DOCSLIB.ORG

2019-2020 Fomc Voting Members:Their Voices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2019-2020 FOMC VOTING MEMBERS: THEIR VOICES By Maeve O’Brien The Fed is expected to hold rates steady in 2020 and voting member turnover should not bring a large overall Looking at a big picture view of voting turnover in the 2020 FOMC, it seems as though there are two hawks shift to policy direction. 2019 alternates Harker, Kaplan, Kashkari, and Mester will replace outgoing Bullard, Evans, replacing two hawks, one dove replacing one dove, and one centrist replacing one centrist. However, while there George, and Rosengren as 2020 voters. The Board of Governors and NY Fed President Williams are always voting appears to be a one-to-one replacement for each non-returning voting member based on policy leanings, the new members of the FOMC. These returning members are mostly centrist with some dovish leanings by Governor dynamic of the FOMC voting members will depend on marginal differences in opinions amongst the new voters. Brainard. Note that there remain two vacancies on the Board. Judy Shelton and Christopher Waller were named Will Mester be as hawkish as Rosengren? Will Kaplan remain centrist or will he begin to lean slightly hawkish? by President Trump but have not been formally nominated. Both are considered to be very dovish. Only time will tell but we should get our first clues at the next FOMC meeting January 29. DOVE HAWK JAMES BULLARD: JOHN WILLIAMS: ROBERT KAPLAN: LORETTA MESTER: Non-returning voting member 2019 Returning voting member 2019 Incoming voting member 2020 Incoming voting member 2020 (dissented on Sept 2019 rate cut in favor of a larger rate cut) “ The economy is in a good place, and monetary policy is as well… Of “ Do we act now or do we let this situation breathe a little bit more (opposed past 3 rate cuts in favor of holding rates steady) “ The bottom line is that U.S. monetary policy is considerably course, things can change. Data dependency remains our motto, and – understand that we could take action in December or some “ I wasn’t a supporter (of rate cuts) but it was a close call. I certainly more accommodative today than it was as of late last year.’’1 if there were a material change to this outlook, we would adjust future day. So that’s the reason it was a close call (to support the understood the arguments for why it made sense to move the rate 6 12 “ The FOMC’s adjustment toward lower rates in the face of monetary policy.” October rate cut).” down. But now I think we’re in a really good spot... I don’t view the trade policy uncertainty may help facilitate somewhat faster “ With the adjustments we’ve already made, lowering interest rates, “ It (US economic growth) gets worse if we don’t make some policy current readings on inflation expectations as being problematic, 18 growth in 2020 than what might otherwise occur.”1 we’ve got the economy on a very strong footing, sustainable footing, changes. We think over the next five or 10 years it’s going to I view them as being relatively stable.” for good growth next year… I expect inflation to move up, with that slowly decline… I think policy is in the right place right now.”13 “ We’re in a good spot right now to wait and see where inflation’s strong economy.”7 going and where the labor market and growth are going before we make another change in policy.”19 NEEL KASHKARI: Incoming voting member 2020 JEROME POWELL: RICHARD CLARIDA: Returning voting member 2019 “ My message is clear, we should be supporting the Returning voting member 2019 ESTHER GEORGE: economy, not tapping the brakes (on monetary policy)… “ Monetary policy is now well positioned… If the outlook changes Non-returning voting member 2019 how much more do we have to cut, I don’t know yet.”2 “ We have the strongest labor market in 50 years… We have low and materially, policy will change as well. At this point in the long stable inflation. We have solid growth, and our baseline outlook for the expansion, I see the glass as much more than half full.”14 (dissented on past 3 rate cuts in favor of holding rates steady) “ We’ve been undershooting inflation for basically six or eight economy is more of the same in 2020.”8 years so why don’t we commit not to raise rates until we “ Our existing framework has served us well. Nonetheless, the “ Supporting an unchanged policy rate in recent meetings does not actually achieve that (higher inflation).”3 “ The consumer has never been in better shape in my professional career current low interest rate environment may limit the ability of ignore the downside risks facing our economy. The emergence of in aggregate.”8 monetary policy to support the economy… In a downturn, it those key risks to the