Shear Strength of Soil

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Shear Strength of Soil 11 ShearStrength of Soil The shearstrength of a soil massis the internal resistanceper unit area that the soil masscan otTerto resistfailure and sliding along any plane insideit. One must under- standthe nature of shearingresistance in order to analyzesoil stabilityproblems such as bearing capacity,slope stability,and lateral pressureon earthretainingstructures. 11.1 Mohr -Coulomb Failure Criterion Mohr ( 1900)presented a theory for rupture in materialsthat contendedthat a ma- terial fails becauseof a critical combination of normal stressand shcaringstress, and not from either maximum normal or shear stressalone. Thus. the functional rela- tionship between normal stressand shearstress on a failure plane can be expressed in the followins form: r1: f@) (11. 1) Thc failureenvelope defined by Eq.(11.1) is a curvedline. For most soil me- chanicsproblems, it is sufficientto approximatethe shearstress on the failure plane as a linear function of the normal stress(Coulomb. 1776).This linear function can be written as rf=c*crtan$ (11.2) where c : cohesion d : angle of internal friction o : normal stresson the failure plane r/ : shearstrength The preceding equation is called the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion. In saturated soil, the total normal stress at a point is the sum of the effective stress(n') and pore water pressure(tt), or o:o'ltt 311 312 Chapter 11 Shear Strength of Soil Table 11. ? Typical Values of Drained Angle of Friction for Sands and Silts Soil type d'(des1 Sand: Rr,tundedgrains Loose 27-30 Medium 30-35 Dense 35-38 Sand: Angulur grains Loose 30-35 Medium 3.5- 4t) Dense 40-45 Gravel with some sand 34,48 Sl/ts 26-35 The effectivestress a' is carried by the soil solids.The Mohr-Coulomb failure cri- terion, expressedin terms of efTectivestress, will bc clf the form - T| ,'' * tr' tan <[' (11.3) where c' : cohesionand @' : friction angle,based on effeotivestrcss. Thus, E,qs.(11.2) and (11.3)are expressionsof shearstrength based on total stressand effectivestress. The value of c' for sand and inorganic silt is 0. For nor- mally consolidatedclays, c' can be approximated at 0. Overconsolidatedclays have valuesof c' that are greaterthan 0. The angleol friction, ry'',is sometimesrcfcrred to ' as the drained angLeo.f .frictbn. Typical values of <f for some granular soils arc given in Table1 1.1. The signilicanccof Eq. ( I 1.3)can be explainedby referring to Fig. I L l, which showsan clemental soil mass.Let the effectivenormal stressand the shearstress on a (a) Figure 11.I Mohr-Coulomb failurecriterion 11'2 rncrinationof the prane of Fairurecaused by shear 313 the plane ab be o' and r, respectively.Figure 11.1bshows the plot of the failure en- velope definedby Eq. (11.3).If the magnitudesof o' and r on planeab are suchthat they plot as point,4 in Figure 11.1b,shear failure will not occur along the plane. If the effective normal stress and the shear stress on plane ab plot as point B (which falls on the failure envelope),shear failure will occur along that plane. A state of stresson a plane representedby point C cannot exist,because it plots abovethe fail- ure envelope,and shearfailure in a soil would have occurrcd alreadv. 11.2 lnclination of the Plane of Failure caused by shear As statedby the Mohr-Coulomb failure crittlrion, failure from shearwill occurwhen the shearstress on a plane reachesa value given by Eq. (1 1.3).To determine the in- clination of the failure plane with the major principal plane, refer to Figure 11.2, where c\ and oi are, respectively,the major and minor effectiveprincipal stresses. The failure plane EFmakes an angled with the major principal plane.To determine the angle0 and the relationshipbetween rrj and ai, refer to Figure 11.3,which is a plot of the Mohr'.scircle for the state of stressshown in Figure I 1.2 (see chapter 9j. In Figure 11.3,fghis thc failure envelopedefined by the relationshipr[: c, * o, tan$, . The radialline ab definesthe major principalplane (CD in Figure'11.2),and the ra- dial lineaddefines the failureplane (E-Fin Figure 1l.z).ltcan be shownthat Lbad: 2e:90*d'.or 0:45+9 ( 2 r1.4) Again.from Figure11.3. ad (r1.