son, L. Eliasson, M. H. Boehm, and L. G. Blomberg (1994), Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 85 (A2), 678–686, doi: Freja observations of electromagnetic ion cyclotron ELF 10.1029/JA085iA02p00678. waves and transverse oxygen ion acceleration on auroral field Lysak, R. L. (1986), Ion acceleration by wave-particle interaction, lines, Geophysical Research Letters, 21 (17), 1855–1858, doi: 10.1029/94GL01363. in Ion Acceleration in the Magnetosphere and Ionosphere, Forest, E., and R. D. Ruth (1990), Fourth-order symplectic inte- Geophys. Monogr. Ser., vol. 38, edited by T. Chang, p. 261, gration, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 43 (1), 105 – 117, AGU. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(90)90019-L. Lysak, R. L., and W. Lotko (1996), On the kinetic dispersion rela- Ganguli, G., M. J. Keskinen, H. Romero, R. Heelis, T. Moore, tion for shear Alfvénwaves, Journal of Geophysical Research: and C. Pollock (1994), Coupling of microprocesses and macro- Space Physics, 101 (A3), 5085–5094, doi:10.1029/95JA03712. processes due to velocity shear: An application to the low- McChesney, J. M., R. A. Stern, and P. M. Bellan (1987), Obser- altitude ionosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 99 (A5), 8873–8889, doi: vation of fast stochastic ion heating by drift waves, Phys. Rev. 10.1029/93JA03181. Lett., 59, 1436–1439, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.1436. X - 12 SHEN ET AL.: ION HEATING BY BBELF WAVES

Papadopoulos, K., J. D. Gaffey Jr., and P. J. Palmadesso (1980), Volwerk, M., P. Louarn, T. Chust, A. Roux, H. de Feraudy, and Stochastic acceleration of large M/Q ions by hydrogen cy- B. Holback (1996), Solitary kinetic Alfvénwaves: A study clotron waves in the magnetosphere, Geophysical Research Let- of the Poynting flux, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space ters, 7 (11), 1014–1016, doi:10.1029/GL007i011p01014. Physics, 101 (A6), 13,335–13,343, doi:10.1029/96JA00166. Paschmann, G., S. Haaland, and R. E. Treumann (2003), Auroral Wahlund, J.-E., A. I. Eriksson, B. Holback, M. H. Boehm, J. Bon- Plasma physics, vol. 103(2002), 1-4, Space Science Reviews. nell, P. M. Kintner, C. E. Seyler, J. H. Clemmons, L. Elias- Providakes, J., and C. E. Seyler (1990), Collisional electrostatic son, D. J. Knudsen, P. Norqvist, and L. J. Zanetti (1998), ion cyclotron waves as a possible source of energetic heavy ions Broadband ELF plasma emission during auroral energization: in the magnetosphere, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space 1. Slow ion acoustic waves, Journal of Geophysical Research: Physics, 95 (A4), 3855–3870, doi:10.1029/JA095iA04p03855. Space Physics, 103 (A3), 4343–4375, doi:10.1029/97JA02008. Ram, A. K., A. Bers, and D. Benisti (1998), Ionospheric ion Wallis, D., D. Miles, B. Narod, J. Bennest, K. Murphy, I. Mann, acceleration by multiple electrostatic waves, Journal of Geo- and A. Yau (2015), The CASSIOPE/e-POP magnetic field in- physical Research: Space Physics, 103 (A5), 9431–9440, doi: strument (MGF), Space Science Reviews, 189 (1-4), 27–39, doi: 10.1029/97JA03668. 10.1007/s11214-014-0105-z. Schunk, R., and A. Nagy (2009), Ionospheres: Physics, Plasma Wilson, G. R. (1994), Kinetic modeling of O+ upflows resulting Physics, and Chemistry, Cambridge Atmospheric and Space from E × B convection heating in the high-latitude F region Science Series, 2 ed., Cambridge University Press, doi: ionosphere, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 10.1017/CBO9780511635342. 99 (A9), 17,453–17,466, doi:10.1029/94JA01214. Seyler, C. E., A. E. Clark, J. Bonnell, and J.