Inner Product Spaces §6.2 Inner Product Spaces

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Inner Product Spaces §6.2 Inner Product Spaces Preview Inner Product Spaces Examples Inner Product Spaces x6.2 Inner product spaces Satya Mandal, KU Summer 2017 Satya Mandal, KU Inner Product Spaces x6.2 Inner product spaces Preview Inner Product Spaces Examples Goals 2 n I Concept of length, distance, and angle in R or R is extended to abstract vector spaces V . Such a vector space will be called an Inner Product Space. I An Inner Product Space V comes with an inner product that is like dot product in Rn. n I The Euclidean space R is only one example of such Inner Product Spaces. Satya Mandal, KU Inner Product Spaces x6.2 Inner product spaces Preview Inner Product Spaces Examples Inner Product Definition Suppose V is a vector space. I An inner product on V is a function h∗; ∗i : V × V ! R that associates to each ordered pair (u; v) of vectors a real number hu; vi, such that for all u; v; w in V and scalar c; we have 1. hu; vi = hv; ui: 2. hu; v + wi = hu; vi + hu; wi: 3. chu; vi = hcu; vi: 4. hv; vi ≥ 0 and v = 0 () hv; vi = 0: I The vector space V with such an inner product is called an inner product space. Satya Mandal, KU Inner Product Spaces x6.2 Inner product spaces Preview Inner Product Spaces Examples Theorem 6.2.1: Properties Let V be an inner product space. Let u; v 2 V be two vectors and c be a scalar, Then, 1. h0; vi = 0 2. hu + v; wi = hu; wi + hv; wi 3. hu; cvi = chu; vi Proof. We would have to use the properties in the definition. 1. Use (3): h0; vi = h00; vi = 0h0; vi = 0. 2. Use commutativity (1) and (2): hu+v; wi = hw; u+vi = hw; ui+hw; vi = hu; wi+hv; wi 3. Use (1) and (3): hu; cvi = hcv; ui = chv; ui = chu; vi The proofs are complete. Satya Mandal, KU Inner Product Spaces x6.2 Inner product spaces Preview Inner Product Spaces Examples Definitions Definitions Let V be an inner product space and u; v 2 V . 1. The length or norm of v is defined as kvk = phv; vi: 2. The distance between u; v 2 V is defined as d(u; v) = ku − vk 3. The angle θ vectors u; v 2 V is defined by the formula: hu; vi cos θ = 0 ≤ θ ≤ π: kuk kvk A version of Cauchy-Swartz inequality, to be given later, would assert that right side is between -1 and 1. Satya Mandal, KU Inner Product Spaces x6.2 Inner product spaces Preview Inner Product Spaces Examples Theorem(s) 6.2.2 Let V be an inner product space and u; v 2 V . Then, 1. Cauchy-Schwartz Inequality: jhu; vij ≤ kuk kvk : 2. Triangle Inequality: ku + vk ≤ kuk + kvk : 3. (Definition) We say that u; v are (mutually) orthogonal or perpendicular, if hu; vi = 0: We write u ? v: 4. Pythagorean Theorem. If u; v are orthogonal, then ku + vk2 = kuk2 + kvk2 : Proof. Exactly similar to the corresponding theorems in x6.1 for Rn: Satya Mandal, KU Inner Product Spaces x6.2 Inner product spaces Preview Inner Product Spaces Examples Orthogonal Projection Definition. Let V be an inner product space. Suppose v 2 V is a non-zero vector. Then, for u 2 V define Orthogonal Projection of u on to v: proj (u) = hv;ui v v kvk2 • ? u projv(u)−u • / ••/ projvu v Satya Mandal, KU Inner Product Spaces x6.2 Inner product spaces Preview Inner Product Spaces Examples Theorem 6.2.3 Let V be an inner product space. Suppose v 2 V is a non-zero vector. Then, (u − projv(u)) ? projv(u): Proof. hv; ui hv; ui hu − projv(u); projv(u)i = u − v ; v kvk2 kvk2 hv; ui hv; ui hv; ui = u; v − v ; v kvk2 kvk2 kvk2 hv; ui2 hv; ui2 = − hv; vi = 0 kvk2 kvk4 The proof is complete. Satya Mandal, KU Inner Product Spaces x6.2 Inner product spaces Preview Inner Product Spaces Examples Examples 6.2.1 I Remark. If v = (1; 0) (or on x−axis) and u = (x; y), then projvu = (x; 0): I (1) The Obvious Example: With dot product as the inner product, the Euclidean n−space