DOCSLIB.ORG

Modern Phytomorphology 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

MODERN 2012 PHYTOMORPHOLOGY ISSN 2226-3063 Volume 1 2012 Volume 1 1 Modern phytomorphology 2012 Editor-in-Chief Tasenkevich L.O. Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Lviv, Ukraine Editorial Assistant Kondratyuk S.Ya. M.G. Kholodny Institute of Botany NASU, Kyiv, Ukraine Executive Editor Novikoff A.V. State Natural History Museum NASU, Lviv, Ukraine Editorial Board Berko Yo.N. S.Z. Gzhytskyj Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies, Lviv, Ukraine Budzhak V.V. Yuriy Fedkovich Chernivtsi National University, Chernivtsi, Ukraine Bukhtiyarova L.N. M.G. Kholodny Institute of Botany NASU, Kyiv, Ukraine Danyluk K.N. State Natural History Museum NASU, Lviv, Ukraine Deroin T. National Museum of Natural History, Paris, France Eberwein R. Carinthian Botanic Center, Klagenfurt am Woerthersee, Austria Kalinovych N.O. Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Lviv, Ukraine Klymyshyn A.S. State Natural History Museum NASU, Lviv, Ukraine Korzhenevsky V.V. Nikitsky Botanical Gardens – National Scientific Centre,Yalta, Ukraine Korzeniak J. Institute for Nature Conservation PAS, Cracow, Poland Lobachevska О.V. Institute of Ecology of the Carpathians of NAS of Ukraine, Lviv, Ukraine Lyakh A.M. A.O. Kovalevsky Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas NASU, Sevastopol, Ukraine Mamchur Z.I. Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Lviv, Ukraine Mitka J. Institute of Botany PAS, Cracow, Poland Odintsova A.V. Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Lviv, Ukraine Ostash B.O. Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Lviv, Ukraine Peruzzi L. University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy Savinykh N.P. Vyatka State University, Kirov, Russia Terek O.I. Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Lviv, Ukraine Tiezzi A. Tuscia University, Viterbo, Italy Fedorenko V.A. Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Lviv, Ukraine Tsaryk Yo.V. Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Lviv, Ukraine Chernobay Yu.M. State Natural History Museum NASU, Lviv, Ukraine Chornej I.I. Yuriy Fedkovich Chernivtsi National University, Chernivtsi, Ukraine Shipunov A. Minot State University, Minot, USA Shevchenko S.V. Nikitsky Botanical Gardens – National Scientific Centre,Yalta, Ukraine Szczepanek K. Institute of Botany PAS, Cracow, Poland Modern Phytomorphology: Proceedings of the 1st International Scientific Conference on Plant Morphology (24-26 April 2012, Lviv, Ukraine). – Lviv, 2012. – Vol. 1. – 208 p. www.phytomorphology.org © Modern Phytomorphology Technical Editor Novikoff A.V. Layout Novikoff A.V. Design Novikoff-Supp M.R., Novikoff A.V. Proofreaders Pochynok T.V., Gavrylov A.I., Klymovska D.T. Cover photo Sunset in Marmarosh Mts., Eastern Carpathians; © Novikoff A.V. Supported by Zhukovsky P.Yu. 1 Сучасна фiтоморфологiя 2012 Головний редактор Тасєнкевич Л.О. Львівський національний університет імені Івана Франка Заступник редактора Кондратюк С.Я. Інститут ботаніки ім. М.Г. Холодного НАН України Відповідальний секретар Новiков А.В. Державний природознавчий музей НАН України Редакційна колегія Берко Й.М. Львівський національний університет ветеринарної медицини та біотехнологій ім. С.