The Impact of Third Places on Community Quality of Life

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Impact of Third Places on Community Quality of Life Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU Communication Faculty Publications School of Communication 12-2009 The impact of third places on community quality of life Leo Wayne Jeffres Cleveland State University, [email protected] Cheryl Campanella Bracken Cleveland State University, [email protected] Guowei Jian Cleveland State University, [email protected] Mary F. Casey Cleveland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clcom_facpub Part of the Civic and Community Engagement Commons, Communication Commons, and the Community-Based Research Commons How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Publisher's Statement The final publication is va ailable at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11482-009-9084-8 Recommended Citation Jeffres, L. W., Bracken, C. C., Jian, G., & Casey, M. F. (2009). The impact of third places on community quality of life. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 4, 333-345. doi:10.1007/s11482-009-9084-8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Communication at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Communication Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Impact of Third Places on Community Quality of Life Leo W. Jeffres & Cheryl C. Bracken & Guowei Jian & Mary F. Casey Abstract Older cities struggling with issues of survival focus on jobs and the economy, but competition requires all cities to pay attention to the quality of life that attracts residents. Creating such an inviting environment includes “third places” that foster community and communication among people outside of home and work, yet we have little empirical evidence that speaks to the subject, or their importance for a community’s quality of life. Here we report on a national U.S. survey that asked people to identify such places in their community, producing a wide variety of “third places” that ranged from the most popular community centers, coffee shops and restaurants to parks and malls. While a few relationships are found between population/diversity and the popularity of particular third places, the most important result confirms a hypothesized relationship between perceptions that third places are accessible in their community and the perceived quality of life. Keywords Third places . Communication . Community quality of life . Urban Communication . Constructed Environment Older cities struggling with issues of survival focus on jobs and the economy, but there’s also recognition that today’s competition requires all cities to pay attention to the quality of life that attracts young professionals and entrepreneurs (Audirac and Fitzgerald 2003; Lambiri et al. 2007). Urban centers around the world see themselves as competing for residents and tourists through unique attractions and leisure activities (Clark et al. 2002; Young et al. 2006).1 1Paskaleva-Shapira (2007) notes that tourist cities need to create an appeal to all stakeholders—tourists, businesses and citizens—to be competitive. The importance of local tourism through arts festivals also is a factor (Quinn (2005). This manuscript is based on a paper presented at the Urban Communication Seminar, National Communication Association, Chicago, Ill., November, 2007. L. W. Jeffres (*) : C. C. Bracken : G. Jian : M. F. Casey School of Communication, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH 44115, USA e-mail: [email protected] This economic competition among cities depends in part on attracting what Florida (2002a, 2002b, 2005a, 2005b, 2008) calls the “creative class,” more highly-paid innovative thinkers such as writers, entertainers, artists and engineers, who are the key to urban regeneration. These individuals fuel the “creative economy” with innovation that generates jobs and hope for older industrial cities. However, these relatively young people (aged 18 to 50) are not only highly educated but also mobile and attracted to environments that have few problems, tolerate “bohemians,” and provide opportunities for leisure and amenities consistent with a high quality of life. In this mix, attractive “public spaces” and the built environment would seem to be necessary ingredients for a desirable quality of life. Here we will focus on this potential link between public places and the perceived quality of life available in the community. Research on the quality of urban life began when concern arose over the secondary effects on American society of national governmental programs (Andrews 1986; Schuessler and Fisher 1985). Among urban scholars today, the focus shifts to how planners and policy makers can create an environment conducive to economic development (While et al. 2004). Quality of life research should be front and center in this process of evaluating people’s relationship to their environment. Urban planners and designers contribute to this dialogue about the future through multidisciplinary contributions that range from “life style centers” that are the domain of commercial interests to public spaces that are the responsibility of officials and government (Marans 2003; Pacione 2003; van Kamp et al. 2003). Changing definitions of the quality of life and the marketing of cities as places to live have led to popular rankings of cities. This media attention has framed policy- making discussions in many U.S. cities (McCann 2004). The concern about urban centers cannot ignore the search for community. While many people select a home for its resale value or neighborhood schools, others seek community, a place to connect with others, where they feel at home. Among long- term residents, the social network is important for neighborhood participation (Dekker 2007). And that brings us to “communication,” which links people to each other and their community. Communication scholars have much to