<<

College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in High Schools, Class of 2005

District and Campus Supplement

Alphabetic by County

■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Division of Accountability Research Department of Accountability and Data Quality October 2006

College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005

District and Campus Supplement

Alphabetic by County

Project Staff Shawn P. Thomas Erika Glaser Randy Gesn

Editorial Staff Amanda Callinan Richard Kallus Sue E. Mutchler

Division of Accountability Research Department of Accountability and Data Quality Texas Education Agency October 2006 Texas Education Agency Shirley J. Neeley, Commissioner of Education Robert Scott, Chief Deputy Commissioner Department of Accountability and Data Quality Criss Cloudt, Associate Commissioner Division of Accountability Research Karen Dvorak, Managing Director Citation. Texas Education Agency. (2006). College admissions testing of graduating seniors in Texas high schools, class of 2005: District and campus supplement (Document No. GE07 601 02). Austin, TX: Author. Keywords. SAT, ACT, college admission, testing, mean scores, criterion, graduate. Bound copies of this report may be purchased using the order form in the back of this publication. Also, the report is available in PDF format on the agency website at http://www.tea.state.tx.us/ research/. Additional information about this report may be obtained by contacting the Texas Education Agency Division of Accountability Research by phone at (512) 475-3523, by email at [email protected], or via the division website: http://www.tea.state.tx.us/research/. For information regarding administration, preparation for, and scoring of the SAT examination, contact the College Board’s Southwestern Regional Office at (512) 891-8400 or http://www.collegeboard.com/. For information on the ACT Assessment, contact ACT, Inc., Southwest Region, at (512) 345-1949 or http://www.act.org/.

Copyright © Notice. The materials are copyrighted © and trademarked ™ as the property of the Texas Education Agency (TEA) and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of TEA, except under the following conditions: (1) Texas public school districts, charter schools, and Education Service Centers may reproduce and use copies of the Materials and Related Materials for the districts’ and schools’ educational use without obtaining permission from TEA; (2) residents of the state of Texas may reproduce and use copies of the Materials and Related Materials for individual personal use only without obtaining written permission of TEA; (3) any portion reproduced must be reproduced in its entirety and remain unedited, unaltered and unchanged in any way; and (4) no monetary charge can be made for the reproduced materials or any document containing them; however, a reasonable charge to cover only the cost of reproduction and distribution may be charged. Private entities or persons located in Texas that are not Texas public school districts, Texas Education Service Centers, or Texas charter schools or any entity, whether public or private, educational or non-educational, located outside the state of Texas MUST obtain written approval from TEA and will be required to enter into a license agreement that may involve the payment of a licensing fee or a royalty. For information contact: Office of Copyrights, Trademarks, License Agreements, and Royalties, Texas Education Agency, 1701 N. Congress Ave., Austin, TX 78701-1494; phone 512-463-9270 or 512-936-6060; email: [email protected]. SAT® and SAT Reasoning Test™ are trademarks of the College Board, and ACT Assessment® is a trademark of the ACT, Inc. Other product and company names mentioned in this report may be the trademarks of their respective owners.

ii College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Contents

Introduction ...... 1 SAT Results for Districts and Campuses ...... 5 Table 1. SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ...... 6 ACT Results for Districts and Campuses...... 65 Table 2. ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ...... 66 College Admissions Examination Results Reported in the Texas Accountability System ...... 125 Table 3. College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005...... 126 College Admissions Examination Results by District Characteristic...... 187 Table 4. College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by District Characteristic, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005...... 188 Texas Education Agency District Characteristic Descriptions, 2004-05...... 193 References ...... 199

District and Campus Supplement iii iv College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Introduction

District and Campus Supplement 1 Introduction

District and Campus Listings by County

This report provides SAT and ACT participation and performance results by campus, district, district characteristic, and state as a supplement to College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 (Texas Education Agency [TEA], 2006). The first three listings display summary data for each Texas public school campus and district, organized by county.

Table 1 includes, for each district and campus: (a) the total number of graduates in the class of 2005; (b) the number and percentage of graduates who took the SAT; (c) the mean SAT Mathematics, Verbal, and combined scores of SAT examinees; and (d) the number and percentage of examinees with SAT combined scores that meet TEA’s Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) criterion score. Table 2 contains the same information for the ACT, with mean English, Mathematics, Reading, Science, and Composite scores. The AEIS criterion scores are 1110 for the SAT and 24 for the ACT.

Table 3 contains information for the AEIS indicators based on results for either the SAT or ACT. Included in Table 3 are: (a) the total number of graduates; (b) the number and percentage of graduates who took the SAT and/or ACT; and (c) the number and percentage of SAT- and/or ACT-tested graduates scoring at or above the criterion score on either test.

In Tables 1-3, SAT and ACT participation and performance data for districts and campuses with fewer than five graduates are removed to protect student confidentiality. This precaution ensures that single sets of scores cannot be identified or linked with any individual. In these cases "<5t" appears in place of the actual value, with "t" referring to a small number of students tested. In addition, districts and campuses with five or more examinees but fewer than five scores of 1110 or above for SAT or 24 or above for ACT receive the note, "<5h." When it is possible for these score data to be arithmetically inferred from other district- or campus-level data, additional masking is employed using intervals of five students, and a note such as the following appears: "<10m," "<15m," "<20m," etc.

College Admissions Examinations by District Characteristic

In the final table, SAT and ACT results have been summarized by a variety of district characteristics. For each of 25 district characteristics, Table 4 shows: (a) the mean SAT combined score; (b) the mean ACT Composite score; (c) the percentage of graduates tested on the SAT and/or the ACT; and (d) the percentage of examinees scoring at or above criterion in 2005. In addition, these four values are presented for the state as a whole and provided at the bottom of the last page.

Information on the 25 district characteristics is based on data from TEA’s Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS). Characteristics include student enrollment, district type, the percentage of students passing the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS), and the percentage of teachers with an advanced degree. Although the number of subcategories within each characteristic is consistent from year to year, the range represented by a subcategory may change. All

2 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 data on Table 4 are for the 2005 graduating class, with the exception of college admissions data, which lag one year behind.

District and Campus Supplement 3 4 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 SAT Results for Districts and Campuses

Table 1. SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005

District and Campus Supplement 5 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

ANDERSON CAYUGA ISD CAYUGA H S 28 16 57.1 488 463 951 <5h ƒ

ELKHART ISD ELKHART H S 58 34 58.6 486 486 972 10 29.4

FRANKSTON ISD FRANKSTON H S 53 29 54.7 480 491 971 9 31.0

NECHES ISD NECHES H S 12 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

PALESTINE ISD PALESTINE HIGH SCHOOL 157 71 45.2 493 479 971 16 22.5

SLOCUM ISD SLOCUM H S 15 6 40.0 510 487 997 <5h ƒ

WESTWOOD ISD WESTWOOD H S 85 28 32.9 530 479 1009 10 35.7

ANDREWS ANDREWS ISD ANDREWS HIGH SCHOOL 174 74 42.5 489 483 971 17 23.0

ANGELINA CENTRAL ISD 73 27 37.0 444 447 891 <10m ƒ CENTRAL H S 70 <30m ƒ 444 447 891 <10m ƒ STUBBLEFIELD LRN CTR 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

DIBOLL ISD 99 53 53.5 416 430 846 <5h ƒ DIBOLL H S 98 <55m ƒ 416 430 846 <5h ƒ STUBBLEFIELD LRN CTR 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HUDSON ISD 137 <55m ƒ 507 494 1001 12 ƒ HUDSON H S 135 <55m ƒ 507 494 1001 <15m ƒ STUBBLEFIELD LRN CTR 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HUNTINGTON ISD 89 37 41.6 480 465 945 6 16.2 HUNTINGTON H S 78 <40m ƒ 480 465 945 <10m ƒ PRIDE ALTER SCH 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LUFKIN ISD 411 209 50.9 493 473 966 <50m ƒ LUFKIN H S 405 <210m ƒ 493 473 966 <50m ƒ STUBBLEFIELD LRN CTR 6 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

ZAVALLA ISD ZAVALLA H S 25 5 20.0 460 518 978 <5h ƒ

ARANSAS ARANSAS COUNTY ISD ROCKPORT-FULTON H S 207 117 56.5 524 499 1023 40 34.2

ARCHER ARCHER CITY ISD ARCHER CITY H S 29 14 48.3 487 494 981 <5h ƒ

HOLLIDAY ISD HOLLIDAY H S 69 25 36.2 533 505 1038 6 24.0

MEGARGEL ISD MEGARGEL SCHOOL 5 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WINDTHORST ISD WINDTHORST H S 30 7 23.3 557 517 1074 <5h ƒ

ARMSTRONG CLAUDE ISD CLAUDE H S 16 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

ATASCOSA CHARLOTTE ISD CHARLOTTE H S 17 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

6 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

ATASCOSA JOURDANTON ISD JOURDANTON H S 53 8 15.1 475 454 929 <5h ƒ

LYTLE ISD LYTLE H S 81 45 55.6 469 472 940 12 26.7

PLEASANTON ISD PLEASANTON H S 176 41 23.3 509 475 984 12 29.3

POTEET ISD POTEET H S 82 28 34.1 429 423 852 <5h ƒ

AUSTIN BELLVILLE ISD BELLVILLE H S 133 83 62.4 495 484 979 18 21.7

BRAZOS ISD BRAZOS H S 44 25 56.8 494 469 963 <5h ƒ

SEALY ISD SEALY H S 120 47 39.2 512 481 993 12 25.5

BAILEY MULESHOE ISD 92 <15m ƒ 525 502 1027 <5h ƒ MULESHOE H S 90 <15m ƒ 525 502 1027 <5h ƒ P E P 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BANDERA BANDERA ISD BANDERA H S 136 84 61.8 503 498 1002 23 27.4

MEDINA ISD MEDINA H S 21 19 90.5 504 517 1021 6 31.6

BASTROP BASTROP ISD 393 208 52.9 487 492 979 56 26.9 BASTROP H S 381 <210m ƒ 487 492 979 <60m ƒ GENESIS H S 12 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

ELGIN ISD 176 96 54.5 500 485 985 23 24.0 ELGIN H S 164 <100m ƒ 499 484 983 <25m ƒ PHOENIX HIGH SCHOOL 12 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SMITHVILLE ISD SMITHVILLE H S 91 43 47.3 487 490 977 5 11.6

BAYLOR SEYMOUR ISD SEYMOUR H S 27 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BEE BEEVILLE ISD 233 59 25.3 481 486 966 9 15.3 A C JONES HIGH SCHOOL 220 <60m ƒ 481 486 966 <10m ƒ LEARNING RESOURCE CENT 13 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

PETTUS ISD PETTUS H S 33 12 36.4 394 483 878 <5h ƒ

SKIDMORE-TYNAN ISD SKIDMORE-TYNAN H S 46 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BELL ACADEMY ISD ACADEMY H S 56 19 33.9 536 499 1035 6 31.6

BARTLETT ISD BARTLETT H S 23 12 52.2 396 404 800 <5h ƒ

BELTON ISD 402 166 41.3 530 526 1056 74 44.6 BELTON H S 382 <170m ƒ 531 526 1057 <75m ƒ HENRY T WASKOW HIGH SC 20 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CEDAR CREST SCHOOL CEDAR CREST CHARTER SC 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 7 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

BELL HOLLAND ISD HOLLAND H S 37 13 35.1 522 487 1008 <5h ƒ

KILLEEN ISD 1,355 799 59.0 478 465 943 142 17.8 229 <150m ƒ 459 452 911 <25m ƒ ELLISON HIGH SCHOOL 326 <195m ƒ 492 473 965 35 ƒ PATHWAYS LEARNING CENT 36 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ HARKER HEIGHTS HIGH SC 392 237 60.5 497 486 983 57 24.1 372 222 59.7 458 447 905 <30m ƒ

RICHARD MILBURN ALT RICHARD MILBURN ALTER 59 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

ROGERS ISD ROGERS H S 61 17 27.9 532 489 1021 6 35.3

SALADO ISD SALADO H S 64 37 57.8 552 508 1061 15 40.5

TEMPLE EDUCATION CE TEMPLE EDUCATION CENTE 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TEMPLE ISD TEMPLE H S 370 205 55.4 514 505 1020 75 36.6

TRANSFORMATIVE CHAR TRANSFORMATIVE CHARTER 28 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TROY ISD 76 22 28.9 493 503 996 <5h ƒ

BEXAR ACADEMY OF CAREERS ACADEMY OF CAREERS AND 25 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

ALAMO HEIGHTS ISD ALAMO HEIGHTS H S 304 282 92.8 554 553 1107 138 48.9

EAGLE ACADEMY OF SA EAGLE ACADEMY OF SAN A 25 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

EAST CENTRAL ISD EAST CENTRAL H S 362 219 60.5 478 474 953 37 16.9

EDGEWOOD ISD 413 202 48.9 415 399 814 10 5.0 JOHN F KENNEDY HIGH SC 213 126 59.2 408 390 798 <5h ƒ MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL 186 66 35.5 424 413 836 5 7.6 EDGEWOOD ACADEMY 14 10 71.4 431 434 865 <5h ƒ

FT SAM HOUSTON ISD ROBERT G COLE JR-SR HI 44 38 86.4 521 516 1036 13 34.2

GEORGE GERVIN ACADE 50 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ GEORGE GERVIN CHARTER 31 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ THE EDUCATION AND TRAI 19 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

GEORGE I SANCHEZ CH GEORGE I SANCHEZ CHART 25 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HARLANDALE ISD 593 261 44.0 415 418 833 10 3.8 HARLANDALE H S 269 <130m ƒ 417 408 825 <10m ƒ MCCOLLUM HIGH SCHOOL 272 131 48.2 414 428 842 <10m ƒ FRANK M TEJEDA ACADEMY 52 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

JOHN H WOOD CHARTER 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ JOHN H WOOD JR CHARTER 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

8 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

BEXAR JOHN H WOOD CHARTER JOHN H WOOD JR CHARTER 8 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ JOHN H WOOD JR CHARTER 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

JUBILEE ACADEMIC CE 14 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ JUBILEE ACADEMIC CENTE 9 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ OMEGA ACADEMIC CENTER 5 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

JUDSON ISD 815 383 47.0 480 487 967 86 22.5 785 <385m ƒ 480 488 968 <90m ƒ JUDSON LEARNING ACAD 30 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LACKLAND ISD VIRGINIA ALLRED STACEY 22 21 95.5 562 558 1120 10 47.6

NORTH EAST ISD 3,020 2,282 75.6 515 517 1032 814 35.7 LEE H S 319 183 57.4 446 465 911 <30m ƒ MACARTHUR H S 479 357 74.5 517 519 1036 120 33.6 CHURCHILL H S 563 496 88.1 529 532 1061 208 41.9 ROOSEVELT H S 405 255 63.0 482 480 961 57 22.4 MADISON H S 480 319 66.5 504 506 1010 97 30.4 CENTER SCH 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ REAGAN H S 616 568 92.2 544 541 1085 268 47.2 ACADEMY OF CREATIVE ED 54 <15m ƒ 500 523 1023 <5h ƒ INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL O 98 <95m ƒ 518 536 1055 35 ƒ HOMEBASED COMP ED 4 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ HOMEBOUND 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

NORTHSIDE ISD 3,782 2,240 59.2 496 490 987 579 25.8 HOLMES H S 378 113 29.9 454 438 892 <15m ƒ JAY H S 511 248 48.5 441 437 878 <25m ƒ MARSHALL H S 474 330 69.6 500 495 994 91 27.6 HOLMGREEN CENTER 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ TOM CLARK H S 528 377 71.4 544 525 1069 159 42.2 HEALTH CAREERS H S 205 156 76.1 572 570 1143 87 55.8 WILLIAM H TAFT H S 513 246 48.0 485 475 960 45 18.3 NORTHSIDE EXCEL ACADEM 35 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ SUNSET H S 0 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ SANDRA DAY O'CONNOR H 655 500 76.3 500 498 998 133 26.6 WARREN H S 467 268 57.4 455 462 916 32 11.9 HOMEBOUND 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ SOUTHWEST MENTAL HEALT 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ SCHOOL AGED PARENTING 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

POR VIDA ACADEMY 88 25 28.4 416 420 836 <5h ƒ POR VIDA ACADEMY CHAR 50 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ CORPUS CHRISTI ACADEMY 38 <25m ƒ 420 420 840 <5h ƒ

POSITIVE SOLUTIONS POSITIVE SOLUTIONS CHA 33 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

RADIANCE ACADEMY OF 14 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ RADIANCE ACADEMY OF LE 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ RADIANCE ACADEMY OF LE 12 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 9 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

BEXAR RANDOLPH FIELD ISD RANDOLPH H S 59 53 89.8 528 516 1044 21 39.6

SAN ANTONIO CAN HIG CAN HIGH S 75 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SAN ANTONIO ISD 2,148 1,259 58.6 420 411 832 74 5.9 BRACKENRIDGE H S 345 225 65.2 447 438 885 27 12.0 BURBANK H S 194 <100m ƒ 430 416 846 5 ƒ EDISON H S 265 166 62.6 393 392 784 <5h ƒ FOX TECHNICAL H S 289 143 49.5 428 395 824 6 4.2 HIGHLANDS H S 322 201 62.4 431 431 862 17 8.5 HOUSTON H S 130 107 82.3 368 378 746 <5h ƒ JEFFERSON H S 308 184 59.7 429 420 849 13 7.1 LANIER H S 217 124 57.1 411 386 796 <5h ƒ NAVARRO ACADEMY 65 <15m ƒ 372 427 798 <5h ƒ HEALY-MURPHY 13 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SAN ANTONIO SCHOOL SAN ANTONIO SCHOOL FOR 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SAN ANTONIO TECHNOL SAN ANTONIO TECHNOLOGY 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SCHOOL OF EXCELLENC 19 <20m ƒ 379 406 785 <5h ƒ RICK HAWKINS H S 19 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ RICK HAWKINS H S 0 <20m ƒ 379 406 785 <5h ƒ

SHEKINAH RADIANCE A SHEKINAH WALZEM 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SOMERSET ISD SOMERSET HIGH SCHOOL 142 46 32.4 466 457 923 <5h ƒ

SOUTH SAN ANTONIO I 388 213 54.9 411 406 817 8 3.8 SOUTH SAN ANTONIO H S 290 <150m ƒ 413 406 819 <10m ƒ SO SAN ANTONIO H S WES 85 <70m ƒ 405 406 811 <5h ƒ LIFE SKILLS PROGRAM FO 13 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SOUTHSIDE ISD SOUTHSIDE H S 202 68 33.7 423 429 852 5 7.4

SOUTHWEST ISD SOUTHWEST H S 460 204 44.3 430 424 854 10 4.9

SOUTHWEST PREPARATO 149 10 6.7 433 452 885 <5h ƒ SOUTHWEST PREPARATORY 63 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ SOUTHWEST PREPARATORY 52 5 9.6 402 424 826 <5h ƒ SOUTHWEST PREPARATORY 33 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ NEW DIRECTIONS 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BLANCO BLANCO ISD BLANCO H S 53 19 35.8 521 536 1057 6 31.6

JOHNSON CITY ISD LYNDON B JOHNSON H S 50 35 70.0 498 506 1004 6 17.1

BORDEN BORDEN COUNTY ISD BORDEN COUNTY SCHOOL 13 7 53.8 520 529 1049 <5h ƒ

BOSQUE CLIFTON ISD CLIFTON H S 57 21 36.8 499 477 976 5 23.8

CRANFILLS GAP ISD CRANFILLS GAP SCHOOL 6 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

10 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

BOSQUE IREDELL ISD IREDELL SCHOOL 5 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

KOPPERL ISD KOPPERL SCHOOL 17 9 52.9 497 469 966 <5h ƒ

MERIDIAN ISD MERIDIAN H S 25 8 32.0 488 451 939 <5h ƒ

MORGAN ISD MORGAN SCHOOL 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

VALLEY MILLS ISD VALLEY MILLS H S 37 6 16.2 475 515 990 <5h ƒ

WALNUT SPRINGS ISD WALNUT SPRINGS SCHOOL 16 5 31.3 496 514 1010 <5h ƒ

BOWIE DEKALB ISD DEKALB H S 47 5 10.6 496 510 1006 <5h ƒ

HOOKS ISD HOOKS H S 66 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LEARY ISD LEARY EL 8 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LIBERTY-EYLAU ISD 132 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ LIBERTY-EYLAU H S 120 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ ALTER SCH 12 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MALTA ISD MALTA EL 4 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MAUD ISD MAUD SCHOOL 25 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

NEW BOSTON ISD NEW BOSTON H S 89 6 6.7 578 568 1147 <5h ƒ

PLEASANT GROVE ISD PLEASANT GROVE H S 142 18 12.7 554 541 1095 9 50.0

RED LICK ISD RED LICK MIDDLE 35 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

REDWATER ISD REDWATER H S 64 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SIMMS ISD JAMES BOWIE H S 29 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TEXARKANA ISD TEXAS H S 314 28 8.9 499 510 1010 9 32.1

BRAZORIA ALVIN ISD 485 220 45.4 515 486 1001 53 24.1

ANGLETON ISD 330 <150m ƒ 526 498 1023 47 ƒ ANGLETON H S 326 <150m ƒ 526 498 1023 <50m ƒ MARSHALL EDUCATION CEN 4 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BRAZOSPORT ISD 629 370 58.8 527 509 1036 130 35.1 BRAZOSPORT H S 162 <75m ƒ 485 472 957 <20m ƒ BRAZOSWOOD H S 456 <305m ƒ 537 518 1055 <115m ƒ LIGHTHOUSE LEARNING CE 8 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ LIGHTHOUSE LEARNING CE 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

COLUMBIA-BRAZORIA I COLUMBIA H S 155 55 35.5 512 497 1009 16 29.1

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 11 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

BRAZORIA DANBURY ISD DANBURY H S 45 21 46.7 496 485 980 <5h ƒ

PEARLAND ISD PEARLAND H S 744 478 64.2 535 507 1042 171 35.8

SWEENY ISD SWEENY H S 115 63 54.8 507 477 984 19 30.2

BRAZOS BRAZOS SCHOOL FOR I BRAZOS SCHOOL FOR INQU 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BRYAN ISD 628 <260m ƒ 535 506 1041 102 ƒ BRYAN H S 564 <260m ƒ 535 506 1041 <105m ƒ ACE CAMPUS 56 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ GRAD 8 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

COLLEGE STATION ISD 481 348 72.3 572 557 1128 <195m ƒ A & M CONS H S 469 <350m ƒ 573 557 1131 <195m ƒ CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVE 12 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BREWSTER ALPINE ISD ALPINE H S 57 11 19.3 521 553 1074 5 45.5

MARATHON ISD MARATHON INDPENDENT SC 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TERLINGUA CSD BIG BEND H S 8 6 75.0 455 513 968 <5h ƒ

BRISCOE SILVERTON ISD SILVERTON SCHOOL 10 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BROOKS BROOKS COUNTY ISD FALFURRIAS H S 76 8 10.5 466 474 940 <5h ƒ

BROWN BANGS ISD 59 18 30.5 499 501 1000 <5h ƒ BANGS H S 58 <20m ƒ 499 501 1000 <5h ƒ C A P HIGH SCHOOL 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BLANKET ISD BLANKET H S 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BROOKESMITH ISD BROOKESMITH H S 12 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BROWNWOOD ISD BROWNWOOD H S 185 107 57.8 489 468 958 21 19.6

EARLY ISD EARLY H S 75 38 50.7 511 496 1006 8 21.1

MAY ISD MAY H S 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

ZEPHYR ISD ZEPHYR H S 13 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BURLESON CALDWELL ISD CALDWELL H S 104 63 60.6 509 481 989 15 23.8

SNOOK ISD SNOOK SECONDARY 35 19 54.3 469 475 944 <5h ƒ

SOMERVILLE ISD SOMERVILLE H S 38 12 31.6 492 471 963 <5h ƒ

BURNET BURNET CISD 183 <80m ƒ 481 476 956 11 ƒ BURNET H S 178 <80m ƒ 481 476 956 <15m ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

12 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

BURNET BURNET CISD QUEST 5 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MARBLE FALLS ISD 212 <105m ƒ 519 512 1030 <40m ƒ MARBLE FALLS HIGH SCHO 197 <105m ƒ 519 512 1030 <40m ƒ FALLS CAREER H S 15 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CALDWELL LOCKHART ISD 254 <140m ƒ 461 456 918 23 ƒ LOCKHART H S 239 <140m ƒ 461 456 918 <25m ƒ LOCKHART PRIDE HS 15 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LULING ISD LULING H S 71 36 50.7 474 467 941 8 22.2

PRAIRIE LEA ISD PRAIRIE LEA SCHOOL 8 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CALHOUN CALHOUN COUNTY ISD 228 59 25.9 498 497 994 17 28.8 CALHOUN H S 213 <60m ƒ 498 497 994 <20m ƒ HOPE H S 15 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CALLAHAN BAIRD ISD BAIRD H S 32 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CLYDE CISD CLYDE H S 71 14 19.7 544 526 1071 7 50.0

CROSS PLAINS ISD CROSS PLAINS H S 24 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

EULA ISD EULA H S 31 13 41.9 502 482 985 <5h ƒ

CAMERON BROWNSVILLE ISD 1,549 666 43.0 442 433 875 47 7.1 HANNA H S 395 201 50.9 454 455 909 23 11.4 BROWNSVILLE PORTER HIG 259 58 22.4 443 437 880 <5h ƒ PACE H S 340 155 45.6 432 432 864 13 8.4 RIVERA H S 305 166 54.4 437 403 840 <5h ƒ LOPEZ H S 250 86 34.4 441 436 877 <5h ƒ

EAGLE ACADEMY OF BR EAGLE PROJECT (BROWNSV 35 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HARLINGEN CISD 787 384 48.8 475 465 940 62 16.1 HARLINGEN H S 438 184 42.0 472 468 939 <30m ƒ HARLINGEN H S - SOUTH 330 192 58.2 482 465 947 34 17.7 KEYS ACAD 19 8 42.1 369 421 790 <5h ƒ

LA FERIA ISD 137 <30m ƒ 480 458 938 <5h ƒ LA FERIA H S 128 <30m ƒ 480 458 938 <5h ƒ LA FERIA ALTERNATIVE S 9 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LOS FRESNOS CISD LOS FRESNOS HS 368 176 47.8 459 439 899 23 13.1

POINT ISABEL ISD PORT ISABEL H S 117 65 55.6 465 440 906 9 13.8

RIO HONDO ISD RIO HONDO H S 88 58 65.9 468 463 932 9 15.5

SAN BENITO CISD SAN BENITO H S 411 262 63.7 401 400 801 8 3.1

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 13 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

CAMERON SANTA MARIA ISD 38 <25m ƒ 405 400 804 <5h ƒ SANTA MARIA H S 35 <25m ƒ 405 400 804 <5h ƒ SANTA MARIA ALTERNATIV 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SANTA ROSA ISD SANTA ROSA H S 59 27 45.8 403 359 761 <5h ƒ

SOUTH TEXAS ISD 312 280 89.7 530 523 1053 103 36.8 SOUTH TEXAS BUSINESS E 70 <65m ƒ 506 508 1014 <15m ƒ SOUTH TEXAS ACADEMY OF 0 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ HIGH SCHOOL FOR HEALTH 138 120 87.0 505 501 1006 <45m ƒ THE SCIENCE ACADEMY 104 98 94.2 577 559 1135 50 51.0

CAMP PITTSBURG ISD PITTSBURG H S 104 76 73.1 441 436 878 12 15.8

CARSON GROOM ISD GROOM SCHOOL 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

PANHANDLE ISD 41 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ PANHANDLE H S 40 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ C H A M P S 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WHITE DEER ISD WHITE DEER H S 27 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CASS ATLANTA ISD ATLANTA H S 97 5 5.2 484 460 944 <5h ƒ

AVINGER ISD AVINGER H S 8 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BLOOMBURG ISD BLOOMBURG H S 18 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HUGHES SPRINGS ISD HUGHES SPRINGS HIGH SC 60 5 8.3 538 518 1056 <5h ƒ

LINDEN-KILDARE CISD LINDEN-KILDARE H S 54 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MCLEOD ISD MCLEOD H S 27 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

QUEEN CITY ISD QUEEN CITY H S 46 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CASTRO DIMMITT ISD DIMMITT H S 56 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HART ISD HART JR-SR H S 21 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

NAZARETH ISD NAZARETH SCHOOL 23 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CHAMBERS ANAHUAC ISD ANAHUAC H S 78 38 48.7 469 469 938 7 18.4

BARBERS HILL ISD 183 114 62.3 515 506 1021 43 37.7 BARBERS HILL H S 182 <115m ƒ 515 506 1021 <45m ƒ GULF COAST H S 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

EAST CHAMBERS ISD EAST CHAMBERS H S 69 48 69.6 466 449 915 8 16.7

CHEROKEE ALTO ISD ALTO H S 37 7 18.9 493 509 1001 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

14 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

CHEROKEE JACKSONVILLE ISD 236 26 11.0 495 511 1006 7 26.9 JACKSONVILLE H S 229 <30m ƒ 495 511 1006 <10m ƒ COMPASS CENTER 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

NEW SUMMERFIELD ISD NEW SUMMERFIELD SCHOOL 15 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

RUSK ISD RUSK H S 85 14 16.5 509 509 1019 6 42.9

WELLS ISD WELLS H S 12 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CHILDRESS CHILDRESS ISD CHILDRESS H S 46 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CLAY BELLEVUE ISD BELLEVUE SCHOOL 13 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BYERS ISD BYERS SCHOOL 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HENRIETTA ISD HENRIETTA H S 65 20 30.8 479 476 955 <5h ƒ

MIDWAY ISD MIDWAY SCHOOL 14 5 35.7 502 454 956 <5h ƒ

PETROLIA ISD PETROLIA H S 33 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

COCHRAN MORTON ISD 27 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ MORTON H S 25 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ P E P 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WHITEFACE CISD 25 12 48.0 475 500 975 <5h ƒ WHITEFACE H S 24 <15m ƒ 475 500 975 <5h ƒ P E P ALTER CO-OP 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

COKE BRONTE ISD 24 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ BRONTE H S 24 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ JUVENILE DETENT CTR 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

ROBERT LEE ISD ROBERT LEE H S 19 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

COLEMAN COLEMAN ISD 46 9 19.6 504 453 958 <5h ƒ COLEMAN H S 39 <10m ƒ 504 453 958 <5h ƒ CO-OP ALTER PROG 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

NOVICE ISD NOVICE SCHOOL 4 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

PANTHER CREEK CISD 16 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ PANTHER CREEK H S 15 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ C A P 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SANTA ANNA ISD SANTA ANNA SECONDARY 14 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

COLLIN ALLEN ISD ALLEN H S 847 619 73.1 541 526 1066 251 40.5

ANNA ISD ANNA H S 45 18 40.0 516 484 1000 6 33.3

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 15 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

COLLIN BLUE RIDGE ISD BLUE RIDGE H S 33 15 45.5 474 449 923 <5h ƒ

CELINA ISD CELINA H S 74 42 56.8 523 513 1036 11 26.2

COMMUNITY ISD COMMUNITY H S 73 19 26.0 483 507 990 5 26.3

FARMERSVILLE ISD FARMERSVILLE H S 74 32 43.2 501 504 1005 8 25.0

FRISCO ISD 577 342 59.3 530 518 1048 123 36.0 FRISCO H S 574 <340m ƒ 530 519 1049 <125m ƒ CENTENNIAL HIGH SCHOOL 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MCKINNEY ISD 745 452 60.7 533 527 1060 185 40.9 MCKINNEY HIGH SCHOOL 366 248 67.8 537 533 1070 106 42.7 THE L I N C CTR 36 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ MCKINNEY NORTH HIGH SC 338 198 58.6 528 520 1048 76 38.4 SERENITY HIGH 4 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ COUNTY RESIDENTIAL CEN 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ ACT ACADEMY AT J L GRE 0 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

PLANO ISD 2,792 2,251 80.6 585 562 1147 1,277 56.7 PLANO SR H S 940 781 83.1 593 569 1162 472 60.4 WILLIAMS H S 0 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ VINES H S 0 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ CLARK H S 0 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ PLANO EAST SR H S 1,029 722 70.2 569 550 1119 370 51.2 JASPER H S 0 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ PLANO WEST SENIOR H S 823 738 89.7 593 567 1159 431 58.4

PRINCETON ISD PRINCETON H S 148 46 31.1 475 459 934 8 17.4

PROSPER ISD PROSPER H S 63 45 71.4 506 488 994 12 26.7

WYLIE ISD WYLIE H S 355 162 45.6 522 510 1033 57 35.2

COLLINGSWORTH SAMNORWOOD ISD SAMNORWOOD SCHOOL 12 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WELLINGTON ISD WELLINGTON H S 28 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

COLORADO COLUMBUS ISD COLUMBUS HIGH SCHOOL 114 62 54.4 497 474 971 15 24.2

RICE CISD RICE H S 63 32 50.8 473 451 923 <5h ƒ

WEIMAR ISD WEIMAR H S 51 34 66.7 495 468 963 5 14.7

COMAL COMAL ISD 713 468 65.6 513 502 1015 145 31.0 CANYON HIGH SCHOOL 287 <195m ƒ 518 499 1016 <60m ƒ SMITHSON VALLEY HIGH S 402 274 68.2 510 505 1014 <90m ƒ COMAL LEADERSHIP INSTI 24 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

NANCY NEY CHARTER S NANCY NEY CHARTER SCHO 17 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

16 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

COMAL NEW BRAUNFELS ISD 365 233 63.8 507 513 1020 72 30.9 NEW BRAUNFELS H S 353 <235m ƒ 507 513 1020 <75m ƒ THE NBISD LEARNING CEN 12 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TRINITY CHARTER SCH TRINITY CHARTER SCHOOL 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

COMANCHE COMANCHE ISD 79 33 41.8 471 459 930 <5h ƒ COMANCHE H S 77 <35m ƒ 471 459 930 <5h ƒ COMANCHE ACCELERATED L 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

DE LEON ISD DE LEON H S 40 20 50.0 472 438 910 <5h ƒ

GUSTINE ISD GUSTINE SCHOOL 12 6 50.0 480 438 918 <5h ƒ

SIDNEY ISD SIDNEY SCHOOL 10 5 50.0 438 456 894 <5h ƒ

CONCHO EDEN CISD EDEN H S 18 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

PAINT ROCK ISD PAINT ROCK SCHOOL 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

COOKE CALLISBURG ISD CALLISBURG H S 66 41 62.1 554 540 1094 18 43.9

ERA ISD ERA SCHOOL 24 11 45.8 524 510 1034 <5h ƒ

GAINESVILLE ISD GAINESVILLE H S 130 42 32.3 490 487 978 8 19.0

LINDSAY ISD LINDSAY H S 47 30 63.8 558 542 1100 14 46.7

MUENSTER ISD MUENSTER H S 34 27 79.4 563 529 1092 11 40.7

VALLEY VIEW ISD VALLEY VIEW HIGH SCHOO 41 19 46.3 542 513 1055 6 31.6

CORYELL COPPERAS COVE ISD 395 214 54.2 475 493 968 <45m ƒ COPPERAS COVE H S 382 <215m ƒ 476 494 970 <45m ƒ CROSSROADS HIGH SCHOOL 13 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

EVANT ISD EVANT H S 20 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

GATESVILLE ISD GATESVILLE H S 129 38 29.5 519 523 1042 13 34.2

JONESBORO ISD JONESBORO SCHOOL 10 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

OGLESBY ISD OGLESBY SCHOOL 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

COTTLE PADUCAH ISD PADUCAH SCHOOL 19 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CRANE CRANE ISD CRANE HIGH SCHOOL 55 5 9.1 424 458 882 <5h ƒ

CROCKETT CROCKETT COUNTY CON OZONA H S 52 13 25.0 469 435 905 <5h ƒ

CROSBY CROSBYTON CISD CROSBYTON H S 22 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 17 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

CROSBY LORENZO ISD LORENZO H S 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

RALLS ISD 35 8 22.9 490 500 990 <5h ƒ RALLS H S 27 <10m ƒ 490 500 990 <5h ƒ RECOVERY EDUCATION CAM 8 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CULBERSON CULBERSON COUNTY-AL VAN HORN H S 28 12 42.9 435 411 846 <5h ƒ

DALLAM DALHART ISD 94 11 11.7 516 535 1051 <5h ƒ DALHART H S 89 <15m ƒ 516 535 1051 <5h ƒ X I T SECONDARY SCHOOL 5 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TEXLINE ISD TEXLINE SCHOOL 8 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

DALLAS A+ ACADEMY A+ ACADEMY 30 20 66.7 430 418 848 <5h ƒ

ALPHA CHARTER SCHOO ALPHA CHARTER SCHOOL 25 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CARROLLTON-FARMERS 1,303 786 60.3 541 516 1056 321 40.8 TURNER HIGH SCHOOL 420 205 48.8 537 511 1048 <90m ƒ SMITH HIGH SCHOOL 411 279 67.9 535 510 1046 <110m ƒ GRIMES EDUCATION CENTE 44 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ CREEKVIEW HIGH SCHOOL 426 299 70.2 549 525 1073 130 43.5 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CEDAR HILL ISD 392 247 63.0 451 466 917 33 13.4

COPPELL ISD COPPELL H S 610 522 85.6 577 551 1128 290 55.6

DALLAS CAN ACADEMY 357 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ DALLAS CAN! ACADEMY CH 95 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ DALLAS CAN! ACADEMY CH 136 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ TEXANS CAN AT CARROLLT 86 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ TEXANS CAN ACADEMY AT 40 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

DALLAS ISD 6,170 3,491 56.6 429 423 852 375 10.7 BRYAN ADAMS H S 356 168 47.2 449 454 903 26 15.5 W H ADAMSON H S 194 129 66.5 374 359 733 <5h ƒ A MACEO SMITH H S 126 61 48.4 370 372 742 <5h ƒ MOISES MOLINA H S 420 257 61.2 398 385 783 <5h ƒ HILLCREST H S 249 164 65.9 469 452 921 36 22.0 THOMAS JEFFERSON H S 235 118 50.2 399 389 788 <5h ƒ JUSTIN F KIMBALL H S 263 116 44.1 387 396 783 5 4.3 LINCOLN H S 216 198 91.7 380 362 743 <5h ƒ L G PINKSTON H S 101 27 26.7 394 379 773 <5h ƒ ROOSEVELT H S 107 66 61.7 358 365 722 <5h ƒ W W SAMUELL H S 220 71 32.3 417 397 814 <5h ƒ SEAGOVILLE H S 165 83 50.3 432 436 868 6 7.2 SOUTH OAK CLIFF H S 179 91 50.8 376 387 763 <5h ƒ H GRADY SPRUCE H S 176 73 41.5 383 376 758 <5h ƒ SUNSET H S 319 178 55.8 396 387 783 6 3.4 W T WHITE H S 356 192 53.9 467 462 928 35 18.2

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

18 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

DALLAS DALLAS ISD WOODROW WILSON H S 234 100 42.7 484 495 979 35 35.0 DAVID W CARTER H S 285 88 30.9 399 399 798 <5h ƒ NORTH DALLAS H S 276 184 66.7 388 364 753 6 3.3 SKYLINE H S 886 461 52.0 429 428 857 29 6.3 SCHOOL OF SCIENCE & EN 102 100 98.0 575 547 1122 50 50.0 JAMES MADISON H S 85 65 76.5 384 370 754 <5h ƒ SCHOOL OF BUSINESS & M 124 96 77.4 469 454 923 9 9.4 BOOKER T WASHINGTON H 155 133 85.8 509 535 1044 53 39.8 SCHOOL OF HEALTH PROFE 122 104 85.2 491 472 962 15 14.4 SCHOOL OF EDUCATION & 64 53 82.8 454 462 916 5 9.4 SCH OF GOVT/LAW/LAW EN 96 65 67.7 462 465 927 6 9.2 SCHOOL FOR THE TALENTE 38 40 105 628 611 1239 36 90.0 MIDDLE COLLEGE 21 10 47.6 437 469 906 <5h ƒ

DESOTO ISD DE SOTO H S 381 151 39.6 478 469 948 32 21.2

DUNCANVILLE ISD 656 238 36.3 493 495 988 71 29.8 DUNCANVILLE H S 633 <240m ƒ 493 495 988 <75m ƒ P A C E SCHOOL 23 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

EAGLE ACADEMY OF DA EAGLE ACADEMY OF DALLA 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

EDUCATION CENTER IN EDUCATION CENTER INTER 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

EVOLUTION ACADEMY C EVOLUTION ACADEMY CHAR 66 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

FAITH FAMILY ACADEM FAITH FAMILY ACADEMY O 20 12 60.0 333 337 670 <5h ƒ

GARLAND ISD 2,813 1,560 55.5 507 499 1006 463 29.7 GARLAND H S 440 255 58.0 547 555 1102 125 49.0 S GARLAND H S 408 199 48.8 500 488 988 56 28.1 N GARLAND H S 442 236 53.4 502 490 992 71 30.1 LAKEVIEW CENTENNIAL H 345 169 49.0 476 478 954 <35m ƒ GISD EVENING SCH 21 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ NAAMAN FOREST H S 383 245 64.0 508 490 998 63 25.7 ROWLETT H S 507 310 61.1 501 491 993 76 24.5 SACHSE H S 267 <150m ƒ 502 485 987 <40m ƒ

GRAND PRAIRIE ISD 933 350 37.5 508 489 997 96 27.4 GRAND PRAIRIE H S 422 <120m ƒ 505 485 990 <30m ƒ SO GRAND PRAIRIE H S 500 <240m ƒ 509 490 1000 <70m ƒ LLOYD BOZE SECONDARY L 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HIGHLAND PARK ISD HIGHLAND PARK HIGH SCH 430 460 107 602 592 1194 327 71.1

HONORS ACADEMY 248 92 37.1 488 500 989 27 29.3 LANDMARK SCHOOL 23 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ HONORS ACADEMY DALLAS 119 6 5.0 255 332 587 <5h ƒ UNIVERSITY SCHOOL 50 8 16.0 476 524 1000 <5h ƒ EXCEL ACADEMY 10 74 740 511 513 1023 25 33.8 LEGACY HIGH SCHOOL 28 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ DESTINY HIGH SCHOOL 18 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 19 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

DALLAS I AM THAT I AM ACAD I AM THAT I AM ACADEMY 14 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

IRVING ISD 1,287 565 43.9 486 481 966 131 23.2 IRVING H S 317 <110m ƒ 482 468 951 <25m ƒ MACARTHUR H S 317 165 52.1 484 480 964 38 23.0 NIMITZ H S 317 160 50.5 492 484 977 40 25.0 UNION BOWER CENTER FOR 24 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ THE ACADEMY OF IRVING 312 131 42.0 482 487 969 <30m ƒ

JEAN MASSIEU ACADEM JEAN MASSIEU ACADEMY 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LANCASTER ISD LANCASTER H S 232 111 47.8 399 404 803 6 5.4

LIFE SCHOOL OAK CLIFF 35 14 40.0 446 466 911 <5h ƒ

MESQUITE ISD 1,852 872 47.1 487 482 969 217 24.9 MESQUITE HIGH SCHOOL 419 163 38.9 473 467 940 <30m ƒ NORTH MESQUITE HIGH SC 450 225 50.0 493 490 983 61 27.1 WEST MESQUITE HIGH SCH 256 <90m ƒ 451 438 889 <15m ƒ POTEET HIGH SCHOOL 297 170 57.2 514 497 1011 55 32.4 HORN HIGH SCHOOL 377 223 59.2 485 493 978 60 26.9 MESQUITE ACADEMY 53 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

NORTH HILLS SCHOOL NORTH HILLS SCHOOL 0 47 ƒ 563 582 1145 31 66.0

PEGASUS SCHOOL OF L PEGASUS CHARTER H S 12 6 50.0 383 413 797 <5h ƒ

RICHARDSON ISD 1,840 1,481 80.5 544 529 1073 639 43.1 LAKE HIGHLANDS H S 472 381 80.7 544 535 1079 175 45.9 RICHARDSON H S 379 284 74.9 528 521 1049 109 38.4 PEARCE H S 421 353 83.8 573 563 1135 188 53.3 BERKNER H S 568 463 81.5 532 504 1036 167 36.1

UNIVERSAL ACADEMY UNIVERSAL ACADEMY 0 5 ƒ 544 516 1060 <5h ƒ

WILMER-HUTCHINS ISD 112 21 18.8 391 409 800 <5h ƒ WILMER-HUTCHINS H S 111 <20m ƒ 393 401 794 <5h ƒ WILMER-HUTCHINS MAGNET 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WINFREE ACADEMY 374 12 3.2 423 436 858 <5h ƒ WINFREE ACADEMY CHARTE 106 <15m ƒ 423 436 858 <5h ƒ WINFREE ACADEMY CHARTE 106 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ WINFREE ACADEMY CHARTE 90 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ WINFREE ACADEMY CHARTE 72 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

DAWSON DAWSON ISD DAWSON SCHOOL 10 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

KLONDIKE ISD KLONDIKE ISD 12 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LAMESA ISD LAMESA H S 105 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

20 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

DAWSON SANDS CISD SANDS CISD 10 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

DEAF SMITH HEREFORD ISD HEREFORD H S 190 16 8.4 499 496 995 <5h ƒ

DELTA COOPER ISD COOPER H S 54 11 20.4 490 536 1026 <5h ƒ

FANNINDEL ISD FANNINDEL H S 9 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

DENTON ARGYLE ISD ARGYLE HIGH SCHOOL 75 60 80.0 556 537 1092 27 45.0

AUBREY ISD AUBREY H S 71 39 54.9 483 461 944 5 12.8

DENTON ISD 699 443 63.4 512 504 1017 143 32.3 RYAN H S 366 211 57.7 510 499 1009 <70m ƒ DENTON H S 323 227 70.3 516 512 1027 <80m ƒ FRED MOORE HIGH SCHOOL 10 5 50.0 462 404 866 <5h ƒ

EDUCATION CENTER 30 <10m ƒ 528 536 1064 <5h ƒ EDUCATION CENTER AT TH 20 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ EDUCATION CENTER AT LI 10 <10m ƒ 528 536 1064 <5h ƒ

KRUM ISD KRUM H S 57 43 75.4 509 498 1007 11 25.6

LAKE DALLAS ISD LAKE DALLAS H S 188 104 55.3 518 519 1037 39 37.5

LEWISVILLE ISD 2,470 1,651 66.8 554 532 1086 771 46.7 LEWISVILLE H S 561 <280m ƒ 524 508 1033 <105m ƒ MARCUS H S 547 441 80.6 563 545 1108 230 52.2 THE COLONY H S 370 <155m ƒ 553 536 1089 <75m ƒ LEARNING CTR 34 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ HEBRON H S 378 293 77.5 537 506 1043 108 36.9 FLOWER MOUND H S 580 488 84.1 572 548 1120 257 52.7

LITTLE ELM ISD LITTLE ELM H S 161 58 36.0 510 492 1003 17 29.3

NORTHWEST ISD NORTHWEST H S 325 187 57.5 508 504 1012 55 29.4

PILOT POINT ISD PILOT POINT H S 81 39 48.1 509 481 990 9 23.1

PONDER ISD PONDER H S 48 20 41.7 540 527 1066 7 35.0

SANGER ISD 143 51 35.7 509 498 1007 16 31.4 SANGER H S 124 <55m ƒ 509 498 1007 <20m ƒ LINDA TUTT HIGH SCHOOL 19 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS ACADEMY OF MATHE 0 184 ƒ 722 673 1395 183 99.5

DEWITT CUERO ISD CUERO H S 116 11 9.5 548 508 1056 5 45.5

NORDHEIM ISD NORDHEIM SCHOOL 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

YOAKUM ISD YOAKUM HIGH SCHOOL 77 18 23.4 556 528 1084 9 50.0

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 21 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

DEWITT YORKTOWN ISD YORKTOWN H S 44 28 63.6 492 460 951 5 17.9

DICKENS PATTON SPRINGS ISD PATTON SPRINGS SCHOOL 4 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SPUR ISD SPUR SCHOOL 12 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

DIMMIT CARRIZO SPRINGS CIS CARRIZO SPRINGS H S 116 55 47.4 453 424 877 6 10.9

DONLEY CLARENDON ISD CLARENDON H S 30 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HEDLEY ISD HEDLEY SCHOOL 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

DUVAL BENAVIDES ISD BENAVIDES SECONDARY 30 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

FREER ISD FREER H S 43 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SAN DIEGO ISD SAN DIEGO H S 75 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

EASTLAND CISCO ISD 64 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ CISCO H S 57 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ CISCO LEARNING CENTER 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

EASTLAND ISD EASTLAND H S 70 27 38.6 533 530 1063 12 44.4

GORMAN ISD GORMAN H S 21 5 23.8 434 394 828 <5h ƒ

RANGER ISD RANGER H S 17 8 47.1 570 509 1079 <5h ƒ

RISING STAR ISD RISING STAR H S 20 16 80.0 425 465 890 <5h ƒ

ECTOR ECTOR COUNTY ISD 1,156 432 37.4 486 482 968 98 22.7 ODESSA H S 500 187 37.4 492 491 983 54 28.9 PERMIAN H S 514 238 46.3 482 476 958 <45m ƒ A I M 41 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ TEEN PARENT CTR 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ CAREER CTR 100 <10m ƒ 470 462 932 <5h ƒ

RICHARD MILBURN ACA RICHARD MILBURN ACADEM 31 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

EDWARDS NUECES CANYON CISD NUECES CANYON JH/HS 25 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

ROCKSPRINGS ISD ROCKSPRINGS H S 17 12 70.6 455 444 899 <5h ƒ

EL PASO ANTHONY ISD ANTHONY H S 23 12 52.2 396 397 793 <5h ƒ

BURNHAM WOOD CHARTE BURNHAM WOOD CHARTER S 0 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CANUTILLO ISD CANUTILLO H S 189 55 29.1 425 438 863 5 9.1

CLINT ISD 420 231 55.0 407 394 800 10 4.3 207 128 61.8 393 390 783 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

22 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

EL PASO CLINT ISD MOUNTAIN VIEW HIGH SCH 213 103 48.4 424 398 822 <10m ƒ

EL PASO ACADEMY 153 17 11.1 393 394 786 <5h ƒ EL PASO ACADEMY 95 <20m ƒ 393 394 786 <5h ƒ EL PASO ACADEMY WEST 58 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

EL PASO ISD 2,978 1,819 61.1 478 473 951 372 20.5 ANDRESS H S 305 169 55.4 446 449 895 20 11.8 AUSTIN H S 192 98 51.0 433 422 855 7 7.1 BOWIE H S 176 46 26.1 423 406 828 <5h ƒ BURGES H S 235 142 60.4 460 450 910 22 15.5 CORONADO H S 483 330 68.3 515 517 1032 115 34.8 EL PASO H S 185 94 50.8 474 459 933 16 17.0 IRVIN H S 257 128 49.8 437 425 862 6 4.7 JEFFERSON H S 169 81 47.9 407 406 813 <5h ƒ FRANKLIN H S 505 398 78.8 508 502 1010 118 29.6 SILVA HEALTH MAGNET 134 127 94.8 476 479 955 15 11.8 CHAPIN HS 307 201 65.5 487 484 971 48 23.9 SCHOOL-AGE PARENT CTR 14 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ SUNSET H S 16 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

FABENS ISD FABENS H S 130 53 40.8 422 397 820 <5h ƒ

PASO DEL NORTE PASO DEL NORTE ACADEMY 15 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SAN ELIZARIO ISD SAN ELIZARIO H S 159 45 28.3 427 397 824 <5h ƒ

SOCORRO ISD 1,618 994 61.4 436 423 860 83 8.4 SOCORRO H S 506 <290m ƒ 418 400 818 <15m ƒ MONTWOOD H S 557 376 67.5 436 428 864 <30m ƒ KEYS ACAD 0 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ AMERICAS H S 555 328 59.1 454 438 892 40 12.2

TORNILLO ISD TORNILLO H S 39 11 28.2 422 387 809 <5h ƒ

YSLETA ISD 2,494 2,384 95.6 413 396 809 131 5.5 BEL AIR H S 409 415 102 400 393 792 18 4.3 EASTWOOD H S 412 397 96.4 455 441 896 53 13.4 PARKLAND H S 172 210 122 382 370 752 <5h ƒ YSLETA H S 347 221 63.7 400 373 773 <5h ƒ RIVERSIDE H S 259 242 93.4 411 393 804 9 3.7 J M HANKS H S 478 452 94.6 442 423 865 37 8.2 DEL VALLE H S 343 339 98.8 399 375 773 8 2.4 TEJAS SCHOOL OF CHOICE 44 67 152 319 305 624 <5h ƒ CESAR CHAVEZ ACAD 0 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ DISTRICT HOMEBOUND 4 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ PLATO ACADEMY 26 <45m ƒ 319 320 639 <5h ƒ

ELLIS AVALON ISD AVALON SCHOOL 15 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

ENNIS ISD ENNIS H S 263 28 10.6 534 520 1054 11 39.3

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 23 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

ELLIS FERRIS ISD FERRIS H S 96 47 49.0 470 437 907 7 14.9

ITALY ISD ITALY H S 34 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MAYPEARL ISD MAYPEARL H S 55 27 49.1 489 512 1001 9 33.3

MIDLOTHIAN ISD MIDLOTHIAN H S 297 153 51.5 522 505 1026 51 33.3

MILFORD ISD MILFORD SCHOOL 10 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

PALMER ISD PALMER H S 53 24 45.3 482 463 945 <5h ƒ

RED OAK ISD RED OAK H S 260 131 50.4 501 504 1005 30 22.9

WAXAHACHIE FAITH FA WAXAHACHIE FAITH FAMIL 11 5 45.5 484 526 1010 <5h ƒ

WAXAHACHIE ISD WAXAHACHIE H S 334 186 55.7 502 502 1003 54 29.0

ERATH DUBLIN ISD DUBLIN H S 67 38 56.7 497 467 964 7 18.4

HUCKABAY ISD HUCKABAY SCHOOL 10 5 50.0 496 456 952 <5h ƒ

LINGLEVILLE ISD LINGLEVILLE SCHOOL 14 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

PARADIGM ACCELERATE PARADIGM ACCELERATED S 22 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

STEPHENVILLE STEPHENVILLE H S 208 105 50.5 516 496 1012 33 31.4

FALLS CHILTON ISD CHILTON SCHOOL 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MARLIN ISD MARLIN H S 65 34 52.3 431 408 839 <5h ƒ

ROSEBUD-LOTT ISD 61 12 19.7 562 517 1078 6 50.0 ROSEBUD-LOTT H S 59 <15m ƒ 562 517 1078 <10m ƒ ROSEBUD-LOTT LEARNING 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

FANNIN BONHAM ISD BONHAM H S 91 33 36.3 506 508 1015 8 24.2

DODD CITY ISD DODD CITY SCHOOL 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

ECTOR ISD ECTOR HIGH SCHOOL 18 7 38.9 520 449 969 <5h ƒ

HONEY GROVE ISD HONEY GROVE H S 38 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LEONARD ISD LEONARD HIGH SCHOOL 42 5 11.9 534 484 1018 <5h ƒ

SAM RAYBURN ISD RAYBURN H S 20 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SAVOY ISD SAVOY H S 16 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TRENTON ISD TRENTON H S 31 5 16.1 484 476 960 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

24 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

FAYETTE FAYETTEVILLE ISD FAYETTEVILLE H S 18 12 66.7 503 448 951 <5h ƒ

FLATONIA ISD FLATONIA SECONDARY 31 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LA GRANGE ISD LA GRANGE H S 117 65 55.6 532 543 1074 29 44.6

ROUND TOP-CARMINE I ROUND TOP-CARMINE H S 17 15 88.2 509 489 999 <5h ƒ

SCHULENBURG ISD SCHULENBURG H S 58 37 63.8 478 458 936 7 18.9

FISHER ROBY CISD ROBY H S 21 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

ROTAN ISD ROTAN H S 22 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

FLOYD FLOYDADA ISD FLOYDADA H S 49 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LOCKNEY ISD LOCKNEY HIGH SCHOOL 43 6 14.0 487 418 905 <5h ƒ

FOARD CROWELL ISD CROWELL H S 10 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

FORT BEND FORT BEND ISD 4,107 3,266 79.5 528 509 1037 1,202 36.8 DULLES H S 504 430 85.3 558 527 1085 187 43.5 WILLOWRIDGE H S 311 212 68.2 409 407 815 <5h ƒ CLEMENTS H S 540 528 97.8 601 573 1174 331 62.7 KEMPNER H S 527 383 72.7 527 495 1023 111 29.0 LAWRENCE E ELKINS H S 444 402 90.5 534 520 1054 164 40.8 STEPHEN F AUSTIN H S 611 523 85.6 576 553 1129 275 52.6 HIGHTOWER H S 378 247 65.3 489 482 971 60 24.3 GEORGE BUSH HIGH SCHOO 437 311 71.2 479 461 940 62 19.9 THURGOOD MARSHALL HIGH 355 230 64.8 405 414 819 <10m ƒ

LAMAR CISD 889 438 49.3 516 507 1023 147 33.6 LAMAR CONS H S 282 142 50.4 516 504 1020 45 31.7 B F TERRY H S 288 116 40.3 495 494 988 36 31.0 FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL 319 180 56.4 530 518 1048 66 36.7

NEEDVILLE ISD NEEDVILLE H S 123 35 28.5 530 530 1060 15 42.9

STAFFORD MSD STAFFORD HIGH SCHOOL 135 102 75.6 480 490 970 25 24.5

FRANKLIN MOUNT VERNON ISD MT VERNON H S 81 13 16.0 542 539 1081 5 38.5

FREESTONE FAIRFIELD ISD FAIRFIELD H S 75 33 44.0 531 515 1046 15 45.5

TEAGUE ISD TEAGUE H S 58 20 34.5 478 464 942 <5h ƒ

WORTHAM ISD WORTHAM H S 31 8 25.8 501 479 980 <5h ƒ

FRIO DILLEY ISD DILLEY H S 41 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

PEARSALL ISD PEARSALL H S 106 21 19.8 424 434 858 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 25 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

GAINES LOOP ISD LOOP SCHOOL 8 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SEAGRAVES ISD 26 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ SEAGRAVES H S 24 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ CHOICES ALTERNATIVE HI 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SEMINOLE ISD 126 53 42.1 497 467 965 9 17.0 SEMINOLE H S 115 <55m ƒ 497 467 965 <10m ƒ SEMINOLE SUCCESS CTR 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

GALVESTON CLEAR CREEK ISD 1,952 1,514 77.6 547 534 1081 645 42.6 CLEAR CREEK H S 626 448 71.6 524 510 1034 <150m ƒ CLEAR LAKE H S 753 649 86.2 578 563 1141 347 53.5 CLEAR BROOK H S 524 405 77.3 525 517 1042 148 36.5 CLEAR VIEW ALTER 49 12 24.5 468 500 968 <5h ƒ

DICKINSON ISD 268 126 47.0 486 448 935 19 15.1 DICKINSON H S 267 <130m ƒ 486 448 935 <20m ƒ GALVESTON CO DETENTION 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

FRIENDSWOOD ISD FRIENDSWOOD H S 384 324 84.4 568 554 1122 171 52.8

GALVESTON ISD BALL H S 420 223 53.1 506 481 987 69 30.9

HIGH ISLAND ISD HIGH ISLAND H S 22 16 72.7 424 406 829 <5h ƒ

HITCHCOCK ISD HITCHCOCK H S 60 18 30.0 454 452 907 <5h ƒ

LA MARQUE ISD LA MARQUE H S 178 89 50.0 404 407 812 5 5.6

SANTA FE ISD SANTA FE H S 228 130 57.0 494 486 980 27 20.8

TEXAS CITY ISD TEXAS CITY H S 250 124 49.6 493 479 972 30 24.2

GARZA POST ISD POST H S 67 16 23.9 519 482 1001 7 43.8

SOUTHLAND ISD SOUTHLAND SCHOOL 8 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

GILLESPIE FREDERICKSBURG ISD 215 <130m ƒ 518 519 1037 48 ƒ FREDERICKSBURG H S 213 <130m ƒ 518 519 1037 <50m ƒ ALTER SCH 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HARPER ISD HARPER H S 19 23 121 491 470 960 7 30.4

GLASSCOCK GLASSCOCK COUNTY IS GLASSCOCK COUNTY H S 22 8 36.4 531 448 979 <5h ƒ

GOLIAD GOLIAD ISD GOLIAD H S 75 31 41.3 512 514 1026 9 29.0

GONZALES GONZALES ISD 127 54 42.5 494 481 975 11 20.4 GONZALES H S 113 <55m ƒ 494 481 975 <15m ƒ GONZALES ALTER 14 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

26 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

GONZALES NIXON-SMILEY CISD NIXON-SMILEY H S 53 11 20.8 435 419 855 <5h ƒ

WAELDER ISD WAELDER H S 15 7 46.7 434 407 841 <5h ƒ

GRAY LEFORS ISD LEFORS SCHOOL 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MCLEAN ISD MCLEAN SCHOOL 12 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

PAMPA ISD 173 <60m ƒ 497 491 988 13 ƒ PAMPA H S 160 <60m ƒ 497 491 988 <15m ƒ P L C-PAMPA LEARNING C 13 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

GRAYSON BELLS ISD BELLS H S 47 26 55.3 512 521 1033 10 38.5

COLLINSVILLE ISD COLLINSVILLE H S 30 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

DENISON ISD 244 69 28.3 552 533 1084 37 53.6 DENISON H S 237 <70m ƒ 552 533 1084 <40m ƒ PATHWAYS H S 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

GUNTER ISD GUNTER H S 46 22 47.8 513 478 990 5 22.7

HOWE ISD HOWE H S 55 9 16.4 521 527 1048 <5h ƒ

POTTSBORO ISD POTTSBORO H S 70 25 35.7 487 504 992 <5h ƒ

S AND S CISD S AND S CONS H S 45 14 31.1 518 546 1064 6 42.9

SHERMAN ISD 309 <110m ƒ 555 542 1097 49 ƒ SHERMAN HIGH SCHOOL 304 <110m ƒ 555 542 1097 <50m ƒ COOKE/FANNIN/GRAYSON C 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ DOUGLASS LEARNING CTR 4 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TOM BEAN ISD TOM BEAN H S 44 18 40.9 471 467 937 <5h ƒ

VAN ALSTYNE ISD VAN ALSTYNE H S 85 43 50.6 530 541 1072 19 44.2

WHITESBORO ISD WHITESBORO H S 87 12 13.8 533 491 1023 5 41.7

WHITEWRIGHT ISD WHITEWRIGHT H S 43 21 48.8 495 478 973 <5h ƒ

GREGG EAST TEXAS CHARTER DAN CHADWICK CAMPUS 61 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

GLADEWATER ISD GLADEWATER H S 101 32 31.7 475 469 944 5 15.6

KILGORE ISD 219 38 17.4 543 535 1078 16 42.1 KILGORE H S 214 <40m ƒ 543 535 1078 <20m ƒ DANVILLE ALTERNATIVE H 5 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LONGVIEW ISD LONGVIEW H S 355 195 54.9 495 497 992 63 32.3

PINE TREE ISD PINE TREE H S 261 177 67.8 523 518 1041 64 36.2

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 27 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

GREGG SABINE ISD SABINE H S 63 19 30.2 528 473 1001 <5h ƒ

SPRING HILL ISD SPRING HILL H S 80 31 38.8 530 507 1037 10 32.3

WHITE OAK ISD WHITE OAK H S 71 19 26.8 503 494 996 <5h ƒ

GRIMES ANDERSON-SHIRO CISD ANDERSON-SHIRO SECONDA 28 12 42.9 511 478 989 <5h ƒ

IOLA ISD IOLA H S 23 11 47.8 505 479 985 <5h ƒ

NAVASOTA ISD 158 49 31.0 472 457 929 9 18.4 NAVASOTA H S 154 <50m ƒ 472 457 929 <10m ƒ SUCCESS ACADEMY AT CAR 4 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

RICHARDS ISD RICHARDS H S 9 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

GUADALUPE MARION ISD MARION H S 86 47 54.7 516 476 992 9 19.1

NAVARRO ISD NAVARRO HIGH SCHOOL 73 51 69.9 523 508 1031 16 31.4

SCHERTZ-CIBOLO-U CI 518 308 59.5 512 509 1022 94 30.5 SAMUEL CLEMENS H S 491 <310m ƒ 512 509 1022 <95m ƒ ALLISON STEELE ENHANC 27 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SEGUIN ISD 360 152 42.2 499 487 987 <40m ƒ SEGUIN HIGH SCHOOL 324 <155m ƒ 499 487 987 <40m ƒ MERCER & BLUMBERG LRN 36 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HALE ABERNATHY ISD ABERNATHY H S 31 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

COTTON CENTER ISD COTTON CENTER SCHOOL 9 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HALE CENTER ISD HALE CENTER H S 29 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

PETERSBURG ISD PETERSBURG H S 23 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

PLAINVIEW ISD 268 68 25.4 480 459 939 12 17.6 PLAINVIEW HIGH SCHOOL 252 <70m ƒ 480 459 939 <15m ƒ HOUSTON SCHOOL 16 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HALL MEMPHIS ISD MEMPHIS H S 18 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TURKEY-QUITAQUE ISD VALLEY SCHOOL 15 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HAMILTON HAMILTON ISD HAMILTON HIGH SCHOOL 52 23 44.2 489 504 993 7 30.4

