DOCSLIB.ORG

A Study on How Wendy's Use Different Forms of Audience Engagement In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Study on How Wendy's Use Different Forms of Audience Engagement In Audience Engagement on Social Media – A Study on how Wendy’s Use Different Forms of Audience Engagement in their Social Media Posts Emma Kauppila Pro gradu-avhandling i engelska språket och litteraturen Handledare: Brita Wårvik Fakulteten för humaniora, psykologi och teologi Åbo Akademi (2019) ÅBO AKADEMI – FAKULTETEN FÖR HUMANIORA, PSYKOLOGI OCH TEOLOGI Abstrakt för avhandling pro gradu Ämne: Engelska språket och litteraturen Författare: Emma Kauppila Arbetets titel: Audience Engagement on Social Media – A Study on how Wendy’s Use Different Forms of Audience Engagement in their Social Media Posts Handledare: Brita Wårvik Handledare: Abstrakt: Social media have acquired important roles in both private and public matters. While creating different networks for people to connect with each other, social media also create networks where businesses can connect with their consumers and create and maintain an online relationship with them. In order to create a valuable relationship the businesses need to know how to interact with their online audience. The businesses also need to listen to their audiences so that they learn what the audience actually is expecting from the business. This leads to the need of audience engagement, i.e. interactive communication between the business and the audience. In order to create a situation where engagement is likely to take place, online users can use different forms of audience engagement in their online content. The purpose of this thesis is to study the language used online on social media and how that language can be used to create audience engagement. The research questions the thesis attempts to answer are 1. What forms of audience engagement can be found and defined? 2. What forms of audience engagement do Wendy’s use in their social media posts? and 3. What kind of similarities, differences and patterns can there be detected regarding the use of forms of audience engagement on the different social media platforms? The study is a qualitative research that defines the different forms of audience engagement through previous research and then identifies the use of those forms in the business Wendy’s social media content. The social media platforms that are central to this study are Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram. Ten posts from each platform are analysed by looking at the use of different forms of audience engagement. The analysis is then discussed regarding notable similarities, differences and patterns in the use of the forms on the different platforms. The results show that Wendy’s use different forms of audience engagement on all three platforms on several occasions. While no clear pattern can be distinguished between the uses of forms of audience engagement, specific similarities and differences can still be recognised. A result that clearly stands out is the difference between the messages and themes on Twitter and the messages and themes on Facebook and Instagram. Twitter is used to discuss humorous themes and through those themes possibly manage the relationship the business has with its audience. Facebook and Instagram on the other hand focus more on promotional content and content that can give more value to the business and possibly create more revenue. Different forms of audience engagement used in Wendy’s online content do however not limit other content that can also be engaging but mainly supports the message the business tries to communicate online. Nyckelord: Social media, audience engagement, forms of audience engagement, online communication, language of advertising, online discourse Datum: 13.5.2019 Sidoantal: 98 Abstraktet godkänt som mognadsprov: Table of Contents 1 Introduction...............................................................................................................1 2 The discourse of advertising ....................................................................................3 2.1 Advertising dialogue ..........................................................................................7 2.2 Persuasion in advertising...................................................................................8 3 Online communication ...........................................................................................10 3.1 Social media platforms ....................................................................................10 3.2 Social media as a tool for online communication ..........................................11 3.3 Social media as a marketing tool ....................................................................12 3.3.1 User-generated content .............................................................................14 3.3.2 Paid social media versus organic social media........................................15 4 Defining the Audience ............................................................................................18 4.1 Online identity ..................................................................................................20 4.2 Target audiences ..............................................................................................21 5 Audience engagement .............................................................................................22 5.1 Defining engagement........................................................................................23 5.2 Defining audience engagement .......................................................................25 