DOCSLIB.ORG

Cover and Contents, IJCB Journal January 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cover and Contents, IJCB Journal January 2013 International Journal of Central Banking Volume 9, Supplement 1 January 2013 Special Supplemental Issue — Central Banking: Before, During, and After the Crisis A Conference to Honor Don Kohn Introduction 1 Opening Remarks 3 Ben S. Bernanke QE1vs.2vs.3...:AFramework for Analyzing 5 Large-Scale Asset Purchases as a Monetary Policy Tool Mark Gertler and Peter Karadi Discussion: Olivier Blanchard 55 Discussion: Varadarajan V. Chari 61 Monetary Aggregates and the Central Bank’s Financial 69 Stability Mandate Hyun Jeong Kim, Hyun Song Shin, and Jaeho Yun An Integrated Framework for Analyzing Multiple Financial 109 Regulations Charles A. E. Goodhart, Anil K. Kashyap, Dimitrios P. Tsomocos, and Alexandros P. Vardoulakis Discussion: Paul M. W. Tucker 145 Discussion: Tobias Adrian 153 Complexity and Monetary Policy 167 Athanasios Orphanides and Volker Wieland Discussion: Lars E.O. Svensson 205 Discussion: Glenn D. Rudebusch 219 Unconventional Monetary Policy Measures: 229 Principles—Conditions—Raison d’ˆetre Jean-Claude Trichet Replumbing Our Financial System: Uneven Progress 251 Darrell Duffie Discussion: Stephen G. Cecchetti 281 A Proposal for the Resolution of Systemically Important 291 Assets and Liabilities: The Case of the Repo Market Viral V. Acharya and T. Sabri Onc¨u¨ Discussion: Andrew Crockett 351 Closing Panel Comments Challenges for the Future 359 Mervyn King Central Banking in a Balance Sheet Recession 367 Jaime Caruana Central Banking: Before, During, and After the Crisis 373 Masaaki Shirakawa The contents of this journal, together with additional materials provided by article authors, are available without charge at www.ijcb.org. Copyright c 2013 by the Association of the International Journal of Central Banking. All rights reserved. Brief excerpts may be reproduced or translated provided the source is cited. Consult www.ijcb.org for further information. The International Journal of Central Banking is published quarterly (ISSN: 1815-4654). Online access to the publication is available free of charge at www.ijcb.org. Individual print subscriptions are available. Orders may be placed by phone (001 415 974 2035), via fax (001 415 974 2168), or by e-mail ([email protected]). Renewals, claims, address changes, and requests for permission to reprint material from this journal should be addressed to: International Journal of Central Banking Economic Research Department Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco 101 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105 USA Phone: 001 415 974 2035 Fax: 001 415 974 2168 E-mail: [email protected] The views expressed in this journal do not necessarily represent the views of the Association of the International Journal of Central Banking or any of its members. ISSN: 1815-4654 International Journal of Central Banking Board of Directors Chairman John Murray, Bank of Canada Board Members Q. Farooq Akram, Norges Bank Choy Keen Meng, Monetary Authority of Singapore Abdulrahman Al-Hamidy, Saudi Arabian Loretta J. Mester, Federal Reserve Bank Monetary Agency of Philadelphia David E. Altig, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta John McDermott, Reserve Bank of New Zealand Carlos Hamilton Vasconcelos Araujo, Central Bank Maurice McGuire, Central Bank of Ireland of Brazil Deepak Mohanty, Reserve Bank of India Jan Marc Berk, The Nederlandsche Bank Vyacheslav Morgunov, Central Bank of Claudio Borio, Bank for International Settlements Russian Federation Mohamed Tahar Bouhouche, Bank of Algeria Edward Offenbacher, Bank of Israel Laurent Clerc, Bank of France Fabio Panetta, Bank of Italy Francisco G. Dakila Jr., Central Bank of Th´orarinnG. P´etursson, Central Bank of Iceland the Philippines Cristian Popa, National Bank of Romania Spencer Dale, Bank of England Ivan Ribnikar, Bank of Slovenia Jean-Pierre Danthine, Swiss National Bank Harvey Rosenblum, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas William English, Federal Reserve Board Mark Schweitzer, Federal Reserve Bank Jiang Feng, People’s Bank of China of Cleveland Manuel Ramos Francia, Bank of Mexico Frank Smets, European Central Bank Jeffrey C. Fuhrer, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Jan Smets, National Bank of Belgium Hiroshi Fujiki, Bank of Japan Kateˇrina Smˇ ´ıdkov´a, Czech National Bank Niels Lyngg˚ardHansen, Danmarks Nationalbank Daniel Sullivan, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Dong He, Hong Kong Monetary Authority Altin Tanku, Bank of Albania