DOCSLIB.ORG

National Security Capability Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Security Capability Review National Security Capability Review Including the second annual report on implementation of the National Security Strategy and Strategic Defence and Security Review 2015 March 2018 © Crown copyright 2018 Produced by Cabinet Office You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or email: [email protected] Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Alternative format versions of this report are available on request from [email protected] National Security Capability Review 1 Contents Foreword by the Prime Minister 2 Overview 3 The national security context 5 Our vision, values and approach 7 Our Global Britain vision and values 7 Our approach 9 The Fusion Doctrine 10 Our national security capabilities 12 Defence 14 Counter-Terrorism 18 Cyber 21 Serious and organised crime 23 Ports and borders 26 National resilience 28 Global Britain 30 National security communications 34 Economic security, prosperity and trade 36 Development 41 Cross-government funds 44 Annex: Principal commitments from the Strategic Defence and Security Review 2015 46 2 National Security Capability Review Foreword by the Prime Minister Last year, we commissioned the National Security Capability Review to establish how best we can apply our national security apparatus to address the increasing and diversifying threats to our country and to our way of life. Overall the framework of the 2015 National Security Strategy and the Strategic Defence and Security Review remains right. But since it was published, threats have continued to intensify and evolve and we face a range of complex challenges at home and overseas: the resurgence of state-based threats and increasing competition between states; the undermining of the international rules based order; the rise in cyber-attacks from both state and non-state actors and the wider impact of technological developments; and the increase in threat posed by terrorism, extremism and instability. Over the past year in the UK we have witnessed appalling terrorist attacks in London and Manchester. But also a brazen and reckless act of aggression on the streets of Salisbury: attempted murder using an illegal chemical weapon, amounting to an unlawful use of force against the UK. Crucially what all of these incidents have made clear is that our national security is conditional on not only the police and security services who work so hard to keep us safe at home, or on the brave men and women of our Armed Forces working tirelessly around the world – but on our ability to mobilise most effectively the full range of our capabilities in concert to respond to the challenges we face. So as this report sets out, we have agreed a new approach to the orchestration of our national security capabilities. Based on the new Fusion Doctrine, this approach will ensure that in defending our national security we make better use of all of our capabilities: from economic levers, through cutting-edge military resources to our wider diplomatic and cultural influence on the world’s stage. Every part of our government and every one of our agencies has its part to play. I am confident that we can rise to the challenges ahead and that we can build on our considerable strengths to enhance our national security. To leverage our influence as a nation with the largest defence and security budget in Europe to advocate for peace and stability and promote our prosperity around the world. To work with our partners and allies to strengthen our collective commitment to the international rules based order and project our global influence. And to stand together to defeat attempts to undermine our security and prosperity, to defend the values that lie at the very heart of our society, and to enhance our ability to protect our people. As long as we defend our interests and stand up for our values, there will continue to be those who seek to undermine or attack us. But these people should be in no doubt that we will use every capability at our disposal to defeat them. National Security Capability Review 3 Overview 1. The National Security Council (NSC) reviewed the National Security Strategy and Strategic Defence and Security Review (SDSR 2015) after the general election in 2017. The NSC concluded that the SDSR, and its three National Security Objectives, should continue to frame our approach to national security. The NSC commissioned a focused National Security Capability Review (NSCR) to identify how we could develop, deliver and deploy our considerable national security capabilities to maximum collective effect. 2. The world has become more uncertain and volatile since 2015. This report updates the SDSR’s assessment of the complex and overlapping challenges likely to drive UK security priorities over the next decade. It explains how we are taking a transformative whole-of- government approach in response, bringing to bear the widest possible range of capabilities. It also highlights areas where we want to sustain dynamic cooperation with the EU to protect capabilities that keep people safer across the whole of our continent. 