Land to the Rear of the Robin Hood Public House, Clifton Road, Clifton Reynes, Buckinghamshire Mk46 5Dr

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Land to the Rear of the Robin Hood Public House, Clifton Road, Clifton Reynes, Buckinghamshire Mk46 5Dr LAND TO THE REAR OF THE ROBIN HOOD PUBLIC HOUSE, CLIFTON ROAD, CLIFTON REYNES, BUCKINGHAMSHIRE MK46 5DR OFFERS ARE INVITED IN EXCESS OF £200,000 A good opportunity to purchase this land to the rear of The Robin Hood Public House, Clifton Road, Clifton Reynes with separate access for sale, Subject to Planning for the construction of one private dwelling house on land inside the Village development limit and for the construction of four houses for affordable housing. Offers are invited for the potential development in excess of £200,000. We attach to these details the Planning Representation - copyright of Phillips Planning Services - along with an indicative layout and we confirm that Phillips Planning Services should be engaged in the forward Planning process. SKETCH PLAN PLANNING REPRESENTATION Planning Briefing Note The Robin Hood Public House, Clifton Reynes, Buckinghamshire, MK46 5DR Planning History The Robin Hood, Road between Spring lane and Newton Road Emberton, Clifton Reynes, Olney, MK46 5DT No online planning history (1997- ) Flat at The Robin Hood, Road between Spring Lane and Newton Road Emberton, Clifton Reynes, Olney, MK46 5DR No online planning history (1997- ) Planning Policy Land to the rear of the Robin Hood Public House, Clifton Reynes is subject to a series of designations as identified on the Milton Keynes Local Plan Proposals Map adopted December2005. A small section of the the northern side of the site is located within the settlement boundary of Clifton Reynes (Clifton Reynes is designated an ‘other village’) adjacent to the Conservation Area and identified as part of a ‘Housing’ area. The remainder of the site is identified is located within the open countryside. The whole site is located within an ‘Area of Attractive Landscape’. Market Housing * PRINCIPLE-Local Plan Policy S9-Clifton Reynes designated as an ‘Other Village-Infill development sympathetic to character of villages permitted within ‘settlement boundary’ * Note-policy to be superseded by Core Strategy Policy CS1 upon adoption –Clifton Reynes still defined as ‘other village’ where infill development will be permitted within the development boundary. * Outside settlement boundary-permission will only be granted for agriculture, forestry, countryside recreation and other development appropriate to rural area and cannot be located within a settlement. * Area of Attractive Landscape/Conservation Area will need to be considered through design. Summary – there is scope for infill on the land within the settlement envelope, subject to the following: Access via the track to the side being available The design will have to either fall just within or straddle the settlement boundary, possibly as built development within and garden land outside. The public house amenity and parking must be maintained or not harmed by the provision of the dwelling – a feasibility layout is required. Rural Exceptions * Policy H6 of Local Plan-Planning permission for affordable housing to meet ‘local rural needs’ may be granted ‘outside the limits of development of villages’ subject to following criteria: i. An up to date housing needs survey has been carried out and agreed with the council, which shows there is a need arising from the settlement for the type, scale and tenure of the proposed affordable dwellings at the estimated out-turn prices or rents ii. Arrangements are in place to reserve the housing for local needs in perpetuity iii. The is no more than 0.4 hectares in size and will provide no more than 12 dwellings iv. The site is well related to the existing pattern of development in the surrounding area * Area of Attractive Landscape/Conservation Area will need to be considered through design of any proposal. * We have been unable to identify whether there has been a local housing needs assessment. It will be important to establish through the Housing Department or the Parish whether there is locally identified need and to what extent is the need (how many units, what type, size and tenure. Summary – there is certainly scope for rural exception housing in policy terms subject to their being an identified need. The site is ideally located at the centre of the village and directly adjacent to the bus stop. Issues that would need be addressed if there is local housing need: Access via the track to the side being available, and it may well be necessary for that the access to be upgraded in some way, as RSLs seek for the road way to be adopted in order to avoid long term maintenance issues, as well as suitable access for refuse collection vehicles etc. The public house amenity and parking must be maintained or not harmed by the provision of the dwellings – a feasibility layout is required. Planning fees budget excluding specialist reports and LPA fees: Single dwelling - £2000 exc VAT for planning. £2500 exc VAT for design of the dwelling for planning stage (excludes construction drawings and building regs application *********** Clifton Reynes Clifton Reynes is a Village in the Borough of Milton Keynes, in the ceremonial county of Buckinghamshire, England. The stone houses and barns are a real taste of the countryside. The vibrant Robin Hood Pub, at the heart of things, is the ideal place for refreshment, and is a friendly place to visit. It is about a mile east of Olney. It is a civil parish sharing a joint parish council with Newton Blossomville. It is bounded, on the North, by the River Great Ouse, by which this Parish is separated from Lavendon and Cold Brayfield; on the East, by Newton-Blossomville; on the South, by Petsoe and Emberton; and on the West, by the latter and by Olney. Local Authority Milton Keynes Borough Council, Saxon Court Offices, 502 Avebury Boulevard, Central Milton Keynes MK9 3HS Telephone: 01908 691691 Clifton Road, Clifton Reynes Location.