Luis Oscar´ Herrera, Central Bank of Chile Juha Tarkka, Bank of Finland Heinz Herrmann, Deutsche Bundesbank George Tavlas, Bank of Greece Tor Jacobson, Sveriges Riksbank Joseph Tracy, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Juan F. Jimeno, Bank of Spain Dobieslaw Tymoczko, National Bank of Poland George A. Kahn, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Christopher Waller, Federal Reserve Bank Ali Hakan Kara, Central Bank of Turkey of St. Louis Jun Il Kim, Bank of Korea John Weinberg, Federal Reserve Bank Ana Christina Leal, Bank of Portugal of Richmond Philip Lowe, Reserve Bank of Australia Kei-Mu Yi, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Editorial Board Managing Editor John C. Williams Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Co-editors Pierpaolo Benigno Harrison Hong Rafael Repullo LUISS Guido Carli Princeton University CEMFI Michael B. Devereux Loretta Mester University of British Columbia Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Associate Editors Patrick Bolton Jordi Gal´ı Eli M. Remolona University of Columbia Centre de Recerca en Economia Bank for International Michael D. Bordo Internacional (CREI) Settlements Rutgers University Marvin Goodfriend H´el`eneRey Mark Carey Carnegie Mellon University London Business School Federal Reserve Board Michael B. Gordy Jean-Charles Rochet Pierre Collin-Dufresne Federal Reserve Board University of Toulouse University of Columbia Luigi Guiso Andrew K. Rose Guy Debelle European University Institute University of California, Reserve Bank of Australia Andrew G. Haldane Berkeley Michael B. Devereux Bank of England Klaus Schmidt-Hebbel University of British Columbia Takatoshi Ito Organisation for Economic University of Tokyo Co-operation and Development Douglas W. Diamond (OECD) University of Chicago Graduate David Lando School of Business Copenhagen Business School Lars E.O. Svensson Sveriges Riksbank Francis Diebold Philip Lane University of Pennsylvania Trinity College Dublin J¨urgen von Hagen University of Bonn Michael Dotsey Francesco Lippi Federal Reserve Bank of University of Sassari Ernst-Ludwig von Thadden University of Mannheim Philadelphia Carmen M. Reinhart Darrell Duffie University of Maryland Tsutomu Watanabe Stanford University University of Tokyo Advisory Board Franklin Allen Hyun Shin Michael Woodford The Wharton School of the Princeton University Columbia University University of Pennsylvania Kazuo Ueda John Taylor Charles Goodhart University of Tokyo Stanford University London School of Economics.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Regpulse Newsletter July 26, 2021 – August 6, 2021
    Financial Services RegPulse Newsletter July 26, 2021 – August 6, 2021 Recent developments › BIS published a white paper on principles for an emerging regulatory framework for the use of AI in financial services › The OCC appointed its first-ever Climate Change Risk Officer and joined the Network of Central Banks and Supervisors for Greening the Financial System › The Senate Banking Committee hosted a hearing on the oversight of selected financial regulators › SEC Chair Gary Gensler delivered separate remarks on digital assets and climate risks › The House and Senate both held hearings on the future of digital currencies in the US Regulatory Roundup | Deloitte Center for Regulatory Strategy, Americas 1 Introduction The Deloitte Center for Regulatory Strategy (DCRS) is a source of critical insight and advice, designed to help clients anticipate change and respond with confidence to the strategic and aggregate impact of national and international regulatory policy. The RegPulse Newsletter is a bi-weekly distribution that features the latest regulatory news and issues that are impacting the financial services and fintech industries. For a deeper analysis and discussion of regulatory developments, make sure to check out our RegPulse blog series, which are a collection of blogs that are contributed by our powerful team of former regulators, industry specialists, and trusted business advisors. US regulatory developments Congress Derivatives Banking & Capital Markets Investment Management Consumer Protection Insurance BSA/AML Fintech EMEA regulatory developments Key: Cross-sector The development covers multiple financial services sub-sectors or other industries. FBO The development pertains to or affects foreign banking organizations (FBOs). Blog/POV The development has been covered or is currently being analyzed by our team to be produced into either a RegPulse blog or broader point of view (POV).
    [Show full text]
  • Is Inflation Really Transitory?