З.Ґжицького Буджак В.В. Чернівецький національний університет імені Юрія Федьковича БухтIярова Л.М. Інститут ботаніки ім. М.Г. Холодного НАН України Данилюк К.М. Державний природознавчий музей НАН України Дероа T. Національний природознавий музей, Париж, Франція Ебервайн Р. Ботанічний центр Карінтії, Клягенфурт-на-Вьортер-Зе, Австрія Калiнович Н.О. Львівський національний університет імені Івана Франка КЛИМИШИН О.С. Державний природознавчий музей НАН України Корженевський В.В. Національний природознавий музей, Париж, Франція Коженяк Й. Нікітський ботанічний сад – Національний науковий центр Лобачевська О.В. Інститут охорони природи ПАН, Краків, Польща Лях А.М. Інститут екології Карпат НАН України Мамчур З.I. Інститут біології південних морів ім. О.О. Ковалевського НАН України МIтка Ю. Львівський національний університет імені Івана Франка Одінцова А.В. Інститут ботаніки ПАН, Краків, Польща Осташ Б.О. Львівський національний університет імені Івана Франка Перуцці Л. Львівський національний університет імені Івана Франка Савiних Н.П. Університет Пізи, Піза, Італія Терек О.І. Вятський державний університет, Кіров, Росія Т’єзі А. Львівський національний університет імені Івана Франка Федоренко В.О. Університет Тусції, Вітербо, Італія Царик Й.В. Львівський національний університет імені Івана Франка Чернобай Ю.М. Львівський національний університет імені Івана Франка Чорней I.I. Державний природознавчий музей НАН України Шипунов О.Б. Чернівецький національний університет імені Юрія Федьковича Шевченко С.В. Державний університет Майнота, Майнот, США Щепанек К. Нікітський ботанічний сад – Національний науковий центр Інститут ботаніки ПАН, Краків, Польща Сучасна Фітоморфологія: Матеріали 1-ї міжнародної наукової конференції з морфології рослин (24-26 квітня 2012 р., Львів. Україна). – Львів, 2012. – Т. 1. – 208 с. www.phytomorphology.org © Сучасна Фітоморфологія Технічний редактор Новіквiков А.В. Верстка Новіквiков А.В. Дизайн Новіквiкова-Суп М.Р., Новіквiков А.В. Коректори Починок Т.В., Гаврилов О.І., Климовська Д.Т. Фото обкладинки Захід сонця на Мармароші, Східні Карпати, Україна; © Новікововiков А..В.. Підтримка Жуковський П.Ю. 1 Современная фитоморфология 2012 Главный редактор Тасенкевич Л.а. Львовский национальный университет имени Ивана Франко Заместитель редактора кОндраТюк с.Я. Институт ботаники им. Н.Г. Холодного НАН Украины Ответственный секретарь нОвикОв а.в. Государственный природоведческий музей НАН Украины Редакционная коллегия БеркО Й.н. Львовский национальный университет ветеринарной медицины и биотехнологии им. С.З.Гжицкого Буджак в.в. Черновецкий национальный университет имени Юрия Федьковича БухТиЯрОва Л.н. Институт ботаники им. Н.Г. Холодного НАН Украины даныЛюк е.н. Государственный природоведческий музей НАН Украины дерОа T. Национальный природоведческий музей, Париж, Франция ЭБерваЙн р. Ботанический центр Каринтии, Клагенфурт-ам-Вёртер-Зе, Австрия каЛинОвич н.а. Львовский национальный университет имени Ивана Франко кЛиМиШин а.с. Государственный природоведческий музей НАН Украины кОрженевскиЙ в.в. Никитский ботанический сад – Национальный научный центр кОженЯк Й. Институт охраны природы ПАН, Краков, Польша ЛОБачевскаЯ О.в. Институт экологии Карпат НАН Украины ЛЯх а.М. Институт биологии южных морей А.