Evaluation of Tolerance to Brown Rot Caused by Monilia Iaxa (Aderhold and Ruhland) Honey, in Peach Germplasm (Prunus Persica (L.) Batsch)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evaluation of Tolerance to Brown Rot Caused by Monilia Iaxa (Aderhold and Ruhland) Honey, in Peach Germplasm (Prunus Persica (L.) Batsch) 2019 118 Vitus Ikechukwu Obi Evaluation of tolerance to brown rot caused by Monilia Iaxa (Aderhold and Ruhland) Honey, in peach germplasm (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) Departamento Ciencias Agrarias y del Medio Natural Director/es BARRIUSO VARGAS, JUAN JOSÉ GOGORCENA AOIZ, YOLANDA Reconocimiento – NoComercial – © Universidad de Zaragoza SinObraDerivada (by-nc-nd): No se Servicio de Publicaciones permite un uso comercial de la obra original ni la generación de obras derivadas. ISSN 2254-7606 Tesis Doctoral EVALUATION OF TOLERANCE TO BROWN ROT CAUSED BY MONILIA IAXA (ADERHOLD AND RUHLAND) HONEY, IN PEACH GERMPLASM (PRUNUS PERSICA (L.) BATSCH) Autor Vitus Ikechukwu Obi Director/es BARRIUSO VARGAS, JUAN JOSÉ GOGORCENA AOIZ, YOLANDA UNIVERSIDAD DE ZARAGOZA Ciencias Agrarias y del Medio Natural 2018 Repositorio de la Universidad de Zaragoza – Zaguan http://zaguan.unizar.es PhD thesis Evaluation of tolerance to brown rot caused by Monilinia laxa (Aderhold and Ruhland) Honey, in peach germplasm (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) Vitus Ikechukwu Obi Zaragoza, 2018 PhD Supervisors: Yolanda Gogorcena (Dr.) Juan Jose Barriuso (Dr.) INFORME FAVORABLE DE LOS DIRECTORES DE LA TESIS Los abajo firmantes Dra. Yolanda Gogorcena Aoiz y Dr. Juan J. Barriuso Vargas, como co- directores de la tesis doctoral realizada por Vitus Ikechukwu Obi con el título “EVALUATION OF TOLERANCE TO BROWN ROT CAUSED BY MONILINIA LAXA (ADERHOLD AND RUHLAND) HONEY, IN PEACH GERMPLASM (PRUNUS PERSICA (L.) BATSCH)” Informan favorablemente: que el contenido de esta tesis doctoral se corresponde con el proyecto de tesis aprobado en su momento. Los objetivos planteados se han alcanzado satisfactoriamente, y el trabajo realizado cumple los requisitos de calidad y originalidad que establece la normativa vigente. Y los resultados obtenidos son de interés académico, práctico y científico y las conclusiones obtenidas pueden servir de base para futuras líneas de investigación teórica y aplicada. Todo lo cual se hace costar a los efectos de la admisión a trámite de la tesis doctoral. En Zaragoza a 30 de mayo de 2018 Fdo. Dra. Yolanda Gogorcena Aoiz Fdo. Dr. Juan J. Barriuso Vargas ACKNOWLEDGMENTS My special thanks go to Drs Yolanda Gogorcena and Juan Jose Barriuso both of whom accepted to direct and supervise this thesis. I thank Dr. Marian Moreno for her assistance in the course of the project. I acknowledge the roles of Dr. Jesús Val Falcón, director of Aula dei CSIC and Sr. Jose Antonio Dominguez, director of CITA for their administrative roles in the success of the project. To Dr. Sergio Sánchez (CITA), Dr. Joaquín Aiber (UNIZAR) and Dr. Jesus Carlos (Mecohisa) once more I expressed my immense gratitude. I must not fail to acknowledge the inputs of the secretary of the department, Madam Yolanda Ubieto and Dr. Ana Olaizola, especially towards the most difficult period of the thesis. I appreciate the company of my colleagues, both at CITA and Aula Dei, including persons like Alex, Maria, Luis, Karina and Rosa. The requisite role, of the members of my family, especially from my lovely spouse, Chinwe; children, Chike and Chinenye; and nephew, Chibuike to the accomplishment of the mission is highly treasured. I express my gratitude to Barr. C.N.Obi (Big daddy) of Obiukwu chambers and Chief (Hon.) A.C.Obi of ASCON pharmacy for their steady show of concern and love at all times. Finally I want to thank Prof. (Dr.) C. E. Akujor (FUTO) for his invaluable counsel and inspiration. This study has been supported by a research grant, (AGL2014-52063R and AGL2017-83358-R) by the MINECO / the Government of Aragón and FEDER / ESF, respectively, through Dr. Yolanda Gogorcena; I can`t thank them enough. El que no ama no ha llegado a conocer a Dios, porque Dios es amor (1 Juan 4:8). INDEX OF CONTENTS Index of tables------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ iii Index of figures----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- iv Summary------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Resumen------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 General introduction--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 Review: Peach brown rot: Still in search of an ideal management option------------------- 7 1. Introduction----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 2. The Peach--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 2.1. Geography and ecological requirement of peaches------------------------------------------- 9 2.2. Botany and susceptibility of peach----------------------------------------------------------------- 10 2.3. Economic significance of peach--------------------------------------------------------------------- 12 3. Brown rot--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 14 3.1. Monilinia spp.