5.3 Forms of audience engagement.......................................................................26 5.3.1 Comments, replies, likes or reactions, shares, and views.......................27 5.3.2 Calls to action .............................................................................................28 5.3.3 Pronouns .....................................................................................................29 5.3.4 Interests ......................................................................................................30 5.3.5 Emotions .....................................................................................................32 5.3.6 Humour.......................................................................................................33 5.4 Summary of forms of audience engagement..................................................34 6 Methods and data....................................................................................................36 6.1 Methods.............................................................................................................36 6.2 Wendy’s.............................................................................................................37 6.3 Social Media Platforms....................................................................................38 6.3.1 Twitter ........................................................................................................38 6.3.2 Facebook .....................................................................................................39 6.3.3 Instagram ...................................................................................................39 7 Results ......................................................................................................................41 7.1 Twitter...............................................................................................................41 7.2 Facebook ...........................................................................................................54 7.3 Instagram ..........................................................................................................62 8 Comparative Analysis and Discussion ..................................................................71 8.1 Similarities between platforms and the use of forms of audience engagement ................................................................................................................71 8.2 Differences between platforms and the use of forms of audience engagement ................................................................................................................73 8.3 Detectable patterns between the use of forms of audience engagement and engagement metrics...................................................................................................74 8.4 Other thoughts..................................................................................................77 9 Conclusion ...............................................................................................................79 10 Summary in Swedish – Svensk sammanfattning ...............................................82 10.1 Introduktion ...................................................................................................82 10.2 Reklamspråk ..................................................................................................82 10.2.1 Dialog inom reklamer..............................................................................83 10.2.2 Övertygande inom reklamer...................................................................83 10.3 Onlinekommunikation...................................................................................84 10.4 Onlinepublik ...................................................................................................85 10.5 Publikengagemang .........................................................................................86 10.5.1 Former av publikengagemang................................................................87
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Social Media and Customer Engagement in Tourism: Evidence from Facebook Corporate Pages of Leading Cruise Companies
    Social Media and Customer Engagement in Tourism: Evidence from Facebook Corporate Pages of Leading Cruise Companies Giovanni Satta, Francesco Parola, Nicoletta Buratti, Luca Persico Department of Economics and Business Studies and CIELI, University of Genoa, Italy, email: [email protected] (Corresponding author), [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Roberto Viviani email: [email protected] Department of Economics and Business Studies, University of Genoa, Italy Abstract In the last decade, an increasing number of scholars has challenged the role of Social Media Marketing (SMM) in tourism. Indeed, Social Media (SM) provide undoubted opportunities for fostering firms’ relationships with their customers, and online customer engagement (CE) has become a common objective when developing communication strategies. Although extant literature appear very rich and heterogeneous, only a limited number of scholars have explored which kind of contents, media and posting day would engage tourists on social media. Hence, a relevant literature gap still persists, as tourism companies would greatly benefit from understanding how posting strategies on major social media may foster online CE. The paper investigates the antecedents of online CE in the tourism industry by addressing the posting activities of cruise companies on their Facebook pages. For this purpose, we scrutinize the impact of post content, format and timing on online CE, modelled as liking, commenting and sharing. In particular, we test the proposed model grounding on an empirical investigation performed on 982 Facebook posts uploaded by MSC Crociere (446), Costa Crociere (331) and Royal Caribbean Cruises (205) in a period of 12 month.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 14 the Political Economy of Capitalist and Alternative Social Media Christian Fuchs and Marisol Sandoval
