DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix E.05 Hydrologic/Water Resources (Waterbody Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Appendix E.05 – Hydrologic/Water Resources (Waterbody Analysis) Data Matrices Tier 1 Final EIS Volume 2 NEC FUTURE Appendix E.05 - Hyrdologic/Water Resources (Waterbody Analysis): Data Exisiting NEC Special WQ Wild and Freshwater Saltwater Construction State County Waterbody Name HUC12 HUC12 Name Navigable SFHA CZMA Swath Consideration Scenic River Wetlands Wetlands Type DC District of Columbia Hickey Run 020700100204 Lower Anacostia River No 303(d) No No No Yes No Affected Environment DC District of Columbia Beaverdam Creek 020700100204 Lower Anacostia River No 303(d) No No No Yes No Affected Environment MD Prince George's Anacostia River 020700100204 Lower Anacostia River No 303(d)-Shellfish No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment MD Prince George's Beaverdam Creek 020700100204 Lower Anacostia River No No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment MD Prince George's Beaverdam Creek 020700100204 Lower Anacostia River No No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment MD Prince George's Beaverdam Creek 020700100204 Lower Anacostia River No No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment MD Prince George's Cabin Branch 020700100204 Lower Anacostia River No No No No Yes No Affected Environment MD Prince George's Beaverdam Creek 020700100204 Lower Anacostia River No No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment MD Prince George's Cattail Branch 020700100204 Lower Anacostia River No No No No Yes No Affected Environment Northwest Branch of the MD Prince George's Folly Branch 020600060302 Western Branch Patuxent No 303(d) No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment River MD Anne Arundel Stony Run 020600031102 Deep Run-Patapsco River No No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment MD Anne Arundel Stony Run 020600031102 Deep Run-Patapsco River No No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment MD Anne Arundel / Howard Deep Run 020600031102 Deep Run-Patapsco River No 303(d) No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment Anne Arundel / Howard MD Patapsco River 020600031102 Deep Run-Patapsco River No Tier II No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment / Baltimore County West Branch Herbert Herbert Run-Patapsco MD Baltimore County 020600031103 No 303(d) No No No Yes No Affected Environment Run River West Branch Herbert Herbert Run-Patapsco MD Baltimore County 020600031103 No 303(d) No No No Yes No Affected Environment Run River Back River-Hawk Cove- MD Baltimore County Northeast Creek 020600030703 No No No Yes Yes Yes Affected Environment Chesapeake Bay Back River-Hawk Cove- MD Baltimore County Stemmers Run 020600030703 No No No No Yes No Affected Environment Chesapeake Bay Back River-Hawk Cove- MD Baltimore County Brien Run 020600030703 No No No No Yes No Affected Environment Chesapeake Bay MD Baltimore County Frog Mortar Creek 020600030701 Middle River No No No No No No Affected Environment Baltimore County / Whitemarsh Run-Bird MD Bird River 020600030601 No No No Yes Yes Yes Affected Environment Harford River Baltimore County / Saltpeter Creek- MD Gunpowder Falls 020600030602 No Tier II No No Yes Yes Yes Affected Environment Harford Gunpowder River MD Harford Deep Spring Branch 020600030106 Bush River No No No Yes Yes Yes Affected Environment MD Harford Deep Spring Branch 020600030106 Bush River No No No Yes Yes Yes Affected Environment MD Harford Deep Spring Branch 020600030106 Bush River No No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment MD Harford Deep Spring Branch 020600030106 Bush River No No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment MD Harford Deep Spring Branch 020600030106 Bush River No No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment MD Cecil North East Creek 020600020102 North East Creek No 303(d) No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment MD Cecil Little North East Creek 020600020102 North East Creek No Tier II No No No Yes No Affected Environment MD Cecil Little North East Creek 020600020101 Little North East Creek No Tier II No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment DE New Castle Persimmon Run 020402050502 Upper Christina River No 303(d) No No No Yes Yes Affected Environment DE New Castle Persimmon Run 020402050502 Upper Christina River No 303(d) No No No Yes Yes Affected Environment DE New Castle White Clay Creek 020402050308 Lower White Clay Creek No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Affected Environment Tier 1 Final EIS Volume 2 1 NEC FUTURE Appendix E.05 - Hyrdologic/Water Resources (Waterbody Analysis): Data Exisiting NEC Special WQ Wild and Freshwater Saltwater Construction State County Waterbody Name HUC12 HUC12 Name Navigable SFHA CZMA Swath Consideration Scenic River Wetlands Wetlands Type DE New Castle White Clay Creek 020402050308 Lower White Clay Creek No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Affected Environment DE New Castle Red Clay Creek 020402050307 Red Clay Creek No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Affected Environment DE New Castle Red Clay Creek 020402050307 Red Clay Creek No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Affected Environment DE New