HICO ISD HICO H S 50 19 38.0 489 459 948 <5h ƒ

HANSFORD GRUVER ISD GRUVER H S 22 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SPEARMAN ISD SPEARMAN H S 48 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

28 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

HARDEMAN CHILLICOTHE ISD CHILLICOTHE H S 16 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

QUANAH ISD QUANAH H S 36 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HARDIN HARDIN-JEFFERSON IS HARDIN-JEFFERSON H S 133 109 82.0 504 495 999 28 25.7

KOUNTZE ISD KOUNTZE H S 61 34 55.7 451 466 917 5 14.7

LUMBERTON ISD LUMBERTON H S 203 113 55.7 465 496 961 28 24.8

SILSBEE ISD SILSBEE H S 170 102 60.0 441 460 901 10 9.8

WEST HARDIN COUNTY WEST HARDIN H S 46 23 50.0 427 440 867 <5h ƒ

HARRIS ALDINE ISD 2,011 908 45.2 447 430 877 99 10.9 427 157 36.8 435 429 864 18 11.5 CARVER H S FOR APPLIE 85 <60m ƒ 479 477 956 <15m ƒ MACARTHUR HIGH SCHOOL 420 172 41.0 458 433 890 <15m ƒ EISENHOWER HIGH SCHOOL 513 265 51.7 437 426 863 26 9.8 NIMITZ HIGH SCHOOL 473 256 54.1 450 422 872 31 12.1 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 93 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

ALIEF ISD 1,921 1,230 64.0 466 446 912 201 16.3 HASTINGS H S 578 339 58.7 475 451 926 62 18.3 ELSIK H S 658 404 61.4 441 425 865 43 10.6 TAYLOR HIGH SCHOOL 534 348 65.2 464 441 905 54 15.5 KERR H S 151 139 92.1 522 510 1032 42 30.2

ALPHONSO CRUTCH'S-L ALPHONSO CRUTCH'S-LIFE 29 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AMERICAN ACADEMY OF EX 23 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BAY AREA CHARTER SC ED WHITE MEMORIAL HIGH 28 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BENJI'S SPECIAL EDU BENJI'S SPECIAL EDUCAT 10 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CALVIN NELMS CHARTE CALVIN NELMS HIGH SCHO 51 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CHANNELVIEW ISD 296 131 44.3 453 448 900 11 8.4 CHANNELVIEW HIGH SCHOO 282 <135m ƒ 453 448 900 <15m ƒ ENDEAVOR SCHOOL 14 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

COMQUEST ACADEMY COMQUEST ACADEMY 44 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CROSBY ISD CROSBY HIGH SCHOOL 200 74 37.0 506 485 991 21 28.4

CROSSROADS COMMUNIT CROSSROAD COMMUNITY ED 16 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CYPRESS-FAIRBANKS I 4,297 2,960 68.9 529 509 1039 1,084 36.6 CY-FAIR H S 612 432 70.6 543 536 1079 193 44.7 JERSEY VILLAGE H S 650 455 70.0 528 507 1035 163 35.8

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 29 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

HARRIS CYPRESS-FAIRBANKS I CYPRESS CREEK H S 568 457 80.5 541 528 1068 189 41.4 LANGHAM CREEK H S 634 457 72.1 541 523 1064 190 41.6 CYPRESS FALLS H S 613 440 71.8 540 511 1051 172 39.1 WINDFERN H S 125 12 9.6 488 483 971 5 41.7 CYPRESS SPRINGS H S 582 360 61.9 505 481 986 98 27.2 CYPRESS RIDGE HIGH SCH 513 347 67.6 494 468 963 74 21.3

DEER PARK ISD DEER PARK HS 706 289 40.9 538 495 1033 98 33.9

GALENA PARK ISD 998 382 38.3 457 436 894 45 11.8 GALENA PARK H S 262 114 43.5 441 427 869 <10m ƒ NORTH SHORE H S 0 7 ƒ 414 383 797 <5h ƒ NORTH SHORE SR H S 736 261 35.5 465 442 907 <40m ƒ

GEORGE I SANCHEZ CH GEORGE I SANCHEZ H S 65 27 41.5 382 374 756 <5h ƒ

GIRLS & BOYS PREP A GIRLS & BOYS PREP ACAD 14 15 107 359 386 745 <5h ƒ

GOOSE CREEK CISD 892 363 40.7 497 473 970 87 24.0 LEE H S 399 <135m ƒ 491 468 960 <35m ƒ STERLING H S 472 232 49.2 501 476 977 <60m ƒ ALTERNATIVE LEARNING 0 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ NIGHT SCHOOL 21 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

GULF SHORES ACADEMY GULF SHORES HIGH SCHOO 0 7 ƒ 351 327 679 <5h ƒ

HARMONY SCIENCE ACA HARMONY SCIENCE ACADEM 13 13 100 495 480 975 <5h ƒ

HOUSTON CAN ACADEMY 156 7 4.5 397 396 793 <5h ƒ HOUSTON CAN! ACADEMY C 95 <10m ƒ 397 396 793 <5h ƒ HOUSTON CAN ACADEMY HO 61 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HOUSTON HEIGHTS HIG HOUSTON HEIGHTS HIGH S 57 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HOUSTON ISD 7,573 4,777 63.1 473 464 936 1,099 23.0 AUSTIN H S 263 137 52.1 422 383 805 5 3.6 BELLAIRE H S 645 572 88.7 592 573 1165 344 60.1 DAVIS H S 242 142 58.7 419 393 812 5 3.5 FURR H S 187 77 41.2 425 416 841 6 7.8 SAM HOUSTON H S 377 158 41.9 405 385 790 <5h ƒ JONES H S 138 78 56.5 405 403 808 5 6.4 KASHMERE H S 100 40 40.0 379 393 772 <5h ƒ LAMAR H S 658 538 81.8 527 530 1056 228 42.4 LEE H S 266 283 106 391 367 758 11 3.9 MADISON H S 330 168 50.9 400 405 805 <5h ƒ MILBY H S 384 195 50.8 440 407 847 12 6.2 REAGAN H S 288 163 56.6 417 413 830 8 4.9 COMMUNITY SERVICES-SEC 4 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ STERLING H S 159 52 32.7 420 413 832 <5h ƒ WALTRIP H S 299 165 55.2 446 452 899 15 9.1 WASHINGTON B T H S 193 141 73.1 473 460 933 37 26.2 WESTBURY H S 253 146 57.7 420 420 840 11 7.5

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

30 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

HARRIS HOUSTON ISD WHEATLEY H S 112 38 33.9 381 354 735 <5h ƒ WORTHING H S 181 117 64.6 405 401 806 <5h ƒ YATES H S 200 116 58.0 383 391 774 <5h ƒ SHARPSTOWN H S 234 123 52.6 438 433 870 9 7.3 SCARBOROUGH H S 148 61 41.2 457 450 906 10 16.4 PERFOR & VIS ARTS H S 157 141 89.8 556 580 1136 80 56.7 DEBAKEY H S FOR HEALTH 124 126 102 600 583 1183 90 71.4 CHAVEZ H S 373 151 40.5 420 402 822 6 4.0 CONTEMPORARY LRN CTR H 50 12 24.0 391 423 813 <5h ƒ KAY ON-GOING ED CTR HI 9 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ BARBARA JORDAN H S 240 114 47.5 404 403 806 <5h ƒ LAW ENFCMT-CRIM JUST H 142 111 78.2 446 463 909 9 8.1 WESTSIDE H S 523 474 90.6 524 510 1035 162 34.2 H P CARTER CAREER CENT 11 5 45.5 348 358 706 <5h ƒ MIDDLE COLLEGE FOR TEC 69 64 92.8 470 484 954 8 12.5 EASTWOOD ACADEMY 58 34 58.6 421 398 819 <5h ƒ HOUSTON DROP BACK IN A 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ ENERGIZED FOR EXCELLEN 0 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ CARNEGIE VANGUARD HS 28 29 104 587 612 1198 18 62.1 CHALLENGE EARLY COLLEG 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ ALTA ACADEMY 119 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HUFFMAN ISD HARGRAVE H S 161 80 49.7 485 482 967 14 17.5

HUMBLE ISD 1,597 1,155 72.3 532 530 1062 485 42.0 HUMBLE H S 730 435 59.6 492 488 981 107 24.6 KINGWOOD H S 824 683 82.9 560 556 1116 362 53.0 QUEST H S 43 37 86.0 502 529 1031 16 43.2

JAMIE'S HOUSE CHART JAMIE'S HOUSE CHARTER 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

JESSE JACKSON ACADE JESSE JACKSON ACADEMY 144 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

JUAN B GALAVIZ CHAR JUAN B GALAVIZ CHARTER 3 5 167 400 366 766 <5h ƒ

KATY ISD 2,572 2,032 79.0 557 542 1099 984 48.4 KATY H S 588 <435m ƒ 534 529 1063 <165m ƒ TAYLOR H S 621 554 89.2 582 560 1142 319 57.6 MAYDE CREEK H S 643 <415m ƒ 514 500 1014 <135m ƒ CINCO RANCH H S 706 638 90.4 579 562 1141 372 58.3 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL OF 14 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

KLEIN ISD 2,096 1,600 76.3 535 512 1047 597 37.3 KLEIN H S 660 579 87.7 567 540 1106 280 48.4 KLEIN FOREST H S 537 351 65.4 486 457 944 72 20.5 KLEIN OAK H S 359 240 66.9 550 528 1078 104 43.3 KLEIN COLLINS HIGH SCH 540 430 79.6 523 510 1033 141 32.8

LA PORTE ISD 440 173 39.3 504 483 988 46 26.6 LA PORTE HIGH SCHOOL 400 <175m ƒ 504 483 988 <50m ƒ DEWALT ALTER 40 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 31 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

HARRIS NORTH FOREST ISD 445 218 49.0 373 375 749 <5h ƒ SMILEY H S 236 129 54.7 366 367 733 <5h ƒ FOREST BROOK H S 209 89 42.6 385 387 772 <5h ƒ

NORTH HOUSTON H S F NORTH HOUSTON H S FOR 38 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

PASADENA ISD 1,807 653 36.1 491 472 962 129 19.8 PASADENA H S 455 <100m ƒ 497 472 969 <20m ƒ RAYBURN H S 439 161 36.7 494 486 980 33 20.5 SOUTH HOUSTON H S 426 159 37.3 461 439 899 <25m ƒ DOBIE H S 486 237 48.8 506 484 990 57 24.1 TEGELER CAREER CENTER 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ PASADENA MEMORIAL HIGH 0 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

RAUL YZAGUIRRE SCHO RAUL YZAGUIRRE SCHOOL 22 11 50.0 374 365 739 <5h ƒ

RICHARD MILBURN ACA RICHARD MILBURN ACADEM 29 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SHELDON ISD 211 73 34.6 444 429 873 6 8.2 C E KING H S 207 <75m ƒ 444 429 873 <10m ƒ KASE ACADEMY 4 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SOUTHWEST SCHOOL SOUTHWEST HIGH SCHOOL 73 16 21.9 399 385 784 <5h ƒ

SPRING BRANCH ISD 1,679 1,235 73.6 548 524 1072 545 44.1 MEMORIAL H S 451 439 97.3 605 578 1183 278 63.3 SPRING WOODS H S 369 211 57.2 501 475 976 51 24.2 NORTHBROOK H S 372 171 46.0 430 404 834 13 7.6 STRATFORD H S 421 378 89.8 570 546 1116 196 51.9 SPRING BRANCH SCHOOL O 32 6 18.8 428 467 895 <5h ƒ WESTCHESTER ACADEMY FO 34 30 88.2 475 497 972 <10m ƒ

SPRING ISD 1,345 690 51.3 491 472 963 144 20.9 SPRING H S 598 <290m ƒ 513 492 1005 <80m ƒ WESTFIELD H S 744 <405m ƒ 475 457 933 <70m ƒ SP ED CONTRACT 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TOMBALL ISD TOMBALL H S 498 336 67.5 531 517 1048 118 35.1

WEST HOUSTON CHARTE WEST HOUSTON CHARTER 0 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

YES COLLEGE PREPARA YES COLLEGE PREPARATOR 73 77 106 510 485 995 18 23.4

HARRISON ELYSIAN FIELDS ISD ELYSIAN FIELDS H S 67 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HALLSVILLE ISD HALLSVILLE H S 208 113 54.3 498 489 987 30 26.5

HARLETON ISD HARLETON H S 31 5 16.1 558 562 1120 <5h ƒ

KARNACK ISD KARNACK H S 6 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MARSHALL ISD 312 77 24.7 504 502 1006 18 23.4

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

32 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

HARRISON MARSHALL ISD MARSHALL H S 288 <80m ƒ 504 502 1006 <20m ƒ MARSHALL ACHIEVEMENT C 24 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WASKOM ISD WASKOM H S 38 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HARTLEY CHANNING ISD CHANNING SCHOOL 8 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HARTLEY ISD HARTLEY SCHOOL 12 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HASKELL HASKELL CISD HASKELL H S 31 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

PAINT CREEK ISD PAINT CREEK SCHOOL 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

RULE ISD RULE SCHOOL 9 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HAYS DRIPPING SPRINGS IS DRIPPING SPRINGS H S 212 187 88.2 556 557 1113 101 54.0

HAYS CISD 453 282 62.3 488 474 963 53 18.8 JACK C HAYS H S 413 275 66.6 488 473 961 <55m ƒ ACADEMY AT HAYS 40 7 17.5 507 513 1020 <5h ƒ

KATHERINE ANNE PORT KATHERINE ANNE PORTER 24 11 45.8 539 574 1113 8 72.7

SAN MARCOS CISD 366 166 45.4 490 471 961 36 21.7 SAN MARCOS H S 341 <170m ƒ 489 471 961 <40m ƒ PRIDE HIGH SCHOOL 25 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WIMBERLEY ISD WIMBERLEY H S 143 99 69.2 529 541 1070 43 43.4

HEMPHILL CANADIAN ISD CANADIAN H S 31 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HENDERSON ATHENS ISD ATHENS H S 166 61 36.7 518 498 1016 15 24.6

BROWNSBORO ISD 160 43 26.9 515 511 1026 <20m ƒ BROWNSBORO H S 159 <45m ƒ 515 511 1026 <20m ƒ ACES CAMPUS 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CROSS ROADS ISD CROSS ROADS H S 33 9 27.3 514 463 978 <5h ƒ

EUSTACE ISD EUSTACE H S 58 22 37.9 548 519 1067 10 45.5

LAPOYNOR ISD 15 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ LAPOYNOR H S 14 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ A L P H A CAMPUS 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MALAKOFF ISD 58 <15m ƒ 556 518 1074 <10m ƒ MALAKOFF H S 51 <15m ƒ 556 518 1074 <10m ƒ GATEWAY 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TRINIDAD ISD 17 <10m ƒ 482 496 978 <5h ƒ TRINIDAD SCHOOL 14 <10m ƒ 482 496 978 <5h ƒ A L P H A CAMPUS 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 33 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

HIDALGO DONNA ISD 369 18 4.9 476 493 969 <5h ƒ

EAGLE ACADEMY OF PH 56 9 16.1 384 373 758 <5h ƒ EAGLE ACADEMY OF PHARR 38 <10m ƒ 356 353 709 <5h ƒ EAGLE ACADEMY OF PHARR 18 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

EDCOUCH-ELSA ISD EDCOUCH-ELSA H S 264 160 60.6 405 390 795 5 3.1

EDINBURG CISD 1,092 208 19.0 473 458 931 35 16.8 EDINBURG H S 420 46 11.0 524 506 1030 <20m ƒ ECONOMEDES H S 331 70 21.1 430 411 841 <5h ƒ EDINBURG NORTH H S 341 92 27.0 480 469 949 18 19.6

HIDALGO ISD 156 62 39.7 435 409 844 <5h ƒ HIDALGO H S 150 <65m ƒ 435 409 844 <5h ƒ HIDALGO ACADEMY 6 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LA JOYA ISD 736 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ LA JOYA SENIOR HIGH SC 659 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ ALTER CTR FOR ED 76 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ JUAREZ/LINCOLN HIGH SC 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LA VILLA ISD 38 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ LA VILLA H S 36 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ LA VILLA ALTERNATIVE H 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MCALLEN ISD 1,141 646 56.6 488 470 958 132 20.4 MCALLEN HIGH SCHOOL 366 223 60.9 484 474 959 <50m ƒ MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL 353 198 56.1 509 482 991 49 24.7 ROWE HIGH SCHOOL 351 207 59.0 477 459 936 <40m ƒ LAMAR ACADEMY 71 18 25.4 416 425 841 <5h ƒ

MERCEDES ISD 216 21 9.7 467 460 928 <5h ƒ MERCEDES H S 191 <25m ƒ 467 460 928 <5h ƒ MERCEDES ALTER ACADEMY 25 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MID-VALLEY ACADEMY 75 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ MID-VALLEY ACADEMY 13 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ MID-VALLEY ACADEMY-MCA 62 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MISSION CISD 639 143 22.4 461 449 910 19 13.3 MISSION H S 316 80 25.3 458 444 902 7 8.8 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGH 323 63 19.5 464 457 921 12 19.0

ONE STOP MULTISERVI 222 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ ONE STOP MULTISERVICE 19 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ ONE STOP MULTISERVICE 64 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ ONE STOP MULTISERVICE 30 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ SENTRY TECHNOLOGY PREP 63 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ CHILDREN OF THE SUN 16 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ CHILDREN OF THE SUN 30 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

34 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

HIDALGO PHARR-SAN JUAN-ALAM 992 189 19.1 439 419 858 15 7.9 PSJA H S 363 <20m ƒ 505 483 989 <5h ƒ PSJA MEMORIAL H S 299 142 47.5 413 398 811 <5h ƒ PSJA NORTH H S 285 <35m ƒ 522 484 1006 7 ƒ TEENAGE PARENT PROG 20 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ BUELL CENTRAL H S 25 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

PROGRESO ISD PROGRESO H S 67 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SHARYLAND ISD 377 242 64.2 496 471 966 51 21.1 SHARYLAND H S 376 <245m ƒ 496 471 966 <55m ƒ SHARYLAND ALTERNATIVE 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TECHNOLOGY EDUCATIO TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION C 13 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

VALLEY VIEW ISD VALLEY VIEW HIGH SCHOO 122 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WESLACO ISD 670 80 11.9 470 477 947 21 26.3 WESLACO H S 351 <60m ƒ 486 497 983 <20m ƒ SOUTH PALM GARDENS H S 19 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ WESLACO EAST HIGH SCHO 300 <30m ƒ 434 432 866 <5h ƒ

HILL ABBOTT ISD ABBOTT SCHOOL 17 13 76.5 522 468 990 <5h ƒ

AQUILLA ISD AQUILLA SCHOOL 14 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BLUM ISD BLUM H S 13 5 38.5 514 512 1026 <5h ƒ

BYNUM ISD BYNUM SCHOOL 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

COVINGTON ISD COVINGTON SCHOOL 25 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HILLSBORO ISD HILLSBORO H S 85 32 37.6 511 508 1019 9 28.1

HUBBARD ISD HUBBARD H S 23 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

ITASCA ISD ITASCA H S 33 23 69.7 447 412 859 <5h ƒ

PENELOPE ISD PENELOPE SCHOOL 18 5 27.8 466 466 932 <5h ƒ

WHITNEY ISD WHITNEY H S 76 13 17.1 449 501 950 <5h ƒ

HOCKLEY ANTON ISD ANTON H S 18 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LEVELLAND ISD LEVELLAND H S 144 28 19.4 516 502 1018 7 25.0

ROPES ISD ROPES SCHOOL 15 6 40.0 537 535 1072 <5h ƒ

SMYER ISD SMYER H S 14 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SUNDOWN ISD 31 11 35.5 535 475 1010 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 35 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

HOCKLEY SUNDOWN ISD SUNDOWN H S 29 <15m ƒ 535 475 1010 <5h ƒ PEP ALTER SCHOOL 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WHITHARRAL ISD WHITHARRAL SCHOOL 21 6 28.6 388 437 825 <5h ƒ

HOOD GRANBURY ISD 370 178 48.1 516 510 1026 52 29.2 GRANBURY H S 360 <180m ƒ 516 510 1026 <55m ƒ S T A R S ACADEMY 10 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LIPAN ISD LIPAN SCHOOL 12 5 41.7 430 448 878 <5h ƒ

TOLAR ISD TOLAR H S 40 6 15.0 450 477 927 <5h ƒ

HOPKINS COMO-PICKTON CISD 30 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ COMO-PICKTON SCHOOL 27 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ HOLY HIGHWAY PICKTON 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CUMBY ISD CUMBY H S 19 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MILLER GROVE ISD MILLER GROVE SCHOOL 18 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

NORTH HOPKINS ISD NORTH HOPKINS H S 21 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SALTILLO ISD SALTILLO SCHOOL 13 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SULPHUR BLUFF ISD SULPHUR BLUFF SCHOOL 12 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SULPHUR SPRINGS ISD SULPHUR SPRINGS H S 209 68 32.5 515 517 1032 26 38.2

HOUSTON CROCKETT ISD CROCKETT H S 71 53 74.6 473 432 905 10 18.9

GRAPELAND ISD GRAPELAND H S 32 11 34.4 482 492 974 <5h ƒ

KENNARD ISD KENNARD H S 13 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LATEXO ISD LATEXO H S 33 15 45.5 462 473 935 <5h ƒ

LOVELADY ISD LOVELADY H S 41 19 46.3 475 446 921 <5h ƒ

HOWARD BIG SPRING ISD BIG SPRING H S 196 16 8.2 527 534 1061 <5h ƒ

COAHOMA ISD COAHOMA H S 77 9 11.7 498 496 993 <5h ƒ

FORSAN ISD FORSAN H S 33 8 24.2 521 528 1049 <5h ƒ

HUDSPETH DELL CITY ISD DELL CITY SCHOOL 16 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

FT HANCOCK ISD FORT HANCOCK HS 33 22 66.7 407 387 794 <5h ƒ

SIERRA BLANCA ISD SIERRA BLANCA SCHOOL 8 8 100 440 418 858 <5h ƒ

HUNT BLAND ISD BLAND H S 21 5 23.8 484 502 986 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

36 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

HUNT BOLES ISD BOLES ISD HIGH SCHOOL 22 18 81.8 459 473 932 <5h ƒ

CADDO MILLS ISD CADDO MILLS H S 65 37 56.9 528 486 1014 10 27.0

CAMPBELL ISD CAMPBELL H S 14 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CELESTE ISD CELESTE HIGH SCHOOL 34 15 44.1 505 520 1025 5 33.3

COMMERCE ISD COMMERCE H S 95 53 55.8 538 527 1065 20 37.7

GREENVILLE ISD 280 121 43.2 505 490 994 34 28.1 NEW HORIZONS LEARNING 25 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ GREENVILLE H S 255 <125m ƒ 505 490 994 <35m ƒ

LONE OAK ISD LONE OAK H S 53 32 60.4 493 488 981 <5h ƒ

QUINLAN ISD WH FORD HIGH SCHOOL 133 34 25.6 449 442 891 <5h ƒ

WOLFE CITY ISD WOLFE CITY H S 35 9 25.7 522 494 1017 <5h ƒ

HUTCHINSON BORGER ISD 156 11 7.1 516 494 1010 <5h ƒ BORGER H S 154 <15m ƒ 516 494 1010 <5h ƒ C H A M P S 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

PLEMONS-STINNETT-PH WEST TEXAS H S 41 14 34.1 478 473 951 <5h ƒ

SANFORD ISD 54 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ SANFORD-FRITCH H S 52 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ C H A M P S 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

IRION IRION COUNTY ISD IRION H S 24 12 50.0 495 450 945 <5h ƒ

JACK BRYSON ISD BRYSON SCHOOL 16 5 31.3 482 456 938 <5h ƒ

JACKSBORO ISD 46 24 52.2 473 450 923 <5h ƒ JACKSBORO H S 45 <25m ƒ 473 450 923 <5h ƒ ALTER SCH 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

PERRIN-WHITT CISD PERRIN H S 18 9 50.0 464 469 933 <5h ƒ

JACKSON EDNA ISD EDNA H S 102 28 27.5 504 474 978 8 28.6

GANADO ISD GANADO H S 40 13 32.5 478 468 945 <5h ƒ

INDUSTRIAL ISD INDUSTRIAL H S 63 41 65.1 512 501 1014 7 17.1

JASPER BROOKELAND ISD BROOKELAND H S 6 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BUNA ISD BUNA H S 83 52 62.7 453 472 925 <5h ƒ

EVADALE ISD EVADALE H S 24 18 75.0 429 451 880 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 37 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

JASPER JASPER ISD JASPER H S 154 47 30.5 489 478 966 8 17.0

KIRBYVILLE CISD KIRBYVILLE HIGH SCHOOL 68 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

JEFF DAVIS FT DAVIS ISD 34 24 70.6 486 504 990 7 29.2 FT DAVIS H S 17 8 47.1 501 539 1040 <5h ƒ HIGH FRONTIER H S 17 16 94.1 478 487 965 <10m ƒ

VALENTINE ISD VALENTINE SCHOOL 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

JEFFERSON ACADEMY OF BEAUMONT ACADEMY OF BEAUMONT 0 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BEAUMONT ISD 927 636 68.6 451 456 907 105 16.5 CENTRAL SENIOR H S 156 93 59.6 381 378 759 <5h ƒ OZEN H S 304 202 66.4 407 416 823 9 4.5 WEST BROOK SR H S 431 333 77.3 498 503 1000 94 28.2 PAUL A BROWN ALTERNATI 36 8 22.2 413 405 818 <5h ƒ

EAGLE ACADEMY OF BE EAGELE ACADEMY OF BEAU 36 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HAMSHIRE-FANNETT IS HAMSHIRE-FANNETT H S 107 73 68.2 457 466 922 14 19.2

NEDERLAND ISD NEDERLAND H S 298 244 81.9 513 495 1008 71 29.1

PORT ARTHUR ISD MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL 490 232 47.3 400 396 796 12 5.2

PORT NECHES-GROVES PORT NECHES-GROVES H S 301 226 75.1 500 488 988 50 22.1

RICHARD MILBURN ACA RICHARD MILBURN ACADEM 34 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SABINE PASS ISD SABINE PASS SCHOOL 15 15 100 431 433 863 <5h ƒ

TEKOA ACADEMY OF AC TEKOA ACADEMY OF ACCEL 18 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TEXAS ACADEMY OF LE TEXAS ACADEMY OF LEADE 0 30 ƒ 595 623 1218 27 90.0

JIM HOGG JIM HOGG COUNTY ISD HEBBRONVILLE H S 65 5 7.7 494 452 946 <5h ƒ

JIM WELLS ALICE ISD ALICE H S 211 33 15.6 481 473 954 8 24.2

BEN BOLT-PALITO BLA BEN BOLT-PAL BLANCO H 47 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

ORANGE GROVE ISD ORANGE GROVE H S 82 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

PREMONT ISD PREMONT H S 56 9 16.1 413 452 866 <5h ƒ

JOHNSON ALVARADO ISD ALVARADO H S 162 105 64.8 468 464 931 13 12.4

BURLESON ISD 446 237 53.1 508 501 1009 64 27.0 BURLESON H S 435 <240m ƒ 508 501 1009 <65m ƒ CROSSROADS HIGH SCHOOL 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

38 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

JOHNSON CLEBURNE ISD 296 117 39.5 522 513 1035 37 31.6 CLEBURNE H S 272 <120m ƒ 522 513 1035 <40m ƒ TEAM SCH 24 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

GODLEY ISD GODLEY H S 65 34 52.3 461 457 918 <5h ƒ

GRANDVIEW ISD GRANDVIEW H S 68 35 51.5 511 492 1003 7 20.0

JOSHUA ISD 239 104 43.5 474 469 942 18 17.3 JOSHUA H S 221 <105m ƒ 474 469 942 <20m ƒ ACCELERATED LRN CTR 18 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

KEENE ISD 35 <25m ƒ 483 478 961 6 ƒ KEENE H S 34 <25m ƒ 483 478 961 <10m ƒ ALTER LEARNING CTR 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

RIO VISTA ISD RIO VISTA H S 67 33 49.3 469 483 952 7 21.2

VENUS ISD 80 21 26.3 488 454 941 <5h ƒ VENUS H S 79 <25m ƒ 488 454 941 <5h ƒ LEARNING CENTER 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

JONES ANSON ISD ANSON H S 51 10 19.6 493 476 969 <5h ƒ

HAMLIN ISD HAMLIN H S 21 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HAWLEY ISD HAWLEY H S 37 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LUEDERS-AVOCA ISD LUEDERS-AVOCA H S 8 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

STAMFORD ISD STAMFORD HIGH SCHOOL 39 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

KARNES FALLS CITY ISD FALLS CITY H S 22 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

KARNES CITY ISD KARNES CITY H S 55 21 38.2 491 484 976 <5h ƒ

KENEDY ISD 34 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ KENEDY HIGH SCHOOL 33 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ KARNES COUNTY ACADEMY 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

RUNGE ISD RUNGE H S 13 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

KAUFMAN CRANDALL ISD 123 58 47.2 519 510 1029 14 24.1 CRANDALL H S 112 <60m ƒ 520 510 1030 <15m ƒ CRANDALL ALTER CTR 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

FORNEY ISD FORNEY H S 179 120 67.0 506 492 998 30 25.0

KAUFMAN ISD 169 84 49.7 484 478 962 <25m ƒ KAUFMAN H S 153 <85m ƒ 484 478 962 <25m ƒ ALTERNATIVE LEARNING C 16 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 39 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

KAUFMAN KEMP ISD KEMP HIGH SCHOOL 93 23 24.7 503 489 992 6 26.1

MABANK ISD MABANK H S 189 62 32.8 482 478 960 10 16.1

SCURRY-ROSSER ISD SCURRY-ROSSER H S 39 17 43.6 461 479 940 <5h ƒ

TERRELL ISD TERRELL H S 191 89 46.6 473 475 948 16 18.0

KENDALL BOERNE ISD BOERNE H S 332 271 81.6 538 526 1064 112 41.3

COMFORT ISD 63 42 66.7 501 500 1001 11 26.2 COMFORT H S 62 <45m ƒ 501 500 1001 <15m ƒ HILL COUNTRY HIGH SCHO 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

KENT JAYTON-GIRARD ISD JAYTON SCHOOLS 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

KERR CENTER POINT ISD CENTER POINT H S 37 22 59.5 460 475 935 <5h ƒ

INGRAM ISD INGRAM-TOM MOORE H S 103 51 49.5 494 493 987 12 23.5

KERRVILLE ISD 257 150 58.4 511 499 1011 43 28.7 TIVY H S 233 <150m ƒ 512 500 1012 <45m ƒ HILL COUNTRY HIGH SCHO 24 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

KIMBLE JUNCTION ISD JUNCTION H S 46 24 52.2 504 506 1010 6 25.0

KING GUTHRIE CSD GUTHRIE SCHOOL 5 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

KINNEY BRACKETT ISD 41 21 51.2 493 501 994 7 33.3 BRACKETT H S 36 <25m ƒ 493 501 994 <10m ƒ BRACKETT ALTER 5 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

KLEBERG KINGSVILLE ISD 241 83 34.4 446 456 902 <20m ƒ H M KING HIGH SCHOOL 224 <85m ƒ 446 456 902 <20m ƒ K E Y S ACADEMY 17 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

RIVIERA ISD KAUFER H S 39 20 51.3 535 501 1036 7 35.0

SANTA GERTRUDIS ISD ACADEMY H S 32 6 18.8 558 492 1050 <5h ƒ

KNOX BENJAMIN ISD BENJAMIN SCHOOL 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

KNOX CITY-O'BRIEN C KNOX CITY H S 22 7 31.8 524 473 997 <5h ƒ

MUNDAY CISD MUNDAY H S 24 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LA SALLE COTULLA ISD 63 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ COTULLA H S 56 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ COTULLA ALTERNATIVE 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LAMAR CHISUM ISD CHISUM H S 55 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

40 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

LAMAR NORTH LAMAR ISD NORTH LAMAR H S 180 59 32.8 526 517 1043 24 40.7

PARIS ISD 138 56 40.6 548 520 1068 24 42.9 PARIS H S 130 <60m ƒ 548 520 1068 <25m ƒ PARIS ALTERNATIVE SCHO 8 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

PRAIRILAND ISD PRAIRILAND H S 61 6 9.8 547 545 1092 <5h ƒ

ROXTON ISD ROXTON H S 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LAMB AMHERST ISD AMHERST SCHOOL 5 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LITTLEFIELD ISD LITTLEFIELD H S 70 6 8.6 498 448 947 <5h ƒ

OLTON ISD OLTON H S 37 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SPADE ISD SPADE SCHOOL 5 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SPRINGLAKE-EARTH IS SPRINGLAKE-EARTH HS 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SUDAN ISD SUDAN H S 32 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LAMPASAS CEDAR RIDGE CHARTER CEDAR RIDGE CHARTER SC 13 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LAMPASAS ISD LAMPASAS H S 154 81 52.6 487 466 952 16 19.8

LOMETA ISD LOMETA SCHOOL 15 7 46.7 483 427 910 <5h ƒ

LAVACA HALLETTSVILLE ISD HALLETTSVILLE H S 84 38 45.2 534 495 1029 8 21.1

MOULTON ISD MOULTON H S 23 20 87.0 480 469 949 5 25.0

SHINER ISD SHINER H S 29 25 86.2 504 455 960 6 24.0

LEE DIME BOX ISD DIME BOX SCHOOL 16 9 56.3 551 510 1061 <5h ƒ

GIDDINGS ISD 108 <45m ƒ 523 503 1026 <15m ƒ GIDDINGS H S 107 <45m ƒ 523 503 1026 <15m ƒ KNOX LEARNING CTR 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

GIDDINGS STATE SCHO GIDDINGS STATE SCHOOL 0 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LEXINGTON ISD LEXINGTON HIGH SCHOOL 67 26 38.8 505 495 1000 10 38.5

LEON BUFFALO ISD BUFFALO H S 53 27 50.9 474 476 950 <5h ƒ

CENTERVILLE ISD CENTERVILLE JR-SR H S 54 46 85.2 454 425 879 <5h ƒ

LEON ISD LEON H S 42 15 35.7 477 466 943 <5h ƒ

NORMANGEE ISD NORMANGEE H S 30 13 43.3 472 425 897 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 41 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

LEON OAKWOOD ISD OAKWOOD H S 16 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LIBERTY CLEVELAND ISD CLEVELAND H S 128 53 41.4 423 424 846 <5h ƒ

DAYTON ISD 282 <145m ƒ 486 471 957 22 ƒ DAYTON H S 281 <145m ƒ 486 471 957 <25m ƒ GULF COAST H S 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HARDIN ISD HARDIN H S 58 39 67.2 420 431 851 <5h ƒ

HULL-DAISETTA ISD HULL-DAISETTA H S 30 19 63.3 444 416 860 <5h ƒ

LIBERTY ISD 127 52 40.9 494 494 988 <20m ƒ LIBERTY H S 126 <55m ƒ 494 494 988 <20m ƒ GULF COAST H S 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TARKINGTON ISD TARKINGTON H S 81 44 54.3 460 480 940 7 15.9

LIMESTONE COOLIDGE ISD COOLIDGE H S 6 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

GROESBECK ISD 111 <20m ƒ 533 523 1056 7 ƒ GROESBECK H S 99 <20m ƒ 533 523 1056 <10m ƒ ALTER LEARNING CTR 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ GROESBECK MIDDLE 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MEXIA ISD 110 <10m ƒ 498 530 1028 <5h ƒ MEXIA H S 105 <10m ƒ 498 530 1028 <5h ƒ MEXIA SCHOOL OF CHOICE 5 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LIPSCOMB BOOKER ISD BOOKER JH/H S 25 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

FOLLETT ISD FOLLETT SCHOOL 10 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HIGGINS ISD HIGGINS SCHOOL 9 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LIVE OAK GEORGE WEST ISD GEORGE WEST H S 67 12 17.9 506 483 989 <5h ƒ

THREE RIVERS ISD THREE RIVERS H S 43 11 25.6 535 529 1065 5 45.5

LLANO LLANO ISD LLANO H S 108 71 65.7 506 487 993 18 25.4

LUBBOCK EAGLE ACADEMY OF LU EAGLE ACADEMY OF LUBBO 9 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

FRENSHIP ISD 258 112 43.4 510 513 1023 39 34.8 FRENSHIP H S 234 <115m ƒ 510 513 1023 <40m ƒ REESE EDUCATIONAL CTR 24 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

IDALOU ISD IDALOU H S 50 9 18.0 501 529 1030 <5h ƒ

LUBBOCK ISD 1,505 776 51.6 512 505 1016 268 34.5 CORONADO H S 449 311 69.3 516 512 1027 108 34.7

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

42 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

LUBBOCK LUBBOCK ISD LUBBOCK H S 428 <195m ƒ 554 551 1104 99 ƒ MONTEREY H S 446 197 44.2 504 490 994 <65m ƒ ESTACADO H S 140 <80m ƒ 409 397 806 <5h ƒ HOMEBOUND 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ MATTHEWS LRN CTR/NEW D 41 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LUBBOCK-COOPER ISD LUBBOCK-COOPER HIGH SC 97 28 28.9 545 538 1084 12 42.9

NEW DEAL ISD NEW DEAL H S 45 7 15.6 486 417 903 <5h ƒ

RICHARD MILBURN ALT RICHARD MILBURN ALTER 32 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

ROOSEVELT ISD ROOSEVELT H S 64 23 35.9 462 429 890 <5h ƒ

SHALLOWATER ISD SHALLOWATER H S 77 25 32.5 550 530 1080 11 44.0

SLATON ISD SLATON H S 64 12 18.8 450 441 891 <5h ƒ

SOUTH PLAINS SOUTH PLAINS ACADEMY 44 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TEXAS TECH UNIVERSI TEXAS TECH H S 0 59 ƒ 553 579 1132 36 61.0

LYNN NEW HOME ISD NEW HOME SCHOOL 9 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

O'DONNELL ISD O'DONNELL HIGH SCHOOL 15 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TAHOKA ISD TAHOKA H S 47 7 14.9 517 469 986 <5h ƒ

WILSON ISD WILSON SCHOOL 9 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MADISON MADISONVILLE CISD MADISONVILLE HIGH SCHO 103 68 66.0 482 463 944 12 17.6

NORTH ZULCH ISD NORTH ZULCH H S 16 9 56.3 451 441 892 <5h ƒ

MARION JEFFERSON ISD JEFFERSON H S 79 12 15.2 479 505 984 <5h ƒ

MARTIN GRADY ISD GRADY SCHOOL 18 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

STANTON ISD STANTON H S 48 21 43.8 484 457 940 <5h ƒ

MASON MASON ISD MASON H S 42 26 61.9 505 457 961 7 26.9

MATAGORDA BAY CITY ISD BAY CITY H S 234 144 61.5 483 478 962 36 25.0

PALACIOS ISD PALACIOS H S 94 39 41.5 480 479 959 7 17.9

TIDEHAVEN ISD TIDEHAVEN H S 52 8 15.4 415 416 831 <5h ƒ

VAN VLECK ISD VAN VLECK H S 58 36 62.1 478 448 926 5 13.9

MAVERICK EAGLE PASS ISD 685 <330m ƒ 435 419 854 31 ƒ EAGLE PASS HIGH SCHOOL 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 43 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

MAVERICK EAGLE PASS ISD EP ALAS (ALTERNATIVE S 16 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ EAGLE PASS H S 668 <330m ƒ 435 419 854 <35m ƒ

MCCULLOCH BRADY ISD BRADY H S 85 7 8.2 497 500 997 <5h ƒ

LOHN ISD LOHN SCHOOL 8 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

ROCHELLE ISD ROCHELLE SCHOOL 13 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MCLENNAN AXTELL ISD 43 17 39.5 494 494 988 <5h ƒ AXTELL H S 38 <20m ƒ 494 494 988 <5h ƒ METHODIST HOME BOYS RA 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ OPPORTUNITY LEARNING C 4 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BOSQUEVILLE ISD BOSQUEVILLE SCHOOL SEC 23 9 39.1 511 523 1034 <5h ƒ

BRUCEVILLE-EDDY ISD 66 26 39.4 521 530 1050 8 30.8 BRUCEVILLE-EDDY H S 59 <30m ƒ 521 530 1050 <10m ƒ OPPORTUNITY LEARNING C 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ B-E ACHIEVEMENT CTR 4 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CHINA SPRING ISD 111 49 44.1 534 520 1053 16 32.7 CHINA SPRING H S 109 <50m ƒ 534 520 1053 <20m ƒ OPPORTUNITY LEARNING C 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CONNALLY ISD 111 54 48.6 474 456 931 <15m ƒ CONNALLY HIGH SCHOOL 105 <55m ƒ 474 456 931 <15m ƒ LAKEVIEW ACADEMY 6 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CRAWFORD ISD 46 33 71.7 553 541 1093 19 57.6 CRAWFORD H S 44 <35m ƒ 553 541 1093 <20m ƒ OPPORTUNITY LEARNING C 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

EAGLE ACADEMY OF WA 43 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ EAGLE ACADEMY OF WACO 19 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ EAGLE ACADEMY OF WACO 24 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LA VEGA ISD 110 21 19.1 469 479 948 6 28.6 LA VEGA H S 108 <25m ƒ 469 479 948 <10m ƒ SUCCESS PROGRAM 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LORENA ISD 103 59 57.3 541 510 1051 21 35.6 LORENA H S 97 <60m ƒ 541 510 1051 <25m ƒ OPPORTUNITY LEARNING C 6 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MART ISD MART H S 29 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MCGREGOR ISD 61 <15m ƒ 504 489 993 <5h ƒ MCGREGOR H S 59 <15m ƒ 504 489 993 <5h ƒ MCGREGOR PREP H S 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MIDWAY ISD MIDWAY H S 376 236 62.8 553 550 1102 112 47.5

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

44 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

MCLENNAN MOODY ISD MOODY H S 32 7 21.9 481 526 1007 <5h ƒ

RIESEL ISD RIESEL SCHOOL 24 12 50.0 485 458 943 <5h ƒ

ROBINSON ISD ROBINSON H S 136 25 18.4 496 458 954 5 20.0

WACO ISD 584 205 35.1 450 448 899 40 19.5 WACO H S 291 133 45.7 467 467 934 35 26.3 UNIVERSITY H S 157 <45m ƒ 436 407 843 <5h ƒ A J MOORE ACAD 104 <35m ƒ 399 423 822 <5h ƒ STARS HIGH SCHOOL 32 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WEST ISD 117 61 52.1 505 462 967 <15m ƒ WEST H S 114 <65m ƒ 505 462 967 <15m ƒ RBEC OPPORTUNITY LEARN 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MCMULLEN MCMULLEN COUNTY ISD MCMULLEN COUNTY SCHOO 17 8 47.1 474 489 963 <5h ƒ

MEDINA D'HANIS ISD D'HANIS SCHOOL 19 13 68.4 524 498 1022 <5h ƒ

DEVINE ISD DEVINE HIGH SCHOOL 98 54 55.1 451 445 896 <5h ƒ

HONDO ISD HONDO H S 105 7 6.7 550 616 1166 <5h ƒ

MEDINA VALLEY ISD 192 67 34.9 467 481 948 16 23.9 MEDINA VALLEY H S 191 <70m ƒ 467 481 948 <20m ƒ MEDINA VALLEY MIDDLE S 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

NATALIA ISD NATALIA H S 56 22 39.3 441 445 886 <5h ƒ

MENARD MENARD ISD MENARD H S 20 6 30.0 507 477 983 <5h ƒ

MIDLAND EAGLE ACADEMY OF MI 34 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ EAGLE ACADEMY OF MIDLA 13 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ EAGLE CHARTER SCHOOL - 21 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

GREENWOOD ISD GREENWOOD H S 105 56 53.3 507 489 996 11 19.6

MIDLAND ISD 1,142 589 51.6 543 520 1063 234 39.7 LEE H S 572 323 56.5 547 521 1068 <135m ƒ MIDLAND H S 507 <270m ƒ 538 519 1056 <105m ƒ VIOLA M COLEMAN H S 18 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ MIDLAND EXCEL CAMPUS 45 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

RICHARD MILBURN ACA RICHARD MILBURN ACADEM 36 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MILAM BUCKHOLTS ISD BUCKHOLTS SCHOOL 13 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CAMERON ISD YOE HIGH SCHOOL 83 48 57.8 446 455 901 7 14.6

MILANO ISD MILANO H S 24 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 45 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

MILAM ROCKDALE ISD ROCKDALE H S 88 64 72.7 490 446 936 10 15.6

THORNDALE ISD THORNDALE H S 33 22 66.7 481 488 969 <5h ƒ

MILLS GOLDTHWAITE ISD GOLDTHWAITE HIGH SCHOO 44 14 31.8 534 484 1019 5 35.7

MULLIN ISD MULLIN HIGH SCHOOL 4 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

PRIDDY ISD PRIDDY SCHOOL 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

STAR ISD STAR SCHOOL 6 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MITCHELL COLORADO ISD COLORADO HIGH SCHOOL 52 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LORAINE ISD LORAINE SCHOOL 5 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WESTBROOK ISD WESTBROOK SCHOOL 10 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MONTAGUE BOWIE ISD BOWIE H S 83 45 54.2 474 478 952 5 11.1

FORESTBURG ISD FORESTBURG SCHOOL 8 7 87.5 509 513 1021 <5h ƒ

GOLD BURG ISD GOLD BURG H S 8 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

NOCONA ISD NOCONA H S 53 5 9.4 504 550 1054 <5h ƒ

PRAIRIE VALLEY ISD PRAIRIE VALLEY H S 4 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SAINT JO ISD SAINT JO H S 17 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MONTGOMERY CONROE ISD 2,237 1,581 70.7 549 532 1081 691 43.7 CONROE H S 405 243 60.0 495 479 975 <60m ƒ W L HAUKE ALTER ED 42 5 11.9 428 514 942 <5h ƒ THE WOODLANDS H S 1,104 921 83.4 568 554 1122 480 52.1 OAK RIDGE H S 421 296 70.3 555 535 1090 136 45.9 CANEY CREEK H S 265 116 43.8 500 465 965 <20m ƒ

MAGNOLIA ISD 479 211 44.1 498 493 991 49 23.2 MAGNOLIA H S 447 207 46.3 500 493 993 <50m ƒ ALPHA 32 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ CENTRAL BAPTIST ACAD 0 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MONTGOMERY ISD MONTGOMERY H S 227 155 68.3 519 497 1016 37 23.9

NEW CANEY ISD NEW CANEY H S 276 133 48.2 472 479 951 20 15.0

SPLENDORA ISD SPLENDORA H S 154 67 43.5 473 478 951 12 17.9

WILLIS ISD WILLIS H S 249 118 47.4 484 481 965 21 17.8

MOORE DUMAS ISD 181 6 3.3 487 488 975 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

46 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

MOORE DUMAS ISD DUMAS H S 176 <10m ƒ 487 488 975 <5h ƒ C H A M P S 5 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SUNRAY ISD 28 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ SUNRAY H S 27 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ C H A M P S 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MORRIS DAINGERFIELD-LONE S DAINGERFIELD H S 78 32 41.0 501 476 978 8 25.0

PEWITT CISD PEWITT H S 34 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MOTLEY MOTLEY COUNTY ISD MOTLEY COUNTY SCHOOL 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

NACOGDOCHES CENTRAL HEIGHTS ISD CENTRAL HEIGHTS H S 35 20 57.1 503 478 981 5 25.0

CHIRENO ISD CHIRENO H S 14 8 57.1 405 416 821 <5h ƒ

CUSHING ISD CUSHING SCHOOL 16 5 31.3 556 488 1044 <5h ƒ

DOUGLASS ISD DOUGLASS SCHOOL 25 14 56.0 516 521 1037 7 50.0

GARRISON ISD GARRISON H S 41 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MARTINSVILLE ISD MARTINSVILLE SCHOOL 18 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

NACOGDOCHES ISD NACOGDOCHES H S 299 162 54.2 536 506 1042 65 40.1

WODEN ISD WODEN H S 54 12 22.2 503 521 1024 <5h ƒ

NAVARRO BLOOMING GROVE ISD BLOOMING GROVE H S 52 17 32.7 474 467 941 <5h ƒ

CORSICANA ISD CORSICANA H IGH SCHOOL 248 125 50.4 489 481 970 29 23.2

DAWSON ISD DAWSON H S 21 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

FROST ISD FROST H S 19 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

KERENS ISD KERENS SCHOOL 31 6 19.4 543 505 1048 <5h ƒ

MILDRED ISD MILDRED H S 45 7 15.6 573 506 1079 <5h ƒ

RICE ISD RICE H S 46 21 45.7 496 479 975 <5h ƒ

NEWTON BURKEVILLE ISD BURKEVILLE HIGH SCHOOL 13 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

DEWEYVILLE ISD DEWEYVILLE H S 54 18 33.3 439 437 877 <5h ƒ

NEWTON ISD NEWTON H S 62 14 22.6 457 466 924 <5h ƒ

NOLAN BLACKWELL CISD BLACKWELL SCHOOL 5 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HIGHLAND ISD HIGHLAND SCHOOL 22 12 54.5 501 494 995 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 47 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

NOLAN ROSCOE ISD ROSCOE H S 20 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SWEETWATER ISD 117 <15m ƒ 593 590 1183 6 ƒ SWEETWATER H S 111 <15m ƒ 593 590 1183 <10m ƒ HOBBS ALTER ED CO-OP 6 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

NUECES AGUA DULCE ISD AGUA DULCE H S 22 7 31.8 416 431 847 <5h ƒ

BANQUETE ISD BANQUETE H S 52 11 21.2 465 440 905 <5h ƒ

BISHOP CISD BISHOP H S 53 33 62.3 468 482 950 7 21.2

CALALLEN ISD 301 151 50.2 509 502 1011 41 27.2

CORPUS CHRISTI ISD 1,747 1,048 60.0 476 471 947 229 21.9 CARROLL H S 434 319 73.5 495 488 983 81 25.4 KING H S 423 244 57.7 511 509 1020 82 33.6 MILLER HIGH SCHOOL CTR 197 <105m ƒ 415 397 812 <10m ƒ MOODY H S 288 209 72.6 429 410 840 <20m ƒ RAY H S 377 <180m ƒ 482 502 984 46 ƒ ALTERNATIVE H S CTR 28 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

DR M L GARZA-GONZAL 27 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ DR M L GARZA-GONZALEZ 9 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ ACCELERATED LEARNING C 18 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

FLOUR BLUFF ISD FLOUR BLUFF H S 285 191 67.0 522 501 1023 55 28.8

PORT ARANSAS ISD PORT ARANSAS H S 34 19 55.9 548 547 1096 11 57.9

RICHARD MILBURN ALT RICHARD MILBURN ALTER 51 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

ROBSTOWN ISD 188 <15m ƒ 422 418 840 <5h ƒ ROBSTOWN H S 169 <15m ƒ 422 418 840 <5h ƒ ALTER LRN CTR 19 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TULOSO-MIDWAY ISD 221 66 29.9 504 507 1011 <25m ƒ TULOSO-MIDWAY H S 210 <70m ƒ 504 507 1011 <25m ƒ TULOSO-MIDWAY ACADEMIC 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WEST OSO ISD WEST OSO H S 78 10 12.8 404 389 793 <5h ƒ

OCHILTREE PERRYTON ISD 98 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ PERRYTON H S 93 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ TOP OF TEXAS ACCELERAT 5 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

OLDHAM ADRIAN ISD ADRIAN SCHOOL 5 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BOYS RANCH ISD BOYS RANCH H S 40 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

VEGA ISD VEGA H S 27 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

48 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

ORANGE BRIDGE CITY ISD BRIDGE CITY H S 124 94 75.8 468 468 936 16 17.0

LITTLE CYPRESS-MAUR LIT CYPR-MRCEVILLE H S 235 151 64.3 488 492 980 40 26.5

ORANGEFIELD ISD ORANGEFIELD H S 107 70 65.4 491 476 967 13 18.6

VIDOR ISD 242 119 49.2 466 474 940 <25m ƒ VIDOR H S 223 <120m ƒ 466 474 940 <25m ƒ A I M S CTR H S 19 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WEST ORANGE-COVE CI WEST ORANGE-STARK H S 158 101 63.9 441 431 871 14 13.9

PALO PINTO GORDON ISD GORDON SCHOOL 16 8 50.0 509 523 1031 <5h ƒ

GRAFORD ISD GRAFORD H S 15 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MINERAL WELLS ISD 162 112 69.1 484 469 953 14 12.5 MINERAL WELL H S 159 <115m ƒ 484 469 953 <15m ƒ DREAM ACADEMY 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SANTO ISD SANTO HIGH SCHOOL 31 7 22.6 496 459 954 <5h ƒ

STRAWN ISD STRAWN SCHOOL 19 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

PANOLA BECKVILLE ISD BECKVILLE JR-SR HIGH S 18 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CARTHAGE ISD CARTHAGE H S 146 18 12.3 528 512 1039 6 33.3

GARY ISD GARY SCHOOL 15 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

PANOLA CHARTER SCHO PANOLA CS 43 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

PARKER ALEDO ISD 233 159 68.2 524 517 1041 59 37.1 ALEDO HIGH SCHOOL 202 <160m ƒ 524 517 1041 <60m ƒ ALEDO LEARNING CENTER 31 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BROCK ISD BROCK H S 42 26 61.9 548 488 1036 8 30.8

MILLSAP ISD MILLSAP H S 38 10 26.3 556 498 1054 <5h ƒ

PEASTER ISD PEASTER H S 66 30 45.5 516 492 1008 9 30.0

POOLVILLE ISD POOLVILLE H S 33 8 24.2 458 450 908 <5h ƒ

SPRINGTOWN ISD 173 81 46.8 486 502 988 18 22.2 SPRINGTOWN H S 170 <85m ƒ 486 502 988 <20m ƒ YALE 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WEATHERFORD ISD 375 <150m ƒ 537 513 1051 <60m ƒ WEATHERFORD H S 360 <150m ƒ 537 513 1051 <60m ƒ PASS LEARNING CENTER 15 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 49 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

PARMER BOVINA ISD BOVINA H S 29 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

FARWELL ISD FARWELL H S 26 5 19.2 538 620 1158 <5h ƒ

FRIONA ISD FRIONA H S 54 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LAZBUDDIE ISD LAZBUDDIE SCHOOL 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

PECOS BUENA VISTA ISD BUENA VISTA SCHOOL 5 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

FT STOCKTON ISD 115 43 37.4 485 463 948 8 18.6 FORT STOCKTON H S 112 <45m ƒ 485 463 948 <10m ƒ BUTZ EDUCATION CENTER 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

IRAAN-SHEFFIELD ISD 25 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ IRAAN H S 25 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ T Y C SHEFFIELD CAMPUS 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

POLK BIG SANDY ISD BIG SANDY SCHOOL 29 20 69.0 413 434 847 <5h ƒ

CORRIGAN-CAMDEN ISD CORRIGAN-CAMDEN H S 41 15 36.6 469 440 909 <5h ƒ

GOODRICH ISD GOODRICH H S 15 8 53.3 444 371 815 <5h ƒ

LEGGETT ISD LEGGETT H S 14 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LIVINGSTON ISD LIVINGSTON H S 225 114 50.7 468 462 930 24 21.1

POTTER AMARILLO ISD 1,391 513 36.9 526 520 1046 194 37.8 AMARILLO H S 439 266 60.6 537 539 1076 118 44.4 CAPROCK H S 262 57 21.8 472 450 922 <10m ƒ AMARILLO AREA CTR FOR 4 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ PALO DURO H S 272 <30m ƒ 481 466 948 <5h ƒ TASCOSA H S 411 161 39.2 536 523 1059 64 39.8 NORTH HEIGHTS ALTER 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HIGHLAND PARK ISD HIGHLAND PARK H S 47 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

RICHARD MILBURN ACA RICHARD MILBURN ACADEM 49 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

RIVER ROAD ISD RIVER ROAD HIGH SCHOOL 94 12 12.8 511 533 1044 <5h ƒ

PRESIDIO MARFA ISD MARFA JUNIOR/SENIOR HI 27 12 44.4 488 445 933 <5h ƒ

PRESIDIO ISD PRESIDIO H S 78 49 62.8 429 412 841 <5h ƒ

RAINS RAINS ISD RAINS HIGH SCHOOL 85 5 5.9 556 526 1082 <5h ƒ

RANDALL CANYON ISD 439 148 33.7 530 516 1046 56 37.8 CANYON H S 156 44 28.2 543 547 1091 20 45.5 RANDALL H S 283 104 36.7 524 503 1027 36 34.6

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

50 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

REAGAN REAGAN COUNTY ISD REAGAN COUNTY H S 59 31 52.5 462 452 915 <5h ƒ

REAL BIG SPRINGS CHARTER BIG SPRINGS CHARTER SC 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LEAKEY ISD LEAKEY SCHOOL 10 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

RED RIVER AVERY ISD AVERY H S 23 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CLARKSVILLE ISD CLARKSVILLE H S 51 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

DETROIT ISD DETROIT H S 24 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

RIVERCREST ISD RIVERCREST H S 26 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

REEVES BALMORHEA ISD BALMORHEA SCHOOL 19 16 84.2 448 446 894 <5h ƒ

PECOS-BARSTOW-TOYAH PECOS H S 124 70 56.5 413 417 830 <5h ƒ

REFUGIO AUSTWELL-TIVOLI ISD AUSTWELL-TIVOLI H S 9 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

REFUGIO ISD 83 14 16.9 455 442 897 <5h ƒ REFUGIO HIGH SCHOOL 35 <15m ƒ 455 442 897 <5h ƒ REFUGIO MIDDLE SCHOOL 48 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WOODSBORO ISD WOODSBORO H S 20 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

ROBERTS MIAMI ISD MIAMI SCHOOL 14 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

ROBERTSON BREMOND ISD BREMOND H S 29 27 93.1 448 390 838 <5h ƒ

CALVERT ISD CALVERT H S 10 5 50.0 414 368 782 <5h ƒ

FRANKLIN ISD FRANKLIN H S 63 42 66.7 479 483 962 9 21.4

HEARNE ISD HEARNE H S 49 9 18.4 360 370 730 <5h ƒ

MUMFORD ISD MUMFORD H S 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

ROCKWALL ROCKWALL ISD 560 389 69.5 536 521 1057 154 39.6 ROCKWALL H S 547 <390m ƒ 536 521 1057 <155m ƒ ROCKWALL QUEST ACADEMY 13 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

ROYSE CITY ISD 136 57 41.9 474 452 926 7 12.3 ROYSE CITY H S 132 <60m ƒ 474 452 926 <10m ƒ ALTERNATIVE LEARNING C 4 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

RUNNELS BALLINGER ISD BALLINGER H S 62 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MILES ISD MILES H S 26 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WINTERS ISD WINTERS H S 36 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 51 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

RUSK CARLISLE ISD CARLISLE SCHOOL 24 6 25.0 517 518 1035 <5h ƒ

HENDERSON ISD HENDERSON H S 175 43 24.6 532 506 1037 15 34.9

LANEVILLE ISD LANEVILLE SCHOOL 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LEVERETTS CHAPEL IS LEVERETTS CHAPEL H S 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MOUNT ENTERPRISE IS MT ENTERPRISE H S 21 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

OVERTON ISD OVERTON H S 24 7 29.2 514 504 1019 <5h ƒ

TATUM ISD TATUM H S 74 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WEST RUSK ISD WEST RUSK H S 36 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SABINE HEMPHILL ISD HEMPHILL H S 63 29 46.0 485 448 932 5 17.2

WEST SABINE ISD WEST SABINE H S 33 32 97.0 417 404 822 <5h ƒ

SAN AUGUSTINE BROADDUS ISD BROADDUS H S 17 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SAN AUGUSTINE ISD 56 11 19.6 440 445 885 <5h ƒ SAN AUGUSTINE H S 55 <15m ƒ 440 445 885 <5h ƒ ACCELERATED LRN CTR 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SAN JACINTO COLDSPRING-OAKHURST COLDSPRING-OAKHURST HI 85 37 43.5 435 456 891 <5h ƒ

SHEPHERD ISD SHEPHERD H S 74 44 59.5 443 465 909 6 13.6

SAN PATRICIO ARANSAS PASS ISD ARANSAS PASS HIGH SCHO 88 42 47.7 467 442 910 <5h ƒ

GREGORY-PORTLAND IS GREGORY-PORTLAND H S 246 159 64.6 536 510 1046 67 42.1

INGLESIDE ISD INGLESIDE H S 109 44 40.4 511 495 1006 12 27.3

MATHIS ISD MATHIS H S 83 5 6.0 536 452 988 <5h ƒ

ODEM-EDROY ISD ODEM H S 66 5 7.6 472 496 968 <5h ƒ

SINTON ISD SINTON H S 98 18 18.4 519 468 987 6 33.3

TAFT ISD TAFT H S 64 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SAN SABA CHEROKEE ISD CHEROKEE H S 8 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

RICHLAND SPRINGS IS RICHLAND SPRINGS SCHOO 14 11 78.6 422 447 869 <5h ƒ

SAN SABA ISD SAN SABA H S 44 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SCHLEICHER SCHLEICHER ISD ELDORADO H S 41 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

52 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

SCURRY HERMLEIGH ISD HERMLEIGH SCHOOL 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

IRA ISD IRA SCHOOL 13 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SNYDER ISD 137 16 11.7 543 542 1084 8 50.0 SNYDER H S 135 <20m ƒ 543 542 1084 <10m ƒ HOBBS ALTER ED CO-OP 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SHACKELFORD ALBANY ISD ALBANY JR-SR H S 33 22 66.7 456 443 900 <5h ƒ

MORAN ISD MORAN SCHOOL 6 5 83.3 510 476 986 <5h ƒ

SHELBY CENTER ISD CENTER H S 109 49 45.0 489 479 968 14 28.6

JOAQUIN ISD JOAQUIN H S 33 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SHELBYVILLE ISD SHELBYVILLE SCHOOL 36 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TENAHA ISD TENAHA HIGH SCHOOL 10 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TIMPSON ISD TIMPSON H S 31 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SHERMAN STRATFORD ISD STRATFORD H S 33 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TEXHOMA ISD TEXHOMA EL 4 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SMITH ARP ISD ARP H S 53 30 56.6 421 441 863 <5h ƒ

AZLEWAY CHARTER SCH AZLEWAY CHARTER SCHOOL 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BULLARD ISD BULLARD H S 99 53 53.5 488 494 981 16 30.2

CHAPEL HILL ISD 194 91 46.9 438 450 889 16 17.6 CHAPEL HILL H S 193 <95m ƒ 438 450 889 <20m ƒ WINGS 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

EAGLE ACADEMY OF TY 28 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ EAGLE ACADEMY OF TYLER 25 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ EAGLE ACADEMY OF TYLER 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LINDALE ISD LINDALE H S 189 115 60.8 503 509 1012 30 26.1

TROUP ISD TROUP H S 60 20 33.3 496 492 988 <5h ƒ

TYLER ISD 760 356 46.8 502 496 998 101 28.4 ROBERT E LEE HIGH SCHO 474 310 65.4 514 503 1017 <100m ƒ JOHN TYLER H S 254 40 15.7 437 458 895 <10m ƒ ALVIN V ANDERSON EDUCA 32 6 18.8 338 375 713 <5h ƒ

WHITEHOUSE ISD WHITEHOUSE H S 232 152 65.5 527 511 1038 52 34.2

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 53 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

SMITH WINONA ISD WINONA H S 52 22 42.3 457 459 916 <5h ƒ

SOMERVELL BRAZOS RIVER CHARTE BRAZOS RIVER CHARTER S 53 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

GLEN ROSE ISD GLEN ROSE H S 81 62 76.5 516 490 1007 15 24.2

STARR RIO GRANDE CITY CIS RIO GRANDE CITY H S 359 52 14.5 427 441 868 5 9.6

ROMA ISD 252 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ ROMA H S 244 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ ACCELERATED LRN ACAD 8 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SAN ISIDRO ISD SAN ISIDRO H S 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

STEPHENS BRECKENRIDGE ISD 79 39 49.4 467 454 922 <10m ƒ BRECKENRIDGE H S 77 <40m ƒ 467 454 922 <10m ƒ BRECKENRIDGE ALTER 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

STERLING STERLING CITY ISD STERLING CITY H S 17 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

STONEWALL ASPERMONT ISD ASPERMONT HS 17 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SUTTON SONORA ISD SONORA H S 41 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SWISHER HAPPY ISD HAPPY H S 15 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

KRESS ISD KRESS H S 12 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TULIA ISD TULIA H S 73 5 6.8 632 632 1264 <5h ƒ

TARRANT ARLINGTON ISD 3,054 1,897 62.1 522 506 1028 646 34.1 ARLINGTON H S 514 340 66.1 521 513 1034 121 35.6 SAM HOUSTON H S 412 <145m ƒ 464 449 913 <20m ƒ LAMAR H S 534 368 68.9 536 517 1053 143 38.9 BOWIE H S 434 299 68.9 503 483 986 79 26.4 MARTIN H S 741 531 71.7 555 536 1091 243 45.8 VENTURE ALTER H S 78 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ SEGUIN H S 341 214 62.8 485 475 960 <45m ƒ

