Potential for Using Through-Boring to Improve Groundline Treatment of Australian Wood Species: a Preliminary Study

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Potential for using through-boring to improve groundline treatment of Australian wood species: A preliminary study J.J. MorrellS Jack Norton Abstract An aging electricity distribution system and reduced availability of naturally durable tropical hardwoods in Australia will combine in the next decade to produce a major shortage of poles. One approach to mitigating this shortage is to utilize lower durability species and improve the penetration of preservatives into the refractory heartwood by introducing additional pre- treatment processes. A potential method for improving preservative penetration in the critical ground-line zone is through- boring. This process, in which holes are drilled through the pole perpendicular to the grain in the ground-line zone, is widely used in the western United States for treatment of Douglas-fir and may be suitable for many Australian wood species. The potential for improving heartwood penetration in eucalypts with alkaline-copper-quaternary (ACQ) compound was assessed on heartwood specimens from four species (Eucalyptus cloeziana F.Muell., E. grandis W.Hill ex Maiden, E. obliqua L’Her. and E. pellita F.Muell.) and Lophostemon confertus (R.Br.) Peter G.Wilson & J.T.Waterh). Longitudinal ACQ penetration was extremely shallow in L. confertus and only slightly better in E. cloeziana. Longitudinal penetration was good in both E. obliqua and E. pellita, although there was some variation in treatment results with length of pressure period. The results suggest that through-boring might be a reasonable approach for achieving heartwood penetration in some Eucalyptus species, although further studies are required to assess additional treatment schedules and to determine the effects of the process on flexural properties of the poles. Australian utilities have long employed naturally dura- Over the past decade, a variety of hardwood plantations ble hardwoods to support their overhead electrical distribu- have been established across Australia. While many of these tion lines, and over 5 million poles currently serve this role stands have been established for the production of pulp for across the country (Francis and Norton 2006). Many of these paper production, some species planted also have potential poles were installed in the post World War II expansion for use as poles. One drawback to the use of some plantation period and are potentially reaching the end of their useful hardwood species that could be used for poles is the relatively service lives. At the same time, changes in public land policy low natural durability of the heartwood. Australian utilities have placed many formerly accessible hardwood resources had a large resource of highly durable hardwoods. This re- that might serve as replacements off limits to continued har- source allowed utilities to pay little attention to protection vest. The same report estimated that demand for poles by of the heartwood in the preinstallation preservative treatment Australian utilities will increase from the current rate of process because protection of sapwood was adequate for 60,000 to 65,000 poles per year to well over 100,000 in obtaining acceptable performance of these species (Crews 2014. Presently, there is an insufficient supply of Durability Class 1 and 2 (Australian Standard AS5604, 2005) poles to meet this burgeoning demand. Francis and Norton (2006) The authors are, respectively, Professor, Dept. of Wood Sci. and summarized this problem and identified a number of possible Engineering, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, Oregon (jeff.morrell@ strategies for bridging the supply gap including improving oregonstate.edu); and Research Scientist, Queensland Dept. of Pri- maintenance of in-service poles to reduce the need for re- mary Industries and Fisheries, Indooroopilly, Queensland, Australia placements, the utilization of plantation softwoods, and ([email protected]). This paper was received for pub- lication in April 2009. Article No. 10609. the use of less durable hardwoods, treated in a manner to S Forest Products Society Member. confer effective protection to the refractory, low durability ÓForest Products Society 2009. heartwood. Forest Prod. J. 59(9):61–66. FOREST PRODUCTS JOURNAL VOL. 59, NO.9 61 et al. 2004). It is likely that those days have passed, and utilities will need to identify methods for improving the per- formance of less durable heartwood. The obvious approach to improving eucalypt durability is preservative treatment; however, many of the plantation spe- cies produce relatively thin bands of permeable sapwood surrounding a thick core of low durability heartwood. Conventional pressure treatments are designed to treat the sapwood and are largely unable to produce acceptable heart- wood penetration. In the absence of improved heartwood treatment, users of less durable plantation hardwoods will be faced with continuing internal decay or insect issues at ground line that will increase maintenance costs and reduce service life. Current maintenance and remedial practices are