“Art of Swindlers”?
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
michael john paton FENGSHUI:ACONTINUATIONOF “ART OF SWINDLERS”? I. Introduction In 1999 on an international fengshui tour comprising more than fifty participants from around the world, one of the seminar presenters, a Taiwanese Guobao dilijia (specialist on national geographical treasures) and the sixtieth generation of fengshui practitioner, He Jinzong, was told by a number of participants that they did not wish to discuss burial because this was not fengshui, not realizing that the term fengshui was first defined in Guo Pu’s Gu Ben Zang Shu (The Book of Burial Rooted in Antiquity or The Book of Burial).1 This is a typical case of people in one culture taking only those parts of other cultures that fit within their cultural norms, and thus creating new theoretical structures to make it easier to consume the specific knowl- edge. There are, however, precedents to such a commodification of fengshui within Chinese history. The author of the late Song Dynasty to early Ming Dynasty text, Nan Jie Ershisi Pian (Twenty-four Difficult Problems), deplores the “present day” practitioners who “absurdly match longevity, the receiving of favours, becoming an offi- cial and imperial prosperity with good and evil spirits and good and ill fortune, consequently causing the luck not to be buried and those buried not to have good fortune” and who “conduct the art of swindlers.”2 This article considers the original concepts of fengshui as garnered from major fengshui writings in relation to some of the claims made by modern Western practitioners of the art. It concludes with some musings on the relationship between culture, knowledge, and philosophy. II. Definition Fengshui with the meaning of placement is first defined in the Gu Ben Zang Shu, which is accredited to the “father” of fengshui, Guo Pu, a famous scholar in Jin Dynasty (265–420 AD): MICHAEL JOHN PATON, Ph.D., teaching quality fellow, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Sydney. Specialties: Chinese history and philosophy of science, critical thinking and discourse. E-mail: [email protected] © 2007 Journal of Chinese Philosophy 428 michael john paton The Classic says that if qi rides the wind it is scattered; if it is bounded by water it is held. Ancient men gathered it, causing it not to be scattered and curtailed its area of circulation. Hence this is referred to as fengshui. The method of fengshui is, first of all, to obtain water and secondly to store from the wind.3 The basic mechanism of the original concept of fengshui is also out- lined in the Gu Ben Zang Shu: Qi circulates through the earth according to the geodetic force of the earth. It gathers where the geodetic force stops. The qi follows the trunk of a hill and branches along its ridges. The Classic says that if the qi rides the wind it is scattered, if it is bounded by water it is held.4 Thus, the consideration is that qi courses through the land in lines or veins as found in acupuncture. In fact, the same character xue is used for both an acupuncture and fengshui point. Such a similarity is also apparent in the relationship between vitality and qi. Again this is perhaps best described in the Gu Ben Zang Shu: The Classic says that when qi circulates through landforms, entities are thereby given life. The geodetic forces of the earth are the basic veins. The geodetic forces of the mountains are the basic bones. They snake either west to east or north to south, curling back on them- selves as if crouching and waiting, as if with something in their grasp. Qi desires to proceed but it is cut off. It desires to halt and becomes deep. Where it approaches and accumulates, stops and gathers, there will be a clashing of yang with a harmonising of yin, the earth will be rich and the water deep, the grasses lush and the forests luxuriant.5 Therefore, in this cosmology fertility is synonymous with the accumu- lation of qi and the correct association of the male and female prin- ciples. However, it should be noted that this fertility is used within the context of the nourishment of the spirit of one’s ancestors. Thus, it seems that the original context for dwelling sites in terms of fengshui was in relation to burial and nourishment of spirit. Seemingly later, this concept of dwelling sites was transferred to the abodes of the living. The Huangdi Zhai Jing (Yellow Emperor’s Classic of Dwelling Sites), attributed to Wang Wei in the Liu Song Dynasty (420–479 AD), states that: The site is the focal point of yin and yang and the standard for human relationships. In general, there is no place where Man resides which is not a site. Even though there may be only a difference in size, there are differences, so