3. The NSCR focused on capabilities that are critical to our national security, where we judged that they could benefit from review to support implementation of the SDSR. We have not revised any of the SDSR principal commitments as a result of the NSCR. This document also incorporates our annual report on implementation of the 2015 SDSR. We set out our progress against commitments in the SDSR and the actions we are taking as a result of the NSCR: • We will use a new national security doctrine, the Fusion Doctrine, to improve our collective approach to national security, building on the creation of the NSC eight years ago so that we use our security, economic and influence capabilities to maximum effect to protect, promote and project our national security, economic and influence goals. • We will further strengthen and modernise Defence and the Armed Forces to deliver better military capability in an enduringly sustainable way, optimise how the Ministry of Defence (MOD) is organised and is operating, pursue a more strategic efficiency and business modernisation programme, and improve our commercial and industrial approach through the Modernising Defence Programme (MDP). The MDP will build on the firm foundations of the SDSR and be informed by the work already undertaken as part of the NSCR. • We will publish a new counter-terrorism strategy, which will include measures to improve our ability to disrupt terrorist plots in their early stages and improve frontline integration of our counter-terrorism response. • We will continue to implement the National Cyber Security Strategy and ensure it keeps pace with the threat, including through the National Cyber Security Centre. • We will take a whole-of-government approach to serious and organised crime, including a single cross-government Ministerial decision-making body, a new intelligence framework, better community engagement and a National Economic Crime Centre in partnership with the private sector. 4 National Security Capability Review • We will integrate the knowledge and expertise held by all border organisations to produce comprehensive strategic threat assessments for the border. • We will improve assurance of resilience and readiness of local and national capabilities, reinforce mutual aid systems during major disasters and continue to develop a holistic approach to supporting victims of emergencies. • We will strengthen our overseas network so that we can reinvest in our relationships around the world, champion the rules-based system including free trade and use our soft power to project our values and advance UK interests. • We will significantly expand the National Security Communications Team to make communications an integral part of our approach to national security. • We will integrate economic goals and capabilities throughout national security. • We will ensure our development capability responds to changes in global poverty and national security challenges. • We will enhance the cross-government funds by improving strategic direction through the Fusion Doctrine, governance through a new Ministerial committee, and efficient administration by merging the secretariats into a single Funds Unit. National Security Capability Review 5 The national security context 1. In SDSR 2015, we described how the world is changing rapidly and fundamentally. We continue to see long-term shifts in the balance of global economic and military power, increasing competition between states as well as the threat from non-state actors. While the UK has chosen to leave the EU, we are unconditionally committed to European security and defence and want to work closely with our European partners to keep all of our citizens safe and our continent secure. 2. In the SDSR we identified four challenges likely to drive UK security priorities for the coming decade. The challenges have become more complex, intertwined and dangerous as the world has become more uncertain and volatile. Domestic, overseas and online threats are increasingly integrated as adversaries develop capabilities and exploit vulnerabilities across borders and between the cyber and physical worlds. We have also added two additional challenges:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Full Reservoir Level of 630 Feet
    y k y cm SERO TESTS IN CITY SPIKE IN CHILD LABOUR KAMALA ‘NOT COMPETENT’ About 1,200 samples have been collected Survey finds child labour has increased by a Kamala Harris is “not competent” to be by the RMRC in 2nd round of sero sizeable 105 per cent during lockdown president, says US President Donald Trump tests in 2 days DOWNTOWN | P3 period in West Bengal TWO STATES | P7 INTERNATIONAL | P10 VOLUME 10, ISSUE 149 | www.orissapost.com BHUBANESWAR | SUNDAY, AUGUST 30 | 2020 12 PAGES + SUNDAY POST | `4.00 IRREGULAR by MANJUL NO LOCAL LOCKDOWNS UNLOCK 4.0: States can’t impose any local lockdown outside the containment zones without prior consultation with the Centre AGENCIES Social, aca- The Ministry added that there shall demic, sports, en- be no restriction on inter-state and AMIT SHAH RECOVERS Instead of paying us one lakh to New Delhi, August 29: The Union tertainment, cul- intra-state movement of persons and NEW DELHI: Union Mahanadi tribunal asks publish your book, pay us two lakh to Home Ministry Saturday issued the tural, religious, goods, and no separate permission/ e- Home Minister reject it. It will give you better publicity Unlock 4.0 guidelines under which the political functions permit will be re- Amit Shah has state governments shall not impose and other con- quired for recovered and will states to submit data to any local lockdown outside the con- gregations such move- be discharged tainment zones without prior consul- will be per- ments dur- from the All India Black Panther actor tation with the Central government.