Rn is an inner product space. Satya Mandal, KU Inner Product Spaces x6.2 Inner product spaces Preview Inner Product Spaces Examples Examples 6.2.2: Integration Integration is a great way to define inner product. Let V = C[a; b] be the vector space of all continuous functions f :[a; b] ! R: For f ; g 2 C[a; b]; define inner product Z b hf ; gi = f (x)g(x)dx: a It is easy to check that hf ; gi satisfies the properties of inner product spaces. Namely, 1. hf ; gi = hg; f i; for all f ; g 2 C[a; b]: 2. hf ; g + hi = hf ; gi + hf ; hi; for all f ; g; h 2 C[a; b]: 3. chf ; gi = hcf ; gi; for all f ; g 2 C[a; b] and c 2 R: 4. hf ; f i ≥ 0 for all f 2 C[a; b] and f = 0 , hf ; f i = 0: Satya Mandal, KU Inner Product Spaces x6.2 Inner product spaces Preview Inner Product Spaces Examples Continued Accordingly, for f 2 C[a; b]; we can define length (or norm) s Z b kf k = phf ; f i = f (x)2dx: a This 'length' of continuous functions would have all the properties that you expect "length" or "magnitude" to have. Satya Mandal, KU Inner Product Spaces x6.2 Inner product spaces Preview Inner Product Spaces Examples Examples 6.2.2A: Double Integration Let D ⊆ R2 be any connected region. Let V = C(D) be the vector space of all bounded continuous functions f (x; y): D ! R: For f ; g 2 V define inner product ZZ hf ; gi = f (x; y)g(x; y)dxdy: D As in Example 6.2.2, it is easy to check that hf ; gi satisfies the properties of inner product spaces. In this case, length or norm of f 2 V is given by sZZ kf k = phf ; f i = f (x; y)2dxdy: D Satya Mandal, KU Inner Product Spaces x6.2 Inner product spaces Preview Inner Product Spaces Examples Continued In particular: I Example a: If D = [a; b] × [c; d], then Z d Z b hf ; gi = f (x; y)g(x; y)dxdy: c a I Example b: If D is the unit disc: D = f(x; y): x 2 + y 2 ≤ 1g, then for f ; g 2 C(D) is: ZZ hf ; gi = f (x; y)g(x; y)dxdy: D p Z 1 Z 1−y 2 = p f (x; y)g(x; y)dxdy −1 − 1−y 2 Satya Mandal, KU Inner Product Spaces x6.2 Inner product spaces Preview By Integration Inner Product Spaces Orthogonal Projections Examples Example 6.2.3 In R2; define an inner product (as above): for u = (u1; u2); v = (v1; v2) define hu; vi = 2(u1v1 + u2v2). It is easy to check that this is an Inner Product on R2 (we skip the proof.) Let u = (1; 3); v = (2; −2). I (1) Compute hu; vi: Solution: hu; vi = 2(u1v1 + u2v2) = 2(2 − 6) = −8 I (2) Compute kuk : Solution: p p p p kuk = hu; ui = 2(u1u1 + u2u2) = 2(1 + 9) = 20: Satya Mandal, KU Inner Product Spaces x6.2 Inner product spaces Preview By Integration Inner Product Spaces Orthogonal Projections Examples Continued I (3) Compute kvk : Solution: kvk = phv; vi = p2(4 + 4) = 4 I (4) Compute d(u; v): Solution: d(u; v) = ku − vk = k(−1; 5)k p = p2(1 + 25) = 52: Satya Mandal, KU Inner Product Spaces x6.2 Inner product spaces Preview By Integration Inner Product Spaces Orthogonal Projections Examples Example 6.2.4 Let V = C[0; 1] with inner product Z 1 hf ; gi = f (x)g(x)dx for f ; g; 2 V : 0 Let f (x) = 2x and g(x) = x 2 + x + 1: I (1) Compute hf ; gi: Solution: We have Z 1 Z 1 hf ; gi = f (x)g(x)dx = 2 x 3 + x 2 + x dx 0 0 x 4 x 3 x 2 1 1 1 1 13 = 2 + + = 2 + + − 0 = 4 3 2 x=0 4 3 2 6 Satya Mandal, KU Inner Product Spaces x6.2 Inner product spaces Preview By Integration Inner Product Spaces Orthogonal Projections Examples Continued I (2) Compute norm kf k : Solution: We have s s Z 1 Z 1 kf k = phf ; f i = f (x)2dx = 4x 2dx 0 0 s x 3 1 r4 r1 = 4 = − 0 = 2 3 x=0 3 3 Satya Mandal, KU Inner Product Spaces x6.2 Inner product spaces Preview By Integration Inner Product Spaces Orthogonal Projections Examples Continued I (3) Compute norm kgk : Solution: We have s s Z 1 Z 1 kgk = phg; gi = g(x)2dx = (x 2 + x + 1)2dx 0 −1 s Z 1 = (x 4 + 2x 3 + 3x 2 + 2x + 1) dx 0 s x 5 x 4 x 3 x 2 1 = + 2 + 3 + 2 + x 5 4 3 2 0 Satya