DOCSLIB.ORG

Geodynamics Statement of Qualifications October 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS Geodynamics, LLC 310-A Greenfield Drive, Newport, NC 28570 Woman-Owned, Small Business Primary NAICS 541370 Surveying and Mapping Additional NAICS 541360 541690 488310 541620 541712 488330 541710 GEODYNAMICS PROFILE Geodynamics is a research-based firm specializing in several areas of coastal, marine and freshwater mapping, monitoring, and high-end Geographic Information Systems (GIS) analyses and database design. Our group was formed in 2000 by researchers from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Duke University and North Carolina State University who had a vision of providing state-of-the-art, research-quality science to the private, governmental and academic sectors. Geodynamics maintains a strong relationship with several academic partners, allowing our group of nationally certified GIS Professionals and ACSM- THSOA hydrographers to further develop the cutting edge research methodologies and analyses that our clients require. The strength and continuing goal of Geodynamics is to provide our clients with the highest level of data quality and scientific integrity in a format that is easily applicable to both real-life management scenarios and research-oriented goals. GEODYNAMICS SPECIALIZES IN • Coastal and offshore multibeam, singlebeam, and sidescan sonar • Benthic habitat assessments using remote sensing, geo-referenced ROV and sediment sampling techniques • High-end GIS analyses and database design including Digital Elevation Modeling and datum-derived shorelines • Accurate depth and volume change maps for Ports, dredging operations and coastal engineering • Offshore remote sensing and oceanographic deployments • 2D & 3D beach mapping with VRS and RTK-GPS • Seafloor mapping / monitoring to support offshore energy planning and infrastructure development • Terrestrial and marine support services including research vessels, instrument integrations and rapid response emergency surveys Geodynamics has built a solid reputation based on innovative applications of R&D and client focus. At Geodynamics, we begin each project with an in-depth understanding of the client’s mission and tailor each program around the specific goals of the project. Our proven track record, depth of technology, and domain expertise give our clients complete confidence in our cutting edge services. CREDENTIALS Geodynamics meets federal subcontracting goals, while exceeding expectations for data quality. Working with a small business has many benefits, including customized service, commitment to every project and continuity from project design through data delivery. We are active members in: the Hydrographic Society of America the Geologic Society of America the American Geophysical Union the American Congress on Surveying and Mapping the American Shore & Beach Preservation Association the Geographic Information Systems Certification Institute the American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing various blogs and online groups within our industry Additionally, Geodynamics is a Woman-Owned Small Business, holding several certifications: • Participant in the SBA’s WOSB Federal Contract Program • Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) in North Carolina • Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) in Virginia • Small, Women- and Minority-owned Business (SWaM) in Virginia • Prequalified Consultant with the NC Department of Transportation in Hydrographic Survey Services • Historically Underutilized Business (HUB) in North Carolina • Small Professional Services Firm (SPSF) in North Carolina • We are listed in the NC Vendor Link and eVA web purchasing systems. SERVICES HYDROGRAPHIC Geodynamics performs hydrographic surveys for clients including USACE Wilmington, USACE Baltimore, the US Navy NAVFAC Atlantic, the USACE Coastal Inlets Research Program, the NOAA Center for Coastal Fisheries and Habitat Research, and the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management. We also provide coastal mapping services to Town and County governments, engineering firms, coastal development and resource management groups. Our survey projects and analyses have received high praise for our procedures, data quality and prompt delivery. Geodynamics maintains a full suite of scientific instruments and customized surveying platforms to accommodate a variety of hydrographic surveys. Geodynamics is one of few private firms that maintains high-resolution multibeam capability on the US East coast, and one of very few in the world operating the dual-head sonar capable of collecting high density, extra wide swath data. GEOPHYSICAL Geodynamics performs geophysical surveys and seabed assessments for a variety of federal and state government clients and private firms. Our geophysical survey projects explore