DOCSLIB.ORG

The Quality of Democracies in Latin America

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Quality of Democracies in Latin America The Quality of Democracies in Latin America The Quality of Democracies in Latin America The Quality of Democracies in Latin America Lead writer Leonardo Morlino Contributors Juan Rial Manuel Alcántara Sáez Massimo Tommasoli Daniel Zovatto © 2016 International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance International IDEA Strömsborg SE-103 34, STOCKHOLM SWEDEN Tel: +46 8 698 37 00, fax: +46 8 20 24 22 Email: [email protected], website: www.idea.int First published in Spanish as La calidad de las democracias en América Latina: Informe para IDEA Internacional (Stockholm and San José: International IDEA, 2013). A second, revised Spanish edition was published in 2014. The electronic version of this publication is available under a Creative Commons Attribute-NonCommercial- ShareAlike 3.0 licence. You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the publication as well as to remix and adapt it provided it is only for non-commercial purposes, that you appropriately attribute the publication and that you distribute it under an identical licence. For more information on this licence see: <http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/>. International IDEA publications are independent of specific national or political interests. Views expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent the views of International IDEA, its Board or its Council members. Translator: Charles Roberts Cover design: Turbo Design Layout and typesetting: Turbo Design Printed by: AGS Custom Graphics, An RR Donnelley Company ISBN: 978-91-7671-050-0 Contents List of tables and figures .......................................................................................................................................... 7 Preface .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Foreword and acknowledgements ........................................................................................................... 13 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................... 17 The quality of democracy in Latin America 35 years after the start of the third wave of democratization in the region ............... 17 A change of epoch: global and regional trends ........................................................... 19 The impact of global and regional changes on the quality of democracy in Latin America ...................................................................................................................... 20 35 years holding our breath ......................................................................................................................... 21 Support for and satisfaction with democracy ............................................................... 22 Strengthening electoral democracy ............................................................................................. 23 Tasks pending .................................................................................................................................................................... 23 Halfway there: much has been achieved but much remains to be done .................................................................................................................................................... 29 What, then, is a quality democracy? ............................................................................................ 33 The current debate about the quality of democracy........................................... 35 Final considerations ................................................................................................................................................ 39 2. Theoretical framework .................................................................................................................................... 43 Literature review .......................................................................................................................................................... 43 Quality and qualities................................................................................................................................................ 46 Procedures ............................................................................................................................................................................. 48 Substantive dimensions .................................................................................................................................... 56 Outcomes .................................................................................................................................................................................. 59 3. Empirical analysis ..................................................................................................................................................... 63 A general overview of Latin America .......................................................................................... 63 Further examination of sub-dimensions ................................................................................. 75 Critical issues and policy recommendations ................................................................... 79 4. Concluding remarks ................................................................................................................................................ 91 5. Postscript: the quality of democracy ........................................................................................ 95 The end of the consensus regarding the definition of democracy and its relationship with republicanism ................................... 95 The performance of elected governments and democracy .................... 96 The ‘new caudillos’ ................................................................................................................................................... 98 Difficulties implementing ‘negative integration’........................................................ 99 5 Attempts to create mechanisms of direct democracy and the development of new institutions have not always strengthened democracy ............................................................................................................................................................................... 100 Current political discourse in a market economy and society ............ 101 Social changes condition institutional development ......................................... 