Mandal, KU Inner Product Spaces x6.2 Inner product spaces Preview By Integration Inner Product Spaces Orthogonal Projections Examples Continued s 1 1 1 1 r37 = + 2 + 3 + 2 + 1 − 0 = 5 4 3 2 10 Satya Mandal, KU Inner Product Spaces x6.2 Inner product spaces Preview By Integration Inner Product Spaces Orthogonal Projections Examples Continued I (4) Compute d(f ; g): Solution: We have d(f ; g) = kf − gk = s Z 1 phf − g; f − gi = (−x 2 + x − 1)2dx 0 s Z 1 = (x 4 − 2x 3 + 3x 2 − 2x + 1) dx 0 s x 5 x 4 x 3 x 2 1 = − 2 + 3 − 2 + x 5 4 3 2 0 Satya Mandal, KU Inner Product Spaces x6.2 Inner product spaces Preview By Integration Inner Product Spaces Orthogonal Projections Examples Continued s 1 1 1 1 r 7 = − 2 + 3 − 2 + 1 − 0 = 5 4 3 2 10 Satya Mandal, KU Inner Product Spaces x6.2 Inner product spaces Preview By Integration Inner Product Spaces Orthogonal Projections Examples Example 6.2.4 Let V = C[−π; π] with inner product hf ; gi as in Example 6.2.2 (by definite integral).
Recommended publications
  • On the Bicoset of a Bivector Space
    International J.Math. Combin. Vol.4 (2009), 01-08 On the Bicoset of a Bivector Space Agboola A.A.A.† and Akinola L.S.‡ † Department of Mathematics, University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria ‡ Department of Mathematics and computer Science, Fountain University, Osogbo, Nigeria E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: The study of bivector spaces was first intiated by Vasantha Kandasamy in [1]. The objective of this paper is to present the concept of bicoset of a bivector space and obtain some of its elementary properties. Key Words: bigroup, bivector space, bicoset, bisum, direct bisum, inner biproduct space, biprojection. AMS(2000): 20Kxx, 20L05. §1. Introduction and Preliminaries The study of bialgebraic structures is a new development in the field of abstract algebra. Some of the bialgebraic structures already developed and studied and now available in several literature include: bigroups, bisemi-groups, biloops, bigroupoids, birings, binear-rings, bisemi- rings, biseminear-rings, bivector spaces and a host of others. Since the concept of bialgebraic structure is pivoted on the union of two non-empty subsets of a given algebraic structure for example a group, the usual problem arising from the union of two substructures of such an algebraic structure which generally do not form any algebraic structure has been resolved. With this new concept, several interesting algebraic properties could be obtained which are not present in the parent algebraic structure. In [1], Vasantha Kandasamy initiated the study of bivector spaces. Further studies on bivector spaces were presented by Vasantha Kandasamy and others in [2], [4] and [5]. In the present work however, we look at the bicoset of a bivector space and obtain some of its elementary properties.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Linear Bialgebra
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of New Mexico University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Mathematics and Statistics Faculty and Staff Publications Academic Department Resources 2005 INTRODUCTION TO LINEAR BIALGEBRA Florentin Smarandache University of New Mexico, [email protected] W.B. Vasantha Kandasamy K. Ilanthenral Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/math_fsp Part of the Algebra Commons, Analysis Commons, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics Commons, and the Other Mathematics Commons Recommended Citation Smarandache, Florentin; W.B. Vasantha Kandasamy; and K. Ilanthenral. "INTRODUCTION TO LINEAR BIALGEBRA." (2005). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/math_fsp/232 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Academic Department Resources at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mathematics and Statistics Faculty and Staff Publications by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. INTRODUCTION TO LINEAR BIALGEBRA W. B. Vasantha Kandasamy Department of Mathematics Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Chennai – 600036, India e-mail: [email protected] web: http://mat.iitm.ac.in/~wbv Florentin Smarandache Department of Mathematics University of New Mexico Gallup, NM 87301, USA e-mail: [email protected] K. Ilanthenral Editor, Maths Tiger, Quarterly Journal Flat No.11, Mayura Park, 16, Kazhikundram Main Road, Tharamani, Chennai – 600 113, India e-mail: [email protected] HEXIS Phoenix, Arizona 2005 1 This book can be ordered in a paper bound reprint from: Books on Demand ProQuest Information & Learning (University of Microfilm International) 300 N.
    [Show full text]
  • Determinant Notes
    68 UNIT FIVE DETERMINANTS 5.1 INTRODUCTION In unit one the determinant of a 2× 2 matrix was introduced and used in the evaluation of a cross product. In this chapter we extend the definition of a determinant to any size square matrix. The determinant has a variety of applications. The value of the determinant of a square matrix A can be used to determine whether A is invertible or noninvertible. An explicit formula for A–1 exists that involves the determinant of A. Some systems of linear equations have solutions that can be expressed in terms of determinants. 5.2 DEFINITION OF THE DETERMINANT a11 a12 Recall that in chapter one the determinant of the 2× 2 matrix A = was a21 a22 defined to be the number a11a22 − a12 a21 and that the notation det (A) or A was used to represent the determinant of A. For any given n × n matrix A = a , the notation A [ ij ]n×n ij will be used to denote the (n −1)× (n −1) submatrix obtained from A by deleting the ith row and the jth column of A. The determinant of any size square matrix A = a is [ ij ]n×n defined recursively as follows. Definition of the Determinant Let A = a be an n × n matrix. [ ij ]n×n (1) If n = 1, that is A = [a11], then we define det (A) = a11 . n 1k+ (2) If na>=1, we define det(A) ∑(-1)11kk det(A ) k=1 Example If A = []5 , then by part (1) of the definition of the determinant, det (A) = 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Bases for Infinite Dimensional Vector Spaces Math 513 Linear Algebra Supplement
    BASES FOR INFINITE DIMENSIONAL VECTOR SPACES MATH 513 LINEAR ALGEBRA SUPPLEMENT Professor Karen E. Smith We have proven that every finitely generated vector space has a basis. But what about vector spaces that are not finitely generated, such as the space of all continuous real valued functions on the interval [0; 1]? Does such a vector space have a basis? By definition, a basis for a vector space V is a linearly independent set which generates V . But we must be careful what we mean by linear combinations from an infinite set of vectors. The definition of a vector space gives us a rule for adding two vectors, but not for adding together infinitely many vectors. By successive additions, such as (v1 + v2) + v3, it makes sense to add any finite set of vectors, but in general, there is no way to ascribe meaning to an infinite sum of vectors in a vector space. Therefore, when we say that a vector space V is generated by or spanned by an infinite set of vectors fv1; v2;::: g, we mean that each vector v in V is a finite linear combination λi1 vi1 + ··· + λin vin of the vi's. Likewise, an infinite set of vectors fv1; v2;::: g is said to be linearly independent if the only finite linear combination of the vi's that is zero is the trivial linear combination. So a set fv1; v2; v3;:::; g is a basis for V if and only if every element of V can be be written in a unique way as a finite linear combination of elements from the set.
