MAINTENANCE FUNDAMENTALS, 2Nd Edition
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
www.mpedia.ir داﻧﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﺖ Keith Mobley /Maintenance Fundamentals Final Proof 15.6.2004 4:42pm page i www.mpedia.ir MAINTENANCE FUNDAMENTALS 2nd Edition داﻧﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﺖ Keith Mobley /Maintenance Fundamentals Final Proof 15.6.2004 4:42pm page ii www.mpedia.ir PLANT ENGINEERING MAINTENANCE SERIES Vibration Fundamentals R. Keith Mobley Root Cause Failure Analysis R. Keith Mobley Maintenance Fundamentals R. Keith Mobley داﻧﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﺖ Keith Mobley /Maintenance Fundamentals Final Proof 15.6.2004 4:42pm page iii www.mpedia.ir MAINTENANCE FUNDAMENTALS 2nd Edition R. Keith Mobley AMSTERDAM • BOSTON • HEIDELBERG • LONDON • NEW YORK • OXFORD PARIS • SAN DIEGO • SAN FRANCISCO • SINGAPORE • SYDNEY • TOKYO داﻧﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﺖ Keith Mobley /Maintenance Fundamentals Final Proof 15.6.2004 4:42pm page iv www.mpedia.ir Elsevier Butterworth–Heinemann 200 Wheeler Road, Burlington, MA 01803, USA Linacre House, Jordan Hill, Oxford OX2 8DP, UK Copyright # 2004, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Science & Technology Rights Department in Oxford, UK: phone: (þ44) 1865 843830, fax: (þ44) 1865 853333, e-mail: [email protected]. You may also complete your request on-line via the Elsevier homepage (http://elsevier.com), by selecting ‘‘Customer Support’’ and then ‘‘Obtaining Permissions.’’ Recognizing the importance of preserving what has been written, Elsevier prints its books on acid-free paper whenever possible. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Application submitted British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN: 0-7506-7798-8 For information on all Butterworth–Heinemann publications visit our Web site at www.bh.com 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Printed in the United States of America داﻧﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﺖ Keith Mobley /Maintenance Fundamentals Final Proof 15.6.2004 4:42pm page v www.mpedia.ir CONTENTS Chapter 1 Impact of Maintenance 1 Chapter 2 Fundamental Requirements of Effective Preventive Maintenance 11 Chapter 3 Designing a Preventive Maintenance Program 25 Chapter 4 Planning and Scheduling 35 Chapter 5 Scheduled Preventive Maintenance 45 Chapter 6 Maintenance Engineering Roles and Responsibilities 55 Chapter 7 Shaft Alignment 71 Chapter 8 Rotor Balancing 112 Chapter 9 Bearings 125 Chapter 10 Couplings 171 Chapter 11 Gears and Gearboxes 201 Chapter 12 Compressors 231 Chapter 13 Control Valves 266 Chapter 14 Conveyors 287 Chapter 15 Fans, Blowers, and Fluidizers 299 Chapter 16 Dust Collectors 317 Chapter 17 Pumps 331 Chapter 18 Steam Traps 365 Chapter 19 Performance Measurement and Management 374 Glossary 390 Index 416 v داﻧﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﺖ Keith Mobley /Maintenance Fundamentals Final Proof 15.6.2004 4:42pm page vi www.mpedia.ir This page intentionally left blank داﻧﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﺖ Keith Mobley /Maintenance Fundamentals Final Proof 15.6.2004 4:44pm page 1 www.mpedia.ir 1 IMPACT OF MAINTENANCE Maintenance costs, as defined by normal plant accounting procedures, are normally a major portion of the total operating costs in most plants. Traditional maintenance costs (i.e., labor and material) in the United States have escalated at a tremendous rate over the past 10 years. In 1981, domestic plants spent more than $600 billion to maintain their critical plant systems. By 1991, the costs had increase to more than $800 billion, and they were projected to top $1.2 trillion by the year 2000. These evaluations indicate that on average, one third, or $250 billion, of all maintenance dollars are wasted through ineffective maintenance management methods. American industry cannot absorb the incredible level of inefficiency and hope to compete in the world market. Because of the exorbitant nature of maintenance costs, they represent the greatest potential short-term improvement. Delays, product rejects, scheduled maintenance downtime, and traditional maintenance costs—such as labor, overtime, and repair parts—are generally the major contributors to abnormal maintenance costs within a plant. The dominant reason for this ineffective management is the lack of factual data that quantify the actual need for repair or maintenance of plant machinery, equipment, and systems. Maintenance scheduling has been and in many in- stances still is predicated on statistical trend data or on the actual failure of plant equipment. Until recently, middle and corporate level management have ignored the impact of the maintenance operation on product quality, production costs, and more importantly on bottom-line profit. The general opinion has been ‘‘maintenance is 1 داﻧﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﺖ Keith Mobley /Maintenance Fundamentals Final Proof 15.6.2004 4:44pm page 2 2 Maintenance Fundamentalswww.mpedia.ir a necessary evil’’ or ‘‘nothing can be done to improve maintenance costs.’’ Perhaps these were true statements 10 or 20 years ago. However, the develop- ments of microprocessor or computer-based instrumentation that can be used to monitor the operating condition of plant equipment, machinery, and systems have provided the means to manage the maintenance operation. They have provided the means to reduce or eliminate unnecessary repairs, prevent cata- strophic machine failures, and reduce the negative impact of the maintenance operation on the profitability of manufacturing and production plants. MAINTENANCE PHILOSOPHIES Industrial and process plants typically utilize two types of maintenance manage- ment: (1) run-to-failure, or (2) preventive maintenance. Run-to-Failure Management The logic of run-to-failure management is simple and straightforward. When a machine breaks, fix it. This ‘‘if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it’’ method of maintaining plant machinery has been a major part of plant maintenance operations since the first manufacturing plant was built, and on the surface sounds reasonable. A plant using run-to-failure management does not spend any money on main- tenance until a machine or system fails to operate. Run-to-failure is a reactive management technique that waits for machine or equipment failure before any maintenance action is taken. It is in truth a no-maintenance approach of management. It is also the most expensive method of maintenance management. Few plants use a true run-to-failure management philosophy. In almost all instances, plants perform basic preventive tasks (i.e., lubrication, machine adjustments, and other adjustments) even in a run-to-failure environment. How- ever, in this type of management, machines and other plant equipment are not rebuilt nor are any major repairs made until the equipment fails to operate. The major expenses associated with this type of maintenance management are: (1) high spare parts inventory cost, (2) high overtime labor costs, (3) high machine downtime, and (4) low production availability. Since there is no attempt to anticipate maintenance requirements, a plant that uses true run-to-failure man- agement must be able to react to all possible failures within the plant. This reactive method of management forces the maintenance department to maintain extensive spare parts inventories that include spare machines or at least all major compon- ents for all critical equipment in the plant. The alternative is to rely on equipment vendors that can provide immediate delivery of all required spare parts. Even if the latter is possible, premiums for expedited delivery substantially increase the costs داﻧﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﺖ Keith Mobley /Maintenance Fundamentals Final Proof 15.6.2004 4:44pm page 3 www.mpedia.ir Impact of Maintenance 3 of repair parts and downtime required for correcting machine failures. To minim- ize the impact on production created by unexpected machine failures, mainten- ance personnel must also be able to react immediately to all machine failures. The net result of this reactive type of maintenance management is higher main- tenance cost and lower availability of process machinery. Analysis of mainten- ance costs indicates that a repair performed in the reactive or run-to-failure mode will average about three times higher than the same repair made within a scheduled or preventive mode. Scheduling the repair provides the ability to minimize the repair time and associated labor costs. It also provides the means of reducing the negative impact of expedited shipments and lost production. Preventive Maintenance Management There are many definitions of preventive maintenance, but all preventive main- tenance management programs are time driven. In other words, maintenance tasks are based on elapsed time or hours of operation. Figure 1.1 illustrates an example of the statistical life of a machine-train. The mean time to failure (MTTF) or bathtub curve indicates that a new machine has a high probability of failure, because of installation problems, during the first few weeks of operation. After this initial period, the probability of failure is relatively low for an extended period of time. Following this normal machine life period, the probability of failure increases sharply with elapsed time. In preventive maintenance management, machine repairs or rebuilds are scheduled on the basis of the MTTF statistic. Number of failures Break in or Equipment start up Normal life worn out Time Figure 1.1 Bathtub curve. داﻧﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﺖ Keith Mobley /Maintenance Fundamentals Final Proof 15.6.2004 4:44pm page 4