that, even if one lodges in a single room, there is both good and evil. For the large site there are many points to speak of. For the small site there are few points to discuss.There is disaster for those who violate this. When bad siting is corrected, misfortune will cease with the effect of medicine for illness.6 However, there is some evidence to show the theory on the impor- tance on how the graves or houses are sited, according to the FENGSHUI AND “ART OF SWINDLERS” 429 principles of fengshui occurred much earlier in Chinese culture. For example, the Mengtian section of the Shi Ji7 mentions local villagers complaining about the excavation of the surround- ing land for the building of the Great Wall because of their fear of the disturbance of the veins of qi in the land in this process. This indicates that even though the term fengshui was not used at that time as a word synonymous to dwelling sites, its theoretical con- struct was in place some five hundred years before the Gu Ben Zang Shu. III. The Art of Swindlers Subsequently, from Tang Dynasty to Song Dynasty there was a theo- retical schism among the practitioners of fengshui into Xingshi Pai (the Form School) and Fangzhi Pai (the Compass School). The Compass School was founded by Wang Ji in Fujian in Song Dynasty. It used astrology and the trigrams of the Yi Jing as well as the compass to determine the indications of the topography. In contrast, the Form School held more to the older principles, which are found in the earlier texts outlined above. The founder was supposedly somewhat mythical personage of Tang Dynasty, Yang Yunsong in Jiangxi Prov- ince. His texts, such as the Han Long Jing (Shaking Dragon Classic), do contain an element of astrology, but there is no consideration of the compass.8 One text that gives us insight into the acrimony of this schism is the Nan Jie Ershisi Pian.This is an extended treatise on the theories of the Form School of dwelling sites and dwellings for both the living and the dead in relation to the energy of mountains and rivers written in the form of a problem-answer dialogue. It is particularly interesting because of its denigration of the Compass School and the use of fengshui in the pursuit of good fortune. Its quasi-scientific and strongly empirical tone is a precursor to the ecological stance that pervades many modern popular treatises on fengshui.9 The authorship of this text is stated to be “anonymous” and there is no indication of the era from which it may come although it is found in the late Ming Dynasty (1628–44) collection, Jin Dai Bi Shu (Writings Fording the Mysteries) compiled by Mao Jin, and this with other textual evidence, particularly the place names used, point toward it probably being written between the late Song Dynasty and the early Ming Dynasty. The poverty of style in the writing of this text and the consequent difficulty of translation suggest that the author is not a scholar merely commentating on the concepts of fengshui but a practitioner––that is, a fengshui xiansheng––of the Form School, who had a stake in deni- 430 michael john paton grating the practices of the then comparatively much newer and perhaps more popular Compass School. Of particular interest is the distress of the author of the Nan Jie Ershisi Pian at the use of the principles of fengshui to ensure good fortune. This attack on the use of bearing associated with the search for auspiciousness occurs first in Problem 4: The whole of this work discusses the form, force, feeling and nature of water. It is never ignorant of the important principles as are the practitioners of the theories of direction who absurdly match longev- ity, the receiving of favours, becoming an official and imperial pros- perity with good and evil spirits and good and ill fortune, consequently causing the lucky not to be buried and those buried not to have good fortune. In deluding the world and misleading the people, nothing is worse than this.10 Another example of the negative stance of this author toward the practitioners of that time occurs in Problem 8: The above 4 points are rejected by the present practitioners of the art, who indeed conduct the art of swindlers. Therefore generations guard their theories without change not knowing that their words are distant from the classics and go against the Way. Oh, the sorrow of it! How can there be an affair not modelled on the ancients or a righ- teousness that does not venerate the classics and yet still not be defiance against the correct?11 Thus, the skeptical distrust that many display around the world today toward “New Age” proponents of fengshui is reflected some seven hundred years earlier in Chinese culture, and seemingly by an actual practitioner himself.