specifically focused on improving heartwood durability, and Figure 1. — Example of a through-boring pattern where the many of the utilities now employ holes drilled abaxially into distances between individual holes (A, B, C, and D) can be the poles around the critical ground-line zone (Greaves and varied to produce the desired degree of treatment. McCarthy 1986, 1993). These holes are used to introduce diffusing preservatives with the intent of creating a treated and protected inner zone. An important aspect of the ability of a species to be through- A related development, in which holes are drilled through bored would be acceptable longitudinal preservative penetra- the poles, has been adopted in the United States to protect thin tion into the heartwood. In general, longitudinal penetration sapwood, low durability poles. The U.S. Pacific Northwest should be between 50 and 75 mm so that preservative move- has an extensive supply of Douglas-fir. This species grows ment from holes can create a sufficient degree of overlap to tall and straight, but also has a thin sapwood shell surrounding produce protection. Previous studies of Douglas-fir suggest a ‘moderately’ durable heartwood core (Graham 1980). In the that poles will be free of internal decay in the through-bored 1960s, utilities using this species were experiencing exten- zone, even when as little as 60 to 70 percent of the heartwood sive internal decay that reduced service life to as little as 12 is treated. This relationship may differ in hardwoods, given years. In their search for solutions to this problem, they de- the more variable treatment patterns produced by differential termined that drilling numerous holes through the pole, per- treatment of the vessels and fibers, but it provides a starting pendicular to the grain, in a regularly spaced pattern around point for assessment. the ground line could be used to improve heartwood treat- In this paper, tests designed to assess longitudinal penetra- ment in this critical zone and thereby the life of a pole with- tion of preservative into selected Australian plantation hard- out adversely affecting flexural properties (Merz 1959, woods subjected to various treatment cycles are described. Brown and Davidson 1961, Graham et al. 1969, Grassel Results are presented and discussed and the direction of fur- 1969). Termed ‘‘through-boring’’, the process involves dril- ther work outlined. ling regularly spaced holes at a slight downward angle through the pole beginning 900 mm below ground line and Materials and methods extending 600 mm above that line (Figs. 1 and 2). The holes expose additional end-grain to preservative flow and the re- The timber species tested were Eucalyptus cloeziana sult is a ground-line zone that has nearly complete preserva- F.Muell., E. grandis W.Hill ex Maiden, E. obliqua L’Her., tive protection. As a result of their efforts, through-boring is E. pellita F.Muell., and Lophostemon confertus (R.Br.) Peter widely used for treatment of Douglas-fir poles (Mankowski G.Wilson & J.T.Waterh. Heartwood of air-dried lumber that et al. 2002). Subsequent tests have shown that the through- was primarily quartersawn was obtained and cut into test bored zone remains free of decay decades after installation specimens (Table 1). One end of each test specimen was and Douglas-fir poles now have average service lives that are coated with a marine sealant to retard longitudinal fluid pen- estimated to exceed 60 years (Morrell and Schneider 1994). etration. The test specimens were then weighed (nearest g). A recent, extensive pole test in which 140 Douglas-fir poles Two test specimens of each species were allocated to each were loaded to failure has shown that holes as large as 13 mm treatment trial. Trials 1 to 3 were performed using test spec- in diameter can be used on poles with no significant loss in imens that were 400 mm long, while Trials 4 to 7 used test flexural properties (Elkins 2005, Elkins et al. 2007). These specimens 200 mm long. results, if transferable to the eucalypt species from Austra- Test specimens were vacuum-pressure-impregnation (VPI) lian plantations, could provide an alternative method for treated using vacuum periods ranging from 5 to 45 minutes, markedly enhancing the durability of these species. followed by pressure periods varying from 1 to 16 hours. All Dale (1977) designed a machine for boring out the center but one trial used a 1.5 percent solution of alkaline-copper- of eucalypt poles providing a means of treating the refractory quaternary (ACQ) compound formulated using monoethanol heartwood while taking out the low strength, low durability amine, while the last treatment used the same solution wood close to the pith of the tree; an added bonus was re- amended with 3.0 percent ammonia. ducing the risk of pole split development. The machine was For each trial, the samples were placed into the treatment used briefly on hardwood poles in Papua New Guinea but, as vessel, a vacuum of 295 KPa was drawn over the wood for the yet has not been used in Australia as a means of treating required time, then the preservative was slowly drawn into the eucalypt pole heartwoods.
Recommended publications
  • Vegetation on Fraser Island

