Supporting Testimony

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Supporting Testimony 1 Pr )_-.4.—. 114 k € I -4-- 3 ho BOOKS enough espionage, although the U.S. au- thorities were fairly heedless of it at the time. One of Chambers' Soviet accom- plices remembered, "If you wore a sign Supporting Testimony saying,') am a spy,' you might still not get arrested." A biography goes beyond the Pumpkin Papers to Chambers broke with the party in assess the troubled life of Whittaker Chambers 1937-38, during the height of the Moscow trials. In September 1939, just as By LANCE MORROW sympathetic, is patient, admirably bal- Hitler smashed into Poland, Chambers anced and fascinating in its rich detail. told Adolph Berle, an assistant Secretary AS A BOY. HE WAS On the great litmus question of postwar of State, about the so-called Ware Group, called by the middle politics—which of them was telling the the cadre of Washington bureaucrats, in- name that he hated, truth?—Tanenhaus is clear, Walking cluding Hiss, with whom Chambers had Vivian, or else by nick- again through all the familiar elements of collaborated as a secret agent. But noth- names that he hated the case (the Woodstock typewriter, the ing came of his revelation then. It was even more—"Girlie," Bokhara rug, the prothonotary warbler, yesterday's news. A war was on, and the or "Stinky," or "Mr. the famous Pumpkin Papers), Tanen- enemy was Germany, not Russia. Chamber Pot." haus shows. if anyone still doubts it, that By 1942, Tanenhaus writes, Cham- His favorite book Alger Hiss was lying. bers had become a Quaker and "had was Les Miserables, But Chambers' story is larger and completely evolved a new religious- and in the family's tdoomed house on more interesting than just that event. political philosophy. Its crux was the 'ir- Earle Avenue in Lynbrook, New York, his For a brief, hilarious season early on, at reconcilable issue' that underlay modern mother kept an ax under the bed to even Columbia University, he campaigned for man's spiritual crisis and also defined the the odds against the murderers she imag- the 1920 Republican vice-presidential struggle against communism: 'Belief in ined. His father, a sardonically unhappy nominee, Calvin Coolidge; but in the God or Belief in Man.'" bisexual, was much given to Chambers became a long absences; his younger book reviewer for TIME, brother became an alco- then rose to become the holic suicide. Young Vivian magazine's controversial Chambers never went to a senior editor for foreign dentist, and by the time he news, eloquently and, some grew up and began calling = thought, obsessively press- himself by his mother's fam- ing his anti-communist ily name of Whittaker, his views. It was in 1948 that teeth had gone to memo- the House Committee on rable ruin. In his mouth, as Un-American Activities and in his early life's story, he an ambitious young Califor- came to believe that he har- nia Congressman, Richard bored a tiny, secret civiliza- Nixon, interviewed Cham- tion in a state of advanced bers and then zeroed in on decay. the impressive, elegant So the themes were Hiss, who had been an ad- there from childhood, and viser to President Roosevelt when Whittaker Chambers at Yalta, and helped orga- went out into the history of nize the founding of the the 20th century, he found a U.N. By 1948 he was head of huge historical correlative, a the Carnegie Endowment COMRADES: Chambers, left, found an ally in the young Nixon, center macrocosm, to match—and for International Peace. to explain—his own biography and, he mid-'20s he pinhalled left-ward and Hiss eventually served 314years for per- thought, to enlarge it with the prestige of joined the Communist Party, animated jury; he denied, up to his death at 92 last destiny. Chambers' high school class- by an anguished convert's zeal. A melo- November, that he had ever been a com- mates voted him "Class Prophet." Many dramatically ernste Mensch (serious munist or had conspired with Chambers. years later, in the '50s, after Alger Hiss man), as he liked to say, Chambers began Tanenhaus does not altogether vin- had been convicted of perjury and the as a useful party literate," hacking away dicate Chambers. He writes, "The awful cold war had hardened into a nuclear as a foreign-news reporter for the dreary fact, which Chambers could not admit— stalemate, Chambers wrote his summum, Daily Worker, contributing to the New and never did—was that his own world which he called Witness, meaning histo- Masses, view, stripped of its lyrical refinements ry's witness, a prophet looking backward. In 1932, just before the start of the and humanist vibrato, had helped bring That strange and sometimes brilliant New Deal, he went underground for the McCarthyism into existence." This is testament aside, Sam Tanenhaus has party. Based in New York City or Balti- true, although Chambers' music was now written the best biography that more, Maryland, Chambers—code- darker than the lyricism Tanenhaus sug- Chambers is likely to receive, Whittaker named "Bob" and later "Karl"—made gests. It was grandiloquent and tragic, Chambers (Random House; 638 pages; his furtive way in the world of disap- and, as Joseph R. McCarthy proved, sub- $35). Tanenhaus' account, essentially pearing ink and microfilm. It was serious ject to ugly distortions. • TIM E. MABC.I I I4 1997 .