Recommended publications
  • Buckingham Share As at 16 July 2021
    Deanery Share Statement : 2021 allocation 3AM AMERSHAM 2021 Cash Recd Bal as at % Paid Share To Date 16-Jul-21 To Date A/C No Parish £ £ £ % S4642 AMERSHAM ON THE HILL 75,869 44,973 30,896 59.3 DD S4645 AMERSHAM w COLESHILL 93,366 55,344 38,022 59.3 DD S4735 BEACONSFIELD ST MARY, MICHAEL & THOMAS 244,244 144,755 99,489 59.3 DD S4936 CHALFONT ST GILES 82,674 48,998 33,676 59.3 DD S4939 CHALFONT ST PETER 88,520 52,472 36,048 59.3 DD S4971 CHENIES & LITTLE CHALFONT 73,471 43,544 29,927 59.3 DD S4974 CHESHAM BOIS 87,147 51,654 35,493 59.3 DD S5134 DENHAM 70,048 41,515 28,533 59.3 DD S5288 FLAUNDEN 20,011 11,809 8,202 59.0 DD S5324 GERRARDS CROSS & FULMER 224,363 132,995 91,368 59.3 DD S5351 GREAT CHESHAM 239,795 142,118 97,677 59.3 DD S5629 LATIMER 17,972 7,218 10,754 40.2 DD S5970 PENN 46,370 27,487 18,883 59.3 DD S5971 PENN STREET w HOLMER GREEN 70,729 41,919 28,810 59.3 DD S6086 SEER GREEN 75,518 42,680 32,838 56.5 DD S6391 TYLERS GREEN 41,428 24,561 16,867 59.3 DD S6694 AMERSHAM DEANERY 5,976 5,976 0 0.0 Deanery Totals 1,557,501 920,018 637,483 59.1 R:\Store\Finance\FINANCE\2021\Share 2021\Share 2021Bucks Share20/07/202112:20 Deanery Share Statement : 2021 allocation 3AY AYLESBURY 2021 Cash Recd Bal as at % Paid Share To Date 16-Jul-21 To Date A/C No Parish £ £ £ % S4675 ASHENDON 5,108 2,975 2,133 58.2 DD S4693 ASTON SANDFORD 6,305 6,305 0 100.0 S4698 AYLESBURY ST MARY 49,527 23,000 26,527 46.4 S4699 AYLESBURY QUARRENDON ST PETER 7,711 4,492 3,219 58.3 DD S4700 AYLESBURY BIERTON 23,305 13,575 9,730 58.2 DD S4701 AYLESBURY HULCOTT ALL SAINTS
    [Show full text]
  • Milton Keynes Neighbourhood Regeneration Phase 2 Consultation
    Milton Keynes Neighbourhood Regeneration Phase 2 Consultation 11th January – 9th April 2010 www.miltonkeynes.gov.uk/regeneration Responses should be sent to: Regeneration Team, Milton Keynes Council, Civic Offices, 1 Saxon Gate East, Central Milton Keynes, MK9 3HN or email: [email protected] Deepening Divide 2 Neighbourhood Regeneration Strategy The approach is driven by the view that services will be improved and communities strengthened only where there is effective engagement and empowerment of the community 3 1 Neighbourhood Regeneration Strategy Physical Economic • Local spatial strategy that will improve the • Local employment strategy physical capital of the area • Support local business and retail provision • Improved green spaces • Promote social enterprise • Improved housing condition • Improved and increased use of facilities Social Human • Local community development and capacity • Promote healthy living and physical exercise building • Develop stronger local learning cultures • Engage ‘hard to reach’ groups • Produce local learning plans • Support building of community pride • Improved performance at school 4 Priority Neighbourhoods Within the 15% most deprived in England as defined by the IMD • Fullers Slade • Water Eaton • Leadenhall • Beanhill • Netherfield • Tinkers Bridge • Coffee Hall Within the 15-20% most deprived in England as defined by the IMD • Stacey Bushes • Bradville/New Bradwell and Stantonbury • Conniburrow • Fishermead • Springfield • Eaglestone Within the 20-25% most deprived in England
    [Show full text]
  • Olney Town Council