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 14 3.2. Geographical distribution of the species of Monilinia----------------------------------------- 15 3.3. Life cycle of the species of Monilinia-------------------------------------------------------------- 16 3.4. Ecological requirements of Monilinia species--------------------------------------------------- 17 3.5. Characterization and identification of Monilinia species------------------------------------- 18 3.5.1. Classical methods------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 18 3.5.2. Molecular methods---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 20 3.5.3. Limitations of molecular methods--------------------------------------------------------------- 22 4. Host-pathogen interactions--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 23 5. Other management strategies to control brown rot in peach ------------------------------ 25 5.1. Biological control--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 25 5.2. Conventional fungicide treatments---------------------------------------------------------------- 27 5.3. Limitations in the use of conventional fungicides---------------------------------------------- 28 5.4. Botanical fungicides------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 28 5.5. Physical measures to control brown rot in peaches------------------------------------------- 29 5.6. Host Resistance and Genetic Management ----------------------------------------------------- 31 6. Breeding for Tolerant Cultivars or Genotypes --------------------------------------------------- 31 6.1. In-situ and ex-situ screening methods to evaluate brown rot tolerance----------------- 33 6.2. Plant parts and screening for disease tolerance------------------------------------------------ 34 6.3. Procedures for spore production and inoculation in lieu of brown rot susceptibility screening------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 34 7. Conclusions------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 36 8. Compliance with Ethical Standard------------------------------------------------------------------- 36 9. References------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 37 General objectives------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 49 General conceptual framework-------------------------------------------------------------------------- 53 Chapter I. Optimizing protocols to evaluate brown rot (Monilinia laxa) susceptibility in peach and nectarine fruits (Australasian Plant Pathology 46:183-189) ------------------- 57 Abstract-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 59 i I-1. Introduction---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 59 I-2. Materials and Methods------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 60 I-2.1. Plant material------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 60 I-2.2. Pathogen culture------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 61 I-2.3. Conidia production and inoculation-------------------------------------------------------------- 61 I-2.4. Incubation and brown rot evaluation------------------------------------------------------------ 62 I-3. Results----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 64 I-4. Discussion------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 64 I-5. Conclusions----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 66 I-6. Acknowledgments-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 67 I-7. References------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 67 Chapter II. Effects of pH and titratable acidity on the growth and development of Monilinia laxa (Aderh. & Ruhl.) in-vitro and in-vivo (European Journal of Plant Pathology)----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recommended publications
  • Fungal Community in Olive Fruits of Cultivars with Different
    Biological Control 110 (2017) 1–9 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Control journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ybcon Fungal community in olive fruits of cultivars with different susceptibilities MARK to anthracnose and selection of isolates to be used as biocontrol agents ⁎ Gilda Preto, Fátima Martins, José Alberto Pereira, Paula Baptista CIMO, School of Agriculture, Polytechnic Institute of Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Olive anthracnose is an important fruit disease in olive crop worldwide. Because of the importance of microbial Olea europaea phyllosphere to plant health, this work evaluated the effect of cultivar on endophytic and epiphytic fungal Colletotrichum acutatum communities by studying their diversity in olives of two cultivars with different susceptibilities to anthracnose. Endophytes The biocontrol potency of native isolates against Colletotrichum acutatum, the main causal agent of this disease, Epiphytes was further evaluated using the dual-culture method. Fungal community of both cultivars encompassed a Cultivar effect complex species consortium including phytopathogens and antagonists. Host genotype was important in shaping Biocontrol endophytic but not epiphytic fungal communities, although some host-specific fungal genera were found within epiphytic community. Epiphytic and endophytic fungal communities also differed in size and in composition in olives of both cultivars, probably due to differences in physical and chemical nature of the two habitats. Fungal tested were able to inhibited C. acutatum growth (inhibition coefficients up to 30.9), sporulation (from 46 to 86%) and germination (from 21 to 74%), and to caused abnormalities in pathogenic hyphae. This finding could open opportunities to select specific beneficial microbiome by selecting particular cultivar and highlighted the potential use of these fungi in the biocontrol of olive anthracnose.
