DOCSLIB.ORG

Larger Sites: Objection to Chawton Park Farm: Four Marks/Medstead Support for Bentley Northbrook Park: Whitehill/Bordon

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Larger Sites: Objection to Chawton Park Farm: Four Marks/Medstead Support for Bentley Northbrook Park: Whitehill/Bordon 11/15/2019 Mail - Woodgate, Jenny - Outlook Larger sites: Objection to Chawton Park Farm: Four Marks/Medstead Support for Bentley Northbrook Park: Whitehill/Bordon Mon 14/10/2019 16:50 To: EHDC - Local Plan <[email protected]> The larger sites already proposed for Whitehill/Bordon and Bentley/Northbrook Park remain the right sites for larger developments. I support both proposals. They allow sustainable infrastructure and limit impact on others. In particular each allows access in a workable way to major roads. The confluence or roads the Surrey side of the border is an issue for these 2 sites but funds from the development can be used substantially to ameliorate those problems. The Four Marks/ Medstead sites all need large further expenditure on the clogged and destructive impact of the A31 at Four Marks and I object to these sites. The need for a Four Marks bypass has been accepted for decades but no one has any current plans to address this. For Chawton Park Farm large highway expenditure is needed to make Northfield Lane and the A 31 /A32 junction roundabout safe and functionable. I object to this proposal. On all these sites if funding was provided that detracts from the funds needed to make any material contribution to the main problem the Surrey side of the border, principally on the Farnham bypass. There are 2 additional points since earlier consultation on the unsuitability of the Chawton Park Farm larger site. Firstly, Beech Neighbourhood Plan has been subject to Regulation 16 consultation ending in September. Section 5.1 specifies the need to prevent coalescence of Medstead, Wivelrod and Beech and ironically shows the wooded area Ackender Wood and Bush Leaze Wood, which run to the Parish Boundary with Chawton and the western boundary of the proposed larger site for Chawton Park Farm. The Beech Plan is a reminder of the need to enhance their ecology, additionally to Chawton’s ecology. These woods are a substantial part of the ring of SiNCs which protect Beech. It also makes specific reference to the farmland lying to the south of the proposed development as an environment to be conserved. Ecology and amenity cannot be severed at the parish boundary. It was clearly not considered possible that land within Chawton Parish would be developed as the Beech Neighbourhood Plan was prepared but the principle from the point of view of Beech is equally applicable to the proposed site as it would be to Medstead and Wivelrod. Secondly, the impact on the National Park has been underplayed. Chawton’s complex planning infrastructure, partly in the South Downs National Park with its specific planning objective of access and recreation and partly within the East Hampshire DC planning zone means both must be considered. This complexity is increased Ironically within Chawton as substantial areas of Open Access Land owned by the Forestry Commission are outside the Nation Park and wrap round Chawton Park Farm. It is vital that both Planning Authorities, East Hampshire and the National Park Authority co-ordinate achieving the best use of space for recreation, open air activities, nature and food production. The proposal shows that has not been progressed and is damaged as an objective. No attempt has been made to show safe, grade separated access across the A31 and A32 for pedestrians, equestrians and cyclists. This must also take account of parking and avoid any increase in parking in Chawton Village where lack of parking damages the Conservation Area, tourism and the amenity of residents. Residents on any new development will inevitably seek to drive to Chawton Village which cannot accept that burden. Parking in Chawton would need to be addressed and financed to prevent any increase in this problem. The current prosed Traffic Regulation Order East Hampshire is in process of making for Chawton Village is an absolute minimum for its existing problems as a tourist destination, residential community and a gateway village for the National Park. Any new, large scale, residential proposals must enhance and encourage access other than by car, not exacerbate the current problem. This interrelates with taking account of 7J of the South Downs Local Plan Policy SD45 which seeks to see Green Infrastructure links maintained and enhanced with that connectivity https://outlook.office365.com/mail/none/id/AAMkADIxNjE3NWJlLTMxYmEtNDEwZC1iOGM4LTYxOTllYjNmN2MzZQBGAAAAAABrEkrzGtHSSpsf… 1/2 11/15/2019 Mail - Woodgate, Jenny - Outlook being strengthened and ecological resilience enhanced. This is not an issue which can be allowed to hit a wall were the Park and East Hampshire Local Plans meet, all proposals should dovetail. SDNP Policy SD20 addresses Walking, Cycling and Equestrian Routes and seeks to see these developed. 