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by WestminsterResearch Chapter 14 The Political Economy of Capitalist and Alternative Social Media Christian Fuchs and Marisol Sandoval Fuchs, Christian and Marisol Sandoval. 2015. The Political Economy of Capitalist and Alternative Social Media. In The Routledge Companion to Alternative and Community Media, ed. Chris Atton, 165-175. London: Routledge. <165> This chapter provides an overview of political economy questions that arise when discussing the relationship of capitalist and alternative social media. We begin by clarifying the notion of social media, before going on to examine aspects of the political economy of alternative media. We then apply these aspects to the realm of social media in order to discuss the relationship between capitalist and alternative social media. This includes a discussion of the contradictory character of social media in the Occupy movement. What are social media? During the past fifteen years, a number of new platforms have become prominent and now range among the 50 most-accessed World Wide Web (WWW) sites in the world (alexa.com 2013). They include: • social networking sites: Facebook (#2, founded in 2004), LinkedIn (#8, 2003), VKontakte (#22, 2006); • video-sharing platforms: YouTube (#3, 2005), XVideos (#41, 1997); • wikis: Wikipedia (#6, 2001); • blogs: Blogspot (#12, 1999), Wordpress (#15, 2003), Blogger (#38, 1999); • microblogs: Twitter (#10, 2006), Sina Weibo (#34, 2009); • online pinboards: Tumblr (#25, 2007), Pinterest (#27, 2010); and • photo-sharing sites: Instagram (#37, 2010). These platforms allow users to generate and share texts and multimedia contents and/or to collaboratively create and edit content and/or to communicate with a <166> self-defined network of contacts and friends.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Core Values and Social Responsibility: What Really Matters to Whom
    Corporate core values and social responsibility: What really matters to whom Barchiesi, M. A., & Fronzetti Colladon, A. This is the accepted manuscript after the review process, but prior to final layout and copyediting. Please cite as: Barchiesi, M. A., & Fronzetti Colladon, A. (2021). Corporate core values and social responsibility: What really matters to whom. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170, 120907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120907 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA. 1 Corporate core values and social responsibility: What really matters to whom Barchiesi, M. A., & Fronzetti Colladon, A. Abstract This study uses an innovative measure, the Semantic Brand Score, to assess the interest of stakeholders in different company core values. Among others, we focus on corporate social responsibility (CSR) core value statements, and on the attention they receive from five categories of stakeholders (customers, company communication teams, employees, associations and media). Combining big data methods and tools of Social Network Analysis and Text Mining, we analyzed about 58,000 Italian tweets and found that different stakeholders have different prevailing interests. CSR gets much less attention than expected. Core values related to customers and employees are in the foreground.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Media Game Plan: IP and Marketing Law Playbook by Feras Mousilli and Barry M
    Social Media Game Plan: IP and Marketing Law Playbook By FeraS MousillI and Barry M. Benjamin For corporate attorneys who are still waiting for the so- cial media craze to fade away, you can no longer ignore the statistics: Two-thirds of the global internet popula- tion visit social media sites. If you believe your company can ignore the Facebook phenomenon, it would be tantamount to ignoring a market bigger than the eighth most populated country in the world. Social networking has exploded in popularity so quickly and become so ingrained in our daily lives that we can no longer think of it as “new media.” Companies hosting and participating in social media face numerous potential legal minefields — new court decisions come at a dizzying pace, often interpreting relatively new statutes that lack established precedents. Furthermore, as the line between “company time” and “personal time” blurs, companies struggle with the right balance between an employee’s free speech rights and restrictions to protect the company when the employee engages in social media. Protecting company intellectual property is yet another challenge. Whether dealing with “friendly” (fan sites) or “unfriendly” (gripe sites) situations, fashioning appropriate, consistent responses can be an arduous task. There are, however, a number of measures that can minimize risks of engag- ing in social media. ACC Docket 105 September 2010 Hosting social media — legal issues publish the problematic content, thus making the as a publisher problematic content a statement by the magazine Companies that were long content to publish itself, as opposed to the library, which merely brochure-type websites now feel compelled to provides access.