AZLE ISD AZLE H S 327 153 46.8 497 503 1000 43 28.1

BIRDVILLE ISD 1,168 584 50.0 513 503 1016 172 29.5 HALTOM H S 437 <185m ƒ 499 484 983 <35m ƒ RICHLAND H S 365 187 51.2 530 517 1047 75 40.1 SHANNON LRN CTR 0 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ BIRDVILLE HIGH SCHOOL 366 213 58.2 513 507 1020 <70m ƒ

CARROLL ISD CARROLL SENIOR HIGH SC 499 494 99.0 567 551 1118 251 50.8

CASTLEBERRY ISD 159 70 44.0 477 458 935 8 11.4 CASTLEBERRY H S 145 <70m ƒ 478 458 936 <10m ƒ REACH H S 14 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

54 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

TARRANT CROWLEY ISD 685 509 74.3 509 501 1010 151 29.7 CROWLEY H S 313 209 66.8 496 483 979 46 22.0 NORTH CROWLEY H S 372 300 80.6 519 513 1031 105 35.0

EAGLE ACADEMY OF FO EAGLE ACADEMY OF FT WO 10 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

EAGLE MT-SAGINAW IS 433 <195m ƒ 518 510 1028 61 ƒ BOSWELL H S 419 <195m ƒ 518 510 1028 <65m ƒ WATSON LEARNING CENTER 14 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

ERATH EXCELS ACADEM ERATH EXCELS ACADEMY I 39 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

EVERMAN ISD EVERMAN H S 158 58 36.7 454 443 898 6 10.3

FORT WORTH ACADEMY FORT WORTH ACADEMY OF 17 17 100 551 576 1127 7 41.2

FORT WORTH CAN ACAD 149 11 7.4 371 413 784 <5h ƒ FORT WORTH CAN ACADEMY 90 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ RIVER OAKS 59 <10m ƒ 360 394 754 <5h ƒ

FORT WORTH ISD 3,252 1,608 49.4 473 462 936 377 23.4 CARTER-RIVERSIDE H S 140 64 45.7 409 390 798 <5h ƒ ARLINGTON HEIGHTS H S 370 242 65.4 522 516 1038 98 40.5 SOUTH HILLS HIGH SCHOO 212 67 31.6 443 406 849 5 7.5 DIAMOND HILL-JARVIS H 149 45 30.2 446 392 838 <5h ƒ DUNBAR H S 170 93 54.7 437 429 866 13 14.0 EASTERN HILLS H S 229 98 42.8 414 405 819 6 6.1 NORTH SIDE H S 221 71 32.1 456 468 925 10 14.1 POLYTECHNIC HIGH SCHOO 147 81 55.1 394 343 738 <5h ƒ PASCHAL H S 441 272 61.7 546 542 1087 130 47.8 TRIMBLE TECHNICAL H S 324 153 47.2 412 409 820 5 3.3 SOUTHWEST H S 263 172 65.4 501 498 999 51 29.7 WESTERN HILLS H S 277 146 52.7 514 500 1015 53 36.3 O D WYATT H S 188 99 52.7 395 379 774 <5h ƒ CTR FOR NEW LIVES 29 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ METRO OPPORTUNITY 0 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ SUCCESS H S 89 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ JAMES MIDDLE 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ MEADOWBROOK MIDDLE 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ WEDGWOOD MIDDLE 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

GRAPEVINE-COLLEYVIL 959 812 84.7 552 545 1097 375 46.2 GRAPEVINE H S 434 <385m ƒ 552 547 1099 <185m ƒ COLLEYVILLE HERITAGE H 506 <435m ƒ 551 544 1095 <195m ƒ THE BRIDGES ACAD ALTER 19 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HURST-EULESS-BEDFOR 1,191 736 61.8 526 511 1036 252 34.2 BELL H S 565 <340m ƒ 520 518 1037 <115m ƒ TRINITY H S 594 399 67.2 531 505 1036 <140m ƒ KEYS CTR 32 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 55 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

TARRANT KELLER ISD 1,233 867 70.3 529 519 1048 328 37.8 KELLER H S 603 489 81.1 539 531 1070 <210m ƒ FOSSIL RIDGE H S 620 <375m ƒ 516 505 1021 <125m ƒ CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ NEW DIRECTION LRN CTR 9 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

KENNEDALE ISD KENNEDALE H S 158 94 59.5 505 490 994 27 28.7

LAKE WORTH ISD 97 <45m ƒ 458 454 912 <5h ƒ LAKE WORTH H S 86 <45m ƒ 458 454 912 <5h ƒ ANNE MANSFIELD SULLIVA 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MANSFIELD ISD 1,134 615 54.2 506 502 1008 177 28.8 SUMMIT HIGH SCHOOL 556 308 55.4 505 495 999 <85m ƒ MANSFIELD HIGH SCHOOL 447 <270m ƒ 515 517 1032 87 ƒ MANSFIELD TIMBERVIEW H 105 <40m ƒ 461 454 915 <10m ƒ ALTER ED CTR 26 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MASONIC HOME ISD MASONIC HOME HIGH SCHO 11 6 54.5 410 408 818 <5h ƒ

RICHARD MILBURN ACA RICHARD MILBURN ACADEM 22 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

THERESA B LEE ACADE THERESA B LEE ACADEMY 70 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TREETOPS SCHOOL INT TREETOPS SCHOOL INTERN 9 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WHITE SETTLEMENT IS 232 <110m ƒ 479 475 954 <20m ƒ BREWER H S 218 <110m ƒ 479 475 954 <20m ƒ MESA HIGH SCHOOL 10 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ WHITE SETTLEMENT DISCI 4 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TAYLOR ABILENE ISD 793 428 54.0 510 507 1017 130 30.4 ABILENE H S 385 <240m ƒ 508 508 1017 <80m ƒ COOPER H S 365 <195m ƒ 512 506 1018 <55m ƒ WOODSON CENTER FOR EXC 39 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ SP ED HOMEBOUND 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ SP ED O J T 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

EAGLE ACADEMY OF AB EAGLE ACADEMY OF ABILE 34 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

JIM NED CISD JIM NED H S 75 50 66.7 494 491 985 13 26.0

MERKEL ISD MERKEL H S 74 19 25.7 508 516 1024 7 36.8

TRENT ISD TRENT SCHOOL 10 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WYLIE ISD WYLIE H S 182 128 70.3 543 517 1059 48 37.5

TERRELL TERRELL COUNTY ISD SANDERSON H S 14 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TERRY BROWNFIELD ISD BROWNFIELD H S 101 16 15.8 468 443 911 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

56 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

TERRY MEADOW ISD MEADOW SCHOOL 17 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WELLMAN-UNION CISD WELLMAN-UNION SCHOOL 12 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

THROCKMORTON THROCKMORTON ISD THROCKMORTON H S 21 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WOODSON ISD WOODSON SCHOOL 12 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TITUS CHAPEL HILL ISD CHAPEL HILL H S 58 15 25.9 461 485 946 <5h ƒ

MOUNT PLEASANT ISD 226 52 23.0 513 473 985 9 17.3 MT PLEASANT H S 204 <55m ƒ 513 473 985 <10m ƒ ALTER ED 22 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TOM GREEN CHRISTOVAL ISD CHRISTOVAL H S 28 9 32.1 529 479 1008 <5h ƒ

GRAPE CREEK ISD 57 36 63.2 498 483 981 <10m ƒ GRAPE CREEK H S 56 <40m ƒ 498 483 981 <10m ƒ FAIRVIEW ACCELERATED 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SAN ANGELO ISD 826 409 49.5 498 490 987 110 26.9 CENTRAL H S 622 323 51.9 505 501 1006 97 30.0 LAKE VIEW H S 204 86 42.2 470 447 917 13 15.1

VERIBEST ISD 17 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ VERIBEST H S 16 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ FAIRVIEW SPECIAL PROGR 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WALL ISD 56 8 14.3 538 605 1143 6 75.0 WALL H S 54 <10m ƒ 538 605 1143 <10m ƒ FAIRVIEW ACCELERATED 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ WALL MIDDLE 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WATER VALLEY ISD 20 11 55.0 493 444 936 <5h ƒ WATER VALLEY H S 19 <15m ƒ 493 444 936 <5h ƒ WATER VALLEY ACCELERAT 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TRAVIS AMERICAN YOUTHWORKS 121 <10m ƒ 462 456 918 <5h ƒ AMERICAN YOUTHWORKS CH 61 <10m ƒ 462 456 918 <5h ƒ AMERICAN YOUTHWORKS CH 60 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

AUSTIN CAN ACADEMY AUSTIN CAN ACADEMY CHA 29 5 17.2 474 432 906 <5h ƒ

AUSTIN ISD 3,276 2,285 69.7 526 510 1036 917 40.1 AUSTIN H S 415 359 86.5 562 544 1106 185 51.5 JOHNSTON H S 110 41 37.3 407 382 789 <5h ƒ LANIER H S 244 164 67.2 411 385 796 <10m ƒ MCCALLUM H S 286 196 68.5 551 552 1103 105 53.6 REAGAN H S 126 52 41.3 417 398 814 <5h ƒ TRAVIS H S 212 82 38.7 440 438 878 9 11.0 CROCKETT H S 296 193 65.2 452 456 907 27 14.0 ANDERSON H S 374 332 88.8 587 549 1135 195 58.7

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 57 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

TRAVIS AUSTIN ISD JOHNSON H S 307 273 88.9 560 553 1113 151 55.3 BOWIE H S 482 415 86.1 559 533 1092 201 48.4 GONZALO GARZA INDEPEND 81 <30m ƒ 470 520 990 8 ƒ AKINS HIGH SCHOOL 341 152 44.6 468 468 936 28 18.4 TRAVIS COUNTY JUVENILE 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ PHOENIX ACADEMY 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

DEL VALLE ISD 337 132 39.2 446 433 879 16 12.1 DEL VALLE H S 318 <135m ƒ 446 433 879 <20m ƒ DEL VALLE OPPORTUNITY 19 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

EANES ISD WESTLAKE H S 538 536 99.6 605 585 1190 375 70.0

FRUIT OF EXCELLENCE FRUIT OF EXCELLENCE SC 5 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LAGO VISTA ISD LAGO VISTA H S 60 40 66.7 553 544 1097 20 50.0

LAKE TRAVIS ISD LAKE TRAVIS H S 295 255 86.4 572 571 1143 143 56.1

MANOR ISD 132 58 43.9 447 450 897 <5h ƒ MANOR H S 124 <60m ƒ 447 450 897 <5h ƒ EXCEL HIGH SCHOOL 8 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

NYOS CHARTER SCHOOL NYOS CHARTER SCHOOL 16 14 87.5 516 535 1051 5 35.7

PFLUGERVILLE ISD 837 587 70.1 515 500 1015 176 30.0 PFLUGERVILLE H S 457 <340m ƒ 532 512 1044 <120m ƒ JOHN B CONNALLY H S 379 <250m ƒ 492 484 976 <60m ƒ HENDRICKSON HS 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

STAR CHARTER SCHOOL STAR CHARTER SCHOOL 8 6 75.0 573 598 1172 <5h ƒ

TEXAS EMPOWERMENT A TEXAS EMPOWERMENT ACAD 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

UNIVERSITY CHARTER 8 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ MARYWOOD 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ MIRACLE FARM 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ ANNUNCIATION MATERNITY 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ TNC CAMPUS (TEXAS NEUR 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ SAN MARCOS TREATMENT C 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT 0 5 ƒ 494 562 1056 <5h ƒ

TRINITY APPLE SPRINGS ISD APPLE SPRINGS H S 13 7 53.8 450 470 920 <5h ƒ

CENTERVILLE ISD CENTERVILLE H S 21 7 33.3 401 439 840 <5h ƒ

GROVETON ISD GROVETON J H-H S 25 22 88.0 461 472 934 <5h ƒ

TRINITY ISD TRINITY H S 72 32 44.4 460 443 903 <5h ƒ

TYLER CHESTER ISD CHESTER H S 11 9 81.8 458 479 937 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

58 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

TYLER COLMESNEIL ISD COLMESNEIL H S 28 22 78.6 475 465 940 <5h ƒ

SPURGER ISD SPURGER H S 29 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WARREN ISD WARREN H S 60 31 51.7 471 457 928 <5h ƒ

WOODVILLE ISD WOODVILLE H S 64 55 85.9 461 437 899 7 12.7

UPSHUR BIG SANDY ISD BIG SANDY H S 19 5 26.3 558 502 1060 <5h ƒ

GILMER ISD GILMER H S 115 20 17.4 489 498 987 5 25.0

HARMONY ISD HARMONY H S 66 14 21.2 516 486 1002 <5h ƒ

NEW DIANA ISD NEW DIANA H S 50 14 28.0 544 525 1069 5 35.7

ORE CITY ISD ORE CITY HIGH SCHOOL 33 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

UNION GROVE ISD UNION GROVE H S 38 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

UNION HILL ISD UNION HILL H S 19 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

UPTON MCCAMEY ISD MCCAMEY H S 28 8 28.6 499 443 941 <5h ƒ

RANKIN ISD RANKIN H S 16 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

UVALDE GABRIEL TAFOLLA CHA GABRIEL TAFOLLA CHARTE 4 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

KNIPPA ISD KNIPPA SCHOOL 8 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SABINAL ISD SABINAL H S 24 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

UTOPIA ISD UTOPIA SCHOOL 20 14 70.0 569 514 1082 5 35.7

UVALDE CISD 244 101 41.4 457 446 903 14 13.9 UVALDE H S 234 <105m ƒ 457 446 903 <15m ƒ EXCEL ACADEMY 10 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

VAL VERDE COMSTOCK ISD COMSTOCK SCHOOL 6 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

EAGLE ACADEMY OF DE EAGLE ACADEMY OF DEL R 9 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SAN FELIPE-DEL RIO DEL RIO H S 401 147 36.7 496 478 973 32 21.8

VAN ZANDT CANTON ISD CANTON H S 79 38 48.1 528 536 1064 15 39.5

EDGEWOOD ISD EDGEWOOD H S 58 32 55.2 492 487 979 5 15.6

FRUITVALE ISD FRUITVALE H S 20 5 25.0 420 398 818 <5h ƒ

GRAND SALINE ISD GRAND SALINE H S 72 21 29.2 496 505 1001 6 28.6

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 59 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

VAN ZANDT MARTINS MILL ISD MARTINS MILL H S 28 17 60.7 500 483 983 <5h ƒ

RANCH ACADEMY RANCH ACADEMY 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

VAN ISD VAN H S 127 62 48.8 479 497 976 11 17.7

WILLS POINT ISD WILLS POINT H S 121 30 24.8 496 517 1013 9 30.0

VICTORIA BLOOMINGTON ISD BLOOMINGTON H S 34 6 17.6 493 515 1008 <5h ƒ

VICTORIA ISD 673 271 40.3 496 500 996 74 27.3 PROFIT ACADEMIC CTR FO 23 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL S 650 <275m ƒ 496 500 996 <75m ƒ

WALKER HUNTSVILLE ISD 374 173 46.3 490 476 966 37 21.4 HUNTSVILLE H S 361 <175m ƒ 490 476 966 <40m ƒ WESTMORELAND LEARNING 13 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

NEW WAVERLY ISD NEW WAVERLY H S 51 14 27.5 456 476 933 <5h ƒ

WALLER HEMPSTEAD ISD HEMPSTEAD H S 53 30 56.6 461 439 900 5 16.7

ROYAL ISD ROYAL H S 68 10 14.7 505 469 974 <5h ƒ

WALLER ISD WALLER H S 241 105 43.6 491 479 969 25 23.8

WARD GRANDFALLS-ROYALTY GRANDFALLS-ROYALTY SCH 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MONAHANS-WICKETT-PY 117 <15m ƒ 543 525 1068 <5h ƒ MONAHANS H S 112 <15m ƒ 543 525 1068 <5h ƒ MONAHANS ED CTR 5 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WASHINGTON BRENHAM ISD 297 144 48.5 503 503 1006 <45m ƒ BRENHAM HIGH SCHOOL 294 <145m ƒ 503 503 1006 <45m ƒ BRENHAM ALTERNATIVE 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BURTON ISD BURTON H S 24 12 50.0 491 460 951 <5h ƒ

WEBB EAGLE ACADEMY OF LA EAGLE ACADEMY OF LARED 13 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

GATEWAY (STUDENT AL GATEWAY ACADEMY (STUDE 101 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LAREDO ISD 817 397 48.6 417 388 804 17 4.3 MARTIN H S 252 136 54.0 414 387 801 7 5.1 NIXON H S 326 143 43.9 430 411 840 <10m ƒ DR LEO CIGARROA H S 237 <120m ƒ 403 362 765 <5h ƒ F S LARA ACADEMY 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

UNITED ISD 1,357 1,034 76.2 421 411 833 59 5.7 UNITED H S 449 368 82.0 437 432 869 27 7.3 UNITED SOUTH H S 257 204 79.4 412 386 799 <10m ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

60 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

WEBB UNITED ISD J B ALEXANDER HIGH SCH 390 301 77.2 431 433 864 <30m ƒ LYNDON B JOHNSON 261 161 61.7 380 357 736 <5h ƒ

WEBB CISD BRUNI H S 15 14 93.3 442 413 855 <5h ƒ

WHARTON BOLING ISD BOLING H S 55 22 40.0 465 470 934 <5h ƒ

EAST BERNARD ISD EAST BERNARD H S 48 25 52.1 488 494 982 6 24.0

EL CAMPO ISD EL CAMPO H S 230 112 48.7 470 462 932 17 15.2

LOUISE ISD LOUISE H S 27 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WHARTON ISD WHARTON H S 125 33 26.4 539 531 1070 13 39.4

WHEELER FORT ELLIOTT CISD FORT ELLIOTT SCHOOL 9 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SHAMROCK ISD SHAMROCK H S 25 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WHEELER ISD WHEELER SCHOOL 23 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WICHITA BRIGHT IDEAS CHARTE BRIGHT IDEAS CHARTER 6 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BURKBURNETT ISD 196 77 39.3 489 484 974 <20m ƒ BURKBURNETT H S 187 <80m ƒ 489 484 974 <20m ƒ ALTER ED CTR 9 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CITY VIEW ISD CITY VIEW JUNIOR/SENIO 41 18 43.9 483 487 970 <5h ƒ

ELECTRA ISD ELECTRA H S 33 5 15.2 476 510 986 <5h ƒ

IOWA PARK CISD IOWA PARK H S 117 30 25.6 526 504 1030 9 30.0

WICHITA FALLS ISD 785 421 53.6 512 510 1022 135 32.1 HIRSCHI HS 161 <85m ƒ 496 492 988 <25m ƒ RIDER H S 321 203 63.2 511 505 1016 62 30.5 WICHITA FALLS H S 280 133 47.5 526 531 1057 <50m ƒ HARRELL ACCELERATED LE 23 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WILBARGER HARROLD ISD HARROLD SCHOOL 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

NORTHSIDE ISD NORTHSIDE SCHOOL 10 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

VERNON ISD 121 21 17.4 498 498 995 <10m ƒ VERNON H S 120 <25m ƒ 498 498 995 <10m ƒ NORTH TEXAS STATE HOSP 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WILLACY LYFORD CISD LYFORD H S 85 25 29.4 393 394 788 <5h ƒ

RAYMONDVILLE ISD RAYMONDVILLE H S 114 67 58.8 419 401 820 <5h ƒ

SAN PERLITA ISD SAN PERLITA H S 17 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 61 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

WILLIAMSON FLORENCE ISD FLORENCE H S 64 31 48.4 494 480 974 7 22.6

GEORGETOWN ISD 503 355 70.6 533 524 1057 149 42.0 GEORGETOWN H S 480 <355m ƒ 534 524 1058 <150m ƒ CHIP RICHARTE H S 23 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

GRANGER ISD GRANGER SCHOOL 35 22 62.9 486 457 943 <5h ƒ

HUTTO ISD HUTTO H S 99 63 63.6 507 497 1003 18 28.6

JARRELL ISD JARRELL H S 34 19 55.9 513 482 994 5 26.3

LEANDER ISD 889 624 70.2 533 522 1055 262 42.0 LEANDER H S 389 <240m ƒ 514 499 1013 <80m ƒ CEDAR PARK H S 486 <390m ƒ 545 537 1081 <185m ƒ NEW HOPE HIGH SCHOOL 14 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LIBERTY HILL ISD LIBERTY HILL H S 125 83 66.4 508 504 1012 21 25.3

ROUND ROCK ISD 2,047 1,598 78.1 551 537 1088 733 45.9 ROUND ROCK H S 402 323 80.3 523 515 1038 <120m ƒ ROUND ROCK OPPORT CTR 0 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ WESTWOOD H S 580 535 92.2 597 580 1177 342 63.9 MCNEIL H S 519 430 82.9 548 531 1079 184 42.8 STONY POINT HIGH SCHOO 512 <310m ƒ 507 493 1000 <95m ƒ SUCCESS PROGRAM WEST 10 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ SUCCESS PROGRAM EAST 24 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TAYLOR ISD TAYLOR H S 158 73 46.2 495 463 958 11 15.1

THRALL ISD THRALL H S 31 16 51.6 453 439 892 <5h ƒ

WILSON FLORESVILLE ISD 192 <65m ƒ 474 491 965 <15m ƒ FLORESVILLE H S 189 <65m ƒ 474 491 965 <15m ƒ FLORESVILLE CHOICE PRO 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LA VERNIA ISD LA VERNIA HIGH SCHOOL 144 74 51.4 501 472 973 15 20.3

POTH ISD POTH H S 43 28 65.1 468 461 929 5 17.9

STOCKDALE ISD STOCKDALE H S 30 17 56.7 448 468 916 <5h ƒ

WINKLER KERMIT ISD KERMIT H S 75 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WINK-LOVING ISD WINK H S 14 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WISE ALVORD ISD ALVORD H S 34 23 67.6 484 464 948 <5h ƒ

BOYD ISD BOYD H S 73 38 52.1 466 451 917 6 15.8

BRIDGEPORT ISD 129 64 49.6 498 480 978 12 18.8

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

62 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 1 SAT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒMean scoreƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Math. Verbal Comb. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

WISE BRIDGEPORT ISD BRIDGEPORT H S 122 <65m ƒ 498 480 978 <15m ƒ BRIDGEPORT ACE HIGH SC 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CHICO ISD CHICO HIGH SCHOOL 36 15 41.7 516 471 987 <5h ƒ

DECATUR ISD 176 66 37.5 511 496 1008 <30m ƒ DECATUR H S 169 <70m ƒ 511 496 1008 <30m ƒ CATES HIGH SCHOOL 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

PARADISE ISD PARADISE H S 63 33 52.4 543 499 1042 11 33.3

SLIDELL ISD SLIDELL J H / H S 20 8 40.0 446 456 903 <5h ƒ

WOOD ALBA-GOLDEN ISD ALBA-GOLDEN H S 36 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HAWKINS ISD HAWKINS H S 45 16 35.6 511 484 995 <5h ƒ

MINEOLA ISD MINEOLA H S 69 13 18.8 498 505 1004 <5h ƒ

QUITMAN ISD 70 <45m ƒ 488 472 959 7 ƒ QUITMAN H S 68 <45m ƒ 488 472 959 <10m ƒ WOOD CO ALTER 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WINNSBORO ISD WINNSBORO H S 88 19 21.6 530 497 1027 5 26.3

YANTIS ISD YANTIS SCHOOL 20 7 35.0 517 511 1029 <5h ƒ

YOAKUM DENVER CITY ISD DENVER CITY H S 99 16 16.2 467 459 926 <5h ƒ

PLAINS ISD PLAINS H S 23 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

YOUNG GRAHAM ISD 150 41 27.3 520 498 1018 13 31.7 GRAHAM H S 141 <45m ƒ 520 498 1018 <15m ƒ GRAHAM LEARNING CTR 9 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

NEWCASTLE ISD NEWCASTLE H S 10 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

OLNEY ISD OLNEY H S 44 13 29.5 560 550 1110 7 53.8

ZAPATA ZAPATA COUNTY ISD ZAPATA H S 116 8 6.9 568 521 1089 <5h ƒ

ZAVALA CRYSTAL CITY ISD CRYSTAL CITY H S 99 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LA PRYOR ISD LA PRYOR H S 24 17 70.8 378 369 747 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 63

64 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 ACT Results for Districts and Campuses

Table 2. ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005

District and Campus Supplement 65 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

ANDERSON CAYUGA ISD CAYUGA H S 28 6 21.4 20.5 17.0 20.2 18.7 19.2 <5h ƒ

ELKHART ISD ELKHART H S 58 7 12.1 17.0 19.6 19.1 18.7 18.9 <5h ƒ

FRANKSTON ISD FRANKSTON H S 53 7 13.2 20.1 19.1 19.1 19.0 19.4 <5h ƒ

NECHES ISD NECHES H S 12 5 41.7 18.6 17.2 20.0 20.2 19.2 <5h ƒ

PALESTINE ISD PALESTINE HIGH SCHO 157 34 21.7 18.8 20.4 20.9 20.2 20.1 10 29.4

SLOCUM ISD SLOCUM H S 15 8 53.3 20.8 20.8 22.5 20.0 21.1 <5h ƒ

WESTWOOD ISD WESTWOOD H S 85 46 54.1 17.6 18.7 18.7 19.0 18.7 6 13.0

ANDREWS ANDREWS ISD ANDREWS HIGH SCHOOL 174 43 24.7 19.6 20.3 20.4 19.5 20.0 7 16.3

ANGELINA CENTRAL ISD 73 18 24.7 18.3 16.8 18.9 17.1 18.0 <5h ƒ CENTRAL H S 70 <20m ƒ 18.3 16.8 18.9 17.1 18.0 <5h ƒ STUBBLEFIELD LRN CT 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

DIBOLL ISD 99 53 53.5 16.4 17.9 17.8 17.8 17.6 <10m ƒ DIBOLL H S 98 <55m ƒ 16.4 17.9 17.8 17.8 17.6 <10m ƒ STUBBLEFIELD LRN CT 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HUDSON ISD 137 <40m ƒ 19.4 19.6 21.1 19.1 19.9 <10m ƒ HUDSON H S 135 <40m ƒ 19.4 19.6 21.1 19.1 19.9 <10m ƒ STUBBLEFIELD LRN CT 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HUNTINGTON ISD 89 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ HUNTINGTON H S 78 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ PRIDE ALTER SCH 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LUFKIN ISD 411 <75m ƒ 15.7 17.7 16.9 17.6 17.1 6 ƒ LUFKIN H S 405 <75m ƒ 15.7 17.7 16.9 17.6 17.1 <10m ƒ STUBBLEFIELD LRN CT 6 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

ZAVALLA ISD ZAVALLA H S 25 10 40.0 20.4 17.8 19.8 18.5 19.2 <5h ƒ

ARANSAS ARANSAS COUNTY ROCKPORT-FULTON H S 207 91 44.0 19.7 21.5 21.6 21.2 21.1 32 35.2

ARCHER ARCHER CITY ISD ARCHER CITY H S 29 11 37.9 21.0 21.2 22.5 20.2 21.4 <5h ƒ

HOLLIDAY ISD HOLLIDAY H S 69 52 75.4 20.6 20.4 21.3 20.7 20.8 12 23.1

MEGARGEL ISD MEGARGEL SCHOOL 5 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WINDTHORST ISD WINDTHORST H S 30 23 76.7 22.1 23.7 22.0 22.1 22.6 8 34.8

ARMSTRONG CLAUDE ISD CLAUDE H S 16 7 43.8 21.0 22.4 23.4 21.1 22.0 <5h ƒ

ATASCOSA CHARLOTTE ISD CHARLOTTE H S 17 5 29.4 18.2 19.6 18.0 18.6 18.6 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

66 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

ATASCOSA JOURDANTON ISD JOURDANTON H S 53 35 66.0 18.8 18.8 20.3 21.4 20.0 7 20.0

LYTLE ISD LYTLE H S 81 11 13.6 19.5 22.7 20.7 21.6 21.4 <5h ƒ

PLEASANTON ISD PLEASANTON H S 176 94 53.4 18.7 20.1 20.1 20.8 20.1 18 19.1

POTEET ISD POTEET H S 82 13 15.9 17.8 17.9 18.4 18.8 18.3 <5h ƒ

AUSTIN BELLVILLE ISD BELLVILLE H S 133 58 43.6 19.4 19.9 19.4 19.5 19.7 14 24.1

BRAZOS ISD BRAZOS H S 44 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SEALY ISD SEALY H S 120 49 40.8 19.7 20.8 20.2 21.2 20.6 12 24.5

BAILEY MULESHOE ISD 92 64 69.6 19.6 21.1 20.5 20.0 20.4 13 20.3 MULESHOE H S 90 <65m ƒ 19.6 21.1 20.5 20.0 20.4 <15m ƒ P E P 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BANDERA BANDERA ISD BANDERA H S 136 61 44.9 20.0 21.3 21.7 20.6 21.0 17 27.9

MEDINA ISD MEDINA H S 21 10 47.6 19.7 19.3 21.3 19.4 20.0 <5h ƒ

BASTROP BASTROP ISD 393 59 15.0 18.4 19.5 19.8 19.9 19.5 <15m ƒ BASTROP H S 381 <60m ƒ 18.4 19.5 19.8 19.9 19.5 <15m ƒ GENESIS H S 12 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

ELGIN ISD 176 19 10.8 20.3 19.7 20.2 20.7 20.2 <10m ƒ ELGIN H S 164 <20m ƒ 20.3 19.7 20.2 20.7 20.2 <10m ƒ PHOENIX HIGH SCHOOL 12 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SMITHVILLE ISD SMITHVILLE H S 91 38 41.8 19.9 21.3 21.5 20.5 21.0 9 23.7

BAYLOR SEYMOUR ISD SEYMOUR H S 27 22 81.5 21.5 22.2 20.6 21.3 21.5 7 31.8

BEE BEEVILLE ISD 233 121 51.9 15.8 17.8 16.9 18.2 17.3 <5h ƒ A C JONES HIGH SCHO 220 <125m ƒ 15.8 17.8 16.9 18.2 17.3 <5h ƒ LEARNING RESOURCE C 13 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

PETTUS ISD PETTUS H S 33 17 51.5 18.6 17.4 20.5 19.4 19.1 <5h ƒ

SKIDMORE-TYNAN SKIDMORE-TYNAN H S 46 22 47.8 19.2 18.3 18.9 19.5 19.1 <5h ƒ

BELL ACADEMY ISD ACADEMY H S 56 20 35.7 20.5 22.6 20.8 22.1 21.6 7 35.0

BARTLETT ISD BARTLETT H S 23 5 21.7 18.0 16.4 16.6 16.4 17.0 <5h ƒ

BELTON ISD 402 398 99.0 17.5 19.7 18.4 18.8 18.7 83 20.9 BELTON H S 382 373 97.6 17.6 19.8 18.5 19.0 18.9 <85m ƒ HENRY T WASKOW HIGH 20 25 125 15.9 17.2 16.1 16.2 16.5 <5h ƒ

CEDAR CREST SCH CEDAR CREST CHARTER 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 67 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

BELL HOLLAND ISD HOLLAND H S 37 21 56.8 20.3 20.5 20.0 20.4 20.4 <5h ƒ

KILLEEN ISD 1,355 357 26.3 18.4 19.4 19.5 19.3 19.3 63 17.6 KILLEEN HIGH SCHOOL 229 <70m ƒ 16.9 18.2 18.2 17.9 17.9 <10m ƒ ELLISON HIGH SCHOOL 326 81 24.8 19.1 20.0 20.1 20.0 19.9 19 23.5 PATHWAYS LEARNING C 36 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ HARKER HEIGHTS HIGH 392 130 33.2 19.5 20.4 20.6 20.1 20.3 31 23.8 SHOEMAKER HIGH SCHO 372 <80m ƒ 17.2 18.2 18.3 18.5 18.2 <10m ƒ

RICHARD MILBURN RICHARD MILBURN ALT 59 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

ROGERS ISD ROGERS H S 61 24 39.3 20.5 21.4 20.8 21.1 21.1 7 29.2

SALADO ISD SALADO H S 64 32 50.0 21.4 22.7 21.4 21.7 22.0 13 40.6

TEMPLE EDUCATIO TEMPLE EDUCATION CE 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TEMPLE ISD TEMPLE H S 370 128 34.6 19.8 21.1 21.2 20.9 20.9 34 26.6

TRANSFORMATIVE TRANSFORMATIVE CHAR 28 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TROY ISD TROY HIGH SCHOOL 76 33 43.4 19.7 20.6 20.5 20.4 20.5 7 21.2

BEXAR ACADEMY OF CARE ACADEMY OF CAREERS 25 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

ALAMO HEIGHTS I ALAMO HEIGHTS H S 304 132 43.4 22.8 23.0 23.4 22.3 23.0 59 44.7

EAGLE ACADEMY O EAGLE ACADEMY OF SA 25 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

EAST CENTRAL IS EAST CENTRAL H S 362 94 26.0 18.8 19.6 19.7 20.4 19.8 15 16.0

EDGEWOOD ISD 413 51 12.3 14.5 17.2 15.7 17.4 16.4 <5h ƒ JOHN F KENNEDY HIGH 213 14 6.6 15.1 17.6 15.9 17.5 16.6 <5h ƒ MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOO 186 26 14.0 13.7 17.0 15.2 17.4 16.0 <5h ƒ EDGEWOOD ACADEMY 14 11 78.6 15.8 17.3 16.7 17.4 16.8 <5h ƒ

FT SAM HOUSTON ROBERT G COLE JR-SR 44 13 29.5 22.3 22.5 23.3 23.2 23.0 6 46.2

GEORGE GERVIN A 50 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ GEORGE GERVIN CHART 31 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ THE EDUCATION AND T 19 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

GEORGE I SANCHE GEORGE I SANCHEZ CH 25 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HARLANDALE ISD 593 70 11.8 16.2 17.2 17.6 18.0 17.4 <5h ƒ HARLANDALE H S 269 <40m ƒ 14.4 16.8 16.5 17.6 16.5 <5h ƒ MCCOLLUM HIGH SCHOO 272 <35m ƒ 18.2 17.6 18.8 18.5 18.3 <5h ƒ FRANK M TEJEDA ACAD 52 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

JOHN H WOOD CHA 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ JOHN H WOOD JR CHAR 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

68 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

BEXAR JOHN H WOOD CHA JOHN H WOOD JR CHAR 8 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ JOHN H WOOD JR CHAR 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

JUBILEE ACADEMI 14 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ JUBILEE ACADEMIC CE 9 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ OMEGA ACADEMIC CENT 5 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

JUDSON ISD 815 166 20.4 18.3 18.9 19.9 19.7 19.3 32 19.3 JUDSON HIGH SCHOOL 785 <170m ƒ 18.3 19.0 19.9 19.7 19.3 <35m ƒ JUDSON LEARNING ACA 30 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LACKLAND ISD VIRGINIA ALLRED STA 22 11 50.0 25.4 24.1 25.4 23.1 24.5 6 54.5

NORTH EAST ISD 3,020 545 18.0 21.0 21.4 21.9 21.4 21.5 190 34.9 LEE H S 319 35 11.0 18.9 18.7 19.5 18.8 19.1 9 25.7 MACARTHUR H S 479 84 17.5 21.0 21.8 21.7 21.7 21.6 28 33.3 CHURCHILL H S 563 107 19.0 21.2 22.0 22.1 21.5 21.8 41 38.3 ROOSEVELT H S 405 66 16.3 17.8 18.7 19.1 19.6 19.0 9 13.6 MADISON H S 480 59 12.3 19.8 21.2 21.1 21.7 21.0 15 25.4 CENTER SCH 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ REAGAN H S 616 166 26.9 22.7 22.7 23.8 22.6 23.1 78 47.0 ACADEMY OF CREATIVE 54 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ INTERNATIONAL SCHOO 98 <30m ƒ 21.5 20.9 21.8 20.5 21.3 <10m ƒ HOMEBASED COMP ED 4 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ HOMEBOUND 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

NORTHSIDE ISD 3,782 862 22.8 20.2 20.8 21.2 21.0 20.9 253 29.4 HOLMES H S 378 <35m ƒ 16.5 18.9 17.8 18.6 18.1 <5h ƒ JAY H S 511 112 21.9 16.9 18.5 17.9 18.9 18.2 <15m ƒ MARSHALL H S 474 114 24.1 20.8 21.4 22.0 21.4 21.5 37 32.5 HOLMGREEN CENTER 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ TOM CLARK H S 528 122 23.1 21.5 21.9 22.5 21.6 22.0 41 33.6 HEALTH CAREERS H S 205 118 57.6 24.3 23.4 24.8 23.6 24.1 69 58.5 WILLIAM H TAFT H S 513 89 17.3 19.5 20.7 20.7 21.1 20.6 25 28.1 NISD EXCEL ACADEMY 35 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ SANDRA DAY O'CONNOR 655 169 25.8 20.7 21.1 21.8 21.4 21.4 51 30.2 WARREN H S 467 103 22.1 17.9 18.6 18.9 19.4 18.8 14 13.6 HOMEBOUND 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ SOUTHWEST MENTAL HE 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ SCHOOL AGED PARENTI 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

POR VIDA ACADEM 88 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ POR VIDA ACADEMY C 50 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ CORPUS CHRISTI ACAD 38 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

POSITIVE SOLUTI POSITIVE SOLUTIONS 33 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

RADIANCE ACADEM 14 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ RADIANCE ACADEMY OF 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ RADIANCE ACADEMY OF 12 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

RANDOLPH FIELD RANDOLPH H S 59 23 39.0 22.0 22.9 24.2 21.4 22.7 10 43.5

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 69 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

BEXAR SAN ANTONIO CAN SAN ANTONIO CAN HIG 75 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SAN ANTONIO ISD 2,148 737 34.3 15.5 17.4 16.8 17.6 17.0 49 6.6 BRACKENRIDGE H S 345 152 44.1 17.2 18.4 18.4 18.5 18.3 18 11.8 BURBANK H S 194 112 57.7 14.6 17.2 16.4 17.6 16.6 5 4.5 EDISON H S 265 100 37.7 14.9 16.6 15.5 17.1 16.1 <5h ƒ FOX TECHNICAL H S 289 <30m ƒ 16.3 17.4 15.3 17.2 16.6 <5h ƒ HIGHLANDS H S 322 107 33.2 17.4 18.5 18.6 19.2 18.5 15 14.0 HOUSTON H S 130 77 59.2 13.6 15.5 15.5 16.2 15.4 <5h ƒ JEFFERSON H S 308 93 30.2 14.7 17.6 16.4 16.9 16.6 5 5.4 LANIER H S 217 58 26.7 14.2 16.7 15.6 16.6 15.9 <5h ƒ NAVARRO ACADEMY 65 <15m ƒ 12.4 15.0 16.2 17.6 15.5 <5h ƒ HEALY-MURPHY 13 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SAN ANTONIO SCH SAN ANTONIO SCHOOL 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SAN ANTONIO TEC SAN ANTONIO TECHNOL 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SCHOOL OF EXCEL 19 <10m ƒ 17.0 18.0 16.8 18.0 17.4 <5h ƒ RICK HAWKINS H S 19 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ RICK HAWKINS H S 0 <10m ƒ 17.0 18.0 16.8 18.0 17.4 <5h ƒ

SHEKINAH RADIAN SHEKINAH WALZEM 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SOMERSET ISD SOMERSET HIGH SCHOO 142 14 9.9 20.3 18.6 19.5 19.1 19.4 <5h ƒ

SOUTH SAN ANTON 388 76 19.6 15.9 16.8 16.9 17.6 17.0 <5h ƒ SOUTH SAN ANTONIO H 290 <60m ƒ 16.3 17.0 17.2 17.8 17.2 <5h ƒ SO SAN ANTONIO H S 85 <20m ƒ 14.4 16.2 16.2 17.0 16.1 <5h ƒ LIFE SKILLS PROGRAM 13 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SOUTHSIDE ISD SOUTHSIDE H S 202 72 35.6 16.8 17.6 18.4 18.3 17.9 <5h ƒ

SOUTHWEST ISD SOUTHWEST H S 460 38 8.3 16.8 18.3 18.2 19.0 18.3 <5h ƒ

SOUTHWEST PREPA 149 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ SOUTHWEST PREPARATO 63 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ SOUTHWEST PREPARATO 52 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ SOUTHWEST PREPARATO 33 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ NEW DIRECTIONS 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BLANCO BLANCO ISD BLANCO H S 53 34 64.2 20.2 20.8 21.4 20.9 20.9 8 23.5

JOHNSON CITY IS LYNDON B JOHNSON H 50 13 26.0 17.5 18.0 18.5 19.7 18.6 <5h ƒ

BORDEN BORDEN COUNTY I BORDEN COUNTY SCHOO 13 8 61.5 22.1 20.5 23.4 21.5 21.9 <5h ƒ

BOSQUE CLIFTON ISD CLIFTON H S 57 23 40.4 20.2 20.5 20.6 20.3 20.4 6 26.1

CRANFILLS GAP I CRANFILLS GAP SCHOO 6 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

70 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

BOSQUE IREDELL ISD IREDELL SCHOOL 5 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

KOPPERL ISD KOPPERL SCHOOL 17 6 35.3 19.5 22.5 19.7 21.7 21.0 <5h ƒ

MERIDIAN ISD MERIDIAN H S 25 17 68.0 17.8 19.4 17.9 19.5 18.8 <5h ƒ

MORGAN ISD MORGAN SCHOOL 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

VALLEY MILLS IS VALLEY MILLS H S 37 13 35.1 20.4 20.3 19.9 19.8 20.1 <5h ƒ

WALNUT SPRINGS WALNUT SPRINGS SCHO 16 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BOWIE DEKALB ISD DEKALB H S 47 41 87.2 18.4 19.4 19.2 19.6 19.3 5 12.2

HOOKS ISD HOOKS H S 66 55 83.3 19.4 18.5 19.5 20.4 19.6 12 21.8

LEARY ISD LEARY EL 8 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LIBERTY-EYLAU I 132 86 65.2 18.4 18.2 19.0 18.8 18.8 9 10.5 LIBERTY-EYLAU H S 120 <90m ƒ 18.3 18.2 19.0 18.8 18.7 <10m ƒ ALTER SCH 12 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MALTA ISD MALTA EL 4 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MAUD ISD MAUD SCHOOL 25 20 80.0 20.3 20.6 22.3 20.9 21.2 6 30.0

NEW BOSTON ISD NEW BOSTON H S 89 63 70.8 20.0 19.4 19.9 19.8 19.9 16 25.4

PLEASANT GROVE PLEASANT GROVE H S 142 110 77.5 24.2 22.5 23.6 22.8 23.4 53 48.2

RED LICK ISD RED LICK MIDDLE 35 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

REDWATER ISD REDWATER H S 64 59 92.2 20.9 20.2 22.0 21.4 21.3 21 35.6

SIMMS ISD JAMES BOWIE H S 29 19 65.5 20.1 18.4 19.7 20.0 19.7 <5h ƒ

TEXARKANA ISD TEXAS H S 314 200 63.7 20.3 19.7 20.0 19.6 20.0 51 25.5

BRAZORIA ALVIN ISD ALVIN HIGH SCHOOL 485 48 9.9 20.4 22.1 21.7 21.4 21.5 16 33.3

ANGLETON ISD 330 73 22.1 19.3 21.4 20.1 20.5 20.5 18 24.7 ANGLETON H S 326 <75m ƒ 19.3 21.4 20.1 20.5 20.5 <20m ƒ MARSHALL EDUCATION 4 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BRAZOSPORT ISD 629 83 13.2 20.5 21.6 21.0 21.4 21.2 <35m ƒ BRAZOSPORT H S 162 <15m ƒ 15.3 16.6 15.7 16.7 16.1 <5h ƒ BRAZOSWOOD H S 456 <75m ƒ 21.5 22.5 22.0 22.2 22.2 <35m ƒ LIGHTHOUSE LEARNING 8 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ LIGHTHOUSE LEARNING 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

COLUMBIA-BRAZOR COLUMBIA H S 155 38 24.5 19.3 19.2 20.6 19.6 19.8 7 18.4

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 71 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

BRAZORIA DANBURY ISD DANBURY H S 45 8 17.8 15.6 15.6 14.6 15.3 15.4 <5h ƒ

PEARLAND ISD PEARLAND H S 744 108 14.5 20.9 22.8 22.5 21.9 22.2 38 35.2

SWEENY ISD SWEENY H S 115 51 44.3 19.8 22.1 21.3 21.1 21.2 17 33.3

BRAZOS BRAZOS SCHOOL F BSIC AUTUMN CIRCLE 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BRYAN ISD 628 106 16.9 18.0 20.5 19.2 19.5 19.4 19 17.9 BRYAN H S 564 <110m ƒ 18.0 20.5 19.2 19.5 19.4 <20m ƒ ACE CAMPUS 56 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ GRAD 8 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

COLLEGE STATION 481 102 21.2 22.2 23.1 22.1 22.1 22.5 39 38.2 A & M CONS H S 469 <105m ƒ 22.2 23.1 22.1 22.1 22.5 <40m ƒ CENTER FOR ALTERNAT 12 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

EAGLE ACADEMY O EAGLE ACADEMY OF BR 0 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BREWSTER ALPINE ISD ALPINE H S 57 38 66.7 19.6 19.7 22.3 20.6 20.6 8 21.1

MARATHON ISD MARATHON INDPENDENT 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TERLINGUA CSD BIG BEND H S 8 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BRISCOE SILVERTON ISD SILVERTON SCHOOL 10 10 100 17.3 20.5 18.5 19.5 19.1 <5h ƒ

BROOKS BROOKS COUNTY I FALFURRIAS H S 76 47 61.8 15.9 17.2 17.1 18.0 17.2 <5h ƒ

BROWN BANGS ISD 59 39 66.1 19.9 20.5 20.6 19.8 20.3 <15m ƒ BANGS H S 58 <40m ƒ 19.9 20.5 20.6 19.8 20.3 <15m ƒ C A P HIGH SCHOOL 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BLANKET ISD BLANKET H S 11 8 72.7 16.0 17.8 17.1 17.6 17.4 <5h ƒ

BROOKESMITH ISD BROOKESMITH H S 12 9 75.0 20.1 21.3 21.7 21.9 21.6 <5h ƒ

BROWNWOOD ISD BROWNWOOD H S 185 50 27.0 19.3 20.6 19.9 19.9 20.0 11 22.0

EARLY ISD EARLY H S 75 49 65.3 20.1 21.4 21.7 21.7 21.4 15 30.6

MAY ISD MAY H S 11 8 72.7 18.0 16.9 21.5 20.0 19.4 <5h ƒ

RON JACKSON STA RON JACKSON STATE J 0 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

ZEPHYR ISD ZEPHYR H S 13 14 108 20.1 21.4 21.7 19.6 20.7 <5h ƒ

BURLESON CALDWELL ISD CALDWELL H S 104 39 37.5 19.4 21.4 21.1 21.3 20.9 10 25.6

SNOOK ISD SNOOK SECONDARY 35 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SOMERVILLE ISD SOMERVILLE H S 38 10 26.3 18.7 20.3 18.4 19.7 19.4 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

72 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

BURNET BURNET CISD 183 86 47.0 19.0 19.9 19.8 20.0 19.8 9 10.5 BURNET H S 178 <90m ƒ 19.0 19.9 19.8 20.0 19.8 <10m ƒ QUEST 5 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MARBLE FALLS IS 212 63 29.7 21.8 20.8 22.4 21.8 21.9 22 34.9 MARBLE FALLS HIGH S 197 <65m ƒ 21.8 20.8 22.4 21.8 21.9 <25m ƒ FALLS CAREER H S 15 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CALDWELL LOCKHART ISD 254 <100m ƒ 18.5 18.9 19.2 19.2 19.1 16 ƒ LOCKHART H S 239 <100m ƒ 18.5 18.9 19.2 19.2 19.1 <20m ƒ LOCKHART PRIDE HS 15 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LULING ISD LULING H S 71 17 23.9 17.8 19.2 19.0 19.4 18.9 <5h ƒ

PRAIRIE LEA ISD PRAIRIE LEA SCHOOL 8 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CALHOUN CALHOUN COUNTY 228 32 14.0 19.6 19.3 20.3 20.2 20.0 6 18.8 CALHOUN H S 213 <35m ƒ 19.9 19.6 20.3 20.2 20.1 <10m ƒ HOPE H S 15 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CALLAHAN BAIRD ISD BAIRD H S 32 25 78.1 18.2 17.8 18.5 18.7 18.5 <5h ƒ

CLYDE CISD CLYDE H S 71 37 52.1 19.9 20.0 20.8 20.8 20.5 8 21.6

CROSS PLAINS IS CROSS PLAINS H S 24 9 37.5 19.4 18.9 19.3 19.2 19.3 <5h ƒ

EULA ISD EULA H S 31 15 48.4 20.1 21.4 22.5 20.0 21.1 <5h ƒ

CAMERON BROWNSVILLE ISD 1,549 228 14.7 17.3 18.3 18.0 18.5 18.1 20 8.8 HANNA H S 395 57 14.4 19.2 18.9 19.9 19.6 19.5 7 12.3 BROWNSVILLE PORTER 259 37 14.3 15.8 19.0 18.4 18.3 17.9 <5h ƒ PACE H S 340 48 14.1 17.1 17.6 17.9 18.1 17.8 5 10.4 RIVERA H S 305 47 15.4 17.4 18.6 16.9 18.1 17.9 <5h ƒ LOPEZ H S 250 39 15.6 15.9 17.4 16.4 17.9 17.0 <5h ƒ

EAGLE ACADEMY O EAGLE PROJECT (BROW 35 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HARLINGEN CISD 787 170 21.6 18.1 19.2 19.2 19.1 19.0 29 17.1 HARLINGEN H S 438 93 21.2 17.5 18.5 19.1 18.8 18.6 <15m ƒ HARLINGEN H S - SOU 330 <80m ƒ 18.9 20.3 19.4 19.4 19.6 <20m ƒ KEYS ACAD 19 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LA FERIA ISD 137 101 73.7 17.5 18.5 18.3 18.8 18.4 9 8.9 LA FERIA H S 128 <105m ƒ 17.5 18.5 18.3 18.8 18.4 <10m ƒ LA FERIA ALTERNATIV 9 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LOS FRESNOS CIS LOS FRESNOS HS 368 134 36.4 17.0 18.9 18.3 18.6 18.3 12 9.0

POINT ISABEL IS PORT ISABEL H S 117 27 23.1 16.6 18.3 16.7 17.4 17.4 <5h ƒ

RIO HONDO ISD RIO HONDO H S 88 27 30.7 18.6 19.6 19.7 18.9 19.4 7 25.9

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 73 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

CAMERON SAN BENITO CISD SAN BENITO H S 411 75 18.2 16.0 16.8 16.8 17.7 16.9 5 6.7

SANTA MARIA ISD 38 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ SANTA MARIA H S 35 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ SANTA MARIA ALTERNA 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SANTA ROSA ISD SANTA ROSA H S 59 33 55.9 14.5 16.9 15.5 16.6 16.0 <5h ƒ

SOUTH TEXAS ISD 312 151 48.4 20.8 22.0 21.7 21.4 21.6 52 34.4 SOUTH TEXAS BUSINES 70 33 47.1 20.0 20.7 22.0 20.4 20.8 9 27.3 HIGH SCHOOL FOR HEA 138 70 50.7 20.0 20.4 19.7 20.0 20.1 17 24.3 THE SCIENCE ACADEMY 104 48 46.2 22.5 25.4 24.3 24.3 24.3 26 54.2

CAMP PITTSBURG ISD PITTSBURG H S 104 8 7.7 16.8 19.1 19.4 20.1 19.1 <5h ƒ

CARSON GROOM ISD GROOM SCHOOL 3 5 167 24.4 23.2 25.0 22.8 23.8 <5h ƒ

PANHANDLE ISD 41 33 80.5 22.0 21.8 22.1 22.4 22.2 <20m ƒ PANHANDLE H S 40 <35m ƒ 22.0 21.8 22.1 22.4 22.2 <20m ƒ C H A M P S 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WHITE DEER ISD WHITE DEER H S 27 23 85.2 21.8 21.0 23.0 20.9 21.8 8 34.8

CASS ATLANTA ISD ATLANTA H S 97 76 78.4 20.7 19.0 21.4 20.4 20.5 21 27.6

AVINGER ISD AVINGER H S 8 10 125 17.0 18.1 18.5 19.2 18.3 <5h ƒ

BLOOMBURG ISD BLOOMBURG H S 18 16 88.9 20.2 18.9 21.9 19.4 20.2 <5h ƒ

HUGHES SPRINGS HUGHES SPRINGS HIGH 60 62 103 18.3 18.0 19.0 19.2 18.8 7 11.3

LINDEN-KILDARE LINDEN-KILDARE H S 54 44 81.5 18.4 18.3 18.8 19.5 18.9 11 25.0

MCLEOD ISD MCLEOD H S 27 22 81.5 20.7 20.5 17.6 20.0 19.8 <5h ƒ

QUEEN CITY ISD QUEEN CITY H S 46 33 71.7 19.5 19.4 19.6 19.6 19.6 6 18.2

CASTRO DIMMITT ISD DIMMITT H S 56 41 73.2 17.7 18.6 19.0 18.7 18.7 5 12.2

HART ISD HART JR-SR H S 21 17 81.0 16.8 18.4 18.4 18.2 18.2 <5h ƒ

NAZARETH ISD NAZARETH SCHOOL 23 21 91.3 23.3 21.9 22.6 21.8 22.5 11 52.4

CHAMBERS ANAHUAC ISD ANAHUAC H S 78 36 46.2 18.3 17.9 19.2 18.7 18.6 5 13.9

BARBERS HILL IS 183 41 22.4 22.1 22.1 21.4 21.5 21.9 16 39.0 BARBERS HILL H S 182 <45m ƒ 22.1 22.1 21.4 21.5 21.9 <20m ƒ GULF COAST H S 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

EAST CHAMBERS I EAST CHAMBERS H S 69 26 37.7 17.6 18.5 18.7 19.5 18.7 6 23.1

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

74 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

CHEROKEE ALTO ISD ALTO H S 37 24 64.9 18.0 16.8 19.0 18.8 18.3 <5h ƒ

JACKSONVILLE IS 236 <115m ƒ 17.8 19.1 18.4 18.6 18.6 19 ƒ JACKSONVILLE H S 229 <115m ƒ 17.8 19.1 18.4 18.6 18.6 <20m ƒ COMPASS CENTER 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

NEW SUMMERFIELD NEW SUMMERFIELD SCH 15 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

RUSK ISD RUSK H S 85 38 44.7 19.6 20.6 20.4 19.9 20.3 8 21.1

WELLS ISD WELLS H S 12 8 66.7 18.1 17.1 18.0 18.0 18.0 <5h ƒ

CHILDRESS CHILDRESS ISD CHILDRESS H S 46 46 100 16.8 18.1 18.8 17.9 18.1 6 13.0

CLAY BELLEVUE ISD BELLEVUE SCHOOL 13 7 53.8 19.6 21.7 18.6 19.4 20.0 <5h ƒ

BYERS ISD BYERS SCHOOL 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HENRIETTA ISD HENRIETTA H S 65 24 36.9 20.0 18.6 21.8 20.4 20.3 5 20.8

MIDWAY ISD MIDWAY SCHOOL 14 9 64.3 16.4 20.2 18.2 19.7 18.8 <5h ƒ

PETROLIA ISD PETROLIA H S 33 19 57.6 20.3 19.9 19.4 20.6 20.1 <5h ƒ

COCHRAN MORTON ISD 27 <25m ƒ 15.3 19.2 17.9 17.7 17.6 <5h ƒ MORTON H S 25 <25m ƒ 15.3 19.2 17.9 17.7 17.6 <5h ƒ P E P 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WHITEFACE CISD 25 23 92.0 18.4 18.4 19.4 17.8 18.7 <5h ƒ WHITEFACE H S 24 <25m ƒ 18.4 18.4 19.4 17.8 18.7 <5h ƒ P E P ALTER CO-OP 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

COKE BRONTE ISD 24 19 79.2 17.1 18.6 18.4 18.2 18.3 <5h ƒ BRONTE H S 24 <20m ƒ 17.1 18.6 18.4 18.2 18.3 <5h ƒ JUVENILE DETENT CTR 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

ROBERT LEE ISD ROBERT LEE H S 19 12 63.2 19.3 20.6 20.7 19.6 20.2 <5h ƒ

COLEMAN COLEMAN ISD 46 26 56.5 17.4 18.8 18.3 18.3 18.4 <5h ƒ COLEMAN H S 39 <30m ƒ 17.4 18.8 18.3 18.3 18.4 <5h ƒ CO-OP ALTER PROG 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

NOVICE ISD NOVICE SCHOOL 4 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

PANTHER CREEK C 16 13 81.3 19.4 19.5 19.7 20.0 19.8 <5h ƒ PANTHER CREEK H S 15 <15m ƒ 19.4 19.5 19.7 20.0 19.8 <5h ƒ C A P 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SANTA ANNA ISD SANTA ANNA SECONDAR 14 5 35.7 17.8 16.8 20.0 19.6 18.6 <5h ƒ

COLLIN ALLEN ISD ALLEN H S 847 266 31.4 22.4 22.8 23.4 22.5 22.9 106 39.8

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 75 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

COLLIN ANNA ISD ANNA H S 45 11 24.4 19.5 19.5 18.5 20.3 19.5 <5h ƒ

BLUE RIDGE ISD BLUE RIDGE H S 33 12 36.4 19.2 20.4 20.4 20.3 20.1 <5h ƒ

CELINA ISD CELINA H S 74 44 59.5 20.5 20.8 21.4 21.0 21.1 14 31.8

COMMUNITY ISD COMMUNITY H S 73 11 15.1 20.5 19.4 22.5 21.9 21.2 5 45.5

FARMERSVILLE IS FARMERSVILLE H S 74 35 47.3 19.7 20.5 20.1 20.3 20.2 10 28.6

FRISCO ISD 577 208 36.0 21.6 21.9 22.4 21.6 22.0 67 32.2 FRISCO H S 574 <210m ƒ 21.6 21.9 22.5 21.6 22.0 <70m ƒ CENTENNIAL HIGH SCH 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MCKINNEY ISD 745 198 26.6 22.1 23.0 23.8 23.1 23.1 91 46.0 MCKINNEY HIGH SCHOO 366 102 27.9 22.4 23.1 24.0 23.1 23.3 49 48.0 THE L I N C CTR 36 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ MCKINNEY NORTH HIGH 338 94 27.8 21.7 22.9 23.4 23.1 22.9 <45m ƒ SERENITY HIGH 4 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ COUNTY RESIDENTIAL 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

PLANO ISD 2,792 1,113 39.9 23.8 24.8 24.8 23.8 24.4 643 57.8 PLANO SR H S 940 420 44.7 24.0 25.1 25.1 24.1 24.7 256 61.0 PLANO EAST SR H S 1,029 263 25.6 23.0 24.3 24.4 23.2 23.9 133 50.6 PLANO WEST SENIOR H 823 430 52.2 24.0 24.9 24.8 24.0 24.6 254 59.1

PRINCETON ISD PRINCETON H S 148 12 8.1 20.8 23.3 22.8 21.5 22.3 5 41.7

PROSPER ISD PROSPER H S 63 29 46.0 21.1 21.6 20.2 21.2 21.3 8 27.6

WYLIE ISD WYLIE H S 355 99 27.9 21.6 21.7 22.5 22.5 22.2 39 39.4

COLLINGSWORTH SAMNORWOOD ISD SAMNORWOOD SCHOOL 12 9 75.0 15.8 17.4 18.1 17.2 17.2 <5h ƒ

WELLINGTON ISD WELLINGTON H S 28 17 60.7 18.4 21.2 18.6 19.7 19.8 <5h ƒ

COLORADO COLUMBUS ISD COLUMBUS HIGH SCHOO 114 20 17.5 20.2 20.8 20.0 20.4 20.4 5 25.0

RICE CISD RICE H S 63 27 42.9 15.3 17.8 16.3 18.3 16.9 <5h ƒ

WEIMAR ISD WEIMAR H S 51 9 17.6 20.2 22.2 20.8 22.4 21.6 <5h ƒ

COMAL COMAL ISD 713 180 25.2 20.1 21.4 21.3 21.2 21.1 55 30.6 CANYON HIGH SCHOOL 287 <95m ƒ 19.9 21.7 21.3 21.2 21.2 <30m ƒ SMITHSON VALLEY HIG 402 <95m ƒ 20.2 21.0 21.2 21.3 21.0 <30m ƒ COMAL LEADERSHIP IN 24 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

NANCY NEY CHART NANCY NEY CHARTER S 17 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

NEW BRAUNFELS I 365 142 38.9 20.8 20.7 21.7 21.2 21.2 38 26.8 NEW BRAUNFELS H S 353 <145m ƒ 20.8 20.7 21.7 21.2 21.2 <40m ƒ THE NBISD LEARNING 12 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

76 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

COMAL TRINITY CHARTER TRINITY CHARTER SCH 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

COMANCHE COMANCHE ISD 79 42 53.2 18.1 19.7 19.6 19.7 19.4 8 19.0 COMANCHE H S 77 <45m ƒ 18.1 19.7 19.6 19.7 19.4 <10m ƒ COMANCHE ACCELERATE 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

DE LEON ISD DE LEON H S 40 9 22.5 16.9 19.4 18.6 18.7 18.7 <5h ƒ

GUSTINE ISD GUSTINE SCHOOL 12 8 66.7 18.1 19.0 17.8 19.3 18.5 <5h ƒ

SIDNEY ISD SIDNEY SCHOOL 10 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CONCHO EDEN CISD EDEN H S 18 19 106 14.9 18.0 17.2 18.5 17.4 <5h ƒ

PAINT ROCK ISD PAINT ROCK SCHOOL 7 5 71.4 21.0 16.8 21.4 20.4 20.0 <5h ƒ

COOKE CALLISBURG ISD CALLISBURG H S 66 20 30.3 22.4 23.9 23.6 24.0 23.6 8 40.0

ERA ISD ERA SCHOOL 24 5 20.8 20.4 20.4 24.6 21.0 21.6 <5h ƒ

GAINESVILLE ISD GAINESVILLE H S 130 55 42.3 18.1 19.0 19.7 19.2 19.1 9 16.4

LINDSAY ISD LINDSAY H S 47 11 23.4 23.4 24.9 25.6 24.3 24.6 7 63.6

MUENSTER ISD MUENSTER H S 34 11 32.4 23.8 23.2 23.0 23.3 23.4 7 63.6

VALLEY VIEW ISD VALLEY VIEW HIGH SC 41 6 14.6 23.2 25.0 24.5 24.2 24.3 <5h ƒ

CORYELL COPPERAS COVE I 395 <75m ƒ 20.0 19.8 21.9 21.1 20.8 16 ƒ COPPERAS COVE H S 382 <75m ƒ 20.0 19.8 21.9 21.1 20.8 <20m ƒ CROSSROADS HIGH SCH 13 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

EVANT ISD EVANT H S 20 14 70.0 18.1 17.6 20.1 18.0 18.4 <5h ƒ

GATESVILLE ISD GATESVILLE H S 129 70 54.3 21.0 21.2 21.4 21.4 21.4 22 31.4

JONESBORO ISD JONESBORO SCHOOL 10 7 70.0 18.7 17.9 18.3 18.1 18.3 <5h ƒ

OGLESBY ISD OGLESBY SCHOOL 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

COTTLE PADUCAH ISD PADUCAH SCHOOL 19 13 68.4 16.5 16.9 18.7 17.7 17.6 <5h ƒ

CRANE CRANE ISD CRANE HIGH SCHOOL 55 24 43.6 17.3 18.8 18.9 18.7 18.6 <5h ƒ

CROCKETT CROCKETT COUNTY OZONA H S 52 24 46.2 19.9 20.9 20.6 20.5 20.6 <5h ƒ

CROSBY CROSBYTON CISD CROSBYTON H S 22 23 105 18.5 19.1 20.0 19.8 19.5 <5h ƒ

LORENZO ISD LORENZO H S 11 10 90.9 20.2 19.0 19.3 19.8 19.8 <5h ƒ

RALLS ISD 35 9 25.7 17.8 21.1 18.8 19.3 19.4 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 77 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

CROSBY RALLS ISD RALLS H S 27 <10m ƒ 17.8 21.1 18.8 19.3 19.4 <5h ƒ RECOVERY EDUCATION 8 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CULBERSON CULBERSON COUNT VAN HORN H S 28 14 50.0 14.4 18.1 14.9 16.6 16.1 <5h ƒ

DALLAM DALHART ISD 94 66 70.2 19.7 21.0 20.5 19.7 20.4 11 16.7 DALHART H S 89 <70m ƒ 19.7 21.0 20.5 19.7 20.4 <15m ƒ X I T SECONDARY SCH 5 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TEXLINE ISD TEXLINE SCHOOL 8 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

DALLAS A+ ACADEMY A+ ACADEMY 30 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

ALPHA CHARTER S ALPHA CHARTER SCHOO 25 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CARROLLTON-FARM 1,303 264 20.3 20.1 21.6 21.1 20.5 20.9 79 29.9 TURNER HIGH SCHOOL 420 <70m ƒ 19.4 21.7 20.7 20.5 20.7 <20m ƒ SMITH HIGH SCHOOL 411 99 24.1 19.7 21.4 20.7 20.4 20.7 27 27.3 GRIMES EDUCATION CE 44 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ CREEKVIEW HIGH SCHO 426 94 22.1 21.0 21.8 21.8 20.6 21.4 33 35.1 RANCHVIEW HIGH SCHO 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CEDAR HILL ISD CEDAR HILL HIGH SCH 392 130 33.2 18.9 18.5 20.1 19.5 19.3 22 16.9