102 There is no question that the position of women in Latin America has improved, but the situation of youth has not improved as much ....................................................................................................................................................... 103 Social protest as a constant and the new forms it takes: virtual assemblies .............................................................................................................................................................................. 104 Rule of law, elections, participation and other relevant issues on the day-to-day agenda of proposed institutional changes............. 105 A basic agenda for discussion on institutions .............................................................. 106 Final general consideration ......................................................................................................................... 108 6. The new constitutionalism: re-foundational constitutions ................... 111 7. Politics and the quality of democracy in Latin America: considerations to supplement the analysis ..................................................................... 123 Politics in Latin America from 1978 to the Present ............................................. 123 The quality of democracy in Latin America in 2012 in diachronic perspective ............................................................................................................................................................................ 127 Final considerations ................................................................................................................................................ 136 References and further reading ..................................................................................................................... 140 Annexes ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 150 Annex 1. Basic sub-dimensions and guiding questions .......................................... 151 The rule of law .................................................................................................................................................................. 151 Electoral accountability .................................................................................................................................... 152 Inter-institutional accountability ........................................................................................................ 153 Political participation ...........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CRITICAL THEORY and AUTHORITARIAN POPULISM Critical Theory and Authoritarian Populism
    CDSMS EDITED BY JEREMIAH MORELOCK CRITICAL THEORY AND AUTHORITARIAN POPULISM Critical Theory and Authoritarian Populism edited by Jeremiah Morelock Critical, Digital and Social Media Studies Series Editor: Christian Fuchs The peer-reviewed book series edited by Christian Fuchs publishes books that critically study the role of the internet and digital and social media in society. Titles analyse how power structures, digital capitalism, ideology and social struggles shape and are shaped by digital and social media. They use and develop critical theory discussing the political relevance and implications of studied topics. The series is a theoretical forum for in- ternet and social media research for books using methods and theories that challenge digital positivism; it also seeks to explore digital media ethics grounded in critical social theories and philosophy. Editorial Board Thomas Allmer, Mark Andrejevic, Miriyam Aouragh, Charles Brown, Eran Fisher, Peter Goodwin, Jonathan Hardy, Kylie Jarrett, Anastasia Kavada, Maria Michalis, Stefania Milan, Vincent Mosco, Jack Qiu, Jernej Amon Prodnik, Marisol Sandoval, Se- bastian Sevignani, Pieter Verdegem Published Critical Theory of Communication: New Readings of Lukács, Adorno, Marcuse, Honneth and Habermas in the Age of the Internet Christian Fuchs https://doi.org/10.16997/book1 Knowledge in the Age of Digital Capitalism: An Introduction to Cognitive Materialism Mariano Zukerfeld https://doi.org/10.16997/book3 Politicizing Digital Space: Theory, the Internet, and Renewing Democracy Trevor Garrison Smith https://doi.org/10.16997/book5 Capital, State, Empire: The New American Way of Digital Warfare Scott Timcke https://doi.org/10.16997/book6 The Spectacle 2.0: Reading Debord in the Context of Digital Capitalism Edited by Marco Briziarelli and Emiliana Armano https://doi.org/10.16997/book11 The Big Data Agenda: Data Ethics and Critical Data Studies Annika Richterich https://doi.org/10.16997/book14 Social Capital Online: Alienation and Accumulation Kane X.
    [Show full text]
  • Ortega for President: the Religious Rebirth of Sandinismo in Nicaragua
    European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies 89, October 2010 | 47-63 Ortega for President: The Religious Rebirth of Sandinismo in Nicaragua Henri Gooren Abstract: This article analyses various connections between Daniel Ortega’s surprising victory in the presidential elections of 5 November 2006, his control of the Frente Sandinista de la Liberación Nacio- nal (FSLN) party, and the changing religious context in Nicaragua, where Pentecostal churches now claim almost one quarter of the population. To achieve this, I draw from my fieldwork in Nicaragua in 2005 and 2006, which analysed competition for members between various religious groups in Managua: charismatic Catholics, the Assemblies of God, the neo-Pentecostal mega-church Hosanna, and the Mormon Church. How did Ortega manage to win the votes from so many religious people (evangelical Protestants and Roman Catholics alike)? And how does this case compare to similar cases of populist leaders in Latin America courting evangelicals, like Chávez in Venezuela and earlier Fujimori in Peru? Keywords: Nicaragua, religion, elections, FSLN, Daniel Ortega. Populist leadership and evangelical support in Latin America At first look, the case of Ortega’s surprise election victory seems to fit an estab- lished pattern in Latin America: the populist leader who comes to power in part by courting – and winning – the evangelical vote. Alberto Fujimori in Peru was the first to achieve this in the early 1990s, followed by Venezuelan lieutenant-colonel Hugo Chávez in the late 1990s and more recently Rafael Correa in Ecuador (Op- penheimer 2006). These three populist leaders came to power thanks to the break- down of an old party system, which gradually became stagnant and corrupted.
