A Proposal for the Protection of Digital Databases in Sri Lanka Submitted

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Proposal for the Protection of Digital Databases in Sri Lanka Submitted A Proposal for the Protection of Digital Databases in Sri Lanka Submitted by Thusitha Bernad Abeysekara to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Law in July 2013 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. Signature: ………………………………………………………….. 1 ABSTRACT Economic development in Sri Lanka has relied heavily on foreign and domestic investment. Digital databases are a new and attractive area for this investment. This thesis argues that investment needs protection and this is crucial to attract future investment. The thesis therefore proposes a digital database protection mechanism with a view to attracting investment in digital databases to Sri Lanka. The research examines various existing protection measures whilst mainly focusing on the sui generis right protection which confirms the protection of qualitative and/or quantitative substantial investment in the obtaining, verification or presentation of the contents of digital databases. In digital databases, this process is carried out by computer programs which establish meaningful and useful data patterns through their data mining process, and subsequently use those patterns in Knowledge Discovery within database processes. Those processes enhance the value and/or usefulness of the data/information. Computer programs need to be protected, as this thesis proposes, by virtue of patent protection because the process carried out by computer programs is that of a technical process - an area for which patents are particularly suitable for the purpose of protecting. All intellectual property concepts under the existing mechanisms address the issue of investment in databases in different ways. These include Copyright, Contract, Unfair Competition law and Misappropriation and Sui generis right protection. Since the primary objective of the thesis is to introduce a protection system for encouraging qualitative and quantitative investment in digital databases in Sri Lanka, this thesis suggests a set of mechanisms and rights which comprises of existing intellectual protection mechanisms for databases. The ultimate goal of the proposed protection mechanisms and rights is to improve the laws pertaining to the protection of digital databases in Sri Lanka in order to attract investment, to protect the rights and duties of the digital database users and owners/authors and, eventually, to bring positive economic effects to the country. Since digital database protection is a new concept in the Sri Lankan legal context, this research will provide guidelines for policy-makers, judges and lawyers in Sri Lanka and throughout the South Asian region. th The law is correct as on 20 July 2013 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS What I was taught during my LLM in Computer & Communications Law at Queen Mary, University of London and the lectures given by Prof. Chris Reed and Prof. Ian Walden motivated and inspired me to do a PhD in Digital Database Protection/Computer Law. Whilst I selected, by my own reasoning, the renowned University of Exeter/UK, the university appointed the most appropriate IP/IT expert as my lead supervisor- Dr. James GH Griffin. I am particularly grateful for his wonderful guidance, support and unending kindness. If it were not for him, this research would not have become a reality so I have no hesitation in describing Dr. Griffin as the best example of a lead supervisor. My second supervisor Dr. Naomi Hawkins and my mentor, Dr. Frederic Rolland helped me throughout the PhD process. Ms Sarah Roberts, the Department’s Administrator, supported for getting through the proceedings of International Conferences where I took part around the world. I thank them all. Special thanks are due to the thesis internal examiner Prof. Rob Merkin who is Lloyd’s Professor of Commercial Law, and the external examiner Mr Stephen Mason/Barrister and General Editor, Electronic Evidence, for their profound examining and invaluable comments. I am greatly indebted to Dr. Asoka Silva, Head-Legal Studies/OUSL, who shouldered all the hard work concerning my scholarships in postgraduate studies and continuously offered me encouragement in difficult times. I owe an extra special thank you to Prof. Laksiri Fernando and his NCAS/Sri Lanka staff for their kind understanding and generosity in offering me a part scholarship for my PhD research. The endless editing process was eventually ended because of the endless helping hands of Dr. George Cumming/Barrister; Dr. Anusha Wickramasinghe; Dinusha Jayanetti/AAL; Nishadi R Thennakoon/AAL; Nalaka Illangaratne/AAL; Dr. Eng. Saman Ilankoon; Mr Benedict Saparamadu; Mr Sanath Jayalath; Mr I Ranjith and Mr Nicholas Cleary. While NCAS and OUSL offered me a part scholarship for my studies, Thusitha Siriwardana/AAL, DM Dissanayake/AAL and Indika Jayaweera/AAL provided a life line for the said scholarship’s proceedings in my absence. Dilojan Pushpakumara/AAL helped to find out living comfort in the United Kingdom. Dr. Balakrishna Sridharan’s advice assisted me at critical points of my thesis drafting. I owe an extra thanks to them. I offer my greatest thanks to my parents and my only sister. My father, Mr Nelson Abeysekara, and my mother, Mrs Soma Abeysekara, provided most of the financial backing in addition to their deep love and affection which took a huge stress off my mind. Without the efforts of my sister, Ms Udeshika Nelani Abeysekara, this thesis would not have been a success. My fiancée, Sewwandika Wijesinghe/AAL, encouraged me a great deal while she patiently waited while I reached this stage in my studies. My thanks go to all the staff of the IALS/London where I spent more than six years since the first day of my LLM studies. 3 CONTENTS ABSTRACT................................................................................................................................. 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................ 3 CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................ 4 CHAPTER 1.............................................................................................................................. 