all dimensions of the seabed using the latest technology and analysis tools. Geodynamics maintains a full suite of scientific instruments and customized surveying platforms to accommodate a variety of geophysical surveys of the surface, sub-surface, composition, and evolution of the seabed in the most demanding environments. TOPOGRAPHIC Geodynamics performs a wide range of topographic services that support coastal and nearshore mapping. Our staff holds advanced degrees in geodesy and coastal geology, bringing a keen understanding of the sophisticated GPS technologies used to evaluate the underlying environmental processes. We provide beach profile surveys, marsh and tideland surveys, feature /attribute mapping, and geodetic control for terrestrial, LIDAR and hydrographic surveys. Our topographic projects utilize real-time and post-processed methods of Real-Time Kinematic corrections with the latest GPS survey instrumentation and processing software. GIS AND DATA PROCESSING Geodynamics specializes in high-end Geographic Information Systems, offering a broad spectrum of GIS services from simple data conversion to complex hydrographic data processing, data modeling and analysis. Our products include database design and management, data integration, Digital Elevation & Terrain Modeling, seamless merge of topographic and bathymetric data, datum derived shoreline change analysis and high-resolution seafloor bathymetry and backscatter data visualization. Experienced and nationally certified GIS Professionals outline GIS / processing demands, create a customized project workflow, and complete each GIS / processing task with accuracy and precision in a timely manner. Geodynamics recognizes the vital role that metadata plays in the production of geospatial products, and therefore supplies standardized metadata with every product. SUPPORT SERVICES Geodynamics owns and operates five USCG approved Class I & II research vessels, each designed primarily for bathymetric mapping and sidescan survey operations. These vessels may be leased independently, or may be mobilized with our hydrographic survey equipment. We perform rapid-response surveys; specialize in sonar systems installation/ calibration and RTK/VRS-GPS integration and support. Our highly trained and experienced team is here to support any of your coastal research needs. Our unique mobility and quick ability to be on-site at remote research locations provide an exceptional opportunity for clients eager to take advantage of specific weather conditions, storm events, or scheduling windows. In addition, our shallow-draft highly maneuverable vessels allow unprecedented access to the nearshore coastal zone. CLIENTS FEDERAL GOVERNMENT NASA, Wallops Island Navy NAVFAC Atlantic NOAA Center for Coastal Fisheries and Habitat Research US Army Corps of Engineers: Wilmington, NC District US Army Corps of Engineers: Baltimore, MD District US Army Corps of Engineers: Charleston, SC District US Army Corps of Engineers: Coastal Inlets Research Program US Army Corps of Engineers: Engineer Research & Development Center US Geological Survey Woods Hole Coastal & Marine Science Center US Coast Guard STATE / LOCAL GOVERNMENTS Carteret County Shore Protection Office NC Division of Coastal Management NC Division of Cultural Resources, Underwater Archaeology Branch NC Division of Cultural Resources, Capital Projects Division NC Department of Transportation Town of Emerald Isle, NC Town of Pine Knoll Shores, NC Village of Bald Head Island, NC SCIENCE & ENGINEERING FIRMS Andrews, Miller & Associates Fugro EarthData, Inc. Parsons Areté Associates Global Remote Sensing Photo Science, Inc. BHE Environmental, Inc. Greenhorne & O’Mara, Inc. SAIC Coastal Planning & Engineering (Shaw) Moffatt & Nichol Engineers Terracon Consultants, Inc. David Evans and Associates Olsen & Associates Tetra Tech EM Inc. Environmental Professionals Inc. Offshore & Coastal Technologies, Inc. Zande-Jon Guerry Taylor, P.E.. Flatiron / United UNIVERSITIES / RESEARCH Duke University Marine Laboratory North Carolina State University University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill – Institute of Marine Science DREDGE OPERATIONS Marinex Construction Inc. Weeks Marine, Inc. EQUIPMENT & TECHNOLOGY Geodynamics maintains a full suite of calibrated scientific instruments and customized surveying platforms to accommodate a variety of marine and terrestrially-based research objectives. We constantly strive to stay ahead of the latest trends in technology and thereby provide our clients with the best possible data and final results. MULTIBEAM SONAR Geodynamics employs a variety of multibeam systems to collect 3D bathymetry with backscatter. These systems can be deployed in many configurations allowing the client flexibility in survey design and pricing. RTK-GPS and inertial
Recommended publications
  • Preprint Arxiv:1806.10939, 2018