    [Show full text]
  • Determinants Math 122 Calculus III D Joyce, Fall 2012
    Determinants Math 122 Calculus III D Joyce, Fall 2012 What they are. A determinant is a value associated to a square array of numbers, that square array being called a square matrix. For example, here are determinants of a general 2 × 2 matrix and a general 3 × 3 matrix. a b = ad − bc: c d a b c d e f = aei + bfg + cdh − ceg − afh − bdi: g h i The determinant of a matrix A is usually denoted jAj or det (A). You can think of the rows of the determinant as being vectors. For the 3×3 matrix above, the vectors are u = (a; b; c), v = (d; e; f), and w = (g; h; i). Then the determinant is a value associated to n vectors in Rn. There's a general definition for n×n determinants. It's a particular signed sum of products of n entries in the matrix where each product is of one entry in each row and column. The two ways you can choose one entry in each row and column of the 2 × 2 matrix give you the two products ad and bc. There are six ways of chosing one entry in each row and column in a 3 × 3 matrix, and generally, there are n! ways in an n × n matrix. Thus, the determinant of a 4 × 4 matrix is the signed sum of 24, which is 4!, terms. In this general definition, half the terms are taken positively and half negatively. In class, we briefly saw how the signs are determined by permutations.
    [Show full text]
  • MATH 304 Linear Algebra Lecture 24: Scalar Product. Vectors: Geometric Approach
    MATH 304 Linear Algebra Lecture 24: Scalar product. Vectors: geometric approach B A B′ A′ A vector is represented by a directed segment. • Directed segment is drawn as an arrow. • Different arrows represent the same vector if • they are of the same length and direction. Vectors: geometric approach v B A v B′ A′ −→AB denotes the vector represented by the arrow with tip at B and tail at A. −→AA is called the zero vector and denoted 0. Vectors: geometric approach v B − A v B′ A′ If v = −→AB then −→BA is called the negative vector of v and denoted v. − Vector addition Given vectors a and b, their sum a + b is defined by the rule −→AB + −→BC = −→AC. That is, choose points A, B, C so that −→AB = a and −→BC = b. Then a + b = −→AC. B b a C a b + B′ b A a C ′ a + b A′ The difference of the two vectors is defined as a b = a + ( b). − − b a b − a Properties of vector addition: a + b = b + a (commutative law) (a + b) + c = a + (b + c) (associative law) a + 0 = 0 + a = a a + ( a) = ( a) + a = 0 − − Let −→AB = a. Then a + 0 = −→AB + −→BB = −→AB = a, a + ( a) = −→AB + −→BA = −→AA = 0. − Let −→AB = a, −→BC = b, and −→CD = c. Then (a + b) + c = (−→AB + −→BC) + −→CD = −→AC + −→CD = −→AD, a + (b + c) = −→AB + (−→BC + −→CD) = −→AB + −→BD = −→AD. Parallelogram rule Let −→AB = a, −→BC = b, −−→AB′ = b, and −−→B′C ′ = a. Then a + b = −→AC, b + a = −−→AC ′.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Clifford's Geometric Algebra
    解説:特集 コンピューテーショナル・インテリジェンスの新展開 —クリフォード代数表現など高次元表現を中心として— Introduction to Clifford’s Geometric Algebra Eckhard HITZER* *Department of Applied Physics, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan *E-mail: [email protected] Key Words:hypercomplex algebra, hypercomplex analysis, geometry, science, engineering. JL 0004/12/5104–0338 C 2012 SICE erty 15), 21) that any isometry4 from the vector space V Abstract into an inner-product algebra5 A over the field6 K can Geometric algebra was initiated by W.K. Clifford over be uniquely extended to an isometry7 from the Clifford 130 years ago. It unifies all branches of physics, and algebra Cl(V )intoA. The Clifford algebra Cl(V )is has found rich applications in robotics, signal process- the unique associative and multilinear algebra with this ing, ray tracing, virtual reality, computer vision, vec- property. Thus if we wish to generalize methods from tor field