DOCSLIB.ORG

Comments by Quod on Behalf of the Brent Cross Cricklewood Development Partners – March 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Comments by Quod on Behalf of the Brent Cross Cricklewood Development Partners – March 2018 NOTE DRAFT LONDON PLAN (DECEMBER 2017) COMMENTS BY QUOD ON BEHALF OF THE BRENT CROSS CRICKLEWOOD DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS – MARCH 2018 1 Introduction and Background 1.1 These representations are made on behalf of our client, the Brent Cross Cricklewood (“BXC”) Development Partners (“DPs”). The BXC DPs are a joint venture between two of the UK’s most successful development and property investment companies – Hammerson UK Properties Plc and Aberdeen Standard Investments Ltd. 1.2 Planning Permission (Ref No C/17559/08) for the comprehensive redevelopment of the BXC Regeneration Area was granted in October 2010, and following this, a Section 73 permission (Ref No F/04687/13) was granted by the Council in July 2014. 1.3 The BXC regeneration scheme will realise the Mayor’s long-term aspirations for this key strategic Opportunity Area. The development will bring some 27,000 jobs, 7,500 new homes, a new town centre, a new commercial district and a new high street together with parkland and open space. The plans will also deliver substantial investment into transport and community facilities, including new schools, health facilities, public transport interchanges, bridges and road junctions. 1.4 Since the 2014 Permission was secured, significant progress has been made toward the delivery of the BXC Development. In respect of the development north of the A406 and associated infrastructure, the DPs have obtained approval for the detailed design for both Phase 1A (North) and Phase 1B (North) and are preparing for the discharge of pre-commencement conditions. In addition, in December 2017, the Secretary of State approved the Compulsory Purchase Orders (“CPO”s) for parts of both the northern and the southern areas of the development. 1.5 The DPs have been working with the London Borough of Barnet and the Greater London Authority to deliver a scheme which will provide the Borough with the regeneration that it urgently requires. As recognised in Barnet’s local policy, seeking the regeneration of BXC is critical not only to the future success of the local area but also to North London. It is therefore important that emerging policy does not fetter the ability to deliver the comprehensive redevelopment of BXC and constrain the wider economic benefit to the local area and beyond. 1.6 Our client’s representations to the Draft London Plan are made in this context and are set out below on a chapter by chapter basis. 2 Chapter 1 – Planning London’s Future (Good Growth Policies) Policy GG2: Making the best use of land 2.1 Chapter 1 is concerned with planning for good growth to improve the health and quality of life of all Londoners, and Policy GG2 is focussed on making the optimum use of land. In order to create high-density, mixed-use places that make the best use of land, the policy states that those involved in planning and development must (amongst other things) prioritise the development of Opportunity Areas (“OA”s), town centres, and sites which are well connected. In addition, they must proactively explore the potential to 1 Quod | Draft London Plan | BXC | March 2018 intensify the use of land to support additional homes and workspace and promote high density development, applying a design-led approach. 2.2 The DPs support the approach identified within Policy GG2 to making the best use of land. It is considered that directing high density development, as well as exploring the intensification of land uses, within well connected OAs and town centres is a welcome response to ensuring growth within London occurs in an appropriate manner. 3 Chapter 2 - Spatial Development Patterns Policy SD1: Opportunity Areas 3.1 Chapter 2 sets out the strategic framework for those parts of London that will see significant development over the lifetime of the Plan. The areas that will see the most significant change are identified as OAs and Policy SD1 sets out specific guidance for these areas. Part A seeks to ensure that OAs fully realise their growth and regeneration potential and Part B(4) recognises that larger OAs can define their own character and density. The DPs are supportive of both of these principles. 3.2 Indicative guideline figures are set out for housing and employment capacity in each of the OAs, and at Figure 2.8 Brent Cross/Cricklewood is identified as having potential for 9,500 new homes and 26,000 new jobs. The DPs welcome the continued commitment to allocating Brent Cross/Cricklewood as an OA, as well as these increased quantums for housing and employment capacity which recognise the need to optimise development in these areas. 3.3 The DPs however question why the strategic policy directions for OAs, previously contained in Annex 1 of the adopted London Plan, has not been carried through into the draft London Plan. The strategic policy direction provided clarity on the broad principles of each OA which assisted the effective implementation of the policy aspirations to maximise development potential and informed the preparation of OA Planning Frameworks. 3.4 The omission of the strategic policy direction means that there is less clarity on the intent of each OA, resulting in a less effective policy framework to facilitate sustainable growth. Policy SD7 – Town Centre Network 3.5 Policy SD7 is concerned with the town centre network and Table 1.1 sets out future potential changes to the town centre network. As with the earlier versions of the London Plan, Brent Cross is identified as a centre which has the potential to be re-classified as a Metropolitan Centre in the future. Paragraph 2.7.4 notes that “These centres are not recommended for immediate reclassification, however it is recognised that they may be appropriate for future reclassification, subject to strategic and Local Plan policies and conditional on matters such as capacity analysis, impact assessments, land use, public transport, walking and cycling, planning approvals and full implementation.” 