    [Show full text]
  • Peach Brown Rot: Still in Search of an Ideal Management Option
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Repositorio Universidad de Zaragoza agriculture Review Peach Brown Rot: Still in Search of an Ideal Management Option Vitus Ikechukwu Obi 1,2, Juan José Barriuso 2 and Yolanda Gogorcena 1,* ID 1 Experimental Station of Aula Dei-CSIC, Avda de Montañana 1005, 50059 Zaragoza, Spain; [email protected] 2 AgriFood Institute of Aragon (IA2), CITA-Universidad de Zaragoza, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-97-671-6133 Received: 15 June 2018; Accepted: 4 August 2018; Published: 9 August 2018 Abstract: The peach is one of the most important global tree crops within the economically important Rosaceae family. The crop is threatened by numerous pests and diseases, especially fungal pathogens, in the field, in transit, and in the store. More than 50% of the global post-harvest loss has been ascribed to brown rot disease, especially in peach late-ripening varieties. In recent years, the disease has been so manifest in the orchards that some stone fruits were abandoned before harvest. In Spain, particularly, the disease has been associated with well over 60% of fruit loss after harvest. The most common management options available for the control of this disease involve agronomical, chemical, biological, and physical approaches. However, the effects of biochemical fungicides (biological and conventional fungicides), on the environment, human health, and strain fungicide resistance, tend to revise these control strategies. This review aims to comprehensively compile the information currently available on the species of the fungus Monilinia, which causes brown rot in peach, and the available options to control the disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Monilinia Fructicola, Monilinia Laxa and Monilinia Fructigena, the Causal Agents of Brown Rot on Stone Fruits Rita M
    De Miccolis Angelini et al. BMC Genomics (2018) 19:436 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4817-4 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access De novo assembly and comparative transcriptome analysis of Monilinia fructicola, Monilinia laxa and Monilinia fructigena, the causal agents of brown rot on stone fruits Rita M. De Miccolis Angelini* , Domenico Abate, Caterina Rotolo, Donato Gerin, Stefania Pollastro and Francesco Faretra Abstract Background: Brown rots are important fungal diseases of stone and pome fruits. They are caused by several Monilinia species but M. fructicola, M. laxa and M. fructigena are the most common all over the world. Although they have been intensively studied, the availability of genomic and transcriptomic data in public databases is still scant. We sequenced, assembled and annotated the transcriptomes of the three pathogens using mRNA from germinating conidia and actively growing mycelia of two isolates of opposite mating types per each species for comparative transcriptome analyses. Results: Illumina sequencing was used to generate about 70 million of paired-end reads per species, that were de novo assembled in 33,861 contigs for M. fructicola, 31,103 for M. laxa and 28,890 for M. fructigena. Approximately, 50% of the assembled contigs had significant hits when blasted against the NCBI non-redundant protein database and top-hits results were represented by Botrytis cinerea, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and Sclerotinia borealis proteins. More than 90% of the obtained sequences were complete, the percentage of duplications was always less than 14% and fragmented and missing transcripts less than 5%. Orthologous transcripts were identified by tBLASTn analysis using the B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brown Rot Fungi of Fruit Crops {Moniliniaspp.), with Special
    Thebrow n rot fungi of fruit crops {Monilinia spp.),wit h special reference to Moniliniafructigena (Aderh. &Ruhl. )Hone y Promotor: Dr.M.J .Jege r Hoogleraar Ecologische fytopathologie Co-promotor: Dr.R.P .Baaye n sectiehoofd Mycologie, Plantenziektenkundige DienstWageninge n MM:-: G.C.M. van Leeuwen The brown rot fungi of fruit crops (Monilinia spp.), with special reference to Moniliniafructigena (Aderh. & Ruhl.) Honey Proefschrift terverkrijgin g vand egraa dva n doctor opgeza g vand erecto r magnificus van Wageningen Universiteit, Dr.ir .L .Speelman , inhe topenbaa r te verdedigen opwoensda g 4oktobe r 2000 desnamiddag st e 16.00i nd eAula . V Bibliographic data Van Leeuwen, G.C.M.,200 0 Thebrow nro t fungi of fruit crops (Monilinia spp.),wit h specialreferenc e toMonilinia fructigena (Aderh. &Ruhl. )Hone y PhD ThesisWageninge n University, Wageningen, The Netherlands Withreferences - With summary inEnglis h andDutch . ISBN 90-5808-272-5 Theresearc h was financed byth eCommissio n ofth eEuropea n Communities, Agriculture and Fisheries (FAIR) specific RTD programme, Fair 1 - 0725, 'Development of diagnostic methods and a rapid field kit for monitoring Monilinia rot of stone and pome fruit, especially M.fructicola'. It does not necessarily reflect its views and in no way anticipates the Commission's future policy inthi s area. Financial support wasreceive d from theDutc hPlan t Protection Service (PD)an d Wageningen University, TheNetherlands . BIBLIOTMEFK LANDBOUWUNlVl.-.KSP'Kin WAGEMIN'GEN Stellingen 1.D eJapans e populatieva nMonilia fructigena isolaten verschilt zodanig van dieva n de Europese populatie,morfologisc h zowel als genetisch, datbeide n alsverschillend e soorten beschouwd dienen te worden.
