Academy of Finland Funding Statistics on September 2020 Call

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Academy of Finland funding statistics on September 2020 call Contents 0. Introduction ............................................................................. 3 1. Applications and funded projects by funding instrument and research council ....................................................................... 3 2. Applications and funded projects by organisation ....................... 4 3. Applications and funded projects by disciplinary group .............. 4 4. Applications and funded projects by funding instrument and gender of applicant ................................................................... 4 5. Applications and funded projects by funding instrument and nationality of applicant ............................................................. 5 6. Rating distribution by funding instrument ................................. 5 7. Academy Projects: Average funding per project by organisation .. 5 8. Reviewers by country of their organisation ................................ 6 9. Tables and figures ..................................................................... 7 Appendix table. Disciplinary classification ............................................ 19 Academy of Finland funding statistics on September 2020 call © Academy of Finland 2021 | 2 0. Introduction • This statistics document describes the funding statistics on the applications submitted to and the researchers and projects funded in the Academy of Finland’s September 2020 call. The funding instruments include Postdoctoral Researchers, Academy Research Fellows, Academy Projects and Clinical Researchers. • A few applications that were not processed or reviewed are excluded from the application numbers. • Each table and figure is briefly described in chapters 1−8. The tables and figures are presented in chapter 9. • In most of the tables, the results of the September 2020 call are compared to the previous two calls in 2019 and 2018. In the tables, however, the years 2019–2021 refer to the years when the funding decisions were made. The calls were opened in the previous year. • In terms of Academy Projects, the data for 2019 (i.e. September 2018 call) include the call for Academy Projects and the call for Academy Projects by early-career researchers. By combining these calls for 2019, the data for 2019, 2020 and 2021 are comparable. • The total number of funded researchers and projects in 2021 may eventually slightly increase if research councils have funding left over from other calls and decide to fund Postdoctoral Researchers, Academy Research Fellows, Academy Projects or Clinical Researchers from the reserve list. • More information about the funding statistics is available from the Division of Strategic Planning and Analysis at the Academy of Finland. • The funding statistics on the September 2020 call were published in June 2021. • The material is available on the Academy of Finland’s website. 1. Applications and funded projects by funding instrument and research council • Tables 1.1–1.3 describe the number of applications, the number of funded researchers/projects and the success rate by research council (Biosciences, Health and the Environment; Culture and Society; Natural Sciences and Engineering) and funding instrument (Postdoctoral Researchers; Academy Research Fellows; Academy Projects) in 2019– 2021. Academy of Finland funding statistics on September 2020 call © Academy of Finland 2021 | 3 • In 2021, the research councils granted funding to 107 Postdoctoral Researchers (success rate 13%), 67 Academy Research Fellows (success rate 11%), and 211 Academy Projects with a total of 265 subprojects. The success rate for the Academy Projects was 15% (consortium subprojects have been counted as separate projects). 2. Applications and funded projects by organisation • Table 2 describes the number of applications, the number of funded projects and the success rate by organisation in 2019–2021. The data include Postdoctoral Researchers, Academy Research Fellows, Academy Projects and Clinical Researchers. In the data for Academy Projects, consortium subprojects have been counted as separate projects. • In the September 2020 call, the Academy of Finland received a total of 3,185 applications and the average success rate was 14%. 3. Applications and funded projects by disciplinary group • Table 3 describes the number of applications, the number of funded projects and the success rate by disciplinary group in 2019–2021. The data include Postdoctoral Researchers, Academy Research Fellows, Academy Projects and Clinical Researchers. In the data for Academy Projects, consortium subprojects have been counted as separate projects. • The disciplinary groups are based on the primary research field of the applications (see Appendix table for the detailed classification). • In the September 2020 call, the Academy of Finland received a total of 3,185 applications and the average success rate was 14%. 