-s) fa:stna Tu - .fO+ Ou : c' ct>rg'-ojt'i (11.6a) 2 U 01, a O'I Ef1'ectivenormal stress Figure | 1.2 Inclination of failure plane in soil with major principal plane Figure 71.3 Mohr'scircle and failureenvelope 314 Chapter 11 Shear Strength of Soil Also, ot-ol aa:r ( l 1.6b) 2 SubstitutingEqs. (11.6a) and (11.6b) into Eq. (11.5),we obtain o\-ot 2 sin@' : o,, _f o,. c'cot$'+ t- /l+sind'\ / cos6'\ 'i -.'1[r (1 1.7) sind/*"\r ,ino,/ However, I + sin@':tan'145*^/ d'\ 1 - sin q5' Z) and cos d' / (b' \ I "t*,t-tan\45+ 2) Thus, : (11.8) o\ o\,un'(+s. +) * ,r',^n(ot . +) An expressionsimilar to Eq. (11.tt)could alsobe derived usingEq. (11.2)(thal is, total stressparameters c and @),or rr) - . rr,,""(0, -- ( l l.e) ut ttun'(+.s, f) 1t.3 Laboratory Test for Determination of Shear Strength Parameters There are several laboratory methods now available to determine the shear strength parameters (i.e., q 6, c' , 6') of various soil specimensin the laboratory. They are as follows: a. Direct shear test b. Triaxial test c. Direct simple shear test d. Plane strain triaxial test e. Torsional rins shear test 11.4 DirectShear Test 315 The direct shear test and the triaxial test are the two commonly used techniques for determining the shear strength parameters. These two tests will be described in de- tail in the sections that follow. 11.4 Direct Shear Test The direct sheartest is the oldest and simplestform of sheartest arrangement.A di- agram of the direct sheartest apparatusis shown in Figure 11.4. The teit equipment consistsof a metal shearbox in which the soil specimenis placed.The soil rp..i."n, may be squareor circular in plan. The sizeof the specimensgenerally ur",l is about 51mm x 5Lmm or102mm x 102mm(2in.x2in.or4in. x 4in.) acrossand about 2-5mm (1 in.) high. The box is split horizontally into halves.Normal force on the specimenis applied from the top of the shear box. The normal stresson the speci- mens can be as great as 10-50kN/m2 (150 lb/in.r). Shear force is applied by moving one-half of the box relative to the other to causefailure in the soil specimen. Depending on the equipment, the sheartest can be either stresscontrolled or strain controlled. In stress-controlledtests, the shearforce is applied in equal incre- ments until the specimenfails. The failure occursalong the plane of split of the shear box. After the application of each incremental load, the shear displacementof the top half of the box is measuredby a horizontal dial gauge.Thc changein the height of the specimen(and thus the volume changeof the specimen)during the test .un b" obtained from the readingsof a dial gaugethat measuresthe vertical movement of the upper loading plate. In strain-controlledtests, a constant rate of shear displacementis applied to one-half of the box by a motor that acts through gears.The constantrate of shear displacementis measuredby a horizontal dial gauge.The resistingshear force of the soil correspondingto any sheardisplacement can be measureclby a horizontal prov- ing ring or load cell. The volume changeof the specimenduring the test is obtained Normal force Porousstone € Shear force Porousstone Figure 11.4 Diagram of direct shear test arrangement 316 Chapter 11 Shear Strength of Soil Figure 1?.5 Strain-controllcddirect shear test equipmcnt (courtesy of Soiltest,Inc., Lake Bluff,Illinois) in a manner similar to that in the stress-controlledtests. Figure 11.5 shows a photo- graph of strain-controlleddirect