    [Show full text]
  • Study of the Genetic Variability of Peach in Susceptibility to Brown Rot During Fruit Development in Relation with Changes in Ph
    Study of the genetic variability of peach in susceptibility to brown rot during fruit development in relation with changes in physical and biochemical characteristics of the fruit Leandro de Oliveira Lino To cite this version: Leandro de Oliveira Lino. Study of the genetic variability of peach in susceptibility to brown rot during fruit development in relation with changes in physical and biochemical characteristics of the fruit. Agricultural sciences. Université d’Avignon, 2016. English. NNT : 2016AVIG0677. tel- 01635960 HAL Id: tel-01635960 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01635960 Submitted on 16 Nov 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. ACADEMIE D’AIX-MARSEILLE UNIVERSITE D’AVIGNON ET DES PAYS DE VAUCLUSE THESE Présentée pour obtenir le grade de Docteur en Sciences De l’Université d’Avignon et des Pays de Vaucluse Spécialité : Sciences Agronomiques Etude de la variabilité génétique de la sensibilité à la pourriture brune au cours du développement du fruit chez la pêche en lien avec l’évolution des caractéristiques biochimiques
    [Show full text]
  • Monilinia Species Causing Brown Rot of Peach in China
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by PubMed Central Monilinia Species Causing Brown Rot of Peach in China Meng-Jun Hu1, Kerik D. Cox2, Guido Schnabel3, Chao-Xi Luo1* 1 Department of Plant Pathology, College of Plant Science and Technology and the Key Lab of Crop Disease Monitoring & Safety Control in Hubei Province, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, People’s Republic of China, 2 Department of Plant Pathology and Plant–Microbe Biology, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Cornell University, Geneva, New York, United States of America, 3 Department of Entomology, Soils, and Plant Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, United States of America Abstract In this study, 145 peaches and nectarines displaying typical brown rot symptoms were collected from multiple provinces in China. A subsample of 26 single-spore isolates were characterized phylogenetically and morphologically to ascertain species. Phylogenetic analysis of internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions 1 and 2, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (G3PDH), b-tubulin (TUB2) revealed the presence of three distinct Monilinia species. These species included Monilinia fructicola, Monilia mumecola, and a previously undescribed species designated Monilia yunnanensis sp. nov. While M. fructicola is a well-documented pathogen of Prunus persica in China, M. mumecola had primarily only been isolated from mume fruit in Japan. Koch’s postulates for M. mumecola and M. yunnanensis were fulfilled confirming pathogenicity of the two species on peach. Phylogenetic analysis of ITS, G3PDH, and TUB2 sequences indicated that M. yunnanensis is most closely related to M. fructigena, a species widely prevalent in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Monilinia Species of Fruit Decay: a Comparison Between Biological and Epidemiological Data ______Alessandra Di Francesco, Marta Mari
    A. Di Francesco, M. Mari Italian Journal of Mycology vol. 47 (2018) ISSN 2531-7342 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2531-7342/7817 Monilinia species of fruit decay: a comparison between biological and epidemiological data ___________________________________________ Alessandra Di Francesco, Marta Mari CRIOF - Department of Agricultural and Food Science, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna Via Gandolfi, 19, 40057 Cadriano, Bologna, Italy Correspondig Author e-mail: [email protected] Abstract The fungal genus Monilinia Honey includes parasitic species of Rosaceae and Ericaceae. The Monilinia genus shows a great heterogeneity, it is divided in two sections: Junctoriae and Disjunctoriae. These sections were defined by Batra (1991) on the basis of morphology, infection biology, and host specialization. Junctoriae spp. produce mitospore chains without disjunctors, they are parasites of Rosaceae spp.; M. laxa, M. fructicola, M. fructigena and recently M. polystroma, represent the principal species of the section, and they are responsible of economically important diseases of Rosaceae, new species such as M. yunnanensis, and M. mumecola could afflict European fruits in the future in absence of a strict phytosanitary control. The Disjunctoriae section includes species that produce mitospores intercalated by appendages (disjunctors); they parasitize Rosaceae, Ericaceae, and Empetraceae. The principal Disjunctoriae species are M. vaccinii-corymbosi, M. urnula, M. baccarum, M. oxycocci, and M. linhartiana. This study has the aim to underline the importance of Monilinia spp., and to describe their features. Keywords: Monilinia spp; Junctoriae; Disjunctoriae; Prunus; Vaccinium Riassunto Il genere Monilinia Honey include diverse specie che attaccano in particolar modo le piante delle famiglie Rosaceae ed Ericaceae. Monilinia è un genere molto eterogeneo, infatti è suddiviso in due sezioni: Junctoriae e Disjunctoriae.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Nature, Symptoms and Genetic Diversity of Monilinia Isolates and Their Viruses in Western Australia