    [Show full text]
  • The Carter Center News Spring 1990
    THE CARTER CENTER NEWS SPRING 1990 Carter, Council Monitor Nicaraguan Elections Peaceful Transition of Power First in Country's History On April 25, the Nicaraguan people inaugurated a new president in the first peaceful transfer of power to an elected opposition in the country's history. of Nicaragua chose their new president in a free and fair election," said President Carter, who led an international delegation to monitor the February 25 elections. The delegation was formed under the auspices of the Council of Freely-Elected Heads of Government, chaired by President Carter and based at The Carter Center of Emory University (CCEU). The Council joined delegations from the United Nations and the Organization of American States (OAS) in monitoring the elections. Following the transfer of power from the Sandinista (FSLN) government of Daniel Ortega to the coalition government (UNO) of Violeta Chamorro, President Carter said, "Both Daniel Ortega and Violeta Chamorro deserve the world's respect and admiration for the way they handled the transition. Former President Ortega has set his country on the road to democracy. President Chamorro has been entrusted by the people of Nicaragua with the difficult task of healing the division in that nation and nurturing the newly-born democratic spirit. It is my sincerest hope that peace and democracy will flourish in Nicaragua." The Invitation In the summer of 1989, President Carter and the Council were invited to observe the elections by thenPresident Daniel Ortega, the Union of National Opposition (UNO), and the Supreme Electoral Council. The Nicaraguan election project was directed by Robert Pastor and Jennie Lincoln, director and associate director respectively of CCEU's Latin American and Caribbean Studies program.
    [Show full text]
  • Dahl and Charles E
    PLEASE READ BEFORE PRINTING! PRINTING AND VIEWING ELECTRONIC RESERVES Printing tips: ▪ To reduce printing errors, check the “Print as Image” box, under the “Advanced” printing options. ▪ To print, select the “printer” button on the Acrobat Reader toolbar. DO NOT print using “File>Print…” in the browser menu. ▪ If an article has multiple parts, print out only one part at a time. ▪ If you experience difficulty printing, come to the Reserve desk at the Main or Science Library. Please provide the location, the course and document being accessed, the time, and a description of the problem or error message. ▪ For patrons off campus, please email or call with the information above: Main Library: [email protected] or 706-542-3256 Science Library: [email protected] or 706-542-4535 Viewing tips: ▪ The image may take a moment to load. Please scroll down or use the page down arrow keys to begin viewing this document. ▪ Use the “zoom” function to increase the size and legibility of the document on the screen. The “zoom” function is accessed by selecting the “magnifying glass” button on the Acrobat Reader toolbar. NOTICE CONCERNING COPYRIGHT The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproduction of copyrighted material. Section 107, the “Fair Use” clause of this law, states that under certain conditions one may reproduce copyrighted material for criticism, comment, teaching and classroom use, scholarship, or research without violating the copyright of this material. Such use must be non-commercial in nature and must not impact the market for or value of the copyrighted work.
    [Show full text]
  • CEU Political Science Journal
    Vol. 6, No. 2 May 2011 CEU Political Science Journal Department of Political Science Central European University CEU Political Science Journal Department of Political Science Central European University, Budapest May 2011 Advisory Board S.M. Amadae, Ohio State University Carol Harrington, Victoria University of Wellington Karen Henderson, University of Leicester Herbert Kitschelt, Duke University Levente Littvay, CEU Budapest Cristian Pirvulescu, SNSPA Bucharest Phillippe C. Schmitter, EUI Florence Carsten Q. Schneider, CEU Budapest Jan Zielonka, University of Oxford Managing Editors Sergiu Gherghina, University of Leiden Arpad Todor, European University Institute, Florence Editorial Board Dorothee Bohle, CEU Budapest Andras Bozoki, CEU Budapest Mihail Chiru, CEU Budapest Anil Duman, CEU Budapest Zsolt Enyedi, CEU Budapest Stela Garaz, CEU Budapest Dylan Kissane, CEFAM Lyon Robert Sata, CEU Budapest Daniela Sirinic, CEU Budapest Fouad Touzani, CEU Budapest Editorial Assistants Gabriela Borz, University of Aberdeen Oana Lup, CEU Budapest ISSN: 1818-7668 CONTENTS ARTICLES Davor Marko The role of opinion leaders in the dissemination of media messages during the pre-election period: The case of Bosnia and Herzegovinia 167 Nicole Gallina Challenging the East-West divide: Insights from a comparison of Ukraine and Italy 192 J. Shola Omotola A cabalised regime: neopatrimonialism, president Yar’adua’s health crisis and Nigeria’s democracy 222 Victoria Makulilo Access denied? examining the loans board facility for higher learning students in Tanzania 254 BOOK REVIEWS Mabel Berezin, Illiberal Politics in Neoliberal Times. Culture, Security and Populism in the New Europe (New York, Cambridge University Press, 2009). Reviewed by: Adriana Marinescu 286 Fred I. Greenstein, Inventing the Job of President: Leadership Style from George Washington to Andrew Jackson (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey's Deep State
    #1.12 PERSPECTIVES Political analysis and commentary from Turkey FEATURE ARTICLES TURKEY’S DEEP STATE CULTURE INTERNATIONAL POLITICS ECOLOGY AKP’s Cultural Policy: Syria: The Case of the Seasonal Agricultural Arts and Censorship “Arab Spring” Workers in Turkey Pelin Başaran Transforming into the Sidar Çınar Page 28 “Arab Revolution” Page 32 Cengiz Çandar Page 35 TURKEY REPRESENTATION Content Editor’s note 3 ■ Feature articles: Turkey’s Deep State Tracing the Deep State, Ayşegül Sabuktay 4 The Deep State: Forms of Domination, Informal Institutions and Democracy, Mehtap Söyler 8 Ergenekon as an Illusion of Democratization, Ahmet Şık 12 Democratization, revanchism, or..., Aydın Engin 16 The Near Future of Turkey on the Axis of the AKP-Gülen Movement, Ruşen Çakır 18 Counter-Guerilla Becoming the State, the State Becoming the Counter-Guerilla, Ertuğrul Mavioğlu 22 Is the Ergenekon Case an Opportunity or a Handicap? Ali Koç 25 The Dink Murder and State Lies, Nedim Şener 28 ■ Culture Freedom of Expression in the Arts and the Current State of Censorship in Turkey, Pelin Başaran 31 ■ Ecology Solar Energy in Turkey: Challenges and Expectations, Ateş Uğurel 33 A Brief Evaluation of Seasonal Agricultural Workers in Turkey, Sidar Çınar 35 ■ International Politics Syria: The Case of the “Arab Spring” Transforming into the “Arab Revolution”, Cengiz Çandar 38 Turkey/Iran: A Critical Move in the Historical Competition, Mete Çubukçu 41 ■ Democracy 4+4+4: Turning the Education System Upside Down, Aytuğ Şaşmaz 43 “Health Transformation Program” and the 2012 Turkey Health Panorama, Mustafa Sütlaş 46 How Multi-Faceted are the Problems of Freedom of Opinion and Expression in Turkey?, Şanar Yurdatapan 48 Crimes against Humanity and Persistent Resistance against Cruel Policies, Nimet Tanrıkulu 49 ■ News from hbs 53 Heinrich Böll Stiftung – Turkey Representation The Heinrich Böll Stiftung, associated with the German Green Party, is a legally autonomous and intellectually open political foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Trilogue Salzburg 2018 Background Paper
    Page 60 | Trilogue Salzburg 2018 Background Paper The Erosion of Democracy in Developing and Transition Countries Hauke Hartmann Introduction Political transformation as measured by the BTI 2018 has, on average, reached a new low around the globe. In more and more countries, rulers are strategically undermining control mechanisms in order to secure power and maintain patronage systems and opportunities for self-enrichment. At the same time, protests are growing against social inequality, mismanagement and corruption. As normative transformation goals, democracy and the market economy have never been so contested – or so threatened by degradation from within. Clearly, if democratic systems do not offer a robust framework for ensuring rule of law and opportunities for political participation, and if market-based economies do not guarantee fair and reliable rules of competition and social inclusion, then not only will they lose their appeal, they will devolve into illiberal, patronage-driven structures. Against this background, populistic and authoritarian criticisms of democratic processes, institutions and ultimately norms will gain credibility. The following text starts out by introducing the most important investigative parameters used to assess the political status and quality of democracy in 129 developing and transformation countries (excluding Western nations that were already members of the OECD in 1989). On this basis, the erosion of democracy worldwide is analyzed and the question addressed in what sense this development represents a global “retreat of democracy.” The prevailing antidemocratic positions are then depicted and discussed. In conclusion, suggestions are made as to how the European Union, as one of the main democratic actors on the international stage, can counteract the erosion in the quality of democracy and promote a liberal order and democratization.