    Preprint Arxiv:1806.10939, 2018

    Solid Earth Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/se-2019-4 Manuscript under review for journal Solid Earth Discussion started: 15 January 2019 c Author(s) 2019. CC BY 4.0 License. Bayesian geological and geophysical data fusion for the construction and uncertainty quantification of 3D geological models Hugo K. H. Olierook1, Richard Scalzo2, David Kohn3, Rohitash Chandra2,4, Ehsan Farahbakhsh2,4, Gregory Houseman3, Chris Clark1, Steven M. Reddy1, R. Dietmar Müller4 5 1School of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia 2Centre for Translational Data Science, University of Sydney, NSW 2006 Sydney, Australia 3Sydney Informatics Hub, University of Sydney, NSW 2006 Sydney, Australia 4EarthByte Group, School of Geosciences, University of Sydney, NSW 2006 Sydney, Australia Correspondence to: Hugo K. H. Olierook ([email protected]) 10 Abstract. Traditional approaches to develop 3D geological models employ a mix of quantitative and qualitative scientific techniques, which do not fully provide quantification of uncertainty in the constructed models and fail to optimally weight geological field observations against constraints from geophysical data. Here, we demonstrate a Bayesian methodology to fuse geological field observations with aeromagnetic and gravity data to build robust 3D models in a 13.5 × 13.5 km region of the Gascoyne Province, Western Australia. Our approach is validated by comparing model results to independently-constrained 15 geological maps and cross-sections produced by the Geological Survey of Western Australia. By fusing geological field data with magnetics and gravity surveys, we show that at 89% of the modelled region has >95% certainty. The boundaries between geological units are characterized by narrow regions with <95% certainty, which are typically 400–1000 m wide at the Earth’s surface and 500–2000 m wide at depth.
  • UCGE Reports Ionosphere Weighted Global Positioning System Carrier

    UCGE Reports Ionosphere Weighted Global Positioning System Carrier

    UCGE Reports Number 20155 Ionosphere Weighted Global Positioning System Carrier Phase Ambiguity Resolution (URL: http://www.geomatics.ucalgary.ca/links/GradTheses.html) Department of Geomatics Engineering By George Chia Liu December 2001 Calgary, Alberta, Canada THE UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY IONOSPHERE WEIGHTED GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM CARRIER PHASE AMBIGUITY RESOLUTION by GEORGE CHIA LIU A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE DEPARTMENT OF GEOMATICS ENGINEERING CALGARY, ALBERTA OCTOBER, 2001 c GEORGE CHIA LIU 2001 Abstract Integer Ambiguity constraint is essential in precise GPS positioning. The perfor- mance and reliability of the ambiguity resolution process are being hampered by the current culmination (Y2000) of the eleven-year solar cycle. The traditional approach to mitigate the high ionospheric effect has been either to reduce the inter-station separation or to form ionosphere-free observables. Neither is satisfactory: the first restricts the operating range, and the second no longer possesses the ”integerness” of the ambiguities. A third generalized approach is introduced herein, whereby the zero ionosphere weight constraint, or pseudo-observables, with an appropriate weight is added to the Kalman Filter algorithm. The weight can be tightly fixed yielding the model equivalence of an independent L1/L2 dual-band model. At the other extreme, an infinite floated weight gives the equivalence of an ionosphere-free model, yet perserves the ambiguity integerness. A stochastically tuned, or weighted, model provides a compromise between the two ex- tremes. The reliability of ambiguity estimates relies on many factors, including an accurate functional model, a realistic stochastic model, and a subsequent efficient integer search algorithm.
  • Geomatics Guidance Note 3