    ON THE NATURE, SYMPTOMS AND GENETIC DIVERSITY OF MONILINIA ISOLATES AND THEIR VIRUSES IN WESTERN AUSTRALIA Thesis is presented by Thao Thi Tran For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at School of Veterinary and Life Sciences Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia 2019 DECLARATION I declare that this work is my own account of my research, and it contains as its main content work which has not previously been submitted for a degree at any tertiary education institution. To the best of my knowledge, it contains no material or work performed by others, published or unpublished without reference being made within the text. Date: Thao Thi Tran 1 ABSTRACT Monilinia species occur in stone fruit (Prunus species) production areas in many parts of the world, where they cause the serious disease brown rot. Incursion into Western Australia (W.A.) by Monilinia fructicola was declared in 1997, and along with Monilinia laxa has subsequent spread throughout the state has cost the stone fruit industry millions of dollars in lost production and the cost of fungicidal sprays. Until this study, no studies had been made in W.A. of Monilinia species identity, genetic diversity, distribution, virulence, fungicide tolerance or presence of mycoviruses. This project aimed to address these knowledge gaps. A collection of Monilinia isolates was made across the major stone fruit production regions in W.A., and the fungal species were identified. Both species were present, but they were not evenly distributed between and within production regions, indicating the main agent of spread is people. High levels of genetic diversity have been reported for WA population, and both pathogens are not recently introduced in this state.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mycobiome of Symptomatic Wood of Prunus Trees in Germany
    The mycobiome of symptomatic wood of Prunus trees in Germany Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät I – Biowissenschaften – der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg vorgelegt von Herrn Steffen Bien Geb. am 29.07.1985 in Berlin Copyright notice Chapters 2 to 4 have been published in international journals. Only the publishers and the authors have the right for publishing and using the presented data. Any re-use of the presented data requires permissions from the publishers and the authors. Content III Content Summary .................................................................................................................. IV Zusammenfassung .................................................................................................. VI Abbreviations ......................................................................................................... VIII 1 General introduction ............................................................................................. 1 1.1 Importance of fungal diseases of wood and the knowledge about the associated fungal diversity ...................................................................................... 1 1.2 Host-fungus interactions in wood and wood diseases ....................................... 2 1.3 The genus Prunus ............................................................................................. 4 1.4 Diseases and fungal communities of Prunus wood ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Identification and Variability of Monilinia Spp. Isolates from Peach
    Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias ISSN: 1981-1160 [email protected] Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco Brasil Vergara Casarin, Josiane; Casa-Coila, Victor Hugo; Rossetto, Edemar Antônio; Bianchi, Valmor João Identification and variability of Monilinia spp. isolates from peach Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias, vol. 12, núm. 4, 2017, pp. 421-427 Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco Pernambuco, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=119054185005 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias ISSN (on line) 1981-0997 v.12, n.4, p.421-427, 2017 Recife, PE, UFRPE. www.agraria.ufrpe.br DOI:10.5039/agraria.v12i4a5471 Protocolo 5471 - 24/02/2016 • Aprovado em 21/07/2017 Identification and variability of Monilinia spp. isolates from peach Josiane Vergara Casarin1, Victor Hugo Casa-Coila1, Edemar Antônio Rossetto1, Valmor João Bianchi2 1 Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Faculdade de Agronomia Eliseu Maciel, Departamento de Fitossanidade, Jardim América, CEP 96010-900, Capão do Leão-RS, Brasil. Caixa Postal 354. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 2 Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Instituto de Biologia, Departamento de Botânica. Campus Universitário, Jardim América, CEP 96010-900, Capão do Leão-RS, Brasil. Caixa Postal 354. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The brown rot caused by the fungus Monilinia spp. is the main disease of peach (Prunus persica) that occurs from flowering to post-harvest fruit.