Castle Christina River 020402050505 Lower Christina River Yes 303(d)-CWF No No Yes Yes Yes Affected Environment DE New Castle Newport Marsh 020402050505 Lower Christina River No 303(d) No No Yes No Yes Affected Environment DE New Castle Christina River 020402050505 Lower Christina River Yes 303(d)-CWF No No Yes Yes Yes Affected Environment DE New Castle Christina River 020402050505 Lower Christina River Yes 303(d)-CWF No No Yes Yes Yes Affected Environment Repaupo Creek-Delaware PA Delaware Stoney Creek 020402020607 No No No No Yes Yes Affected Environment River City of Philadelphia- PA Philadelphia Schuylkill River 020402031008 Yes Category 5 No Yes No Yes Yes Affected Environment Schuylkill River City of Philadelphia- PA Philadelphia Schuylkill River 020402031008 No Category 5 No Yes No Yes Yes Affected Environment Schuylkill River City of Philadelphia- PA Philadelphia Schuylkill River 020402031008 No Category 5 No Yes No Yes Yes Affected Environment Schuylkill River PA Bucks Silver Lake 020402010405 Mill Creek-Silver Lake No 303(d)/Category 5 No Yes No Yes Yes Affected Environment Van Sciver Lake-Delaware PA Bucks Van Sciver Lake 020402010404 No No Yes No Yes Yes Affected Environment River Van Sciver Lake-Delaware PA Bucks Van Sciver Lake 020402010404 No No Yes No Yes Yes Affected Environment River Van Sciver Lake-Delaware PA Bucks Van Sciver Lake 020402010404 No No Yes No Yes Yes Affected Environment River Buck Creek-Delaware PA / NJ Bucks / Mercer Delaware River 020401050911 Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Affected Environment River Assunpink Creek NJ Mercer 020401050803 Lower Assunpink Creek No Category 1 No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment Tributary NJ Mercer Miry Run Tributary 020401050802 Miry Run No 303(d) No Yes No No No Affected Environment NJ Mercer Miry Run Tributary 020401050802 Miry Run No 303(d) No Yes No No No Affected Environment NJ Mercer Miry Run Tributary 020401050802 Miry Run No 303(d) No Yes No No No Affected Environment NJ Mercer Miry Run Tributary 020401050802 Miry Run No 303(d) No Yes No No No Affected Environment Assunpink Creek NJ Mercer 020401050801 Upper Assunpink Creek No Category 1 No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment Tributary Assunpink Creek NJ Mercer 020401050801 Upper Assunpink Creek No Category 1 No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment Tributary Shipetaukin Creek NJ Mercer 020401050803 Lower Assunpink Creek No No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment Tributary Shipetaukin Creek NJ Mercer 020401050803 Lower Assunpink Creek No No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment Tributary Shipetaukin Creek NJ Mercer 020401050803 Lower Assunpink Creek No No Yes No No No Affected Environment Tributary Duck Pond Run NJ Mercer 020301050307 Upper Millstone River No 303(d) No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment Tributary Duck Pond Run NJ Mercer 020301050307 Upper Millstone River No 303(d) No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment Tributary Duck Pond Run NJ Mercer 020301050307 Upper Millstone River No 303(d) No Yes No No No Affected Environment Tributary Little Bear Brook NJ Mercer 020301050307 Upper Millstone River No No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment Tributary NJ Mercer Bear Brook Tributary 020301050304 Bear Brook No 303(d) No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment Tier 1 Final EIS Volume 2 2 NEC FUTURE Appendix E.05 - Hyrdologic/Water Resources (Waterbody Analysis): Data Exisiting NEC Special WQ Wild and Freshwater Saltwater Construction State County Waterbody Name HUC12 HUC12 Name Navigable SFHA CZMA Swath Consideration Scenic River Wetlands Wetlands Type NJ Mercer Bear Brook 020301050307 Upper Millstone River No 303(d) No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment Millstone River NJ Middlesex 020301050307 Upper Millstone River No 303(d) No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment Tributary Millstone River NJ Mercer 020301050307 Upper Millstone River No 303(d) No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment Tributary Millstone River NJ Middlesex 020301050307 Upper Millstone River No 303(d) No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment Tributary NJ Middlesex Cranbury Brook 020301050305 Cranbury Brook No 303(d) No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment NJ Middlesex Bee Brook 020301050306 Devils Brook No No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment NJ Middlesex Devils Brook Tributary 020301050306 Devils Brook No 303(d) No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment NJ Middlesex Devils Brook Tributary 020301050306 Devils Brook No 303(d) No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment NJ Middlesex Shallow Brook 020301050306 Devils Brook No 303(d) No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment NJ Middlesex Devils Brook Tributary 020301050306 Devils Brook No 303(d) No Yes No No No Affected Environment NJ Middlesex Devils Brook Tributary 020301050306 Devils Brook No 303(d) No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment NJ Middlesex Devils Brook Tributary 020301050306 Devils Brook No 303(d) No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment
Recommended publications
  • NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5