sheartest equipment. The advantageof the strain-controlledtests is that in the caseof densesand, peak shearresistance (that is, at failurc) as well as lessershear resistance (that is,at a point after failure called ultimate streng,th)can be observed and plotted. In stress- controlled tests,only the peak shear resistancecan be observedand plotted. Note that the peak shearresistance in stress-controlledtests can be only approximatedbe- causefailure occurs at a stresslevel somewherebetween the prefailure load incre- ment and the failure load increment.Nevertheless, compared with strain-controlled tests,stress-controlled tests probably model real field situationsbetter. For a given test,the normal stresscan be calculatedas Normal force o : Normal stress: (11.10) Cross-sectionalarea of the specimen The resistinsshear stress for anv sheardisplacement can be calculatedas Resistinsshear force r : Shearstress : (11.11) Cross-sectionalarea of the specimen Figure 11.6 shows a typical plot of shear stressand change in the height of the specimen against shear displacement for dry loose and dense sands.These observa- tions were obtained from a strain-controlled test. The following generalizationscan 11.4 DirectShear Test 317 E a Sheardisplacentent .='c x u)T F dF = r) o a o U Figure 11.6 PloIof shearstress ancl changc in heightof specimenagainst shear displace- mentfor looseand dcnse dry sand(dircct shcar test) be developedfrom Figure I 1.6regarding the variation of resistingshear stress with sheardisplacement: 1. ln loose sand,the resistingshear stress increases with sheardisplacement until a failure shearstress of 11is reached.After that, the shearresistance remains approximatelyconstant for any further increasein the sheardisplacement. 2. In densesand, the resistingshear stress increases with sheardisplacement until it reaches a failure stressof rr. This rlis called the peak shear strength. After failure stressis attained,the resistingshear stress gradually decreasesas shear displacementincreases until it finalty reachesa constantvalue called the ulti- mate .shear.strength.
Recommended publications
  • SHEAR Axial and Direct Shear Module for GEOSYSTEM® for Windows
    GEOSYSTEM® SHEAR Axial and Direct Shear Module for GEOSYSTEM® for Windows Copyright © 2004 Von Gunten Engineering Software, Inc. 363 West Drake #10 Fort Collins, CO 80526 www.geosystemsoftware.com Information in this document is subject to change without notice and does not represent a commitment on the part of Von Gunten Engineering Software, Inc. The software described in this document is furnished under a license agreement, and the software may be used or copied only in accordance with the terms of that agreement. The licensee may make copies of the software for backup purposes only. No part of this manual may be reproduced in any form for purposes other than the licensee’s personal use without the written consent of Von Gunten Engineering Software, Inc. Copyright © Von Gunten Engineering Software, Inc. 2004. All rights reserved. Published in the United States of America. GEOSYSTEM® is a registered trademark of VES, Inc. Windows® is a registered trademark of Microsoft Corporation Terms of License Agreement 1. The Licensee agrees not to sell or otherwise distribute the program or the program documentation. Each copy of the program is licensed only for use at a single address. 2. The Licensee agrees not to hold Von Gunten Engineering Software, Inc. (VES, Inc.) liable for any harm, damages claims, losses or expenses arising out of any act or occurrence related in any way to the use of the program. 3. The program is warranted to fully perform the tasks described in the program documentation. All results of the operation of the program are subject to the further engineering judgment, prudence, and study of the user.