    [Show full text]
  • Monilinia Fructicola
    EPPO quarantine pest Prepared by CABI and EPPO for the EU under Contract 90/399003 Data Sheets on Quarantine Pests Monilinia fructicola IDENTITY Name: Monilinia fructicola (Winter) Honey Synonyms: Sclerotinia fructicola (Winter) Rehm Anamorph: Monilia sp. Taxonomic position: Fungi: Ascomycetes: Helotiales Common names: Brown rot, twig canker (English) Pourriture brune (French) Fruchtfäule des Kern- und Steinobstes (German) Rot pardo de los frutales (Spanish) Bayer computer code: MONIFC EPPO A1 list: No. 153 EU Annex designation: I/A1 HOSTS The main host range of this fungus covers the rosaceous fruit trees: principally peaches and other Prunus spp., to a lesser extent apples and pears; the fungus can also be found on Chaenomeles, Crataegus, Cydonia and Eriobotrya. A recent report from Japan (Visarathanonth et al., 1988) claims that M. fructicola also causes a brown rot of grapes. Infected grapes were found in a wholesale market in Tokyo and inoculation tests were successful. In the EPPO region, apples, pears and peaches are the most widely cultivated hosts. GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION EPPO region: Egypt (unconfirmed). Asia: India (Himachal Pradesh), Japan (Honshu), Taiwan, Yemen. Africa: Egypt (unconfirmed), South Africa, Zimbabwe (IAPSC, 1985). North America: Canada (Ontario), Mexico, USA (widespread). Central America and Caribbean: Guatemala, Panama; probably widespread. South America: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil (Rio Grande do Sul, São Paulo), Ecuador, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay, Venezuela; reported absent from Chile. Oceania: Australia (New South Wales, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia), New Zealand. EU: Absent. Distribution map: See IAPSC (1985, No. 306), CMI (1991, No. 50). BIOLOGY M. fructicola overwinters in or on mummified fruit, or in infected tissues on trees, such as twigs, peduncles and cankers on branches.
    [Show full text]
  • Deciphering the Monilinia Fructicola Genome to Discover Effector Genes Possibly Involved in Virulence
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Article Deciphering the Monilinia fructicola Genome to Discover Effector Genes Possibly Involved in Virulence Laura Vilanova 1,2 , Claudio A. Valero-Jiménez 1 and Jan A.L. van Kan 1,* 1 Laboratory of Phytopathology, Wageningen University, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands; [email protected] (L.V.); [email protected] (C.A.V.-J.) 2 IRTA, Postharvest Programme, Edifici Fruitcentre, Parc Científic i Tecnològic Agroalimentari de Lleida, Parc de Gardeny, 25003 Lleida, Catalonia, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Brown rot is the most economically important fungal disease of stone fruits and is primarily caused by Monilinia laxa and Monlinia fructicola. Both species co-occur in European orchards although M. fructicola is considered to cause the most severe yield losses in stone fruit. This study aimed to generate a high-quality genome of M. fructicola and to exploit it to identify genes that may contribute to pathogen virulence. PacBio sequencing technology was used to assemble the genome of M. fructicola. Manual structural curation of gene models, supported by RNA-Seq, and functional annotation of the proteome yielded 10,086 trustworthy gene models. The genome was examined for the presence of genes that encode secreted proteins and more specifically effector proteins. A set of 134 putative effectors was defined. Several effector genes were cloned into Agrobacterium tumefaciens for transient expression in Nicotiana benthamiana plants, and some of them triggered necrotic lesions. Studying effectors and their biological properties will help to better understand the Citation: Vilanova, L.; interaction between M.
    [Show full text]