Effects of the Interannual Variations in the Flood Pulse Mediated by Hypoxia Tolerance: the Case of the Fish Assemblages in the Upper Paraná River Floodplain
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Gills Coulee Creek, 2006 [PDF]
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Bureau of Watershed Management Sediment TMDL for Gills Coulee Creek INTRODUCTION Gills Coulee Creek is a tributary stream to the La Crosse River, located in La Crosse County in west central Wisconsin. (Figure A-1) The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) placed the entire length of Gills Coulee Creek on the state’s 303(d) impaired waters list as low priority due to degraded habitat caused by excessive sedimentation. The Clean Water Act and US EPA regulations require that each state develop Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) for waters on the Section 303(d) list. The purpose of this TMDL is to identify load allocations and management actions that will help restore the biological integrity of the stream. Waterbody TMDL Impaired Existing Codified Pollutant Impairment Priority WBIC Name ID Stream Miles Use Use Gills Coulee 0-1 Cold II Degraded 1652300 168 WWFF Sediment High Creek 1-5 Cold III Habitat Table 1. Gills Coulee use designations, pollutants, and impairments PROBLEM STATEMENT Due to excessive sedimentation, Gills Coulee Creek is currently not meeting applicable narrative water quality criterion as defined in NR 102.04 (1); Wisconsin Administrative Code: “To preserve and enhance the quality of waters, standards are established to govern water management decisions. Practices attributable to municipal, industrial, commercial, domestic, agricultural, land development, or other activities shall be controlled so that all waters including mixing zone and effluent channels meet the following conditions at all times and under all flow conditions: (a) Substances that will cause objectionable deposits on the shore or in the bed of a body of water, shall not be present in such amounts as to interfere with public rights in waters of the state. -
§4-71-6.5 LIST of CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November
§4-71-6.5 LIST OF CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November 28, 2006 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME INVERTEBRATES PHYLUM Annelida CLASS Oligochaeta ORDER Plesiopora FAMILY Tubificidae Tubifex (all species in genus) worm, tubifex PHYLUM Arthropoda CLASS Crustacea ORDER Anostraca FAMILY Artemiidae Artemia (all species in genus) shrimp, brine ORDER Cladocera FAMILY Daphnidae Daphnia (all species in genus) flea, water ORDER Decapoda FAMILY Atelecyclidae Erimacrus isenbeckii crab, horsehair FAMILY Cancridae Cancer antennarius crab, California rock Cancer anthonyi crab, yellowstone Cancer borealis crab, Jonah Cancer magister crab, dungeness Cancer productus crab, rock (red) FAMILY Geryonidae Geryon affinis crab, golden FAMILY Lithodidae Paralithodes camtschatica crab, Alaskan king FAMILY Majidae Chionocetes bairdi crab, snow Chionocetes opilio crab, snow 1 CONDITIONAL ANIMAL LIST §4-71-6.5 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Chionocetes tanneri crab, snow FAMILY Nephropidae Homarus (all species in genus) lobster, true FAMILY Palaemonidae Macrobrachium lar shrimp, freshwater Macrobrachium rosenbergi prawn, giant long-legged FAMILY Palinuridae Jasus (all species in genus) crayfish, saltwater; lobster Panulirus argus lobster, Atlantic spiny Panulirus longipes femoristriga crayfish, saltwater Panulirus pencillatus lobster, spiny FAMILY Portunidae Callinectes sapidus crab, blue Scylla serrata crab, Samoan; serrate, swimming FAMILY Raninidae Ranina ranina crab, spanner; red frog, Hawaiian CLASS Insecta ORDER Coleoptera FAMILY Tenebrionidae Tenebrio molitor mealworm, -
Ecomorphological Patterns of the Fish Assemblage in a Tropical Floodplain: Effects of Trophic, Spatial and Phylogenetic Structures