processing, tracking, geographic information algebra, analysis, calculus, differential geometry (etc.) systems and neural computing. This tutorial explains of real numbers, complex numbers, and quaternion al- the basics of geometric algebra, with concrete exam- gebra to vector spaces and multivector spaces (which ples of the plane, of 3D space, of spacetime, and the include additional elements representing 2D up to nD popular conformal model. Geometric algebras are ideal subspaces, i.e. plane elements up to hypervolume ele- to represent geometric transformations in the general ments), the study of Clifford algebras becomes unavoid- framework of Clifford groups (also called versor or Lip- able. Indeed repeatedly and independently a long list of schitz groups). Geometric (algebra based) calculus al- Clifford algebras, their subalgebras and in Clifford al- lows e.g., to optimize learning algorithms of Clifford gebras embedded algebras (like octonions 17))ofmany neurons, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Review a Basis of a Vector Space 1
    Review • Vectors v1 , , v p are linearly dependent if x1 v1 + x2 v2 + + x pv p = 0, and not all the coefficients are zero. • The columns of A are linearly independent each column of A contains a pivot. 1 1 − 1 • Are the vectors 1 , 2 , 1 independent? 1 3 3 1 1 − 1 1 1 − 1 1 1 − 1 1 2 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 3 3 0 2 4 0 0 0 So: no, they are dependent! (Coeff’s x3 = 1 , x2 = − 2, x1 = 3) • Any set of 11 vectors in R10 is linearly dependent. A basis of a vector space Definition 1. A set of vectors { v1 , , v p } in V is a basis of V if • V = span{ v1 , , v p} , and • the vectors v1 , , v p are linearly independent. In other words, { v1 , , vp } in V is a basis of V if and only if every vector w in V can be uniquely expressed as w = c1 v1 + + cpvp. 1 0 0 Example 2. Let e = 0 , e = 1 , e = 0 . 1 2 3 0 0 1 3 Show that { e 1 , e 2 , e 3} is a basis of R . It is called the standard basis. Solution. 3 • Clearly, span{ e 1 , e 2 , e 3} = R . • { e 1 , e 2 , e 3} are independent, because 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 has a pivot in each column. Definition 3. V is said to have dimension p if it has a basis consisting of p vectors. Armin Straub 1 [email protected] This definition makes sense because if V has a basis of p vectors, then every basis of V has p vectors.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bit About Hilbert Spaces
    A Bit About Hilbert Spaces David Rosenberg New York University October 29, 2016 David Rosenberg (New York University ) DS-GA 1003 October 29, 2016 1 / 9 Inner Product Space (or “Pre-Hilbert” Spaces) An inner product space (over reals) is a vector space V and an inner product, which is a mapping h·,·i : V × V ! R that has the following properties 8x,y,z 2 V and a,b 2 R: Symmetry: hx,yi = hy,xi Linearity: hax + by,zi = ahx,zi + b hy,zi Postive-definiteness: hx,xi > 0 and hx,xi = 0 () x = 0. David Rosenberg (New York University ) DS-GA 1003 October 29, 2016 2 / 9 Norm from Inner Product For an inner product space, we define a norm as p kxk = hx,xi. Example Rd with standard Euclidean inner product is an inner product space: hx,yi := xT y 8x,y 2 Rd . Norm is p kxk = xT y. David Rosenberg (New York University ) DS-GA 1003 October 29, 2016 3 / 9 What norms can we get from an inner product? Theorem (Parallelogram Law) A norm kvk can be generated by an inner product on V iff 8x,y 2 V 2kxk2 + 2kyk2 = kx + yk2 + kx - yk2, and if it can, the inner product is given by the polarization identity jjxjj2 + jjyjj2 - jjx - yjj2 hx,yi = . 2 Example d `1 norm on R is NOT generated by an inner product. [Exercise] d Is `2 norm on R generated by an inner product? David Rosenberg (New York University ) DS-GA 1003 October 29, 2016 4 / 9 Pythagorean Theroem Definition Two vectors are orthogonal if hx,yi = 0.