    [Show full text]
  • The Challenges of Migration
    The Centre for Enterprise, Markets and Ethics ENTERPRISE AND VALUES SERIES The Challenges of Migration Andrei Rogobete The Centre for Enterprise, Markets and Ethics We are a think tank based in Oxford that seeks to promote an enterprise, market economy built on ethical foundations. Copyright © 2018, Andrei Rogobete We undertake research on the interface of Christian theology, economics Copyright © 2018: this edition, The Centre for Enterprise, Markets and and business. Ethics Our aim is to argue the case for an economy that generates wealth, The moral rights of the author have been asserted. employment, innovation and enterprise within a framework of calling, All rights reserved. This book or any portion thereof may not be integrity, values and ethical behaviour, leading to the transformation of the reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever without the express written business enterprise and contributing to the relief of poverty. permission of the publisher except for the use of brief quotations in a We publish a range of material, hold events and conferences, undertake book review. research projects and speak and teach in the areas with which we are Scripture quotations are from New Revised Standard Version Bible: concerned. Anglicized Edition, copyright © 1989, 1995 National Council of the We are independent and a registered charity entirely dependent on Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. donations for our work. All rights reserved. Our website is www.theceme.org. For further information please
    [Show full text]
  • Intelligence, Emergencies and Foreign Policy the EU's Role in Counter-Terrorism
    essays Intelligence, emergencies and foreign policy: The EU’s role in counter-terrorism # Hugo Brady about the CER The Centre for European Reform is a think-tank devoted to improving the quality of the debate on the European Union. It is a forum for people with ideas from Britain and across the continent to discuss the many political, economic and social challenges facing Europe. It seeks to work with Intelligence, similar bodies in other European countries, North America and elsewhere in the world. The CER is pro-European but not uncritical. It regards European integration as largely beneficial but recognises that in many respects the Union does not work well. The CER therefore aims to emergencies promote new ideas for reforming the European Union. Director: CHARLES GRANT ADVISORY BOARD and foreign GIULIANO AMATO.............................................................................................. Former Italian Prime Minister ANTONIO BORGES..................................................................................................... Former Dean of INSEAD NICK BUTLER .................................................................. Senior Policy Adviser to Prime Minister Gordon Brown IAIN CONN ................................... Group Managing Director and Chief Executive, Refining & Marketing, BP p.l.c. LORD HANNAY.................................................................................... Former Ambassador to the UN & the EU policy LORD HASKINS .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • APR 2016 Part C.Pdf
    Page | 1 CBRNE-TERRORISM NEWSLETTER – April 2016 www.cbrne-terrorism-newsletter.com Page | 2 CBRNE-TERRORISM NEWSLETTER – April 2016 After Brussels, Europe's intelligence woes revealed Source:http://www.cnbc.com/2016/03/22/brussels-attack-why-europe-must-increase-terror- intelligence.html Mar 23 – Europe must improve the regional Rudd's comments are at the crux of a hot- sharing of intelligence to successfully button discourse about the encroachment on combat the rise of homegrown militants, civil liberties should governments ramp up policy experts told CNBC a day after deadly surveillance and detainment tactics in the explosions hit Brussels. global war on terror. Global terrorist organization ISIS claimed Rudd believes it's a necessary cost to bear. responsibility for Tuesday's attacks that killed "This is not a normal set of circumstances, at least 31 people, the latest episode in the we've got to give our men and women in group's campaign of large-scale violence on uniform and in the intelligence services the the international stage. powers necessary to deal with this. This is no Recent offensives in Paris and Jakarta indicate criticism of the Belgian government but a wake- ISIS is increasingly relying on local up call to all of us who wrestle with this fundamentalists, typically trained in ISIS debate." strongholds within the Middle East, to execute Others agree that European officials must suicide bombings and shootings in busy direct more investment to counter-terrorism, metropolitan areas. despite strained finances for most countries in "The key question here is closing the the region. intelligence gap," said Kevin Rudd, former The fact that the perpetrator of December's Prime Minister of Australia and president of the Paris attacks was caught in Belgium four Asia Society Policy Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • Secrecy Reigns at the EU's Intelligence Analysis Centre
    Analysis Secrecy reigns at the EU’s Intelligence Analysis Centre Chris Jones The Centre's reports are widely distributed within the EU and have a direct bearing on political decision-making despite an alarming lack of operational transparency and democratic accountability. The EU Intelligence Analysis Centre (INTCEN) is the most recent name for an institution that has existed in a number of forms since 1999. It monitors events both inside and outside the EU in order to provide “intelligence analyses, early warning and situational awareness” to EU institutions and Member States in the fields of security, defence and counter-terrorism. While it remains relatively small and lacks a clear legal basis, the agency’s size and remit have expanded over the years. INTCEN’s work often influences political decision-making, raising questions over whether the secrecy surrounding the institution’s work is acceptable. History of INTCEN INTCEN became part of the European External Action Service (EEAS) in 2010, but has a far longer history. Its origins, as “a structure working exclusively on open source intelligence,” lie in the Western European Union (WEU), an intergovernmental military alliance that officially disbanded in June 2011 after its functions were gradually transferred over the last decade to the EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy. [1] The exact date that INTCEN’s predecessor organisation began its work within the WEU is unknown. With the establishment of the European Security and Defence Policy in 1999 it was transferred to the EU along with the EU Military Staff (EUMS) (the EU’s “source of military expertise” [2] which is responsible for organising “concepts, doctrine, capability planning and capability development including crisis management exercises, training, analysis and lessons learned.”) [3] Some years later, the EUMS Intelligence Division began to work with INTCEN.