    [Show full text]
  • The Functioning of Democratic Institutions in Turkey
    http://assembly.coe.int Doc. 15272 21 April 2021 The functioning of democratic institutions in Turkey Report1 Committee on the Honouring of Obligations and Commitments by Member States of the Council of Europe (Monitoring Committee) Co-rapporteurs: Mr Thomas HAMMARBERG, Sweden, Socialists, Democrats and Greens Group, and Mr John HOWELL, United Kingdom, European Conservatives Group and Democratic Alliance Summary The Monitoring Committee is deeply concerned about recent developments in Turkey which have further undermined democracy, the rule of law and human rights. Procedures seeking to lift the parliamentary immunity of a third of the parliamentarians (overwhelmingly from opposition parties), the attempt to close the Peoples' Democratic Party (HDP) and the continued crackdown on its members put political pluralism and the functioning of democratic institutions at risk. The presidential decision of 20 March 2021 to withdraw from the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (CETS No.210, the Istanbul Convention) to combat violence against women and domestic violence is a regrettable step backwards, made without any parliamentary debate, which raises the question of the modalities of denunciation of conventions in democratic societies. The committee also urges the immediate release of Selahattin Demirtaş and Osman Kavala following the final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights. In order to reverse these worrying trends, the Turkish authorities should seize the opportunity of implementing the Human Rights Action Plan and revising the legislation on elections and political parties to take meaningful steps, put an end to the judicial harassment of opposition and dissenting voices, improve freedom of expression and media and restore the independence of the judiciary, in co-operation with the Council of Europe 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Class Code ITAL-UA9513/MCC-UE9452001 Instructor Details
    ITAL-UA9513/MCC-UE9452001 Class code Name: Cristian Vaccari Instructor Details NYUHome Email Address: [email protected] Office Hours: By appointment only, Wednesdays, 6pm-7pm Villa Ulivi Office Location: Borgo de’ Greci Villa Ulivi Office Extension: 313 For fieldtrips refer to the email with trip instructions and trip assistant’s cell phone number Semester: Spring 2013 Class Details Full Title of Course: Global Media Seminar: Television and Democracy in Italy Meeting Days and Times: Wednesdays, 3:00pm - 5:45pm Classroom Location: Montughi None Prerequisites The goal of this course is to present a comparative perspective on media and politics in Class Description Western democracies and a thorough historical survey of political communication in Italy, with a special emphasis on the relation between television and democratic politics and an eye towards the evolving role of digital media. Students who take the course will be able to comprehend the most recent developments in political communication across Western democracies as well as to understand the complex media-politics relationships in Italy. The first part of the course will enable students to contextualize the Italian case within global trends in political communication that affect most Western democracies. Students will learn how to evaluate the ways in which the media contribute to democracy from a normative standpoint and to appreciate how different types of media systems affect citizens’ levels of information and political participation. Moreover, they will learn about parties, party systems, and party identification, which will allow them to better understand the dynamics of elections and vote choice. Building on this groundwork, the second part of the course will deal with the history of political communication in Italy from the post-War era until present-day developments.
    [Show full text]
  • The November 2011 Elections in Nicaragua: a Study Mission Report of the Carter Center
    The November 2011 Elections in Nicaragua Study Mission Report Waging Peace. Fighting Disease. Building Hope. The November 2011 Elections in Nicaragua: A Study Mission Report of the Carter Center THE NOVEMBER 2011 ELECTIONS IN NICARAGUA: A STUDY MISSION REPORT OF THE CARTER CENTER OVERVIEW On November 6, 2011 Nicaragua held general elections for president and vice president, national and departmental deputies to the National Assembly, and members of the Central American Parliament. Fraudulent local elections in 2008, a questionable Supreme Court decision in October 2009 to permit the candidacy of incumbent President Daniel Ortega, and a presidential decree in January 2010 extending the Supreme Electoral Council (CSE) magistrates in office after their terms expired provided the context for a deeply flawed election process. Partisan election preparations were followed by a non-transparent election day and count. The conditions for international and domestic election observation, and for party oversight, were insufficient to permit verification of compliance with election procedures and Nicaraguan electoral law, and numerous anomalies cast doubt on the quality of the process and honesty of the vote count. The most important opposition party rejected the election as fraudulent but took its seats in the legislature. Nicaragua’s Supreme Electoral Council dismissed opposition complaints and announced that President Daniel Ortega had been re-elected to a third term. In addition, the official results showed that Ortega’s Sandinista National Liberation Front (FSLN) party had won enough legislative seats both to reform articles of the constitution (requires a 60% majority) and to call a constituent assembly to write a new constitution (requires 66%).