contribute to this concern about spaces and activities, though their participation has been minimal so far. Our lives are acted out in three broad contexts: homes, the private spaces of individuals and families; workplaces, that generate economic resources; and “third places” that are neither home nor work. Someone’s workplace is someone else’s “third place,” but the distinction is not some absolute categorization but the function it serves. “Third places,” as defined by Oldenburg (1989), are the “great, good places” that foster community and communication among people outside of home and work, the first and second places of daily life. Third places are the bars and coffee shops, the beauty salons and barbershops, bowling alleys and recreation centers, public places where people meet, congregate, and communicate. As Das (2008) notes, both objective and subjective factors are important for people’s quality of life, and “third places” are part of the “constructed environment” that contribute to objective conditions of living. Even economists now recognize that the “quality of life” is an “economic good,” with multiple dimensions (Lambiri et al. 2007). Kearney (2006) found that opportunities by residents to visit nearby shared space affected neighborhood satisfaction. These “third places” may take many forms, and, while observers and scholars have written many essays on their form and their importance, we have no scholarly con- tributions that ascertain the public’s perception of such spaces, and whether they contribute to the quality of life in their communities. This paper will report on such an effort. Third Places as Centers of Community One of the long-running hit television shows of the 1980s and early 1990s was Cheers, a situation comedy about a Boston tavern. The setting was a perfect example of Oldenburg’s third place. The regulars were a racially homogeneous but socio- economically diverse group who laughed, told stories, confided problems, drank moderately, and blew off steam from the pressures of home and work. The theme song summed up both the series and the ideal third place as where you can go and everybody knows your name.2 Not every community or neighborhood has a “Cheers,” where that perfect social experience exists, but many communities have places that are near-equivalents. The recreation center where neighbors meet for aqua aerobics classes, the church where most of the parishioners have ties with each other, the McDonald’s where the gang meets for morning coffee, all have at least some of the characteristics of an ideal “third place.” Oldenburg and Brissett (1982) note that, “Third places exist outside the home and beyond the ‘work lots’ of modern economic production. They are places where people gather primarily to enjoy each other’s company” (p. 269). Third places function as unique public spaces for social interaction, providing a context for sociability, spontaneity, community building and emotional expressiveness. Third places also serve as a means of “keeping in touch with reality” through intimate personal ties outside the home and workplace (Oldenburg and Brissett 1982, p. 280). Oldenburg (1989) outlines some of the specific characteristics of third places:1) They are on neutral ground. All are welcome, and no one plays “host”; 2) They are a leveler; people of different socio-economic strata attend; 3) Conversation is the main activity. Even though the setting may be a place for drinking, or exercising, or playing a game, talking is always present; 4) They are accessible; there are no physical, policy, or monetary barriers to entrance; 5) They are a home away from home. There are “regulars” who find the atmosphere comfortable enough to “root” them there; 6) The mood is playful, laughter is often heard, and wit is prized. Oldenburg believes that these are the essential characteristics of third places because they engender the unique communication experiences and sociological 2 The lyrics of the theme from the television show, Cheers, “Where Everybody Knows Your Name” are: Making your way in the world today takes everything you’ve got. Taking a break from all your worries, sure would help a lot. Wouldn’t you like to get away? Sometimes you want to go.
Recommended publications
  • E-Participation: a Quick Overview of Recent Qualitative Trends
    DESA Working Paper No. 163 ST/ESA/2020/DWP/163 JANUARY 2020 E-participation: a quick overview of recent qualitative trends Author: David Le Blanc ABSTRACT This paper briefly takes stock of two decades of e-participation initiatives based on a limited review of the academic literature. The purpose of the paper is to complement the results of the e-government Survey 2020. As such, the emphasis is on aspects that the e-government survey (based on analysis of e-government portals and on quantitative indicators) does not capture directly. Among those are the challenges faced by e-participation initiatives and key areas of attention for governments. The paper maps the field of e-par- ticipation and related activities, as well as its relationships with other governance concepts. Areas of recent development in terms of e-participation applications are briefly reviewed. The paper selectively highlights conclusions from the literature on different participation tools, as well as a list of key problematic areas for policy makers. The paper concludes that while e-participation platforms using new technologies have spread rapidly in developed countries in the first decade of the 2000s and in developing countries during the last 10 years, it is not clear that their multiplication has translated into broader or deeper citizen participation. Be- yond reasons related to technology access and digital skills, factors such as lack of understanding of citizens’ motivations to participate and the reluctance of public institutions to genuinely share agenda setting and decision-making power seem to play an important role in the observed limited progress.