    [Show full text]
  • An Empirical Approach for Tunnel Support Design Through Q and Rmi Systems in Fractured Rock Mass
    applied sciences Article An Empirical Approach for Tunnel Support Design through Q and RMi Systems in Fractured Rock Mass Jaekook Lee 1, Hafeezur Rehman 1,2, Abdul Muntaqim Naji 1,3, Jung-Joo Kim 4 and Han-Kyu Yoo 1,* 1 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hanyang University, 55 Hanyangdaehak-ro, Sangnok-gu, Ansan 426-791, Korea; [email protected] (J.L.); [email protected] (H.R.); [email protected] (A.M.N.) 2 Department of Mining Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Baluchistan University of Information Technology, Engineering and Management Sciences (BUITEMS), Quetta 87300, Pakistan 3 Department of Geological Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Baluchistan University of Information Technology, Engineering and Management Sciences (BUITEMS), Quetta 87300, Pakistan 4 Korea Railroad Research Institute, 176 Cheoldobangmulgwan-ro, Uiwang-si, Gyeonggi-do 16105, Korea; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-31-400-5147; Fax: +82-31-409-4104 Received: 26 November 2018; Accepted: 14 December 2018; Published: 18 December 2018 Abstract: Empirical systems for the classification of rock mass are used primarily for preliminary support design in tunneling. When applying the existing acceptable international systems for tunnel preliminary supports in high-stress environments, the tunneling quality index (Q) and the rock mass index (RMi) systems that are preferred over geomechanical classification due to the stress characterization parameters that are incorporated into the two systems. However, these two systems are not appropriate when applied in a location where the rock is jointed and experiencing high stresses. This paper empirically extends the application of the two systems to tunnel support design in excavations in such locations.
    [Show full text]
  • FHWA/TX-07/0-5202-1 Accession No
    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA/TX-07/0-5202-1 Accession No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Determination of Field Suction Values, Hydraulic Properties, August 2005; Revised March 2007 and Shear Strength in High PI Clays 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Jorge G. Zornberg, Jeffrey Kuhn, and Stephen Wright 0-5202-1 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Center for Transportation Research 11. Contract or Grant No. The University of Texas at Austin 0-5202 3208 Red River, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78705-2650 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Technical Report Research and Technology Implementation Office September 2004–August 2006 P.O. Box 5080 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Austin, TX 78763-5080 15. Supplementary Notes Project performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. Project Title: Determination of Field Suction Values in High PI Clays for Various Surface Conditions and Drain Installations 16. Abstract Moisture infiltration into highway embankments constructed by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) using high Plasticity Index (PI) clays results in changes in shear strength and in flow pattern that leads to recurrent slope failures. In addition, soil cracking over time increases the rate of moisture infiltration. The overall objective of this research is to determine the suction, hydraulic properties, and shear strength of high PI Texas clays. Specifically, two comprehensive experimental programs involving the characterization of unsaturated properties and the shear strength of a high PI clay (Eagle Ford clay) were conducted.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Soil Dilatancy
    The Influence of Grain Shape on Dilatancy Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Cox, Melissa Reiko Brooke Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 24/09/2021 03:25:54 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/195563 THE INFLUENCE OF GRAIN SHAPE ON DILATANCY by MELISSA REIKO BROOKE COX ________________________ A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MECHANICS In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY WITH A MAJOR IN CIVIL ENGINEERING In the Graduate College THE UNIVERISTY OF ARIZONA 2 0 0 8 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Melissa Reiko Brooke Cox entitled The Influence of Grain Shape on Dilatancy and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy ___________________________________________________________________________ Date: October 17, 2008 Muniram Budhu ___________________________________________________________________________ Date: October 17, 2008 Achintya Haldar ___________________________________________________________________________ Date: October 17, 2008 Chandrakant S. Desai ___________________________________________________________________________ Date: October 17, 2008 John M. Kemeny Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate’s submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College. I hereby certify that I have read this dissertation prepared under my direction and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Slenderness Ratios on Triaxial Shear Testing
    Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science Volume 73 Annual Issue Article 41 1966 The Influence of Slenderness Ratios on riaxialT Shear Testing Eugene R. Moores Sunray D-X Oil Company J. M. Hoover Iowa State University Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Copyright ©1966 Iowa Academy of Science, Inc. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias Recommended Citation Moores, Eugene R. and Hoover, J. M. (1966) "The Influence of Slenderness Ratios on riaxialT Shear Testing," Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science, 73(1), 285-292. Available at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias/vol73/iss1/41 This Research is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa Academy of Science at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science by an authorized editor of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Moores and Hoover: The Influence of Slenderness Ratios on Triaxial Shear Testing The Influence of Slende,rness Ratios on Triaxial Sihear Testing 1 EUGENE R. MooRES AND J. M. Hoovm2 Abstract. Determination of the effect of the slenderness ratio on the results of the triaxial test depends, theoretically, on the boundary conditions induced by ( a) shape of the test specimen, ( o) manner of the transmission of the external load, and · ( c) deformations. From a practical point of view enough length should be available to develop two complete cones of failure and the length of the specimen should equal the diameter times the 0 tangent of (45 + .p/2) • Most workers in the field of triaxial testing of soils accept a slenderness ratio of from 1.5 to 3.0.