Neotropical Ichthyology, 8(3):569-586, 2010 Copyright © 2010 Sociedade Brasileira de Ictiologia Ecomorphological patterns of the fish assemblage in a tropical floodplain: effects of trophic, spatial and phylogenetic structures Edson Fontes Oliveira1,2, Erivelto Goulart1, Luciani Breda1, Carolina Viviana Minte-Vera1, Luiz Ricardo de Souza Paiva1 and Melina Rizzato Vismara1 Ecomorphological patterns of the fish assemblage from the upper Paraná River floodplain, Brazil, were described and evaluated according to trophic (guilds), spatial (habitats) and phylogenetic (taxonomic distances) structures. The samples were obtained through the Long Term Research Project (LTER-CNPq/UEM/NUPELIA) in August and October 2001. Thirty-five species were analyzed from thirty-one morphological variables. Strong significant correlations (Mantel test) between morphology and trophic guilds and between morphology and taxonomy were found, while morphology and habitat revealed a weak correlation. However, the partial Mantel test showed that the correlations between morphology and trophic guilds persist even when the effect of taxonomy is discounted. The ecomorphological pattern shown by the Principal Component Analysis separated species according to locomotion structures used in feeding. At one extreme there are the piscivores and insectivores that exploit lentic habitats and have compressed bodies and well developed anal fins, while at the other there are detritivores and invertivores that exploit lotic and semi-lotic habitats and have depressed bodies and well developed pectoral, pelvic and caudal fins. Canonical Discriminant Analysis using ecomorphological variables successfully predicted 94.5% of the trophic guild ecomorphotypes, but only 57.1% of the habitat ecomorphotypes. These data indicate that the fish assemblage of the upper Paraná River floodplain is structured ecomorphologically mainly according to trophic structure rather than habitat. -
Interindividual Size Heteromorphism of NOR and Chromosomal Location of 5S Rrna Genes in Iheringichthys Labrosus
141 Vol.50, n. 1 : pp.141-146, January 2007 ISSN 1516-8913 Printed in Brazil BRAZILIAN ARCHIVES OF BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL Interindividual Size Heteromorphism of NOR and Chromosomal Location of 5S rRNA Genes in Iheringichthys labrosus Rafael Augusto de Carvalho and Ana Lúcia Dias * Universidade Estadual de Londrina; Departamento de Biologia Geral; CCB; [email protected]; C. P. 6001; 86051-970; Londrina - PR - Brasil ABSTRACT Twenty-five specimens of Iheringichthys labrosus from the Capivara Reservoir were analysed cytogenetically. AgNORs were detected in a pair of ST chromosomes, in the telomeric region of the long arm. Some individuals showed size heteromorphism of this region between homologous chromosomes. Treatment with CMA 3 displayed GC-rich regions corresponding to the AgNOR pair, plus other fluorescent staining. In situ hybridization by fluorescence (FISH) with the 18S rDNA probe showed only one pair of stained chromosomes, confirming the heteromorphism observed with AgNO 3 and CMA 3 in some individuals. The 5S rDNA probe revealed telomeric staining on the long arm of a pair of chromosomes of the ST-A group, probably different from the NOR pair. Key words : F ish chromosome, AgNOR, in situ hibridization, chromomycin A 3, heteromorphism INTRODUCTION used in chromosome preparations of fish to demonstrate the location of NORs, because Ribosomal cistrons are organized in multiple according to Salvadori et al . (1995), these regions copies that are repeated in tandem throughout the are associated with DNA families rich in GC cellular genome. Two different arrangements are bases. More recently, FISH with rDNA probes has known: one that contains 45S ribosomal DNA been utilized with precision to determine the exact (rDNA) which codes for 28S, 5.8S and 18S location and number of ribosomal cístrons. -
Species Richness and Functional Structure of Fish Assemblages in Three Freshwater Habitats: Effects of Environmental Factors and Management