    [Show full text]
  • Traditional and Independent Media in the Brazilian Public Sphere on the Age of Crisis, Social Media and the Precariat
    Traditional and Independent Media in the Brazilian Public Sphere On the age of crisis, social media and the precariat MA Thesis Name of author: Lucas Pascholatti Carapiá Student number: 640146 Track: Global Communication Department of Culture Studies School of Humanities August 2017 Supervisor: Piia Varis Second reader: Jan Blommaert Table of Contents 1) INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 6 2) METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................................ 8 A) Max Horkheimer and Rationality in the Contemporary Social Philosophy – Criticism regarding the empirical analytical method ..................................................................................................................... 8 B) Key Events and Data Collection ............................................................................................................ 9 C) Critical Online Ethnography ................................................................................................................ 12 3) THEORETICAL BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................. 14 A) Public sphere, the utopia and ideology behind it ............................................................................... 14 B) Communicative capitalism and the public sphere ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Social Media Monopolies and Their Alternatives 2
    EDITED BY GEERT LOVINK AND MIRIAM RASCH INC READER #8 The Unlike Us Reader offers a critical examination of social media, bringing together theoretical essays, personal discussions, and artistic manifestos. How can we understand the social media we use everyday, or consciously choose not to use? We know very well that monopolies control social media, but what are the alternatives? While Facebook continues to increase its user population and combines loose privacy restrictions with control over data, many researchers, programmers, and activists turn towards MIRIAM RASCH designing a decentralized future. Through understanding the big networks from within, be it by philosophy or art, new perspectives emerge. AND Unlike Us is a research network of artists, designers, scholars, activists, and programmers, with the aim to combine a critique of the dominant social media platforms with work on ‘alternatives in social media’, through workshops, conferences, online dialogues, and publications. Everyone is invited to be a part of the public discussion on how we want to shape the network architectures and the future of social networks we are using so intensely. LOVINK GEERT www.networkcultures.org/unlikeus Contributors: Solon Barocas, Caroline Bassett, Tatiana Bazzichelli, David Beer, David M. Berry, Mercedes Bunz, Florencio Cabello, Paolo Cirio, Joan Donovan, EDITED BY Louis Doulas, Leighton Evans, Marta G. Franco, Robert W. Gehl, Seda Gürses, Alexandra Haché, Harry Halpin, Mariann Hardey, Pavlos Hatzopoulos, Yuk Hui, Ippolita, Nathan Jurgenson, Nelli Kambouri, Jenny Kennedy, Ganaele Langlois, Simona Lodi, Alessandro Ludovico, Tiziana Mancinelli, Andrew McNicol, Andrea Miconi, Arvind Narayanan, Wyatt Niehaus, Korinna Patelis, PJ Rey, Sebastian SOCIAL MEDIA MONOPOLIES Sevignani, Bernard Stiegler, Marc Stumpel, Tiziana Terranova, Vincent Toubiana, AND THEIR ALTERNATIVES Brad Troemel, Lonneke van der Velden, Martin Warnke and D.E.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case for Alternative Social Media © the Author(S) 2015 DOI: 10.1177/2056305115604338 Sms.Sagepub.Com
    SMSXXX10.1177/2056305115604338Social Media + SocietyGehl 604338research-article2015 SI: Culture Digitally Social Media + Society July-December 2015: 1 –12 The Case for Alternative Social Media © The Author(s) 2015 DOI: 10.1177/2056305115604338 sms.sagepub.com Robert W. Gehl Abstract What are “alternative social media”? How can we distinguish alternative social media from mainstream social media? Why are social media alternatives important? How do they work? Why do people make them? What do they tell us about contemporary corporate social media and its related phenomena: surveillance, privacy, power, self-expression, and sociality? This essay answers these questions by theorizing alternative social media. The empirical data for this alternative social media theory are drawn from previous work on alternative sites such as Diaspora, rstat.us, Twister, GNU social, and the Dark Web Social Network. These cases are used to build a generalized conceptual framework. However, this article does not solely theorize from these examples, but rather seeks to contextualize and historicize alternative social media theory within larger bodies of work. In addition to generalization from examples, the theory is informed by two threads. The first thread is the work of alternative media scholars such as Nick Couldry, Chris Atton, and Clemencia Rodriguez, who have done the historical and theoretical work to define alternative media. The second thread is a synthesis of works exploring the technical side of contemporary media, coming from new fields such as software studies. The threads and empirical analyses of sites such as Diaspora, Quitter, and rstat.us are combined into a theoretical matrix that can account for the processes and technical infrastructures that comprise social media alternatives and explain why they are distinct from sites such as Facebook, Twitter, and Google, as well as why they are important.