COPPELL ISD COPPELL H S 610 241 39.5 22.9 23.7 24.0 22.7 23.5 126 52.3

DALLAS CAN ACAD 357 5 1.4 13.6 16.0 15.4 14.6 15.0 <5h ƒ DALLAS CAN! ACADEMY 95 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ DALLAS CAN! ACADEMY 136 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ TEXANS CAN AT CARRO 86 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ TEXANS CAN ACADEMY 40 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

DALLAS ISD 6,170 1,226 19.9 16.2 17.5 17.1 17.8 17.3 106 8.6 BRYAN ADAMS H S 356 45 12.6 18.3 18.5 19.8 18.7 18.9 8 17.8 W H ADAMSON H S 194 53 27.3 13.1 15.7 14.4 15.9 14.9 <5h ƒ A MACEO SMITH H S 126 23 18.3 14.1 15.0 15.2 16.4 15.4 <5h ƒ MOISES MOLINA H S 420 59 14.0 15.0 16.8 15.4 16.3 16.0 <5h ƒ HILLCREST H S 249 14 5.6 20.2 21.5 22.1 21.0 21.4 7 50.0 THOMAS JEFFERSON H 235 20 8.5 12.7 16.8 14.7 16.5 15.3 <5h ƒ JUSTIN F KIMBALL H 263 14 5.3 14.8 16.4 16.0 17.9 16.4 <5h ƒ LINCOLN H S 216 107 49.5 13.9 15.6 14.7 15.6 15.1 <5h ƒ L G PINKSTON H S 101 12 11.9 15.6 16.8 17.0 17.0 16.8 <5h ƒ ROOSEVELT H S 107 25 23.4 13.9 15.6 14.7 16.5 15.2 <5h ƒ W W SAMUELL H S 220 9 4.1 12.2 14.0 13.3 15.3 13.8 <5h ƒ SEAGOVILLE H S 165 11 6.7 17.8 17.2 18.4 19.5 18.3 <5h ƒ SOUTH OAK CLIFF H S 179 29 16.2 14.9 15.8 14.9 15.6 15.5 <5h ƒ H GRADY SPRUCE H S 176 16 9.1 12.2 15.3 14.6 14.9 14.4 <5h ƒ SUNSET H S 319 80 25.1 15.1 16.8 16.0 17.0 16.3 <5h ƒ W T WHITE H S 356 68 19.1 18.2 18.7 18.6 19.3 18.8 9 13.2 WOODROW WILSON H S 234 38 16.2 18.6 19.0 20.3 19.5 19.4 10 26.3 DAVID W CARTER H S 285 122 42.8 15.3 16.8 15.7 17.2 16.4 <5h ƒ NORTH DALLAS H S 276 23 8.3 12.1 15.7 13.0 14.0 13.7 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

78 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

DALLAS DALLAS ISD SKYLINE H S 886 189 21.3 16.3 17.0 17.1 18.3 17.3 10 5.3 SCHOOL OF SCIENCE & 102 43 42.2 21.5 24.9 22.9 24.3 23.5 20 46.5 JAMES MADISON H S 85 39 45.9 14.1 16.3 15.0 16.1 15.5 <5h ƒ SCHOOL OF BUSINESS 124 49 39.5 18.2 19.5 19.3 19.9 19.3 <5h ƒ BOOKER T WASHINGTON 155 59 38.1 20.6 19.5 21.5 20.1 20.5 17 28.8 SCHOOL OF HEALTH PR 122 32 26.2 19.1 20.4 19.3 20.0 19.9 6 18.8 SCHOOL OF EDUCATION 64 15 23.4 18.1 17.1 18.1 17.4 17.8 <5h ƒ SCH OF GOVT/LAW/LAW 96 25 26.0 18.4 18.2 19.3 18.8 18.8 <5h ƒ SCHOOL FOR THE TALE 38 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ MIDDLE COLLEGE 21 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

DESOTO ISD DE SOTO H S 381 265 69.6 19.2 18.7 19.6 19.3 19.3 37 14.0

DUNCANVILLE ISD 656 402 61.3 18.6 19.2 19.9 19.8 19.5 <80m ƒ DUNCANVILLE H S 633 <405m ƒ 18.6 19.2 19.9 19.8 19.5 <80m ƒ P A C E SCHOOL 23 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

EAGLE ACADEMY O EAGLE ACADEMY OF DA 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

EDUCATION CENTE EDUCATION CENTER IN 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

EVOLUTION ACADE EVOLUTION ACADEMY C 66 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

FAITH FAMILY AC FAITH FAMILY ACADEM 20 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

GARLAND ISD 2,813 599 21.3 19.3 20.1 20.3 20.1 20.1 137 22.9 GARLAND H S 440 101 23.0 22.3 22.0 22.4 21.7 22.2 40 39.6 S GARLAND H S 408 127 31.1 17.7 18.7 19.0 19.6 18.9 23 18.1 N GARLAND H S 442 <75m ƒ 19.5 20.0 20.8 20.2 20.2 <15m ƒ LAKEVIEW CENTENNIAL 345 86 24.9 17.7 17.9 18.5 18.5 18.3 <10m ƒ GISD EVENING SCH 21 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ NAAMAN FOREST H S 383 82 21.4 19.7 21.4 20.9 21.1 20.9 22 26.8 ROWLETT H S 507 128 25.2 19.3 20.8 20.4 20.0 20.3 29 22.7 SACHSE H S 267 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

GRAND PRAIRIE I 933 172 18.4 17.3 19.5 18.5 19.2 18.8 32 18.6 GRAND PRAIRIE H S 422 <65m ƒ 17.8 20.1 18.8 19.5 19.1 <15m ƒ SO GRAND PRAIRIE H 500 <115m ƒ 17.0 19.2 18.3 19.0 18.6 <25m ƒ LLOYD BOZE SECONDAR 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HIGHLAND PARK I HIGHLAND PARK HIGH 430 277 64.4 25.0 25.6 25.8 24.1 25.2 188 67.9

HONORS ACADEMY 248 11 4.4 18.4 18.6 19.5 18.0 18.8 <5h ƒ LANDMARK SCHOOL 23 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ QUEST ACADEMY 119 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ UNIVERSITY SCHOOL 50 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ EXCEL ACADEMY 10 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ LEGACY HIGH SCHOOL 28 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ DESTINY HIGH SCHOOL 18 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

I AM THAT I AM I AM THAT I AM ACAD 14 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 79 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

DALLAS IRVING ISD 1,287 356 27.7 18.7 19.7 19.6 19.3 19.5 60 16.9 IRVING H S 317 <80m ƒ 18.1 19.6 19.1 18.8 19.0 <15m ƒ MACARTHUR H S 317 97 30.6 18.1 19.9 19.1 19.0 19.2 15 15.5 NIMITZ H S 317 84 26.5 19.3 20.5 20.4 20.1 20.2 16 19.0 UNION BOWER CENTER 24 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ THE ACADEMY OF IRVI 312 98 31.4 19.1 19.1 19.9 19.2 19.5 <20m ƒ

JEAN MASSIEU AC JEAN MASSIEU ACADE 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LANCASTER ISD LANCASTER H S 232 79 34.1 15.5 16.2 17.2 17.3 16.7 5 6.3

LIFE SCHOOL LIFE SCHOOL OAK CLI 35 9 25.7 18.4 17.9 19.2 18.4 18.6 <5h ƒ

MESQUITE ISD 1,852 532 28.7 18.5 18.8 19.5 19.1 19.1 85 16.0 MESQUITE HIGH SCHOO 419 163 38.9 17.9 18.3 18.8 18.6 18.6 21 12.9 NORTH MESQUITE HIGH 450 87 19.3 18.5 18.4 19.6 18.9 19.0 <20m ƒ WEST MESQUITE HIGH 256 <65m ƒ 17.1 17.4 18.9 18.1 18.0 <10m ƒ POTEET HIGH SCHOOL 297 126 42.4 19.0 19.4 20.0 20.2 19.9 21 16.7 HORN HIGH SCHOOL 377 89 23.6 19.7 20.4 20.3 19.6 20.1 20 22.5 MESQUITE ACADEMY 53 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

NORTH HILLS SCH NORTH HILLS SCHOOL 0 23 ƒ 23.1 22.9 24.5 21.8 23.3 13 56.5

PEGASUS SCHOOL PEGASUS CHARTER H S 12 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

RICHARDSON ISD 1,840 708 38.5 21.4 22.7 22.6 21.8 22.3 280 39.5 LAKE HIGHLANDS H S 472 170 36.0 21.7 22.2 22.4 21.5 22.1 62 36.5 RICHARDSON H S 379 157 41.4 20.9 22.2 22.4 21.6 21.9 62 39.5 PEARCE H S 421 206 48.9 22.6 23.6 23.8 22.8 23.3 100 48.5 BERKNER H S 568 175 30.8 20.3 22.5 21.4 21.2 21.5 56 32.0

WILMER-HUTCHINS 112 32 28.6 14.3 15.4 15.3 15.8 15.3 <5h ƒ WILMER-HUTCHINS H S 111 <35m ƒ 14.0 15.3 14.8 15.7 15.1 <5h ƒ WILMER-HUTCHINS MAG 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WINFREE ACADEMY 374 <10m ƒ 16.6 17.4 21.0 19.4 18.6 <5h ƒ WINFREE ACADEMY CHA 106 <10m ƒ 16.6 17.4 21.0 19.4 18.6 <5h ƒ WINFREE ACADEMY CHA 106 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ WINFREE ACADEMY CHA 90 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ WINFREE ACADEMY CHA 72 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

DAWSON DAWSON ISD DAWSON SCHOOL 10 6 60.0 22.2 20.5 23.8 21.5 22.2 <5h ƒ

KLONDIKE ISD KLONDIKE ISD 12 11 91.7 21.4 23.5 21.1 21.4 22.0 <5h ƒ

LAMESA ISD LAMESA H S 105 52 49.5 18.6 20.5 20.5 20.6 20.1 11 21.2

SANDS CISD SANDS CISD 10 5 50.0 20.0 21.8 18.4 20.4 20.2 <5h ƒ

DEAF SMITH HEREFORD ISD HEREFORD H S 190 86 45.3 18.5 19.9 19.4 20.1 19.6 14 16.3

DELTA COOPER ISD COOPER H S 54 34 63.0 20.2 20.5 21.6 21.6 21.1 7 20.6

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

80 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

DELTA FANNINDEL ISD FANNINDEL H S 9 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

DENTON ARGYLE ISD ARGYLE HIGH SCHOOL 75 24 32.0 20.3 21.6 21.4 20.8 21.1 8 33.3

AUBREY ISD AUBREY H S 71 17 23.9 16.8 19.7 17.5 19.7 18.6 <5h ƒ

DENTON ISD 699 185 26.5 19.1 19.8 20.8 20.2 20.1 42 22.7 RYAN H S 366 <115m ƒ 18.7 19.1 20.2 19.7 19.6 <25m ƒ DENTON H S 323 <75m ƒ 19.8 20.7 21.6 21.0 20.9 <25m ƒ FRED MOORE HIGH SCH 10 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

EDUCATION CENTE 30 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ EDUCATION CENTER AT 20 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ EDUCATION CENTER AT 10 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

KRUM ISD KRUM H S 57 13 22.8 19.0 21.3 20.8 19.8 20.5 <5h ƒ

LAKE DALLAS ISD LAKE DALLAS H S 188 50 26.6 19.4 19.7 19.9 20.1 19.9 7 14.0

LEWISVILLE ISD 2,470 1,368 55.4 20.6 21.8 22.2 21.2 21.6 470 34.4 LEWISVILLE H S 561 289 51.5 18.9 20.4 20.6 20.1 20.1 <70m ƒ MARCUS H S 547 276 50.5 22.3 23.4 23.5 22.1 22.9 121 43.8 THE COLONY H S 370 <245m ƒ 19.3 20.5 20.7 20.5 20.4 <65m ƒ LEARNING CTR 34 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ HEBRON H S 378 <220m ƒ 19.7 21.4 21.8 20.7 21.0 72 ƒ FLOWER MOUND H S 580 342 59.0 21.9 23.0 23.7 22.1 22.8 148 43.3

LITTLE ELM ISD LITTLE ELM H S 161 43 26.7 19.7 20.7 21.5 21.0 20.9 15 34.9

NORTHWEST ISD NORTHWEST H S 325 82 25.2 20.1 20.0 21.3 20.3 20.6 22 26.8

PILOT POINT ISD PILOT POINT H S 81 35 43.2 18.5 21.3 20.2 20.6 20.2 <5h ƒ

PONDER ISD PONDER H S 48 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SANGER ISD 143 33 23.1 20.0 21.2 22.2 21.6 21.3 <10m ƒ SANGER H S 124 <35m ƒ 20.0 21.2 22.2 21.6 21.3 <10m ƒ LINDA TUTT HIGH SCH 19 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

UNIVERSITY OF N TEXAS ACADEMY OF MA 0 28 ƒ 29.2 31.6 30.0 29.3 30.2 28 100

DEWITT CUERO ISD CUERO H S 116 69 59.5 20.1 20.4 19.7 20.3 20.2 13 18.8

NORDHEIM ISD NORDHEIM SCHOOL 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

YOAKUM ISD YOAKUM HIGH SCHOOL 77 45 58.4 19.4 19.9 19.3 20.1 19.8 9 20.0

YORKTOWN ISD YORKTOWN H S 44 12 27.3 20.3 19.8 21.1 19.9 20.4 <5h ƒ

DICKENS PATTON SPRINGS PATTON SPRINGS SCHO 4 9 225 14.2 15.8 16.4 17.4 16.0 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 81 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

DICKENS SPUR ISD SPUR SCHOOL 12 9 75.0 20.1 20.6 21.6 20.2 20.8 <5h ƒ

DIMMIT CARRIZO SPRINGS CARRIZO SPRINGS H S 116 17 14.7 15.1 16.8 14.9 16.8 16.2 <5h ƒ

DONLEY CLARENDON ISD CLARENDON H S 30 23 76.7 23.7 20.7 23.2 22.2 22.7 8 34.8

HEDLEY ISD HEDLEY SCHOOL 11 5 45.5 20.8 21.6 22.4 21.4 21.6 <5h ƒ

DUVAL BENAVIDES ISD BENAVIDES SECONDARY 30 29 96.7 13.9 16.2 15.9 15.8 15.7 <5h ƒ

FREER ISD FREER H S 43 32 74.4 15.8 17.3 17.0 16.9 16.9 <5h ƒ

SAN DIEGO ISD SAN DIEGO H S 75 47 62.7 14.9 16.4 16.2 17.3 16.3 <5h ƒ

EASTLAND CISCO ISD 64 <25m ƒ 18.7 19.4 19.8 19.9 19.4 <5h ƒ CISCO H S 57 <25m ƒ 18.7 19.4 19.8 19.9 19.4 <5h ƒ CISCO LEARNING CENT 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

EASTLAND ISD EASTLAND H S 70 21 30.0 21.6 20.5 21.5 22.2 21.5 6 28.6

GORMAN ISD GORMAN H S 21 11 52.4 15.9 18.1 16.7 17.4 17.1 <5h ƒ

RANGER ISD RANGER H S 17 7 41.2 18.1 21.6 18.9 19.6 19.7 <5h ƒ

RISING STAR ISD RISING STAR H S 20 14 70.0 18.4 18.4 19.4 19.9 19.1 <5h ƒ

ECTOR ECTOR COUNTY IS 1,156 129 11.2 18.8 20.3 20.0 20.4 20.1 30 23.3 ODESSA H S 500 <55m ƒ 18.4 20.4 19.8 20.9 20.0 <15m ƒ PERMIAN H S 514 76 14.8 19.2 20.3 20.2 20.3 20.2 <20m ƒ A I M 41 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ TEEN PARENT CTR 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ CAREER CTR 100 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

RICHARD MILBURN RICHARD MILBURN ACA 31 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

EDWARDS NUECES CANYON C NUECES CANYON JH/HS 25 10 40.0 19.9 20.6 20.6 20.9 20.7 <5h ƒ

ROCKSPRINGS ISD ROCKSPRINGS H S 17 13 76.5 15.4 18.0 16.9 19.8 17.6 <5h ƒ

EL PASO ANTHONY ISD ANTHONY H S 23 19 82.6 17.1 16.7 16.5 17.6 17.2 <5h ƒ

CANUTILLO ISD CANUTILLO H S 189 83 43.9 14.9 16.8 16.4 17.0 16.4 5 6.0

CLINT ISD 420 111 26.4 16.0 17.3 17.2 17.3 17.1 10 9.0 CLINT HIGH SCHOOL 207 61 29.5 16.0 17.1 17.0 17.7 17.0 <5h ƒ MOUNTAIN VIEW HIGH 213 50 23.5 16.0 17.5 17.5 16.8 17.1 <10m ƒ

EL PASO ACADEMY 153 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ EL PASO ACADEMY 95 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ EL PASO ACADEMY WES 58 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

EL PASO ISD 2,978 445 14.9 19.2 20.5 20.5 20.3 20.2 113 25.4

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

82 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

EL PASO EL PASO ISD ANDRESS H S 305 23 7.5 17.8 19.3 19.3 19.1 19.0 7 30.4 AUSTIN H S 192 14 7.3 19.2 21.6 19.4 20.0 20.2 <5h ƒ BOWIE H S 176 62 35.2 13.5 17.4 14.9 16.8 15.7 <5h ƒ BURGES H S 235 46 19.6 17.3 19.2 18.7 19.1 18.7 5 10.9 CORONADO H S 483 74 15.3 22.1 21.9 23.4 21.7 22.4 29 39.2 EL PASO H S 185 <15m ƒ 21.9 22.4 22.8 21.1 22.2 <5h ƒ IRVIN H S 257 <15m ƒ 15.3 16.8 17.3 17.8 16.8 <5h ƒ JEFFERSON H S 169 26 15.4 14.4 16.9 16.3 17.5 16.3 <5h ƒ FRANKLIN H S 505 78 15.4 22.5 23.4 23.6 23.0 23.2 38 48.7 SILVA HEALTH MAGNET 134 45 33.6 20.2 19.8 21.8 20.7 20.8 9 20.0 CHAPIN HS 307 53 17.3 20.9 21.8 22.2 21.9 21.8 19 35.8 SCHOOL-AGE PARENT C 14 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ SUNSET H S 16 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

FABENS ISD FABENS H S 130 15 11.5 16.5 16.7 15.9 17.9 16.9 <5h ƒ

PASO DEL NORTE PASO DEL NORTE ACAD 15 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SAN ELIZARIO IS SAN ELIZARIO H S 159 107 67.3 13.8 17.1 15.4 16.9 15.9 <5h ƒ

SOCORRO ISD 1,618 96 5.9 18.8 19.8 20.2 20.4 19.9 19 19.8 SOCORRO H S 506 36 7.1 17.7 18.2 18.5 19.5 18.6 <5h ƒ MONTWOOD H S 557 19 3.4 20.7 22.2 22.8 22.2 22.1 <10m ƒ AMERICAS H S 555 41 7.4 18.8 20.1 20.5 20.3 20.0 10 24.4

TORNILLO ISD TORNILLO H S 39 11 28.2 12.5 15.8 16.1 16.5 15.4 <5h ƒ

YSLETA ISD 2,494 421 16.9 14.6 17.2 16.2 17.2 16.4 29 6.9 BEL AIR H S 409 40 9.8 16.4 18.5 17.8 18.6 17.9 <5h ƒ EASTWOOD H S 412 89 21.6 18.0 20.2 19.2 19.4 19.3 19 21.3 PARKLAND H S 172 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ YSLETA H S 347 209 60.2 12.9 15.9 14.5 16.2 15.0 <5h ƒ RIVERSIDE H S 259 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ J M HANKS H S 478 23 4.8 19.2 20.0 19.8 20.6 20.0 5 21.7 DEL VALLE H S 343 40 11.7 13.7 15.4 16.0 15.9 15.4 <5h ƒ TEJAS SCHOOL OF CHO 44 15 34.1 10.2 13.5 13.0 13.1 12.6 <5h ƒ DISTRICT HOMEBOUND 4 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ PLATO ACADEMY 26 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

ELLIS AVALON ISD AVALON SCHOOL 15 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

ENNIS ISD ENNIS H S 263 168 63.9 18.1 19.3 19.0 19.7 19.1 27 16.1

FERRIS ISD FERRIS H S 96 6 6.3 17.7 17.7 18.5 19.3 18.5 <5h ƒ

ITALY ISD ITALY H S 34 19 55.9 17.3 19.3 20.0 19.6 19.2 <5h ƒ

MAYPEARL ISD MAYPEARL H S 55 20 36.4 22.7 21.2 22.5 21.7 22.1 9 45.0

MIDLOTHIAN ISD MIDLOTHIAN H S 297 179 60.3 20.8 21.1 21.2 21.5 21.3 49 27.4

MILFORD ISD MILFORD SCHOOL 10 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 83 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

ELLIS PALMER ISD PALMER H S 53 18 34.0 20.1 20.8 21.7 20.5 21.0 <5h ƒ

RED OAK ISD RED OAK H S 260 119 45.8 20.4 20.2 21.6 20.8 20.8 29 24.4

WAXAHACHIE FAIT WAXAHACHIE FAITH FA 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WAXAHACHIE ISD WAXAHACHIE H S 334 94 28.1 21.0 21.0 21.6 21.4 21.3 27 28.7

ERATH DUBLIN ISD DUBLIN H S 67 13 19.4 18.5 19.0 18.2 19.4 18.9 <5h ƒ

HUCKABAY ISD HUCKABAY SCHOOL 10 11 110 16.3 17.7 16.7 18.1 17.4 <5h ƒ

LINGLEVILLE ISD LINGLEVILLE SCHOOL 14 8 57.1 17.8 18.3 18.4 19.8 18.9 <5h ƒ

PARADIGM ACCELE PARADIGM ACCELERATE 22 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

STEPHENVILLE STEPHENVILLE H S 208 129 62.0 19.7 21.0 20.5 20.5 20.6 35 27.1

FALLS CHILTON ISD CHILTON SCHOOL 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MARLIN ISD MARLIN H S 65 8 12.3 17.1 17.0 19.3 18.4 18.1 <5h ƒ

ROSEBUD-LOTT IS 61 38 62.3 20.7 21.6 21.1 21.6 21.3 12 31.6 ROSEBUD-LOTT H S 59 <40m ƒ 20.7 21.6 21.1 21.6 21.3 <15m ƒ ROSEBUD-LOTT LEARNI 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

FANNIN BONHAM ISD BONHAM H S 91 25 27.5 19.0 20.2 21.5 20.8 20.6 5 20.0

DODD CITY ISD DODD CITY SCHOOL 11 8 72.7 18.6 18.9 17.3 19.5 18.8 <5h ƒ

ECTOR ISD ECTOR HIGH SCHOOL 18 9 50.0 18.8 19.9 20.7 20.0 19.8 <5h ƒ

HONEY GROVE ISD HONEY GROVE H S 38 24 63.2 19.4 19.4 20.1 18.4 19.5 6 25.0

LEONARD ISD LEONARD HIGH SCHOOL 42 22 52.4 20.3 20.8 21.7 21.8 21.2 5 22.7

SAM RAYBURN ISD RAYBURN H S 20 11 55.0 19.4 19.5 21.8 20.3 20.5 <5h ƒ

SAVOY ISD SAVOY H S 16 9 56.3 18.2 19.7 18.2 19.8 19.1 <5h ƒ

TRENTON ISD TRENTON H S 31 10 32.3 17.0 17.6 16.5 18.3 17.6 <5h ƒ

FAYETTE FAYETTEVILLE IS FAYETTEVILLE H S 18 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

FLATONIA ISD FLATONIA SECONDARY 31 20 64.5 19.9 21.1 21.3 21.6 21.0 6 30.0

LA GRANGE ISD LA GRANGE H S 117 16 13.7 21.4 21.9 22.1 22.9 22.3 6 37.5

ROUND TOP-CARMI ROUND TOP-CARMINE H 17 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SCHULENBURG ISD SCHULENBURG H S 58 9 15.5 17.6 19.0 18.7 18.9 18.7 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

84 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

FISHER ROBY CISD ROBY H S 21 18 85.7 18.5 18.9 19.0 18.9 19.0 <5h ƒ

ROTAN ISD ROTAN H S 22 13 59.1 20.2 19.5 18.8 20.1 19.8 <5h ƒ

FLOYD FLOYDADA ISD FLOYDADA H S 49 31 63.3 19.5 20.8 20.1 20.5 20.3 7 22.6

LOCKNEY ISD LOCKNEY HIGH SCHOOL 43 29 67.4 18.6 21.4 20.4 21.4 20.6 5 17.2

FOARD CROWELL ISD CROWELL H S 10 6 60.0 17.0 17.3 17.8 19.7 18.2 <5h ƒ

FORT BEND FORT BEND ISD 4,107 1,102 26.8 20.2 21.2 21.0 20.7 20.9 319 28.9 DULLES H S 504 76 15.1 20.6 22.4 21.4 21.5 21.6 30 39.5 WILLOWRIDGE H S 311 55 17.7 14.9 16.6 14.9 16.5 15.8 <5h ƒ CLEMENTS H S 540 165 30.6 21.9 23.7 23.0 22.1 22.8 66 40.0 KEMPNER H S 527 90 17.1 19.8 21.4 20.6 20.4 20.6 23 25.6 LAWRENCE E ELKINS H 444 209 47.1 21.9 22.1 22.3 21.5 22.1 85 40.7 STEPHEN F AUSTIN H 611 210 34.4 22.0 23.3 22.9 22.4 22.8 76 36.2 HIGHTOWER H S 378 135 35.7 18.6 18.8 19.3 19.4 19.2 17 12.6 GEORGE BUSH HIGH SC 437 82 18.8 18.5 19.5 20.4 19.7 19.7 19 23.2 THURGOOD MARSHALL H 355 80 22.5 15.4 16.2 16.1 17.3 16.4 <5h ƒ

LAMAR CISD 889 311 35.0 19.3 20.2 19.9 20.0 20.0 75 24.1 LAMAR CONS H S 282 84 29.8 20.5 20.4 20.6 19.9 20.5 20 23.8 B F TERRY H S 288 101 35.1 18.3 19.0 18.8 19.3 18.9 16 15.8 FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL 319 126 39.5 19.3 20.9 20.3 20.6 20.4 39 31.0

NEEDVILLE ISD NEEDVILLE H S 123 67 54.5 20.6 20.5 20.8 20.5 20.7 16 23.9

STAFFORD MSD STAFFORD HIGH SCHOO 135 21 15.6 21.7 20.0 22.4 20.9 21.4 6 28.6

FRANKLIN MOUNT VERNON IS MT VERNON H S 81 44 54.3 22.8 21.2 21.9 21.8 22.0 16 36.4

FREESTONE FAIRFIELD ISD FAIRFIELD H S 75 41 54.7 20.7 22.0 21.9 20.7 21.4 14 34.1

TEAGUE ISD TEAGUE H S 58 13 22.4 16.3 17.8 18.2 18.2 17.7 <5h ƒ

WORTHAM ISD WORTHAM H S 31 18 58.1 19.4 20.6 19.2 20.8 20.1 <5h ƒ

FRIO DILLEY ISD DILLEY H S 41 39 95.1 18.0 17.6 18.4 18.7 18.3 <5h ƒ

PEARSALL ISD PEARSALL H S 106 49 46.2 16.5 17.8 17.5 17.9 17.6 5 10.2

GAINES LOOP ISD LOOP SCHOOL 8 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SEAGRAVES ISD 26 18 69.2 16.6 17.0 18.0 17.8 17.4 <5h ƒ SEAGRAVES H S 24 <20m ƒ 16.6 17.0 18.0 17.8 17.4 <5h ƒ CHOICES ALTERNATIVE 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SEMINOLE ISD 126 31 24.6 17.9 21.8 20.1 20.2 20.1 6 19.4 SEMINOLE H S 115 <35m ƒ 17.9 21.8 20.1 20.2 20.1 <10m ƒ SEMINOLE SUCCESS CT 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 85 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

GALVESTON CLEAR CREEK ISD 1,952 502 25.7 21.9 23.4 23.2 22.5 22.9 212 42.2 CLEAR CREEK H S 626 151 24.1 21.2 23.0 22.7 22.1 22.4 <65m ƒ CLEAR LAKE H S 753 233 30.9 23.1 24.7 24.2 23.4 24.0 119 51.1 CLEAR BROOK H S 524 <120m ƒ 20.6 21.1 22.2 21.4 21.5 <35m ƒ CLEAR VIEW ALTER 49 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

DICKINSON ISD 268 31 11.6 17.1 19.3 18.2 18.5 18.4 <5h ƒ DICKINSON H S 267 <35m ƒ 17.1 19.3 18.2 18.5 18.4 <5h ƒ GALVESTON CO DETENT 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

FRIENDSWOOD ISD FRIENDSWOOD H S 384 86 22.4 23.3 24.5 24.1 23.4 24.0 43 50.0

GALVESTON ISD BALL H S 420 73 17.4 15.6 17.5 16.8 17.3 17.0 7 9.6

HIGH ISLAND ISD HIGH ISLAND H S 22 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HITCHCOCK ISD HITCHCOCK H S 60 6 10.0 13.8 16.8 14.5 17.7 15.8 <5h ƒ

LA MARQUE ISD LA MARQUE H S 178 42 23.6 14.9 16.0 16.0 16.1 15.8 <5h ƒ

SANTA FE ISD SANTA FE H S 228 44 19.3 19.6 21.8 20.9 20.7 20.8 10 22.7

TEXAS CITY ISD TEXAS CITY H S 250 32 12.8 17.8 17.8 18.2 19.2 18.3 <5h ƒ

GARZA POST ISD POST H S 67 33 49.3 19.0 19.8 19.9 20.2 19.8 6 18.2

SOUTHLAND ISD SOUTHLAND SCHOOL 8 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

GILLESPIE FREDERICKSBURG 215 58 27.0 20.7 20.5 22.0 21.5 21.3 14 24.1 FREDERICKSBURG H S 213 <60m ƒ 20.7 20.5 22.0 21.5 21.3 <15m ƒ ALTER SCH 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HARPER ISD HARPER H S 19 22 116 19.0 21.8 21.6 22.1 21.4 8 36.4

GLASSCOCK GLASSCOCK COUNT GLASSCOCK COUNTY H 22 17 77.3 19.8 21.5 21.1 22.0 21.1 <5h ƒ

GOLIAD GOLIAD ISD GOLIAD H S 75 33 44.0 18.3 18.9 20.0 19.0 19.2 <5h ƒ

GONZALES GONZALES ISD 127 58 45.7 18.3 20.6 19.4 20.6 19.9 11 19.0 GONZALES H S 113 <60m ƒ 18.3 20.6 19.4 20.6 19.9 <15m ƒ GONZALES ALTER 14 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

NIXON-SMILEY CI NIXON-SMILEY H S 53 15 28.3 16.7 18.6 18.1 19.6 18.3 <5h ƒ

WAELDER ISD WAELDER H S 15 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

GRAY LEFORS ISD LEFORS SCHOOL 11 5 45.5 22.8 22.4 22.2 21.8 22.4 <5h ƒ

MCLEAN ISD MCLEAN SCHOOL 12 10 83.3 18.3 18.3 21.5 19.6 19.5 <5h ƒ

PAMPA ISD 173 <85m ƒ 19.5 20.1 20.1 20.4 20.2 13 ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

86 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

GRAY PAMPA ISD PAMPA H S 160 <85m ƒ 19.5 20.1 20.1 20.4 20.2 <15m ƒ P L C-PAMPA LEARNIN 13 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

GRAYSON BELLS ISD BELLS H S 47 10 21.3 20.9 21.0 21.2 22.3 21.5 <5h ƒ

COLLINSVILLE IS COLLINSVILLE H S 30 24 80.0 18.8 19.1 19.5 19.6 19.3 <5h ƒ

DENISON ISD 244 99 40.6 19.8 21.2 21.7 20.8 21.0 27 27.3 DENISON H S 237 <100m ƒ 19.8 21.2 21.7 20.8 21.0 <30m ƒ PATHWAYS H S 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

GUNTER ISD GUNTER H S 46 29 63.0 20.3 20.9 21.1 21.4 21.1 5 17.2

HOWE ISD HOWE H S 55 31 56.4 23.2 21.9 24.2 22.3 23.0 15 48.4

POTTSBORO ISD POTTSBORO H S 70 32 45.7 20.2 20.8 22.2 21.6 21.3 8 25.0

S AND S CISD S AND S CONS H S 45 15 33.3 22.9 21.0 24.4 22.7 22.8 8 53.3

SHERMAN ISD 309 <95m ƒ 20.0 20.7 21.0 20.6 20.7 <30m ƒ SHERMAN HIGH SCHOOL 304 <95m ƒ 20.0 20.7 21.0 20.6 20.7 <30m ƒ COOKE/FANNIN/GRAYSO 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ DOUGLASS LEARNING C 4 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TOM BEAN ISD TOM BEAN H S 44 19 43.2 16.6 17.7 19.3 20.5 18.6 <5h ƒ

VAN ALSTYNE ISD VAN ALSTYNE H S 85 15 17.6 24.1 23.9 25.9 24.2 24.7 12 80.0

WHITESBORO ISD WHITESBORO H S 87 54 62.1 19.4 19.9 20.9 20.4 20.3 13 24.1

WHITEWRIGHT ISD WHITEWRIGHT H S 43 9 20.9 21.2 20.9 21.7 21.2 21.3 <5h ƒ

GREGG EAST TEXAS CHAR DAN CHADWICK CAMPUS 61 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

GLADEWATER ISD GLADEWATER H S 101 26 25.7 18.7 18.5 18.8 19.7 19.2 6 23.1

KILGORE ISD 219 69 31.5 18.8 18.3 19.7 19.8 19.3 14 20.3 KILGORE H S 214 <70m ƒ 18.8 18.3 19.7 19.8 19.3 <15m ƒ DANVILLE ALTERNATIV 5 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LONGVIEW ISD LONGVIEW H S 355 87 24.5 19.3 19.8 20.0 19.5 19.8 18 20.7

PINE TREE ISD PINE TREE H S 261 96 36.8 22.1 22.9 22.7 22.3 22.6 38 39.6

SABINE ISD SABINE H S 63 15 23.8 21.7 22.0 20.9 20.5 21.5 <5h ƒ

SPRING HILL ISD SPRING HILL H S 80 60 75.0 22.5 21.9 21.5 21.1 21.9 17 28.3

WHITE OAK ISD WHITE OAK H S 71 35 49.3 20.7 19.9 20.6 20.5 20.6 6 17.1

GRIMES ANDERSON-SHIRO ANDERSON-SHIRO SECO 28 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 87 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

GRIMES IOLA ISD IOLA H S 23 6 26.1 16.7 19.2 15.7 19.8 17.8 <5h ƒ

NAVASOTA ISD 158 33 20.9 17.0 18.9 17.3 18.8 18.1 <5h ƒ NAVASOTA H S 154 <35m ƒ 17.0 18.9 17.3 18.8 18.1 <5h ƒ SUCCESS ACADEMY AT 4 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

RICHARDS ISD RICHARDS H S 9 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

GUADALUPE MARION ISD MARION H S 86 22 25.6 20.1 23.0 19.5 21.7 21.1 7 31.8

NAVARRO ISD NAVARRO HIGH SCHOOL 73 32 43.8 19.6 20.8 22.0 20.8 20.9 7 21.9

SCHERTZ-CIBOLO- 518 137 26.4 20.5 21.7 21.4 21.4 21.4 39 28.5 SAMUEL CLEMENS H S 491 <140m ƒ 20.5 21.7 21.4 21.4 21.4 <40m ƒ ALLISON STEELE ENH 27 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SEGUIN ISD 360 111 30.8 18.6 19.5 19.1 19.1 19.1 12 10.8 SEGUIN HIGH SCHOOL 324 <115m ƒ 18.6 19.5 19.1 19.1 19.1 <15m ƒ MERCER & BLUMBERG L 36 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HALE ABERNATHY ISD ABERNATHY H S 31 21 67.7 18.6 19.9 19.0 19.9 19.4 <5h ƒ

COTTON CENTER I COTTON CENTER SCHOO 9 9 100 23.7 19.6 21.9 22.0 22.0 <5h ƒ

HALE CENTER ISD HALE CENTER H S 29 18 62.1 20.1 19.2 19.5 19.3 19.6 5 27.8

PETERSBURG ISD PETERSBURG H S 23 24 104 17.8 19.0 19.5 18.9 19.0 <5h ƒ

PLAINVIEW ISD 268 136 50.7 18.2 19.2 19.2 19.5 19.1 19 14.0 PLAINVIEW HIGH SCHO 252 <140m ƒ 18.2 19.2 19.2 19.6 19.2 <20m ƒ HOUSTON SCHOOL 16 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HALL MEMPHIS ISD MEMPHIS H S 18 8 44.4 18.6 24.3 21.6 20.4 21.3 <5h ƒ

TURKEY-QUITAQUE VALLEY SCHOOL 15 10 66.7 15.1 18.4 17.1 17.9 17.4 <5h ƒ

HAMILTON HAMILTON ISD HAMILTON HIGH SCHOO 52 34 65.4 19.6 19.9 21.2 20.4 20.4 10 29.4

HICO ISD HICO H S 50 43 86.0 18.3 20.7 20.3 20.6 20.0 8 18.6

HANSFORD GRUVER ISD GRUVER H S 22 21 95.5 20.4 22.0 22.3 21.2 21.6 8 38.1

SPEARMAN ISD SPEARMAN H S 48 45 93.8 20.2 21.1 20.7 20.7 20.8 11 24.4

HARDEMAN CHILLICOTHE ISD CHILLICOTHE H S 16 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

QUANAH ISD QUANAH H S 36 25 69.4 19.8 20.1 20.7 20.5 20.4 6 24.0

HARDIN HARDIN-JEFFERSO HARDIN-JEFFERSON H 133 14 10.5 20.1 20.1 20.2 20.1 20.3 <5h ƒ

KOUNTZE ISD KOUNTZE H S 61 7 11.5 18.4 18.6 18.1 17.6 18.3 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

88 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

HARDIN LUMBERTON ISD LUMBERTON H S 203 29 14.3 21.9 19.2 23.3 21.1 21.6 10 34.5

SILSBEE ISD SILSBEE H S 170 8 4.7 19.3 17.3 20.0 19.1 19.1 <5h ƒ

WEST HARDIN COU WEST HARDIN H S 46 6 13.0 13.5 16.0 13.8 13.2 14.2 <5h ƒ

HARRIS ALDINE ISD 2,011 414 20.6 16.3 17.8 16.5 17.6 17.2 33 8.0 ALDINE HIGH SCHOOL 427 113 26.5 15.8 17.6 16.2 17.2 16.8 6 5.3 CARVER H S FOR APP 85 <15m ƒ 17.2 18.9 18.2 18.7 18.5 <5h ƒ MACARTHUR HIGH SCHO 420 88 21.0 16.9 18.1 16.9 18.0 17.6 7 8.0 EISENHOWER HIGH SCH 513 <80m ƒ 15.3 16.6 15.8 17.0 16.3 <10m ƒ NIMITZ HIGH SCHOOL 473 122 25.8 17.0 18.5 16.9 17.9 17.7 13 10.7 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 93 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

ALIEF ISD 1,921 301 15.7 16.3 17.8 17.8 18.2 17.7 23 7.6 HASTINGS H S 578 <105m ƒ 16.1 17.6 18.0 18.4 17.7 <10m ƒ ELSIK H S 658 177 26.9 15.8 17.7 17.1 17.7 17.2 9 5.1 TAYLOR HIGH SCHOOL 534 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ KERR H S 151 <25m ƒ 21.3 19.9 23.0 21.1 21.5 <10m ƒ

ALPHONSO CRUTCH ALPHONSO CRUTCH'S-L 29 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

AMERICAN ACADEM AMERICAN ACADEMY OF 23 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BAY AREA CHARTE ED WHITE MEMORIAL H 28 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BENJI'S SPECIAL BENJI'S SPECIAL EDU 10 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CALVIN NELMS CH CALVIN NELMS HIGH S 51 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CHANNELVIEW ISD 296 41 13.9 18.3 19.3 19.6 19.6 19.4 9 22.0 CHANNELVIEW HIGH SC 282 <45m ƒ 18.3 19.3 19.6 19.6 19.4 <10m ƒ ENDEAVOR SCHOOL 14 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

COMQUEST ACADEM COMQUEST ACADEMY 44 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CROSBY ISD CROSBY HIGH SCHOOL 200 66 33.0 17.3 18.5 18.1 19.1 18.3 8 12.1

CROSSROADS COMM CROSSROAD COMMUNITY 16 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CYPRESS-FAIRBAN 4,297 1,169 27.2 20.4 21.9 21.3 21.2 21.3 358 30.6 CY-FAIR H S 612 221 36.1 21.8 22.7 22.8 22.0 22.5 91 41.2 JERSEY VILLAGE H S 650 145 22.3 20.3 21.7 21.0 21.1 21.1 40 27.6 CYPRESS CREEK H S 568 189 33.3 20.7 22.1 22.1 21.5 21.7 63 33.3 LANGHAM CREEK H S 634 150 23.7 20.6 22.7 21.5 21.6 21.8 50 33.3 CYPRESS FALLS H S 613 205 33.4 20.9 22.4 21.6 21.6 21.8 67 32.7 WINDFERN H S 125 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ CYPRESS SPRINGS H S 582 131 22.5 19.4 20.9 20.2 20.6 20.4 <35m ƒ CYPRESS RIDGE HIGH 513 <130m ƒ 17.6 19.8 18.7 19.1 18.9 <20m ƒ

DEER PARK ISD DEER PARK HS 706 110 15.6 20.6 23.2 22.0 21.6 22.0 27 24.5

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 89 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

HARRIS GALENA PARK ISD 998 247 24.7 15.8 17.7 17.3 17.8 17.3 12 4.9 GALENA PARK H S 262 <55m ƒ 14.4 16.8 17.0 17.4 16.5 <5h ƒ NORTH SHORE H S 0 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ NORTH SHORE SR H S 736 194 26.4 16.2 17.9 17.4 18.0 17.5 <15m ƒ

GEORGE I SANCHE GEORGE I SANCHEZ H 65 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

GIRLS & BOYS PR GIRLS & BOYS PREP A 14 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

GOOSE CREEK CIS 892 87 9.8 19.6 20.6 21.2 20.5 20.6 21 24.1 LEE H S 399 <30m ƒ 19.3 20.1 20.2 19.6 20.0 <10m ƒ STERLING H S 472 60 12.7 19.7 20.9 21.7 20.9 20.9 <20m ƒ ALTERNATIVE LEARNIN 0 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ NIGHT SCHOOL 21 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

GULF SHORES ACA GULF SHORES HIGH SC 0 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HARMONY SCIENCE HARMONY SCIENCE ACA 13 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HOUSTON CAN ACA 156 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ HOUSTON CAN! ACADEM 95 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ HOUSTON CAN ACADEMY 61 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HOUSTON HEIGHTS HOUSTON HEIGHTS HIG 57 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HOUSTON ISD 7,573 1,565 20.7 17.9 18.8 18.6 18.7 18.6 285 18.2 AUSTIN H S 263 19 7.2 13.1 17.1 15.1 16.4 15.6 <5h ƒ BELLAIRE H S 645 149 23.1 22.8 23.6 23.4 22.4 23.2 72 48.3 DAVIS H S 242 22 9.1 14.0 16.5 15.5 16.5 15.7 <5h ƒ FURR H S 187 17 9.1 16.1 17.5 15.5 17.5 16.8 <5h ƒ SAM HOUSTON H S 377 9 2.4 13.4 15.8 15.3 14.6 15.0 <5h ƒ JONES H S 138 29 21.0 15.7 16.7 16.2 17.3 16.6 <5h ƒ KASHMERE H S 100 58 58.0 14.1 15.4 14.3 15.6 15.0 <5h ƒ LAMAR H S 658 209 31.8 21.8 21.0 22.3 20.8 21.6 70 33.5 LEE H S 266 10 3.8 15.9 19.3 18.1 18.3 17.9 <5h ƒ MADISON H S 330 73 22.1 15.6 16.4 15.6 16.9 16.3 <5h ƒ MILBY H S 384 50 13.0 14.2 17.0 14.8 16.9 15.8 <5h ƒ REAGAN H S 288 21 7.3 15.3 17.6 16.0 17.3 16.6 <5h ƒ COMMUNITY SERVICES- 4 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ STERLING H S 159 57 35.8 13.6 15.5 14.8 15.5 15.0 <5h ƒ WALTRIP H S 299 75 25.1 17.8 17.4 18.0 18.3 18.0 7 9.3 WASHINGTON B T H S 193 53 27.5 17.1 17.9 17.2 18.2 17.7 9 17.0 WESTBURY H S 253 48 19.0 15.5 16.9 16.7 17.0 16.7 <5h ƒ WHEATLEY H S 112 <10m ƒ 16.1 16.6 16.3 16.6 16.7 <5h ƒ WORTHING H S 181 55 30.4 14.1 15.7 15.5 15.7 15.3 <5h ƒ YATES H S 200 54 27.0 15.2 15.5 15.8 15.9 15.7 <5h ƒ SHARPSTOWN H S 234 90 38.5 16.0 17.1 16.8 17.4 17.0 <5h ƒ SCARBOROUGH H S 148 37 25.0 17.4 19.1 17.2 18.6 18.2 5 13.5 PERFOR & VIS ARTS H 157 19 12.1 23.7 21.8 23.1 21.3 22.5 8 42.1 DEBAKEY H S FOR HEA 124 46 37.1 25.0 26.3 26.6 24.1 25.7 37 80.4 CHAVEZ H S 373 40 10.7 17.0 18.3 17.6 18.0 17.9 <5h ƒ CONTEMPORARY LRN CT 50 30 60.0 12.4 15.1 14.4 15.9 14.6 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

90 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

HARRIS HOUSTON ISD KAY ON-GOING ED CTR 9 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ BARBARA JORDAN H S 240 67 27.9 14.9 16.4 15.5 16.2 15.9 <5h ƒ LAW ENFCMT-CRIM JUS 142 34 23.9 17.4 17.6 18.1 18.9 18.1 <5h ƒ WESTSIDE H S 523 142 27.2 20.3 21.0 20.9 20.6 20.8 38 26.8 H P CARTER CAREER C 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ MIDDLE COLLEGE FOR 69 33 47.8 19.0 18.0 20.5 19.7 19.4 <5h ƒ EASTWOOD ACADEMY 58 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ HOUSTON DROP BACK I 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ CARNEGIE VANGUARD H 28 11 39.3 25.3 24.2 27.4 25.7 25.8 7 63.6 CHALLENGE EARLY COL 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ ACCELERATED LEARNIN 119 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HUFFMAN ISD HARGRAVE H S 161 18 11.2 18.8 19.3 18.5 19.6 19.2 <5h ƒ

HUMBLE ISD 1,597 420 26.3 21.2 22.1 22.4 21.9 22.0 147 35.0 HUMBLE H S 730 230 31.5 19.7 21.0 21.0 21.1 20.8 56 24.3 KINGWOOD H S 824 182 22.1 22.8 23.5 24.0 22.8 23.4 86 47.3 QUEST H S 43 8 18.6 25.5 22.1 27.3 23.9 24.9 5 62.5

JAMIE'S HOUSE C JAMIE'S HOUSE CHART 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

JESSE JACKSON A JESSE JACKSON ACADE 144 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

JUAN B GALAVIZ JUAN B GALAVIZ CHAR 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

KATY ISD 2,572 922 35.8 22.7 23.7 23.7 22.7 23.3 429 46.5 KATY H S 588 <220m ƒ 21.5 22.4 22.3 21.9 22.2 <75m ƒ TAYLOR H S 621 261 42.0 23.5 24.6 24.8 23.3 24.2 145 55.6 MAYDE CREEK H S 643 <150m ƒ 20.7 21.9 22.0 21.0 21.5 <50m ƒ CINCO RANCH H S 706 296 41.9 23.8 24.9 24.5 23.7 24.3 169 57.1 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 14 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

KLEIN ISD 2,096 553 26.4 21.1 22.8 21.8 21.8 22.0 208 37.6 KLEIN H S 660 219 33.2 22.9 24.3 23.6 23.0 23.6 109 49.8 KLEIN FOREST H S 537 101 18.8 17.5 19.8 17.8 19.0 18.7 13 12.9 KLEIN OAK H S 359 75 20.9 20.6 22.7 21.8 21.7 21.8 29 38.7 KLEIN COLLINS HIGH 540 158 29.3 21.3 22.7 22.1 22.0 22.1 57 36.1

LA PORTE ISD 440 68 15.5 18.2 19.9 20.5 19.5 19.7 14 20.6 LA PORTE HIGH SCHOO 400 <70m ƒ 18.2 19.9 20.5 19.5 19.7 <15m ƒ DEWALT ALTER 40 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

NORTH FOREST IS 445 56 12.6 14.5 15.8 15.9 16.2 15.7 <5h ƒ SMILEY H S 236 26 11.0 14.3 15.7 16.2 16.3 15.7 <5h ƒ FOREST BROOK H S 209 30 14.4 14.6 16.0 15.6 16.1 15.8 <5h ƒ

NORTH HOUSTON H NORTH HOUSTON H S F 38 8 21.1 11.8 15.5 13.1 16.3 14.1 <5h ƒ

PASADENA ISD 1,807 247 13.7 17.8 19.3 18.6 19.6 19.0 33 13.4 PASADENA H S 455 101 22.2 16.9 18.3 17.4 18.8 18.0 <10m ƒ RAYBURN H S 439 65 14.8 18.7 20.0 20.1 20.8 20.0 13 20.0 SOUTH HOUSTON H S 426 <20m ƒ 16.5 20.1 17.6 19.0 18.4 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 91 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

HARRIS PASADENA ISD DOBIE H S 486 <65m ƒ 18.7 20.1 19.2 19.9 19.6 10 ƒ TEGELER CAREER CEN 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

RAUL YZAGUIRRE RAUL YZAGUIRRE SCHO 22 5 22.7 13.2 14.4 14.0 16.2 14.6 <5h ƒ

RICHARD MILBURN RICHARD MILBURN ACA 29 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SHELDON ISD 211 26 12.3 16.4 18.3 17.4 18.7 17.7 <5h ƒ C E KING H S 207 <30m ƒ 16.4 18.3 17.4 18.7 17.7 <5h ƒ KASE ACADEMY 4 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SOUTHWEST SCHOO SOUTHWEST HIGH SCHO 73 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SPRING BRANCH I 1,679 495 29.5 22.2 24.0 22.9 22.5 23.0 242 48.9 MEMORIAL H S 451 214 47.5 24.6 26.0 25.0 24.2 25.1 141 65.9 SPRING WOODS H S 369 82 22.2 19.3 21.7 20.4 20.6 20.6 25 30.5 NORTHBROOK H S 372 29 7.8 14.3 18.1 15.8 17.8 16.6 <5h ƒ STRATFORD H S 421 154 36.6 22.3 23.8 22.9 22.3 22.9 69 44.8 SPRING BRANCH SCHOO 32 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ WESTCHESTER ACADEMY 34 <15m ƒ 20.1 21.4 21.6 20.2 21.0 <5h ƒ

SPRING ISD 1,345 299 22.2 18.2 19.8 19.1 19.6 19.3 56 18.7 SPRING H S 598 <130m ƒ 19.2 20.7 19.8 20.5 20.1 <30m ƒ WESTFIELD H S 744 <175m ƒ 17.4 19.3 18.6 19.1 18.7 <30m ƒ SP ED CONTRACT 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TOMBALL ISD TOMBALL H S 498 149 29.9 21.3 22.6 22.7 22.3 22.4 53 35.6

WEST HOUSTON CH WEST HOUSTON CHARTE 0 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

YES COLLEGE PRE YES COLLEGE PREPARA 73 38 52.1 19.3 20.0 18.8 19.0 19.4 5 13.2

HARRISON ELYSIAN FIELDS ELYSIAN FIELDS H S 67 56 83.6 19.6 19.5 20.3 19.7 19.9 15 26.8

HALLSVILLE ISD HALLSVILLE H S 208 54 26.0 19.8 21.8 20.4 21.1 20.9 17 31.5

HARLETON ISD HARLETON H S 31 31 100 19.2 19.3 20.3 19.3 19.5 5 16.1

KARNACK ISD KARNACK H S 6 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MARSHALL ISD 312 146 46.8 18.1 19.0 19.8 19.8 19.3 22 15.1 MARSHALL H S 288 <150m ƒ 18.1 19.0 19.8 19.8 19.3 <25m ƒ MARSHALL ACHIEVEMEN 24 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WASKOM ISD WASKOM H S 38 25 65.8 20.0 18.8 19.5 19.4 19.6 <5h ƒ

HARTLEY CHANNING ISD CHANNING SCHOOL 8 5 62.5 24.8 22.4 23.8 23.2 23.6 <5h ƒ

HARTLEY ISD HARTLEY SCHOOL 12 8 66.7 18.5 19.9 20.9 22.8 20.8 <5h ƒ

HASKELL HASKELL CISD HASKELL H S 31 24 77.4 18.1 18.8 19.3 18.9 19.0 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

92 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

HASKELL PAINT CREEK ISD PAINT CREEK SCHOOL 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

ROCHESTER COUNT ROCHESTER SCHOOL 0 10 ƒ 15.6 16.1 15.9 16.9 16.3 <5h ƒ

RULE ISD RULE SCHOOL 9 6 66.7 21.8 22.0 24.8 23.2 23.0 <5h ƒ

HAYS DRIPPING SPRING DRIPPING SPRINGS H 212 105 49.5 22.7 23.7 23.9 22.4 23.4 50 47.6

HAYS CISD 453 124 27.4 17.9 19.2 19.5 19.4 19.1 19 15.3 JACK C HAYS H S 413 116 28.1 17.7 19.0 19.3 19.3 18.9 <20m ƒ ACADEMY AT HAYS 40 8 20.0 20.9 21.9 22.0 21.0 21.6 <5h ƒ

KATHERINE ANNE KATHERINE ANNE PORT 24 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SAN MARCOS CISD 366 <95m ƒ 18.1 19.7 19.1 19.1 19.1 <20m ƒ SAN MARCOS H S 341 <95m ƒ 18.1 19.7 19.1 19.1 19.1 <20m ƒ PRIDE HIGH SCHOOL 25 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WIMBERLEY ISD WIMBERLEY H S 143 63 44.1 22.3 21.9 22.9 22.3 22.5 29 46.0

HEMPHILL CANADIAN ISD CANADIAN H S 31 31 100 20.8 22.1 22.1 22.2 21.9 7 22.6

HENDERSON ATHENS ISD ATHENS H S 166 42 25.3 20.2 21.7 20.8 20.7 21.0 12 28.6

BROWNSBORO ISD 160 19 11.9 19.8 20.0 22.1 20.1 20.7 <10m ƒ BROWNSBORO H S 159 <20m ƒ 19.8 20.0 22.1 20.1 20.7 <10m ƒ ACES CAMPUS 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CROSS ROADS ISD CROSS ROADS H S 33 13 39.4 19.6 18.2 20.5 20.2 19.7 <5h ƒ

EUSTACE ISD EUSTACE H S 58 12 20.7 21.4 22.9 23.8 23.5 23.0 6 50.0

LAPOYNOR ISD 15 6 40.0 16.2 18.0 17.7 18.3 17.7 <5h ƒ LAPOYNOR H S 14 <10m ƒ 16.2 18.0 17.7 18.3 17.7 <5h ƒ A L P H A CAMPUS 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MALAKOFF ISD 58 11 19.0 23.8 21.9 22.9 21.7 22.6 <10m ƒ MALAKOFF H S 51 <15m ƒ 23.8 21.9 22.9 21.7 22.6 <10m ƒ GATEWAY 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TRINIDAD ISD 17 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ TRINIDAD SCHOOL 14 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ A L P H A CAMPUS 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HIDALGO DONNA ISD DONNA HIGH SCHOOL 369 267 72.4 15.2 16.6 16.9 17.2 16.6 <5h ƒ

EAGLE ACADEMY O 56 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ EAGLE ACADEMY OF PH 38 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ EAGLE ACADEMY OF PH 18 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

EDCOUCH-ELSA IS EDCOUCH-ELSA H S 264 121 45.8 14.3 17.1 15.8 16.7 16.1 5 4.1

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 93 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

HIDALGO EDINBURG CISD 1,092 813 74.5 15.5 17.7 17.3 18.0 17.2 53 6.5 EDINBURG H S 420 361 86.0 16.2 18.0 17.9 18.5 17.8 26 7.2 ECONOMEDES H S 331 217 65.6 14.5 17.0 16.4 17.4 16.5 <5h ƒ EDINBURG NORTH H S 341 235 68.9 15.3 17.9 17.0 17.8 17.1 <25m ƒ

HIDALGO ISD 156 87 55.8 14.3 17.0 15.8 16.9 16.2 <5h ƒ HIDALGO H S 150 74 49.3 15.1 17.5 16.3 17.8 16.8 <5h ƒ HIDALGO ACADEMY 6 13 217 10.3 14.1 12.8 12.2 12.5 <5h ƒ

LA JOYA ISD 736 374 50.8 14.7 16.8 16.4 17.2 16.4 13 3.5 LA JOYA SENIOR HIGH 659 <375m ƒ 14.7 16.8 16.4 17.2 16.4 <15m ƒ ALTER CTR FOR ED 76 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ JUAREZ/LINCOLN HIGH 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LA VILLA ISD 38 23 60.5 14.9 15.9 16.7 16.3 16.1 <5h ƒ LA VILLA H S 36 <25m ƒ 14.9 15.9 16.7 16.3 16.1 <5h ƒ LA VILLA ALTERNATIV 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MCALLEN ISD 1,141 482 42.2 16.6 19.0 18.1 18.4 18.2 55 11.4 MCALLEN HIGH SCHOOL 366 116 31.7 17.2 18.8 18.4 18.3 18.3 <20m ƒ MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOO 353 174 49.3 17.4 20.1 18.8 18.9 19.0 24 13.8 ROWE HIGH SCHOOL 351 168 47.9 15.9 18.4 17.5 18.2 17.6 <20m ƒ LAMAR ACADEMY 71 24 33.8 13.3 16.3 15.4 16.7 15.5 <5h ƒ

MERCEDES ISD 216 144 66.7 15.5 16.4 16.6 17.4 16.6 <10m ƒ MERCEDES H S 191 <145m ƒ 15.5 16.4 16.6 17.4 16.6 <10m ƒ MERCEDES ALTER ACAD 25 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MID-VALLEY ACAD 75 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ MID-VALLEY ACADEMY 13 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ MID-VALLEY ACADEMY- 62 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MISSION CISD 639 329 51.5 15.7 17.9 17.3 17.7 17.3 13 4.0 MISSION H S 316 163 51.6 15.8 18.0 17.0 17.8 17.3 <10m ƒ VETERANS MEMORIAL H 323 166 51.4 15.5 17.8 17.5 17.7 17.2 <5h ƒ

ONE STOP MULTIS 222 <10m ƒ 13.4 15.4 14.8 16.4 15.2 <5h ƒ ONE STOP MULTISERVI 19 <10m ƒ 13.4 15.4 14.8 16.4 15.2 <5h ƒ ONE STOP MULTISERVI 64 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ ONE STOP MULTISERVI 30 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ SENTRY TECHNOLOGY P 63 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ CHILDREN OF THE SUN 16 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ CHILDREN OF THE SUN 30 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

PHARR-SAN JUAN- 992 770 77.6 15.1 17.4 16.5 17.5 16.8 41 5.3 PSJA H S 363 310 85.4 15.0 17.3 16.5 17.5 16.7 <20m ƒ PSJA MEMORIAL H S 299 223 74.6 14.6 17.3 15.8 17.2 16.3 <10m ƒ PSJA NORTH H S 285 228 80.0 15.6 17.5 17.2 18.0 17.2 17 7.5 TEENAGE PARENT PROG 20 <10m ƒ 15.9 17.0 18.3 17.4 17.3 <5h ƒ BUELL CENTRAL H S 25 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

PROGRESO ISD PROGRESO H S 67 50 74.6 14.0 16.4 15.9 17.3 16.0 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

94 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

HIDALGO SHARYLAND ISD 377 138 36.6 17.3 19.9 18.3 19.1 18.8 21 15.2 SHARYLAND H S 376 <140m ƒ 17.3 19.9 18.3 19.1 18.8 <25m ƒ SHARYLAND ALTERNAT 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TECHNOLOGY EDUC TECHNOLOGY EDUCATIO 13 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

VALLEY VIEW ISD VALLEY VIEW HIGH SC 122 77 63.1 14.9 17.2 16.7 17.5 16.7 <5h ƒ

WESLACO ISD 670 440 65.7 15.2 17.4 16.6 17.9 16.9 30 6.8 WESLACO H S 351 193 55.0 16.5 18.0 17.8 18.7 17.9 <25m ƒ SOUTH PALM GARDENS 19 14 73.7 12.7 15.8 15.9 16.4 15.4 <5h ƒ WESLACO EAST HIGH S 300 233 77.7 14.3 16.9 15.7 17.3 16.1 <15m ƒ

HILL ABBOTT ISD ABBOTT SCHOOL 17 18 106 19.8 22.7 20.9 21.8 21.4 6 33.3

AQUILLA ISD AQUILLA SCHOOL 14 5 35.7 22.6 23.0 24.8 23.6 23.8 <5h ƒ

BLUM ISD BLUM H S 13 7 53.8 22.1 21.1 22.7 20.6 21.9 <5h ƒ

BYNUM ISD BYNUM SCHOOL 11 8 72.7 18.3 20.4 19.6 20.5 19.8 <5h ƒ

COVINGTON ISD COVINGTON SCHOOL 25 11 44.0 16.4 16.3 17.8 18.2 17.4 <5h ƒ

HILLSBORO ISD HILLSBORO H S 85 37 43.5 18.6 19.4 18.6 19.5 19.1 <5h ƒ

HUBBARD ISD HUBBARD H S 23 11 47.8 19.5 18.0 20.3 19.4 19.4 <5h ƒ

ITASCA ISD ITASCA H S 33 30 90.9 16.2 19.2 16.9 18.6 18.0 <5h ƒ

PENELOPE ISD PENELOPE SCHOOL 18 6 33.3 11.7 17.0 16.0 19.2 16.0 <5h ƒ

WHITNEY ISD WHITNEY H S 76 30 39.5 18.3 17.4 19.4 18.8 18.6 <5h ƒ

HOCKLEY ANTON ISD ANTON H S 18 15 83.3 20.3 20.6 22.4 22.1 21.6 5 33.3

LEVELLAND ISD LEVELLAND H S 144 61 42.4 19.1 20.2 20.0 20.1 19.9 9 14.8

ROPES ISD ROPES SCHOOL 15 11 73.3 23.0 23.7 22.5 22.6 23.1 5 45.5

SMYER ISD SMYER H S 14 11 78.6 18.1 18.7 19.0 20.3 19.1 <5h ƒ

SUNDOWN ISD 31 17 54.8 17.4 19.8 19.3 19.4 19.1 <5h ƒ SUNDOWN H S 29 <20m ƒ 17.4 19.8 19.3 19.4 19.1 <5h ƒ PEP ALTER SCHOOL 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WHITHARRAL ISD WHITHARRAL SCHOOL 21 8 38.1 17.3 19.6 15.4 17.5 17.6 <5h ƒ

HOOD GRANBURY ISD 370 135 36.5 21.8 22.1 22.4 21.7 22.1 43 31.9 GRANBURY H S 360 <135m ƒ 21.8 22.1 22.5 21.7 22.1 <45m ƒ S T A R S ACADEMY 10 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 95 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

HOOD LIPAN ISD LIPAN SCHOOL 12 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TOLAR ISD TOLAR H S 40 34 85.0 19.5 19.4 20.5 20.5 20.1 5 14.7

HOPKINS COMO-PICKTON CI 30 <15m ƒ 16.6 18.9 18.8 18.5 18.3 <5h ƒ COMO-PICKTON SCHOOL 27 <15m ƒ 16.6 18.9 18.8 18.5 18.3 <5h ƒ HOLY HIGHWAY PICKTO 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CUMBY ISD CUMBY H S 19 7 36.8 22.1 21.1 20.7 21.3 21.4 <5h ƒ

MILLER GROVE IS MILLER GROVE SCHOOL 18 5 27.8 21.8 22.2 24.8 23.4 23.2 <5h ƒ

NORTH HOPKINS I NORTH HOPKINS H S 21 17 81.0 17.2 19.5 19.1 19.3 18.9 <5h ƒ

SALTILLO ISD SALTILLO SCHOOL 13 6 46.2 16.2 17.2 19.0 18.5 17.8 <5h ƒ

SULPHUR BLUFF I SULPHUR BLUFF SCHOO 12 9 75.0 20.9 20.6 21.7 21.9 21.4 <5h ƒ

SULPHUR SPRINGS SULPHUR SPRINGS H S 209 91 43.5 19.4 19.9 20.7 20.6 20.3 19 20.9

HOUSTON CROCKETT ISD CROCKETT H S 71 20 28.2 15.3 19.2 17.6 16.3 17.2 <5h ƒ

GRAPELAND ISD GRAPELAND H S 32 18 56.3 17.1 19.1 17.8 19.7 18.5 <5h ƒ

KENNARD ISD KENNARD H S 13 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LATEXO ISD LATEXO H S 33 5 15.2 17.8 16.2 18.4 18.8 18.0 <5h ƒ