3.6 The DPs support the recognition that Brent Cross should be given Metropolitan status. However, the context to the regeneration of BXC has changed since the previous London Plan was produced, to the point where development will commence imminently and as a result, Brent Cross should be re-classified as a Metropolitan town centre as part of the revised London Plan. 3.7 The BXC regeneration scheme has made significant progress with the planning permission now implemented and detailed design approved for Phase 1(A) North, which contains all key infrastructure including expansive highway and junction improvements. Detailed design for Phase 1B (North) has also 2 Quod | Draft London Plan | BXC | March 2018 been secured, which includes the transformation of Brent Cross Shopping Centre from an inward facing shopping centre to an outward facing network of streets and spaces, as well as a new high street which links to a pedestrian and cycle bridge over the A406, a new bus station and extensive public realm works. Pre-commencement conditions are now being prepared for discharge and early works are progressing on site ahead of main works beginning in Q1 2019. Argent Related, who are delivering the elements of the scheme south of the A406, has secured consent for the detailed design of Phase 1A (South) and Phase 1B (South), delivering over 300 residential homes. 3.8 Construction of the project will be well advanced by the time the London Plan has progressed through Examination in Public and has been adopted. In light of this, and alongside the continued recognition of the importance of the regeneration scheme within both strategic and local plan policy, Brent Cross in its regenerated form should be identified as a Metropolitan town centre. This re-classification will enable Barnet’s Local Plan to respond accordingly and develop a policy framework that will give the scheme the support it needs to fully realise its growth potential. 3.9 Table A1.1 provides further detail in respect of the roles of each town centre and Brent Cross is identified as an area with high commercial and residential growth potential and a centre which has the capacity, demand and viability to accommodate new and/or speculative office development. Brent Cross is also classified as a strategic area for regeneration. The DPs welcome the ongoing recognition of the town centre’s growth potential in respect of the identified development sectors which will assist enable its regeneration to come forward. 3.10 Notwithstanding this, we question why Brent Cross has not been allocated a night-time economy classification. The approved development scheme which will be coming forward imminently will comprise a mix of evening activities, including cultural, leisure, entertainment, food and drink, and shopping facilities. It is therefore considered that this should be recognised within the London Plan and a classification be applied accordingly to support the contribution that the development will have on the night-time economy within London. 3.11 It is noted that Figures A1.1 to A1.5 which support Table A1.1 are a useful addition but are difficult to navigate and should include labels so that specific centres can be easily recognised. Policy SD8 – Town centres: development principles and Development Plan Documents 3.12 Part A(1) of Policy SD8 considers that Development Plans and proposals should take a town centres first approach by: adopting a sequential approach to accommodating town centre uses such that new development of these uses is focused on sites within town centres or (if no sites are available, suitable or viable) on sites on the edges of centres that are, or can be, well integrated with the existing centre. 3.13 Part A(2) of the policy goes on to state this approach should be followed by: “firmly resisting out-of-centre development of town centre uses in line with the sequential approach in A(1) above, with limited exceptions for existing viable office locations in outer London (see Policy E1 Offices)” 3.14 Paragraph 24 of the NPPF deals with the location of town centre uses and states local planning authorities should require applications for main town centre uses to: “be located in town centres, then in edge of centre locations and only if suitable sites are not available should out of centre sites be considered.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • London Borough of Croydon/Matter 51
    London borough of Croydon/Matter 51 Matter 51: Delivering Social Infrastructure 1. This matter statement on delivering social infrastructure should be read in the context of the overall response by the London Borough of Croydon (ref 5622), in which the Council said that there is much to be welcomed and supported in the Draft London Plan. The Mayor’s Good Growth vision echoes Croydon Council’s own vision set out in the recently adopted Croydon Local Plan (February) 2018 (CLP18). The Council continues to work with the Mayor to enable and deliver his, and our own, vision for growth in the borough. All arguments and concerns regarding the Draft London Plan’s policies hinge from the Council’s original representation. 2. It should be noted that the Council are mainly commenting on the Draft London Plan as it relates to the specific delivery of housing and infrastructure, particularly in Croydon, outer London and the suburbs. Question; Delivering Social Infrastructure M51. Would Policy S1 provide an effective and justified approach to the development of London’s social infrastructure? In particular would it be effective in meeting the objectives of policies GG1 and GG3 in creating a healthy city and building strong and inclusive communities? In particular: a) Would Policy S1, in requiring a needs assessment of social infrastructure and encouraging cross borough collaboration provide an effective and justified strategic framework for the preparation of local plans and neighbourhood plans in relation to the development of social infrastructure?