    [Show full text]
  • True False Questions from 4,5,6
    (c)2015 UM Math Dept licensed under a Creative Commons By-NC-SA 4.0 International License. Math 217: True False Practice Professor Karen Smith 1. For every 2 × 2 matrix A, there exists a 2 × 2 matrix B such that det(A + B) 6= det A + det B. Solution note: False! Take A to be the zero matrix for a counterexample. 2. If the change of basis matrix SA!B = ~e4 ~e3 ~e2 ~e1 , then the elements of A are the same as the element of B, but in a different order. Solution note: True. The matrix tells us that the first element of A is the fourth element of B, the second element of basis A is the third element of B, the third element of basis A is the second element of B, and the the fourth element of basis A is the first element of B. 6 6 3. Every linear transformation R ! R is an isomorphism. Solution note: False. The zero map is a a counter example. 4. If matrix B is obtained from A by swapping two rows and det A < det B, then A is invertible. Solution note: True: we only need to know det A 6= 0. But if det A = 0, then det B = − det A = 0, so det A < det B does not hold. 5. If two n × n matrices have the same determinant, they are similar. Solution note: False: The only matrix similar to the zero matrix is itself. But many 1 0 matrices besides the zero matrix have determinant zero, such as : 0 0 6.
    [Show full text]
  • The Determinant Inner Product and the Heisenberg Product of Sym(2)
    INTERNATIONAL ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF GEOMETRY VOLUME 14 NO. 1 PAGE 1–12 (2021) DOI: HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.32323/IEJGEO.602178 The determinant inner product and the Heisenberg product of Sym(2) Mircea Crasmareanu (Dedicated to the memory of Prof. Dr. Aurel BEJANCU (1946 - 2020)Cihan Ozgur) ABSTRACT The aim of this work is to introduce and study the nondegenerate inner product < ·; · >det induced by the determinant map on the space Sym(2) of symmetric 2 × 2 real matrices. This symmetric bilinear form of index 2 defines a rational symmetric function on the pairs of rays in the plane and an associated function on the 2-torus can be expressed with the usual Hopf bundle projection 3 2 1 S ! S ( 2 ). Also, the product < ·; · >det is treated with complex numbers by using the Hopf invariant map of Sym(2) and this complex approach yields a Heisenberg product on Sym(2). Moreover, the quadratic equation of critical points for a rational Morse function of height type generates a cosymplectic structure on Sym(2) with the unitary matrix as associated Reeb vector and with the Reeb 1-form being half of the trace map. Keywords: symmetric matrix; determinant; Hopf bundle; Hopf invariant AMS Subject Classification (2020): Primary: 15A15 ; Secondary: 15A24; 30C10; 22E47. 1. Introduction This short paper, whose nature is mainly expository, is dedicated to the memory of Professor Dr. Aurel Bejancu, who was equally a gifted mathematician and a dedicated professor. As we hereby present an in memoriam paper, we feel it would be better if we choose an informal presentation rather than a classical structured discourse, where theorems and propositions are followed by their proofs.
    [Show full text]
  • Inner Product Spaces
    CHAPTER 6 Woman teaching geometry, from a fourteenth-century edition of Euclid’s geometry book. Inner Product Spaces In making the definition of a vector space, we generalized the linear structure (addition and scalar multiplication) of R2 and R3. We ignored other important features, such as the notions of length and angle. These ideas are embedded in the concept we now investigate, inner products. Our standing assumptions are as follows: 6.1 Notation F, V F denotes R or C. V denotes a vector space over F. LEARNING OBJECTIVES FOR THIS CHAPTER Cauchy–Schwarz Inequality Gram–Schmidt Procedure linear functionals on inner product spaces calculating minimum distance to a subspace Linear Algebra Done Right, third edition, by Sheldon Axler 164 CHAPTER 6 Inner Product Spaces 6.A Inner Products and Norms Inner Products To motivate the concept of inner prod- 2 3 x1 , x 2 uct, think of vectors in R and R as x arrows with initial point at the origin. x R2 R3 H L The length of a vector in or is called the norm of x, denoted x . 2 k k Thus for x .x1; x2/ R , we have The length of this vector x is p D2 2 2 x x1 x2 . p 2 2 x1 x2 . k k D C 3 C Similarly, if x .x1; x2; x3/ R , p 2D 2 2 2 then x x1 x2 x3 . k k D C C Even though we cannot draw pictures in higher dimensions, the gener- n n alization to R is obvious: we define the norm of x .x1; : : : ; xn/ R D 2 by p 2 2 x x1 xn : k k D C C The norm is not linear on Rn.
    [Show full text]