    [Show full text]
  • Kurden in Europa: Ethnizität Und Diaspora Kapitel 8: Konkurrenzkategorie Religion*
    www.yeziden-colloquium.de Kurden in Europa: Ethnizität und Diaspora Kapitel 8: Konkurrenzkategorie Religion* Birgit Ammann Die meisten Kurden gehören der sunnitischen Ausprägung des Islam, genauer bezeichnet der schafiitischen Rechtsschule,283 an (Antes 1997: 54; Werle & Kreile 1987: 34, 37), während Türken und Araber meistens der hanafitischen Schule angehören (Ibrahim 1998: 105; Hütteroth 1959: 277). In der iranischen Provinz Kermanshah, im irakischen Khana- qin sowie um die Städte Erbil und Kirkuk gibt es schiitische Kurden (Kreyenbroek 1996: 99). Wie sich im Laufe dieser Arbeit noch zeigen wird, spielt in kurdischen Zusammenhängen die, wenngleich minoritäre, Religionsgemeinschaft der Yeziden eine wichtige Rolle. Bei einem erheblichen Teil der in der Türkei lebenden Kurden handelt es sich um Aleviten, auf die ebenfalls noch detailliert eingegangen wird. Bis in die fünfziger Jahre des zwanzigsten Jahrhunderts lebte unter den Kurden eine Min- derheit von Juden, die sich in ihrem religiösen Leben und ihrer Sprache, dem Aramäi- schen, von ihrer Umgebung unterschieden (Brauer 1993; Ammann. 1991a). Ähnliches gilt für verschiedene christliche Gruppen, die bis heute mit Kurden zusammenleben und sich jeweils als eigene Ethnien betrachten.284 Außerdem gibt es unter den Kurden Anhänger islamischer Orden wie die Naqshabandi und die Qadhi sowie Sekten wie die der Ahl-i Haqq und andere.285 Insgesamt hatten solche Gruppen in den kurdischen Gebieten immer besonderen Einfluß, in der Migration spielen sie, wie auch schiitische Kurden, kaum eine Rolle. Traditionell definieren sich viele Gruppen primär über ihre Religionszugehörigkeit. Reli- giöse Lehren schließen ethnische Definitionen teil- [255] weise sogar völlig aus. Der is- lamische Begriff der umma, der Gemeinschaft aller Gläubigen, geht beispielsweise in die- se Richtung.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Routes to an Impasse: Understanding Turkey's
    Two Routes to an Impasse: Understanding Turkey’s Kurdish Policy Ayşegül Aydin Cem Emrence turkey project policy paper Number 10 • December 2016 policy paper Number 10, December 2016 About CUSE The Center on the United States and Europe (CUSE) at Brookings fosters high-level U.S.-Europe- an dialogue on the changes in Europe and the global challenges that affect transatlantic relations. As an integral part of the Foreign Policy Studies Program, the Center offers independent research and recommendations for U.S. and European officials and policymakers, and it convenes seminars and public forums on policy-relevant issues. CUSE’s research program focuses on the transforma- tion of the European Union (EU); strategies for engaging the countries and regions beyond the frontiers of the EU including the Balkans, Caucasus, Russia, Turkey, and Ukraine; and broader European security issues such as the future of NATO and forging common strategies on energy security. The Center also houses specific programs on France, Germany, Italy, and Turkey. About the Turkey Project Given Turkey’s geopolitical, historical and cultural significance, and the high stakes posed by the foreign policy and domestic issues it faces, Brookings launched the Turkey Project in 2004 to foster informed public consideration, high‐level private debate, and policy recommendations focusing on developments in Turkey. In this context, Brookings has collaborated with the Turkish Industry and Business Association (TUSIAD) to institute a U.S.-Turkey Forum at Brookings. The Forum organizes events in the form of conferences, sem- inars and workshops to discuss topics of relevance to U.S.-Turkish and transatlantic relations.
    [Show full text]