LOVELADY ISD LOVELADY H S 41 15 36.6 20.1 20.1 21.6 19.1 20.4 <5h ƒ

HOWARD BIG SPRING ISD BIG SPRING H S 196 70 35.7 19.5 20.5 20.6 20.2 20.3 15 21.4

COAHOMA ISD COAHOMA H S 77 37 48.1 19.0 18.6 20.4 20.0 19.6 5 13.5

FORSAN ISD FORSAN H S 33 23 69.7 22.3 20.8 22.6 20.8 21.8 8 34.8

HUDSPETH DELL CITY ISD DELL CITY SCHOOL 16 13 81.3 16.4 17.6 19.2 16.8 17.5 <5h ƒ

FT HANCOCK ISD FORT HANCOCK HS 33 8 24.2 16.8 18.1 15.4 17.0 16.9 <5h ƒ

SIERRA BLANCA I SIERRA BLANCA SCHOO 8 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HUNT BLAND ISD BLAND H S 21 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BOLES ISD BOLES ISD HIGH SCHO 22 13 59.1 17.2 17.2 17.6 18.7 17.8 <5h ƒ

CADDO MILLS ISD CADDO MILLS H S 65 42 64.6 19.5 20.9 21.2 21.3 20.9 8 19.0

CAMPBELL ISD CAMPBELL H S 14 7 50.0 20.4 18.3 19.4 18.3 19.3 <5h ƒ

CELESTE ISD CELESTE HIGH SCHOOL 34 19 55.9 23.1 21.3 23.5 20.1 22.1 7 36.8

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

96 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

HUNT COMMERCE ISD COMMERCE H S 95 39 41.1 20.3 22.7 21.4 21.2 21.5 13 33.3

GREENVILLE ISD 280 55 19.6 19.3 20.7 21.1 20.0 20.4 12 21.8 NEW HORIZONS LEARNI 25 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ GREENVILLE H S 255 <55m ƒ 19.2 20.7 21.0 19.9 20.4 <15m ƒ

LONE OAK ISD LONE OAK H S 53 25 47.2 18.7 19.4 19.8 20.0 19.6 <5h ƒ

QUINLAN ISD WH FORD HIGH SCHOOL 133 33 24.8 17.2 19.2 17.8 18.8 18.4 <5h ƒ

WOLFE CITY ISD WOLFE CITY H S 35 25 71.4 20.6 20.5 20.8 21.1 21.0 5 20.0

HUTCHINSON BORGER ISD 156 77 49.4 20.9 21.5 21.6 21.6 21.5 26 33.8 BORGER H S 154 <80m ƒ 20.9 21.5 21.6 21.6 21.5 <30m ƒ C H A M P S 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

PLEMONS-STINNET WEST TEXAS H S 41 26 63.4 17.8 19.3 20.0 19.0 19.2 5 19.2

SANFORD ISD 54 <35m ƒ 20.1 19.8 22.4 20.9 20.9 7 ƒ SANFORD-FRITCH H S 52 <35m ƒ 20.1 19.8 22.4 20.9 20.9 <10m ƒ C H A M P S 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

IRION IRION COUNTY IS IRION H S 24 20 83.3 18.0 19.9 18.7 19.7 19.2 <5h ƒ

JACK BRYSON ISD BRYSON SCHOOL 16 12 75.0 18.5 19.1 20.2 19.6 19.6 <5h ƒ

JACKSBORO ISD 46 29 63.0 18.2 19.6 19.3 19.6 19.3 <10m ƒ JACKSBORO H S 45 <30m ƒ 18.2 19.6 19.3 19.6 19.3 <10m ƒ ALTER SCH 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

PERRIN-WHITT CI PERRIN H S 18 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

JACKSON EDNA ISD EDNA H S 102 50 49.0 18.7 20.3 20.0 20.8 20.1 11 22.0

GANADO ISD GANADO H S 40 23 57.5 18.0 20.1 19.0 20.3 19.5 <5h ƒ

INDUSTRIAL ISD INDUSTRIAL H S 63 27 42.9 21.2 21.4 21.9 21.3 21.6 6 22.2

JASPER BROOKELAND ISD BROOKELAND H S 6 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BUNA ISD BUNA H S 83 5 6.0 20.2 17.4 22.0 18.8 19.8 <5h ƒ

EVADALE ISD EVADALE H S 24 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

JASPER ISD JASPER H S 154 83 53.9 17.6 18.6 18.6 18.7 18.6 10 12.0

KIRBYVILLE CISD KIRBYVILLE HIGH SCH 68 50 73.5 16.7 17.3 17.1 19.2 17.7 <5h ƒ

JEFF DAVIS FT DAVIS ISD 34 18 52.9 18.7 19.3 20.6 20.4 19.9 <5h ƒ FT DAVIS H S 17 12 70.6 17.8 18.8 19.7 19.0 19.0 <5h ƒ HIGH FRONTIER H S 17 6 35.3 20.7 20.3 22.5 23.2 21.8 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 97 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

JEFF DAVIS VALENTINE ISD VALENTINE SCHOOL 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

JEFFERSON BEAUMONT ISD 927 162 17.5 17.9 18.2 18.6 19.0 18.5 28 17.3 CENTRAL SENIOR H S 156 <40m ƒ 14.5 15.4 15.4 16.4 15.6 <5h ƒ OZEN H S 304 47 15.5 15.6 16.9 16.4 17.9 16.8 <5h ƒ WEST BROOK SR H S 431 77 17.9 20.9 20.4 21.5 21.0 21.0 <30m ƒ PAUL A BROWN ALTERN 36 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

EAGLE ACADEMY O EAGELE ACADEMY OF B 36 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HAMSHIRE-FANNET HAMSHIRE-FANNETT H 107 22 20.6 21.1 20.0 21.0 21.1 20.9 5 22.7

NEDERLAND ISD NEDERLAND H S 298 21 7.0 22.8 23.9 22.7 21.9 23.0 11 52.4

PORT ARTHUR ISD MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOO 490 44 9.0 14.7 16.8 15.7 16.9 16.1 5 11.4

PORT NECHES-GRO PORT NECHES-GROVES 301 35 11.6 20.9 22.5 21.9 21.1 21.7 13 37.1

RICHARD MILBURN RICHARD MILBURN ACA 34 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SABINE PASS ISD SABINE PASS SCHOOL 15 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TEKOA ACADEMY O TEKOA ACADEMY OF AC 18 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

JIM HOGG JIM HOGG COUNTY HEBBRONVILLE H S 65 45 69.2 15.6 17.4 17.0 18.2 17.0 <5h ƒ

JIM WELLS ALICE ISD ALICE H S 211 177 83.9 16.9 17.6 17.9 18.1 17.8 15 8.5

BEN BOLT-PALITO BEN BOLT-PAL BLANCO 47 42 89.4 15.0 17.3 17.1 17.3 16.9 <5h ƒ

ORANGE GROVE IS ORANGE GROVE H S 82 56 68.3 19.6 19.1 20.2 19.5 19.7 12 21.4

PREMONT ISD PREMONT H S 56 39 69.6 14.8 16.7 16.6 16.7 16.3 <5h ƒ

JOHNSON ALVARADO ISD ALVARADO H S 162 45 27.8 17.4 18.9 18.8 18.6 18.5 <5h ƒ

BURLESON ISD 446 71 15.9 20.9 20.7 22.1 20.9 21.3 17 23.9 BURLESON H S 435 <75m ƒ 20.9 20.7 22.1 20.9 21.3 <20m ƒ CROSSROADS HIGH SCH 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CLEBURNE ISD 296 66 22.3 20.8 21.7 21.7 20.9 21.4 21 31.8 CLEBURNE H S 272 <70m ƒ 20.8 21.7 21.7 20.9 21.4 <25m ƒ TEAM SCH 24 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

GODLEY ISD GODLEY H S 65 18 27.7 18.1 19.1 18.6 19.5 19.1 <5h ƒ

GRANDVIEW ISD GRANDVIEW H S 68 53 77.9 19.2 20.8 20.2 19.4 20.0 13 24.5

JOSHUA ISD 239 36 15.1 19.3 19.7 21.1 20.4 20.2 7 19.4 JOSHUA H S 221 <40m ƒ 19.3 19.7 21.1 20.4 20.2 <10m ƒ ACCELERATED LRN CTR 18 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

98 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

JOHNSON KEENE ISD 35 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ KEENE H S 34 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ ALTER LEARNING CTR 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

RIO VISTA ISD RIO VISTA H S 67 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

VENUS ISD 80 6 7.5 19.3 21.3 19.3 20.8 20.3 <5h ƒ VENUS H S 79 <10m ƒ 19.3 21.3 19.3 20.8 20.3 <5h ƒ LEARNING CENTER 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

JONES ANSON ISD ANSON H S 51 18 35.3 19.8 19.8 20.3 21.3 20.5 6 33.3

HAMLIN ISD HAMLIN H S 21 19 90.5 19.6 20.7 19.5 20.6 20.2 <5h ƒ

HAWLEY ISD HAWLEY H S 37 27 73.0 20.4 19.9 21.1 21.1 20.7 6 22.2

LUEDERS-AVOCA I LUEDERS-AVOCA H S 8 5 62.5 15.0 16.6 14.8 17.2 16.0 <5h ƒ

STAMFORD ISD STAMFORD HIGH SCHOO 39 30 76.9 17.1 18.4 18.5 18.4 18.2 <5h ƒ

KARNES FALLS CITY ISD FALLS CITY H S 22 18 81.8 19.6 19.8 18.6 20.0 19.5 <5h ƒ

KARNES CITY ISD KARNES CITY H S 55 17 30.9 19.9 21.2 21.1 21.1 20.9 <5h ƒ

KENEDY ISD 34 8 23.5 17.6 20.3 21.0 21.0 20.3 <5h ƒ KENEDY HIGH SCHOOL 33 <10m ƒ 17.6 20.3 21.0 21.0 20.3 <5h ƒ KARNES COUNTY ACADE 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

RUNGE ISD RUNGE H S 13 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

KAUFMAN CRANDALL ISD 123 28 22.8 20.9 22.4 21.2 21.8 21.7 9 32.1 CRANDALL H S 112 <30m ƒ 20.9 22.4 21.2 21.8 21.7 <10m ƒ CRANDALL ALTER CTR 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

FORNEY ISD FORNEY H S 179 66 36.9 20.6 20.8 21.1 20.9 20.9 14 21.2

KAUFMAN ISD 169 18 10.7 23.1 20.6 23.3 20.0 21.9 9 50.0 KAUFMAN H S 153 <20m ƒ 23.1 20.6 23.3 20.0 21.9 <10m ƒ ALTERNATIVE LEARNIN 16 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

KEMP ISD KEMP HIGH SCHOOL 93 23 24.7 20.2 19.3 21.8 20.5 20.6 5 21.7

MABANK ISD MABANK H S 189 43 22.8 17.5 19.3 20.0 19.5 19.1 7 16.3

SCURRY-ROSSER I SCURRY-ROSSER H S 39 11 28.2 18.5 18.9 20.5 19.9 19.6 <5h ƒ

TERRELL ISD TERRELL H S 191 81 42.4 18.1 19.0 18.2 19.2 18.8 10 12.3

KENDALL BOERNE ISD BOERNE H S 332 106 31.9 22.1 21.5 23.2 21.9 22.3 42 39.6

COMFORT ISD 63 17 27.0 19.2 20.9 20.5 20.5 20.4 6 35.3 COMFORT H S 62 <20m ƒ 19.2 20.9 20.5 20.5 20.4 <10m ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 99 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

KENDALL COMFORT ISD HILL COUNTRY HIGH S 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

KENT JAYTON-GIRARD I JAYTON SCHOOLS 7 7 100 19.9 19.9 20.7 20.4 20.4 <5h ƒ

KERR CENTER POINT IS CENTER POINT H S 37 16 43.2 18.6 19.1 20.9 19.2 19.6 <5h ƒ

INGRAM ISD INGRAM-TOM MOORE H 103 38 36.9 18.5 18.6 19.7 19.7 19.2 <5h ƒ

KERRVILLE ISD 257 46 17.9 19.1 20.6 20.3 19.9 20.1 <15m ƒ TIVY H S 233 <50m ƒ 19.2 20.8 20.4 20.0 20.2 <15m ƒ HILL COUNTRY HIGH S 24 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

KIMBLE JUNCTION ISD JUNCTION H S 46 21 45.7 20.6 21.0 23.6 21.3 21.7 5 23.8

KING GUTHRIE CSD GUTHRIE SCHOOL 5 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

KINNEY BRACKETT ISD 41 16 39.0 20.6 20.9 20.9 20.6 21.0 <5h ƒ BRACKETT H S 36 <20m ƒ 20.6 20.9 20.9 20.6 21.0 <5h ƒ BRACKETT ALTER 5 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

KLEBERG KINGSVILLE ISD 241 126 52.3 16.7 16.9 17.5 18.0 17.4 <15m ƒ H M KING HIGH SCHOO 224 115 51.3 17.0 17.1 17.6 18.1 17.6 <15m ƒ K E Y S ACADEMY 17 11 64.7 14.3 14.9 16.5 16.8 15.7 <5h ƒ

RIVIERA ISD KAUFER H S 39 24 61.5 18.9 21.6 20.0 20.1 20.4 7 29.2

SANTA GERTRUDIS ACADEMY H S 32 22 68.8 18.5 20.2 19.6 20.5 19.8 6 27.3

KNOX BENJAMIN ISD BENJAMIN SCHOOL 7 9 129 21.7 21.3 23.4 22.2 22.6 <5h ƒ

KNOX CITY-O'BRI KNOX CITY H S 22 15 68.2 18.2 20.7 18.7 19.7 19.5 <5h ƒ

MUNDAY CISD MUNDAY H S 24 21 87.5 17.2 18.5 17.7 18.0 17.9 <5h ƒ

LA SALLE COTULLA ISD 63 <45m ƒ 14.6 17.9 17.1 18.1 17.1 <5h ƒ COTULLA H S 56 <45m ƒ 14.6 17.9 17.1 18.1 17.1 <5h ƒ COTULLA ALTERNATIVE 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LAMAR CHISUM ISD CHISUM H S 55 46 83.6 20.8 21.0 20.7 20.2 20.8 14 30.4

NORTH LAMAR ISD NORTH LAMAR H S 180 57 31.7 21.1 20.9 22.6 22.3 21.9 19 33.3

PARIS ISD 138 42 30.4 18.6 20.3 19.8 19.3 19.6 9 21.4 PARIS H S 130 <45m ƒ 18.6 20.3 19.8 19.3 19.6 <10m ƒ PARIS ALTERNATIVE S 8 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

PRAIRILAND ISD PRAIRILAND H S 61 29 47.5 19.2 19.6 21.0 19.7 20.0 <5h ƒ

ROXTON ISD ROXTON H S 7 7 100 15.3 16.7 17.3 19.0 17.3 <5h ƒ

LAMB AMHERST ISD AMHERST SCHOOL 5 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

100 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

LAMB LITTLEFIELD ISD LITTLEFIELD H S 70 44 62.9 18.5 18.9 19.1 19.4 19.0 7 15.9

OLTON ISD OLTON H S 37 21 56.8 20.2 20.0 21.2 20.5 20.6 5 23.8

SPADE ISD SPADE SCHOOL 5 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SPRINGLAKE-EART SPRINGLAKE-EARTH HS 11 7 63.6 22.3 21.4 21.3 21.9 21.9 <5h ƒ

SUDAN ISD SUDAN H S 32 22 68.8 17.1 19.0 19.1 19.2 18.7 <5h ƒ

LAMPASAS CEDAR RIDGE CHA CEDAR RIDGE CHARTER 13 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LAMPASAS ISD LAMPASAS H S 154 56 36.4 18.5 19.6 19.8 20.0 19.5 9 16.1

LOMETA ISD LOMETA SCHOOL 15 5 33.3 16.0 18.8 16.8 19.0 17.8 <5h ƒ

LAVACA HALLETTSVILLE I HALLETTSVILLE H S 84 39 46.4 20.1 20.1 20.7 20.2 20.4 8 20.5

MOULTON ISD MOULTON H S 23 5 21.7 22.2 21.6 19.4 20.0 21.0 <5h ƒ

SHINER ISD SHINER H S 29 18 62.1 20.6 21.6 20.6 20.3 20.8 <5h ƒ

LEE DIME BOX ISD DIME BOX SCHOOL 16 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

GIDDINGS ISD 108 32 29.6 20.6 21.4 21.1 22.1 21.4 7 21.9 GIDDINGS H S 107 <35m ƒ 20.6 21.2 21.0 22.2 21.3 <10m ƒ KNOX LEARNING CTR 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LEXINGTON ISD LEXINGTON HIGH SCHO 67 21 31.3 19.5 20.2 21.4 21.3 20.7 5 23.8

LEON BUFFALO ISD BUFFALO H S 53 9 17.0 17.6 18.1 20.1 19.6 19.0 <5h ƒ

CENTERVILLE ISD CENTERVILLE JR-SR H 54 13 24.1 18.1 20.4 18.1 19.6 19.2 <5h ƒ

LEON ISD LEON H S 42 13 31.0 19.1 20.2 20.0 21.6 20.4 <5h ƒ

NORMANGEE ISD NORMANGEE H S 30 16 53.3 16.2 19.4 17.8 19.4 18.3 <5h ƒ

OAKWOOD ISD OAKWOOD H S 16 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LIBERTY CLEVELAND ISD CLEVELAND H S 128 26 20.3 16.7 16.5 17.6 16.6 17.0 <5h ƒ

DAYTON ISD 282 29 10.3 18.4 20.2 19.1 18.2 19.2 <10m ƒ DAYTON H S 281 <30m ƒ 18.4 20.2 19.1 18.2 19.2 <10m ƒ GULF COAST H S 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HARDIN ISD HARDIN H S 58 5 8.6 18.6 17.6 22.2 19.2 19.6 <5h ƒ

HULL-DAISETTA I HULL-DAISETTA H S 30 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LIBERTY ISD 127 13 10.2 22.5 22.4 23.6 21.8 22.6 7 53.8 LIBERTY H S 126 <15m ƒ 22.5 22.4 23.6 21.8 22.6 <10m ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 101 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

LIBERTY LIBERTY ISD GULF COAST H S 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TARKINGTON ISD TARKINGTON H S 81 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LIMESTONE COOLIDGE ISD COOLIDGE H S 6 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

GROESBECK ISD 111 47 42.3 18.1 18.6 19.2 19.0 18.9 7 14.9 GROESBECK H S 99 <50m ƒ 18.1 18.6 19.2 19.0 18.9 <10m ƒ ALTER LEARNING CTR 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ GROESBECK MIDDLE 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MEXIA ISD 110 <90m ƒ 18.0 19.5 18.7 19.2 19.0 12 ƒ MEXIA H S 105 <90m ƒ 18.0 19.5 18.7 19.2 19.0 <15m ƒ MEXIA SCHOOL OF CHO 5 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LIPSCOMB BOOKER ISD BOOKER JH/H S 25 24 96.0 18.3 20.1 18.2 19.7 19.2 7 29.2

FOLLETT ISD FOLLETT SCHOOL 10 8 80.0 16.9 20.1 18.9 19.8 19.1 <5h ƒ

HIGGINS ISD HIGGINS SCHOOL 9 7 77.8 18.3 21.1 20.3 18.6 19.6 <5h ƒ

LIVE OAK GEORGE WEST ISD GEORGE WEST H S 67 42 62.7 19.3 18.2 19.6 19.7 19.3 5 11.9

THREE RIVERS IS THREE RIVERS H S 43 24 55.8 18.3 20.8 20.6 21.1 20.3 7 29.2

LLANO LLANO ISD LLANO H S 108 55 50.9 18.3 20.0 19.7 19.8 19.6 8 14.5

LUBBOCK EAGLE ACADEMY O EAGLE ACADEMY OF LU 9 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

FRENSHIP ISD 258 113 43.8 21.9 21.6 23.9 22.2 22.5 <50m ƒ FRENSHIP H S 234 <115m ƒ 21.9 21.6 23.9 22.2 22.5 <50m ƒ REESE EDUCATIONAL C 24 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

IDALOU ISD IDALOU H S 50 33 66.0 20.6 20.5 20.8 21.3 20.9 10 30.3

LUBBOCK ISD 1,505 406 27.0 19.1 20.4 20.6 20.3 20.2 106 26.1 CORONADO H S 449 137 30.5 20.8 22.1 22.0 21.3 21.7 49 35.8 LUBBOCK H S 428 <90m ƒ 20.1 20.9 21.9 20.7 21.1 29 ƒ MONTEREY H S 446 133 29.8 18.7 20.0 20.2 20.2 19.9 <30m ƒ ESTACADO H S 140 <50m ƒ 13.6 16.0 15.1 16.5 15.4 <5h ƒ HOMEBOUND 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ MATTHEWS LRN CTR/NE 41 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LUBBOCK-COOPER LUBBOCK-COOPER HIGH 97 58 59.8 19.7 21.4 20.8 21.4 20.9 17 29.3

NEW DEAL ISD NEW DEAL H S 45 26 57.8 16.8 18.7 17.6 19.5 18.3 <5h ƒ

RICHARD MILBURN RICHARD MILBURN ALT 32 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

ROOSEVELT ISD ROOSEVELT H S 64 12 18.8 19.6 21.9 20.8 22.1 21.3 <5h ƒ

SHALLOWATER ISD SHALLOWATER H S 77 42 54.5 21.3 21.6 21.6 21.5 21.7 13 31.0

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

102 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

LUBBOCK SLATON ISD SLATON H S 64 37 57.8 18.2 18.9 19.5 19.2 19.1 <5h ƒ

SOUTH PLAINS SOUTH PLAINS ACADEM 44 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LYNN NEW HOME ISD NEW HOME SCHOOL 9 13 144 15.2 20.2 18.0 18.6 18.1 <5h ƒ

O'DONNELL ISD O'DONNELL HIGH SCHO 15 11 73.3 18.8 19.7 19.4 18.9 19.4 <5h ƒ

TAHOKA ISD TAHOKA H S 47 21 44.7 19.7 20.4 19.2 20.1 19.9 5 23.8

WILSON ISD WILSON SCHOOL 9 5 55.6 14.8 16.4 14.0 15.8 15.4 <5h ƒ

MADISON MADISONVILLE CI MADISONVILLE HIGH S 103 22 21.4 17.4 19.9 18.9 18.7 18.8 <5h ƒ

NORTH ZULCH ISD NORTH ZULCH H S 16 8 50.0 17.3 18.5 17.6 19.6 18.5 <5h ƒ

MARION JEFFERSON ISD JEFFERSON H S 79 70 88.6 16.5 17.0 17.1 17.8 17.2 6 8.6

MARTIN GRADY ISD GRADY SCHOOL 18 8 44.4 20.8 20.1 20.6 19.0 20.3 <5h ƒ

STANTON ISD STANTON H S 48 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MASON MASON ISD MASON H S 42 24 57.1 17.4 20.0 18.8 19.6 19.1 <5h ƒ

MATAGORDA BAY CITY ISD BAY CITY H S 234 41 17.5 19.6 21.1 20.3 21.0 20.6 12 29.3

PALACIOS ISD PALACIOS H S 94 28 29.8 17.3 19.5 17.6 19.1 18.6 <5h ƒ

TIDEHAVEN ISD TIDEHAVEN H S 52 28 53.8 17.5 18.5 17.8 19.1 18.3 <5h ƒ

VAN VLECK ISD VAN VLECK H S 58 17 29.3 17.5 19.5 18.9 19.2 18.9 <5h ƒ

MAVERICK EAGLE PASS ISD 685 <70m ƒ 14.7 18.0 15.5 17.3 16.5 <5h ƒ EAGLE PASS HIGH SCH 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ EP ALAS (ALTERNATIV 16 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ EAGLE PASS H S 668 <70m ƒ 14.7 18.0 15.5 17.3 16.5 <5h ƒ

MCCULLOCH BRADY ISD BRADY H S 85 62 72.9 18.1 19.5 18.9 19.4 19.1 10 16.1

LOHN ISD LOHN SCHOOL 8 6 75.0 16.2 20.5 20.0 20.7 19.5 <5h ƒ

ROCHELLE ISD ROCHELLE SCHOOL 13 6 46.2 19.2 19.7 19.3 19.3 19.5 <5h ƒ

MCLENNAN AXTELL ISD 43 23 53.5 19.7 19.1 21.4 21.1 20.4 6 26.1 AXTELL H S 38 <25m ƒ 19.7 19.1 21.4 21.1 20.4 <10m ƒ METHODIST HOME BOYS 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ OPPORTUNITY LEARNIN 4 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BOSQUEVILLE ISD BOSQUEVILLE SCHOOL 23 6 26.1 18.5 21.8 21.0 22.7 21.0 <5h ƒ

BRUCEVILLE-EDDY 66 24 36.4 21.1 21.0 22.3 21.8 21.7 <10m ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 103 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

MCLENNAN BRUCEVILLE-EDDY BRUCEVILLE-EDDY H S 59 <25m ƒ 21.1 21.0 22.3 21.8 21.7 <10m ƒ OPPORTUNITY LEARNIN 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ B-E ACHIEVEMENT CTR 4 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CHINA SPRING IS 111 36 32.4 19.6 21.6 20.5 21.3 20.9 11 30.6 CHINA SPRING H S 109 <40m ƒ 19.6 21.6 20.5 21.3 20.9 <15m ƒ OPPORTUNITY LEARNIN 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CONNALLY ISD 111 38 34.2 17.5 19.4 18.6 18.5 18.6 6 15.8 CONNALLY HIGH SCHOO 105 <40m ƒ 17.5 19.4 18.6 18.5 18.6 <10m ƒ LAKEVIEW ACADEMY 6 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CRAWFORD ISD 46 13 28.3 21.6 22.8 23.7 22.5 22.8 6 46.2 CRAWFORD H S 44 <15m ƒ 21.6 22.8 23.7 22.5 22.8 <10m ƒ OPPORTUNITY LEARNIN 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

EAGLE ACADEMY O 43 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ EAGLE ACADEMY OF WA 19 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ EAGLE ACADEMY OF WA 24 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LA VEGA ISD 110 29 26.4 17.1 18.1 18.4 18.9 18.2 <5h ƒ LA VEGA H S 108 <30m ƒ 17.1 18.1 18.4 18.9 18.2 <5h ƒ SUCCESS PROGRAM 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LORENA ISD 103 42 40.8 20.7 22.0 20.9 21.2 21.4 12 28.6 LORENA H S 97 <45m ƒ 20.7 22.0 20.9 21.2 21.4 <15m ƒ OPPORTUNITY LEARNIN 6 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MART ISD MART H S 29 16 55.2 20.4 21.4 20.4 20.8 20.8 <5h ƒ

MCGREGOR ISD 61 18 29.5 17.9 19.8 19.6 19.2 19.3 <5h ƒ MCGREGOR H S 59 <20m ƒ 17.9 19.8 19.6 19.2 19.3 <5h ƒ MCGREGOR PREP H S 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MCLENNAN CO ST MCLENNAN CO STATE J 0 5 ƒ 14.2 16.4 16.2 15.4 15.8 <5h ƒ

MIDWAY ISD MIDWAY H S 376 130 34.6 22.4 23.0 23.3 22.7 23.0 56 43.1

MOODY ISD MOODY H S 32 18 56.3 18.5 19.4 18.9 20.2 19.4 <5h ƒ

RIESEL ISD RIESEL SCHOOL 24 6 25.0 20.3 22.8 21.7 21.0 21.5 <5h ƒ

ROBINSON ISD ROBINSON H S 136 66 48.5 21.2 20.8 22.0 21.4 21.5 20 30.3

WACO ISD 584 80 13.7 15.6 17.6 17.2 17.5 17.1 11 13.8 WACO H S 291 48 16.5 17.3 18.4 18.9 18.1 18.4 <15m ƒ UNIVERSITY H S 157 <20m ƒ 13.9 17.4 14.9 16.9 15.9 <5h ƒ A J MOORE ACAD 104 <20m ƒ 12.0 15.1 14.8 16.4 14.6 <5h ƒ STARS HIGH SCHOOL 32 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WEST ISD 117 <25m ƒ 19.4 20.2 19.3 19.7 19.8 <5h ƒ WEST H S 114 <25m ƒ 19.4 20.2 19.3 19.7 19.8 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

104 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

MCLENNAN WEST ISD RBEC OPPORTUNITY LE 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MCMULLEN MCMULLEN COUNTY MCMULLEN COUNTY SC 17 8 47.1 18.1 17.9 17.3 17.3 17.8 <5h ƒ

MEDINA D'HANIS ISD D'HANIS SCHOOL 19 10 52.6 18.7 19.6 18.8 19.0 19.1 <5h ƒ

DEVINE ISD DEVINE HIGH SCHOOL 98 23 23.5 19.2 18.8 19.4 20.0 19.6 <5h ƒ

HONDO ISD HONDO H S 105 62 59.0 19.3 19.7 21.1 21.2 20.5 14 22.6

MEDINA VALLEY I 192 101 52.6 20.1 20.0 21.4 20.8 20.7 26 25.7 MEDINA VALLEY H S 191 <105m ƒ 20.1 20.0 21.4 20.8 20.7 <30m ƒ MEDINA VALLEY MIDDL 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

NATALIA ISD NATALIA H S 56 16 28.6 17.4 16.8 19.6 18.5 18.2 <5h ƒ

MENARD MENARD ISD MENARD H S 20 15 75.0 19.7 19.7 19.8 19.8 19.9 <5h ƒ

MIDLAND EAGLE ACADEMY O 34 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ EAGLE ACADEMY OF MI 13 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ EAGLE CHARTER SCHOO 21 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

GREENWOOD ISD GREENWOOD H S 105 17 16.2 22.8 22.6 23.1 22.1 22.8 7 41.2

MIDLAND ISD 1,142 221 19.4 20.9 23.1 22.0 21.9 22.1 85 38.5 LEE H S 572 <105m ƒ 21.2 23.9 22.7 22.4 22.7 <50m ƒ MIDLAND H S 507 <120m ƒ 20.6 22.4 21.4 21.4 21.6 <40m ƒ VIOLA M COLEMAN H S 18 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ MIDLAND EXCEL CAMPU 45 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

RICHARD MILBURN RICHARD MILBURN ACA 36 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MILAM BUCKHOLTS ISD BUCKHOLTS SCHOOL 13 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CAMERON ISD YOE HIGH SCHOOL 83 19 22.9 17.3 17.7 17.2 18.7 17.9 <5h ƒ

MILANO ISD MILANO H S 24 14 58.3 21.9 23.9 22.4 20.9 22.4 6 42.9

ROCKDALE ISD ROCKDALE H S 88 27 30.7 18.3 20.6 20.5 19.7 19.9 <5h ƒ

THORNDALE ISD THORNDALE H S 33 11 33.3 20.4 21.0 20.2 22.0 21.1 <5h ƒ

MILLS GOLDTHWAITE ISD GOLDTHWAITE HIGH SC 44 28 63.6 20.4 20.9 21.2 21.0 21.0 <5h ƒ

MULLIN ISD MULLIN HIGH SCHOOL 4 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

PRIDDY ISD PRIDDY SCHOOL 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

STAR ISD STAR SCHOOL 6 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MITCHELL COLORADO ISD COLORADO HIGH SCHOO 52 26 50.0 19.2 20.0 19.7 19.6 19.8 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 105 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

MITCHELL LORAINE ISD LORAINE SCHOOL 5 5 100 14.0 15.8 16.0 16.0 15.6 <5h ƒ

WESTBROOK ISD WESTBROOK SCHOOL 10 7 70.0 22.7 20.9 22.3 21.4 21.9 <5h ƒ

MONTAGUE BOWIE ISD BOWIE H S 83 27 32.5 19.0 19.0 20.1 19.9 19.7 <5h ƒ

FORESTBURG ISD FORESTBURG SCHOOL 8 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

GOLD BURG ISD GOLD BURG H S 8 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

NOCONA ISD NOCONA H S 53 31 58.5 20.1 20.4 20.2 20.6 20.5 7 22.6

PRAIRIE VALLEY PRAIRIE VALLEY H S 4 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SAINT JO ISD SAINT JO H S 17 8 47.1 18.5 20.0 17.5 19.8 19.1 <5h ƒ

MONTGOMERY CONROE ISD 2,237 756 33.8 22.1 23.3 22.8 22.1 22.7 305 40.3 CONROE H S 405 97 24.0 19.4 20.5 20.1 19.8 20.1 <25m ƒ W L HAUKE ALTER ED 42 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ THE WOODLANDS H S 1,104 438 39.7 23.1 23.8 23.8 22.7 23.4 208 47.5 OAK RIDGE H S 421 135 32.1 23.3 25.2 23.7 23.7 24.1 69 51.1 CANEY CREEK H S 265 <85m ƒ 17.9 20.6 19.2 19.8 19.4 <10m ƒ

MAGNOLIA ISD 479 109 22.8 20.7 20.3 21.8 21.1 21.1 33 30.3 MAGNOLIA H S 447 <110m ƒ 20.7 20.3 21.8 21.1 21.1 <35m ƒ ALPHA 32 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MONTGOMERY ISD MONTGOMERY H S 227 34 15.0 21.1 22.7 23.1 22.1 22.4 12 35.3

NEW CANEY ISD NEW CANEY H S 276 16 5.8 21.3 20.4 22.2 21.4 21.5 <5h ƒ

SPLENDORA ISD SPLENDORA H S 154 13 8.4 17.8 18.5 20.2 19.6 19.3 <5h ƒ

WILLIS ISD WILLIS H S 249 61 24.5 18.4 18.7 20.4 19.3 19.3 13 21.3

MOORE DUMAS ISD 181 83 45.9 18.8 20.1 19.9 19.8 19.8 <20m ƒ DUMAS H S 176 <85m ƒ 18.8 20.1 19.9 19.8 19.8 <20m ƒ C H A M P S 5 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SUNRAY ISD 28 18 64.3 18.9 19.8 21.3 19.6 20.0 <5h ƒ SUNRAY H S 27 <20m ƒ 18.9 19.8 21.3 19.6 20.0 <5h ƒ C H A M P S 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MORRIS DAINGERFIELD-LO DAINGERFIELD H S 78 23 29.5 16.2 18.6 18.0 19.3 18.3 <5h ƒ

PEWITT CISD PEWITT H S 34 12 35.3 20.8 19.2 19.3 19.5 19.9 <5h ƒ

MOTLEY MOTLEY COUNTY I MOTLEY COUNTY SCHOO 11 10 90.9 17.6 17.9 20.0 19.2 18.8 <5h ƒ

NACOGDOCHES CENTRAL HEIGHTS CENTRAL HEIGHTS H S 35 17 48.6 18.5 20.4 19.9 20.1 19.9 <5h ƒ

CHIRENO ISD CHIRENO H S 14 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

106 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

NACOGDOCHES CUSHING ISD CUSHING SCHOOL 16 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

DOUGLASS ISD DOUGLASS SCHOOL 25 16 64.0 23.3 22.8 23.7 21.4 22.9 8 50.0

GARRISON ISD GARRISON H S 41 29 70.7 17.5 19.2 18.0 18.4 18.4 <5h ƒ

MARTINSVILLE IS MARTINSVILLE SCHOOL 18 15 83.3 18.7 19.6 19.6 20.6 19.8 <5h ƒ

NACOGDOCHES ISD NACOGDOCHES H S 299 78 26.1 19.2 21.3 20.8 20.2 20.6 24 30.8

WODEN ISD WODEN H S 54 29 53.7 18.6 19.4 18.8 18.7 19.0 <5h ƒ

NAVARRO BLOOMING GROVE BLOOMING GROVE H S 52 35 67.3 17.5 20.0 18.5 19.2 18.9 <5h ƒ

CORSICANA ISD CORSICANA H IGH SCH 248 45 18.1 19.1 19.7 20.9 19.9 20.0 10 22.2

DAWSON ISD DAWSON H S 21 13 61.9 18.7 18.4 17.8 17.9 18.3 <5h ƒ

FROST ISD FROST H S 19 15 78.9 20.1 20.8 20.3 19.4 20.1 <5h ƒ

KERENS ISD KERENS SCHOOL 31 24 77.4 17.2 18.9 18.0 17.6 18.1 <5h ƒ

MILDRED ISD MILDRED H S 45 34 75.6 17.5 18.8 17.7 18.6 18.3 5 14.7

RICE ISD RICE H S 46 5 10.9 19.8 18.0 22.8 17.6 19.8 <5h ƒ

NEWTON BURKEVILLE ISD BURKEVILLE HIGH SCH 13 10 76.9 15.1 16.7 17.6 17.7 16.9 <5h ƒ

DEWEYVILLE ISD DEWEYVILLE H S 54 6 11.1 18.2 18.5 19.3 20.2 19.2 <5h ƒ

NEWTON ISD NEWTON H S 62 42 67.7 18.1 18.6 19.2 18.0 18.7 5 11.9

NOLAN BLACKWELL CISD BLACKWELL SCHOOL 5 5 100 17.4 18.8 16.8 18.0 17.6 <5h ƒ

HIGHLAND ISD HIGHLAND SCHOOL 22 13 59.1 22.3 22.2 22.3 22.3 22.5 6 46.2

ROSCOE ISD ROSCOE H S 20 15 75.0 22.1 21.7 21.8 21.7 21.7 6 40.0

SWEETWATER ISD 117 64 54.7 21.2 20.4 22.3 21.6 21.5 17 26.6 SWEETWATER H S 111 <65m ƒ 21.2 20.4 22.3 21.6 21.5 <20m ƒ HOBBS ALTER ED CO-O 6 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

NUECES AGUA DULCE ISD AGUA DULCE H S 22 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BANQUETE ISD BANQUETE H S 52 56 108 16.0 17.2 16.1 17.3 16.7 <5h ƒ

BISHOP CISD BISHOP H S 53 20 37.7 15.2 16.1 18.6 18.1 17.2 <5h ƒ

CALALLEN ISD CALALLEN HIGH SCHOO 301 150 49.8 19.9 20.9 20.6 21.0 20.7 35 23.3

CORPUS CHRISTI 1,747 561 32.1 17.7 18.7 18.7 18.7 18.6 79 14.1

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 107 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

NUECES CORPUS CHRISTI CARROLL H S 434 <90m ƒ 19.3 19.9 20.3 20.3 20.0 19 ƒ KING H S 423 144 34.0 20.0 20.4 20.9 20.3 20.5 35 24.3 MILLER HIGH SCHOOL 197 <70m ƒ 14.6 16.7 16.0 16.9 16.2 <5h ƒ MOODY H S 288 119 41.3 15.5 17.5 16.8 17.1 16.8 <10m ƒ RAY H S 377 144 38.2 17.7 18.2 18.3 18.4 18.3 17 11.8 ALTERNATIVE H S CTR 28 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

DR M L GARZA-GO 27 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ DR M L GARZA-GONZAL 9 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ ACCELERATED LEARNIN 18 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

FLOUR BLUFF ISD FLOUR BLUFF H S 285 76 26.7 19.8 20.9 20.5 20.7 20.6 17 22.4

PORT ARANSAS IS PORT ARANSAS H S 34 12 35.3 21.2 21.8 22.1 21.5 21.8 <5h ƒ

RICHARD MILBURN RICHARD MILBURN ALT 51 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

ROBSTOWN ISD 188 148 78.7 15.7 16.7 17.0 17.6 16.9 <5h ƒ ROBSTOWN H S 169 <150m ƒ 15.7 16.7 17.0 17.6 16.9 <5h ƒ ALTER LRN CTR 19 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TULOSO-MIDWAY I 221 136 61.5 19.0 20.0 19.7 20.8 20.0 26 19.1 TULOSO-MIDWAY H S 210 <140m ƒ 19.0 20.0 19.7 20.8 20.0 <30m ƒ TULOSO-MIDWAY ACADE 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WEST OSO ISD WEST OSO H S 78 42 53.8 15.2 16.6 17.2 16.9 16.6 <5h ƒ

OCHILTREE PERRYTON ISD 98 <70m ƒ 19.9 21.6 20.7 21.4 21.0 21 ƒ PERRYTON H S 93 <70m ƒ 19.9 21.6 20.7 21.4 21.0 <25m ƒ TOP OF TEXAS ACCELE 5 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

OLDHAM ADRIAN ISD ADRIAN SCHOOL 5 6 120 12.5 16.3 14.3 17.2 15.3 <5h ƒ

BOYS RANCH ISD BOYS RANCH H S 40 44 110 17.3 18.6 19.0 18.8 18.5 9 20.5

VEGA ISD VEGA H S 27 23 85.2 18.9 21.3 20.4 21.2 20.6 6 26.1

ORANGE BRIDGE CITY ISD BRIDGE CITY H S 124 21 16.9 21.5 20.5 20.6 21.3 21.1 8 38.1

LITTLE CYPRESS- LIT CYPR-MRCEVILLE 235 38 16.2 20.9 21.8 21.5 21.8 21.6 15 39.5

ORANGEFIELD ISD ORANGEFIELD H S 107 10 9.3 23.6 23.8 22.9 22.0 23.0 5 50.0

VIDOR ISD 242 <60m ƒ 19.9 19.0 21.8 20.3 20.3 12 ƒ VIDOR H S 223 <60m ƒ 19.9 19.0 21.8 20.3 20.3 <15m ƒ A I M S CTR H S 19 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WEST ORANGE-COV WEST ORANGE-STARK H 158 24 15.2 16.6 17.0 16.9 17.3 17.1 <5h ƒ

PALO PINTO GORDON ISD GORDON SCHOOL 16 12 75.0 21.0 18.8 22.3 21.8 21.3 <5h ƒ

GRAFORD ISD GRAFORD H S 15 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

108 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

PALO PINTO MINERAL WELLS I 162 23 14.2 18.9 20.5 19.7 20.1 19.9 <5h ƒ MINERAL WELL H S 159 <25m ƒ 18.9 20.5 19.7 20.1 19.9 <5h ƒ DREAM ACADEMY 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SANTO ISD SANTO HIGH SCHOOL 31 24 77.4 20.7 20.3 21.7 20.8 20.9 <5h ƒ

STRAWN ISD STRAWN SCHOOL 19 15 78.9 20.1 20.4 20.0 19.5 20.0 <5h ƒ

PANOLA BECKVILLE ISD BECKVILLE JR-SR HIG 18 14 77.8 15.5 18.9 17.7 18.0 17.7 <5h ƒ

CARTHAGE ISD CARTHAGE H S 146 82 56.2 19.9 20.3 20.4 20.0 20.3 17 20.7

GARY ISD GARY SCHOOL 15 9 60.0 16.7 17.9 16.8 18.7 17.7 <5h ƒ

PANOLA CHARTER PANOLA CS 43 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

PARKER ALEDO ISD 233 <75m ƒ 22.2 22.6 22.6 22.1 22.5 31 ƒ ALEDO HIGH SCHOOL 202 <75m ƒ 22.2 22.6 22.6 22.1 22.5 <35m ƒ ALEDO LEARNING CENT 31 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BROCK ISD BROCK H S 42 15 35.7 19.5 22.3 20.6 20.9 20.9 <5h ƒ

MILLSAP ISD MILLSAP H S 38 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

PEASTER ISD PEASTER H S 66 7 10.6 21.0 23.1 23.6 22.6 22.9 <5h ƒ

POOLVILLE ISD POOLVILLE H S 33 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SPRINGTOWN ISD 173 27 15.6 20.2 21.3 22.1 21.7 21.6 <15m ƒ SPRINGTOWN H S 170 <30m ƒ 20.2 21.3 22.1 21.7 21.6 <15m ƒ YALE 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WEATHERFORD ISD 375 91 24.3 20.4 21.1 21.4 21.4 21.2 26 28.6 WEATHERFORD H S 360 <95m ƒ 20.4 21.1 21.4 21.4 21.2 <30m ƒ PASS LEARNING CENTE 15 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

PARMER BOVINA ISD BOVINA H S 29 22 75.9 15.5 19.5 16.8 18.3 17.8 <5h ƒ

FARWELL ISD FARWELL H S 26 14 53.8 25.2 23.1 26.9 23.5 24.9 8 57.1

FRIONA ISD FRIONA H S 54 45 83.3 17.2 19.1 18.7 19.9 19.0 8 17.8

LAZBUDDIE ISD LAZBUDDIE SCHOOL 11 10 90.9 16.5 18.7 17.3 18.6 17.9 <5h ƒ

PECOS BUENA VISTA ISD BUENA VISTA SCHOOL 5 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

FT STOCKTON ISD 115 11 9.6 21.2 23.1 21.6 22.2 22.2 <5h ƒ FORT STOCKTON H S 112 <15m ƒ 21.1 23.2 21.8 22.3 22.3 <5h ƒ BUTZ EDUCATION CTR 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

IRAAN-SHEFFIELD 25 19 76.0 17.9 18.6 17.9 18.5 18.4 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 109 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

PECOS IRAAN-SHEFFIELD IRAAN H S 25 <20m ƒ 17.9 18.6 17.9 18.5 18.4 <5h ƒ T Y C SHEFFIELD CAM 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

POLK BIG SANDY ISD BIG SANDY SCHOOL 29 18 62.1 17.7 18.5 18.9 19.1 18.7 <5h ƒ

CORRIGAN-CAMDEN CORRIGAN-CAMDEN H S 41 19 46.3 16.1 16.8 17.4 17.3 16.9 <5h ƒ

GOODRICH ISD GOODRICH H S 15 16 107 12.4 15.7 13.8 14.8 14.4 <5h ƒ

LEGGETT ISD LEGGETT H S 14 7 50.0 19.4 18.6 20.7 19.7 19.9 <5h ƒ

LIVINGSTON ISD LIVINGSTON H S 225 50 22.2 20.0 19.7 20.4 19.8 20.1 11 22.0

POTTER AMARILLO ISD 1,391 358 25.7 19.2 20.7 20.6 20.8 20.5 99 27.7 AMARILLO H S 439 125 28.5 22.5 23.2 23.7 22.7 23.2 65 52.0 CAPROCK H S 262 <65m ƒ 17.7 19.2 18.9 19.3 19.0 <10m ƒ AMARILLO AREA CTR F 4 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ PALO DURO H S 272 105 38.6 15.2 17.6 17.2 18.6 17.3 <5h ƒ TASCOSA H S 411 <70m ƒ 20.6 22.4 21.8 22.1 21.9 23 ƒ NORTH HEIGHTS ALTER 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HIGHLAND PARK I HIGHLAND PARK H S 47 38 80.9 16.8 19.0 18.8 19.6 18.7 6 15.8

RICHARD MILBURN RICHARD MILBURN ACA 49 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

RIVER ROAD ISD RIVER ROAD HIGH SCH 94 53 56.4 19.8 20.0 21.1 20.8 20.5 9 17.0

PRESIDIO MARFA ISD MARFA JUNIOR/SENIOR 27 16 59.3 16.4 17.8 19.3 18.8 18.1 <5h ƒ

PRESIDIO ISD PRESIDIO H S 78 43 55.1 15.1 16.9 17.0 16.7 16.6 <5h ƒ

RAINS RAINS ISD RAINS HIGH SCHOOL 85 48 56.5 18.9 19.3 21.5 20.5 20.1 10 20.8

RANDALL CANYON ISD 439 234 53.3 21.3 22.0 22.7 22.1 22.1 80 34.2 CANYON H S 156 114 73.1 22.6 22.2 23.9 22.6 23.0 48 42.1 RANDALL H S 283 120 42.4 20.1 21.8 21.6 21.6 21.3 32 26.7

REAGAN REAGAN COUNTY I REAGAN COUNTY H S 59 27 45.8 18.4 20.0 18.4 19.3 19.0 <5h ƒ

REAL BIG SPRINGS CHA BIG SPRINGS CHARTER 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LEAKEY ISD LEAKEY SCHOOL 10 8 80.0 20.5 21.3 21.6 20.9 21.1 <5h ƒ

RED RIVER AVERY ISD AVERY H S 23 15 65.2 16.4 18.5 17.3 18.2 17.7 <5h ƒ

CLARKSVILLE ISD CLARKSVILLE H S 51 30 58.8 19.6 18.5 20.0 19.2 19.6 7 23.3

DETROIT ISD DETROIT H S 24 9 37.5 21.6 19.1 22.0 20.7 21.0 <5h ƒ

RIVERCREST ISD RIVERCREST H S 26 22 84.6 19.4 20.3 19.8 19.2 19.7 <5h ƒ

REEVES BALMORHEA ISD BALMORHEA SCHOOL 19 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

110 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

REEVES PECOS-BARSTOW-T PECOS H S 124 12 9.7 17.7 17.6 18.9 18.7 18.4 <5h ƒ

REFUGIO AUSTWELL-TIVOLI AUSTWELL-TIVOLI H S 9 7 77.8 19.3 19.1 20.4 20.0 19.9 <5h ƒ

REFUGIO ISD 83 18 21.7 16.9 17.9 17.8 19.1 17.9 <5h ƒ REFUGIO HIGH SCHOOL 35 <20m ƒ 16.9 17.9 17.8 19.1 17.9 <5h ƒ REFUGIO MIDDLE SCHO 48 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WOODSBORO ISD WOODSBORO H S 20 32 160 16.2 19.1 17.3 19.2 18.1 <5h ƒ

ROBERTS MIAMI ISD MIAMI SCHOOL 14 10 71.4 21.0 19.6 22.2 22.5 21.4 <5h ƒ

ROBERTSON BREMOND ISD BREMOND H S 29 6 20.7 18.8 21.2 21.5 20.2 20.7 <5h ƒ

CALVERT ISD CALVERT H S 10 5 50.0 14.0 15.4 15.2 17.0 15.4 <5h ƒ

FRANKLIN ISD FRANKLIN H S 63 24 38.1 19.7 20.2 20.4 20.3 20.4 6 25.0

HEARNE ISD HEARNE H S 49 16 32.7 15.1 15.9 14.6 16.4 15.7 <5h ƒ

MUMFORD ISD MUMFORD H S 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

ROCKWALL ROCKWALL ISD 560 221 39.5 21.9 22.2 23.1 21.8 22.3 91 41.2 ROCKWALL H S 547 <225m ƒ 21.9 22.2 23.1 21.8 22.3 <95m ƒ ROCKWALL QUEST ACAD 13 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

ROYSE CITY ISD 136 28 20.6 19.2 19.6 19.8 19.8 19.7 6 21.4 ROYSE CITY H S 132 <30m ƒ 19.2 19.6 19.8 19.8 19.7 <10m ƒ ALTERNATIVE LEARNIN 4 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

RUNNELS BALLINGER ISD BALLINGER H S 62 50 80.6 20.5 21.2 21.5 20.4 21.0 13 26.0

MILES ISD MILES H S 26 22 84.6 20.6 21.7 19.8 21.5 21.0 6 27.3

WINTERS ISD WINTERS H S 36 20 55.6 22.4 20.1 21.8 20.7 21.4 7 35.0

RUSK CARLISLE ISD CARLISLE SCHOOL 24 10 41.7 23.9 21.2 23.4 21.8 22.6 <5h ƒ

HENDERSON ISD HENDERSON H S 175 92 52.6 19.4 19.9 20.1 20.1 20.0 18 19.6

LANEVILLE ISD LANEVILLE SCHOOL 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LEVERETTS CHAPE LEVERETTS CHAPEL H 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MOUNT ENTERPRIS MT ENTERPRISE H S 21 19 90.5 19.7 19.0 20.1 20.6 20.0 <5h ƒ

OVERTON ISD OVERTON H S 24 10 41.7 21.8 20.0 19.5 20.4 20.6 <5h ƒ

TATUM ISD TATUM H S 74 48 64.9 19.5 19.4 19.9 20.3 19.9 7 14.6

WEST RUSK ISD WEST RUSK H S 36 18 50.0 18.9 19.6 20.7 20.6 20.1 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 111 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

SABINE HEMPHILL ISD HEMPHILL H S 63 26 41.3 18.3 19.6 18.2 18.5 18.8 <5h ƒ

WEST SABINE ISD WEST SABINE H S 33 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SAN AUGUSTINE BROADDUS ISD BROADDUS H S 17 13 76.5 20.7 19.2 21.8 21.7 20.9 <5h ƒ

SAN AUGUSTINE I 56 28 50.0 16.1 17.5 16.9 17.7 17.1 <5h ƒ SAN AUGUSTINE H S 55 <30m ƒ 16.1 17.5 16.9 17.7 17.1 <5h ƒ ACCELERATED LRN CTR 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SAN JACINTO COLDSPRING-OAKH COLDSPRING-OAKHURST 85 8 9.4 21.3 18.1 20.5 19.5 19.8 <5h ƒ

SHEPHERD ISD SHEPHERD H S 74 14 18.9 14.6 16.9 16.2 17.1 16.3 <5h ƒ

SAN PATRICIO ARANSAS PASS IS ARANSAS PASS HIGH S 88 13 14.8 19.0 21.0 20.9 19.9 20.3 <5h ƒ

GREGORY-PORTLAN GREGORY-PORTLAND H 246 51 20.7 20.8 22.5 22.1 21.9 21.9 18 35.3

INGLESIDE ISD INGLESIDE H S 109 9 8.3 22.0 22.6 23.9 21.6 22.6 <5h ƒ

MATHIS ISD MATHIS H S 83 36 43.4 16.8 17.6 17.2 18.0 17.6 <5h ƒ

ODEM-EDROY ISD ODEM H S 66 47 71.2 18.0 19.0 19.7 19.6 19.1 8 17.0

SINTON ISD SINTON H S 98 70 71.4 15.9 18.4 17.1 17.2 17.3 5 7.1

TAFT ISD TAFT H S 64 57 89.1 14.0 16.2 14.5 16.5 15.4 <5h ƒ

SAN SABA CHEROKEE ISD CHEROKEE H S 8 7 87.5 20.7 19.3 20.7 20.6 20.4 <5h ƒ

RICHLAND SPRING RICHLAND SPRINGS SC 14 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SAN SABA ISD SAN SABA H S 44 35 79.5 17.9 19.1 18.4 18.7 18.7 7 20.0

SCHLEICHER SCHLEICHER ISD ELDORADO H S 41 25 61.0 18.9 20.5 19.1 20.3 19.8 <5h ƒ

SCURRY HERMLEIGH ISD HERMLEIGH SCHOOL 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

IRA ISD IRA SCHOOL 13 9 69.2 17.4 17.6 18.6 19.6 18.4 <5h ƒ

SNYDER ISD 137 <95m ƒ 20.1 20.2 20.7 20.4 20.5 21 ƒ SNYDER H S 135 <95m ƒ 20.1 20.2 20.7 20.4 20.5 <25m ƒ HOBBS ALTER ED CO-O 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SHACKELFORD ALBANY ISD ALBANY JR-SR H S 33 23 69.7 18.6 18.9 21.4 19.1 19.6 <5h ƒ

MORAN ISD MORAN SCHOOL 6 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SHELBY CENTER ISD CENTER H S 109 86 78.9 17.4 19.0 18.8 19.1 18.7 14 16.3

JOAQUIN ISD JOAQUIN H S 33 21 63.6 21.6 21.3 21.9 20.8 21.6 5 23.8

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

112 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

SHELBY SHELBYVILLE ISD SHELBYVILLE SCHOOL 36 20 55.6 22.4 20.6 22.1 20.3 21.5 6 30.0

TENAHA ISD TENAHA H S 10 5 50.0 21.0 20.2 21.8 20.6 21.2 <5h ƒ

TIMPSON ISD TIMPSON H S 31 23 74.2 17.8 18.0 18.5 18.4 18.2 <5h ƒ

SHERMAN STRATFORD ISD STRATFORD H S 33 34 103 17.7 19.3 18.9 19.4 18.8 <5h ƒ

TEXHOMA ISD TEXHOMA EL 4 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SMITH ARP ISD ARP H S 53 19 35.8 17.3 18.8 18.6 19.4 18.6 <5h ƒ

AZLEWAY CHARTER AZLEWAY CHARTER SCH 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BULLARD ISD BULLARD H S 99 24 24.2 19.6 20.4 21.5 19.8 20.5 <5h ƒ

CHAPEL HILL ISD 194 68 35.1 18.4 18.7 20.5 20.0 19.6 14 20.6 CHAPEL HILL H S 193 <70m ƒ 18.4 18.7 20.5 20.0 19.6 <15m ƒ WINGS 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

EAGLE ACADEMY O 28 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ EAGLE ACADEMY OF TY 25 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ EAGLE ACADEMY OF TY 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LINDALE ISD LINDALE H S 189 43 22.8 20.0 20.7 21.1 20.8 20.7 10 23.3

TROUP ISD TROUP H S 60 16 26.7 15.8 17.9 17.8 18.1 17.5 <5h ƒ

TYLER ISD 760 254 33.4 16.9 18.6 18.1 18.5 18.2 34 13.4 ROBERT E LEE HIGH S 474 <120m ƒ 19.8 21.0 20.9 20.9 20.8 <35m ƒ JOHN TYLER H S 254 <140m ƒ 14.4 16.4 15.7 16.5 15.9 <5h ƒ ALVIN V ANDERSON ED 32 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WHITEHOUSE ISD WHITEHOUSE H S 232 54 23.3 20.7 21.6 22.1 21.3 21.5 14 25.9

WINONA ISD WINONA H S 52 12 23.1 16.7 17.4 17.3 17.3 17.2 <5h ƒ

SOMERVELL BRAZOS RIVER CH BRAZOS RIVER CHARTE 53 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

GLEN ROSE ISD GLEN ROSE H S 81 40 49.4 21.5 23.6 22.2 21.8 22.4 13 32.5

STARR RIO GRANDE CITY RIO GRANDE CITY H S 359 237 66.0 15.4 16.4 16.8 17.5 16.7 5 2.1

ROMA ISD 252 177 70.2 15.2 17.3 16.3 17.5 16.7 8 4.5 ROMA H S 244 <180m ƒ 15.2 17.3 16.3 17.5 16.7 <10m ƒ ACCELERATED LRN ACA 8 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SAN ISIDRO ISD SAN ISIDRO H S 11 10 90.9 18.3 19.5 19.4 18.7 19.2 <5h ƒ

STEPHENS BRECKENRIDGE IS 79 16 20.3 18.2 19.8 20.6 20.7 19.9 <5h ƒ BRECKENRIDGE H S 77 <20m ƒ 18.2 19.8 20.6 20.7 19.9 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 113 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

STEPHENS BRECKENRIDGE IS BRECKENRIDGE ALTER 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

STERLING STERLING CITY I STERLING CITY H S 17 14 82.4 20.1 21.9 22.9 21.4 21.6 <5h ƒ

STONEWALL ASPERMONT ISD ASPERMONT HS 17 13 76.5 19.2 18.6 21.2 20.3 20.0 <5h ƒ

SUTTON SONORA ISD SONORA H S 41 30 73.2 17.8 19.9 17.9 18.4 18.5 <5h ƒ

SWISHER HAPPY ISD HAPPY H S 15 11 73.3 20.0 20.7 21.6 20.9 21.0 <5h ƒ

KRESS ISD KRESS H S 12 5 41.7 14.6 16.4 18.0 18.0 16.8 <5h ƒ

TULIA ISD TULIA H S 73 36 49.3 19.5 20.9 20.0 20.8 20.5 8 22.2

TARRANT ARLINGTON ISD 3,054 532 17.4 19.7 21.0 20.8 20.5 20.7 146 27.4 ARLINGTON H S 514 87 16.9 19.8 20.7 20.4 20.1 20.4 22 25.3 SAM HOUSTON H S 412 53 12.9 16.6 19.1 17.8 18.3 18.1 <10m ƒ LAMAR H S 534 88 16.5 21.1 21.9 21.3 21.1 21.5 28 31.8 BOWIE H S 434 83 19.1 18.0 20.4 20.1 20.3 19.8 16 19.3 MARTIN H S 741 159 21.5 21.3 22.5 22.5 21.9 22.2 61 38.4 VENTURE ALTER H S 78 6 7.7 18.0 15.8 19.8 17.7 18.2 <5h ƒ SEGUIN H S 341 56 16.4 18.5 19.4 19.7 19.0 19.3 11 19.6

AZLE ISD AZLE H S 327 49 15.0 20.8 21.4 21.5 21.4 21.3 15 30.6

BIRDVILLE ISD 1,168 197 16.9 20.5 20.8 21.8 21.1 21.2 57 28.9 HALTOM H S 437 47 10.8 18.7 19.4 20.6 20.1 19.8 12 25.5 RICHLAND H S 365 86 23.6 20.1 21.0 21.5 20.7 20.9 18 20.9 BIRDVILLE HIGH SCHO 366 64 17.5 22.6 21.7 23.1 22.4 22.5 27 42.2

CARROLL ISD CARROLL SENIOR HIGH 499 342 68.5 23.5 24.0 24.5 23.1 23.9 178 52.0

CASTLEBERRY ISD 159 11 6.9 18.0 18.7 18.8 19.4 18.7 <5h ƒ CASTLEBERRY H S 145 <15m ƒ 18.0 18.7 18.8 19.4 18.7 <5h ƒ REACH H S 14 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CROWLEY ISD 685 195 28.5 19.0 20.5 20.2 20.2 20.2 44 22.6 CROWLEY H S 313 83 26.5 19.0 20.3 20.1 20.2 20.1 15 18.1 NORTH CROWLEY H S 372 112 30.1 19.0 20.7 20.3 20.2 20.2 29 25.9

EAGLE ACADEMY O EAGLE ACADEMY OF FT 10 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

EAGLE MT-SAGINA 433 <45m ƒ 20.8 21.7 22.4 21.7 21.8 17 ƒ BOSWELL H S 419 <45m ƒ 20.8 21.7 22.4 21.7 21.8 <20m ƒ WATSON LEARNING CEN 14 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

ERATH EXCELS AC ERATH EXCELS ACADEM 39 8 20.5 15.1 15.6 16.9 17.0 16.3 <5h ƒ

EVERMAN ISD EVERMAN H S 158 53 33.5 15.3 17.4 16.5 18.1 16.9 <5h ƒ

FORT WORTH ACAD FORT WORTH ACADEMY 17 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

114 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

TARRANT FORT WORTH CAN 149 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ FORT WORTH CAN ACAD 90 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ RIVER OAKS 59 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

FORT WORTH ISD 3,252 559 17.2 17.0 18.5 18.2 18.6 18.2 76 13.6 CARTER-RIVERSIDE H 140 <15m ƒ 14.5 18.4 15.1 16.2 16.2 <5h ƒ ARLINGTON HEIGHTS H 370 89 24.1 20.1 20.9 21.5 20.5 20.9 25 28.1 SOUTH HILLS HIGH SC 212 32 15.1 14.9 17.6 16.4 17.8 16.8 <5h ƒ DIAMOND HILL-JARVIS 149 18 12.1 15.4 16.1 15.7 17.3 16.3 <5h ƒ DUNBAR H S 170 30 17.6 15.0 18.0 16.3 17.8 16.9 <5h ƒ EASTERN HILLS H S 229 77 33.6 14.3 15.9 14.8 16.0 15.4 <5h ƒ NORTH SIDE H S 221 33 14.9 16.4 17.9 17.9 18.5 17.9 <5h ƒ POLYTECHNIC HIGH SC 147 23 15.6 14.4 16.8 15.3 16.4 15.9 <5h ƒ PASCHAL H S 441 66 15.0 22.1 22.3 23.7 22.1 22.7 28 42.4 TRIMBLE TECHNICAL H 324 54 16.7 15.6 17.2 16.5 17.7 16.9 <5h ƒ SOUTHWEST H S 263 48 18.3 17.8 18.3 18.3 18.9 18.4 <5h ƒ WESTERN HILLS H S 277 33 11.9 18.3 21.1 20.6 20.7 20.3 11 33.3 O D WYATT H S 188 44 23.4 13.7 16.3 15.1 16.8 15.6 <5h ƒ CTR FOR NEW LIVES 29 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ SUCCESS H S 89 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ JAMES MIDDLE 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ MEADOWBROOK MIDDLE 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ WEDGWOOD MIDDLE 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

GRAPEVINE-COLLE 959 349 36.4 22.3 22.8 23.5 22.2 22.8 141 40.4 GRAPEVINE H S 434 <145m ƒ 21.8 22.1 23.1 21.5 22.2 <55m ƒ COLLEYVILLE HERITAG 506 208 41.1 22.6 23.3 23.8 22.8 23.2 <90m ƒ THE BRIDGES ACAD AL 19 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

HURST-EULESS-BE 1,191 358 30.1 20.7 21.9 21.7 21.3 21.5 127 35.5 BELL H S 565 <190m ƒ 20.9 21.3 21.8 21.5 21.5 <70m ƒ TRINITY H S 594 <175m ƒ 20.6 22.5 21.5 21.1 21.6 <65m ƒ KEYS CTR 32 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

KELLER ISD 1,233 460 37.3 20.8 21.7 22.1 21.5 21.7 155 33.7 KELLER H S 603 255 42.3 21.1 22.1 22.4 21.8 22.0 <100m ƒ FOSSIL RIDGE H S 620 <205m ƒ 20.4 21.3 21.8 21.3 21.3 <65m ƒ CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ NEW DIRECTION LRN C 9 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