    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5

    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5 DATABASE DESIGN DOCUMENTATION AND DATA DICTIONARY 1 June 2013 Prepared for: United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21403 Prepared By: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, MD 21403 By Jacqueline Johnson Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin To receive additional copies of the report please call or write: The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 301-984-1908 Funds to support the document The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.0; Database Design Documentation And Data Dictionary was supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency Grant CB- CBxxxxxxxxxx-x Disclaimer The opinion expressed are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the U.S. Government, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the several states or the signatories or Commissioners to the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia or the District of Columbia. ii The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................
  • Thames River Basin Partnership Partners in Action Quarterly Report

    Thames River Basin Partnership Partners in Action Quarterly Report

    Thames River Basin Partnership Partners in Action Quarterly Report Summer 2018 Volume 47 The Thames River watershed includes the Five Mile, French, Moosup, Natchaug, Pachaug, Quinebaug, Shetucket, Willimantic, and Yantic Rivers and all their tributaries. We’re not just the "Thames main stem." Greetings from the Thames River Basin Partnership. Once again this quarter our partners have proven their ability to work cooperatively on projects compatible with the TRBP Workplan and in support of our common mission statement to share organizational resources and to develop a regional approach to natural resource protection. I hope you enjoy reading about these activities as much as I enjoy sharing information about them with you. For more information on any of these updates, just click on the blue website hyperlinks in this e-publication, but be sure to come back to finish reading the rest of the report. Jean Pillo, Watershed Conservation Project Manager Eastern Connecticut Conservation District And TRBP Coordinator Special Presentation If you missed the July 2018 meeting of the Thames River Basin Partnership, then you missed a presentation by Chuck Toal, Avalonia Land Conservancy’s development and programs director. Chuck gave a presentation on the 50 years of accomplishments of ALC as a regional land trust. ALC is focused on 22 towns in southeastern Connecticut. ALC, which oversees 4000 acres of preserved land, achieved accreditation in 2017. Their success has resulted from a working board of directors and the establishment of town committees to focus on smaller areas. Their current focus is to be more selective on land acquisition, particularly concentrating on building blocks of open space while also building an endowment fund land stewardship going forward.
  • Tices Lane Park Inventory Analysis

    Tices Lane Park Inventory Analysis

    Tices Land Park - East Brunswick, NJ Inventory & Analysis Prepared in March, 2017 By: Daryl Krasnuk Page | 1 Table of Contents 2. SITE HISTORY ................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 3. PRESENT ENVIRONMENT ............................................................................................................................................................. 3 3.1 PHYSICAL CONTEXT ............................................................................................................................................ 5 3.1.1 Geology .................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 3.1.2 Soils .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 3.1.3 Topography ............................................................................................................................................................................ 10 3.2 CLIMATE ........................................................................................................................................................... 12 3.3 WATER RESOURCES .........................................................................................................................................
  • Gunpowder River

