Columbiana County Hazard Mitigation Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Columbiana County Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Mitigation Plan Columbiana County, Ohio Released 2019 Completed by: JH Consulting, LLC 29 East Main Street, Suite 1, Buckhannon, WV 26201 (304) 473-1009 ~ www.jhcpreparedness.com COLUMBIANA COUNTY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN RELEASED 2019 FOR THE COUNTY JURISDICTION OF COLUMBIANA COUNTY, OHIO AND THE MUNICIPAL JURISDICTIONS THEREIN Columbiana County Hazard Mitigation Plan Table of Contents COLUMBIANA COUNTY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………….1 1.1 Planning Process…………………………………………………………………………………..4 1.2 Description of the Planning Area………………………………………………………………..16 1.3 Capabilities…………………………………………………………………………………………39 1.4 Trends and Predictions……………………………………………………………………………47 2.0 Risk Assessment……………………………………………………………………………………….62 2.1 Hazards Identification……………………………………………………………………………..63 2.2 Complicating Variables……………………………………………………………………………65 2.3 Hazard Profiles……………………………………………………………………………………69 2.3.1 Drought……………………………………………………………………………………. 71 2.3.2 Earthquake…………………………………………………………………………………81 2.3.3 Extreme Temperatures…………………………………………………………………. 88 2.3.4 Flooding………………………………………………………………………………………96 2.3.5 Public Health Emergency……………………………………………………………….. 119 2.3.6 Severe Thunderstorm and Hail…………………………………………………………..129 2.3.7 Severe Wind and Tornado……………………………………………………………… 142 2.3.8 Severe Winter Storms………………………………………………………………………151 2.3.9 Dam and Levee Failure……………………………………………………………………157 2.3.10 Hazardous Materials Incident…………………………………………………………..167 2.4 Hazard Rankings…………………………………………………………………………………..184 3.0 Mitigation Strategy…………………………………………………………………………………. 187 3.1 Mitigation Goals……………………………………………………………………………….. 188 3.2 Mitigation Actions……………………………………………………………………………… 189 Columbiana County Hazard Mitigation Plan Table of Contents 4.0 Plan Maintenance and Integration…………………………………………………………………209 4.1 Monitoring, Evaluating and Updating the Plan…………………………………………….. 209 4.2 Implementation through Existing Programs……………………………………………….. 210 4.3 Continued Public Involvement………………………………………………………………. 213 5.0 Appendices 5.1 Planning Process Involvement 5.2 Project Prioritization 5.3 Inactive Projects 5.4 Public Survey, Raw Data 5.5 Citations Columbiana County Hazard Mitigation Plan 1.0 Introduction 1.0 INTRODUCTION Purpose The purpose of the mitigation plan is to identify risks and vulnerabilities from hazards that affect Columbiana County, Ohio. With these risks and vulnerabilities identified, local officials can reduce losses of life, injuries, and to limit future damages by developing methods to mitigate or eliminate damages. Scope The Columbiana County Hazard Mitigation Plan follows a planning methodology that includes public involvement, a risk assessment for various identified hazards, an inventory of critical facilities and at-risk areas, a mitigation strategy for high-risk hazards, and a method to maintain and update the plan. Plan Authority The Columbiana County Hazard Mitigation Plan is “multi-jurisdictional,” meaning that it includes several jurisdictions. Columbiana County stakeholders prepared this plan per federal requirements outlined in the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA2K), which requires communities to formulate a hazard mitigation plan to be eligible for mitigation funds made available through the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Section 322 of the Robert T. Stafford Act requires that local jurisdictions develop and submit plans meeting the criteria outlined in 44 CFR Parts 201.6. When the content of this plan corresponds to a requirement of 44 CFR 201.6, it will include a description of the relevant guidance. The following table lists the requirements of 44 CFR 201.6 and identifies the sections of the plan fulfilling the guidance. 44 CFR 201.6 REQUIREMENTS IN THIS PLAN Section Description Section in Plan § 201.6 Local Mitigation Plans. The local mitigation plan is the representation of Section 1.0 Introduction the jurisdiction's commitment to reduce risks from natural hazards, serving as a guide for decision makers as they commit resources to reducing the effects of natural hazards. Local plans will also serve as the basis for the state to provide technical assistance and to prioritize project funding. § 201.6(a)(4) Multi-jurisdictional plans may be accepted, as appropriate, as long as Section 1.1 The Planning Process each jurisdiction has participated in the process and has officially adopted the plan. 1 Columbiana County Hazard Mitigation Plan 1.0 Introduction 44 CFR 201.6 REQUIREMENTS IN THIS PLAN Section Description Section in Plan § 201.6(b)(1) An opportunity for the public to comment on the plan during the drafting Section 1.1 The Planning Process stage and prior to plan approval Section 4.3 Continued Public Involvement § 201.6(b)(2) An opportunity for neighboring communities, local and regional agencies Section 1.1 The Planning Process involved in hazard mitigation activities, and agencies that have the authority to regulate development, as well as businesses, academia and other private and non-profit interests to be involved in the planning process § 201.6(b)(3) Review and incorporate, if appropriate, existing plans, studies, reports, Section 1.3 Capabilities and technical information Section 1.4 Trends & Predictions Section 4.2 Implementation through Existing Programs § 201.6(c)(1) Documentation of the planning process