outlook as early as the fourth quarter of 2018 “ My own outlook for the economy is one of continued growth would also be important for fiscal policy to support the economy. caused me to moderate my expectation that further rate increases but somewhat cautious growth going forward, because “ We were just doing textbook monetary policy to provide some support However.. the federal budget is on an unsustainable path.”15 were needed… I shifted downward my view of the appropriate there are some risks on the horizon.”4 for the economy in the face of this global slowdown and muted path for policy over the next one to two years... I view this as an 8 inflation pressures.” “ A significant move up in inflation that’s also persistent before appropriate adjustment.”20 raising rates to address inflation concerns: That’s my view.”16 LAEL BRAINARD: Returning voting member 2019 CHARLES EVANS: ERIC ROSENGREN: Non-returning voting member 2019 PATRICK HARKER: Non-returning voting member 2019 “ It may be helpful to specify that policy aims to achieve Incoming voting member 2020 inflation outcomes that average 2 percent over time or over “ So the economy is in a good place, and I think we’ve made good adjust- (dissented on past 3 rate cuts in favor of holding rates steady) (opposed past 2 rate cuts in favor of holding rates steady) the cycle. Given the persistent shortfall of inflation from ments to the stance monetary policy. So cutting the funds rate target by “ I view the U.S. economy as in pretty good shape right now… The its target over recent years, this would imply supporting 75 basis points – three cuts, as you mentioned. I think that puts us in a “ My own view is that we should hold steady for a while and watch U.S. economy is in good enough shape that I dissented at the last 9 inflation a bit above 2 percent for some time to compensate good place.” how things unfold before taking any more action… I held this meeting… I did not think the last cut was necessary, and I certainly 5 for the period of underperformance.” “ Policy is not that far off neutral, I would say it’s accommodative.”10 same view regarding the last two cuts. And while it wasn’t my think that there is nothing that has come in since that meeting that “ I will be watching the data carefully for signs of a material preference, it does act as a good reminder that monetary policy would change my view.”21 in the United States is a deliberative process.”17 change to the outlook that could prompt me to reassess the “ I don’t think there’s a big cost to being a little below 2% (inflation)… 5 appropriate path of policy.” I’d rather be higher, but I wouldn’t want to distort financial markets RANDAL QUARLES: to get that outcome.”22 Returning voting member 2019 “ By lowering the federal funds rate this year, we are supporting the continued expansion of the economy. Overall, with these policy adjustments, I believe that the economy will remain in a good place.”11 BBH Foreign Exchange 2020 First Quarter Outlook | 2 1. Bullard, James. “The FOMC’s Substantial Turn During 2019.” Rotary Club of Louisville. Louisville, KY. 14 November 2019. 2. Kashkari, Neel. Article by Derby, Michael S. “Fed’s Kashkari Supports Rate Cuts, But Unsure How Many More Are Needed.” The Wall Street Journal, Wall Street Journal, 07 Oct. 2019, www.wsj.com/articles/ feds-kashkari-supports-rate-cuts-but-unsure-how-many-more-are-needed-11570462866. 3. Kashkari, Neel. “Kashkari at Thrivent Employee Event.” Discussion and Q&A. Minneapolis, MN. 05 November 2019. 4. Kashkari, Neel. “Neel Kashkari at UW La Crosse.” Discussion and Q&A. La Crosse, WI. 13 November 2019. 5. Brainard, Lael. “Federal Reserve Review of Monetary Policy Strategy, Tools, and Communications: Some Preliminary Views.” New York Association for Business Economics. New York, NY. 26 November 2019. 6. Williams, John. “No Man is an Island.” Asia Economic Policy Conference. San Francisco, CA. 14 November 2019. 7. Williams, John. Speech in New York, NY 13 December 2019 covered by Bloomberg. “Fed’s Williams Says Rate Cuts Have Put Economy on Strong Footing.” Reported by Boesler, Matthew. Bloomberg. 13 December 2019. 8. Clarida, Richard. “Trade Deal Progress Good for US Economy: Fed’s Clarida.” Interview by Liz Claman. Fox Business. 13 December 2019. 9. Evans, Charles. “Chicago Fed President Charles Evans Speaks with Yahoo Finance.” Interview with Brian Cheung. 06 November 2019. 10. Evans, Charles. Article by Derby, Michael S. “Fed’s Evans: Fed Has Moved Policy to Slightly Accommodative Stance.” The Wall Street Journal, Wall Street Journal, 06 Nov.
Recommended publications
  • Nominations of Joseph Otting and Randal Quarles Hearing Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs United States Senate