10 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 10 1.1. Background............................................................................................................... 10 1.1.1. The Problem ...................................................................................................... 12 1.1.2. Types of Databases ............................................................................................ 14 1.1.3. Definition of a database ..................................................................................... 17 1.1.4. Reasons for a research into digital database protection ..................................... 22 1.2. Methodology ............................................................................................................ 31 1.2.1. Using economics as an approach to the concept of “property” .......................... 34 1.2.2. Investment in making a database ....................................................................... 37 1.3. Arguments ................................................................................................................ 40 1.4. Chapter outline ......................................................................................................... 44 1.5. Ways that digital databases enhance the ‘value and/or usefulness’ of data .............. 52 1.6. The role of investment in database protection .......................................................... 61 1.6.1. The broad context of the problem ..................................................................... 61 1.6.2. Link between protection and investment ........................................................... 64 1.6.3. Possible reasons for a lack of investment ........................................................... 71 1.6.4. Reasons for legal protection .............................................................................. 71 1.6.5. Previous research carried out in this area .......................................................... 72 1.6.5.1. Issues that have not been considered in previous research ......................... 77 1.6.5.2. Novel aspects of this thesis ......................................................................... 77 1.6.6. Reasons for choosing Sri Lanka .......................................................................... 78 1.7. Importance of “sui generis” right protection and link with investment ...................... 79 1.8. Overview .................................................................................................................. 81 4 CHAPTER 2.............................................................................................................................. 83 PROTECTION OF DIGITAL DATABASES BY COPYRIGHT LAW .................................................. 83 2.1. Introduction.............................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • International Intellectual Property Law
    ee--RRGG Electronic Resource Guide International Intellectual Property Law * Jonathan Franklin This page was last updated February 8, 2013. his electronic resource guide, often called the ERG, has been published online by the American Society of International Law (ASIL) since 1997. T Since then it has been systematically updated and continuously expanded. The chapter format of the ERG is designed to be used by students, teachers, practitioners and researchers as a self-guided tour of relevant, quality, up-to-date online resources covering important areas of international law. The ERG also serves as a ready-made teaching tool at graduate and undergraduate levels. The narrative format of the ERG is complemented and augmented by EISIL (Electronic Information System for International Law), a free online database that organizes and provides links to, and useful information on, web resources from the full spectrum of international law. EISIL's subject-organized format and expert-provided content also enhances its potential as teaching tool. 2 This page was last updated February 8, 2013. I. Introduction II. Overview III. Research Guides and Bibliographies a. International Intellectual Property Law b. International Patent Law i. Public Health and IP ii. Agriculture, Plant Varieties, and IP c. International Copyright Law i. Art, Cultural Property, and IP d. International Trademark Law e. Trade and IP f. Arbitration, Mediation, and IP g. Traditional Knowledge and IP h. Geographical Indications IV. General Search Strategies V. Primary Sources VI. Primary National Legislation and Decisions VII. Recommended Link sites VIII. Selected Non-Governmental Organizations IX. Electronic Current Awareness 3 This page was last updated February 8, 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • The Expansion of Intellectual Property for the Protection of Databases Lionel M
    Santa Clara Law Review Volume 38 | Number 1 Article 1 1-1-1997 Database Rights and Technical Data Rights: the Expansion of Intellectual Property for the Protection of Databases Lionel M. Lavenue Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/lawreview Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Lionel M. Lavenue, Database Rights and Technical Data Rights: the Expansion of Intellectual Property for the Protection of Databases, 38 Santa Clara L. Rev. 1 (1997). Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/lawreview/vol38/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Santa Clara Law Review by an authorized administrator of Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLES DATABASE RIGHTS AND TECHNICAL DATA RIGHTS: THE EXPANSION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY FOR THE PROTECTION OF DATABASES Lionel M. Lavenue* INTRODUCTION Databases represent the most valuable form of technical data.' Indeed, all businesses utilize some form of database, whether an inventory, price schedule, or customer list.' Da- tabases play a critical role in all facets of computer technol- ogy as every type of computer hardware utilizes computer software which, in turn, utilizes some form of database.' Da- Associate, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett, & Dunner, L.L.P., Washington, D.C.; Fulbright Scholar (1996-97), Max Planck Institute of Foreign and International Patent, Copyright, and Competition Law, Munich, Germany; Law Clerk (1994-96), Chief Judge Glenn L. Archer, Jr., United States Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit; Law Clerk (1992-94), Judge Robert J.