    Geomatics Guidance Note 3

    Geomatics Guidance Note 3 Contract area description Revision history Version Date Amendments 5.1 December 2014 Revised to improve clarity. Heading changed to ‘Geomatics’. 4 April 2006 References to EPSG updated. 3 April 2002 Revised to conform to ISO19111 terminology. 2 November 1997 1 November 1995 First issued. 1. Introduction Contract Areas and Licence Block Boundaries have often been inadequately described by both licensing authorities and licence operators. Overlaps of and unlicensed slivers between adjacent licences may then occur. This has caused problems between operators and between licence authorities and operators at both the acquisition and the development phases of projects. This Guidance Note sets out a procedure for describing boundaries which, if followed for new contract areas world-wide, will alleviate the problems. This Guidance Note is intended to be useful to three specific groups: 1. Exploration managers and lawyers in hydrocarbon exploration companies who negotiate for licence acreage but who may have limited geodetic awareness 2. Geomatics professionals in hydrocarbon exploration and development companies, for whom the guidelines may serve as a useful summary of accepted best practice 3. Licensing authorities. The guidance is intended to apply to both onshore and offshore areas. This Guidance Note does not attempt to cover every aspect of licence boundary definition. In the interests of producing a concise document that may be as easily understood by the layman as well as the specialist, definitions which are adequate for most licences have been covered. Complex licence boundaries especially those following river features need specialist advice from both the survey and the legal professions and are beyond the scope of this Guidance Note.
  • SOP14 Geophysical Survey

    SOP14 Geophysical Survey

    SSFL Use Only SSFL SOP 14 Geophysical Survey Revision: 0 Date: April 2012 Prepared: C. Werden Technical Review: J. Plevniak Approved and QA Review: J. Oxford Issued: 4/6/2012 Signature/Date 1.0 Objective The purpose of this technical standard operating procedure (SOP) is to introduce the procedures for non-invasive geophysical investigations in areas suspected of being used for disposal of debris or where landfill operations may have been conducted. Specifics of the geophysical surveys will be discussed in the Geophysical Survey Field Sampling Plan Addendum. Geophysical methods that will be used to accurately locate and record buried geophysical anomalies are: . Total Field Magnetometry (TFM) . Frequency Domain Electromagnetic Method (FDEM) . Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) TFM and FDEM will be applied to all areas of interest while GPR will be applied only to areas of interest that require further and/or higher resolution of geophysical anomaly. The geophysical investigation (survey) will be conducted by geophysical subcontractor personnel trained, experienced, and qualified in shallow subsurface geophysics necessary to successfully perform any of the above geophysical methods. CDM Smith will provide oversight of the geophysical contractor. 2.0 Background 2.1 Discussion This SOP is based on geophysical methods employed by US Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) subcontractor Hydrogeologic Inc. (HGL) while conducted geophysical surveys of portions of Area IV during 2010 and 2011. The Data Gap Investigation conducted as part of Phase 3 identified additional locations of suspected buried materials not surveyed by HGL. To be consistent with the recently collected subsurface information, HGL procedures are being adopted. The areas of interest and survey limits will be determined prior to field mobilization.
  • PRINCIPLES and PRACTICES of GEOMATICS BE 3200 COURSE SYLLABUS Fall 2015

    PRINCIPLES and PRACTICES of GEOMATICS BE 3200 COURSE SYLLABUS Fall 2015

    PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES OF GEOMATICS BE 3200 COURSE SYLLABUS Fall 2015 Meeting times: Lecture class meets promptly at 10:10-11:00 AM Mon/Wed in438 Brackett Hall and lab meets promptly at 12:30-3:20 PM Wed at designated sites Course Basics Geomatics encompass the disciplines of surveying, mapping, remote sensing, and geographic information systems. It’s a relatively new term used to describe the science and technology of dealing with earth measurement data that includes collection, sorting, management, planning and design, storage, and presentation of the data. In this class, geomatics is defined as being an integrated approach to the measurement, analysis, management, storage, and presentation of the descriptions and locations of spatial data. Goal: Designed as a "first course" in the principles of geomeasurement including leveling for earthwork, linear and area measurements (traversing), mapping, and GPS/GIS. Description: Basic surveying measurements and computations for engineering project control, mapping, and construction layout. Leveling, earthwork, area, and topographic measurements using levels, total stations, and GPS. Application of Mapping via GIS. 2 CT2: This course is a CT seminar in which you will not only study the course material but also develop your critical thinking skills. Prerequisite: MTHSC 106: Calculus of One Variable I. Textbook: Kavanagh, B. F. Surveying: Principles and Applications. Prentice Hall. 2010. Lab Notes: Purchase Lab notes at Campus Copy Shop [REQUIRED]. Materials: Textbook, Lab Notes (must be brought to lab), Field Book, 3H/4H Pencil, Small Scale, and Scientific Calculator. Attendance: Regular and punctual attendance at all classes and field work is the responsibility of each student.
  • Geophysical Investigations of Well Fields to Characterize Fractured-Bedrock Aquifers in Southern New Hampshire