    OLNEY TOWN COUNCIL To all members of Olney Town Council You are hereby summoned to attend the Meeting of Olney Town Council to be held in The Olney Centre, on Monday 04 March 2019 at 7.30 p.m. for the purpose of transacting the following business. Liam Costello Town Clerk 27 February 2019 There will be a 15 minute open forum at the beginning of the meeting when members of the public resident in Olney are invited to address the Council. Each individual will be limited to speak for no more than 3 minutes AGENDA 1. Apologies for absence 2. Declarations of interests on items on the agenda 3. To approve the minutes of the meeting held on 14 January 2019 4. To approve the minutes of the meeting held on 04 February 2019 5. Report of meeting with Barclays on 1st March 6. Consultation on the proposal to close Emberton School 7. Near Town Gardens - Proposed Parking and Waiting Restrictions 8. Sponsorship of Hanging Baskets 9. Library request for funding for towards the Summer Reading Challenge 10. Events a. Riverfest - weekend of 6th and 7th July b. BOFF – Weekend of 14 and 15 September 11. Communications Policies a. Communications Policy Town Clerk: Mr. Liam Costello Tel: 01234 711679 e: [email protected] – Web: www.olneytowncouncil.gov.uk b. Social Media Policy 12. To receive minutes, or reports from chairman, of committees that have met since the last council meeting: a. Planning – 11 February b. Olney Development Group – 25 February 13. Interim Internal Audit Report 2018/19 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Milton Keynes in Buckinghamshire
    Final recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Milton Keynes in Buckinghamshire Report to the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions August 2001 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND © Crown Copyright 2001 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by the Local Government Commission for England with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. Report no: 255 ii LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CONTENTS page WHAT IS THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND? v SUMMARY vii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 CURRENT ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS 3 3 DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS 7 4 RESPONSES TO CONSULTATION 9 5 ANALYSIS AND FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS 11 6 WHAT HAPPENS NEXT? 33 APPENDIX A Final Recommendations for Milton Keynes: Detailed Mapping 35 A large map illustrating the proposed ward boundaries for the new town of Milton Keynes and Bletchley is inserted inside the back cover of the report. LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND iii iv LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND WHAT IS THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND? The Local Government Commission for England is an independent body set up by Parliament. Our task is to review and make recommendations to the Government on whether there should be changes to local authorities’ electoral arrangements. Members of the Commission are: Professor Malcolm Grant (Chairman) Professor Michael Clarke CBE (Deputy Chairman) Peter Brokenshire Kru Desai Pamela Gordon Robin Gray Robert Hughes CBE Barbara Stephens (Chief Executive) We are required by law to review the electoral arrangements of every principal local authority in England.