used to develop the plan, Section 1.1 The Planning Process including how it was prepared, who was involved in the process, and how the public was involved § 201.6(c)(2) A risk assessment that provides the factual basis for activities proposed Section 2.0 Risk Assessment in the strategy to reduce losses from identified hazards. Local risk assessments must provide sufficient information to enable the jurisdiction to identify and prioritize appropriate mitigation actions to reduce losses from identified hazards. § 201.6(c)(2)(i) The risk assessment shall include a description of the type, location, and Section 2.1 Hazards Identification extent of all natural hazards that can affect the jurisdiction. The plan shall Section 2.3 Hazard Profiles include information on previous occurrences of hazard events and on the probability of future hazard events. § 201.6(c)(2)(ii) The risk assessment shall include a description of the jurisdiction's Section 2.3 Hazard Profiles vulnerability to the hazards described in paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this Section 2.4 Hazard Rankings section. This description shall include an overall summary of each hazard and its impact on the community. All plans approved after October 1, 2008, must also address NFIP insured structures that have been repetitively damaged by floods. § 201.6(c)(2)(ii)(A) The plan should describe vulnerability in terms of the types and numbers Section 2.3 Hazard Profiles of existing and future buildings, infrastructure, and critical facilities located in the identified hazard areas; § 201.6(c)(2)(ii)(B) The plan should describe vulnerability in terms of an estimate of the Section 2.3 Hazard Profiles potential dollar losses to vulnerable structures identified in paragraph (c)(2)(ii)(A) of this section and a description of the methodology used to prepare the estimate; § 201.6(c)(2)(ii)(c) The risk assessment shall provide a general description of land uses and Section 1.4 Trends and Predictions development trends within the community so that mitigation options can be considered in future land use decisions. § 201.6(c)(2)(iii) For multi-jurisdictional plans, the risk assessment section must assess Section 2.3 Hazard Profiles each jurisdiction's risks where they vary from the risks facing the entire planning area. § 201.6(c)(3) A mitigation strategy that provides the jurisdiction's blueprint for reducing Section 3.0 Mitigation Strategy the potential losses identified in the risk assessment, based on existing authorities, policies, programs and resources, and its ability to expand on and improve these existing tools. § 201.6(c)(3)(i) This section shall include a description of mitigation goals to reduce or Section 3.1 Mitigation Goals avoid long-term vulnerabilities to the identified hazards. 2 Columbiana County Hazard Mitigation Plan 1.0 Introduction 44 CFR 201.6 REQUIREMENTS IN THIS PLAN Section Description Section in Plan § 201.6(c)(3)(ii) This section shall include a section that identifies and analyzes a Section 3.2 Mitigation Actions comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions and projects being considered to reduce the effects of each hazard, with particular emphasis on new and existing buildings and infrastructure. All plans approved by FEMA after October 1, 2008, must also address the jurisdiction's participation in the NFIP, and continued compliance with NFIP requirements, as appropriate. § 201.6(c)(3)(iii) This section shall include an action plan describing how the actions Section 3.2 Mitigation Actions identified in paragraph (c)(3)(ii) of this section will be prioritized, implemented, and administered by the local jurisdiction. Prioritization shall include a special emphasis on the extent to which benefits are maximized according to a cost-benefit review of the proposed projects and their associated costs. § 201.6(c)(3)(iv) For multi-jurisdictional plans, there must be identifiable action items Section 3.2 Mitigation Actions specific to the jurisdiction requesting FEMA approval or credit of the plan. § 201.6(c)(4)(i) A plan maintenance process that includes a section describing the Section 4.1 Monitoring, Evaluating method and schedule of monitoring, evaluating,
Recommended publications
  • Register of Historic Places Registration
    NPS Form 10-900 ONB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 10-90 "«* United Slates Department of the Interior National ParK SetViqC^ \ REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM \ This form is for use irr tinatir esting determii ations for individual properl the National Register of Historic PR Registration FornS (National F egister Bulletin 16A). Com >lete ox or by entering the information requested. If any item doesi hot apply t the property being docurr jnted, enter "N/A" , architectural classification,, materials,, and areas of significance,, enter nly categories and subcat gories from the i"" ies and narrative items on continuation sheets (Nj?S Foqi;rt»,10*SiMa). Use typewriter, word processo , or comp 1. Naie NION DEPOT HOTEL. OLD other names/site number Union Hotel and Cafe 2. Location street & number 858 East Zack Street N/A D not for publication citv or town Tampa ___N/A D vicinitv state FLORIDA code FL county Hillsboroiigh .code 057 zio code 33602 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this E3 nomination D request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property E3 meets D does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant D nationally D statewide ^ locally. (D See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature/of certifying officiil/Title Date State Historic Preservation Officer, Florida Division of Historical Resources State or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property D meets D does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Pending Lists for 2015