4. Applications and funded projects by funding instrument and gender of applicant • Table 4 describes the proportion of women among applicants (applications) and funded researchers or projects by funding instrument in 2019–2021. The totals include data in the following gender categories: female, male, other/prefer not to answer. In the data for Academy Projects, consortium subprojects have been counted as separate projects. • For Postdoctoral Researchers in 2021, women accounted for 46% of applicants and 48% of funding recipients. Academy of Finland funding statistics on September 2020 call © Academy of Finland 2021 | 4 • For Academy Research Fellows in 2021, women accounted for 42% of applicants and 40% of funding recipients. • For Academy Projects in 2021, women accounted for 34% of the applications and 36% of the funded projects. 5. Applications and funded projects by funding instrument and nationality of applicant • Table 5.1 describes the proportion of applications and funded Postdoctoral Researchers by nationality in 2019–2021. In 2021, foreign nationals accounted for 48% of applicants and 41% of funding recipients. • Table 5.2 describes the proportion of applications and funded Academy Research Fellows by nationality in 2019–2021. In 2021, foreign nationals accounted for 38% of applicants and 37% of funding recipients. • Table 5.3 describes the proportion of applications and funded Academy Projects by nationality in 2019–2021. In 2021, foreign nationals accounted for 17% of applications and 14% of funded projects. In the data, consortium subprojects have been counted as separate projects. 6. Rating distribution by funding instrument • Tables 6.1–6.3 describe the distribution of final ratings of applications (%) in the September 2020 call by funding instrument. The funding decisions were made in 2021. • The number of Academy Project applications reflects the total number of reviewed projects, not subprojects. • Applications were reviewed based on a scale from 6 (outstanding) to 1 (poor). In the data, the score is the overall rating of an application given by a panel of international experts, or the average of the overall ratings if the application was reviewed in more than one panel. The average of the ratings given by independent experts was used if the application was not reviewed in a panel. 7. Academy Projects: Average funding per project by organisation • Table 7 describes the number of funded projects, total funding and the average funding per funded Academy Project by organisation in Academy of Finland funding statistics on September 2020 call © Academy of Finland 2021 | 5 2019−2021. Consortium subprojects have been counted as separate projects. Academy Project funding is typically granted for four years. • In case the principal investigator has changed organisations, the granted funding by organisation is reported according to the original funding decision. • In the 2021 funding decisions, the average funding granted per project was around 427,881 euros. 8. Reviewers by country of their organisation • Table 8 and figure 1 describe the number of reviewers by country. Country refers to the country of the reviewer’s home organisation. • A total of 722 reviewers (of which 36% were women) from 31 countries participated in the review of applications submitted to the September 2020 call. • The total number of reviewers comprises 631 panel members and 91 independent experts. • Some of the 70 panels also reviewed applications that had been submitted to other calls than the ones included in the funding statistics on the September 2020 call. This slightly increases the total number of reviewers. • In the September 2020 call, the five most typical countries where the reviewers worked were the United Kingdom, Germany, Sweden, the Netherlands, and Norway. Academy of Finland funding statistics on September 2020 call © Academy of Finland 2021 | 6 9. Tables and figures Table 1.1. Postdoctoral Researchers: Applications, funded researchers and success rate by research council in 2019–2021. Source: Academy of Finland. Applica- Applica- Applica- Funded Funded Funded Success Success Success Research tions in tions in tions in researchers researchers researchers rate in rate in rate in Council 2019 2020 2021 in 2019 in 2020 in 2021 2019 2020 2021 Biosciences, Health and the Environment 255 207 222 38 35 33 15% 17% 15% Culture and Society 249 235 267 38 31 30 15% 13% 11% Natural Sciences and Engineering 267 277 312 42 44 44 16% 16% 14% Total 771 719 801 118 110 107 15% 15% 13% Academy of Finland funding statistics on September 2020 call © Academy of Finland 2021 | 7 Table
Recommended publications
  • 1 Short Curriculum Vitae – Tomi Rantamäki 1. Education • Phd in Pharmacology/Neuroscience in 20.12.2006, Univ. of Helsinki