    Gunpowder River

    Table of Contents 1. Polluted Runoff in Baltimore County 2. Map of Baltimore County – Percentage of Hard Surfaces 3. Baltimore County 2014 Polluted Runoff Projects 4. Fact Sheet – Baltimore County has a Problem 5. Sources of Pollution in Baltimore County – Back River 6. Sources of Pollution in Baltimore County – Gunpowder River 7. Sources of Pollution in Baltimore County – Middle River 8. Sources of Pollution in Baltimore County – Patapsco River 9. FAQs – Polluted Runoff and Fees POLLUTED RUNOFF IN BALTIMORE COUNTY Baltimore County contains the headwaters for many of the streams and tributaries feeding into the Patapsco River, one of the major rivers of the Chesapeake Bay. These tributaries include Bodkin Creek, Jones Falls, Gwynns Falls, Patapsco River Lower North Branch, Liberty Reservoir and South Branch Patapsco. Baltimore County is also home to the Gunpowder River, Middle River, and the Back River. Unfortunately, all of these streams and rivers are polluted by nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment and are considered “impaired” by the Maryland Department of the Environment, meaning the water quality is too low to support the water’s intended use. One major contributor to that pollution and impairment is polluted runoff. Polluted runoff contaminates our local rivers and streams and threatens local drinking water. Water running off of roofs, driveways, lawns and parking lots picks up trash, motor oil, grease, excess lawn fertilizers, pesticides, dog waste and other pollutants and washes them into the streams and rivers flowing through our communities. This pollution causes a multitude of problems, including toxic algae blooms, harmful bacteria, extensive dead zones, reduced dissolved oxygen, and unsightly trash clusters.
  • New York Freshwater Fishing Regulations Guide: 2015-16

    New York Freshwater Fishing Regulations Guide: 2015-16

    NEW YORK Freshwater FISHING2015–16 OFFICIAL REGULATIONS GUIDE VOLUME 7, ISSUE NO. 1, APRIL 2015 Fishing for Muskie www.dec.ny.gov Most regulations are in effect April 1, 2015 through March 31, 2016 MESSAGE FROM THE GOVERNOR New York: A State of Angling Opportunity When it comes to freshwater fishing, no state in the nation can compare to New York. Our Great Lakes consistently deliver outstanding fishing for salmon and steelhead and it doesn’t stop there. In fact, New York is home to four of the Bassmaster’s top 50 bass lakes, drawing anglers from around the globe to come and experience great smallmouth and largemouth bass fishing. The crystal clear lakes and streams of the Adirondack and Catskill parks make New York home to the very best fly fishing east of the Rockies. Add abundant walleye, panfish, trout and trophy muskellunge and northern pike to the mix, and New York is clearly a state of angling opportunity. Fishing is a wonderful way to reconnect with the outdoors. Here in New York, we are working hard to make the sport more accessible and affordable to all. Over the past five years, we have invested more than $6 million, renovating existing boat launches and developing new ones across the state. This is in addition to the 50 new projects begun in 2014 that will make it easier for all outdoors enthusiasts to access the woods and waters of New York. Our 12 DEC fish hatcheries produce 900,000 pounds of fish each year to increase fish populations and expand and improve angling opportunities.
  • Department of Environmental Protection Inland Waters And

    Department of Environmental Protection Inland Waters And

    Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies TITLE 26. Fisheries & Game Agency Department of Environmental Protection Subject Inland Waters and Marine District Defined Section § 26-108-1 CONTENTS Sec. 26-108-1. Inland waters and marine district defined Revised: 2015-3-6 R.C.S.A. § 26-108-1 - I- Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies TITLE 26. Fisheries & Game Department of Environmental Protection §26-108-1 Inland Waters and Marine District Defined Sec. 26-108-1. Inland waters and marine district defined The following lines across streams flowing into Long Island Sound, Fisher’s Island Sound, Little Narragansett Bay and tributaries thereof shall be known as the inland-marine demarcation lines above which lines such water shall be known as the “inland district” and below which lines such water shall be known as the “marine district”: FAIRFIELD COUNTY Byram River, Greenwich marine district—up to and including the railroad crossing inland district—all waters above Horse Neck Brook, Greenwich marine district—none inland district—above junction with mouth of harbor Indian Harbor, Greenwich marine district—up to and including the first railroad crossing inland district—all waters above Mianus River, Greenwich marine district—below dam just above Boston Post Road inland district—all waters above Rippowam River, Stamford marine district—up to and including the first railroad crossing inland district—all waters above Noroton River, Stamford-Darien marine district—up to and including Boston Post Road inland district—all waters above Goodwives River,
  • The District of Columbia Water Quality Assessment