    [Show full text]
  • Think Before You Speak - Optimizing Corporate Social Media Policies 33Rd Annual PMA Law Conference November 15, 2011
    Think Before You Speak - Optimizing Corporate Social Media Policies 33rd Annual PMA Law Conference November 15, 2011 Melissa Landau Steinman, Venable, LLP Sarah J. LaVoi, McDonald’s Corporation David Zucco, General Mills, Inc. Bruce E.L.M. Strothers, The Coca-Cola Company © 2011 Venable LLP 1 What’s All The Buzz? © 2011 Venable LLP 2 Risks and Benefits of Social Media Risks Are Significant: Damage to reputation, legal violations, exposure of trade secrets/leaks, forum for complaints, distraction Study of companies with 1,000 or more employees reported that 17% had issues with employee’s use of social media. – 8% of respondents fired someone for behavior on SM sites – 15% had disciplined for violating sharing/posting policies – 13% had investigated an exposure event – 17% disciplined an employee for violating blog/board policies Sunk cost arising from dismissed employees, plus potential for litigation/exposure from content that being posted Google/Mark Jen firing (employee fired 11 days after blogging about company’s health benefits): – “I goofed and put some stuff on my blog that’s not supposed to be there. I’m learning that Google is understandably careful about disclosing sensitive information, even vague financial-related things” But there are benefits to social media too: exposure; advertising; member networks; collaboration opportunities; real time customer service; interactive contests and promotions; etc. © 2011 Venable LLP 3 Creating and Implementing Social Media Policies Legal issues: Classic concerns but new platforms Entity use of social media -- defamation, IP, advertising, antitrust, tax, privacy, document retention, labor/employment Employee use of social media --attribution to entity, corporate identity, discrimination/harassment Social media policy should address issues of: – Business vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Media & Social Media Policy 2021
    Appendix One: Media & Social Media Policy January 2021 Media and Social Media Policy - 2021 1 Media and Social Media Policy Version Control Sheet Title: Media and Social Media Policy Purpose: To outline how we deal with media and social media and to provide advice and guidance to officers and elected Members Owner: Communications & Engagement Manager [email protected] Date: January 2021 Version Number: 1.0 Status: Review Frequency: Every two years or sooner if required Next review date: January 2023 Consultation: This document will be sent out for consultation to the following: Community PDG Cabinet Document History This document obtained the following approvals. Title Date Version Approved Community PDG* Cabinet *- Delete if not applicable Media and Social Media Policy - 2021 2 Contents Page 1 Introduction 5 1.1 Our strategic aim 5 1.2 Our policy statement 5 2 Proactive media relations 6 2.1 Press releases 6 2.1.1 Press release content 6 2.1.2 Who should be quoted in a press release? 7 2.1.3 Contact details on press releases 7 2.1.4 Press release approval 7 2.1.5 Press release distribution 8 2.2 Other ways of generating coverage 9 3 Reputational issues 10 3.1 Imbalanced or inaccurate media coverage 10 3.2 Confidential information 10 3.3 Issues relating to employee relations 10 3.4 Protecting the Council’s reputation 11 4 Media enquiries 12 4.1 Points of contact for media enquiries 12 4.1.1 Communications 12 4.1.2 Officers and Members 13 4.2 Media interviews and comments 13 4.2.1 Officers 13 4.2.2 Members 14 4.3 Freedom of Information
    [Show full text]
  • Social Media Policies, Corporate Censorship and the Right to Be Forgiven: a Proposed Framework for Free Expression in an Era of Employer Social Media Monitoring
    SOCIAL MEDIA POLICIES, CORPORATE CENSORSHIP AND THE RIGHT TO BE FORGIVEN: A PROPOSED FRAMEWORK FOR FREE EXPRESSION IN AN ERA OF EMPLOYER SOCIAL MEDIA MONITORING Kathleen McGarvey Hidy* ABSTRACT This Article examines the censorship by business organizations of employee social media speech in the context of evolving and uncertain standards for legal employer surveillance and proposes a risk mitigation strategy that enhances employee freedom of expression. Corporate censorship of employee speech on social media continues despite the United States Supreme Court’s declaration that social media occupies a critically important venue for the exercise of free speech. The business rationale for this censorship, increasingly conducted through the use of social media policies that enforce employer restrictions for online employee speech, include brand protection, the securing of property rights, and legal risk mitigation. However, this form of social media censorship faces increasing legal scrutiny under executive, legislative, and judicial action at both the federal and state levels, requiring business organizations to navigate a complicated and uncertain legal environment. This Article investigates these evolving legal risks to business organizations that engage in censorship of employee social media speech. This Article also advances a framework that mitigates employer risk associated with employee social media misuse while enhancing employees’ freedom of expression. I. INTRODUCTION....................................................................................... 