Recommended publications
  • ABSTRACT Title of Document: from the BELLY of the HUAC: the RED PROBES of HOLLYWOOD, 1947-1952 Jack D. Meeks, Doctor of Philos
    ABSTRACT Title of Document: FROM THE BELLY OF THE HUAC: THE RED PROBES OF HOLLYWOOD, 1947-1952 Jack D. Meeks, Doctor of Philosophy, 2009 Directed By: Dr. Maurine Beasley, Journalism The House Un-American Activities Committee, popularly known as the HUAC, conducted two investigations of the movie industry, in 1947 and again in 1951-1952. The goal was to determine the extent of communist infiltration in Hollywood and whether communist propaganda had made it into American movies. The spotlight that the HUAC shone on Tinsel Town led to the blacklisting of approximately 300 Hollywood professionals. This, along with the HUAC’s insistence that witnesses testifying under oath identify others that they knew to be communists, contributed to the Committee’s notoriety. Until now, historians have concentrated on offering accounts of the HUAC’s practice of naming names, its scrutiny of movies for propaganda, and its intervention in Hollywood union disputes. The HUAC’s sealed files were first opened to scholars in 2001. This study is the first to draw extensively on these newly available documents in an effort to reevaluate the HUAC’s Hollywood probes. This study assesses four areas in which the new evidence indicates significant, fresh findings. First, a detailed analysis of the Committee’s investigatory methods reveals that most of the HUAC’s information came from a careful, on-going analysis of the communist press, rather than techniques such as surveillance, wiretaps and other cloak and dagger activities. Second, the evidence shows the crucial role played by two brothers, both German communists living as refugees in America during World War II, in motivating the Committee to launch its first Hollywood probe.
    [Show full text]
  • Scopeofsovietact2730unit.Pdf
    POSITORT SCOPE OF SOVIET ACTIVITY IN THE UNITED STATES HEARINGS BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE TO INVESTIGATE THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE INTERNAL SECURITY ACT AND OTHER INTERNAL SECURITY LAWS OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE EIGHTY-FOURTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION ON SCOPE OF SOVIET ACTIVITY IN THE UNITED STATES JUNE 12 AND 14, 1956 PART 27 (With Sketch of the Career of J. Peters) Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 72723 WASHINGTON : 1956 vsoTieo Boston Public Library Superintendent of Document* JAN 2 8 1957- COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY JAMES 0. EASTLAND, Mississippi, Chairman ESTDS KEFAUVER, Tennessee ALEXANDER WILEY, Wisconsin OLIN D. JOHNSTON, South Carolina WILLIAM LANGER, North Dakota THOMAS C. HENNINGS, Jr., Missouri WILLIAM E. JENNER, Indiana JOHN L. McCLELLAN, Arkansas ARTHUR V. WATKINS, Utah PRICE DANIEL, Texas EVERETT McKINLEY DIRKSEN, Illinois JOSEPH C. O'MAHONEY, Wyoming HERMAN WELKER, Idaho MATTHEW M. NEELY, West Virginia JOHN MARSHALL BUTLER, Maryland Subcommittee To Investigate the Administration of the Internal Security Act and Other Internal Security Laws JAMES O. EASTLAND, Mississippi, Chairman OLIN D. JOHNSTON, South Carolina WILLIAM E. JENNER, Indiana JOHN L. McCLELLAN, Arkansas ARTHUR V. WATKINS, Utah THOMAS C. HENNINGS, Jr., Missouri HERMAN WELKER, Idaho PRICE DANIEL, Texas JOHN MARSHALL BUTLER, Maryland Robert Morris, Chief Counsel William A. Rosher, Administrative Counsel Benjamin Mandel, Director of Research n CONTENTS Witnesses : Page Dodd, Bella V 1467 Munsell, Alexander E. O 1463 APPENDIX The career of J. Peters 1483 in SCOPE OF SOVIET ACTIVITY IN THE UNITED STATES TUESDAY, JUNE 12, 1956 United States Senate, Subcommittee To Investigate the Administration of the Internal Security Act and Other Internal Security Laws of the Committee on the Judiciary, Washington, D.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Reviews