    Vegetation on Fraser Island

    Vegetation On Fraser Island Imagine towering pines, rainforest trees with three metre girths, rare and ancient giant ferns, eucalypt forests with their characteristic pendulous leaves, lemon-scented swamp vegetation and dwarfed heathland shrubs covered in a profusion of flowers. Now imagine them all growing on an island of sand. Two of Fraser Island’s unique features are its diversity of vegetation and its ability to sustain this vegetation in sand, a soil that is notoriously low in nutrients essential to plant growth. Plants growing on the dunes can obtain their nutrients (other than nitrogen) from only two sources - rain and sand. Sand is coated with mineral compounds such as iron and aluminium oxides. Near the shore the air contains nutrients from sea spray which are deposited on the sand. In a symbiotic relationship, fungi in the sand make these nutrients available to the plants. These in turn supply various organic compounds to the fungi which, having no chlorophyll cannot synthesise for themselves. Colonising plants, such as spinifex, grow in this nutrient poor soil and play an integral role in the development of nutrients in the sand. Once these early colonisers have added much needed nutrients to the soil, successive plant communities that are also adapted to low nutrient conditions, can establish themselves. She-oaks ( Allocasuarina and Casuarina spp.) can be found on the sand dunes of the eastern beach facing the wind and salt spray. These hardy trees are a familiar sight throughout the island with their thin, drooping branchlets and hard, woody cones. She-oaks are known as nitrogen fixers and add precious nutrients to the soil.
  • Terrestrial Ecology

    Terrestrial Ecology

    Table 9-7 Mapped Vegetation Communities Vegetation Vegetation Description Regional Conservation Type Ecosystem Status 1 Broad-leaved White Mahogany / Queensland Stringybark (E. 12.11.5a Regional carnea / E. tindaliae) Open Forest on Metasediments significance 1b Grey Gum/Ironbark (E. propinqua / E. siderophloia +/- 12.11.3 State significance Corymbia intermedia / Lophostemon confertus) 1e Grey Ironbark/Tallowwood/Grey Gum 12.8.8a Regional (E.siderophloia/E.microcorys/E.propinqua) Open Forest on significance Cainozoic Igneous Rocks 2 Brush Box (L. confertus) Open Forest with Rainforest 12.11.3a State significance understorey on Metasediments 2a Flooded Gum (E. grandis) Tall Open Forest on Alluvium 12.3.2 State significance 4d Broad-leaved Spotted Gum/White Mahogany (C.henryi / 12.11.5k Local significance E.carnea) Open Forest on Metasediments 29a Gully Vine Forest on Metasediments 12.11.1 State significance Non-remnant vegetation types Regrowth of Acacia species - - Regrowth of Allocasuarina and Acacia species - - Observed Vegetation Communities Vegetation within the study area was surveyed to verify regional ecosystem mapping and to describe the vegetation community types present within the study area, including the presence of rare or threatened flora species. Twelve vegetation communities (species associations) were observed across the study area, representing seven regional ecosystems. These vegetation communities are listed in Table 9-8 below. Table 9-8 Vegetation Communities Observed in Study Area No. Short Vegetation Description Regional Ecosystem Equivalent Dry Sclerophyll Forest Types 1 Tall Open Forest (Corymbia citriodora) 12.11.5 2 Tall Open Forest (E. siderophloia/E. microcorys/E. propinqua) 12.11.5a 3 Tall Open Forest (Eucalyptus fibrosa subsp.
  • Species List