    1 Short Curriculum Vitae – Tomi Rantamäki 1. Education • Phd in Pharmacology/Neuroscience in 20.12.2006, Univ. of Helsinki

    Short Curriculum Vitae – Tomi Rantamäki 1. Education PhD in pharmacology/neuroscience in 20.12.2006, Univ. of Helsinki, Finland M.Sci. in pharmacology in 24.3.2003, Univ. of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland B.Sci. in Pharmacy, in 10.4.2001, Univ. of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland 2. Other education and special skills Qualified pharmacy chemist (2003; proviisori), qualified pharmacist (2001; farmaseutti) Scientific meetings e.g. FENS (5 times), Society for Neuroscience (8 times), Neuroplasticity, Neurotrophic factors & Mood Disorders, NGF (2 times), IBRO (2 times), GRC Neurotrophic Factors (2 times), GRC Inhibition in CNS, Sortilins in sorting & disease, In vivo microscopy (2 times), CINP, ECNP (pending), World Congress of Psychiatry (pending), CINP Thematic Meeting (pending) Commercialisation meetings e.g. The Neurotech Investing & Partnering Conference, BIO, The European Neurotech Investing & Partnering Summit (2 times), Slush, Neurogaming expo 3. Language skills (Europass) Mother language: Finnish English* (listening: B2; reading: B2; spoken interaction: B2; spoken production: B2; writing: C1) Swedish* (listening: A1; reading: A1; spoken interaction: A1; spoken production: A1; writing: A1) 4. Current positions Associate Professor (molecular pharmacology) (2018-) Academy Research Fellow (1.9.2014-30.8.2019) Adjunct Professor (neuropharmacology) in 14.6.2011, Univ. of Helsinki, Finland 5. Previous positions Project leader, Neuroscience Center, Univ. of Helsinki, 1.1.2013-30.8.2014. Postdoctoral fellow, Neuroscience Center,
  • Academy of Finland's Funding Terms and Conditions 2020

    Academy of Finland's Funding Terms and Conditions 2020

    ACADEMY OF FINLAND’S FUNDING TERMS AND CONDITIONS 2020–2021 (6 May 2020) Funding calls between 1 September 2020 and 31 August 2021 and funding decisions made on such calls Table of contents Part 1: Applying for funding .................................................................. 1 1 Scope of application ....................................................................... 1 1.1. Scope of application of these funding terms and conditions .........................1 1.2. Receiving and confirming receipt of funding, notifying application for advance payment ....................................................................................2 2 How cost models are applied to Academy of Finland’s research funding .......................................................................................... 3 2.1. Funding percentage.................................................................................3 2.2. Decisions in accordance with the additional cost model ..............................3 3 Basic facilities for a project ............................................................. 3 4 Costs of foreign scientists’ research visits to or research in Finland ... 4 5 Considering sustainability ............................................................... 4 6 Responsible science ........................................................................ 5 6.1. Research ethics .......................................................................................5 6.2. Publishing, data and open science ............................................................5
  • The National Roadmap for Research, Development and Innovation: a New Beginning for RDI Cooperation Between Companies and Research Organisations

    The National Roadmap for Research, Development and Innovation: a New Beginning for RDI Cooperation Between Companies and Research Organisations

    23 April 2020 Solutions for a sustainable and developing society Objectives and targets of the National Roadmap for Research, Development and Innovation: A new beginning for RDI cooperation between companies and research organisations Finland’s competitiveness and wellbeing are built on competence, research and innovations. Finland’s rise from the emergency caused by the pandemic and success in global competition require the production of new knowledge, innovations that bring social benefits and added value, and a high level of competence. Research and innovation activities are undergoing change. Alongside universities and research institutions, there is a narrow group of spearheading companies that invest heavily in research, development and innovation (RDI) activities. Finland needs more companies engaged in RDI activities. The research, development and innovation of companies in the SME sector must also be activated. A share of turnover larger than at present must be invested in RDI activities. It must be possible to step up and intensify public–private partnerships with new incentives for cooperation, such as a new partnership model. Risk-sharing between companies and the public sector must be predictable, simple and encouraging. Diversification of the economic structure and improvement of the productivity trend must be one of the most important long-term goals of innovation policy. Achievement of this goal requires that those doing RDI work are supported by new policy measures. Incentives for research and innovation must diversify the utilisation of research-based knowledge in society and must encompass all aspects of society’s activities. Research and innovation activities can improve the 1 resilience of society and its operational capacity in unforeseen crises, such as the exceptional situation posed to society and the economy by the coronavirus.
  • Country Review Finland

    Country Review Finland

    Universiteit Maastricht Monitoring and analysis of policies and public financing instruments conducive to higher levels of R&D investments The “POLICY MIX” Project Country Review Finland Submitted by: Marcel de Heide Technopolis March 2007 Introduction and Policy mix concept Introduction and Policy mix concept The policy mix project This report is one of the 31 country reviews produced as internal working papers for the research project “Monitoring and analysis of policies and public financing instruments conducive to higher levels of R&D investments” (Contract DG-RTD- 2005-M-01-02, signed on 23 December 2005). This project is a research project conducted for DG Research, to serve as support for policy developments in Europe, notably in the framework of CREST activities. It does not form part of the ERAWATCH project, but the working documents are made available on ERAWATCH webpages for the purpose of steering a debate on the policy mix concept. The “Policy Mix” project is run by a consortium of 7 partners: · UNU-MERIT (The Netherlands), consortium leader · Technopolis (The Netherlands) · PREST – University of Manchester (United Kingdom) · ZEW (Germany) · Joanneum Research (Austria) · Wiseguys Ltd. (United Kingdom) · INTRASOFT International (Luxembourg). Each country review is produced by an individual author, and provides expert’s view on the policy mix in the country. This report is not approved by the Commission or national authorities, and is produced under the responsibility of its author. The role of country reviews is to provide an exploratory analysis of the current policy mixes in place in all countries and detect the most important areas of interactions between instruments as well as new modes of policy governance that are particularly adapted (or detrimental) for the building of policy mixes.
  • The Finnish Meteorological Institute's Action Plan for Finland's Chairmanship of the Arctic Council 2017–2019