О. Ковалевського НАН Украины МаМчур З.и. Львовский национальный университет имени Ивана Франко МиТка ю. Институт ботаники ПАН, Краков, Польша ОдинцОва а.в. Львовский национальный университет имени Ивана Франко ОсТаШ Б.О. Львовский национальный университет имени Ивана Франко Перуцци Л. Университет Пизы, Пиза, Италия савиных н.П. Вятский государственный университет, Киров, Россия Терек О.и. Львовский национальный университет имени Ивана Франко ТьеЗи а. Университет Тусции, Витербо, Италия ФедОренкО в.а. Львовский национальный университет имени Ивана Франко царик Й.в. Львовский национальный университет имени Ивана Франко чернОБаЙ ю.н. Государственный природоведческий музей НАН Украины чОрнеЙ и.и. Черновецкий национальный университет имени Юрия Федьковича ШиПунОв а.Б. Государственный университет Майнота, Майнот, США ШевченкО с.в. Никитский ботанический сад – Национальный научный центр ЩеПанЭк к. Институт ботаники ПАН, Краков, Польша Современная Фитоморфология: Материалы 1-й международной научной конференции по морфологии растений (24-26 апреля 2012 г., Львов, украина). – Львіов, 2012. – Т. 1. – 208 с. www.phytomorphology.org © современная Фитоморфология Технический редактор нОвикОв а.в. Верстка нОвикОв а.в. Дизайн нОвикОва-суП М.р., нОвикОв а.в. Корректоры ПОчинОк Т.в., Гаврилов а.и., кЛиМОвскаЯ д.Т. Фото обложки Закат солнца на Мармароше, восточные карпаты, украина; © новиков а.в. Поддержка жукОвскиЙ П.ю. Contents Зміст Содержание Mitka J. Aconitum in Central Europe: from Linnaean taxonomy to molecular markers .............................. 7 Sołtys-Lelek A., Barabasz-Krasny B., Turis P., Turisová I. Taxonomic revision of roses (Rosa L.) of selected areas in buffer zone of the Low Tatras National Park (Slovakia) ....................... 11 Chernetskyy M.A. The role of morpho-anatomical traits of the leaves in the taxonomy of Kalanchoideae Berg. subfamily (Crassulaceae DC.) ................................................................................ 15 Dąbrowska A. Morpho-anatomical structure of the leaves of Festuca trachyphylla (Hack.) Krajina in the ecological aspect ................................................................................................................................. 19 dos Santos P., Brockington S., Glover B. & Ronse de Craene L.P. Micromorphological evidence for androecium origin of Claytonia (Montiaceae) petaloids .................................................. 23 Novikoff A.V. & Kazemirska M.A. Vascular anatomy and morphology of the flowerin Fritillaria montana Hoppe (Liliaceae) ......................................................................................................................... 27 Савиных н.П., Дегтерева О.П., Журавлёва и.а., Чупракова Е.и., Шабалкина С.в. структурная поливариантность растений с позиции модульной организации.................................................. 37 Savinykh N.P., Degtereva O.P., Zhuravleva I.A., Chuprakova E.I., Shabalkina S.V. Structural multivariate of plants from the position of modular organization ..................................... 37 КОнДратюК т.О. Прояви морфологічних та фізіологічних особливостей мікроскопічних грибів-пошкоджувачів виробів і матеріалів в умовах впливу
Recommended publications
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016