    Species List

    Photo by Peter Brastow 2021 Recommended Street Tree Species List 1 Introduction Growing the urban forest canopy is a central goal of the San Francisco Urban Forest Plan, and the approved street tree list provides easy to understand guidance on finding trees well-suited to our unique growing conditions. The San Francisco Urban Forestry Council periodically reviews and updates this list of trees in collaboration with public and non-profit urban forestry stakeholders, including San Francisco Public Works, Bureau of Urban Forestry and Friends of the Urban Forest. The 2021 Street Tree List was approved by the Urban Forestry Council on June 22, 2021. This list is intended to be used for the public realm of streets and associated spaces and plazas that are generally under the jurisdiction of Public Works. While the focus is on the streetscape, e.g., tree wells in the public sidewalks, the list makes accommodations for other areas in the public realm, e.g., “Street Parks.” While this list recommends species that are known to do well in many locations in San Francisco, no tree is perfect for every potential tree planting location. This list should be used as a guideline for choosing which street tree to plant but should not be used without the help of an arborist or other tree professional. All street tree site and species selections must be approved by Public Works before planting. Sections 1 and 2 of the list are focused on trees appropriate for sidewalk tree wells, and Section 3 is intended as a list of trees that have limited use cases and/or are being considered as street trees.
  • S41598-021-83919-1.Pdf

    S41598-021-83919-1.Pdf

    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN The environmental and ecological determinants of elevated Ross River Virus exposure in koalas residing in urban coastal landscapes Brian J. Johnson1,4*, Amy Robbins2,4, Narayan Gyawali1, Oselyne Ong1, Joanne Loader2, Amanda K. Murphy1,3, Jon Hanger2 & Gregor J. Devine1 Koala populations in many areas of Australia have declined sharply in response to habitat loss, disease and the efects of climate change. Koalas may face further morbidity from endemic mosquito-borne viruses, but the impact of such viruses is currently unknown. Few seroprevalence studies in the wild exist and little is known of the determinants of exposure. Here, we exploited a large, spatially and temporally explicit koala survey to defne the intensity of Ross River Virus (RRV) exposure in koalas residing in urban coastal environments in southeast Queensland, Australia. We demonstrate that RRV exposure in koalas is much higher (> 80%) than reported in other sero-surveys and that exposure is uniform across the urban coastal landscape. Uniformity in exposure is related to the presence of the major RRV mosquito vector, Culex annulirostris, and similarities in animal movement, tree use, and age-dependent increases in exposure risk. Elevated exposure ultimately appears to result from the confnement of remaining coastal koala habitat to the edges of permanent wetlands unsuitable for urban development and which produce large numbers of competent mosquito vectors. The results further illustrate that koalas and other RRV-susceptible vertebrates may serve as useful sentinels of human urban exposure in endemic areas. Te koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) is an important emblem of Australia’s biodiversity and a globally-recognised Australian icon, yet many populations continue to decline1.
  • Arboricultural Assessment Flemington Estate Racecourse Road, Flemington

    Arboricultural Assessment Flemington Estate Racecourse Road, Flemington

    Arboricultural Assessment Flemington Estate Racecourse Road, Flemington Prepared for: Jenny Wilson Department of Health and Human Services Prepared by: Greg Pollard Tree Logic Ref: 7943 1/02/2017 Tree Logic Pty Ltd Unit 4, 21 Eugene Terrace Ringwood Vic 3134 Ph. 03 9870 7700 treelogic.com.au 1 Objectives 1.1 To undertake a ground-based inspection of selected trees within the public housing estate at Racecourse Road, Flemington. 1.2 To record tree characteristics including species, age, dimensions, health, structure and useful life- expectancy. 1.3 To attribute the trees with a Retention Value and to identify works required to mitigate hazards or promote improved tree condition. 1.4 To calculate appropriate Tree Protection Zones to guide future activity in proximity of trees being retained. 1.5 To provide a plan showing tree locations. 2 Method 2.1 Site inspection method; A site inspection was undertaken on 27 January, 2017. The trees were inspected from the ground and observations were made of the growing environment and the surrounding area. The trees were not climbed and no samples were collected. Tree assessment details are contained in Appendix 1 and relate to the trees numbered on the plan at Appendix 2. Tree numbering and locations have been maintained from the supplied survey plan produced by Taylors Development Strategists (Drawing 20960-D1 V01) with the exception of one additional tree identified as TL1. Observations were made to determine the type, age and condition of the trees. Approximate height and width were also recorded and trunk diameter was generally measured at 1.4 metres above ground level.
  • Tristania Conferta R