6/16 of this policy specifically seeks to see this gaol addressed using disused railway lines and the former Meon Valley line severed by the A31/A32/ Northfield Lane roundabout provides an excellent site for such linkage. Any development of this scale should address this need. This is further emphasised as the need to address the difficulty in crossing major roads is a specific objective at 6.22 in the South Downs Local Plan. This cannot be ignored as the current proposals do. The roundabout is within 200 metres of the site entrance. 6.23 emphasizes the need for new development to provide new or enhanced connections. East Hampshire DC has to consider larger greenfield sites because of central government’s new National Planning Policy Framework which stifles East Hampshire in choosing the right sites for the District. It stifles Localism. Housing in those parts of East Hampshire outside the National Park are best met by smaller sites and the Council has consulted wisely and well on those smaller sites. This leaves no requirement in meeting housing targets to do more than meet the minimum obligation imposed by national policy and the Whitehill/Bordon and Bentley/Northwood are the 2 larger sites which do this, sustainably in a way which minimises adverse impact on other residential areas or the natural environment. I support the representations made by Chawton Parish Council. Email: Sent from Mail for Windows 10 https://outlook.office365.com/mail/none/id/AAMkADIxNjE3NWJlLTMxYmEtNDEwZC1iOGM4LTYxOTllYjNmN2MzZQBGAAAAAABrEkrzGtHSSpsf… 2/2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1St – 31St May 2021 Welcome
    ALTON Walking & Cycling Festival 1st – 31st May 2021 Welcome... Key: to Alton Town Councils walking and cycling festival. We are delighted that Walking experience isn’t necessary for this year’s festival is able to go ahead and that we are able to offer a range Easy: these as distances are relatively short and paths and of walks and cycle rides that will suit not only the more experienced enthusiast gradients generally easy. These walks will be taken but also provide a welcome introduction to either walking or cycling, or both! at a relaxed pace, often stopping briefly at places of Alton Town Council would like wish to thank this year’s main sponsor, interest and may be suitable for family groups. the Newbury Buiding Society and all of the volunteers who have put together a programme to promote, share and develop walking and cycling in Moderate: These walks follow well defined paths and tracks, though they may be steep in places. They and around Alton. should be suitable for most people of average fitness. Please Note: Harder: These walks are more demanding and We would remind all participants that they must undertake a self-assessment there will be some steep climbs and/or sustained for Covid 19 symptoms and no-one should be participating in a walk or cylcle ascent and descent and rough terrain. These walks ride if they, or someone they live with, or have recently been in close contact are more suitable for those with a good level of with have displayed any symptoms. fitness and stamina.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Organisation Proposal for the Benefice of Bentworth, Lasham, Medstead and Shalden (BLMS)
    Re-organisation proposal for the Benefice of Bentworth, Lasham, Medstead and Shalden (BLMS) Due to financial difficulties in the Diocese of Winchester, plans are being considered at the moment for a re-organisation of the North Hampshire Parish Boundaries, of which the Benefice of Bentworth, Lasham, Medstead and Shalden, within the Deanery of Alton, is a part. If agreed upon, this would make the saving of one stipendiary post (vicar), as the individual BLMS parishes will be merged with already existing parishes. The proposal is that the parishes of Bentworth, Lasham and Shalden will merge with the Parish of the Resurrection in Alton and the parish of Medstead with the Parish of the Good Shepherd, Four Marks. This is part of the consultation process which will be ongoing in the next months. There is an information pack issued by the Diocese of Winchester which gives more information about the proposals for the Deanery of Alton. Please read those additional papers which should be on this web site. An important aspect of how churches are managed is called governance. The governance options for the present BLMS churches are that, when joining the parish in Alton or Four Marks respectively, they could: a) Remain as Parish Churches b) Become individual ‘Chapels of Ease’ c) Convert to ‘Festival Churches.’ In remaining a Parish Church, it retains its PCC; its burial, baptism and wedding rights and the obligation to pay its parish share (known here as the CMF). Description of ‘Chapel of Ease’ A chapel-of-ease can have any number of services (a minimum of 6 is recommended), but does not normally (traditionally) have burial, baptism or wedding rights, though the Bishop could licence it for such.