Received: 13 March 2019 Accepted: 26 July 2019 DOI: 10.1111/jfb.14109 REGULAR PAPER FISH Species richness and functional structure of fish assemblages in three freshwater habitats: effects of environmental factors and management Jamile Queiroz-Sousa1,2 | Sally A. Keith2,3 | Gianmarco S. David4 | Heleno Brandão5 | André B. Nobile1 | Jaciara V. K. Paes1 | Ana C. Souto1 | Felipe P. Lima1 | Reinaldo J. Silva1 | Raoul Henry1 | Katherine Richardson2 1Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University, Botucatu, Brazil Abstract 2Center for Macroecology, Evolution and In this study, the inverted trophic hypothesis was tested in the freshwater fish com- Climate, Natural History Museum of Denmark, munities of a reservoir. The distribution of fish species in three freshwater habitats in University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark the Jurumirim Reservoir, Brazil, was examined using both species richness and the 3Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster relative proportions of different trophic groups. These groups were used as a proxy University, Lancaster, UK for functional structure in an attempt to test the ability of these measures to assess 4Agencia Paulista de Tecnologia do Agronegócio (APTA), Jaú, Brazil fish diversity. Assemblage structures were first described using non-metric multi- 5Paraná Federal Technology University, Santa dimensional scaling (NMDS). The influence of environmental conditions for multiple Helena, Brazil fish assemblage response variables (richness, total abundance and abundance per tro- Correspondence phic group) was tested using generalised linear mixed models (GLMM). The metric Jamile Queiroz-Sousa, Institute of Biosciences, typically employed to describe diversity; that is, species richness, was not related to São Paulo State University, Prof. Dr. Antônio Celso Wagner Zanin street, 250, 18618-689 - environmental conditions. -
Pleistocene Drainage Changes in Uncompahgre Plateau-Grand
New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/32 Pleistocene drainage changes in Uncompahgre Plateau-Grand Valley region of western Colorado, including formation and abandonment of Unaweep Canyon: a hypothesis Scott Sinnock, 1981, pp. 127-136 in: Western Slope (Western Colorado), Epis, R. C.; Callender, J. F.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 32nd Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 337 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1981 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States. -
A Comparison of Flooded Forest and Floating Meadow Fish Assemblages
Journal of Fish Biology (2008) 72, 629–644 doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01752.x, available online at http://www.blackwell-synergy.com A comparison of flooded forest and floating meadow fish assemblages in an upper Amazon floodplain S. B. CORREA*†,W.G.R.CRAMPTON‡, L. J. CHAPMAN§k AND J. S. ALBERT{ *Zoology Department, University of Florida, 223 Bartram Hall, Gainesville, FL 32611–8525, U.S.A.,‡Department of Biology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816-2368, U.S.A.,§McGill University, Biology Department, 1205 Avenue Docteur Penfield, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1B1 Canada, kWildlife Conservation Society, 2300 Southern Boulevard, Bronx, NY 10460, U.S.A. and {Department of Biology, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA 70504-2451, U.S.A. (Received 31 August 2006, Accepted 20 October 2007) Matched sets of gillnets of different mesh-sizes were used to evaluate the degree to which contiguous and connected flooded forest and floating meadow habitats are characterized by distinct fish faunas during the flooding season in the Peruvian Amazon. For fishes between 38–740 mm standard length (LS) (the size range captured by the gear), an overriding pattern of faunal similarity emerged between these two habitats. The mean species richness, diversity, abundance, fish mass, mean and maximum LS, and maximum mass did not differ significantly between flooded forest and floating meadows. Species abundances followed a log-normal distribution in which three species accounted for 60–70% of the total abundance in each habitat. Despite these similarities, multivariate analyses demonstrated subtle differences in species composition between flooded forest and adjacent floating macrophytes. -
Inland Waters