    Tristania Conferta R

    Common Forest Trees of Hawaii (Native and Introduced) Brushbox seasoning. It is not subject to severe growth stress prob- lems in manufacturing as are certain eucalypts. Wood Tristania conferta R. Br. grown in Hawaii is moderately resistant to decay and termites. Wood from Australia is classed as very resis- Myrtle family (Myrtaceae) tant to both. In Hawaii, it has been used for pallets, floor- ing, and pulp chips, generally mixed indiscriminately Post-Cook introduction with the wood of Eucalyptus saligna. Elsewhere, used for construction, shipbuilding, bridges, railway crossties, Large evergreen tree related to Eucalyptus, introduced and mallets. A sizable amount of flooring of this species in forest plantations. Planted as an ornamental and for has been imported to Hawaii from Australia. shade. Differs from Eucalyptus by the leaves, which are Planted in moist areas of Hawaii in forest planta- crowded at ends of twigs, and the very numerous sta- tions and as a handsome shade tree. The Division of mens united in five groups. Forestry has planted more than 396,000 trees in the for- 1 To 60 ft (18 m) high with straight trunk 1 ⁄2 ft (0.5 est reserves on all islands, but mostly on Oahu and Ha- m) in diameter or larger, with narrow rounded crown of waii. Oahu has 1.1 million board feet of timber and dense foliage. Bark gray brown, becoming rough, thick, Hawaii 1.3 million. Trees may be seen at Waahila Ridge slightly scaly with long fissures. Inner bark light brown, State Park (St. Louis Heights) and Keaiwa Heiau State fibrous, slightly bitter.
  • County-Approved Plant List (Combined)

    County-Approved Plant List (Combined)

    County-Approved Plant List (Combined) Plant CA. Water Drought- Growth Ever- Resists Eros. Street Trees Climate Bio BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME type Native Needs Tolerant Height Spread Rate green Fire(1) Ag-buffer Cntrl ? Zone Retention OTHER West only Abelia floribunda Mexican Abelia sh N av N 3-6' Y No N 8,9,12-24 N Abelia grandiflora Glossy Abelia sh N av N 8'+ Y N 5 thru 24 N Abies bracteata Santa Lucia/ Bristlecone tr Y lo Y 70' 15-20' slow Y No N U 8, 9, 14-21 heat tolerant; good wildlife plant Y Fir Abies concolor White Fir tr Y av N 30-66' slow Y No N U 1-9,14-24 good wildlife plant N Abies pinsapo Spanish Fir tr N lo N 25-50' very slow Y No N U 5-11, 14-24 good wildlife plant N Abies procera Noble Fir tr Y av N 90-200' slow Y No N U 1-7,15-17 good wildlife plant N Abronia latifolia Yellow Sand Verbena gc Y av N 3' F3 N 4, 5, 17, 24 likes sandy soils Y Abronia maritima Red Sand Verbena gc Y lo N 3" F3 N 4, 5, 17, 24 likes sandy soils Y Abronia umbellata Pink Sand Verbena gc Y av N 3' F3 N 4, 5, 17, 24 likes sandy soils Y Abronia villosa Sand Verbena gc Y lo Y F3 N 4, 5, 17, 24 likes sandy soils Y Acacia baileyana Bailey Acacia tr N lo * 20-30' 20-40' fast Y No N Y 7-9,13-24 * somewhat once established; N needs good drainage; fragrant flowers; good inland ; plant with caution around animals Acacia cultriformis Knife Acacia tr N lo * 10-15' 10-15' mod to fast Y No N U 13-24 * once established; Y needs good drainage; plant with caution around animals Acacia dealbata Silver Wattle tr N lo N To 50' 40-50' fast Y No N U# 8,9,14-24 plant
  • Does Urban Forestry Have a Quantitative Effect on Ambient Air Quality in an Urban Environment?

    Does Urban Forestry Have a Quantitative Effect on Ambient Air Quality in an Urban Environment?