    Is Inflation Really Transitory? By Eric Grover National Review August 17, 2021 Financial-market indicators point to a persistent uptick in inflation. DESPITE a few recent hints of unease, the Fed still maintains that the current surge in inflation is “transitory.” That seems optimistic: The central bank has been stoking inflation and is stubbornly blind to the danger of getting more than it bargained for, of letting loose what Nobel Prize– winning economist Friedrich Hayek described as the “tiger.” Fed chairman Paul Volcker caged inflation after it’d crested at 13.5 percent in 1980. Since then, however, the Fed, politicians, consumers, and producers have become complacent about the risk that it might escape again. The current cocktail of money-printing, massive deficit spending, pandemic- related supply-chain disruptions, and pent-up demand coming out of COVID-19 hibernation means inflation ahead — and not just for the short term. The outlook is only made worse by the hit to the supply side that will come from increased regulation and taxes, not to speak of the boost to energy costs that will flow from the administration’s hostility to fossil fuels. The Fed’s balance sheet has ballooned from $900 billion in August 2008 to a whopping $8.2 trillion in mid July 2021. However, by paying banks interest to park excess reserves held at the Fed, the central bank has managed to keep new dollars from entering the economy in the form of credit, thereby holding down inflation. Now, printed money is showing up in consumption and price data, and the longer the “transitory” surge endures, the more difficult it will be to contain.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantitative Easing: the Fed’S Tough Decision Around the World, Financial Markets Have Been Talking of Little Else for Weeks
    FOMC PREVIEW QUANTITATIVE EASING: THE FED’s tOUGH DECISION Around the world, financial markets have been talking of little else for weeks. On Wednesday, the waiting game finally comes to an end. REUTERS/ KEVIN LAMARQUE BY PEDRO NICOLACI DA COstA Treasury bond buying from the Federal that, like its promise to keeping interest WASHINGTON, OCT 21 Reserve could ultimately rival the hefty first rates low, the second round of so-called round of asset purchases. quantitative easing will be around for an NE HUNDRED BILLION here, one With expectations of at least $500 billion “extended period” if needed. hundred billion there. Pretty soon already built into financial markets, the Fed The rationale for further monetary we’reO talking real money. may try to counter possible disappointment accommodation has been laid out by It may not be “shock and awe” at first by making its commitment open ended. Chairman Ben Bernanke, whose views on blush, but the ultimate sums involved in It will likely do so by setting parameters policy carry the day at the Federal Open a second, widely anticipated program of vague enough to convince the markets Market Committee. OCTOBER 2010 FOMC PREVIEW OCTOBER 2010 ”DepenDING ON EVOLVING ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL CONDITIONS, QE2 HAS THE POTENTIAL TO GROW QUITE LARGE.” He has made clear that, with the 9.6 percent unemployment rate far above what might be seen as normal even in a post- recession context and inflation dangling at uncomfortably low levels, policymakers deem the risk of an outright deflationary rut significant enough to justify action. An incremental, flexible approach serves two purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bretton Woods Debates : a Memoir / Raymond F
    ESSAYS IN INTERNATIONAL FINANCE ESSAYS IN INTERNATIONAL FINANCE are published by the International Finance Section of the Department of Economics of Princeton University. The Section sponsors this series of publications, but the opinions expressed are those of the authors. The Section welcomes the submission of manuscripts for publication in this and its other series. Please see the Notice to Contributors at the back of this Essay. The author of this Essay, Raymond F. Mikesell, is Profes- sor of Economics at the University of Oregon. He was an economic advisor at the Bretton Woods conference in 1944 and a member of the staff of the President’s Council of Economic Advisors from 1955 to 1957. He was a senior research associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research from 1970 to 1974 and a consultant to the World Bank in 1968-69 and 1991-92. He has published a number of books and articles on international finance. This is his seventh contribution to the Section’s publications. PETER B. KENEN, Director International Finance Section INTERNATIONAL FINANCE SECTION EDITORIAL STAFF Peter B. Kenen, Director Margaret B. Riccardi, Editor Lillian Spais, Editorial Aide Lalitha H. Chandra, Subscriptions and Orders Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Mikesell, Raymond Frech. The Bretton Woods debates : a memoir / Raymond F. Mikesell. p. cm. — (Essays in international finance, ISSN 0071-142X ; no. 192) Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-88165-099-4 (pbk.) : $8.00 1. United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference (1944: Bretton Woods, N.H.)—History 2. International Monetary Fund—History. 3. World Bank—History. I.