    Geophysical Investigations of Well Fields to Characterize Fractured-Bedrock Aquifers in Southern New Hampshire

    In Cooperation with the NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES o Geophysical Investigations of Well Fields to Characterize Fractured-Bedrock Aquifers in Southern New Hampshire Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4183 U.S. Department of the Interior / U.S. Geological Survey The base map on the front cover shows geophysical survey locations overlaying a geologic map of U.S. Geological Survey, Windham, New Hampshire, 1:24,000-scale quadrangle. Geology is by G.S. Walsh and S.F. Clark, Jr. (1999) and lineaments are from Ferguson and others (1997) and R.B. Moore and Garrick Marcoux, 1998. The photographs and graphics overlying the base map are showing, counterclockwise from the left, a USGS scientist using a resistivity meter and surveying equipment (background) to survey the bedrock beneath the surface using a geophysical method called azimuthal square-array direct- current resistivity. In the lower left, this cross section is showing the results of a survey along line 3 in Windham, N.H., using another method called two-dimensional direct-current resistivity. In the lower right, the photograph is showing a bedrock outcrop located between red lines 3 and 4 (on base map) at Windham, in which the fractures and parting parallel to foliation have the same strike as the azimuthal square-array direct-current resistivity survey results, and remotely sensed lineaments (purple and green lines on base map). The upper right graphic shows a polar plot of the results of an azimuthal square-array direct-current resistivity survey at Windham for array 1 (red circle on base map). U.S. Department of the Interior U.S.
  • An Introduction to Geophysical Exploration, 3E

    An Introduction to Geophysical Exploration, 3E

    An Introduction to Geophysical Exploration Philip Kearey Department of Earth Sciences University of Bristol Michael Brooks Ty Newydd, City Near Cowbridge Vale of Glamorgan Ian Hill Department of Geology University of Leicester THIRD EDITION AN INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICAL EXPLORATION An Introduction to Geophysical Exploration Philip Kearey Department of Earth Sciences University of Bristol Michael Brooks Ty Newydd, City Near Cowbridge Vale of Glamorgan Ian Hill Department of Geology University of Leicester THIRD EDITION © 2002 by The right of the Authors to be distributors Blackwell Science Ltd identified as the Authors of this Work Marston Book Services Ltd Editorial Offices: has been asserted in accordance PO Box 269 Osney Mead, Oxford OX2 0EL with the Copyright, Designs and Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4YN 25 John Street, London WC1N 2BS Patents Act 1988. (Orders: Tel: 01235 465500 23 Ainslie Place, Edinburgh EH3 6AJ Fax: 01235 465555) 350 Main Street, Malden All rights reserved. No part of MA 02148-5018, USA this publication may be reproduced, The Americas 54 University Street, Carlton stored in a retrieval system, or Blackwell Publishing Victoria 3053,Australia transmitted, in any form or by any c/o AIDC 10, rue Casimir Delavigne means, electronic, mechanical, PO Box 20 75006 Paris, France photocopying, recording or otherwise, 50 Winter Sport Lane except as permitted by the UK Williston,VT 05495-0020 Other Editorial Offices: Copyright, Designs and Patents Act (Orders: Tel: 800 216 2522 Blackwell Wissenschafts-Verlag GmbH 1988, without the prior
  • Geophysical Methods Commonly Employed for Geotechnical Site Characterization TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2008 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OFFICERS

    Geophysical Methods Commonly Employed for Geotechnical Site Characterization TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2008 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OFFICERS