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Atmospheric Environment 120 (2015) 173e181 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Atmospheric Environment journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/atmosenv Does urban forestry have a quantitative effect on ambient air quality in an urban environment? * P.J. Irga, M.D. Burchett, F.R. Torpy Plants and Environmental Quality Research Group, School of Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Technology Sydney, P.O. Box 123, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia highlights There were localised differences in PM across different areas within Sydney, Australia. Areas with high urban forestry density had lower PM than other sites. Associations between PM and meteorological factors were also observed. No trends in CO2, CO, TVOCs, NO, NO2, or SO2 were observed. article info abstract Article history: Increasing urban greenspace has been proposed as a means of reducing airborne pollutant concentra- Received 6 July 2015 tions; however limited studies provide experimental data, as opposed to model estimates, of its ability to Received in revised form do so. The current project examined whether higher concentrations of urban forestry might be associ- 18 August 2015 ated with quantifiable effects on ambient air pollutant levels, whilst accounting for the predominant Accepted 18 August 2015 source of localized spatial variations in pollutant concentrations, namely vehicular traffic. Monthly air Available online 22 August 2015 samples for one year were taken from eleven sites in central Sydney, Australia. The sample sites exhibited a range of different traffic density, population usage, and greenspace/urban forest density conditions.
  • White Gum Moist Forest in the NSW North Coast Bioregion

    White Gum Moist Forest in the NSW North Coast Bioregion

    White Gum Moist Forest in the NSW North Coast Bioregion Introduction This forest occurs on the escarpment slopes and foothills of north-east NSW, associated These guidelines provide background with relatively fertile soils. It is typically found information to assist landholders to identify in gullies and lower slopes. It has also been remnants of White Gum Moist Forest. For found on upper slopes and basalt ridges. more detailed information, refer to the NSW Scientific Committee’s Determination The trees which characterise this community Advice at http://www.environment.nsw.gov. are White Gum (Eucalyptus dunnii), au/committee/FinalDeterminations.htm sometimes occurring with Sydney Blue Gum (Eucalyptus saligna), Tallowwood (Eucalyptus microcorys) and/or Brush Box (Lophostemon confertus). The understorey typically includes a diverse range of rainforest trees, vines, Brett Snelson Brett palms, ferns and herbs. Mature stands of the community feature a structurally diverse understorey. Regrowth stands, or recently disturbed stands, may take on the structure of low closed forest or scrub, or may have a simplified understorey structure, depending on the nature of the disturbance and the time elapsed since. Where is White Gum Moist Forest found? Regrowth White Gum moist forest What is an Endangered Ecological Community? An ecological community is a group plants and animals that occur together in a particular area including trees, shrubs and understorey plants. An Endangered Ecological Community is an ecological community listed under the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 as being at risk of extinction unless threats affecting these areas are managed and reduced. What is White Gum Moist White Gum Moist Forest occurs in the Forest? NSW North Coast bioregion (Thackway & When mature, White Gum Moist Forest Cresswell 1995), as well as adjacent regions typically has a tall open canopy of a number of in south-east Queensland.
  • Lophostemon Confertus Click on Images to Enlarge

    Lophostemon Confertus Click on Images to Enlarge

    Species information Abo ut Reso urces Hom e A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Lophostemon confertus Click on images to enlarge Family Myrtaceae Scientific Name Lophostemon confertus (R.Br.) Peter G.Wilson & J.T.Waterh. Wilson, Peter G. & Waterhouse, J.T. (1982) Australian Journal of Botany 30: 424. Flowers [not vouchered]. Copyright G. Sankowsky Common name Vinegartree; Box, Queensland; Pink Box; Box Scrub; Box, Pink; Box, Brisbane; Box, Brush; Brush Box; Brisbane Box; Brisbane Box Tree; Queensland Box; Scrub Box Stem Bark somewhat rough and flaky on the lower bole but smooth and brownish on the upper bole and branches. Narrow cream or pale brown brittle stripes in the blaze. Leaves Flowers. Copyright Australian Plant Image Index (APII). Photographer: unknown. Leaf blades about 7-15 x 2.5-4.5 cm, crowded together in groups of about 3-5 at the ends of twigs. Seldom more than one oil dot per reticulation. Conspicuous vegetative buds generally terminating the twigs. Young shoots clothed in pale, prostrate, silky hairs. Young shoots produce a milky exudate when broken. Flowers Calyx lobes subulate, caducous. Staminal fascicles about 10-15 mm long, opposite the petals. Stamens usually more than 70 per fascicle. Fruit Leaves and flowers [not vouchered]. Copyright G. Sankowsky Fruit about 10-15 mm diam., included in the calyx tube (hypanthium). Seeds linear, about 2-3 mm long. Seedlings Cotyledons shortly ovate to triangular, about 2-3 mm long with a few very small oil dots visible only with a lens.
  • Universidade De Brasília Instituto De Ciências Biológicas Departamento De Botânica Programa De Pós-Graduação Em Botânica