    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016

    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Revised February 24, 2017 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate.
  • Native Orchids in Southeast Alaska

    Native Orchids in Southeast Alaska

    Native Orchids in Southeast Alaska Marlin Bowles & Bob Armstrong 2019 Preface Southeast Alaska's rainforests, peatlands and alpine habitats support a wide variety of plant life. The composition of this vegetation is strongly influenced by patterns of plant distribution and geographical factors. For example, the ranges of some Asian plant species extend into Southeast Alaska by way of the Aleutian Islands; other species extend northward into this region along the Pacific coast or southward from central Alaska. Included in Southeast Alaska's vegetation are at least 27 native orchid species and varieties whose collective ranges extend from Mexico north to beyond the Arctic Circle, and from North America to northern Europe and Asia. These orchids survive in a delicate ecological balance, requiring specific insect pollinators for seed production, and mycorrhizal fungi that provide nutrients essential for seedling growth and survival of adult plants. These complex relationships can lead to vulnerability to human impacts. Orchids also tend to transplant poorly and typically perish without their fungal partners. They are best left to survive as important components of biodiversity as well as resources for our enjoyment. Our goal is to provide a useful description of Southeast Alaska's native orchids for readers who share enthusiasm for the natural environment and desire to learn more about our native orchids. This book addresses each of the native orchids found in the area of Southeast Alaska extending from Yakutat and the Yukon border south to Ketchikan and the British Columbia border. For each species, we include a brief description of its distribution, habitat, size, mode of reproduction, and pollination biology.
  • The Effect of BA and GA on the Shoot Multiplication of in Vitro

    The Effect of BA and GA on the Shoot Multiplication of in Vitro

    FOLIA HORTICULTURAE Folia Hort. 23/2 (2011): 145-149 Published by the Polish Society DOI: 10.2478/v10245-011-0022-5 for Horticultural Science since 1989 The effect of BA and GA3 on the shoot multiplication of in vitro cultures of Polish wild roses Bożena Pawłowska Department of Ornamental Plants University of Agriculture in Krakow 29 Listopada 54, 31-425 Kraków, Poland e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The experiment was conducted using five species of roses naturally occurring in Poland:Rosa agrestis (fieldbriar rose), R. canina (dog rose), R. dumalis (glaucous dog rose), R. rubiginosa (sweetbriar rose), and R. tomentosa (whitewooly rose), from the in vitro collection of the Department of Ornamental Plants of the University of Agriculture in Kraków. We examined the effect of cytokinin BA (1-10 µM) added to an MS medium (Murashige and Skoog 1962) on auxiliary shoot multiplication. The second group of test media contained BA (1-5 µM) and gibberellin GA3 (0.3-1.5 µM). The cultures were maintained at a phytotron temperature of 23/25°C (night/ day), 80% relative humidity, with a 16-hour photoperiod and PPFD of 30 µmol m-2 s-1, and cultured in five-week cycles. The highest multiplication rate was obtained for R. canina and R. rubiginosa (4.1 shoots per one explant) and R. dumalis (2.9 shoots per one explant), when shoots were multiplied on an MS medium supplemented with 1 µM BA and 1.5 µM GA3. Multiplication was the weakest in Rosa tomentosa independent of the medium used. Key words: Polish wild roses, auxiliary shoots, multiplication INTRODUCTION obtained plant material, whereas only a few studies have reported successful somatic embryogenesis In vitro cultures are one of the key tools in plant (Roy et al.
  • Likely to Have Habitat Within Iras That ALLOW Road

    Likely to Have Habitat Within Iras That ALLOW Road

    Item 3a - Sensitive Species National Master List By Region and Species Group Not likely to have habitat within IRAs Not likely to have Federal Likely to have habitat that DO NOT ALLOW habitat within IRAs Candidate within IRAs that DO Likely to have habitat road (re)construction that ALLOW road Forest Service Species Under NOT ALLOW road within IRAs that ALLOW but could be (re)construction but Species Scientific Name Common Name Species Group Region ESA (re)construction? road (re)construction? affected? could be affected? Bufo boreas boreas Boreal Western Toad Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Plethodon vandykei idahoensis Coeur D'Alene Salamander Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Rana pipiens Northern Leopard Frog Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Accipiter gentilis Northern Goshawk Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Ammodramus bairdii Baird's Sparrow Bird 1 No No Yes No No Anthus spragueii Sprague's Pipit Bird 1 No No Yes No No Centrocercus urophasianus Sage Grouse Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Cygnus buccinator Trumpeter Swan Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Falco peregrinus anatum American Peregrine Falcon Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Gavia immer Common Loon Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Histrionicus histrionicus Harlequin Duck Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Lanius ludovicianus Loggerhead Shrike Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Oreortyx pictus Mountain Quail Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Otus flammeolus Flammulated Owl Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Picoides albolarvatus White-Headed Woodpecker Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Picoides arcticus Black-Backed Woodpecker Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Speotyto cunicularia Burrowing
  • Native Orchids in Southeast Alaska with an Emphasis on Juneau