    BOOK REVIEWS Kati Marton, True Believer: Stalin’s Last American Spy.NewYork:Simon&Schuster, 2016. 289 pp. $27.00. Reviewed by R. Bruce Craig, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton True Believer chronicles the life and times of Cold War–era espionage agent Noel Field and, to a lesser extent, the life of his wife, Herta, both of whom remained steadfast believers in the ideals and promises of Soviet-style Communism even when it had fallen out of fashion. In telling their story, Kati Marton paints a vivid and somewhat sympathetic portrait of the couple. She draws in a cast of characters, including Paul and Hede Massing, Alger Hiss, Lawrence Duggan, J. Peters (aka Sandor Goldberger), Allen Dulles, “Wild Bill” Donovan, and Iosif Stalin. A major strength of the book is Marton’s success in integrating these characters and their beliefs into the context of the times. The result is not only a balanced biography of Noel Field but also a nuanced account of espionage during the Red Decade and early Cold War era. Marton is uniquely qualified to tell this story. Like Field, her father was a political prisoner of the Hungarian Communists who for a time occupied the same cell with Field. Later, after both men were released from prison, Marton’s parents interviewed Noel and Herta, earning the distinction of being the only Western journalists ever to do so. Marton came to possess her parent’s notes of that interview, which, when combined with private correspondence from cooperating surviving members of the Field family, enabled her to flesh out the story of Noel Field, assessing his motives and adeptly placing him in his era.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Soviet Spy Networks in the United States Throughout the Twentieth Century Julia S
    Union College Union | Digital Works Honors Theses Student Work 6-2015 An Analysis of Soviet Spy Networks in the United States Throughout the Twentieth Century Julia S. Shively Union College - Schenectady, NY Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Shively, Julia S., "An Analysis of Soviet Spy Networks in the United States Throughout the Twentieth Century" (2015). Honors Theses. 391. https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses/391 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Work at Union | Digital Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Union | Digital Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. An Analysis of Soviet Spy Networks in the United States Throughout the Twentieth Century By Julia S. Shively ********* Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Honors in the Department of History Union College June, 2015 Chapter 1: Spies Before the War The Soviet Union and the United States have always had a complicated relationship. When the Bolshevik Revolution of 1921 brought the communist party to power in Russia, the United States government did not recognize the new regime. The communist ideologies of the newly established state did not line up well with the democratic ideals of the United States. These new communist principles threatened the strength of the American system, as labor disputes and the Great Depression gave citizens reason to question capitalism’s effectiveness. The fear of this system grew as the world progressed through the twentieth century when the Soviet Union shifted from ally to enemy in all but a few years.
    [Show full text]
  • Spying on America Courtney Hatfield Harding University, [email protected]
    Tenor of Our Times Volume 3 Article 7 Spring 2014 Spying On America Courtney Hatfield Harding University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.harding.edu/tenor Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Hatfield, Courtney (Spring 2014) "Spying On America," Tenor of Our Times: Vol. 3, Article 7. Available at: https://scholarworks.harding.edu/tenor/vol3/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts & Humanities at Scholar Works at Harding. It has been accepted for inclusion in Tenor of Our Times by an authorized editor of Scholar Works at Harding. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SPYING ON AMERICA By Courtney Hatfield B.A. It is a well-known fact that the Soviet Union and the United States of America shared little trust with each other during the Cold War. In fact, the lack of trust between these two countries almost led to nuclear disaster. However, the depths of that mistrust have only recently been revealed. With the releases of Alexander Vassiliev’s notes on old Soviet Union Secret Police records and the Venona transcripts has come the shocking revelation of just how severely Josef Stalin mistrusted America. Before the Soviet Union and the United States were on hostile terms, before the Cold War began, and even before the start of World War II, the Soviet Union had spies in America. When the Communist Party gained popularity in the United States in the early twentieth century, the Soviet Union created networks of spies, informants, couriers, and American sources to inform Moscow of any intelligence gathered on the American government.