    Nominations of Joseph Otting and Randal Quarles Hearing Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs United States Senate

    S. HRG. 115–133 NOMINATIONS OF JOSEPH OTTING AND RANDAL QUARLES HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON BANKING, HOUSING, AND URBAN AFFAIRS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON THE NOMINATIONS OF: JOSEPH OTTING, OF NEVADA, TO BE COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY, OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY RANDAL QUARLES, OF COLORADO, TO BE A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, AND VICE CHAIRMAN FOR SUPERVISION, BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM JULY 27, 2017 Printed for the use of the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs ( Available at: http://www.govinfo.gov/ U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 28–282 PDF WASHINGTON : 2018 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Nov 24 2008 13:17 Mar 27, 2018 Jkt 046629 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\DOCS\28282.TXT SHERYL COMMITTEE ON BANKING, HOUSING, AND URBAN AFFAIRS MIKE CRAPO, Idaho, Chairman RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama SHERROD BROWN, Ohio BOB CORKER, Tennessee JACK REED, Rhode Island PATRICK J. TOOMEY, Pennsylvania ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey DEAN HELLER, Nevada JON TESTER, Montana TIM SCOTT, South Carolina MARK R. WARNER, Virginia BEN SASSE, Nebraska ELIZABETH WARREN, Massachusetts TOM COTTON, Arkansas HEIDI HEITKAMP, North Dakota MIKE ROUNDS, South Dakota JOE DONNELLY, Indiana DAVID PERDUE, Georgia BRIAN SCHATZ, Hawaii THOM
  • IFFCBANO Symposium: Keeping Trade Moving

    IFFCBANO Symposium: Keeping Trade Moving

    IFFCBANO Symposium: Keeping Trade Moving Adrienne C. Slack Regional Executive Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta - New Orleans Branch The views expressed here are my own, and not necessarily those of the Atlanta Fed or the Federal Reserve System. The Fed’s Dual Mandate • The Fed is pursuing two objectives as given to us by Congress— maximum employment and price stability. • The maximum level of employment is largely determined by nonmonetary factors that affect the structure and dynamics of the job market, although a stronger economy does help with job creation. • The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) has chosen an inflation target of two percent per year over the medium term as measured by the annual change in the price index for personal consumption expenditures. 2 Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Randal Quarles Jerome H. Powell Richard H. Clarida Lael Brainard Vice Chair for Chair Vice Chair Supervision Vacant Michelle W. Bowman Vacant 3 The Federal Reserve Bank Presidents Loretta Mester Charles Evans Neel Kashkari Patrick Harker Eric Rosengren Cleveland Chicago Minneapolis Philadelphia Boston 4th District 7th District 9th District 3rd District 1st District John Williams New York 2nd District Tom Barkin Richmond 5th District Mary Daly San Francisco Esther George Raphael Bostic Robert Kaplan James Bullard 12th District Kansas City Atlanta 10th District Dallas St. Louis 6th District 11th District 8th District 4 The Sixth District Information Flow Public Sixth Policy District Business Sixth FOMC District Research Sixth Atlanta District Board of President Directors 6 Summary of the Economic Environment: The May 2019 FOMC Policy Statement • Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in March indicates that the labor market remains strong and that economic activity rose at a solid rate.
  • Inflation Targeting