    The District of Columbia Water Quality Assessment

    THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT 2008 INTEGRATED REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND U.S. CONGRESS PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 305(b) AND 303(d) CLEAN WATER ACT (P.L. 97-117) District Department of the Environment Natural Resources Administration Water Quality Division Government of the District of Columbia Adrian M. Fenty, Mayor PREFACE PREFACE The Water Quality Division of the District of Columbia's District Department of the Environment, Natural Resources Administration, prepared this report to satisfy the listing requirements of §303(d) and the reporting requirements of §305(b) of the federal Clean Water Act (P.L. 97-117). This report provides water quality information on the District of Columbia’s surface and ground waters that were assessed during 2008 and updates the water quality information required by law. Various programs in the Natural Resources Administration contributed to this report including the Fisheries and Wildlife Division and the Watershed Protection Division. Questions or comments regarding this report or requests for copies should be forwarded to the address below. The District of Columbia Government District Department of the Environment Natural Resources Administration Water Quality Division 51 N St., NE Washington, D.C. 20002-3323 Attention: N. Shulterbrandt ii TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE ................................................................... ii TABLE OF CONTENTS........................................................iii LIST OF TABLES...........................................................
  • Geographical Distribution and Potential for Adverse Biological Effects of Selected Trace Elements and Organic Compounds in Strea

    Geographical Distribution and Potential for Adverse Biological Effects of Selected Trace Elements and Organic Compounds in Strea

    Geographical Distribution and Potential for Adverse Biological Effects of Selected Trace Elements and Organic Compounds in Streambed Sediment in the Connecticut, Housatonic, and Thames River Basins, 1992-94 By Robert F. Breault and Sandra L. Harris Abstract exceed sediment-quality guidelines over a wider geographical area, although usually by lower Streambed-sediment samples were collected ratios of contaminant concentration to sediment- in 1992-94 at selected sites in the Connecticut, quality guideline than the organic compounds. Housatonic, and Thames River Basins to determine the geographical distribution of trace elements and organic compounds and their INTRODUCTION potential for adverse biological effects on aquatic organisms. Chromium, copper, lead, mercury, The Connecticut, Housatonic, and Thames River Basins study unit is one of 59 National Water-Quality nickel, zinc, chlordane, DDT, PAHs, and PCBs Assessment (NAWQA) study units nationwide. The were detected in samples from throughout the study unit drainage basin comprises an area of almost basins, but concentrations of these constituents 16,000 mi2 and extends through parts of the Province of generally were lowest in the northern forested Quebec, Canada, eastern Vermont, western New Hamp- drainage basins and highest in the southern shire, west-central Massachusetts, nearly all of Connect- urbanized drainage basins of Springfield, icut, and small parts of New York and Rhode Island. Massachusetts, and Hartford, New Haven and The study unit is entirely within the New Bridgeport, Connecticut. Possible anthropogenic England Physiographic Province (Fenneman, 1938), a sources of these contaminants include industrial plateau-like upland that rises gradually from the sea but effluent; municipal wastewater; runoff from includes numerous mountain ranges and individual agricultural, urban and forested areas; and peaks.
  • Water-Supply Paper 374 Hartford, Stamford, Salisbury, Willimantic and Saybrooi Areas, Connecticut

    Water-Supply Paper 374 Hartford, Stamford, Salisbury, Willimantic and Saybrooi Areas, Connecticut

    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRANKLIN K. LANE, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 374 GROUND WATER IN THE HARTFORD, STAMFORD, SALISBURY, WILLIMANTIC AND SAYBROOI AREAS, CONNECTICUT BY HERBERT E. GREGORY AND ARTHUR J. ELUS Prepared IB cooperation with the CoBBectleat State Geological and Natural Hbtorjr Surer WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1016 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRANKLIN K. LANE, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Water-Supply Paper 374 GROUND WATER IN THE HARTFORD, STAMFORD, SALISBURY, WILLIMANTIC AND SAYBROOK AREAS, COHECTICUT HERBERT E. GREGORY AND Prepared in cooperation with the Connecticut State Geological and Natural History Surrey WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT FEINTING OFFICE 1916 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction.. ........................................................... 9 The problem. ........................................................ 9 History of the investigation. ........................................... 10 Acknowledgments. ................................................... 11 Areas selected for study. .................................................. 11 Reliability of data. ....................................................... la Occurrence of ground water. .............................................. 14 Origin.. .............................................................. 14 Water in the glacial drift. ............................................. 15 Circulation.... ...................................................
  • Middlesex Public Hearing Minutes