KENNEDALE ISD KENNEDALE H S 158 43 27.2 18.3 18.5 18.7 19.4 18.9 5 11.6

LAKE WORTH ISD 97 27 27.8 15.8 16.9 16.4 17.9 16.9 <5h ƒ LAKE WORTH H S 86 <30m ƒ 15.8 16.9 16.4 17.9 16.9 <5h ƒ ANNE MANSFIELD SULL 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MANSFIELD ISD 1,134 213 18.8 19.4 20.0 20.6 20.1 20.2 43 20.2 SUMMIT HIGH SCHOOL 556 <130m ƒ 18.9 19.8 20.2 19.9 19.8 <25m ƒ MANSFIELD HIGH SCHO 447 <85m ƒ 20.0 20.2 21.4 20.5 20.6 <20m ƒ MANSFIELD TIMBERVIE 105 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ ALTER ED CTR 26 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 115 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

TARRANT MASONIC HOME IS MASONIC HOME HIGH S 11 10 90.9 14.0 16.7 16.3 15.5 15.6 <5h ƒ

RICHARD MILBURN RICHARD MILBURN ACA 22 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

THERESA B LEE A THERESA B LEE ACADE 70 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TREETOPS SCHOOL TREETOPS SCHOOL INT 9 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WHITE SETTLEMEN 232 59 25.4 18.8 19.3 20.1 20.1 19.7 11 18.6 BREWER H S 218 <60m ƒ 18.8 19.3 20.1 20.1 19.7 <15m ƒ MESA HIGH SCHOOL 10 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ WHITE SETTLEMENT DI 4 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TAYLOR ABILENE ISD 793 217 27.4 21.0 21.3 21.9 21.4 21.5 66 30.4 ABILENE H S 385 <125m ƒ 21.0 21.3 22.3 21.6 21.7 <40m ƒ COOPER H S 365 <95m ƒ 21.0 21.3 21.4 21.3 21.3 <30m ƒ WOODSON CENTER FOR 39 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ SP ED HOMEBOUND 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ SP ED O J T 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

EAGLE ACADEMY O EAGLE ACADEMY OF AB 34 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

JIM NED CISD JIM NED H S 75 61 81.3 19.7 21.6 20.5 21.6 21.0 15 24.6

MERKEL ISD MERKEL H S 74 55 74.3 17.7 19.3 19.7 19.3 19.2 8 14.5

TRENT ISD TRENT SCHOOL 10 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WYLIE ISD WYLIE H S 182 76 41.8 21.5 22.3 22.8 21.9 22.3 31 40.8

TERRELL TERRELL COUNTY SANDERSON H S 14 8 57.1 21.0 19.6 22.5 20.4 21.1 <5h ƒ

TERRY BROWNFIELD ISD BROWNFIELD H S 101 48 47.5 17.4 20.0 19.3 19.3 19.1 11 22.9

MEADOW ISD MEADOW SCHOOL 17 9 52.9 14.8 16.8 14.8 18.1 16.3 <5h ƒ

WELLMAN-UNION C WELLMAN-UNION SCHOO 12 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

THROCKMORTON THROCKMORTON IS THROCKMORTON H S 21 14 66.7 23.6 20.9 24.5 22.9 23.2 5 35.7

WOODSON ISD WOODSON SCHOOL 12 10 83.3 20.3 22.1 21.7 20.9 21.4 <5h ƒ

TITUS CHAPEL HILL ISD CHAPEL HILL H S 58 15 25.9 22.4 19.1 23.1 20.2 21.3 <5h ƒ

MOUNT PLEASANT 226 48 21.2 18.8 19.2 18.8 20.0 19.3 11 22.9 MT PLEASANT H S 204 <50m ƒ 18.8 19.2 18.8 20.0 19.3 <15m ƒ ALTER ED 22 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TOM GREEN CHRISTOVAL ISD CHRISTOVAL H S 28 23 82.1 19.5 21.5 19.9 20.1 20.3 <5h ƒ

GRAPE CREEK ISD 57 34 59.6 19.6 20.9 21.5 20.6 20.8 <15m ƒ GRAPE CREEK H S 56 <35m ƒ 19.6 20.9 21.5 20.6 20.8 <15m ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

116 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

TOM GREEN GRAPE CREEK ISD FAIRVIEW ACCELERATE 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SAN ANGELO ISD 826 274 33.2 18.5 19.4 20.0 19.5 19.5 50 18.2 CENTRAL H S 622 185 29.7 19.3 20.0 20.7 20.0 20.1 44 23.8 LAKE VIEW H S 204 89 43.6 17.0 18.1 18.7 18.6 18.2 6 6.7

VERIBEST ISD 17 <10m ƒ 16.8 17.6 17.2 18.0 17.6 <5h ƒ VERIBEST H S 16 <10m ƒ 16.8 17.6 17.2 18.0 17.6 <5h ƒ FAIRVIEW SPECIAL PR 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WALL ISD 56 48 85.7 20.7 20.8 21.4 20.4 20.9 7 14.6 WALL H S 54 <50m ƒ 20.7 20.8 21.4 20.4 20.9 <10m ƒ FAIRVIEW ACCELERATE 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ WALL MIDDLE 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WATER VALLEY IS 20 17 85.0 18.3 20.1 18.6 20.2 19.4 <5h ƒ WATER VALLEY H S 19 <20m ƒ 18.3 20.1 18.6 20.2 19.4 <5h ƒ WATER VALLEY ACCELE 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TRAVIS AMERICAN YOUTHW 121 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ AMERICAN YOUTHWORKS 61 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ AMERICAN YOUTHWORKS 60 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

AUSTIN CAN ACAD AUSTIN CAN ACADEMY 29 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

AUSTIN ISD 3,276 859 26.2 19.0 20.7 20.3 20.0 20.1 249 29.0 AUSTIN H S 415 104 25.1 20.7 22.0 21.2 21.0 21.3 32 30.8 JOHNSTON H S 110 40 36.4 11.7 15.5 12.9 14.7 13.8 <5h ƒ LANIER H S 244 83 34.0 14.0 17.1 15.3 16.7 15.9 <5h ƒ MCCALLUM H S 286 74 25.9 21.0 21.6 22.3 21.2 21.7 30 40.5 REAGAN H S 126 37 29.4 13.8 16.6 15.1 15.7 15.4 <5h ƒ TRAVIS H S 212 <30m ƒ 15.6 17.8 17.3 18.3 17.3 <5h ƒ CROCKETT H S 296 83 28.0 16.6 17.6 17.9 19.0 17.9 12 14.5 ANDERSON H S 374 105 28.1 21.7 24.4 22.9 22.3 23.0 56 53.3 JOHNSON H S 307 62 20.2 21.4 21.1 22.6 21.1 21.7 22 35.5 BOWIE H S 482 174 36.1 21.9 23.2 23.4 22.2 22.8 79 45.4 GONZALO GARZA INDEP 81 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ AKINS HIGH SCHOOL 341 66 19.4 18.7 19.2 19.7 18.8 19.3 13 19.7 TRAVIS COUNTY JUVEN 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ PHOENIX ACADEMY 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

DEL VALLE ISD 337 43 12.8 16.3 17.5 17.5 17.3 17.2 <5h ƒ DEL VALLE H S 318 <45m ƒ 16.3 17.5 17.5 17.3 17.2 <5h ƒ DEL VALLE OPPORTUNI 19 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

EANES ISD WESTLAKE H S 538 192 35.7 24.1 25.2 25.0 23.5 24.6 114 59.4

FRUIT OF EXCELL FRUIT OF EXCELLENCE 5 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LAGO VISTA ISD LAGO VISTA H S 60 15 25.0 20.7 23.4 22.5 22.0 22.3 5 33.3

LAKE TRAVIS ISD LAKE TRAVIS H S 295 71 24.1 22.8 24.0 24.4 23.1 23.7 33 46.5

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 117 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

TRAVIS MANOR ISD 132 32 24.2 16.7 17.8 18.6 18.9 18.1 <5h ƒ MANOR H S 124 <35m ƒ 16.7 17.8 18.6 18.9 18.1 <5h ƒ EXCEL HIGH SCHOOL 8 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

NYOS CHARTER SC NYOS CHARTER SCHOOL 16 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

PFLUGERVILLE IS 837 165 19.7 19.5 20.3 20.8 20.1 20.4 38 23.0 PFLUGERVILLE H S 457 <115m ƒ 19.9 21.3 20.9 20.6 20.8 <30m ƒ JOHN B CONNALLY H S 379 <55m ƒ 18.8 18.3 20.5 19.2 19.4 <15m ƒ HENDRICKSON HS 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

STAR CHARTER SC STAR CHARTER SCHOOL 8 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TEXAS EMPOWERME TEXAS EMPOWERMENT A 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

UNIVERSITY CHAR 8 9 113 15.1 15.7 17.2 16.8 16.1 <5h ƒ A R C CONGRESS 0 <10m ƒ 15.1 15.7 17.2 16.8 16.1 <5h ƒ MARYWOOD 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ MIRACLE FARM 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ ANNUNCIATION MATERN 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ TNC CAMPUS (TEXAS N 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ SAN MARCOS TREATMEN 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TRINITY APPLE SPRINGS I APPLE SPRINGS H S 13 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CENTERVILLE ISD CENTERVILLE H S 21 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

GROVETON ISD GROVETON J H-H S 25 9 36.0 17.0 18.1 20.6 18.7 18.8 <5h ƒ

TRINITY ISD TRINITY H S 72 20 27.8 16.2 18.4 17.2 17.6 17.5 <5h ƒ

TYLER CHESTER ISD CHESTER H S 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

COLMESNEIL ISD COLMESNEIL H S 28 11 39.3 18.8 19.4 19.6 20.3 19.5 <5h ƒ

SPURGER ISD SPURGER H S 29 11 37.9 18.0 18.0 17.2 18.6 18.0 <5h ƒ

WARREN ISD WARREN H S 60 11 18.3 19.2 17.9 20.5 18.9 19.2 <5h ƒ

WOODVILLE ISD WOODVILLE H S 64 9 14.1 19.3 18.3 21.4 20.0 19.9 <5h ƒ

UPSHUR BIG SANDY ISD BIG SANDY H S 19 15 78.9 20.3 20.9 19.9 20.8 20.6 <5h ƒ

GILMER ISD GILMER H S 115 69 60.0 18.6 19.4 19.7 19.2 19.3 12 17.4

HARMONY ISD HARMONY H S 66 48 72.7 20.0 20.1 20.3 21.1 20.5 11 22.9

NEW DIANA ISD NEW DIANA H S 50 38 76.0 21.4 20.4 23.0 22.3 21.9 12 31.6

ORE CITY ISD ORE CITY HIGH SCHOO 33 22 66.7 19.0 19.8 21.4 20.3 20.2 6 27.3

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

118 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

UPSHUR UNION GROVE ISD UNION GROVE H S 38 23 60.5 19.9 21.6 20.8 20.2 20.7 5 21.7

UNION HILL ISD UNION HILL H S 19 15 78.9 17.0 16.6 16.2 17.7 17.0 <5h ƒ

UPTON MCCAMEY ISD MCCAMEY H S 28 9 32.1 15.8 17.2 19.0 18.6 17.8 <5h ƒ

RANKIN ISD RANKIN H S 16 16 100 17.0 20.6 17.0 19.1 18.5 <5h ƒ

UVALDE GABRIEL TAFOLLA GABRIEL TAFOLLA CHA 4 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

KNIPPA ISD KNIPPA SCHOOL 8 6 75.0 18.8 22.8 18.8 22.3 20.8 <5h ƒ

SABINAL ISD SABINAL H S 24 14 58.3 18.8 19.4 20.9 20.1 19.9 <5h ƒ

UTOPIA ISD UTOPIA SCHOOL 20 13 65.0 23.2 24.8 22.8 23.7 23.9 6 46.2

UVALDE CISD 244 36 14.8 16.8 19.0 16.7 18.2 17.8 <10m ƒ UVALDE H S 234 <40m ƒ 16.8 19.0 16.7 18.2 17.8 <10m ƒ EXCEL ACADEMY 10 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

VAL VERDE COMSTOCK ISD COMSTOCK SCHOOL 6 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

EAGLE ACADEMY O EAGLE ACADEMY OF DE 9 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

SAN FELIPE-DEL DEL RIO H S 401 87 21.7 16.1 18.5 17.4 18.0 17.6 8 9.2

VAN ZANDT CANTON ISD CANTON H S 79 12 15.2 24.6 23.3 27.3 23.2 24.7 9 75.0

EDGEWOOD ISD EDGEWOOD H S 58 16 27.6 21.3 22.1 22.3 23.2 22.3 5 31.3

FRUITVALE ISD FRUITVALE H S 20 12 60.0 16.3 16.8 18.4 18.6 17.7 <5h ƒ

GRAND SALINE IS GRAND SALINE H S 72 22 30.6 20.6 19.7 21.0 20.4 20.6 <5h ƒ

MARTINS MILL IS MARTINS MILL H S 28 14 50.0 21.9 22.1 20.9 21.7 21.7 <5h ƒ

RANCH ACADEMY RANCH ACADEMY 11 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

VAN ISD VAN H S 127 8 6.3 20.5 20.5 22.0 21.6 21.4 <5h ƒ

WILLS POINT ISD WILLS POINT H S 121 46 38.0 19.4 19.2 19.7 20.6 19.8 10 21.7

VICTORIA BLOOMINGTON ISD BLOOMINGTON H S 34 13 38.2 18.2 17.7 18.8 19.2 18.7 <5h ƒ

VICTORIA ISD 673 93 13.8 20.2 20.5 21.2 21.1 20.9 22 23.7 PROFIT ACADEMIC CTR 23 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOO 650 <95m ƒ 20.2 20.5 21.2 21.1 20.9 <25m ƒ

WALKER HUNTSVILLE ISD 374 99 26.5 17.1 18.5 17.8 19.2 18.3 9 9.1 HUNTSVILLE H S 361 <100m ƒ 17.1 18.5 17.8 19.2 18.3 <10m ƒ WESTMORELAND LEARNI 13 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 119 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

WALKER NEW WAVERLY ISD NEW WAVERLY H S 51 15 29.4 18.6 20.4 18.7 18.9 19.3 <5h ƒ

WALLER HEMPSTEAD ISD HEMPSTEAD H S 53 40 75.5 16.3 17.9 17.6 17.3 17.3 <5h ƒ

ROYAL ISD ROYAL H S 68 33 48.5 17.5 19.2 18.7 19.2 18.8 <5h ƒ

WALLER ISD WALLER H S 241 94 39.0 18.4 19.0 19.1 19.5 19.1 15 16.0

WARD GRANDFALLS-ROYA GRANDFALLS-ROYALTY 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

MONAHANS-WICKET 117 66 56.4 19.4 20.6 20.7 20.5 20.5 16 24.2 MONAHANS H S 112 <70m ƒ 19.4 20.6 20.7 20.5 20.5 <20m ƒ MONAHANS ED CTR 5 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WASHINGTON BRENHAM ISD 297 49 16.5 19.9 21.5 20.7 20.8 20.8 17 34.7 294 <50m ƒ 19.9 21.5 20.7 20.8 20.8 <20m ƒ BRENHAM ALTERNATIVE 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BURTON ISD BURTON H S 24 8 33.3 20.5 22.1 24.1 23.5 22.8 <5h ƒ

WEBB EAGLE ACADEMY O EAGLE ACADEMY OF LA 13 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

GATEWAY (STUDEN GATEWAY ACADEMY (ST 101 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LAREDO ISD 817 190 23.3 14.5 17.4 15.6 16.9 16.2 5 2.6 MARTIN H S 252 80 31.7 14.5 17.5 15.2 17.1 16.2 <5h ƒ NIXON H S 326 <45m ƒ 15.7 17.7 16.7 17.2 17.0 <5h ƒ DR LEO CIGARROA H S 237 <70m ƒ 13.7 17.3 15.3 16.5 15.9 <5h ƒ F S LARA ACADEMY 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

UNITED ISD 1,357 277 20.4 16.8 18.2 17.7 18.0 17.8 22 7.9 UNITED H S 449 83 18.5 17.4 19.4 18.1 18.8 18.5 <10m ƒ UNITED SOUTH H S 257 89 34.6 15.0 17.3 16.5 17.0 16.6 <5h ƒ J B ALEXANDER HIGH 390 92 23.6 18.3 18.3 18.9 18.7 18.7 11 12.0 LYNDON B JOHNSON 261 13 5.0 13.0 15.6 13.5 16.2 14.6 <5h ƒ

WEBB CISD BRUNI H S 15 8 53.3 16.9 17.6 16.0 19.0 17.4 <5h ƒ

WHARTON BOLING ISD BOLING H S 55 20 36.4 19.9 19.8 21.4 21.5 20.8 <5h ƒ

EAST BERNARD IS EAST BERNARD H S 48 8 16.7 17.4 19.0 20.0 19.9 19.3 <5h ƒ

EL CAMPO ISD EL CAMPO H S 230 37 16.1 17.2 17.4 16.9 18.3 17.5 <5h ƒ

LOUISE ISD LOUISE H S 27 13 48.1 20.2 19.8 19.1 19.8 19.8 <5h ƒ

WHARTON ISD WHARTON H S 125 63 50.4 18.2 19.5 18.7 19.6 19.1 8 12.7

WHEELER FORT ELLIOTT CI FORT ELLIOTT SCHOOL 9 8 88.9 19.3 22.8 20.0 20.0 20.6 <5h ƒ

SHAMROCK ISD SHAMROCK H S 25 19 76.0 20.5 18.9 20.5 20.6 20.4 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

120 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

WHEELER WHEELER ISD WHEELER SCHOOL 23 19 82.6 19.3 21.6 19.9 21.2 20.6 5 26.3

WICHITA BRIGHT IDEAS CH BRIGHT IDEAS CHARTE 6 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

BURKBURNETT ISD 196 108 55.1 20.5 20.5 21.5 21.0 21.0 <35m ƒ BURKBURNETT H S 187 <110m ƒ 20.5 20.5 21.5 21.0 21.0 <35m ƒ ALTER ED CTR 9 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CITY VIEW ISD CITY VIEW JUNIOR/SE 41 7 17.1 15.4 17.3 14.6 17.0 16.3 <5h ƒ

ELECTRA ISD ELECTRA H S 33 19 57.6 18.8 18.4 19.9 19.6 19.4 <5h ƒ

IOWA PARK CISD IOWA PARK H S 117 41 35.0 19.5 20.7 19.9 20.3 20.3 9 22.0

WICHITA FALLS I 785 201 25.6 20.0 20.7 21.2 21.0 20.9 52 25.9 HIRSCHI HS 161 <50m ƒ 20.4 21.5 22.3 21.3 21.5 <20m ƒ RIDER H S 321 <55m ƒ 19.5 20.7 20.9 20.8 20.6 <15m ƒ WICHITA FALLS H S 280 106 37.9 20.0 20.4 20.9 20.9 20.7 25 23.6 HARRELL ACCELERATED 23 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WILBARGER HARROLD ISD HARROLD SCHOOL 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

NORTHSIDE ISD NORTHSIDE SCHOOL 10 5 50.0 23.6 20.4 25.6 22.2 23.4 <5h ƒ

VERNON ISD 121 86 71.1 21.2 20.3 20.7 20.5 20.9 22 25.6 VERNON H S 120 <90m ƒ 21.2 20.3 20.7 20.5 20.9 <25m ƒ NORTH TEXAS STATE H 1 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WILLACY LYFORD CISD LYFORD H S 85 56 65.9 14.8 16.3 15.6 16.9 16.0 <5h ƒ

RAYMONDVILLE IS RAYMONDVILLE H S 114 40 35.1 15.8 17.4 16.5 17.5 16.8 <5h ƒ

SAN PERLITA ISD SAN PERLITA H S 17 14 82.4 17.6 19.4 19.1 19.6 19.0 <5h ƒ

WILLIAMSON FLORENCE ISD FLORENCE H S 64 23 35.9 19.8 19.9 19.6 20.1 20.0 6 26.1

GEORGETOWN ISD 503 154 30.6 21.8 22.1 21.6 21.1 21.8 56 36.4 GEORGETOWN H S 480 <155m ƒ 21.8 22.1 21.6 21.1 21.8 <60m ƒ CHIP RICHARTE H S 23 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

GRANGER ISD GRANGER SCHOOL 35 21 60.0 18.2 19.0 19.2 19.4 19.0 <5h ƒ

HUTTO ISD HUTTO H S 99 20 20.2 21.5 21.2 22.7 21.1 21.8 7 35.0

JARRELL ISD JARRELL H S 34 12 35.3 20.8 19.9 19.0 19.6 20.0 <5h ƒ

LEANDER ISD 889 239 26.9 20.3 21.7 21.5 21.4 21.3 69 28.9 LEANDER H S 389 <115m ƒ 19.4 20.5 20.3 20.6 20.3 <25m ƒ CEDAR PARK H S 486 126 25.9 21.1 22.7 22.5 22.0 22.2 44 34.9 NEW HOPE HIGH SCHOO 14 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LIBERTY HILL IS LIBERTY HILL H S 125 33 26.4 20.5 21.5 22.1 21.2 21.5 11 33.3

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 121 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

WILLIAMSON ROUND ROCK ISD 2,047 760 37.1 22.5 23.6 23.9 22.8 23.3 356 46.8 ROUND ROCK H S 402 155 38.6 20.4 22.0 22.1 21.2 21.5 <50m ƒ WESTWOOD H S 580 330 56.9 24.9 25.7 26.0 24.4 25.4 213 64.5 MCNEIL H S 519 <150m ƒ 21.5 23.0 23.5 22.6 22.8 67 ƒ STONY POINT HIGH SC 512 <130m ƒ 19.8 21.2 20.9 20.8 20.8 <35m ƒ SUCCESS PROGRAM WES 10 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ SUCCESS PROGRAM EAS 24 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

TAYLOR ISD TAYLOR H S 158 15 9.5 16.8 21.1 18.9 20.3 19.3 <5h ƒ

THRALL ISD THRALL H S 31 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WILSON FLORESVILLE ISD 192 98 51.0 19.3 18.9 20.0 19.4 19.6 <20m ƒ FLORESVILLE H S 189 <100m ƒ 19.3 18.9 20.0 19.4 19.6 <20m ƒ FLORESVILLE CHOICE 3 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

LA VERNIA ISD LA VERNIA HIGH SCHO 144 31 21.5 19.4 20.0 18.7 20.2 19.7 <5h ƒ

POTH ISD POTH H S 43 18 41.9 21.5 20.6 22.3 21.9 21.8 <5h ƒ

STOCKDALE ISD STOCKDALE H S 30 17 56.7 19.2 18.1 21.3 19.4 19.6 <5h ƒ

WINKLER KERMIT ISD KERMIT H S 75 51 68.0 17.9 20.1 19.3 19.2 19.3 <5h ƒ

WINK-LOVING ISD WINK H S 14 9 64.3 18.4 19.8 18.2 20.3 19.4 <5h ƒ

WISE ALVORD ISD ALVORD H S 34 20 58.8 20.1 20.3 20.9 21.2 20.7 5 25.0

BOYD ISD BOYD H S 73 12 16.4 20.8 22.0 20.1 19.9 20.8 <5h ƒ

BRIDGEPORT ISD 129 29 22.5 19.6 20.9 20.6 21.2 20.7 <10m ƒ BRIDGEPORT H S 122 <30m ƒ 19.6 20.9 20.6 21.2 20.7 <10m ƒ BRIDGEPORT ACE HIGH 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

CHICO ISD CHICO HIGH SCHOOL 36 16 44.4 20.8 22.1 21.3 20.3 21.3 <5h ƒ

DECATUR ISD 176 64 36.4 19.9 20.8 20.1 20.7 20.5 <20m ƒ DECATUR H S 169 <65m ƒ 20.0 20.8 20.1 20.7 20.6 <20m ƒ CATES HIGH SCHOOL 7 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

PARADISE ISD PARADISE H S 63 16 25.4 19.1 20.6 21.6 21.1 20.7 <5h ƒ

SLIDELL ISD SLIDELL J H / H S 20 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WOOD ALBA-GOLDEN ISD ALBA-GOLDEN H S 36 8 22.2 19.9 19.1 20.1 22.0 20.3 <5h ƒ

HAWKINS ISD HAWKINS H S 45 11 24.4 21.2 22.0 21.1 20.5 21.3 <5h ƒ

MINEOLA ISD MINEOLA H S 69 37 53.6 19.0 19.8 21.9 20.8 20.5 7 18.9

QUITMAN ISD 70 18 25.7 20.1 19.9 20.4 20.3 20.3 <10m ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

122 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 2 ACT Participation and Performance, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Mean Score ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Eng. Math. Read. Sci. Comp. Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

WOOD QUITMAN ISD QUITMAN H S 68 <20m ƒ 20.1 19.9 20.4 20.3 20.3 <10m ƒ WOOD CO ALTER 2 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

WINNSBORO ISD WINNSBORO H S 88 68 77.3 19.4 20.6 20.2 20.4 20.3 14 20.6

YANTIS ISD YANTIS SCHOOL 20 10 50.0 18.8 19.3 21.3 21.2 20.3 <5h ƒ

YOAKUM DENVER CITY ISD DENVER CITY H S 99 48 48.5 17.5 18.8 18.9 18.9 18.7 5 10.4

PLAINS ISD PLAINS H S 23 18 78.3 20.7 24.1 21.9 22.2 22.3 8 44.4

YOUNG GRAHAM ISD 150 <75m ƒ 19.6 19.8 20.0 20.7 20.2 8 ƒ GRAHAM H S 141 <75m ƒ 19.6 19.8 20.0 20.7 20.2 <10m ƒ GRAHAM LEARNING CTR 9 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

NEWCASTLE ISD NEWCASTLE H S 10 <5t ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ <5t ƒ

OLNEY ISD OLNEY H S 44 23 52.3 21.7 21.7 21.3 22.3 22.0 7 30.4

ZAPATA ZAPATA COUNTY I ZAPATA H S 116 68 58.6 15.7 17.8 17.6 18.2 17.4 6 8.8

ZAVALA CRYSTAL CITY IS CRYSTAL CITY H S 99 51 51.5 14.4 15.9 16.2 17.1 16.0 <5h ƒ

LA PRYOR ISD LA PRYOR H S 24 15 62.5 15.6 15.9 16.1 17.7 16.5 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 123 124 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 College Admissions Examination Results Reported in the Texas Accountability System

Table 3. College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005

District and Campus Supplement 125 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

ANDERSON CAYUGA ISD CAYUGA H S 28 19 67.9 <5h ƒ

ELKHART ISD ELKHART H S 58 38 65.5 10 26.3

FRANKSTON ISD FRANKSTON H S 53 30 56.6 10 33.3

NECHES ISD NECHES H S 12 6 50.0 <5h ƒ

PALESTINE ISD PALESTINE HIGH SCHOOL 157 87 55.4 22 25.3

SLOCUM ISD SLOCUM H S 15 9 60.0 <5h ƒ

WESTWOOD ISD WESTWOOD H S 85 59 69.4 11 18.6

ANDREWS ANDREWS ISD ANDREWS HIGH SCHOOL 174 86 49.4 17 19.8

ANGELINA CENTRAL ISD 73 <45m ƒ <10m ƒ CENTRAL H S 70 <45m ƒ <10m ƒ STUBBLEFIELD LRN CTR 3 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

DIBOLL ISD 99 72 72.7 <10m ƒ DIBOLL H S 98 <75m ƒ <10m ƒ STUBBLEFIELD LRN CTR 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

HUDSON ISD 137 66 48.2 <20m ƒ HUDSON H S 135 <70m ƒ <20m ƒ STUBBLEFIELD LRN CTR 2 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

HUNTINGTON ISD 89 <45m ƒ 6 ƒ HUNTINGTON H S 78 <45m ƒ <10m ƒ PRIDE ALTER SCH 11 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

LUFKIN ISD 411 238 57.9 49 20.6 LUFKIN H S 405 <240m ƒ <50m ƒ STUBBLEFIELD LRN CTR 6 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

ZAVALLA ISD ZAVALLA H S 25 11 44.0 <5h ƒ

ARANSAS ARANSAS COUNTY ISD ROCKPORT-FULTON H S 207 140 67.6 47 33.6

ARCHER ARCHER CITY ISD ARCHER CITY H S 29 19 65.5 6 31.6

HOLLIDAY ISD HOLLIDAY H S 69 59 85.5 12 20.3

MEGARGEL ISD MEGARGEL SCHOOL 5 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

WINDTHORST ISD WINDTHORST H S 30 23 76.7 8 34.8

ARMSTRONG CLAUDE ISD CLAUDE H S 16 8 50.0 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

126 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

ATASCOSA CHARLOTTE ISD CHARLOTTE H S 17 5 29.4 <5h ƒ

JOURDANTON ISD JOURDANTON H S 53 36 67.9 9 25.0

LYTLE ISD LYTLE H S 81 46 56.8 12 26.1

PLEASANTON ISD PLEASANTON H S 176 102 58.0 25 24.5

POTEET ISD POTEET H S 82 30 36.6 <5h ƒ

AUSTIN BELLVILLE ISD BELLVILLE H S 133 96 72.2 24 25.0

BRAZOS ISD BRAZOS H S 44 26 59.1 <5h ƒ

SEALY ISD SEALY H S 120 59 49.2 14 23.7

BAILEY MULESHOE ISD 92 66 71.7 14 21.2 MULESHOE H S 90 <70m ƒ <15m ƒ P E P 2 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

BANDERA BANDERA ISD BANDERA H S 136 101 74.3 28 27.7

MEDINA ISD MEDINA H S 21 21 100 6 28.6

BASTROP BASTROP ISD 393 222 56.5 58 26.1 BASTROP H S 381 <225m ƒ <60m ƒ GENESIS H S 12 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

ELGIN ISD 176 100 56.8 23 23.0 ELGIN H S 164 <100m ƒ <25m ƒ PHOENIX HIGH SCHOOL 12 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

SMITHVILLE ISD SMITHVILLE H S 91 56 61.5 10 17.9

BAYLOR SEYMOUR ISD SEYMOUR H S 27 23 85.2 8 34.8

BEE BEEVILLE ISD 233 142 60.9 11 7.7 A C JONES HIGH SCHOOL 220 <145m ƒ <15m ƒ LEARNING RESOURCE CENTER 13 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

PETTUS ISD PETTUS H S 33 19 57.6 <5h ƒ

SKIDMORE-TYNAN ISD SKIDMORE-TYNAN H S 46 23 50.0 <5h ƒ

BELL ACADEMY ISD ACADEMY H S 56 29 51.8 10 34.5

BARTLETT ISD BARTLETT H S 23 12 52.2 <5h ƒ

BELTON ISD 402 414 100 100 24.2 BELTON H S 382 388 100 <100m ƒ HENRY T WASKOW HIGH SCHOOL 20 26 100 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 127 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

BELL CEDAR CREST SCHOOL CEDAR CREST CHARTER SCHOOL 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

HOLLAND ISD HOLLAND H S 37 22 59.5 <5h ƒ

KILLEEN ISD 1,355 886 65.4 169 19.1 ELLISON HIGH SCHOOL 326 <210m ƒ 42 ƒ HARKER HEIGHTS HIGH SCHOOL 392 266 67.9 70 26.3 KILLEEN HIGH SCHOOL 229 <170m ƒ <30m ƒ PATHWAYS LEARNING CENTER 36 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ SHOEMAKER HIGH SCHOOL 372 245 65.9 <35m ƒ

RICHARD MILBURN ALTER HIGH RICHARD MILBURN ALTER H S (KIL 59 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

ROGERS ISD ROGERS H S 61 32 52.5 9 28.1

SALADO ISD SALADO H S 64 48 75.0 21 43.8

TEMPLE EDUCATION CENTER TEMPLE EDUCATION CENTER 7 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

TEMPLE ISD TEMPLE H S 370 235 63.5 82 34.9

TRANSFORMATIVE CHARTER ACAD TRANSFORMATIVE CHARTER ACADEMY 28 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

TROY ISD TROY HIGH SCHOOL 76 40 52.6 8 20.0

BEXAR ACADEMY OF CAREERS AND TECH ACADEMY OF CAREERS AND TECHNOL 25 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

ALAMO HEIGHTS ISD ALAMO HEIGHTS H S 304 299 98.4 148 49.5

EAGLE ACADEMY OF SAN ANTONI EAGLE ACADEMY OF SAN ANTONIO 25 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

EAST CENTRAL ISD EAST CENTRAL H S 362 243 67.1 45 18.5

EDGEWOOD ISD 413 222 53.8 11 5.0 EDGEWOOD ACADEMY 14 13 92.9 <5h ƒ JOHN F KENNEDY HIGH SCHOOL 213 130 61.0 <5h ƒ MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL 186 79 42.5 6 7.6

FT SAM HOUSTON ISD ROBERT G COLE JR-SR HIGH SCHOO 44 40 90.9 15 37.5

GEORGE GERVIN ACADEMY 50 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ GEORGE GERVIN CHARTER 31 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ THE EDUCATION AND TRAINING CEN 19 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

GEORGE I SANCHEZ CHARTER HS GEORGE I SANCHEZ CHARTER H S S 25 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

HARLANDALE ISD 593 276 46.5 12 4.3 FRANK M TEJEDA ACADEMY 52 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ HARLANDALE H S 269 138 51.3 <10m ƒ MCCOLLUM HIGH SCHOOL 272 <140m ƒ <10m ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

128 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

BEXAR JOHN H WOOD CHARTER SCHOOL 11 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ JOHN H WOOD JR CHARTER SCHOOL 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ JOHN H WOOD JR CHARTER SCHOOL 2 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ JOHN H WOOD JR CHARTER SCHOOL 8 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

JUBILEE ACADEMIC CENTER 14 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ JUBILEE ACADEMIC CENTER 9 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ OMEGA ACADEMIC CENTER 5 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

JUDSON ISD 815 434 53.3 <100m ƒ JUDSON HIGH SCHOOL 785 <435m ƒ <100m ƒ JUDSON LEARNING ACAD 30 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

LACKLAND ISD VIRGINIA ALLRED STACEY JR/SR H 22 22 100 11 50.0

NORTH EAST ISD 3,020 2,368 78.4 860 36.3 ACADEMY OF CREATIVE ED 54 <15m ƒ <5h ƒ CENTER SCH 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ CHURCHILL H S 563 510 90.6 215 42.2 HOMEBASED COMP ED 4 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ HOMEBOUND 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF AMERIC 98 <100m ƒ 37 ƒ LEE H S 319 187 58.6 <30m ƒ MACARTHUR H S 479 371 77.5 124 33.4 MADISON H S 480 330 68.8 102 30.9 REAGAN H S 616 594 96.4 292 49.2 ROOSEVELT H S 405 268 66.2 59 22.0

NORTHSIDE ISD 3,782 2,439 64.5 672 27.6 HEALTH CAREERS H S 205 187 91.2 112 59.9 HOLMES H S 378 122 32.3 <15m ƒ HOLMGREEN CENTER 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ HOMEBOUND 3 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ JAY H S 511 281 55.0 <30m ƒ MARSHALL H S 474 357 75.3 105 29.4 NORTHSIDE EXCEL ACADEMY 35 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ SANDRA DAY O'CONNOR H S 655 521 79.5 145 27.8 SCHOOL AGED PARENTING PROGRAM 11 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ SOUTHWEST MENTAL HEALTH 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ SUNSET H S 0 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ TOM CLARK H S 528 398 75.4 169 42.5 WARREN H S 467 299 64.0 41 13.7 WILLIAM H TAFT H S 513 271 52.8 60 22.1

POR VIDA ACADEMY 88 25 28.4 <5h ƒ CORPUS CHRISTI ACADEMY 38 <25m ƒ <5h ƒ POR VIDA ACADEMY CHARTER H S 50 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

POSITIVE SOLUTIONS CHARTER POSITIVE SOLUTIONS CHARTER 33 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 129 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

BEXAR RADIANCE ACADEMY OF LEARNIN 14 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ RADIANCE ACADEMY OF LEARNING 2 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ RADIANCE ACADEMY OF LEARNING ( 12 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

RANDOLPH FIELD ISD RANDOLPH H S 59 55 93.2 24 43.6

SAN ANTONIO CAN HIGH SCHOOL SAN ANTONIO CAN HIGH SCHOOL 75 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

SAN ANTONIO ISD 2,148 1,396 65.0 90 6.4 BRACKENRIDGE H S 345 256 74.2 31 12.1 BURBANK H S 194 127 65.5 6 4.7 EDISON H S 265 179 67.5 <5h ƒ FOX TECHNICAL H S 289 144 49.8 6 4.2 HEALY-MURPHY 13 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ HIGHLANDS H S 322 212 65.8 23 10.8 HOUSTON H S 130 <130m ƒ <5h ƒ JEFFERSON H S 308 197 64.0 15 7.6 LANIER H S 217 136 62.7 <5h ƒ NAVARRO ACADEMY 65 <25m ƒ <5h ƒ

SAN ANTONIO SCHOOL FOR INQU SAN ANTONIO SCHOOL FOR INQUIRY 11 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

SAN ANTONIO TECHNOLOGY ACA SAN ANTONIO TECHNOLOGY ACADEMY 11 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE IN EDU 19 18 94.7 <5h ƒ RICK HAWKINS H S 19 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ RICK HAWKINS H S 0 <20m ƒ <5h ƒ

SHEKINAH RADIANCE ACADEMY SHEKINAH WALZEM 3 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

SOMERSET ISD SOMERSET HIGH SCHOOL 142 47 33.1 5 10.6

SOUTH SAN ANTONIO ISD 388 220 56.7 8 3.6 LIFE SKILLS PROGRAM FOR STUDEN 13 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ SO SAN ANTONIO H S WEST 85 <70m ƒ <5h ƒ SOUTH SAN ANTONIO H S 290 <155m ƒ <10m ƒ

SOUTHSIDE ISD SOUTHSIDE H S 202 101 50.0 7 6.9

SOUTHWEST ISD SOUTHWEST H S 460 212 46.1 11 5.2

SOUTHWEST PREPARATORY SCHOO 149 10 6.7 <5h ƒ NEW DIRECTIONS 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ SOUTHWEST PREPARATORY SCHOOL 63 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ SOUTHWEST PREPARATORY SCHOOL-N 33 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ SOUTHWEST PREPARATORY SOUTHEAS 52 5 9.6 <5h ƒ

BLANCO BLANCO ISD BLANCO H S 53 36 67.9 8 22.2

JOHNSON CITY ISD LYNDON B JOHNSON H S 50 39 78.0 7 17.9

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

130 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

BORDEN BORDEN COUNTY ISD BORDEN COUNTY SCHOOL 13 12 92.3 <5h ƒ

BOSQUE CLIFTON ISD CLIFTON H S 57 31 54.4 8 25.8

CRANFILLS GAP ISD CRANFILLS GAP SCHOOL 6 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

IREDELL ISD IREDELL SCHOOL 5 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

KOPPERL ISD KOPPERL SCHOOL 17 9 52.9 <5h ƒ

MERIDIAN ISD MERIDIAN H S 25 19 76.0 <5h ƒ

MORGAN ISD MORGAN SCHOOL 7 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

VALLEY MILLS ISD VALLEY MILLS H S 37 14 37.8 <5h ƒ

WALNUT SPRINGS ISD WALNUT SPRINGS SCHOOL 16 9 56.3 <5h ƒ

BOWIE DEKALB ISD DEKALB H S 47 42 89.4 6 14.3

HOOKS ISD HOOKS H S 66 55 83.3 12 21.8

LEARY ISD LEARY EL 8 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

LIBERTY-EYLAU ISD 132 86 65.2 9 10.5 ALTER SCH 12 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ LIBERTY-EYLAU H S 120 <90m ƒ <10m ƒ

MALTA ISD MALTA EL 4 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

MAUD ISD MAUD SCHOOL 25 20 80.0 6 30.0

NEW BOSTON ISD NEW BOSTON H S 89 63 70.8 16 25.4

PLEASANT GROVE ISD PLEASANT GROVE H S 142 113 79.6 54 47.8

RED LICK ISD RED LICK MIDDLE 35 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

REDWATER ISD REDWATER H S 64 59 92.2 21 35.6

SIMMS ISD JAMES BOWIE H S 29 19 65.5 <5h ƒ

TEXARKANA ISD TEXAS H S 314 204 65.0 51 25.0

BRAZORIA ALVIN ISD ALVIN HIGH SCHOOL 485 232 47.8 58 25.0

ANGLETON ISD 330 169 51.2 53 31.4 ANGLETON H S 326 <170m ƒ <55m ƒ MARSHALL EDUCATION CENTER 4 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

BRAZOSPORT ISD 629 391 62.2 136 34.8

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 131 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

BRAZORIA BRAZOSPORT ISD BRAZOSPORT H S 162 <80m ƒ <20m ƒ BRAZOSWOOD H S 456 <315m ƒ <125m ƒ LIGHTHOUSE LEARNING CENTER - A 3 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ LIGHTHOUSE LEARNING CENTER - D 8 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

COLUMBIA-BRAZORIA ISD COLUMBIA H S 155 76 49.0 20 26.3

DANBURY ISD DANBURY H S 45 25 55.6 <5h ƒ

PEARLAND ISD PEARLAND H S 744 494 66.4 185 37.4

SWEENY ISD SWEENY H S 115 73 63.5 25 34.2

BRAZOS BRAZOS SCHOOL FOR INQUIRY & BRAZOS SCHOOL FOR INQUIRY & CR 7 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

BRYAN ISD 628 291 46.3 108 37.1 ACE CAMPUS 56 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ BRYAN H S 564 <295m ƒ <110m ƒ GRAD 8 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

COLLEGE STATION ISD 481 368 76.5 206 56.0 A & M CONS H S 469 <370m ƒ <210m ƒ CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVE LEARNIN 12 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

EAGLE ACADEMY OF BRYAN EAGLE ACADEMY OF BRYAN 0 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

BREWSTER ALPINE ISD ALPINE H S 57 42 73.7 11 26.2

MARATHON ISD MARATHON INDPENDENT SCHOOL DIS 3 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

TERLINGUA CSD BIG BEND H S 8 6 75.0 <5h ƒ

BRISCOE SILVERTON ISD SILVERTON SCHOOL 10 10 100 <5h ƒ

BROOKS BROOKS COUNTY ISD FALFURRIAS H S 76 49 64.5 <5h ƒ

BROWN BANGS ISD 59 44 74.6 13 29.5 BANGS H S 58 <45m ƒ <15m ƒ C A P HIGH SCHOOL 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

BLANKET ISD BLANKET H S 11 8 72.7 <5h ƒ

BROOKESMITH ISD BROOKESMITH H S 12 9 75.0 <5h ƒ

BROWNWOOD ISD BROWNWOOD H S 185 120 64.9 25 20.8

EARLY ISD EARLY H S 75 62 82.7 17 27.4

MAY ISD MAY H S 11 8 72.7 <5h ƒ

ZEPHYR ISD ZEPHYR H S 13 14 100 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

132 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

BURLESON CALDWELL ISD CALDWELL H S 104 73 70.2 19 26.0

SNOOK ISD SNOOK SECONDARY 35 19 54.3 <5h ƒ

SOMERVILLE ISD SOMERVILLE H S 38 17 44.7 <5h ƒ

BURNET BURNET CISD 183 112 61.2 14 12.5 BURNET H S 178 <115m ƒ <15m ƒ QUEST 5 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

MARBLE FALLS ISD 212 121 57.1 44 36.4 FALLS CAREER H S 15 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ MARBLE FALLS HIGH SCHOOL 197 <125m ƒ <45m ƒ

CALDWELL LOCKHART ISD 254 153 60.2 27 17.6 LOCKHART H S 239 <155m ƒ <30m ƒ LOCKHART PRIDE HS 15 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

LULING ISD LULING H S 71 41 57.7 9 22.0

PRAIRIE LEA ISD PRAIRIE LEA SCHOOL 8 5 62.5 <5h ƒ

CALHOUN CALHOUN COUNTY ISD 228 75 32.9 19 25.3 CALHOUN H S 213 <75m ƒ <20m ƒ HOPE H S 15 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

CALLAHAN BAIRD ISD BAIRD H S 32 25 78.1 <5h ƒ

CLYDE CISD CLYDE H S 71 40 56.3 10 25.0

CROSS PLAINS ISD CROSS PLAINS H S 24 10 41.7 <5h ƒ

EULA ISD EULA H S 31 21 67.7 5 23.8

CAMERON BROWNSVILLE ISD 1,549 735 47.4 53 7.2 BROWNSVILLE 259 71 27.4 5 7.0 HANNA H S 395 220 55.7 24 10.9 LOPEZ H S 250 100 40.0 5 5.0 PACE H S 340 173 50.9 14 8.1 RIVERA H S 305 171 56.1 5 2.9

HARLINGEN CISD 787 442 56.2 72 16.3 HARLINGEN H S 438 221 50.5 <35m ƒ HARLINGEN H S - SOUTH 330 212 64.2 37 17.5 KEYS ACAD 19 9 47.4 <5h ƒ

LA FERIA ISD 137 <110m ƒ 9 ƒ LA FERIA ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 9 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ LA FERIA H S 128 <110m ƒ <10m ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 133 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

CAMERON LOS FRESNOS CISD LOS FRESNOS HS 368 213 57.9 23 10.8

POINT ISABEL ISD PORT ISABEL H S 117 73 62.4 11 15.1

RIO HONDO ISD RIO HONDO H S 88 61 69.3 10 16.4

SAN BENITO CISD SAN BENITO H S 411 274 66.7 12 4.4

SANTA MARIA ISD 38 <25m ƒ <5h ƒ SANTA MARIA ALTERNATIVE 3 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ SANTA MARIA H S 35 <25m ƒ <5h ƒ

SANTA ROSA ISD SANTA ROSA H S 59 40 67.8 <5h ƒ

SOUTH TEXAS ISD 312 307 98.4 115 37.5 HIGH SCHOOL FOR HEALTH PROFESS 138 137 99.3 <50m ƒ SOUTH TEXAS ACADEMY OF MEDICAL 0 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ SOUTH TEXAS BUSINESS EDUCATION 70 <70m ƒ <20m ƒ THE SCIENCE ACADEMY 104 102 98.1 55 53.9

ZEPHYR ISD 35 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

CAMP PITTSBURG ISD PITTSBURG H S 104 77 74.0 13 16.9

CARSON GROOM ISD GROOM SCHOOL 3 5 100 <5h ƒ

PANHANDLE ISD 41 33 80.5 <20m ƒ C H A M P S 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ PANHANDLE H S 40 <35m ƒ <20m ƒ

WHITE DEER ISD WHITE DEER H S 27 24 88.9 9 37.5

CASS ATLANTA ISD ATLANTA H S 97 77 79.4 22 28.6

AVINGER ISD AVINGER H S 8 10 100 <5h ƒ

BLOOMBURG ISD BLOOMBURG H S 18 17 94.4 <5h ƒ

HUGHES SPRINGS ISD HUGHES SPRINGS HIGH SCHOOL 60 63 100 7 11.1

LINDEN-KILDARE CISD LINDEN-KILDARE H S 54 45 83.3 11 24.4

MCLEOD ISD MCLEOD H S 27 22 81.5 <5h ƒ

QUEEN CITY ISD QUEEN CITY H S 46 33 71.7 6 18.2

CASTRO DIMMITT ISD DIMMITT H S 56 41 73.2 5 12.2

HART ISD HART JR-SR H S 21 17 81.0 <5h ƒ

NAZARETH ISD NAZARETH SCHOOL 23 21 91.3 11 52.4

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

134 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

CHAMBERS ANAHUAC ISD ANAHUAC H S 78 53 67.9 10 18.9

BARBERS HILL ISD 183 123 67.2 <50m ƒ BARBERS HILL H S 182 <125m ƒ <50m ƒ GULF COAST H S 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

EAST CHAMBERS ISD EAST CHAMBERS H S 69 58 84.1 9 15.5

CHEROKEE ALTO ISD ALTO H S 37 24 64.9 <5h ƒ

JACKSONVILLE ISD 236 116 49.2 <25m ƒ COMPASS CENTER 7 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ JACKSONVILLE H S 229 <120m ƒ <25m ƒ

NEW SUMMERFIELD ISD NEW SUMMERFIELD SCHOOL 15 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

RUSK ISD RUSK H S 85 44 51.8 10 22.7

WELLS ISD WELLS H S 12 9 75.0 <5h ƒ

CHILDRESS CHILDRESS ISD CHILDRESS H S 46 45 97.8 6 13.3

CLAY BELLEVUE ISD BELLEVUE SCHOOL 13 8 61.5 <5h ƒ

BYERS ISD BYERS SCHOOL 7 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

HENRIETTA ISD HENRIETTA H S 65 34 52.3 7 20.6

MIDWAY ISD MIDWAY SCHOOL 14 12 85.7 <5h ƒ

PETROLIA ISD PETROLIA H S 33 18 54.5 <5h ƒ

COCHRAN MORTON ISD 27 <25m ƒ <5h ƒ MORTON H S 25 <25m ƒ <5h ƒ P E P 2 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

WHITEFACE CISD 25 27 100 <10m ƒ P E P ALTER CO-OP 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ WHITEFACE H S 24 <30m ƒ <10m ƒ

COKE BRONTE ISD 24 19 79.2 <5h ƒ BRONTE H S 24 <20m ƒ <5h ƒ JUVENILE DETENT CTR 3 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

ROBERT LEE ISD ROBERT LEE H S 19 13 68.4 <5h ƒ

COLEMAN COLEMAN ISD 46 29 63.0 <5h ƒ CO-OP ALTER PROG 7 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ COLEMAN H S 39 <30m ƒ <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 135 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

COLEMAN NOVICE ISD NOVICE SCHOOL 4 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

PANTHER CREEK CISD 16 13 81.3 <5h ƒ C A P 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ PANTHER CREEK H S 15 <15m ƒ <5h ƒ

SANTA ANNA ISD SANTA ANNA SECONDARY 14 5 35.7 <5h ƒ

COLLIN ALLEN ISD ALLEN H S 847 663 78.3 290 43.7

ANNA ISD ANNA H S 45 20 44.4 7 35.0

BLUE RIDGE ISD BLUE RIDGE H S 33 20 60.6 <5h ƒ

CELINA ISD CELINA H S 74 58 78.4 17 29.3

COMMUNITY ISD COMMUNITY H S 73 21 28.8 8 38.1

FARMERSVILLE ISD FARMERSVILLE H S 74 49 66.2 14 28.6

FRISCO ISD 577 402 69.7 145 36.1 CENTENNIAL HIGH SCHOOL 3 5 100 <5h ƒ FRISCO H S 574 397 69.2 <145m ƒ

MCKINNEY ISD 745 493 66.2 214 43.4 ACT ACADEMY AT J L GREER 0 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ COUNTY RESIDENTIAL CENTER 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ MCKINNEY HIGH SCHOOL 366 264 72.1 118 44.7 MCKINNEY NORTH HIGH SCHOOL 338 222 65.7 92 41.4 SERENITY HIGH 4 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ THE L I N C CTR 36 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

PLANO ISD 2,792 2,413 86.4 1,439 59.6 CLARK H S 0 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ JASPER H S 0 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ PLANO EAST SR H S 1,029 768 74.6 398 51.8 PLANO SR H S 940 849 90.3 548 64.5 PLANO WEST SENIOR H S 823 787 95.6 490 62.3 VINES H S 0 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ WILLIAMS H S 0 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

PRINCETON ISD PRINCETON H S 148 51 34.5 11 21.6

PROSPER ISD PROSPER H S 63 52 82.5 18 34.6

WYLIE ISD WYLIE H S 355 178 50.1 67 37.6

COLLINGSWORTH SAMNORWOOD ISD SAMNORWOOD SCHOOL 12 9 75.0 <5h ƒ

WELLINGTON ISD WELLINGTON H S 28 17 60.7 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

136 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

COLORADO COLUMBUS ISD COLUMBUS HIGH SCHOOL 114 65 57.0 16 24.6

RICE CISD RICE H S 63 45 71.4 <5h ƒ

WEIMAR ISD WEIMAR H S 51 38 74.5 6 15.8

COMAL COMAL ISD 713 505 70.8 162 32.1 CANYON HIGH SCHOOL 287 <215m ƒ <65m ƒ COMAL LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE 24 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ SMITHSON VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL 402 <295m ƒ <100m ƒ

NANCY NEY CHARTER SCHOOL NANCY NEY CHARTER SCHOOL 17 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

NEW BRAUNFELS ISD 365 271 74.2 <90m ƒ NEW BRAUNFELS H S 353 <275m ƒ <90m ƒ THE NBISD LEARNING CENTER 12 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

TRINITY CHARTER SCHOOL TRINITY CHARTER SCHOOL 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

COMANCHE COMANCHE ISD 79 49 62.0 8 16.3 COMANCHE ACCELERATED LRN CTR 2 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ COMANCHE H S 77 <50m ƒ <10m ƒ

DE LEON ISD DE LEON H S 40 22 55.0 5 22.7

GUSTINE ISD GUSTINE SCHOOL 12 8 66.7 <5h ƒ

SIDNEY ISD SIDNEY SCHOOL 10 5 50.0 <5h ƒ

CONCHO EDEN CISD EDEN H S 18 19 100 <5h ƒ

PAINT ROCK ISD PAINT ROCK SCHOOL 7 5 71.4 <5h ƒ

COOKE CALLISBURG ISD CALLISBURG H S 66 42 63.6 18 42.9

ERA ISD ERA SCHOOL 24 13 54.2 <5h ƒ

GAINESVILLE ISD GAINESVILLE H S 130 67 51.5 12 17.9

LINDSAY ISD LINDSAY H S 47 30 63.8 15 50.0

MUENSTER ISD MUENSTER H S 34 30 88.2 15 50.0

VALLEY VIEW ISD VALLEY VIEW HIGH SCHOOL 41 21 51.2 6 28.6

CORYELL COPPERAS COVE ISD 395 230 58.2 47 20.4 COPPERAS COVE H S 382 <230m ƒ <50m ƒ CROSSROADS HIGH SCHOOL 13 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

EVANT ISD EVANT H S 20 14 70.0 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 137 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

CORYELL GATESVILLE ISD GATESVILLE H S 129 75 58.1 25 33.3

JONESBORO ISD JONESBORO SCHOOL 10 8 80.0 <5h ƒ

OGLESBY ISD OGLESBY SCHOOL 3 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

COTTLE PADUCAH ISD PADUCAH SCHOOL 19 13 68.4 <5h ƒ

CRANE CRANE ISD CRANE HIGH SCHOOL 55 24 43.6 <5h ƒ

CROCKETT CROCKETT COUNTY CONSOLIDATE OZONA H S 52 28 53.8 5 17.9

CROSBY CROSBYTON CISD CROSBYTON H S 22 24 100 <5h ƒ

LORENZO ISD LORENZO H S 11 10 90.9 <5h ƒ

RALLS ISD 35 12 34.3 <5h ƒ RALLS H S 27 <15m ƒ <5h ƒ RECOVERY EDUCATION CAMPUS 8 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

CULBERSON CULBERSON COUNTY-ALLAMOORE VAN HORN H S 28 19 67.9 <5h ƒ

DALLAM DALHART ISD 94 68 72.3 12 17.6 DALHART H S 89 <70m ƒ <15m ƒ X I T SECONDARY SCHOOL 5 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

TEXLINE ISD TEXLINE SCHOOL 8 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

DALLAS A+ ACADEMY A+ ACADEMY 30 20 66.7 <5h ƒ

ALPHA CHARTER SCHOOL ALPHA CHARTER SCHOOL 25 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH I 1,303 857 65.8 343 40.0 CREEKVIEW HIGH SCHOOL 426 322 75.6 142 44.1 GRIMES EDUCATION CENTER 44 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ RANCHVIEW HIGH SCHOOL 2 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ SMITH HIGH SCHOOL 411 304 74.0 111 36.5 TURNER HIGH SCHOOL 420 226 53.8 <90m ƒ

CEDAR HILL ISD CEDAR HILL HIGH SCHOOL 392 286 73.0 41 14.3

COPPELL ISD COPPELL H S 610 564 92.5 325 57.6

DALLAS CAN ACADEMY CHARTER 357 5 1.4 <5h ƒ DALLAS CAN! ACADEMY CHARTER 95 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ DALLAS CAN! ACADEMY CHARTER-OA 136 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ TEXANS CAN ACADEMY AT PAUL QUI 40 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ TEXANS CAN AT CARROLLTON-FARME 86 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

DALLAS ISD 6,170 3,820 61.9 413 10.8 A MACEO SMITH H S 126 68 54.0 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

138 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

DALLAS DALLAS ISD BOOKER T WASHINGTON H S 155 140 90.3 55 39.3 BRYAN ADAMS H S 356 181 50.8 29 16.0 DAVID W CARTER H S 285 158 55.4 <5h ƒ H GRADY SPRUCE H S 176 81 46.0 <5h ƒ HILLCREST H S 249 165 66.3 36 21.8 JAMES MADISON H S 85 73 85.9 <5h ƒ JUSTIN F KIMBALL H S 263 117 44.5 6 5.1 L G PINKSTON H S 101 31 30.7 <5h ƒ LINCOLN H S 216 226 100 <5h ƒ MIDDLE COLLEGE 21 13 61.9 <5h ƒ MOISES MOLINA H S 420 268 63.8 <5h ƒ NORTH DALLAS H S 276 192 69.6 6 3.1 ROOSEVELT H S 107 70 65.4 <5h ƒ SCH OF GOVT/LAW/LAW ENFORCEMEN 96 72 75.0 7 9.7 SCHOOL FOR THE TALENTED & GIFT 38 40 100 36 90.0 SCHOOL OF BUSINESS & MANAGEMEN 124 102 82.3 12 11.8 SCHOOL OF EDUCATION & SOCIAL S 64 54 84.4 6 11.1 SCHOOL OF HEALTH PROFESSIONS 122 106 86.9 18 17.0 SCHOOL OF SCIENCE & ENGINEERIN 102 101 99.0 53 52.5 SEAGOVILLE H S 165 85 51.5 6 7.1 SKYLINE H S 886 519 58.6 35 6.7 SOUTH OAK CLIFF H S 179 98 54.7 <5h ƒ SUNSET H S 319 195 61.1 8 4.1 THOMAS JEFFERSON H S 235 127 54.0 <5h ƒ W H ADAMSON H S 194 140 72.2 <5h ƒ W T WHITE H S 356 213 59.8 40 18.8 W W SAMUELL H S 220 74 33.6 <5h ƒ WOODROW WILSON H S 234 111 47.4 40 36.0

DESOTO ISD DE SOTO H S 381 311 81.6 56 18.0

DUNCANVILLE ISD 656 482 73.5 106 22.0 DUNCANVILLE H S 633 <485m ƒ <110m ƒ P A C E SCHOOL 23 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

EAGLE ACADEMY OF DALLAS EAGLE ACADEMY OF DALLAS 7 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

EDUCATION CENTER INTERNATIO EDUCATION CENTER INTERNATIONAL 7 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

EVOLUTION ACADEMY CHARTER S EVOLUTION ACADEMY CHARTER SCHO 66 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

FAITH FAMILY ACADEMY OF OAK FAITH FAMILY ACADEMY OF OAK CL 20 12 60.0 <5h ƒ

GARLAND ISD 2,813 1,716 61.0 504 29.4 GARLAND H S 440 278 63.2 134 48.2 GISD EVENING SCH 21 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ LAKEVIEW CENTENNIAL H S 345 196 56.8 <40m ƒ N GARLAND H S 442 247 55.9 76 30.8 NAAMAN FOREST H S 383 257 67.1 72 28.0 ROWLETT H S 507 339 66.9 85 25.1 S GARLAND H S 408 252 61.8 62 24.6

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 139 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

DALLAS GARLAND ISD SACHSE H S 267 <150m ƒ <40m ƒ

GRAND PRAIRIE ISD 933 418 44.8 106 25.4 GRAND PRAIRIE H S 422 <150m ƒ <35m ƒ LLOYD BOZE SECONDARY LEARNING 11 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ SO GRAND PRAIRIE H S 500 <275m ƒ <75m ƒ

HIGHLAND PARK ISD HIGHLAND PARK HIGH SCHOOL 430 495 100 357 72.1

HONORS ACADEMY 248 98 39.5 27 27.6 DESTINY HIGH SCHOOL 18 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ EXCEL ACADEMY 10 76 100 25 32.9 HONORS ACADEMY DALLAS 119 6 5.0 <5h ƒ LANDMARK SCHOOL 23 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ LEGACY HIGH SCHOOL 28 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ UNIVERSITY SCHOOL 50 9 18.0 <5h ƒ

I AM THAT I AM ACADEMY I AM THAT I AM ACADEMY 14 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

IRVING ISD 1,287 684 53.1 148 21.6 IRVING H S 317 <145m ƒ <35m ƒ MACARTHUR H S 317 193 60.9 39 20.2 NIMITZ H S 317 181 57.1 44 24.3 THE ACADEMY OF IRVING ISD 312 169 54.2 <40m ƒ UNION BOWER CENTER FOR LEARNIN 24 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

JEAN MASSIEU ACADEMY JEAN MASSIEU ACADEMY 3 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

LANCASTER ISD LANCASTER H S 232 142 61.2 10 7.0

LIFE SCHOOL LIFE SCHOOL OAK CLIFF 35 16 45.7 <5h ƒ

MESQUITE ISD 1,852 1,113 60.1 256 23.0 HORN HIGH SCHOOL 377 254 67.4 71 28.0 MESQUITE ACADEMY 53 6 11.3 <5h ƒ MESQUITE HIGH SCHOOL 419 248 59.2 <40m ƒ NORTH MESQUITE HIGH SCHOOL 450 257 57.1 66 25.7 POTEET HIGH SCHOOL 297 225 75.8 63 28.0 WEST MESQUITE HIGH SCHOOL 256 123 48.0 <20m ƒ

NORTH HILLS SCHOOL NORTH HILLS SCHOOL 0 52 ƒ 36 69.2

PEGASUS SCHOOL OF LIBERAL A PEGASUS CHARTER H S 12 6 50.0 <5h ƒ

RICHARDSON ISD 1,840 1,583 86.0 712 45.0 BERKNER H S 568 489 86.1 186 38.0 LAKE HIGHLANDS H S 472 409 86.7 187 45.7 PEARCE H S 421 378 89.8 215 56.9 RICHARDSON H S 379 307 81.0 124 40.4

UNIVERSAL ACADEMY UNIVERSAL ACADEMY 0 5 ƒ <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

140 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

DALLAS WILMER-HUTCHINS ISD 112 44 39.3 <5h ƒ WILMER-HUTCHINS H S 111 <45m ƒ <5h ƒ WILMER-HUTCHINS MAGNET H S FOR 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

WINFREE ACADEMY 374 17 4.5 <5h ƒ WINFREE ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL 72 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ WINFREE ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL 106 <20m ƒ <5h ƒ WINFREE ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL 106 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ WINFREE ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL 90 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

DAWSON DAWSON ISD DAWSON SCHOOL 10 6 60.0 <5h ƒ

KLONDIKE ISD KLONDIKE ISD 12 11 91.7 <5h ƒ

LAMESA ISD LAMESA H S 105 52 49.5 11 21.2

SANDS CISD SANDS CISD 10 5 50.0 <5h ƒ

DEAF SMITH HEREFORD ISD HEREFORD H S 190 89 46.8 15 16.9

DELTA COOPER ISD COOPER H S 54 36 66.7 7 19.4

FANNINDEL ISD FANNINDEL H S 9 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

DENTON ARGYLE ISD ARGYLE HIGH SCHOOL 75 63 84.0 29 46.0

AUBREY ISD AUBREY H S 71 49 69.0 7 14.3

DENTON ISD 699 518 74.1 157 30.3 DENTON H S 323 243 75.2 <85m ƒ FRED MOORE HIGH SCHOOL 10 5 50.0 <5h ƒ RYAN H S 366 270 73.8 <75m ƒ

EDUCATION CENTER 30 7 23.3 <5h ƒ EDUCATION CENTER AT LITTLE ELM 10 <10m ƒ <5h ƒ EDUCATION CENTER AT THE COLONY 20 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

KRUM ISD KRUM H S 57 47 82.5 12 25.5

LAKE DALLAS ISD LAKE DALLAS H S 188 123 65.4 40 32.5

LEWISVILLE ISD 2,470 2,133 86.4 912 42.8 FLOWER MOUND H S 580 565 97.4 295 52.2 HEBRON H S 378 <350m ƒ 129 ƒ LEARNING CTR 34 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ LEWISVILLE H S 561 418 74.5 <130m ƒ MARCUS H S 547 505 92.3 264 52.3 THE COLONY H S 370 <300m ƒ <100m ƒ

LITTLE ELM ISD LITTLE ELM H S 161 72 44.7 25 34.7

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 141 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

DENTON NORTHWEST ISD NORTHWEST H S 325 215 66.2 65 30.2

PILOT POINT ISD PILOT POINT H S 81 59 72.8 13 22.0

PONDER ISD PONDER H S 48 21 43.8 7 33.3

SANGER ISD 143 58 40.6 18 31.0 LINDA TUTT HIGH SCHOOL 19 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ SANGER H S 124 <60m ƒ <20m ƒ

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS TEXAS ACADEMY OF MATHEMATICS & 0 185 ƒ 184 99.5

DEWITT CUERO ISD CUERO H S 116 76 65.5 17 22.4

NORDHEIM ISD NORDHEIM SCHOOL 3 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