    Inflation Targeting

    A SYMPOSIUM OF VIEWS Inflation Targeting Should the Federal Reserve in its conduct of monetary policy follow ome argue that while Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan, in office since 1987, has been an extraordinarily sub- Stle and skillful manager, his successor may not en- the European Central joy these unique skills. Thus, the system needs eventually to agree on a series of guiding benchmarks if not a target for use Bank and adopt some in the conduct of monetary policy. Globally, such an addi- tional tool might help in the convergence process and po- form of inflation target tentially create more stability for exchange rates. Others counter that it is not wise to lock the system range? TIE asked thirteen into a simplistic rule, or set of rules, particularly at a time of continued geopolitical uncertainty. Still others distinguished experts. counter that the European Central Bank established provisions that have successfully anticipated such ex- ternal shocks to the system. Is the time approaching for the U.S. central bank to adopt an inflation target or inflation target range? Or does the U.S. monetary system require a more prag- THE MAGAZINE OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC POLICY matic and intuitive approach? To what extent should an 2099 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Suite 950 Washington, D.C. 20006 inflation target be discretionary? Phone: 202-861-0791, Fax: 202-861-0790 www.international-economy.com 24 THE INTERNATIONAL ECONOMY WINTER 2004 I will therefore simply sketch out what has worked well for us at the ECB. We announced our monetary poli- Inflation targets are cy strategy in October 1998.
  • Former Fed Chiefs Weigh In

    Former Fed Chiefs Weigh In

    JULY 17 2020 Former Fed chiefs weigh in Ben Bernanke and Janet Yellen have hardly been quiet since they left their positions as heads of the Federal Reserve. Whether in media, articles or, recently, as part of a group of 150 economists who wrote a letter to Congress, the two have remained public figures. It has been some time since they testified before lawmakers, however. Appearing twice a year to committees in both the House and the Senate was part of the job back then; Friday marked the first required appearances for each since they left their posts. Paige Wilhelm Given Yellen and Bernanke’s support for Jerome Powell, the current Fed Senior Vice President Senior Portfolio Manager chair, it is no surprise they praised the Fed’s actions so far in the crisis or Federated Investment Counseling that they echoed his call for Congress to provide more fiscal support to the economy. The overarching message for lawmakers was do not worry about the deficit at this time—the economy needs assistance now. One thing is certain, the Fed is not worried about its own balance sheet. This week it revealed that figure now stands at more than $7 trillion. Interestingly, the special purpose vehicles it created in the height of the crisis in March are hardly being used now. These include the Primary Dealer Credit Facility and the Money Market Liquidity Facility. This is a good sign, as it means the liquidity markets are functioning well on their own. But the greater economy probably will require Congress’s assistance to do the same.
  • Regpulse Newsletter July 26, 2021 – August 6, 2021

    Regpulse Newsletter July 26, 2021 – August 6, 2021

    Financial Services RegPulse Newsletter July 26, 2021 – August 6, 2021 Recent developments › BIS published a white paper on principles for an emerging regulatory framework for the use of AI in financial services › The OCC appointed its first-ever Climate Change Risk Officer and joined the Network of Central Banks and Supervisors for Greening the Financial System › The Senate Banking Committee hosted a hearing on the oversight of selected financial regulators › SEC Chair Gary Gensler delivered separate remarks on digital assets and climate risks › The House and Senate both held hearings on the future of digital currencies in the US Regulatory Roundup | Deloitte Center for Regulatory Strategy, Americas 1 Introduction The Deloitte Center for Regulatory Strategy (DCRS) is a source of critical insight and advice, designed to help clients anticipate change and respond with confidence to the strategic and aggregate impact of national and international regulatory policy. The RegPulse Newsletter is a bi-weekly distribution that features the latest regulatory news and issues that are impacting the financial services and fintech industries. For a deeper analysis and discussion of regulatory developments, make sure to check out our RegPulse blog series, which are a collection of blogs that are contributed by our powerful team of former regulators, industry specialists, and trusted business advisors. US regulatory developments Congress Derivatives Banking & Capital Markets Investment Management Consumer Protection Insurance BSA/AML Fintech EMEA regulatory developments Key: Cross-sector The development covers multiple financial services sub-sectors or other industries. FBO The development pertains to or affects foreign banking organizations (FBOs). Blog/POV The development has been covered or is currently being analyzed by our team to be produced into either a RegPulse blog or broader point of view (POV).
  • January 2021 Fri, Jan 1