477 Fish, crustaceans, molluscs, etc Capture production by species items America, South - Inland waters C-03 Poissons, crustacés, mollusques, etc Captures par catégories d'espèces Amérique du Sud - Eaux continentales (a) Peces, crustáceos, moluscos, etc Capturas por categorías de especies América del Sur - Aguas continentales English name Scientific name Species group Nom anglais Nom scientifique Groupe d'espèces 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Nombre inglés Nombre científico Grupo de especies t t t t t t t Common carp Cyprinus carpio 11 321 114 134 179 169 46 240 Cyprinids nei Cyprinidae 11 425 429 423 400 400 400 400 ...A Caquetaia kraussii 12 ... ... 11 182 111 559 64 Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus 12 5 7 3 6 255 257 159 Tilapias nei Oreochromis (=Tilapia) spp 12 9 133 9 210 9 093 8 690 8 600 8 600 8 600 Oscar Astronotus ocellatus 12 1 847 1 862 1 951 1 941 1 825 1 813 1 815 Velvety cichlids Astronotus spp 12 391 385 318 571 330 345 334 Green terror Aequidens rivulatus 12 26 38 20 24 36 30 34 Cichlids nei Cichlidae 12 13 013 13 123 12 956 12 400 12 403 12 735 12 428 Arapaima Arapaima gigas 13 1 478 1 504 1 484 2 232 1 840 2 441 1 647 Arawana Osteoglossum bicirrhosum 13 1 642 1 656 1 635 1 570 1 571 2 200 2 056 Banded astyanax Astyanax fasciatus 13 1 043 1 052 1 039 1 000 1 000 1 000 1 000 ...A Brycon orbignyanus 13 8 8 8 8 8 9 14 ...A Brycon dentex 13 35 20 5 6 11 10 6 ...A Brycon spp 13 .. -
Westport, Connecticut Department of Public Works Town Hall, 110 Myrtle Avenue Westport, Connecticut 06880 (203) 341 1120
WESTPORT, CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TOWN HALL, 110 MYRTLE AVENUE WESTPORT, CONNECTICUT 06880 (203) 341 1120 MEMORANDUM Date: 04/08/2020 To: Conservation Commission From: Edward Gill, Engineer II Re: 222 Wilton Road, Appl. #IWW-10978-20 Reference Materials Reviewed: Application, Westport Conservation Commission, dated 03/12/2020. Plan prepared by J. Edwards & Associates, LLC entitled “Proposed Site Plan, Lot B, 222 Wilton Road, Westport, Connecticut,” dated 08/10/2015 as revised to 01/28/2016. Plan prepared by Brautigam Land Surveyors, P.C. entitled “Improvement Location Survey Prepared for FBCH CT Holdings LLC, 222 Westport – Wilton Road, Westport, Connecticut,” dated 01/15/2019. Plan prepared by Landtech entitled “Proposed Site Improvement Plan, Prepared for FBCH Holdings, LLC, 222 Wilton Road, Westport, CT,” dated 02/05/2020 as revised to 04/08/2020. Corresponding Stormwater Management Report dated 03/11/2020. Dear Conservation Commission: Our office has reviewed the proposed activity as depicted by the above referenced documents. Based on these criteria, we offer the following comments: 1. Project Description. The applicant is proposing to legalize changes to a previously approved permit for a single-family residence. These changes include construction of a patio and placement of significant fill within the 100-foot upland review setback from wetlands located on a neighboring property. The applicant is also proposing to remove a septic system installed within the 100-foot setback, construct a code complying system outside the setback, and remove a portion of the driveway previously approved for removal. 2. Flood & Erosion Control Board (FECB). The project will be subject to an administrative review from the associated staff. -
Violent Crimes in Aid of Racketeering 18 U.S.C. § 1959 a Manual for Federal Prosecutors
Violent Crimes in Aid of Racketeering 18 U.S.C. § 1959 A Manual for Federal Prosecutors December 2006 Prepared by the Staff of the Organized Crime and Racketeering Section U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20005 (202) 514-3594 Frank J. Marine, Consultant Douglas E. Crow, Principal Deputy Chief Amy Chang Lee, Assistant Chief Robert C. Dalton Merv Hamburg Gregory C.J. Lisa Melissa Marquez-Oliver David J. Stander Catherine M. Weinstock Cover Design by Linda M. Baer PREFACE This manual is intended to assist federal prosecutors in the preparation and litigation of cases involving the Violent Crimes in Aid of Racketeering Statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1959. Prosecutors are encouraged to contact the Organized Crime and Racketeering Section (OCRS) early in the preparation of their case for advice and assistance. All pleadings alleging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1959 including any indictment, information, or criminal complaint, and a prosecution memorandum must be submitted to OCRS for review and approval before being filed with the court. The submission should be approved by the prosecutor’s office before being submitted to OCRS. Due to the volume of submissions received by OCRS, prosecutors should submit the proposal three weeks prior to the date final approval is needed. Prosecutors should contact OCRS regarding the status of the proposed submission before finally scheduling arrests or other time-sensitive actions relating to the submission. Moreover, prosecutors should refrain from finalizing any guilty plea agreement containing a Section 1959 charge until final approval has been obtained from OCRS. The policies and procedures set forth in this manual and elsewhere relating to 18 U.S.C. -
