DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2106.15290V1 [Gr-Qc] 29 Jun 2021 the Aim of This Work Is to Account Fully for the Contri- Different Types of Object Following the Same Geodesic

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2106.15290V1 [Gr-Qc] 29 Jun 2021 the Aim of This Work Is to Account Fully for the Contri- Different Types of Object Following the Same Geodesic Constraints on Equivalence Principle Violation from Gamma Ray Bursts D. J. Bartlett,1, ∗ D. Bergsdal,2, 3 H. Desmond,1 P. G. Ferreira,1 and J. Jasche3 1Astrophysics, University of Oxford, Denys Wilkinson Building, Keble Road, Oxford, OX1 3RH, UK 2Particle and Astroparticle Physics, Department of Physics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, SE 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden 3The Oskar Klein Centre, Department of Physics, Stockholm University, AlbaNova University Centre, SE 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden Theories of gravity that obey the Weak Equivalence Principle have the same Parametrised Post- Newtonian parameter γ for all particles at all energies. The large Shapiro time delays of extragalactic sources allow us to put tight constraints on differences in γ between photons of different frequencies from spectral lag data, since a non-zero ∆γ would result in a frequency-dependent arrival time. The majority of previous constraints have assumed that the Shapiro time delay is dominated by a few local massive objects, although this is a poor approximation for distant sources. In this work we consider the cosmological context of these sources by developing a source-by-source, Monte Carlo-based forward model for the Shapiro time delays by combining constrained realisations of the local density field using the BORG algorithm with unconstrained large-scale modes. Propagating uncertainties in the density field reconstruction and marginalising over an empirical model describing other contributions to the time delay, we use spectral lag data of Gamma Ray Bursts from the BATSE satellite to constrain ∆γ < 3:4 × 10−15 at 1σ confidence between photon energies of 25 keV and 325 keV. I. INTRODUCTION they experience time delays identically. This can be achieved either when the source emits light at varying A basic feature of metric theories of gravity is that frequencies which can be independently measured [6], or objects on either timelike or null geodesics experience when it emits other types of energy in addition to light, apparent time delays due to motion through regions of such as gravitational waves [7]. Within the PPN frame- varying spacetime curvature, caused by the difference work, this constrains the difference between their γ fac- between proper and observer time induced by a grav- tors. itational field. This effect, first derived by Shapiro in In general metric theories the time delay is propor- 1964 [1], has now been accurately measured in the Solar tional to the integral of the fluctuation in Newtonian po- System: the best constraint on the fractional deviation tential φ along the line of sight to the source; within the of the time delay from the prediction of General Rel- PPN framework it has a prefactor 1 + γ where γ = 1 ativity (GR) is currently at the 10−5 level, using data in GR. Predicting time delays is therefore equivalent to from the radio link with the Cassini spacecraft [2]. In determining δφ. In typical analyses, δφ φ is modelled the Parametrised Post-Newtonian (PPN) framework the as arising from one or a few isolated sources' near the line time delay is governed by the light-bending parameter γ of sight that are believed to be predominantly respon- [3]. For sources at greater distance, however, the lack of sible for sourcing the potential. However, as φ 1=r knowledge of the time of emission of a signal precludes one should expect it to be sensitive to the distribution∼ of direct measurement of the delay. distant sources, and indeed the contribution to φ from a Nevertheless, the time delay effect has found use in spherical shell at distance r from a test point diverges as testing various aspects of the theory of gravity and the r . This casts doubt on the multiple point masses standard model of cosmology. This is done by comparing approximation! 