    [Show full text]
  • Redacted Draft 2007-2010 FOMC Meeting Transcript Excerpts
    [Requester] [Signed] Meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee on January 30–31, 2007 A meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee was held in the offices of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday, January 30, 2007, at 2:00 p.m., and continued on Wednesday, January 31, 2007, at 9:00 a.m. Those present were the following: Mr. Bernanke, Chairman Mr. Geithner, Vice Chairman Ms. Bies Mr. Hoenig Mr. Kohn Mr. Kroszner Ms. Minehan Mr. Mishkin Mr. Moskow Mr. Poole Mr. Warsh Mr. Fisher, Ms. Pianalto, and Messrs. Plosser and Stern, Alternate Members of the Federal Open Market Committee Mr. Lacker and Ms. Yellen, Presidents of the Federal Reserve Banks of Richmond and San Francisco, respectively Mr. Barron, First Vice President, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Mr. Reinhart, Secretary and Economist Ms. Danker, Deputy Secretary Ms. Smith, Assistant Secretary Mr. Skidmore, Assistant Secretary Mr. Alvarez, General Counsel Mr. Baxter, Deputy General Counsel Ms. K. Johnson, Economist Mr. Stockton, Economist Messrs. Connors, Evans, Fuhrer, Kamin, Madigan, Rasche, Sellon, Slifman, Tracy, and Wilcox, Associate Economists Mr. Dudley, Manager, System Open Market Account Messrs. Clouse and English, Associate Directors, Division of Monetary Affairs, Board of Governors Authorized for Public Release 1 of 513 Ms. Liang and Mr. Struckmeyer, Associate Directors, Division of Research and Statistics, Board of Governors Messrs. Gagnon, Reifschneider, and Wascher, Deputy Associate Directors, Divisions of International Finance, Research and Statistics, and Research and Statistics, respectively, Board of Governors Messrs. Dale and Orphanides, Senior Advisers, Division of Monetary Affairs, Board of Governors Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maastricht Way to EMU / by Michele Fratianni, Jürgen Von Hagen, and Christopher Waller P
    ESSAYS IN INTERNATIONAL FINANCE ESSAYS IN INTERNATIONAL FINANCE are published by the International Finance Section of the Department of Eco- nomics of Princeton University. The Section sponsors this series of publications, but the opinions expressed are those of the authors. The Section welcomes the submission of manuscripts for publication in this and its other series. Please see the Notice to Contributors at the back of this Essay. The authors of this Essay are Michele Fratianni, Jürgen von Hagen, and Christopher Waller. Michele Fratianni is Professor of Business Economics and Public Policy at the Graduate School of Business, Indiana University, a Director of the International Trade and Financial Association, and Managing Editor of Open Economies Review. He has written extensively on monetary economics and international financial markets and is the author of One Money for Europe (1978) and coauthor, with Jürgen von Hagen, of “The European Monetary System Ten Years After” (1990) and The European Monetary System and European Monetary Union (1992). Jürgen von Hagen is Professor of Economics at the Uni- versity of Mannheim, Adjunct Professor of Business Eco- nomics and Public Policy at the Graduate School of Business, Indiana University, and a Research Fellow of the Centre of Economic Policy Research, London. His numerous writings on international monetary issues include, in addition to the above, “Monetary Policy Coordination in the EMS” (1992). Christopher Waller is Associate Professor of Economics at Indiana University. His writings on the politics of mone- tary policy and the design of central-banking institutions include “Monetary Policy Games and Central Bank Politics” (1989), “A Bargaining Model of Partisan Appointments to the Central Bank” (1992), and “The Choice of a Conserva- tive Central Banker in a Multi-Sector Economy” (1992).