    [Show full text]
  • Islamic Radicalization in the Uk: Index of Radicalization
    ISLAMIC RADICALIZATION IN THE UK: INDEX OF RADICALIZATION Anna Wojtowicz, (Research Assistant, ICT) Sumer 2012 ABSTRACT The purpose of this paper is to analyze the process of radicalization amongst British Muslims in the United Kingdom. It begins with a review of the Muslim population, demographics and community structure. Further presenting several internal and external indicators that influenced and led to radicalization of Muslim youth in Britain. The paper concludes that there is no one certainty for what causes radicalization amongst Muslims in United Kingdom. However, it is certain that Islamic radicalization and the emergence of a homegrown threat is a growing trend that jeopardizes the countries security, peace and stability. Radicalization in the United Kingdom is an existing concern that needs to be addressed and acted upon immediately. Misunderstanding or underestimating the threat may lead to further and long term consequences. * The views expressed in this publication are solely those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the International Institute for Counter-Terrorism (ICT). 2 I. Introduction 4 II. Background 5 History of the Muslim Community in the United Kingdom 5 Population 7 Geographical Concentration of Muslims 8 Ethnic Background 10 Age Estimate 11 Occupation and Socio-Economic Conditions 11 Religious and Cultural Aspects 13 Multiculturalism 17 Islamophobia 20 Converts 21 Case Studies –London, Birmingham, Bradford, Leeds, Leicester 22 III. Organizations 28 Organizations within the United Kingdom 28 Mosques, Koranic Schools and Islamic Centers 34 Student Groups 40 Islamic Websites and TV 43 IV. Radicalization in Britain 43 Theoretical Background and Causes of Radicalization 43 Recruitment and Radicalization: Overlook 47 Radicalization Process 49 Forms of Financing 51 Radical Groups and Movements in the UK 53 Influential Leaders in the UK 60 Inspiration and Influence from Abroad 67 Sunni 67 Shia 70 3 V.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Armed Forces Personnel and the Legal Framework for Future Operations
    House of Commons Defence Committee UK Armed Forces Personnel and the Legal Framework for Future Operations Twelfth Report of Session 2013–14 Report, together with formal minutes and written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 26 March 2013 HC 931 Published on 2 April 2013 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £17.50 The Defence Committee The Defence Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Ministry of Defence and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon James Arbuthnot MP (Conservative, North East Hampshire) (Chair) Mr Julian Brazier MP (Conservative, Canterbury) Rt Hon Jeffrey M. Donaldson MP (Democratic Unionist, Lagan Valley) Mr James Gray MP (Conservative, North Wiltshire) Mr Dai Havard MP (Labour, Merthyr Tydfil and Rhymney) Adam Holloway MP (Conservative, Gravesham) Mrs Madeleine Moon MP (Labour, Bridgend) Sir Bob Russell MP (Liberal Democrat, Colchester) Bob Stewart MP (Conservative, Beckenham) Ms Gisela Stuart MP (Labour, Birmingham, Edgbaston) Derek Twigg MP (Labour, Halton) John Woodcock MP (Labour/Co-op, Barrow and Furness) The following Members were also members of the Committee during this inquiry. Thomas Docherty MP (Labour, Dunfermline and West Fife) Penny Mordaunt MP (Conservative, Portsmouth North) Sandra Osborne MP (Labour, Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Horizon 2020 SME Instrument Phase 1 Beneficiaries