1 [8, 9]. time delays, either between nearby geodesics or between arXiv:2106.15290v1 [gr-qc] 29 Jun 2021 The aim of this work is to account fully for the contri- different types of object following the same geodesic. The butions to the time delay from all mass in the non-linear former may be achieved by comparing the time of recep- cosmological density field. We derive the contribution tion of photons originating from a common source but from local structures using constrained density fields gen- traversing different paths due to gravitational lensing. erated by the BORG algorithm [10{14] and combine this When the source is a time-varying quasar and the lens with an unconstrained contribution from distant sources a single massive elliptical galaxy or cluster, this method to produce a Monte-Carlo based source-by-source for- has been used to constrain the Hubble parameter, H0, ward model for the expected Shapiro time delay. on which time delay distances depend [4, 5]. Conversely, We apply our method to high-energy astrophysical comparing time delays between different objects travel- sources that have previously been used to test the ling along the same geodesic allows the Weak Equivalence Equivalence Principle for photons of varying wavelength. Principle (WEP) to be tested by investigating whether Marginalising over uncertainties in the density field re- construction and parameters describing non-Equivalence- Principle-violating contributions, we compare our pre- ∗ [email protected] dictions to the observations via a Markov Chain Monte 2 Carlo (MCMC) algorithm. We find our constraints are which can be parametrised as a difference in the PPN pa- 40 times tighter than literature results, illustrating the rameter γ between two wavelengths. Thus by comparing benefit∼ of using complete mass distributions when study- the measured time delays with the line-of-sight integral ing non-local relativistic effects such as time delays in a in Equation 2, one can put constraints on how γ changes cosmological setting. with photon frequency, and thus on any violation of the In Section II we discuss time delays in the context of WEP. metric theories of gravity, including the importance of long wavelength modes in calculating the Shapiro time delay. We describe the Gamma Ray Burst (GRB) obser- B. Time delay angular power spectrum vations in Section III and detail our inference methods in Section IV. The results are presented in Section V. The angular power spectrum of the gravitational time A discussion of systematic uncertainties, future applica- delay is [8] tions of our methods and a comparison to the literature Z Z rs 2 are presented in Section VI. We conclude in Section VII. 2 2 C` = dk k Pφ (k) dr D (r) j` (kr) ; (4) π 0 II. TIME DELAY DIFFERENCES IN METRIC such that the mean-squared time delay is THEORIES OF GRAVITY X 2` + 1 t2 = C ; (5) grav 4π ` A. Equivalence principle violation ` where Pφ is the power spectrum of the potential. For Consider a perturbed FRW-like metric in the Newto- k 1=rs, the spherical Bessel function can be expanded nian gauge, as 2 2 2 2 pπ ds = (1 + 2γδφ) dt + a (t) (1 2δφ) dr ; (1) j (x) = x` + x2+` ; (6) − − ` `+1 3 2 Γ ` + 2 O where we have introduced the PPN parameter γ to allow for deviations from General Relativity (where γ = 1). so that For a massless particle, the gravitational time delay to 4 pπ Z dk C = [T (k)]2 A kns−1k2` a source at distance rs is given by (1 + γ) tgrav, where ` 3 `+1 3 φ s π 2 Γ ` + 2 k (7) Z rs Z 2 ! ` 2+2` tgrav = dr δφ0(r)D(r); (2) dr D (r) r + k ; − 0 O where D(r) is the linear growth factor, δφ is the poten- 0 where Tφ is the potential transfer function and we assume tial fluctuation evaluated using the present-day matter a nearly scale-invariant primordial power spectrum field and we have used the weak field limit δφ 1. For P ns−1 a set of point masses φ = i GMi=ri, but in a general R (k) = Ask : (8) density field δφ must be found by solving the Poisson P equation On super-Hubble scales, Tφ (k) constant, so the small- est power of k in the integral has∼ an exponent n 2+2`. s − 2δφ(r) = 4πGδρ(r); (3) For ` 1, this is ns, which, given that ns 0:97 r [15], means≥ that, for≥ ` 1, the integral does not∼ di- ≥ where δρ is the total matter density fluctuation. This is verge at small k. However for ` = 0, the exponent is most readily solved in Fourier space. Thus determining ns 2 < 1, and so the integral diverges. We therefore − − time delays amounts to mapping out the three dimen- see that the monopole diverges due to the contribution sional density field to at least the redshift of the source. from large scales. This is not to say that there is an We describe how we do this in Section IV A. infinite time delay for a given universe, but that its vari- There exist several formulations of the Equivalence ance across all possible universes is infinite. Thus when Principle, of varying strength. The WEP, our focus here, we forward model the time delays in Section IV, we will states that all freely-falling test objects follow the same only be able to predict angular fluctuations about the trajectories given the same initial conditions, irrespec- mean Shapiro time delay at a given redshift, and not its tive of their composition or structure. This requires that absolute value. all objects from a given source experience the same time delay, regardless of their composition or energy. Multiple astrophysical sources have been detected with C. Other contributions to the time delay precise timings of photons of different wavelengths.