    [Show full text]
  • Chipping Barnet Constituency Insight and Evidence Review
    Chipping Barnet Constituency Insight and Evidence Review 1 Contents 1 Introduction....................................................................................................................................3 2 Overview of Findings ......................................................................................................................3 2.1 Challenges of an ageing & isolated population ......................................................................3 2.2 Pockets of relative deprivation...............................................................................................4 2.3 Obesity and Participation in Sport..........................................................................................4 3 Recommended Areas of Focus .......................................................................................................5 4 Summary of Key Facts.....................................................................................................................6 4.1 Population ..............................................................................................................................6 4.2 Employment ...........................................................................................................................6 4.3 Deprivation .............................................................................................................................6 4.4 Health .....................................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Delegated Powers Report No
    DELEGATED POWERS REPORT NO. 1897 SUBJECT: Control sheet All of the following actions MUST be completed at each stage of the process and the signed and dated report MUST be passed to Democratic Service for publishing All reports 1. Democratic Services receive draft report Name of DSO Nick Musgrove Date 29.9.2010 2. Democratic Services cleared draft report as Name of DSO Nick Musgrove being constitutionally appropriate Date 30.9.2010 3. Finance clearance obtained (report author to Name of Fin. officer Alex Altman complete) Date 30.9.2010 4. Staff and other resources issues clearance Name of Res. officer N/A obtained (report author to complete) Date 5. Trade Union response received (Staffing Name of TU rep. N/A issues only) Date 6. Legal clearance obtained from (report author to Name of Legal officer Chileme Hayes complete) Date 30.9.2010 7. Policy & Partnerships clearance obtained Name of P&P officer Andrew Nathan (report author to complete) Date 30.9.2010 8. Equalities & Diversity clearance obtained Name of officer Andrew Nathan (report author to complete) Date 30.9.2010 9. The above process has been checked and Name Stewart Murray verified by Director, Head of Service or Deputy (report author to complete) Date 5.10.2010 10. Signed & dated report, scanned or hard copy Name of DSO Nick Musgrove received by Democratic Services for publishing Date 05.10.2010 11. Report published by Dem Services to website Name of DSO Paul Frost Date 08.1.2013 Officer reports: 12. Head of Service informed report is published Name of DSO Paul Frost and can be implemented.