    [Show full text]
  • Decision Codes
    PAGE: 1 DETAILS OF DECISIONS MADE WEEK BEGINNING 7th March 2005 Decision Codes AGRAPP Agricultural Notification – Approved PD Permitted development (Planning Permission Not Required) AGRPPR Agricultural Notification – PEAVNZ Advert consent with standard conditions Planning Permission Required ALLOW Appeal Allowed PER Permitted APPWD Appeal Withdrawn PERLBZ Listed Building consent CATREE No objection to works to tree in Conservation Area PHEDGZ Hedgerow can be removed CSS Called in by the Secretary of State for decision PRESMZ Approval of reserved matters DEEMD Hazardous Substance Deemed Consent PTALLW Appeal allowed in part DISMIS Appeal Dismissed PTCON Permit works to tree in CA HEDGN Hedgerow Notice Not Required PTPOZ Tree preservation order consent HZPER Hazardous Substances Approval RCONAZ Conservation area consent refusal LAWFUL Lawful Use/Development READVZ Advert consent refused LEGAL Subject to a legal Agreement REF Refused NCAD Negative certificate of appropriate development REFLBZ Listed Building consent refused NDET Appeal RETURN Invalid application returned NOELB No objections Ecclesiastical L.B RHEDGZ Hedgerow to be retained NOOBJ No objections raised Circ. 18/84 or 14/90 RTCON Trees in CA objections/split decision NPW Application not proceeded with RTPOZ Tree preservation order consent refused PANRQ Prior approval not required SOSA Approved by Secretary of State PAREQ Prior approval required SPLITZ Advert split decision PAREQA Prior approval required and approved TCASPL Split response to trees in CA notification PAREQR Prior
    [Show full text]
  • Emberton Parish Council Minutes of Meeting – Tuesday 1St October 2019
    77 Emberton Parish Council st Minutes of Meeting – Tuesday 1 October 2019 Present: Councillor Victoria McLean (Chairman) Councillor Stephen Gibson (Vice Chairman) Councillor Paul Flowers Councillor Soo Hall Councillor Mike Horton Councillor Harry White Ward Councillor David Hosking (part meeting) Mr D Cobbold – resident (part meeting) Mr R Laval – Chairman – Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group (part meeting) Mr A McGrandle – resident (part meeting) Mr N Sibbald – Chair of Finance, Staff & Premises Committee, Village School Federation (part meeting) Mr S Sims, Strategic Lead, Education Access MKC (part meeting) Ms M Younger – Deputy of School Federation (part meeting) Mrs Karen Goss – Clerk and RFO Apologies for Absence - Apologies for Absence were received from Cllr Logsdail and Ward Cllrs Peter Geary and Keith McLean. Declarations of Interest in items on the Agenda – There were no Declarations of Interest. 1. MINUTES OF THE MEETING held on 3rd September 2019. These were confirmed and signed by the Chairman. 3.85 Emberton School – Mr Sims stated that the consultation was open until 3rd October for people to put forward their comments on the proposal to close Emberton School. The proposal was based on low pupil numbers over the last few years with no pupils on roll at the present time. The birth rate had dropped significantly across the borough and the position was that there were a lot of school places giving parents a choice. The consultation finishes on the 3rd October and would go to a delegated decision and taken by Councillor Nolan in November. A number of consultations had already been undertaken and MKC have been collecting information back from consultations and took it back to delegated decision as to whether to proceed to the present stage.
    [Show full text]
  • Milton Keynes Councillors
    LIST OF CONSULTEES A copy of the Draft Telecommunications Systems Policy document was forwarded to each of the following: MILTON KEYNES COUNCILLORS Paul Bartlett (Stony Stratford) Jan Lloyd (Eaton Manor) Brian Barton (Bradwell) Nigel Long (Woughton) Kenneth Beeley (Fenny Stratford) Graham Mabbutt (Olney) Robert Benning (Linford North) Douglas McCall (Newport Pagnell Roger Bristow (Furzton) South) Stuart Burke (Emerson Valley) Norman Miles (Wolverton) Stephen Clark (Olney) John Monk (Linford South) Martin Clarke (Bradwell) Brian Morsley (Stantonbury) George Conchie (Loughton Park) Derek Newcombe (Walton Park) Stephen Coventry (Woughton) Ian Nuttall (Walton Park) Paul Day (Wolverton) Michael O’Sullivan (Loughton Park) Reginald Edwards (Eaton Manor) Michael Pendry (Stony Stratford) John Ellis (Ouse Valley) Alan Pugh (Linford North) John Fairweather (Campbell Park) Christopher Pym (Walton Park) Brian Gibbs (Loughton Park) Hilary Saunders (Wolverton) Grant Gillingham (Fenny Stratford) Patricia Seymour (Sherington) Bruce Hardwick (Newport Pagnell Valerie Squires (Whaddon) North) Paul Stanyer (Furzton) William Harnett (Denbigh) Wedgwood Swepston (Emerson Euan Henderson (Newport Pagnell Valley) North) Cec Tallack (Campbell Park) Irene Henderson (Newport Pagnell Bert Tapp (Hanslope Park) South) Christine Tilley (Linford South) David Hopkins (Danesborough) Camilla Turnbull (Whaddon) Janet Irons (Bradwell Abbey) Paul White (Danesborough) Harry Kilkenny (Stantonbury) Isobel Wilson (Campbell Park) Michael Legg (Denbigh) Kevin Wilson (Woughton) David