    The Finnish Meteorological Institute's Action Plan for Finland's Chairmanship of the Arctic Council 2017–2019

    THE FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE’S ACTION PLAN FOR FINLAND’S CHAIRMANSHIP OF THE ARCTIC COUNCIL 2017–2019 WWW.FMI.FI BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES THE FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE’S FOCUS AREAS, SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES AND MEASURES uring its 2017–2019 Chair- 1. Monitoring the Arctic region taining Arctic Observing Networks manship of the Arctic (SAON), the EU’s Horizon 2020 pro- D Council, Finland has four During its Chairmanship of the Arc- gramme’s integrated Arctic obser- priorities: environmental protection, tic Council, Finland will propose that vation system (INTAROS) and the meteorological cooperation, the Arctic Council includes both WMO’s Year of Polar Prediction communication solutions and meteorological and oceanographic (YOPP). education. observations as one of the scopes in Intensified meteorological its working groups. Measures: These are to be discussed and oceanographic cooperation with the working group: How can improves general security, serves Responsible person: AMAP enhance the inclusion of international maritime and air traffic, Mikko Strahlendorff. Arctic monitoring in AMAP’s and and produces information for Arctic the Arctic Council’s work in general? climate research. Objective: Provide a synopsis of the results (the shortcomings and needs Timetable: of Arctic observation activities as Spring–summer 2017: discussions well as the added value of inten- with AMAP. sified observations) from current- Autumn 2017 to spring 2019: prepa- ly ongoing activities and bring this ration and communication of the up for discussion within the Arctic synopsis Monitoring and Assessment Spring 2019: assignment of the syn- Programme (AMAP). The main opsis to AMAP and the next host of sources of information are the Sus- the Arctic Council (Iceland).
  • Finland and the Space Era

    Finland and the Space Era

    HSR-32 April 2003 Finland and the Space Era Ilkka Seppinen a ii Title: HSR-32 Finland and the Space Era Published by: ESA Publications Division ESTEC, PO Box 299 2200 AG Noordwijk The Netherlands Editor: R.A. Harris Price: €10 ISSN: 1638-4704 ISBN: 92-9092-542-6 Copyright: ©2003 The European Space Agency Printed in: The Netherlands iii Contents 1 A Modest Start .............................................................................................................................1 2 Finland participates in the IGY ....................................................................................................3 3 The Space Era opens for Finland .................................................................................................5 4 Satellites enter Finnish space research.........................................................................................7 5 Finland considers ESRO Membership in 1968............................................................................9 6 A Single Space Research Centre? ..............................................................................................13 7 Small steps forward....................................................................................................................17 8 1983: ESA, at Last! ....................................................................................................................21 9 From Earth to Mars ....................................................................................................................23
  • Assessment of the Additional Appropriation for Research

    Assessment of the Additional Appropriation for Research

    Aatto Prihti Luke Georghiou Elisabeth Helander Jyrki Juusela Frieder Meyer-Krahmer Bertil Roslin Tuire Santamäki-Vuori Mirja Gröhn Assessment of the additional appropriation for research Sitra Reports series 2 2 ASSESSMENT OF THE ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATION FOR RESEARCH Copyright: the authors and Sitra Graphic design: Leena Seppänen ISBN 951-563-372-9 (print) ISSN 1457-571X (print) ISBN 951-563-373-7 (URL: http://www.sitra.fi) ISSN 1457-5728 (URL: http://www.sitra.fi) The Sitra Reports series consists of research publications, reports and evaluation studies especially for the use of experts. To order copies of publications in the Sitra Reports series, please contact Sitra at tel. +358 9 618 991 or e-mail [email protected]. Printing house: Hakapaino Oy Helsinki 2000 CONTENTS 3 SUMMARY 5 Results of the evaluation 5 Future priorities 7 FOREWORD 9 1. EVALUATION EFFORT 11 2. ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATION PROGRAMME 15 Objectives 15 Use of funds 17 Distinctive features of projects set up using the additional appropriations 23 Assessment of intention of appropriation against actual allocation 24 3. EVIDENCE OF IMPACTS 25 Basic research 25 Cooperation networks and cluster programmes 31 Productivity and employment 37 Modernisation and regional development 41 Tekes 46 4. POLICY OPTIONS FOR THE FUTURE 47 Continue setting ambitious aims for research funding 49 Strengthen the conditions for basic research 50 Improve the cluster approach 51 Integrate the new and the old economies 51 Focus more on innovation 52 Develop the future competencies of the workforce 53
  • Country Report Finland