    [Show full text]
  • Cover and Contents, IJCB September 2013
    Volume 9, Number 3 September 2013 Volume 9, Number 3Volume INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CENTRAL BANKING September 2013 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CENTRAL BANKING Fiscal Shocks and the Real Exchange Rate Agustín S. Bénétrix and Philip R. Lane Granularity Adjustment for Regulatory Capital Assessment Michael B. Gordy and Eva Lütkebohmert (Un)anticipated Monetary Policy in a DSGE Model with a Shadow Banking System Fabio Verona, Manuel M. F. Martins, and Inês Drumond The Impact of Monetary Policy Shocks on Commodity Prices Alessio Anzuini, Marco J. Lombardi, and Patrizio Pagano Policymakers’ Interest Rate Preferences: Recent Evidence for Three Monetary Policy Committees Alexander Jung Capital Regulation, Monetary Policy, and Financial Stability Pierre-Richard Agénor, Koray Alper, and Luiz Pereira da Silva International Journal of Central Banking Volume 9, Number 3 September 2013 Fiscal Shocks and the Real Exchange Rate 1 Agust´ın S. B´en´etrix and Philip R. Lane Granularity Adjustment for Regulatory Capital Assessment 33 Michael B. Gordy and Eva L¨utkebohmert (Un)anticipated Monetary Policy in a DSGE Model with a 73 Shadow Banking System Fabio Verona, Manuel M. F. Martins, and Inˆes Drumond The Impact of Monetary Policy Shocks on Commodity 119 Prices Alessio Anzuini, Marco J. Lombardi, and Patrizio Pagano Policymakers’ Interest Rate Preferences: Recent Evidence 145 for Three Monetary Policy Committees Alexander Jung Capital Regulation, Monetary Policy, and Financial Stability 193 Pierre-Richard Ag´enor, Koray Alper, and Luiz Pereira da Silva The contents of this journal, together with additional materials provided by article authors, are available without charge at www.ijcb.org. Copyright c 2013 by the Association of the International Journal of Central Banking.
    [Show full text]
  • Regpulse Newsletter December 14, 2020 – January 8, 2021
    Financial Services RegPulse Newsletter December 14, 2020 – January 8, 2021 Recent developments › COVID-19 economic stimulus bill, known CARES 2.0, is signed into law › Federal Reserve formally joins the Network of Central Banks and Supervisors for Greening the Financial System › Federal banking agencies announce a proposed rule that would require prompt notification of any “computer-security incident” › OCC clarifies that federally chartered banks and thrifts may participate in public blockchain networks and use stablecoins for payment activities › SEC requests comment regarding the custody of digital asset securities by special purpose Regulatory Roundup | Deloitte Center for Regulatory Strategy, Americas 1 broker-dealers Introduction The Deloitte Center for Regulatory Strategy (DCRS) is a source of critical insight and advice, designed to help clients anticipate change and respond with confidence to the strategic and aggregate impact of national and international regulatory policy. The RegPulse Newsletter is a bi-weekly distribution that features the latest regulatory news and issues that are impacting the financial services and fintech industries. For a deeper analysis and discussion of regulatory developments, make sure to check out our RegPulse blog series, which are a collection of blogs that are contributed by our powerful team of former regulators, industry specialists, and trusted business advisors. US regulatory developments Congress Derivatives Banking & Capital Markets Investment Management Consumer Protection Insurance BSA/AML Fintech EMEA regulatory developments Featured DCRS content Key: Cross-sector The development covers multiple financial services sub-sectors or other industries. FBO The development pertains to or affects foreign banking organizations (FBOs). Blog/POV The development has been covered or is currently being analyzed by our team to be produced into either a RegPulse blog or broader point of view (POV).
    [Show full text]
  • The Coexistence of Money and Credit As Means of Payment∗
    The Coexistence of Money and Credit as Means of Payment∗ S´ebastienLotzy Cathy Zhangz LEMMA, University of Paris II Purdue University November 2013 Abstract This paper studies the choice of payment instruments in a simple model where both money and credit can be used as means of payment. We endogenize the acceptability of credit by allowing retailers to invest in a costly record-keeping technology. Our framework captures the two-sided market interaction between consumers and retailers, leading to strategic complemen- tarities that can generate multiple steady-state equilibria. In addition, limited commitment makes debt contracts self-enforcing and yields an endogenous upper bound on credit use. Our model can explain why the demand for credit declines as inflation falls, and how hold-up prob- lems in technological adoption can prevent retailers from accepting credit as consumers continue to coordinate on cash usage. We show that when money and credit coexist, equilibrium is generi- cally inefficient and changes to the debt limit are not neutral. We also discuss the extent to which our model can reconcile some key patterns in the use of cash and credit in retail transactions. Keywords: coexistence of money and credit, costly record-keeping, endogenous credit JEL Classification Codes: D82, D83, E40, E50 ∗We are indebted to Guillaume Rocheteau for valuable feedback and comments throughout this project. This paper also benefitted from discussions and comments from Luis Araujo, Zach Bethune, Pedro Gomis-Porqueras, Matt Hoelle, Tai-Wei Hu, Janet Jiang, Yiting Li, Stan Rabinovich, Jose Antonio Rodriguez-Lopez, Yongseok Shin, Irina Telyukova, Russell Tsz-Nga Wong, Randy Wright and seminar and conference participants at the 2013 Chicago Federal Reserve Money, Banking, Finance, and Payments Workshop, Purdue University, Paris II, University of Queensland, U.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Institutions of Federal Reserve Independence