    Universidade De Brasília Instituto De Ciências Biológicas Departamento De Botânica Programa De Pós-Graduação Em Botânica

    UNIVERSIDADE DE BRASÍLIA INSTITUTO DE CIÊNCIAS BIOLÓGICAS DEPARTAMENTO DE BOTÂNICA PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM BOTÂNICA EVOLUÇÃO DE ESTRATÉGIAS DE FLORAÇÃO NA ORDEM MYRTALES THAÍS NOGALES DA COSTA VASCONCELOS BRASÍLIA AGOSTO/2013 UNIVERSIDADE DE BRASÍLIA 1 INSTITUTO DE CIÊNCIAS BIOLÓGICAS DEPARTAMENTO DE BOTÂNICA PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM BOTÂNICA EVOLUÇÃO DE ESTRATÉGIAS DE FLORAÇÃO NA ORDEM MYRTALES THAÍS NOGALES DA COSTA VASCONCELOS ORIENTADORA: Drª. CAROLYN ELINORE BARNES PROENÇA Dissertação submetida ao Departamento de Botânica, do Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, da Universidade de Brasília, como requisito parcial para a obtenção do titulo de Mestre em Botânica BRASÍLIA AGOSTO/2013 THAÍS NOGALES DA COSTA VASCONCELOS 2 EVOLUÇÃO DAS ESTRATÉGIAS DE FLORAÇÃO NA ORDEM MYRTALES Dissertação aprovada junto ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Botânica da Universidade de Brasília como requisito parcial para obtenção do título de Mestre em Botânica. Banca examinadora __________________________________ Profa. Carolyn Elinore Barnes Proença Orientadora – UnB __________________________________ Prof. Marcelo Fragomeni Simon Membro titular – UnB __________________________________ Prof. Paulo Eugenio Alvez Macedo de Oliveira Membro Titular – UFU __________________________________ Profa. Rosana Tidon Membro Suplente - UnB Brasília, 05 de Agosto de 2013 3 FICHA CATALOGRÁFICA Vasconcelos, Thaís Nogales da Costa Evolução de Estratégias de Floração na Ordem Myrtales / Thaís Nogales da Costa Vasconcelos; Orientação de Carolyn Elinore Barnes Proença – Brasília, 2013. 139 p. Dissertação de Mestrado (M) – Universidade de Brasília/ Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, 2013. 1. Polinização 2. Sinal filogenético 3. Trade-off (palavras chave) REFERÊNCIA BIBLIOGRÁFICA VASCONCELOS, T. N. C. 2013. Evolução das Estratégias de Floração na Ordem Myrtales. Brasília: Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade de Brasília. 139 p. Dissertação de Mestrado.
  • Tweed Coast Koala Habitat Atlas Australian Koala Foundation

    Tweed Coast Koala Habitat Atlas Australian Koala Foundation

    Koala Habitat Atlas Project No. 4 : Tweed Coast DRAFT Prepared for Tweed Shire Council by Steve Phillips John Callaghan Vegetation Mapping by Landmark Ecological Services, Robert Payne & AKF GIS Operation by David Staines & Dave Mitchell September 1996 Australian Koala Foundation GPO Box 9899 Brisbane Qld 4001 Ph: (07) 3229-7233 Fax: (07) 3221-0337 Tweed Coast Koala Habitat Atlas Australian Koala Foundation CONTENTS Page Executive Summary .................................................................................. 4 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Habitat Utilisation by Koalas ....................................................... 6 1.2 Description of the Study Area ..................................................... 9 1.3 Study Objectives ......................................................................... 11 2.0 METHODOLOGY 2.1 Assessment of Habitat Utilisation by Koalas ............................ 12 2.2 Site Selection ................................................................................ 12 2.3 Assessment of Field Sites ............................................................. 13 2.4 Data Analysis ............................................................................. 14 2.5 Attribute Layers for Modelling Purposes .................................. 16 2.6 Vegetation Mapping ................................................................... 17 3.0 RESULTS 3.1 (a) Neranleigh-Fernvale Group ........................................................ 18 3.1 (b) Quaternary Deposits ...................................................................