    National Register of Historic Places Pending Lists 2015 January 3, 2015. ............................................................................................................................................ 3 January 10, 2015. .......................................................................................................................................... 8 January 17, 2015. ........................................................................................................................................ 14 January 24, 2015. ........................................................................................................................................ 18 January 31, 2015. ........................................................................................................................................ 21 February 7, 2015. ........................................................................................................................................ 28 February 14, 2015. ...................................................................................................................................... 32 February 21, 2015. ...................................................................................................................................... 37 February 28, 2015. ...................................................................................................................................... 44 March 7, 2015. ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • East Liverpool Central Business District MRA, Columbiana County, 0 Continuation Sheet______Item Number____5______Page
    FHR-8-300 (11-78) United States Department of the Interior Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries complete applicable sections ______ ________ 1. Name historic Liverpool Central Business District Multiple Resource Area (partial: and/or common history/archi ;ectura) 2. Location street & number not for publication East Liverpool city, town vicinity of congressional district Ohio 039 Columbiana state code county code 02? 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use X _*_ district ^ public occupied __ agriculture museum building(s) private unoccupied commercial park structure both work in progress educational private residence site Publiic Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object in process yes: restricted x government scientific being considered X yes: unrestricted industrial transportation "M no military Other- 4. Owner of Property name see continuation sheet street & number city, town vicinity of state 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Columbiana County Courthouse street* number Courthouse Sq, Lisbon city, town state Ohio 6. Representation in Existing Surveys title Ohio Historic Inventory has this property been determined elegible? yes no date 1984 federal state county local depository for survey records Ohi° Historic Preservation Office, 1-71 & 17th Ave. city, town Columbus state Ohio 7. Description Condition Check one Check one deteriorated unaltered < original site excellent .. j _X_good ruins moved date - ———————————— fair unexposed see indivfdueil OHrt f&«vfti> Describe the present and original (iff known) physical appearance East Liverpool, Ohio is a city of 25,000 located on the north bank of the Ohio River, 40 miles downstream from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places 2015 Weekly Lists
    National Register of Historic Places 2015 Weekly Lists January 2, 2015 ............................................................................................................................................. 3 January 9, 2015 ............................................................................................................................................. 6 January 16, 2015 ......................................................................................................................................... 11 January 23, 2015 ......................................................................................................................................... 16 January 30, 2015 ......................................................................................................................................... 19 February 6, 2015 ......................................................................................................................................... 24 February 13, 2015 ....................................................................................................................................... 29 February 20, 2015 ....................................................................................................................................... 32 February 27, 2015 ....................................................................................................................................... 34 March 6, 2015 ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Intensive Level Survey for Downtown Ponca City