    [Show full text]
  • Does E-Government Use Contribute to Civic Engagement with Government
    DOES E‐GOVERNMENT USE CONTRIBUTE TO CIVIC ENGAGEMENT WITH GOVERNMENT AND COMMUNITY? Megan Haller, Ph.D. [email protected] Meng-Hao Li [email protected] Karen Mossberger, Ph.D. [email protected] Department of Public Administration University of Illinois at Chicago ABSTRACT: Is e-government changing patterns of interaction between citizens and government? Does it support civic engagement by citizens, with government and with each other? After discussing theories of civic engagement and possible links to e-government, we examine different types of e-government use (service users and policy researchers), and the relationships between these types of use on the one hand, with various kinds of civic engagement on the other: contacting through email, offline interactions with government, online participation in public affairs, and online and offline discussion with neighbors regarding community affairs. Using data from a recent national survey from the Pew Internet and American Life Project (December 2009), we find that policy researchers are more likely to engage in all of these activities, both online and offline. Those who use e-government for services, however, are also more likely than non-e-government users to engage in some of these activities. This suggests multiple ways in which e-government may be assisting in the transformation of governance, not only through service delivery but also through more informed and engaged citizenship. Acknowledgment: We thank the Institute for Policy and Civic Engagement (IPCE) of the University of Illinois at Chicago for generously supporting this research. The analysis and conclusions drawn here, however, are the sole responsibility of the authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Libraries 59N4
    Aging in (Third) Place | Philadelphia Autism Project | Computational Thinking FOR KIDS | Makerspace DESIGN PublicLibraries A PUBLICATION OF THE PUBLIC LIBRARY ASSOCIATION JULY / AUGUST 2020 INTERESTED IN LIBRARY SOCIAL WORK TOPICS? JOIN THE PLA SOCIAL WORK INTEREST GROUP fullpageconnect.ala.org ad page C02 JULY / AUGUST 2020 VOLUME 59 NUMBER 4 Contents PUBLICLIBRARIESONLINE.ORG ISSN 0163-5506 Columns FEATURES 2 16 22 FROM THE EDITOR The Wired Library Aging in (Third) Place KATHLEEN M. HUGHES Public Computer and with Public Libraries Internet Access in the NICOLE DALMER, MERIDITH GRIFFIN, 3 Time of COVID-19 KAITLIN WYNIA BALUK, AND JAMES GILLETT FROM THE PRESIDENT NICK TANZI Reimagining the Library for a New World 19 32 MICHELLE JESKE THE BIG IDEA Cooking with May the ZOOM Be with Confidence 6 You! Partnering to Support PLA NEWS KEVIN KING Teenagers and Young Adults on the Autism Spectrum 9 66 MI-YEET WONG, CAITY RIETZEN, By the Book ELIZABETH FITZGERALD, CLAIRE EDISJ MATTERS RICHARDSON, DISHA UPPAL, AND Reimagining the Library Community Voice LINDSAY SHEA as Third Place A Conversation with Cyns Nelson CHRISTINA FULLER-GREGORY CATHARINE HAKALA-AUSPERK 44 Making the 12 72 Connection BEST PRACTICES info-graphic Computational Thinking and Libraries and Virtual Third Libraries Respond Early Learning for Young Spaces after COVID-19 to COVID-19 Children and Their Families KRISTA RIGGS KATHLEEN CAMPANA, CLAUDIA HAINES, JACQUELINE KOCIUBUK, AND PAULA LANGSAM 58 Design Thinking in Public Library Extras Makerspaces STACEY FORSYTH, KATHRYN PENZKOVER, PHYLLIS DAVIS, AND IAN MATTY 4 ADVERTISER INDEX 11 Public libraries online ON THE COVER: ARTWORK BY Elle Maxwell/ADOBE STOCK EDITORIAL EDITOR: Kathleen M.