    Horizon 2020 SME Instrument Updated in June 2017 Phase 1 beneficiaries Call Deadline Country City Beneficiary Website Proposal Acronym Long name Date Topic May 2017 cut off Small business innovation Novel, automated charging infrastructure for Austria Graz easE-Link GmbH http://ease-link.com/ MATRIX CHARGING 03/05/2017 research for Transport and electric vehicles Smart Cities Mobility Small business innovation Austria Linz My Esel GmbH MI-BIKE World's Most Individual Bikes and e-bikes 03/05/2017 research for Transport and Smart Cities Mobility Boosting the potential of small Metallurgical patented Process Transforming businesses in the areas of Austria Leoben UrbanGold GmbH www.urbangold.at METALLICA Residues from the Electronic Industry into 03/05/2017 climate action, environment, Valuable Precious Metals resource efficiency and raw Accelerating market Pridiktiv - Exploring European expansion introduction of ICT solutions Belgium Roosdaal Pridiktiv NV www.pridiktiv.care PRIDIKTIV 03/05/2017 through 4 pilot studies for Health, Well-Being and Ageing Well Full scale demonstration of an Innovative Small business innovation Denmark Hedehusene BBHS A/S www.bbhs.dk IBiS solution for Baggage Handling Systems at 03/05/2017 research for Transport and airports (IBiS) Smart Cities Mobility Accelerating the uptake of A disruptive air filtration system for cleaning- nanotechnologies advanced Denmark Herning MULTI AIR Aps http://www.multiair.dk JetConveyor free operation in dust-intensive process 03/05/2017 materials or advanced industrial environments
    [Show full text]
  • Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament
    Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament Annual Report 2016–2017 Chair: The Rt. Hon. Dominic Grieve QC MP Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament Annual Report 2016–2017 Chair: The Rt. Hon. Dominic Grieve QC MP Presented to Parliament pursuant to sections 2 and 3 of the Justice and Security Act 2013 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 20 December 2017 HC 655 © Crown copyright 2017 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/version/3 Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at isc.independent.gov.uk Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us via our webform at isc.independent.gov.uk/contact ISBN 978-1-5286-0168-9 CCS1217631642 12/17 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office THE INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMITTEE OF PARLIAMENT This Report reflects the work of the previous Committee,1 which sat from September 2015 to May 2017: The Rt. Hon. Dominic Grieve QC MP (Chair) The Rt. Hon. Richard Benyon MP The Most Hon. the Marquess of Lothian QC PC (from 21 October 2016) The Rt. Hon. Sir Alan Duncan KCMG MP The Rt. Hon. Fiona Mactaggart MP (until 17 July 2016) The Rt. Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on NW Europe Regional Workshop
    D7.1 – Report on NW Europe regional workshop Grant agreement number: 605142 Due date of deliverable: 2015-02-28 Start date of the project: 2014-06-01 Actual submission date: 2015-02-28 Duration: 18 months Deliverable approved: Y Lead Beneficiary: Loughborough University (LUNI) Contributing beneficiaries: The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies (HCSS) and Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (UCSC) Authors: Ksenia Chmutina, Lee Bosher, Andrew Dainty (LUNI), with Joshua Polchar, Tim Sweijs (HCSS), Barbara Lucini, Marco Lombardi (UCSC) Keywords: North-West Europe; Concepts of Security, EvoCS Dissemination level: PU Release Number Release date Released by 0.9 24.02.2015 Lee Bosher 1.0 25.02.2015 Joachim Burbiel EvoCS Deliverable 7.1 Report on the NW Europe Case Study Workshop Executive Summary This report constitutes Deliverable 7.1 of the FP7 Security Programme project ‘Evolving Concepts of Security’ (EvoCS, Grant Agreement). This report on Work Package 7 (WP7) of the EvoCS project is chronologically the first deliverable of the work package. The purpose of this deliverable is to report on the North-West Europe (NWE) Case Study Workshop, which took place on the 29th of January 2015 at the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) in London. The insights emerging from this regional workshop have provided a sense of the complex interconnectivity of the debates that have shaped / are shaping the security discourse, as well as the disconnected dimensions that could be considered under this nebulous and politically charged term. The workshop allowed for corroboration and/or re-calibration of the EvoCS coding analysis (see Deliverable 3.1), informing the coding with expert opinion from a cross-section of policy makers, academics and practitioners.