    [Show full text]
  • Ousedale Revised Admission Arrangements KGE Amends 6 Sept
    ADMISSION ARRANGEMENTS For Year 7 entry in September 2020 & In-year admissions from September 2019 (Sections A-C) 1 ADMISSIONS ARRANGEMENTS FOR OUSEDALE SCHOOL A. BACKGROUND The ethos of Ousedale School is expressed in its mission statement: in which it strives to provide: Students with the knowledge, confidence and skills to contribute and compete successfully locally, nationally and globally because they were educated at Ousedale School. Our school motto is for the school community to Aspire, Believe, Achieve: Aspire: Students, supported by staff and parents, are motivated to aim high in everything they do. They are encouraged to aspire to new heights: academically, practically and through the acquisition of new skills. Core values are promoted and opportunities provided for staff and students to demonstrate these on a daily basis. Believe: Students, with staff, develop resilience and self-belief in their ability to reach challenging targets and develop new skills. Achieve: Students achieve outstanding results and take responsibility for their learning enabling them to progress onto pathways of their choice and participate fully in the life of the school. We ask all parents/carers applying for a place to respect this ethos and its importance to the school community. 2 B. AREA SERVED BY OUSEDALE SCHOOL – THE DEFINED AREA The school serves the two most northern towns in Milton Keynes, Newport Pagnell and Olney. Students in years 7 to 11 will attend one of the campuses (later referred to as the ‘designated campus’) of Ousedale School as follows; students living outside the defined area are considered for the campus they live closest to: Newport Pagnell Campus for children living in: Astwood, Chicheley, Gayhurst, Hardmead, Lathbury, Little Linford, Moulsoe, Newport Pagnell, North Crawley, Sherington and Stoke Goldington.
    [Show full text]
  • Dc00090-Censusatlastenure
    Census Atlas: Tenure Introduction This document provides a set of thematic maps on the tenure data by estate and settlement in Milton Keynes from 2011 Census data. You can download the tables of data used in the maps via the MKi Observatory using the link below: • Tenure – Estates and Settlements Methodology These maps were created by the Research and Intelligence team at Milton Keynes Council based on 2011 Census data published by the Office for National Statistics. The 2011 Census data was not released at estate level. The Research and Intelligence team at Milton Keynes Council therefore added together Output Area (the smallest census geography) data to provide an estimate at estate level. As Output Areas (OAs) boundaries and estate boundaries do not always match, the data for OAs is weighted to estates. The data in the maps should therefore be seen as estimates based on 2011 Census data rather than actual figures. Full information on the methodology used to estimates the data at estate level can be viewed here: http://www.mkiobservatory.org.uk/document.aspx?id=10215&siteID=1026 Further Information Further information, data and analysis on the 2011 Census can be viewed on the MKi Observatory via the link below: http://www.mkiobservatory.org.uk/page.aspx?id=1924&siteID=1026 Email: [email protected] Tel: 01908 254257 2011 Census Atlas: Tenure Map 1: % of households - Owned Outright Warrington Lavendon Olney Cold Br ay field Weston Underwood Newton Blossomville Clifton Ravenstone Reynes Stok e Goldington Emberton Hardmead Tyringham
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Area Review Programme