    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH Number E-C130 October 2008 Geophysical Methods Commonly Employed for Geotechnical Site Characterization TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2008 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OFFICERS Chair: Debra L. Miller, Secretary, Kansas Department of Transportation, Topeka Vice Chair: Adib K. Kanafani, Cahill Professor of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley Division Chair for NRC Oversight: C. Michael Walton, Ernest H. Cockrell Centennial Chair in Engineering, University of Texas, Austin Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2008–2009 TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES COUNCIL Chair: Robert C. Johns, Director, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis Technical Activities Director: Mark R. Norman, Transportation Research Board Paul H. Bingham, Principal, Global Insight, Inc., Washington, D.C., Freight Systems Group Chair Shelly R. Brown, Principal, Shelly Brown Associates, Seattle, Washington, Legal Resources Group Chair Cindy J. Burbank, National Planning and Environment Practice Leader, PB, Washington, D.C., Policy and Organization Group Chair James M. Crites, Executive Vice President, Operations, Dallas–Fort Worth International Airport, Texas, Aviation Group Chair Leanna Depue, Director, Highway Safety Division, Missouri Department of Transportation, Jefferson City, System Users Group Chair Arlene L. Dietz, A&C Dietz and Associates, LLC, Salem, Oregon, Marine Group Chair Robert M. Dorer, Acting Director, Office of Surface Transportation Programs, Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Rail Group Chair Karla H. Karash, Vice President, TranSystems Corporation, Medford, Massachusetts, Public Transportation Group Chair Mary Lou Ralls, Principal, Ralls Newman, LLC, Austin, Texas, Design and Construction Group Chair Katherine F. Turnbull, Associate Director, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, Planning and Environment Group Chair Daniel S.
  • GLY5455 Introduction to Geophysics/Geodynamics Syllabus Fall 2015 Instructor: Mark Panning Location: Williamson 218 Time: Tuesday and Thursday, 1:55-3:10Pm

    GLY5455 Introduction to Geophysics/Geodynamics Syllabus Fall 2015 Instructor: Mark Panning Location: Williamson 218 Time: Tuesday and Thursday, 1:55-3:10Pm

    GLY5455 Introduction to Geophysics/Geodynamics Syllabus Fall 2015 Instructor: Mark Panning Location: Williamson 218 Time: Tuesday and Thursday, 1:55-3:10pm Contact Info Office: 229 Williamson Hall Phone: 392-2634 Email: [email protected] Office hours: Can be arranged at any time via email Textbook Turcotte & Schubert, Geodynamics, 3rd Edition (required) We will also be pulling material from the following books (not required) Physics of the Earth, Stacey and Davis (2008) The Magnetic Field of the Earth, Merrill, McElhinny, and McFadden (1996) Introduction to Seismology, Shearer (2006) Pre-reqs You will ideally have completed 1 year of calculus and a semester of physics. This class will deal with vector calculus… if this worries you, check out div grad curl and all that, by H.M. Schey (available for around $30 online). Grading 60% Homework 20% Midterm 20% Final Course topics (roughly 2-3 weeks per topic… but very flexible!) Topic Text Gravity Ch. 5 + other notes Heat Ch. 4 Magnetism Material from The Magnetic Field of the Earth Seismology Ch. 2, 3, and material from Introduction to Seismology Plate Tectonics & Mantle Geodynamics Ch. 1,6,7 Geophysical inverse theory (if time allows) Outside readings TBA Class notes Lecture notes will be distributed, sometimes before the material is covered in lecture, and sometimes after. Regardless, as always, such notes are meant to be supplementary to your own notes. I may cover things not in the distributed notes, and likewise may not cover everything in lecture that is included in the notes. Homework The first homework assignment will be assigned in week 2.
  • Geodynamics and Rate of Volcanism on Massive Earth-Like Planets