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Relativity and Fundamental Physics
    Relativity and Fundamental Physics Sergei Kopeikin (1,2,*) 1) Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Missouri, 322 Physics Building., Columbia, MO 65211, USA 2) Siberian State University of Geosystems and Technology, Plakhotny Street 10, Novosibirsk 630108, Russia Abstract Laser ranging has had a long and significant role in testing general relativity and it continues to make advance in this field. It is important to understand the relation of the laser ranging to other branches of fundamental gravitational physics and their mutual interaction. The talk overviews the basic theoretical principles underlying experimental tests of general relativity and the recent major achievements in this field. Introduction Modern theory of fundamental interactions relies heavily upon two strong pillars both created by Albert Einstein – special and general theory of relativity. Special relativity is a cornerstone of elementary particle physics and the quantum field theory while general relativity is a metric- based theory of gravitational field. Understanding the nature of the fundamental physical interactions and their hierarchic structure is the ultimate goal of theoretical and experimental physics. Among the four known fundamental interactions the most important but least understood is the gravitational interaction due to its weakness in the solar system – a primary experimental laboratory of gravitational physicists for several hundred years. Nowadays, general relativity is a canonical theory of gravity used by astrophysicists to study the black holes and astrophysical phenomena in the early universe. General relativity is a beautiful theoretical achievement but it is only a classic approximation to deeper fundamental nature of gravity. Any possible deviation from general relativity can be a clue to new physics (Turyshev, 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • New Experiments in Gravitational Physics
    St. John Fisher College Fisher Digital Publications Physics Faculty/Staff Publications Physics 2014 New Experiments in Gravitational Physics Munawar Karim St. John Fisher College, [email protected] Ashfaque H. Bokhari King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals Follow this and additional works at: https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/physics_facpub Part of the Physics Commons How has open access to Fisher Digital Publications benefited ou?y Publication Information Karim, Munawar and Bokhari, Ashfaque H. (2014). "New Experiments in Gravitational Physics." EPJ Web of Conferences 75, 05001-05001-p.10. Please note that the Publication Information provides general citation information and may not be appropriate for your discipline. To receive help in creating a citation based on your discipline, please visit http://libguides.sjfc.edu/citations. This document is posted at https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/physics_facpub/29 and is brought to you for free and open access by Fisher Digital Publications at St. John Fisher College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. New Experiments in Gravitational Physics Abstract We propose experiments to examine and extend interpretations of the Einstein field equations. Experiments encompass the fields of astrophysics, quantum properties of the gravity field, gravitational effects on quantum electrodynamic phenomena and coupling of spinors to gravity. As an outcome of this work we were able to derive the temperature of the solar corona. Disciplines Physics Comments Proceedings from the Fifth International Symposium on Experimental Gravitation in Nanchang, China, July 8-13, 2013. Copyright is owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences in EPJ Web of Conferences in 2014. Article is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/20147405001.