    [Show full text]
  • Slope Stability 101 Basic Concepts and NOT for Final Design Purposes! Slope Stability Analysis Basics
    Slope Stability 101 Basic Concepts and NOT for Final Design Purposes! Slope Stability Analysis Basics Shear Strength of Soils Ability of soil to resist sliding on itself on the slope Angle of Repose definition n1. the maximum angle to the horizontal at which rocks, soil, etc, will remain without sliding Shear Strength Parameters and Soils Info Φ angle of internal friction C cohesion (clays are cohesive and sands are non-cohesive) Θ slope angle γ unit weight of soil Internal Angles of Friction Estimates for our use in example Silty sand Φ = 25 degrees Loose sand Φ = 30 degrees Medium to Dense sand Φ = 35 degrees Rock Riprap Φ = 40 degrees Slope Stability Analysis Basics Explore Site Geology Characterize soil shear strength Construct slope stability model Establish seepage and groundwater conditions Select loading condition Locate critical failure surface Iterate until minimum Factor of Safety (FS) is achieved Rules of Thumb and “Easy” Method of Estimating Slope Stability Geology and Soils Information Needed (from site or soils database) Check appropriate loading conditions (seeps, rapid drawdown, fluctuating water levels, flows) Select values to input for Φ and C Locate water table in slope (critical for evaluation!) 2:1 slopes are typically stable for less than 15 foot heights Note whether or not existing slopes are vegetated and stable Plan for a factor of safety (hazards evaluation) FS between 1.4 and 1.5 is typically adequate for our purposes No Flow Slope Stability Analysis FS = tan Φ / tan Θ Where Φ is the effective
    [Show full text]
  • CE2112: Laboratory Determination of Soil Properties and Soil Classification
    CE2112: Laboratory Determination of Soil Properties and Soil Classification Laboratory Report G1: Index and Consolidation Properties G2 Shear Strength Year 2013/2014 Semester 2 PENG LE A0115443N 1 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................ 4 2. Overview .................................................................................................................................. 5 3. Atterberg Limits Tests ........................................................................................................... 6 3.1. Principles ............................................................................................................................ 6 3.2. Plastic Limit (PL) ............................................................................................................... 7 3.3. Liquid Limit (LL) ............................................................................................................... 8 3.4. Classification of the Soil .................................................................................................... 9 3.5. Discussion......................................................................................................................... 10 4. One Dimension Consolidation Test .................................................................................... 11 4.1. Principles of One Dimension Consolidation Test ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Stability Charts for a Tall Tunnel in Undrained Clay
    Int. J. of GEOMATE, April, 2016, Vol. 10, No. 2 (Sl. No. 20), pp. 1764-1769 Geotech., Const. Mat. and Env., ISSN: 2186-2982(P), 2186-2990(O), Japan STABILITY CHARTS FOR A TALL TUNNEL IN UNDRAINED CLAY Jim Shiau1, Mathew Sams1 and Jing Chen1 1School of Civil Engineering and Surveying, University of Southern Queensland, Australia ABSTRACT The stability of a plane strain tall rectangular tunnel in undrained clay is investigated in this paper using shear strength reduction technique. The finite difference program FLAC is used to determine the factor of safety for unsupported tall rectangular tunnels. Numerical results are compared with upper and lower bound limit solutions, and the comparison finds a very good agreement with solutions to be within 5% difference. Design charts for tall rectangular tunnels are then presented for a wide range of practical scenarios using dimensionless ratios ~ a similar approach to Taylor’s slope stability chart. A number of typical examples are