2.0 Risk Assessment
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
HA-1517 Col. John Streett House
HA-1517 Col. John Streett House Architectural Survey File This is the architectural survey file for this MIHP record. The survey file is organized reverse- chronological (that is, with the latest material on top). It contains all MIHP inventory forms, National Register nomination forms, determinations of eligibility (DOE) forms, and accompanying documentation such as photographs and maps. Users should be aware that additional undigitized material about this property may be found in on-site architectural reports, copies of HABS/HAER or other documentation, drawings, and the “vertical files” at the MHT Library in Crownsville. The vertical files may include newspaper clippings, field notes, draft versions of forms and architectural reports, photographs, maps, and drawings. Researchers who need a thorough understanding of this property should plan to visit the MHT Library as part of their research project; look at the MHT web site (mht.maryland.gov) for details about how to make an appointment. All material is property of the Maryland Historical Trust. Last Updated: 02-18-2004 NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service _,.~ational Register of Historic Places riegistration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. -
Lafayette Historic Register
Colorized photo of Lafayette’s Jefferson Street taken in the 1920s. Photo is provided courtesy of Louis J. Perret, Lafayette Parish Clerk of Court. A Brief History of Acadiana Before European influence, Acadiana’s population consisted mainly of the indigenous Ishak (Atakapa), Chahta (Choctaw), and Sitimaxa (Chitimacha) peoples. It was not until 1541 that the first people of the lower Mississippi Delta region first encountered Europeans in any noticeable number. European influence was still negligible until 1682 when France colonized Louisiana under King Louis XIV, and even after another 100 years, the population of European settlers remained small. However, by 1720, South Louisiana had became home to small groups of Spanish, French, and English working as ranchers, trappers or traders. Europeans named the region using the Choctaw word for the Ishak inhabitants, which was Atakapa. By 1800, the two largest population groups were French refugees from Nova Scotia, now called Acadians, (also called Cajuns), and enslaved Africans. Acadians were brought to Southwest Louisiana to clear and cultivate the fertile river- bottom land. Some were given Spanish land grants to cultivate the land along the various rivers, bayous, and lakes. At the same time, Africans were brought to the Atakapa Region to be sold into slavery for work on Louisiana farms and plantations. For several decades, the Catholic Acadians, deported by the British, made up the largest European-heritage population. Additional French and other Europeans settled in the Atakapa Region in greater numbers after 1785. With the Louisiana Purchase in 1803, “Des Americans” began to settle in the Atakapa Region, and significant numbers of other Europeans began to arrive between 1820 and 1870; Germans searched for affordable land, Irish wished to escape famine, and more French citizens fled from religious persecution. -
1.0 Introduction-Columbiana.Pdf
Columbiana County Hazard Mitigation Plan 1.0 Introduction 1.0 INTRODUCTION Purpose The purpose of the mitigation plan is to identify risks and vulnerabilities from hazards that affect Columbiana County, Ohio. With these risks and vulnerabilities identified, local officials can reduce losses of life, injuries, and to limit future damages by developing methods to mitigate or eliminate damages. Scope The Columbiana County Hazard Mitigation Plan follows a planning methodology that includes public involvement, a risk assessment for various identified hazards, an inventory of critical facilities and at-risk areas, a mitigation strategy for high-risk hazards, and a method to maintain and update the plan. Plan Authority The Columbiana County Hazard Mitigation Plan is “multi-jurisdictional,” meaning that it includes several jurisdictions. Columbiana County stakeholders prepared this plan per federal requirements outlined in the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA2K), which requires communities to formulate a hazard mitigation plan to be eligible for mitigation funds made available through the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Section 322 of the Robert T. Stafford Act requires that local jurisdictions develop and submit plans meeting the criteria outlined in 44 CFR Parts 201.6. When the content of this plan corresponds to a requirement of 44 CFR 201.6, it will include a description of the relevant guidance. The following table lists the requirements of 44 CFR 201.6 and identifies the sections of the plan fulfilling the guidance. 