    [Show full text]
  • Circular Walk Four Marks to Medstead
    Walk No. 5 A Circular Walk from Four Marks to Medstead 5¼ miles. Time 3 hours. GR. 672361 OS Explorer Map 132 By car: take the A31 from Alton to the village of Four Marks. Just after Charters Close turn right into Boyneswood Road and in about 1/3mile turn right into Chawton Park Wood. There is a free car park. By bus: take the 64 from Alton towards Alresford and alight just past the Four Marks sign at Telegraph Lane bus stop. Walk towards the village and at Boyneswood Road follow car directions above. By train: take the Watercress Line from Alton and alight at Medstead & Four Marks station. At the Alton end of the platform a gate (if locked ask staff to open it) leads to a footpath to Boyneswood Road. Turn left and walk mile along Boyneswood Road to Chawton ParkW ood. The Walk starts at Chawton Park grassy track to level out again and Car Park in Boyneswood Road, then descending to another grassy Medstead. The walk is on public track. footpaths although there is a small amount of road walking on Turn left along this track and in quiet lanes. The walk is mostly on about 150 yards at cross tracks level ground except for one or two (sign posted), take the path on the inclines, but no steep climbs. right which climbs uphill through Most of the stiles are sound and trees to a barrier / gate on the edge in a good state except for one or of the wood. Go through the gate two in Medstead that are broken and walk along a path between a or missing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution of the Romano-British Population in The
    PAPERS AND PROCEEDINGS 119 THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE ROMANO - BRITISH POPULATION IN THE BASINGSTOKE AREA. By SHIMON APPLEBAUM, BXITT., D.PHIL. HE district round Basingstoke offers itself as the subject for a study of Romano-British . population development and. Tdistribution because Basingstoke Museum contains a singu­ larly complete collection of finds made in this area over a long period of years, and preserved by Mr. G. W. Willis. A number of the finds made are recorded by him and J. R. Ellaway in the Proceedings of the Hampshire Field Club (Vol. XV, 245 ff.). The known sites in the district were considerably multiplied by the field-work of S. E. Winbolt, who recorded them in the Proceedings of the same Society.1 I must express my indebtedness to Mr. G. W. Willis, F.S.A., Hon. Curator of Basingstoke Museum, for his courtesy and assist­ ance in affording access to the collection for the purposes of this study, which is part of a broader work on the Romano-British rural system.2 The area from which the bulk of the collection comes is limited on the north by the edge of the London Clay between Kingsclere and Odiham ; its east boundary is approximately that, of the east limit of the Eastern Hampshire High Chalk Region' southward to Alton. The south boundary crosses that region through Wilvelrod, Brown Candover and Micheldever, with outlying sites to the south at Micheldever Wood and Lanham Down (between Bighton and Wield). The western limit, equally arbitrary, falls along the line from Micheldever through Overton to Kingsclere.
    [Show full text]
  • Beech Parish Archaeology HER Report
    Archaeology Beech Parish HER search 08/04/2019 ¯ 41718 19170 54858 54856 38558 51835 54857 17117 38556 51840 19103 19102 19104 64947 38557 Legend Findspot 54860 39137 Monument NamedPlace 60752 68610 ParksAndGardens HCC Cropmarks 57992 © Crown copyright and database rights 2018 Ordnance Survey 100019180. Use of this data is subject to terms and conditions. You are granted a non-exclusive, royalty free, revocable licence solely to view the Licensed Data for non-commercial purposes for the period during which HCC makes it available. You are not permitted to copy, sub-license, distribute, sell or 0 0.175 0.35 0.7 1.05 1.4 otherwise make available the Licensed Data to third parties in any Kilometers form. Third party rights to enforce the terms of this licence shall be reserved to Ordnance Survey Historic Environment Record Search Monument ID Record Type Name Alternate Name Summary Status Grade DateAssigned 17117 Findspot Mesolithic Tranchet Axes None (1) Two mesolithic Tranchet Axes from the Alton area are in Alton <null> <null> <null> Museum. No more information is available. Investigation Type Min Date Max Date Investigation Method Description Stray Finds - Non 1977 1977 N/A <null> Verified Find Find Type Min Date Max Date Material Description Tranchet -10000 -4001 Flint (1) Two mesolithic Tranchet Axes from the Alton area are in Alton Museum. No more information Axehead is available. Investigation Type Min Date Max Date Investigation Method Description Deposited -10000 -4001 N/A (1) Two mesolithic Tranchet Axes from the Alton area are in Alton Museum. No more information is available. Source Title Subtitle Author Date Summary Gazetteer Of Mesolithic Sites <null> Wymer J.