    [Show full text]
  • Static Spherically Symmetric Black Holes in Weak F(T)-Gravity
    universe Article Static Spherically Symmetric Black Holes in Weak f (T)-Gravity Christian Pfeifer 1,*,† and Sebastian Schuster 2,† 1 Center of Applied Space Technology and Microgravity—ZARM, University of Bremen, Am Fallturm 2, 28359 Bremen, Germany 2 Ústav Teoretické Fyziky, Matematicko-Fyzikální Fakulta, Univerzita Karlova, V Holešoviˇckách2, 180 00 Praha 8, Czech Republic; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] † These authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract: With the advent of gravitational wave astronomy and first pictures of the “shadow” of the central black hole of our milky way, theoretical analyses of black holes (and compact objects mimicking them sufficiently closely) have become more important than ever. The near future promises more and more detailed information about the observable black holes and black hole candidates. This information could lead to important advances on constraints on or evidence for modifications of general relativity. More precisely, we are studying the influence of weak teleparallel perturbations on general relativistic vacuum spacetime geometries in spherical symmetry. We find the most general family of spherically symmetric, static vacuum solutions of the theory, which are candidates for describing teleparallel black holes which emerge as perturbations to the Schwarzschild black hole. We compare our findings to results on black hole or static, spherically symmetric solutions in teleparallel gravity discussed in the literature, by comparing the predictions for classical observables such as the photon sphere, the perihelion shift, the light deflection, and the Shapiro delay. On the basis of these observables, we demonstrate that among the solutions we found, there exist spacetime geometries that lead to much weaker bounds on teleparallel gravity than those found earlier.
    [Show full text]
  • Radio and High-Energy Emission of Pulsars Revealed by General Relativity Q
    A&A 639, A75 (2020) Astronomy https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202037979 & c Q. Giraud and J. Pétri 2020 Astrophysics Radio and high-energy emission of pulsars revealed by general relativity Q. Giraud and J. Pétri Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, Observatoire Astronomique de Strasbourg, UMR 7550, 67000 Strasbourg, France e-mail: [email protected] Received 18 March 2020 / Accepted 14 May 2020 ABSTRACT Context. According to current pulsar emission models, photons are produced within their magnetosphere and current sheet, along their separatrix, which is located inside and outside the light cylinder. Radio emission is favoured in the vicinity of the polar caps, whereas the high-energy counterpart is presumably enhanced in regions around the light cylinder, whether this is the magnetosphere and/or the wind. However, the gravitational effect on their light curves and spectral properties has only been sparsely researched. Aims. We present a method for simulating the influence that the gravitational field of the neutron star has on its emission properties according to the solution of a rotating dipole evolving in a slowly rotating neutron star metric described by general relativity. Methods. We numerically computed photon trajectories assuming a background Schwarzschild metric, applying our method to neu- tron star radiation mechanisms such as thermal emission from hot spots and non-thermal magnetospheric emission by curvature radiation. We detail the general-relativistic effects onto observations made by a distant observer. Results. Sky maps are computed using the vacuum electromagnetic field of a general-relativistic rotating dipole, extending previous works obtained for the Deutsch solution. We compare Newtonian results to their general-relativistic counterpart.
    [Show full text]
  • The Confrontation Between General Relativity and Experiment
    The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment Clifford M. Will Department of Physics University of Florida Gainesville FL 32611, U.S.A. email: [email protected]fl.edu http://www.phys.ufl.edu/~cmw/ Abstract The status of experimental tests of general relativity and of theoretical frameworks for analyzing them are reviewed and updated. Einstein’s equivalence principle (EEP) is well supported by experiments such as the E¨otv¨os experiment, tests of local Lorentz invariance and clock experiments. Ongoing tests of EEP and of the inverse square law are searching for new interactions arising from unification or quantum gravity. Tests of general relativity at the post-Newtonian level have reached high precision, including the light deflection, the Shapiro time delay, the perihelion advance of Mercury, the Nordtvedt effect in lunar motion, and frame-dragging. Gravitational wave damping has been detected in an amount that agrees with general relativity to better than half a percent using the Hulse–Taylor binary pulsar, and a growing family of other binary pulsar systems is yielding new tests, especially of strong-field effects. Current and future tests of relativity will center on strong gravity and gravitational waves. arXiv:1403.7377v1 [gr-qc] 28 Mar 2014 1 Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Tests of the Foundations of Gravitation Theory 6 2.1 The Einstein equivalence principle . .. 6 2.1.1 Tests of the weak equivalence principle . .. 7 2.1.2 Tests of local Lorentz invariance . .. 9 2.1.3 Tests of local position invariance . 12 2.2 TheoreticalframeworksforanalyzingEEP. ....... 16 2.2.1 Schiff’sconjecture ................................ 16 2.2.2 The THǫµ formalism .............................