    Native Orchids in Southeast Alaska with an Emphasis on Juneau

    Native Orchids in Southeast Alaska with an Emphasis on Juneau Marlin Bowles & Bob Armstrong 2019 Acknowledgements We are grateful to numerous people and agencies who provided essential assistance with this project. Carole Baker, Gilbette Blais, Kathy Hocker, John Hudson, Jenny McBride and Chris Miller helped locate and study many elusive species. Pam Bergeson, Ron Hanko, & Kris Larson for use of their photos. Ellen Carrlee provided access to the Juneau Botanical Club herbarium at the Alaska State Museum. The U.S. Forest Service Forestry Sciences Research Station at Juneau also provided access to its herbarium, and Glacier Bay National Park provided data on plant collections in its herbarium. Merrill Jensen assisted with plant resources at the Jensen-Olson Arboretum. Don Kurz, Jenny McBride, Lisa Wallace, and Mary Willson reviewed and vastly improved earlier versions of this book. About the Authors Marlin Bowles lives in Juneau, AK. He is a retired plant conservation biologist, formerly with the Morton Arboretum, Lisle, IL. He has studied the distribution, ecology and reproductionof grassland orchids. Bob Armstrong has authored and co-authored several books about nature in Alaska. This book and many others are available for free as PDFs at https://www.naturebob.com He has worked in Alaska as a biologist, research supervisor and associate professor since 1960. Table of Contents Page The southeast Alaska archipellago . 1 The orchid plant family . 2 Characteristics of orchids . 3 Floral anatomy . 4 Sources of orchid information . 5 Orchid species groups . 6 Orchid habitats . Fairy Slippers . 9 Eastern - Calypso bulbosa var. americana Western - Calypso bulbosa var. occidentalis Lady’s Slippers .
  • Rosacea) Roots Extract: Bioactivity Guided Fractionation and Cytotoxicity Against Breast Cancer Cell Lines

    Rosacea) Roots Extract: Bioactivity Guided Fractionation and Cytotoxicity Against Breast Cancer Cell Lines

    ROSA HECKELIANA (ROSACEA) ROOTS EXTRACT: BIOACTIVITY GUIDED FRACTIONATION AND CYTOTOXICITY AGAINST BREAST CANCER CELL LINES A THESIS SUMMITTED TO GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY NİZAMETTİN ÖZDOĞAN IN PARTIAL FULLFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN BIOCHEMISTRY OCTOBER 2013 1 2 Approval of the thesis: ROSA HECKELIANA (ROSACEA) ROOTS EXTRACT: BIOACTIVITY GUIDED FRACTIONATION AND CYTOTOXICITY AGAINST BREAST CANCER CELL LINES submitted by NİZAMETTİN ÖZDOĞAN in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biochemistry Department, Middle East Technical University by, Prof. Dr. Canan ÖZGEN Dean, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences ___________________ Prof. Dr. Orhan ADALI Head of Department, Biochemistry ___________________ _ Assoc. Prof. Dr. Nursen ÇORUH Supervisor, Chemistry Department., METU ____________________ Prof. Dr. Mesude İŞCAN Co-supervisor, Biology Dept., METU ____________________ Examining Committee Members: Prof. Dr. Orhan ADALI Biology Dept., METU ____________________ Assoc. Prof. Dr. Nursen ÇORUH Chemistry Dept., METU ____________________ Prof. Dr. İsmet Deliloğlu GÜRHAN Bioengineering Dept., Ege University ____________________ Prof. Dr. Musa DOĞAN Biology Dept., METU ____________________ Assoc. Prof. Dr. Çagdaş Devrim SON Biology Dept., METU ____________________ Date: 10.10.2013 3 I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name: Nizamettin ÖZDOĞAN Signature : iv ABSTRACT ROSA HECKELIANA (ROSACEA) ROOTS EXTRACT: BIOACTIVITY GUIDED FRACTIONATION AND CYTOTOXICITY AGAINST BREAST CANCER CELL LINES ÖZDOĞAN, Nizamettin Ph.D., Deparment of Biochemistry Supervisor: Doç.Dr.
  • Bark Medicines Used in Traditional Healthcare in Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa: an Inventory