    [Show full text]
  • Hampshire County Council Temporary Road
    HAMPSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL TEMPORARY ROAD CLOSURES – VARIOUS ROADS, EAST HAMPSHIRE (No 21) 2015 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Hampshire County Council is making an order to allow maintenance works to be carried out. ROADS TO BE CLOSED: those parts of the following roads: 1) Oakhanger Road, Whitehill between its junction with Old Station Way and its junction with B3002 Station road. 2) Station Road, Whitehill between its junction with Oakhanger Road and its junction with A325 Farnham Road. 3) B3002 Beech Hill, Headley between its junction with Gentles Lane and its junction with Glayshers Hill. 4) Boyneswood Road, Medstead between its junction with A31 Winchester Road and its junction with Roe Downs Road 5) Gaston Lane, Farringdon between its junction with Church Road and its junction with Barleywood Farm Lane. 6) Barleywood Farm Lane, Worldham between its junction with Gaston Lane and its junction with Barleywood Farm Lane. 7) Hall Lane, Selborne between its junction with B3006 Selborne Road and its junction with Crows Lane. 8) Ridge Common Lane, Steep between its junction with A272 Winchester Road and its junction with Church Road. 9) Newton Lane, Newton Valence between its junction with A32 Gosport Road and its junction with Shotters Lane. 10) Honey Lane, Selborne between its junction with B3006 High Street and its junction with Oakhanger Road. 11) Bradshott Lane, Selborne between its junction with Sothernington Lane and its junction with B3006 Selborne Road. 12) Oakhanger Road, Kingsley between its junction with B3004 Forge Road and its junction with Honey Lane. 13) Oxenbourne Lane, East Meon between its junction with Twenty Way Farm Lane and its junction with Clanfield Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology in Hampshire
    Archaeology in Hampshire Annual Report 2005 BASINGSTOKE AND DEANE Basingstoke Skippett’s House (SU 64012 50613) (Site UID: 2143) Geophysical survey A magnetic survey of the land surrounding Skippett’s House in Basingstoke was done by CGMS. Initial concerns over the quality of data due to recent tree felling work were not realized and several linear responses were identified that may be of archaeological origin. Other anamolies were identified, but remain ambiguous. Deane Banjo Enclosure, Oakley Park (SU 55840 49370) (Site UID: 36887) Fieldwalking Systematic collection by Basingstoke Archaeology and History Society recovered burnt flints and Iron Age pottery sherds. East Woodhay Hayes (SU 40171 62312) (Site UID: 56669) Building survey The survey was carried out by CKC Archaeology. The core of this building appears to have been a lobby-entry house with a queen post roof. Such a house would be typical of the 17th century. All that remains from this phase is the central stack, the attached dog-leg staircase and some fragments of the original roof. Farleigh Wallop Farleigh Wallop (SU 61050 47670) (Site UID: 36367) Fieldwalking The survey was carried out by Basingstoke Archaeological and Historical Society. Finds from the walk mainly comprised pieces of worked flint, including one 'D-shaped' scraper, suggesting a Neolithic presence. Hannington Tidgrove Warren Farm (SU 51707 54255) (Site UID: 57174) Geophysical survey The survey by Archaeological Prospection Services was successful in locating a number of features associated with the Romano-British settlement at Tidgrove Warren Farm. The results show the extent and nature of the settlement as a whole, including the outer and inner enclosures, and associated structural remains, plus evidence of agricultural activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Medstead Parish Council