    The Institutions of Federal Reserve Independence Peter Conti-Brownt The Federal Reserve System has come to occupy center stage in the formulation and implementation of national and global economic policy. And yet, the mechanisms through which the Fed creates that policy are rarely analyzed. Scholars, central bankers, and other policymakers assume that the Fed's independent authority to make policy is created by law-specifically, the FederalReserve Act, which created removabilityprotectionfor actors within the Fed, long tenures for Fed Governors, and budgetary autonomyfrom Congress. This Article analyzes these assumptions about law and argues that nothing about Fed independence is as it seems. Removability protection does not exist for the Fed Chair, but it exists in unconstitutionalform for the Reserve Bank presidents. Governors never serve their full fourteen-year terms, giving every President since FDR twice the appointments that the Federal Reserve Act anticipated. And the budgetary independence designed in 1913 bears little relation to the budgetary independence of2015. This Article thus challenges the prevailing accounts of agency independence in administrative law and central bank independence literature, both of which focus on law as the basis of Fed independence. It argues, instead, that the life of the Act-how its terms are interpreted, how its legal and economic contexts change, and how politics and individual personalities influence policymaking-is more important to understandingFed independence than the birth of the Act, the language passed by Congress. The institutions of Federal Reserve independence include statute, but not only the statute. Law, conventions, politics, and personalities all shape the Fed's unique policy-making space in ways that scholars, central bankers, and policy-makers have ignored.
    [Show full text]
  • January Flashlight for the FOMC Blackout Period
    January 15, 2021 Economics Group Special Commentary Jay H. Bryson, Chief Economist [email protected] ● (704) 410-3274 Tim Quinlan, Senior Economist [email protected] ● (704) 410-3283 Sarah House, Senior Economist [email protected] ● (704) 410-3282 Michael Pugliese, Economist [email protected] ● (212) 214-5058 January Flashlight for the FOMC Blackout Period Executive Summary The January 26-27 meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) is now eleven days away, and we have entered the blackout period when committee members refrain from public comments. Notably, this will be first meeting to occur during the Biden administration, and in keeping with schedule, the first meeting of the year also means a rotation of regional board governors as well as the addition of new Board Governor Christopher Waller. In this edition of the Flashlight for the Blackout Period, we breakdown the new seating assignments and what it means for policy. In the lead-up to the blackout period, a number of Fed officials have been addressing the timing of the eventual dialing back of the asset purchase programs that helped the financial system function smoothly throughout the pandemic. Although we do not expect the FOMC will increase the size or the composition of its asset purchase programs at this meeting, the committee could potentially provide some guidance on the conditions that will be needed before it starts to wind down those programs. While 10-year benchmark Treasury yields rose considerably at the start of this year, short-term yields like the effective fed funds rate remain quite low.
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Market Commentary
    WEEKLY MARKET COMMENTARY For the Week of January 4, 2021 The Markets U.S. stocks rose on the final trading day of a tumultuous year. Amid pandemic-related closures and a global recession, equities plunged into a bear market in February and March but quickly rebounded. The Dow and the S&P 500 broke their records Thursday, and the NASDAQ’s year- to-date gains were the strongest of the three indices. For the week, the Dow rose 1.35 percent to close at 30,606.48. The S&P gained 1.45 percent to finish at 3,756.07, and the NASDAQ climbed 0.66 percent to end the week at 12,888.28. I Need My Space — In 2020, 28 percent of the households in the United States were made up of just one individual living alone. Another 35 percent of households were made up of just two people, of which 65 percent (of the 35 percent) are a married couple (source: Census Bureau, BTN Research). The Fed — Four of the six current members of the Federal Reserve’s Board of Governors – Richard Clarida, Randal Quarles, Michelle Bowman, and Christopher Waller – were appointed during President Trump’s four years in office. There remains one vacancy on the seven-member Board of Governors (source: Federal Reserve, BTN Research). All for Exactly the Same Services — Private U.S. health insurance pays on average $241 for health care services for every $100 that Medicare pays and for every $72 that Medicaid pays (source: RAND, Health Affairs, BTN Research). WEEKLY FOCUS – Why You Should Set Up Your Online Social Security Account For many of us, Social Security plays an important part in our financial plans for retirement or later stage of life.
    [Show full text]