    [Show full text]
  • Hendon Constituency Insight and Evidence Review
    Hendon Constituency Insight and Evidence Review 1 Contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 3 2 Overview of Findings ....................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Deprivation and Employment ................................................................................................. 3 2.2 Increasing Diversity & Community Cohesion .......................................................................... 4 2.3 Health and Participation in Sport ............................................................................................ 4 3 Recommended areas of focus ...................................................................................................... 5 • Deprivation and Employment ......................................................................................................... 5 • Increasing Diversity & Community Cohesion .................................................................................. 5 • Health and Participation in Sport .................................................................................................... 5 4 Summary of Key Facts ..................................................................................................................... 6 4.1 Population ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Burnt Oak, Colindale and the Hyde Placemaking Plan
    Burnt Oak, Colindale and The Hyde Placemaking Plan January 2014 INTRODUCTION This document has been prepared by 5th Studio, with ABA, GVA and Northcroft, on behalf of the London Borough of Brent and with input from a number of stakeholders including officers from Brent, Barnet, Harrow, Transport for London and the local community. Prepared by: Prepared for: Nathan Jones Key contact: Director E: [email protected] Joyce Ip T: 020 7837 7221 Planning and Regeneration E: [email protected] T: 020 8937 2274 In close consultation with LB Barnet: This plan has been prepared with reference to the context across the borough boundary in LB Barnet - in particular the growth agenda - and has involved detailed input from and consultation with Barnet officers. 2 Burnt Oak, Colindale and The Hyde Placemaking Plan - January 2014 CONTENTS 0. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY p02 1. VISION 1.1 Background p06 1.2 Vision p08 2. STRATEGY 2.1 Public Realm p12 2.2 Transport and access p14 3. PROPOSALS A. The A5 p20 B. Burnt Oak p34 C. Capital Valley p38 D. The Hyde p44 E. Edge Projects p48 4. DELIVERY p52 In addition to this summary report there are two appendices - as separate volumes - that provide a summary of the public engagement events and baseline snap-shot. This document is intended to be read in conjunction with the detailed general guidance provided in the Brent Placemaking Guide which is downloadable from www.brent.gov.uk Burnt Oak, Colindale and The Hyde Placemaking Plan - January 2014 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION POLICY CONTEXT This document sets out a placemaking strategy for an area The study has been developed to build upon and respond to of North West London focussed on the A5 corridor - a busy a number of key policy documents, notably: London street which follows the course of Watling Street, the ancient Roman Road.
    [Show full text]
  • London Borough of Barnet Election Results 1964-2010
    London Borough of Barnet Election Results 1964-2010 Colin Rallings and Michael Thrasher The Elections Centre Plymouth University The information contained in this report has been obtained from a number of sources. Election results from the immediate post-reorganisation period were painstakingly collected by Alan Willis largely, although not exclusively, from local newspaper reports. From the mid- 1980s onwards the results have been obtained from each local authority by the Elections Centre. The data are stored in a database designed by Lawrence Ware and maintained by Brian Cheal and others at Plymouth University. Despite our best efforts some information remains elusive whilst we accept that some errors are likely to remain. Notice of any mistakes should be sent to [email protected]. The results sequence can be kept up to date by purchasing copies of the annual Local Elections Handbook, details of which can be obtained by contacting the email address above. Front cover: the graph shows the distribution of percentage vote shares over the period covered by the results. The lines reflect the colours traditionally used by the three main parties. The grey line is the share obtained by Independent candidates while the purple line groups together the vote shares for all other parties. Rear cover: the top graph shows the percentage share of council seats for the main parties as well as those won by Independents and other parties. The lines take account of any by- election changes (but not those resulting from elected councillors switching party allegiance) as well as the transfers of seats during the main round of local election.
    [Show full text]
  • Shelter's Response to the Mayor of London's – the London Plan: Consultation on Draft Replacement Plan
    Shelter’s response to the Mayor of London’s – The London Plan: Consultation on draft replacement plan From the Shelter policy library January 2010 www.shelter.org.uk © 2010 Shelter. All rights reserved. This document is only for your personal, non-commercial use. You may not copy, reproduce, republish, post, distribute, transmit or modify it in any way. This document contains information and policies that were correct at the time of publication. Shelter’s response to the Mayor of London’s – The London Plan: Consultation on draft replacement plan Shelter is a national campaigning charity that provides practical advice, support and innovative services to over 170,000 homeless or badly housed people a year. This work gives us direct experience of the various problems caused by the shortage of affordable housing across all tenures. Our services include: A national network of over 20 advice centres Shelter's free advice helpline which runs from 8am-8pm Shelter’s website which provides advice online The Government-funded National Homelessness Advice Service, which provides specialist housing advice, training, consultancy, referral and information to other voluntary agencies, such as Citizens Advice Bureaux and members of Advice UK, which are approached by people seeking housing advice A number of specialist projects promoting innovative solutions to particular homelessness and housing problems. These include housing support services, which work with formerly homeless families, and the Shelter Inclusion Project, which works with families, couples and single people who are alleged to have been involved in anti- social behaviour. The aim of these services is to sustain tenancies and ensure people live successfully in the community.