    [Show full text]
  • Special and General Relativity (PHZ 4601/5606 – Fall 2018) Prof. Bernd A. Berg Phones: 850-273-0001, 850-644-6246, E-Mail: Bberg at Fsu Dot Edu Office: 615 Keen
    Special and General Relativity (PHZ 4601/5606 { Fall 2018) Prof. Bernd A. Berg Phones: 850-273-0001, 850-644-6246, e-mail: bberg at fsu dot edu Office: 615 Keen • Class: MWF 9:05{9:55 am at HCB 0209. First Class August 27. • Office hours: Wednesdays 10:30-11:45 am and Thursdays 1:45-3:15 pm, and by ap- pointment (send e-mail). • Grader: Juan Mejia Marin, e-mail jjm17c at my dot fsu dot edu, Office hours Thursdays 5:15{7 pm at 614 Keen, and by appointment (send e-mail). • Midterm: Wednesday, October 17, 2018. • Test on Homework (tentative): Friday November 30. • Final: Thursday, December 11, 10 am { 12 pm at HCB 0209. Required Text: Wolfgang Rindler, Relativity, Special, General and Cosmological, Second Edition, Oxford University Press, New York, 2006. Overview and Goal The course gives an introduction to the fundamentals of space, time and matter. As a systematic, mathematically rigorous treatment is beyond the scope of an undergraduate course, we intend in essence to learn by explaining (often omitting proofs) sections from the textbook by Rindler. Bring the book to the lectures! Under the title Essential Relativity the book started off as a one semester course for senior undergraduate students, but has since then been expanded to a two semester course. Therefore, we will have to omit about half of the material. For an overview see the tentative schedule at the end of this syllabus and compare it with the preface and the table of contents of the textbook. After this course students should be able to explain the fundamental ideas of Special Relativity (SR) and General Relativity (GR) and master to solve by themselves standard problems to which the methods apply.
    [Show full text]
  • Pos(GMC8)062 ∗ [email protected] Speaker
    Gravitational lensing along multiple light paths as a PoS(GMC8)062 probe of physics beyond Einstein gravity Hideki Asada∗ Faculty of Science and Technology, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki 036-8561, Japan E-mail: [email protected] The light propagation is reexamined, allowing for various models of modied gravity. We clarify the dependence of the time delay (and induced frequency shift) on modied gravity models and investigate how to distinguish those models, when light propagates in static spherically symmetric spacetimes parameterized to express modied gravity. Implications to gravitational lensing are mentioned. The Manchester Microlensing Conference: The 12th International Conference and ANGLES Microlensing Workshop January 21-25 2008 Manchester, UK ∗Speaker. c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Licence. http://pos.sissa.it/ Gravitational lensing by modied gravity Hideki Asada 1. Introduction A certain modication, in whatever form, in the standard cosmological model, is strongly suggested by recent observations such as the magnitude-redshift relation of type Ia supernovae (SNIa) and the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropy by WMAP. We are forced to add a new component into the energy-momentum tensor in the Einstein equation or modify the theory of general relativity itself. Indeed, plenty of models have been proposed, such as scalar tensor theories, string theories, higher dimensional scenarios and quantum gravity. Therefore, it is of great importance to observationally test these models. PoS(GMC8)062 The theory of general relativity has passed classical tests, such as the deection of light, the perihelion shift of Mercury and the Shapiro time delay, and also a systematic test using the remarkable binary pulsar PSR 1913+16.