YOAKUM ISD YOAKUM HIGH SCHOOL 77 51 66.2 16 31.4

YORKTOWN ISD YORKTOWN H S 44 29 65.9 5 17.2

DICKENS PATTON SPRINGS ISD PATTON SPRINGS SCHOOL 4 9 100 <5h ƒ

SPUR ISD SPUR SCHOOL 12 9 75.0 <5h ƒ

DIMMIT CARRIZO SPRINGS CISD CARRIZO SPRINGS H S 116 62 53.4 6 9.7

DONLEY CLARENDON ISD CLARENDON H S 30 23 76.7 8 34.8

HEDLEY ISD HEDLEY SCHOOL 11 5 45.5 <5h ƒ

DUVAL BENAVIDES ISD BENAVIDES SECONDARY 30 29 96.7 <5h ƒ

FREER ISD FREER H S 43 32 74.4 <5h ƒ

SAN DIEGO ISD SAN DIEGO H S 75 47 62.7 <5h ƒ

EASTLAND CISCO ISD 64 22 34.4 <5h ƒ CISCO H S 57 <25m ƒ <5h ƒ CISCO LEARNING CENTER 7 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

EASTLAND ISD EASTLAND H S 70 37 52.9 13 35.1

GORMAN ISD GORMAN H S 21 11 52.4 <5h ƒ

RANGER ISD RANGER H S 17 10 58.8 <5h ƒ

RISING STAR ISD RISING STAR H S 20 18 90.0 <5h ƒ

ECTOR ECTOR COUNTY ISD 1,156 472 40.8 110 23.3 A I M 41 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

142 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

ECTOR ECTOR COUNTY ISD CAREER CTR 100 <10m ƒ <5h ƒ ODESSA H S 500 202 40.4 59 29.2 PERMIAN H S 514 261 50.8 <55m ƒ TEEN PARENT CTR 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (EC RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - ECTO 31 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

EDWARDS NUECES CANYON CISD NUECES CANYON JH/HS 25 10 40.0 <5h ƒ

ROCKSPRINGS ISD ROCKSPRINGS H S 17 15 88.2 <5h ƒ

EL PASO ANTHONY ISD ANTHONY H S 23 25 100 <5h ƒ

BURNHAM WOOD CHARTER SCHOOL BURNHAM WOOD CHARTER SCHOOL 0 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

CANUTILLO ISD CANUTILLO H S 189 106 56.1 6 5.7

CLINT ISD 420 267 63.6 13 4.9 CLINT HIGH SCHOOL 207 141 68.1 <5h ƒ MOUNTAIN VIEW HIGH SCHOOL 213 126 59.2 <10m ƒ

EL PASO ACADEMY 153 17 11.1 <5h ƒ EL PASO ACADEMY 95 <20m ƒ <5h ƒ EL PASO ACADEMY WEST 58 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

EL PASO ISD 2,978 1,948 65.4 405 20.8 ANDRESS H S 305 177 58.0 24 13.6 AUSTIN H S 192 102 53.1 7 6.9 BOWIE H S 176 83 47.2 <5h ƒ BURGES H S 235 156 66.4 23 14.7 CHAPIN HS 307 210 68.4 53 25.2 CORONADO H S 483 348 72.0 123 35.3 EL PASO H S 185 99 53.5 16 16.2 FRANKLIN H S 505 415 82.2 129 31.1 IRVIN H S 257 131 51.0 6 4.6 JEFFERSON H S 169 94 55.6 <5h ƒ SCHOOL-AGE PARENT CTR 14 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ SILVA HEALTH MAGNET 134 128 95.5 19 14.8 SUNSET H S 16 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

FABENS ISD FABENS H S 130 62 47.7 <5h ƒ

PASO DEL NORTE PASO DEL NORTE ACADEMY 15 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

SAN ELIZARIO ISD SAN ELIZARIO H S 159 118 74.2 <5h ƒ

SOCORRO ISD 1,618 1,012 62.5 91 9.0 AMERICAS H S 555 332 59.8 44 13.3 KEYS ACAD 0 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ MONTWOOD H S 557 383 68.8 <35m ƒ SOCORRO H S 506 <300m ƒ <20m ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 143 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

EL PASO TORNILLO ISD TORNILLO H S 39 18 46.2 <5h ƒ

YSLETA ISD 2,494 2,568 100 140 5.5 BEL AIR H S 409 413 100 19 4.6 CESAR CHAVEZ ACAD 0 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ DEL VALLE H S 343 351 100 9 2.6 DISTRICT HOMEBOUND 4 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ EASTWOOD H S 412 431 100 58 13.5 J M HANKS H S 478 457 95.6 38 8.3 PARKLAND H S 172 210 100 <5h ƒ PLATO ACADEMY 26 <40m ƒ <5h ƒ RIVERSIDE H S 259 242 93.4 9 3.7 TEJAS SCHOOL OF CHOICE 44 78 100 <5h ƒ YSLETA H S 347 346 99.7 <10m ƒ

ELLIS AVALON ISD AVALON SCHOOL 15 5 33.3 <5h ƒ

ENNIS ISD ENNIS H S 263 170 64.6 30 17.6

FERRIS ISD FERRIS H S 96 49 51.0 7 14.3

ITALY ISD ITALY H S 34 20 58.8 <5h ƒ

MAYPEARL ISD MAYPEARL H S 55 32 58.2 12 37.5

MIDLOTHIAN ISD MIDLOTHIAN H S 297 225 75.8 68 30.2

MILFORD ISD MILFORD SCHOOL 10 5 50.0 <5h ƒ

PALMER ISD PALMER H S 53 31 58.5 5 16.1

RED OAK ISD RED OAK H S 260 173 66.5 46 26.6

WAXAHACHIE FAITH FAMILY ACA WAXAHACHIE FAITH FAMILY ACADEM 11 5 45.5 <5h ƒ

WAXAHACHIE ISD WAXAHACHIE H S 334 217 65.0 63 29.0

ERATH DUBLIN ISD DUBLIN H S 67 44 65.7 8 18.2

HUCKABAY ISD HUCKABAY SCHOOL 10 11 100 <5h ƒ

LINGLEVILLE ISD LINGLEVILLE SCHOOL 14 8 57.1 <5h ƒ

PARADIGM ACCELERATED SCHOOL PARADIGM ACCELERATED SCHOOL 22 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

STEPHENVILLE STEPHENVILLE H S 208 172 82.7 50 29.1

FALLS CHILTON ISD CHILTON SCHOOL 7 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

MARLIN ISD MARLIN H S 65 36 55.4 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

144 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

FALLS ROSEBUD-LOTT ISD 61 38 62.3 13 34.2 ROSEBUD-LOTT H S 59 <40m ƒ <15m ƒ ROSEBUD-LOTT LEARNING CENTER 2 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

FANNIN BONHAM ISD BONHAM H S 91 48 52.7 11 22.9

DODD CITY ISD DODD CITY SCHOOL 11 8 72.7 <5h ƒ

ECTOR ISD ECTOR HIGH SCHOOL 18 11 61.1 <5h ƒ

HONEY GROVE ISD HONEY GROVE H S 38 24 63.2 6 25.0

LEONARD ISD LEONARD HIGH SCHOOL 42 22 52.4 5 22.7

SAM RAYBURN ISD RAYBURN H S 20 11 55.0 <5h ƒ

SAVOY ISD SAVOY H S 16 10 62.5 <5h ƒ

TRENTON ISD TRENTON H S 31 12 38.7 <5h ƒ

FAYETTE FAYETTEVILLE ISD FAYETTEVILLE H S 18 12 66.7 <5h ƒ

FLATONIA ISD FLATONIA SECONDARY 31 20 64.5 6 30.0

LA GRANGE ISD LA GRANGE H S 117 69 59.0 29 42.0

ROUND TOP-CARMINE ISD ROUND TOP-CARMINE H S 17 15 88.2 <5h ƒ

SCHULENBURG ISD SCHULENBURG H S 58 39 67.2 7 17.9

FISHER ROBY CISD ROBY H S 21 18 85.7 <5h ƒ

ROTAN ISD ROTAN H S 22 13 59.1 <5h ƒ

FLOYD FLOYDADA ISD FLOYDADA H S 49 31 63.3 7 22.6

LOCKNEY ISD LOCKNEY HIGH SCHOOL 43 31 72.1 5 16.1

FOARD CROWELL ISD CROWELL H S 10 6 60.0 <5h ƒ

FORT BEND FORT BEND ISD 4,107 3,482 84.8 1,278 36.7 CLEMENTS H S 540 555 100 344 62.0 DULLES H S 504 444 88.1 192 43.2 437 331 75.7 69 20.8 HIGHTOWER H S 378 287 75.9 67 23.3 KEMPNER H S 527 404 76.7 121 30.0 LAWRENCE E ELKINS H S 444 430 96.8 187 43.5 STEPHEN F AUSTIN H S 611 554 90.7 285 51.4 THURGOOD MARSHALL HIGH SCHOOL 355 256 72.1 <10m ƒ WILLOWRIDGE H S 311 221 71.1 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 145 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

FORT BEND LAMAR CISD 889 549 61.8 168 30.6 B F TERRY H S 288 163 56.6 39 23.9 FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL 319 217 68.0 79 36.4 LAMAR CONS H S 282 169 59.9 50 29.6

NEEDVILLE ISD NEEDVILLE H S 123 78 63.4 24 30.8

STAFFORD MSD STAFFORD HIGH SCHOOL 135 103 76.3 26 25.2

FRANKLIN MOUNT VERNON ISD MT VERNON H S 81 45 55.6 17 37.8

FREESTONE FAIRFIELD ISD FAIRFIELD H S 75 57 76.0 22 38.6

TEAGUE ISD TEAGUE H S 58 29 50.0 5 17.2

WORTHAM ISD WORTHAM H S 31 19 61.3 <5h ƒ

FRIO DILLEY ISD DILLEY H S 41 39 95.1 <5h ƒ

PEARSALL ISD PEARSALL H S 106 56 52.8 6 10.7

GAINES LOOP ISD LOOP SCHOOL 8 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

SEAGRAVES ISD 26 18 69.2 <5h ƒ CHOICES ALTERNATIVE HIGH SCHOO 2 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ SEAGRAVES H S 24 <20m ƒ <5h ƒ

SEMINOLE ISD 126 62 49.2 11 17.7 SEMINOLE H S 115 <65m ƒ <15m ƒ SEMINOLE SUCCESS CTR 11 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

GALVESTON CLEAR CREEK ISD 1,952 1,580 80.9 699 44.2 CLEAR BROOK H S 524 422 80.5 <155m ƒ CLEAR CREEK H S 626 469 74.9 164 35.0 CLEAR LAKE H S 753 675 89.6 377 55.9 CLEAR VIEW ALTER 49 14 28.6 <5h ƒ

DICKINSON ISD 268 134 50.0 19 14.2 DICKINSON H S 267 <135m ƒ <20m ƒ GALVESTON CO DETENTION CTR 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

FRIENDSWOOD ISD FRIENDSWOOD H S 384 335 87.2 181 54.0

GALVESTON ISD BALL H S 420 252 60.0 71 28.2

HIGH ISLAND ISD HIGH ISLAND H S 22 16 72.7 <5h ƒ

HITCHCOCK ISD HITCHCOCK H S 60 20 33.3 <5h ƒ

LA MARQUE ISD LA MARQUE H S 178 101 56.7 5 5.0

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

146 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

GALVESTON SANTA FE ISD SANTA FE H S 228 145 63.6 31 21.4

TEXAS CITY ISD TEXAS CITY H S 250 138 55.2 32 23.2

GARZA POST ISD POST H S 67 38 56.7 9 23.7

SOUTHLAND ISD SOUTHLAND SCHOOL 8 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

GILLESPIE FREDERICKSBURG ISD 215 138 64.2 52 37.7 ALTER SCH 2 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ FREDERICKSBURG H S 213 <140m ƒ <55m ƒ

HARPER ISD HARPER H S 19 27 100 9 33.3

GLASSCOCK GLASSCOCK COUNTY ISD GLASSCOCK COUNTY H S 22 19 86.4 <5h ƒ

GOLIAD GOLIAD ISD GOLIAD H S 75 55 73.3 12 21.8

GONZALES GONZALES ISD 127 77 60.6 <20m ƒ GONZALES ALTER 14 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ GONZALES H S 113 <80m ƒ <20m ƒ

NIXON-SMILEY CISD NIXON-SMILEY H S 53 22 41.5 <5h ƒ

WAELDER ISD WAELDER H S 15 8 53.3 <5h ƒ

GRAY LEFORS ISD LEFORS SCHOOL 11 5 45.5 <5h ƒ

MCLEAN ISD MCLEAN SCHOOL 12 10 83.3 <5h ƒ

PAMPA ISD 173 92 53.2 21 22.8 P L C-PAMPA LEARNING CTR 13 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ PAMPA H S 160 <95m ƒ <25m ƒ

GRAYSON BELLS ISD BELLS H S 47 29 61.7 10 34.5

COLLINSVILLE ISD COLLINSVILLE H S 30 24 80.0 <5h ƒ

DENISON ISD 244 126 51.6 46 36.5 DENISON H S 237 <130m ƒ <50m ƒ PATHWAYS H S 7 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

GUNTER ISD GUNTER H S 46 35 76.1 7 20.0

HOWE ISD HOWE H S 55 32 58.2 15 46.9

POTTSBORO ISD POTTSBORO H S 70 43 61.4 10 23.3

S AND S CISD S AND S CONS H S 45 20 44.4 11 55.0

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 147 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

GRAYSON SHERMAN ISD 309 <155m ƒ 56 ƒ COOKE/FANNIN/GRAYSON CO JUVENI 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ DOUGLASS LEARNING CTR 4 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ SHERMAN HIGH SCHOOL 304 <155m ƒ <60m ƒ

TOM BEAN ISD TOM BEAN H S 44 28 63.6 <5h ƒ

VAN ALSTYNE ISD VAN ALSTYNE H S 85 43 50.6 22 51.2

WHITESBORO ISD WHITESBORO H S 87 58 66.7 15 25.9

WHITEWRIGHT ISD WHITEWRIGHT H S 43 27 62.8 <5h ƒ

GREGG EAST TEXAS CHARTER SCHOOLS DAN CHADWICK CAMPUS 61 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

GLADEWATER ISD GLADEWATER H S 101 49 48.5 11 22.4

KILGORE ISD 219 92 42.0 <30m ƒ DANVILLE ALTERNATIVE H S 5 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ KILGORE H S 214 <95m ƒ <30m ƒ

LONGVIEW ISD LONGVIEW H S 355 221 62.3 68 30.8

PINE TREE ISD PINE TREE H S 261 193 73.9 70 36.3

SABINE ISD SABINE H S 63 24 38.1 <5h ƒ

SPRING HILL ISD SPRING HILL H S 80 63 78.8 18 28.6

WHITE OAK ISD WHITE OAK H S 71 39 54.9 7 17.9

GRIMES ANDERSON-SHIRO CISD ANDERSON-SHIRO SECONDARY SCHOO 28 12 42.9 <5h ƒ

IOLA ISD IOLA H S 23 14 60.9 <5h ƒ

NAVASOTA ISD 158 <70m ƒ 11 ƒ NAVASOTA H S 154 <70m ƒ <15m ƒ SUCCESS ACADEMY AT CARVER LEAR 4 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

RICHARDS ISD RICHARDS H S 9 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

GUADALUPE MARION ISD MARION H S 86 51 59.3 15 29.4

NAVARRO ISD NAVARRO HIGH SCHOOL 73 63 86.3 19 30.2

SCHERTZ-CIBOLO-U CITY ISD 518 343 66.2 106 30.9 ALLISON STEELE ENHANCED LEARN 27 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ SAMUEL CLEMENS H S 491 <345m ƒ <110m ƒ

SEGUIN ISD 360 199 55.3 42 21.1 MERCER & BLUMBERG LRN CTR 36 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

148 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

GUADALUPE SEGUIN ISD SEGUIN HIGH SCHOOL 324 <200m ƒ <45m ƒ

HALE ABERNATHY ISD ABERNATHY H S 31 21 67.7 <5h ƒ

COTTON CENTER ISD COTTON CENTER SCHOOL 9 8 88.9 <5h ƒ

HALE CENTER ISD HALE CENTER H S 29 18 62.1 5 27.8

PETERSBURG ISD PETERSBURG H S 23 24 100 <5h ƒ

PLAINVIEW ISD 268 151 56.3 22 14.6 HOUSTON SCHOOL 16 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ PLAINVIEW HIGH SCHOOL 252 <155m ƒ <25m ƒ

HALL MEMPHIS ISD MEMPHIS H S 18 8 44.4 <5h ƒ

TURKEY-QUITAQUE ISD VALLEY SCHOOL 15 10 66.7 <5h ƒ

HAMILTON HAMILTON ISD HAMILTON HIGH SCHOOL 52 40 76.9 12 30.0

HICO ISD HICO H S 50 47 94.0 9 19.1

HANSFORD GRUVER ISD GRUVER H S 22 21 95.5 8 38.1

SPEARMAN ISD SPEARMAN H S 48 45 93.8 11 24.4

HARDEMAN CHILLICOTHE ISD CHILLICOTHE H S 16 5 31.3 <5h ƒ

QUANAH ISD QUANAH H S 36 25 69.4 6 24.0

HARDIN HARDIN-JEFFERSON ISD HARDIN-JEFFERSON H S 133 111 83.5 29 26.1

KOUNTZE ISD KOUNTZE H S 61 35 57.4 5 14.3

LUMBERTON ISD LUMBERTON H S 203 121 59.6 31 25.6

SILSBEE ISD SILSBEE H S 170 103 60.6 11 10.7

WEST HARDIN COUNTY CISD WEST HARDIN H S 46 26 56.5 <5h ƒ

HARRIS ALDINE ISD 2,011 1,071 53.3 115 10.7 ALDINE HIGH SCHOOL 427 216 50.6 21 9.7 CARVER H S FOR APPLIED TECH/E 85 <60m ƒ <15m ƒ EISENHOWER HIGH SCHOOL 513 293 57.1 28 9.6 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 93 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ MACARTHUR HIGH SCHOOL 420 210 50.0 <20m ƒ NIMITZ HIGH SCHOOL 473 292 61.7 37 12.7

ALIEF ISD 1,921 1,297 67.5 209 16.1 ELSIK H S 658 444 67.5 45 10.1 HASTINGS H S 578 367 63.5 64 17.4

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 149 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

HARRIS ALIEF ISD KERR H S 151 140 92.7 46 32.9 TAYLOR HIGH SCHOOL 534 346 64.8 54 15.6

ALPHONSO CRUTCH'S-LIFE SUPP ALPHONSO CRUTCH'S-LIFE SUPPORT 29 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

AMERICAN ACADEMY OF EXCELLE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF EXCELLENCE 23 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

BAY AREA CHARTER SCHOOL ED WHITE MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL 28 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

BENJI'S SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL BENJI'S SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL AC 10 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

CALVIN NELMS CHARTER SCHOOL CALVIN NELMS HIGH SCHOOL 51 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

CHANNELVIEW ISD 296 142 48.0 <20m ƒ CHANNELVIEW HIGH SCHOOL 282 <145m ƒ <20m ƒ ENDEAVOR SCHOOL 14 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

COMQUEST ACADEMY COMQUEST ACADEMY 44 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

CROSBY ISD CROSBY HIGH SCHOOL 200 117 58.5 25 21.4

CROSSROADS COMMUNITY ED CTR CROSSROAD COMMUNITY ED CTR CHA 16 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

CYPRESS-FAIRBANKS ISD 4,297 3,167 73.7 1,182 37.3 CY-FAIR H S 612 469 76.6 213 45.4 CYPRESS CREEK H S 568 478 84.2 207 43.3 CYPRESS FALLS H S 613 480 78.3 194 40.4 CYPRESS RIDGE HIGH SCHOOL 513 370 72.1 80 21.6 CYPRESS SPRINGS H S 582 387 66.5 111 28.7 JERSEY VILLAGE H S 650 479 73.7 172 35.9 LANGHAM CREEK H S 634 491 77.4 200 40.7 WINDFERN H S 125 13 10.4 5 38.5

DEER PARK ISD DEER PARK HS 706 313 44.3 103 32.9

GALENA PARK ISD 998 487 48.8 52 10.7 GALENA PARK H S 262 127 48.5 <10m ƒ NORTH SHORE H S 0 6 ƒ <5h ƒ NORTH SHORE SR H S 736 354 48.1 <50m ƒ

GEORGE I SANCHEZ CHARTER GEORGE I SANCHEZ H S 65 27 41.5 <5h ƒ

GIRLS & BOYS PREP ACADEMY GIRLS & BOYS PREP ACADEMY 14 16 100 <5h ƒ

GOOSE CREEK CISD 892 376 42.2 90 23.9 ALTERNATIVE LEARNING 0 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ LEE H S 399 <135m ƒ <35m ƒ NIGHT SCHOOL 21 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ STERLING H S 472 243 51.5 <60m ƒ

GULF SHORES ACADEMY GULF SHORES HIGH SCHOOL 0 9 ƒ <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

150 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

HARRIS HARMONY SCIENCE ACADEMY HARMONY SCIENCE ACADEMY 13 13 100 <5h ƒ

HOUSTON CAN ACADEMY CHARTER 156 8 5.1 <5h ƒ HOUSTON CAN ACADEMY HOBBY 61 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ HOUSTON CAN! ACADEMY CHARTER S 95 <10m ƒ <5h ƒ

HOUSTON HOUSTON HEIGHTS HIGH SCHOOL 57 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

HOUSTON ISD 7,573 5,222 69.0 1,175 22.5 ALTA ACADEMY 119 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ AUSTIN H S 263 148 56.3 5 3.4 BARBARA JORDAN H S 240 145 60.4 <5h ƒ BELLAIRE H S 645 595 92.2 364 61.2 CARNEGIE VANGUARD HS 28 29 100 18 62.1 CHALLENGE EARLY COLLEGE H S 2 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ CHAVEZ H S 373 160 42.9 7 4.4 COMMUNITY SERVICES-SEC 4 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ CONTEMPORARY LRN CTR H S 50 37 74.0 <5h ƒ DAVIS H S 242 144 59.5 5 3.5 DEBAKEY H S FOR HEALTH PROF 124 128 100 95 74.2 EASTWOOD ACADEMY 58 34 58.6 <5h ƒ ENERGIZED FOR EXCELLENCE ALTER 0 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ FURR H S 187 81 43.3 6 7.4 H P CARTER CAREER CENTER 11 5 45.5 <5h ƒ HOUSTON DROP BACK IN ACADEMY 7 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ JONES H S 138 86 62.3 6 7.0 KASHMERE H S 100 70 70.0 <5h ƒ KAY ON-GOING ED CTR HIGH SCHOO 9 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ LAMAR H S 658 584 88.8 244 41.8 LAW ENFCMT-CRIM JUST H S 142 122 85.9 9 7.4 LEE H S 266 286 100 12 4.2 MADISON H S 330 193 58.5 <5h ƒ MIDDLE COLLEGE FOR TECH CAREER 69 69 100 10 14.5 MILBY H S 384 205 53.4 14 6.8 PERFOR & VIS ARTS H S 157 144 91.7 82 56.9 REAGAN H S 288 168 58.3 10 6.0 SAM HOUSTON H S 377 160 42.4 <5h ƒ SCARBOROUGH H S 148 71 48.0 12 16.9 SHARPSTOWN H S 234 152 65.0 11 7.2 STERLING H S 159 88 55.3 <5h ƒ WALTRIP H S 299 194 64.9 19 9.8 WASHINGTON B T H S 193 152 78.8 41 27.0 WESTBURY H S 253 165 65.2 14 8.5 WESTSIDE H S 523 496 94.8 168 33.9 WHEATLEY H S 112 42 37.5 <5h ƒ WORTHING H S 181 129 71.3 <5h ƒ YATES H S 200 133 66.5 5 3.8

HUFFMAN ISD HARGRAVE H S 161 86 53.4 15 17.4

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 151 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

HARRIS HUMBLE ISD 1,597 1,247 78.1 529 42.4 HUMBLE H S 730 500 68.5 126 25.2 KINGWOOD H S 824 707 85.8 386 54.6 QUEST H S 43 40 93.0 17 42.5

JAMIE'S HOUSE CHARTER SCHOO JAMIE'S HOUSE CHARTER SCHOOL 3 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

JESSE JACKSON ACADEMY JESSE JACKSON ACADEMY 144 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

JUAN B GALAVIZ CHARTER SCHO JUAN B GALAVIZ CHARTER SCHOOL 3 5 100 <5h ƒ

KATY ISD 2,572 2,152 83.7 1,067 49.6 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL OF CHOICE 14 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ CINCO RANCH H S 706 665 94.2 394 59.2 KATY H S 588 <465m ƒ <190m ƒ MAYDE CREEK H S 643 <445m ƒ <145m ƒ TAYLOR H S 621 582 93.7 345 59.3

KLEIN ISD 2,096 1,691 80.7 653 38.6 KLEIN COLLINS HIGH SCHOOL 540 447 82.8 153 34.2 KLEIN FOREST H S 537 371 69.1 74 19.9 KLEIN H S 660 620 93.9 312 50.3 KLEIN OAK H S 359 253 70.5 114 45.1

LA PORTE ISD 440 199 45.2 53 26.6 DEWALT ALTER 40 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ LA PORTE HIGH SCHOOL 400 <200m ƒ <55m ƒ

NORTH FOREST ISD 445 227 51.0 5 2.2 FOREST BROOK H S 209 94 45.0 <5h ƒ SMILEY H S 236 133 56.4 <5h ƒ

NORTH HOUSTON H S FOR BUSIN NORTH HOUSTON H S FOR BUSINESS 38 9 23.7 <5h ƒ

PASADENA ISD 1,807 764 42.3 144 18.8 DOBIE H S 486 256 52.7 62 24.2 PASADENA H S 455 <160m ƒ <25m ƒ PASADENA MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL 0 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ RAYBURN H S 439 187 42.6 39 20.9 SOUTH HOUSTON H S 426 165 38.7 <25m ƒ TEGELER CAREER CENTER 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

RAUL YZAGUIRRE SCHOOL FOR S RAUL YZAGUIRRE SCHOOL FOR SUCC 22 11 50.0 <5h ƒ

RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (SU RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - SUBU 29 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

SHELDON ISD 211 86 40.8 6 7.0 C E KING H S 207 <90m ƒ <10m ƒ KASE ACADEMY 4 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

SOUTHWEST SCHOOL SOUTHWEST HIGH SCHOOL 73 16 21.9 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

152 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

HARRIS SPRING BRANCH ISD 1,679 1,317 78.4 605 45.9 MEMORIAL H S 451 474 100 314 66.2 NORTHBROOK H S 372 189 50.8 14 7.4 SPRING BRANCH SCHOOL OF CHOICE 32 8 25.0 <5h ƒ SPRING WOODS H S 369 223 60.4 59 26.5 STRATFORD H S 421 391 92.9 209 53.5 WESTCHESTER ACADEMY FOR INTERN 34 32 94.1 <10m ƒ

SPRING ISD 1,345 786 58.4 167 21.2 SP ED CONTRACT 3 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ SPRING H S 598 <335m ƒ <95m ƒ WESTFIELD H S 744 <455m ƒ <80m ƒ

TOMBALL ISD TOMBALL H S 498 361 72.5 131 36.3

WEST HOUSTON CHARTER SCHOOL WEST HOUSTON CHARTER 0 5 ƒ <5h ƒ

YES COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCH YES COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL 73 78 100 19 24.4

HARRISON ELYSIAN FIELDS ISD ELYSIAN FIELDS H S 67 57 85.1 16 28.1

HALLSVILLE ISD HALLSVILLE H S 208 128 61.5 36 28.1

HARLETON ISD HARLETON H S 31 31 100 5 16.1

KARNACK ISD KARNACK H S 6 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

MARSHALL ISD 312 164 52.6 29 17.7 MARSHALL ACHIEVEMENT CTR 24 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ MARSHALL H S 288 <165m ƒ <30m ƒ

WASKOM ISD WASKOM H S 38 27 71.1 <5h ƒ

HARTLEY CHANNING ISD CHANNING SCHOOL 8 6 75.0 <5h ƒ

HARTLEY ISD HARTLEY SCHOOL 12 7 58.3 <5h ƒ

HASKELL HASKELL CISD HASKELL H S 31 25 80.6 <5h ƒ

PAINT CREEK ISD PAINT CREEK SCHOOL 3 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

ROCHESTER COUNTY LINE ISD ROCHESTER SCHOOL 0 10 ƒ <5h ƒ

RULE ISD RULE SCHOOL 9 6 66.7 <5h ƒ

HAYS DRIPPING SPRINGS ISD DRIPPING SPRINGS H S 212 203 95.8 111 54.7

HAYS CISD 453 305 67.3 60 19.7 ACADEMY AT HAYS 40 11 27.5 <5h ƒ JACK C HAYS H S 413 294 71.2 <60m ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 153 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

HAYS KATHERINE ANNE PORTER SCHOO KATHERINE ANNE PORTER SCHOOL 24 11 45.8 8 72.7

SAN MARCOS CISD 366 192 52.5 <45m ƒ PRIDE HIGH SCHOOL 25 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ SAN MARCOS H S 341 <195m ƒ <45m ƒ

WIMBERLEY ISD WIMBERLEY H S 143 117 81.8 51 43.6

HEMPHILL CANADIAN ISD CANADIAN H S 31 32 100 7 21.9

HENDERSON ATHENS ISD ATHENS H S 166 72 43.4 24 33.3

BROWNSBORO ISD 160 <55m ƒ <20m ƒ ACES CAMPUS 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ BROWNSBORO H S 159 <55m ƒ <20m ƒ

CROSS ROADS ISD CROSS ROADS H S 33 18 54.5 <5h ƒ

EUSTACE ISD EUSTACE H S 58 24 41.4 10 41.7

LAPOYNOR ISD 15 7 46.7 <5h ƒ A L P H A CAMPUS 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ LAPOYNOR H S 14 <10m ƒ <5h ƒ

MALAKOFF ISD 58 <20m ƒ 6 ƒ GATEWAY 7 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ MALAKOFF H S 51 <20m ƒ <10m ƒ

TRINIDAD ISD 17 <10m ƒ <5h ƒ A L P H A CAMPUS 3 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ TRINIDAD SCHOOL 14 <10m ƒ <5h ƒ

HIDALGO DONNA ISD DONNA HIGH SCHOOL 369 269 72.9 <5h ƒ

EAGLE ACADEMY OF PHARR/MCAL 56 9 16.1 <5h ƒ EAGLE ACADEMY OF PHARR AT MISS 18 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ EAGLE ACADEMY OF PHARR/MCALLEN 38 <10m ƒ <5h ƒ

EDCOUCH-ELSA ISD EDCOUCH-ELSA H S 264 186 70.5 6 3.2

EDINBURG CISD 1,092 848 77.7 66 7.8 ECONOMEDES H S 331 231 69.8 6 2.6 EDINBURG H S 420 363 86.4 30 8.3 EDINBURG NORTH H S 341 254 74.5 30 11.8

HIDALGO ISD 156 112 71.8 6 5.4 HIDALGO ACADEMY 6 13 100 <5h ƒ HIDALGO H S 150 99 66.0 <10m ƒ

LA JOYA ISD 736 <380m ƒ 13 ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

154 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

HIDALGO LA JOYA ISD ALTER CTR FOR ED 76 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ JUAREZ/LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ LA JOYA SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL 659 <380m ƒ <15m ƒ

LA VILLA ISD 38 23 60.5 <5h ƒ LA VILLA ALTERNATIVE H S 2 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ LA VILLA H S 36 <25m ƒ <5h ƒ

MCALLEN ISD 1,141 860 75.4 150 17.4 LAMAR ACADEMY 71 36 50.7 <5h ƒ MCALLEN HIGH SCHOOL 366 269 73.5 <55m ƒ MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL 353 273 77.3 55 20.1 ROWE HIGH SCHOOL 351 282 80.3 <45m ƒ

MERCEDES ISD 216 148 68.5 7 4.7 MERCEDES ALTER ACADEMY 25 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ MERCEDES H S 191 <150m ƒ <10m ƒ

MID-VALLEY ACADEMY 75 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ MID-VALLEY ACADEMY 13 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ MID-VALLEY ACADEMY-MCALLEN 62 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

MISSION CISD 639 376 58.8 23 6.1 MISSION H S 316 187 59.2 11 5.9 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL 323 189 58.5 12 6.3

ONE STOP MULTISERVICE CHART 222 <10m ƒ <5h ƒ CHILDREN OF THE SUN 16 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ CHILDREN OF THE SUN 30 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ ONE STOP MULTISERVICE 64 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ ONE STOP MULTISERVICE 30 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ ONE STOP MULTISERVICE H S 19 <10m ƒ <5h ƒ SENTRY TECHNOLOGY PREP SCH 63 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

PHARR-SAN JUAN-ALAMO ISD 992 800 80.6 43 5.4 BUELL CENTRAL H S 25 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ PSJA H S 363 310 85.4 <20m ƒ PSJA MEMORIAL H S 299 253 84.6 <15m ƒ PSJA NORTH H S 285 228 80.0 17 7.5 TEENAGE PARENT PROG 20 <10m ƒ <5h ƒ

PROGRESO ISD PROGRESO H S 67 49 73.1 <5h ƒ

SHARYLAND ISD 377 302 80.1 57 18.9 SHARYLAND ALTERNATIVE EDUCATI 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ SHARYLAND H S 376 <305m ƒ <60m ƒ

TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION CHARTE TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION CHARTER H 13 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

VALLEY VIEW ISD VALLEY VIEW HIGH SCHOOL 122 77 63.1 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 155 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

HIDALGO WESLACO ISD 670 452 67.5 35 7.7 SOUTH PALM GARDENS H S 19 14 73.7 <5h ƒ WESLACO EAST HIGH SCHOOL 300 232 77.3 <15m ƒ WESLACO H S 351 206 58.7 <25m ƒ

HILL ABBOTT ISD ABBOTT SCHOOL 17 19 100 6 31.6

AQUILLA ISD AQUILLA SCHOOL 14 7 50.0 <5h ƒ

BLUM ISD BLUM H S 13 8 61.5 <5h ƒ

BYNUM ISD BYNUM SCHOOL 11 7 63.6 <5h ƒ

COVINGTON ISD COVINGTON SCHOOL 25 13 52.0 <5h ƒ

HILLSBORO ISD HILLSBORO H S 85 53 62.4 9 17.0

HUBBARD ISD HUBBARD H S 23 11 47.8 <5h ƒ

ITASCA ISD ITASCA H S 33 32 97.0 <5h ƒ

PENELOPE ISD PENELOPE SCHOOL 18 9 50.0 <5h ƒ

WHITNEY ISD WHITNEY H S 76 33 43.4 <5h ƒ

HOCKLEY ANTON ISD ANTON H S 18 15 83.3 5 33.3

LEVELLAND ISD LEVELLAND H S 144 70 48.6 11 15.7

ROPES ISD ROPES SCHOOL 15 11 73.3 5 45.5

SMYER ISD SMYER H S 14 11 78.6 <5h ƒ

SUNDOWN ISD 31 24 77.4 <5h ƒ PEP ALTER SCHOOL 2 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ SUNDOWN H S 29 <25m ƒ <5h ƒ

WHITHARRAL ISD WHITHARRAL SCHOOL 21 12 57.1 <5h ƒ

HOOD GRANBURY ISD 370 216 58.4 68 31.5 GRANBURY H S 360 <215m ƒ <70m ƒ S T A R S ACADEMY 10 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

LIPAN ISD LIPAN SCHOOL 12 7 58.3 <5h ƒ

TOLAR ISD TOLAR H S 40 36 90.0 6 16.7

HOPKINS COMO-PICKTON CISD 30 11 36.7 <5h ƒ COMO-PICKTON SCHOOL 27 <15m ƒ <5h ƒ HOLY HIGHWAY PICKTON 3 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

156 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

HOPKINS CUMBY ISD CUMBY H S 19 7 36.8 <5h ƒ

MILLER GROVE ISD MILLER GROVE SCHOOL 18 5 27.8 <5h ƒ

NORTH HOPKINS ISD NORTH HOPKINS H S 21 18 85.7 <5h ƒ

SALTILLO ISD SALTILLO SCHOOL 13 6 46.2 <5h ƒ

SULPHUR BLUFF ISD SULPHUR BLUFF SCHOOL 12 9 75.0 <5h ƒ

SULPHUR SPRINGS ISD SULPHUR SPRINGS H S 209 117 56.0 33 28.2

HOUSTON CROCKETT ISD CROCKETT H S 71 55 77.5 10 18.2

GRAPELAND ISD GRAPELAND H S 32 21 65.6 <5h ƒ

KENNARD ISD KENNARD H S 13 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

LATEXO ISD LATEXO H S 33 17 51.5 <5h ƒ

LOVELADY ISD LOVELADY H S 41 24 58.5 <5h ƒ

HOWARD BIG SPRING ISD BIG SPRING H S 196 75 38.3 16 21.3

COAHOMA ISD COAHOMA H S 77 41 53.2 6 14.6

FORSAN ISD FORSAN H S 33 23 69.7 8 34.8

HUDSPETH DELL CITY ISD DELL CITY SCHOOL 16 13 81.3 <5h ƒ

FT HANCOCK ISD FORT HANCOCK HS 33 23 69.7 <5h ƒ

SIERRA BLANCA ISD SIERRA BLANCA SCHOOL 8 8 100 <5h ƒ

HUNT BLAND ISD BLAND H S 21 5 23.8 <5h ƒ

BOLES ISD BOLES ISD HIGH SCHOOL 22 21 95.5 <5h ƒ

CADDO MILLS ISD CADDO MILLS H S 65 53 81.5 13 24.5

CAMPBELL ISD CAMPBELL H S 14 8 57.1 <5h ƒ

CELESTE ISD CELESTE HIGH SCHOOL 34 22 64.7 8 36.4

COMMERCE ISD COMMERCE H S 95 68 71.6 24 35.3

GREENVILLE ISD 280 139 49.6 39 28.1 GREENVILLE H S 255 <140m ƒ <40m ƒ NEW HORIZONS LEARNING CENTER 25 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

LONE OAK ISD LONE OAK H S 53 40 75.5 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 157 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

HUNT QUINLAN ISD WH FORD HIGH SCHOOL 133 55 41.4 <5h ƒ

WOLFE CITY ISD WOLFE CITY H S 35 27 77.1 6 22.2

HUTCHINSON BORGER ISD 156 82 52.6 27 32.9 BORGER H S 154 <85m ƒ <30m ƒ C H A M P S 2 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

PLEMONS-STINNETT-PHILLIPS C WEST TEXAS H S 41 27 65.9 5 18.5

SANFORD ISD 54 31 57.4 7 22.6 C H A M P S 2 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ SANFORD-FRITCH H S 52 <35m ƒ <10m ƒ

IRION IRION COUNTY ISD IRION H S 24 24 100 <5h ƒ

JACK BRYSON ISD BRYSON SCHOOL 16 13 81.3 <5h ƒ

JACKSBORO ISD 46 36 78.3 <10m ƒ ALTER SCH 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ JACKSBORO H S 45 <40m ƒ <10m ƒ

PERRIN-WHITT CISD PERRIN H S 18 10 55.6 <5h ƒ

JACKSON EDNA ISD EDNA H S 102 55 53.9 15 27.3

GANADO ISD GANADO H S 40 30 75.0 <5h ƒ

INDUSTRIAL ISD INDUSTRIAL H S 63 46 73.0 11 23.9

JASPER BROOKELAND ISD BROOKELAND H S 6 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

BUNA ISD BUNA H S 83 55 66.3 <5h ƒ

EVADALE ISD EVADALE H S 24 18 75.0 <5h ƒ

JASPER ISD JASPER H S 154 103 66.9 16 15.5

KIRBYVILLE CISD KIRBYVILLE HIGH SCHOOL 68 50 73.5 <5h ƒ

JEFF DAVIS FT DAVIS ISD 34 35 100 8 22.9 FT DAVIS H S 17 15 88.2 <5h ƒ HIGH FRONTIER H S 17 20 100 <10m ƒ

VALENTINE ISD VALENTINE SCHOOL 3 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

JEFFERSON ACADEMY OF BEAUMONT ACADEMY OF BEAUMONT 0 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

BEAUMONT ISD 927 672 72.5 115 17.1 CENTRAL SENIOR H S 156 104 66.7 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

158 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

JEFFERSON BEAUMONT ISD OZEN H S 304 211 69.4 10 4.7 PAUL A BROWN ALTERNATIVE CENTE 36 9 25.0 <5h ƒ WEST BROOK SR H S 431 348 80.7 103 29.6

EAGLE ACADEMY OF BEAUMONT EAGELE ACADEMY OF BEAUMONT 36 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

HAMSHIRE-FANNETT ISD HAMSHIRE-FANNETT H S 107 80 74.8 17 21.3

NEDERLAND ISD NEDERLAND H S 298 244 81.9 72 29.5

PORT ARTHUR ISD MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL 490 242 49.4 15 6.2

PORT NECHES-GROVES ISD PORT NECHES-GROVES H S 301 228 75.7 54 23.7

RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (BE RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (BEAUM 34 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

SABINE PASS ISD SABINE PASS SCHOOL 15 15 100 <5h ƒ

TEKOA ACADEMY OF ACCELERATE TEKOA ACADEMY OF ACCELERATED S 18 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

TEXAS ACADEMY OF LEADERSHIP TEXAS ACADEMY OF LEADERSHIP IN 0 29 ƒ 27 93.1

JIM HOGG JIM HOGG COUNTY ISD HEBBRONVILLE H S 65 45 69.2 <5h ƒ

JIM WELLS ALICE ISD ALICE H S 211 184 87.2 18 9.8

BEN BOLT-PALITO BLANCO ISD BEN BOLT-PAL BLANCO H S 47 42 89.4 <5h ƒ

ORANGE GROVE ISD ORANGE GROVE H S 82 56 68.3 12 21.4

PREMONT ISD PREMONT H S 56 41 73.2 <5h ƒ

JOHNSON ALVARADO ISD ALVARADO H S 162 121 74.7 14 11.6

BURLESON ISD 446 251 56.3 <75m ƒ BURLESON H S 435 <255m ƒ <75m ƒ CROSSROADS HIGH SCHOOL 11 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

CLEBURNE ISD 296 <145m ƒ 47 ƒ CLEBURNE H S 272 <145m ƒ <50m ƒ TEAM SCH 24 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

GODLEY ISD GODLEY H S 65 38 58.5 <5h ƒ

GRANDVIEW ISD GRANDVIEW H S 68 59 86.8 15 25.4

JOSHUA ISD 239 116 48.5 22 19.0 ACCELERATED LRN CTR 18 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ JOSHUA H S 221 <120m ƒ <25m ƒ

KEENE ISD 35 <25m ƒ 6 ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 159 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

JOHNSON KEENE ISD ALTER LEARNING CTR 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ KEENE H S 34 <25m ƒ <10m ƒ

RIO VISTA ISD RIO VISTA H S 67 34 50.7 7 20.6

VENUS ISD 80 23 28.8 <5h ƒ LEARNING CENTER 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ VENUS H S 79 <25m ƒ <5h ƒ

JONES ANSON ISD ANSON H S 51 20 39.2 6 30.0

HAMLIN ISD HAMLIN H S 21 19 90.5 <5h ƒ

HAWLEY ISD HAWLEY H S 37 27 73.0 6 22.2

LUEDERS-AVOCA ISD LUEDERS-AVOCA H S 8 5 62.5 <5h ƒ

STAMFORD ISD STAMFORD HIGH SCHOOL 39 31 79.5 5 16.1

KARNES FALLS CITY ISD FALLS CITY H S 22 19 86.4 <5h ƒ

KARNES CITY ISD KARNES CITY H S 55 24 43.6 <5h ƒ

KENEDY ISD 34 8 23.5 <5h ƒ KARNES COUNTY ACADEMY 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ KENEDY HIGH SCHOOL 33 <10m ƒ <5h ƒ

RUNGE ISD RUNGE H S 13 5 38.5 <5h ƒ

KAUFMAN CRANDALL ISD 123 65 52.8 17 26.2 CRANDALL ALTER CTR 11 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ CRANDALL H S 112 <65m ƒ <20m ƒ

FORNEY ISD FORNEY H S 179 140 78.2 34 24.3

KAUFMAN ISD 169 88 52.1 23 26.1 ALTERNATIVE LEARNING CENTER 16 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ KAUFMAN H S 153 <90m ƒ <25m ƒ

KEMP ISD KEMP HIGH SCHOOL 93 39 41.9 10 25.6

MABANK ISD MABANK H S 189 80 42.3 14 17.5

SCURRY-ROSSER ISD SCURRY-ROSSER H S 39 22 56.4 <5h ƒ

TERRELL ISD TERRELL H S 191 123 64.4 21 17.1

KENDALL BOERNE ISD BOERNE H S 332 304 91.6 135 44.4

COMFORT ISD 63 46 73.0 14 30.4 COMFORT H S 62 <50m ƒ <15m ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

160 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

KENDALL COMFORT ISD HILL COUNTRY HIGH SCHOOL 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

KENT JAYTON-GIRARD ISD JAYTON SCHOOLS 7 7 100 <5h ƒ

KERR CENTER POINT ISD CENTER POINT H S 37 26 70.3 6 23.1

INGRAM ISD INGRAM-TOM MOORE H S 103 66 64.1 13 19.7

KERRVILLE ISD 257 159 61.9 48 30.2 HILL COUNTRY HIGH SCHOOL 24 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ TIVY H S 233 <160m ƒ <50m ƒ

KIMBLE JUNCTION ISD JUNCTION H S 46 34 73.9 9 26.5

KING GUTHRIE CSD GUTHRIE SCHOOL 5 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

KINNEY BRACKETT ISD 41 26 63.4 7 26.9 BRACKETT ALTER 5 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ BRACKETT H S 36 <30m ƒ <10m ƒ

KLEBERG KINGSVILLE ISD 241 164 68.0 <25m ƒ H M KING HIGH SCHOOL 224 153 68.3 <25m ƒ K E Y S ACADEMY 17 11 64.7 <5h ƒ

RIVIERA ISD KAUFER H S 39 27 69.2 9 33.3

SANTA GERTRUDIS ISD ACADEMY H S 32 23 71.9 7 30.4

KNOX BENJAMIN ISD BENJAMIN SCHOOL 7 9 100 <5h ƒ

KNOX CITY-O'BRIEN CISD KNOX CITY H S 22 16 72.7 <5h ƒ

MUNDAY CISD MUNDAY H S 24 21 87.5 <5h ƒ

LA SALLE COTULLA ISD 63 <45m ƒ <5h ƒ COTULLA ALTERNATIVE 7 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ COTULLA H S 56 <45m ƒ <5h ƒ

LAMAR CHISUM ISD CHISUM H S 55 46 83.6 14 30.4

NORTH LAMAR ISD NORTH LAMAR H S 180 80 44.4 32 40.0

PARIS ISD 138 82 59.4 27 32.9 PARIS ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL FOR S 8 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ PARIS H S 130 <85m ƒ <30m ƒ

PRAIRILAND ISD PRAIRILAND H S 61 31 50.8 5 16.1

ROXTON ISD ROXTON H S 7 7 100 <5h ƒ

LAMB AMHERST ISD AMHERST SCHOOL 5 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 161 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

LAMB LITTLEFIELD ISD LITTLEFIELD H S 70 44 62.9 7 15.9

OLTON ISD OLTON H S 37 22 59.5 5 22.7

SPADE ISD SPADE SCHOOL 5 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

SPRINGLAKE-EARTH ISD SPRINGLAKE-EARTH HS 11 7 63.6 <5h ƒ

SUDAN ISD SUDAN H S 32 22 68.8 <5h ƒ

LAMPASAS CEDAR RIDGE CHARTER SCHOOL CEDAR RIDGE CHARTER SCHOOL 13 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

LAMPASAS ISD LAMPASAS H S 154 99 64.3 18 18.2

LOMETA ISD LOMETA SCHOOL 15 8 53.3 <5h ƒ

LAVACA HALLETTSVILLE ISD HALLETTSVILLE H S 84 59 70.2 11 18.6

MOULTON ISD MOULTON H S 23 21 91.3 6 28.6

SHINER ISD SHINER H S 29 28 96.6 7 25.0

LEE DIME BOX ISD DIME BOX SCHOOL 16 10 62.5 <5h ƒ

GIDDINGS ISD 108 51 47.2 <20m ƒ GIDDINGS H S 107 <55m ƒ <20m ƒ KNOX LEARNING CTR 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

LEXINGTON ISD LEXINGTON HIGH SCHOOL 67 34 50.7 12 35.3

LEON BUFFALO ISD BUFFALO H S 53 30 56.6 <5h ƒ

CENTERVILLE ISD CENTERVILLE JR-SR H S 54 46 85.2 5 10.9

LEON ISD LEON H S 42 19 45.2 <5h ƒ

NORMANGEE ISD NORMANGEE H S 30 23 76.7 <5h ƒ

OAKWOOD ISD OAKWOOD H S 16 5 31.3 <5h ƒ

LIBERTY CLEVELAND ISD CLEVELAND H S 128 61 47.7 5 8.2

DAYTON ISD 282 144 51.1 23 16.0 DAYTON H S 281 <145m ƒ <25m ƒ GULF COAST H S 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

HARDIN ISD HARDIN H S 58 40 69.0 <5h ƒ

HULL-DAISETTA ISD HULL-DAISETTA H S 30 19 63.3 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

162 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

LIBERTY LIBERTY ISD 127 53 41.7 17 32.1 GULF COAST H S 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ LIBERTY H S 126 <55m ƒ <20m ƒ

TARKINGTON ISD TARKINGTON H S 81 46 56.8 7 15.2

LIMESTONE COOLIDGE ISD COOLIDGE H S 6 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

GROESBECK ISD 111 53 47.7 11 20.8 ALTER LEARNING CTR 11 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ GROESBECK H S 99 <55m ƒ <15m ƒ GROESBECK MIDDLE 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

MEXIA ISD 110 86 78.2 12 14.0 MEXIA H S 105 <90m ƒ <15m ƒ MEXIA SCHOOL OF CHOICE 5 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

LIPSCOMB BOOKER ISD BOOKER JH/H S 25 24 96.0 7 29.2

FOLLETT ISD FOLLETT SCHOOL 10 8 80.0 <5h ƒ

HIGGINS ISD HIGGINS SCHOOL 9 7 77.8 <5h ƒ

LIVE OAK GEORGE WEST ISD GEORGE WEST H S 67 44 65.7 6 13.6

THREE RIVERS ISD THREE RIVERS H S 43 27 62.8 8 29.6

LLANO LLANO ISD LLANO H S 108 92 85.2 19 20.7

LUBBOCK EAGLE ACADEMY OF LUBBOCK EAGLE ACADEMY OF LUBBOCK 9 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

FRENSHIP ISD 258 151 58.5 <60m ƒ FRENSHIP H S 234 <155m ƒ <60m ƒ REESE EDUCATIONAL CTR 24 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

IDALOU ISD IDALOU H S 50 36 72.0 10 27.8

LUBBOCK ISD 1,505 905 60.1 297 32.8 CORONADO H S 449 342 76.2 118 34.5 ESTACADO H S 140 <90m ƒ <5h ƒ HOMEBOUND 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ LUBBOCK H S 428 <230m ƒ 108 ƒ MATTHEWS LRN CTR/NEW DIRECTION 41 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ MONTEREY H S 446 251 56.3 <70m ƒ

LUBBOCK-COOPER ISD LUBBOCK-COOPER HIGH SCHOOL 97 68 70.1 22 32.4

NEW DEAL ISD NEW DEAL H S 45 27 60.0 <5h ƒ

RICHARD MILBURN ALTER HIGH RICHARD MILBURN ALTER H S (LUB 32 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 163 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

LUBBOCK ROOSEVELT ISD ROOSEVELT H S 64 27 42.2 <5h ƒ

SHALLOWATER ISD SHALLOWATER H S 77 53 68.8 18 34.0

SLATON ISD SLATON H S 64 42 65.6 <5h ƒ

SOUTH PLAINS SOUTH PLAINS ACADEMY 44 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HIGH TEXAS TECH H S 0 59 ƒ 36 61.0

LYNN NEW HOME ISD NEW HOME SCHOOL 9 13 100 <5h ƒ

O'DONNELL ISD O'DONNELL HIGH SCHOOL 15 11 73.3 <5h ƒ

TAHOKA ISD TAHOKA H S 47 22 46.8 5 22.7

WILSON ISD WILSON SCHOOL 9 5 55.6 <5h ƒ

MADISON MADISONVILLE CISD MADISONVILLE HIGH SCHOOL 103 71 68.9 13 18.3

NORTH ZULCH ISD NORTH ZULCH H S 16 13 81.3 <5h ƒ

MARION JEFFERSON ISD JEFFERSON H S 79 70 88.6 6 8.6

MARTIN GRADY ISD GRADY SCHOOL 18 9 50.0 <5h ƒ

STANTON ISD STANTON H S 48 22 45.8 <5h ƒ

MASON MASON ISD MASON H S 42 37 88.1 10 27.0

MATAGORDA BAY CITY ISD BAY CITY H S 234 151 64.5 41 27.2

PALACIOS ISD PALACIOS H S 94 51 54.3 8 15.7

TIDEHAVEN ISD TIDEHAVEN H S 52 32 61.5 <5h ƒ

VAN VLECK ISD VAN VLECK H S 58 42 72.4 7 16.7

MAVERICK EAGLE PASS ISD 685 338 49.3 32 9.5 EAGLE PASS H S 668 <340m ƒ <35m ƒ EAGLE PASS HIGH SCHOOL 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ EP ALAS (ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL) 16 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

MCCULLOCH BRADY ISD BRADY H S 85 61 71.8 9 14.8

LOHN ISD LOHN SCHOOL 8 6 75.0 <5h ƒ

ROCHELLE ISD ROCHELLE SCHOOL 13 6 46.2 <5h ƒ

MCLENNAN AXTELL ISD 43 29 67.4 6 20.7 AXTELL H S 38 <30m ƒ <10m ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

164 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

MCLENNAN AXTELL ISD METHODIST HOME BOYS RANCH 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ OPPORTUNITY LEARNING CTR 4 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

BOSQUEVILLE ISD BOSQUEVILLE SCHOOL SECONDARY 23 14 60.9 <5h ƒ

BRUCEVILLE-EDDY ISD 66 33 50.0 <15m ƒ B-E ACHIEVEMENT CTR 4 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ BRUCEVILLE-EDDY H S 59 <35m ƒ <15m ƒ OPPORTUNITY LEARNING CTR 3 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

CHINA SPRING ISD 111 <80m ƒ 24 ƒ CHINA SPRING H S 109 <80m ƒ <25m ƒ OPPORTUNITY LEARNING CTR 2 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

CONNALLY ISD 111 72 64.9 14 19.4 CONNALLY HIGH SCHOOL 105 <75m ƒ <15m ƒ LAKEVIEW ACADEMY 6 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

CRAWFORD ISD 46 36 78.3 21 58.3 CRAWFORD H S 44 <40m ƒ <25m ƒ OPPORTUNITY LEARNING CENTER 2 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

EAGLE ACADEMY OF WACO 43 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ EAGLE ACADEMY OF WACO 19 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ EAGLE ACADEMY OF WACO AT TRINI 24 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

LA VEGA ISD 110 41 37.3 8 19.5 LA VEGA H S 108 <45m ƒ <10m ƒ SUCCESS PROGRAM 2 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

LORENA ISD 103 74 71.8 26 35.1 LORENA H S 97 <75m ƒ <30m ƒ OPPORTUNITY LEARNING CTR 6 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

MART ISD MART H S 29 16 55.2 <5h ƒ

MCGREGOR ISD 61 21 34.4 <5h ƒ MCGREGOR H S 59 <25m ƒ <5h ƒ MCGREGOR PREP H S 2 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

MIDWAY ISD MIDWAY H S 376 265 70.5 131 49.4

MOODY ISD MOODY H S 32 20 62.5 5 25.0

RIESEL ISD RIESEL SCHOOL 24 13 54.2 <5h ƒ

ROBINSON ISD ROBINSON H S 136 81 59.6 20 24.7

WACO ISD 584 228 39.0 43 18.9 A J MOORE ACAD 104 <40m ƒ <5h ƒ STARS HIGH SCHOOL 32 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 165 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

MCLENNAN WACO ISD UNIVERSITY H S 157 <50m ƒ <5h ƒ WACO H S 291 141 48.5 38 27.0

WEST ISD 117 67 57.3 <15m ƒ RBEC OPPORTUNITY LEARNING CENT 3 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ WEST H S 114 <70m ƒ <15m ƒ

MCMULLEN MCMULLEN COUNTY ISD MCMULLEN COUNTY SCHOOL 17 12 70.6 <5h ƒ

MEDINA D'HANIS ISD D'HANIS SCHOOL 19 14 73.7 <5h ƒ

DEVINE ISD DEVINE HIGH SCHOOL 98 59 60.2 5 8.5

HONDO ISD HONDO H S 105 63 60.0 15 23.8

MEDINA VALLEY ISD 192 124 64.6 34 27.4 MEDINA VALLEY H S 191 <125m ƒ <35m ƒ MEDINA VALLEY MIDDLE SCHOOL 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

NATALIA ISD NATALIA H S 56 30 53.6 <5h ƒ

MENARD MENARD ISD MENARD H S 20 16 80.0 <5h ƒ

MIDLAND EAGLE ACADEMY OF MIDLAND 34 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ EAGLE ACADEMY OF MIDLAND 13 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ EAGLE CHARTER SCHOOL - MIDLAND 21 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

GREENWOOD ISD GREENWOOD H S 105 62 59.0 14 22.6

MIDLAND ISD 1,142 642 56.2 258 40.2 LEE H S 572 344 60.1 <150m ƒ MIDLAND EXCEL CAMPUS 45 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ MIDLAND H S 507 <300m ƒ <115m ƒ VIOLA M COLEMAN H S 18 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (MI RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (MIDLA 36 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

MILAM BUCKHOLTS ISD BUCKHOLTS SCHOOL 13 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

CAMERON ISD YOE HIGH SCHOOL 83 54 65.1 7 13.0

MILANO ISD MILANO H S 24 14 58.3 6 42.9

ROCKDALE ISD ROCKDALE H S 88 69 78.4 11 15.9

THORNDALE ISD THORNDALE H S 33 23 69.7 <5h ƒ

MILLS GOLDTHWAITE ISD GOLDTHWAITE HIGH SCHOOL 44 32 72.7 7 21.9

MULLIN ISD MULLIN HIGH SCHOOL 4 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

166 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

MILLS PRIDDY ISD PRIDDY SCHOOL 7 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

STAR ISD STAR SCHOOL 6 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

MITCHELL COLORADO ISD COLORADO HIGH SCHOOL 52 26 50.0 <5h ƒ

LORAINE ISD LORAINE SCHOOL 5 5 100 <5h ƒ

WESTBROOK ISD WESTBROOK SCHOOL 10 9 90.0 <5h ƒ

MONTAGUE BOWIE ISD BOWIE H S 83 51 61.4 9 17.6

FORESTBURG ISD FORESTBURG SCHOOL 8 7 87.5 <5h ƒ

GOLD BURG ISD GOLD BURG H S 8 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

NOCONA ISD NOCONA H S 53 31 58.5 8 25.8

PRAIRIE VALLEY ISD PRAIRIE VALLEY H S 4 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

SAINT JO ISD SAINT JO H S 17 10 58.8 <5h ƒ

MONTGOMERY CONROE ISD 2,237 1,719 76.8 756 44.0 CANEY CREEK H S 265 145 54.7 <25m ƒ CONROE H S 405 265 65.4 <70m ƒ OAK RIDGE H S 421 319 75.8 148 46.4 THE WOODLANDS H S 1,104 984 89.1 521 52.9 W L HAUKE ALTER ED 42 6 14.3 <5h ƒ

MAGNOLIA ISD 479 256 53.4 63 24.6 ALPHA 32 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ CENTRAL BAPTIST ACAD 0 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ MAGNOLIA H S 447 252 56.4 <65m ƒ

MONTGOMERY ISD MONTGOMERY H S 227 158 69.6 40 25.3

NEW CANEY ISD NEW CANEY H S 276 133 48.2 19 14.3

SPLENDORA ISD SPLENDORA H S 154 71 46.1 12 16.9

WILLIS ISD WILLIS H S 249 134 53.8 26 19.4

MOORE DUMAS ISD 181 86 47.5 <20m ƒ C H A M P S 5 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ DUMAS H S 176 <90m ƒ <20m ƒ

SUNRAY ISD 28 18 64.3 <5h ƒ C H A M P S 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ SUNRAY H S 27 <20m ƒ <5h ƒ

MORRIS DAINGERFIELD-LONE STAR ISD DAINGERFIELD H S 78 42 53.8 8 19.0

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 167 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

MORRIS PEWITT CISD PEWITT H S 34 13 38.2 <5h ƒ

MOTLEY MOTLEY COUNTY ISD MOTLEY COUNTY SCHOOL 11 10 90.9 <5h ƒ

NACOGDOCHES CENTRAL HEIGHTS ISD CENTRAL HEIGHTS H S 35 29 82.9 7 24.1

CHIRENO ISD CHIRENO H S 14 8 57.1 <5h ƒ

CUSHING ISD CUSHING SCHOOL 16 7 43.8 <5h ƒ

DOUGLASS ISD DOUGLASS SCHOOL 25 21 84.0 10 47.6

GARRISON ISD GARRISON H S 41 29 70.7 <5h ƒ

MARTINSVILLE ISD MARTINSVILLE SCHOOL 18 15 83.3 <5h ƒ

NACOGDOCHES ISD NACOGDOCHES H S 299 201 67.2 70 34.8

WODEN ISD WODEN H S 54 33 61.1 5 15.2

NAVARRO BLOOMING GROVE ISD BLOOMING GROVE H S 52 42 80.8 6 14.3

CORSICANA ISD CORSICANA H IGH SCHOOL 248 138 55.6 31 22.5

DAWSON ISD DAWSON H S 21 15 71.4 <5h ƒ

FROST ISD FROST H S 19 15 78.9 <5h ƒ

KERENS ISD KERENS SCHOOL 31 25 80.6 <5h ƒ

MILDRED ISD MILDRED H S 45 35 77.8 6 17.1

RICE ISD RICE H S 46 24 52.2 <5h ƒ

NEWTON BURKEVILLE ISD BURKEVILLE HIGH SCHOOL 13 10 76.9 <5h ƒ

DEWEYVILLE ISD DEWEYVILLE H S 54 19 35.2 <5h ƒ

NEWTON ISD NEWTON H S 62 45 72.6 5 11.1

NOLAN BLACKWELL CISD BLACKWELL SCHOOL 5 5 100 <5h ƒ

HIGHLAND ISD HIGHLAND SCHOOL 22 15 68.2 8 53.3

ROSCOE ISD ROSCOE H S 20 15 75.0 6 40.0

SWEETWATER ISD 117 66 56.4 19 28.8 HOBBS ALTER ED CO-OP 6 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ SWEETWATER H S 111 <70m ƒ <20m ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

168 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

NUECES AGUA DULCE ISD AGUA DULCE H S 22 8 36.4 <5h ƒ

BANQUETE ISD BANQUETE H S 52 55 100 <5h ƒ

BISHOP CISD BISHOP H S 53 47 88.7 7 14.9

CALALLEN ISD CALALLEN HIGH SCHOOL 301 218 72.4 58 26.6

CORPUS CHRISTI ISD 1,747 1,233 70.6 252 20.4 ALTERNATIVE H S CTR 28 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ CARROLL H S 434 338 77.9 84 24.9 KING H S 423 295 69.7 93 31.5 MILLER HIGH SCHOOL CTR FOR COM 197 <125m ƒ <10m ƒ MOODY H S 288 <240m ƒ <20m ƒ RAY H S 377 244 64.7 51 20.9

DR M L GARZA-GONZALEZ CHART 27 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ ACCELERATED LEARNING CENTER 18 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ DR M L GARZA-GONZALEZ CHARTER 9 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

FLOUR BLUFF ISD FLOUR BLUFF H S 285 214 75.1 59 27.6

PORT ARANSAS ISD PORT ARANSAS H S 34 22 64.7 11 50.0

RICHARD MILBURN ALTER HIGH RICHARD MILBURN ALTER H S (COR 51 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

ROBSTOWN ISD 188 <155m ƒ <5h ƒ ALTER LRN CTR 19 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ ROBSTOWN H S 169 <155m ƒ <5h ƒ

TULOSO-MIDWAY ISD 221 152 68.8 <40m ƒ TULOSO-MIDWAY ACADEMIC CAREER 11 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ TULOSO-MIDWAY H S 210 <155m ƒ <40m ƒ

WEST OSO ISD WEST OSO H S 78 49 62.8 <5h ƒ

OCHILTREE PERRYTON ISD 98 66 67.3 21 31.8 PERRYTON H S 93 <70m ƒ <25m ƒ TOP OF TEXAS ACCELERATED EDUCA 5 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

OLDHAM ADRIAN ISD ADRIAN SCHOOL 5 6 100 <5h ƒ

BOYS RANCH ISD BOYS RANCH H S 40 45 100 9 20.0

VEGA ISD VEGA H S 27 23 85.2 7 30.4

ORANGE BRIDGE CITY ISD BRIDGE CITY H S 124 95 76.6 21 22.1

LITTLE CYPRESS-MAURICEVILLE LIT CYPR-MRCEVILLE H S 235 161 68.5 45 28.0

ORANGEFIELD ISD ORANGEFIELD H S 107 72 67.3 14 19.4

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 169 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

ORANGE VIDOR ISD 242 144 59.5 27 18.8 A I M S CTR H S 19 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ VIDOR H S 223 <145m ƒ <30m ƒ