    [Show full text]
  • Brent Valley & Barnet Plateau Area Framework All London Green Grid
    All Brent Valley & Barnet Plateau London Area Framework Green Grid 11 DRAFT Contents 1 Foreword and Introduction 2 All London Green Grid Vision and Methodology 3 ALGG Framework Plan 4 ALGG Area Frameworks 5 ALGG Governance 6 Area Strategy 9 Area Description 10 Strategic Context 11 Vision 14 Objectives 16 Opportunities 20 Project Identification 22 Clusters 24 Projects Map 28 Rolling Projects List 34 Phase One Early Delivery 36 Project Details 48 Forward Strategy 50 Gap Analysis 51 Recommendations 52 Appendices 54 Baseline Description 56 ALGG SPG Chapter 5 GGA11 Links 58 Group Membership Note: This area framework should be read in tandem with All London Green Grid SPG Chapter 5 for GGA11 which contains statements in respect of Area Description, Strategic Corridors, Links and Opportunities. The ALGG SPG document is guidance that is supplementary to London Plan policies. While it does not have the same formal development plan status as these policies, it has been formally adopted by the Mayor as supplementary guidance under his powers under the Greater London Authority Act 1999 (as amended). Adoption followed a period of public consultation, and a summary of the comments received and the responses of the Mayor to those comments is available on the Greater London Authority website. It will therefore be a material consideration in drawing up development plan documents and in taking planning decisions. The All London Green Grid SPG was developed in parallel with the area frameworks it can be found at the following link: http://www.london.gov.uk/publication/all-london- green-grid-spg . Cover Image: View across Silver Jubilee Park to the Brent Reservoir Foreword 1 Introduction – All London Green Grid Vision and Methodology Introduction Area Frameworks Partnership - Working The various and unique landscapes of London are Area Frameworks help to support the delivery of Strong and open working relationships with many recognised as an asset that can reinforce character, the All London Green Grid objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Brent Cross Cricklewood in the London Borough of Barnet
    planning report PDU/1483/02 12 March 2010 Brent Cross Cricklewood in the London Borough of Barnet planning application no. C/17559/08 Strategic planning application stage II referral (old powers) Town & Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended); Greater London Authority Acts 1999 and 2007; Town & Country Planning (Mayor of London) Order 2000 The proposal Outline application for comprehensive mixed use redevelopment of the Brent Cross Cricklewood regeneration area comprising residential, town centre uses including retail, leisure, hotel and conference facilities, offices, industrial and other business uses, rail-based freight facilities, waste handling facility, petrol filling station, community, health and education facilities, private hospital, open space and public realm, landscaping and recreation facilities, new rail and bus stations, vehicular and pedestrian bridges, underground and multi-storey car parking, works to the River Brent and Clitterhouse Stream and associated infrastructure, demolition and alterations of existing building structures, electricity generation stations, relocated electricity substation, free standing or building mounted wind turbines, alterations to existing railway infrastructure including Cricklewood railway track and station and Brent Cross London Underground station, creation of new strategic accesses and internal road layout, at grade or underground conveyor from waste handling facility to combined heat and power plant, infrastructure and associated facilities together with any required temporary works or structures and associated utilities/services required by the development. The applicant The applicants are Hammerson, Standard Life Investments and Brookfield Europe (“the Brent Cross Development Partners”), and the architect is Allies & Morrison Architects. Strategic issues Outstanding issues relating to retail, affordable housing, urban design and inclusive access, transport, waste, energy, noise, phasing and infrastructure triggers have been addressed.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Quality in Barnet a Guide for Public Health
    AIR QUALITY IN BARNET A GUIDE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH PROFESSIONALS Air Quality Information for Public Health Professionals – London Borough of Barnet COPYRIGHT Greater London Authority September 2013 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4531 Air Quality Information for Public Health Professionals – London Borough of Barnet CONTENTS Description Page How to use this document 1 1 Introduction 2 2 Air Pollution 3 2.1 External air pollution 3 2.2 Internal air pollution 6 3 Air Quality in LB Barnet 8 4 Air quality impacts on health 12 4.1 Premature deaths 12 4.2 Vulnerable groups 13 4.3 Air pollution and deprivation 14 4.4 The Public Health Outcomes Framework 15 5 Health impacts in LB Barnet 17 6 Co-benefits of improving air quality in London 20 6.1 Maximising the health benefits from improving air quality 20 6.2 Cost of the impact of Air Pollution 21 7 Policy and legal framework for improving air quality 23 7.1 EU Directive 23 7.2 UK air quality policy 23 7.3 Regional strategies 24 7.4 Local Authority responsibilities 26 8 Taking action 27 8.1 Actions taken by the Mayor 27 8.2 Borough level action 28 8.3 Individual action 30 9 Next steps 32 10 References 33 11 Glossary 35 12 Appendices 40 Appendix 1 – Annual mean concentration of pollutants 40 Appendix 2 – National air quality objectives 41 Appendix 3 – Actions for Londoners to mitigate and adapt to air pollution 43 Air Quality Information for Public Health Professionals – London Borough of Barnet HOW TO USE THIS DOCUMENT Air quality is an important Public Health issue in London, it contributes to shortening the life expectancy of all Londoners, disproportionately impacting on the most vulnerable.