    Middlesex Public Hearing Minutes

    State of New Jersey DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS STATE PLANNING COMMISSION OFFICE OF SMART GROWTH PO BOX 204 TRENTON NJ 08625-0204 JON S. CORZINE SUSAN BASS LEVIN BENJAMIN L. SPINELLI Governor Commissioner Acting Executive Director & Secretary Middlesex County Cross-acceptance III Public Hearing New Jersey State Planning Commission Minutes of the Meeting Held June 14, 2007 Middlesex County Planning Department Middlesex County Planning Board Meeting Room 40 Livingston Avenue New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901 WELCOME & INTRODUCTIONS Benjamin Spinelli, Acting Executive Director in the Office of Smart Growth (OSG), called the June 14, 2007 meeting of the New Jersey State Planning Commission to order at 5:10 p.m. Mr. Spinelli proceeded to introduce the State Planning Commission (SPC) members in attendance. Louise Wilson, Local Government Representative and Deborah Mans, State Agency Representative attended on behalf of the SPC. Mr. Spinelli then introduced Middlesex County Planning Department staff in attendance. George Veverides, Middlesex County Planning Director and Mirah Becker, Middlesex County Supervising Planner attended on behalf of the Middlesex County Planning staff. John Sully, Nicolas Tufaro and Daniel Ryan also attended on behalf of the Middlesex County Planning Department. The Honorable Camille Fernicola, Freeholder also attended on behalf of the Middlesex County Board of Chosen Freeholders. Mr. Spinelli then introduced staff attending on behalf of the Office of Smart Growth (OSG) and OSG’s State Agency partners. The following people were in attendance on behalf of OSG: Barry Ableman, Principal Planner and Lorissa Whitaker, Area Planner. The following people were in attendance on behalf of OSG’s State Agency partners: Helene Rubin, New Jersey Department of Transportation.
  • DNR Fine Schedule

    DNR Fine Schedule

    JOHN P. MORRISSEY DISTRICT COURT OF MARYLAND 187 Harry S Truman Parkway, 5th Floor Chief Judge Annapolis, Maryland 21401 Tel: (410) 260-1525 Fax: (410) 260-1375 December 31, 2020 TO: All Law Enforcement Officers of the State of Maryland Authorized to Issue Citations for Violations of the Natural Resources Laws The attached list is a fine or penalty deposit schedule for certain violations of the Natural Resources laws. The amounts set out on this schedule are to be inserted by you in the appropriate space on the citation. A defendant who does not care to contest guilt may prepay the fine in that amount. The fine schedule is applicable whether the charge is made by citation, a statement of charges, or by way of criminal information. For some violations, a defendant must stand trial and is not permitted to prepay a fine or penalty deposit. Additionally, there may be some offenses for which there is no fine listed. In both cases, you should check the box which indicates that the defendant must appear in court on the offense. I understand that this fine schedule has been approved for legal sufficiency by the Office of the Attorney General, Department of Natural Resources. This schedule has, therefore, been adopted pursuant to the authority vested in the Chief Judge of the District Court by the Constitution and laws of the State of Maryland. It is effective January 1, 2021, replacing all schedules issued prior hereto, and is to remain in force and effect until amended or repealed. No law enforcement officer in the State is authorized to deviate from this schedule in any case in which they are involved.
  • Report of Investigations 71 (Pdf, 4.8

    Report of Investigations 71 (Pdf, 4.8

    Department of Natural Resources Resource Assessment Service MARYLAND GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Emery T. Cleaves, Director REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS NO. 71 A STRATEGY FOR A STREAM-GAGING NETWORK IN MARYLAND by Emery T. Cleaves, State Geologist and Director, Maryland Geological Survey and Edward J. Doheny, Hydrologist, U.S. Geological Survey Prepared for the Maryland Water Monitoring Council in cooperation with the Stream-Gage Committee 2000 Parris N. Glendening Governor Kathleen Kennedy Townsend Lieutenant Governor Sarah Taylor-Rogers Secretary Stanley K. Arthur Deputy Secretary MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 580 Taylor Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21401 General DNR Public Information Number: 1-877-620-8DNR http://www.dnr.state.md.us MARYLAND GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 2300 St. Paul Street Baltimore, Maryland 21218 (410) 554-5500 http://mgs.dnr.md.gov The facilities and services of the Maryland Department of Natural Resources are available to all without regard to race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, or physical or mental disability. COMMISSION OF THE MARYLAND GEOLOGICAL SURVEY M. GORDON WOLMAN, CHAIRMAN F. PIERCE LINAWEAVER ROBERT W. RIDKY JAMES B. STRIBLING CONTENTS Page Executive summary.........................................................................................................................................................1 Why stream gages?.........................................................................................................................................................4 Introduction............................................................................................................................................................4