    Bark Medicines Used in Traditional Healthcare in Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa: an Inventory

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector South African Journal of Botany 2003, 69(3): 301–363 Copyright © NISC Pty Ltd Printed in South Africa — All rights reserved SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY ISSN 0254–6299 Bark medicines used in traditional healthcare in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: An inventory OM Grace1, HDV Prendergast2, AK Jäger3 and J van Staden1* 1 Research Centre for Plant Growth and Development, School of Botany and Zoology, University of Natal Pietermaritzburg, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa 2 Centre for Economic Botany, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, United Kingdom 3 Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Royal Danish School of Pharmacy, 2 Universitetsparken, 2100 Copenhagen 0, Denmark * Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Received 13 June 2002, accepted in revised form 14 March 2003 Bark is an important source of medicine in South Overlapping vernacular names recorded in the literature African traditional healthcare but is poorly documented. indicated that it may be unreliable in local plant identifi- From thorough surveys of the popular ethnobotanical cations. Most (43%) bark medicines were documented literature, and other less widely available sources, 174 for the treatment of internal ailments. Sixteen percent of species (spanning 108 genera and 50 families) used for species were classed in threatened conservation cate- their bark in KwaZulu-Natal, were inventoried. gories, but conservation and management data were Vernacular names, morphological and phytochemical limited or absent from a further 62%. There is a need for properties, usage and conservation data were captured research and specialist publications to address the in a database that aimed to synthesise published infor- gaps in existing knowledge of medicinal bark species mation of such species.
  • Vegetation Survey of Mount Gorongosa

    Vegetation Survey of Mount Gorongosa

    VEGETATION SURVEY OF MOUNT GORONGOSA Tom Müller, Anthony Mapaura, Bart Wursten, Christopher Chapano, Petra Ballings & Robin Wild 2008 (published 2012) Occasional Publications in Biodiversity No. 23 VEGETATION SURVEY OF MOUNT GORONGOSA Tom Müller, Anthony Mapaura, Bart Wursten, Christopher Chapano, Petra Ballings & Robin Wild 2008 (published 2012) Occasional Publications in Biodiversity No. 23 Biodiversity Foundation for Africa P.O. Box FM730, Famona, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe Vegetation Survey of Mt Gorongosa, page 2 SUMMARY Mount Gorongosa is a large inselberg almost 700 sq. km in extent in central Mozambique. With a vertical relief of between 900 and 1400 m above the surrounding plain, the highest point is at 1863 m. The mountain consists of a Lower Zone (mainly below 1100 m altitude) containing settlements and over which the natural vegetation cover has been strongly modified by people, and an Upper Zone in which much of the natural vegetation is still well preserved. Both zones are very important to the hydrology of surrounding areas. Immediately adjacent to the mountain lies Gorongosa National Park, one of Mozambique's main conservation areas. A key issue in recent years has been whether and how to incorporate the upper parts of Mount Gorongosa above 700 m altitude into the existing National Park, which is primarily lowland. [These areas were eventually incorporated into the National Park in 2010.] In recent years the unique biodiversity and scenic beauty of Mount Gorongosa have come under severe threat from the destruction of natural vegetation. This is particularly acute as regards moist evergreen forest, the loss of which has accelerated to alarming proportions.
  • Szó- És Szólásmagyarázatok