    [Show full text]
  • North London Development Opportunity
    North London Development Opportunity St John’s Church Hall, Friern Barnet Lane, Whetstone, London N20 0LP For sale freehold For indicative purposes only. Image date October 2015. ■ Development opportunity in the London Borough of Barnet approximately 600 metres from Totteridge & Whetstone London Underground Station. ■ The Property comprises a single storey Church Hall (Use Class D1), which extends to approximately 177 sq m (1,905 sq ft), and associated car parking. ■ Site extending to approximately 0.11 hectares (0.28 acres). ■ Potential for redevelopment for other uses, including residential, subject to the necessary consents. ■ For sale freehold. savills.co.uk Location The site is located in Whetstone, in the London Borough of Barnet. Whetstone is an affluent suburb, approximately 10km (6 miles) to the north of Central London. The property fronts Friern Barnet Lane, approximately 25 metres from the junction with High Road Finchley (A1000). To the immediate north west is a former police station that is currently being redeveloped into a school. There are residential properties to the east and north of the property. A wide range of local retailers are based along High Road (A1000) nearby with further extensive amenities south towards Tally Ho corner. There are numerous green open spaces in the area, including Friary Park and Bethune Park along with North Middlesex Golf Club 200 metres to the south and South Herts Golf Club 1.3km (0.8 miles) to the north west. Totteridge & Whetstone London Underground Station is approximately 600 metres to the north west and provides access to the Northern Line and direct services to the City of London (Bank 34 minutes) and the West End (Leicester Square 29 minutes).
    [Show full text]
  • Mercedes-Benz and Smart Colindale, Brent
    MERCEDES-BENZ AND SMART COLINDALE, BRENT Feasibility Study November 2019 MERCEDES-BENZ AND SMART COLINDALE, BRENT Site and context 1 LOCATION PLAN N EDGWARE ROAD CARLISLE ROAD CAPITOL WAY STAG LANE Existing site location plan - Mercedes-Benz and Smart Colindale, 403 Edgware Road, London Borough of Brent (LBB) Mercedes-Benz and Smart site boundary: 1.47ha / 3.64ac LBB proposed site allocation area (BNSA1: Capitol Way Valley) 2 MERCEDES-BENZ AND SMART COLINDALE, BRENT Title Site and context Title pageheader Aerial Photograph Fig ?.?: Caption title ?????? MERCEDES-BENZ AND SMART COLINDALE, BRENT Site and context THE EXISTING SITE 2 TNQ 19-storey tower TNQ behind the site Edgware Road 1 Mercedes-Benz frontage onto Edgware Road basement access access from Edgware Raoad Aerial photograph from the north east* Edgware Road 1 2 3 rear of Mercedes-Benz and Smart site 2 Carlisle Road N 3 Plan showing location of street views Street views of the existing site and context* *images from Google Earth 4 MERCEDES-BENZ AND SMART COLINDALE, BRENT Site and context RECENT MIXED USE DEVELOPMENTS 3 Burnt Oak Broadway - complete (app. no. 05-0380) Mixed use development - retail floorspace + 73 residential units (266dph) 5-6 storeys Residential parking ratio: 0.9 spaces / unit 3 Burnt Oak Broadway London Borough London Borough of Brent of Barnet EDGWARE ROAD Green Point - complete (Barnet - app. no. H-03389-13) Green Point Mixed use development - A1 retail / B1 floorspace + 86 residential units (218 dph) 8 storeys CARLISLE ROAD Residential parking ratio: 1.4 spaces / unit The Northern Quarter (TNQ) - complete/tower under construction (app.
    [Show full text]