    January 2021 Fri, Jan 1

    January 2021 Fri, Jan 1 All Day Bank Holiday 1 January 2021 Mon, Jan 4 All Day 2021 AEA/ASSA Annual Meeting Virtual Event 8:30 AM – 8:55 AM Morning Checkpoint Call John to dial in 8:55 AM – 9:00 AM Blocked 9:00 AM – 9:30 AM Markets Group 9:05/9:20 Conference Call John to dial in 9:30 AM – 2:00 PM Blocked 2:00 PM ‐2:30 PM Meeting with Daleep Singh Skype 2:30 PM – 6:00 PM Blocked Tue, Jan 5 All Day 2021 AEA/ASSA Annual Meeting Virtual Event 9:00 AM – 9:30 AM Markets Group 9:05/9:20 Conference Call John to dial in 9:30 AM – 12:00 PM Blocked 12:00 PM – 12:30 PM Meeting with the Board John to dial in 12:30 PM – 1:00 PM Blocked 1:00 PM – 1:45 PM Weekly Email Discussion Skype 1:45 PM – 2:00 PM Blocked 2:00 PM – 2:30 PM Weekly Meeting with Chair Jay Powell Skype 2:30 PM – 3:30 PM Blocked 3:30 PM – 3:45 PM Tech Set‐Up for ASSA Panel: The Monetary‐Fiscal Nexus with Ultra Low Interest Rates Zoom 3:45 PM – 5:45 PM John to chair ASSA Panel: The Monetary‐Fiscal Nexus with Ultra Low Interest Rates Zoom 5:45 PM – 6:00 PM Blocked 1 January 2021 Wed, Jan 6 8:30 AM – 8:55 AM Morning Checkpoint Call John to dial in 8:55 AM – 9:00 AM Blocked 9:00 AM – 9:30 AM Markets Group 9:05/9:20 Conference Call John to dial in 9:30 AM – 10:00 AM Phone Call with Barbara Van Allen, ECNY John to initiate the call 10:00 AM – 10:15 AM Phone Call with Luiz Pereira da Silva, BIS Deputy General Manager John to initiate the call 10:15 AM – 10:30 AM Blocked 10:30 AM – 11:30 AM Government Relations Committee Meeting Skype 11:30 AM – 1:00 PM Blocked 1:00 PM – 2:00 PM FVP Interview
  • Is the Fed Too Active?

    Is the Fed Too Active?

    OPINION BY KARTIK ATHREYA Is the Fed Too Active? ome observers have recently voiced concern that Fed So the goal of redressing at least some aspects of activities in the areas of climate change and inequal- economic inequality has long been a Fed concern. Indeed, Sity may put the institution at risk. In a forthcoming the Richmond Fed strives to understand the full range of Duke Law Journal article, for instance, Christina Parajon economic outcomes of Fifth District residents, including Skinner of the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School inequities, and among them, those that occur along racial argues that the Fed must avoid the temptation to engage in lines. To fail here would hinder our ability to fulfill our “central bank activism” by pushing its powers beyond the mandate under the CRA and to provide better informa- text and purpose of its legal mandate to address “imme- tion via the Beige Book and other means to guide mone - diate public policy problems” such as climate change tary policy. As Richmond Fed President Tom Barkin and economic inequality. She cautions, “Activism under- has pointed out, “The regional Fed banks are charged mines the legitimacy of central bank authority, with understanding the dynamics within our erodes its political independence, and ultimately “We should districts. In pursuit of that goal, we have been renders a weaker central bank.” In a recent Wall investing in research that addresses these Street Journal op-ed, Michael Belongia of the always strive to issues and the racial inequities that result.” University of Mississippi and Peter Ireland of understand forces Lately, the connection between mone- Boston College voiced similar concerns about Fed that plausibly tary policy and economic inclusion has drawn activities in the area of income inequality.
  • Chairman Jay Clayton, February 1, 2018 to February 28, 2018