    [Show full text]
  • Pulse Arrival-Times from Binary Pulsars with Rotating Black Hole Companions
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CERN Document Server Submitted Ap. J. Lett. Pulse Arrival-Times from Binary Pulsars with Rotating Black Hole Companions Pablo Laguna1 and Alex Wolszczan2 Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics and Center for Gravitational Physics & Geometry Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802 ABSTRACT We present a study of the gravitational time delay of arrival of signals from binary pulsar systems with rotating black hole companions. In particular, we investigate the strength of this effect (Shapiro delay) as a function of the inclination, eccentricity and period of the orbit, as well as the mass and angular momentum of the black hole. This study is based on direct numerical integration of null geodesics in a Kerr background geometry. We find that, for binaries with sufficiently high orbital inclinations (> 89o) and compact companion masses > 10M , the effect arising from the rotation of the black hole in the system amounts to a microsecond–level variation of the arrival times of the pulsar pulses. If measurable, this variation could provide a unique signature for the presence of a rotating black hole in a binary pulsar system. Subject headings: pulsars: binaries, relativity Binary pulsars are excellent laboratories for testing General Relativity (GR) and other theories of gravity. Long-term timing observations of relativistic binaries, such as PSR B1913+16 (Hulse & Taylor 1975), yield highly precise measurements of post-Keplerian orbital parameters of the pulsar. In particular, observations of the the orbital decay of PSR B1913+16 induced by gravitational radiative effects have verified the validity of GR to within 0.5% (Taylor & Weisberg 1989).
    [Show full text]
  • Physics 129 LECTURE 4 January 16, 2014 SR + QM Spin & Statistics
    Physics 129 LECTURE 4 January 16, 2014 ● Special Relativity Doppler shift ● SR + QM ⇒ Spin & Statistics & PCT ● Introduction to General Relativity: In accelerating reference frames there are “pseudoforces” Fpseudo = ma, where a is the acceleration of the frame. General Relativity: gravity is a pseudoforce that is eliminated in inertial (freely falling) reference frames. ● Classic GR tests: precession, light deflection, redshift ● GR passes much more precise tests ● GR is essential for the GPS system - so, for our everyday lives! ● Black Holes in the Universe Thursday, January 16, 14 Lorentz transformations and the Doppler effect The Lorentz transformation between inertial reference frame (x,t) and inertial frame (x’,t’) moving at speed v in the x-direction is (setting c = 1 and writing v/c = β) t’ = γ(t − βx), x’ = γ(x − βt), y’ = y, z’ = z Since all 4-vectors transform the same way, the Lorentz transformation between the same frames for the energy-momentum 4-vector Pμ = (E,p) is E’ = γ(E − βpx), px’ = γ(px − βE), py’ = py, pz’ = pz Since |p| = p = E for photons, this says that for a photon moving in the x-direction E ’ = γE (1 − β) = E [(1 − β)/(1 + β)]½ . Since E = hf where h = Planck’s constant and f is the frequency, the frequencies are related by f ’ = f [(1 − β)/(1 + β)]½ ≈ f (1 − β), which is 1st order in velocity β. Frequency decreases, so wavelength λ = c /f increases, or “red-shifts” λ’ ≈ λ (1 + β) so Δλ ≡ λ’ − λ ≈ λ β and Δλ/λ ≈ β. (We will derive a different formula in the expanding universe.) For a photon moving in the transverse (y or z) direction, the only effect is time dilation, and the redshift is second order in velocity β.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Positioning System Receivers and Relativity
    INST. OF STAND & TEf" fcT'L f.:]f. NIST IIIDS blfiT17 PUBLICATIONS United States Department of Commerce Technology Administration Nisr National Institute of Standards and Technology N/ST Technical Note 1385 NIST Technical Note 1385 Global Position System Receivers and Relativity Neil Ashby Marc Weiss Time and Frequency Division Physics Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology 325 Broadway Boulder, Colorado 80303-3328 March 1999 '4rES U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, William M. Daley, Secretary TECHNOLOGY ADMINISTRATION, Gary R. Bachula, Acting Under Secretary for Technology NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY, Raymond G. Kamnier, Director National Institute of Standards and Technology Technical Note Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol., Tech. Note 1385, 52 pages (March 1999) CODEN:NTNOEF U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1999 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402-9325 . Contents 1 Introduction 1 2. Theory 2 2.1 Pseudorange 2 2.2 Phase Time 2 2.3 Relevant Relativity 3 2.4 Common Misunderstandings 4 2.5 User Corrections 6 2.6 Relativistic Doppler Effect and Use of the GPS Carrier 7 2.7 Rotation Matrix 8 3. Time Tagging at Receiver 9 3.1 Time Tagging at Receiver— General Prescription 9 3.2 Examples 11 Example 3.21 Multi- Channel Receiver, Time Tagging at Receiver 12 Example 3.211 Erroneous Use of ECEF Coordinates 16 Example 3.212 Iteration With a Succession of Inertial Frames 16 Example 3.213 The Benefit of Better Initialization 17 4. Time Tagging at Transmitter 18 4.1 Code Boundary Measurements 18 4.2 Phase Time 19 4.3 Accounting for Receiver Motion 20 4.4 Time Tagging at Transmitter—General Prescription 22 4.5 Examples 24 Example 4.51 Time Tagging at Transmitter 24 Example 4.52 Time Tagging at Transmitter, Neglecting Doppler Corrections 29 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility of Measuring the Shapiro Time Delay Over Meter-Scale Distances
    Syracuse University SURFACE Physics College of Arts and Sciences 2009 Feasibility of Measuring the Shapiro Time Delay over Meter-Scale Distances Stefan Ballmer Syracuse University S. Marka Syracuse University P. Shawhan University of Maryland Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/phy Part of the Physics Commons Recommended Citation Ballmer, Stefan; Marka, S.; and Shawhan, P., "Feasibility of Measuring the Shapiro Time Delay over Meter- Scale Distances" (2009). Physics. 12. https://surface.syr.edu/phy/12 This Working Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts and Sciences at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Physics by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Feasibility of measuring the Shapiro time delay over meter-scale distances S Ballmer1;2;3,SMarka´ 4 and P Shawhan5 1Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA 2TAMA - National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan 3LIGO - California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 4Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, NY 10027, USA 5University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract. The time delay of light as it passes by a massive object, first calculated by Shapiro in 1964, is a hallmark of the curvature of space-time. To date, all measurements of the Shapiro time delay have been made over solar-system distance scales. We show that the new generation of kilometer-scale laser interferometers being constructed as gravitational wave detectors, in particular Advanced LIGO, will in principle be sensitive enough to measure variations in the Shapiro time delay produced by a suitably designed rotating object placed near the laser beam.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Uniform Acceleration
    Physics 139 Relativity Relativity Notes 2003 G. F. SMOOT Oce 398 Le Conte DepartmentofPhysics, University of California, Berkeley, USA 94720 Notes to b e found at: http://aether.lbl.gov/www/classes/p139/homework/homework.html 1 Uniform Acceleration This material is to prepare a transition towards General Relativity via the Equivalence Principle by rst understanding uniform acceleration. The Equivalence Principle stated in a simple form: Equivalence Principle: A uniform gravitational eld is equivalent to a uniform acceleration. This is not very precise statement and one lesson wehave learned in Sp ecial Relativity is the need to b e precise in our statements, de nitions, and use of co ordinates. We will come to a more precise statement of the Equivalence Principle in terms like at a space-time p oint with gravitational acceleration ~g there is a tangent reference frame undergoing uniform acceleration that is equivalent. This is similar to the instantaneous rest frame of Sp ecial Relativity in the case of an ob ject undergoing acceleration. We rst need to understand carefully what is a uniform acceleration reference frame, whichwe will do in steps. First imagine a reference frame { a rigid framework of rulers and clo cks, our standard reference frame { undergoing uniform acceleration. In classical nonrelativistic physics we can imagine a rigid framework to whichwe can apply a force which will cause it to move with constant acceleration. However, in Sp ecial Relativity no causal impulse can travel faster than the sp eed of light, thus the frame work cannot b e in nitely rigid. When the force causing the acceleration is rst applied, the p oint where the force is rst applied b egins to accelerate rst and as the casual impulse moves out, the other p ortions join in the acceleration.
    [Show full text]