    MEDSTEAD PARISH COUNCIL Minutes of the Planning Committee held on Wednesday 8th July 2020 PRESENT: Councillors Roy Pullen (Chair), Mike (Jo) Smith, Mike (Ja) Smith & Charles Clark. Also present: Peter Baston (Parish Clerk). 20.38 OPEN SESSION Cllr Mike (Jo) Smith mentioned that a mobile home which has been parked up in Station Approach has now moved to Lymington Bottom Rd. Cllr Pullen asked for this to be raised at Full Council. 20.39 APOLOGIES. None. 20.40 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST None. 20.41 MINUTES i. The minutes of the meeting held on the 10th June 2020, previously circulated were agreed as a true record, proposed by Cllr Clark and second by Cllr Mike (Jo) Smith and would be signed by the Chairman at a later date. ii. No Matters Arising. 20.42 CHAIRMAN’S REPORT Cllr Pullen reported a very quiet month again but two appeals have been lodged, the first is as expected, the proposed traveller plots on Abbey Road. Although technically within the parish of Bentworth Medstead Parish Council get to comment officially as the site is less than a quarter of a mile from our boundary. This will be an informal hearing, details of which are unknown to date. The second is against the refusal of East Hampshire District Council (EHDC) to allow an extra dwelling to be built next to a house in Abbey Road. This was refused last year by EHDC, taken to appeal which was rejected and then submitted again very quickly by EHDC, with the latest appeal being lodged this month, this one will be by written representation.
    [Show full text]
  • Greendrift, Homestead Road, Medstead, Alton, Hampshire, GU34 5PW
    Greendrift, Homestead Road, Medstead, Alton, Hampshire, GU34 5PW Greendrift, Homestead Road, Medstead, Alton, Guide Price £510,000 Hampshire, GU34 5PW Chain-Free Sale A marvellous opportunity to acquire a 1.34 acre (0.54 hectare) country retreat with a road frontage approaching 150 feet (45.69m) and potential for future development subject to the necessary planning consents. The land has a depth of over 400 feet (121.83m) with an integral avenue driveway the length of the plot, which consists of light woodland and coppicing with a grass clearing in the far section. The rhododendron fringed grass glade includes an mature mobile home and chalet used by our clients' and their forefathers as a country retreat since 1957. Adjacent is a paved car parking/turning area. Mains water is via a meter beside the disused pedestrian gate on the frontage, some yards west of the recessed gate accessing the driveway. There is no electric or drainage connected to the land with houses and bungalows in the neighbourhood being served by their own septic tank/bio systems. The land adjoins open fields either side and backs on to land and outbuildings known as Hideaway, which is under separate ownership. Commanding a long frontage to an unmade village lane, Greendrift occupies a country setting bordering open fields beyond which is The Dell to the West and Woodstock to the East. The land lies within 0.75 mile of Medstead village centre, which, in best village traditions, has two shops including a post office, picturesque church, a pub, village green, associated sports and cultural facilities, and a primary school.