    Chairman Jay Clayton, February 1, 2018 to February 28, 2018

    Chairman Jay Clayton Public Calendar February 1, 2018 to February 28, 2018 Thursday, February 1, 2018 9:00 am Meeting with staff 9:30 am Meeting with staff 10:00 am Meeting with staff 10:30 am Meeting with staff 12:00 pm Meeting with Commissioner 1:00 pm Meeting with Silicon Valley Bank, including: Greg Becker, CEO, and Michael Zuckert, General Counsel; and Kara Calvert, Partner, Franklin Square Group 2:00 pm Closed Commission Meeting 2:30 pm Meeting with staff 3:00 pm Meeting with staff 3:30 pm Meeting with staff Friday, February 2, 2018 8:30 am Phone call with Senator Sherrod Brown 9:00 am Meeting with the Capital Market Authority (CMA) of Saudi Arabia, including: Ms. Mona Al-Nemer, Manager, Investment Products Development Department; and Ms. Hanan Al-Shehri, Officer, Investment Products Development Department 11:30 am Speaking engagement at the Mid-Atlantic Security Traders Association’s 2018 Winter Conference Monday, February 5, 2018 11:00 am Meeting with Commissioner 12:00 pm Meeting with staff 2:00 pm Meeting with Greg Gilman, President, National Treasury Employees Union Chapter 293 4:00 pm Meeting with Senator Heidi Heitkamp 6:30 pm Meeting with Tom Ayres, Department of the Air Force General Counsel Nominee Tuesday, February 6, 2018 8:30 am Phone call with Jerome Powell, Governor, Federal Reserve Board 10:00 am Hearing before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 2:00 pm Meeting with staff 2:30 pm Meeting with staff 3:00 pm Meeting with staff 4:00 pm Meeting with Commissioner 4:45 pm Meeting with Commissioner
  • Is Inflation Really Transitory?

    Is Inflation Really Transitory?

    Is Inflation Really Transitory? By Eric Grover National Review August 17, 2021 Financial-market indicators point to a persistent uptick in inflation. DESPITE a few recent hints of unease, the Fed still maintains that the current surge in inflation is “transitory.” That seems optimistic: The central bank has been stoking inflation and is stubbornly blind to the danger of getting more than it bargained for, of letting loose what Nobel Prize– winning economist Friedrich Hayek described as the “tiger.” Fed chairman Paul Volcker caged inflation after it’d crested at 13.5 percent in 1980. Since then, however, the Fed, politicians, consumers, and producers have become complacent about the risk that it might escape again. The current cocktail of money-printing, massive deficit spending, pandemic- related supply-chain disruptions, and pent-up demand coming out of COVID-19 hibernation means inflation ahead — and not just for the short term. The outlook is only made worse by the hit to the supply side that will come from increased regulation and taxes, not to speak of the boost to energy costs that will flow from the administration’s hostility to fossil fuels. The Fed’s balance sheet has ballooned from $900 billion in August 2008 to a whopping $8.2 trillion in mid July 2021. However, by paying banks interest to park excess reserves held at the Fed, the central bank has managed to keep new dollars from entering the economy in the form of credit, thereby holding down inflation. Now, printed money is showing up in consumption and price data, and the longer the “transitory” surge endures, the more difficult it will be to contain.
  • Annual Report 2014–15 © 2015 National Council of Applied Economic Research