    [Show full text]
  • Foresight Research Report: Museums As Third Place
    Foresight Research Report: Museums as Third Place Document Overview The following research report is based on an adaptation of a common foresight tool: the Framework Forecast model developed by Dr. Peter Bishop, Chair of the Studies of the Future program at the University of Houston. The report is designed to provide an overview of key strategic issues relevant to the future of California communities and museums. We hope that this report will be of interest to California museum professionals working to improve service to their community and to plan for the future. In the Spring/Summer of 2012 a team of museum professionals participating in the California Association of Museum’s Leaders of the Future: Museum Professionals Developing Strategic Foresight training project conducted their own secondary (desktop) research on current conditions, trends, and plans for a baseline forecast that postulates the most expected future. The authors of this report include: David Bloom, VertNet Coordinator, Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, UC Berkeley Ruth Cuadra, Applications Systems Analyst, Getty Research Institute (team leader) Johanna Fassbender, Education Director, Hayward Area Historical Society Elizabeth Welden-Smith, Curator of Education and Public Programs, National Steinbeck Center Shelby Graham, Gallery Director, Mary Porter Sesnon Art Gallery, UC Santa Cruz The report is the first phase in the development of a baseline forecast and is intended to define the idea of “Third Places,” explore emerging trends and possible futures, and create
    [Show full text]
  • E-Government and Civic Engagement in San Diego County
    California State University, San Bernardino CSUSB ScholarWorks Electronic Theses, Projects, and Dissertations Office of aduateGr Studies 9-2017 E-GOVERNMENT AND CIVIC ENGAGEMENT IN SAN DIEGO COUNTY Marcos A. Ybarra Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd Part of the Public Administration Commons Recommended Citation Ybarra, Marcos A., "E-GOVERNMENT AND CIVIC ENGAGEMENT IN SAN DIEGO COUNTY" (2017). Electronic Theses, Projects, and Dissertations. 579. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd/579 This Project is brought to you for free and open access by the Office of aduateGr Studies at CSUSB ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses, Projects, and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of CSUSB ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. E-GOVERNMENT AND CIVIC ENGAGEMENT IN SAN DIEGO COUNTY A Project Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Public Administration by Marcos Anthony Ybarra September 2017 E-GOVERNMENT AND CIVIC ENGAGEMENT IN SAN DIEGO COUNTY A Project Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino by Marcos Anthony Ybarra September 2017 Approved by: Dr. Kimberly Collins, Committee Chair, Public Administration Dr. Jonathan Anderson, Committee Member © 2017 Marcos Anthony Ybarra ABSTRACT Due to technological advances, local city governments are relying heavily on websites and the Internet to connect with citizens. This project will discuss the relationship between e-government and civic engagement in San Diego county and its effectiveness. E-government is defined as the delivery of a city government’s information and services to its citizens through its website.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Public Relations in Social Capital and Civic Engagement Weiwu Zhang Texas Tech University
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Dayton University of Dayton eCommons Communication Faculty Publications Department of Communication 2014 The Role of Public Relations in Social Capital and Civic Engagement Weiwu Zhang Texas Tech University Alan Abitbol University of Dayton, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://ecommons.udayton.edu/cmm_fac_pub Part of the Civic and Community Engagement Commons, Public Relations and Advertising Commons, and the Religion Commons eCommons Citation Zhang, Weiwu and Abitbol, Alan, "The Role of Public Relations in Social Capital and Civic Engagement" (2014). Communication Faculty Publications. 45. http://ecommons.udayton.edu/cmm_fac_pub/45 This Conference Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Communication at eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Communication Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. The Role of Public Relations in Social Capital and Civic Engagement Abstract Public relations scholars have increasingly argued for the broader role of public relations and strategic communication in society (e.g., Taylor, 2010). That is, how can knowledge of public relations be used to make society better rather than simply making organizations more effective? This study examines how different types of public relations and strategic communication efforts contribute to citizens’ social capital and civic engagement. Specifically, this study uses data from the 2010 Pew Internet and American Life Project ‘Social Side of the Internet’ survey to examine the relationship between various strategic communication efforts by social, civic, professional, and religious organizations and individuals’ social capital and civic engagement.