    [Show full text]
  • Birth and Evolution of Korean Reality Show Formats
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Film, Media & Theatre Dissertations School of Film, Media & Theatre Spring 5-6-2019 Dynamics of a Periphery TV Industry: Birth and Evolution of Korean Reality Show Formats Soo keung Jung [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/fmt_dissertations Recommended Citation Jung, Soo keung, "Dynamics of a Periphery TV Industry: Birth and Evolution of Korean Reality Show Formats." Dissertation, Georgia State University, 2019. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/fmt_dissertations/7 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Film, Media & Theatre at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Film, Media & Theatre Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DYNAMICS OF A PERIPHERY TV INDUSTRY: BIRTH AND EVOLUTION OF KOREAN REALITY SHOW FORMATS by SOOKEUNG JUNG Under the Direction of Ethan Tussey and Sharon Shahaf, PhD ABSTRACT Television format, a tradable program package, has allowed Korean television the new opportunity to be recognized globally. The booming transnational production of Korean reality formats have transformed the production culture, aesthetics and structure of the local television. This study, using a historical and practical approach to the evolution of the Korean reality formats, examines the dynamic relations between producer, industry and text in the
    [Show full text]
  • On the Treatment of the Sui Generis Database Rights in Version 3.0 of the Creative Commons Licenses
    On the treatment of the sui generis database rights in Version 3.0 of the Creative Commons licenses. Background: Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases (the "Database Directive") created a new basis for the protection of databases ("sui generis database protection") not previously recognized under copyright law. The database directive has by now been implemented by the 25 member states of the EU (plus some of the countries such as Norway that are part of the European Economic Area - EEA). Outside of Europe there is no sui generis protection of Databases. In some countries (for example Germany) the database directive has been implemented as part of the national copyright act, while others (such as the Netherlands) have chosen to implement via a separate act (in this case the database act). The lawmakers of the European Union decided that in order to provide greater protection to collections of information they should have a unified legal protection for databases. To this end, they created a sui generis right called database right. The database right lasts for 15 years under this regime, but can be extended if the database is updated. Database rights prevent copying of substantial parts of a database (including frequent extraction of insubstantial parts). However unlike copyright the protection of the database right is not over the form of expression of information but of the information itself [source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Database_rights]. Prior to Version 3.0, some localized and translated versions of the Creative Commons licenses (Belgium, Netherlands, France and Germany) contained references to national legislation passed pursuant to the Database Directive, by defining a "work" to include databases protected by these laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Page | 1 the Global TV Format Trading System: Trends And
    The Global TV Format Trading System: Trends and Developments since the Format Revolution Prof. Jean K. Chalaby The history of TV formats is now relatively well established, not least thanks to Albert Moran and other people around this table, but it seems to me that the period we know least is the last 10 years. We sometimes act as if time had stopped since four super-formats Who wants to be a millionaire?, Survivor, Big Brother and Idols, swept the world. But it sometimes feel that time has stopped indeed, as they formats, and their newish successors, are still winning rating wars in many countries. However, scratching beneath the surface, the past decade has probably been one of the most eventful for the format trade. In this short presentation I am highlighting three key points in the recent history of the TV trade. 1. The format trade has truly become global, penetrating further into established markets and reaching territories it has never visited before. It only since the late 1990s, and precisely since Who wants to be a millionaire?, that broadcasters in the world’s premier media market, the USA, have been buying formats in great numbers. New markets include territories in the Middle East and Africa, but it is in Asia that the growth has been most noticed, and rightly so. Format buying and adapting has become an established practice in Asia over the past 10 years. In China, the format market was heating up so much that the authorities decided to restrict new formats to one per broadcaster earlier in the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Text and Data Mining in EU Copyright Law