    INTENSIVE LEVEL SURVEY FOR DOWNTOWN PONCA CITY Ponca City, Oklahoma about 1946. Photographer and copyright holder not known. Postcard from collection of Michael Cassity. September 22, 2008 Michael Cassity, Ph.D. Historical research and photography 304 West Albuquerque Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74011 Phone: 918 / 451-8378 y FAX: 918 / 451-8379 [email protected] Contents Acknowledgments . ii 1. Abstract . 1 2. Introduction . 2 3. Research Design . 4 4. Project Objectives . 6 5. Area Surveyed. 7 6. Methodology. 9 7. Results Summary . 15 8. Kinds of Historic Properties Present . 17 9. Specific Properties Identified . 19 10. Individual Properties and Historic District . 30 11. Areas that do not Meet Eligibility Requirements . 64 12. Properties and Districts for Additional Research . 65 13. Table of Properties Documented . 67 14. Historic Context . 78 ¾ History, Context, and Downtown Ponca City . 78 ¾ The Buildings of Downtown Ponca City and the National Register . 91 15. Annotated Bibliography . 96 16. Summary . 101 ii Acknowledgment: The activity that is the subject of this publication has been financed in part with federal funds from the National Park Service, Department of the Interior. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the policies of the Department of the Interior, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendations by the Department of the Interior. This program receives Federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the U.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.0 Risk Assessment
    Columbiana County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2.0 Risk Assessment 2.0 RISK ASSESSMENT 2.3.8 Severe Winter Storms Severe winter weather is a combination of heavy snow, blowing snow, and dangerous wind chills that could threaten life or property. Vulnerability Period of At any type, typically Hazard Index Medium Occurrence: during the winter months Ranking: HIGHEST HIGH Warning Time: Over 24 hours State Risk 4-High Ranking: MEDIUM Probability: Highly likely Severity: Critical LOW Type of Natural Disaster EM-3029 (1977) Hazard: Declarations: EM-3055 (1978) LOWEST DR-1580 (2005) Hazard Overview During winter, there are multiple instances of cold weather, snow, and storms. This profile includes only those winter weather events that are damaging enough to be considered “severe.” These include NOAA-labeled winter storms, heavy snow, blizzards, and ice storms. • Winter Storm: A winter storm is a combination of heavy snow, blowing snow, and dangerous wind chills. • Heavy Snow: Heavy snow refers to snowfall accumulating to 4” or more in 12 hours or less or snowfall accumulating to 6” or more in 24 hours or less. • Blizzard: A blizzard is a dangerous winter storm that is a combination of blowing snow and wind and results in very low visibility (less than ¼ mile). Heavy snowfall and severe cold usually accompany blizzards, but not always. Sometimes strong winds can pick up fallen snow, creating a ground blizzard. • Ice Storm: An ice storm is a storm that results in the accumulation of at least 0.25’’ of ice on exposed surfaces. It can create hazardous driving and walking conditions, and tree branches and power lines can easily snap under the weight of the ice.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places REGISTRATION FORM NPS Form 10-900 OMB No
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National RegisterSBR of Historic Places Registration Draft Form 1. Name of Property Historic Name: Aurora Apartment Hotel Other name/site number: Aurora Apartments Name of related multiple property listing: NA 2. Location Street & number: 509 Howard Street City or town: San Antonio State: Texas County: Bexar Not for publication: Vicinity: 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ( meets does not meet) the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following levels of significance: national statewide local Applicable National Register Criteria: A B C D State Historic Preservation Officer ___________________________ Signature of certifying official / Title Date Texas Historical Commission State or Federal agency / bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria. _______________________________________________________________________ ___________________________ Signature of commenting or other official Date ____________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • HA-1517 Col. John Streett House
    HA-1517 Col. John Streett House Architectural Survey File This is the architectural survey file for this MIHP record. The survey file is organized reverse- chronological (that is, with the latest material on top). It contains all MIHP inventory forms, National Register nomination forms, determinations of eligibility (DOE) forms, and accompanying documentation such as photographs and maps. Users should be aware that additional undigitized material about this property may be found in on-site architectural reports, copies of HABS/HAER or other documentation, drawings, and the “vertical files” at the MHT Library in Crownsville. The vertical files may include newspaper clippings, field notes, draft versions of forms and architectural reports, photographs, maps, and drawings. Researchers who need a thorough understanding of this property should plan to visit the MHT Library as part of their research project; look at the MHT web site (mht.maryland.gov) for details about how to make an appointment. All material is property of the Maryland Historical Trust. Last Updated: 02-18-2004 NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service _,.~ational Register of Historic Places riegistration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions.