    Country Report Finland

    COUNTRY REPORT Finland ERA-LEARN: enabling systematic interaction with the P2P community February 2021 Project no. 811171 Project acronym ERA-LEARN Project full title Strengthening partnership programmes in Europe Funding scheme CSA Start date of project July 1st, 2018 Duration 48 months Deliverable D5.3 ERA-LEARN Country Report Finland Authors Dr. Effie Amanatidou, R&I Policy Analyst, Greece Debbie Cox, UNIMAN, UK With contributions from the Academy of Finland, Business Finland, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Ministry of Education and Culture, Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment. Date of deliverable February 2021 Dissemination Level Public Finland 2 Table of contents Preface 4 The Finnish context in research and innovation 4 Introduction 8 Acknowledgements 9 Key Highlights 10 1. Who are the key R&I funders in Finland? 13 1.1. Ministry of Education and Culture 14 1.2. Academy of Finland (AKA) 15 1.3. Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment 19 1.4. Business Finland 20 1.5. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MMM) 22 2. Who are the key R&I performers in Finland? 25 3. In which R&I areas is Finland strong? 30 4. With whom does Finland collaborate in R&I and why? 32 5. What are Finland’s overall S&W in R&I? 34 6. Topic of interest from Finland: Baltic Sea Research and SSH networks 35 Annex 37 References 39 Finland 3 Preface The Finnish context in research and innovation Finland was an exemplary country that transformed from a largely resource-based economy to a leading knowledge-based economy in the second half of the 20th centrury with strong emphasis in high-technology manufacturing and knowledge-based services.
  • Future Is Made in Finland – FAQ

    Future Is Made in Finland – FAQ

    Future is Made in Finland – FAQ FUTURE IS MADE IN FINLAND – FAQ 1 STUDY: APPLYING – WHAT, WHEN, HOW 1 STUDY: LANGUAGE MATTERS 3 STUDY: MONEY MATTERS + ACCOMMODATION 3 STUDY: PERMIT MATTERS 4 PHD, POSTDOC, RESEARCH 4 WORK: WORKING IN FINLAND, SETTING UP A COMPANY, RESIDENCE PERMITS 6 STARTUP: SET UP A COMPANY IN FINLAND 7 FUTURE IS MADE IN FINLAND: PARTICIPATING UNIVERSITIES 8 Study: Applying – What, When, How How can I study in Finland? Studying in Finland is open to foreign students from and outside Europe. There are a lot of English- taught courses available at Bachelor, Master and PhD level. Students from outside Europe need to pay tuition fees, but universities do have compensating grants. Guidelines for applying to study programs and for grants are available at www.studyinfinland.fi/admissions. Can I study in English? What is available? There are more than 400 English-taught programmes available. You’ll find them all listed or through a keyword filtering at Studyinfo.fi – there you can also learn how and when to apply, and what the eligibility criteria for your favourite course would be. For starter’s advice on how to proceed, see www.studyinfinland.fi/admissions What are the best universities in Finland? Most Finnish comprehensive science universities belong to top 600 globally (AWRU-Shanghai list), and all of them are within the top 1000. Even smaller universities do have internationally strong, cutting- edge research teams. In learning outcomes the students in Finnish HEIs rank #1 in scientific literacy globally (Universitas-21) You can find a full list of universities at https://www.studyinfinland.fi/universities-list-view University/UAS – what’s the difference? These are two different sectors of higher education in Finland: 1) Universities provide academic learning based on scientific research, whereas 2) Universities of Applied Sciences (UAS) offer more professionally oriented higher education degrees, geared towards the working life.
  • Orientation Program