    Conservation and Archaeology Conservation Area Review Programme General Information Document – Consultation Draft The Green, Milton Keynes Village www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/planning-and-building/conservation-and-archaeology Conservation Area Review Programme - General Information Document – Consultation Draft Map 1. Conservation Areas – Milton Keynes Milton Keynes Conservation Area Review Conservation Area Milton Keynes LAVENDON OLNEY NEWTON BLOSSOMVILLE WESTON UNDERWOOD CLIFTON REYNES RAVENSTONE EMBERTON STOKE GOLDINGTON HANSLOPE SHERINGTON NORTH CRAWLEY CASTLETHORPE NEWPORT PAGNELL GREAT LINFORD WOLVERTON WILLEN STONY STRAFORD BROUGHTON OLD BRADWELL MILTON KEYNES VILLAGE CALVERTON LOUGHTON WOUGHTON ON THE GREEN SHENLEY CHURCH END WOBURN SANDS BLETCHLEY LITTLE BRICKHILL 0km 1km 3km 5km 0.5km 2km 4km 3 Conservation Area Review Programme - General Information Document – Consultation Draft 1. Introduction 2. Milton Keynes Borough: Conservation areas are ‘areas of special architectural or Historic development historic interest the character or appearance of which it Pre Roman and Roman is desirable to preserve or enhance.’1 Milton Keynes Borough is rich in archaeological Milton Keynes Council (the Council) has 27 remains with sites and finds from the Palaeolithic conservation areas within its administrative boundary period onwards. Though the prehistoric and Roman (Map 1). It is a statutory requirement for councils to periods were important in shaping the appearance of review their conservation area boundaries and the the wider landscape, there is little discernible influence supporting texts from ‘time to time’2. In line with best on the character and appearance of the later towns practice the council seeks to review its conservation and villages in the area, including the 27 conservation areas every five years.
    [Show full text]
  • Brochure Template
    MEDIA PACK 2020 Two quality, glossy monthly magazines Ensuring your brand is seen by the right people at the right time www.pulsemagazine.co.uk | 01908 465488 Connect with your target audience online and in print We produce two magazines with a combined readership of 162,000 ABOUT PULSE MAGAZINE In 2009 our first publication,MK Pulse launched with a circulation of 10,000. Today there are now two publications - MK and NN They use the Magazine to find trusted suppliers Pulse. MK Pulse is delivered throughout Milton and tradesmen and since the editorial content Keynes and Buckinghamshire and NN Pulse spans the entire month, Pulse Magazine is kept Northamptonshire. We pride ourself on carefully and referred to time and time again. selecting the 54,000 plus ABc1 areas we cover Pulse Magazine carries around 60% editorial and across both counties. advertising is interspersed among local stories, A vibrant lifestyle magazine and a trusted news, features and other information that matters companion to those living locally, Pulse Magazine to readers. Advertising is seen as an integral part is A4 in size, full colour and printed on premium of Pulse Magazine; readers value it and consume glossy paper that invites the reader and the content with interest. Advertisements are encourages retention. At home, at work and on the screened looking for items that interest, intrigue, go, people look to Pulse Magazine when they’re catch the eye, entertain and inform. When you open to discovering what’s going on in the local create well-targeted adverts that speak to readers, area.
    [Show full text]
  • Hardmead and Its Deserted Village. Paul S H Smith
    HARDMEAD AND ITS DESERTED VILLAGE PAUL S. H. SMITH The results of a survey and watching brief at the deserted medieval village of Hardmead are evaluated in the context of additional archaeological and historical evidence assembled during a subsequent parish survey. There are indications that Roman land use may have influenced later colonization patterns, which did not peak until the thirteenth century. Documentary sources show that enclosure, followed by local and national socio-economic trends producing long-term pauperism and housing problems, led to the depopulation of the medieval village in the mid-nineteenth century. Introduction The soil is heavy, slowly permeable calcareous There are two deserted medieval villages in clay with flint, overlying a chalky fill. This Hardmead which formed a north-south orien- would have caused considerable drainage and tated polyfocal settlement. The watching brief saturation problems in the past, especially on was carried out on the area of the northern the level plateau area in the north of the parish 'end' (Fig. 1:5 and Fig. 2), a little under one around the northern 'end' where, even with mile (1.4 km) north of the west-east Newport modern drainage techniques, long periods of Pagnell-Bedford road, which bisects the waterlogging can still occur. These soils are also southern half of Hardmead parish. The parish susceptible to compaction, a hard impervious is irregular in shape, with a narrow penisula- 'plough-sole' forming beneath the tilth after like projection to the south, and a long sustained use as arable land. The present agri- north-south axis. It is bounded on the west by culture is primarily arable with very little Chicheley and Emberton, on the south by permanent pasture.
    [Show full text]