    Annual Report 2014–15 © 2015 National Council of Applied Economic Research

    National Council of Applied Economic Research Annual Report Annual Report 2014–15 2014–15 National Council of Applied Economic Research Annual Report 2014–15 © 2015 National Council of Applied Economic Research August 2015 Published by Dr Anil K. Sharma Secretary & Head Operations and Senior Fellow National Council of Applied Economic Research Parisila Bhawan, 11 Indraprastha Estate New Delhi 110 002 Telephone: +91-11-2337-9861 to 3 Fax: +91-11-2337-0164 Email: [email protected] www.ncaer.org Compiled by Jagbir Singh Punia Coordinator, Publications Unit ii | NCAER Annual Report 2014-15 NCAER | Quality . Relevance . Impact The National Council of Applied Economic Research, or NCAER as it is more commonly known, is India’s oldest and largest independent, non-profit, economic policy research institute. It is also one of a handful of think tanks globally that combine rigorous analysis and policy outreach with deep data collection capabilities, especially for household surveys. NCAER’s work falls into four thematic NCAER’s roots lie in Prime Minister areas: Nehru’s early vision of a newly- independent India needing independent • Growth, macroeconomics, trade, institutions as sounding boards for international finance, and economic the government and the private sector. policy; Remarkably for its time, NCAER was • The investment climate, industry, started in 1956 as a public-private domestic finance, infrastructure, labour, partnership, both catering to and funded and urban; by government and industry. NCAER’s • Agriculture, natural resource first Governing Body included the entire management, and the environment; and Cabinet of economics ministers and • Poverty, human development, equity, the leading lights of the private sector, gender, and consumer behaviour.
  • Weekly Economic Commentary

    Weekly Economic Commentary

    LPL FINANCIAL RESEARCH Weekly Economic Commentary December 10, 2012 Festive Fed FAQ John Canally, CFA Why Write About the Federal Reserve (Fed) This Week When the Economist Fiscal Cliff Is Looming? LPL Financial The Fed may deliver the most important policy announcement of the week, given the ongoing behind-the-scenes fiscal policy debate in Washington. The Fed continues to play a key role in markets and the economy, and that Highlights will continue into 2013 and beyond. Although Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke We expect the Federal Reserve (Fed) to has said that the Fed cannot offset the impact of the fiscal cliff, Fed continue Operation Twist at this week’s policymakers are keenly aware that they remain the “only game in town” Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) when it comes to simulative policy. meeting. Before ending quantitative easing (QE), the Fed has repeatedly said it is looking What Is the Schedule of Events for the Fed This Week? for “sustained and substantial” improvement in the labor market. The Fed holds its eighth and final Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting of 2012 this Tuesday and Wednesday, December 11 – 12. The The Fed’s communication policy is likely to be at the heart of the agenda. meeting will be followed by an FOMC statement at 12:30 PM ET, the FOMC’s latest economic and Fed funds projections at 2:00 PM ET, and Looking ahead, the rotation to new FOMC members in January 2013 is unlikely to Chairman Bernanke’s final press conference of 2012 begins at 2:15 PM ET.
  • Quantitative Easing: the Fed’S Tough Decision Around the World, Financial Markets Have Been Talking of Little Else for Weeks

    Quantitative Easing: the Fed’S Tough Decision Around the World, Financial Markets Have Been Talking of Little Else for Weeks

    FOMC PREVIEW QUANTITATIVE EASING: THE FED’s tOUGH DECISION Around the world, financial markets have been talking of little else for weeks. On Wednesday, the waiting game finally comes to an end. REUTERS/ KEVIN LAMARQUE BY PEDRO NICOLACI DA COstA Treasury bond buying from the Federal that, like its promise to keeping interest WASHINGTON, OCT 21 Reserve could ultimately rival the hefty first rates low, the second round of so-called round of asset purchases. quantitative easing will be around for an NE HUNDRED BILLION here, one With expectations of at least $500 billion “extended period” if needed. hundred billion there. Pretty soon already built into financial markets, the Fed The rationale for further monetary we’reO talking real money. may try to counter possible disappointment accommodation has been laid out by It may not be “shock and awe” at first by making its commitment open ended. Chairman Ben Bernanke, whose views on blush, but the ultimate sums involved in It will likely do so by setting parameters policy carry the day at the Federal Open a second, widely anticipated program of vague enough to convince the markets Market Committee. OCTOBER 2010 FOMC PREVIEW OCTOBER 2010 ”DepenDING ON EVOLVING ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL CONDITIONS, QE2 HAS THE POTENTIAL TO GROW QUITE LARGE.” He has made clear that, with the 9.6 percent unemployment rate far above what might be seen as normal even in a post- recession context and inflation dangling at uncomfortably low levels, policymakers deem the risk of an outright deflationary rut significant enough to justify action. An incremental, flexible approach serves two purposes.