-E. Wahlund (1998), Winkler, E., J. P. St-Maurice, and A. R. Barakat (1992), Re- Electrostatic broadband ELF wave emission by Alfvénwave sults From improved Monte Carlo calculations of auroral ion breaking, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, velocity distributions, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space 103 (A4), 7027–7041, doi:10.1029/97JA02297. Physics, 97 (A6), 8399–8423, doi:10.1029/91JA03104. Shen, Y., D. J. Knudsen, J. K. Burchill, A. D. Howarth, A. W. Wu, J., D. J. Knudsen, D. M. Gillies, and J. K. Burchill Yau, D. M. Miles, H. G. James, G. W. Perry, and L. Cog- (2020), Swarm survey of alfvénicfluctuations and their rela- ger (2018), Low-altitude ion heating, downflowing ions, and tion to nightside field-aligned current and auroral arc systems, BBELF waves in the return current region, Journal of Geo- Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 125 (3), physical Research: Space Physics, 123 (4), 3087–3110, doi: e2019JA027,220, doi:10.1029/2019JA027220. 10.1002/2017JA024955. Wu, X.-Y., J. L. Horwitz, G. M. Estep, Y.-J. Su, D. G. Brown, St-Maurice, J.-P., and R. W. Schunk (1979), Ion velocity distribu- P. G. Richards, and G. R. Wilson (1999), Dynamic fluid-kinetic tions in the high-latitude ionosphere, Reviews of Geophysics, (DyFK) modeling of auroral plasma outflow driven by soft elec- 17 (1), 99–134, doi:10.1029/RG017i001p00099. tron precipitation and transverse ion heating, Journal of Geo- Stasiewicz, K., Y. Khotyaintsev, M. Berthomier, and J. E. physical Research: Space Physics, 104 (A8), 17,263–17,275, Wahlund (2000a), Identification of widespread turbulence of doi:10.1029/1999JA900114. dispersive Alfvénwaves, Geophysical Research Letters, 27 (2), Yau, A. W., and H. G. James (2015), CASSIOPE Enhanced Po- 173–176, doi:10.1029/1999GL010696. lar Outflow Probe (e-POP) Mission Overview, Space Science Stasiewicz, K., R. Lundin, and G. Marklund (2000b), Stochas- Reviews, 189 (1), 3–14, doi:10.1007/s11214-015-0135-1. tic ion heating by orbit chaotization on electrostatic Zeng, W., J. L. Horwitz, and J.-N. Tu (2006), Characteristic ion wave and non-linear structures, Phys. Scr., T84 (60), doi: distributions in the dynamic auroral transition region, Jour- https://doi.org/10.1238/Physica.Topical.084a00060. nal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 111 (A4), doi: Temerin, M., and I. Roth (1986), Ion heating by waves with fre- 10.1029/2005JA011417. quencies below the ion gyrofrequency, Geophysical Research Letters, 13 (11), 1109–1112, doi:10.1029/GL013i011p01109. Tsurutani, B. T., and G. S. Lakhina (1997), Some basic concepts Corresponding author: Yangyang Shen, Department of of wave-particle interactions in collisionless plasmas, Reviews Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, of Geophysics, 35 (4), 491–501, doi:10.1029/97RG02200. Canada. ([email protected]) SHEN ET AL.: ION HEATING BY BBELF WAVES X - 13 Heating feature no heating no heating no heating trapping small stochastic heating strong cyclotron heating limited cyclotron heating no heating gyro gyro gyro gyro gyro gyro gyro gyro T T T T T T T T Integration Time 200 200 200 1000 1000 1600 1600 1000 i ρ ⊥ k Initial 0 0.02-0.8 0.017-0.8 0.0006-0.017 0.04-0.8 0.22-0.6 0.22-0.6 0.04-0.8 m ⊥ λ ∞ 50 m - 2000 m 50 m - 2400 m 240065600 m m 50 m - - 1000 m 70 m - 20070 m m - 200500 m m, 300 m, 150 m i i i i i i i i ,1.4Ω i shifted -4Ω -4Ω -4Ω -4Ω − -0.1Ω i i i i -2.0Ω -2.0Ω i i i ,0.69Ω i 0.1Ω 0.1Ω 0.1Ω 0.2Ω 0.1Ω 0.1Ω 0.01Ω Doppler ω 0.42Ω ⊥ E = 0 Stochastic = 0 +Collision i i 0.5 Hz 0.5 Hz 0.5 Hz with 10* Ω Ω ´ ´ ´ ´ en en en en Alfv Alfv Alfv Alfv Wave Mode T emporal Limit k Spatial Limit ω 1D 1D 1D Cyclotron Cyclotron 2D Run-1 Run-2 Run-3 Run-4 Run-5 Run-6 Run-7 Run-8 Number Parameters for the 8 test particle simulation runs. Table 1.