    [Show full text]
  • Sam Tanenhaus Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf900006kh No online items Preliminary Inventory to the Sam Tanenhaus papers Finding aid prepared by Hoover Institution Library and Archives Hoover Institution Library and Archives © 1998 434 Galvez Mall Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-6003 [email protected] URL: http://www.hoover.org/library-and-archives Preliminary Inventory to the Sam 97029 1 Tanenhaus papers Title: Sam Tanenhaus papers Date (inclusive): 1901-1998 Collection Number: 97029 Contributing Institution: Hoover Institution Library and Archives Language of Material: English Physical Description: 69 manuscript boxes, 4 oversize boxes(32.4 Linear Feet) Abstract: Writings, correspondence, trial transcripts, memoranda, notes, and printed matter, relating to the life of Whittaker Chambers and to the Alger Hiss espionage case. Used as research material for the book by Sam Tanenhaus, Whittaker Chambers: A Biography (New York, 1997). Includes letters by Chambers. Creator: Tanenhaus, Sam Hoover Institution Library & Archives Access The collection is open for research; materials must be requested at least two business days in advance of intended use. Publication Rights For copyright status, please contact the Hoover Institution Library & Archives. Acquisition Information Acquired by the Hoover Institution Library & Archives in 1997. Preferred Citation [Identification of item], Sam Tanenhaus papers, [Box no., Folder no. or title], Hoover Institution Library & Archives. Subjects and Indexing Terms Communism -- United States Espionage, Russian -- United States Hiss, Alger Chambers, Whittaker Sam Tanenhaus, Whittaker Chambers box 1 Drafts box 2 Drafts box 3 Drafts box 4 Drafts box 5 Drafts box 6 Drafts box 7 Drafts Preliminary Inventory to the Sam 97029 2 Tanenhaus papers Drafts box 8 Drafts box 9 Drafts box 10 Drafts box 11 Drafts box 12 Drafts box 13 Drafts box 14 Galleys Sam Tanenhaus, draft articles box 15 Sam Tanenhaus, draft articles box 16 Sam Tanenhaus, draft articles Notebooks box 17 United States vs.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tale of Two Typewriters Author(S): Herbert L
    Stanford Law Review A Tale of Two Typewriters Author(s): Herbert L. Packer Source: Stanford Law Review, Vol. 10, No. 3 (May, 1958), pp. 409-440 Published by: Stanford Law Review Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1226822 Accessed: 20/01/2010 23:22 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=slr. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Stanford Law Review is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Stanford Law Review. http://www.jstor.org A Tale of Two Typewriters* HERBERTL. PACKERt "The trial . is not an investigative,but a demonstrativepro- ceeding."' It is up to the partiesto supply the informationon which a verdictrests.
    [Show full text]
  • The Trial of Harry Dexter White: Soviet Agent of Influence
    University of New Orleans ScholarWorks@UNO University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations Dissertations and Theses 12-17-2004 The Trial of Harry Dexter White: Soviet Agent of Influence Tom Adams University of New Orleans Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td Recommended Citation Adams, Tom, "The Trial of Harry Dexter White: Soviet Agent of Influence" (2004). University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations. 177. https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/177 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by ScholarWorks@UNO with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights- holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE TRIAL OF HARRY DEXTER WHITE: SOVIET AGENT OF INFLUENCE A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of New Orleans in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of History by Tom A. Adams B.A., Ambassador University, 1975 December 2004 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Late at night, when you are alone with your keyboard, overwhelmed by the mass of information that has to be synthesized, and frozen by writer’s block it is comforting to know you are not entirely on your own.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hiss-Chambers Case, 1 W
    Western New England Law Review Volume 1 1 (1978-1979) Article 11 Issue 4 1-1-1979 ALLEN WEINSTEIN: PERJURY: THE HISS- CHAMBERS CASE Gordon H. Wentworth Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.wne.edu/lawreview Recommended Citation Gordon H. Wentworth, ALLEN WEINSTEIN: PERJURY: THE HISS-CHAMBERS CASE, 1 W. New Eng. L. Rev. 861 (1979), http://digitalcommons.law.wne.edu/lawreview/vol1/iss4/11 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Review & Student Publications at Digital Commons @ Western New England University School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Western New England Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Western New England University School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PERJURY: THE HISS-CHAMBERS CASE: By Allen Weinstein. New York, New York: Alfred A. Knopf. 1978. Reviewed by Gordon H. Wentworth* The confrontation between Alger Hiss and Whitaker Chambers in 1948 helped to create a political and intellectual divide in the American public which has never been fully bridged. The convic­ tion of Hiss on two perjury counts officially vindicated Chambers' charges that Hiss had been a secret member of the Communist party actively involved in espionage during the late 1930's. A large part of the liberal establishment, however, refused to accept the conviction and their doubts have been kept alive to this day. The charges were first publicly aired in 1948 when, what Winston Churchill described as the "iron curtain" was clanging shut across Europe. Russian financed spy systems and other illegal activities surfaced in the United States and in Western ,European countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Jowitt: the Strange Case of Alger Hiss