    [Show full text]
  • Lafayette Historic Register
    Colorized photo of Lafayette’s Jefferson Street taken in the 1920s. Photo is provided courtesy of Louis J. Perret, Lafayette Parish Clerk of Court. A Brief History of Acadiana Before European influence, Acadiana’s population consisted mainly of the indigenous Ishak (Atakapa), Chahta (Choctaw), and Sitimaxa (Chitimacha) peoples. It was not until 1541 that the first people of the lower Mississippi Delta region first encountered Europeans in any noticeable number. European influence was still negligible until 1682 when France colonized Louisiana under King Louis XIV, and even after another 100 years, the population of European settlers remained small. However, by 1720, South Louisiana had became home to small groups of Spanish, French, and English working as ranchers, trappers or traders. Europeans named the region using the Choctaw word for the Ishak inhabitants, which was Atakapa. By 1800, the two largest population groups were French refugees from Nova Scotia, now called Acadians, (also called Cajuns), and enslaved Africans. Acadians were brought to Southwest Louisiana to clear and cultivate the fertile river- bottom land. Some were given Spanish land grants to cultivate the land along the various rivers, bayous, and lakes. At the same time, Africans were brought to the Atakapa Region to be sold into slavery for work on Louisiana farms and plantations. For several decades, the Catholic Acadians, deported by the British, made up the largest European-heritage population. Additional French and other Europeans settled in the Atakapa Region in greater numbers after 1785. With the Louisiana Purchase in 1803, “Des Americans” began to settle in the Atakapa Region, and significant numbers of other Europeans began to arrive between 1820 and 1870; Germans searched for affordable land, Irish wished to escape famine, and more French citizens fled from religious persecution.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.0 Introduction-Columbiana.Pdf
    Columbiana County Hazard Mitigation Plan 1.0 Introduction 1.0 INTRODUCTION Purpose The purpose of the mitigation plan is to identify risks and vulnerabilities from hazards that affect Columbiana County, Ohio. With these risks and vulnerabilities identified, local officials can reduce losses of life, injuries, and to limit future damages by developing methods to mitigate or eliminate damages. Scope The Columbiana County Hazard Mitigation Plan follows a planning methodology that includes public involvement, a risk assessment for various identified hazards, an inventory of critical facilities and at-risk areas, a mitigation strategy for high-risk hazards, and a method to maintain and update the plan. Plan Authority The Columbiana County Hazard Mitigation Plan is “multi-jurisdictional,” meaning that it includes several jurisdictions. Columbiana County stakeholders prepared this plan per federal requirements outlined in the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA2K), which requires communities to formulate a hazard mitigation plan to be eligible for mitigation funds made available through the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Section 322 of the Robert T. Stafford Act requires that local jurisdictions develop and submit plans meeting the criteria outlined in 44 CFR Parts 201.6. When the content of this plan corresponds to a requirement of 44 CFR 201.6, it will include a description of the relevant guidance. The following table lists the requirements of 44 CFR 201.6 and identifies the sections of the plan fulfilling the guidance. 44 CFR 201.6 REQUIREMENTS IN THIS PLAN Section Description Section in Plan § 201.6 Local Mitigation Plans. The local mitigation plan is the representation of Section 1.0 Introduction the jurisdiction's commitment to reduce risks from natural hazards, serving as a guide for decision makers as they commit resources to reducing the effects of natural hazards.
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL REGISTER of HISTORIC PLACES Rlegistration FO
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB NO. 1024-0018 (Rev. 10-90) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES RlEGISTRATION FO This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "NIA"for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and n;mrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name William Bwd Hotel DWR 127-0466 other narneshite number 2. Location street & number 2501 West Broad Street not for publication city or town Richmond vicinity -C state Virginia codem county code 760 Zip 23220 3. StatelFederal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this -X- nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property -X- meets does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant - nationally - statewide -X- locally. ( - See continuation sheet for additjonal comments.) Virpinia Department of Historic Resources State or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. Name of Property Historic Name: Travelers Hotel Other name/site number: NA Name of related multiple property listing: NA 2. Location Street & number: 220 Broadway City or town: San Antonio State: Texas County: Bexar Not for publication: Vicinity: 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following levels of significance: national statewide local Applicable National Register Criteria: A B C D State Historic Preservation Officer ___________________________ Signature of certifying official / Title Date Texas Historical Commission State or Federal agency / bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria. _______________________________________________________________________ ___________________________ Signature of commenting or other official Date ____________________________________________________________ State or Federal agency
    [Show full text]