    [Show full text]
  • Co-Ordinated By
    Co-ordinated by: Last updated: February 2019 Julia Zelvenska Head of Legal Support and Litigation European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE) Rue Royale 146, 1st floor 1000 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 (2) 212 0814 Fax: +32 (2) 514 5922 E-mail: [email protected] CONTENTS A. Introduction Preface i European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE) ii Introduction to ELENA iii B. Countries Austria 1 Belgium 8 Bosnia-Herzegovina 13 Bulgaria 15 Croatia 19 Cyprus 23 Czech Republic 26 Denmark 28 Estonia 32 Finland 34 France 37 Germany 47 Greece 57 Hungary 62 Iceland 65 Ireland 68 Italy 73 Latvia 87 Lithuania 89 Luxembourg 91 Malta 94 The Netherlands 97 Norway 102 Poland 108 Portugal 111 Romania 114 Russia 117 Serbia 121 Slovak Republic 125 Slovenia 128 Spain 133 Sweden 145 Switzerland 153 Turkey 156 Ukraine 159 United Kingdom 161 C. UNHCR Offices 165 D. Format of the country chapters In general the country chapters are structured as follows: I. ELENA NATIONAL COORDINATOR Name and address of the person who serves as the contact and coordination person for the ELENA network for the country in question. II. NATIONAL UMBRELLA ORGANISATIONS / REFUGEE COUNCILS National umbrella organisations of voluntary agencies, counselling offices and lawyers who exercise a coordinating function. III. ORGANISATIONS SUPPORTING ASYLUM SEEKERS Voluntary agencies, counselling centres and other humanitarian organisations dealing with counselling, housing, financial support, integration and other social problems of asylum seekers during the asylum procedure. IV. ORGANISATIONS PROVIDING ADVICE TO ASYLUM SEEKERS Non-Governmental Organisations and voluntary agencies providing legal advice and assistance to asylum seekers.
    [Show full text]
  • Globsec Intelligence Reform Initiative 2
    GLOBSECINTELLIGENCEREFORMINITIATIVEGLOBSECINTELLIGENCEREFORMINITIATIVE GLOBSECINTELLIGENCEREFORMINITIATIVEGLOBSECINTELLIGENCEREFORMINITIATIVE GLOBSECINTELLIGENCEREFORMINITIATIVE GLOBSECINTELLIGENCEREFORMINITIATIVE GLOBSECINTELLIGENCEREFORMINITIATIVE GLOBSECINTELLIGENCEREFORMINITIATIVE GLOBSECINTELLIGENCEREFORMINITIATIVE GLOBSECINTELLIGENCEREFORMINITIATIVE GLOBSECINTELLIGENCEREFORMINITIATIVE GLOBSECINTELLIGENCEREFORMINITIATIVE GLOBSECINTELLIGENCEREFORMINITIATIVE GLOBSECINTELLIGENCEREFORMINITIATIVE GLOBSECINTELLIGENCEREFORMINITIATIVE GLOBSECINTELLIGENCEREFORMINITIATIVE GLOBSECINTELLIGENCEREFORMINITIATIVEGLOBSECINTELLIGENCEREFORMINITIATIVE GLOBSECINTELLIGENCEREFORMINITIATIVE GLOBSECINTELLIGENCEREFORMINITIATIVE GLOBSECINTELLIGENCEREFORMINITIATIVEGLOBSECINTELLIGENCEREFORMINITIATIVE GLOBSECINTELLIGENCEREFORMINITIATIVEGLOBSECINTELLIGENCEREFORMINITIATIVE Towards a Transatlantic Counter-Terrorism Centre of Excellence www.globsec.org GLOBSEC Intelligence Reform Initiative Towards a Transatlantic Counter-Terrorism Centre of Excellence A Feasibility Study May 2017 Steering Committee and Advisors Hon. Michael Chertoff (Chair), former Secretary of US Department for Homeland Security, co-founder and Chairman of The Chertoff Group. John Cuddihy, former Detective Chief Superintendent, Police Scotland, Visiting Practice Fellow at Coventry University. Iulian Fota, former National Security Advisor to the President of Romania and Director of the National Defence College of Romania. Dr. Kjetil Anders Hatlebrekke, Associate Professor of Intelligence, The Norwegian
    [Show full text]