    REVIEWS THE STRANGE CASE OF ALGER HISS. By The Earl Jowitt. New York: Doubleday & Company, 1953. Pp. 380. $3.95. WHILE the jury's verdict in the second Hiss case 1 decisively settled the defendant's fate, 2 it has by no means settled the question of his guilt or inno- cence in the minds of those who are either convinced of his innocence or have serious doubts about his guilt. There is no reason why it should have. No one would assert that the jury's verdict on the evidence before it was in- fallible.3 Moreover, there is a good bit of evidence about the case which- though such "as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion" 4 - was not submitted to the jury, either because not admissible under the applicable rules of evidence or because it did not come to light until after the trial was concluded. This is not to say that all those who disagree with the jury base their dis- agreement on a consideration of all the evidence. There are some whose dis- agreement seems to be based on little or nothing more than an unshakeable faith in the defendant. And, in any event, much of the evidence has not been readily available to all who wish to form their own opinion about the case. Whittaker Chambers' version of that evidence has been twice presented- once by Lasky and de Toledano r and once by Chambers himself.0 Alistair Cooke has contributed his book 7 which, though a considerable improvement over the daily newspaper reports which accompanied the trial,8 is still a jour- nalist's account.
    [Show full text]
  • Mr. Try-It Goes to Washington: Law and Policy at the Agricultural Adjustment Administration
    MR. TRY-IT GOES TO WASHINGTON: LAW AND POLICY AT THE AGRICULTURAL ADJUSTMENT ADMINISTRATION Daniel R. Ernst* In December 1933, Jerome Frank, the general counsel of the Agricultural Adjustment Administration (AAA) but better known for writing Law and the Modern Mind (1930), a sensational attack on legal formalism, told an audience at the Association of American Law Schools a parable about two lawyers in the New Deal, each required to interpret the same ambiguous language of a statute. The first lawyer, “Mr. Absolute,” reasoned from the text and canons of statutory interpretation without regard for the desirability of the outcome. “Mr. Try-It,” in contrast, began with the outcome he thought desirable. He then said to himself, “The administration is for it, and justifiably so. It is obviously in line with the general intention of Congress as shown by legislative history. The statute is ambiguous. Let us work out an argument, if possible, so to construe the statute as to validate this important program.”1 Although the memoranda the two produced were interchangeable, Mr. Try-It wrote his in one-fifth the time.2 Perhaps some professors in attendance nodded approvingly, but Frank’s speech, later printed in the Congressional Record, was startlingly impolitic in its blurring of the distinction between “law”—Mr. Absolute’s starting place—and “policy”—Mr. Try-It’s. In fact, the general counsel was himself insisting upon this in battles with AAA administrators. How Frank actually drew the line owed less to his legal realist jurisprudence than the persuasiveness of his two associate general counsels, the radicals Lee Pressman and Alger Hiss.
    [Show full text]
  • Law and Policy at the Agricultural Adjustment Administration
    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2019 Mr. Try-It Goes to Washington: Law and Policy at the Agricultural Adjustment Administration Daniel R. Ernst Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/2143 https://ssrn.com/abstract=3345294 Fordham Law Review, Vol. 87, No. 5, 1795. This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Agriculture Law Commons, Law and Politics Commons, and the Legal History Commons MR. TRY-IT GOES TO WASHINGTON: LAW AND POLICY AT THE AGRICULTURAL ADJUSTMENT ADMINISTRATION Daniel R. Ernst* In December 1933, Jerome Frank, the general counsel of the Agricultural Adjustment Administration (AAA) but better known for writing Law and the Modern Mind (1930), a sensational attack on legal formalism, told an audience at the Association of American Law Schools a parable about two lawyers in the New Deal, each required to interpret the same ambiguous language of a statute. The first lawyer, “Mr. Absolute,” reasoned from the text and canons of statutory interpretation without regard for the desirability of the outcome. “Mr. Try-It,” in contrast, began with the outcome he thought desirable. He then said to himself, “The administration is for it, and justifiably so. It is obviously in line with the general intention of Congress as shown by legislative history. The statute is ambiguous. Let us work out an argument, if possible, so to construe the statute as to validate this important program.”1 Although the memoranda the two produced were interchangeable, Mr.
    [Show full text]