    Department of Law Spring Term 2020 Master Programme in Intellectual Property Law Master’s Thesis 30 ECTS Text and Data Mining in EU Copyright Law Author: Gabriella Svensson Supervisor: Kacper Szkalej 1 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Subject and Purpose ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Material and Method ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Delimitations .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Outline ............................................................................................................................................................ 5 1. A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO TEXT AND DATA MINING ................................................................... 7 2. FUNDAMENTAL EU COPYRIGHT LAW .............................................................................................. 11 2.1 Protectable Subject Matter and Exclusive Rights .......................................................................... 11 2.2 The DSM Directive and TDM ....................................................................................................... 14 3. WHY AND HOW MIGHT
    [Show full text]
  • RIGHTS in DATA HANDBOOK Protecting and Exploiting IP in Data and Databases Internationally RIGHTS in DATA HANDBOOK
    January 2013 RIGHTS IN DATA HANDBOOK Protecting and exploiting IP in data and databases internationally RIGHTS IN DATA HANDBOOK January 2013 Edition EDITORS INTRODUCTION The value of data and databases to business is undeniable and continues to increase. As a result the laws which enable data to be protected and exploited are crucial to many industries, from horseracing to !nancial services. Nonetheless, while much has been written about the neighbouring area of data privacy/data protection, the issue of IP rights in data and databases has John Wilks, Editor traditionally received almost no attention. This guide sets out an overview of the Partner IP and related rights affecting data and databases in 12 key global jurisdictions. T +44 (0)20 7796 6288 How this Handbook Works M +44 (0)7796 15 8896 [email protected] This handbook provides a high-level summary, with links to relevant sources, of the different types of protection which are available for data and databases in 12 key global jurisdictions. For each jurisdiction we consider three categories of database which may bene!t from protection: original databases, databases in which investment has been made, and con!dential databases. As database law is only part-harmonised in the EU we have, in addition to a section on the EU, separate sections on six representative EU jurisdictions Alec Christie, Co-Editor (France, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands, Spain and the UK). To assist you to Partner navigate our European content and avoid repetition, there are cross-references T +61 2 9286 8237 between the EU section and the national sections.
    [Show full text]
  • Neue Fernsehserien Und Ihr Potenzial Für Eine Kritische Medienpädagogik
    ISSN 1424-3636 www.medienpaed.com Themenheft Nr. 26: Neue Fernsehserien und ihr Potenzial für eine kritische Medien pädagogik. Herausgegeben von Elena Pilipets und Rainer Winter Editorial: Neue Fernsehserien und ihr Potenzial für eine kritische Medienpädagogik Elena Pilipets und Rainer Winter Die Auseinandersetzung mit Fernsehserien spielt eine wichtige Rolle im Leben vieler Menschen weltweit: Die Serien wiederholen und entwickeln sich, sind Teil der Medienroutine, begleiten uns im Alltag. Was sie erzählen, entsteht daher nicht unerwartet oder zufällig, sondern verweist auf eine langfristige Ausprägung popu- lärkultureller Ausdrucksformen, die kognitiv und ästhetisch sowie anwendungsori- entiert ist (Eichner et al. 2013). Nichtsdestotrotz hatten die populären Serien schon immer ‹unvorhersehbare Folgen›. Vor allem Fernsehserien, die angesichts enor- mer Veränderungen in verschiedenen Bereichen der kulturindustriellen Medien- unterhaltung seit den 1980er- und vor allem den 1990er- Jahren als anspruchsvolle und experimentelle erzählerische Formen wiederentdeckt wurden, scheinen sich permanent aufs Neue zu erfinden. Episode für Episode, Staffel für Staffel, irgend- wo im Dazwischen von «coming next…» und «previously on» (Meteling et al. 2010) entfalten sich komplexe mediale Erfahrungswelten, indem sie dem performativen Imperativ popkultureller Überbietung zufolge an der kontinuierlichen Erweiterung ihrer narrativen und medialen Möglichkeiten arbeiten (Jahn-Sudmann/Kelleter 2012). Diese prozessorientierte Fähigkeit der Fernsehserie, aus der
    [Show full text]
  • Intellectual Property Right Assignments Q&A: US
    Intellectual property right assignments Q&A: US, Practical Law Country Q&A w-026-1550 Intellectual property right assignments Q&A: US by Michael S. Palmisciano, Christopher T. McWhinney and Kimberly B. Herman, Sullivan & Worcester LLP Country Q&A | Law stated as at 31-May-2020 | United States This Q&A provides country-specific commentary on the following standard documents: Assignment of intellectual property rights: Cross-border. Assignment of trade marks: Cross-border. Assignment of copyright: Cross-border. Assignment of patents: Cross-border. Assignment of industrial designs: Cross-border. Waiver of moral rights: Cross-border. Letter confirming assignment of intellectual property rights: Cross-border. and forms part of Cross-border Intellectual property. Key aspects of intellectual property right assignments Definition of IP rights Assigning the benefit of licences to use IP rights Assigning future intellectual property rights Implied covenants Right to sue for past infringement Right of priority Tax considerations Power of Attorney Assistance with future proceedings Perfecting the assignment Liability Guarantor Formalities for assignment Compliance with local law and practice © 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1 Intellectual property right assignments Q&A: US, Practical Law Country Q&A w-026-1550 Brexit Registration and recordal aspects of intellectual property right assignments Registrable intellectual property rights Assignment recordal / registration Warranties and indemnities in intellectual property right assignments