    [Show full text]
  • Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital by Robert D
    Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital by Robert D. Putnam When Alexis de Tocqueville visited the United States in the 1830s, it was the Americans' propensity for civic association that most impressed him as the key to their unprecedented ability to make democracy work. "Americans of all ages, all stations in life, and all types of disposition," he observed, "are forever forming associations." Recently, American social scientists of a neo-Tocquevillean bent have unearthed a wide range of empirical evidence that the quality of public life and the performance of social institutions are indeed powerfully influenced by norms and networks of civic engagement. Researchers in such fields as education, urban poverty, unemployment, the control of crime and drug abuse, and even health have discovered that successful outcomes are more likely in civically engaged communities. Social scientists in several fields have recently suggested a common framework for understanding these phenomena, a framework that rests on the concept of social capital. By analogy with notions of physical capital and human capital--tools and training that enhance individual productivity--"social capital" refers to features of social organization such as networks, norms, and social trust that facilitate coordination and cooperation for mutual benefit. Whatever Happened to Civic Engagement? By almost every measure, Americans' direct engagement in politics and government has fallen steadily and sharply over the last generation, despite the fact that average levels of education--the best individual- level predictor of political participation--have risen sharply throughout this period. Consider the well- known decline in turnout in national elections over the last three decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Civic Disengagement in Contemporary America (The
    CIVIC DISENGAGEMENT IN CONTEMPORARY AMERICA 135 Robert D. Putnam Civic Disengagement in Contemporary America* OVER THE PAST TWO GENERATIONS THE UNITED STATES HAS UNDERGONE a series of remarkable transformations. It has helped to defeat global communism, led a revolution in information technology that is fuelling unprecedented prosperity, invented life-saving treatments for diseases from AIDS to cancer, and made great strides in reversing discriminatory practices and promoting equal rights for all citizens. But during these same decades the United States also has undergone a less sanguine transformation: its citizens have become remarkably less civic, less politically engaged, less socially connected, less trust- ing, and less committed to the common good. At the dawn of the millennium Americans are fast becoming a loose aggregation of disengaged observers, rather than a community of connected participants.1 In social science terms, Americans have dramatically less ‘social capital’ than they had even 30 years ago. Social capital simply refers to the social norms and networks that enhance people’s ability to collaborate on common endeavours. These social norms and networks have important consequences, both for the people who share and participate in them and for those who do not. All things being equal, social capital makes individuals — and communities — * This is the text of the Government and Opposition/Leonard Schapiro lecture delivered at the London School of Economics on 6 May 1999. 1 Because this essay was originally delivered as a lecture, I forgo extensive citation. However, the lecture drew heavily on the material subsequently published in my Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, London, Simon & Schuster, 2001, and I there provide much fuller documentation of the arguments presented in synthetic form here.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Society, Civic Engagement, and Peacebuilding
    Paper No. 36 / October 2006 Civil Society, Civic Engagement, and Peacebuilding Thania Paffenholz Christoph Spurk Summary Findings With the proliferation of conflicts in the 1990s and The study presents and applies an analytical the increasing complexity of the peacebuilding framework developed from the fields of efforts confronting the international community, democracy and development, and based on seven donors and the peacebuilding discourse core functions of civil society: (i) protection; (ii) increasingly focused on the potential role of civil monitoring and accountability; (iii) advocacy and society. This led to a massive rise in civil society public communication; (iv) socialization and a peacebuilding initiatives but it was not matched by culture of peace; (v) conflict sensitive social a corresponding research agenda and debate on the cohesion; (vi) intermediation and facilitation; and nexus between civil society and peacebuilding. (vii) service delivery. There has been little systematic analysis of the specific role of civic engagement and civil society The study also suggests the need to analyze the in the context of armed conflict and even less enabling conditions for civil society to fulfill a regarding its potentials, limitations and critical constructive role in peacebuilding and approach factors. The aim of this study is to: this from a holistic understanding of what are the • analyze existing research knowledge on the needs of civil society. Not only is it necessary to nexus of civil society and peacebuilding, identify the relevant functions of civil society • examine operational experiences and lessons within peacebuilding, but also the composition of learned, and civil society. This would avoid the common • develop operational principles, guidelines and misconception that conflates support to civil questions for further research.