    Geodynamics and Rate of Volcanism on Massive Earth-Like Planets

    The Astrophysical Journal, 700:1732–1749, 2009 August 1 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/700/2/1732 C 2009. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. GEODYNAMICS AND RATE OF VOLCANISM ON MASSIVE EARTH-LIKE PLANETS E. S. Kite1,3, M. Manga1,3, and E. Gaidos2 1 Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA Received 2008 September 12; accepted 2009 May 29; published 2009 July 16 ABSTRACT We provide estimates of volcanism versus time for planets with Earth-like composition and masses 0.25–25 M⊕, as a step toward predicting atmospheric mass on extrasolar rocky planets. Volcanism requires melting of the silicate mantle. We use a thermal evolution model, calibrated against Earth, in combination with standard melting models, to explore the dependence of convection-driven decompression mantle melting on planet mass. We show that (1) volcanism is likely to proceed on massive planets with plate tectonics over the main-sequence lifetime of the parent star; (2) crustal thickness (and melting rate normalized to planet mass) is weakly dependent on planet mass; (3) stagnant lid planets live fast (they have higher rates of melting than their plate tectonic counterparts early in their thermal evolution), but die young (melting shuts down after a few Gyr); (4) plate tectonics may not operate on high-mass planets because of the production of buoyant crust which is difficult to subduct; and (5) melting is necessary but insufficient for efficient volcanic degassing—volatiles partition into the earliest, deepest melts, which may be denser than the residue and sink to the base of the mantle on young, massive planets.
  • Geophysical Field Mapping

    Geophysical Field Mapping

    Presented at Short Course IX on Exploration for Geothermal Resources, organized by UNU-GTP, GDC and KenGen, at Lake Bogoria and Lake Naivasha, Kenya, Nov. 2-23, 2014. Kenya Electricity Generating Co., Ltd. GEOPHYSICAL FIELD MAPPING Anastasia W. Wanjohi, Kenya Electricity Generating Company Ltd. Olkaria Geothermal Project P.O. Box 785-20117, Naivasha KENYA [email protected] or [email protected] ABSTRACT Geophysics is the study of the earth by the quantitative observation of its physical properties. In geothermal geophysics, we measure the various parameters connected to geological structure and properties of geothermal systems. Geophysical field mapping is the process of selecting an area of interest and identifying all the geophysical aspects of the area with the purpose of preparing a detailed geophysical report. The objective of geophysical field work is to understand all physical parameters of a geothermal field and be able to relate them with geological phenomenons and come up with plausible inferences about the system. Four phases are involved and include planning/desktop studies, reconnaissance, actual data aquisition and report writing. Equipments must be prepared and calibrated well. Geophysical results should be processed, analysed and presented in the appropriate form. A detailed geophysical report should be compiled. This paper presents the reader with an overview of how to carry out geophysical mapping in a geothermal field. 1. INTRODUCTION Geophysics is the study of the earth by the quantitative observation of its physical properties. In geothermal geophysics, we measure the various parameters connected to geological structure and properties of geothermal systems. In lay man’s language, geophysics is all about x-raying the earth and involves sending signals into the earth and monitoring the outcome or monitoring natural signals from the earth.
  • Geodetic Position Computations

    Geodetic Position Computations

    GEODETIC POSITION COMPUTATIONS E. J. KRAKIWSKY D. B. THOMSON February 1974 TECHNICALLECTURE NOTES REPORT NO.NO. 21739 PREFACE In order to make our extensive series of lecture notes more readily available, we have scanned the old master copies and produced electronic versions in Portable Document Format. The quality of the images varies depending on the quality of the originals. The images have not been converted to searchable text. GEODETIC POSITION COMPUTATIONS E.J. Krakiwsky D.B. Thomson Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering University of New Brunswick P.O. Box 4400 Fredericton. N .B. Canada E3B5A3 February 197 4 Latest Reprinting December 1995 PREFACE The purpose of these notes is to give the theory and use of some methods of computing the geodetic positions of points on a reference ellipsoid and on the terrain. Justification for the first three sections o{ these lecture notes, which are concerned with the classical problem of "cCDputation of geodetic positions on the surface of an ellipsoid" is not easy to come by. It can onl.y be stated that the attempt has been to produce a self contained package , cont8.i.ning the complete development of same representative methods that exist in the literature. The last section is an introduction to three dimensional computation methods , and is offered as an alternative to the classical approach. Several problems, and their respective solutions, are presented. The approach t~en herein is to perform complete derivations, thus stqing awrq f'rcm the practice of giving a list of for11111lae to use in the solution of' a problem.