presented to illustrate the potential usefulness for practicing engineers. Keywords: Stability Analysis, Tall Tunnel, Undrained Clay, Factor of Safety, FLAC, Strength Reduction Method INTRODUCTION C/D and the strength ratio Su/γD. This approach is very similar to the widely used Taylor’s design chart The critical geotechnical aspects for tunnel design for slope stability analysis (Taylor, 1937) [9]. discussed by Peck (1969) in [1] are: stability during construction, ground movements, and the determination of structural forces for the lining design. The focus of this paper is on the design consideration of tunnel stability that was expressed by a stability number initially defined by Broms and Bennermark (1967) [2] in equation 1: = (1) − + Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Shear Strength Examples.Pdf
    444 Chapter 12: Shear Strength of Soil Example 12.2 Following are the results of four drained direct shear tests on an overconsolidated clay: • Diameter of specimen ϭ 50 mm • Height of specimen ϭ 25 mm Normal Shear force at Residual shear Test force, N failure, Speak force, Sresidual no. (N) (N) (N) 1 150 157.5 44.2 2 250 199.9 56.6 3 350 257.6 102.9 4 550 363.4 144.5 © Cengage Learning 2014 t t Determine the relationships for peak shear strength ( f) and residual shear strength ( r). Solution 50 2 Area of the specimen 1A2 ϭ 1p/42 a b ϭ 0.0019634 m2. Now the following 1000 table can be prepared. Residual S shear peak S force, T ϭ residual ؍ Normal Normal Peak shearT S؅ f r Test force, N stress, force, Speak A Sresidual A no. (N) (kN/m2) (N) (kN/m2) (N) (kN/m2) 1 150 76.4 157.5 80.2 44.2 22.5 2 250 127.3 199.9 101.8 56.6 28.8 3 350 178.3 257.6 131.2 102.9 52.4 4 550 280.1 363.4 185.1 144.5 73.6 © Cengage Learning 2014 t t sЈ The variations of f and r with are plotted in Figure 12.19. From the plots, we find that t 2 ϭ ؉ S؅ Peak strength: f (kN/m ) 40 tan 27 t 2 ϭ S؅ Residual strength: r(kN/m ) tan 14.6 (Note: For all overconsolidated clays, the residual shear strength can be expressed as t ϭ sœ fœ r tan r fœ ϭ where r effective residual friction angle.) Copyright 2012 Cengage Learning.
    [Show full text]
  • Overconsolidated Clays: Shales
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD 873 Overconsolidated Clays: 11 Shales 001411672 Transportation Research Record Issue : 873 - ------ - --------------1 ~IT"ID TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 1982 TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Officers DARRELL V MANNING, Chairman LAWRENCE D. DAHMS, Vice Chairman THOMAS B. DEEN, Executive Director Members RAY A. BARNHART, JR., Administrator, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation (ex officio) FRANCIS B. FRANCOIS, Executive Director, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (ex officio) WILLIAM J. HARRIS, JR., Vice President, Research and Test Depart1111mt, Association of American Raili'oads (ex officio) J. LYNN HFLMS, Admi11istro1or, Ji'f!deral A11iatio11 Admi11is1ratio11, U.S. D<:par/111(1 111 of 1'rrmsportation (ex officio) Tl IOMAS D. LARSON, Secretory of '/)'a11spor1a/io11, Pen11sylva11ia Deµart111 e111 of 1'ra11sporration (ex officio, Past Chair111an , 1981) RAYMOND A. PECK, JR., Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety Ad111i11ls1rotio11, U.S. Department of 'f'ronsporta1io11 (ex officio) ARTHUR E. TEELE, JR., Administrator, Urban Mass Transportation Admi11istrotio11, U.S. Deparrmenr of Tro11spor1ation (ex officio) CHARLEY V. WOOTAN, Director, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University (ex officio, Past Chairman, 1980) GEORGE J. BEAN, Director of Aviation, Hillsborough County (F1orida) Aviation Authority JOHN R. BORCHERT, Professor, Department of Geography, University of Minnesota RICHARD P. BRAUN, Commissioner, Minnesota Deportment of Transportation ARTHUR J. BRUEN, JR., Vice President, Con tinentol Illinois National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago JOSEPH M. CLAPP, Senior Vice President and Member, Board of Directors, Roadway Express, Inc. ALAN G. DUSTIN, President, Chief Executive, and Chief Operating Officer, Boston and Maine Corporation ROBERT E. FARRIS, Commissioner, Tennessee Department of 1'ronsportation ADRIANA GIANTURCO, Director, California Department of Transportation JACK R.