    Szó- És Szólásmagyarázatok

    Szó- és szólásmagyarázatok Erdei gyümölcsök II/1. Fajnevek a Rosa nemzetségben A vadrózsafajok pontos taxonómiai ismerete kiváló beltartalmuk és élettani hatásaik miatt fontos a gyümölcskutatásban is. Olyan rózsák tartoznak a vadrózsák csoportjába, amelyeket még nem neme- sítettek. Értéküket éppen ez adja: szívósak, bírják a szárazságot, hideget, növényvédelemre és metszésre nincs szükség. Ehető gyümölcsöt teremnek, viszont évente csak egyszer, nyár elején virágoznak. rozsdás rózsa J. Rosa rubiginosa (P. 484). Európában és Nyugat-Ázsiában őshonos, mára máshol is elterjedt. A hosszúkás, piros termés a tél elején érik be. Már a debreceni füvészkönyvben is, 1807-ben rozsdás Rózsa (MFűvK. 303), majd 1881: rozsdáslevelű rózsák ’Rubiginosae’ (MTtK. XVI: 312), 1902: rozsdás rózsa (MVN. 103), 1911: ua. (Nsz. 259). A név a latin szaknyelvi Rosa rubiginosa binómen tükörfordítása, a faji jelzőnek ’rozsdás, rozsdavörös’ a jelentése, a szó az indogerm. *roudho ’vörös’ (G. 545) gyökre vezethető vissza (> lat. ruber ’ua.’). A rozsdás rózsa szó szerinti megfelelője a ném. Rostrose (WR. 93; R. 1890: Meyers 963), ol. rosa robiginosa, sp. eglatina roja (AFE. 105), fr. rosier rouillé (GRIN.; R. 1887: CA. 52), rosier rubigineux, le. róża rdzawa, szlk. ruža hrdzavá, szln. šipek rjastordeči, sp. rosa herrumbrosa ’ua.’ (LH.) terminus, illetve bővítménnyel a fr. églantier couleur de rouille (TB.), azaz ’rozsdaszínű vadrózsa’. Hasonneve a rozsdaszínű rózsa (AFE. 105). Társneve a ragyás rózsa (P. 217) és a sövény- rózsa (uo.; R. 1952: sövény rózsa ’Rosa rubiginosa’ [Növhat. 324]). Az utóbbi név arra utal, hogy az igen erőteljes, sűrű, tüskés növény alkalmas sövények készítésére. Ez az alapja ném. schottische Zaunrose (G. 223), azaz ’skót kerítésrózsa’ nevének is. A fr. R.
  • Greenhouse of UNI Del’S Greenhouse Joe and Joan Traylor Ben and Tina Donath Bev Edmondson Patricia Hampton

    Greenhouse of UNI Del’S Greenhouse Joe and Joan Traylor Ben and Tina Donath Bev Edmondson Patricia Hampton