    [Show full text]
  • Directive 96/9/Ec
    DIRECTIVE 96/9/EC (Database Directive) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases [Introductory remarks] 1. General. The Database Directive has created a two-tier protection regime for electronic and non-electronic databases. Member States are to pro- tect databases by copyright as intellectual creations (Chapter 2), and provide for a sui generis right (database right) to protect the contents of a database in which the producer has substantially invested (Chapter 3). Both rights may apply cumulatively if the prerequisites for both regimes are fulfilled. The introduction of sui generis protection was considered necessary after supreme courts in the Netherlands and the US had held that copyright does not protect databases reflecting merely economic investment or intellectual effort (see Feist (US) and Van Dale (Netherlands)). Prior to implementation, intellectual property protection for non-original compilations existed in just a few Member States (the United Kingdom, Denmark, Sweden and the Nether- lands). Many Member States provided only for unfair competition remedies, to be applied in special circumstances, or no remedies at all. However, the absence of a harmonized legal framework for unfair competition in Europe necessitated the introduction of a sui generis right to complement copyright protection for databases (recital 6). 2. Harmonization. The Directive is based on arts. 47(2), 55 and 95 of the EC Treaty, and is aimed at harmonizing the legal protection of databases across the European Community. The copyright chapter of the Directive harmonizes the originality standard for databases, which prior to the implementation dif- fered greatly between Member States, especially between countries of the authors’ right tradition where a measure of creativity, personal character or personal imprint was required, and the two Member States (Ireland and the UK) of the British copyright tradition where mere skill and labour sufficed.
    [Show full text]
  • COPYRIGHT GUIDE Practical Information for Broadcasters
    Copyright Guide 1 COPYRIGHT GUIDE PRACTICAL INFORMATION FOR BROADCASTERS February 2014 Copyright Guide 2 ABOUT THE EUROPEAN BROADCASTING UNION (EBU) The EBU is the world’s foremost alliance of public service media organisations, with Active Members in 56 countries in Europe and beyond. The EBU’s mission is to defend the interests of public service media and to promote their indispensable contribution to modern society. It is the point of reference for industry knowledge and expertise. The EBU operates EUROVISION and EURORADIO. ABOUT THE EBU LEGAL DEPARTMENT The EBU Legal Department supports and advises its Members on specific legal issues, offering practical solutions in the fields of intellectual property, media and telecommunications regulation and competition law. The Department is proactively involved in various copyright initiatives that are relevant for media, such as the review of the EU copyright acquis. At the global level it advocates broadcasters’ interests at the World Intellectual Property Organisation meetings. The Department also provides advice and services internally for the EBU’s operational activities, assists with the acquisition of sports rights, deals with membership issues, and handles all questions related to the EBU Statutes. Copyright Guide 3 Dear Reader This Guide is intended as a practical toolkit for editors and programme makers working for public service broadcasters, with the aim of increasing awareness of all the rights and obligations under copyright law to be taken into account when creating, selecting and using protected material. We hope that the Guide will prove useful, in particular, for industry newcomers and non-experts who find themselves dealing with copyright-relevant issues in their daily activities, to gain a better understanding of copyright basics.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying, Protecting & Exploiting Your
    IDENTIFYING, PROTECTING & EXPLOITING YOUR IPR This Briefing Note provides an overview of the different types of intellectual property rights, what is required to acquire such rights and how these rights can be exploited. Copyright: Copyright is an unregistered intellectual property right that aims to prevent one person copying or using another person's original work without that person's permission. Copyright extends to any form of original literary, dramatic, musical or artistic works, sound or video recordings, broadcasts, tables, compilations, computer programs or databases. Copyright arises automatically provided: (i) the work is original; (ii) recorded; and (iii) either the author is a “qualifying person” (i.e. British, a resident in the UK or a company incorporated in the UK) or the work is first published in the UK. The person who creates the work will be the first owner of copyright except an employer will own the copyright in a work created by an employee “in the course of employment”. Database Rights: A “database” is defined as “a collection of independent works, data or other materials which are: (i) arranged in a systematic or methodical way; and (ii) individually accessible by electronic or other means”. Databases can be protected by copyright and/or by database rights. To be protected by copyright, the database must be “original” in that the arrangement or selection of the contents is the result of the author’s intellectual creation. In contrast, to qualify for database right, the database does not require “originality” but there must have been a substantial investment in obtaining, verifying or presenting the contents of the database.
    [Show full text]