    [Show full text]
  • Winchester Museums Service Historic Resources Centre
    GB 1869 AA2/110 Winchester Museums Service Historic Resources Centre This catalogue was digitised by The National Archives as part of the National Register of Archives digitisation project NRA 41727 The National Archives ppl-6 of the following report is a list of the archaeological sites in Hampshire which John Peere Williams-Freeman helped to excavate. There are notes, correspondence and plans relating to each site. p7 summarises Williams-Freeman's other papers held by the Winchester Museums Service. William Freeman Index of Archaeology in Hampshire. Abbots Ann, Roman Villa, Hampshire 23 SW Aldershot, Earthwork - Bats Hogsty, Hampshire 20 SE Aldershot, Iron Age Hill Fort - Ceasar's Camp, Hampshire 20 SE Alton, Underground Passage' - Theddon Grange, Hampshire 35 NW Alverstoke, Mound Cemetery etc, Hampshire 83 SW Ampfield, Misc finds, Hampshire 49 SW Ampress,Promy fort, Hampshire 80 SW Andover, Iron Age Hill Fort - Bagsbury or Balksbury, Hampshire 23 SE Andover, Skeleton, Hampshire 24 NW Andover, Dug-out canoe or trough, Hampshire 22 NE Appleshaw, Flint implement from gravel pit, Hampshire 15 SW Ashley, Ring-motte and Castle, Hampshire 40 SW Ashley, Earthwork, Roman Building etc, Hampshire 40 SW Avington, Cross-dyke and 'Ring' - Chesford Head, Hampshire 50 NE Barton Stacey, Linear Earthwork - The Andyke, Hampshire 24 SE Basing, Park Pale - Pyotts Hill, Hampshire 19 SW Basing, Motte and Bailey - Oliver's Battery, Hampshire 19 NW Bitterne (Clausentum), Roman site, Hampshire 65 NE Basing, Motte and Bailey, Hampshire 19 NW Basingstoke, Iron
    [Show full text]
  • Medstead Village (East Hampshire District)
    HCC Traffic Management & Road Safety Team - Residential 20mph Pilot Schemes Site 5: Medstead Village (East Hampshire District) ) m u ( th a P Pit (disused) 194.8m GP T 194.5m R I N I T Y Redwood H I L Poultry L Pit Farm Pine (disused) Croft W I EL D RO Little AD Pit Pit (disused) Metcombe S w (disused) e e t Braida 196.2m B Earthwork r Garth ia Benedicts r Lark Hill Marls Row ± Kelmscott Linden House ) Hazelmead m u ( h Pit t a Highcroft Oakwood (disused) P Heather Bank k c Summer u r d Lea r e T h h S Domboshawa e T2 B r a m b le ! s Path (um) d n ! Kaduna E k Kings Mead c o d d a Adbeji P Path (um) W 208.0m IELD RO AD Tumulus s la d e n t a s East l o h p t Westbrook r m s o Barrow o e d C N l Edoras s e u i Cedar f The Rectory H o r o H a Stables C l H s m y r le l e v s r t Grestock e te 214.0m e s la a D h i t e n d b r d n u o Old s o o F Windham r S Hill Stables Chapel T1 Notre B Margaret a Barn r Maison le House y Io End c n R Church House o a o m o The b L d Castle of Comfort Cottage e o e Towngate d b g e (PH) U e r ! p g o v Farmhouse e Wilsons r e g Church House a Trinity Hill Convent of St Lucy W Farm t t e Path (um) o C P n Cottage Bungalow e o t l Cherry t C i w s l n The Old Rectory a a t o C C i e R r ! Orchard o r o mf e t LB ort Temescal s h H P e ET o Oak E S1 i V R Elm Tree n Lamedos ST i Domek E e e House Jasmine TL Cott 205.6m AS Highgrounds T w 5 Cottage C 1 209.8m Rest Harrow o p 208.5m 3 s e C g l ! GP ta a t g e o c Squirrels C L a g P r a r at a h ( a o um) l b Hall t n i Old t a e L M c o Rectory C Cottage H Castlewarden S 1 a K 203.3m ! School Filter Bed z A e O The Yews l House E d E e H N Oxdrove M n T A C u e L astle En d lb e St Andrew's Church r r Medstead House H y C A T4 R Rose C b b U o e Cott tta y H ge C Bel L le N 3 IL View R ew Spruce Copse h y H la The Folly s N d n S2 l Medstead War a d O Church l e s e M i s p h Winton M Lodge Meml Cottage f e s T l e O 2 r C 0 y b g 9 Beech e a .
    [Show full text]
  • Medstead Parish Plan
    Sparsholt Parish Plan Sparsholt Parish Plan August 2017 August 2017 Final Draft Page 1 of 35 Sparsholt Parish Plan Contents Contents ..................................................................................................................................... 2 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Foreword ......................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Summary ........................................................................................................................ 4 1.3 Sparsholt Maps and Parish ............................................................................................. 5 1.4 Parish Plans .................................................................................................................... 7 2 Consultation Methodology ........................................................................................... 8 3 Key Issues ..................................................................................................................... 9 3.1 Rural Ambience .............................................................................................................. 9 3.2 Roads ............................................................................................................................. 9 3.3 Traffic ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]