    Orientation Program

    ARRIVAL ORIENTATION PROGRAM For U.S. Fulbright Scholars and Students August 19-22, 2019, Helsinki, Finland #FinnishWelcome Welcome to Fulbright Finland! Dear Fulbright Awardee, On behalf of the Fulbright Finland information already in advance through Foundation Board of Directors and the the Pre-Arrival Webinar and the web- staff team, it is my great pleasure and based Fulbright Finland Orientation privilege to welcome you to Finland. Guide. The on-site seminar starts from Among the nearly 160 Fulbright where these two resources left off. It programs around the world, the strives to give you the direct contacts Finnish-American program is unique. and connections that will help you hit Celebrating its 70th Anniversary this the ground running! year, it is based on a history unlike Please take an active role in the any other, and in the present day it week’s program. It is your questions distinguishes itself internationally for and comments that will help steer its exceptionally broad funding and the discussions to be helpful to you partnership network. We are proud specifically, and we look forward to of our program and we are so pleased lively and timely discussions with to welcome you to our community of you. Once again, welcome to Finland! Finland Fulbrighters. Lämpimästi tervetuloa Suomeen! The Fulbright year in Finland begins with an orientation week in Helsinki. The most important focus of the on- Terhi Mölsä site orientation is to plug you in to the Chief Executive Officer, important local networks and give you Fulbright Finland Foundation an opportunity to meet face-to-face @TerhiMolsa with our key partners and leaders in education and society.
  • Researching Less-Resourced Languages – the Digisami Corpus

    Researching Less-Resourced Languages – the Digisami Corpus

    Researching Less-Resourced Languages – the DigiSami Corpus Kristiina Jokinen University of Helsinki, Finland and AIRC, AIST Tokyo Waterfront, Japan [email protected] Abstract Increased use of digital devices and data repositories has enabled a digital revolution in data collection and language research, and has also led to important activities supporting speech and language technology research for less-resourced languages. This paper describes the DigiSami project and its research results, focussing on spoken corpus collection and speech technology for the Fenno-Ugric language North Sami. The paper also discusses multifaceted questions on ethics and privacy related to data collection for less-resourced languages and indigenous communities. Keywords: corpus collection, under-resourced languages, North Sami with new technology applications. The main motivation 1. Introduction was to improve digital visibility and viability of the target languages, and to explore different choices for encouraging Several projects and events have increased research and maintaining the use of less-resourced languages in the activities for under-resourced languages during the past digitalized world. The goals of the DigiSami project are years. For instance, the DLDP-project (Digital Language discussed in Jokinen (2014) and Jokinen et al. (2017). Diversity Project) is to advance the sustainability of Europe’s regional and minority languages, while the Flare- The DigiSami project deals with the North Sami language net network and the LRE Map (Calzolari et al. 2012) have (Davvisámegiela) which belongs to the Fenno-Ugric had a big impact on sharing language resources and making language family and is one of the nine Sami languages speech corpora freely available.
  • Jari Tiihonen

    Jari Tiihonen

    1 (5) CURRICULUM VITAE Name Jari Tiihonen Date and place of birth 27 Nov 1960 Säyneinen, Finland Contact details Karolinska Institutet Department of Clinical Neuroscience Byggnad R5:00 S-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden [email protected] Current position Professor, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden since 1 Sep 2011 Part-time Chief Psychiatrist, Psykiatri nord-vest, Stockholm, Sweden since 1 Sep 2011 Professor and Chairman, Department of Forensic Psychiatry, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland since 1 Aug 2003 Chief Psychiatrist, Niuvanniemi Hospital, Kuopio, Finland since 1 Aug 2003 Research Professor, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland since 1 Mar 2008 Education and training Licentiate of Medicine, University of Kuopio 21 Aug 1985 Doctor of Medical Sciences, University of Kuopio 31 Jan 1990 Topic: Evoked and spontaneous neuromagnetic activity in man. Docent (Senior Lecturer) in Neurophysiology, University of Kuopio 25 May 1992 Specialist in Psychiatry 21 Feb 1994 Specialist in Forensic Psychiatry 20 Dec 1994 Docent (Senior Lecturer) in Psychiatry, University of Helsinki 1 Oct 2003 Previous professional appointments Resident Physician in Departments of Psychiatry, Kuopio University Hospital, Niuvanniemi Hospital, and Outpatient Care of Psychiatric District of Harjamäki Hospital; total 4 years 1985–1993 Resident Physician in Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Kuopio University Hospital, Vaajasalo Epilepsy Hospital; total 1 year 3 months 1986–1990 Junior Research