Great Glen Trails Special Use Permit Trail and Warming Hut Construction
United States Department of Agriculture Great Glen Trails Forest Special Use Permit Service Trail and Warming Hut August 2005 Construction Scoping Report Androscoggin Ranger District White Mountain National Forest Greens Grant Coos County, New Hampshire For Information Contact: Joe Gill Eastern Region Winter Sports Team Specialist Androscoggin Ranger District White Mountain National Forest 300 Glen Road Gorham, NH 03581 (603)466-2713, ext 221 FAX/TTY (603) 466-2856 www.fs.fed.us/r9/white or Susan Howle Interdisciplinary Team Leader Eastern Region Winter Sports Team 99 Ranger Road Rochester, VT 05767 (802)767-4261 ext 543 FAX/TTY (802)767-4777 Page 1 of 5 What is the Forest Service Proposing? The Androscoggin Ranger District of the White Mountain National Forest has received a special use permit application from Great Glen. They are proposing to construct and maintain 1.3 miles of cross-country ski trails and a warming hut approximately 20 feet by 20 feet. Great Glen feels that there is a need to expand their trail system to service the northern New Hampshire cross-country skiing population to offer more varied and challenging terrain and provide a more efficient trail system. All of the additional trail system and warming hut will occur inside their current trail system area (Figure 2). Background Great Glen Trails operates a Nordic ski area on lands conveyed by its parent company, the Mount Washington Summit Road Company (Auto Road), to the United States in 1993 (Figure 1). Upon conveyance, the Auto Road retained easements for a trail system. Several of these easements have proven to be impractical to construct without creating undesirable impacts on the natural resources in the area. -
! 1! a Millennium-Length Reconstruction of Bear River Stream Flow, Utah 1! 2
1! A millennium-length reconstruction of Bear River stream flow, Utah 2! 3! DeRose, R.J., USDA, Forest Service, Forest Inventory and Analysis, Rocky Mountain Research 4! Station, 507 25th Street Ogden, UT 84401, Email: [email protected], Phone: 801-625- 5! 5795 6! Bekker, M.F., Department of Geography, 690 SWKT, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 7! 84602. 8! Wang, S.-Y., Plant, Soil, and Climate Department, 4820 Old Main Hill, Utah State University, 9! Logan, UT 84322-4820. 10! Buckley, B.M., Tree Ring Lab, Room 108, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia 11! University, 61 Route 9W, Palisades, NY 10964 12! Kjelgren, R.K., Plant, Soil, and Climate Department, 4820 Old Main Hill, Utah State University, 13! Logan, UT 84322-4820. 14! Bardsley, T, Western Water Assessment, 2242 West North Temple, Salt Lake City, UT 84116. 15! Rittenour, T.M., Department of Geology, 4505 Old Main Hill, Utah State University, Logan, UT 16! 84322-4505. 17! Allen, E.B., United States Geological Survey, 4200 New Haven Road, Columbia, MO 65201. 18! 19! 1! ! 20! Abstract: The Bear River contributes more water to the eastern Great Basin than any other river 21! system. It is also the most significant source of water for the burgeoning Wasatch Front 22! metropolitan area in Northern Utah. Despite its importance for water resources for the region’s 23! agricultural, urban, and wildlife needs, our understanding of the variability of Bear River’s 24! stream flow derives entirely from the short instrumental record (1943-2010). Here we present a 25! 1,200-year calibrated and verified tree-ring reconstruction of stream flow for the Bear River that 26! explains 67% of the variance of the instrumental record over the period from 1943-2010.