    [Show full text]
  • Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital" Journal of Democracy, January 1995, Pp
    1 Bowling Alone by Robert D. Putnam “Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital" Journal of Democracy, January 1995, pp. 65-78. Abstract: The US once had an enviable society, but over the last two or three decades this civic society has shrunk, and more people are watching TV. Possible explanations for this trend include more women in the workplace, increased mobility of families and changing demographics. Many students of the new democracies that have emerged over the past decade and a half have emphasized the importance of a strong and active civil society to the consolidation of democracy. Especially with regard to the postcommunist countries, scholars and democratic activists alike have lamented the absence or obliteration of traditions of independent civic engagement and a widespread tendency toward passive reliance on the state. To those concerned with the weakness of civil societies in the developing or postcommunist world, the advanced Western democracies and above all the United States have typically been taken as models to be emulated. There is striking evidence, however, that the vibrancy of American civil society has notably declined over the past several decades. Ever since the publication of Alexis de Tocqueville's Democracy in America, the United States has played a central role in systematic studies of the links between democracy and civil society. Although this is in part because trends in American life are often regarded as harbingers of social modernization, it is also because America has traditionally been considered unusually "civic" (a reputation that, as we shall later see, has not been entirely unjustified).
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Democracy in America
    JMQXXX10.1177/1077699016681969Journalism & Mass Communication QuarterlyNelson et al. 681969research-article2016 Article Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 1 –17 Digital Democracy in © 2016 AEJMC Reprints and permissions: America: A Look at sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/1077699016681969 Civic Engagement in an jmcq.sagepub.com Internet Age Jacob L. Nelson1, Dan A. Lewis1, and Ryan Lei1 Abstract Although the Internet has redefined interactions between the individual and the community, the U.S. civic engagement that so impressed Tocqueville still occurs today. Using data derived from a longitudinal survey of undergraduate students at a Midwestern university, we find that digital civic engagement fills the void left by drops in more conventional forms of political participation. We also find that educators have an important role to play in cultivating and maintaining online and offline civic engagement among younger people. We conclude that scholars and undergraduate educators need to develop curricula that build upon the ways students currently participate in democracy. Keywords civic engagement, higher education, digital democracy The dominant sociological view of civic engagement in the United States is a bleak one. Putnam (2000) and others have argued that we have lost our way and that many people have withdrawn from community life. They argue that political involvement is low (McMillan & Harriger, 2007) and community is dying (Bellah, Madsen, Sullivan, Swidler, & Tipton, 1985; Nielsen, 2015). In this article, we propose a dif- ferent perspective. Following Tocqueville, we argue that there is a complicated interplay between individualism and community engagement in the United States 1Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA Corresponding Author: Jacob L. Nelson, Northwestern University, 2240 Campus Drive, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Six Proven Practices for Effective Civic Learning
    Guidebook: Six Proven Practices for Effective Civic Learning LISA GUILFOILE NCLCE BRADY DELANDER National Center for Learning and Civic Engagement JANUARY 2014 Table of Contents Introduction 3 Proven Practice #1 7 Proven Practice #2 10 Proven Practice #3 12 Proven Practice #4 16 Proven Practice #5 19 Proven Practice #6 21 Conclusion 25 ECS Resources 26 Organizations 27 Endnotes 33 NCLCE National Center for Learning and Civic Engagement © 2014 by the Education Commission of the States (ECS). All rights reserved. ECS is the only nationwide, unbiased, interstate compact devoted to education. Funding and support for this paper was generously provided by State Farm. Guidebook: Six Proven Practices for Effective Civic Learning PAGE 2 Introduction ivic education in this country has been diluted over the In 2011, after considerable research in civic education confirmed years, pushed to the back burner in deference to more these practices as effective, the Campaign for the Civic Mission of Cintense accountability systems in subject areas like math, Schools (CMS) followed with the Guardian of Democracy,3 which science, and English language arts. In 2003, in an effort to help included the “Six Proven Practices for Effective Civic Learning.” reinvigorate civic education, the Carnegie Corporation of New Throughout this paper we reference the description of civic York and the Center for Information and Research on Civic learning developed by CMS: Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE) convened a diverse and dedicated group of civic thinkers to brainstorm strategies for “The necessary elements of effective civic education what this “revitalization” might look like.1 The group developed include classroom instruction in civics & government, a set of six “promising practices” for effective civic learning history, economics, law and geography; service designed to help teachers create civic curricula with robust, learning linked to classroom learning; experiential relevant learning experiences for students.
    [Show full text]