44 CFR 201.6 REQUIREMENTS IN THIS PLAN Section Description Section in Plan § 201.6 Local Mitigation Plans. The local mitigation plan is the representation of Section 1.0 Introduction the jurisdiction's commitment to reduce risks from natural hazards, serving as a guide for decision makers as they commit resources to reducing the effects of natural hazards. -
Salem Area Sustainable Comprehensive Plan: a Community Vision and Comprehensive Plan Created Through the Principles of Sustainability
Salem Area Sustainable Comprehensive Plan: A Community Vision and Comprehensive Plan Created through the Principles of Sustainability Cooperating Partners: Salem Area Chamber of Commerce Salem Utilities Commission The City of Salem Ohio State University Extension Sustainable Development Initiative January 2009 Acknowledgements The following organizations and their representatives made this project possible through their sponsorship, leadership and commitment of time: Daniel Moore COC/The Moore Agency Audrey Null Salem Area Chamber of Commerce Gary Abrams Kolby's Alma Apicella Retired-Salem City Council Steve Andres Service Director-City of Salem James Armeni Auditor-City of Salem Matt Bender Schroedel, Scullin & Bestic CPAs Greg Bestic Schroedel, Scullin & Bestic CPAs Walt Bezeredi Retired-Salem City Council Larry Bowersock Citizen of Salem Brenda Bradley Hofmeister Real Estate Clyde Brown Salem City Council Nick Bush Phantom Auto Works Jock Buta Butech-Bliss Karen Carter Preservation Society Patty Colian Citizen of Salem Frank Coy Citizen of Salem Scott Cranmer Retired-Safety Director of Salem J.D. Creer The Salem News Victoria Curran YWCA of Salem Larry DeJane Retired-Mayor of Salem Gina Dermotta Salem Radiologists Tom Eddinger Retired-Zeigler’s Trophies & Gifts Steve Faber Salem Parks Jean Alice Fehr Preservation Society Dr. Kristen Figg Kent State University - Salem Mark Flake Salem Rotary Robert Floor Police Chief-City of Salem Ryan Gillis The Morning Journal Geoff Goll Attny, Salem Utility Commission Kim Goll Hofmeister Realty Mike -
Columbiana County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Hazard Mitigation Plan Columbiana County, Ohio Released 2019 Completed by: JH Consulting, LLC 29 East Main Street, Suite 1, Buckhannon, WV 26201 (304) 473-1009 ~ www.jhcpreparedness.com COLUMBIANA COUNTY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN RELEASED 2019 FOR THE COUNTY JURISDICTION OF COLUMBIANA COUNTY, OHIO AND THE MUNICIPAL JURISDICTIONS THEREIN Columbiana County Hazard Mitigation Plan Table of Contents COLUMBIANA COUNTY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………….1 1.1 Planning Process…………………………………………………………………………………..4 1.2 Description of the Planning Area………………………………………………………………..16 1.3 Capabilities…………………………………………………………………………………………39 1.4 Trends and Predictions……………………………………………………………………………47 2.0 Risk Assessment……………………………………………………………………………………….62 2.1 Hazards Identification……………………………………………………………………………..63 2.2 Complicating Variables……………………………………………………………………………65 2.3 Hazard Profiles……………………………………………………………………………………69 2.3.1 Drought……………………………………………………………………………………. 71 2.3.2 Earthquake…………………………………………………………………………………81 2.3.3 Extreme Temperatures…………………………………………………………………. 88 2.3.4 Flooding………………………………………………………………………………………96 2.3.5 Public Health Emergency……………………………………………………………….. 119 2.3.6 Severe Thunderstorm and Hail…………………………………………………………..129 2.3.7 Severe Wind and Tornado……………………………………………………………… 142 2.3.8 Severe Winter Storms………………………………………………………………………151 2.3.9 Dam and Levee Failure……………………………………………………………………157 2.3.10 Hazardous Materials Incident…………………………………………………………..167 2.4 Hazard Rankings…………………………………………………………………………………..184