347 II. SOCIAL MEDIA POLICIES AND BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS: POLICING EMPLOYEE SPEECH ........................................................ 351 A. Data and Trends on Employer Social Media Surveillance ..... 352 * Assistant Professor of Legal Studies, Xavier University. B.A., University of Notre Dame; J.D. Columbia Law School. 346 2020] SOCIAL MEDIA POLICIES 347 B. The Business Rationale for Employee Social Media Speech Surveillance...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Social Media, Peer Production, and Web 2.0
    CHAPTER 7 Social Media, Peer Production, and Web 2.0 1. INTRODUCTION LEARNING OBJECTIVES 1. Recognize the unexpected rise and impact of social media and peer production systems, and understand how these services differ from prior generation tools. 2. List the major classifications of social media services. Over the past few years, a fundamentally different class of Internet services has attracted users, made headlines, and increasingly garnered breathtaking market valuations. Often referred to under the Web 2.0 poorly defined umbrella term “Web 2.0,” these new services are targeted at harnessing the power of A term broadly referring to the Internet to empower users to collaborate, create resources, and share information in a distinctly Internet services that foster collaboration and different way than the static Web sites and transaction-focused storefronts that characterized so many information sharing; failures in the dot-com bubble. Techies often joust over the precise definition of Web 2.0, but these ar- characteristics that distinctly guments aren’t really all that important. What is significant is how quickly the Web 2.0 revolution set “Web 2.0” efforts apart came about, how unexpected it was, and how deeply impactful these efforts have become for individu- from the static, als, businesses, and society. Consider the following: transaction-oriented Web sites of “Web 1.0.” The term is < Six of the world’s top ten most heavily trafficked Internet sites are social: Facebook, YouTube, often applied to Web sites Blogger.com (considered separately from parent Google), Wikipedia, Twitter, and QQ.com and Internet services that (China).[1] Via Alexa.com, June 1, 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Media - Integrate It and Perform Better?
    Social media - Integrate it and perform better? Authors: Gabriel Modéus Tutor: Dr. Martin Amstéus Roger Blomkvist Examiner: Prof. Mosad Zineldin Business Administration and Economics Programme (Civilekonomprogrammet) Subject: Business Administration, Marketing Level and semester: Degree project in Marketing, the Business Administration and Economics Programme, 30 credits, Spring 2013 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT We wrote this thesis between the 21st of January and the 30th May 2013, at Linnaeus University, Campus Växjö. During this time we have received a lot of extremely appreciated support from a large amount of people. We now would like to take the opportunity to thank all these helpful people, who have contributed to our thesis. First we would like to thank our tutor Dr. Martin Amstéus for all his feedback, support and for the inspiration he has given us. We also want to show our gratitude towards our examiner Prof. Mosad Zineldin for his feedback and support. Further, we want to send our gratitude to the opposition groups and our seminar colleagues, Astrit Hodza, Rickard Paulsson and Helena Olsson. Their comments as well as the discussions during the seminars, has contributed a lot to our thesis. Next we would like to show our gratitude towards all the respondents of our survey, their contribution of data has been of unspeakable value for this thesis. Our gratitude also goes to the interviewees. We are deeply thankful that they took the time to answer our questions and give us their feedback. Last, but not least, we want to send our gratitude toward our friends and families, for all their support and feedback during these months.
    [Show full text]