    A special thank you to: Harry and Molly Stine and Stine Seeds Merle Philips The Shea Foundation Greenhouse of UNI Del’s Greenhouse Joe and Joan Traylor Ben and Tina Donath Bev Edmondson Patricia Hampton BUENA VISTA Iowa’s accessibly scaled, eye-opening university. Estelle Siebens Science Center 610 West Fourth Street Storm Lake, Iowa 50588 1 800 383 9600 ph www.bvu.edu Greenhouse Only in a greenhouse can you have a desert right next to a rainforest. The western most of the three rooms has a number of cacti, aloes, agaves and euphorbia collected from the American Southwest and South Africa. The middle room has many species from the warm and wet parts of our planet, several of which make good houseplants. The nearest room is reserved for research projects, new plants and display of plants that are blooming. Greenhouse funds were Rainforest provided by Stine Seeds. Bambusa verticillata (Gramineae) (Bamboo) Carissa grandiflora (Apocynaceae) (Natural Plum Jasmine) Cissus rhombifolia (Grape Ivy) Desert Citrus lemoni (Ritaceae) (Ponderosa Lemon) Adromischus cristatus (Crassulaceae)(Crinkle Leaf Plant) Cyperus alternifolius (Cyperaceae) Aloe brevifolia (Liliaceae) (Crocodile Jaws) Drypterus marginalis (Eastern Wood Fern) Astrophytum myriostigma (Cactaceae) (Bishop’s Cap) Evolvulus speciosa (Convulaceae) Bryophyllum daigremontianum (Crassulaceae) (Mother of thousands) Ficus benjamina (Braided Ficus Tree) Crassula arborescens (Crassulaceae) (Silver Dollar Jade) Ficus elastica (Rubber Plant) Crassula perforata (Crassulaceae) (String of Buttons)
  • GROWING INDOOR PLANTS with Success

    GROWING INDOOR PLANTS with Success

    GROWING INDOOR PLANTS with Success Table of Contents Introduction............................................................................................................................ 3 Factors Affecting Plant Growth............................................................................................ 3 Light..................................................................................................................................... 3 Temperature........................................................................................................................ 5 Relative Humidity................................................................................................................. 6 Water................................................................................................................................... 7 Water Quantity ................................................................................................................. 7 Water Quality.................................................................................................................... 7 Nutrition ............................................................................................................................... 8 Soil/Growing Medium .......................................................................................................... 9 Growing Mix for Flowering House Plants.......................................................................... 9 Growing Mixes for Foliage Plants....................................................................................
  • Asteropeia Micraster

    Asteropeia Micraster

    UNIVERSITÉ D'ANTANANARIVO ÉCOLE SUPÉRIEURE DES SCIENCES AGRONOMIQUES DÉPARTEMENT DES EAUX ET FORÊTS PROMOTION FITSINJO (2001-2006) MÉMOIRE DE FIN D'ÉTUDES Étude de la distribution, de l'écologie et du risque d'extinction des espèces Asteropeia micraster HALLIER , Dalbergia baroni BAKER et Dalbergia chapelieri BAILLON en vue de l'élaboration d'une stratégie de conservation de ces espèces dans la forêt littorale d'Agnalazaha (Mahabo Mananivo, Farafangana) présenté par RALAMBOMANANA-ANDRIAMAHEFA Andriamarohaja Membres du Jury Monsieur RANDRIAMBOAVONJY Jean Chrisostome Madame RAJOELISON Lalanirina Gabrielle Monsieur RABARISON Harison Monsieur RAKOTOARIVONY Fortunat Date de soutenance : 20 Novembre 2006 Résumé La forêt littorale fait partie des écosystèmes naturels les plus fragiles et sont pauvrement représentées dans le réseau des aires protégées de Madagascar. Pourtant, ce type de forêt regroupe un peu plus d'un millier d'espèces endémiques qui font la richesse floristique de l'île. La forêt littorale d'Agnalazaha, située à 50 Km au sud de Farafangana, ne fait pas exception à cette fragilité, avec d'importantes pressions anthropiques constatées, particulièrement entre 1997 et 2002. En outre, 3 espèces cibles rentrant dans la liste IUCN sont présentes sur le site étudié: Asteropeia micraster, Dalbergia baroni et Dalbergia chapelieri . Des études sur la distribution et sur l'écologie de ces espèces ont ainsi été effectuées sur le site d'Agnalazaha, afin d'évaluer les degrés des menaces auxquelles ces plantes sont confrontées, et de suggérer les mesures nécessaires à leur conservation dans la forêt d'Agnalazaha. Un travail de bibliographie, des observations sur terrain, une enquête socioéconomique et un inventaire de la forêt d'Agnalazaha ont été réalisés dans le but d'obtenir des données précises sur les espèces cibles.