    [Show full text]
  • A Constitutive Model of Sandy Gravel Soil Under Large-Sized Loading/Unloading Triaxial Tests
    Hindawi Advances in Civil Engineering Volume 2021, Article ID 4998351, 11 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4998351 Research Article A Constitutive Model of Sandy Gravel Soil under Large-Sized Loading/Unloading Triaxial Tests Pengfei Zhang,1 Han Liu,1 Zhentu Feng,2 Chaofeng Jia,2 and Rui Zhou 3 1Hebei Research Institute of Construction and Geotechnical Investigation Co. Ltd., Shijiazhuang 050031, China 2Luoyang Rail Transit Group Co Ltd., Luoyang 471000, Henan, China 3School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China Correspondence should be addressed to Rui Zhou; [email protected] Received 23 April 2021; Accepted 2 June 2021; Published 14 June 2021 Academic Editor: Faming Huang Copyright © 2021 Pengfei Zhang et al. +is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Based on large-scale triaxial tests of sandy gravel materials, the strength and deformation characteristics under loading/unloading conditions are analyzed. At the same time, the applicability of the hyperbolic constitutive model to sandy gravel is studied using experimental data. +e results indicate that sandy gravel under low confining pressures (0.2 and 0.4 MPa) shows a weak softening trend; the higher the confining pressure, the more obvious the hardening tendency (0.6 and 0.8 MPa) and the greater the peak strength. During unloading tests, strain softening occurs, and the peak strength increases with increasing confining pressure. During loading tests, dilatancy appears when the confining pressure is low (0.2 MPa).
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Retrogressive Landslide Risk Analysis in Sensitive Clay Slope
    geosciences Review Overview of Retrogressive Landslide Risk Analysis in Sensitive Clay Slope Blanche Richer * , Ali Saeidi , Maxime Boivin and Alain Rouleau Department of Applied Sciences, University of Quebec at Chicoutimi, Chicoutimi, QC G7H 2B1, Canada; [email protected] (A.S.); [email protected] (M.B.); [email protected] (A.R.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 2 June 2020; Accepted: 18 July 2020; Published: 22 July 2020 Abstract: Sensitive clays are known for producing retrogressive landslides, also called spread or flowslides. The key characteristics associated with the occurrence of these landslides on a sensitive clay slope must be assessed, and the potential retrogressive distance must be evaluated. Common risk analysis methods include empirical methods for estimating the distance of potential retrogression, analytical limit equilibrium methods, numerical modelling methods using the strength reduction technique, and the integration of a progressive failure mechanism into numerical methods. Methods developed for zoning purposes in Norway and Quebec provide conservative results in most cases, even if they don’t cover the worst cases scenario. A flowslide can be partially analysed using analytical limit equilibrium methods and numerical methods having strength reduction factor tools. Numerical modelling of progressive failure mechanisms using numerical methods can define the critical parameters of spread-type landslides, such as critical unloading and the retrogression distance of the failure. Continuous improvements to the large-deformation numerical modeling approach allow its application to all types of sensitive clay landslides. Keywords: sensitive clay; quick clay; landslide; stability analysis; failure type; retrogressive distance 1. Introduction Clays are constituted of fine-grained soil material having a grain size of less than approximately 0.05 mm.
    [Show full text]