WEST ORANGE-COVE CISD WEST ORANGE-STARK H S 158 106 67.1 14 13.2

PALO PINTO GORDON ISD GORDON SCHOOL 16 13 81.3 <5h ƒ

GRAFORD ISD GRAFORD H S 15 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

MINERAL WELLS ISD 162 114 70.4 17 14.9 DREAM ACADEMY 3 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ MINERAL WELL H S 159 <115m ƒ <20m ƒ

SANTO ISD SANTO HIGH SCHOOL 31 26 83.9 5 19.2

STRAWN ISD STRAWN SCHOOL 19 15 78.9 <5h ƒ

PANOLA BECKVILLE ISD BECKVILLE JR-SR HIGH SCHOOL 18 14 77.8 <5h ƒ

CARTHAGE ISD CARTHAGE H S 146 82 56.2 17 20.7

GARY ISD GARY SCHOOL 15 9 60.0 <5h ƒ

PANOLA CHARTER SCHOOL PANOLA CS 43 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

PARKER ALEDO ISD 233 169 72.5 68 40.2 ALEDO HIGH SCHOOL 202 <170m ƒ <70m ƒ ALEDO LEARNING CENTER 31 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

BROCK ISD BROCK H S 42 33 78.6 9 27.3

MILLSAP ISD MILLSAP H S 38 11 28.9 <5h ƒ

PEASTER ISD PEASTER H S 66 33 50.0 10 30.3

POOLVILLE ISD POOLVILLE H S 33 8 24.2 <5h ƒ

SPRINGTOWN ISD 173 88 50.9 24 27.3 SPRINGTOWN H S 170 <90m ƒ <25m ƒ YALE 3 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

WEATHERFORD ISD 375 187 49.9 64 34.2 PASS LEARNING CENTER 15 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ WEATHERFORD H S 360 <190m ƒ <65m ƒ

PARMER BOVINA ISD BOVINA H S 29 23 79.3 <5h ƒ

FARWELL ISD FARWELL H S 26 14 53.8 8 57.1

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

170 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

PARMER FRIONA ISD FRIONA H S 54 45 83.3 8 17.8

LAZBUDDIE ISD LAZBUDDIE SCHOOL 11 10 90.9 <5h ƒ

PECOS BUENA VISTA ISD BUENA VISTA SCHOOL 5 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

FT STOCKTON ISD 115 46 40.0 <15m ƒ BUTZ EDUCATION CENTER 3 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ FORT STOCKTON H S 112 <50m ƒ <15m ƒ

IRAAN-SHEFFIELD ISD 25 19 76.0 <5h ƒ IRAAN H S 25 <20m ƒ <5h ƒ T Y C SHEFFIELD CAMPUS 2 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

POLK BIG SANDY ISD BIG SANDY SCHOOL 29 25 86.2 <5h ƒ

CORRIGAN-CAMDEN ISD CORRIGAN-CAMDEN H S 41 27 65.9 <5h ƒ

GOODRICH ISD GOODRICH H S 15 16 100 <5h ƒ

LEGGETT ISD LEGGETT H S 14 9 64.3 <5h ƒ

LIVINGSTON ISD LIVINGSTON H S 225 131 58.2 30 22.9

POTTER AMARILLO ISD 1,391 702 50.5 230 32.8 AMARILLO AREA CTR FOR ADVANCED 4 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ AMARILLO H S 439 299 68.1 144 48.2 CAPROCK H S 262 <105m ƒ <15m ƒ NORTH HEIGHTS ALTER 3 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ PALO DURO H S 272 115 42.3 <10m ƒ TASCOSA H S 411 184 44.8 69 37.5

HIGHLAND PARK ISD HIGHLAND PARK H S 47 41 87.2 7 17.1

RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (AM RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (AMARI 49 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

RIVER ROAD ISD RIVER ROAD HIGH SCHOOL 94 56 59.6 10 17.9

PRESIDIO MARFA ISD MARFA JUNIOR/SENIOR HIGH 27 21 77.8 <5h ƒ

PRESIDIO ISD PRESIDIO H S 78 59 75.6 <5h ƒ

RAINS RAINS ISD RAINS HIGH SCHOOL 85 48 56.5 10 20.8

RANDALL CANYON ISD 439 285 64.9 103 36.1 CANYON H S 156 121 77.6 51 42.1 RANDALL H S 283 164 58.0 52 31.7

REAGAN REAGAN COUNTY ISD REAGAN COUNTY H S 59 40 67.8 <5h ƒ

REAL BIG SPRINGS CHARTER SCHOOL BIG SPRINGS CHARTER SCHOOL 3 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 171 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

REAL LEAKEY ISD LEAKEY SCHOOL 10 8 80.0 <5h ƒ

RED RIVER AVERY ISD AVERY H S 23 15 65.2 <5h ƒ

CLARKSVILLE ISD CLARKSVILLE H S 51 31 60.8 7 22.6

DETROIT ISD DETROIT H S 24 9 37.5 <5h ƒ

RIVERCREST ISD RIVERCREST H S 26 22 84.6 <5h ƒ

REEVES BALMORHEA ISD BALMORHEA SCHOOL 19 16 84.2 <5h ƒ

PECOS-BARSTOW-TOYAH ISD PECOS H S 124 70 56.5 <5h ƒ

REFUGIO AUSTWELL-TIVOLI ISD AUSTWELL-TIVOLI H S 9 7 77.8 <5h ƒ

REFUGIO ISD 83 26 31.3 <10m ƒ REFUGIO HIGH SCHOOL 35 <30m ƒ <10m ƒ REFUGIO MIDDLE SCHOOL 48 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

WOODSBORO ISD WOODSBORO H S 20 32 100 <5h ƒ

ROBERTS MIAMI ISD MIAMI SCHOOL 14 10 71.4 <5h ƒ

ROBERTSON BREMOND ISD BREMOND H S 29 28 96.6 <5h ƒ

CALVERT ISD CALVERT H S 10 6 60.0 <5h ƒ

FRANKLIN ISD FRANKLIN H S 63 45 71.4 13 28.9

HEARNE ISD HEARNE H S 49 19 38.8 <5h ƒ

MUMFORD ISD MUMFORD H S 11 5 45.5 <5h ƒ

ROCKWALL ROCKWALL ISD 560 442 78.9 183 41.4 ROCKWALL H S 547 <445m ƒ <185m ƒ ROCKWALL QUEST ACADEMY 13 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

ROYSE CITY ISD 136 64 47.1 <15m ƒ ALTERNATIVE LEARNING CENTER 4 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ ROYSE CITY H S 132 <65m ƒ <15m ƒ

RUNNELS BALLINGER ISD BALLINGER H S 62 50 80.6 13 26.0

MILES ISD MILES H S 26 22 84.6 6 27.3

WINTERS ISD WINTERS H S 36 20 55.6 7 35.0

RUSK CARLISLE ISD CARLISLE SCHOOL 24 13 54.2 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

172 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

RUSK HENDERSON ISD HENDERSON H S 175 108 61.7 29 26.9

LANEVILLE ISD LANEVILLE SCHOOL 7 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

LEVERETTS CHAPEL ISD LEVERETTS CHAPEL H S 7 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

MOUNT ENTERPRISE ISD MT ENTERPRISE H S 21 20 95.2 <5h ƒ

OVERTON ISD OVERTON H S 24 11 45.8 <5h ƒ

TATUM ISD TATUM H S 74 50 67.6 8 16.0

WEST RUSK ISD WEST RUSK H S 36 18 50.0 <5h ƒ

SABINE HEMPHILL ISD HEMPHILL H S 63 42 66.7 7 16.7

WEST SABINE ISD WEST SABINE H S 33 33 100 <5h ƒ

SAN AUGUSTINE BROADDUS ISD BROADDUS H S 17 14 82.4 <5h ƒ

SAN AUGUSTINE ISD 56 33 58.9 <5h ƒ ACCELERATED LRN CTR 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ SAN AUGUSTINE H S 55 <35m ƒ <5h ƒ

SAN JACINTO COLDSPRING-OAKHURST CISD COLDSPRING-OAKHURST HIGH SCHOO 85 40 47.1 <5h ƒ

SHEPHERD ISD SHEPHERD H S 74 48 64.9 6 12.5

SAN PATRICIO ARANSAS PASS ISD ARANSAS PASS HIGH SCHOOL 88 47 53.4 5 10.6

GREGORY-PORTLAND ISD GREGORY-PORTLAND H S 246 179 72.8 71 39.7

INGLESIDE ISD INGLESIDE H S 109 49 45.0 13 26.5

MATHIS ISD MATHIS H S 83 38 45.8 <5h ƒ

ODEM-EDROY ISD ODEM H S 66 48 72.7 8 16.7

SINTON ISD SINTON H S 98 72 73.5 6 8.3

TAFT ISD TAFT H S 64 57 89.1 <5h ƒ

SAN SABA CHEROKEE ISD CHEROKEE H S 8 7 87.5 <5h ƒ

RICHLAND SPRINGS ISD RICHLAND SPRINGS SCHOOL 14 13 92.9 <5h ƒ

SAN SABA ISD SAN SABA H S 44 35 79.5 7 20.0

SCHLEICHER SCHLEICHER ISD ELDORADO H S 41 25 61.0 <5h ƒ

SCURRY HERMLEIGH ISD HERMLEIGH SCHOOL 7 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 173 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

SCURRY IRA ISD IRA SCHOOL 13 9 69.2 <5h ƒ

SNYDER ISD 137 94 68.6 23 24.5 HOBBS ALTER ED CO-OP 2 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ SNYDER H S 135 <95m ƒ <25m ƒ

SHACKELFORD ALBANY ISD ALBANY JR-SR H S 33 29 87.9 <5h ƒ

MORAN ISD MORAN SCHOOL 6 5 83.3 <5h ƒ

SHELBY CENTER ISD CENTER H S 109 96 88.1 20 20.8

JOAQUIN ISD JOAQUIN H S 33 21 63.6 5 23.8

SHELBYVILLE ISD SHELBYVILLE SCHOOL 36 20 55.6 6 30.0

TENAHA ISD TENAHA HIGH SCHOOL 10 5 50.0 <5h ƒ

TIMPSON ISD TIMPSON H S 31 23 74.2 <5h ƒ

SHERMAN STRATFORD ISD STRATFORD H S 33 36 100 <5h ƒ

TEXHOMA ISD TEXHOMA EL 4 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

SMITH ARP ISD ARP H S 53 40 75.5 <5h ƒ

AZLEWAY CHARTER SCHOOL AZLEWAY CHARTER SCHOOL 3 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

BULLARD ISD BULLARD H S 99 66 66.7 18 27.3

CHAPEL HILL ISD 194 <120m ƒ 21 ƒ CHAPEL HILL H S 193 <120m ƒ <25m ƒ WINGS 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

EAGLE ACADEMY OF TYLER 28 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ EAGLE ACADEMY OF TYLER 25 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ EAGLE ACADEMY OF TYLER AT LIND 3 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

LINDALE ISD LINDALE H S 189 124 65.6 35 28.2

TROUP ISD TROUP H S 60 30 50.0 <5h ƒ

TYLER ISD 760 491 64.6 113 23.0 ALVIN V ANDERSON EDUCATIONAL C 32 6 18.8 <5h ƒ JOHN TYLER H S 254 146 57.5 <10m ƒ ROBERT E LEE HIGH SCHOOL 474 339 71.5 <110m ƒ

WHITEHOUSE ISD WHITEHOUSE H S 232 162 69.8 57 35.2

WINONA ISD WINONA H S 52 28 53.8 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

174 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

SOMERVELL BRAZOS RIVER CHARTER SCHOOL BRAZOS RIVER CHARTER SCHOOL 53 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

GLEN ROSE ISD GLEN ROSE H S 81 69 85.2 17 24.6

STARR RIO GRANDE CITY CISD RIO GRANDE CITY H S 359 244 68.0 7 2.9

ROMA ISD 252 177 70.2 8 4.5 ACCELERATED LRN ACAD 8 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ ROMA H S 244 <180m ƒ <10m ƒ

SAN ISIDRO ISD SAN ISIDRO H S 11 10 90.9 <5h ƒ

STEPHENS BRECKENRIDGE ISD 79 <50m ƒ 7 ƒ BRECKENRIDGE ALTER 2 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ BRECKENRIDGE H S 77 <50m ƒ <10m ƒ

STERLING STERLING CITY ISD STERLING CITY H S 17 13 76.5 <5h ƒ

STONEWALL ASPERMONT ISD ASPERMONT HS 17 13 76.5 <5h ƒ

SUTTON SONORA ISD SONORA H S 41 30 73.2 <5h ƒ

SWISHER HAPPY ISD HAPPY H S 15 12 80.0 <5h ƒ

KRESS ISD KRESS H S 12 5 41.7 <5h ƒ

TULIA ISD TULIA H S 73 36 49.3 8 22.2

TARRANT ARLINGTON ISD 3,054 2,016 66.0 693 34.4 ARLINGTON H S 514 359 69.8 131 36.5 BOWIE H S 434 317 73.0 83 26.2 LAMAR H S 534 385 72.1 149 38.7 MARTIN H S 741 557 75.2 261 46.9 SAM HOUSTON H S 412 164 39.8 <25m ƒ SEGUIN H S 341 227 66.6 45 19.8 VENTURE ALTER H S 78 7 9.0 <5h ƒ

AZLE ISD AZLE H S 327 172 52.6 46 26.7

BIRDVILLE ISD 1,168 633 54.2 193 30.5 366 220 60.1 <80m ƒ HALTOM H S 437 <200m ƒ <40m ƒ RICHLAND H S 365 215 58.9 78 36.3 SHANNON LRN CTR 0 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

CARROLL ISD CARROLL SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL 499 525 100 295 56.2

CASTLEBERRY ISD 159 72 45.3 8 11.1 CASTLEBERRY H S 145 <75m ƒ <10m ƒ REACH H S 14 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 175 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

TARRANT CROWLEY ISD 685 548 80.0 161 29.4 CROWLEY H S 313 227 72.5 50 22.0 NORTH CROWLEY H S 372 321 86.3 111 34.6

EAGLE ACADEMY OF FORT WORTH EAGLE ACADEMY OF FT WORTH 10 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

EAGLE MT-SAGINAW ISD 433 203 46.9 67 33.0 BOSWELL H S 419 <205m ƒ <70m ƒ WATSON LEARNING CENTER 14 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

ERATH EXCELS ACADEMY INC ERATH EXCELS ACADEMY INC 39 10 25.6 <5h ƒ

EVERMAN ISD EVERMAN H S 158 89 56.3 6 6.7

FORT WORTH ACADEMY OF FINE FORT WORTH ACADEMY OF FINE ART 17 17 100 7 41.2

FORT WORTH CAN ACADEMY 149 14 9.4 <5h ƒ FORT WORTH CAN ACADEMY 90 6 6.7 <5h ƒ RIVER OAKS 59 8 13.6 <5h ƒ

FORT WORTH ISD 3,252 1,752 53.9 393 22.4 ARLINGTON HEIGHTS H S 370 257 69.5 102 39.7 CARTER-RIVERSIDE H S 140 65 46.4 <5h ƒ CTR FOR NEW LIVES 29 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ DIAMOND HILL-JARVIS H S 149 50 33.6 <5h ƒ DUNBAR H S 170 101 59.4 13 12.9 EASTERN HILLS H S 229 135 59.0 6 4.4 JAMES MIDDLE 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ MEADOWBROOK MIDDLE 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ METRO OPPORTUNITY 0 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ NORTH SIDE H S 221 82 37.1 10 12.2 O D WYATT H S 188 112 59.6 <5h ƒ PASCHAL H S 441 277 62.8 133 48.0 POLYTECHNIC HIGH SCHOOL 147 87 59.2 <5h ƒ SOUTH HILLS HIGH SCHOOL 212 75 35.4 6 8.0 SOUTHWEST H S 263 186 70.7 52 28.0 SUCCESS H S 89 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ TRIMBLE TECHNICAL H S 324 160 49.4 6 3.8 WEDGWOOD MIDDLE 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ WESTERN HILLS H S 277 158 57.0 58 36.7

GRAPEVINE-COLLEYVILLE ISD 959 852 88.8 407 47.8 COLLEYVILLE HERITAGE H S 506 457 90.3 <215m ƒ GRAPEVINE H S 434 <395m ƒ <195m ƒ THE BRIDGES ACAD ALTER 19 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

HURST-EULESS-BEDFORD ISD 1,191 819 68.8 289 35.3 BELL H S 565 <385m ƒ <140m ƒ KEYS CTR 32 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ TRINITY H S 594 435 73.2 <155m ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

176 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

TARRANT KELLER ISD 1,233 985 79.9 367 37.3 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ FOSSIL RIDGE H S 620 <450m ƒ <145m ƒ KELLER H S 603 536 88.9 <225m ƒ NEW DIRECTION LRN CTR 9 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

KENNEDALE ISD KENNEDALE H S 158 106 67.1 28 26.4

LAKE WORTH ISD 97 53 54.6 <5h ƒ ANNE MANSFIELD SULLIVAN H S 11 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ LAKE WORTH H S 86 <55m ƒ <5h ƒ

MANSFIELD ISD 1,134 684 60.3 193 28.2 ALTER ED CTR 26 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ MANSFIELD HIGH SCHOOL 447 <290m ƒ 94 ƒ MANSFIELD TIMBERVIEW HIGH SCHO 105 <40m ƒ <10m ƒ SUMMIT HIGH SCHOOL 556 356 64.0 <95m ƒ

MASONIC HOME ISD MASONIC HOME HIGH SCHOOL 11 15 100 <5h ƒ

RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (FO RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - FORT 22 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

THERESA B LEE ACADEMY THERESA B LEE ACADEMY 70 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

TREETOPS SCHOOL INTERNATION TREETOPS SCHOOL INTERNATIONAL 9 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

WHITE SETTLEMENT ISD 232 128 55.2 19 14.8 BREWER H S 218 <130m ƒ <20m ƒ MESA HIGH SCHOOL 10 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ WHITE SETTLEMENT DISCIPLINARY 4 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

TAYLOR ABILENE ISD 793 494 62.3 152 30.8 ABILENE H S 385 <270m ƒ <90m ƒ COOPER H S 365 <230m ƒ <65m ƒ SP ED HOMEBOUND 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ SP ED O J T 3 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ WOODSON CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE 39 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

EAGLE ACADEMY OF ABILENE EAGLE ACADEMY OF ABILENE 34 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

JIM NED CISD JIM NED H S 75 72 96.0 19 26.4

MERKEL ISD MERKEL H S 74 61 82.4 11 18.0

TRENT ISD TRENT SCHOOL 10 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

WYLIE ISD WYLIE H S 182 155 85.2 61 39.4

TERRELL TERRELL COUNTY ISD SANDERSON H S 14 8 57.1 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 177 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

TERRY BROWNFIELD ISD BROWNFIELD H S 101 51 50.5 11 21.6

MEADOW ISD MEADOW SCHOOL 17 9 52.9 <5h ƒ

WELLMAN-UNION CISD WELLMAN-UNION SCHOOL 12 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

THROCKMORTON THROCKMORTON ISD THROCKMORTON H S 21 14 66.7 5 35.7

WOODSON ISD WOODSON SCHOOL 12 10 83.3 <5h ƒ

TITUS CHAPEL HILL ISD CHAPEL HILL H S 58 20 34.5 6 30.0

MOUNT PLEASANT ISD 226 77 34.1 <20m ƒ ALTER ED 22 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ MT PLEASANT H S 204 <80m ƒ <20m ƒ

TOM GREEN CHRISTOVAL ISD CHRISTOVAL H S 28 23 82.1 5 21.7

GRAPE CREEK ISD 57 42 73.7 13 31.0 FAIRVIEW ACCELERATED 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ GRAPE CREEK H S 56 <45m ƒ <15m ƒ

SAN ANGELO ISD 826 519 62.8 129 24.9 CENTRAL H S 622 390 62.7 112 28.7 LAKE VIEW H S 204 129 63.2 17 13.2

VERIBEST ISD 17 <10m ƒ <5h ƒ FAIRVIEW SPECIAL PROGRAMS 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ VERIBEST H S 16 <10m ƒ <5h ƒ

WALL ISD 56 51 91.1 <15m ƒ FAIRVIEW ACCELERATED 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ WALL H S 54 <55m ƒ <15m ƒ WALL MIDDLE 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

WATER VALLEY ISD 20 17 85.0 <5h ƒ WATER VALLEY ACCELERATED 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ WATER VALLEY H S 19 <20m ƒ <5h ƒ

TRAVIS AMERICAN YOUTHWORKS CHARTER 121 7 5.8 <5h ƒ AMERICAN YOUTHWORKS CHARTER SC 61 <10m ƒ <5h ƒ AMERICAN YOUTHWORKS CHARTER SC 60 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

AUSTIN CAN ACADEMY CHARTER AUSTIN CAN ACADEMY CHARTER SCH 29 6 20.7 <5h ƒ

AUSTIN ISD 3,276 2,487 75.9 975 39.2 AKINS HIGH SCHOOL 341 169 49.6 29 17.2 ANDERSON H S 374 345 92.2 210 60.9 AUSTIN H S 415 368 88.7 189 51.4 BOWIE H S 482 445 92.3 216 48.5 CROCKETT H S 296 226 76.4 36 15.9

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

178 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

TRAVIS AUSTIN ISD GONZALO GARZA INDEPENDENCE H S 81 <30m ƒ 9 ƒ JOHNSON H S 307 285 92.8 157 55.1 JOHNSTON H S 110 66 60.0 <5h ƒ LANIER H S 244 184 75.4 <10m ƒ MCCALLUM H S 286 211 73.8 111 52.6 PHOENIX ACADEMY 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ REAGAN H S 126 67 53.2 <5h ƒ TRAVIS COUNTY JUVENILE DETENTI 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ TRAVIS H S 212 92 43.4 9 9.8

DEL VALLE ISD 337 147 43.6 18 12.2 DEL VALLE H S 318 <150m ƒ <20m ƒ DEL VALLE OPPORTUNITY CTR 19 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

EANES ISD WESTLAKE H S 538 554 100 391 70.6

FRUIT OF EXCELLENCE FRUIT OF EXCELLENCE SCHOOL 5 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

LAGO VISTA ISD LAGO VISTA H S 60 44 73.3 20 45.5

LAKE TRAVIS ISD LAKE TRAVIS H S 295 262 88.8 150 57.3

MANOR ISD 132 <75m ƒ 6 ƒ EXCEL HIGH SCHOOL 8 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ MANOR H S 124 <75m ƒ <10m ƒ

NYOS CHARTER SCHOOL NYOS CHARTER SCHOOL 16 14 87.5 5 35.7

PFLUGERVILLE ISD 837 625 74.7 186 29.8 HENDRICKSON HS 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ JOHN B CONNALLY H S 379 <260m ƒ <65m ƒ PFLUGERVILLE H S 457 <370m ƒ <125m ƒ

STAR CHARTER SCHOOL STAR CHARTER SCHOOL 8 6 75.0 5 83.3

TEXAS EMPOWERMENT ACADEMY TEXAS EMPOWERMENT ACADEMY 2 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

UNIVERSITY CHARTER SCHOOL 8 8 100 <5h ƒ A R C CONGRESS 0 <10m ƒ <5h ƒ ANNUNCIATION MATERNITY HOME 2 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ MARYWOOD 2 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ MIRACLE FARM 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ SAN MARCOS TREATMENT CENTER 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ TNC CAMPUS (TEXAS NEUROREHABIL 2 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUST UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN 0 5 ƒ <5h ƒ

TRINITY APPLE SPRINGS ISD APPLE SPRINGS H S 13 7 53.8 <5h ƒ

CENTERVILLE ISD CENTERVILLE H S 21 7 33.3 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 179 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

TRINITY GROVETON ISD GROVETON J H-H S 25 25 100 <5h ƒ

TRINITY ISD TRINITY H S 72 41 56.9 5 12.2

TYLER CHESTER ISD CHESTER H S 11 9 81.8 <5h ƒ

COLMESNEIL ISD COLMESNEIL H S 28 26 92.9 5 19.2

SPURGER ISD SPURGER H S 29 13 44.8 <5h ƒ

WARREN ISD WARREN H S 60 35 58.3 <5h ƒ

WOODVILLE ISD WOODVILLE H S 64 56 87.5 8 14.3

UPSHUR BIG SANDY ISD BIG SANDY H S 19 16 84.2 <5h ƒ

GILMER ISD GILMER H S 115 73 63.5 12 16.4

HARMONY ISD HARMONY H S 66 52 78.8 12 23.1

NEW DIANA ISD NEW DIANA H S 50 42 84.0 15 35.7

ORE CITY ISD ORE CITY HIGH SCHOOL 33 24 72.7 6 25.0

UNION GROVE ISD UNION GROVE H S 38 23 60.5 5 21.7

UNION HILL ISD UNION HILL H S 19 15 78.9 <5h ƒ

UPTON MCCAMEY ISD MCCAMEY H S 28 15 53.6 <5h ƒ

RANKIN ISD RANKIN H S 16 16 100 <5h ƒ

UVALDE GABRIEL TAFOLLA CHARTER SCH GABRIEL TAFOLLA CHARTER SCHOOL 4 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

KNIPPA ISD KNIPPA SCHOOL 8 6 75.0 <5h ƒ

SABINAL ISD SABINAL H S 24 13 54.2 <5h ƒ

UTOPIA ISD UTOPIA SCHOOL 20 14 70.0 6 42.9

UVALDE CISD 244 111 45.5 17 15.3 EXCEL ACADEMY 10 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ UVALDE H S 234 <115m ƒ <20m ƒ

VAL VERDE COMSTOCK ISD COMSTOCK SCHOOL 6 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

EAGLE ACADEMY OF DEL RIO EAGLE ACADEMY OF DEL RIO 9 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

SAN FELIPE-DEL RIO CISD DEL RIO H S 401 193 48.1 34 17.6

VAN ZANDT CANTON ISD CANTON H S 79 39 49.4 18 46.2

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

180 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

VAN ZANDT EDGEWOOD ISD EDGEWOOD H S 58 36 62.1 7 19.4

FRUITVALE ISD FRUITVALE H S 20 12 60.0 <5h ƒ

GRAND SALINE ISD GRAND SALINE H S 72 32 44.4 7 21.9

MARTINS MILL ISD MARTINS MILL H S 28 22 78.6 5 22.7

RANCH ACADEMY RANCH ACADEMY 11 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

VAN ISD VAN H S 127 67 52.8 11 16.4

WILLS POINT ISD WILLS POINT H S 121 59 48.8 14 23.7

VICTORIA BLOOMINGTON ISD BLOOMINGTON H S 34 15 44.1 <5h ƒ

VICTORIA ISD 673 291 43.2 <85m ƒ MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL STROMAN C 650 <295m ƒ <85m ƒ PROFIT ACADEMIC CTR FOR SUCCES 23 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

WALKER HUNTSVILLE ISD 374 216 57.8 <45m ƒ HUNTSVILLE H S 361 <220m ƒ <45m ƒ WESTMORELAND LEARNING CENTER 13 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

NEW WAVERLY ISD NEW WAVERLY H S 51 25 49.0 <5h ƒ

WALLER HEMPSTEAD ISD HEMPSTEAD H S 53 51 96.2 5 9.8

ROYAL ISD ROYAL H S 68 33 48.5 <5h ƒ

WALLER ISD WALLER H S 241 151 62.7 33 21.9

WARD GRANDFALLS-ROYALTY ISD GRANDFALLS-ROYALTY SCHOOL 7 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

MONAHANS-WICKETT-PYOTE ISD 117 69 59.0 18 26.1 MONAHANS ED CTR 5 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ MONAHANS H S 112 <70m ƒ <20m ƒ

WASHINGTON BRENHAM ISD 297 158 53.2 46 29.1 BRENHAM ALTERNATIVE 3 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ BRENHAM HIGH SCHOOL 294 <160m ƒ <50m ƒ

BURTON ISD BURTON H S 24 14 58.3 <5h ƒ

WEBB EAGLE ACADEMY OF LAREDO EAGLE ACADEMY OF LAREDO 13 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

GATEWAY (STUDENT ALTERNATIV GATEWAY ACADEMY (STUDENT ALTER 101 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

LAREDO ISD 817 461 56.4 19 4.1 DR LEO CIGARROA H S 237 <140m ƒ <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 181 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

WEBB LAREDO ISD F S LARA ACADEMY 2 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ MARTIN H S 252 163 64.7 <10m ƒ NIXON H S 326 158 48.5 8 5.1

UNITED ISD 1,357 1,075 79.2 71 6.6 J B ALEXANDER HIGH SCHOOL 390 318 81.5 33 10.4 LYNDON B JOHNSON 261 165 63.2 <5h ƒ UNITED H S 449 379 84.4 <35m ƒ UNITED SOUTH H S 257 213 82.9 <10m ƒ

WEBB CISD BRUNI H S 15 16 100 <5h ƒ

WHARTON BOLING ISD BOLING H S 55 32 58.2 <5h ƒ

EAST BERNARD ISD EAST BERNARD H S 48 27 56.3 6 22.2

EL CAMPO ISD EL CAMPO H S 230 126 54.8 18 14.3

LOUISE ISD LOUISE H S 27 15 55.6 <5h ƒ

WHARTON ISD WHARTON H S 125 75 60.0 15 20.0

WHEELER FORT ELLIOTT CISD FORT ELLIOTT SCHOOL 9 8 88.9 <5h ƒ

SHAMROCK ISD SHAMROCK H S 25 19 76.0 <5h ƒ

WHEELER ISD WHEELER SCHOOL 23 19 82.6 5 26.3

WICHITA BRIGHT IDEAS CHARTER BRIGHT IDEAS CHARTER 6 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

BURKBURNETT ISD 196 <145m ƒ 37 ƒ ALTER ED CTR 9 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ BURKBURNETT H S 187 <145m ƒ <40m ƒ

CITY VIEW ISD CITY VIEW JUNIOR/SENIOR HIGH 41 22 53.7 <5h ƒ

ELECTRA ISD ELECTRA H S 33 22 66.7 <5h ƒ

IOWA PARK CISD IOWA PARK H S 117 57 48.7 12 21.1

WICHITA FALLS ISD 785 492 62.7 149 30.3 HARRELL ACCELERATED LEARNING C 23 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ HIRSCHI HS 161 <100m ƒ <30m ƒ RIDER H S 321 220 68.5 67 30.5 WICHITA FALLS H S 280 175 62.5 <60m ƒ

WILBARGER HARROLD ISD HARROLD SCHOOL 3 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

NORTHSIDE ISD NORTHSIDE SCHOOL 10 6 60.0 <5h ƒ

VERNON ISD 121 87 71.9 22 25.3

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

182 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

WILBARGER VERNON ISD NORTH TEXAS STATE HOSPITAL - A 1 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ VERNON H S 120 <90m ƒ <25m ƒ

WILLACY LYFORD CISD LYFORD H S 85 62 72.9 <5h ƒ

RAYMONDVILLE ISD RAYMONDVILLE H S 114 80 70.2 <5h ƒ

SAN PERLITA ISD SAN PERLITA H S 17 15 88.2 <5h ƒ

WILLIAMSON FLORENCE ISD FLORENCE H S 64 39 60.9 10 25.6

GEORGETOWN ISD 503 384 76.3 166 43.2 CHIP RICHARTE H S 23 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ GEORGETOWN H S 480 <385m ƒ <170m ƒ

GRANGER ISD GRANGER SCHOOL 35 32 91.4 <5h ƒ

HUTTO ISD HUTTO H S 99 70 70.7 23 32.9

JARRELL ISD JARRELL H S 34 23 67.6 6 26.1

LEANDER ISD 889 671 75.5 287 42.8 CEDAR PARK H S 486 403 82.9 196 48.6 LEANDER H S 389 <270m ƒ <95m ƒ NEW HOPE HIGH SCHOOL 14 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

LIBERTY HILL ISD LIBERTY HILL H S 125 91 72.8 23 25.3

ROUND ROCK ISD 2,047 1,687 82.4 798 47.3 MCNEIL H S 519 445 85.7 202 45.4 ROUND ROCK H S 402 343 85.3 <130m ƒ ROUND ROCK OPPORT CTR DAEP 0 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ STONY POINT HIGH SCHOOL 512 <335m ƒ <95m ƒ SUCCESS PROGRAM EAST 24 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ SUCCESS PROGRAM WEST 10 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ WESTWOOD H S 580 568 97.9 376 66.2

TAYLOR ISD TAYLOR H S 158 75 47.5 12 16.0

THRALL ISD THRALL H S 31 17 54.8 <5h ƒ

WILSON FLORESVILLE ISD 192 113 58.9 17 15.0 FLORESVILLE CHOICE PROGRAM 3 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ FLORESVILLE H S 189 <115m ƒ <20m ƒ

LA VERNIA ISD LA VERNIA HIGH SCHOOL 144 87 60.4 17 19.5

POTH ISD POTH H S 43 33 76.7 6 18.2

STOCKDALE ISD STOCKDALE H S 30 21 70.0 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 183 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

WINKLER KERMIT ISD KERMIT H S 75 51 68.0 <5h ƒ

WINK-LOVING ISD WINK H S 14 9 64.3 <5h ƒ

WISE ALVORD ISD ALVORD H S 34 26 76.5 6 23.1

BOYD ISD BOYD H S 73 38 52.1 7 18.4

BRIDGEPORT ISD 129 <75m ƒ 14 ƒ BRIDGEPORT ACE HIGH SCHOOL 7 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ BRIDGEPORT H S 122 <75m ƒ <15m ƒ

CHICO ISD CHICO HIGH SCHOOL 36 20 55.6 <5h ƒ

DECATUR ISD 176 98 55.7 <35m ƒ CATES HIGH SCHOOL 7 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ DECATUR H S 169 <100m ƒ <35m ƒ

PARADISE ISD PARADISE H S 63 38 60.3 10 26.3

SLIDELL ISD SLIDELL J H / H S 20 8 40.0 <5h ƒ

WOOD ALBA-GOLDEN ISD ALBA-GOLDEN H S 36 10 27.8 <5h ƒ

HAWKINS ISD HAWKINS H S 45 23 51.1 5 21.7

MINEOLA ISD MINEOLA H S 69 39 56.5 7 17.9

QUITMAN ISD 70 <50m ƒ 11 ƒ QUITMAN H S 68 <50m ƒ <15m ƒ WOOD CO ALTER 2 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

WINNSBORO ISD WINNSBORO H S 88 70 79.5 14 20.0

YANTIS ISD YANTIS SCHOOL 20 12 60.0 5 41.7

YOAKUM DENVER CITY ISD DENVER CITY H S 99 52 52.5 7 13.5

PLAINS ISD PLAINS H S 23 18 78.3 8 44.4

YOUNG GRAHAM ISD 150 84 56.0 18 21.4 GRAHAM H S 141 <85m ƒ <20m ƒ GRAHAM LEARNING CTR 9 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

NEWCASTLE ISD NEWCASTLE H S 10 <5t ƒ <5t ƒ

OLNEY ISD OLNEY H S 44 25 56.8 9 36.0

ZAPATA ZAPATA COUNTY ISD ZAPATA H S 116 68 58.6 6 8.8

ZAVALA CRYSTAL CITY ISD CRYSTAL CITY H S 99 51 51.5 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

184 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 3 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by County, District, and Campus, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

Examinees at or above ƒƒƒƒTestedƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒcriterionƒƒƒ County District Campus Graduates Number Percent Number Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ

ZAVALA LA PRYOR ISD LA PRYOR H S 24 22 91.7 <5h ƒ

______Note. 't' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested. 'h' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of examinees scoring at or above criterion. 'm' indicates masking is applied because small numbers can be imputed from other district or campus counts. 'ƒ' indicates masking is applied because of the small number of students tested or scoring at or above criterion.

District and Campus Supplement 185

186 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 College Admissions Examination Results by District Characteristic

Table 4. College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by District Characteristic, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005

Texas Education Agency District Characteristic Descriptions, 2004-05

District and Campus Supplement 187 Table 4 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by District Characteristic, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

_____Mean score______Graduates tested (%)_____ Examinees Combined Composite SAT, ACT, at or above Districts Category SAT ACT SAT ACT or both criterion (%) ______

Enrollment

14 50,000 and over 982 20.0 63.6 22.9 68.8 28.9 26 25,000 to 49,999 998 20.5 62.6 29.1 72.0 29.9 46 10,000 to 24,999 1002 19.8 52.3 27.2 62.9 28.0 74 5,000 to 9,999 1005 20.2 52.3 31.0 64.7 29.2 82 3,000 to 4,999 985 19.7 45.4 32.6 61.0 23.7 127 1,600 to 2,999 975 19.9 38.7 36.8 60.5 22.2 128 1,000 to 1,599 971 19.6 34.7 40.2 59.9 21.0 225 500 to 999 968 19.8 30.4 44.4 60.8 19.2 367 Under 500 950 19.6 19.1 36.7 47.0 18.4

District Type

10 Major Urban 938 19.0 63.7 20.5 68.9 22.4 77 Major Suburban 1029 21.3 63.5 27.6 70.2 35.5 41 Other Central City 984 19.4 49.6 30.5 63.1 24.8 144 Other Central City Suburban 987 19.7 46.7 33.6 63.3 24.0 71 Independent Town 988 19.6 41.7 33.8 60.0 23.7 24 Non-metropolitan Fast Growing 977 20.2 40.8 37.0 60.1 22.5 238 Non-metropolitan Stable 966 19.5 34.5 42.4 62.4 19.9 370 Rural 958 19.6 29.5 54.2 69.3 18.2 114 Charters 925 18.5 12.8 4.2 14.9 20.3

Property Wealth: Median ($205,990)

99 Under $98,566 864 17.4 31.9 39.4 59.4 7.7 103 $98,566 to $128,354 876 18.7 49.5 34.0 71.3 12.1 99 $128,355 to $149,827 912 19.0 42.4 35.8 61.0 15.3 100 $149,828 to $175,255 951 19.4 46.8 28.0 60.9 19.8 99 $175,256 to $205,989 959 19.2 45.9 28.3 58.9 20.7 102 $205,990 to $238,865 992 20.1 50.8 26.5 61.1 27.0 96 $238,866 to $287,593 1032 21.1 61.8 28.5 70.3 34.7 94 $287,594 to $370,454 1005 20.6 61.2 27.2 70.3 31.1 96 $370,455 to $601,094 1035 21.5 64.7 31.6 73.3 37.6 81 Over $601,094 1077 21.4 55.3 39.2 72.6 39.7 120 Non-taxing entities 974 20.0 19.2 8.6 22.7 26.6

Property Wealth: Average ($260,579)

649 Under $260,579 959 19.3 47.7 30.7 63.0 21.3 320 Over $260,579 1025 21.1 62.1 29.6 71.3 34.7 120 Non-taxing entities 974 20.0 19.2 8.6 22.7 26.6

Property Wealth: Equal Student Groups

43 Under $77,477 839 16.9 30.3 40.6 59.6 5.3 61 $77,477 to < $100,142 857 17.9 50.4 31.9 70.3 9.4 104 $100,142 to < $130,225 912 18.8 38.1 39.5 64.5 14.2 97 $130,225 to < $151,566 918 19.0 42.7 37.5 62.4 16.1 33 $151,566 to < $159,434 942 19.2 45.8 21.4 55.9 18.7 74 $159,434 to < $177,887 954 19.5 47.1 31.4 63.2 20.0 45 $177,887 to < $190,864 952 19.0 48.7 30.5 62.6 19.8 65 $190,864 to < $211,786 984 19.8 44.8 24.9 55.3 24.6 41 $211,786 to < $227,645 967 19.4 47.6 23.2 56.6 23.7 28 $227,645 to < $235,216 1006 20.8 56.4 24.7 63.9 29.9 39 $235,216 to < $251,515 1027 20.6 59.2 32.6 71.7 33.2 ______

188 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 4 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by District Characteristic, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

_____Mean score______Graduates tested (%)_____ Examinees Combined Composite SAT, ACT, at or above Districts Category SAT ACT SAT ACT or both criterion (%) ______

50 $251,515 to < $277,055 1034 21.2 57.6 31.4 67.7 34.7 17 $277,055 to < $286,314 1031 21.0 64.3 26.0 71.2 34.5 54 $286,314 to < $333,116 1030 21.0 60.6 30.8 71.7 33.4 25 $333,116 to < $351,557 1028 21.0 62.8 26.0 70.9 34.8 4 $351,557 to < $357,562 944 19.0 62.9 21.3 68.9 23.3 15 $357,562 to < $371,575 945 19.9 58.0 31.2 68.4 24.5 50 $371,575 to < $457,361 1060 22.0 64.6 32.8 73.7 40.5 31 $457,361 to < $535,409 1072 22.1 68.9 31.5 76.2 44.3 93 $535,409 and over 1078 21.6 58.8 36.5 73.2 40.9 120 Non-taxing entities 974 20.0 19.2 8.6 22.7 26.6

Tax: Local Adopted Rate (Avg=1.5584)

219 Under $1.4971 931 19.1 34.1 40.1 60.6 16.3 243 $1.4971 to under $1.5601 955 19.6 41.9 35.7 62.7 20.2 253 $1.5601 to under $1.6501 977 19.3 48.5 32.3 64.8 24.1 254 $1.6501 and over 1004 20.6 60.3 27.3 68.4 30.8 120 Non-taxing entities 974 20.0 19.2 8.6 22.7 26.6

Tax: Local M & 0 Rates (Avg=1.4469)

236 Under $1.4201 953 19.6 44.8 32.2 62.3 20.8 237 $1.4201 to $1.4910 972 19.7 50.3 29.2 63.1 23.7 10 $1.4911 to $1.4990 1081 22.3 68.9 39.3 78.5 43.2 486 $1.4991 and over 1002 20.2 56.6 30.2 68.4 29.4 120 Non-taxing entities 974 20.0 19.2 8.6 22.7 26.6

Highest Property Value

400 Residential 994 20.2 57.6 28.7 68.0 28.6 269 Land 960 19.6 32.5 49.3 66.2 18.7 130 Oil and gas 950 19.2 24.0 50.8 63.5 16.2 170 Business 975 19.6 41.7 30.2 57.8 23.2 120 Non-taxing entities 974 20.0 19.2 8.6 22.7 26.6

Small/Sparse Adjustment (Avg=25.8%)

277 No small/sparse adjustment 995 20.2 57.9 26.0 66.2 29.2 218 Under 9.5% 975 19.7 41.3 35.7 60.9 22.1 214 9.5% to under 27.6% 972 19.6 33.6 45.7 64.4 19.7 210 27.6% to under 36.3% 966 19.7 28.8 53.4 66.5 18.8 170 36.3% and over 948 19.7 27.6 59.3 72.5 18.3

Cost of Education Index (Median=1.06)

156 Under 1.04 949 19.8 16.4 15.6 27.2 21.9 234 1.04 to under 1.06 991 20.1 30.9 49.3 64.8 22.2 246 1.06 to under 1.08 989 20.2 39.8 40.7 63.9 24.4 244 1.08 to 1.11 1013 20.2 50.8 33.8 65.8 29.3 209 1.11 and over 986 19.9 57.8 26.9 67.1 27.5

Operating Cost Per Student (Avg=$6,966)

200 Under $6,450 1019 21.1 58.5 25.3 65.7 32.8 231 $6,450 to $7,130 997 20.2 53.7 29.3 65.7 28.2 228 $7,131 to $7,773 967 19.5 52.5 29.9 65.3 24.6

______

District and Campus Supplement 189 Table 4 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by District Characteristic, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

_____Mean score______Graduates tested (%)_____ Examinees Combined Composite SAT, ACT, at or above Districts Category SAT ACT SAT ACT or both criterion (%) ______

222 $7,774 to $9,025 899 18.5 34.1 41.9 61.1 13.0 208 Over $9,025 971 19.6 32.0 52.4 69.8 19.5

Education Service Center Regions

42 I Edinburg 888 17.3 37.0 42.8 65.1 8.9 37 II Corpus Christi 972 18.5 41.0 45.6 69.4 18.4 33 III Victoria 977 19.7 40.0 29.3 55.5 21.3 73 IV Houston 1004 20.5 61.5 22.8 67.1 31.3 34 V Beaumont 927 19.2 60.0 16.9 66.5 17.9 56 VI Huntsville 1020 20.8 56.5 26.0 63.7 31.8 98 VII Kilgore 991 19.7 37.2 36.5 59.2 23.2 44 VIII Mt Pleasant 1004 20.1 17.8 54.8 62.9 24.4 39 IX Wichita Falls 1007 20.6 37.5 43.1 63.8 25.4 93 X Richardson 1008 20.8 55.4 29.9 65.0 32.2 80 XI Fort Worth 1024 21.0 57.4 27.7 65.6 32.9 78 XII Waco 983 19.8 43.1 37.2 61.6 24.2 63 XIII Austin 1041 21.2 65.2 28.7 71.7 37.5 44 XIV Abilene 1008 20.4 37.9 45.0 65.1 26.0 43 XV San Angelo 977 19.7 36.7 45.9 65.7 21.1 56 XVI Amarillo 1041 20.4 21.2 49.2 60.2 27.1 61 XVII Lubbock 1005 20.0 31.9 43.2 59.8 25.1 35 XVIII Midland 995 20.3 38.2 24.0 50.8 25.4 15 XIX El Paso 864 18.0 68.3 16.1 74.8 10.7 65 XX San Antonio 957 19.6 55.7 24.1 62.9 23.3

TAKS: Passing All Tests Taken, %

0 No students tested 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 202 Under 47.1% 848 17.1 27.4 27.4 45.2 7.4 225 47.1% to under 58.0% 905 18.2 49.9 26.0 62.6 15.2 243 58.0% to under 65.0% 987 19.6 46.4 29.0 60.1 24.7 210 65.0% to under 72.0% 1016 20.6 54.8 30.1 67.4 30.3 209 72.0% and over 1069 22.2 68.5 35.3 78.0 42.1

SAT/ACT: Participation, %

426 0% to under 55% 938 19.1 39.9 21.9 49.8 19.0 336 55% to under 70% 966 19.5 52.0 29.3 65.0 23.1 311 70% and over 1044 21.0 67.1 38.2 81.6 36.1 16 No graduates 937 18.7 22.8 13.9 29.7 18.3

SAT/ACT: At or Above Criterion, %

130 None met criterion 858 17.6 16.4 21.0 32.0 8.7 132 Under 10% 845 17.2 44.3 33.3 64.7 7.1 270 10% to under 20% 922 18.9 44.6 29.4 60.1 16.2 381 20% to under 35% 987 20.1 49.6 27.8 61.6 25.9 121 35% and over 1070 22.2 70.1 32.1 77.6 43.2 55 No test takers 949 18.4 12.1 5.9 14.2 16.5

Student Density (Avg=16 Students/Sq Mile)

434 Fewer than 5 958 19.6 29.0 51.0 65.6 18.3 281 5 to fewer than 20 966 19.7 40.6 37.2 61.7 21.4 140 20 to fewer than 100 991 19.7 47.1 29.2 60.6 25.4

______

190 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Table 4 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by District Characteristic, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

_____Mean score______Graduates tested (%)_____ Examinees Combined Composite SAT, ACT, at or above Districts Category SAT ACT SAT ACT or both criterion (%) ______

114 100 and over 996 20.3 61.0 26.7 69.0 29.8 120 Non-taxing entities 974 20.0 19.2 8.6 22.7 26.6

Student Change: 03/04-04/05

473 Declining students 948 19.4 50.2 27.9 62.9 21.8 302 0% to under 3% 1007 20.1 53.2 30.0 65.6 29.2 153 3% to under 6% 1017 20.3 56.1 34.6 70.5 30.5 77 6% to under 10% 1014 20.8 58.6 27.1 67.5 31.1 84 10% and over 1009 20.6 36.2 22.2 45.5 28.7

Students: African American, % (Avg=14%)

607 Under 5% 961 19.5 46.4 35.5 65.9 21.2 151 5% to under 10% 1037 21.3 59.7 31.0 69.2 35.7 148 10% to under 20% 1019 20.5 54.0 26.3 63.3 31.9 87 20% to under 30% 976 19.5 53.9 24.5 63.2 26.0 54 30% to under 50% 942 18.8 54.7 24.5 63.8 21.1 42 50% and over 865 18.3 42.9 25.4 55.7 12.9

Students: Hispanic, % (Avg=45%)

118 Under 5% 1023 21.1 44.9 41.8 69.0 30.6 152 5% to under 10% 1034 20.9 48.8 34.5 66.7 32.0 212 10% to under 20% 1043 21.3 59.5 34.9 71.6 36.0 145 20% to under 30% 1036 21.2 61.7 30.1 70.5 35.2 207 30% to under 50% 1003 20.1 50.8 26.3 61.8 28.6 255 50% and over 918 18.3 48.4 27.6 61.9 16.6

Students: Nonwhite, % (Avg=62%)

27 Under 5% 967 20.3 45.7 29.6 62.4 21.6 65 5% to under 10% 1064 21.7 47.3 43.6 70.3 35.8 184 10% to under 20% 1030 21.3 52.2 34.6 67.7 32.7 155 20% to under 30% 1029 21.0 52.6 36.5 68.6 31.7 237 30% to under 50% 1054 21.5 58.6 33.1 70.1 37.4 421 50% and over 954 19.0 51.1 26.9 63.0 21.8

Students: Econ Disad, % (Avg=55%)

49 Under 20% 1097 22.8 74.8 38.8 83.8 48.0 79 20% to under 30% 1046 21.7 67.2 28.5 74.3 37.8 136 30% to under 40% 1021 21.2 56.0 28.0 65.3 31.8 448 40% to under 60% 1003 20.2 47.6 30.6 61.9 27.5 268 60% to under 80% 910 18.5 46.7 25.8 60.3 15.5 109 80% and over 875 17.2 44.8 30.0 61.0 11.2

Teacher Experience (Avg=11.5 yrs)

215 Under 9.9 years 977 19.8 48.1 25.3 58.2 25.2 292 9.9 to under 11.9 years 1002 20.2 58.0 28.4 68.3 29.6 300 11.9 to under 13.6 years 984 20.0 50.7 30.6 64.3 26.0 282 13.6 years and over 968 19.7 42.1 39.7 65.1 21.9

Teacher Salary (Avg=$41,011)

233 Under $34,741 945 19.3 22.4 28.6 42.1 18.3 ______

District and Campus Supplement 191 Table 4 College Admissions Examination Participation and Performance Based on Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Standards, by District Characteristic, Texas Public Schools, Class of 2005 ______

_____Mean score______Graduates tested (%)_____ Examinees Combined Composite SAT, ACT, at or above Districts Category SAT ACT SAT ACT or both criterion (%) ______

287 $34,741 to under $36,754 984 20.1 33.5 41.3 60.6 23.0 287 $36,754 to under $39,005 981 19.5 38.6 38.7 61.3 22.1 282 $39,005 and over 993 20.2 58.8 27.0 67.6 28.7

Teachers: Nonwhite, % (Avg=30%)

448 Under 5% 1027 21.1 48.5 37.7 66.9 31.0 217 5% to under 10% 1042 20.9 53.3 34.8 68.4 34.0 163 10% to under 20% 1039 21.1 58.0 29.8 68.1 35.2 60 20% to under 30% 995 19.8 49.5 23.0 57.7 27.1 64 30% to under 50% 972 19.4 57.7 23.5 65.2 25.9 137 50% and over 880 17.5 49.5 27.6 63.6 11.7

Teachers with Adv Degrees, % (Avg=21.8%)

252 Under 10.2% 947 18.9 23.0 40.3 53.1 15.8 280 10.2% to under 15.8% 934 18.8 40.6 35.9 61.4 16.3 289 15.8% to under 21.3% 991 20.1 48.2 27.0 60.2 25.8 268 21.3% and over 1003 20.6 61.7 28.4 70.4 31.5

STATE TOTAL

1,096 991 20.0 53.0 29.8 65.5 27.4

______

192 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Texas Education Agency District Characteristic Descriptions, 2004-05

Cost of Education Index

The Cost of Education Index (CEI) reflects geographic variations in costs beyond the control of districts. The CEI has a minimum value of 0.0 and a maximum of 1.2. Most districts have CEI values of at least 1.0. Districts with CEI values of 0.0 are primarily charter school districts. Districts are grouped into five subcategories, each with approximately the same number of districts.

District Type

Districts are grouped into eight subcategories, ranging from major urban to rural, based on factors such as enrollment, growth in enrollment, economic status, and proximity to urban areas. Charter school districts make up a ninth subcategory. The subcategories are as follows.

Major Urban

A district is classified as major urban if: (a) it is located in a county with a population of at least 700,000; (b) its enrollment is the largest in the county or at least 75 percent of the largest district enrollment in the county; and (c) at least 35 percent of enrolled students are economically disadvantaged. A student is reported as economically disadvantaged if he or she is: • eligible for free or reduced-price meals under the National School Lunch and Child Nutrition Program; • from a family with annual income at or below the federal poverty line; • eligible for Temporary Assistance to Needy Families or other public assistance; • a recipient of a Pell Grant or comparable state program of need-based financial assistance; • eligible for programs assisted under Title II of the Job Training Partnership Act; or • eligible for benefits under the Food Stamp Act of 1977.

Major Suburban

A district is classified as major suburban if: (a) it does not meet the criteria for classification as major urban; (b) it is contiguous to a major urban district; and (c) its enrollment is at least 3 percent that of the contiguous major urban district or at least 4,500 students. A district also is classified as major suburban if: (a) it does not meet the criteria for classification as major urban; (b) it is not contiguous to a major urban district; (c) it is located in the same county as a major urban district; and (d) its enrollment is at least 15 percent that of the nearest major urban district in the county or at least 4,500 students.

District and Campus Supplement 193 Other Central City

A district is classified as other central city if: (a) it does not meet the criteria for classification in either of the previous subcategories; (b) it is not contiguous to a major urban district; (c) it is located in a county with a population of between 100,000 and 699,999; and (d) its enrollment is the largest in the county or at least 75 percent of the largest district enrollment in the county.

Other Central City Suburban

A district is classified as other central city suburban if: (a) it does not meet the criteria for classification in any of the previous subcategories; (b) it is located in a county with a population of between 100,000 and 699,999; and (c) its enrollment is at least 15 percent of the largest district enrollment in the county. A district also is other central city suburban if: (a) it does not meet the criteria for classification in any of the previous subcategories; (b) it is contiguous to an other central city district; (c) its enrollment is greater than 3 percent that of the contiguous other central city district; and (d) its enrollment exceeds the median district enrollment for the state of 701 students.

Independent Town

A district is classified as independent town if: (a) it does not meet the criteria for classification in any of the previous subcategories; (b) it is located in a county with a population of 25,000 to 99,999; and (c) its enrollment is the largest in the county or greater than 75 percent of the largest district enrollment in the county.

Non-Metropolitan: Fast Growing

A district is classified as non-metropolitan: fast growing if: (a) it does not meet the criteria for classification in any of the previous subcategories; (b) it has an enrollment of at least 300 students; and (c) its enrollment has increased by at least 20 percent over the past five years.

Non-Metropolitan: Stable

A district is classified as non-metropolitan: stable if: (a) it does not meet the criteria for classification in any of the previous subcategories; and (b) its enrollment exceeds the median district enrollment for the state.

Rural

A district is classified as rural if it does not meet the criteria for classification in any of the previous subcategories. A rural district has either: (a) an enrollment of between 300 and the median district enrollment for the state and an enrollment growth rate over the past five years of less than 20 percent; or (b) an enrollment of less than 300 students.

194 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Charter School Districts

Charter school districts are open-enrollment school districts chartered by the State Board of Education. Established by the Texas Legislature in 1995 to promote local initiative, charter school districts are subject to fewer regulations than other public school districts. Generally, charter school districts are subject to laws and rules that ensure fiscal and academic accountability but that do not unduly regulate instructional methods or pedagogical innovation. Like other public school districts, charter school districts are monitored and accredited under the statewide testing and accountability system.

Education Service Center Regions

The state is divided into 20 geographic regions, each served by an education service center (ESC). Although not usually the case, an ESC may serve districts outside its geographic boundaries. For this category, districts are grouped by the ESC regions that serve them, not by the ESC regions in which they are located geographically.

Enrollment

Districts are grouped into nine subcategories based on number of students enrolled. Enrollment counts are taken on a specified date in late October of each year.

Highest Property Value

Each district is placed into one of four subcategories of taxable property based on type of property with the highest value for the district. Special statutory school districts and charter school districts make up a fifth subcategory, labeled "non-taxing entities," because they do not have taxable property. The four subcategories of taxable property are: • residential: single-family and multi-family residential, and residential inventory; • land: vacant lots and taxable rural real property; • oil and gas: oil, gas, and minerals; and • business: commercial and industrial real property, commercial and industrial personal, and utilities.

Operating Cost Per Student

Operating costs are the sum of actual expenditures for a district’s operation. Note that the number shown is not the amount actually spent on each student, but rather a per-student average of the total. Per-student amounts are calculated as expenditures for the prior school year divided by the current number of students. Districts are grouped into five subcategories, each with approximately the same number of districts.

District and Campus Supplement 195 Property Wealth: Average, Equal Student Groups, and Median

Property wealth is used as an indicator of a district's ability to raise local funds on a per-student basis. It is calculated as total taxable property value for the last completed calendar year divided by total enrollment for the current school year. Taxable value is the traditional measure of value, not the alternative value used in state funding formulas. The "property wealth: average" category classifies districts as either under or over the state average for district property wealth. The "property wealth: equal student groups" category groups districts by property wealth into 20 subcategories, each accounting for approximately the same number of students. The "property wealth: median category" groups districts by property wealth into 10 subcategories, each with approximately the same number of districts. In each of the three categories, special statutory school districts and charter school districts make up a separate subcategory, labeled "non-taxing entities," because they do not have taxable property wealth.

SAT/ACT: At or Above Criterion, Percentage

Districts are grouped into five subcategories based on percentage of examinees in the prior year who scored at or above the criterion score on either the SAT or ACT. Districts that did not have test takers make up a sixth subcategory. Criterion on the SAT is a combined score of 1110, and criterion on the ACT is a composite score of 24.

SAT/ACT: Participation, Percentage

Districts are grouped into three subcategories based on percentage of non-special education graduates who took the SAT, ACT, or both in the prior year. Districts that did not have graduates make up a fourth subcategory.

Small/Sparse Adjustment

Districts are grouped into four subcategories, each with approximately the same number of districts, based on adjustments to state funding to compensate for small and/or sparsely populated districts. Districts receiving no small/sparse adjustment make up a fifth subcategory. Small/sparse adjustments are shown as percentages of total adjusted basic allotment amounts.

Student Change: 2003-04 – 2004-05

Districts are grouped into five subcategories based on change in enrollment from the prior school year to the current school year.

196 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Student Density

Districts are grouped into four subcategories based on number of students per square mile. Special statutory school districts and charter school districts make up a fifth subcategory, labeled "non-taxing entities," because they do not have mileage information.

Students: African American, Hispanic, and Non-White, Percentage

In each of these three categories, districts are grouped into six subcategories based on racial/ethnic composition of enrollment. The term "Non-White" is used to designate the following groups combined: African American, not of Hispanic origin; Asian or Pacific Islander; Hispanic; and Native American or Alaskan Native.

Students: Economically Disadvantaged, Percentage

Districts are grouped into six subcategories based on percentage of enrollment reported as economically disadvantaged. A student is reported as economically disadvantaged if he or she is: • eligible for free or reduced-price meals under the National School Lunch and Child Nutrition Program; • from a family with annual income at or below the federal poverty line; • eligible for Temporary Assistance to Needy Families or other public assistance; • a recipient of a Pell Grant or comparable state program of need-based financial assistance; • eligible for programs assisted under Title II of the Job Training Partnership Act; or • eligible for benefits under the Food Stamp Act of 1977.

TAKS: Passing All Tests Taken, Percentage

Districts are grouped into five subcategories based on percentage of Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) examinees in Grades 3-11 who passed all TAKS sections taken. Districts that did not administer TAKS make up a sixth subcategory. The percentages include only examinees who were enrolled in the same districts in October of the school year.

Tax: Local Adopted Rate

Districts are grouped into four subcategories, each with approximately the same number of districts, based on total locally-adopted tax rate. Special statutory school districts and charter school districts make up a fifth subcategory, labeled "non-taxing entities," because they do not levy property taxes. The total locally-adopted tax rate is made up of a maintenance and operation rate and a debt service rate (sometimes referred to as the Interest and Sinking fund rate). Rates are expressed per $100 of taxable value.

District and Campus Supplement 197 Tax: Local Maintenance & Operation Rate

Districts are grouped into four subcategories based on locally-adopted maintenance and operation (M&O) tax rate. Special statutory school districts and charter school districts make up a fifth subcategory, labeled "non-taxing entities," because they do not levy property taxes. The M&O rate includes money generated by districts for equalizing wealth.

Teacher Experience

Districts are grouped into four subcategories, each with approximately the same number of districts, based on average years of teacher experience. The average for a district is calculated by multiplying the full-time-equivalent (FTE) count for each teacher by years of experience. Results are summed, then divided by the FTE count for all teachers.

Teacher Salary

Districts are grouped into four subcategories, each with approximately the same number of districts, based on average teacher salary. The average for a district is calculated by dividing the salary for all teachers by the full-time-equivalent (FTE) count for all teachers. Salaries reflect pay for regular duties only; they do not include pay for supplemental duties.

Teachers: Non-White, Percentage

Districts are grouped into six subcategories based on percentage of non-White teachers. The term "Non-White" is used to designate the following groups combined: African American, not of Hispanic origin; Asian or Pacific Islander; Hispanic; and Native American or Alaskan Native. The percentage for a district is calculated by dividing the full-time-equivalent (FTE) count for non-White teachers by the FTE count for all teachers.

Teachers: With Advanced Degrees, Percentage

Districts are grouped into four subcategories, each with approximately the same number of districts, based on percentage of teachers with advanced degrees. The percentage for a district is calculated by dividing the full-time-equivalent (FTE) count for teachers with master’s or doctorate degrees by the FTE count for all teachers.

198 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 References

District and Campus Supplement 199 References

Texas Education Agency. (2006). College admissions testing of graduating seniors in Texas high schools, class of 2005 (GE07 601 01). Austin, TX: Author.

200 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 Texas Education Agency Publication Order Form Purchaser name ______Date ______Send to (name, if different)______Address ______City ______State ___ Zip ______

Tax exempt only Available Price per Price per Publication number and title in PDF* Quantity copy Quantity copy Cost GE07 601 01 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Yes ______$14.00 ______$13.00 ______Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005 GE07 601 02 College Admissions Testing of Graduating Yes ______$18.00 ______$17.00 ______Seniors in Texas High Schools, Class of 2005: District and Campus Supplement

Total ______Price includes postage, handling, and applicable state tax. Make check or money order payable to Texas Education Agency. For publication inquiries and purchase orders† send to: If you are mailing a check or money order, remit this form with payment to: Texas Education Agency Texas Education Agency Publications Distribution Publications Distribution 1701 North Congress Avenue P.O. Box 13817 Austin, Texas 78701-1494 Austin, Texas 78711-3817 †Purchase orders are accepted only from Texas educational institutions and government agencies.

*Copies of this report and other reports produced by the Division of Accountability Research can be downloaded and printed at no cost from the division website at http://www.tea.state.tx.us/research/.

Compliance Statement

Title VI, Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Modified Court Order, Civil Action 5281, Federal District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division. Reviews of local education agencies pertaining to compliance with Title VI Civil Rights Act of 1964 and with specific requirements of the Modified Court Order, Civil Action No. 5281, Federal District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division are conducted periodically by staff representatives of the Texas Education Agency. These reviews cover at least the following policies and practices: 1. acceptance policies on student transfers from other school districts; 2. operation of school bus routes or runs on a nonsegregated basis; 3. nondiscrimination in extracurricular activities and the use of school facilities; 4. nondiscriminatory practices in the hiring, assigning, promoting, paying, demoting, reassigning, or dismissing of faculty and staff members who work with children; 5. enrollment and assignment of students without discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin; 6. nondiscriminatory practices relating to the use of a student’s first language; and 7. evidence of published procedures for hearing complaints and grievances. In addition to conducting reviews, the Texas Education Agency staff representatives check complaints of discrimination made by a citizen or citizens residing in a school district where it is alleged discriminatory practices have occurred or are occurring. Where a violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act is found, the findings are reported to the Office for Civil Rights, U.S. Department of Education. If there is a direct violation of the Court Order in Civil Action No. 5281 that cannot be cleared through negotiation, the sanctions required by the Court Order are applied. Title VII, Civil Rights Act of 1964 as Amended by the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972; Executive Orders 11246 and 11375; Equal Pay Act of 1964; Title IX, Education Amendments; Rehabilitation Act of 1973 as Amended; 1974 Amendments to the Wage-Hour Law Expanding the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967; Vietnam Era Veterans Readjustment Assistance Act of 1972 as Amended; Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986; Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990; and the Civil Rights Act of 1991. The Texas Education Agency shall comply fully with the nondiscrimination provisions of all federal and state laws, rules, and regulations by assuring that no person shall be excluded from consideration for recruitment, selection, appointment, training, promotion, retention, or any other personnel action, or be denied any benefits or participation in any educational programs or activities which it operates on the grounds of race, religion, color, national origin, sex, disability, age, or veteran status (except where age, sex, or disability constitutes a bona fide occupational qualification necessary to proper and efficient administration). The Texas Education Agency is an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action employer.

Texas Education Agency 1701 North Congress Avenue Austin, Texas 78701-1494 Document No. GE07 601 02 October 2006